ML112280389: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 16
| page count = 16
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Pre-Application Meeting for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP)
Extended Power Uprate (EPU)
NRC Headquarters Rockville, MD August 18, 2011 1
===Introductions===
* Jim Molden - Vice President of Engineering, Regulatory Affairs and Projects
* Tom Verbout - Manager, Prairie Island EPU and LCM Projects
* Scott McCall - Prairie Island Design Engineering Manager
* Gene Eckholt - Nuclear Projects Licensing Manager 2
Agenda
* Objectives
* Background
* Project Overview
* Licensing Action Interfaces
* License Amendment Request (LAR)
* Questions/Discussion 3
Objectives
* Open Communications with NRC
* EPU Project Status Update
* Discuss EPU License Amendment Request Development and Content
* Discuss Interfaces Between EPU and other Licensing Actions
* Obtain NRC Feedback and Expectations 4
===Background===
* Initial Licenses
  - Unit 1 Operating License Issued August 1973
  - Unit 2 Operating License Issued October 1974
  - 1650 MWt Original Licensed Thermal Power (OLTP)
* Renewed Operating Licenses issued in June 2011
  - Unit 1 Renewed Operating License Expires August 2033
  - Unit 2 Renewed Operating License Expires October 2034 5
===Background===
* Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (MUR)
Uprate
  - Implemented October 2010
* 1677 MWt Licensed Power Level
* 1683 MWt Analyzed Power Level
* Extended Power Uprate
  - 1804 MWt Licensed Power Level (~109 % of OLTP)
  - 1811 MWt Analyzed Power Level
  - Unit 1 Implementation 1R29, 2014
  - Unit 2 Implementation 2R29, 2015 6
Project Overview 2009        2010                2011                2012                2013                2014                2015 EPU - Phase 2 - LAR Development                  NRC Review EPU - Phase 3 - Material Procurement EPU - Phase 4 - Modification Design EPU - Phase 5 - U1 Key:                                                                            Implementation
            = Submittal
            = NRC Approval                                                                              EPU - Phase 6 - U2 Implementation
            = Implementation EPU - Phase 7 - Project Closeout 1R26 C26                      1R27 C27                      1R28 C28                  1R29 C29 U1 Vibration Monitoring          U1 EPU C25            2R26      C26                    2R27        C27                    2R28      C28                        2R29 U2 Vibration Monitoring                U2 EPU
Project Overview
* Major Modifications
  - Main Generator Rewind (Rotor and Stator)
  - Generator Step-up Transformer Replacement
  - High Pressure Turbine Replacement
  - Moisture Separator Reheater (MSR) Replacement
  - Auxiliary Feedwater System Upgrades
* Same Basic System Design with Larger Pumps and Larger Recirculation Lines
* Pre-Implementation Modification
  - Vibration Monitoring for Flow Induced Vibration (to be installed 1 cycle prior to EPU implementation on each unit) 8
Project Overview
* Project Status
  - NSSS Systems
* Safety Analysis of Events Impacted by EPU Complete 3/4 Demonstrates Safety Analysis Limits are Met at EPU Conditions
* Major Components Analysis Complete 3/4 Demonstrates Components Capable of Operation at Uprated Conditions Maintaining Adequate Margins
* Impacts 3/4 Uninterrupted Post-LOCA RHR flow 3/4 Feedwater Isolation Modification
  - Methodology Changes Identified
* RAVE (Locked Rotor/Loss of RC Flow Analyses) 3/4 RAVE Methodology WCAP-16259-P-A Approved by an SER dated September 15, 2005 3/4 Will be Submitted for Plant-Specific Approval by the EPU LAR 9
Project Overview
* Project Status
  - Margin Management
* Impact of EPU on Plant Margin Being Evaluated 3/4 Overall Margin Impact of EPU Evaluated Prior to Submittal 3/4 Review Process Includes Plant Margin Review Board 3/4 Margin Impact Also Evaluated as Part of the Modification Process 10
Project Overview
* Project Status
  - BOP Systems
* System and Program Evaluations 95% Complete
* Auxiliary Feedwater System Modification 3/4 Preliminary Design Option Chosen
* Component Cooling Pump Impellers
  - Electrical Systems Analyses
* Preliminary MISO Study Completed 3/4 Based on Assumed Prior-Queued Projects 3/4 Additional Power Assumptions Bound EPU Design 3/4 Need for Additional Capacitor Banks and Voltage Support Identified
* MISO Study Completion Prior to Implementation of EPU 11
Project Overview
* Status of LAR Development
  - Licensing Report Sections
* 95% Drafted
  - LAR Submittal Packages
* Under Development 12
Licensing Action Interfaces 2008            2009      2010                2011        2012                  2013            2014            2015 Alternative Source Term Leak Before Break Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Key:                                                              EPU - U1/U2
    = Submittal
    = NRC Approval RSG Submittals
    = Implementation NFPA-805 1R25                    1R26                        1R27                    1R28                      1R29 C25                  C26                      C27                            C28                        C29 U1 EPU 2R25                      2R26                      2R27                              2R28                    2R29 C25                      C26                            C27                              C28 U2 RSG                    U2 EPU 13
License Amendment Request
* EPU License Amendment Request Approach
  - Content and Structure in Accordance with RS-001, Review Standard for Extended Power Uprates
* Content and structure followed closely
* PINGP is not designed to GDCs
  - Applicable Operating Experience Reviewed and Considered in EPU LAR
* Continuous Process Through EPU Implementation
* Includes Review of Applicable NRC Requests for Additional Information (RAIs)
  - LAR Content will be Frozen Prior to Submittal
* Necessary to Support Validation and Final Reviews 14
License Amendment Request
* NRC Acceptance Review Expectations
  - Acceptance Review Expectations Appear to be Changing
  - Recent Acceptance Review RAI
* All Structural Modifications and/or Additions Identified and Designed
* All Structural Evaluations and Required Calculations Completed
* All Controlled Documentation Exists Which Finds SSCs Structurally Adequate for EPU Conditions
  - Component Level Detailed Design Not Scheduled for Completion Prior to PINGP EPU LAR Submittal.
  - Significant Impact on Schedule for Submittal of PINGP EPU LAR
* AFW System Redesign
* Piping Support Modifications
* Feedwater Isolation 15
Questions/Discussion 16}}

Latest revision as of 17:03, 12 November 2019

Pre-Application Meeting for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (Ping) Extended Power Uprate (EPU)
ML112280389
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/18/2011
From:
Xcel Energy
To:
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
Wengert, Thomas
References
Download: ML112280389 (16)


Text

Pre-Application Meeting for Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP)

Extended Power Uprate (EPU)

NRC Headquarters Rockville, MD August 18, 2011 1

Introductions

  • Jim Molden - Vice President of Engineering, Regulatory Affairs and Projects
  • Tom Verbout - Manager, Prairie Island EPU and LCM Projects
  • Scott McCall - Prairie Island Design Engineering Manager
  • Gene Eckholt - Nuclear Projects Licensing Manager 2

Agenda

  • Objectives
  • Background
  • Project Overview
  • Licensing Action Interfaces
  • License Amendment Request (LAR)
  • Questions/Discussion 3

Objectives

  • Open Communications with NRC
  • EPU Project Status Update
  • Discuss EPU License Amendment Request Development and Content
  • Discuss Interfaces Between EPU and other Licensing Actions
  • Obtain NRC Feedback and Expectations 4

Background

  • Initial Licenses

- Unit 1 Operating License Issued August 1973

- Unit 2 Operating License Issued October 1974

- 1650 MWt Original Licensed Thermal Power (OLTP)

  • Renewed Operating Licenses issued in June 2011

- Unit 1 Renewed Operating License Expires August 2033

- Unit 2 Renewed Operating License Expires October 2034 5

Background

Uprate

- Implemented October 2010

  • 1677 MWt Licensed Power Level
  • 1683 MWt Analyzed Power Level

- 1804 MWt Licensed Power Level (~109 % of OLTP)

- 1811 MWt Analyzed Power Level

- Unit 1 Implementation 1R29, 2014

- Unit 2 Implementation 2R29, 2015 6

Project Overview 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 EPU - Phase 2 - LAR Development NRC Review EPU - Phase 3 - Material Procurement EPU - Phase 4 - Modification Design EPU - Phase 5 - U1 Key: Implementation

= Submittal

= NRC Approval EPU - Phase 6 - U2 Implementation

= Implementation EPU - Phase 7 - Project Closeout 1R26 C26 1R27 C27 1R28 C28 1R29 C29 U1 Vibration Monitoring U1 EPU C25 2R26 C26 2R27 C27 2R28 C28 2R29 U2 Vibration Monitoring U2 EPU

Project Overview

  • Major Modifications

- Main Generator Rewind (Rotor and Stator)

- Generator Step-up Transformer Replacement

- High Pressure Turbine Replacement

- Moisture Separator Reheater (MSR) Replacement

- Auxiliary Feedwater System Upgrades

  • Same Basic System Design with Larger Pumps and Larger Recirculation Lines
  • Pre-Implementation Modification

- Vibration Monitoring for Flow Induced Vibration (to be installed 1 cycle prior to EPU implementation on each unit) 8

Project Overview

  • Project Status

- NSSS Systems

  • Safety Analysis of Events Impacted by EPU Complete 3/4 Demonstrates Safety Analysis Limits are Met at EPU Conditions
  • Major Components Analysis Complete 3/4 Demonstrates Components Capable of Operation at Uprated Conditions Maintaining Adequate Margins
  • Impacts 3/4 Uninterrupted Post-LOCA RHR flow 3/4 Feedwater Isolation Modification

- Methodology Changes Identified

  • RAVE (Locked Rotor/Loss of RC Flow Analyses) 3/4 RAVE Methodology WCAP-16259-P-A Approved by an SER dated September 15, 2005 3/4 Will be Submitted for Plant-Specific Approval by the EPU LAR 9

Project Overview

  • Project Status

- Margin Management

  • Impact of EPU on Plant Margin Being Evaluated 3/4 Overall Margin Impact of EPU Evaluated Prior to Submittal 3/4 Review Process Includes Plant Margin Review Board 3/4 Margin Impact Also Evaluated as Part of the Modification Process 10

Project Overview

  • Project Status

- BOP Systems

  • System and Program Evaluations 95% Complete
  • Component Cooling Pump Impellers

- Electrical Systems Analyses

  • Preliminary MISO Study Completed 3/4 Based on Assumed Prior-Queued Projects 3/4 Additional Power Assumptions Bound EPU Design 3/4 Need for Additional Capacitor Banks and Voltage Support Identified
  • MISO Study Completion Prior to Implementation of EPU 11

Project Overview

  • Status of LAR Development

- Licensing Report Sections

  • 95% Drafted

- LAR Submittal Packages

  • Under Development 12

Licensing Action Interfaces 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Alternative Source Term Leak Before Break Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Key: EPU - U1/U2

= Submittal

= NRC Approval RSG Submittals

= Implementation NFPA-805 1R25 1R26 1R27 1R28 1R29 C25 C26 C27 C28 C29 U1 EPU 2R25 2R26 2R27 2R28 2R29 C25 C26 C27 C28 U2 RSG U2 EPU 13

License Amendment Request

  • EPU License Amendment Request Approach

- Content and Structure in Accordance with RS-001, Review Standard for Extended Power Uprates

  • Content and structure followed closely
  • PINGP is not designed to GDCs

- Applicable Operating Experience Reviewed and Considered in EPU LAR

  • Continuous Process Through EPU Implementation
  • Includes Review of Applicable NRC Requests for Additional Information (RAIs)

- LAR Content will be Frozen Prior to Submittal

  • Necessary to Support Validation and Final Reviews 14

License Amendment Request

- Acceptance Review Expectations Appear to be Changing

- Recent Acceptance Review RAI

  • All Structural Modifications and/or Additions Identified and Designed
  • All Structural Evaluations and Required Calculations Completed
  • All Controlled Documentation Exists Which Finds SSCs Structurally Adequate for EPU Conditions

- Component Level Detailed Design Not Scheduled for Completion Prior to PINGP EPU LAR Submittal.

- Significant Impact on Schedule for Submittal of PINGP EPU LAR

  • AFW System Redesign
  • Piping Support Modifications

Questions/Discussion 16