ML17240A338

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Non-Safety Related Digital Feedwater and Amsac/Dss Control Systems Replacement Project Presentation
ML17240A338
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/30/2017
From:
Northern States Power Co, Xcel Energy
To: Robert Kuntz
Plant Licensing Branch III
Kuntz R, NRR/DORL/LPLIII
References
Download: ML17240A338 (31)


Text

Non-Safety Related Digital Feedwater and AMSAC/DSS Control Systems Replacement Project Xcel Energy Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant 8-30-2017 1

Agenda

  • Introductions
  • Meeting Purpose
  • Project Overview
  • Future Actions
  • Summary
  • Feedback and Questions 2

Meeting Purpose

  • Outline project scope, design, and licensing basis supporting the digital FW and AMSAC/DSS control system change
  • Discuss the preliminary 10 CFR 50.59 assessments and conclusions
  • Discuss possible future interaction with the NRC staff 3

Project Overview

  • Current System

- Westinghouse WDPF System

  • Digital Technology
  • Installed WDPF FWCS and AMSAC in 1989/1990
  • Modified AMSAC and installed DSS Feature in 1998/1999
  • Non-Safety Related Distributed Control System (DCS) 4

Project Overview

  • Project Drivers

- Obsolescence

  • WDPF Systems are 28 years old

- Parts not manufactured since 2002

- Vendor technical support ends in 2017

  • Recent Hardware Issues
  • Current system not suitable for plant life

- Unit 1 operation to 2033

- Unit 2 operation to 2034

- Long term operating and maintenance strategy

  • Common platform with demonstrated history of reliable operation 5

Project Overview

  • Timeline

- 2015-2016: Preliminary Engineering Phase

  • Multidiscipline team
  • Many team members from original WDPF team

- 2017: 10 CFR 50.59 Assessment Phase

- 2018: Detailed Design Phase

- 2019-2020: Installation Phase

  • In service dates:

- Unit 2 - 2019

- Unit 1 - 2020 6

Project Overview

  • Project Scope

- Replace existing DCS

  • Digital to digital - Ovation
  • WDPF to Ovation

- Next generation of platform

- Same OEM

- Upgrade FW Reg Valve Controls

  • Analog to digital - DVC 7

Project Overview

  • Project Design Principles

- Mitigate obsolescence

- Improve equipment reliability

- Eliminate SPVs and transient initiators

- Use well vetted, common platform with demonstrated history

- Design system hardware and software within the bounds of current design and licensing basis

- Use industry standard methods for design and testing

- Use a multi-layer testing approach through fabrication, installation, and commissioning

- Design, test, and install system to minimize outage impact 8

Project Overview 9

Project Overview

  • Project Scope Detail

- Install Ovation DCS:

  • FW Control System (SGWLC)
  • AMSAC/DSS System
  • Control System Infrastructure

- Modify Main Control Board Operator Interface:

  • Retain operator manual controls
  • Move some indications to new graphic display

- Modify FW Control Valve field devices:

  • Replace FW Reg valve controls with dual redundant digital positioners on Main Control Valves and single digital positioner on Bypass Control Valves

- Modify Simulator 10

Project Overview

  • Project Scope Detail (contd)

- Improve Equipment Reliability

  • Increase redundancy
  • Eliminate at least 16 SPVs (8 per unit)

- Functional Control Enhancements

  • Reduce operator burden
  • More fault tolerant
  • Improve FW Control strategies
  • Improve time response 11

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • FW Design & Licensing Basis
  • AMSAC/DSS Design & Licensing Basis
  • Assessment Approach
  • Qualitative Assessment

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • FW Design & Licensing Basis

- USAR described FWCS & Control Valve Design Functions:

  • Provide FW flow to SGs for RCS heat removal during normal operation
  • Provide SG Program Level Control during normal operation
  • Prevent control and protection interaction with Median Signal Select (MSS) for NR SG level
  • Valves provide isolation of FW flow to SGs

- Licensing

  • Steam Flow/FW Flow mismatch trip elimination

- USAR described Failures and Accident Analysis 13

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • AMSAC/DSS Design & Licensing Basis

- Design Function: Satisfy 10 CFR 50.62

- Licensing

  • Modified AMSAC logic and added DSS feature

- USAR described Failures and Accident Analysis 14

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • Assessment Approach

- Use current regulatory requirements & guidance

- Monitoring ongoing NEI/NRC efforts

- 10 CFR 50.59 screening considerations (NEI 01-01 Section 4.3):

  • Software considerations
  • Functional segmentation
  • Time response
  • Human System Interface
  • Safety to Non-Safety Interface

- NEI 01-01 drives conservative conclusion to screen in 15

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • Assessment Approach (contd)

- 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation Considerations (NEI 01-01 Section 4.4)

  • Same as screening considerations
  • Qualitative Assessment is key to addressing Criterion 1, 2, 5, and 6 of 10 CFR 50.59 16

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • Assessment Approach (contd)

- NEI 01-01, Section 5.3.1, Factors that Affect Dependability

  • The ability to provide reasonable assurance that an upgrade will exhibit sufficient dependability is a key element of 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations

- Qualitative Assessment characteristics:

  • System design features
  • System design development and quality processes
  • Operating history 17

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • Qualitative Assessment - Design Features

- Design Features to support low likelihood of failure (examples):

  • Isolation Devices
  • Redundancy
  • Architectural assignments
  • Segmentation
  • Self Diagnostics
  • Failure states
  • Existing Manual Controls

- Susceptibility Analysis

  • Hardware Failures
  • Environmental
  • Design Defects
  • Operator or Maintenance Errors 18

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • Qualitative Assessment - Design Development and Quality Processes

- Design specification provides requirements for design, fabrication, documentation, testing, and delivery

- Specification and Westinghouse design development processes based upon industry standards

- Specification requires multi-layer testing approach through fabrication, installation, and commissioning 19

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • Qualitative Assessment - Operating History

- Ovation Experience

  • More than 100 Ovation nuclear systems deployed
  • Variety of nuclear applications worldwide
  • Greater than 500 Rx years of OE

- Fisher DVC Experience

  • Over 700,000 sold
  • Over 7 years

- OE Research 20

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

  • Qualitative Assessment Preliminary Conclusions

- Will demonstrate dependability and low likelihood of failure:

  • Required design features maintained and no new failure results
  • Design development and quality processes being applied
  • Operating history is strong 21

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

- Expected 10 CFR 50.59 Criteria 1, 2, 5, and 6 conclusions based on preliminary Qualitative Assessment and preliminary design work:

  • No more than a minimal increase in frequency of an accident
  • No more than a minimal increase in likelihood of malfunction
  • No possibility of an accident of a different type
  • No possibility of a malfunction with a different result 22

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

- Other 10 CFR 50.59 Criteria:

  • Criteria 3 & 4:

- Systems do not initiate new failures or malfunctions

- Radiological consequences are not evaluated for these events

  • Criterion 7:

- Systems do not impact any critical inputs credited in the Safety Analysis for fission product barriers

- Change will not exceed or alter a fission product barrier design basis limit

  • Criterion 8:

- Change does not constitute, involve or modify a method of evaluation described in the USAR 23

10 CFR 50.59 Assessment

- Screens in for evaluation

- Would not require prior NRC approval

- Perform change under 10 CFR 50.59 24

Future Actions

  • Xcel Next Steps

- Proceed with detailed design

- 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation sufficiently complete in 3rd Quarter 2018

- Opportunity for additional learning with new guidance

- Timing to accommodate project installation

  • Unit 2 - 2019
  • Unit 1 - 2020 25

Summary

  • Described the project scope, design, and licensing basis supporting the digital FW and AMSAC/DSS control system change
  • Discussed the preliminary 10 CFR 50.59 assessment and conclusions
  • Outlined next steps and possible future interaction with the NRC staff 26

Feedback and Questions

?

27

Acronyms

  • AMSAC - ATWS Mitigating System Actuation Circuitry
  • CCF - Common Cause Failure
  • CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
  • CR - Control Room
  • DCS - Distributed Control System
  • DVC - Digital Valve Controller

Acronyms

  • HSI - Human System Interface
  • IN - Information Notice
  • I/O - Input/Output
  • I/P - Current to Pressure Converter
  • LVDT - Linear Variable Differential Transformer
  • MFRV - Main FW Regulating Valve
  • M/A - Manual/Automatic Control Station
  • M/L - Manual Loading Station
  • M/P - Motor to Pressure Converter
  • MSS - Median Signal Select
  • NEI - Nuclear Energy Institute 29

Acronyms

  • NR - Narrow Range
  • NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  • NRR - Nuclear Reactor Regulation (Office of)
  • OE - Operating Experience
  • OEM - Original Equipment Manufacturer
  • P/I - Pressure to Current Converter
  • RG - Regulatory Guide
  • RIS - Regulatory Issue Summary
  • Rx - Reactor
  • SF/FF - Steam Flow/Feedwater Flow 30

Acronyms

  • SLIM - Small Loop Interface Module
  • SME - Subject Matter Expert
  • SPV - Single Point Vulnerability
  • SWIL - Software In Loop
  • USAR - Updated Safety Analysis Report
  • WDPF - Westinghouse Distributed Processing Family
  • WR - Wide Range 31