Revision as of 11:23, 17 June 2019

Text

Rev 1A to Vol a of Salem Generating Station Unit 2 Second 10-Yr Insp Interval ISI Program Plan.
	ML18101A771
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	05/11/1995
From:	Lake L, Nichols J; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	;
Shared Package
ML18101A770	List: ML18101A769; ML18101A771;
References
	PROC-950511, NUDOCS 9506160189
	Download: ML18101A771 (93)
	v • d • e

*

SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT #2 SECOND 10-YEAR INSPECTION INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM PLAN VOLUME A PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY RELIABILITY AND ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT INSPECTION SERVICES -* ISI GROUP COPIES TO: MAY 11, 1995 REVISION lA PREPARED BY ewicz -ISI Support NRC (2 COPY, Transmitted ANII (1 COPY, Distributed QA (1 COPY, Distributed by licensing) by DDG) by DDG) IS! (1 COPY, Distributed by DDG) DDG Approved by Louis F. Lake Senior Engineer -ISI Support 9506160189 950607 PDR ADOCK 05000311 Q PDR (1 COPY, for microfilming)

Approved by Jon A. Nichols Manager -R & A

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd) INSERVICE INSPECTION LTP I. INSERVICE INSPECTION LTP

SUMMARY

(cont'd) VOLUME A (cont'd) 12.0 REQUESTS FOR RELIEF FROM EXAMINATION . . . . . . . . . .

12-1 13.0 NDE ULTRASONIC (UT) CALIBRATION BLOCKS . . . . . . . . .

13-1 14.0 ALLOCATION TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14-1 15.0 ISi 10 YEAR PROGRAM AND SCHEDULES II. APPENDICES A ABBREVIATIONS AND SYSTEM ACRONYMS B ALLOCATION TABLES Tab 1 Allocation Summary Tab 2 IWB Allocation Table Tab 3 IWC Allocation Table Tab 4 IWD Allocation Table Tab 5 IWF Allocation Table c CLASS 1, 2 & 3 EXAMINATION LIMITATIONS Tab 1 CLASS 1, ISi Exam Limitations Tab 2 CLASS 2, ISi Exam Limitations D REVISION DATA REPORT E DELETED COMPONENTS LISTING F EXAM CATEGORY

SUMMARY

TABLE S/2 ISi PROGRAM -LTP REV. lA 11 15-1 REVISION 12/11/94 12/11/94 12/11/94 12/11/94 . 12/11/94 12/11/94 04/26/95 04/26/95 12/11/94 12/11/94 12/11/94

*

REVISION HISTORY RECORD (CONT'D) REV. DATE REVISION HISTORY COMMENTS NO. OF lA REV. 04/95 The LTP was revised, due to an NRC Request for Additional Information

{RAI). This request was in the form of a Telephone conversation between the NRC and PSE&G, on 3/10/95. The NRC requested that PSE&G provide additional information in reguards to Relief Request RR-Bl & RR-Cl & Appendix "C". PSE&G responded to this RAI, through ISI letter No. NRS-95-036.

The following are the specific changes and the pages that were affected:

a) Page ii -Revised Appendix "C", Tab 1 and Tab 2's revision date from 12/11/94 to b) Page vi -Added this page to document the Revision History Record. c) Appendix "C" -Revised this section in its entirety, to reflect further examination limitation descriptions . NOTE: Attachment

1 for both Tab #1 and #2 was*added to provide additional information as needed. Attachment

1, is broken down by applicable Summary Number . S/2 ISI PROGRAM -LTP REV. lA vi

*

APPENDIX "C" CLASS 1, 2 & 3 EXAMINATION LIMITATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB REVISION Description 1 04/26/95 2 04/26/95 Class 1 Examination Limitations greater than 10%.

NOTE: Attachment

1 has been included to provide additional limitation supporting information, identified by applicable Summary Number. Class 2 Examination Limitations greater than 10%. NOTE: Attachment

1 has been included to provide additional limitation supporting information, identified by applicable Summary Number. S/2 SI PROGRAM -LTP REV. lA PAGE 1OF1

04/26/95

SUMMARY

COMPONENT NO. ID COMPONENT DESCRIPTION

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-81 CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

ALTERNATE EXAM ===--= --===========

=============-

=== ====== ===== ======= -*=-= --===--=====--

--'=-====---000400 2-RPV-3442A 000500 2-RPV-3442B 000600 2-RPV-3442C 000900 2-RPV-1442B LOWER SHELL 1 B-A B1 .12 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 77% OF THE NONE AT 60 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CORE BARREL SUPPORT LUG INTERFERENCE.

LOWER SHELL 1. B-A B1.12 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 77% OF THE NONE AT 180 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CORE BARREL SUPPORT LUG INTERFERENCE.

LOWER SHELL 1 8-A B1.12 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 77% OF THE NONE AT 300 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CORE BARREL SUPPORT LUG INTERFERENCE.

UPPERSHELLAT 1 8-A 81.12 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED(M-UT)69%0FTHE NONE 180 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE OUTLET NOZZLES AND FLANGE TAPER. Page 1 04/26/95 *

SUMMARY

COMPONENT NO. ID

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81 COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

ALTERNATE EXAM ---:=====--=

--=---==--===

*==-=--

==== ==== ==----===--====-

======== 001100 2-RPV-10442 LOWER SHELL 1 TO LOWER HEAD 001400 2-RPV-14438 MERIDIONAL 1 WELDAT330 DEG 001500 2-RPV-1443C MERIDIONAL 1 WELDAT30 DEG. 001600 2-RPV-1443D MERIDIONAL 1 WELDAT90 DEG. B-A B1.11 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 88% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CORE BARREL SUPPORT LUG INTERFERENCE.

B-A 81.22 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 76% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES. B-A B1.22 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 75% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES. B-A 81.22 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 64% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES. Page 2

04/26/95

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT DESCRIPTION NO. ID 001700 001800 001900 002000 2-RPV-1443E MERIDIONAL WELD AT 150 DEG 2-RPV-1443F MERIDIONAL WELD AT 210 DEG 2-RPV-3443 LOWER HEAD DISC TO PEEL SEGMENTS 2-RPVCH-1446A MERIDIONAL WELD AT 300 DEG *

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-81 CODE CODE CODE CODE REQ. NOE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS ALTERNATE EXAM CLASS CAT. ITEM 1 1 1 1 # --------

==--B-A B1 .22 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-un 87% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES. B-A B1 .22 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-un 82% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES. B-A B1.21 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-un 4% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES. B-A B1.22 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED cun 31% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE Page 3 FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS AND SHROUD SUPPORT RING. ----

04/26/95 *

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2

2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT DESCRIPTION CODE CODE CLASS CAT. CODE ITEM # CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE EXAM NO. ID REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

=========--

====== ==-=F==

=!

002100 002200 002300 002400 2-RPVCH-1446B MERIDIONAL 1 WELD AT 0 DEG. 2-RPVCH-1446C MERIDIONAL 1 WELDAT60 DEG. 2-RPVCH-1446D MERIDIONAL 1 WELD AT 120 DEG 2-RPVCH-1446E MERIDIONAL 1 WELD AT 180 DEG B-A B1.22 UT B-A B1.22 UT B-A B1.22 UT B-A B1.22 UT Page 4 LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 26% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS, SHROUD SUPPORT RING AND LIFTING LUG. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 35% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS AND SHROUD SUPPORT RING. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 35% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS, SHROUD SUPPORT RING AND LIFTING LUG. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 36% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS AND SHROUD SUPPORT RING.

04/26/95

SUMMARY

COMPONENT NO. ID COMPONENT DESCRIPTION

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

CODE CODE CLASS CAT. CODE ITEM # CODE REQ. NDE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

ALTERNATE EXAM ==============

====----========--

=====================-

== ======== ====

-======= ===========================================================

===========

002500 002600 002700 002900 2-RPVCH-1446F MERIDIONAL WELDAT240 DEG 2-RPVCH-64468 DOLLAR PLATE 2-RPV-7442 VESSEL TO FLANGE 29-RCN-1230 OUTLET NOZZLE AT 22 DEG. 1 1 1 1 B-A 81.22 UT B-A B1.21 UT B-A 81.30 M-UT B-D B3.90 M-UT Page 5 LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 54% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS, SHROUD SUPPORT RING AND LIFTING LUG. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 67% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CRD PENETRATION OBSTRUCTIONS.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 60% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE TAPER. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. SEE

SUMMARY

002701 FOR 100% COVERAGE BY MANUAL UT, FROM THE FLANGE SEAL SURFACE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 49% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE INTEGRAL EXTENSION AND GEOMETRIC SHADOWING.

EXAMINED BY SwRI USING THE PAR DEVICE. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT AND EXAM TECHNIQUE.

NONE NONE

*

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

====-===== ------------------------------003200 29-RCN-1240 OUTLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.90 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 49% OF THE NONE AT 158 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE INTEGRAL EXTENSION AND GEOMETRIC SHADOWING.

EXAMINED BY SwRI USING THE PAR DEVICE. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT AND EXAM TECHNIQUE.

003300 '29-RCN-1220 OUTLET NOZZLE 1 B-D B3.90 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 49% OF THE NONE AT 203 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE INTEGRAL EXTENSION AND GEOMETRIC SHADOWING.

EXAMINED BY SwRI USING THE PAR DEVICE. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT AND EXAM TECHNIQUE.

003600 29-RCN-1210 OUTLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.90 M-UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (M-UT) 49% OF THE NONE AT 338 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE INTEGRAL EXTENSION AND GEOMETRIC SHADOWING.

EXAMINED BY SwRI USING THE PAR DEVICE. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT AND EXAM TECHNIQUE.

011800 6-PR-1205-1 NOZZLE TO 1 B-F B5.40 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 74% OF THE NONE SAFE-END PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE NOZZLE AND SAFE-END CONFIGURATION.

Page 6 04/26/95

SUMMARY

NO. 011830 020600 020700 020800 *

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE ID DESCRIPTION CLASS 4-PR-1200-1 NOZZLE TO 1 SAFE-END 31-STG-1240-IRS OUTLET NOZZLE 1 IRS 31-STG-1230-IRS OUTLET NOZZLE 1 IRS 31-STG-1220-IRS OUTLET NOZZLE 1 IRS 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-81 CODE CODE CODE CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE = 8-F 85.40 UT PT 8-D. 83.140 UT 8-D 83.140 UT 8-D 83.140 UT Page 7 % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

-LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 84% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE SAFE-END AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 85% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 81% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 80% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT RING INTERFERENCE.

ALTERNATE EXAM --NONE NONE NONE NONE 04/26/95

SUMMARY

NO. 020900 021000 021100 021200

COMPONENT COMPONENT ID DESCRIPTION 31-STG-1210-IRS OUTLET NOZZLE IRS 29-STG-1240-IRS INLET NOZZLE IRS 29-STG-1230-IRS INLET NOZZLE IRS 29-STG-1220-IRS INLET NOZZLE IRS

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 CODE CLASS 1 1 1 1 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81 CODE CODE CODE CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE 8-D 83.140 UT 8-D 83.140 UT 8-D 83.140 UT 8-D 83.140 UT Page 8 % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED . EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 79% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 86% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 75% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 73% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT RING INTERFERENCE . .

ALTERNATE EXAM NONE NONE NONE NONE 04/26/95 *

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT DESCRIPTION NO. ID

021300 070000 072300 073500 29-STG-1210-IRS INLET NOZZLE IRS 31-RC-1240-1 NOZZLE TO ELBOW 31-RC-1230-1 NOZZLE TO ELBOW 31-RC-1230-4LU-I LONGITUDINAL

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-B1 CODE CODE CODE CODE CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

ALTERNATE EXAM ======== ======== --========

== =====--======--===-======!==

1 B-D B3.140 UT 1 B-F B5.130 UT PT 1 B-F B5.130 UT PT 1 B-J 89.12 UT PT Page 9 LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 82% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

LIMITATION:

EXAM'D (UT) 50% OF CODE REQ. VOL, AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXAM'D ON WELD UT45 CW & CCW. 2) NO EXAM FROM NOZ. SIDE DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG., SEE ATIACH.1, RR-81. 3) NO EXAM FROM EL. SIDE DUE TO ACCOUSTIC PROP. OF CAST MATERIAL A-351, GR CF8M LIMITATION:

EXAM'D (UT) 50% OF CODE REQ. VOL., AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXAM'D ON WELD UT45 CW & CCW. 2) NO EXAM FROM NOZ. SIDE DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG., SEE ATIACH.1, RR-81. 3) NO EXAM FROM EL. SIDE DUE TO ACCOUSTIC PROP. OF CAST MATERIALA-351, GR CF8M LIMITATION:

EXAM'D (UT) 0% OF CODE REQ. VOL. AS FOLLOWS: THE EL. HAS 2 CAST SS (A-351, GR CF8M) PCS. WITHE LONG. SEAM ELECTRO SLAG WELDED. DUE TO LRG. GRAIN SIZE, UT IS HIGHLY ATIENUATED.

NO MEANINGFUL TECHNIQUE IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.

NONE NONE NONE NONE

*

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

073600 31-RC-1230-4LU-LONGITUDINAL 1 B-J B9.12 UT LIMITATION:

EXAM'D (UT) 0% OF CODE REQ. NONE 0 PT VOL. AS FOLLOWS: THE EL. HAS 2 CAST SS (A-351, GR CF8M) PCS. WITHE LONG. SEAM ELECTRO SLAG WELDED. DUE TO LRG GRAIN SIZE, UT IS HIGHLY ATTENUATED.

NO MEANINGFUL TECHNIQUE IS CURRENTLY AVAi LALE. 073700 31-RC-1230-4 ELBOW TO PIPE 1 B-J B9.11 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 75% OF THE NONE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF CASTING AND BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION.

074600 31-RC-1220-1 NOZZLE TO 1 B-F 85.130 UT LIMITATION:

EXAM'D (UT) 50% OF CODE REQ. NONE ELBOW PT VOL., AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXAM'D ON WELD UT45 CW & CCW. 2) NO EXAM FROM NOZ. SIDE DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG., SEE ATTACH. 1, RR-81. 3) NO EXAM FROM EL. SIDE DUE TO ACCOUSTIC PROP. OF CAST MATERIAL A-351, GR CF8M 075800 31-RC-1220-4LU-I LONGITUDINAL 1 B-J B9.12 UT LIMITATION:

EXAM'D (UT) 0% OF CODE REQ. NONE PT VOL. AS FOLLOWS: THE EL. HAS 2 CAST SS (A-351, GR CF8M) PCS. WITHE LONG. SEAM ELECTRO SLAG WELDED. DUE TO LRG. GRAIN SIZE, UT IS HIGHLY ATTENUATED.

NO MEANINGFUL TECHNIQUE IS CURRENTLY AVALIABLE.

Page 10

*

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 075900 31-RC-1220-4LU-LONGITUDINAL 1 B-J 89.12 UT LIMITATION:

EXAM'D (UT) 0% OF CODE REQ. NONE 0 PT VOL. AS FOLLOWS: THE EL. HAS 2 CAST SS (A-351, GR CF8M) PCS. WfTHE LONG. SEAM ELECTRO SLAG WELDED. DUE TO LRG. GRAIN SIZE, UT IS HIGHLY ATIENUATED.

NO MEANINGFUL TECHNIQUE IS CURRENTLY AVAIABLE.

076000 31-RC-1220-4 ELBOW TO PIPE 1 B-J 89.11 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 84% OF THE NONE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF CASTING AND BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION. (UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) 076800 31-RC-1210-1 NOZZLE TO 1 B-F B5.130 UT LIMITATION:

EXAM'D (UT) 50% OF CODE REQ. NONE ELBOW PT VOL., AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXAM'D ON WELD UT45 CW & CCW. 2) NO EXAM FROM NOZ. SIDE DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG., SEE ATIACH. 1, RR-B1. 3) NO EXAM FROM EL. SIDE DUE TO ACCOUSTIC PROP. OF CAST MATERIALA-351, GR CF8M 080000 29-RC-1240-5 ELBOW TO 1 B-F B5.130 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 50% OF THE NONE NOZZLE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE ELBOW ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

Page 11 ---------------

04/26/95

SUMMARY

COMPONENT NO. ID --:===*==

081200 29-RC-1230-5 082200 29-RC-1220-5 083300 29-RC-1210-5 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION

---

ELBOW TO NOZZLE ELBOW TO NOZZLE ELBOW TO NOZZLE 085000 27.5-RC-1230-1 BC 4 IN. BRANCH -5 CONNECTION

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-81 CODE CODE CODE CODE REQ. NDE CLASS CAT. ITEM # ======== =======-==========

== 1 1 1 1 B-F B5.130 UT PT B-F B5.130 . UT PT B-F 85.40 UT B-J B9.31 Page 12 PT UT PT % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS ALTERNATE EXAM --:=================F======

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 50% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE ELBOW ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 50% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE ELBOW ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AND NOZZLE

CONFIGURATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 67% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE ELBOW ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 55% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT .. SET-ON WELD CONFIGURATION.

04/26/95 *

SUMMARY

COMPONENT NO. ID COMPONENT DESCRIPTION

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-81 CODE CODE CLASS CAT. CODE ITEM # CODE REQ. NOE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

ALTERNATE EXAM

---===========

==========

--=====

== ====

== ==============================--=====

--==== ======= 086800 086900 165760 165790 27.5-RC-1210-1BC 10 IN. BRANCH -3 CONNECTION 27.5-RC-1210-1BC 4 IN. BRANCH -4 CONNECTION 8-SJ-1262-6PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT THRU7 8-SJ-1262-6PS-8 PIPE SUPPORT THRU 11 1 1 1 1 B-J B9.31 UT PT B-J B9.31 UT PT B-K-1 B10.10 PT B-K-1 B10.10 PT Page 13 LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 55% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. SET-ON WELD CONFIGURATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 52% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. SET-ON WELD CONFIGURATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE EXAM AREA PRECLUDES A PERSON FROM PERFORMING AN ADEQUATE PT WITHOUT AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF LIMITATIONS.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, THE SUPPORTS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. NONE NONE 04/26/95 *

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2

2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

--168240 8-SJ-1252-9PS-4 PIPE SUPPORT 1 B-K-1 810.10 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU7 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY OF THE PIPE SUPPORT (LOCATED INSIDE OF THE CONTAINMENT WALL PENETRATION).

169450 8-SJ-1245-1 TEE TO VALVE 1 B-J B9.11 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 36% OF THE NONE 24RH27 PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO RADIUS OF THETEE AND VALVE CONFIGURATION.

177200 4-SJ-1294-8PL-1 PIPE LUG 1 B-K-1 810.10 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU4 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE INACCESSIBILITY OF THE LUGS. THE LUGS ARE INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. 179750 4-SJ-1282-23PL-1 PIPE LUG 1 8-K-1 810.10 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU4 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE INACCESSIBILITY OF THE LUGS. THE LUGS ARE INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. Page 14 04/26/95 *

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT DESCRIPTION NO. ID ==

181800 4-SJ-1272-23PL-1 PIPE LUG THRU4 250200 23-PMP-BOL TS BOLTING 1-24 250300 22-PMP-BOL TS BOLTING 1-24 250400 21-PMP-BOL TS BOLTING 1-24

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81 CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

ALTERNATE EXAM ===--= ==--====== -===---=I======

==I=

1 B-K-1 810.10 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY OF THE LUGS. THE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. 1 B-G-1 B6.180 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 87% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, NO EXAM OF BOLTS 6910, 7658 AND 7280 DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

MISC. PIPING IS LOCATED OVER TOP OF THE STUD UT INSPECTION HEATER HOLES. SEE SUM# 250201 FOR VT-1&2. 1 B-G-1 B6.180 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 87% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, NO EXAM OF BOLTS 7, 21, AND 22 DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PERMANENTLY INSTALLED MISC. PIPING IS LOCATED OVER TOP OF THE STUD UT INSPECTION HEATER HOLES. SEE SUM# 250301 FOR VT-1 &2. 1 B-G-1 B6.180 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 83% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, NO EXAM OF BOLTS 7, 8, 11AND21 DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PERMANENTLY INSTALLED MISC. PIPING IS LOCATED OVER TOP OF THE STUD UT INSPECTION HEATER HOLES. SEE SUM# 250401 FOR VT-1 &2 Page 15 04/26/95 *

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2

2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

====== -----=======--==-

=====---===

251200 22-PMP-LUGS PUMP LUGS 1 B-K-1 B10.20 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 67% OF THE NONE 1,2,3 CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE INACCESSIBLE AREA OF THE LUGS. A PORTION OF THE LUGS ARE HIDDEN WITHIN THE PUMP SUPPORT STRUCTURE.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. 251300 21-PMP-LUGS PUMP LUGS 1 B-K-1 B10.20 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 67% OF THE NONE 1,2,3 CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE INACCESSIBLE AREA OF THE LUGS. A PORTION OF THE LUGS ARE HIDDEN WITHIN THE PUMP SUPPORT STRUCTURE.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. Page 16

_._, '* -*I *I *-*--1 1*-*'"' I

... I 1'-* * * ** ...:... .... *-**-*.:...:.:....:..

=---r*-* *7 Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage .l. I '-'*-'="=" J.. t:...IC..

't1 .l. During development of the Automated Scan Plant SwRI uses vessel "as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticil'ated scanning and coverage.

These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is det.ennined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements.

The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts".

As a function of weld typet device used, scan direction, beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined t::l assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this infonnation, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit, interval, units, and counts per unit are determined and documented in the SwRI Scan Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the a&Will scan and increment, start and stop counts that were perfonned.

After completion of the examinationt the Data Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. TL is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment, start, and stop positions are then tabulated for each examination performed.

The coverage obtained must be determined for each examination perfonned on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device counts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan developme'nt.

The computer scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions.

The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square inches for the area defined by the points selected.

The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage.

This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to the percent coverage for each angle and directiont then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction, (CW, CCW, UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for either the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction.

Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise, the maximum volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the 50no and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%. This reporting method has since been refined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations performed by the computer were not written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible.

However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the necessary data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS sous. 002700 2-RPV-7442 45 cw 2i.90 % LIMITED DUE TO VESSEL TO FLANG 60 cw 2i.90 % TAPER CIRC. WELD . 0 cw 21.90 o/o 50/70 cw 7.30 % COMBINED 26.7i o/o

45 ccw 2i.9o o/o 60 ccw 21.90 % 0 ccw 2i.9o % 50/70 ccw 7.30 % COMBINED 26.7i % 45 UP 73.95 % 60 UP 79.39 o/o 0 UP 49.77 o/o 50/70 UP 9.59 o/o COMBINED 88.99 % 1.5 DN *100.00 o/o EXAMINATION DOWN FROM 5.7 DN 100.00 o/o SEAL SURFACE 12.5 DN 100.00 o/o COMBINE 100.00 o/o *

'

LiMito. tion Due to Upper Shell No Covero.ge 45T, 60T m No Covero.ge 60 cleg

No Covero.ge 0 cleg No Covero.ge 50/70 No Covero.ge 45 deg Figure 3 H-19 to Flo.nge & 50/70T To.per pprr .-to rta.n .. Lt,.,lto t1ons 14 Apr 92 SAM/LMUSFL

'

SEl'IT BY :

Et'iG I NEER I NG 11-17-94 03:43PM 17 6399 102 1 * *

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plant SwRI uses vessel "as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticipated scanning and coverage.

These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is determined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements.

The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts".

As a function of weld typet device usedt scan directiont beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined to assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this information, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit, '1Crement interval, units, and counts per unit are dctennined and documented in the SwRI Scan Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the mwu scan and increment, start and stop counts that were perfonned.

After completion of the examination, the Data .Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. IL is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment, start, and stop positions are then tabulated for each examination performed.

The coverage obtained must be determined for each examination perfonned on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device co*nts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan development.

The computer scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions.

The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square for the area defined by the points selected.

The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage.

This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to list the percent coverage for each angle and directiont then show the combined coverage as a function beam (CW, CCWt UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for either the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction.

Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise, the maximum volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the sono and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%. This reporting method has since been refined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations performed by the computer were not written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible.

However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the necessary data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS 002900 29-RCN-1240 45 cw 19.20 % 6 LIMITED DUE TO OUTLET NOZZLE 60 CW 19.20 % INTERGAL EXTENSION

@22-DEG 0 cw 19.20 % 50/70 cw 6.40 % COMBINED 25.60 % 45 ccw 19.20 % 60 ccw 19.20 % 0 CCW 19.20 % 50/70 ccw 6.40 % COMBINED 25.60 % 10 TOWARD 96.66 % 6 LIMITED AREAS DUE TO 45 .IO WARD 93.68 % GEOMETRIC SHADOWING 50/70 cw 25.00 % 50/70 CCW 25.00 % COMBINED 96.66 % *

*

No Covero.ge Tro.nsverse froM Vessel \Jo.ll No Covero.ge 45 deg froM Nozzle Bore No Covero.ge 10 deg froM Nozzle Bore Figure 6 H-22 I So.leM Unit 2 I Wtl*'

,.,,.,, 16 Apr I SAM/LMNSOL.JTI

ENT B"i: NDE ENG I NEER I 11-17-94 03:43PM 2105222946..,, 1 7 6399 102 !:; 1 * *

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plan, SwRI uses vessel "as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticipated scanning and coverage.

These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is determined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements.

The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts".

As a function of weld type, device used, scan direction, beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined to assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this infonnation, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit, 11crement interval, units, and counts per unit are determined and documented in the SwRI Scan Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the scan and increment, start and stop counts that were performed.

After completion of the examination; the Data Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. TL is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment, start, and stop positions are then tabulated for each examination performed.

The coverage obtained must be determined for each examination perfonned on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device counts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan development.

The comput.er scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions.

The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square for the area defined by the points selected.

The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage.

This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to list the percent coverage for each angle and direction, then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction, (CW, CCW, UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for ejther the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction.

Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise, the maximum volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the sono and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%. This reporting method has since been refined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations performed by the computer were not written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible.

However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the necessary data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS 003200 29-RCN-1230 45 cw 19.20 % 6 LIMITED DUE TO INTEGRAL OUTLET NOZZLE 60 cw 19.20 % EXTENSION

@ 158-DEG 0 cw 19.20 % 50170 cw .6.40 % COMBINED 25.60 %

45 ccw 19.20 % 60 ccw 19.20 % 0 ccw 19.20 % 50170 ccw 6.40 o/o COMBINED 25.60 % 10 TOWARD 96.66 o/o 6 LIMITED AREAS DUE TO 45 TOWARD 93.68 % GEOMETRIC SHADOWING 50170 cw 25.00 % 50170 ccw 25.00 o/o COMBINED 96.66 o/o *

*

No Covero.ge Tro.nsverse fror1 Vessel \.Jo.ll No Covero.ge 45 deg fror1 Nozzle Bore No Covero.ge 10 deg fror1 Nozzle Bore Figure 6 H-22 Sa.leM Un;t 2 : L.UCl*'t

'tO ,.,.,.,1 16 Apr '?2 I SAM/LMNSOUT 1 c .*

5El'lT B\': l'lDE ENG I NEER I 11-17-94 03:43PM 2105222946-?

17 6399 102 j:I 1 *

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plan. SwRI uses vessel 11 as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticiQated scanning and coverage.

These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is determined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements.

The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts".

As a function of weld type. device used, scan direction, beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined to assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this infonnation, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit, '1Crement interval, units, and counts per unit are determined and documented in the SwRI Scan Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the scan and increment, start and stop counts that were perfonned.

After completion of the examination, the Data Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. IL is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment.

start, and stop positions are then tabulated for each examination performed.

The* coverage obtained must be determined for each examination performed on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device counts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan development.

The comput.er scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions.

The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square for the area defined by the points selected.

The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage.

This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to list the percent coverage for each angle and direction, then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction, (CW, CCW. UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for either the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction.

Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise.

the maximum volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the sono and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%. This reporting method has since been re.fined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations pelformed by the computer were not written or recorded as hard copy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible.

However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the nccessazy data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS 003300 29-RCN-1220 45 cw 19.20 % 6 LIMITED DUE TO INTEGRAL OUTLET NOZZLE so. cw 19.20 % EXTENSION

@ 203-DEG 0 cw 19.20 % 50170 cw 6.40 % COMBINED 25.60 % 45 ccw 19.20 % 60 ccw 19.20 %

0 ccw 19.20 % 50170 ccw 6.40 % COMBINED 25.60 % 10 TOWARD 96.66 % 6 LIMITED AREAS DUE TO 45 TOWARD 93.68 % GEOMETRIC SHADOWING 50170 cw 25.00 % 50170 ccw 25.00 % COMBINED 96.66 % **

No Covero.ge Tro.nsverse froM Vessel wo.ll No Covero.ge 45 deg froM Nozzle Bore No Covero.ge 10 deg froM Nozzle Bore Figure 6 H-22 SClleM Unit 2 I 16 Apr 92 SAM/LMNSOUTI c:*

SENT ff)': MDE ENG I NEER I I'm 11-17-94 03:43PM 17 6399 102 I=! 1 * *

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plan, SwRI uses vessel "as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticipated scanning and coverage.

These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is determined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements.

The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts".

As a function of weld type, device used, scan direction, beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined to assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this infonnation, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit, '1Crement interval, units, and counts per unit are dctcnnined and documented in the SwRI Scan .Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the .a&1lW. scan and increment, start and stop counts that were performed.

After completion of the examination, the Data .Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. It is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment, start, and stop positions are then tabulated for each examination performed.

The coverage obtained must be determined for each examination performed on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device counts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan development.

The computer scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions.

The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square for the area defined by the points selected.

The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage.

This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area. that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to list the percent coverage for each angle and direction, then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction, (CW, CCW, UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for either the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction.

Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise, the maxin1Um volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the 50170 and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%. This reporting method has since been refined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations performed by the computer were not written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible.

However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the necessary data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS 003600 29;..RCN-121 0 45 cw 19.20 % 6 LIMITED DUE TO INTEGRAL OUTLET NOZZLE 60 cw 19.20 % EXTENSION

@338-DEG 0 cw 19.20 o/o 50/70 cw 6.40 % COMBINED 25.60 o/o 45 ccw 19.20 % 60 ccw 19.20 % 0 ccw 19.20 % 50/70 ccw 6.40 o/o COMBINED 25.60 % 10 TOWARD 96.66 % 6 LIMITED AREAS DUE TO 45 TOWARD 93.68 o/o GEOMETRIC SHADOWING 50/70 cw 25.00 % 50/70 ccw 25.00 o/o COMBINED 96.66 o/o

*

No Covero.ge Tro.nsverse froM Vessel W'o.ll No Covero.ge 45 deg froM Nozzle Bore No Covero.ge 10 deg froM Nozzle Bore ..... Figure 6 H-22 Sa.leM Unit 2 : IJU'U*'t Hoz:ZI* 'tO .,-.911 16 l SAM/LMNSOUi! ( .

1 N I * ,I "' I (!) z < x u q u? ::( .... .... o ,_

encnooo1 x >-a ';!!-w _, II'> II'> I-"" a: < .... CL <D :> z :i; ... (LI * ... ...-.. .. , * -.... ""1Sa. DK* ___ ,. _ __,,.,._ tOllfllll'

.. te.M ... & M:fZf" ......

d Citl9f(J ........

lll3Qml

.........

l:JICUO

___ ,,_ -*--a"" I "' \ ... un _ .. -

PSE&G LIMITATION REPORT .ECT: ! SYSTEM: 17 -'239 9 UNIT: SALEM lJ,..., ,,-?-WELD NO.: ?..1.v--f?c-1:1;}0

-18 c -:r Prepared By: _________

_ Date: 7 '""'0 1/ 9Lt SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A= Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Branch Connection

3. Compute Branch Connection Limitation Percentage . &ompute Vol. Not Covered Main Run 5. Compute Main Run Limitation Percentage

=A (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 =B (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW = C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (CI Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW = D 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (DI Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4)

I 4 = L 2. Compute Total Coverage 100-L ;2.3. 63 0 o* 0 0 <).:8,35 90,00 qo.oc 55k

,,.,.,,.---

.... --* f/ b f'. or1 l rw L2l o H ).1ou 1 (\

-:icJ*S'l.t

...1-rv11.,oo;::;

YOt./(l;.'(_J bb£."'J -LI -C ..Liu1; i . .1.;;n{}.::;-

(""l;:J.)/1'1".J

).0 ti

/ / I ('IQ /.L.::J;J I I NO/

I * *

PSE&G LIMITATION REPORT i PROJECT: / 7 -(...,39 9 UNIT: I SYSTEM: f2E.BC'TOIC C'oot...tWT WELD NO.: "2.7.5-t<C-12.10 /6C-'"5 I Prepared By: V1 Clo({

Date: 9 /VO a/ 94 SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A= Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Branch Connection

= A 3. Compute Branch Connection Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Main Run = B 5. Compute Main Run Limitation Percentage (BI Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW = C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C I Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW = D 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D /Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L 2. Compute Total Coverage 100 -L EMARKS: t-:il.2.b 0 0 10,81 111, 03 84-111. 03 <33 ,81j--44, 16 s5_g5°£

/ / *

S1lt-*f-I C'f.JIT I 7-t..37'7 RE1-1cnxr.

CocL!JrJT

.!7.,_"i"-RC-/

<.to /l3c-3 V1c-n:>({

M-oic:-ro,.J

n:r. 8r.JoV 9tf LtHnn7lo,..J MA*r--1 {<!uµ flr<'t="ft NoT C-o Vti"tcO) cw/ccw \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I ( I I I REVIEWED & ACCEPTED FACTORY .MUTUAL ENGi NG A OCIATION *

/ / / * ::: () I -C-* ' . ' I I I . < -.; I / -

'11 R.r-n CooLA**J-r

-;;_7,5 _ -I

! I B.::. --.:: *) I 1 ., -. c . I () II *, 1 CIC r::.

_LL l. .. c_: _'.J:Jv -, ...., P,REA Nol cavn::rti

(:°(Zo n f1 1 r-1 R lJ I* I CoNNEC'llON

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I I I I

I I I I I I I I \ I \ I

./ I I I I / / I

I PSE&G LIMITATION REPORT I PROJECT: j (-b39 9 UNIT: , SYSTEM: f?eeCTOg Ccc.<-e..n-WELD NO.: 21S-Rc-/';1..I0-113c-Lt 1 Prepared By: \.f 1 c:>c,-c Date: 7 IVC L/ 9f SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A= Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) Percentage Of Coverage ! ! VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS I A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld) I i i 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 I ;B. \9 I 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Branch Connection

= A I .ompute Branch Connection Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 Z1 0 0 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Main Run = B 0 5. Compute Main Run Limitation Percentage (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 0 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 ?lt. 'l5 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C I Vt2) x 100 = Z3 94.97 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D ::23.03 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D /Vt2) x 100 = Z4 94. 97 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L 2. Compute Total Coverage 100-L 52.SI ....... RKS: b'10o

- $f}t..£r1 UNIT ;l..

Cnor..t1rrr

-6C.'f VrCTo<<.

111 7 NCJV 9'! Pore LrM rTAllD rJ.S O/'J '-'/* o=nCoC\00

-----Ar<EA f>J07' cavfNU!D CVJ/c.ew **

*

l LIMITATION REPORT j Project: r1 -

l-Weld No.: SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined {Length x Width -A) Area Of Limitation (Length x Width* Al) Percentage of Coverage {A -Al/ A) A* see. Sl-'i!Tc::l-1 Al-------:::::;::.

b 7 VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel ..... 1------Example ----* ... Transverse Obstruction a -Area of no examination

l. Compute Area ax 1 2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length 3. Compute Area Not Covered 41. Multiply *a* by Weld Length 5. Percentage of Coverage

Asq

Vt (Volume Total) -a

VI {Volume Limited) -(Vt -VI/Vt) t--11 A NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld . Preparedby*

\/, c-i-ort H o<Z.To Date: bftff'l. 93 Level:_..:m;-=-

___ Date: 93 Level:_:l._

1_1 __ _ p I .* . . *:

ExAltUA.I/.

10.!.. z. I I I . I I * ... ! ,L --------........ SALEM UNIT :i_ _,,t. ___ -*-------REACTof( COOLANT fLJMP:2:Lf>ml' L/3 I REF. /Jllm l(c. I I 0/3 0 I i'JAc::c::esoS' R-15'-e. foe PH'f5 *en-.... I I ______ J,I -. . ' *

" -.

1 I I I I I * ---*------

S .J..."'., ..... 'ii "2' ri \4 1-t:1:::i1sk.ttd SJ"'l S\:jSS-.a?:::>\.f 1"'1 I °l r,. I o II

J,f/ tu. tt(J . .J 3)} 'C' fl7 tlUldc_c dWflJ ).NV100"J

____ --------**-/ 7: llNfl WT/tJ(_; ,( . ---------,., ;--* 1 I ' I I I I I I 3?lnl:>nltl c:;

dWnd * . .....

QO't:/..52

---.... -. r""r--1 I I I I I * --------------c:;; -1.rl iO L-1 SJ "2J C1 S -'1 ill i-4 -,-tj I S' A-f1 d "2l Gd

\:IN I Y. Z,./ CJ// 'J.(j tutt(J 'J3)/ 97 ttWd-zC' dWflr/ J. N "/1007 )J0..1JV7>J ------------... / 7:: l!Nfl WTl'r;I<;; " . ---------i ...

I I I I I I I I 3?Jnl:>n(ll

':>

dWnd

Project: 17 -S-!:J-C::, ?-Unit: System:

Pu!"\ P Weld No.: ;2./-PMP-Lu5s I, .Z +3 i I I SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width -A) Area Of Limitation (Length x Width-Al) Percentage of Coverage (A -Al/ A) Al--< -----=bl VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel a Example.

Transverse ObstructJoa -Area of no examination I. Compute Area ax I 2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length 3. Compute Area Not Covered 1. Multiply *a* by Weld Length 5. Percentage of Coverage

Asq -Vt (Volume Total) -a -VI (Volume Limited) * (Vt -VI/Vt) NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld. Preparedby*

Vi cl"ba:. Ho Date: b 9 3 Level: ..:LJE Reviewedby:_*

__ _ Date: <o A£(Z. 9 3 ---111 Level:--=-====-==:....._-

Pa e I of

*-*** PLJmP .

ExAlnllJ/.

Jo!.. z. I I I 1 I I . I I * ---------. .5ALEM UNIT :l. _,,!:. ___ -*-------

COOLANT fU/r1P;} I Pm!' Lt3 I REr. IJ111'1 kc. /Io !":] 3 IN AC:::C:E.S.SA1S 1.F-. PHYS*CA '-H 1£ Mll!rJT S. --------------.--

I I I _J ... I -. . ..... :25(360 *

'. r-r-1 I I I I I 7;01 (11fl1WV'K1

-----------------'5...l..t"'lil"4

-,-'tJ;) *st+'d ill.,9tl S'S iP ?:;;i-\j t"' I '7 <ii 0 I 1 'J.fl l;U/I(/ '.13)} fl7 tl'Wc:I 1--edWfld J.N"/1007 ---------____ .. / ltNn W37'r/<; ,( . -----------,"' i ...

I I . I I I I I I fOI '!IVIWJ/X.1 3'?1nlJfl21.L c;;

ll!Ndns dWnd *

ExAlnlN/.

101-z. I I I . I I * ..-! ,L ---------. .SALEM UNIT l.

COOLANr fUMP;2. / PHJI> L/3 3 R£r. /J11n1 Re. I I() 13 > , ...,

(.;,(Z. P'dy SI t:. A,_ Mc£ A--5 t-'\,.:"1T .S -------I I I _J_ I -. . ' ------------*

04/26/95 *

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT NO. ID DESCRIPTION

= 275030 2-CVCT-2 SHELL TO LOWER HEAD 275040 2-CVCT-2VS-1

&2 VESSEL SUPPORT 275050 2-CVCT-2VS-3&4-VESSEL SUPPORT 275060 2-CVCT-2VS-5&6 VESSEL SUPPORT SALEM NUCLEAR PO. STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL CODE CLASS -----2 2 2 2 RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1 CODE CODE CODE CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE C-A C1.20 UT C-C C3.10 PT C-C C3.10 PT C-C C3.10 PT Page 1 % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 71% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO SUPPORT *LEG PLATE INTERFERENCE.

SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 89% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO A PERMANENT I-BEAM VESSEL SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 89% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE SUPPORT LEG INTERFERENCE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 89% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE SUPPORT LEG INTERFERENCE.

ALTERNATE EXAM NONE NONE NONE NONE

*

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2

SUMMARY

COMPONENT NO. ID ====== -==========

COMPONENT DESCRIPTION CODE CLASS -----275070 2-CVCT-2VS-7&8 VESSEL 2 SUPPORT 275230 2-RCF-1 UPPER HEAD TO 2 FLANGE 275358 2-RHE-1VS-1&2 VESSEL 2 SUPPORT 275359 2-RHE-5VS-1

&2 VESSEL 2 SUPPORT 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#:

CODE CODE CAT. ITEM # ---C-C C3.10 CODE REQ. NOE -------------PT % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PD 89% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE SUPPORT LEG INTERFERENCE.

ALTERNATE EXAM NONE C-A C1.20 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UD 50% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE WELD AND FLANGE CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PD 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE EXAM AREA PRECLUDES A PERSON FROM PERFORMING AN ADEQUATE PT WITHOUT AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF LIMITATIONS.

C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PD 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE EXAM AREA PRECLUDES A PERSON FROM PERFORMING AN ADEQUATE PT WITHOUT AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF LIMITATIONS.

Page 2 I 04/26/95

SUMMARY

NO. 275360 275365 275370 275400 *

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE ID DESCRIPTION CLASS ----------2-RHE-9VS-1

&2 VESSEL 2 SUPPORT 21-RHRHEX-1 FLANGE TO 2 SHELL 21-RHRHEX-2 SHELL TO 2 FLANGE 21-RHRHEX-OUT NOZZLE-TO-SHE 2 LL WELD 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#:

CODE CODE CODE CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE ----==== --------C-C C3.10 PT C-A C1.10 UT C-A C1.10 UT C-B C2.21 UT PT Page 3 % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

---LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE EXAM AREA PRECLUDES A PERSON FROM PERFORMING AN ADEQUATE PT WITHOUT AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF LIMITATIONS.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 79% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO FLANGE AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 20% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FLANGE, NOZZLE AND SUPPORT PLATE CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 45% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE NOZZLE CONFIGURATION AND AS WELDED CONDITION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

ALTERNATE EXAM NONE NONE NONE NONE 04/26/95

SUMMARY

NO. 330040 330360 330400 330540

COMPONENT COMPONENT ID DESCRIPTION 14-BF-2241-2PS-2 PIPE SUPPORT 14-BF-2231-6PL-1 PIPE LUG THRU4 14-BF-2231-9PS PIPE SUPPORT 14-BF-2231-17PS PIPE SUPPORT S-22 -* SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2

2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1 CODE CODE CODE CODE o/o OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

===-----2 C-C C3.20 MT 2 C-C C3.20 MT 2 C-C C3.20 MT 2 C-C C3.20 MT Page 4 LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

SUPPORT WELD IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, WELD IS WITHIN A PIPING ENCAPSULATION AND IS INACCESSIBLE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, NO EXAM DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. EXAM LIMITED TO 50% CODE COVERAGE, DUE NONE TO PROXIMITY OF A PERMANENT PIPE RESTRAINT.

04/26/95

SUMMARY

NO. 330560 330660 330860 330930

COMPONENT COMPONENT ID DESCRIPTION

--======= 14-BF-2231-18PS PIPE SUPPORT 14-BF-2221-3PS-2 PIPE SUPPORT 14-BF-2221-14PS PIPE SUPPORT SALEM NUCLEAR PO. STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL

CODE CLASS ----2 2 2 RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1 CODE CODE CODE CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE -----C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

--EXAM LIMITED TO 50% CODE COVERAGE, NONE DUE TO PROXIMITY OF A PERMANENT PIPE COLLAR. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, NO EXAM DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, NO EXAM DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY CAUSED BY A PIPE RESTRAINT OBSTRUCTION.

14-BF-2211-2 PIPE TO ELBOW 2 C-F-2 C5.51 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT & MT) 84% OF THE NONE MT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT SUPPORT COLUMN LUG. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

Page 5 04/26/95 *

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT NO. ID DESCRIPTION

-330950 14-BF-2211-3PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 330955 16-BF-2211-3PL-9 LUGS THRU12 331095 14-BF-2211 TRUNNIONS 331160 14-BF-2211-14PS PIPE SUPPORT SALEM NUCLEAR PO. STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1 CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

-2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

ALTERNATE ExAM NONE 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE 2 C-C C3.20 MT 2 C-C C3.20 MT Page 6 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 80% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE TRUNNION BEING OBSTRUCTED BY A PERMANENT PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY CAUSED BY A PIPE RESTRAINT OBSTRUCTION.

NONE NONE 04/26/95

SUMMARY

NO. 380140 381010 381020 381070

COMPONENT COMPONENT ID DESCRIPTION 34-MS-2241-3 PIPE TO VALVE 24MS167 32-MS-2241-1 PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 32-MS-2241-1PS-2 PIPE SUPPORT R-210 34-MS-2241-242P PIPE LUG 242 L SALEM NUCLEAR P.R STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL

CODE CLASS 2 2 2 2 RELIEFREQUEST#:

CODE CODE CODE CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE -----------C-F-2 C5.51 UT MT C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT Page 7 % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, ExAM WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 85% OF THE NONE CODE REQ. VOL. ON THE LONG SEAM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS WELD, DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMIT. NOTE: THE LONG SEAM WAS NOT LOCATABLE.

THE LIMITATION WAS CALCULATED AS WORST CASE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE WELD IS PHYSICALLY OBSTRUCTED BY SUPPORTS 1-PS-3 THROUGH 1-PS-12. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 71% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA ON LUG #2, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY (PERMANENT BEAM OBSTRUCTION).

NONE 04/26/95 *

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2

2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#:

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT DESCRIPTION CODE CODE CLASS CAT. CODE ITEM # CODE REQ. NOE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS ALTERNATE EXAM NO. ID :=====*===:!:--=====

===-!'=====!=====-----

---381110 32-MS-2231-1PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT -2 381210 32-MS-2221-1PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 2 381310 32-MS-2211-1 PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 2 381530 30-MS-2241-8PL-1 PIPE LUG 2 &2 C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT Page 8 LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBLITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBLITY.

THE PIPE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A FLOOR PENETRATION SLEEVE.

04/26/95

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT NO. ID DESCRIPTION 381695 30-MS-2231-8PL-1 PIPE LUG &2 381920 30-MS-2221-7PL-1 PIPE LUG &2 382120 30-MS-2211-8PL-1 PIPE LUG &2 384755 6-MS-2231-14PS PIPE SUPPORT SALEM NUCLEAR POI STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL

CODE CLASS 2 2 2 2 RELIEF REQUEST#:

RR-C1 CODE CODE CODE CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE -C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT C-C C3.20 MT Page 9 % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

-LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE PIPE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A FLOOR PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE PIPE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A FLOOR PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE PIPE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A FLOOR PENETRATION SLEEVE. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, WELD IS WITHIN A PIPING ENCAPSULATION AND IS INACCESSIBLE.

04/26/95

SUMMARY

NO. 384850 500010 501800 570010

COMPONENT ID 6-MS-2231-21 PS 12-PR-2201-1 14-RH-2212-1 14-SJ-2224-1 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION PIPE SUPPORT CAP TO PIPE VALVE 2RH2 TO PIPE VALVE 22SJ44 TO ELBOW

SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 CODE CLASS --2 2 2 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1 CODE CODE CODE CAT. ITEM REQ. # NOE --------------C-C C3.20 MT C-F-1 C5.11 UT PT C-F-1 C5.11 UT PT C-F-1 C5.11 UT PT Page 10 % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, WELD IS WITHIN A PIPING ENCAPSULATION AND IS INACCESSIBLE.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 78% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO PIPE SUPPORT AND CAP CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 87% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO VALVE CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. (UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 75% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO VALVE CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

ALTERNATE EXAM NONE NONE NONE NONE 04/26/95 *

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT DESCRIPTION NO. ID ========t=======-======*========

573055 573380 573383 573387 12-RH-2252-5PL-1 PIPE LUG THRU6 12-RH-2252-38 PIPE TO PIPE 12-RH-2252-38PS-PIPE SUPPORT 1&2 12-RH-2252-38PS-PIPE SUPPORT 3 SALEM NUCLEAR PO. STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#:

CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

==='===-:::!:-

==== ==-=-=F==-=-

2 C-C C3.20 PT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 33% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, NO EXAM ON LUG NOS. 2, 3, 4, AND 5 DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE. 2 C-F-1 C5.11 UT PT 2 C-C C3.20 PT 2 C-C C3.20 PT Page 11 LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 67% OF THE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A WELDED PLUG & PROXIMITY OF ADJACENT PIPING. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION. (UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 71% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA OF 38PS-1, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF A PERMANENT SUPPORT. LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (PT) 71% OF THE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF ADJACENT PIPING.

ALTERNATE EXAM NONE NONE NONE NONE 04/26/95 *

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT NO. ID DESCRIPTION 707130 4-CV-2257-1 FLANGE TO PIPE 707730 3-CV-2257-7 VALVE 2CV82 TO PIPE SALEM NUCLEAR P.R STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1 CODE CODE CODE CODE o/o OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, # NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

2 C-F-1 C5.21 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 86% OF THE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FLANGE AND VALVE CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. (UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) 2 C-F-1 C5.21 UT LIMITATION:

EXAMINED (UT) 80% OF THE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME COVERAGE, DUE TO THE VALVE CONFIGURATION.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. (UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) Page 12

ALTERNATE ExAM NONE NONE

LIMITATION REPORT Projeet: \ -z -

System: C:. V-C. 1)4.,J JJ.... Unit: $ai..er-i UN ,-r 2--Weld No.: ;2.-cvCl-::t SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length xWidth *A) A* tJ \ Area or Limitation (Length xWidth *Al) Percentage or Coverage (A -Al/ A) VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel ...

Example _____ ..,.,. Transverse Obstructk>D a

Area or no examination

l. Compute Area ax 1

Asq 2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) 3. Compute Area Not Covered

a Multiply "'a* by Weld Length -VI (Volume Limited) 5. Percentage of Covet"age

(Vt -VI/Vt) .t$ !'SS: 65: *bS 53.oo 7l.3Cf NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld. Reviewedby*

Date: S-3 Level: l LL Date: S&cc '13 Level: -11 I Pa e I of I ]

* ' .* ( SwRI STRAIGHT BEAM LAMINATION EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: Salem Generating Station, DATE: (DAY -MONTH -YEAR! TIME: lZ4 HR CLOCK! SHEET No 5502 Unit2 03 /) fR,, 93 EXAM STARTED 1 L.\ *s G 180,0lO EXAM ENDED EXAMINATION AREA lSYST /COMP! (LINE/SUBASSEMBL YI (IDENTIFICATION I L 0 LOCATION -W 0 LOCATION CV C T/fNk. -c.\J C./ ci 1= op MA NWAY r/::. WF-LD EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE CALIBRATION

'7 MEASURED THICKNESS CROWN HEIGHT ATTENUATION WELD TYPE (-FLOW--)

L. Vt£-..L...J)

JI No S fl M -;) -V T l-] 'j SHEET(SI UP CL DOWN I II UP DOWN s H f!/...J-.

-/..OWi°! p.., /t(..

REV6 I lJ "b' 0 I Q -,_:J

l i' .. 37 /\I EXAMINER SNT LEVEL CHGO CROWN WIDTH WELD LENGTH fVj, COTTEtJ Lr ICN @NIA 11-('i{ol/

5 ,, *1 A d-?) 5 :Ye;? IND POSITION I POSITION POSITION POSITION Z SEARCH IND LOSS AMP No Of % UNIT REMARKS INITIAL B.W. F.S. L1 W1 Wz MP L W1 Wz MP L W1 Wz MP Lz W1 Wz MP LOC /JC R F< DI. .8L £. "t:fJ DI c I <J, l!..s SHt:J.l.. "L-U 11 I r'"lr-'t rr ,-, .. I I *, '* .,

1 If' 1 l'W* I '\.\. s ;4-' ""-*--'f*

DJ\l'E t-l/)-v ------1--.___ --u;.

INSPECTION SERVICE:$

N.D.E.

REMARKS I LIMITATIONS, IF NONE SO STATE: r=RtJM qq') TO J

'l II E V4 M FRO tV\ :1 q \ IJ FROM L Id 11 TO l '?? F P.. o M :l w r: \> T Q. 5(' '/,. l<"* ll :J. DUF... re S ve_P n.K_/ L ff.. fl,

J "' .J "' J I I ,S 7:-1 .._,..

p s f:. *""(,-f,. V 8 J .. 5 .S -,r S. 'J--7--o O g R .-z,) REVIEWED BY:\I I SNT LEVEi PAGE ... / 1 I DATE \) c: )

q 3 l l OF SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-18 (REV. 6/90)

Sw. R. I. EXAMINATION

SUMMARY

RECORD PROJECT No.: SITE: Salem Generating SHEET No.: 17-3373 Station, Unit 2 27.5230 EXAMINATION AREA ( SYSTF.M /COMPONENT) (LINE/ SUBASSEMBLY) (IDENTIFICATION) 2-/2C/: I EXAMINATION EXAMINATION EXAMINER EXAM INDICATIONS RESOLUTION

/l&d -

.. TYPE RECORD INITIALS DATE RECORD CNF No. REMARKS SHEET No. N I G 0 SHEET No. INITIAL /vf-J Py"/:l/11'7{[)/f./

C/ ,4,,</6./L v EXAMINATION T FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION

<:::' / /J4C ; !'r.7 //C::-/.t:. PTO INITIAL ,,,,,-;...,,,... .I/:/ 6 / ,/ /;:.? 4

,( /C> EXAMINATION MTO FOLLOW-UP d--r-T <O/c/1///ELO

-<///#"':

-

r{-1 EXAMINATION 0° LAM SCAN lh',4/G t>< {?,,d .£"/6 u T ' I * . ...,,*oe::::::,c:)/

f?a7c? /d:>o n//1/-?c/

0° WELD SCAN 45° SCAN lf14£ IX Wm/9 .j? {j /. L /'/

?/ .a ./'14 /

f7 45° T SCAN I //n/YJ.-:;;

d/1"1 IX I/ I G0° SCAN G0° T SCAN ( 00 II 1lllJN. 'ERV ICES v/o£K' Reviev edaoo I/ j/j, b1.o/, llcT4 . --* ......

lhvvn SUMMARIZED BY'h,...--

.& DATE CONTINUED ON SHEET No.: -.L/7 _/?/ ;J/d PAGE I OF/ FORM NO. SWRI 17-30 (REV 1-29 I , I / *-Z75Z30

*

Sw. R. I. STRAIGHT BEAM LAMINATION EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No. SITE: Salem Generating DATE:( DAY -MON. -YR.) TIME* ( 24 -HR. CLOCK I SHEET No. SHEET STARTED I I;>, '2..1";)

17-3373 Station, Unit 2 :i r,, 1-1 PR c1l'-i SHEET ENDED I I :o... ""r) EXAMINATION AREA:( SYSTEM /COMPONENT I (LINE /SUBASSEMBLY) (IDENTIFICATION)

Lo LOCATION W 0 LOCATION r:-1=1rlrJR cont..r-1 NT r:1LTEl2 ,:/-Ac/= -I rf.: Or Nciz.zLE 4= cF WE.LD EXAMINER:

SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE CALIBRATION MEASURED CROWN HEIGHT ATTENUATION WELD TYPE (-FLOW--) .t)_RoBG-RDS

.Ti. SHEET (S) THICKNESS

] / UP DOWN

_,,. rl-Jl.A'GE N af),1<(2/Jf?J.r -z....5ooz5 UP ct DOWN '/ '/., llcno EXAMINER:

SNT LEVEL CROWN 1 WIDTH "'/ WELD LENGTH H/R, 7( Jfo ro 111 IA/, DIC ?121(1.1/

REV 0 (J.'7 ,Jc) '% 4--3 /r,, O/o IND POSITION I POSIT ION POSITION POSITION 2 SEARCH REMARKS IND LOSS UNIT INI. No. OF .§. L1 W1 W2 MP L W1 W2 MP L W1 W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP LOCATION "1'0 C:-.N-\IA C(I..) BW \-L'\"' ""1C., L:$'

"" No g,, t:C.D1 i:Lt: DIC. :\-Tl C. A)0 HEl-ILJ D..Je: 'TO Li>nl 1 \::'/f.:.(1jeA rto-t_I. fo..u? I / .z_7 ,_ 0 K-

!-:.LA,, IQF I ! 1__...,-,..,,/ ------v

' -. .. ---* **---ll ... u1 ._v I IV 1-. ,,u ... 1 . v *-Review,jffld APf

/,JZ::::14

/* I/'? 0 N.D.E. SUPER\ ISOR A REMARKS: £ tf./-1M

,?'/?OCV\

.,,G = 4/ '50. ro 2 ;::._ (o /7 -: 2 2: ,q.3 l

,. c. c l. ; ; EXAMINATION AREA LIMllATIONS:

!IF NONE, SO STATE): \ /{(') r::: XA m Ot-i F J..A NG E f)u E TO CO/'/ F' I G i) Rn T/i:_) N. j.hr#l.--REVIEWED BY:

SNT LEVEL* DATE ;j'. p: /(//(. Yu PAGE I OF / FORM No Sw.R I. NDTR 17-111 (REV.7-31-75)

LIMITATION REPORT

Project: f 7 -d--Unit: S'f'rJ.-*M 1 zrv r1 ;L

System: f?,ES!DQfrL t+ireT el£,Mp\,/,4L Weld No.:

-H-ex -I SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) Area or Limitation xWidth-Al) Percentage of Coverage (A -Al/ A) A--""-1-.l...,_I a...__ VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Example -----1 ... Transverse ct>sttuctlon a -Area of no examination I. Compute Area ax l

Asq 2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length -Vt (Volume Total) 3. Compute Area Not Covered -a '4. Multiply *a* by Weld Length -VI (Volume Limited) 5. Percentage of Coverage -(Vt -VI/Vt) 1-1 If\ I \b.O f.4-.0 N lPi 79.3 NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendiculu to the weld.

Preparedby*

\/, C\"'<Z No=..J Revlewedby*

\./.i., Date: 1-.:s 9 3 Level:-='=':::::L:__

__ Date: \3ftfR q 3 Level: _j_j]_ Pa e of (

*

SwRI PRESSURE VESSEL EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: 17-5502 EXAMINATION AREA (SYST /COMP! l?ESJOuf1L HEATRE:/VloVAL SITE: Salem Generating Unit2 (LINE/SUBASSEMBL YI -:J./-R -HEX EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE L . V) L LA ff No S fl M 'J -L' T 3 o DATE: IDAY -MONTH -YEAR! ) ;:). --It p R. -73 (IDENTIFICATION)

J CALIBRATION SHEETISI ANGLE USED TIME: 124 HR CLOCK! SHEET No .-E-XA_M_S-TA-RT-ED_/

_0_/_0-t 10 5 0 0 8 EXAM ENDED J J / 5 L 0 LOCATION IW 0 LOCATION 'I=.. op f.)Oi!:*/:Lc

\AJ EL.D 'f:: 0 o WELD TYPE EXAM SURFACE / TEMP 'F FL!tN(}E SHE LL BEFORE AFTER 1------------+----1 REV o EXAMINER SNT LEVEL CHG o M. CoT/EtJ Ir 1cN J'-(707'f dB 73_ J. WELD LENGTH 110 11 INDICATION No. I MAX S OF DAC I J CJ. 5 L ZOS DAC 50S DAC I SEARCH UNIT ANGLE 1-/ o" IOOS DAC >100 DAC l/Z MAX W MAX I SEARCH UNIT LOCATION 5/IELL >100 DAC 112 MAX IOOS DAC I EXAMINATION SURFACE 0 INSIDE OUTSIDE l2$J 50S DAC ZOS DAC MEASUREMENTS REMARKS INITIAL 20'.1 LI ,, 50S Lt

'I IOOS L1 l MAX LJi' lOOS Lz II 50S Lz Lf ZOS Lz L POS L POS l POS L POS w. MP Wt MP W1 MP Wz MP w MP Wz MP W1 MP Wz MP Wz 1£" /.5 I II " I /3 /.If l'l'f? I ';J /.C:,5 II I 1.5 Ne E.X/1M FL,1NG E SJDE DLE 70 fL.11A.'/}-E u.Z.,/77/<J"-

I CONTINUED ON SHEET MP ANI 1.) --1--.J I Ui11t ,1fl<Jl.cr , I

_, N.0£ SUPERVISOR PAGE REVIEWED BY\ ' ,. '\ I I SNT LEVEL

lJ DA TE \J J f., 'fVVV\ ' !'. --I :;l q :3 I OS"oo 'i SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-105 IREV. 6/901 °'* f' S E'i-(f VS :J -SS *-TS. r_ c -00 8'6

I LIMITATION REPORT Weld No.: 2r -RHR-HtEK-2= SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) Area Of Limitation (Length xWidth-Al)

Percentage of Coverage (A -All A) VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel Example Transverse Ob sttuc:tJon a .* -Area of no examination

l. Compute Area ax l

Asq 2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) 3. Compute Area Not Covered

a 'i. Multiply *a* by Weld Length -Vt (Volume Limited) 5. Percentage of Coverage * (Vt -VI/Vt) 117 NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld . Preparedby*

\J, cm.z TiT Date: 13 A-Pl< 93 Level:"'--'

____ Date:

9 3 Level: __ t 1_1 __ _ Pae of

__ v

SwRI PRESSURE VESSEL EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: Salem Generating Station, DA TE: (DAY -MONTH -YEAR I TIME: IZ4 HR CLOCK) SHEET No 17-5502 Unit2 !1FF.. qJ EXAM STARTED I 0 :}. 105004 'd EXAM ENDED i/30 EXAMINATION AREA ISYST/COMPI ILINE/SUBASSEMBLYI (IDENTIFICATION)

L°l.OC/ON f I WO LOCATION fl ES l.J) \l'J)J., H Ehr /?EMO'JRL.

JI -H EJ.. #' :C'iV/-e_

/IJ0"2-Z /--e WEt..D 1:_ EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE

-¥* CALIBRATION ANGLE '{-rr o 0 WELD TYPE /J EXAM SURFACE L.. VI/.... Lf/ a No S /1 M cl -v T".:io SHEETISI USED '-LS 0 5A..e. <<

TEMP *F BEFORE AFTER EXAMINER REV o . 1Lj70"?'-f WELD LENGTH SNT LEVEL CHG C

'-1 '-f :) , 7J'.c1 117 lj h M-coTTEtJ T.7 ICN !mNIA /c/-1/u/ dB INDICATION No. MAX J Of DAC I SEARCH UNIT ANGLE I SEARCH UNIT LOCVN .,,, It I EXAMINATION SURFACE 0° oiV w-R/, ( e D INSIDE OUTSIDE "lit >100 DAC >100 DAC ( L ZOJ DAC 50J DAC IOOJ DAC l/Z MAX W MAX l/Z MAX IOOJ DAC 50J DAC ZOJ DAC MEASUREMENTS REMARKS INITIAL W1 MP W1 MP W1 MP Wz MP w MP Wz MP W1 MP Wz MP Wz MP ZOJ Li Jl* .? /'-.e. (_ 01 .. J).

I/ IV' le dt 0.-V* 0° o,v wQ/J kAe /; -;iJ 50J L1 Jl;c JLJ f4 ;;c1

I I--wh £J a Nwe!l /c!ie// -:;/_.)

l 0 ,,...l J /LJ' :1' rs ('. IM_i ' VJo*, . t./-t;0 o rJ >Lei 100'.I L1 //) v !vd ' ?) ""'"-el () ,._,,., I/) c ... 4-L MAX -/\ i\11 I IOOJ Lz 1::1 1 ..

"V.. . 50J Lz I;;,.*

INSPECTION SERVICES ZO'.I Lz /J .I ff I £.. _/* b-D .,[r. I-";ZJ If *v .:... /) ) ,___, . /) -r I ' 0 , L POS /11 11 vi 6 It ?.. +-. --){, 't. lo.< N.D.! SUPERVISOR

--r-...) /1J ')

--.. A/I' I) :z_ Cl/I L POS I I "" l::::J 6.r I I cJ, f,; 1 it ..e. I -;z....J 0 lfl * -.Z....'"2 I .,. L POS lb t;i_{ /{-fz 7 I/ I) v I? tt I '.>' ,,.,.. 'f'di_ () 1:."vt:t .tf ,... -'/ l.) I ..e_. , (' s --;2../...)

-.... 7f I . I I' I . L POS :, REVIEWED BVv. .. l SNT LEVEL .7J'L DATE /3 RPR93 CONTINUED ON SHEET 1.1/tt-PAGE I \-:I" ) I v. OF SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-105 IREV. 6/901 .. -oo 37()

PROJECT: fl-f,399 UNIT: s A t.....r::

r--; (,' ... ) I, :>.. SYSTEM: RQ"10t..*,qt...

li@-rR.etto*"fU.

WELD NO.: RH R 1-1 E.x -a !.. "I Prepared By: V, c.To<< M oRTO t;:> Date: SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A= Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 Stte1.1..

!:roe 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered.l.JflsB'ea111 S rltU .. '-3. Compute-Upstream Limitation Percentage J...J:i-zz<..E

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered-Gc;iwRstFeam Nc.:*z.z.c...r::.

5. Conipute Downstream Limitation Percentage

=A (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 =B (B /Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (CI Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D 5.

CCW Limitation Percentage (DI Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L 2. Compute Total Coverage 100-L REMARKS:

q,50

";?..b .. q1, 04 ').i..'84

'(1.04 SIJ..SI/.

us.4t.% : :: . **.*:.**

-/ I I I * * ' ' *,:_:; \ \ \ \ ' \ *

--* \ \ \ \ ' ' * --5f!Lcrl Ul-JtT 2. I 7, {. 3'/'l Nor F"Ro*f't' SH tr Lt. SID*. 11,e-s101>At.

HE'"' REMovAL Hc1tr

'2.. l -

CIVT V\c.ToR. Mo,..To,.!1 nI 8 wo\J 'Ill fo p;, co VE. fi 'J

o rJL y 'l..1S li()O *

- * ** LIMITATION REPORT Project: 17 -s.s-o;s System: F="eeDwA-TER Weld No.: tLI -Bt=-;2..A-1 J -6 SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) Area Of Limitation (Length xWidth-Al)

Percentage of Coverage (A -Al/ A) VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A* 130.7 Al* ?.O-b -'84 .3 Parallel Example_

Transverse a,struc:tlon a .* -Area of no examination

l. Compute Area a x I -Asq .92 2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) qO.'/f/. 3. Compute Area Not Covered -a

c, :z. 41. Multiply *a* by Weld Length -VI (Volume Limited) b -4't 5. Percentage of Coverage -(Vt -VI/Vt) '3Ll-3 NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld . Preparedl>y*

\}, "-"'.c MDoCTt>.:I Revlewedby*

v-& << J > Date: c;l.. icK>R q :3 Level:_.TO:..i.::::

1=-___ Date: ee.<' 93 Level: 7tT Pa e I of I

SwRI ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: Sali G . s . DATE: IDAY -MONTH -YEAR) TIME: 124 HR CLOCK) SHEET No 17-5502 em enerattng talion, EXAM ST ART ED I '-I 3 ':-1 860077 Unit2 31 IVJ AR 'l 3 EXAM ENDED !l/5<6 EXAMINATION AREA ISYST /COMP) (LINE/SUBASSEMBLY I (IDENTIFICATION)

L 0 LOCATION I WO LOCATION ' FEED W/tTER 1'f-8F -

II I c/=. o F W F-LD EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE

CALIBRATION ANGLE 0 0 WELD TYPE EXAM SURFACE L. VJJ....Lfi .a N SHEETISJ USED 45 NJ PIPE. I 151..BOW TEMP *F 05AM;;!-UT3 BEFORE AFTER EXAMINER SITT LEVEL I 'f /OL{ .t.f ( WELD (ENGTH CHG o SC!ffilNG ((0 M-COTTclJ Ir ICN l3J NIA dB 5'1-'1 'I 'J.{ IND OF W MAX L ' L L 2 SEARCH SEARCH DAMPS No DAC SOJ IOOJ l/Z MAX MAX IOOJ SOJ ZOJ UNIT UNIT (IF YES. EXPLAIN) REMARKS INITIAL MAX w MP l/Z MAX Loe ANGLE DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC I I ylf I lf Y. 1-f 'I.ff 7tlJ DN 45° No t-) N< RE C..Of .J)jtfj l;,t:.jVL; lcA.

S" UP '-I 50 "2-) -n 1.::-,, ,_ .. n1'41 I I(!*,,,, .. \f --

I., I INSPECTION SERVICES Reviewed and Aoomved I DA TE J . I -. 'If) I/) '1'?.g, II . I N fl i:""

II I REMARKS I LIMITATIONS.

IF NONE so STATE: Ala /;,.XbM£Al8.Lf.at./.

FB.oM J.0 11 rQ 112 11 D.1.2.C..

L.a. B.1%. S r A/1.lt:!.l N !:-/.., u r.;. i,7 REVIEWED BY:v ,

SNT LEVEL :IlL DATE CONTINUED ON SHEET 1r1/11-PAGE Je ?3 l OF L SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-86 IREV. Z/931 Project: \I -S-S-o?-Unit: .s AL-£ M uN ,, 1 Weld No.: IH-BF-#l -t<[JJJ IV ID TVS SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) Area or Limitation (Length xWidth-Al)

Percentage or Coverage (A -Al/ A) A* _7_._S' __ Al*_/_. 5" __ _ * '80 VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel Example a ____ ..,_ Transverse Obstruction

Area or no examination

l. Compute Area ax l

Asq 2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) 3. Compute Area Not Covered

a '4. Multiply *a* by Weld Length -VI (Volume Limited) S. Percentage of Coverage * (Vt -VI/Vt) NOTE: Compute in asimilar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld. * . Preparedby*

V N Reviewedby*_\L_(;

__ {l,f:a _______ _ Date: /')... ee<<.. 9 0 -. Level: _...__LL1-_

1 ___ Date: 12 /tiff'( 9 3 Level: 7JT Pa e I of I 33/0'?S-l I *:* ..

*

SwRI MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: Salem Generating Station, DATE: IDA Y -MONTH -YEAR I TIME 124 HR. CLOCK) SHEET No.: 17-5502 Unit2 EXAM STARTED: l'J'l07 1.2001G / 2. AP(( 93 EXAM ENDED: 0 ?.2..'-f EXAMINATION AREA: (SYSTICOMP)

LINEISUBASSEMBL Y: IDENTIFICATION:

L 0 LOCATION:

W 0 LOCATION:

,.. f(,E0cJA7rK i'f -P. F -1211 TRuNN JorJ5 f d SI .:J../ /. / ""' /YJ n , ,,..; /< u rJ EXAMINER:

SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE SURFACE FINISH: WELD TYPE (--FLOW-I YOKE SPACING: 'I IN V :U .. 55 15.Ll *co l"iJ uJ * /fftr..U/{/

N 5" JI No Snrr.2 -n1 Tl -f:l s* r ./F[OC 0 F !Uf T YOKE BRAND: f REV / MATERIAL EXAMINER:

SNT LEVEL BRAND: OE TE k WET D DRY IKJ SERIAL No.: f O / CHG i tJ. 6 'Ii.Er<..

r.. r IXJ NIA BATCH No.: 7g o I

l (; v_ FLOURESCENT D / ICN SURFACE TEMP *N_.---.** ....... ,F CALIBRATION BLOCK CALIBRATION VERIFICATION DISTANCE FROM TYPE: (Y'l P LU -'f Iv YES D MIXED SERIAL No. : / BLACK LIGHT B 7ol 9 <? D TIME: o8Yl TO SENSOR COLOR:i£t.LO c.v MIXED WITH NL14 A WEIGHT://.

3 INITIALS:

CELL Nf f1 IN --MATERIAL DUSTING [ZJ BLACK LIGHT OUTPUT VERIF IC.A TION ...

--*-** APPLICATION:

t':! TIME: "'1.-------FLOODING D BRAND: S No.: f\ A A SPRAYING D pw/cm IND No. L w LOCATION ROUND OR SIZE DIA. REMARKS: INITIALS LINEAR OR LENGTH .......___.----.__-

........_

... -----****--

.. ----..... --........ PrtC.S.S I.( "1..L -IV* A t CoA.J. li8{£. /NO t '-;:rt I'/(.) ' v5 i£ ( --v/ ---'\\ .Vin: v \ ' r< \\ "s I

-

I ----------::-:--i SERVI ::s \ J j " :-. \.' .. ft i Revi //,) '" I -*

li*l1. " --,/_;/ nr.1 Z\ N D.t SUPERVISOI

' / l'f--9f-J.211 I

... --------EXAMINATION AREA LIMITATION: (IF NONE. SO STATE)

I) IA£:_. lo

/::J /0

,, ,, i..ol'lG 1 '( i.'.' v-F wC:-1.-ij C.-t'\NNO\

13E 7 '2-, I REVIEWED BY: V .. 1Vr;J' -'\ SNT LEVEL I DATE I PAGE ,Je /;).. r.-PK 9 3 /OF / SWRJ FORM No. NDTR 17-12 IREV. 6/90) -0 PSE&G LIMITATION REPORT I PROJECT: I J -b 3 9 9 UNIT: Se-LeM , "'"' *T :Z. SYSTEM: MA IN $IE"A M WELD NO.: '3ir 1:1 s -:.2.2. 4 I -

Prepared By: \/i cToR Date: SURFACE EXAMINATIONS A= $$,7S 1-Jco Area To Be Examined (length xJAliath =A) f.)cT ,a,l!Q Area Of Limitation (Length x.Wietttr=

Al) Percentage Of Coverage Al= 7 *SO ..

t:Hs£ Sfls1.s) (A-Al /A)= 85, 7 / z* VOLUMETRIC ExAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel-To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream 3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage

=A (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 =B (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C /Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D /Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage v 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1+Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L

2. Compute Total Coverage 1 oo -L *-. 85. 7 I k EMARKS: if Tifl.S If &s". 7tk OF 77ft! 5'..1arnt:.£ l't-l!&li ro tlt:Hlt!'t/E.

Joo% Rr;.61t.J1H*{) (lowm (a::u .. cut.RTEQ o,J 8-Worc-rr Be.s':) . : *-

* -*s<601Lta SwRI MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: Salem Generating Station, DATE: IDAY -MONTH -YEARI TIME 1241 HR. CLOCK) SHEET No.: 17-6399 Unit 2 EXAM STARTED: O'iJ4 '=} J2004n 14 NOV '1 IJ. EXAM ENDED: o CJ O '1 EXAMINATION AREA: ISYST /COMP) LINE/SUBASSEMBLY:

IDENTIFICATION:

L 0 LOCATION:

W 0 LOCATION:

/VJ h J N S' T E /.+ IV\ f34 -M,_" *-rl-::J. LI i 3+-*" I if; or WE lJJ EXAMINER:

SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE SURFACE FINISH: WELD TYPE 1--FLOW-I YOKE SPACING: G> IN W

ANC.ELL . .IL No .SAM ;;i -MT/ P-RQ UN.T>

VAJ.. VE. YOKE REV I '* MATERIAL EXAMINER:

SNT LEVEL BRAND:/Vlff6?lVAFL.

u X WET D DRY J&l SERIAL No.: 4 3 580 CHG I )vt ... Go TTEI I .XT ICN BATCH No.:

'-11$ FLOURESCENT D SURF ACE TEMP * 'F CALIBRATION BLOCK CALIBRATION VER IF I CATION DISTANCE FROM TYPE: DR..Y PoWDF-R...

MIXED NOD YES D THERMOMETER N/A SERIAL No.: BLACK LIGHT J3 70/9'3 Jl{ TIME: 01)47 o<J/O F, TO SENSOR COLOR: I y MIXED WITH SERIAL No.: INITIALS:

tvA tv)/ 'Vflt_ CELL IV/A IN WEIGHT: I/ .,3 L8.S BLACK LIGHT OUTPUT VERIFICATION MATERIAL DUSTING l&J BLACK LIGHT INTENSITY METER BLACK LIGHT OUTPUT APPLICATION:

BRAND: N/11 BRAND: N/11 N/fi TIME: tJ ----------FLOODING D SERIAL No.: SERIAL No.: µw/cm 2 INITIALS:

/I SPRAYING D IND No. L w LOCATION ROUND OR SIZE DIA. REMARKS: INITIALS LINEAR OR LENGTH N,.., REC.OR A.RLF Nf)/r.A/ /oN-S w,11 '

VS ::l

S" .:.... T 7 Z *-o O '7 0 R I.I. n r1 toil E.XAl'11NF.n

lY:7T ."=?rnn° AROON!J PIPE FoR... &Vii--7:N r£R.S£"c.T1

/\/fl.. LaNCITUDLNti

{. WELD otJ wH REVIEW *D & Alii.;c1 I t;U tv!f i:A.r.T DRY MUTUI L VP s TR EA/VJ C:JDE U/ll/j8t.E ro DfZ T£1?MltJE.

AllUl't IN SPECTIONSI

,__ RV ICES LoN/?...1 ruD1 t \Al 15 l n Lo c*ATUJ tJ /.ud1_ ' "" lft * * "'" d I 'l JA \ Ill '"l l 1 "

l\ISP. ... "" C&A I SE -* N.D:E.

SOlf EXAMINATION AREA LIMITATION:

llF NONE. SO STATEI -ro*i/(3WFR<:1M 5

/7NIJ FR.Of"\

TO Jo 3 D u £ TO NO 2: Z "-E co"'/::/.@.

URhTION (,I.I 11-REVIEWED BY:Vv II . II SNT LEVEL I NOV 9 if PAGE f't A _JI '--/// _f_oF_}__

., r -SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-IZ IREV. 6/90)

LIMITATION REPORT Project: / 7 -55b :Z. Unit: Weld No.: PR-.:u.01

-r SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) Area or Limitation (Length xWidth *Al) Percentage of Coverage (A -Al/ A) A* 79. 00 Al* /7. 00 VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel a Example_ -----... Transverse Obstruction .* Area or no examination

1. Compute Area ax l

Asq 2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) 3. Compute Area Not Covered

a 4. Multiply *a* by Weld Length

VI (Volume Limited) 5. Percentage of Coverage * (Vt -VI/Vt) .40 /$", '80 *40 3.40 NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld. Preparedby*

\J\ Hort""il),J ltevlewedby*

\L ;:, ffjj Date: 7 9 3 Level: 7/C Date: 93 Level:___;"';..:::;'='=----

Pa e of -

SwRI LIQUID PENETRANT EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: 17-5502 SITE: Salem Generating Station, DATE: IDAY MONTH -YEARI W 0 LOCATION SHEET Ni 1014.4 Unit2 C Afr"/ 7 3 .i:_ Of-EXAMINATION AR£A ISYST /COMPI ILINE/SUBASSEMBLYI llDENT IFICA TION I L 0 LOCATION WELD TYPE:(--FLow--)

p P-E s;s u

I "/--p /Z-I A£ s*IA WI oeJ C-t\P -ro P rPt=-fl-e;_ t.-1 E.. F EXAMINi< Kur! z_ SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE

' SURFACE TEMP "F I PENE;NTcfEMP "F Ti-ERMOMETER SERIAL NUMBER ;a:-No S"AM-;2..

-?T-1 '/ C/ f,L.._.,/2...

T 17.S-REV 2. WELD LENGTH EXAMINER 'ff; SNT LEVEL CHG I SURFACE FINISH j ;::: rltttn ti ICN 8n7A ()i_r()/J.,,, r/u. c;h 3 C/ Yz.. PRE CLEANER PENETRANT REMOVER DEVELOPER BRAND 7!?0rC!f-6r BRAND 5 (10 TC BRAND 5 l?O 'IC /Tc IC BRAND 4 Pl? /C TYPE c;/cc,,,.. -J..rF TYPE .-;* JC. L -ff-F/5 TYPE TYPE '7):::. D -/VF BATCH No o/'/],.u o I fc. BATCH No 0'3'7 BATCH No BATCH No q/J-A-CJIP CLEANING TIME APPLIED REMOVAL TIME APPLIED /5'&( COMPLETED

!Lf:3o COMPLETED r tf-..!JF TIME REMOVED I 7'-4.q' TIME READ IS--0 t/ INDICATION LOCATION TYPE SIZE L w IF OR DOWN ROUND OR DIAMETER OR REMARKS INITIAL No STREAM .LINEAR LENGTH llY !/,

-""'. ... ff. /VI} I '} .I!.. k"' ,./')

-r I F I *--, -OPSfMJ , ... .. ,. INSPJ:f'Tlf'll\J Hl\11 I I\,_*'***"'

-

\,. Reviewed f P(/f PmyA/ Jf '""it.

lr'V"fl((IJ DATE N.D.E. SUPERVISO I I I I I EXAMINATION AREA LIMITATION

-IF NONE, so STATE /10 ex11m TO itlfl/"lln4

/--2(

"/Jue 1b J'fe 5""'"fftJrT.

rr I t REVIEWED BY: v

SNT LEVEL DATE CONTINUED ON SHEET 1-irt PAGE I I v. (. '\ '-1 ll 7 rrt'IC 9 3 OF SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-11 IREV. 6/90) 500 Of 0

- *:* . * * ..

SwRI ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: 17-5502 SITE: S-' G . s . wem enerattng Unit2 EXAMINATION AREA (SYST /COMP) (LINE/SUBASSEMBLY)

/<15.u eF ?--p t2--7-::i-o / EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE -V -15;: (/fl. f2f:_ No ("YI -?-U T "°3>

CHG O AV/Y (I ICN ffiWA IND ' OF W MAX L 1 L L 2 No MAX 11z MAX 100' so' 20' DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DATE: !DAY -MONTH -YEAR) TIME: (24 HR CLOCK) SHEET No /I frff2.. { l-'J EXAM STARTED / ':) 0 8 6 0 l 0 5 b ( EXAM ENDED !IDENTIFICATION) 1 ALIBRATION ANGLE SHEET IS I USED I lf-7 0 7 5"-

dB SEARCH SEARCH UNIT UNIT LOC ANGLE DAMPS !IF YES, EXPLAIN) ANI W 0 LOCATION lLAS.0l LD TYPE EXAM SURF ACE n TEMP *F C.../+-P (0 BEFORE AFTER REMARKS INITIAL C:.-Atv /3E EEIY /'f T F-f/-.C'Yf I TT TL Y 3 (0 SNT LEVEL ll . DATE Q . *7 A-f'te ,3 CONTINUED ON SHEET NA I OF I SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-86 IREV. Z/93)

.... PROJECT: fl-6399 UNIT: SYSTEM: £1?S10UA1..

Hc::.A-r C<et'10111H-WELD NO.: 14-RH-

-I Prepared By: Vic.Toa..

Date: SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A= Area Of Limitation (Length x Width= Al) Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream =A

3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream

=B 5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW = C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (CI Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW = D 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D / Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1+Z2+Z3+Z4)/4

= L 2. Compute Total Coverage 100 -L

REMARKS: 3l-3b 0 0 0 0 /.{2. b9 /0 l 31.f ?..Li 10 I 34-/1... II

UP '/flLVE: ___

s Ft i...e M c_, t.J 1 -,-?. r7 -t:. 3 17 r<<=s10u1=t1-H&l1T 1<anovt7-'--R 1-1 -. ;i.;;i_; ;z -I V1 c:-rv"-Motz.To r-J m-. 9 t-io v q4 FO ri: L 1 ,_.,, rA-n o i-J....s o '-Y** 50l'6(K:)

*

'PROJECT:

........ ( 7-L---_.b""-'3=--.....9_,_'f

___ _ UNIT: S A-L-e 1-1 ur-.> LI :2-s:s-11/111(itf SYSTEM:

Hes' Rettovsc....

WELD NO.:

-:ZA:l.4 -( Prepared By: V' CTI::>.'Z Mo <t*oh) Date: /LI-/JOI/ 9'3 SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width= A) A= Al= Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) (A-Al '-'-/A-"--)=

___

Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream =A 3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage (A/Vt1) x 100 = 21 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream

=B 5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (B /Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW = C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C / Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW = D 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D I Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4)

I 4 = L 2. Compute Total Coverage 100 -L .REMARKS: ) 'l. 91 0 0 0 0 50-00 50.,QQ

-,5% s1oa\D

*

ARE:A NOT cw/ccw SALEM UN 11 :J.. / 7-b.3'7 '1 r<.r:.s101.;nL-f/E11-r Rt:rtovlJt...

I tr SJ' -;;._;:i..;i..4

-I V1 CTooz Ho tc?:TO t-J 'Ill.-I l.j NOV 9 lf L1M 1"11'111 OrJ.S Ot.J Ly, S10D\D L

.PROJECT:

n-b399 UNIT: SYSTEM: WELD NO.: Date: 17-RH

-38 15" IV ov 9w SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width= A) A= Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream = A 3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (A/Vt1) x 100 = Z1 =B (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C I Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D I Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L 2. Compute Total Coverage 100 -L EMARKS: '?-?..-l::t]

-, "-8 3?..-39

SwRI ULTRASONIC EXAMINAT*ION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: Salem Generating Station, Unit2 DATE: IDAY -MONTH -YEARI 17-6399 EXAMINATION AREA ISYST /COt.f> I lllt£/&.eASSEt.el YI EmDv4J...

EXAMltER SHT lfVB. PROCEOUU:

"Jr No m (). -ur:3 ICN liJ NIA I llDENTIFICATIONI CALIBRA TloH StEETISI /Jf 710/o lt-V No l I l z SEARaf SEARCH SWRI FORM No. N>TR 17-88 IREV. Z/931 i-1/-Z -MAX ..........

lt-4IT lt-4IT OAC DAC DAC DAC LOC ANGLE SNT LEVEL /r / _ DATE UP/ /Dt( I[) NOV 9 l 0 LOCATION ' ANGLE o USED DMf>S (IF YES, EXPLAIN! o WELD TYPE REMARKS PAGE *** W 0 LOCATION £1-cf_ EXAM SlJlf ACE TE..., 'F E BEFORE AFTER INITIAL I OF I

-.-.

PROJECT: * //-'239 7 UNIT: SeLeH Ut? rT :2... SYSTEM: (HEl'11Cd(.

v"'-""e Co,..rrtto(..

Prepared By: \h

\Y o4tToN WELD NO.: Date: 4-cv -:Z.'2!,-7 -/ I NO\( ( 9f.f(f SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) Percentage Of Coverage A= VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream = A 3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 =B (B I Vt1) x 1 oo = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 . 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW = C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C / Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW = D 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D / Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage

2. Compute Total Coverage REMARKS: (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L 100 -L !L-OO 0 0 0 0 1.19 {'?;,lb 761(6(:)

UP

FLO<...) > ft __ ---.1-__ _ 5At..£/-1 Ut-J/I -;2.. /7-6399 Cl/F.111t:'f}l VOL Ut1i! COtr7tZO L> -e. v-:r2s 7 -/ Fo<< Lin 1?/?7701-lS otvt-)"-* . .,,*p; DoiNN I I:

PROJECT: i7-'23 9 9 UNIT: .$AL...e M 2.... SYSTEM: C/.lertu:BL Vowne WELD NO.: 3-cv-2.2.S? -7 Prepared By: \ / \ CTQ<t N Date: "3 l Oc.T 9y SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width= A) A= Percentage Of Coverage

___ _ Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams {Indications Parallel To Weld) 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream = A 3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (A/Vt1)x 100 = Z1 =B (B I Vt1) x 1 oo = Z2 8. Circumferential Exams "(Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1: Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C 3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C I Vt2) x 100 = Z3 4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D 5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D I Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage 1. Compute Total Limitati9n Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L 2. Compute Total Coverage 100 -L

.99 14-41 4-64 -JI 'b ,59 -11 f b-S"Cf \9,\'8 80. <8?..

uP I-cow VALl/6. ----. S"Al.t=t-"\

UN IT::<-l/-b3C/9

'CAL VDL-t.IHE COrJT!fOL

'3-c. v -;l..";i._5 7 -7 Vr t:-rol'"t.

tvf 31 OCT '14 For<. L11-1 nFJ-nDr-l CoVEtUlcjE ONL.(. 4-* Dowt-J p, PE.. :::: ArttA l'lo* covcr<c:()

cw/ccw :::

tJ OT c::ovt=IZ*/J uP/oow,.J

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 | issue date = 05/11/1995
 | title = Rev 1A to Vol a of Salem Generating Station Unit 2 Second 10-Yr Insp Interval ISI Program Plan.
-| author name = LAKE L F, NICHOLS J A
+| author name = Lake L, Nichols J
 | author affiliation = PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC &amp; GAS CO. OF NEW JERSEY
 | addressee name =

ML18101A771: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:23, 17 June 2019

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

=== ====== ===== ======= -*=-= --===--=====--

SUMMARY

*==-=--

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

=========--

====== ==-=F==

=!

SUMMARY

====----========--

== ======== ====

===========

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

== =====--======--===-======!==

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

== 1 1 1 1 B-F B5.130 UT PT B-F B5.130 . UT PT B-F 85.40 UT B-J B9.31 Page 12 PT UT PT % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS ALTERNATE EXAM --:=================F======

SUMMARY

==========

--=====

== ====

== ==============================--=====

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

==I=

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

==== ==-=-=F==-=-

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search