Text

Rev 1A to Vol a of Salem Generating Station Unit 2 Second 10-Yr Insp Interval ISI Program Plan.
	ML18101A771
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	05/11/1995
From:	Lake L, Nichols J; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	;
Shared Package
ML18101A770	List: ML18101A769; ML18101A771;
References
	PROC-950511, NUDOCS 9506160189
	Download: ML18101A771 (93)
	v • d • e

SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT #2 SECOND 10-YEAR INSPECTION INTERVAL INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM PLAN VOLUME A PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY RELIABILITY AND ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT INSPECTION SERVICES -* ISI GROUP MAY 11, 1995 REVISION lA

PREPARED BY ewicz

- ISI Support COPIES TO: NRC (2 COPY, Transmitted by licensing)

ANII (1 COPY, Distributed by DDG)

QA (1 COPY, Distributed by DDG)

IS! (1 COPY, Distributed by DDG)

DDG (1 COPY, for microfilming)

Approved by Approved by

~?(~

Louis F. Lake Senior Engineer - ISI Support 9506160189 950607 Jon A. Nichols Manager - R & A PDR ADOCK 05000311 Q PDR

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

INSERVICE INSPECTION LTP I. INSERVICE INSPECTION LTP

SUMMARY

(cont'd)

VOLUME A (cont'd) 12.0 REQUESTS FOR RELIEF FROM EXAMINATION . . . . . . . . . . 12-1 13.0 NDE ULTRASONIC (UT) CALIBRATION BLOCKS . . . . . . . . . 13-1 14.0 ALLOCATION TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14-1 15.0 ISi 10 YEAR PROGRAM AND SCHEDULES 15-1 II. APPENDICES REVISION A ABBREVIATIONS AND SYSTEM ACRONYMS 12/11/94 B ALLOCATION TABLES

Tab 1 Tab 2 Tab 3 Tab 4 Tab 5 Allocation Summary IWB Allocation Table IWC Allocation Table IWD Allocation Table IWF Allocation Table 12/11/94 12/11/94 12/11/94

. 12/11/94 12/11/94 c CLASS 1, 2 & 3 EXAMINATION LIMITATIONS Tab 1 CLASS 1, ISi Exam Limitations 04/26/95 Tab 2 CLASS 2, ISi Exam Limitations 04/26/95 D REVISION DATA REPORT 12/11/94 E DELETED COMPONENTS LISTING 12/11/94 F EXAM CATEGORY

SUMMARY

TABLE 12/11/94

S/2 ISi PROGRAM - LTP REV. lA 11

REV.

NO.

DATE OF REV.

REVISION HISTORY RECORD (CONT'D)

REVISION HISTORY COMMENTS lA 04/95 The LTP was revised, due to an NRC Request for Additional Information {RAI). This request was in the form of a Telephone conversation between the NRC and PSE&G, on 3/10/95. The NRC requested that PSE&G provide additional information in reguards to Relief Request RR-Bl

& RR-Cl & Appendix "C". PSE&G responded to this RAI, through ISI letter No. NRS-95-036. The following are the specific changes and the pages that were affected:

a) Page ii - Revised Appendix "C", Tab 1 and Tab 2's revision date from 12/11/94 to 04/26/95~

b) Page vi - Added this page to document the Revision History Record.

c) Appendix "C" - Revised this section in its entirety, to reflect further examination

limitation descriptions .

NOTE: Attachment #1 for both Tab #1 and

2 was*added to provide additional information as needed. Attachment

1, is broken down by applicable Summary Number .

S/2 ISI PROGRAM - LTP REV. lA vi

APPENDIX "C"

CLASS 1, 2 & 3 EXAMINATION LIMITATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB REVISION Description 1 04/26/95 Class 1 Examination Limitations greater than 10%.

NOTE: Attachment #1 has been included to provide additional limitation supporting information, identified by applicable Summary Number.

2 04/26/95 Class 2 Examination Limitations greater than 10%.

NOTE: Attachment #1 has been included to provide additional limitation supporting information, identified by applicable Summary Number.

S/2 SI PROGRAM - LTP REV. lA PAGE 1OF1

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

===--= --=========== =============- ==== ====== ===== ======= -*=-= - -===--=====--= --'=-= = = = - - -

000400 2-RPV-3442A LOWER SHELL 1 B-A B1 .12 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 77% OF THE NONE AT 60 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CORE BARREL SUPPORT LUG INTERFERENCE.

000500 2-RPV-3442B LOWER SHELL 1. B-A B1.12 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 77% OF THE NONE AT 180 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CORE BARREL SUPPORT LUG INTERFERENCE.

000600 2-RPV-3442C LOWER SHELL 1 8-A B1.12 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 77% OF THE NONE AT 300 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CORE BARREL SUPPORT LUG INTERFERENCE.

000900 2-RPV-1442B UPPERSHELLAT 1 8-A 81.12 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED(M-UT)69%0FTHE NONE 180 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE OUTLET NOZZLES AND FLANGE TAPER.

Page 1

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

---:=====--= --=---==--=== =*==-=--= ==== ==== = = - ---===--====-========

001100 2-RPV-10442 LOWER SHELL 1 B-A B1.11 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 88% OF THE NONE TO LOWER HEAD CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CORE BARREL SUPPORT LUG INTERFERENCE.

001400 2-RPV-14438 MERIDIONAL 1 B-A 81.22 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 76% OF THE NONE WELDAT330 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES.

001500 2-RPV-1443C MERIDIONAL 1 B-A B1.22 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 75% OF THE NONE WELDAT30 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG. PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES.

001600 2-RPV-1443D MERIDIONAL 1 B-A 81.22 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 64% OF THE NONE WELDAT90 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG. PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES.

Page 2

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

~-------

==--

001700 2-RPV-1443E MERIDIONAL 1 B-A B1 .22 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-un 87% OF THE NONE WELD AT 150 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES.

001800 2-RPV-1443F MERIDIONAL 1 B-A B1 .22 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-un 82% OF THE NONE WELD AT 210 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES.

001900 2-RPV-3443 LOWER HEAD 1 B-A B1.21 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-un 4% OF THE NONE DISC TO PEEL CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE SEGMENTS PROXIMITY OF THE INSTRUMENTATION TUBES.

002000 2-RPVCH-1446A MERIDIONAL 1 B-A B1.22 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED cun 31% OF THE NONE WELD AT 300 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS AND SHROUD SUPPORT RING.

Page 3

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

~-~~~-----======== ===============--====== ====== ====== = = - =F======== =======!======

002100 2-RPVCH-1446B MERIDIONAL 1 B-A B1.22 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 26% OF THE NONE WELD AT 0 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS, SHROUD SUPPORT RING AND LIFTING LUG.

002200 2-RPVCH-1446C MERIDIONAL 1 B-A B1.22 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 35% OF THE NONE WELDAT60 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG. FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS AND SHROUD SUPPORT RING.

002300 2-RPVCH-1446D MERIDIONAL 1 B-A B1.22 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 35% OF THE NONE WELD AT 120 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS, SHROUD SUPPORT RING AND LIFTING LUG.

002400 2-RPVCH-1446E MERIDIONAL 1 B-A B1.22 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 36% OF THE NONE WELD AT 180 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS AND SHROUD SUPPORT RING.

Page 4

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR~1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NDE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

======== ========----========--==== =====================- ======== ======== ========== -======= =========================================================== =================

002500 2-RPVCH-1446F MERIDIONAL 1 B-A 81.22 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 54% OF THE NONE WELDAT240 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE DEG FOLLOWING PERMANENT OBSTRUCTIONS:

CRD PENETRATIONS, SHROUD SUPPORT RING AND LIFTING LUG.

002600 2-RPVCH-64468 DOLLAR PLATE 1 B-A B1.21 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 67% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE CRD PENETRATION OBSTRUCTIONS.

002700 2-RPV-7442 VESSEL TO 1 B-A 81.30 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 60% OF THE NONE FLANGE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE TAPER. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT. SEE

SUMMARY

002701 FOR 100% COVERAGE BY MANUAL UT, FROM THE FLANGE SEAL SURFACE.

002900 29-RCN-1230 OUTLET NOZZLE 1 B-D B3.90 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 49% OF THE NONE AT 22 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE INTEGRAL EXTENSION AND GEOMETRIC SHADOWING. EXAMINED BY SwRI USING THE PAR DEVICE. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT AND EXAM TECHNIQUE.

Page 5

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

====- ===== -------

003200 29-RCN-1240 OUTLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.90 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 49% OF THE NONE AT 158 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE INTEGRAL EXTENSION AND GEOMETRIC SHADOWING. EXAMINED BY SwRI USING THE PAR DEVICE. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT AND EXAM TECHNIQUE.

003300 '29-RCN-1220 OUTLET NOZZLE 1 B-D B3.90 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 49% OF THE NONE AT 203 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE INTEGRAL EXTENSION AND GEOMETRIC SHADOWING. EXAMINED BY SwRI USING THE PAR DEVICE. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT AND EXAM TECHNIQUE.

003600 29-RCN-1210 OUTLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.90 M-UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (M-UT) 49% OF THE NONE AT 338 DEG. CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE INTEGRAL EXTENSION AND GEOMETRIC SHADOWING. EXAMINED BY SwRI USING THE PAR DEVICE. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT AND EXAM TECHNIQUE.

011800 6-PR-1205-1 NOZZLE TO 1 B-F B5.40 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 74% OF THE NONE SAFE-END CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT NOZZLE AND SAFE-END CONFIGURATION.

Page 6

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

= - --

011830 4-PR-1200-1 NOZZLE TO 1 8-F 85.40 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 84% OF THE NONE SAFE-END CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT SAFE-END AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

020600 31-STG-1240-IRS OUTLET NOZZLE 1 8-D. 83.140 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 85% OF THE NONE IRS CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

020700 31-STG-1230-IRS OUTLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.140 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 81% OF THE NONE IRS CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

020800 31-STG-1220-IRS OUTLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.140 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 80% OF THE NONE IRS CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT RING INTERFERENCE.

Page 7

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. . EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 020900 31-STG-1210-IRS OUTLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.140 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 79% OF THE NONE IRS CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

021000 29-STG-1240-IRS INLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.140 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 86% OF THE NONE IRS CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

021100 29-STG-1230-IRS INLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.140 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 75% OF THE NONE IRS CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

021200 29-STG-1220-IRS INLET NOZZLE 1 8-D 83.140 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 73% OF THE NONE IRS CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT RING INTERFERENCE .

Page 8

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-B1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

~~- --------------~------ -~------------------ ======== ======== --======== ======== =====--======--===-======!========

021300 29-STG-1210-IRS INLET NOZZLE 1 B-D B3.140 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 82% OF THE NONE IRS CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT INSULATION SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

070000 31-RC-1240-1 NOZZLE TO 1 B-F B5.130 UT LIMITATION: EXAM'D (UT) 50% OF CODE REQ. NONE ELBOW VOL, AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXAM'D ON WELD UT45 PT CW & CCW. 2) NO EXAM FROM NOZ. SIDE DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG., SEE ATIACH.1, RR-81. 3)

NO EXAM FROM EL. SIDE DUE TO ACCOUSTIC PROP. OF CAST MATERIAL A-351, GR CF8M 072300 31-RC-1230-1 NOZZLE TO 1 B-F B5.130 UT LIMITATION: EXAM'D (UT) 50% OF CODE REQ. NONE ELBOW VOL., AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXAM'D ON WELD UT45 PT CW & CCW. 2) NO EXAM FROM NOZ. SIDE DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG., SEE ATIACH.1, RR-81. 3)

NO EXAM FROM EL. SIDE DUE TO ACCOUSTIC PROP. OF CAST MATERIALA-351, GR CF8M 073500 31-RC-1230-4LU-I LONGITUDINAL 1 B-J 89.12 UT LIMITATION: EXAM'D (UT) 0% OF CODE REQ. NONE PT VOL. AS FOLLOWS: THE EL. HAS 2 CAST SS (A-351, GR CF8M) PCS. WITHE LONG. SEAM ELECTRO SLAG WELDED. DUE TO LRG. GRAIN SIZE, UT IS HIGHLY ATIENUATED. NO MEANINGFUL TECHNIQUE IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.

Page 9

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 073600 31-RC-1230-4LU- LONGITUDINAL 1 B-J B9.12 UT LIMITATION: EXAM'D (UT) 0% OF CODE REQ. NONE 0 VOL. AS FOLLOWS: THE EL. HAS 2 CAST SS PT (A-351, GR CF8M) PCS. WITHE LONG. SEAM ELECTRO SLAG WELDED. DUE TO LRG GRAIN SIZE, UT IS HIGHLY ATTENUATED. NO MEANINGFUL TECHNIQUE IS CURRENTLY AVAi LALE.

073700 31-RC-1230-4 ELBOW TO PIPE 1 B-J B9.11 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 75% OF THE NONE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF CASTING AND BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION.

074600 31-RC-1220-1 NOZZLE TO 1 B-F 85.130 UT LIMITATION: EXAM'D (UT) 50% OF CODE REQ. NONE ELBOW VOL., AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXAM'D ON WELD UT45 PT CW & CCW. 2) NO EXAM FROM NOZ. SIDE DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG., SEE ATTACH. 1, RR-81. 3)

NO EXAM FROM EL. SIDE DUE TO ACCOUSTIC PROP. OF CAST MATERIAL A-351, GR CF8M 075800 31-RC-1220-4LU-I LONGITUDINAL 1 B-J B9.12 UT LIMITATION: EXAM'D (UT) 0% OF CODE REQ. NONE PT VOL. AS FOLLOWS: THE EL. HAS 2 CAST SS (A-351, GR CF8M) PCS. WITHE LONG. SEAM ELECTRO SLAG WELDED. DUE TO LRG. GRAIN SIZE, UT IS HIGHLY ATTENUATED. NO MEANINGFUL TECHNIQUE IS CURRENTLY AVALIABLE.

Page 10

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 075900 31-RC-1220-4LU- LONGITUDINAL 1 B-J 89.12 UT LIMITATION: EXAM'D (UT) 0% OF CODE REQ. NONE 0 VOL. AS FOLLOWS: THE EL. HAS 2 CAST SS PT (A-351, GR CF8M) PCS. WfTHE LONG. SEAM ELECTRO SLAG WELDED. DUE TO LRG. GRAIN SIZE, UT IS HIGHLY ATIENUATED. NO MEANINGFUL TECHNIQUE IS CURRENTLY AVAIABLE.

076000 31-RC-1220-4 ELBOW TO PIPE 1 B-J 89.11 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 84% OF THE NONE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF CASTING AND BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION. (UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) 076800 31-RC-1210-1 NOZZLE TO 1 B-F B5.130 UT LIMITATION: EXAM'D (UT) 50% OF CODE REQ. NONE ELBOW VOL., AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXAM'D ON WELD UT45 PT CW & CCW. 2) NO EXAM FROM NOZ. SIDE DUE TO NOZ. CONFIG., SEE ATIACH. 1, RR-B1. 3)

NO EXAM FROM EL. SIDE DUE TO ACCOUSTIC PROP. OF CAST MATERIALA-351, GR CF8M 080000 29-RC-1240-5 ELBOW TO 1 B-F B5.130 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 50% OF THE NONE NOZZLE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT ELBOW ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

Page 11

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NDE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

--:===*== --- ~~~---========== ======== =======- ========== ======== --:=================F============

081200 29-RC-1230-5 ELBOW TO 1 B-F B5.130 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 50% OF THE NONE NOZZLE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT ELBOW ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

082200 29-RC-1220-5 ELBOW TO 1 B-F B5.130 . UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 50% OF THE NONE NOZZLE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT ELBOW ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AND NOZZLE

CONFIGURATION.

083300 29-RC-1210-5 ELBOW TO 1 B-F 85.40 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 67% OF THE NONE NOZZLE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT ELBOW ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION.

085000 27.5-RC-1230-1 BC 4 IN. BRANCH 1 B-J B9.31 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 55% OF THE NONE

-5 CONNECTION CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-81), FOR COVERAGE PLOT..

SET-ON WELD CONFIGURATION.

Page 12

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

~~~--~- - -- =========== ====================== =--====== ======== ========== ======== ==============================--=========== --==== = = = = = = =

086800 27.5-RC-1210-1BC 10 IN. BRANCH 1 B-J B9.31 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 55% OF THE NONE

-3 CONNECTION CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

SET-ON WELD CONFIGURATION.

086900 27.5-RC-1210-1BC 4 IN. BRANCH 1 B-J B9.31 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 52% OF THE NONE

-4 CONNECTION CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT BRANCH CONNECTION CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

SET-ON WELD CONFIGURATION.

165760 8-SJ-1262-6PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 1 B-K-1 B10.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU7 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE EXAM AREA PRECLUDES A PERSON FROM PERFORMING AN ADEQUATE PT WITHOUT AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF LIMITATIONS.

165790 8-SJ-1262-6PS-8 PIPE SUPPORT 1 B-K-1 B10.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU 11 REQUIRED AREA, THE SUPPORTS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

Page 13

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 168240 8-SJ-1252-9PS-4 PIPE SUPPORT 1 B-K-1 810.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU7 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY OF THE PIPE SUPPORT (LOCATED INSIDE OF THE CONTAINMENT WALL PENETRATION).

169450 8-SJ-1245-1 TEE TO VALVE 1 B-J B9.11 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 36% OF THE NONE 24RH27 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO RADIUS PT OF THETEE AND VALVE CONFIGURATION.

177200 4-SJ-1294-8PL-1 PIPE LUG 1 B-K-1 810.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU4 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE INACCESSIBILITY OF THE LUGS. THE LUGS ARE INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

179750 4-SJ-1282-23PL-1 PIPE LUG 1 8-K-1 810.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU4 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE INACCESSIBILITY OF THE LUGS. THE LUGS ARE INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

Page 14

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

*l.~~~-====== ===--= ==-- ====== -===-- -=I====== ========I=====

181800 4-SJ-1272-23PL-1 PIPE LUG 1 B-K-1 810.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU4 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY OF THE LUGS. THE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

250200 23-PMP-BOLTS BOLTING 1 B-G-1 B6.180 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 87% OF THE NONE 1-24 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, NO EXAM OF BOLTS 6910, 7658 AND 7280 DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY. MISC. PIPING IS LOCATED OVER TOP OF THE STUD UT INSPECTION HEATER HOLES. SEE SUM# 250201 FOR VT-1&2.

250300 22-PMP-BOLTS BOLTING 1 B-G-1 B6.180 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 87% OF THE NONE 1-24 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, NO EXAM OF BOLTS 7, 21, AND 22 DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PERMANENTLY INSTALLED MISC. PIPING IS LOCATED OVER TOP OF THE STUD UT INSPECTION HEATER HOLES. SEE SUM#

250301 FOR VT-1 &2.

250400 21-PMP-BOLTS BOLTING 1 B-G-1 B6.180 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 83% OF THE NONE 1-24 CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, NO EXAM OF BOLTS 7, 8, 11AND21 DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY. PERMANENTLY INSTALLED MISC. PIPING IS LOCATED OVER TOP OF THE STUD UT INSPECTION HEATER HOLES. SEE SUM# 250401 FOR VT-1 &2 Page 15

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-81

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

====== - ---- =======--==- ---- ----- =====---=== ---- - -------- ---

251200 22-PMP-LUGS PUMP LUGS 1 B-K-1 B10.20 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 67% OF THE NONE 1,2,3 CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE INACCESSIBLE AREA OF THE LUGS. A PORTION OF THE LUGS ARE HIDDEN WITHIN THE PUMP SUPPORT STRUCTURE. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

251300 21-PMP-LUGS PUMP LUGS 1 B-K-1 B10.20 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 67% OF THE NONE 1,2,3 CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE INACCESSIBLE AREA OF THE LUGS. A PORTION OF THE LUGS ARE HIDDEN WITHIN THE PUMP SUPPORT STRUCTURE. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-B1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

Page 16

1*-*'"' *--*~

_._, '* -*I *I *-*- -1 I ... I 1'-*

. .:. . .... *-**-*.:...:.:....:.. =---r*-* *7 .l. I '-'*-'="=" J.. t:...IC.. 't1 .l.

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plant SwRI uses vessel "as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticil'ated scanning and coverage. These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is det.ennined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements. The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts". As a function of weld typet device used, scan direction, beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined t::l assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this infonnation, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit,

~".1crement interval, units, and counts per unit are determined and documented in the SwRI Scan Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the a&Will scan and increment, start and stop counts that were perfonned. After completion of the examinationt the Data Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. TL is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment, start, and stop positions are then tabulated for each examination performed. The coverage obtained must be determined for each examination perfonned on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device counts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan developme'nt. The computer scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions. The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square inches for the area defined by the points selected. The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage. This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to li~t the percent coverage for each angle and directiont then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction, (CW, CCW, UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for either the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction. Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise, the maximum volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the 50no and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%.

This reporting method has since been refined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld.

At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations performed by the computer were not

- written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible. However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the necessary data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS sous.

002700 2-RPV-7442 45 cw 2i.90 % ~3 LIMITED DUE TO VESSEL TO FLANG 60 cw 2i.90 % TAPER CIRC. WELD . 0 cw 21.90 o/o 50/70 cw 7.30 %

COMBINED 26.7i o/o

45 60 0

50/70 COMBINED 45 ccw ccw ccw ccw UP 2i.9o 21.90 2i.9o 7.30 26.7i 73.95 o/o 60 UP 79.39 o/o 0 UP 49.77 o/o 50/70 UP 9.59 o/o COMBINED 88.99 %

1.5 DN *100.00 o/o EXAMINATION DOWN FROM 5.7 DN 100.00 o/o SEAL SURFACE 12.5 DN 100.00 o/o COMBINE 100.00 o/o

LiMito. tion Due to Upper Shell to Flo.nge To.per

~ No Covero.ge 45T, 60T & 50/70T m No Covero.ge 60 cleg

~

No Covero.ge 0 cleg No Covero.ge 50/70

~ No Covero.ge 45 deg pprr .- to rta.n .. Lt,.,lto t1ons Figure 3 14 Apr 92 SAM/LMUSFL '

H-19

SEl'IT BY : ~~DE Et'iG I NEER I NG 11-17-94 03:43PM 2105222946~ 17 6399 102 ~ 1

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plant SwRI uses vessel "as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticipated scanning and coverage. These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is determined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements. The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts". As a function of weld typet device usedt scan directiont beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined to assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this information, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit,

~ '1Crement interval, units, and counts per unit are dctennined and documented in the SwRI Scan Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the mwu scan and increment, start and stop counts that were perfonned. After completion of the examination, the Data .Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. IL is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment, start, and stop positions are then

tabulated for each examination performed. The coverage obtained must be determined for each examination perfonned on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device co*nts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan development. The computer scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions. The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square inch~s for the area defined by the points selected. The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage. This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to list the percent coverage for each angle and directiont then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction~ (CW, CCWt UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for either the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction. Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise, the maximum volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the sono and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%.

This reporting method has since been refined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld.

At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations performed by the computer were not

written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible. However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the necessary data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS 002900 29-RCN-1240 45 cw 19.20 % 6 LIMITED DUE TO OUTLET NOZZLE 60 CW 19.20 % INTERGAL EXTENSION

@22-DEG 0 cw 19.20 %

50/70 cw 6.40 %

COMBINED 25.60 %

45 ccw 19.20 %

60 ccw 19.20 %

0 CCW 19.20 %

50/70 ccw 6.40 %

COMBINED 25.60 %

10 TOWARD 96.66 % 6 LIMITED AREAS DUE TO 45 .IO WARD 93.68 % GEOMETRIC SHADOWING 50/70 cw 25.00 %

50/70 CCW 25.00 %

COMBINED 96.66 %

~ No Covero.ge Tro.nsverse froM Vessel \Jo.ll

~ No Covero.ge 45 deg froM Nozzle Bore

~ No Covero.ge 10 deg froM Nozzle Bore So.leM Unit 2 II Wtl*' l~:~!~"":a ,.,,.,,

Figure 6 16 Apr 9~ I SAM/LMNSOL.JTI H-22

ENT B"i: NDE ENG I NEER I t~G 11-17-94 03:43PM 2105222946..,, 1 7 6399 102 !:; 1

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plan, SwRI uses vessel "as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticipated scanning and coverage. These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is determined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements. The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts". As a function of weld type, device used, scan direction, beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined to assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this infonnation, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit,

~ 11crement interval, units, and counts per unit are determined and documented in the SwRI Scan Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the ~ scan and increment, start and stop counts that were performed. After completion of the examination; the Data Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. TL is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment, start, and stop positions are then

tabulated for each examination performed. The coverage obtained must be determined for each examination perfonned on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device counts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan development. The comput.er scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions. The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square inch~s for the area defined by the points selected. The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage. This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to list the percent coverage for each angle and direction, then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction, (CW, CCW, UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for ejther the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction. Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise, the maximum volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the sono and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%.

This reporting method has since been refined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld.

At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations performed by the computer were not

written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible. However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the necessary data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS 003200 29-RCN-1230 45 cw 19.20 % 6 LIMITED DUE TO INTEGRAL OUTLET NOZZLE 60 cw 19.20 % EXTENSION

@ 158-DEG 0 cw 19.20 %

50170 cw .6.40 %

COMBINED 25.60 %

45 ccw 19.20 %

60 ccw 19.20 %

0 ccw 19.20 %

50170 ccw 6.40 o/o COMBINED 25.60 %

10 TOWARD 96.66 o/o 6 LIMITED AREAS DUE TO 45 TOWARD 93.68 % GEOMETRIC SHADOWING 50170 cw 25.00 %

50170 ccw 25.00 o/o COMBINED 96.66 o/o

c .*

~ No Covero.ge Tro.nsverse fror1 Vessel \.Jo.ll

~ No Covero.ge 45 deg fror1 Nozzle Bore

~ No Covero.ge 10 deg fror1 Nozzle Bore Sa.leM Un;t 2 :

L.UCl*'t I~::'* 'tO ,.,.,.,1 Figure 6 16 Apr '?2 I SAM/LMNSOUT 1 H-22

5El'lT B\': l'lDE ENG I NEER I l~G 11-17-94 03:43PM 2105222946-? 17 6399 102 j:I 1

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plan. SwRI uses vessel 11 as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticiQated scanning and coverage. These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is determined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements. The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts". As a function of weld type. device used, scan direction, beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined to assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this infonnation, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit,

~ '1Crement interval, units, and counts per unit are determined and documented in the SwRI Scan Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the ~ scan and increment, start and stop counts that were perfonned. After completion of the examination, the Data Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. IL is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment. start, and stop positions are then tabulated for each examination performed. The* coverage obtained must be determined for each examination performed on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device counts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan development. The comput.er scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions. The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square inch~s for the area defined by the points selected. The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage. This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to list the percent coverage for each angle and direction, then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction, (CW, CCW. UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for either the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction. Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise. the maximum volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the sono and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%.

This reporting method has since been re.fined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld.

At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations pelformed by the computer were not written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible. However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the nccessazy data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS 003300 29-RCN-1220 45 cw 19.20 % 6 LIMITED DUE TO INTEGRAL OUTLET NOZZLE so. cw 19.20 % EXTENSION

@ 203-DEG 0 cw 19.20 %

50170 cw 6.40 %

COMBINED 25.60 %

45 ccw 19.20 %

60 ccw 19.20 %

0 ccw 19.20 %

50170 ccw 6.40 %

COMBINED 25.60 %

10 TOWARD 96.66 % 6 LIMITED AREAS DUE TO 45 TOWARD 93.68 % GEOMETRIC SHADOWING 50170 cw 25.00 %

50170 ccw 25.00 %

COMBINED 96.66 %

c:*

~ No Covero.ge Tro.nsverse froM Vessel wo.ll

~ No Covero.ge 45 deg froM Nozzle Bore

~ No Covero.ge 10 deg froM Nozzle Bore SClleM Unit 2 I Figure 6 16 Apr 92 SAM/LMNSOUTI H-22

SENT ff)': MDE ENG I NEER I I'm 11-17-94 03:43PM 2105222946~ 17 6399 102 I=! 1

Salem Unit 2 1992 RPV Ultrasonic Examination Computation of Estimated Coverage During development of the Automated Scan Plan, SwRI uses vessel "as built" drawings to generate Scan Path Sketches which depict the extent of anticipated scanning and coverage. These Sketches are drawn using a computer assisted drawing (CAD) program. At the time of initial planning, the required volume to be examined is determined based on ASME Section XI IWB-2500 Examination Figures/Requirements. The actual vessel dimensions such as thickness, weld length, weld crown width, etc. are converted from inches to device readout "counts". As a function of weld type, device used, scan direction, beam direction and other parameters, the counts may represent inches or degrees from a given reference point. Also, the scan and increment offsets for each examination angle must be determined to assure the required coverage will be obtained.

From this infonnation, the planned increment and scan axis parameters for upper limit, lower limit,

~ '1Crement interval, units, and counts per unit are dctcnnined and documented in the SwRI Scan

.Plan under Examination Parameters.

When automated scanning commences, the operator inputs the planned parameters into the computers which control the mechanical movements of the device. The operator also documents the .a&1lW. scan and increment, start and stop counts that were performed. After completion of the examination, the Data .Analyst will document the device counts for scan and increment positions to verify that data exists for the area actually scanned. It is from the final, actual device readout counts for which data exists that coverage obtained is calculated.

The actual device readout counts for scan increment, start, and stop positions are then

tabulated for each examination performed. The coverage obtained must be determined for each examination performed on that particular volume. When the Limitations Report is developed, the device counts are then converted back into the units (inches or degrees) used for scan plan development. The computer scan path sketches used for the initial scan plan development are then used to plot the beam angles and beam directions. The CAD system allows the operator to select points from a cross-sectional view to automatically calculate square inch~s for the area defined by the points selected. The length of the volume will then be multiplied by the area in square inches to calculate volume in cubic inches. The volume examined is then divided by the volume required to be examined and the result reported as percent of coverage. This calculation is performed for all beam angles and beam directions for each weld examined.

The percent of coverage for an examination area. that is comprised of different volumes being examined by several angles and directions can be reported many different ways. At the time of the Salem Unit 2 automated examinations, the chosen method of reporting limitations was to list the percent coverage for each angle and direction, then show the combined coverage as a function beam direction, (CW, CCW, UP, and DOWN). The combined coverage was determined by adding the 50/70 (near-surface) percent coverage from a given direction to the highest percent coverage for either the 45 or 60 degree from the same beam direction. Because the 50170 search unit is applied only for the inner 25% of "t", the maximum coverage that can be obtained with the 50170 is 25%. Likewise, the maxin1Um volume for which the 45 and 60 degree can be credited is 75%. The coverage obtained with the 50170 and the angle beams combined is therefore 100%.

This reporting method has since been refined and enhanced to reflect the average coverage of all examination angles and beam directions used for a given weld.

At the time of the Salem Unit 2 Report, calculations performed by the computer were not

written or recorded as hardcopy information, therefore, an exact duplication of those calculations may not be possible. However, the SwRI EDAS Exam and Review Records, which contain the necessary data for computation of coverage, are on file and can be retrieved at any time.

EXAMINATION COVERAGE TABLES

SUMMARY

EXAM AREA BEAM BEAM PERCENT FIGURE NUMBER WELD NO. ANGLE DIR. COVERAGE NUMBER REMARKS 003600 29;..RCN-121 0 45 cw 19.20 % 6 LIMITED DUE TO INTEGRAL OUTLET NOZZLE 60 cw 19.20 % EXTENSION

cw

@338-DEG 0 19.20 o/o 50/70 cw 6.40 %

COMBINED 25.60 o/o 45 ccw 19.20 %

60 ccw 19.20 %

0 ccw 19.20 %

50/70 ccw 6.40 o/o COMBINED 25.60 %

10 TOWARD 96.66 % 6 LIMITED AREAS DUE TO 45 TOWARD 93.68 o/o GEOMETRIC SHADOWING 50/70 cw 25.00 %

50/70 ccw 25.00 o/o COMBINED 96.66 o/o

- '~*

( .

No Covero.ge Tro.nsverse froM Vessel W'o.ll No Covero.ge 45 deg froM Nozzle Bore No Covero.ge 10 deg froM Nozzle Bore Sa.leM Unit 2 :

IJU'U*'t Hoz:ZI* 'tO .,-.911 Figure 6 16 ~*;;:-**9? l SAM/LMNSOUi!

H-22

1

.t:-

N I

... ...- .. ?IC....nlf.*.,....-

DK*

~- _._ _ ,. _ _ _ , , . , . _

., * - . . . . ""1Sa. IQ~

tOllfllll' .. te.M . . . & M:fZf" ...... ~

~181(1--~.-~

ml.~~.

d Citl9f(J . . . . . . . . lll3Qml 11~.____.

-~,. . . . . . . . . . l:JICUO a ';!!-_,

,I w II'> II'>

I z"'

(!) I-x ....<D <""

a:

CL u ~

z

i;

... (LI j~

q u? ,_

.... o

(

-a"" I "' \ ... un encnooo1 x

PSE&G LIMITATION REPORT

.ECT: 17 - '239 9 UNIT: SALEM lJ,..., ,,- ?-

! SYSTEM: WELD NO.: ?..1.v--f?c-1:1;}0 -18 c -:r Prepared By: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date: 7 '""'0 1/ 9Lt SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A=

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al)

Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 ;2.3. 63

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Branch Connection =A 0

3. Compute Branch Connection Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 o*

. &ompute Vol. Not Covered Main Run =B 0

5. Compute Main Run Limitation Percentage (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 0 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C <).:8,35

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (CI Vt2) x 100 = Z3 90,00

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (DI Vt2) x 100 = Z4 qo.oc C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) I4 = L

2. Compute Total Coverage 100- L 55k

f/ b f'. or1 l .~U:1. rw L2l o H ).1ou 1 ( \

-~J9/-0£C/* -:icJ*S'l.t ...1-rv11.,oo;::; YOt./(l;.'(_J bb£."'J -LI -C ..Liu1; i ..1.;;n{}.::;-

(""l;:J.)/1'1".J OiJ"ZJ"iJM~? ).0 ti ~:ii?,!l:J =~

/

('IQ /.L.::J;J I I NO/

H,NV~1 I I

/

PSE&G LIMITATION REPORT i PROJECT: / 7 - (...,39 9 UNIT:

I SYSTEM: f2E.BC'TOIC C'oot...tWT WELD NO.: "2.7.5-t<C-12.10 ~ /6C- '"5 I Prepared By: V1 Clo({ l'vtotrTO~ Date: 9 /VO a/ 94 SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A=

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al)

Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 t-:il.2.b

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Branch Connection = A 0

3. Compute Branch Connection Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 0

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Main Run = B 10,81

5. Compute Main Run Limitation Percentage (BI Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C 111, 03

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C I Vt2) x 100 = Z3 ~3. 84-

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D 111. 03

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D /Vt2) x 100 = Z4 <33 ,81j-C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 =L 44, 16 -

2. Compute Total Coverage 100 - L s5_g5°£ EMARKS:

S1lt-f-I C'f.JIT ~ I 7-t..37'7 RE1-1cnxr. CocL!JrJT :.!7.,_"i"-RC-/ :<.to /l3c-3 V1c-n:>({ M-oic:-ro,.J :::n:r. 8r.JoV 9tf Fo~ LtHnn7lo,..J MA*r--1 {<!uµ flr<'t="ft NoT C-o Vti"tcO) cw/ccw

\ I

/

/ \ I

\ I

(

\ I

\

I

\ I

\ I I

REVIEWED & ACCEPTED FACTORY .MUTUAL ENGi NG A OCIATION

::: () I -C- * '

R.r-n c-1~1.:.

.' I I I . <

CooLA**J-r

-.; I/ - (~:::; '11

-;;_7,5 _ ~c - I ~.i.,1 :! I B.::. -- .::

*I

) I..,~ 1 ., - . c . I () II 1

CIC r::. ~(::"Tnr-.l _LL l. .. c_: _'.J:Jv -, ...., /

I

/

P,REA Nol cavn::rti

(:°(Zo n f1 ~ 1 r-1 R lJ I* I I

I I

I

/ I

/ \

I

\ I

\ I I

I

\

\ I

\ I I

CoNNEC'llON I

\ I

~i------*-*-.1..*--*-----*-""'" ./

PSE&G LIMITATION REPORT I PROJECT: j (- b39 9 UNIT:

, SYSTEM: f?eeCTOg Ccc.<-e..n- WELD NO.: 21S-Rc-/';1..I0-113c-Lt 1 Prepared By: \.f 1 c:>c,-c Mo~~ Date: 7 IVC L/ 9f SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A=

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al)

Percentage Of Coverage

! VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS I A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld)

Ii i 1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 I ;B. \9 I 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Branch Connection =A 0 I.ompute Branch Connection Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 ~ Z1 0

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Main Run = B 0

5. Compute Main Run Limitation Percentage (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 0 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 ?lt. 'l5

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C ~3.03

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C I Vt2) x 100 = Z3 94.97

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D ::23.03

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D /Vt2) x 100 = Z4 94. 97 C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 =L

2. Compute Total Coverage 100- L 52.SI

.......RKS:

b'10o

Ar<EA f>J07' cavfNU!D CVJ/c.ew

$f}t..£r1 UNIT ;l.. /7,639~

f<Ft1C7~ Cnor..t1rrr ;n~-RC-/;/../O - 6C.'f VrCTo<<. Mo~Totl *111 7 NCJV 9'!

Pore LrM rTAllD rJ.S O/'J '-'/*

o=nCoC\00

Project: r1 - ~~'D :l-LIMITATION REPORT j Weld No.:

SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined {Length x Width - A) A* see. Sl-'i!Tc::l-1 Area Of Limitation (Length x Width* Al) Al- - ~

Percentage of Coverage {A - Al/ A) - -:: : ;: . b 7 VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel .....1 - - - - - - Example - - - - * ... Transverse

Obstruction a

~ - Area of no examination

l. Compute Area ax 1

Asq t--11 A

2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total)

3. Compute Area Not Covered - a

41. Multiply *a* by Weld Length

VI {Volume Limited)

5. Percentage of Coverage - (Vt - VI/Vt)

NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld .

l Preparedby* \/, c-i-ort H o<Z.To ~ Reviewedby*~~~t.A.~-e~*_l:.~~~~-- .

~ .* .

Date: bftff'l. 93 Level:_..:m;-=-_ _ _ Date: IP~ 93 Level:_:l._1_ 1_ __

p I

ExAltUA.I/.

10.!..

z.

I I i'JAc::c::esoS' R-15'-e.

I foe PH'f5 *en- ....

I I

. I I I

. . ! ,L -

SALEM UNIT :i_ _,,t.___ - *- - - - -

_ _ _ _ _ _ J,I REACTof( COOLANT fLJMP:2:Lf>ml' L/3 I REF. /Jllm l(c. I I 0/3 0

°l r,. I o II *J,f/ tu. tt(J ..J3)}

'C' fl7 tlUldc_c dWflJ ).NV100"J ~O..J.J'l7!J

---*------ _ _ _ _ - - -- - ---**-/ 7: llNfl WT/tJ(_;

"r-~r- -

1

,(

1 I *S .J..."'., . . . 'ii "2' ri s~ \4 I I I '

I I 1-t:1:::i1sk.ttd ~o;;J I I I I SJ"'l S\:jSS-.a?:::>\.f 1"'1 I I I 3?lnl:>nltl c:;

1~4dns dWnd

.**~-

QO't:/..52 Y. Z,./ CJ// 'J.(j tutt(J 'J3)/

~ 97 ttWd-zC' dWflr/ J. N "/1007 )J0..1JV7>J

---- - - - - - - -- - - - -... / 7:: l!Nfl WTl'r;I<;;

.- - - - --- - - ~-( "i. .

r""r-- I I 1 I c:;; -1.rl iO L-1 SJ "2J C1 S -'1 ill i-4 I I I I -,-tj ~ I S' A-f1 d "2l Gd I I I I '31"7~SS~==1? \:IN I I I 3?Jnl:>n(ll ':>

l~N<1ns dWnd

~---------------L~IM~l~T~A_T_IO~N~R_E_PO__;R~T--------------------_____;

Project: 17 - S-!:J-C::, ?- Unit:

System: Re~ CooL~'I Pu!"\ P Weld No.: ;2./-PMP- Lu5s I,i .ZI +3 I SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width - A)

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width- Al) Al- - -<

Percentage of Coverage (A - Al/ A) - =bl VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel --~1----- Example. -----1~~ Transverse ObstructJoa a

~ - Area of no examination I. Compute Area ax I

Asq

2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length - Vt (Volume Total)

3. Compute Area Not Covered - a

1. Multiply *a* by Weld Length - VI (Volume Limited)

5. Percentage of Coverage * (Vt - VI/Vt)

NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld.

Preparedby* Vi cl"ba:. Ho ~"TZ>,j Reviewedby:_*~...£..-1..:~:::::=:::::::__ __

Date: b ae~ 9 3 Level: ..:LJE Date: <o A£(Z. 9 3 --111 Level:--=-====-==:....._-

Pa e I of

ExAlnllJ/.

PLJmP suP~~r . Jo!..

z.

S~UCTU~E IN AC:::C:E.S.SA1S 1.F-.

I I I Fo~ PHYS*CA '-

I 1 H 1£ A-'!SL>I':~ Mll!rJT S. I I I

. I I I

.5ALEM UNIT :l.

~! ,.~ - - - - - - -

_ J ... I REACTO~ COOLANT fU/r1P;} I Pm!' Lt3 I REr. IJ111'1 kc. /Io !":] 3

25(360

'7 <ii 0 I 1 'J.fl l;U/I(/ '.13)}

~ fl7 tl'Wc:I 1--edWfld J.N"/1007 ~O..J.Jl/7Y

- - - - - - -- - ____,(.. / ~ ltNn W37'r/<;

'. - - - - - - - - . - - - - --- - - - -,"'I i. .

r-r- I .

1 I '5...l..t"'lil"4 -.i~ciS..\it3~ I I I I I I I I

-,-'tJ;) *st+'d ~~ I I ill.,9tl S'S iP ?:;;i-\j t"' I 3'?1nlJfl21.L c;;

fOI

ll!Ndns dWnd 7;01 '!IVIWJ/X.1 (11fl1WV'K1

ExAlnlN/.

101-z.

, ..., 1'lec:.ce.s.SA-~t..e I (.;,(Z. P'dy SI t:. A,_ I I Mc£ A--5 LJ~CI! t-'\,.:"1T.S I I

I

.SALEM

. I I

,L - -

UNIT l. /~--- - -- - - - -

_J_ I REACTO~ COOLANr fUMP;2. / PHJI> L/3 3 R£r. /J11n1 Re. I I() 13 >

04/26/95

SALEM NUCLEAR PO. STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

= -----

275030 2-CVCT-2 SHELL TO 2 C-A C1.20 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 71% OF THE NONE LOWER HEAD CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO SUPPORT

LEG PLATE INTERFERENCE. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

275040 2-CVCT-2VS-1 &2 VESSEL 2 C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 89% OF THE NONE SUPPORT CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO A PERMANENT I-BEAM VESSEL SUPPORT INTERFERENCE.

275050 2-CVCT-2VS-3&4- VESSEL 2 C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 89% OF THE NONE SUPPORT CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE SUPPORT LEG INTERFERENCE.

275060 2-CVCT-2VS-5&6 VESSEL 2 C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 89% OF THE NONE SUPPORT CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE SUPPORT LEG INTERFERENCE.

Page 1

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#: RR~1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

====== -========== ----- -- - -------

275070 2-CVCT-2VS-7&8 VESSEL 2 C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PD 89% OF THE NONE SUPPORT CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE SUPPORT LEG INTERFERENCE.

275230 2-RCF-1 UPPER HEAD TO 2 C-A C1.20 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UD 50% OF THE NONE FLANGE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE WELD AND FLANGE CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH.

1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

275358 2-RHE-1VS-1&2 VESSEL 2 C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PD 0% OF THE CODE NONE SUPPORT REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE EXAM AREA PRECLUDES A PERSON FROM PERFORMING AN ADEQUATE PT WITHOUT AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF LIMITATIONS.

275359 2-RHE-5VS-1 &2 VESSEL 2 C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PD 0% OF THE CODE NONE SUPPORT REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE EXAM AREA PRECLUDES A PERSON FROM PERFORMING AN ADEQUATE PT WITHOUT AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF LIMITATIONS.

Page 2

I 04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#: RR~1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

==== ---

275360 2-RHE-9VS-1 &2 VESSEL 2 C-C C3.10 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE SUPPORT REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PHYSICAL LOCATION OF THE EXAM AREA PRECLUDES A PERSON FROM PERFORMING AN ADEQUATE PT WITHOUT AN INORDINATE NUMBER OF LIMITATIONS.

275365 21-RHRHEX-1 FLANGE TO 2 C-A C1.10 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 79% OF THE NONE SHELL CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO FLANGE AND NOZZLE CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH.

1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

275370 21-RHRHEX-2 SHELL TO 2 C-A C1.10 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 20% OF THE NONE FLANGE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FLANGE, NOZZLE AND SUPPORT PLATE CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1),

FOR LIMITATION.

275400 21-RHRHEX-OUT NOZZLE-TO-SHE 2 C-B C2.21 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 45% OF THE NONE LL WELD CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE PT NOZZLE CONFIGURATION AND AS WELDED CONDITION. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

Page 3

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE o/o OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

- ===- -- - -

330040 14-BF-2241-2PS-2 PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

SUPPORT WELD IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

330360 14-BF-2231-6PL-1 PIPE LUG 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU4 REQUIRED AREA, WELD IS WITHIN A PIPING ENCAPSULATION AND IS INACCESSIBLE.

330400 14-BF-2231-9PS PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, NO EXAM DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY. PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

330540 14-BF-2231-17PS PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT EXAM LIMITED TO 50% CODE COVERAGE, DUE NONE S-22 TO PROXIMITY OF A PERMANENT PIPE RESTRAINT.

Page 4

04/26/95

SALEM NUCLEAR P O . STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

- -======= ---- ----- --

330560 14-BF-2231-18PS PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT EXAM LIMITED TO 50% CODE COVERAGE, NONE DUE TO PROXIMITY OF A PERMANENT PIPE COLLAR.

330660 14-BF-2221-3PS-2 PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, NO EXAM DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY. SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

330860 14-BF-2221-14PS PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, NO EXAM DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY CAUSED BY A PIPE RESTRAINT OBSTRUCTION.

330930 14-BF-2211-2 PIPE TO ELBOW 2 C-F-2 C5.51 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT & MT) 84% OF THE NONE MT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A PERMANENT SUPPORT COLUMN LUG. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

Page 5

04/26/95

SALEM NUCLEAR P O . STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, ExAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 330950 14-BF-2211-3PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

330955 16-BF-2211-3PL-9 LUGS 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE THRU12 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

331095 14-BF-2211 TRUNNIONS 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 80% OF THE NONE CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE TRUNNION BEING OBSTRUCTED BY A PERMANENT PIPE SUPPORT MEMBER. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

331160 14-BF-2211-14PS PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY CAUSED BY A PIPE RESTRAINT OBSTRUCTION.

Page 6

04/26/95

SALEM NUCLEAR P . R STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#: RR~1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, ExAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 380140 34-MS-2241-3 PIPE TO VALVE 2 C-F-2 C5.51 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 85% OF THE NONE 24MS167 CODE REQ. VOL. ON THE LONG SEAM MT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS WELD, DUE TO NOZ.

CONFIG. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMIT.

NOTE: THE LONG SEAM WAS NOT LOCATABLE. THE LIMITATION WAS CALCULATED AS WORST CASE.

381010 32-MS-2241-1 PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

381020 32-MS-2241-1PS-2 PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE R-210 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE WELD IS PHYSICALLY OBSTRUCTED BY SUPPORTS 1-PS-3 THROUGH 1-PS-12.

381070 34-MS-2241-242P PIPE LUG 242 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 71% OF THE NONE L CODE REQUIRED AREA ON LUG #2, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY (PERMANENT BEAM OBSTRUCTION).

Page 7

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#: RR~1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

=====*===:!:--===== ----===- !'=====!=====----- -- -

381110 32-MS-2231-1PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT -2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

381210 32-MS-2221-1PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

381310 32-MS-2211-1 PS-1 PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBLITY.

PIPE SUPPORT IS LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

381530 30-MS-2241-8PL-1 PIPE LUG 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE

&2 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBLITY.

THE PIPE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A FLOOR PENETRATION SLEEVE.

Page 8

04/26/95

SALEM NUCLEAR P O I STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST#: RR-C1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 381695 30-MS-2231-8PL-1 PIPE LUG 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE

&2 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE PIPE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A FLOOR PENETRATION SLEEVE.

381920 30-MS-2221-7PL-1 PIPE LUG 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE

&2 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE PIPE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A FLOOR PENETRATION SLEEVE.

382120 30-MS-2211-8PL-1 PIPE LUG 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE

&2 REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE PIPE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A FLOOR PENETRATION SLEEVE.

384755 6-MS-2231-14PS PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, WELD IS WITHIN A PIPING ENCAPSULATION AND IS INACCESSIBLE.

Page 9

04/26/95 SALEM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 384850 6-MS-2231-21 PS PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 MT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (MT) 0% OF THE CODE NONE REQUIRED AREA, WELD IS WITHIN A PIPING ENCAPSULATION AND IS INACCESSIBLE.

500010 12-PR-2201-1 CAP TO PIPE 2 C-F-1 C5.11 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 78% OF THE NONE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO PIPE SUPPORT AND CAP CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

501800 14-RH-2212-1 VALVE 2RH2 TO 2 C-F-1 C5.11 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 87% OF THE NONE PIPE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO VALVE PT CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1),

FOR COVERAGE PLOT. (UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) 570010 14-SJ-2224-1 VALVE 22SJ44 2 C-F-1 C5.11 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 75% OF THE NONE TO ELBOW CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO VALVE PT CONFIGURATION. SEE ATIACH. #1 (RR-C1),

FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

Page 10

04/26/95

SALEM NUCLEAR PO. STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEFREQUEST#: RR~1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE % OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, EXAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS

======t=======-======*======== ==='===-:::!:-====== ==- =-=F==-=-

573055 12-RH-2252-5PL-1 PIPE LUG 2 C-C C3.20 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 33% OF THE NONE THRU6 CODE REQUIRED AREA, NO EXAM ON LUG NOS. 2, 3, 4, AND 5 DUE TO INACCESSIBILITY.

THE LUGS ARE LOCATED INSIDE A PIPING PENETRATION SLEEVE.

573380 12-RH-2252-38 PIPE TO PIPE 2 C-F-1 C5.11 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 67% OF THE NONE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO A WELDED PLUG & PROXIMITY OF ADJACENT PIPING.

SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR LIMITATION.

(UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) 573383 12-RH-2252-38PS- PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 71% OF THE NONE 1&2 CODE REQUIRED AREA OF 38PS-1, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF A PERMANENT SUPPORT.

573387 12-RH-2252-38PS- PIPE SUPPORT 2 C-C C3.20 PT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (PT) 71% OF THE NONE 3 CODE REQUIRED AREA, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF ADJACENT PIPING.

Page 11

04/26/95

SALEM NUCLEAR P . R STATION, UNIT 2 2ND INSPECTION INTERVAL RELIEF REQUEST #: RR-C1

SUMMARY

COMPONENT COMPONENT CODE CODE CODE CODE o/o OF COMPLETED CODE REQUIRED ALTERNATE NO. ID DESCRIPTION CLASS CAT. ITEM REQ. EXAMINATIONS, REQUIRING RELIEF, ExAM

NOE WITH LIMITATION DESCRIPTIONS 707130 4-CV-2257-1 FLANGE TO PIPE *2 C-F-1 C5.21 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 86% OF THE NONE PT CODE REQUIRED VOLUME, DUE TO THE FLANGE AND VALVE CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

(UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2) 707730 3-CV-2257-7 VALVE 2CV82 TO 2 C-F-1 C5.21 UT LIMITATION: EXAMINED (UT) 80% OF THE NONE PIPE CODE REQUIRED VOLUME COVERAGE, DUE PT TO THE VALVE CONFIGURATION. SEE ATTACH. #1 (RR-C1), FOR COVERAGE PLOT.

(UT ANGLE VERIFICATION PERFORMED 2/1/2)

Page 12

LIMITATION REPORT ]

Projeet: \-z - s~o:i Unit: $ai..er-i UN ,-r 2--

System: C:. V- C. 1)4.,J JJ.... Weld No.: ;2.-cvCl-::t SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length xWidth *A) A* tJ \ ~

Area or Limitation (Length xWidth *Al)

Percentage or Coverage (A - Al/ A)

VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS

~t----- Example _____..,.,. Transverse Parallel ...

Obstructk>D

a

~

Area or no examination

l. Compute Area ax 1

Asq .t$

2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) !'SS: 65:

3. Compute Area Not Covered

a *bS

~- Multiply "'a* by Weld Length - VI (Volume Limited) 53.oo

5. Percentage of Covet"age * (Vt - VI/Vt) 7l.3Cf NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld.

V~~b

Date: S- e-e~ ~ 3 Level: l LL Reviewedby*

Date: S&cc '13 Level: -11 I Pa e I of I

* (' .*

~

PROJECT No:

SwRI STRAIGHT BEAM LAMINATION EXAMINATION RECORD DATE: (DAY - MONTH - YEAR! TIME: lZ4 HR CLOCK! SHEET No SITE: Salem Generating Station, 5502 Unit2 03 /) fR,, 93 EXAM STARTED 1 L.\ *s G 180,0lO EXAM ENDED /'ii.~

EXAMINATION AREA lSYST /COMP! (LINE/SUBASSEMBL YI (IDENTIFICATION I L 0 LOCATION - W0 LOCATION CV C T/fNk. ~ - c.\J C./ ci 1= op MA NWAY r/::. WF-LD EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE CALIBRATION '7 MEASURED THICKNESS CROWN HEIGHT ATTENUATION WELD TYPE (-FLOW--)

SHEET(SI ">~0 I II L. Vt£-..L...J) JI No S fl M -;) - V T l-] 'j UP CL DOWN

/t(.. UP DOWN s Hf!/...J-. - /..OWi°! p..,

1-1r=-~D REV6 I lJ "b' 0 I Q -,_:J

.. 37 /\I ~

EXAMINER SNT LEVEL

l i' ~'I CROWN WIDTH WELD LENGTH fVj, COTTEtJ Lr CHGO ICN ~ @NIA 11-('i{ol/ 5 ,,

Ye;? *1 A d-?) 5 ,~

~ IND POSITION I POSITION POSITION POSITION Z SEARCH IND LOSS AMP REMARKS INITIAL Of % UNIT No L1 W1 Wz MP L W1 Wz MP L W1 Wz MP Lz W1 Wz MP LOC B.W. F.S.

SHt:J.l..

/JC R ~( ~() F< DI. .8L £. "t:fJ DI c"JI}'~ I <J, l!..s

~ "L-U I\~

.. 11 I I

r'"lr-'t I *, '* .,

rr ,-,

I'**~ 1 If' ' l'W*

1 I '\.\. s;4-

""-*--'f*

DJ\l'E t-l/)-v ~-"

-- 1- -

u;. .-e~-:.

INSPECTION SERVICE:$

Hev~;j{):%t~

N.D.E. SUPER~ISOR REMARKS I LIMITATIONS, IF NONE SO STATE: II J\J~ E V4 M FRO tV\ :1 q \1~ l<"* ll :J.

~

1 \

1~

IJ J

r=RtJM qq') TO J /:lY~? FROM LId 11 TO l '?? 1J~ F P.. oM :l w r: \>'lI T {~ Q. .~* 5(' '/,.

I DUF... re S ve_P n.K_/ L ff.. fl, £!..LJ~T£ ,S 7:- .._,..1

"' .J

"' J

s p f:. *""(,- f,. V 8 J .. 5.S -,r S. 'J- -

I oOgR .-z,)

\) c: \\#~

REVIEWED BY:\I ... SNT LEVEi DATE PAGE

) / 1I ~ftf>R q3 l OF l SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-18 (REV. 6/90)

Sw. R. I. EXAMINATION

SUMMARY

RECORD PROJECT No.: SITE: SHEET No.:

Salem Generating 17-3373 Station, Unit 2 27.5230 EXAMINATION AREA ( SYSTF.M /COMPONENT) (LINE/ SUBASSEMBLY) (IDENTIFICATION)

/l~4CTo/Z ~,,../;7,u//'lLn£1Z. 2-/2C/: I EXAMINATION INDICATIONS RESOLUTION /l&d - ,Ct::.4/J~ ..~

EXAMINATION EXAMINER EXAM RECORD RECORD CNF No. REMARKS TYPE SHEET No. INITIALS DATE N I G 0 SHEET No.

INITIAL v EXAMINATION /vf-J Py"/:l/11'7{[)/f./ C / ,4,,</6./L T FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION * <:::'/ /J4C ///~ ~ ~ ; !'r.7//C::- /.t:.

INITIAL PTO EXAMINATION

,,,,,-;...,,,... . I / : / 6 / ,/ /;:.?4 /""/I"?~ ,(/C> ~

MTO FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION d--r-T <O/c/1///ELO -<///#"': ;;;:- /e/~ r{-1 T

u 0° LAM SCAN

/~'l'!K7t lh',4/G 14}~ t>< I

{?,,d.£"/6 r//C:/~//0/i.J 0° WELD SCAN ' *. ...,,*oe::::::,c:)/ f?a7c? /d:>o n//1/-?c/

~ .j?

45° SCAN

//~,-q' lf14£ ~~;: IX Wm/9 /. L/'/ ~--??/

{j

~A .a ./'14/ ,,(_.//~ f7 45° T SCAN I //n/YJ.-:;; d/1"1

~

~h;0i IX I/ I G0° SCAN G0° T SCAN

( t~ 00 II ~O>t'l:l.. 1lllJN. 'ERV ICES Reviev edaoo ~DDlllVeif v/o£K' n/PneP':..8A-~5Z-=1147 j/j,

.......- -* b1.o/,

I/

vvo~ lhvvn llcT4 SUMMARIZED BY'h,...--

- .L/7 _/?/ h?~

.& DATE 4/~/Yr-J CONTINUED ON SHEET No.:

J/d I FORM NO. SWRI 17-30 (REV 1-29 I , I /

PAGE

-Z75Z30 OF/

Sw. R. I. STRAIGHT BEAM LAMINATION EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No. SITE: DATE:( DAY - MON. -YR.) TIME* ( 24 - HR. CLOCK I SHEET No.

Salem Generating I 1800~JG SHEET STARTED I;>, '2..1";)

17-3373 Station, Unit 2 :i r,, 1-1 PR c1l'-i SHEET ENDED I I :o... ""r)

EXAMINATION AREA:( SYSTEM /COMPONENT I (LINE /SUBASSEMBLY) (IDENTIFICATION) Lo LOCATION W LOCATION 0

~ r:-1=1rlrJR cont..r-1 NT r:1LTEl2 ,:/-Ac/= - I rf.: Or Nciz.zLE 4= cF WE.LD EXAMINER: SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE CALIBRATION MEASURED CROWN HEIGHT ATTENUATION WELD TYPE (-FLOW--)

SHEET (S) THICKNESS

.t)_RoBG-RDS :.Ti. UP ct DOWN

]/

'/ '/.,

UP DOWN tiE~/) _,,. rl-Jl.A'GE N af),1<(2/Jf?J.r -z....5ooz5 llcno EXAMINER: SNT LEVEL ~£)4f:i~

CROWN 1 WIDTH "'/ WELD LENGTH H/R, 7( Jfo ro 111 IA/, DIC ?121(1.1/

O/o IND

-l~

REV 0 (J.'7 ,Jc)

REMARKS 4--3 '% /r,,

POSITION I POSIT ION POSITION POSITION 2 SEARCH

~p IND LOSS UNIT No. OF INI.

BW .§. L1 W1 W2 MP L W1 W2 MP L W1 W2 MP L2 W1 W2 MP LOCATION "1'0 C:-.N-\IA C(I..) \- L'\"' ""1C., L:$' -~1"11.-

No g,, t:C.D1 l'\DA~ i:Lt: (~~ DIC. :\-Tl C. A)0 HEl-ILJ

"" D..Je: 'TO Li>nl 1\::'/f.:.(1jeA rto-t_I. fo..u?

I )~

/

K- .z_7 ,_ 0 111r~r !-:.LA,, IQF I

v --- - --

1__...,-

,..,,/

OPS~

ll ... u1 ._v I IV 1-. ,,u... 1 . v Review,jffld APf~'~ed

/,JZ::::14 /* I/'? 0 N.D.E. SUPER\ ISOR A

REMARKS:

£ tf./-1M&'~*/::; ,?'/?OCV\ .,,G = 4/ '50.,. c. ro 2 ;c

._ ~-d (o /7 ; l.

~ -: 2 2: 1'-~ ,q.3 l ..,:?~.

EXAMINATION AREA LIMllATIONS: !IF NONE, SO STATE): \

j.hr#l.--

/{(') r::: XA m Ot-i F J..A NG E f)u E TO CO/'/ F' I G i) Rn T/i:_) N.

REVIEWED BY: SNT LEVEL* DATE R~a. ;j'. ~~?Ar p: ~~ /(//(. Yu PAGE I OF /

FORM No Sw.R I. NDTR 17-111 (REV.7-31-75)

LIMITATION REPORT

,2753~5 Project: f 7 - ~~o d-- Unit: S'f'rJ.-M 1 zrv r1 ;L System: f?,ES!DQfrL t+ireT el£,Mp\,/,4L Weld No.: 21-RH~ - H-ex - I SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) A- -""-1-.l...,_Ia...__

Area or Limitation (~ngth xWidth- Al)

Percentage of Coverage (A - Al/ A)

VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel--~...---- Example -----1... ~ Transverse ct>sttuctlon

a

~ - Area of no examination I. Compute Area ax l

Asq 1-1 If\

2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length - Vt (Volume Total) I \b.O

3. Compute Area Not Covered - a f.4-.0

'4. Multiply *a* by Weld Length - VI (Volume Limited) N lPi

5. Percentage of Coverage - (Vt - VI/Vt) 79.3 NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendiculu to the weld.

Preparedby* \/, C\"'<Z No=..J Revlewedby* \./.i., ~

Date: 1-.:s ~ 9 3 Level:-='=':::::L:____ Date: \3ftfR q 3 Level: _j_j]_

Pa e of (

SwRI PRESSURE VESSEL EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No:

SITE: Salem Generating Statio~ DATE: IDAY - MONTH - YEAR! TIME: 124 HR CLOCK!

.-E-XA_M_S-TA-RT-ED_/_0_/_0-t SHEET No 10 5 00 8 17-5502 Unit2 ) ;:). -- It p R. -73 EXAM ENDED JJ / 5 EXAMINATION AREA (SYST /COMP! (LINE/SUBASSEMBL YI (IDENTIFICATION) L 0 LOCATION IW 0 LOCATION l?ESJOuf1L HEATRE:/VloVAL -:J./- R /-II~ -HEX J 'I=.. op INL~T f.)Oi!:*/:Lc \AJ EL.D 'f::

EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE ~ CALIBRATION ANGLE 0 o WELD TYPE EXAM SURFACE SHEETISI TEMP 'F L . V) L LA ff No S fl M 'J - L' T 3 o USED FL!tN(}E/ SHE LL BEFORE AFTER 1------------+----1 SNT LEVEL CHG o REV o WELD LENGTH EXAMINER J'-(707'f SCA~ING Ir ~NIA dB 73_ J. 11 M. CoT/EtJ INDICATION No.

I IMAX S OF DAC J CJ. 5 I 1-/

1cN SEARCH UNIT ANGLE o" I SEARCH UNIT LOCATION 5/IELL I0 110 INSIDE EXAMINATION SURFACE OUTSIDE l2$J ZOS DAC 50S DAC IOOS DAC >100 DAC W MAX >100 DAC IOOS DAC 50S DAC ZOS DAC L l/Z MAX 112 MAX MEASUREMENTS t----.--+~-r--t-~-..---+--~--t--~~+---r--t----..----t~--T--+--r--t REMARKS INITIAL

w. MP Wt MP W1 MP Wz MP w MP Wz MP W1 MP Wz MP Wz MP 20'.1 LI

,, 1£"

~

50S Lt '!~}/, /.5 1.)

'I IOOS L1 l MAX I

II LJi' I /3 /.If l'l'f? 1-~ I ';J /.C:,5 lOOS Lz II 50S Lz Lf 7~

II I :r~ 1.5

-- 1--.J ANI I r~:~VIEW ZOS Lz Ne E.X/1M FL,1NG E SJDE DLE 70 fL.11A.'/}-E CiJ1VFI~ u.Z.,/77/<J"-

Ui11t ,1fl<Jl.cr

, I

_,

L POS L POS l POS N.0£ SUPERVISOR L POS I

REVIEWED BY\ ' ,. '\

\J J f.,

I

'fVVV\ ~

I SNT LEVEL * ~

lJ DA TE I:;l ~,Z. q:3 CONTINUED ON SHEET I OS"oo 'i PAGE

~;)_OF~ef-SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-105 IREV. 6/901 °'* f' S E'i- (f VS :J -SS *-TS. r_ c - 00 8'6

I LIMITATION REPORT Weld No.: 2r -RHR-HtEK- 2=

SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A)

Area Of Limitation (Length xWidth-Al)

Percentage of Coverage (A - All A)

VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel -~.---- Example -----1*~ Transverse Ob sttuc:tJon

a

~ - Area of no examination

l. Compute Area ax l

Asq

2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) 117

3. Compute Area Not Covered

a

'i. Multiply *a* by Weld Length - Vt (Volume Limited)

5. Percentage of Coverage * (Vt - VI/Vt)

~

NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld .

Preparedby* \J, cm.z MoR.'TD~

Date: 13 A-Pl< 93 TiT Level:"'--'_ _ _ _ Date: l~~cc:: 93 Level: __t 1_ 1_ __

Pae of

_ _v

~

PROJECT No:

SwRI PRESSURE VESSEL EXAMINATION RECORD DA TE: (DAY - MONTH - YEAR I SITE: Salem Generating Station, TIME: IZ4 HR CLOCK) SHEET No 17-5502 Unit2

'd !1FF.. qJ EXAM STARTED I 0 :}. ~

105004 EXAMINATION AREA ISYST/COMPI fl ES l.J) \l'J)J., HEhr /?EMO'JRL.

ILINE/SUBASSEMBLYI

JI *-~*HR -H EJ..

(IDENTIFICATION)

~

EXAM ENDED L°l.OC/ON i/30

C'iV/-e_

f /IJ0"2-Z /--e IWO LOCATION WEt..D 1:_

EXAMINER L..

EXAMINER VI/.... Lf/

SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE -¥*

a SNT LEVEL, No S/1 M cl - v REV o T".:io CALIBRATION SHEETISI

. 1Lj70"?'-f ANGLE USED SCA~ING

'{-rr o

'-LS 0 0 WELD TYPE 5A..e.

WELD LENGTH

<</JFh-AJ~.e EXAM SURFACE TEMP *F BEFORE

)

AFTER CHG C M- T.7 7J'.c1 '-1 '-f 117 lj h 73~

coTTEtJ I ID

/c/-1/u/ dB I

ICN !mNIA INDICATION No. MAX J Of DAC SEARCH UNIT ANGLE 0° tf~

SEARCH UNIT LOCVN oiV w-R/,

~ .,,,

( e It INSIDE EXAMINATION SURFACE OUTSIDE "lit

(

ZOJ DAC 50J DAC IOOJ DAC >100 DAC W MAX >100 DAC IOOJ DAC 50J DAC ZOJ DAC L l/Z MAX l/Z MAX MEASUREMENTS REMARKS INITIAL W1 MP W1 MP W1 MP Wz MP w MP Wz MP W1 MP Wz MP Wz MP ZOJ Li Jl* .? /'- .e. (_ 01 . J). I/~~ I/ IV' le dt 0.-V* 0° o,v wQ/J kAe /; -;iJ 50J L1 Jl;c ~.e_ l 0 ,,...l JLJ f4 J ;;c1 *

/.~

I I-

/LJ' :1' rs - ('. wh. £J a Nwe!l /c!ie//

-:;/_.)

!vd c'. . 4- VJo*, ~-< >Lei 100'.I L1 IM_i ' 0

//) v ""'"-el () ,._,,., I/) t./-t; o rJ ?)

L MAX

/\ i\11 I

-l""'t-~t1r:1~1 IOOJ Lz 1::1 1 :~ ..?:.?~~#!~

50J Lz

"V..*-**-~..JI..

I;;,.*

INSPECTION SERVICES ZO'.I Lz

/J D ~ If.,[r.

v .I ff .:... /)

I

) ,___, ~ i~ ~ .£.. -o~ /) ~

_/*

- b- I-

~~

Rev~l~~'1w, ";ZJ

--r.. ~- ' ,

~A -- ~ 't.

~.

I L POS

/1J ') ~~x.~ ~ /11 11 vi 6 It I~ ?.. +-. A/I' ){, I) :z_ lo.< Cl/I 0

~ I

~ N.D.! SUPERVISOR --r-...)

L POS

~l I I "" l::::J 0 6.r II cJ, ~ f,; .,.

~

1it - lfl * -.Z....'"2 1-..e. I

-;z....J t;i_{ /{-fz I) v ~ , (',,.,.. s 'f'di_

L POS L POS lb () 1:."vt:t

- ~

~~ .tf 7 I/ ,...

~

I 7f '/ I? tt I l.) I '.>' J~ ..e_. I . ~

I' I

~ ~.

--;2../...)

REVIEWED BVv. ..~ l SNT LEVEL .7J'L DATE CONTINUED ON SHEET PAGE

\-:I" v.

)

'~ /3 RPR93 1.1/tt- I OF I SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-105 IREV. 6/901 .. -oo

~75 37()

PROJECT: fl- f,399 UNIT: s A t.....r:: r--; (,' ...) I, :>..

SYSTEM: RQ"10t..*,qt... li@-rR.etto*"fU. WELD NO.: RH R 1-1 E.x - a !.. " I Prepared By: V, c.To<< M oRTO t;:> Date:

SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A=

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al)

Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 Stte1.1.. !:roe

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered.l.JflsB'ea111 =A 7.~4 S rltU.. '-

3. Compute-Upstream Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 J...J:i-zz<..E s.o~

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered-Gc;iwRstFeam =B Nc.:*z.z.c...r::.

5. Conipute Downstream Limitation Percentage (B /Vt1) x 100 = Z2 q,50 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 ?.'1.4~

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C ";?..b .. ~4

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (CI Vt2) x 100 = Z3 q1, 04

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D ').i..'84

5. Compu~e CCW Limitation Percentage (DI Vt2) x 100 = Z4 '(1.04 C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L SIJ..SI/.

2. Compute Total Coverage 100- L us.4t.%

REMARKS: **.*:.**

~~,v---------- - '

~ ' \

/ I \

I \

I

\

A~E"A Nor coV~ll..r!D F"Ro*f't' SH tr Lt. SID.

\

5f!Lcrl Ul-JtT 2. I 7, {. 3'/'l 11,e-s101>At. HE'"' REMovAL Hc1tr c7'a<A,J#~lt..

'2.. l - ~H~HE")( CIVT V\c.ToR. Mo,..To,.!1 nI 8 wo\J 'Ill fo p;, co VE. ~ fi 'J o rJL y

'l..1S li()O

LIMITATION REPORT

- Project: 17 - s.s-o;s System: F="eeDwA-TER Weld No.: tLI -Bt=- ;2..A-1 J - 6 SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) A* 130.7 Area Of Limitation (Length xWidth-Al) Al* ?.O- b Percentage of Coverage (A - Al/ A) - '84 .3 VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel -~~--- Example_ ----*~ Transverse a,struc:tlon a

~ - Area of no examination

l. Compute Area a x I - Asq .92

2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) qO.'/f/.

3. Compute Area Not Covered - a *c, :z.

41. Multiply *a* by Weld Length - VI (Volume Limited) b -4't

5. Percentage of Coverage - (Vt - VI/Vt) '3Ll-3 NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld .

Preparedl>y* \}, "-"'.c MDoCTt>.:I Revlewedby* v-& << ~ J >

Date: c;l.. icK>R q:3 1=-___ Date: ~ ee.<' 93 Level:_.TO:..i.:::: Level: 7tT Pa e I of I

~ SwRI ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: Saliem Generattng . s .

talion, DATE: IDAY - MONTH - YEAR) TIME: 124 HR CLOCK) SHEET No 17-5502 Unit2 31 IVJ AR 'l 3 EXAM ST ART ED I '-I 3 ':-1 860077 EXAMINATION AREA ISYST /COMP)

FEED W/tTER (LINE/SUBASSEMBLY I 1 'f-8F - ;;i~ II (IDENTIFICATION)

~

EXAM ENDED L 0 LOCATION I

!l/5<6 I WO LOCATION c/=. o F W F-LD EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE

CALIBRATION ANGLE 0 0 WELD TYPE EXAM SURFACE N vs~.ss-1.s.:r:-e-008~ SHEETISJ TEMP *F L. VJJ....Lfi .a 05AM;;!-UT3 REV~

USED 45 NJ PIPE. I 151..BOW BEFORE AFTER EXAMINER SITT LEVEL CHG o I 'f /OL{ .t.f ( /~ WELD (ENGTH M-COTTclJ Ir ICN l3J NIA SC!ffilNG dB 5'1- ~-

'1 'I 'J.{ ~~ ((0

~ OF W MAX L ' L L2 SEARCH SEARCH DAMPS IND REMARKS INITIAL DAC MAX UNIT UNIT (IF YES. EXPLAIN)

No MAX w MP 20~ SOJ IOOJ l/Z MAX l/Z MAX IOOJ SOJ ZOJ Loe ANGLE DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC I 5~ I ylf (.~;5 /If~ I lf Y.1-f 'I.ff 7tlJ DN 45° No t-)

N< RE C..Of .J)jtfj ~ l;,t:.jVL; lcA. ~10/J S" UP '-I 50 "2- )

"~'

n1'41 I I(!*,,,, .. \f

,_ n- -

1.::-,,

'IN/T/,~LXl.stt. I., I INSPECTION SERVICES

- Reviewed and Aoomved I DA TE J . I I;~

II . . 'If) I/) '1'?.g, I N fl i:"" '"VI~* II I

rQ D.1.2.C.. L.a. B.1%. S r A/1.lt:!.l N !:- /.., u r.;.

11 REMARKS I LIMITATIONS. IF NONE so STATE: Ala /;,.XbM£Al8.Lf.at./. FB.oM J.0 11 112 i,7

~/-=~

REVIEWED BY:v , SNT LEVEL DATE CONTINUED ON SHEET PAGE Je :IlL ~ ~te ?3 1r1/11- l OF L SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-86 IREV. Z/931

Project: \I - S-S-o?- Unit:

Weld No.:

.s AL-£ M IH-BF-#l uN , ,

-t<[JJJ IV ID TVS 1

l I

SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) A* _7_._S'_ _

Area or Limitation (Length xWidth-Al) Al*_/_.5" _ __

Percentage or Coverage (A - Al/ A) * '80 VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel _.,.~--- Example _ _ _ _..,_ Transverse Obstruction a

~

Area or no examination

l. Compute Area ax l

Asq

2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total)

3. Compute Area Not Covered

a

'4. Multiply *a* by Weld Length - VI (Volume Limited)

S. Percentage of Coverage * (Vt - VI/Vt)

NOTE: Compute in asimilar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld.

Preparedby* V ~ie N ot?.lo~

Reviewedby*_\L_(;__{l,f:a 1~

Date: /')... ee<<.. 9 0 1 Level: _...__LL1-__ _ _ Date: 12 /tiff'( 93 Level: 7JT Pa e I of I 33/0'?S-

~

PROJECT No:

SwRI MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION RECORD SHEET No.:

SITE: Salem Generating Station, DATE: IDA Y - MONTH - YEAR I TIME 124 HR. CLOCK) 17-5502 EXAM STARTED: l'J'l07 Unit2

/ 2. AP(( 93 EXAM ENDED: 0 ?.2..'-f 1.2001G EXAMINATION AREA: (SYSTICOMP) LINEISUBASSEMBL Y: IDENTIFICATION: L 0 LOCATION: W0 LOCATION: ,..

f d SI .:J../ /. / ""'

f(,E0cJA7rK i'f - P. F -1211 TRuNN JorJ5 ~ /YJ n , ,,..; /< u rJ EXAMINER: SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE V :U.. 55 15.Ll *co l"iJ SURFACE FINISH: WELD TYPE (--FLOW-I YOKE SPACING: 'I IN No Snrr.2 -n1 Tl - f:l s* r ./F[OC 0 F !Uf T YOKE BRAND: f f:lt?k'~R_

uJ * /fftr..U/{/ N 5" JI REV / MATERIAL EXAMINER: SNT LEVEL BRAND: OE TE k WET D DRY IKJ SERIAL No.: f O /

CHG i tJ. 6 'Ii.Er<.. r.. r ICN IXJ NIA BATCH No.: 7g o I

l (; v_ FLOURESCENT D SURFACE TEMP

/

N_.- -- .** . . . . ,F CALIBRATION BLOCK DISTANCE FROM CALIBRATION VERIFICATION TYPE: (Y'l P LU - 'f Iv NO~ D

~A MIXED YES SERIAL No. : / BLACK LIGHT B 7ol 9 <? D TIME: o8Yl Ill~ TO SENSOR COLOR:i£t.LO c.v MIXED WITH NL14 WEIGHT://. 3 INITIALS: ~ VJ~

... ~

CELL Nff1 IN BLACK LIGHT OUTPUT VERIF IC.A TION

-- MATERIAL DUSTING [ZJ

~- ~- x~~u~

APPLICATION:

BRAND: t':! TIME:

"'1.--- ---- FLOODING D f\ I~ SPRAYING D S No.: A pw/cm A IND No. w LOCATION ROUND OR SIZE DIA. REMARKS: INITIALS L OR LENGTH LINEAR

~o A t CoA.J. li8{£. /NO t '-;:rt I'/(.) ' v5 i£ PrtC.S.S I.( "1..L

~ll~~:F>tr-.i IV*

l~,r ~~

(

v/ ---'\\ .Vin: - -

\\ "s v

\ r<'

-..-.~

I -

~ "'16~ti::..'

I

-::-:--i IN~PI= ~ON SERVI

s \

Jj "

-. \.'

.. ft

-* *~*:=;**

i Revi

~~~~z ~h3 1*~ //,)

li*l1.

I

_--~-:J71ih Z\

A~..- I~

ND.t SUPERVISOI

" - -,/_;/

/

nr.1

~-

I l'f--9f-J.211 i...------~------- ---

W~LD 7 EXAMINATION AREA LIMITATION: (IF NONE. SO STATE) i..ol'lG 1'( i.'.' v-F wC:-1.-ij C.-t'\NNO\ 13E /!V~l'i:cTEAJ I) IA£:_. lo C.ONftGi.-'~J4.j /::J /0 ,

I /;).. r.-PK 93 I

'2-REVIEWED BY: V.. 1Vr;J' -'\

,Je I

SNT LEVEL ~

-~

DATE PAGE

/OF /

SWRJ FORM No. NDTR 17-12 IREV. 6/90) - 0

PSE&G LIMITATION REPORT I PROJECT: IJ - b 3 9 9 UNIT: Se-LeM , "'"' *T :Z.

SYSTEM: MA IN $IE"A M WELD NO.: '3ir 1:1 s - :.2.2. 4 I - 3<~ SE-A~

Prepared By: \/i cToR Mc~ot.:) Date:

SURFACE EXAMINATIONS 1-Jco (!.1U;.u1~tr.O Area To Be Examined (length xJAliath =A) A= $$,7S f.)cT (!~&.." ,a,l!Q Area Of Limitation (Length x.Wietttr= Al) Al= 7 *SO ..~o({SI t:Hs£ Sfls1.s)

Percentage Of Coverage (A-Al /A)= 85, 7 / z*

VOLUMETRIC ExAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel-To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream =A

3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream =B

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage * (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C /Vt2) x 100 = Z3

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D /Vt2) x 100 = Z4 v C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1+Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 =L f..J~A

2. Compute Total Coverage 1oo - L *-. 85. 7 I k EMARKS: if Tifl.S If &s". 7tk OF 77ft! 5'..1arnt:.£ l't-l!&li N1teet=5stt~f ro tlt:Hlt!'t/E.

Joo% oF~ Rr;.61t.J1H{) (lowm (a::u..cut.RTEQ o,J 8- Worc-rr ~Its- Be.s':) . : *-

~

~PROJECT No:

s<601Lta SwRI MAGNETIC PARTICLE EXAMINATION RECORD SITE: Salem Generating Station, DATE: IDAY - MONTH - YEARI TIME 1241 HR. CLOCK) SHEET No.:

17-6399 Unit 2 EXAM STARTED: O'iJ4 EXAM ENDED: o CJ O

'=}

'1 J2004n 14 NOV '1 IJ.

EXAMINATION AREA: ISYST /COMP) LINE/SUBASSEMBLY: IDENTIFICATION: L 0 LOCATION: W0 LOCATION:

/VJ h J N S' T E /.+ IV\ f34 -M,_" *- rl- ::J. LI i 3+-*" I if; or WE lJJ EXAMINER: SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE SURFACE FINISH: WELD TYPE 1--FLOW-I YOKE SPACING: G> I/~ IN No .SAM ;;i - MT/ P-RQ UN.T> fl!'£~ VAJ.. VE. YOKE BRAND:Mnfl.Ntu::~IJk W

ANC.ELL ..IL EXAMINER: SNT LEVEL REV I CHG I

'* BRAND:/Vlff6?lVAFL. uX MATERIAL WET D DRY J&l SERIAL No.: 4 3 580

)vt . . Go TTEI I .XT ICN ~NIA BATCH No.: ~SiTa '-11$ FLOURESCENT D SURF ACE TEMP * 'F CALIBRATION BLOCK CALIBRATION VER IF ICATION DISTANCE FROM SERIAL No.: BLACK LIGHT TYPE: DR..Y PoWDF-R... MIXED NOD YES D THERMOMETER N/A J3 70/9'3 Jl{ TIME: 01)47 o<J/O F, SERIAL No.:

TO SENSOR COLOR: I C~/J y MIXED WITH WEIGHT: I/ .,3 L8.S INITIALS: tvA tv)/ 'Vflt_ CELL IV/A IN MATERIAL BLACK LIGHT INTENSITY METER BLACK LIGHT OUTPUT BLACK LIGHT OUTPUT VERIFICATION APPLICATION:

DUSTING l&J TIME: D BRAND: BRAND: FLOODING N/11 N/11 N/fi tJ --

SERIAL No.: SERIAL No.: µw/cm 2 INITIALS: -- /I SPRAYING D IND No. L w LOCATION ROUND OR LINEAR SIZE DIA.

OR LENGTH

REMARKS: INITIALS N,.., REC.OR I~ A.RLF ~ Nf)/r.A/ /oN-S w,11

'

VS ::l

S" .:. . T ~. 7 Z *- o O '7 0 R ~ I.I. n r1 toil

~~ E.XAl'11NF.n ::lY:7T ."=?rnn° AROON!J PIPE FoR... &Vii-

-7:N r£R.S£"c.T1 /\/fl.. LaNCITUDLNti {. WELD otJ wH REVIEW *D &Alii.;c1 I t;U tv!f i:A.r.T DRY MUTUI L n~i ,__ ~r. VP s TR EA/VJ C:JDE ~ U/ll/j8t.E ro DfZ T£1?MltJE.

E'~I~ 1~G ~-soc AllUl't IN SPECTIONSI RV ICES d )t\!\..~ ~ ~VICE

' "" ~ ,-*-**-rm,;~

lft *-~ *

LoN/?...1 ruD1 "'~ t \Al 15 l n Lo c*ATUJ tJ /.ud1_

'~"".

"'" I 'l JA \ Ill '"l

"-... " " C&A I SE l\ISP.

l 1 ~l'C N.D:E. SUPER~ SOlf EXAMINATION AREA LIMITATION: llF NONE. SO STATEI EX"/JM-l..lM~TlE./J -ro*i/(3WFR<:1M 5 TO/~ /7NIJ ~!1.zW FR.Of"\ 'ZS"'l~ TO Jo 3 D u £ TO NO 2: Z "- E co"'/::/.@. URhTION (,I.I 11-II . II REVIEWED BY:Vv ~

'.,).~

f't _JI A

., r -

SNT LEVEL ~

/// ID/1~ NOV 9if PAGE

_f_oF_}__

SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17- IZ IREV. 6/90)

LIMITATION REPORT

- Project: / 7 - 55b :Z. Unit:

Weld No.: 1~- PR-.:u.01 - r SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (Length x Width* A) A* 79. 00 Area or Limitation (Length xWidth *Al) Al* /7. 00 Percentage of Coverage (A - Al/ A)

VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS Parallel -~i----- ~ Transverse Example_ - - - - -...

Obstruction

a

~ .* Area or no examination

1. Compute Area ax l

Asq .40

2. Multiply Asq by Weld Length

Vt (Volume Total) /$", '80

3. Compute Area Not Covered

a *40

4. Multiply *a* by Weld Length

VI (Volume Limited) 3.40

5. Percentage of Coverage * (Vt - VI/Vt) 7~.lf~

NOTE: Compute in a similar manner for indications perpendicular to the weld.

-~~ Preparedby* \J\ ~ Hort""il),J ltevlewedby* \L ;:, ffjj Date: 7 '4P~ 9 3 Level: 7/C Date: 7~ 93 Level:___;"';..:::;'='=----

Pa e of -

~ SwRI LIQUID PENETRANT EXAMINATION RECORD DATE: IDAY ~ MONTH - YEARI PROJECT No:

17-5502 SITE: Salem Generating Station, W0 LOCATION

.i:_ Of- W~C-.P SHEET Ni 1014.4 Unit2 C Afr"/ 73 EXAMINATION AR£A ISYST /COMPI ILINE/SUBASSEMBLYI llDENT IFICATION I L0 LOCATION WELD TYPE:(--FLow--)

p P-E s;s u * £-e-~fl.-

I "/- - p /Z- -~~O{ I s*IA WI oeJ C-t\P -ro PrPt=-

EXAMINi<

fl- e;_ t.-1 E.. F Kur!z_

SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE V51J..S:5-(S;?*Z*-a:7~ ' SURFACE TEMP "F

a: - No S"AM-;2.. - ?T-1 '/ C/

I PENE;NTcfEMP "F A£ Ti-ERMOMETER SERIAL NUMBER

~ f,L.._.,/2... T 17.S-REV 2.

EXAMINER 'ff; SNT LEVEL CHG I SURFACE FINISH j WELD LENGTH

rltttn ti ICN 8n7A ()i_r()/J.,,, r/u. c;h 3 C/ Yz..

PRE CLEANER PENETRANT REMOVER DEVELOPER BRAND BRAND BRAND BRAND 7!?0rC!f-6r 5 (10 TC ff73:/~. 5 l?O 'IC /TcIC 4 Pl? /C ~,K:.

TYPE c;/cc,,,.. -J..rF TYPE

.-;* JC. L - ff-F/5 TYPE

~~-./fr TYPE

'7):::. D -/VF BATCH No o/'/],.u o I fc. BATCH No

"?Cf~ 0'3'7 BATCH No q~{TD/t:=-

BATCH No q/J-A-CJIP CLEANING TIME APPLIED (Cf-~£" REMOVAL TIME APPLIED

/5'&(

COMPLETED

!Lf:3o TIME REMOVED I 7'-4.q' COMPLETED rtf-..!JF TIME READ IS--0 t/

LOCATION TYPE SIZE INDICATION L w IF OR DOWN ROUND OR DIAMETER OR REMARKS INITIAL No STREAM .LINEAR LENGTH

/VI} I '} ~ L/'~ .I!.. ~OA/?~,.*-

k"' llY -!/, /~A'

- r I F I

,./') Iv'~

ff.

, ... .. ,. - OPSfMJ INSPJ:f'Tlf'll\J c-r:n'"".-~

Hl\11

-~*

I I\,_*'***"' -

1~.*rnr.1 \,. ~

Reviewed f P(/fPmyA/

DATE Jf '""it. lr'V"fl((IJ N.D.E. SUPERVISO I I I I I EXAMINATION AREA LIMITATION - IF NONE, so STATE I t

/10 ex11m from/.-.-/~~/ TO itlfl/"lln4 /--2(~ r(j3/~ "/Jue 1b J'fe 5""'"fftJrT. ;rr

~!'

REVIEWED BY:v

SNT LEVEL DATE CONTINUED ON SHEET PAGE

v. (. '\

'-1 ll 7 rrt'IC 93 1-irt I OF I SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-11 IREV. 6/90) 500 Of 0

.. _...:J.-~~

SwRI ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: S-'

wem Generattng . statio~ . DATE: !DAY - MONTH - YEAR) TIME: (24 HR CLOCK) SHEET No 17-5502 Unit2 /I frff2.. {

b l- ~

(

'J EXAM STARTED /

EXAM ENDED

':) 0 8 6 0l 0 5 EXAMINATION AREA (SYST /COMP) (LINE/SUBASSEMBLY) !IDENTIFICATION) W0 LOCATION ff2.~57Vi2.t£:F-(Z.. /<15.u eF ?- -p t2- - 7- ::i-o / 1 ~OF lLAS.0l EXAMINER SNT LEVEL PROCEDURE -V ~ ~. ~5 -15;: ALIBRATION ANGLE LD TYPE EXAM SURF ACE

(/fl. f2f:_ No ~ ~ ("YI -?- U T "°3> SHEET IS I USED n TEMP *F C.../+-P ( 0 r~'ff~ BEFORE AFTER

~E-X-AM-IN_E_RF,__~,-'-~~~~~~~SNT=:::.L~E~~L~REV~ 7 5"- SC~ING CHG O I lf- 7 0

~ AV/Y ( I ICN ffiWA dB IND ' OF W MAX L 1 L L2 SEARCH SEARCH DAMPS REMARKS INITIAL No B~~ 1--w~-M-P--+-2-o,~-s-o,~-,o-o,--...11-z-MA-1X MAX 11z MAX 100' so' 20' UNIT UNIT !IF YES, EXPLAIN)

LOC ANGLE DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC DAC C:.-Atv /3E ~ EEIY

/'f T F- f/-.C'Yf ITT~l'f TLY 3 (0 ANI SNT LEVEL ~ . DATE Q CONTINUED ON SHEET

~ ll . *7 A-f'te ,3 NA I OF I SWRI FORM No. NDTR 17-86 IREV. Z/93)

.... PROJECT:

SYSTEM:

f l - 6399

£1?S10UA1.. Hc::.A-r C<et'10111H-UNIT:

WELD NO.: 14-RH- 2.~12. - I Prepared By: Vic.Toa.. Mc~~ Date:

SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A=

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width= Al)

Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 3l-3b

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream =A 0

3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1

=B (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 0 0

0 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 /.{2. b9

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW = C /0 l 31.f

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (CI Vt2) x 100 = Z3 ?..Li .i~

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW = D 10 I 34-

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D / Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1+Z2+Z3+Z4)/4 =L /1... II

2. Compute Total Coverage 100 - L

REMARKS:

UP

'/flLVE:

___J~~...,_.__-

s Ft i...e M c_, t.J 1 -,- ?. r7 - t:. 3 17 r<<=s10u1=t1- H&l1T 1<anovt7-'-

11~ - R 1-1 -. ;i.;;i_; ;z - I V1 c:-rv"- Motz.To r-J m-. 9 t-io v q4 FO ri: L 1,_.,, rA-n o i-J....s o ~J '-Y**

50l'6(K:)

'PROJECT: . .(. . 7-L---_.b""-'3=--.....9_,_'f_ _ __ UNIT: S A-L-e 1-1 ur-.> L I :2-s:s- ~ 11/111(itf SYSTEM: ~5\l)LlAL. Hes' Rettovsc.... WELD NO.: 14-~ - :ZA:l.4 - (

Prepared By: V' CTI::>.'Z Mo <t*oh) Date: /LI- /JOI/ 9'3 SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width= A) A=

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al) Al=

Percentage Of Coverage (A-Al '-'-/A-"--)=

___ ~.1.-----

VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 'l. 91

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream =A 0

3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage (A/Vt1) x 100 = 21 0

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream =B 0

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (B /Vt1) x 100 = Z2 0 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C / Vt2) x 100 = Z3 50-00

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D I Vt2) x 100 = Z4 50.,QQ C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) I 4 =L ~5.oO

2. Compute Total Coverage 100 - L -,5%

.REMARKS:

)

s1oa\D

ARE:A NOT cov~~eD cw/ccw SALEM UN 11 :J.. / 7- b.3'7 '1 r<.r:.s101.;nL- f/E11-r Rt:rtovlJt...

I tr SJ' - ;;._;:i..;i..4 - I V1 CTooz Ho tc?:TO t-J 'Ill.- I l.j NOV 9 lf ro~ L1M 1"11'111 OrJ.S Ot.J Ly, S10D\D L

.PROJECT: n- b399 UNIT:

SYSTEM: WELD NO.: 17- RH -~?..S"d. -38 Date: 15" IV ov 9w SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width= A) A=

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al)

Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream = A

3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage (A/Vt1) x 100 = Z1

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream =B

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (B I Vt1) x 100 = Z2 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 '?-?..- l::t]

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C /.-;)..~

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C I Vt2) x 100 = Z3 3'?.*3~

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D -, ~ "-8

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D I Vt2) x 100 = Z4 3?..-39 C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 = L

2. Compute Total Coverage 100 - L EMARKS:

~'*

SwRI ULTRASONIC EXAMINAT*ION RECORD PROJECT No: SITE: Salem Generating Station, DATE: IDAY - MONTH - YEARI 17-6399 Unit2 I

EXAMINATION AREA ISYST /COt.f> I lllt£/&.eASSEt.el YI llDENTIFICATIONI l 0 LOCATION W0 LOCATION cf_

EXAMltER EmDv4J...

SHT lfVB. PROCEOUU: *"Jr No -S~ m (). -ur:3 CALIBRA TloH StEETISI ANGLE USED o ' o WELD TYPE

£1-EXAM SlJlf ACE TE..., 'F

~EXAM--~ltE~R-a.u..:.~:..L.a."-l-----------1-SHT~*Ir=~~VEl.---l~~1. /Jf 710/o E BEFORE AFTER ICN liJ NIA l I l z SEARaf SEARCH lt-V DMf>S REMARKS INITIAL No ..........IOO~J~5.,,...0J,.........=zo,.,,.J-t lt-4IT i-1/-Z-MAX lt-4IT (IF YES, EXPLAIN!

OAC DAC DAC DAC LOC ANGLE UP/

/Dt(

SNT LEVEL *-rr-;-- DATE PAGE

/r / _ I[) NOV 9 I OF I SWRI FORM No. N>TR 17-88 IREV. Z/931

-.-. PROJECT: * / / -

SYSTEM:

'239 (HEl'11Cd(.

7 v"'-""e Co,..rrtto(..

UNIT:

WELD NO.:

SeLeH Ut? rT :2...

4- cv - :Z.'2!,- 7 -/

Prepared By: \h ~"T"OIC. \Y o4tToN Date: I NO\( ( 9f.f(f SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width = A) A=

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al)

Percentage Of Coverage VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams (Indications Parallel To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1 !L-OO

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream =A 0

3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage (A I Vt1) x 100 = Z1 0

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream =B 0

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (B I Vt1) x 1oo = Z2 0 B. Circumferential Exams (Indications Perpendicular To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2

. 2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C 1.19

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C / Vt2) x 100 = Z3

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D / Vt2) x 100 = Z4 C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitation Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 =L {'?;,lb

2. Compute Total Coverage 100 - L REMARKS:

761(6(:)

UP

. .,,*p; I

I:

FLO<...) DoiNN f t_ _ ---.1- _ _ _

5At..£/-1 Ut-J/I -;2.. /7-6399 Cl/F.111t:'f}l VOL Ut1i! COtr7tZO l.-

L> - e. v- :r2s 7 - /

Fo<< Lin 1?/?7701-lS otvt-)"-

PROJECT: i7- '23 9 9 UNIT: .$AL...e M 2....

SYSTEM: C/.lertu:BL Vowne ~c.rJTlfOL. WELD NO.: 3-cv- 2.2.S? -7 Prepared By: \ / \ CTQ<t N0~1a,..J Date: "3 l Oc.T 9y SURFACE EXAMINATIONS Area To Be Examined (length x Width= A) A=

(A-Al:;.;._:""-~=---i..._*

Area Of Limitation (Length x Width = Al)

Percentage Of Coverage _ _ __

VOLUMETRIC EXAMINATIONS A. Axial Exams {Indications Parallel To Weld)

1. Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt1

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered Upstream = A .99

3. Compute Upstream Limitation Percentage (A/Vt1)x 100 = Z1

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered Downstream =B

5. Compute Downstream Limitation Percentage (B I Vt1) x 1oo = Z2 14-41

8. Circumferential Exams "(Indications Perpendicular To Weld) 1: Compute Exam Volume (height x width x length) = Vt2 4-64

2. Compute Vol. Not Covered CW =C -JI

3. Compute CW Limitation Percentage (C I Vt2) x 100 = Z3 'b ,59

4. Compute Vol. Not Covered CCW =D -11

5. Compute CCW Limitation Percentage (D I Vt2) x 100 = Z4 f b-S"Cf C. Total Coverage

1. Compute Total Limitati9n Percentage (Z1 +Z2+Z3+Z4) / 4 =L \9,\'8

2. Compute Total Coverage 100 - L 80. <8?..

.~EMARKS:

701~0

-~'

uP I-cow

Dowt-J VALl/6. p, PE..

4-

~ :::: ArttA l'lo* covcr<c:() cw/ccw S"Al.t=t-"\ UN IT::<- l/-b3C/9

~ ::: fi~A tJ OT c::ovt=IZ/J uP/oow,.J CHE~-t 'CAL VDL-t.IHE COrJT!fOL

'3- c. v - ;l..";i._5 7 - 7 Vr t:-rol'"t. tvf 0~101..J -~ 31 OCT '14 For<. L11-1 nFJ-nDr-l CoVEtUlcjE ONL.(.

ML18101A771

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

======== ========----========--==== =====================- ======== ======== ========== -======= =========================================================== =================

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

*l.~~~-====== ===--= ==-- ====== -===-- -=I====== ========I=====

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

======t=======-======*======== ==='===-:::!:-====== ==- =-=F==-=-

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search