ML11263A139

2011/08/15 Indian Point Lr Hearing

ML11263A139
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	08/15/2011
From:	Kuntz R F Division of License Renewal
To:	Waters R M - No Known Affiliation
References
Download: ML11263A139 (13)

Text

1 Stuyvenberg, Andrew From: Kuntz, Robert Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 12:58 PM To: Waters, Roger M.

Cc: IPRenewal NPEmails Attachments:

Telecon Summary 8-3-11 nonEQ cables.docx; Telecon Summary 7-21-11 OE.docx; Telecon Summary 7-25-11 SG and MF.docx Roger, Attached are the draft telecon summaries from calls held on July 21, July 25, and August 3, 2011.

Please let me know if any corrections/changes are necessary.

Robert Kuntz Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB 1 (301) 415-3733 robert.kuntz@nrc.gov

LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-BOTAGE CABLE PROGRA FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on August 3, 2011 to discuss the applicant's letter dated July 27, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11215A128). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on the UFSAR revisions in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22. The staff was unclear if the revi sed Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as described in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22 would include event driven inspections (such as heavy rain or flooding). The applicant indicated that the periodic inspections completed as part of the Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would be determined based on operating experience. The staff indicated that Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would have to ensure that water accumulation would not submerge underground cables and that even if periodic inspections were done frequently, if there were not accomplished when the cables are most likely to be submerged then there was a potential that the cables would be exposed to an environment that they were not design to withstand. The applicant stated that it would review the s ubmittal and revise the p Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

ENCLOSURE:

List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-BOTAGE CABLE PROGRA FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on August 3, 2011 to discuss the applicant's letter dated July 27, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11215A128). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on the UFSAR revisions in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22. The staff was unclear if the revi sed Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as described in LRA Sections A.2.1.22 and A.3.1.22 would include event driven inspections (such as heavy rain or flooding). The applicant indicated that the periodic inspections completed as part of the Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would be determined based on operating experience. The staff indicated that Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program would have to ensure that water accumulation would not submerge underground cables and that even if periodic inspections were done frequently, if there were not accomplished when the cables are most likely to be submerged then there was a potential that the cables would be exposed to an environment that they were not design to withstand. The applicant stated that it would review the s ubmittal and revise the p Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

ENCLOSURE: List of Participants

cc w/encl: Listserv

DISTRIBUTION

See next page ADAMS Accession No.: *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1* PM: DLR/RPB1BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August 3, 2011

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 3, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3

DISTRIBUTION

HARD COPY: DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource

RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource

RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource

---

AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AUGUST 3, 2011

PARTICIPANTS

AFFILIATIONS

Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Re g ulator y Commission (NRC)Cliff Doutt NRC Alan Cox Enter gy Nuclear O p erations, Inc.

(Enter gy)Robert Waters Enter gy Charlie Ca p uto Enter gySteve Manzione Enter gyLou Lubrano Enter gyMike Stroud Enter gy Ro g er Rucke r Enter gy

LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 21, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 21, 2011, to discuss the applicant's response to request for additional information B.0.4-1 which was provided in a letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML11201A160). The staff questioned the applicant on why the response did not include an Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) supplement as required by Title 10 of The Code of Federal Regulations, Section 54.21(d). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and provide an UFSAR supplement as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

List of Participants

cc w/encl: Listserv

ML11215A056 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1* PM: DLR/RPB1BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey SFigueroa RKuntz DATE 08/3/2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 08/ /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August XX, 2011

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 21, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING OPERATING EXPERIENCE AT INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3

DISTRIBUTION

HARD COPY: DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource

RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource

RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource

RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource

---

AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 21, 2011

PARTICIPANTS

AFFILIATIONS

Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Re g ulator y Commission (NRC)Bo Pham NRCMatthew Homiack NRC Mike Stroud Enter gy Nuclear O p erations, Inc.

(Entergy)Alan Cox Enter gyTed Iv y Enter gy A nd y Ta y lo r Enter gyDavid Lach Enter gy Alan Ettin g e r Enter gy John Curr y Enter gy Charlie Ca p uto Enter gyPaul Bode Enter gyCharles B. Rokes Enter gy

LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 25, 2011, to discuss the applicant's letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11201A160). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on Commitment 42.

Commitment 42 contains two options for developing a plan for each unit to address the potential for cracking of the primary to secondary pressure boundary due to PWSCC of tube-to-tubesheet welds. The two options were to either perform an analysis or inspect the welds. The staff questioned the applicant on the implementation schedule for the two options. The applicant's letter proposed to do the analysis for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 several years after the implementation schedule for the inspections. The staff questioned the applicant on how the proposed implementation was acceptable since the analysis would need to be completed in order to support not completing the inspection. The staff also noted that the implementation schedule for Commitment 43 was extended 10 years for each unit from the previous letter which was dated March 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110960360). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise commitments as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

List of Participants cc w/encl: Listserv LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on July 25, 2011, to discuss the applicant's letter dated July 14, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML11201A160). Specifically, the staff questioned the applicant on Commitment 42.

Commitment 42 contains two options for developing a plan for each unit to address the potential for cracking of the primary to secondary pressure boundary due to PWSCC of tube-to-tubesheet welds. The two options were to either perform an analysis or inspect the welds. The staff questioned the applicant on the implementation schedule for the two options. The applicant's letter proposed to do the analysis for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 3 several years after the implementation schedule for the inspections. The staff questioned the applicant on how the proposed implementation was acceptable since the analysis would need to be completed in order to support not completing the inspection. The staff also noted that the implementation schedule for Commitment 43 was extended 10 years for each unit from the previous letter which was dated March 28, 2011 (ADAMS Accession No. ML110960360). The applicant stated that it would review the submittal and revise commitments as needed.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

List of Participants

cc w/encl: Listserv

DISTRIBUTION

See next page

ADAMS Accession No.: ML11215A088 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICELA:DLR/RPB1

• PM:DLR/RPB1 BC: RPB1:DLR LA: DLR/RPB1 PM:DLR/RPB1 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated August XX, 2011

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JULY 25, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., STEAM GENERATOR AGING MANAGEMENT AND METAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS FOR INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3

DISTRIBUTION

HARD COPY: DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource

RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource

RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource

RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource

---

AStuyvenberg GMeyer, RI RAuluck RConte, RI BPham JBoska DPelton DScrenci, RI OPA MKowal NSheehan, RI OPA DJackson, RI PCataldo, RI BMizuno, OGC NMcNamara, RI STurk, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell, OPA OAvegbusi, RI DMcIntyre, OPA MCatts, RI EDacus, OCA MHalter, RI

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JULY 25, 2011

PARTICIPANTS

AFFILIATIONS

Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Re g ulator y Commission (NRC)Bo Pham NRC A llen Hise r NRCRachel Vouche r NRCOn Yee NRC Alan Cox Enter gy Nuclear O p erations, Inc.

(Enter gy)Charles B. Rokes Enter gy