ML13004A256

SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 177 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 231 of 467

ML13004A256
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	11/26/2012
From:	Miktus P A Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Southern Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2267 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML13004A256 (55)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of?' ýStatus: ONO] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2H2,1E505 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description I4, I 6KV S.YITCHGER.

24.1 OCAL CONT PANEL Location:

Bla../ESEL Floor El. 155, Room, Area.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optionil bht recomnmiended)

... .-._......._._.._._.......

Insitructions for Completing Checklist This checklist inay beiused to ddcument the results Of the Seismic Walkdown ofan item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of thefollowing.

questions may:be used to record ihe results. ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space-is, provided at the end of this checklist fo- documenting other comments.Anchorage 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is thc:anchorage free ofbent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is morethaln mildsurface Oxidation?

YE NO U1 N/AE.YLE 'NO J N/At3 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?'

YEI NO01F NtACIE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant, documentation?(Note: TI-i§ question only applies if the item is one of the.50% for which an anchorage configuration veriiication is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YENO UK N/Au ED NE3 UIIA Enter the equipment class name from Appendix t3: Classes of'"Equipment.

Page 177 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2o 0170$Status: )* No U97 Lm A h4j Equipment 11N) .Q2H21E505 Equip, Class' 20 Equipment Description 4,.16kV SWITCHGEAR 2J LOCAL coNT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targeis fTee frm impan. by nearby equipment or structures? ND UiD N/AD'1)' ýAt't 0it- ili ' -"A ccit&4 t 'i k < rl I>~~(rpn.e

8. Are overhead equipment, disti bution systemsceiling tiles and lighting; Y .N-1D UD N/AD and masonry block walils ,not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid camiage?Y6ND UD N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interactipn.evaluations, is equipment free Yo- ND Ufli of potentially adverse seismic i.nteraetion effects?Other Adverse Conditions I1., Have you looked for and Ibund~no~other seismicz conditions that coild adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

DcUD U Comnments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated4 y: Ititi4iX Date: cit hI2.~j%1~?V)CJQ~4Laam- (M4dý&ta c)Aj' r7Z ,J l Page 178 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 179 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 180 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 181 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 5 status: Y[EI ND ,UQ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipmenit ID No. QC2H21-E507

.Equip; Class, 20 Equipoente Des1iption 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2L LOCAL CONT PANEL Location,:

Bl1dg.. SWIS Floor EL 188' Rooim,.Area' Manufacturer, tModel, Etc. (opjionalbkut recommended)

-____________________

Instructions forCompletingChecklist Thisacheckiist may beused.tb document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item Of 64uipmient on tih SWEL. The space below each:of the following questions may be usedlto record theresults ofjudgments and fndings. Additional space is provided at the end of this eceeklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the michorage configuiration verification.required (ieiS the item one YR NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.. Is the anchorage free.of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is theanchorage free of corrosion that is more than mildsurface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?*5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plnt documentation?(Note: :This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configurationverification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NO UEP N/AIA YO NO UM N/AO3 YO NOJ UM N/AD YEI NO UL N/AO YO NO uJ6 I Entwi fiei equipment clssna mie from Appemlix 13: Classes of Ecuipment, Page 182 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofX9 Status: YE NO U9]Seismic Walkdbwn Checklist (SWC)Equipmcnt ID No. Q2H21E507 Equip. Class, 20 _ _ _._EquipmentDescription.

446KKVSWITCHGEAR 2LLOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft.argeis frce.fromimpactbybuearby equipmentor strmuctres?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceilingtfies and lighting, and mdsbny :blopký:walls"ot likely to collapse ontb theequipiment?

9. Do lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damaage?j .01 Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmnent free bfpotentially.adverse seismic iateraction effects?Y0 NI UD N/AD3 Y1ND :: UDN/AD Y93 ND1 UD 1/Othier Adverse Conditions, 1i. Have you looked forand. found no other seismic condittions thatcoud adversely afftd6 the. Safety fnnctinsw of the eqtuipmnent?

YI NEI UD Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) cA :" e l.d v 'e O- ' '. .':.g,- n. $ ....l~ o.... , ro AC ... .... 4 ,x k EvaluatedbyýfLa.LQC2:k

5. ~ ~ ~ ~ R -tW !/ / ../tj Page 183 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 184 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Mow on, MIN im.6 imift Page 185 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 186 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 I Sh1eet i oflý 'P S.ta~tus:

~Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O2H21NBMER2619

-Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description, SG IC WIDE RANGE:LEVEL MCB ISOLA TORý .LOcation:

Bldg. AUXILIAR Y FloorE1. 121, Room, Area 2227 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recomnmended)

Intru tions for Completing Checklist This checktist may be.used to doc utent the results o' the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipmemnonithe SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to-record the results ofjudgmenls and findings, Addiitiorial space is proyided.

at the end of this checklist for doumnenting other comments.,Anchorage I, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ie., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiting such verification)?

y 0<0 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, brokený missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is...ilie anchorage:

fiee of visibi cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is o9e of the50% for which on ahchOrgo ciontigt.ration verification is required.)

YIGýf$ 13[C N/AC Yr,[r UC N/AC Y&I<NE UE] N/ACE Yg NC C N/AO the above anchorage 6valuations, is the atichorage free of Y NE tiC 6. Based on potentially adverse seismfic cotaditi ons?I Enter the equipmeion class 4alue fron Appendix B;:C!nssesof, Equtpment, Page 187 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1,0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist

($WC)EUutpJmrent UP No. 02H21NBMER2619 Eqbip. Class' 20*Equipmnt De 'cription SG xC WIDE RANGE LEVEL MCB ISOLATOR Status: ; ~ jU Interaction Effects 7.. Aird targe(s free from imipact by nearby equipment or.struchtres?

8. Are overhead equipment.

distribution systems, ceiling tiles~and lighting, ueAdm asonry block walls norlikely to coltapsei onto

9. Do at a'lbed lihds::have fiddqua~teflc ibitityto avoid dannge?10. Based on the.above seismic interaction evaluations.

i' equipment free of pot ntiallyadverse swismic interaction offeets?yk,</0 UJD NIACI YbENY' U0 N/AE)YtrNI E] u Other Conditions, 1.. Hve you looked for and.found no other scisiin conditions that moild, adversely aff ct the safety functions of the equipment?

Y lý[]U0 Comments (Additional pages may bef a'dcted as necessary)

Evaluated by: % V A~~ ;I 4 ml 1ýDte: /, Page 188 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 S NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 189 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 190 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 191 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sh*'ti o]u Status. YMI NO UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment

[D No. Q2H22L0O'ID Equip, Class' 20 Equipment Description MUL TPiPLYING RELAY CABINET 2D Location:.

Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor EL. L1 __ Room,Aa _ __ __ _....Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used .o document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item ofequipment on the.SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for docurmenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is:the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YXNO of the 50% of'SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2: Is the anchoragefree of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more tlan mild surface oxidation?

Y6 ND UD- N/AD YV NO UO N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free ofvisible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y' ND] UD N/AD)5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies i f the item.is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configumration verification is required.)

6, Based on the above anehorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yd ND UD N/AD YýNO (I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipmeat; Page 192 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Statu-s: ,Y NO E]Seismicwalkdowwn Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .QH22LH001P

-Equip.Ccassl 20 Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 20 .... .Interaction Effects 7. Are's6ft targets free frtm impact by nearby equipmenflor, structuresi?

YjN UN D N/`AO 89 Are overhead equipmentj distributiorisystemns, ceilirig tiles-and lighting, Y& NEI VO N/AO: and maso t'y block waglsnbt likely to collapse onto the e Oipment?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibiIlty to avoid damage?10. Bascd on the above seisinic interadtion evaluations, is equipment free*Ofpotenitially .adtverse seismic interaction effects?Yj6 Na Un NIAI]YEý NO] -UI Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other sciSmic'conditions that could Yg" N 0 rU]affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as itecessary)

C)Ev' 1 ated by: -<\. z t JS j 1 Date: Z ~B4 7 Page 193 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).Shees of 3 status: UR-Equipment ID No. 02H22LO03 Equip.Equipment Description TRANSFER RELAY CABI1f Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor.El.

1.00 Room,. Area 2zl'Tt Manufactuer, Model, Etc. (optional bult te'ommtended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown ofan item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the fdllowing questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

AdditionaI space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Ancboae 1, Is the anchorage configuration "ienification requred (i-e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requing such verifiaion)?

d.sL 7-I-'2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or toose hardware?3. Is the anchorage fiee of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5, Isthe anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the, item is one ofthe 50% for Which an anchorage configuration verificationis required.)

6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YM/ND UO N/AD1 GND UD1 NI/A YU/NO UD] N/AD yt, KD UD!~ntr ot'eq~ipr H ctsonamne from Appendix B3: Classes eftqujinijcmrit Page 194 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sho4 z of 3 St~ tu 1JU]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)qupn~nt D No 02H2LO03 Equip. Qlass 20 Equipm ntiD'scription TRA ISFER RELAY CABINET 2..... ... .~ ~ E Y,. , .. A ......INET.2. ......-Interaclion Effects 7 Are soft targets free frfn', impa;ct by nearby equipmencor stmictures?

8& Are ov The d8. ~qipinent, distribution systins, iling tiles and lightiing, and masOur: bloCk wallt} noi [ikelv to d6u1apse onto th e eUipinenL?

9. Do aftached lines have adequte, flexibility to avoid~dainge7 10- Based on the above seisividint ractiou:valuatns, :is equipment free ofipotentially adverse seiSie int eraction effects.Other Adverse Conditions 1i1 ,. Have you @e~d :for. an fou to othe r.emic c'ndiiorn that co.d8 adversely affe the sai'ety fuctions ofe equipment, Y17-No ULIQL yýN1 E-% 'A YýjýN[l LIE]Comments (Additional may be added as necessary)

-- .--1f~ t Uo~~2&z ,~-Page 195 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 196 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of: 'Status: YQ[_ NEI U13 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Eiquipmenet ID No. Q2H22L503 Equip. Classy! 20 Equipment Description, DIESEL LOCAL REMA YPANEL 2B.Location:

Bldg. DIESEL , Flobr El, 155 Roomn, Area 0059 Mauiufacturei, Model, Etc.:(optioiial but recomrherided)

Instructionsfor fCompleting Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWELý The spacel.belowv.

each1,of'thefol o1wing questions may be used, to recordthe results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional:ipaceis.ptbvidid atthe end bf this Liecklist for docuimentingiothefcbimemts, Anchorage 1. ,Is the anchorage configuration.verification required (i e., is the iteni one YN--NE31-L

'of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

isc V tloar S\)ý. r p )~-rio v,,snt ~b, 2. Is the anchorage free of bentbroken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is theanchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YFD NEI UN N/AE YE- NEI UZ NI/A[-4. Is the anchorage free ofvisible cracks in the concrete nearlthe anchors? YEI NE UN N/AE 5., Is the anchorageconfiguration consistentwith plantldocumentation?

YO NEil N/AE, (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which anchdrage configiratidnaerificatiibn is.required.)

A) 4 Loi~L /I fo6e1cl axAýakv.6A Based on~the above. anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially'adver:seseismiceonditious?

YO NEI UZ!SnLer the equipment class namnefroin Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 197 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2. of~z 5 StatUs: "U NE UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 02H-22L503

Equ p.Class',20 Equipment Description DIESELLOCAL RELAY PANEL-2B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets fZee from impact by arby equipment or struCtUres?

Y0 ND UD N/AO 8. Are overhead:equipment, distribution.systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE) ND D U N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9., Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[D ND UO N/AO.10. Based on the above evaluatidnr, is equipment free YZ ND UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 1.1. Hite you looked for and found no other. seismic conditions that c0-ll Y9, ND UO ad;ersely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages'may be added asnecessary)

A~ zeo fOt-yt-ý 5 ~ r4J~Y1/At~itee.

i i;fýi AirLnt*1 J4) /7 LAJf4tt ii 7 > s.,Date: ýF-24-. 12'9 j.Z\J~/' /7 Page 198 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 199 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS O NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 200 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 1:: --c -4:5:, (S Page 201 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 dSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status..Y%

EquipmentI.)No Q2H25L029 Equip. C1a!s. .. .Equip~ I~es l.ptfbn aination Cabin t: Locationi jdg, AUXILIARY Floor El, 139 Ro0im Areaa 2318

.Etc. (optional bht con ded) ....___ ... ...

for Completing Checklist Thiis eh ckist may b:useto docurnenthe results of the Seismic WV ikdown o ii itemo. equipment on ihe SWEL FThe -pac; beow cliv of the follow-ino gqstions mn- yeuse to cordwthe *eselto of jdgment nd findings:.

Additional space is prqvid.ed atthe end of this c feckli'tfor documenting'other comments, Anchorae: L is'th'e anchorage configu raiionv erification required (i.e., is theitem one of tihe 50% of SWEL isis isrtiirin Such Verification)?

2. Isthean ho, zage ireof bent, brokem looe haildwlre?

I. is le anchoraggefreeofcorrosion thatlsm mre..th6ri mild surface o iseývion?4. 1 thi anchoragfe h'eof visihi 'aks ihe concAi.' ete tha iheaochorfs?

YD' No'YCR 'ND X4.IAD Yk NEI N/AD'YD NDI UD N/Affl 5.Is the anchorage

ýý'on'igzura lion con-i nr with plant d te a n (Note: This qseslion only applies if item isone of he Si)% fo which: an aucljo ~geieo tiguratit erificati~on'is:

+ei~i'ed 6- Based on the above anmhorage evaluations, is the anchoig free of potentially adverse setsmic conditions?

t5 Enter the eq oimen iIdsis iiame frofi Apps;d~ ix : Cl;ses sof Kqimpi LLy*Page 202 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status:: NEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)lFiquipmentlIDNo.

02H25L029 Equip.Class' 20 Description TERMINATION CABINET.tieraction Effects 7. Are o.frtargets.free from inmpactby nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribut ion systemns, c6ling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equirpment?

Y~fNEI UL NWAD YJNO UO ',,/An Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE(ND N tO N/AD 0 CcA,-At'h Acoj, W. cc:.Odt.a tcs .... ... cC&LQb. cAc ,: ,,~U.0 , C-ý Q 0NO 10., Based on the above sesicnecto evaluations, is equipment ft Yl! O:U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? tX\ .h .°Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no:other.

ýeismic conditions that couild Y-01ND- UD adversely.affect'ihe safety functions.of the equipment?

Comments (Addfibtial pages may be added:as necessary)

ýv mj CA Evaluated by- \.. ' -Z, k~(cK' Date:,~Ak~lz Page 203 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 204 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 205 of 467 i ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 206 of 467 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS O0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 207 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 7/1 Page 208 of 467 T ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 209 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 210 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of,,y .405 Status: Yiilýý1-6 UE1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. Q2N1 1HV3369C Equip, Class,' 7 Equipment Dcscription.

MAIN STEAM, ISOLATION VALVE.Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor EL 127 Room, Area 22~4T.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) lnstructions for Completing Checklist This chicklistmay be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of cquipment on the SWEL The space below each ofthe following questions may be used tOrecordthe restKofadgmentsand findings, Additional space is proyided at the end of this checklist for documenting Other coimments.

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i~e., is the item oine of the 50% of SWEL. items requiringsuch verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing orloose hardWare?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than, mild surface oxidation?

YE)YEI NOE LrE N/Atj YEJ NO UE N/AZý-'4. Is the anchorage fieedf visible cracks in~the.concrete near the anchors? YE ND U.i NhLAE 5, Is the anchorageconfiguration consistent with plantdocumentation?(Note: This question only applies if tlih itm is one of the 50% for which an anchoragedconfiguration verifcationis requiredL) 6; Based on the above anchorage evaiuanons, is the anchlorage .free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NE UEf N/An Y/E UlE Entter the equipmnent clasi nlame from.Appendix 8: Cliiieii ot'Equipment..

Page 211 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2N1HV3369C Sheet12 Of,4 014 Status: Yff"N] U[]Equip. Class' 7 ......Equipmeut.DesdriptioL MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE interactioi Effects 7. Are soft targets free frimiihnpact byrnearby equipment or stiructures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tilesand lighting,.

and rMasonr block walls not likely to coIlap~seoo-the equipment?

9. Do afttchedlinestiave adequateflexibilityto avoid damage?,ý10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adv/erse seismic nteracti.on effects?Otber Adverse Conditions 11.: ooked ofr and found: no other seismicconditions that could'adversely affect the safety functions of the'equipment?

Y N[]: UE] N/A[U Y/ND U0] N/AK-]'INE U0] N/AE-YV 7 NEI UE Y O-U-Comments (Additional pages fitay be added as necesmaay),/V g/lqý '?,I- $Jj Date: K. -201' 'Page 212 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS O0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 213 of 467 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 214 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of Status: u0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist,(SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N 1HV3370B.

Equip. Class' 7 EquipmentDcscfiption MAIN STEAULINE ISOLATION VALVE Locationw Bldg, AUXILIARY FloorEL 1L Room Atrea _ __Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checldist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic'Walkdown of an itei ofequipime nt n the SWEL. Thee space below each of the following questions may be used to he esdaults ofjudgments and findings.-Additional space is provided at the end ofthis chedklist for documntniig ofter omments.Anchorayee 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,.is the ite anom of the 50% of SWEL items requiringsuch verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent,,broken, missin4&r loose hardware?3.. Is the anchorage free of corrosiot tie is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free:of visible cracks in the concrete rear the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above. anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seism.ic conditions, YEO NEI-YO NO UEO N/A[D--YE NEIUEI NI 4_YE NE UED N/A[16---YE NE, UEI N/AZ--'NO EUO Enter the eq uipen t class name from Appendix B: of Equipme t, Page 215 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of Status: YET' NEI] VIZ]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2NIlHV3370B Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLA TON VALVE Interaction Erfects.=7, Are soff targets: free: from impact-by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lightingi and masonry block walls not likely to collapse Onto the equipment?

9. Do'attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based On the above seismicinteraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y"ii UE- N/A0/Y UD N/AD Xý/NDu UENIAO: Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 9" E UD.adversely affect the safety, liinctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages. may be added as~necessary)

Evaluated by:.Date:<'i L-,1012 14/ 'vi _______Page 216 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS S 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 217 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 218 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 219 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Waikdown Checklist. (SWC).Sheet i-o Status: YL-3 N17 UD1 Equipment ID No. .Q2N.I1PTO484 Equip. Ciassý 18 Equipment Description SG 2B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor Ei. Room, Area 2- 24 4(0 .Manrmfactbrer, Model, Etc. (optional but re~ornnended)

._._..........---_............

..Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used'to document the results of tie Seismic Walkdown ofan item ofequipment on the SWEL; The space below each of the foliowing questions may be used t recordihe results of judgments and.findings, -Additional space. is~provided at the end'ofthis checklist for documenting other comments..Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of. SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Isthe anchorage free.of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4, Is the~anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5ý Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: Thisquestion only applies if the item is one of the 50%:for which an anchorage configuration verificationis required,)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluationsis the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YDE NO'YO1 ND UD NT/AD Y12'ND UC N/AD YVND] UD N/AD-YO ND CD N/A YffNO CD'Enter the equipment, class rune from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 220 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Shelot 01o/~ A Sta tus: Y7'YD N-L t Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Euipm~htJD4.Nd Q2NIIPT0484

-.ip. CIa :18 Bqu~pmaeni SG 2t3 DtSCHApRGE PRESSURE ..Interaction Effeets 71, Aisoft tt-ge freefrom impact by nearby equipmentt or structur'eS?

8, e o 'eread yatems, ceiling tile-s and iglhting,:and so block 11aili notý w, collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines hiave adequate-flexibility to a..i..damage?

10. Based on the al-h6.ve seismic interaction evaIuatiofis, is equipment free C fpLotrnt ally adverse seismic inti *qtion f'cts?Yd NEJ5N~YEYf NO1 UQ N,/I]Y8NT U0 !other '1 dverse Conditi s 11 Haye you looked for and 1fou1d0o other mi cotmditns that could adNceryety Lectehe safety fio Of ti equipm Y9 NQUQ0:Commnents(Addi

o~l pages maybe added as neessaly).

livalu< tedý by,,_f7~~

$____ _ ~ 3rt. l5~4"'a ~Dte:1w Page 221 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 222 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 223 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0$7 status:' U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) .Equipment 1D No, .Q2N11PV337W1/

quip. Class. 7 Equipment Dtstription, MAIN STEAM A TMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVE ,Location:

Bldga AUXILIARY.

]4oor.E. .127 Room, Area ____._______.

.........Ma.1facturer, Model, Etc. (optional but;recommended)

Instrictionsfor.

Completing:

Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the.Seismnic Walkdown.of anitem.0fequipment on th.SWEL..The space below. each of the fllofingqueStiotsimaybe usedto'.reciord the results ofjudgmints and findings.

Additional.

space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments;Anchorage 1. Is tficejatchorage configuration verification required (ije.,.is the item one YE NI -[of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verificatiori)?

2. Is the anchorage freeof bent; broken, missing or loose hardvware?

3. Is the anchotage tfee of cornosibi.

that is morne thdann-ild surface oxidation?

4; Is the&inchorage freeý of visible cracks in.the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage co-figuratiohiconsistent withppltirtdocumentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%.-for: which an anchorage configuration verification.is required.)

6. Based on the above ani hbrage'evaluations,.is the anchorage, freeof potentialllyadverse seismic conditions?

YE NO UEr NA-YE NEI UE1 N/AP--YEI NED UF N,/Ah-YEI NE. U[E N/A6-'Y-- UE]ECnter fth equipmnt c class namefrom-Appendix B:,C~a~isesofEquiprnent.

Page 224 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equpmnt ID No. Q2N 1PV337.1 CquipaCsas, 7 Equipment Desci ption MAINT STEAMýý RELIEFAVALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, dictibueion sytens, iling tiles andlighting, and: masonry block walis not likciy to collipse onto the equipment?

9. Do.attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid dainage?Sheet 2 of$'" C, Status: YE NEI UEl 15-\0Ut] N/AE]eNO U7 N/AEJ YN 0 Ut] N/AO 10. B4ased on the abovetseismiclnteraction evaluations, is equipment free YpNO U, M ofpot:rtially adverse, seismicinteraction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 11 H e'y u looKed for and found no other ei Conditions that could *11 U0 adversely

ffect the safety fiuictions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be, added as necessary)

Evaluated by 30 D'te: a0 .e .'1VNg-I " ' " "' <.2 .' .-- ...Page 225 of 467 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 226 of 467 D 0 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 227 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: YKI N E].Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC), Equipment I.DNo, 02NIISV3369CC Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SOLENOID FOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 127 Room,.Area

--'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an~item of equipmenton the SWELL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is:the anchorage configuration verification required (i e, is the item one YE] Nt ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent; bioken, missing or loose hardware?YEl NO U-0 NIAe":/7//L-3. Is the anchdrage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NO UE NiAM--`-4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the dbncrete near the anchbrs? YE N[ UD-E N/AE]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note This question only-applies if the item is one of the 50%:fOr which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class rtamefirom AppendixR:

Classes ofEquipment.

YE i NUF1 Page 228 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checkiist (SWC)Sbheet4 Of 3 Status, NF LIE Equipment ID'No. WQ2N1SV3369CC Equip. Class- 8 Equipipent Description SOLENOID FOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft:targets free froi impact by nearby equipment or structires?

8. Are overhead equipment,, distribution'systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, andniasoniry block walis'not likelyto collapse onto the equipment?

ý9.. D10 attached lines have adequate flekibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seigmi&interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentiaily adverse, seismic interactioneffects?*

10"NE] UE] N/AiE oU3. N/AD Y040 U0 N/AD YýfhIO Lh1 Other Adverse Conditions I11 Have you looked for and found no othder seismie conditions Ithat could adversely a ,fct :the: safety functionsoftheetquipment?

Y~dlUD .1 Comments (Add itional pages nRay be added as necessary) 3!e((l)/~3'/

,?'~~~)~ A4 j~Evaiuated by: Date 0 z..1 __C.2 J5~Z~z Page 229 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 230 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet sof 3 Status: U-]Equipment ID No. Q2N23FI3229CB Equip. Class' 18 Equippment Description FEED WA TER INTAKE FLOW INDICATION Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room,/ ea I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional biit.recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document theresults of the Seismhi Walkdown of an item of equipmem on the SWEL. The space below each ofthe .following~questions.ma.y be usedtorecord the results ofjudgments and'findings,.

Additional space is'provided at the end of this checklist, for documenting other comments.Anchorage I.Is the anchorage configuration verification*

required (i.e., is the item one YO NW of the 50% of SWEL items requiring~such verification)?

Yr N UD N/AD 2. Is the anchorage free 0f beoit, broken,:missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchragefree of corrosion that is more than. mild.surface Y 1N[D UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YKDNO UD N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note:.This question only applies if theitem is one of te 50%Tfr which an anchorage contiguraLion.

verification is required,)

6. Based on the anchrage.

evaluations, is the anchorage fi-ee:of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD ND UD N/AE--'YFKD Uh-D I Entter the equipm~ent class nrne te~ot Appendix B3: Classes of Equipment.

Page 231 of 467