ML14071A071

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562

ML14071A071
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A071 (38)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of ý4Plf Status: Y[] N ULE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP18COO2B.Pkq Equip. Class' 12 Fl-80 Equipment Description TRAIN B EMERGENCY AIR COMPRESSOR Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 189 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NEI UM] N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE] N/AE]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NE- UE] N/AE]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NEI UE] N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawingsin the package used to veriofy this anchorage configuration are H-37787-A/U-262818.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 313 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of)W 7,.4i Status: YE[ NE U0I]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP18COO2B.Pkq Equip. Class' 12 FI-80 Equipment Description TRAIN B EMERGENCY AIR COMPRESSOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE N/AO Tubing too close to piping, see pix, entered in CAP (CR505553, CR504972)

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nil UQ N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

nothing noted overhead that can collapse, see #7.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO UO N/AC electrical,tubing, ppg insp;ected

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Nl U-t of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

see #7 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

nothing found, see AWB fpor Rm 189 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None This package was originallysigned on 8-21-12 but retyped for clarityon 10-23-12.

Evaluated by: PaulMiktus, Date: 8/21/12 Steven Yuan by Telecon I1/ 30 8121/12 Page 314 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a

Page 315 of 562

A17ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 316 of 562

3: SE ~ S I~ WA A'I-IACHMENT~ ~ K~O ~ N~C~~As E K I TSN .S C 1 4 R T-11E S O .

AAW!

Page 317 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0

Page 318 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS z

Page 319 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

,I I ý(, I Shee i ofX5 Status: Y7N- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1P9IH-V2228 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description PZR PORV BACK-UP AIR SUPPLY VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 223 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO- NO] Ur- N/A0 infl4vit coy O'n-er ~ -WAe.- ts 00

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE7] NE] UE] N/A0 oxidation'?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/A[

"I- tk~A QWVOc('j*ý Avfte. i -%O noQeKSuQ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- NE] UE] N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

V%

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIRNO L]l potentially adverse seismic conditions?

"\ \"tl o C jlasses of0E qupnAt.

'Enter the equipment ctass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 320 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shee 2 ofN(5 Status: Y7F N1" U["

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1P19HV2228 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description PZR PORV BACK-UP AIR SUPPLY VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free fiom impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y9 NEI UD N/A-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y13 ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Bent overhead light fixture that is strappedto a conduitsupport west of QtP19HV2228. This light fixture is held by a cable with no attachment bolts.

There is no potentialfor seismic interactionconcern since the fixture is connectedltea cable and the cable is not expected to rupture.

Bent overhead light fixture that is strappedto a near by conduit east of Q 1R45EITE1310 (Aux Bid Emergency light "R").

There is no potential for seismic interaction concern since the fixture is connectedgteacable and the cable is not expected to rupture.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 ND UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

~3aa. C:~7JC fAJ.~Jr Page 321 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of*'5 Status: N NO Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, QtP19HV2228 Equip. ClassI 7 Equipment DesciiptioA PL POE* BACK.UP AIR SUPPLY VALVE Evaluated by: qogn %- e S-af-a-ýVate. -T I zi // -Z, TvIr r-a V'ic, Page 322 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS v

PORV BKUP AIR SUPPLY Q1P19HV2228 11111181 1111111111 11111 Page 323 of 562

A'TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 324 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheetus of: (a Status: YC] NZ U-"

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP19HV3611 Equip, Class' 7 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area C.)

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEI UE N/Ad

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE] N/AEf oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE] N/A[9

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] N] UE] N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y5' NO UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 325 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 A,/C-Sheet 2 Of4 Status: Y[i NEý U!]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP19HV3611 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Intermction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[*N" UM] N/A-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[d NO Ut N/A0]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO Nlj Ut] N/AO ObAt~y\M a kkOLV AA Q- Q.('O- Q3,CAbsV4r.A Ks4c, ~ ~ .\

10. Based on the above seismic interacton evaluations, is equipment free YlE" NCi UE] -

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJZ'N[I Ut]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date:a/a(;12 4?o 11/V,ralm ef o. Z-Page 326 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 327 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-- t r I"

/9 Ii Page 328 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 329 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 VJ 10 "7 T Page 330 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of/ 4 Status: I N] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR1BO04 Equip.

Equipment Description LC TRANSFORMER ID Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area i*

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Ylt NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yt1 NO ur- N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y)9 NC UM N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yf NCI UC' N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YoN UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y% NC UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 331 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

• J- ,

Sheet 2 of 4+

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: YA NEI U-I Equipment ID No. Q1RI 18004. Equip. Classý Equipment Description LC TRANSFORMER IQ Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y$ NEI UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo ND UD N/AFJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YP ND UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YQ NODU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? that could Yn NDI UD Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) tiJRPEOiTo M9*15 -VW6E0 H QJD~~~

WW M br~C ev jAr Evaluated by: 'A/tŽYV'iC k4j ugwa Mac&Jcv\'

hPg - 332 of56 Date: 91-'da4 Page 332 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 333 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-T Page 334 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ow Status: YI2 NEI UD-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0IR17I8001A Equip. Class' I Equipment Description MCC 1A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room. Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YVNr"I Ur N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface NO UO N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEn'NO UO N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y2"NJ U- N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required)

OWl txl4& S OVA -Ro0-r C Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

V'XQ-b% "-f 4$lsýdýv -0* cv-&f-ks /

.1A NE cN,.*(AJ Ur "A I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 335 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of9 Status: Y[If/J UrL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIRI7BOO1-A Equip. Class' Equipment Description MCC 1A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y1/4J-N UQ N/As

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YPNO U1-1 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yj N" U- N/AD

~SAL )4eYL- A c4 t~. C tuT ~uQ

( W-t&t,)W' Ckuv-- 5 a.% 11L

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YE(ND UD 5'i&N **t JW' C. 0 ,J'br ,c Other Adverse Conditions 4o-r xd buoll

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y&1N0 U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ii Evaluated by: 54~7f -- /7 -- _-

6*ýZIA/

=- i . . . .. .

° Date:

%_ 1-1 L. .)CJ -Z" Page 336 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 7,

I Page 337 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 338 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of / 1 Status: YE] NE] U1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR15A504 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area CCIai Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie LM0-ý7347-A2

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Ver*(-i e-(iLi ti I a- c,-ý " jd

• YD NID U N/AD

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[I N[] U09 N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YD' NDI UW N/ADl

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y[D ND UW N/AD1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YF9 ND UM potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 339 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofý'4'q Status: Yo NE] U:

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR6SA504 Equip. Class' Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1J Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y NEI UO N/A[

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y ND U N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yo ND U' N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yý NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NDi UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ( o0 7 A"eo wckivC- N t s \ r- Aj~o~ckr i~sitz 701 -

1R rR--n %'-.nO Jk0~e* 'in- are40kjbA4&U-U tpEftL iS reS01\,Cei, 0a 4 Evaluated by: Q a4*3,AALOXMad0ct\4 Date: SlLQIJ0/1-U

'-C7

-, ~

1#YAý1oAt -0t" Page 340 of 562

2.0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC s3 R- 1,:

Page 341 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 342 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r* -,*t, SheSt t 1ofN I' Status: Y[M NEIl U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR16BO06 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER ID Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 05_

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one I NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y Nr] UCI N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y NEI U0 N/ADI oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y",NEI Ur] N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yý NCI UCI N/ArI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

sey~c F3 Lx e 4t4LJ 5/l./. viW , +fitf,, "* A-L.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NIN UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 343 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 PI-'i(o Sheet 2 ofg4 FH4 Status: Y0 O U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR16BO06 Equip. Class Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER ID Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? u[ N/AD UD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YXND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý ND UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YOUNOUQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJ ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) nat mw ef L~ead e4&&. WtlIA 4, rmo ~ w~ 6aA~at444 Ca u;UoIt tot

ý*I VOh ~J~f Cj.¶AiVN4'tOI4ar (F)'99).

Evaluated y AJMj Date: - 2. izI 7t ~XC)J 6 L&A L~AtWr MacdCt

'I Qj I

Page 344 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 345 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 L 41 Page 346 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of,.'

Status: YD N[I] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR17B504-A Equip. Class1 1 Equipment Description MCC 1K Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188.5 Room, Area * ..

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NW, of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yý NO UM0 N/Ar

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YM NO UO N/Ap4 yepev Wwa&W,%.~ Tkme i4,q z/,+/

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

zitIZOAot*

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YCl NC UC N/AQ9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YIPNO UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 347 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofX q Status: Y10 NE] LTD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R17B504-A Equip. Class, I Equipment Description MCC 1K Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ)N[ UO N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YqO NO UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YW NO U[ N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free NoU0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YP NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Am v, iv- i~ -kd n Fý Date: _111li_ z 9/iij/e ' -

Page 348 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 349 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r1-I tp Page 350 of 562