NL-19-019, On-Shift Staffing Analysis, Revision 19-01 and Evaluation
ML19071A154 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Indian Point |
Issue date: | 02/07/2019 |
From: | Deborah Gray, Karsten C Entergy Nuclear Operations |
To: | Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
NL-19-019 | |
Download: ML19071A154 (131) | |
Text
Docket Nos.50-003, 50-247 and 50-286 NL-19-019 ENCLOSURE TO NL-19-019 "INDIAN POINT ENERGY CENTER ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS" REVISION 19-01 AND EVALUATION
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT INDIAN POINT ENERGY CENTER ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS (PHASE 1)
Rev 19-01 February 7, 2019 Prepared by:
Dara Gray Casey Karsten
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 4 II. ANALYSIS
SUMMARY
.................................................................................................................. 4 A. Emergency Plan Minimum Staffing .................................................................................. 6 B. Other Commitments to Shift Staffing ................................................................................ 7 C. Staffing Exceptions and Time Motion Studies {TMS) ..................................................... 7 D. Emergency Plan Tasks Not Analyzed .............................................................................. 8 Ill. ANALYSIS PROCESS .................................................................................................-.................. 8 IV. ACCIDENT SCENARIOS .............................................................................................................. 9 A. Accident Selection ............................................................................................................. 9 B. Accident Sc~narios included in the Analysis ................................................................. 10 C. AccidentScenarios Not Included in the Analysis .......................................................... 11 V. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS ...................................................................... 12 A. Notes and Assumptions Applicable to All IPEC OSA ................................................... 12 B. NEI 10-05 Rev O Assumptions ....................................................................., .................. 12 VI. APPENDIX A - ANALYZED EVENTS AND ACCIDENTS ........................................................ 15 VII. APPENDIX B- U2 ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS ............................................................ 17 A. Design Basis Accident Analysis #3 - Steam Line Rupture .......................................... 17 B. Design Basis Accident Analysis #4- Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) .................... 22 C. Design Basis Accident Analysis #5 - Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR) ........ 28 D. Design Basis Accident Analysis #6 - Fuel Handling Accident.. .................. ~ ................ 34 I
E. Design Basis Accident Analysis #1 O- Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown .......................................................................................................................... 40 F. Design Basis Accident Analysis #11 - Station Blackout (SBO) ................................... 46 G. Design Basis Accident Analysis #12- LOCNGeneral Emergency with Release and PAR .....................................................................................................................:............. 51 VIII. APPENDIX B - UNIT 3 SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS ................................ ,........................*... 56 A. Design Basis Accident Analysis #3 - Steam Line Rupture .......................................... 56 B. Design Basis Accident Analysis #4- Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) .................... 61 C. Design Basis Accident Analysis #5 - Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR) ........ 67 D. Design Basis Accident Analysis #6 - Fuel Handling Accident.. ................................... 73 IPEC Page2
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT E. Design Basis Accident Analysis #1 O - Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown ....................................... :.................................................................................. 79 F. Design Basis Accident Analysis #11 - Station Blackout (SBO) ................................... 85 G. Design Basis Accident Analysis #12 - LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR .................................................................................................................................... 90 IX. APPENDIX B - COMMON CONTROL ROOM SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS ...................... 95 A. Accident Analysis #1 - Design Basis Threat (DBT) ...................................................... 95 B. Accident Analysis #9 -Aircraft Probable Threat.. .......................................... ;............ 101 X. APPENDIX C - TIMI;: MOTION STUDIES SUPPORTING. THE STAFFING ANALYSIS .... 108 A. ERO Notification (Everbridge activation) ..................................................................... 108 XI. OVERLAP OF TASKS ACTIVITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED ....................... 113 A. Overlap Requiring Compensatory Measures .............................................................. 113 XII. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 113 XIII. STAFFING ANALYIS TEAM ...................................................................................................... 113 IPEC Page 3
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT I. INTRODUCTION This document is a revision to the Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report added to the IPEC Emergency Plan on December 17, 2012, as updated via the December 2015 Revision to the Report (Revision 1) submitted to the US NRG (Letter NL-15-154), Revision 1 incorporated the analysis of the responsibilities of the on-shift staff supporting IPEC Unit 1 and documented the evaluation of the Shift Manager's task of Emergency Response Organization (ERO) notification. This revision (Revision 19-01) documents the fact that both the Fire Brigade Leader and the Communicator can come from either unit and need not only come from Unit 3, as previously listed in the-unit staffing numbers.
This revision continues to satisfy the requirement of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Section IV.A.9 for Units 1, 2 and 3, which states that nuclear power licensees shall perform "a detailed analysis demonstrating that on-shift personnel assigned emergency plan implementation functions are not assigned responsibilities that would prevent the timely performance of their assigned functions as specified in the emergency plan." It does not identify the need for nor incorporate any changes to the necessary minimum staffing and merely provides a clarification on the units from which personnel supporting emergency planning functions can be supplied.
A structured approach using the guidance found in NEI 10-05 was utilized to perform the analysis in Revision 1 which is incorporated in this document. That analysis was based on the assumption that both the Fire Brigade Leader and the Communicator came from Unit 3. Changing the assumption so that both can be supplied by either unit does not impact the conclusions reached by the analysis. It does not change the minimum staffing needs or the ability of the staff to perform the necessary emergency functions. The analysis examined the capability of the minimum staff listed in Table B-1 of the IPEC Emergency Plan (E-Plan) to perform the actions for the key functional areas of events described in NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance -
Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, until augmenting ERO staff arrives in accordance with the E-Plan.
II. ANALYSIS
SUMMARY
The OSA team determined that a total on-shift staff of twenty-six (26) for IPEC units 1, 2 and 3 is required to respond to the accidents reviewed. It is noted, however, that Unit 1, is defueled and only those areas that either store or process radioactive materials (the Fuel Handling Building and waste storage/process areas in the Chemical Systems Building and the Integrated Liquid Radwaste Systems Building) are considered in evaluating the radiological hazards for the IPEC IPEC Page4
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Emergency Plan. As detailed in the Unit 1 Safety Analysis Report and Decommissioning Plan, there are limited operating systems remaining in Unit 1. The limited operating systems combined with the reduced radioactive source term would result in a limited potential impact to a radiological release resulting from an event at Unit 1. Additionally, there are no Emergency Action Levels specific to IPEC Unit 1 that would challenge the on-shift staffing above and beyond
., those considered in this analysis for Units 2 and 3. For any event that may challenge Unit 1, Unit 2 and 3 staff are available to provide support-as needed. As such, the IPEC on~shift staff actions in response to the accidents evaluated for this staffing analysis are bounded by the operating units (Units 2 and 3) and a separate evaluation of the NEI 10-05 required accidents for Unit 1 is not included in the analysis.
Additionally, the single plant operator assigned to Unit 1 has minimal responsibilities specific to Unit 1. These responsibilities consist of conducting a limited scope building tour once per shift and the periodic monitoring of evaporator operation occurring approximately 2 to 3 times/week.
These tasks are not time critical and do not impact the Unit 1 staff member's ability to perform assigned Emergency Plan functions and/or tasks. Additionally, the limited Unit 1 tasks are not time critical and can be accomplished by the augmented ERO if required.
The most limiting accident scenario reviewed for the operating units (Units 2 and 3) was a main control room fire and alternate shutdown. The on-shift staff consists of individuals necessary to support each of the emergency plan functional areas or tasks:
- Emergency Direction and Control
- Plant Operations and Safe Shutdown (SSD)
- Fire Fighting (FB)
- Accident Assessment
- Radiation Protection and Chemistry
- Notification/Communication
- Technical Support
- Access Control and Accountability NEI 10-05 states it is acceptable for certain function to be assigned to personnel already assigned other functions/tasks. These include Repair and Corrective Action, Rescue Operations and First Aid.
The Fire Brigade Leader and Communicator positions are not unit-specific qualifications and as such, they can be supplied from either unit as the situation warrants. This revision to the Phase 1 Study provides the documented clarification of this ability to utilize staff from either unit and maintain minimum staffing, as noted in the table below.
IPEC Page 5
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT A Emergency Plan Minimum Staffing Per 10 CFR 50.54 (q)(1)(iii), Emergency planning function means a capability or resource necessary to prepare for and respond to a radiological emergency, as set forth in the elements of section IV of Appendix E and, for nuclear power reactor licensees, the planning standards of§ 50.47(b).
The following table indicates the result of the NEI 10-05 staffing analysis of on-shift personnel to perform the required emergency planning functions and the licensing oasis requirement for each on-shift position. These positions are included in Table 1 of each accident.
On-Shift On-Shift E-Plan E-Plan Staffing Staffing E-Plan Functional Functional Position U2 Analysis Analysis Requirement Area Area Results Results U2 staff U3 staff U2 U3 Emergency SSD/Emergency E-Plan Table B-Shift Manager (SM) Direction and Direction and 1 1 1
Control Control Control Room E-Pl,an Table B- SSD SSD 1 1 Supervisor (CRS)
Shift Technical E-Plan Table B- Technical Technical 1 1 Advisor/FSS (STA) 1 Support Support Reactor Operators E-Plan Table B- 1 SSD U3 SSD 2 2 (RO) 1 1 SSD U2 & U3)
Nuclear Plant E-Plan Table B- SSD (2) SSD (3) 5 4 Operator (NPO) 1 FB (3) FB (1)
Nuclear Plant SSD N/A Operator (U 1)
E-Plan Table B-SRO FBL for both units 1
Nuclear Plant E-Plan Table B- Communicator/ Notifications for Operator 1 both units E-Plan Table B-Chemistry Chemistry Chemistry 1 1 1
Radiation E-Plan Table B- Radiation Radiation 1 1 Protection (RP) 1 Protection Protection Security Contingency Security Access Control and Accountability Per Security Contingency Plan Plan / E-Plan Table B-1 TOTAL 13 13
- The Fire Brigade Leader is shown under the Unit 3 staffing numbers but can come from either unit..
- The Communicator is shown under the Unit 3 staffing numbers but can come from either unit IPEC Page 6
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT B. Other Commitments to Shift Staffing
- 1. No additional shift staffing commitments were identified.
C. Staffing Exceptions and Time Motion Studies (TMS)
- 1. The primary responsibility for the two on-shift Chemistry Technicians is chemistry/radiochemistry sampling; however no chemistry job tasks were noted as being required within the first 90 minutes of any of the analyzed events. The two Chemistry Technicians on-shift are qualified to work either unit. The task of dose assessment, currently assigned to the Shift Manager, will be reassigned to Chemistry as a result of this staffing analysis. One Chemistry Tech is assigned to perform the chemistry tasks and the second is assigned the responsibility for dose assessment. It is acceptable for one on-shift Chemistry Technician to perform dose assessment because no specific time critical chemistry tasks were identified requiring the use of both Chemistry Technicians. No further analysis or TMS is required.
- 2. The Shift fv1,anager is assigned the responsibility to make some notifications such as the Duty Plant Manager, Operations Manager, and Resident Inspector. These
'notifications by phone are considered communications that are approximately one minute in length and are acceptable tasks for the Shift Manager. No further analysis or TMS is required.
- 3. Station staff is required to maintain continuous communications with the notification source during an aircraft threat in accordance with 10CFR50.54(hh) and Reg. Guide 1.214. There are no specific qualifications required to perform this task and the function is not required to be assigned in advance. The analysis of this event identified there are sufficient personnel on-shift to perform this task during the event. Specifically, reactor operators, nuclear plant operators, radiation protection technicians, or chemistry technicians were all available to fill this function. No furth"er analysis or TMS is required.
- 4. The task of activating EROS (Emergency Response Data System) is not required for this analysis because the system operates 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />s/day. A specific task to I
initiate EROS is therefore ndt required and was not analyzed.
- 5. The STA was previously assigned the task of notifying the off-shift ERO of the emergency. A TMS was conducted to determine if this task could be reassigned to the Shift Manager and to verify the Shift Manager could perform the concurrent tasks of maintaining emergency direction and control while notifying the ERO of the event using Everbridge. The TMS demonstrated the Shift Manager was able to maintain Emergency Direction and Control during the approximate two minutes it took to notify the ERO using Everbridge. This evaluation may be used to allow the Shift Manager to perform the task of ERO notification.
IPEC Page 7
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT D. Emergency Plan Tasks Not Analyzed
- 1. Repair and Corrective Action - Per the guidance of NUREG-0654, Table B-1, repair and corrective action tasks may be performed by dedicated shift personnel or qualified shift personnel assigned other functions/tasks. Repair and corrective action is defined as:
- An action that can be, performed promptly to restore a non-functional component to functional status (e.g., resetting a breaker), or to place a component in a desired configuration (e.g., open a valve), and which does not require work planning or implementation of lockouUtagout controls to I complete.
In accordance with NEI 10-05 section 2.5, the analysis included a review of repair and corrective action tasks. For the purpose of this analysis, the tasks were considered to fall into two broad categories:
- Unplanned/unexpected action.s that address equipment failures. These actions are contingent in nature and cannot be specified in advance.
- Planned/expected actions performed in support of operating procedure implementation, including severe accident management guidelines.
At IPEC, Nuclear Plant Operators are trained to perform the actions associated with this functional area. Repair and Corrective Action is an acceptable collateral duty per the guidance of NEI 10-05 and was not analyzed
- 2. Rescue Operations and First Aid: In accordance with NEI 10-05 section 2.6, the analysis also included a review of rescue operations and first aid response. Per the guidance of NUREG-0654, Table B-1, rescue operations and first aid may be performed by shift personnel assigned other functions. IPEC Fire brigade members are trained to perform rescue operations and are assigned the task should the need arise. Rescue operations were not required in any of the accident scenarios reviewed. Additionally the Nuclear Plant Operators on shift are trained to Red Cross First Aid standards and meet the basic requirements to render first aid and CPR. Rescue operations and first aid response are acceptable collateral duties per the guidance of NEI 10-05 and were not analyzed.
Ill. ANALYSIS PROCESS This analysis was conducted by a joint team of corporate Emergency Preparedness (EP) personnel and station personnel from the Operations, Operations Training, Radiation Protection, Chemistry, and Emergency Preparedness (EP) departments. The team members are identified in Section XII of this report.
The emergency response to each event was determined by conducting a tabletop of the event using the emergency plan and procedures and the applicable department procedures such as Operations emergency and abnormal operating procedures.
IPEC Page 8
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Each scenario was reviewed by the cross disciplinary team to determine what plant actions and emergency plan implementation actions wer.e required based on plant procedures prior to staff augmentation. These actions were then compared to the minimum staffing for Emergency Plan implementation as described in the Emergency Plan Table B-1 and Figure B-1.1, ensuring that no actions were assigned to staff members that conflicted with either their dedicated emergency plan role or their dedicated operational role as appropriate. In cases where multiple tasks were assigned to an individual in their role, the team evaluated timing of the tasks to ensure that they could be performed by the individual in series within any specified time requirements.
The results of the analysis for each of the scenarios are included in Sections VII, VIII and IX, APPENDIX B - ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS. Note that NSIR DPR-ISG-01 states that only OBA accidents "which would result in an emergency declaration" should be evaluated in the '
staffing assessment. Each of IPEC's DBAs were evaluated and classified according to its FSAR Chapter 14 description. If the accident description alone did not result in a classification, the projected accident Exclusion Area Boundary (EAB) dose found in the FSAR was utilized to determine if an EAL threshold would be exceeded within the first 60 minutes using the Abnormal Rad Level EAL thresholds. In cases where several projected dose rates were provided or release data was not detailed significantly to determine an EAL, the assessment used the radiological consequences associated with the realistic case in accordance with NEI 10-05.
IV. ACCIDENT SCENARIOS A. Accident Selection
- 1. The OSA scenarios were chosen using the guidance of NEI 10-05 and NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, "Interim Staff Guidance - Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants." The evaluation considered the station Design Basis Accidents (OBA) described in the FSAR along with additional scenarios specified by the guidance documents. The scenarios considered for both U2 and U3 were:
- Design Basis Threat (DBT)
- OBA Control Element Ejection Accident
- OBA Steam Line Rupture
- OBA Loss of Coolant Accident
- OBA Steam Generator Tube Rupture
- OBA Fuel Handling Accident
- OBA Accidental Release of Waste - Liquid
- OBA Accidental Release of Waste - Gases
- OBA Aircraft Probable Threat
- Control Room (CR) fire requiring CR evacuation and Alternate Shutdown (Appendix R Fire)
- Station Blackout, (SBO)
- LOCNGeneral Emergency with release and PAR
- LOCA with entry into Severe Accident Management I
- Appendix R Fire (Fire that results in reactor trip)
IPEC Page9
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT B. Accident Scenarios included in the Analysis
- Land and/or waterborne Hostile Action directed against the Protected Area by a Hostile Force. This event assumes the threat is neutralized immediately when inside the protected area fence, no significant damage to equipment or systems that require corrective actions before the ERO is staffed, no radiological release, and no fire that requires firefighting response before the ERO is staffed. EAL is based on the event.
- 2. Steam Line Rupture as described in FSAR 14.2.5 _
- A main steam line break with loss of offsite power. Release into the turbine building until Main steam stop valves isolates. EAL is based on the event.
- 3. Loss of Coolant Accident as described in FSAR 14.3
- Break (Double Ended Guillotine Cold Leg (DEGGL} break) between the reactor coolant pump and the reactor vessel. Core degradation with release to the containment and to the environment at the containment design leakage rate. EAL is based on the event.
- 4. Steam Generator Tube Rupture as described in FSAR 14.2.4
- Double ended rupture of a single U-tube that results in exceeding charging pump capacity. No fuel failure is postulated. The EAL is based on the event
- 5. Fuel Handling Accident as described in FSAR 14.2.1
- The accident involves a dropped fuel bundle on top of the core. Initial EAL is based on the event.
- 6. Aircraft Probable Threat as described in 10 CFR 50.54 hh(1)
- Notification is received from the NRC that a probable aircraft threat exists
(>5 minutes, <30 minutes). EAL is based on the event
- 7. CR Fire Requiring CR evacuation and Alternate Shutdown
- A fire occurs in the main control room requiring the evacuation and the procedure implemented to shutdown from the alternate shutdown panels.
EAL is based on the event.
- 8. Station Blackout
- A loss of all offsite AC power occurs and the failure of the emergency diesel generators to start. EAL is based on the event.
- 9. General Emergency with release and PAR
- Assumed SAE condition when dose projection indicates an upgrade to GE and a PAR based on release is needed.
IPEC Page 10
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
, C. Accident Scenarios Not Included in the Analysis
- 1. Control Rod Ejection (CRE) as described in FSAR 14.2.1
- Mechanical failure of a control rod mechanism pressure housing resulting in the* ejection of a rod cluster control assembly and drive shaft.
The CRE accident is bound by the LOCA. No further analysis is required.
- 2. Accidental Release of Waste - Liquid as described in FSAR 14.2.2
- The largest vessels are the three liquid holdup tanks (CVCS), each sized to hold two-thirds of the reactor coolant liquid volume. The tanks are used to process the normal recycle or waste fluids produced. The contents of one tank will be passed through the liquid processing train while another tank is being filled. Hence, the loss of water from the spent resin storage tank presents no hazard offsite or onsite because means are available both to detect the situation occurring and to keep the resin temperature under control until the resin can be removed to burial facilities. No EAL condition met. *
- 2. Accidental Release of Waste - Gases as described in 14.2.3
- The tanks operate at low pressure, approximately 2 psig, a gas phase leak would result in an expulsion of approximately 12-percent of the contained gases and then the pressure would be in equilibrium with atmosphere. The curie content of the tanks is controlled administratively to maintain an operating limit. It is conservatively assumed that all of the contained noble gas activity and one percent of the iodine activity are released. The tank pits are vented to the ventilation system so that any gaseous leakage would be discharged to the atmosphere by this route.
No EAL condition met.
- 3. Implement Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMG)
- A review of the SAMGs associated with the initial site-specific Candidate High Level Actions concluded that no actions would require on-shift personnel other than licensed and non-licensed operators. No analysis required.
- 4. Appendix R Fire
- The team concluded the Control Room fire to be the most limiting for resources and therefore a staffing analysis for an additional fire scenario is not required. The emergency plan and fire brigade responsibilities are the same for both events. No analysis required.
IPEC Page 11
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT V. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS A. Notes and Assumptions Applicable to All IPEC OSA
- 1. The RP and Chemistry tasks reviewed were those directed by the Shift Manager to support actions in Abnormal Operating Procedures (AOP), Off Normal Procedures (OP), Emergency Operating Procedures (OP), and Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures (EP). Any additional tasks directed by the Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), or Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) procedures were not reviewed.
- 2. IPEC has 60 minute emergency responders when augmented while the ERO is offsite. This analysis was conducted assuming a 90 minute response of the augmented ERO. No specific emergency response tasks requiring the augmented ERO were identified prior to the 90 minutes following the emergency declaration.
- 3. The OSA team determined there are no time critical RP and Chemistry tasks and that task performance is directed and prioritized by the Shift Manager. The time RP or Chemistry is directed to perform a task and the amount of time taken to complete tasks are estimated. No Chemistry samples are required by Tech Specs within the 90 minute period after a declaration. Since the Shift Manager directs when the tasks are performed, there are no overlapping RP or chemistry tasks.
- 4. All crews have one individual filling the SM and one individual filling the STA roles therefore the analysis did not consider using a dual-role individual.
- 5. For the purposes of this analysis, both the Fire Brigade Leader and the Communicator were assumed to come from Unit 3 but both those positions can be supplied by either unit.
B. NEI 10-05 Rev OAssumptions
- 1. Response time used for this analysis was the maximum acceptable number of minutes elapsed between emergency declaration and the augmented ERO position holder at a location necessary to relieve an on-shift position of the emergency response task. (60 min.)
- 2. On-shift personnel complement was limited to the minimum required number and composition as described in the site emergency plan. If the plan commitments allow for different minimum staffing levels (e.g., a variance between a normal dayshift and a backshift), the staffing with the smallest total number of personnel was used for the analysis.
- 3. Although the temporary absence of a position may be allowed by Tech Specs, the analysis was performed assuming that all required on-shift positions are filled.
- 4. Event occurred during off-normal work hours where ERO was offsite and all required minimum on-shift positions were filled.
IPEC Page 12
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 5. On-shift personnel reported to their assigned response locations within timeframes sufficient to allow for performance of assigned actions.
- 6. On-shift staff had necessary Radiation Worker qualification to obtain normal dosimetry and enter the radiological control area (RCA) (but not locked high or very high radiation areas) without the aid of a RP technician.
- 7. Personnel assigned plant operations and SSD met the requirements and guidance (analyzed through other programs such as operator training) and were not evaluated as part of this assessment unless a role/function/task from another major response area was assigned as a collateral duty.
- 8. In-plant (manual} safety related operator actions to manipulate components and equipment from locations outside the control room to achieve and maintain safe shutdown was done by a member of the on-shift staff as defined in the unit's Tech Specs.
- 9. Fire brigade (FB) staff performance is analyzed through other station programs (e.g., fire drills) and was not evaluated as part of this assessment unless a role/function/task from another major response area was assigned as a collateral duty.
- 10. Individuals holding the position of RP technician or Chemistry technician are qualified to perform the range of tasks expected of their position.
- 11. Security was not evaluated unless a role or function from another major response area was assigned as a collateral duty.
- 12. Communications, briefings, and peer checks are acceptable collateral duties.
- 13. All on-shift staff positions were evaluated, even if they had no known collateral duties, to ensure they can perform the tasks assigned to them. [Ref NSIR/DPR-ISG-01]
- 14. The Staffing Analysis specified the resources available to perform "Repair and Corrective Actions" and "Rescue Operations and First Aid" but these may be assigned as collateral duty to a designated on-shift responder.
- 15. For assessment purposes, NRC notifications were treated as a continuous action per 10CFR50.72(c}(3) and 73.71(b)(1). This means once the initial NRC communications are established, the NRC will request an open line be maintained with the NRC Operations Center.
- 16. OBA (postulated accident, Condition IV event, or limiting fault) is considered as "Unanticipated occurrences that are postulated for accident analysis purposes but not expected to occur during the life of the plant. A postulated accident could result in sufficient damage to preclude resumption of plant operation. As a result, a greater number and variety of actions would need to be implemented by plant personnel."
IPEC Page 13
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 17. Unless otherwise specified in NSIR/DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance -
Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants, or by the USAR initial conditions of a DBA analysis, it was assumed that the unit was in Mode 1, Power.
- 18. DBT assumed a hostile force breached the protected area fence but was neutralized with no adverse consequences to plant safety. Damage inflicted on plant systems, structures and components was not sufficient to prevent safe shutdown or cause a radiological release. There was no fire significant enough to warrant firefighting efforts prior to arrival of offsite resources and/or the augmented ERO.
- 19. The Staffing Analysis used OBA analysis assumptions, inputs, timing of events, plant protective response, and specified manual operator actions and their timing, as documented in the USAR.
- 20. In cases where a DBA analysis included a radiological release, and the starting point of the release was not clearly defined, the staffing analysis assumed that the release began 15-minutes after the initiating event.
- 21. Severe Accident Management Guideline (SAMG) - It is sufficient to simply assume that the accident progressed to conditions requiring a severe accident response; it did not include determining specific failures and the accident sequence.
- 22. SAMG - The actions analyzed included those that implement the initial site-specific actions assuming the core is not ex-vessel (i.e., no reactor vessel failure), and there is no actual or imminent challenge to containment integrity.
IPEC Page 14
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT VI. APPENDIX A - ANALYZED EVENTS AND ACCIDENTS NOTE Appendix A is applicable to both Unit 2 and Unit 3. Accidents and FSAR section numbers are the same.
Event Event Summary Description Plant Reference Analysis 1 Event EGL
- Type of Event Mode Document(s) Required?
Land and/or 1 waterborne HOSTILE ACTION directed NEI 10-05 Site Area 1 DST YES against the Protected ISGIV.C Emergency Area by a HOSTILE FORCE.
2 OBA Control Rod Ejection 1 FSAR 14.2.6 Alert NOL Steam Line Rupture 1 Unusual 3 OBA FSAR 14.2.5 YES Event Loss of Coolant 1 Site Area 4 OBA FSAR 14.3 YES Accident (LOCA) Emergency Steam Generator Tube 1 5 OBA FSAR 14.2.4 Alert YES Rupture 6 OBA Fuel Handling Accident 1 FSAR 14.2.1 Alert YES Accidental Release of 1 7 OBA FSAR 14.2.2 None NO Waste - Liquid Accidental Release of 1 8 OBA FSAR 14.2.3 None NO Waste - Gases Assumed Aircraft Probable 1 for Threat. 10CFR50.54hh(1) 9 Alert YES Analysis RG 1.214 Purpose Control Room 1 Assumed Evacuation and 10CFR50 for 10 Alternate Shutdown Appendix R Alert YES Analysis (fire in main control ISGIV,C Purpose room)
Assumed Station Blackout 1 for Site Area 11 ISG IV.C YES Analysis Emergency Purpose Assumed LOCA - General 1 for Emergency with 12 ISG IV.C GE YES Analysis radiological release Purpose and PAR Assumed LOCA with entry into 1 for severe accident 13 ISG IV.C GE N03 Analysis procedures.
Purpose IPEC Page 15
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Event Event Summary Description Plant Reference Analysis Event EGL
- Type of Event Mode1 Document(s) Required?
Assumed Appendix R Fire with 1 for Reactor Trip 4 14 ISG IV.C Alert N0 Analysis Purpose 1
Plant mode per USAR or assumed for analysis purpose 2
The CRE accident is bound by the LOCA accident. No further analysis required.
3 1PEC does not meet the NEI 10-05 intent for the analysis of implementing SAMG. NEI 10-05 Section 2.11 states that the analysis of the ability to implement SAMG focuses on the reasonably expected initial mitigation action that would be performed by on-shift personnel other than licensed and non-licensed operators. The actions assessed by NEI 10-05 are those which implement the initial site-specific Candidate High Level Action assuming the core is not ex-vessel (i.e., no reactor vessel failure), and there is no actual or imminent challenge to containment integrity. SAMG is implemented by the TSC. All success paths' actions are performed by on-shift licensed and non-licensed operators.
4 Appendix R Fire is bound by the Control Room Fire and Remote Shutdown.
IPEC Page 16
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT VII. APPENDIX B - U2 ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS A. Design Basis Accident Analysis #3 - Steam Line Rupture
- 1. Accident Summary
- Steam pipe rupture in a faulted main steam line with loss of offsite power.
- Reactor coolant contaminated with fission products corresponding to continuous operation with a limited amount of defective fuel rods. Leads to contamination of the secondary system due to leakage.
- Main steam stop valves and check valves close and prevent blow-down of the other
\
steam generator. Feedwater isolates and receive safety injection signal.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- None
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 2-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- 2-E-2, Faulted Steam Generator Isolation
- 2-E-1, Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant
- 2-ES-1.1, SI Terminqtion
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room
- 4. Tables IPEC Page 17 -
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
.* (.l~l:CJ~ijl;.E;1. 7".QNJ~H.IfJ ,e.9SJTIQJJS,,,,,:;
,;r, , "
. Analysis'.# 3.;:. Steam Line Rupture (U2) .;;,., ,:,,;, :,{\ ,,: /;,~
,, ' ,,;;:,' ,,; *.* *' ,, *,,' ,' ' ',,:* ', '.*s':, ,,*,, ',,l.:. : .*. £4,: ,,,,,*,,;i;;,,;' *'
- 4, Augmeniation Role in Table #
Line On~.shjft. ,',
ElapsedTime * :: . * *ru11e'#i
- i
- Unanalyzed TM.S f ~ ,, .,,
'"" Basis£Doe'urfi1ent*~ .
,# Position'.
','i) "' . " .. , ."' " . ; . ,.. \;::: ' *,. ' < I *:.,.,. .-: ', : .. .(mh:t)h ...: ,, 4c .*.' .;,:'. ,:,.. ...,,,: ,., :,
. Task? Requi,req?
'ii\) ;t: >!t,J:' ,<\ ,* )x' "1 r,f..I\ */,. ,~~ ,,
U2 T2/L1 T5/L1 E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L3 1 U2SM 60 No No T5/L5 T5/L8 T5/L10 E-Plan Table B-1 2 U2CRS N/A U2 T2/L2 No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table B-1 60 U2 T2/L3 No No 4 U2 R0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2.R0#2
- E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No 8 U2A0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 9 U2A0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2A0#5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 60 T4/L7 No No 12 U2RP E-Plan Table B-1 60 T4/L1 No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L 13 E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L6 14 U3SM N/A No No T5/L 14 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No
. 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T5/L 12 No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T4/L2 No No 25 U1NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L 15 No No Plan / E-Plan Table B-1 IPEC Page 18
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT IPEC'TABUE2.- UNIT 2 PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN
- * *.
- One Unit...:. On.e Control Room ** *
- ,, ,, , . , * .'.,
- ,,~..
- Analy~~s#~ ~. S~earri Line. Ru,pJu~e (J.12)*, . * . *., ':, , , . : *,
Miriifoum: Operations: erew/N.ecessary,.to. ;lrr:iplemerif AOPs ci'Qd ,EOPs:or,SAMG.s W~pplicabte;,
- Line'.# GenericTitle/Role Oil-Shift Position** ** rrask Anatysi&: .
, _c ,~-
- ,1 Contr:olling. Method
~ *, * -* ".'..::cs _ , ,:;
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training Shift Manager
-. Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 rT"raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 rT"raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 Auxiliary Operator #3 rT"raining Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable
,, ,. ,, : ~
Line# ' Generic; Title/Role "' ',
- , On~Shift:P_ositie:in. [ask Analysis,
,*', ,, ,."* ' ...... ** ' ,, Contr911ing fVlethod '
N/A N/A 11 Mechanic 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 19
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade
.IF;>EC TABLE 3 .:..*FIREFIGHTING:,
Analysii:; # 3 ~ Steam Un_e Rupture (U2}'
Performed by,, _ Task Analy~is ,*
ControUing '. Method 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A No firefighting activities included in this accident.
IPEC TABL~ 4 ~ ~IATION PR9TECTION AND CHEMISTRY' ' *_-I 1
.:.,\ , .,*.* - *-, Analysis#*3-'Stear:n-'l;'.ineRupture(U2): *: ,' :_, * :, ', . .< ;,.,
ft'1,;)*., pF,.u~"'~fi.~[l)lj1,aS1'\*",,\ ":\;:.:'.:,.;,,;~*~'~t~-
1
_r16~':J:'i'.~E!i8*_,?i.ct_ :rte~.:~_;@i1t~~.~~-::,b:e~_,_~_r;~fi ,. .-~~t~s);':*;i,:S1jii1i'{;;:,:;
1 J:>_:}_~~-it_t*_-iID~~It~_-,
i~ ,_~P1_<A,A_:~_.:_~1,:;i _:!1i}..:.~~ : -~.,} ,: t.'>;'-.:, f_ *1."'
~'A_*
r;., *., '.*. t,,l,,".i-./,f;,.,."l/,;,,, .~*",: *, ,, *:,.\* :,,;~ ~
- , N' , ; :*.,; , * , .' _: ', ._-: >-, '. 5~, 10- :-1 ~- 20~ 2'5 ,35:, 40 ,50.: '*55- 60.-' 55::,, 7.:0- 75~ 80:.:0 '.85-'
1:
. E_ _ - : *_ . ~. 0:5:, 1*0* ,15 20: '25 30 35 - ;40 45 50.' 55 \30 65: 70,, 75 8Cl 85 90, 1 In-Plant Survey:
U2RP X X X X X X X survey TB) 2
- On-site Survey:
U3 RP (site X X X X X boundarv) 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 Uob Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad
~ssessment:
(Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific )
RP (describe):
N/A )
7 Chemistry Function
~ask #1 (describe)
U2 Chemistrv X X X X X X X X X X samole all SG's) 8 Chemistry Function
~ask #2 (describe)
N/A
- Times are estimated.
_ IPEC Page 20
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
' l~~p:rABLE.s...::~MERGEl'*JCY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 3 --,stearri,Line*R* t' *(U2)";,,,. *
- iitl;<:~
11 1
,.', *; ftt:k., * '*n';.z;fi;J':;d":/d
,,:,;;,.*:; Analfsis#
,'L'" **,,eu/'.,,,,;,;;li:;¢f,*')_,,;. t>,",.J,;,41,y',;', ,;", ~,.,, ,,/' ~g-~r.~ \*, , * '.<\,<(£\" ,,,,
- "\.*'~- ,, , '" ,q_~;*~ ,., "*".,:",*,~./.':,;' '.~~'1" .,,, :,,?':: \, ,>>::,, .. ***:,~~;-~t~i*' ' *:'tt;ir~;, '
t4:~~~:,~::;*.,
- Func~ion {Task On-Shift Position
- Task Analysis Controlling Line~
Method
\:,;*, ' .: ,, .,
,, ~* ' ':, ,,' ' ' : *,,,,, '* ' " ;,,','*'*
,,, ,,,,,"/,, ,,
/**.' '*' o,' L "',,, : ' ' ',,"
Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL)
U2 Shift Manager Program / EP Drills
!Approve Offsite Protective Action 2
Recommendations N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 3 lApprove content of State/local notifications U2 Shift Manager Program 4 lApprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
U2 Shift Manager Program / Emergency Planning Training Program .
Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification U3 Shift Manager Program 7 !Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form U2 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRC event notification form U2 Shift Manager Program 11 !Activate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A U3 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training 12 Offsite radiological assessment Technician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U3 Shift Manager INPO, ANI, Program etc.)
Security Training Program/ EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 21
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT B. Design Basis Accident Analysis #4 - Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)
- 4. Accident Summary
- Break (Double Ended Guillotine Cold Leg (DEGGL) break) between the reactor coolant pump and the reactor vessel occurred. Safety Injection initiated.
- It is assumed core cooling features fail to prevent the core from experiencing significant degradation (i.e. melting) A portion of the activity that is released to the containment is assumed to be released to the environment due to the containment leaking at its design rate.
- 5. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- Assume GE conditions are not met until after the emergency response facilities are activated.
- Assumed reactor coolant activity was >300 µCi/cc 1-131 equivalent based on FSAR LOCA accident analysis. Initial EAL based on event.
- 6. Procedures for Accident Response
- 2-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room
- 2-E-1, Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant
- 2-ES-1.3, Transfer to Cold Leg Recirculation
- IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment
- O-CY-1645, Chemistry Response to Plant Causalities IPEC Page 22
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables l*f">
- +:, l~EG.!Aij.LE;.f;:<<iN-~,HlfT :RP~11::iq~$ \, -
Analy~1s # 4 - LOGA (U,2) * .
- . * 'J *,. *,, ;.* ..,\** ,,,, , ! , , , .l * '" c" ,,. **. <<>'.,, ,. ,ah :* ::,,., '" ' *.* ,i;** \ ::, 5
- Augmentation Role in Table #
,Line On-shift. TMS,
. :*if. ' Position:.* /', Basis:Docuril~nt* ....
- Ela'psecfTirile* . !:' *tune*#;~*** *, .* !Jnanalyzed I:; ,,* '"~ ..:. ' '.,,, .::, .*, .... 'j" ,,.,*., ._.:, :, .,'.' ,.. -~ * ..:,:.. .(mi A)*,,..;., . , /<, Y<<* ,,'.,*<' <"' \' >C, ,,;J,,
- U2 T2/L 1
< < ~; . r~.~rl.. *i, . Requirec;i? .
I/), ,,'-*- ,: ~P. f:'"'"'.: ',<;,- .
r T5/L1 E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L3 1 U2SM 60 No No T5/L5 T5/L8 T5/L 10 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L2 No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table B-1 60 U2 T2/L3 No No 4 U2 R0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2AO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No 8 U2AO #3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No
.9 U2AO #4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2AO #5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 60 T4/L7 No No E-Plan Table B-1 60 T4/L1 12 U2RP No No T4/L6 E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L13 E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L6 14 U3SM N/A No No T5/L14 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 17 U3 R0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T5/L 12 No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L 15 No No Plan/ E-Plan Table B-1 IPEC Page 23
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor License~ Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 uxiliary Operator #1 raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 uxiliary Operator #2 raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 uxiliary Operatof #3 raining Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable 11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A NIA 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 24
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade
. - l~E~JAf!LE} ~.flREfl9~H,1,t:J~ ,
- ' Analysis # 4 - LOCA (U2) ,
1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A Firefighting activities not included in the analysis.
IPEC Page 25
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT I;;,:., ,. ::.. ;, :* IPE~ :rA~lE~ +:AAIDIATION PROTECTION:AND'C,HEMI.STRY> ' ' t*** ,* *, .. .
'~,
'"[' Positioh*Perforniing
.. ,,.*, ,, J ..,. ... '.* .Analy!iis # 4 .::-. 1'..QCA(U2L. *", *t ,,, ,.,,,,., ,} ,' ,., : ,:,,', ,.,.*: <,~. ::?c.
,,,, /
,J lv.0+ Functiort/' :Y~sk N .
,,,.. *,;f .,,;;:;,,,, .~~r:fo~~~~e Jim~J?eripd ~fteri.Ern~rg~pcy; Pef[ar.ation :(m(.nut~~):*,.,:
.l
- ~ 6,, k:
' & 0.:.5 5;- 10~ 15 ?.5-
'1(f *1*5 20 25 30
'.'i'*
ti~- 35:-' 40~, 45~ *50- :.5f5'; !,{:!0,-. 65- 10~.
46 45 50 *55 .Bo: 65 ..70 7,5 80, 85* 90 c < *3' 7t§i 80- *1:!5.~,
1 In-Plant Survey:
U2 RP survev all X X X X SG lines 2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Mo!litoring:
N/A 4 Job Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:
(Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP (describe): U2 RP goes o CR setup habitability/contamination X X X X instruments N/A )
7 Chemistry Function task 1#1 U2 Chemistry X X X X X X X X Samoleall SG 8 Chemistry Function task 1#2 (describe)
N/A IPEC Page 26
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- / *,\~~:: *:;: ~~: t <r,,:~1.PEO "lABL:E:~!t~:EMERGENGY*'PLANJMPLEMENT-A'illlON* * , ::-<":w,: ,:. * : 2':'f;' , .,,.*.
. , . Analysis # 4 LOCA (U2) , '* : . :, ' . .' .
Li~~;I(; *;:M); . ::,F:un:ctjonrcrask*:" :;~ ,' ::4.,
- o~~Shin Positiohr;;,>. Task~naly~is Conlrolling ~
Method
- Declare EGL) the emergency'classification level U2 Shift Manager Emergency Pl anning Training 1 ( Program I EP Drills
~pprove Offsite Protective Action 2
Recommendations NIA NIA 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications U2 Shift Manager Emergency Planning Training Program 4 !Approve extension to allowable dose NIA NIA Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 U2 Shift Manager Program I Emergency Planning (e.g., to assemble, evacuate,' etc.)
trraining Program ERO notification U3 Shift Manager Emergency Planning Training 6
Program 7 !Abbreviated NRG notification for DBT event N/A NIA Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form U2 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform* State/local notifications Communicator Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRG event notification form U2 Shift Manager Program 11 !Activate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) NIA U3 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training
. 12 Offsite. radiological assessment tTechnician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRG notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training 14 notificaUons (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U3 Shift Manager Program INPO, ANI, etc.)
Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 27
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT C. Design Basis Accident Analysis #5 - Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR)
- 1. Accident Summary
- Primary to secondary leakage 150 gal/day in all SGs. All noble gases carried over to the secondary side through SG tube leakage is assumed to be immediately released to the atmosphere.
- Operators recognize the tube leak and isolate the affected steam generator.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- EAL is based on event.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 2-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- 2-E-1, Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant
- 2-E-3, Steam Generator Tube Rupture
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- EP-EP-115, Forms I
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room
- IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment
- O-CY-1645, Chemistry Response to Plant Causalities IPEC Page 28
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT
- 4. Tables
- ' ' _;;,
- ;. ~r. --~*; ,. - .
IPEC TABLE 1 "7.0N~SHIFT.POSITIONS *;
"'Yit;: ::,, ;: Ahalysii;#,s"f"sGTR'(U2)':'
'* ~(.01 . F
- ,r,
,, Augmentation- , TMS, -:
,11.irt.e, on;snifti,, ., Basis Dbc~*m~nt*,*' ., IL'Elapsed'ifime' R?J.~t:~a=I~~,,', ~. : ~na:nalyzed
- Pos.itiori . *Task? Required?
.,(mint . _,,, _";,_: .,.,,* ,,
- -* .; '~ !.
.U2 T2/L 1 T5/L1 E-Plan Table 8-1 T5/L3 1 U2SM 60 No No T5/L5 T5/L8 T5/L10 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L2 No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table 8-1 60 U2 T2/L3 No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No No 6 U2 AO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2AO #2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No 8 U2AO #3 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 9 U2AO #4 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2AO #5 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table 8-1 60 T4/L7 No No E-Plan Table 8-1 60 T4/L1 12 U2RP No No T4/L6 E-Plan Table 8-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L13 E-Plan Table 8-1 T5/L6 14 U3SM N/A No No T5/L 14 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A '--- N/A No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No. No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table 8~1 N/A T5/L 12 No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No 26 SRO F8L E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L 15 No No Plan/ E-Plan Table 8-1 IPEC Page 29
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
,,;"* . ' ** *,IPEC '.FABLE 2 .::..itJNl"F2 PL:~T'OPERATIONS..'& SAFE SHl:JTl!>OWN'. **"i ., ", .
- r .' ,, ,, ,..0ne Unit.:.:,Qne,.control Room:,;., e:., ,;. "" ,, *' ,;,1,, '<-*"
~, ,.,, ,* ,, * , ,'. <*i *,r"~na[ysjs,#.5-,SGTR .,,,, . . * , , .,,: . :'
Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to Implement A08s and .EOPs. or SAM Gs if,App!icable ,: *.,:.. ,,, )'
tine#* Generic Title/Role O~~S~hj~!, .PQ~iti91\ T~s~ Ava!ysi.~ . ,, . ,,,.: ....
':"'.' , '/' j ,:\; '~
, .: Conttornn~.M~th9d "'"
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 ~uxiliary Operator #1
!l"raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 ~uxiliary Operator #2 rrraining Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 ~uxiliary Operator #3 rrraining Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable l!ine'#;r* Gemeric:Title/Rore:,,,. ,,, , , **y , !f~S~ ~!1~1f;=:,i~ ."<* {, .~:.
\,,;,\, ~:i,~,:*~tfi.~ ,,>:,;i,.:,-:J& -, ) ~\'., ~ ~ 0, ,~,' Jtr:,,\,~P<,~, ;;:,/
Gon~ro.lJing Metho~.: . ,
11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page'30
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade IPECTABLE 3-:; FIREFIGHTING.
Analysis,#5.;::. SGTR (l:J2)'.
- N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A IPEC Page 31
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT 1 In-Plant Survey:
RP#1 Surve't_s X X X X X X X X X X X S/Gs RCS 2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 ob Coverage:
N/A 5
ssessment:
Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP#1 (describe): CR abitability/air X X X X X sampler/contamination 7 Chemistry Function ask #1 (describe) X X X X X X X X X X X X Sam le all S/Gs 8 Chemistry Function ask #2 (describe)
N/A IPEC Page 32
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT 1,:,,' ;l: '<<,; .* .' ,1PEC T.AB1£E s:*
- EMERGENCY PL:AN'IMPl.:.EMENT'ATION; * ",: *,., .. , :, ,,
.~Q~l~!iis ,#*5.r..SGT~.(U2): .,
1;;;.: ., *,
- ,; ,, ,, 'l*
,,,;,.*, .,.; ,i
' :,:;* ' Fuiictiofr*J Task*: Or:i'\.:Sliift Position "' Tasl{Arfalysis Controlling '.
(1rie'#
';' ' .;; ,-,, *,
- i ,, ,; '. ,'
Method* 'l;i
- ,, . ,,,
- *, ,cl' "
Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL)
U2 Shift Manager Program / EP Drills
!Approve Offsite Protective Action 2
Recommendations N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications ~2 Shift Manager Program 4 !Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 U2 Shift Manager Program / Emergency Planning (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
rTraining Program Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification U3 Shift Manager Program 7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form U2 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRC event notification form U2 Shift Manager Program 11 ~ctivate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A U3 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training 12 Offsite radiological assessment Technician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U3 Shift Manager Program INPO, ANI, etc.)
Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 33
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT D. Design Basis Accident Analysis #6 - Fuel Handling Accident
- 1. Accident Summary
- Dropped fuel assembly over the core in the containment building. The activity is discharged to the atmosphere at the ground level. No credit is taken for filtration or isolation of the leak.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- Additional SROs, ROs, NPOs, and RP techs are assumed to be on shift as part of the refueling/outage staff to assist the Shift Manager.
- EAL is based on the event.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room 2-AOP-FH-1, Fuel Damage or Loss of SFP/Refuel Cavity Level IPEC Page 34
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables
, ,.,. ,**. ..:. ,* ; ,i,. ,
1.PECTABLE;1- ON;SHI.F:TPOSITIONS,:
, ,\!. ;.,
- i; Analysi? # 6-: FHA. (i.12) ": "*' ' *
,,,,. * , ,?{,,_ ,, ', ,,, .,. ,,, , >: ,.,,, , :,c,) , *:,, :1 ~1,':, ,0'*; , c:, i, , ;, J';;
E-Plan Table 8-1 1 U2SM 60 No No 2 U2 CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L2 No No 3 U2 STA E-Plan Table B-1 60 U2 T2/L3 No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2 RO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No No 6 U2 AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No 8 U2AO #3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 9 U2AO #4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2AO #5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry -E-Plan Table B-1 60 T4/L7 No No 12 U2 RP E-Plan Table B-1 60 T4/L6 No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 T5/L 13 No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L6 14 U3SM N/A No No T5/L 14 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T5/L 12 No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security Plan/ E-Plan Table B-1 60 T5/L 15 No No IPEC Page 35
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Shift Manager 1 Shift Manager Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 hift Technical Advisor I Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 uxiliary Operator #1 raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 uxiliary Operator #2 raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 uxiliary Operator #3 raining Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable 11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other . N/A N/A IPEC Page 36
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade IPEC TABLE3....: FIREFIGHTING
,. Analy~is #~-~ FHA(l)2} ** . , ,.
line f;.
- .o-,:-/ . . **:'*,,p~rtQrrriJ~d* by;':il~:"' ' ;:~t"
- ~'
,*?*,
- J"~~R Analysis C,o,ritrom~.9tM~tl:tQ~':>* **;,s;:*:
, - . . 0~
.J ', ,: -- ,;,, , '.c,' ', ,,,
\
, '~ ,'. ,-. ' ,' 0 ,0 *,*d:i 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A Firefighting activities are not included in the analysis.
IPEC Page 37
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
,if;., / ;:~!:,. :~ . :: * .. IPE&1T~BLE '4 ..:'.J~~DIATl<?,N: PR?TEC:'flON::4N°, CHEMISTRY r .* '. :*:* *r,* * *. *" , ;,** ']
' ,, ,, ...... ,. , ,:. ,Ana!.YSl~:#6,::--.Fl::IA(Y2),. '" ..,,,,. ,. , .... , , :,.c., ,.,.. ,,::~. ,,..,.,.::.,.,
'J.:, PositionPerrom1ing
,< :I' Ftmctidr'.):/ 'Fask;;,, ' Js P~rf9r;rng:~c~)Ii0,1~ F~riocj,Aft~~.E:cnerg~n~y,Q.~cla~?tioq (njinujes)0.. : .
,'"_.,. i .;. ' -* ,, ...
.J N 70 ..
~. t.: '* ',,
5-
- 0-5 ' ' .10:;,
- 10'. 15 "20 15., *20- ~5- 30-,,
- 2s, ':'
- 30 35
,',*,p
- !~" '40-,
45 A5-, i59~.i ;55~
50 55
,,,'f;,
60 60.- :65-. ,75~, 80,-. . 8,5.;;,
6.5 70 ,,75* ,80. 85 '9.0.
1 In-Plant Survey:
N/A .,
2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 ~ob Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad
~ssessment:
(Included iii Table 5
6 Other site specific U2RP:
X X X X X X contamination monitorina 7 Chemistry Function ltask #1 U2 Chem.
Monitor olant X X X X X X X X tvents for risina levels 8 Chemistry Function ltask #2 (describe)
N/A
- Times are estimated.
IPEC Page 38
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT 1*, ' / \1 *,' ..:. 1~'* .. ::1t:\',:*:1:r:1pE~TA~L:E*~*""EMERGENCYPl:ANIMPLEMENT ATION' ' *:,,, ,,,,,
' ,;* ~.;' ,<;'I~
It;*: ,,f,*
- L . ,,:,t '.",,::": \);:,
e~ '
,,.':{.:.,; *, .*'(t,'c -~tlc:11¥,~i~
\
~Q.:
,,,.. ' ,.,,,.,t:', FHA ...{Ui~,'
i < ,> ' , \ / * . , , "<
'.1;1 :;;i*l;; ;
. ~!,lnctiori !:Task Line~ . *',' . ' **;*,,'.. '., ' 9":f~.~i~tPP;~z~ti~Q i: . ,:c:1sk ,,
Analysi~
Controlling.* ... .
, , " , ,~ , :;q, , , r .,i:j-\ ,'
~' ,, ' *, * " Method::* *
- Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning Training 1 U2 Shift Manager (ECL) Program / EP Drills Approve Offsite Protective Action 2
Recommendations N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications U2 Shift Manager Program 4 ~pprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 U2 Shift Manager Program / Emergency Planning (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
[raining Program Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification U3 Shift Manager Program 7 !Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form U2 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRC event notification form U2 Shift Manager Program 11 !Activate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A U3 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training 12 Offsite radiological assessment rf echnician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator C Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U3 Shift Manager Program INPO, ANI, etc.) .
Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC . Page 39
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT E. Design Basis Accident Analysis #10 -Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown
- 1. Accident Summary
- Fire in the control room and decision is made by ttie Shift Manager to evacuate and shutdown from the Alternate Shutdown Panel.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- Assume reactor tripped, turbine tripped, feed pumps tripped, reactor coolant pumps tripped and other actions of step~ 4.1-4.12 are completed prior to evacuation.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 2-AOP-SSD-1, Control Room Inaccessibility Safe Shutdown Control
- IP-EP-120, Classifications
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control room IPEC Page 40
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALV-.IS REPORT
- 4. Tables
> t :.:*tPECTABl:E *1;,...: (l)N~SH,IFT'P0Sff10NS( 'I** \* .* *, . *:*** ,' *.*...
'ifo.' .Zt;_. ":.'/' *'/ ,'P' ,*';"*
,<,,,.,.iAn.alY.S!~.#.tO-,i:Cqntrol, ~oom,Evacliation .c:1nd*Alternate* S.hutdowm(U2)!1 ',, ,*,, <,
i
- ,. .r*, ,*;,< ,,:, ', ': "*.**, ,, ' ,., '), "'*<,' a.?" e* ,, ,, .,,
- dn~ On:-shift t
'A'i.igmeritation
- Role in Table'#
. * . *:.Una.nc:1ly;z:ed. 1,.. .. ,TMS.' .. ,
Basis Document', * , ,;ElapsedTimf:l.*. I".*, 1J*tin'e # *
- f.' Positfon' ' ,I ,. ,,
Task? I>: ~~.9~Jr~9'~'.;l
'{ .,';,> ,,.;* ' ' . ,*. ,,,;,
' ..,, ... "', ;i; >.* .. (minr. ~. 1,,,.;,, ,,,.. '"" ,,; "' ,* '*,:. / .t?J!i,,, ', ,.~ *ti:"'" . ., '
1 U2SM E-Plan Table B-1 60 U2 T2/L1 No No 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L2 No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table B-1 60 U2 T2/L3 No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A L U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2AO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L2 8 U2A0#3 No No E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L3 9 U2A0#4 No No 10 U2A0#5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L4 No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 60 N/A No No 12 U2RP E-Plan Table B-1 60 T4/L4 No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L 13 E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L1 T5/L3 T5/L5 14 U3SM N/A T5/L6 No No T5/L8 T5/L10 T5/L 14 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L9 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L5 No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L1 No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L 15 No No Plan/ E-Plan Table B:1 IPEC Page 41
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT 1
- ~b* ~*.E~l~~~~}~ ~;~~e~:n~t;~~:;:!!?;!o~!;:t~: ~~'~!(:~1f;, :., '-:,
'.1\..
. *'**Analysis #1:o :'.l*Coritrol Rooni:Evacuation and'Alternate Shutdown (U2).
. L.irie: #:; Generic Jitle/Role,;.,,;j; .,*
'., ,* ~>?:\~ ..' '"';J~:' .*:
t,' ;~ ,:,,,,:' :',,:;,. ' , : ' * ;
'!"':~ On-Shift*Positibn..,
- ,:,,, '.";""'.*"a "ix,'",",,, ':;t:::, . ]~sk ~n'.~l_ysi~'o:.ftl,r,. '. /t:t}
Controlling*Method '
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical f.dvisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program I
Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 ~uxiliary Operator #1
.. Ifraining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 ~uxiliary Operator #2
!fraining Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 ~uxiliary Operator #3 rrraining Program Nuclear Plant Operator U3 Non-Licensed Operator 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown Training Program 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable 11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A Fire Brigade IPEC Page42
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
, .IF:>EC TABLE 3 ..,;FIREE'.IGHTING, * ,
Analysis #10- Contf91 RoorriJ:v~cu,ation'and ~lte~na(e Shu\dQ:)llff'! (Ui) 1 SRO FBL Fire Protection Training Program 2 U2 NP0#3 Fire Protection Training Program 3 U2 NP0#4 Fire Protection Training Program 4 U2 NP0#5 Fire Protection Training Program 5 U3 NP0#4 Fire Protection Training Program IPEC Page 43
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
,J: . 10. * *t*/.: * '* IPE*cTABLE *4 ..::!*RADIATION PRO'JiECTION':AND 'GHEMISTRY: ,.,,* ' ... , .., *'
.. .. ;, , . ~nalysis #,1.<t::::- Gc:>nti:c:>I Rc:>c:>m,E~aclt;:1ti9n arid Altema~e .S1:tutdc:>JNn,:(U2); .. , ,, .. ,, . .
L'* Position Performing . n rf, , . r* R'.
- d Aft'* E , D ', 1* . t* * : (' * . t )* . l
~ii:J.,' r;unction\,*/iask* . . ,;;, .,>,, ,;. .* r:/. ~nn.~1:1c~:. 1rne , .,~_no.. . .~r merge1:1~y .ec ar:~ 10n r:11mu es ,, ..,., ... 1
.*N , . 5
- 5- 10::., 15~ 2. O:.,, 145- ._30:-, 3_.!:i-. AO_~- :. 45~, .50- :.55-. *60~. o5-. :,70-* 75.:;;_ *so,., ._85r 0
- ,E '*' _
- 0- H> :1s: 2d 25 30 35 '46 ,4.5 50 _55, *6Q (35 zo:_75 ao .. a.5 :90 1 In-Plant Survey:
N/A 2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 Job Coverage: U2 RP FB Support X X X X X X X X X X 5 Offsite Rad ,
Assessment:
llncluded in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP (describe):
N/A )
7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe)
N/A 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe)
N/A
- Times are estimated IPEC Page 44
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- "IPEC 1TABLE 5:_ EMERGENCY P.fAN.'IMPLEMENTATION ,. *::,,*:'
IJ"\ ,7: .*~:* , * *" :/. , *: 1
' ,** ;rA,n.a.l}'~is!\,1 ~I:7-.Cpn,~r;ol.R.9,9111. E;~a~~~ti9~ ag:d.~lte~n,ate,. ~hu,tcfowrlJU2),'. :
1:**::'
'*y::,:* **;r ,* Fun_ction*rTasl<*. * ; ,,. .c*
,'!'"~'
Line * ..
- "'
- On-Shift . Taslc"Analysis Controlling Method
',~?
rn'
,,.';,, , *:::' Positton.w * *,; : '1' Declare the emergency classification level U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL) Manager Program / EP Drills
~pprove Offsite Protective Action 2
Recommendations N/A N/A U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications Manager Program 4 ~pprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Program Notification and direction to on-shift staff U3 Shift 5 'Emergency Planning Training (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Manager Program U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification Manager Program 7 ~bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program U3 Shift 10 Complete NRC event notification form Licensed Operator Training Program Manager 11 ~ctivate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event notifications U3 Shift 14 Licensed Operator Training Program (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Manager Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page45
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT F. Design Basis Acci~ent Analysis #11 - Station Blackout (SBO)
- 1. Accident Summary
- A loss of all AC power occurred on U2 ..
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- Assume the emergency diesel generators are not started for the first 60 minutes and that that the Appendix R SBO diesel is started and energizes equipment per procedure.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 2-ECA-0.0, Loss of All AC Power
- 2-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- O-SOP-ESP-002, Emergency Contingency Plan
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room IPEC Page 46
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables
~ ' ~z.. . . {,c. ,: ~ IPEC'r,ABl:E':~ *.:-'"'()N~SHIFT .POSITIONS *:.** "" < .,. * "' ':
. , An~lysis,#11:,-*~tatiori Blacl<:out,(SBO) (U2)*.: * ** *
- Augrri'e~tation ., Ffole i'n'Table # '. u*
- I *d *TMS
- Elapsed Tim1f :/. L::ine # ..., *
- rialjla ~e .. , f<, * ,. ** .;~.*
,*,:,* (.m,n.*)*.. ,.*;;,~*.*.t: Task*. . Regu1red.,,,
~ .,. *.,.*<* .. ,., .. 1... *"'" J>: 'i .' "Y., .1,* .. , ,,.i,,
U2 T2/L1 T5/L1 E-Plan Table 8-1 T5/L3 1 U2SM 60 T5/L5 No No T5/L8 T5/L 10 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L2 No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table 8-1 60 U2 T2/L3 No No 4 U2 R0#1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No No 6 U2 AO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No 8 U2A0#3 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 9 U2A0#4 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2A0#5 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table 8-1 60 N/A No No E-Plan Table 8-1 60 T4/L1 12 U2 RP T4/L6 No No E-Plan Table 8-1 T5/L9 13 Communicatc;:>r 60 T5/L 13 No No E-Plan Table 8-1 T5/L6 14 U3SM N/A T5/14 No No 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No 26 SRO F8L E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security Plan/ E-Plan Table 8-1 60 T5/L 15 No No IPEC Page 47
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT
'* * - , .,. ', *: IPEC TABLE'2 ..: UNIT 2 PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN.*
, ;,,>*/*,: l°; ;'* ori~'Utiit::.:.'dneContrtS'fRocim :,~. 1 '"~,*i ':',>".' <,'
, 'c ,,~ ,'. " ,,
.
- Analysis #t1*:.::. s,ationBla'ckbut (SBOL,(Otr*
Mihirnum OperationsJ:;rew Necessary to*!rnplerpent AO Rs af:]d l=GPs or SAM Gs if'Applicable', , ",:' , ;,
l,,;in.~.#.' Generic Jitle/R<>Je, , OnrShift :Positic,n. ::,,, ,y rrask,Ar:ialysis;, :,,,>'
', *'":' P,'<' " '"".'. ',,,' ,
I~,. ,;,,,. ..~;,,, ' r, L ,,,
,, **,,:', ,~ ., . ' ,,_., ,, . "\~ , .,',.,, ',,J>' z, :,, ..; .. ,. , , *>* .;,~,*.,, ', ,;;, ',* dJ *', *;, C9nt~ol!ing,
. Nl~thgd
,f; , :,
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 $hift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 ~hift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 Auxiliary Operator #3 Training Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A OJher (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Lj~,e,#f G.e~er,ic 0Ti11e/ijol.e ,:askt Analysis C,ontrolH"'g Method/:
11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A Fire Brigade IPEC Page 48
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- ,leEC:.T.ABl:E.3:t:;i:;1REFIGl:ITING~"! 1*1* ., .
- Analy;i~ #11 :.:j;fr1tion Biackout'(S80),<U2) 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A Firefighting activities not included in the analysis.
1 In-Plant Survey:
U2 RP X X X X X X X 2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 Job Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:
(Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP U2 RP X X X Control Room Habitabilitv 7 Chemistry Function
~ask #1 (describe)
N/A 8 Chemistry Function
~ask #2 (describe)
N/A
- Times are estimated IPEC Page 49
J IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT i;,; ti._;, ~' '."'
IPEC TABLE 5 - 'EMER,GENCY-'PLAN' IMPLEMENTAT.ION.
,, 7,;.;
';:, i .,,, '"
F*,
,,, i::,.A~5!-'Y'j~ #,t~ ::: S,tati~r;t f:\!~c~9ut (S,~Q) (~,J,~)
~ , ,,
. ", * , ** '. r ,, "* "
,,, *- FunctiO_IJ ,f,Jasf<;~, *
- On~Shift:11, '.Jeask.:An'alysis'.'Controlling<Method b,;i~ *";:,
P.o.sition
,, I',. '
!tr:, .:\', ;' '" ,.
' ~,.,,:.,,. ~' P, ,' f, ,i Declare the emergency classification level U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL) Manager Program I EP Drills
~pprove Offsite Protective Action 2
Recommendations N/A N/A U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications Manager Program 4 ~pprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Program Notification and direction to on-shift staff U2 Shift 5 It Emergency Planning Training (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Manager Program U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification Manager Program 7 ~bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator I Program U2 Shift 10 Complete NRC event notification form Manager Licensed Operator Training Program 11 ~ctivate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event notifications U3 Shift 14 Licensed Operator Training Program (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Manager
!security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability !security Drills IPEC Page 50
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS.REPORT G. Design Basis Accident Analysis #12 - LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR
- 1. Accident Summary (Assumed for Staffing Analysis Purpose)
- The unit is in a Site Area Emergency AS1 when the Shift Manager is given a dose projection update and site boundary survey data that supports >1 Rem TEDE dose at the site boundary.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- All actions for SAE are complete.
- No transients other than LOCA are considered.
- The ERO would be activated at an Alert or SAE. For Staffing Analysis purpose, the T=O clock is used for the emergency plan actions to evaluate the capability to implement the GE classification, PAR and notification functions before the ERO arrives.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-410, PARs
- IP_EP-310, Dose Assessment
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room IPEC Page 51
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT 4 Tables
- ,, .. .* .. ,. ,;
- , *.\~ .lfEC,TABL.:E 1 -:,G>N:-SHlfT ..Rp~rflON&/*. J:1, . ~. :': ,,g** ,. *'
l'>
" ,, ,,, . * ~a!~i;~l~1~ :*~~'~/V~?ne~al ~!11~~~e~.~~. .~it~.,~~l~a~1e ~n~ ~~R,..JU2):: ,: f. ,>. ,.
- prye, on~shift . Augmeritafion Role in.,Table #
e,si~ Dohuffient* " l!Jnanalyzed ~;£ TMS*>
Elapsecf'fime * * *,tine#".
~* .~,,q~*!rE;it?.:
1
'# Positio~
h.. , .. L ,, , ~ ; ' , , ; (>, l ~ "~',)\ ZS:'>t :; *\,..*,,,;, ,,. ' :~.;.? *:'.~: '.. '\,, h :(min)1' .,i;~ * , Ii' .\ ,..,.,1.1, **,;;;'; . :;~ *,.I~~~~1* '* .1 U2 T2/L 1 T5/L1 T5/L2 T5/L3 E-Plan Table B-1 1 U2SM 60 T5/L4 No No T5/L5 T5/L8
~
T5/L 10 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L2 No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table B-1 60 U2 T2/L3 No No 4 U2 R0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No I No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No 8 U2A0#3 E-Plan Table B-,1 N/A N/A No No 9 U2A0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2A0#5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 60 N/A No No 12 U2RP E-Plan Table B-1 60 T4/L2 No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L 13 E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L6 14 U3SM N/A No No T5/L 14 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 17 U3 R0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T5/L 12 No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No 26 *SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L 15 No No Plan / E-Plan Table B-1 IPEC Page 52
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
~'; rr,~ . ,t .* * :'IPEC,T:ABl::,E 2'*f UNl:r 2. P,LANT*OPERATIONS:&"S:AFE SHl:JifDOWN"' **:: ***;* '; ,*'
. . . * .One Unit.,.. One Control Room . . . , .. * ,.
,f,
' '\,~nalS,~is #,~2 "'.':tOCA/G,eneral1Emergency with1Reiease,~nd*'PAff (tfa}
Minimum Operations. Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs* and EOPs or SAMG;; if Applicable line,# Generic Title/Role.; ':. :, if*' ' , .. ,,,,, .. On~Shift Position ./' :** ' °, Ta'sk'Analysis ,, ,, A
,,,', ;l;; '
. gory,t.roll1ng, N!~th<?,~ . ' ,.;
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operatpr #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 Auxiliary Operator #3 Training Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable lf:ine'#' ., GenericTitletRote* . a$k Analysi~**
c,e11Ji:<>1Ji9g.;.1Y1~t~i?,~:,.; i. 1 11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 53
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT IPE"TABtE;3; ....~.FIREFIGHTING;*, ' ,,, ,
,,::, A11:a1ysi!; #'.J 2;-- 1:,0GA/Genei:,~I, Emergencywith Release.:ahd' PAR (tJ2)"; ,
1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A No firefighting activities included in the analysis.
- 't: Positior:fPefforrnihg':*>t> ,;,, ':i ~** .-:* ,*.: *** ':. , . ' ' :::;:* . 'C"' *_: ' * . ' '. , ** )*;; ,, , .'
- h,,i ~urieti~r).f\yasbf
- ,;: I>, )a',~;,, ,;(,~~r:fQT!Tl§!n~~ T[!rn~ ~E{10p,~tterprp~rgen9}',,p~9l,ar13t10'1 Jrp11:1~t~~ ' ,,; *,:,,
~;.- 1,: . ib~s Si ,>10.:, ,,15~ t20.:. *25~ 30~' a.5~ i4rn.: 45.* ;50*:z:, 55- 60"** *55_: *,7,0~ :,15:r *s0~ :,a5.J:
'-"E . ,;, * * ,,;, ;,, , . , , ,, ,JO. ,rn,.! .. 2.0 ,,25 ,30 ,,,35~ ,Afk ,;45;; 50; ~55-? [,.60:, .65 70,, ..7.:5': *80 1* *85" ;:g~H 1 In-Plant Survey:
N/A 2 On-site Survey:
U2 RP (site X X X X X boundarv) 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 IJob Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad
~ssessment:
1/ncluded in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP (describe):
N/A )
7 Chemistry Function
~ask #1 (describe)
N/A 8 Chemistry Function
~ask #2 (describe)
N/A
- Times are estimated.
IPEC Page 54
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT LJ~;~ '.f? *
- F1il'nctiorf</:Task > -:1,>: *
- Qn\;Shiff Position Ii", Tas!t\~naly~is Controllin*g ' .
.. Method.
,;.~.,, .. ,; ,,)*,; ;,:., L *'.' : * ,,,;\/:~ '* >< ,'. *.:..,.,,,/,,; . , , * ,,
Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL) U2 Shift Manager Program / EP Drills
!Approve Offsite Protective Action U2 Shift Manager Emergency Planning Training 2
Recommendations Program / EP Drills Emergency Planning Training 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications U2 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 4 !Approve extension to allowable dose U2 Shift Manager Program / EP Drills Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 U2 Shift Manager Program / Emergency Planning (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
Ifraining Program Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification U3 Shift Manager Program 7 !Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A Complete State/local notification form U2 Shift Manager Emergency Planning Training 8
Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program 10 Complete NRC event notification form U2 Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training Program 11 !Activate ERDS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A U3 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training 12 Offsite radiological assessment tTechnician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U3 Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training Program INPO, ANI, etc.)
Security Training Program/ EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 55
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT VIII. APPENDIX B- UNIT 3 SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS A. Design Basis Accident Analysis #3 - Steam Line Rupture
- 1. Accident Summary
- Steam pipe rupture in a faulted main steam line downstream of MS IVs with loss of offsite power.
- Release until MSIVs close. Puff release to turbine building and to environment.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- EAL based on Shift Manager's discretion
_../
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 3-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- 3-E-2, Faulted Steam Generator Isolation
- 3-E-1, Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant
- 3-ES-1.1 SI Termination
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- I P-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room
- 4. Tables IPEC Page 56
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT IPEC TABLE .1 - ON-SHIFT POSITIONS l:Sf:'* ;'
<:i; ,,
'!.1;*,,
- ,*.':t. '., ',,';,'.J',;,~n~li~is ~ ~;i;J}~tea,i;u~~i.n~ ~H~t~r~,{:~;! ,, *, _;\ : :;,;:,, ', :: :'~,;,;~+, , ,,r;. :*/,:
r
' Augmentation Role *in Table # ' '
tine On-shift Unanalyzed T~S.
Basis Document: . EJapsed.Tim~ / L:,ine#
,i#*' Position,.,.* .
- r}~\ \.J ~,' ;,;~)!,.
- :: **<;.£-. .~ ~.r;: ',,:-.P, . *. ,~{t::,,.'i :!~i~ * .',?'. ~;}>;1t,; ;~ ,:::;*~, (mih)t:1: /.' ~~)i~ '( ",:.:f!:~:s1/:*.:' <:~ Ii'::. I~,i~? , O'Requir:ed?s, *
(";! :;;>:,:,:-:.: :'"i>_~,, '": *;
T5/L6 1 U2SM E-Plan Table B-1 N/A No No T5/L 14 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A NIA No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 8 U2A0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 9 U2AO #4 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 10 U2AO #5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A NIA No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A NIA No No 12 U2RP E-Plan Table B-1 , N/A T4IL2 No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5IL9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5IL 13 E-Plan Table B-1 U3 T2/L 1 T5IL1 U3 Shift T5IL3 14 60 No No Manager T5IL5 T5IL8 T5IL 10 .
15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL2 No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL3 No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2/L5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA l U3 T2IL6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL7 No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 NIA T4IL7 No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 NIA T4IL1 No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No
$ecurity Contingency 27 Security 60 T5IL 15 No No
. Plan IE-Plan Table B-1 IPEC Page 57
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT IPECTABLE 2-UNIT 3'PLANT OPERATIONS & SAF,E SHVTDOWN
,, , ,, , :, , * . . Qne Unit:: One*Confrol .Room *: . , '
. ,, 'f~}~!A~al~sis*~-3~tsieam'l:air)iRt.'pt~r'e'(U3J' ,. .,
Minimum Operations Crew Necessary to.Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAM Gs if Applicable Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Qperator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 ~uxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 ~uxiliary Operator #2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 ~uxiliary Operator #3 Training Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable L:ine'lf
- Ger{eric Titl~/Role'/t:'f-' ,.,,,, ,: .,,.,,' "
, c::n,:shiff Position' , ;'
' J~sk An'alyshf/* * , .r.,,
.. Co1.1tr~!ling Met~od 11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician 'N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 58
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade
',, 1.PEC TAB.LE 3 ":':Fl,REFIGHTING1 ; '
. A"n'atysis if3~:L::ste~ifi?line RG~fore (03).
PerforlJ!ed by T~sk Analysis ControlJing Method
":,::)~t:~t~:*'; '
1 NIA NIA 2 NIA NIA 3 NIA NIA 4 NIA NIA 5 NIA NIA No firefighting activities included in this accident.
I'" . * * * ,, "
.:,**:. ;:"* IPECTA"BLE.4 _,RADIA1110N. PROTECTION AND CliEMl~:rRY
. ,' : , , ;c ,. Analysis#
- i '
3"..,. Steam,Line Rupture (.U~). ..C ,, . *.* , , : , . *,
l 2 On-site Survey:
U3 RP (site X X X X X boundarv) 3 Personnel Monitoring:
NIA 4 Uob Coverage:
NIA 5 Offsite Rad
~ssessment:
(Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP (describe):
NIA )
7 Chemistry Function
~ask #1 (describe)
X X X X X X X X X X U3 Chemistrv samole all SG's) 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe)
- Times are estimated.
IPEC Page 59
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT 1
- '>". *IPECTABLE 5 - EMERGENCY'PtAN IMPLEMENTATION
- . * ;,, ~flatysi!f # 3 . :: Sfeam Lin~ ~uptu~e'{U3) *Y ~. ,,, * ,. ~
, ",a ' ',%;.i., :r' ~** ** '1 ,~;.,,. ~~- , ' . /! :°'~ ;"' ,,
v::'q, :,*,.;' lw lJ' ,/
hln.e~..
I<***"* ;,*J****
Declare the emergency classification level U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 1
(ECL) Manager Program / EP Drills
!Approve Offsite Protective Action
- 2 Recommendations N/A N/A U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications Manager Program 4 !Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Notification and direction to on-shift staff Licensed Operator Training Program U3 Shift 5 It Emergency Planning Training (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Man 9 ger Program U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification Manager Program 7 !Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event' NIA N/A U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form Manager Program 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Emergency Planning Training Program U3 Shift 1O Complete NRC event notification form Licensed Operator Training Program Manager 11 !Activate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Emergency Planning Training Program Perform other site-specific event notifications U2 Shift 14 Licensed Operator Training Program (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Manager Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 60
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT B. Design Basis Accident Analysis #4 - Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)
- 1. Accident Summary
- Break (Double Ended Guillotine Cold Leg (DEGGL} break) between the reactor coolant pump and the reactor vessel occurred. Safety Injection initiated.
- It is assumed core cooling features fail to prevent the core from experiencing significant degradation (i.e. melting) A portion of the activity that is released to the containment is assumed to be released to the environment due to the containment leaking at its design rate.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- Worse 2 hr. EAB dose occurs at 0.6 hour6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> to 2.6 hour6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. Assume GE condition not met until after the emergency response facilities are activated.
- Assumed reactor coolant activity was >300 µCi/cc 1-131 equivalent based on FSAR LOCA accident analysis.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 2-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room
- 2-E-1, Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant
- 2-ES-1.3, Transfer to Cold Leg Recirculation
- 1 IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment
- O-CY-1645 Chemistry Response to Plant Causalities IPEC Page 61
1 IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables T5IL6 1 U2SM E~Plan Table B-1 NIA No No T5IL 14 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 8 U2AO #3 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 9 U2A0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 10 U2AO #5 E-Plan Table B-1
- NIA NIA No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 NIA T5IL 12 No No 12 U2RP E-Plan Table B-1 NIA T4IL1 No No 13 Communicator E-Plan Table B-1 T5IL9 60 No No T5IL 13 U3 T2IL1 T5IL1 U3 Shift T5IL3 14 E-Plan Table B-1 60 T5IL5 No No Manager T5IL8 T5IL 10 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL2 No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL3 No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL7 No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA U3 T2IL8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 NIA T4IL7 No No' E-Plan Table B-1 T4IL4 24 U3 RP NIA No No T4IL6 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 NIA NIA No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5IL 15 No No Plan IE-Plan Table B-1 IPEC Page 62
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT
*, ,.,, " ' IPEC'TABL?E '2 ..!: UNIT'2"PLANT'OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN.. , .. , , ,
,. . *,. , . '.Orie Onil : :. dne:S'cbntrol ~9om': * .' :; * *, , J ', * '*
. * .* , Analy~is # 4 : . . to*c.Acua) ,* . * ,. . .. * .
Minimclm~Ooeration~rcre\o/ Neceisary to lmolemen't AOPs'and EOPs' or* SAMGs if Applic:abfe .
. Lin~f# Ge'ri'eric'Title/Rble' ,. ,. . . ,, On~~~ift Pos.ition, ; , ,, . I~~~ At:}a_lysjs .'" . . . .,
, ,. ,. , , . :1s. ,. ,, , ,,. .. * ' ' .., . . :~ ,* .* ~, ,, ,,,, c;:~,111ro!li'19J/l~t,hg~., .. ,,), .. :
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 Auxiliary Operator #3 Training Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A .N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) PersonrnlNecessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable Lille* # G~erieiiC ,Title/ROle*:* -. Op-S~Jft~.~f19,~i\t91;(, ..:, ~r~s~.~paJySJS i:'j'~** ., .* ,:*~~< ... ~
1
- * ,, J .*
., * '"' ::, : *:;,** ,'.. "~ : :: ,:r.*, :;.*:...' ,,, ., . ,.. ,, .,, *.* ,.. r"'" . .1 * ,;,: yc,:* .,,; >,.,. i}* ";:,, C~>ntrelling,Metho'cf'.?.'
1 1
11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 63
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade
, IPECTABLE 3 .::,.l'flREFIGHTING . * *
Analysis *ff'4*!:... tOCA'(tfa) ;,. ,,
1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A Firefighting activities not included in the analysis.
IPEC Page 64
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT 1, :,c:*, >f*" ,/ *:r/ * ::*' *'IP.EC~TABtE4 2'RAD1AT10N'.PROTECTION'AN0 CHEMISTRY:"'. *:: :?, ' ' *1
.. , . .: Anal,ysis :# 4 ~ LOC:A (U~) * , * .. '"* ,. . * * ,, ,,
- 'L- Positi6ff Pen'ormirfg>,' ' :\ :.*,, :rt' P~if~~*~nc61"i;e P~ricid Aft;~ Erri~;g~~*~y d~cl~r;tion (~inut~~y
I i=~mcti~n.J.Jas~
- ".' I
, Nd' , ieC *.. , * . ' . , t~ .* 5.: 10! 15_:: 2()'.. '25- :ao- 35~' 40- 45" :5().:. 55,.; i6b 0 :55_ 7o.: 75~ 80~ 85:
5
.E, _,, ..... ~*-*-- ~--- .* _ ,o- fo 1.5 20 25 30 :35 40 .45 .5o 55. eo.. :."65 J,o, 1,5- .~!J. as...
1 9o 1 In-Plant Survey:
U2 RP survev all X X X X X SG lines 2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 Job Coverage: U3 RP X X X X X 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:
(Included in Table 5
6 other site specific RP (describe): U3 RP goes to CR setup habitability/contamination X X X X instruments N/A )
7 Chemistry Function task
- 1 U2 Chemistry X X X X X X X X Samole all SG 8 Chemistry Function task
- 2 (describe)
N/A IPEC Page 65
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT i;,, ,,: :".';,;. T' ,.,. ? ':
' ":?"IPEC l'A~LE 5.:. EME~GENCY PLAN: IMPtEMENTATION ' *~ "I . *;
An~ly~is. lit 4. LOCA .(U~),., . ,
le i'*f ";'f'*>:". ' * .~ ~,,, "';,p fr:,; ',, ," .'" ,t!~, ,,:,,:~, ?f/>* "* tt.~!* ; < '"
, ~uncti(?n /,J:ask . On~ShiftPosition
'r: *)r',. **: ,/;,4'"',J*' *,1;,/"( ',~ 1,:, *: 1'.~.s.~ ~~.t;1ly!;s. C~,f;ltr~Jli119,_ :
Line~ '*' "'° , ~,} ., ', 'i ,,,w :, " '~,; ,; "' ',
' ' Method' :
,, ,, ',,<*,. ,,,i, *... *.*.. ', ', ' *' ,,'
I
'*.... , *.. *" I.* .. , ,.r, ,J ** . . :.,. 1*, .,,, ",:;' :,,. ' ", .. , ,."' "' ',,,, J./ ,,,., .*'
Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning Training 1 U3 Shift Manager (EGL) Program / EP Drills
!Approve Offsite Protective Action 2 N/A N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning Training 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications U3 Shift Manager Program 4 !Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 U3 Shift Manager Program / Emergency Planning (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
rTraining Program Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification U2 Shift Manager Program 7 !Abbreviated NRG notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form U3 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRG event notification form U3 Shift Manager Program 11 !Activate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A U2 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training 12 Offsite radiological assessment trechnician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRG notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U2 Shift Manager Program INPO, ANI, etc.)
Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 66
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT C. Design Basis Accident Analysis #5 - Steam Generator Tube Rupture (SGTR)
- 1. Accident Summary
- Primary to secondary leakage 150 gal/day in all SGs. All noble gases carried over to the secondary side through SG tube leakage are assumed to be immediately released to the I
atmosphere. .
- Operators recognize the tube leak and isolate the affected steam generator.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- EAL is based on event.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 2-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- 2-E-1, Loss of Reactor or Secondary Coolant
- 2-E-3, Steam Generator Tube Rupture
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- EP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room
- IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment
- O-CY-1645 Chemistry Response to Plant Causalities IPEC Page 67
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables r 1
.. J~EG T~BLJ'1 ~O~:;~Hlf7J:.PQ~!I,1QN~. .. ,, : ,. ,;fa
.' * ,.,Jt'.,* *,'An~
..*@,'* '"I ys1s*
J. *'# *5'"'.SGTFf(U3)"'
- ..... * * . *' ql,. . ** '.
' : i. ~ ;:,, r ,? ' :~Au'g111eritation( Role' in/J;abl~1 # l".,)r,;'.,, ',\'t ,;.,"~1<*
. >')' ,fJ f)'J;,
Line* o,r~siiitt:: *
- Urianalyzeci TMS Basis C>ocument *
- Elapsed. Time . l Line# *
- Position ,;,,{!': :* . ,,~ . ,::,<* ,: *,;i~\, . ',,,i:;~ , * ::%(mi[))~.... , :,;.: .. , * ,i::: .,, :.r:,,. I';,'~ .~~~'.k},,\tf**' ~
,ij,equir,e~:?~'°
}a} ~ ' ,:'< , ,;",
1,. / "1 *'" ~.~ *~* 'J, Jr*f//, ~ "t.@) "' l, ;;',:,, . <, * ,
T5/L6 1 U2SM E-Plan Table B-1 N/A No No T5/L 14 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 4 U2 R0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 6, U2 AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A 8 U2A0#3 No No U2A0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A 9 No No E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A 10 U2A0#5 No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T5/L 12 No No 12 U2RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T4/L1 No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L 13 :
E-Plan Table B-1 U3 T2/L 1 T5/L 1 T5/L3 U3 Shift 14 60 T5/L5 No No Manager T5/L8 T5/L 10 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L2 No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L3 No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L7 No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T4/L7 ' No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T4/L4 No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L 15 No No Plan/ E-Plan Table B-1 IPEC Page 68
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 uxiliary Operator #1 raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 uxiliary Operator #2 raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 uxiliary Operator #3 raining Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable 11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 69
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade IPEC TABl'..E 3"~'FIREFIGHTING'"
- '-Analysis* #5 *:_ SGTR (U3). _ .'.
. Task
~' "', "t Analy,sis C~mtr9IHng:Method
"(i ,, " "~" ' ' ~ " :"'"' ' ,, ", ' ,
"'1.', o>"J ,,_ ..
1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A IPEC Page 70
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
'*,>, IPEC'!f.ABLE . .,,,
- ~ _,f'"s,)'('
,, ':!'.; ' 'i/i'; 4" .::.>RADIA"f'.ION PROTECTION"AN~ CHEMl~TRY ,. ' '{
0:
Analysii;; #5,~,,SGTR (U3)
,, ' .:>1 "Lf PbsitidnPeifor,rning
- _ 1 *,, Function- /.Task,
',,', ,"?,~" .*-;;.- ::*:.\t':
!!~'"' /,; / f '"'iJ ":' <<:,,"i*,",l<,.*,' ,'".'.*-'"" *0***,*,,;?* ,";/",,
- Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minute$).*
'l'
",;,,e;?;* t1
'*:i
, N, r I,;., . :5: ,1(0:'_ '15-* 20r ,:25::.* 30'- 35..: :40.:* (45- :50~ :55_ *~*o- '65-: 70.* 75- '80- 85:.:
0-5
~E .. ,~1..:...-- ,' ~,--J.-~~*- , ; ? '~
,* *10 . 15 ,20. , 25. 30: 35 40 A5, 50 55 ,'60 .Q5 1:0, , 75.. 80; 85. 90 1 In-Plant Survey:
U2RP X X X X X p
2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
NIA 4 Llob Coverage:
U3RP X X X X X X 5 Offsite Rad
!Assessment:
Oncluded in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP (describe):
N/A )
7 Chemistry Function kask#1 U3Chem X X X X X X X sample SGs 8 Chemistry Function kask #2 (describe)
- Times are estimated.
IPEC Page 71
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT ic,.* *:, ':>.','* j's ,; f,' .,. , -~ , ,*c, :*,
' '"' IPEC T ABL:E'5 .:.: EMERGENCY PlAN IMPLEMENTATION
);',,: ; , tnalysis~#, 5.-.S$J:R~('J3)\ * ,, '~ ~,
',,, ','£-"
' ' . Function/ Task" Orf-Shift Position Task Analysis C~ntr;ollhig" Linei ',, ,, ,}:
?~/ ','( " '/"
' ,' Methoct
- : _,,, .~ ' *>' ,, ',),,
Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning Training 1 U3 Shift Manager (ECL) Program / EP Drills lt\pprove Offsite Protective Action 2 N/A N/A Recommendations Emergency Planning Training 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications IU3 Shift Manager Program 4 IApprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 U3 Shift Manager Program / Emergency Planning (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
rTraining Program Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification U2 Shift Manager Program -
7 !Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form U3 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRC event notification form U3 Shift Manager Program 11 !Activate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A U2 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training 12 Offsite radiological assessment
!Technician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U2 Shift Manager Program INPO, ANI, etc.)
Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 72
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT D. Design Basis Accident Analysis #6 - Fuel Handling Accident
- 1. Accident Summary
- Dropped fuel assembly over the core in the containment building. The activity is discharged to the atmosphere at the ground level. No credit is taken for filtration or isolation ofthe leak.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- Additional SROs, ROs, NPOs, and RP techs are assumed to be on shift as part of the refueling/outage staff to assist the Shift Manager.
- EAL is based on the event.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- * *. IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room
- 3-AOP-FH-1 Fuel Damage or Loss of SFP/Refuel Cavity Level IPEC Page 73
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables T5/L6 1 U2SM E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A T5/L 14 No No 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 6 U2 AO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 7 U2AO #2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A 8 U2AO #3 !';Jo No E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A 9 U2A0#4 No No E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A 10 U2AO #5 No No E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A T5/L 12 11 U2 Chemistry No No E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A 12 U2 RP No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 T5/L 13 No No E-Plan Table 8-1 U3 T2/L1 T5/L1 T5/L3 U3 Shift 14 Manager 60 T5/L5 No No T5/L8 T5/L 10 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L2 No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L3 No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L7 No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A T4/L7 No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A T4/L6 No No 25 U1NPO E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 26 SRO F8L E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security Plan/ E-Plan Table 8-1 60 T5/L 15 No No IPEC Page 74
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
.. >\'W~tr.. ** * ** 'IPE¢",:F 1ABLE 2:.;. !J~l.;F.:3cf?t;6.Nl'O~E~TIQNS. &(S~E'SMUJD'OWl1f.:: '.* :
- * " * * * .d11e Unit....: OriEd:ontrol R<:>om . , . . . * ' . > *. * ',
. , ' r~>;;k
~* '
- , . . . . Analysis # 6 ~ FHA (U3) .
Minimum Operations* Crew Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable L:i~e # Generic Title/Role . . ' . On~S~ift P<:>sition,C . Task Analysis
...iv*JJ(,; 1-~ t:','.: ~: r::~: ;;/,:;;:;Jx'.:-:~ ' .~,:: ,~'. ,>k', *~" ,i1L:::::,,,.* .. :.:, :s::;~j . *. < J*,,~;,~~:/X <;,ont.r,,q!!f:9~i.~~t~<?<:t.:.:~: J';1::,:;
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 ~uxiliary Operator #1 rT"raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 ~uxiliary Operator #2 rT"raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 ~uxiliary Operator #3 rTraining Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown NIA NIA 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown NIA NIA Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable
' ,, ', * *i,<,.,
Line# G~neric Title/Role . On-Shift Positior{>::;.i:. * .* Task ~ri~lyl:,iS ,~ 1
- Controllihg Method '
11 Mechanic NIA NIA 12 Electrician NIA NIA 13 l&C Technician NIA NIA 14 Other NIA NIA 15 Other NIA NIA IPEC Page 75
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade
. , ' .. IPEC TABLE 3 --- FIREFIGHTING Analysis #6 ~ FHA (U3)
. P~rformed by , Task An~lysis Controlling Method
,,::,";;::./: ;.c-:/J,:,~f~t~;~{:,:.'? ' , , ');~;';;;;,:)!;,, :~l\t::~r/ 1 , **s<J;;;e:~!7*1,SI 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A Firefighting activities are not included in the analysis.
IPEC Page 76
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
,, ',,\, :,* IPEG T.ABLE-liJ*.;:: RADIA:TION'PROTECTION:AND ~HEMISTRY:'
1
,S ,,, ' '/ .... ,
, :f;, ,., *,,p ,J .r , ,. */ ,,. , .. , 1Analysis,#6*L FHA*:(U3) ::1 . ;.!,. .* '* '*,.
",l,;t PF. osjtti?n P/eTrforkr:ning 11 ,,
- l unc 10n as . .. .. . . , ,. , ,.
h Perfo'rtnarice.Time P~rio!fAJtef'Effietg~/fcy'o.~~1.~fatfcf.. *(mi~.i:it.es)t' i! *i:*.,,
'~r ,,, ' y,i * , , ,: O '5 5: ,10~. 1.5- io-. 25- .3Q~, }.5-: :.40,, 45: i59:- §Jh ,,!:iQ; s5- ..70- (q-, 80- ;~.501'*
' E_, ' -- --* -* ' -: . 'fo' :15 ~to \,25 '30 ~35 : 46 45 Sb 55 ;*56 65 . 70 , 7!5. )30, 85 !:lO.
1 In-Plant Survey:
N/A 2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 Job Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:
(Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific U3RP:
contamination X X X X X X monitorina 7 Chemistry Function
~ask #1 U3Chem.
Monitor olant X X X X X X X X vents for risina levels 8 Chemistry Function ask #2 (describe)
N/A
- Times are estimated.
IPEC Page 77
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT I
- {: ,,:;, *;** .. **,, **',; ,.,,_, '",
.**': t::. IPEC 'fABt£5 'EMERGENCY'PL~N'IMPl.EMENTATIOr:.r
- A~alysis#6,~ f'.H:A (U3):)*** ., '*'
I';; '
',, ' ,,, ',, ' ,: * ,'.,,, .,,;,. !. ,,,, ,, ' ' ii< '.. '.'.,,, ,;,, ,,',*., ,,;,,,,,, ,.;,, :* ,d, ' ':;,, :,;:,,,,' '" ; ,,, . :, ' ' ' ,, .' ,; '*
Function,/ Task*. : On-Shift.;Position
.,.. /' *:Task,Analysis.Controlling:.
Linet. 1,, a ~ "~'i-'\ " < <" J' '* ,, ,,~ ';" ,, ' .,,,
,;. " ,, ', ,. *, ,,, ' 'C
- ~*:Metho,d,c
'. .,,, ,', ,,: .*, - ,, ,~ '" , . '" /
Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning Training 1 U3 Shift Manager (ECL) Program I EP Drills
!Approve Offsite Protective Action 2 Recommendations N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications IU3 Shift Manager Program 4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 U3 Shift Manager Program I Emergency Planning (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
tTraining Program Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification U2 Shift Manager Prpgram 7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A 0 Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form U3 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRC event notification form U3 Shift Manager Program 11 !Activate ERDS* N/A (runs 24/7) N/A U2 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training 12 Offsite radiological assessment
!Technician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U2 Shift Manager Program INPO, ANI, etc.)
Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 78
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT E. Design Basis Accident Analysis #10 - Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown
- 1. Accident Summary
- Fire in the control room and decision is made by the Shift Manager to evacuate and shutdown from the Alternate Shutdown Panel.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- Assume reactor tripped, turbine tripped, feed pumps tripped, reactor coolant pumps tripped and other actions of steps 4.1-4.12 are completed prior to evacuation.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 3-AOP-SSD-1, Control Room Inaccessibility Safe Shutdown Control
- IP-EP-120, Classifications
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control room IPEC Page 79
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables
- 4~,
- { .*: .:*** , ; IPEClABL:l;t~ -:©N-SHIFTr F?OSl;TIONS*!' . :,,1,;, *, , *"*. ,:; ;:.,
- 1.; ;/;,
- Analysis #10 - Control Room Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown (U3)
'.:,'k~,0* ,~;'; ,wi',i ,' "-*v/J\ '<"~: l ' ", ,4 .J. ,/s~* ~ "',t, ',;'";:-\
- 1" '.%:/ t 1' ( '*~ t ~ "*
- f .i; ¥"' '\);, ,, :~00 "# "~
a..i;.e: 0 p n~\ I '
h"ft.
Bcisis':c>ot:6m~nt<
,, Augmentation Role in.Table#
ElapsedTinie. i':'* J:t:.iife*#
1 U .. . 1 .
n;na J;eu*. ~*'>*,'T.Ms*
- .i .
. *d~.*,
[; ; ., .o~* *,?:r. '*,$.; .,.,.,, .,,, ,,. ':: '.;/ ,, ;. ,:,.';,**ti -;,,;.°' (miri)t:.-;~,. {.. '*?' ,, I', *:*c.,'.,~~. <;, ,;; ..* ~q.Y!re.i~.*.
T5/L1 T5/L3 T5/L5 1 U2SM E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T5/L6 No No T5/L8 T5/L 10 T5/L 14 2 U2 CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 3 U2 STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 5 U2 RO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 7 U2AO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 8 U2AO #3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L3 No No 9 U2AO #4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L4 No No 10 U2AO #5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L5 No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B~1 N/A N/A No No 12 U2 RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No T5/L9 13 Communicator E-Plan Table B-1 60 T5/L 13 No No U3 Shift E-Plan Table B-1 U3 T2/L 1 14 Manager 60 No No 15 U3CRS E-Pla'n Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L2 No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L3 No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L7 No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L2 No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T3/L1 No No Security Contingency 27 Security Plan/ E-Plan Table B-1 60 T5/L 15 No No IPEC Page 80
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 uxiliary Operator #1 raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 uxiliary Operator #2 raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 uxiliary Operator #3 raining Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable 11 Mechanic 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 81
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade 1 SRO FBL Fire Protection Training Program 2 U2 NP0#3 Fire Protection Training Program 3 U2 NP0#4 Fire Protection Training Program 4 UQ NP0#5 Fire Protection Training Program 5 U3 NP0#4 Fire Protection Training Program IPEC Page 82
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- .';> . *::;}?~;':~}, : ....*.:~ ?:,l~J:'?>)T~ijl.:E 4:.:.:.: ~DIATl0t'ff>J{~1:ECJIQN'A~f??PHEM1STR~'::,!!;:":? ;::* .* /.:\', :i:~;*:(,:;: 1*:1
- ' . . Ar:1aM:,is #10 - Contr61,,Ro6m Evacuation and Alternate Shutdown (~3)* '
'L Position Performing I Function/ fask Performance Time Period After Emergency Declaration (minutes)*
l N
.,-1.E..,:;;,~ ':ii
., ', *. <- H~S,
! ,,.,;~*f...1
.5s 10-, 15- :20,. 25- 30-; :35-, 40,. 45- ,50~ 55 65-* 70~ w- 80-
,,. ,r.* 85-
- w; , t5z ,20.~ .25. ,30* *.'35' ;1
- *{Q' 45 /50. :.5!f 60 65 ,]Q~ .:?5 8Q,; \8,5: 1,,.90, 1 In-Plant Survey:
N/A -
2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 lJob Coverage: U2 RP FB Su1;mort X X X X X X X X X X 5 Offsite Rad
~ssessment:
1/ncluded in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP (describe):
N/A )
7 Chemistry Function ask#1 (describe)
N/A 8 Chemistry Function ask #2 (describe)
N/A
- Times are estimated IPEC Page 83
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT k . ' :':\*;,;> . :,,:c:f::*c::_: ':IPEC'TAB.L:E 5'.:~.EMERGENe\i:':,PtAN:'IMPlEMENTATIQN'. ;'::'.}':, . ,*:** **.: /*,:,?*:i>:
. ,. ', An~lysis' #10.-Control Room**~vacuation and*Alter~atES ShutdOWl'l"(t.13)
Fun.ctiori 'fTas1<, ,, ' ' :, '>!*' * , *'.fOn-Sliift :* :' Tlflsk AnaJ~sis Co),trolling:M~ttiod
[ine#l
.Position
' ,, ,. ,,,:, ' ,;' cc ' ,, J:' ',*, / ,,: ,. :i":, ' ' ,,*,, .. : '* ' ' , ' . ,"""' ,.,,:: ,,,,,:**,' *,.
- ,_< *- ~~. '
Declare the emergency classification level U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL) Manager Program I EP Drills
~pprove Offsite Protective Action 2
Recommendations N/A N/A U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications Manager Program 4 !Approve extension to allowable dose
- N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Program Notification and direction to on-shift staff U2 Shift 5 ' Emergency Planning Training (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Manager Program U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification Manager Program 7 !Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event NIA N/A U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program U2 Shift 10 Complete NRC event notification form Manager Licensed Operator Training Program 11 !Activate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event notifications U2 Shift 14 (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Manager Licensed Operator Training Program Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 84
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT F. Design Basis Accident Analysis #11 - Station Blackout (SBO)
- 1. Accident Summary
- A loss of all AC power occurred on U3 ..
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- Assume the emergency diesel generators are not started for the first 60 minutes and that that the Appendix R SBO diesel is started and energizes equipment per procedure.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- 2-ECA-0.0, Loss of All AC Power
- 2-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- O-SOP-ESP-002, Emergency Contingency Plan
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP~115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room IPEC Page 85
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables
- IPECTABLE,1...,,0N".SHIFT POSITIONS,, ,,~
'\' :;:
- ' ',~),., * .,;;\, ,,** ">'fJ<f', / /'/tl~ '.;,,f<f11:"/, '.,~*.*"
- Anal}'sis #11 '..l.Station Blackout (U3)'
',.*,,*;,;~*"\ui'.'.,,;;" 'Ii,
- ,
- :" *.;*,,, ,' ,,:. '** **,,* *, : Augmentation:* .Role. iri"Table1#
'*~f11*, " ~>>P a ',,,,*
TMS'
~ .~' *~
/'/st~
tine pn*~shitt' : *~' ' r ' 1 Unanalyzed .
Basis Document Elapsed :rim~ / Line#
I.:~,;: Position, ..
..:,*'!) ' i,,.}1,,,"4"~,f¢,*
t :;_,,: '.", )<,' ~z: , .;{,/_;. ' ; it\ i':Y(rnint* f 1r,,';.;,~.. ', ',, '\/~ ' ', ' f
,Task?
- ,, > '~ 1 ' .".' : Req~ir,ed1:,
T5/L6 1 U2SM E-Plan Table B-1 N/A No No T5/L 14 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 , N/A N/A No G No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 7 U2AO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 8 U2AO #3 E-Plan Table B-1 t-:JIA. N/A No No 9 U2AO #4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2AO #5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 12 U2RP E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L 13 E-Plan Table B-1 U3 T2/L 1 T5/L1 U3 Shift T5/L3 14 60 No No Manager T5/L5 T5/L8 T5/L 10 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L2 No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L3 No - No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L7 No *No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A I N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L15 No No Plan/ E-Plan Table B-1 IPEC Page 86
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT
',.; *-' :IPEC T.<<BtE2-U~l'F 3:PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE:SHUTDOWN"' . *.,
!'\' ,,. <'.. * .gne,,l:Jnit,...:. One,CoritrokRoom,1, . ,* ;:
. . .. , . . ' Analysis #11 - Station~ Blackout'(SBQ)JU3,) .. * . . .* ,,
tvlinimurh'Op'eraUOnsCrew Necessarv'to:lmplemehtAOPs andEOPs~*or SAMGs 1f Aoolicable* 1
,Lin~.#,; ~en.eric.Tttle/~ol~,. * ,,:: On~.Shift Position: * *. , rFask,An.alysis. f , ' ,.
- , .. , ,, .
- . *' ,, . . *, . , ,, .u .,J*. , ~Qn$r9,t,tingJ1/let~pq,,,, ** , ,,
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program
' Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 !Auxiliary Operator #3 Training Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable
, , J:a~,~:.~n~!y,~is,;:,., * ,. ,<,:t,..
. ~oritr~W.ng:M~~~o.~.\ ,:e .
11 Mechanic N/A N/A 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 87
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade
....*... IPEC TAB.LE 3 - FIREFIGHTING . : . '.
.>c:fAn,alysi~' #1;1;,_:!Sfatic:>rf'i::liI1cR6iit:(SE30) '(U3f ?'yv;,;*
1 NIA 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A Firefighting activities not included in the analysis.
i'."f:, * *.r,*:. ** ..: **.1PECTABL:E4..:.:R,AD1A'.fl0WPROTEC"FIQN"AND'CMEMISTRY ***.
. .. . Analysis #11 - Station Blacko'1:1t (SBO) (U3)
- , '. * .* l Posi,ti.011,PerfOrming
,*. **,*;,,**.'.*:.,**,*,;;i~*:*;:, * '"".
If'.*< ' .;,'.},\'./p' 'rf' .:*,\ ,;..* : ***. ,:".*~..**:: .. *p'*.;~,f.;; ***...1A*f't'i1:,.,E, ,;, ,,/;ti,,,.,,.... 'I)*~*i£~*1*,, ' t\<,:JJ;,(,,.;'t; ;, ,Jt:,~,,:).* *. ,,;:":?{; ,'\i;J: ;l
- ,:* "~ .e. orrnance*,;.1;1mer ertou . er: mergency* .e.cara 1on.minu es * <'.' * *
- F1:mct1onlTask * . ** *., . **: *.** *,.* * *, , * * * * * *
- 'N* : . , , . 5:. 10° 15- *20- 25° 30~ 35~ 40 50~ 55., .60 70- 75, 80~ 85--*
[!::** : .1,~,,: , -.:'.t;;:: *). 8:~ ,JO:, ,:)5.*i ,49,; '.:"25. ?:~p: ')5; ~:~o. :4:$¥: ..,.50:, iJ~5,. )3(;l.:Ji :;6q* :.;'l:Pr ;z:5,,, {~@. \~6.i t90:~
1 In-Plant Survey:
NIA 2 On-site Survey:
NIA 3 Personnel Monitoring:
NIA 4 Uob Coverage:
NIA 5 Offsite Rad
~ssessment: ..
(Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP NIA 7 Chemistry Function
~ask #1 (describe)
NIA 8 Chemistry Function
~ask #2 (describe)
- Times are estimated IPEC Page 88
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT l*:;i? j(:/: ,., A ',;\e;'}IP,E'G.TABl:;E'.'.5,G;r: EMERGENC;~ f.!L:ANJM!?t:~tyl~~TATION:>;;~~~t . ,,
,,.. , i,::~~
' , , * * * * *.**. : Analysis #11- Statiofi'~lackout (5B'0)'(l:Jj)' ,** ' , *. : ..
Function /,Task On-Shift Task. Analysis Controlling Method Line~ '
". *: : ,, Position,
{**,:;,'.t HJ:i ,. ,;:,:,, \?Ji~/~/; ' :, , ~, ,,.::.: ',, :, ' , ' ,' ,: '.~ :){;:t:~l ~,,_ ;;. -~~,* t:'s;~fii:.; .*. *;~, *: ,:.<.:,~\i:::,,::: .* , ,*,: ,":.C+;.=!i}
'i Declare the emergency classification level U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL} Manager Program I EP Drills Approve Offsite Protective Action 2
Recommendations N/A N/A U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 3 Approve content of State/local notifications Manager Program 4 Approve extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Program Notification and direction to on-shift staff U3 Shift 5 (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
' Emergency Planning Training Manager Program U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification Manager Program 7 Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form Manager Program g, Perform State/local notifications Emergency Planning Training Communicator Program U3 Shift 10 Complete NRC event notification form Licensed Operator Training Program Manager 11 Activate EROS NIA (runs 24/7) NIA 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event notifications U2 Shift 14 Licensed Operator Training Program (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Manager Security Training Program I EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 89
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT G. Design Basis Accident Analysis #12 - LOCA/General Emergency with Release and PAR
- 1. Accident Summary (Assumed for Staffing Analysis Purpose)
- The unit is in a Site Area Emergency AS1 when the Shift Manager is given a dose projection update and site boundary survey data that supports >1 Rem TEDE dose at the site boundary.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- All actions for SAE are complete.
- No transients other than LQCA are considered.
- The ERO would be activated at an Alert or SAE. For Staffing Analysis purpose, the T=O clock is used for the emergency plan actions to evaluate the capability to implement the GE classification, PAR and notification functions before the ERO arrives.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-410, PARs
- IP_EP-310, Dose Assessment
- IP-EP-115, Forms,
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room IPEC Page 90
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables
.i ::: . IPECT~BLE 1-0N-SHIFT POSl'nt>NS . . ..
Analysis #12- LOCA/General Emergency with Rel~ase and PAR (U3}
T5/L6 1 U2SM E~Plan Table B-1 N/A No No T5/L 14 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 3 U2 STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 5 U2 RO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 8 U2A0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 9 U2A0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2AO #5 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A T5/L 12 No No 12 U2 RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L 13 E-Plan Table B-1 U3 T2/L1 T5/L1 T5/L2 U3 Shift T5/L3 14 60 No No Manager T5/L4 T5/L5 T5/L8 T5/L10 15 U3 CRS , E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L2 No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L3 No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L7 No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A T4/L2 No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 26 SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L 15 No No Plan / E-Plan Table B-1 IPEC Page 91
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- ' ,;;; ', ,,:T:,'> ,:IPEC~T~BL6'2-UNl1'.'3 PLANT'OPERATIQNS& S~E SHUTDOWN'.,. *,: " ' ' / :
, . .. ' One Unif:.... One Control Room . . , .
, . : .* :° '. ',. ,,Analysis.~12.'.:"' LO<;:A/.G~neral,Emerg~ncy Vl{ith,Release a1:tJl:."PA.R (µ3.) ' ' ;
Minifu'din *. bt>'e~atioiis :crew Nef~ss*arv!ttrilitibi~rnenf AOPs and:'EOP§*:c5r'SAMG's* if Ap6IH::able * ' ::
Line# Generic Title/Role , On-Shitt Position Task Analysis .
- ' .:,.:£,:, ,.. , ', ,' *::,* ', .~ * >*,",,,> . :.* Li, :, : .:::,.; , .: . '.,,,,:,i., t * :',,.; 2: , .' .,' '.,.,., ,*, . \,*, :,::*~ . ,., i'cJ 9.:Qrjt,rol}.!J1~.~.~t~~~ ,,.:,,.1;'¥,*
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor
' Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 ~uxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 ~uxiliary Operator #2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 ~uxiliary Operator #3 Training Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable 12 Electrician N/A N/A 13 l&C Technician N/A N/A 14 Other N/A N/A 15 Other N/A N/A IPEC Page 92
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade
,,, -., **.:~ *: *r,, "' 1:,:: *t' :* . 'IPECT~BtE*3<::.*flREFIGHTING'* * '**: - : , . ,,,,, * ,* ...' ,,,,.
i , Analysis #12,..,, LOC:~General l:rn~rgen~y witll Release and PAR (lJ;3) ,:,, e, Lin'e#
,,, .. *"**p~rformed'by" ,,,;** ~ ' ' **,: ... **- TasR Analysis,Coriti'olling Method * --"
.**.~ -. - ',
. ***' ' ,.,,,. *- ,. .. ~,..: ' " ' ' '_;., ,,,;.,, ,*.';
1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A No firefighting activities included in the analysis.
' ,, *. IPECTABL:E 4 ::::RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY'
- "';1,;,, u>&;;: ", ,' ,,~~,:~,, .-~~" ~ Anal.Y,si~t#,1-~-~-'.~:,.P:CA/_~~ri~r~tJ;01'3r9.en:CY}JVitb.-~~l~~,S8;:~gd .eA.R;(u~) i;~~~L ,:)< /~:i" ;,);~'~,,,,;? ~~. }-
I T'. :~!~~fonn'k~~c:rrn.9 e : *. :.*:~e~grroanc~ :Tt~~FI;ri~ci,~!t~r;~~er~,enc~:r,.~~1,~~atte9J~~!,~.~te~t: ;,,,;:)',._ f:,
11 r(t E
'.; ' ( ' ' .* '. ' ~' :,": ,. :0-5 : 5-' ' '
10 20~ 25:: :30: 35- 40-, "45- '50- 55~ *50~ 65- 70,.. 75 85-
- .. *-*, ' ' ' ' ' ' - I* ' ' ' ' *,.* ' - - .*,_
,.: .~ ,,,., ....,, ,.,,.h, ,, .,.*,,,~. -,, ",,.,..* ,,1Jt :c1rR,; '.:20, . 2q,. 30;; ,3Qii; ~fl.0,: :4:R';; r.:!:?O: ,i55;. 11;6Q,, J65, 1:10 * ,7:,5: ,;§0, *a!:i; 90:<
1 In-Plant Survey:
N/A 2 On-site Survey:
. U3 RP (site X X X X X boundarv) 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 Job Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:
(Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP (describe):
N/A )
7 Chemistry Function task #1 (describe) 8 Chemistry Function task #2 (describe)
N/A
- Times are estimated.
IPEC Page 93
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
~
It"* *'. .. '-"*.* IPEC'FAB1.:.E5:'-EMERGENCYPLANIMPLEMENTATION ,. "*
l,J, . ~l)alY;Si~::f#1i::-:-*l:..O.G~Ci~he~~l ,EJ11ergen~y vvith,Rel~a~e;andJ?AR.(U3)f,i,, ...
>,µ' ... ,
'.,* :*."' 0 !*
., ;."' ** Function'/ TasR .,. ' . Ori:.Shift Position ' T;ask Analysis q~ntrolli'ng .*.
lin~ .. *,,,' ., )
'iii;' ';,
- *Metho'd' , ' * ' f
,_, :c \* ,, ,, , , ,: ,~
,,;_,,,, ' \ ", ! ..
,,;~, .:,.,
Declare the emergency classification level Emergency Planning Training 1 U3 Shift Manager (ECL) Program / EP Drills
!Approve Offsite Protective Action Emergency Planning Training 2 U3 Shift Manager Recommendations Program / EP Drills Emergency Planning Training 3 !Approve content of State/local notifications IU3 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 4 !Approve extension to allowable dose U3 Shift Manager Program / EP Drills Licensed Operator Training Notification and direction to on-shift staff 5 U3 Shift Manager Program / Emergency Planning (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.)
trraining Program Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification U2 Shift Manager Program 7 !Abbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form U3 Shift Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program Licensed Operator Training 10 Complete NRC event notification form U3 Shift Manager Program 11 !Activate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A U2 Chemistry Emergency Planning Training 12 Offsite radiological assessment trechnician Program Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event Licensed Operator Training 14 notifications (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, U2 Shift Manager Program INPO, ANI, etc.)
Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 94
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT IX. APPENDIX B - COMMON CONTROL ROOM SHIFT STAFFING ANALYSIS A. Accident Analysis #1 - Design Basis Threat (DBT)
NOTE' Threat based event is single procedure and both units affected. Unit 2 takes lead on EP actions.
- 1. Accident Summary
- Land and/or waterborne HOSTILE ACTION directed against the Protected Area by a HOSTILE FORCE. Assume adversary characteristics defined by the Design Basis Threat.
- Security Code Red condition
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- This event assumes the threat is neutralized immediately when inside the protected area fence, no significant damage to equipment or systems that require corrective actions before the ERO is staffed, no radiological release, and no fire that requires firefighting response before the ERO is staffed.
- Assume at power in Mode 1
- Assume Security notifies the Shift Manager of condition Security Code RED.
- Assume all non~security staff is located inside the protected area at their normal work station when the event occurs.
- Assume all systems function and the core remains covered. No fuel damage and no release.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- O-AOP-SEC-1, Response to Security Compromise
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- 2/3-E-O, Reactor Trip or Safety Injection
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room
)
IPEC Page 95
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
L.me .n~s h"ft a*
- 1 * *. * ,
Au. gmentation Role ih,..
- Table#
U.nana.. .yze 1, d TM~:
- ~*< ~&~!!(~n;:);;i/~t~M;~t~*~1;t;'1{:;<* ~.~1~~~fu11jl!iT 8
. I\ '*~,:0~?'.l*.,;: i .;:'.!;r~~t~::~,,: . ;.~e,~mi:~~f?/'.
U2 T2/L 1 T5/L1 T5/L3 1 U2SM E-Plan Table B-1 N/A No No T5/L5 T5/L8 T5/L10 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L2 No No E-Plan Table B-1 U2 T2/L3 3 U2STA N/A T5L7 No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2 RO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No No 6 U2 AO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2AO #2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No 8 U2A0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 9 U2A0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2A0#5
- E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No.
11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 12 U2 RP E-Plan Table 13-1 N/A N/A No No E-Plan Table B-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/L13 E-Plan Table B-1 U3 T2/L 1 U3 Shift 14 60 T5/L6 No No Manager T5/L 14 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L2 No No 16 U3STA E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L3 No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L7 No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U3 T2/L8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1NPO E-Plan Table B-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No SRO FBL E-Plan Table B-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security Plan/ E-Plan Table B-1 60 T5/L 15 No No IPEC Page 96
l, IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
\',%?,,,1: .'0f? 1 '.IPEC;:f~B(E(2 ...: UNIJ':2 PL:::~NT OPERATIONS'.'.g. S~E SHUTDOWN* ' ' *>' *, .. * : *
. . . . . * * >* * . 9ne. ~nit - One Control Room.. * . . .
MiritffiGnf or3i~ati611~;rew*r-iJti~s$:~i~r:of~~~:1~;~?;~~;'.~~r;:~r*,~A M'ci~';f,,A.pplib~ble;;:,j;,:: **'.'q~'.~:;:*
Lirie#
- Generic Title/Role On-Shift Position Ti:lsk Analysis
~. *~.'* :,;*'.: :1;; \, ? ,.'.,. :¢,_ ~ ,<* ;::.:: :,., '.: ', :'.,,~ ,; ..n:
Shift Manager
- .
- : ..:~.. <;iQt'!,tr<>.llj,i:1~,'.M.~1~9JI ,..::.:::::,:
Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 RE:actor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 Auxiliary Operator #3 Training Program 9 other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A h'*
1:, ,,
'i
}v;,1t,'?&,J~.~iji~~L~fi~;::-;*~~J.~ta.e~At;:ft9,~t;M11~,~~&'.~:ffl; S~Pf PQ;'IY~ .t***
, * ,* * * *** Ot:1e:Umt-OneGontrolRoom ;: ,, , * *.
1 i~!~~f . *
- },J/(1i
. . . ,. . Analysis #'t DBT Security Threat* . ' . .: . . , , .
Mimitn.um 0p~,r13ti.ons,I~rew)\l~:C:~ss1:11¥<<JQ lmPl.~.IJ!l~ntA~P:s.andiE::O.F?sr,c:lr::SAMJ,is,if .t\ppli¢qb.lej:::}' .* ,: "' ,,
- l!'.ine'# Gerferic Title/Role T '. :'*,' ';;C"
', Oh-Shift' Pos.itibri
'" .ll, :, Task Artalysis ...*.* ,*, ', i
- ,, ,)'.
Controlling Method Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator'#2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 Auxiliary Operator #3 Training Program IPEC Page 97
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown NIA NIA 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown NIA NIA Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable 11 Mechanic NIA NIA 12 Electrician NIA NIA 13 l&C Technician NIA NIA 14 Other NIA NIA 15 Other NIA NIA IPEC Page 98
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade
'f,:',.IPEC'TABL:E'3 ;::;FIREFIGHTING"*. *
- 0 C, p ; < < ** ," , , e , f" '" * * > ' ':e ~' "J'<'!, o,, ~1 <
- ' Analysis,# 1 'DBT4SecuritY'"fhi"eaf
- tine* ,,, ., Tasf<'Analysis co'ntfo'llin"g 'Metl'1oc1*:>,: < *.
1 N/A N/A 2
N/A N/A 3
N/A N/A 4
N/A N/A 5
N/A N/A Note: This accident does not include the need for firefighting, first aid or search & rescue.
1,.. * -* ,1,F;>,J;c ;rr~e~e ,~ -:::,;~,.~:r,q~; P,~0r1;~.,:10~5AN~1,c1:1e.JV1'~~Ry;,,.5::*:** .-'.:0:,,,< *'*;;i:,,,,.* ~::
- , * * :* ** . * : '. < Arjalysis'*# 1' oer*:sectfrity 'Ftlreat." * . . * . . ' ' ** . . ..,:* " _" . :,; ' .. ': .
I* , ' ,; , ) . '-~: *; .:,%>/Y *, ' *. '., / ,,*:,.,j,,, ,.,,,;.; \ *:£.., :.;t; :,; < ;,,;, , J\ ' *',, . *., ,,\c\ ,,,.,.r;' ,,;..,':,;i'., ",,,a;.,:,,:; ;i'],;.,: ;,:j,. ,; ,, ); *,;*,J{;i
.. L Positi6n Performing:. * . . . Periofr'nanc;e Time P~tiod After:~mergencyD~~larati6n (miriutes). . * .. .'
- ,11. 1
- i !:l!'1S!io11Jift,~s~~ *. '" "' 1. .,,,., ,t*.; :;,:., .. * * * * * *. . . *. "' ,.,;;," .,.. ,;i./,i.:J,,.,: ,,;t,, *,!,::/*.,.;;.~n t*d.:i ~
- N.., : .'~- : :/- :*.. * \' , , . _Q.:5 . 5,-" ":lb- .1,5~ 120:: 2s~ 30- 4Cl-:- .45..: ,50"' 55-- 60.:. 65-* 70,., 75-*, iao7rs .-:
- ,I;;-; Sw ~;., ,
- ;."~;(_,* . .,*;f; ..:/J ;:- it, l,1,,0;; ./11'5' :r4Q,. ; if>:: 1~~9;:, 35;~ AO!~ f.4f>.~ ,~50; ;55. r.J>O,". };p5; S>fQ,; t,7if>; ;:$@;; ;Bf, /9@~]
1 In-Plant Survey:
N/A 2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 Uob Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad )
!Assessment:
N/A 6 Other site specific RP (describe):
N/A 7 Chemistry Function ltask #1 (describe)
N/A 8 Chemistry Function ltask #2 (describe)
N/A Note: No chemistry or RP job function tasks for the conditions described in the DST assumptions. RP and Chemistry take cover as directed.
IPEC Page 99
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT 1::> . i'(:i{;r1*'Jc /..'
1
- / /1 l~E;C;'TABI:;E:5~EM.E~Gl:NCttJ~ll.Af.J:11\11~~EIVl.1:,NfATION). rr :/,*::*. '.'. I). *:v; 1, . **: * , , Analysis # 1 DBT Security Threaf *7 , * ** .* . * . ; '.
': , ' ' " " - ' ' "',' ~,
\
.Function /Task On-Shift i:-ask Analysis Contr~lling Method Linefl s
!\,
, . ,,Position ,
i'.:',A:/;) I 1\;.;, ,£ *:. .: ::.. ;:,: ,,,,; ~ ;1i,;: ' '. ' ,; */;,~, ,,, ' . i /*, ,. ~{i4!i;_;f~,,~'~', .:.),,4, '1' /:~ii~.:::'" ,: .:: ., ~I~,Tu;~: : *, , ., :, ,* : :,,;(
Declare the emergency classification level U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL)
Manager Program I EP Drills
~pprove Offsite Protective Action 2 N/A N/A Recommendations U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications Manager Program 4 ~pprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/A Licensed Operator Training Program Notification and direction to on-shift staff U2 Shift 1 5 Emergency Planning Training (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Manager Program U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 6 ERO notification Manager Program Licensed Operator Training Program 7 ~bbreviated NRC notification for dBT event U2STA ' Emergency Planning Training Program U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program U2 Shift 10 Complete NRC event notification form Licensed Operator Training Program Manager 11 ~ctivate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A 12 Offsite radiological' assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event notifications U3 Shift 14 \ Licensed Operator Training Program (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Manager Security Training Program / EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 100
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT B. Accident Analysis #9 - Aircraft Probable Threat NOTE Threat based event is single procedure and both units affected. Unit 2 takes lead on EP actions.
- 1. Accident Summary
- The analysis includes all emergency response actions taken prior to an aircraft impact in accordance with RG 1.214 for an aircraft threat that is greater than 5 minutes, but less than 30 minutes from the site, and considers the dispersal of the site fire brigade away from target areas for firefighting.
- The analysis does not include a scenario or response actions taken during or after a crash.
- 2. Accident Specific Assumptions Made
- The Shift Manager receives the call from the NRC of probable aircraft threat.
- All non-security on-shift personnel are inside the protected area fence at their normal workstation.
- 3. Procedures for Accident Response
- O-AOP-SEC-2, Aircraft Threat
- IP-EP-120, Classification
- IP-EP-115, Forms
- IP-EP-210, Central Control Room (for both units)
IPEC Page 101
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- 4. Tables
, : ,* ' " , ,'i :* % ":
' ::; '4',, ,,,
, ', ,, 'l"'
.
- z,;IPEC'TAB1:.E1:":J:.\QN:sHIFF'P(JSITIONS**' .,, ,,, * . ,, '.~~: ,, :-'f,.*' , , ;" .: ,, '.
, .. Analy~is # 9 - Aircr~ft 'Probable Threat ,, , . , *.' ,
""'* ~.~., l; " , ,*,'
.'t\l, '*> ;; ' ", ' "~; ' ; ,i~t'J;,;:
l.ine ori~M.itt* :**t *.,., Ba~is Do~um~nt *:~'F .,
- Augment:tition, Role'iii Elapsed Tiine Table'#
- 1 LinE(# * '"O~'a11*;1y~~H:: f '., tivi'~r{\,
.'#*, Position *
- ,. (mJn)* Task?* *Required?
U2 T2/L 1 T5/L1 T5/L3 1 U2SM E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A No No l T5/L5 T5/L8 T5/L 10 2 U2CRS E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L2 No No 3 U2STA E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L3 No No 4 U2 RO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L4 No No 5 U2 R0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L5 No No 6 U2AO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L6 No No 7 U2A0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L7 No No 8 U2A0#3 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 9 U2A0#4 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 10 U2A0#5 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 11 U2 Chemistry E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 12 U2RP E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No E-Plan Table 8-1 T5/L9 13 Communicator 60 No No T5/l13 E-Plan Table 8-1 U3 T2/L 1 U3 Shift 14 60 T5/L6 No No Manager T5/L 14 15 U3CRS E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L2 No No E-Plan Table 8-1 U3 T2/L3 16 U3STA N/A No No 17 U3 RO #1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L4 No No 18 U3 R0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L5 No No 19 U3 NP0#1 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L6 No No 20 U3 NP0#2 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L7 No No 21 U3 NP0#3 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U3 T2/L8 No No 22 U3 NP0#4 E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 23 U3 Chemistry E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 24 U3RP E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No 25 U1 NPO E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A U2 T2/L8 No No 26 SRO F8L E-Plan Table 8-1 N/A N/A No No Security Contingency 27 Security 60 T5/L 15 No No Plan/ E-Plan Table 8-1 IPEC Page 102
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
"~'- . --:~*IPEC,TABLE-1'..:*uNlif'2'PLANil' OPERATIONS.&"S~E-SHUTD'OWN \ ",::::.:* . :,};
. . One Unit'~ One Control Ro~m . _*. .
. . _ _:.,. *. - ' :. " , *->. Analy~is # 9.Aircraft Probable Threat: ... _*>,, * ,*
or Minimum ()per~tibns"Cr~v,iN~c~~sarv-tb ir'nplenient JXdPs' and 'EOPs 0SAMGiifApolicable '.'~~;; : '.;.::,,
Line# Generic Title/Role. On.-Shift Position Task Analysis
- 1-.,. ,.,. ,.:,::, -,: ...:]-;,,. z,;,. ,L,<, ,-, *;;;. -* ,;_id* }",>I; ,,. *. ,;'*..L-
- _ . ', ', ;(;,:,;,*.: CP}*~Jli!J,9' ~~t~C?,,~:,, . . .'.:'.)
Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program ReaQtor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Opera!or #1
!T"raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2
!T"raining Program Nuclear Plant Operator U1 Non-Licensed Operator 8 Auxiliary Operator #3 rrraining Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown N/A N/A IPEC TABLE- 2 ,_ UNIT 3 PLANT OPERATIONS & SAFE SHUTDOWN:.
[,~__*. 1,*,, , ,;01i~j,;J)i~~~i+l;,_ ,:,,~:,t:~;,.-,r.:'. q~:~UQ)t~~Qri~;$5>.~troi}!~~fl}i,Jf<*.1,:,,,.:ril~;i~:*:.. ,i:~i:1:;_:, g_:**.,.
If ..,. f' *. i*" -< * ;;>:> **: :'"rAnalysis.# 9'.AircraftlProbable'Threat:: . ....
- 0~\, '* , ..,,*l. **. "<ft'.
Minimum Operc:itions Crew Nec::essary fo Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAM Gs' if Applicable Shift Manager Licensed Operator Training 1 Shift Manager Program Control Room Supervisor Licensed Operator Training 2 Unit Supervisor Program Shift Technical Advisor Licensed Operator Training 3 Shift Technical Advisor Program Reactor Operator #1 Licensed Operator Training 4 Reactor Operator #1 Program Reactor Operator #2 Licensed Operator Training 5 Reactor Operator #2 Program Nuclear Plant Operator #1 Non-Licensed Operator 6 Auxiliary Operator #1 Training Program Nuclear Plant Operator #2 Non-Licensed Operator 7 Auxiliary Operator #2 Training Program IPEC Page 103
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT Nuclear Plant Operator #3 Non-Licensed Operator 8 Auxiliary Operator #3 Training Program 9 Other needed for Safe Shutdown NIA NIA 10 Other needed for Safe Shutdown NIA NIA Other (non-Operations) Personnel Necessary to Implement AOPs and EOPs or SAMGs if Applicable
- Lirie #
- Gerieric Title/Role ' *.,' '.,. Oh\.:Shift'Positiori'l:,::
- Task'Analysis* *:.* ' ,,
- , '* \* "s.
C:ontrollipg Method .
11 Mechanic NIA NIA 12 Electrician NIA NIA 13 l&C Technician NIA NIA 14 Other NIA NJA 15 Other NIA NIA IPEC Page 104
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Fire Brigade 1 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 3 N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A FB stages in the In-Processing Building, no firefighting activities during the 30 minutes included in the analysis.
IPEC Page 105
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT
- ,<1"?\;,.,, '",-c,*;* *:: ' '}r .,. IPEC.TABIJ:e:4 ,.2,RADIAFl0N'PR01'ECTl<i)N'ANIJ)"*CHEMIS:fRY.*' , *... ,
- ** * ""Analysis #9 -.,Aircraft Probab,le threat* , *
'.:':::**,',.'I eosition Perfqrrnir19
}f: Fun'ctiolfr=ra~k ::*
- 1:i:;;/
- j;,;Pe'r.fo~ ance J:,(rn.eJ=>~r;i~d. AftEl{ffel;merg~ncy. D~el,aratioM;,(r:ni mllt~~)f
' ,. . . ~* ",, '**"'~ " ,, *,,, ~ " . : . '\, .,, . :, -:,;~:': i~ .: *I N '5- 10~ 15 25 35- ,40- ;45- 50c. 55-' 60 70- 75:: 80- 85-:
- E 9::5 10 ,,}5 20; ;,25' ,,~Q*, 35
.....;.,':Z,~. ' ' ... ' ' ~~' -:~~....... " ""'-~~~ *, ' f,
-* J ,, . ,.~O ,A!?~ 50 /55 ,60 ,65 7~0, 7,5, ~BP,: ,85, . 9,0 1 In-Plant Survey:
N/A 2 On-site Survey:
N/A 3 Personnel Monitoring:
N/A 4 Job Coverage:
N/A 5 Offsite Rad Assessment:
(Included in Table 5
6 Other site specific RP (describe):
N/A )
7 Chemistry Function ask#1 (describe}
N/A 8 Chemistry Function ask #2 (describe}
N/A Note: No chemistry or RP Job function tasks for the conditions described in the Aircraft Threat assumptions.
IPEC - Page 106
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT
' ?
y,;:~** "
1
- IPECliABLE5-'.:.'.:'EMERGENC"l11PLAN;1MPlEMENTATION', ,',:f'. ,<'.C/*7' .j *:*:';,. 7"
. , , .* ' , *. . : Ana'tysis # 9 ~ircraft Prob~ble'Threat . : . *
' '.1,' ' ,,:., ,, ,,
',; <: '\,, ,,,':,d ' ,,'
Une#l
- ,, I,
- , 'cf ,.' ,,
Fun.ctiori 1,Task, ' '
'.*' P.n-Sh'ift ' Tasl< An~ltsis Controllfrig(.M~ttioa
- Position ,,
i: {,* '.: ,;, ",,,,.,;; ,,,.,**:.:,;'.::... , ':' 1;, ',': ,, . .,;,.:*,." .w',, *;,,,*, ;,.;., ,,, .*A./,.1*.: ', ::. '
' ,,,i ' ' ' *,,i/,,."' ' :,~*..
Declare the emergency classification level U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 1 (ECL) Manager Program I EP Drills
~pprove Offsite Protective Action 2 N/~ N/A Recommendations U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 3 ~pprove content of State/local notifications Manager Program 4 ~pprove extension to allowable dose N/A N/AI Licensed Operator Training Program Notification and direction to on-shift staff U2 Shift 5 ' Emergency Planning Training (e.g., to assemble, evacuate, etc.) Manager Program U3 Shift Emergency Planning Training 6, ERO notification Manager Program 7 ~bbreviated NRC notification for DBT event N/A N/A U2 Shift Emergency Planning Training 8 Complete State/local notification form Manager Program Emergency Planning Training 9 Perform State/local notifications Communicator Program U2 Shift 10 Complete NRC event notification form Licensed Operator Training Program Manager 11 ~ctivate EROS N/A (runs 24/7) N/A 12 Offsite radiological assessment N/A N/A Emergency Planning Training 13 Perform NRC notifications Communicator Program Perform other site-specific event notifications U3 Shift 14 Licensed Operator Training Program (e.g., Duty Plant Manager, INPO, ANI, etc.) Manager Security Training Program/ EP 15 Personnel Accountability Security Drills IPEC Page 107
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT X. APPENDIX C - TIME MOTION STUDIES SUPPORTING THE STAFFING ANALYSIS A. ERO Notification (Everbridge activation)
TIME MOTION STUDY OF OVERLAPPING TASKS TASK 1: ACTIVATE THE ERO USING EVERBRIDGE JOB: SHIFT MANAGER TASK 2: EMERGENCY DIRECTION AND CONTROL JOB: SHIFT MANAGER IPEC Page 108
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALVIS REPORT PURPOSE:
Perform a Time Motion Study to evaluate whether assigning the performance of ERO notification using Everbridge to the Shift Manager or STA can be justified as an acceptable overlap to the Shift Manager's primary emergency plan function of direction and control.
NOTE The Time Motion Study may be completed during simulator training/evaluation or during EP drills LOCATION:
Simulator (to use the "TRAINING" event code to avoid inadvertent ERO activation for an EMERGENCY event.)
Codes are site specific.
REQUIRED TOOLS/EQUIPMENT:
A. Individual performing the procedure actions must be logged on to the computer being used.
B. PC with Internet 7.0 and internet access.
C. Instructions/codes for activating Everbridge in the TRAINING mode. [Staged Instruction sheet for activating Everbridge may be used in lieu of EN-EP-310, Emergency Response Organization Notification System)]
)
IPEC Page 109
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Function/ Responsibility (Task) Analysis Template Event: __,A 11 _ _ _ __ Site: _IPEC _ _ Position: Shift Manager Line#:_1~-
Function Responsibility (Task) Action Step Duration 1.Notification 1.1 Initiate notification to the ERO via the 1.1.1 ERON Program Retrieve the Everbridge instruction that contains the 22 sec.
[TRAINING] Access code and Pass code.
1 (On the PC)
Open ERO Notification System by clicking: 17 sec.
Start -Nuclear Corporate Apps (ESM) - Nuclear Emergency Response (ESM) ------+ ERON I 2 Enter Access code (XXXXX) and Pass code (XXXXX) 11 sec.
and click the SUBMIT button 3
Select the appropriate classification by clickin{on it. 8 sec.
(Select ALERT) 4 Answer "Yes" or "No" to Security EAL question, 'Was 8 sec.
the event declared on a Security EAL?" [ Click on "YES"]
5 Select proper response action by clicking on it. 10 sec.
[Select "Security Event"}
6 Review the message that was generated in the User 12 sec.
Message box at the bottom of the screen. Ensure the message contains the information to communicate to
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT the ERO. Additional information can be added to the message by clicking in the User Message box and typing.
7 Once satisfied with the message content, click send 7 sec.
notification button. [Click "Send Notification"]
8 Answer "YES" to send verification question, "Are you 5 sec.
CERTAIN you want to send this message?" [Click "YES".]
9 If message was successfully sent, you will see a dialog 5 sec.
box
[Click "Return"]
2.E~ergency Direction and 2.1 Maintain emergency direction and control 1 Control of the event response. Oversight of the emergency response. NA 2
Initiate any emergency actions. NA Comments:
The task of ERO notification/activation via ERON for the Non-ED Unit Shift Manager does not negate or interfere with the SM's ability to continue oversight of control room activities or to initiate additional emergency actions.
- eNo '~KEMERG~Ncv 01~1:bi"10N *ANo'coNt~oc
.TASK:\~:r -*,---
IPEC Page 111
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT Task Performer: _Donald Dewey_ _ _ __ Position: __Shift Manager/ADM_ _ __ Date: ___4/9/13_ _ _ __
Name Job Title Evaluator: _ _Anthony Ambrose_ _ __ Position: _Sr. Emergency Planner_ _ __ Date: ---4/9/13- - - - - -
Name Job Title Evaluator: _ _Brian McCarthy_ _ _ __ Position: _ _Shift Manager/ADM._ _ __ Date: _ _4/9/13_ _ _ __
IPEC Page 112
IPEC ON-SHIFT STAFFING ANALYIS REPORT XI. OVERLAP OF TASKS ACTIVITIES OR OTHER CONFLICTS IDENTIFIED A. Overlap Requiring Compensatory Measures.
NONE XII. REFERENCES
- NEI 10-05, Rev 0, Assessment of On-Shift Emerge,ncy Response Organization Staffing and Capabilities
- NSIR DPR-ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance - Emergency Planning for Nuclear Power Plants
- NUREG-0654, Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants.
- Indian Point No. 1 Safety Analysis Report
- Decommissioning Plan for Indian Point Unit 1, October 1980 XIII. STAFFING ANALYIS TEAM
- Myra Jones, Contractor CMCG
- Charles Hock, IPEC Operations Shift Manager
- Brian Sullivan, Training Superintendent
- Brent Magurno, Chemistry Specialist
- Steve Sandike, Chemistry Specialist
- Scott Stevens, Radiation Protection Supervisor
- Mary Ann Wilson, Emergency Preparedness Manager
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessment (Rev 19-01} REVISION MATRIX Change Page/Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19..01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)
No.
Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements?
' Justify if NO.
- 1. .. COVER Entergy Indian Point Energy Center Entergy Indian Point Energy Center Yes PAGE On-shift Staffing Analysis, Revision No - This is an editorial change to On-shift Staffing Analysis, Phase 1, the Revision number and effective 1, Nov~mber 2, 2015 Revision 19-01, January 31, 2019 date.
The meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the emergency plan or a process described in the emergency plan are not affected by this change. No further
- evaluation is required for this change.
- 2. Page 4, This document is a revision to the This document is a revision to the No Introduction, Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) No - Added wording to clarify that Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) this revision incorporates the Paragraph 1 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report information in the previous added to the IPEC Emergency Plan added to the IPEC Emergency Plan on December 17, 2012. This revision revision (including the evaluation on December 17, 2012, as updated provided).
incorporates the analysis of the via the December 2015 Revision to responsibilities of the on-shift staff the Report (Revision 1) submitted to The meaning or intent of supporting IPEC Unit 1 and the US NRC (Letter NL-15-154), description in the emergency plan, documents the evaluation of the Shift Revision 1 incorporated the analysis facilities or equipment described Manager's task of Emergency of the responsibilities of the on-shift in the emergency plan or a Response Organization (ERO) staff supporting IPEC Unit 1 and process described in the notification. The NEI 10-05 Tables in documented the evaluation of the emergency plan are not affected sections VII, VIII, and IX were also Shift Manager's task of Emergency by this change. No further updated to reflect the corrective Response Organization (ERO) evaluation is required for this actions taken for the task over:laps notification. This revision (Revision change.
listed in section X of the original ' 19-01) documents the fact that both report (Revision 0). the Fire Brigade Leader and the Communicator can come from either unit and need not only come from Unit 3, as previously listed in the unit staffina numbers.
(.
Page 1 of9
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessment (Rev 19-01) REVISION MATRIX Change Page/Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19-01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)
No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements?
Justify if NO.
- 3. Page 4, This document is a revision to the , This document is a revision to the No Yes -Added wording to clarify Introduction, Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) that the Fire *Brigade Leader can Paragraph 1 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report be provided by either unit.
added to the IPEC Emergency Plan added to the IPEC Emergency Plan on December 17, 2012. This revision on December 17, 2012, as updated incorporates the analysis of the via the December 2015 Revision to responsibilities of the on-shift staff the Report (Revision 1) submitted to supporting IPEC Unit 1 and the US NRC (Letter NL-15-154),
documents the evaluation of the Shift Revision 1 incorporated the analysis Manager's task of Emergency of the responsibilities of the on-shift Response Organization (ERO) staff supporting IPEC Unit 1 and notification. The NEI 10-05 Tables in documented the evaluation of the sections VII, VIII, and IX were also Shift Manager's task of Emergency updated to reflect the corrective Response Organization (ERO) actions taken for the task overlaps notification. This revision (Revision listed in section X of the original 19-01) documents the fact that both report (Revision O}. the Fire Brigade Leader and the Communicator can come.from either unit and need not only come from Unit 3, as previously listed in the unit staffina numbers.
Page 2 of9
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessmen t (Rev 19-01) REVISION MATRIX Change Page/Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19-01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b) '
No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements?
Justify if NO.
- 4. Page 4, This document is a revision to the This document is a revision to the No Yes - Added wording to clarify Introduction. Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) that the Communicator can be Paragraph 1 On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report provided by either unit.
added to the IPEC Emergency Plan added to the IPEC Emergency Plan on December 17, 2012. This revision on December 17, 2012, as updated incorporates the analysts of the via the December 2015 Revision to responsibilities of the on-shift staff the Report (Revision 1) submitted to supporting IPEC Unit 1 and the US NRC (Letter NL-15-154),
documents the evaluation of the Shift Revision 1 incorporated the analysis Manager's task of Emergency of the responsibilities of the on-shift Response Organization (ERO) staff supporting IPEC Unit 1 and notification. The NEI 10-05 Tables in documented the evaluation of the sections VII, VIII, and IX were also Shift Manager's task of Emergency updated to reflect the corrective Response Organization (ERO) actions taken for the task overlaps notification. This revision (Revision listed in section X of the original 19-01) documents the fact that both report (Revision 0). the Fire Brigade Leader and the Communicator can come from either unit and need not only come from Unit 3, as previously listed in the unit staffing numbers Page 3 of9
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessment (Rev 19-01) REVISION MATRIX Change Page/Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19-01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b}
No. Chan~e Planning Standards or NUREG-
- 0654 program elements?
Justify if NO.
5, ,.Page 4, This revision continues to satisfy This, revision continues to satisfy the Yes No - separated this paragraph Introduction, the requirement of 1o CFR 50 requirement of 10 CFR 50 Appendix into two separate ones. No Paragraph 2 Appendix E Section IV.A.9 for E Section IV.A.9 for Units 1, 2 and 3, additional wording was added in Units 1, 2 and 3, which states which states thatnuclear power this change. This changed does that nuclear power licensees licensees shall perform "a detailed not change the meaning or intent shall perform "a detailed analysis ' analysis demonstrating that on-shift of description in the emergency demonstrating that on-shift. personnel assigned emergency plan plan, facilities or equipment personnel assigned emergency implementation functions are not described in the emergency plan plan implementation functions assigned responsibilities that would or a process described in the are not assigned responsibilities prevent the timely performance of emergency plan. No further that would prevent the timely their assigned functions as specified evaluation is required for this performance of their assigned in the emergency plan." It does not change.
functions as specified in the identify the need for nor incorporate emergency plan." A structured any changes to the necessary approach using the guidance minimum staffing and merely found in NEI 10-05 was utilized provides a clarification on the units to perform the analysis in from which personnel supporting Revision 1 which is incorporated emergency planning functions can In this document. be supplied.
A structured approach using the
- guidance found in NEI 10-05 was utilized to perform the analysis in Revision 1 which i.s incorporated in this* document.
Page4 of9
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessm ent (Rev 19..Q1) REVISION MATRIX Change Page/Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19..01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)
No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements?
Justifv if NO.
- 6. Page 4, This revision continues to satisfy This revision continues to s-atisfy the No Yes -Added wording to note that Introduction, the requirement of 10 CFR 50 requirement of 10CFR 50 Appendix Paragraph 2 this revision doesn't require any Appendix E Section IV.A.9 for E Section IV.A.9 for Units 1, 2 and 3, changes to minimum staffing and Units 1, 2 and 3, which states which states that nuclear power only provides clarification on that nuclear power licensees
- licensees shall perform "a detailed which units can supply personnel shall perform "a detailed analysis analysis demonstrating that on-shift supporting certain emergency demonstrating that on-shift personnel assigned emergency plan planning functions. The meaning personnel assigned emergency implementation functions are not - or intent of description in the plan implementation functions assigned responsibilities that would emergency plan, facilities or are not assigned responsibilities prevent the timely performance of equipment described in the that would prevent the timely their assigned functions as specified emergency plan or a process performance of their assigned in the emergency plan." It does not described in the emergency plan functions as specified in the identify the need for nor incorporate are not affected by this change.
emergency plan." any changes to the necessary minimum staffing and merely provides a clarification on the units from which personnel supporting emergency planning functions can be suaolled.
Page 5 of9
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessment (Rev 19-01) REVISION MATRIX Change Page/Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19-01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)
No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements?
Justify if NO.
- 7. Page 4, . A structured approach was A structured approach using the No No- Reworded the paragraph to
. Introduction, utilized to perform this analysis guidance .found in NEI 10-05 was state that the methodologies used Paragraph* 3 using the guidance found in NEI utilized to perform the analysis in in the initial staffing study and 10-05, Rev. 0, Assessment of Revision 1 which is incorporated in Revision 1 of this staffing study On-Shift Emergency Response this document That analysis was are included in Revision 19-01 Organization Staffing and based on the assumption that both (current revision).
Capabilities. This analysis the Fire Brigade Leader and the examined the capability of the Communicator came from Unit 3. This change does not change the minimum staff listed in Table 8-1 Changing the assumption so that meaning or intent of description in of the IPEC Emergency Plan (E- both can be supplied by either unit the emergency plan, facilities or Plan} to perform the actions for does not impact the conclusions equipment described in the reached by the analysis. It does not emergency plan or a process the key functional areas of events described in NSIR/OP.R- change the minimum staffing needs described in the emergency plan.
No further evaluation is required ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance - or the ability of the staff to perform Emergency Planning for Nuclear the necessary emergency functions. for this change.
Power Plants, until augmenting ERO staff arrives in accordance with the E-Plan.
Page 6 of9
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessment (Rev 19-01) REVISION MATRIX Change Page/Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19-01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)
No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements?
Justify if NO.
- 8. Page 4, A structured approach was A structured approach using the No Introduction, Yes -Added wording to note that utilized to perform this analysis guidance found in NEI 10-05 was although the previous staffing Paragraph 3 using the guidance found in NEI utilized to perform the analysis in analysis used the assumption that 10-05, Rev. 0, Assessment of Revision 1 which is incorporated in the Fire Brigade Leader would On-Shift Emergency Response this document Although that come from Unit 3, changing that Organization Staffing and analysis was based on the assumption to having them come Capabilities. This analysis assumption that both the Fire from either unit does not impact examined the capability of the Brigade Leader and the the conclusions reached by the minimum staff listed in Table B-1 Communicator came from Unit 3, analysis since it does not impact of the IPEC Emergency Plan (E- changing the assumption to say that minimum staffing needs or Plan) to perform the actions for they can be supplied by either unit functions the key functional areas of does not impact the conclusions events described in NSIR/DPR- reached by the analysis since it does ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance - not change the minimum staffing Emergency Planning far Nuclear needs or the ability of the staff to Power Plants, until augmenting perform the necessary emergency ERO staff arrives in accordance functions.
with the E-Plan.
- 9. Page 4, A structured approach was A structured approach using the No Yes - Added wording to note that Introduction, utilized to perform this analysis guidance found in NEI 10-05 was although the previous staffing Paragraph 3 using the guidance found in NEI utilized to perform the analysis in analysis used the assumption that 1o~os, Rev. O, Assessment of Revision 1 which is incorporated in the Communicator would come On-Shift Emergency Response this document Although that from Unit 3, changing that Organization Staffing and analysis was based on the assumption to having them come Capabilities. This analysis assumption that both the Fire from either unit does not impact examined the capability of the Brigade Leader and the the conclusions reached by the minimum staff listed .in Table B-1 Communicator came from Unit 3, analysis since it does not impact of the IPEC Emergency Plan (E- changing the assumption to say that minimum staffing needs or Plan) to perform the actions for they can be supplied by either unit functions the key functional areas of does not impact the conclusions events described in NSIR/DPR- reached by the analysis since it does ISG-01, Interim Staff Guidance - not change the minimum staffing Emergency Planning for Nuclear needs or the ability of the staff to Power Plants, until augmenting perform the necessary emergency ERO staff arrives in accordance functions.
with the E-Plan.
Page 7 of9
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessment (Rev 19-01) REVISION MATRIX Change Page1Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19-01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)
No. Change Planning *Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements?
Justify if NO.
- 10. Page 5, N/A The Fire Brigade Leader and No Yes - Added wording to note that Analysis Communicator positions are not unit- although the staffing analysis Summary specific qualifications and as such, assumed that the Fire Brigade they can be supplied from either unit Leader came from Unit 3, the as the situation warrants. This current revision reflects the fact revision to the Phase 1 Study
- that that position can be staffed provides the documented from either unit.
clarification of this ability to utilize staff from either unit and maintain minimum staffing, as noted in the table below.
- 11. Page 5, N/A The Fire Brigade Leader and No Yes -Added wording to note that Analysis Communicator positions are not although the staffing analysis Summary unit-specific qualifications and as assumed that the Communicator such, they can be supplied from came from Unit 3, the current either unit as the situation revision reflects the fact that that warrants. This revision to the position can be staffed from either
' Phase 1 Study provides the unit documented clarification of this ability to utilize staff from either unit and maintain minimum staffing, as noted in the table below
- 12. Page 6, Table NIA *The Fire Brigade Leader is No Yes -Added a footnote to clarify Footnote* shown under the Unit 3 staffing that the Fire Brigade Leader can numbers but can come from be provided by either unit.
either unit.
- 13. Page 6, Table NIA ..The Communicator is shown under No Yes -Added a footnote to clarify Footnote** the Unit 3 staffing numbers but can that the Communicator can come come from either unit.
- from either unit.
Page 8 of9
Entergy IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Assessment (Rev 19-01) REVISION MATRIX Change Page/Section Previous Version (Revision 1) New Version (Revision 19-01) Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)
No. Change Planning Standards or NUREG-0654 program elements?
Justif\/ if NO.
- 14. Page 12, N/A 5. For the purposes of this analysis, No Yes -Added wording to *note. that Section V.A both the Fire Brigade Leader and the the analysis used the assumption Notes and Communicator were assumed to that the Fire Brigade Leader came Assumptions come from Unit 3 but both those Applicable to fromUnit3 positions can be supplied by either ALLIPEC unit.
- 15. Page 12, NIA 5. For the purposes of this analysis, No Yes - Added* wording to note that Section V.A both the Fire Brigade Leader and the Notes and the analysis used the assumption Communicator were assumed to that the Communicator came from Assumptions come from Unit 3 but both those Unit3 Applicable to positions can be supplied by either ALLIPEC unit.
- OSA Page 9 of 9
- J
- ~Entergy NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL NON-QUALITY RELATED INFORMATIONAL USE Emergency Planning 10CFR50.54tal Review Program EN-EP-305 PAGE 1 OF4 I REV.6 ATTACHMENT 9.2 10 CFR 50.54(Q)(3) SCREENING PAGE1 OF4 Procedure/Document Number: IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Study Revision: 19-01 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)
Title:
Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report (Phase 1)
Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (This is generally changes to the emergency plan, EALs, EAL bases, etc. - refer to step 3.0{6]):
The activity being reviewed is a revision to the IPEC Units 2 and 3 NEI 12-01 Phase 1, Staffing Assessment, (OSSA) to Incorporate changes identified in the attached Revision Matrix.
Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? UYES ~NO Is this activity fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal. or 50.54(q)(3) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Evaluation is next part NOT required.
Enter If YES, identify bounding source document number/approval reference and justification ensure the .basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the below and proposed change is docu*mented below: complete Part VI.
Justification:
D Bounding document attached (optional)
Part Ill. Applicability of Other Regulatory Change Control Proce~es Check if any other regulatory change processes control the proposed activity.(Refer to EN,-Ll-100)
APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION 181 If there are no other controlling change processes, continue the 50.54(q)(3) Screening.
D One or more contromng change processes are selected, however, some portion of the activity involves the emergency plan or affects the Implementation of the emergency plan: continue the 50.54(q)(3) Screening for that portion of the activity. Identify the applicable controlling change processes below.
D One or more controlling change processes are selected and fully bounds all aspects of the adivity. 5D.54(q)(3)
Evaluation is NOT required. Identify controlling change processes below and complete Part VI.
CONTROLLING CHANGE PROCESSES Part IV. Editorial Change UYES ~NO Sli.S4(q)(3) Continue to next Is this activity an editorial or typographical change such as fonnatting, paragraph Evaluation is port numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? NOT required.
Justification: Enter justification and Change 1 and S In the attached revision matrix are editorial, but uNO" is checked because the continue to next procedure revision contains non-editorial changes per the attached revision matrix. part or comp! ete Port Vias applicnblc.
.e*:
- "="Entergy NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT NON-QUALITY RELATED EN-EP-305 I REV.6 MANUAL INFORMATIONAL use PAGE 20F4 Emergency Planning 10CFR50.54la) Review Program ATTACHMENT 9.2
- 10 CFR 50.54(Q)(3) SCREENING PAGE20F4 Procedure/Document Number: IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Study I Revision: 19-01 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC) '.
Title:
Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report (Phase 1) a a* -
Part V. Emergency Planning Element/Function Screen (Associated 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standard function identified in brackets) Does this activity affect any of the following, induding program elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II?
- 1. Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. [1] ,*O
- 2. The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (2417 D staffing) in accordance With the emergency plan. [1] *
- 3. The process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned. [2] ~
- 4. The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. [2] D
- 5. Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been macle. (3] D -
- 6. State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. [3]
D
- 7. A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. [4] D
- 8. Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of D the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. [5]
- 9. Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt D instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway. [5]
- 10. The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and u Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. [5)
- 11. Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response D organizations. [6]
- 12. Systems are estabRshed for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. [6] u
- 13. Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the u plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). [7]
- 14. Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. [7] u
- 15. Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. [8] lJ
- 16. Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergenqy response. [8] lJ
- 17. Methods, syst_ems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are In use. [9] u
- 18. A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. [1 OJ LJ
- 19. Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are lJ available to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. [1 OJ
- 20. A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including w those for hostile action events.[10)
~Entergy NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL NON-QUALITY RELATED INFORMATIONAL USE EN-EP-305 I
PAGE 30F4 REV.6 Emergencv Planning 10CFR50.54(a) Review Program ATIACHMENT9;2 ) 10 CFR 50.54(Q)(3) SCREENING PAGE30F4 Procedure/Document Number: IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Study I Revision: 19-01 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)
Title:
Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report (Phase 1)
- 21. The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. [11) u
- 22. Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. [12) u
- 23. Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. [13) u
- 24. A dnll and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program u areas) is established. [14)
- 25. Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, LJ maintain,. and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. [14)
- 26. Identified weaknesses are corrected. [14] LJ
- 27. Training is provided to emergency responders. [151 D
- 28. Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. [16] u
- 29. Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. [16) u APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION D If no Part V criteria are checked, a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation is NOT required; document the basis for condusion below and complete Part VI.
181 If any Part V c;riteria c1re che<;ked, complete Part VI and perform a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation.
BASIS FOR CONCLUSION Change 2: Added wording to clarify that this revision updates the information (including the evaluation provided). The meaning or Intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the emergency plan or a process described in the emergency plan are not affected by this change. No further evaluation is required for this change.
Change 7: Reworded the paragraph to state that the methodologies used in the initial staffing study and Revision 1 ofthis staffing study are included in Revision 19-01 (current revision). This change does not change the meaning or intent of description in the emergency plan, facilities or equipment described in the emergency phm or a process described in the emergency plan. No further evaluation is req4ired for this change.
In addition, the IPEC Emergency Plan Revision 19-01 was updated to reflect the changes made in this Staffing Study, regarding the ability for the Fire Brigade Leader and the Communicator to be staffed by persons from either Unit 2 or Unit 3. A separate S0.54Qscreen and evaluation was also completed for the revision to the Emergency Pla_n.
I
- ~Enter gy NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL NON*QUALITV RELATED INFORMATIONAL Use Emeraency Plannlna 1DCFR50.54(q) Review Program EN-EP-305 I
PAGE 40F4 REV.6 ATTACHMENT 9.2 10 CFR50.54(Q)(3) SCREENING PAGE40F4 Procedure/Document Number: IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Study I Revision: 19-01 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)
Title:
Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report (Phase 1)
BASIS FOR CONCLUSION (Con't)
Changes 1, 2, 5, and 7from the revision matrix made to the On-Shift Staffing analysis have been reviewed to determine if they affect any of the planning standards or program elements in Part V of this form. It has been concluded that there is no effect on the planning standards or program elements arid no further evaluation is required for these changes.
Emergency Planning Element 3, In Part V of this form ls affected by changes 3, 4, 6, 8, - 15 identified on the revision matrix. A 10CFR 50.54(q) evaluation will be performed to determine If the effectiveness of the IPEC Emeraencv Plan is reduced and Prior NRC aooroval is recmired.
Part VI. Signatures:
Preparer Name (Print) Preparer Signature Date:
. Gl Casey Karsten Sr. Emergency Planner ==- ~
1/15/19 (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:
Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:
Timothy Garvey Nuclear EP Project Manager
~- \ V'-- . -
.ti I..... l{ls(\C\
. K Approver Name (Print)
- iliila Date:
Frank Mitchell Manager, Emergency Planning or designee 1/;1t1
PAGE 1 OF4 REV.6 ATTACHMENT 9,3 10 CFR 50.54(Q)(3) EVALUATION Page1of4 Procedure/Document Number: IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Study I Revhtion: 19-01
~quipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)
Title:
Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report (Phase 1)
Part I. Description of Proposed Change:
The changes being made to the Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report Phase 1 (OSSA) are described in the attached revision matrix.
Part II. Description and Review of Licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change:
The Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report (Phase 1) (OSSA) has been reviewed through the Process Applicability Determination (PAD) in accordance with the criteria described in NEI 96-07 and EN-Ll-100. This proposed change does not ( 1) change the faCil ity or procedures as described in the UFSAR or (2) create a test or equipment not described in the UFSAR and is governed under the Emergency Plan 10 CFR 50.54(q) screening process in accordance with EN-EP-305. These proposed changes do not involve structures, systems or components controlled by 10 CFR 50.59 or 72.48 and do not have the potential to impact any of the License Basis Documents (LBDs) on the PAD form, except for the Emergency Plan. All responses to the questions contained in sections III and IV of the PAD form were determined to be "no impact". Since these proposed changes do not contain any requirements that could affect any LBDs other than the Emergency Plan, it is determined to be fully governed under IO CFR 50,54(q). In addition to those reviewed for the PAD, each of the following documents/relevant sections was reviewed:
a) Reviewed current IPEC Emergency Plan, all sections Part 1 and Part 2. This document is being revised in conjunction with the OSSA.
b) Reviewed OSSA. No additional relevant or affected OSSA content was identified.
c) The original Plans, U2 1970 and U3 1973, were not available for review.
d) Historical IOCFR50.54 (q) documents were manually reviewed dating back to 2005 for significant changes. No impact identified based on proposed changes.
.eE
~-- ntergy NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT NON-QUALITY RELATED EN-EP-3Q5 I REV.6 MANUAL INFORMATIONAL Use PAGE 20F4 Emergency Planning 10CFR50.54(Q) Review Program ATTACHMENT 9.3 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3) EVALUATION Page 2of4 Procedure/Document Number: IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Study I Revision: 19-01 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)
Title:
Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report (Phase 1)
Part Ill. Describe How the Proposed Change Complies with Relevant Emergency Preparedness Regulation(s) and Previous Commitment(s) Made to the NRC:
10 CFR 50.47_(b)(2)-0nsite Emergency Organization *
- The process ensures that on -shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned.
Site Compliance:' The changes associated with revision 19-0 I of OSSA allow for the assignment of additional shift personnel to perform Emergency Planning roles to Unit 2 or Unit 3. The _qualifications of Fire Brigade Leader and On Shift Communicator are site qualifications and not unit specific. These individuals are additional personnel placed on shift to perform the function of Fire Brigade Leader and On Shift Communicator and do not have *additional emergency response responsibilities during an emergency declaration and therefore can fi!lfill their site emergency response role no matter which unit the individual is assigned to.
Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change:
10 CFR. 50.47(b) (2~nsite Emergency Organization Functions:
- The process ensures that on -shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned.
Program Elements: Sections IV.A.2.a-c, IV.A.3, and IV.C of Appendix E to IO CFR Part 50 provide supporting requirements. Informing criteria appear in Section 11.B of NUREG-0654 and in the IPEC Emergency P~an.
-~-Entergy NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL NON-QUALITY RELATED INFORMATIONAL Use EN-EP-305 PAGE 30F4 I REV.6 Emeraencv Plannina 10CFR50.54(q) Review Program ATTACHMENT 9.3 10 CFR 5Q.54_(Q)(3) l:VALUATJON Page 3 of 4 Procedure/Document Number: IPEC Phase 1 Staffing Study I Revision: 19..()1 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)
Title:
Indian Point On-Shift Staffing Analysis Report (Phase 1)
Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions:
Changes 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (FBL Changes): In the current version of the OSSA, the Fire Brigade Leader (FBL) is assigned to Unit 3. The qualification for FBL qualification is not a unit specific qualification so anyone that is qualified as a FBL can act as FBL for the IPEC Site. Additionally, the FBL is an additional SRO on shift and does not have an Emergency Plan role, except for FBL, during that shift period. With a common qualification and being an additional person on shift there is no impact to shift staffing assignments and the FBL can be assigned to either unit.
The changes do not represent a reduction in the effectiveness of the emergency plan, continue to meet planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) and 10CFR50 Appendix E Sections IV.A.2.a-c; IV.A.3, and IV.C and can be incorporated without prior NRC approval because the change does not alter the number of individuals required to be on shift at any one point. It does not add any additional responsibilities to individuals on shift, but adds additional. flexibility to which unit the FBL can be assigned.
Changes 4, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15 (Communicator Changes): In the current version of the OSSA, the On Shift Communicator is assigned to Unit 3. The quaHfication for On Shift Communicator is not a unit specific qualification so anyone that is qualified as an On Shift Communicator can ad as On Shift Communicator for the IPEC Site. Additionally, the On Shift Communicator is an additional Nuclear Plant Operator on shift and does not have an Emergency Plan role, except for On Shift Communicator, during that shift period. With a common qualification and being an additional person on shift with no additional Emergency Response responsibilities, there is no impact to shift staffing assignments and the On Shift Communicator can be assigned to either unit.
The change does not represent a reduction In the effectiveness of the emergency plan, continues to meet planning standard 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) and 1ciCFR50 Appendix E Sections IV.A.2.a-c, IV.A.3, and IV.C and can be incorporated without prior NRC approval because the change does not alter the num_ber of individuals required to be on shift at any one point. It doe$ *not add any additional responsibilities to Individuals on shift, but adds additional flexibility to which unit the On Shift Communicator can be assigned.
Conclusion Regarding Impact:
The proposed changes to the IPEC EPLAN Rev 19-01, continue to meet the planning standards ouUined in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (2). This revision does not represent a reduction in effectiveness to the IPEC Emergency Plan and can be incorporated without prior NRC approval.
- -=-Entergy NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT MANUAL NON-QUALITY RELATED INFORMATIONAL Use EN-EP-305 Emergency Planning 10CFR50.54ra> Review Program PAGE I
40F4 REV.6 ATTACHMENT 9.3 10 CFRS0.54(Q)(3) EVALUATION ,
Page4of4 Procedure/Document Number: IPEC..EP I Revision: 19-01 Equlpment/Faclllty/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)
Title:
Indian Point Energy Center Emergency Plan j I
Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion Answer the following questions about th__e proposed change.
I. Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50:47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? 18JYES0 NO
- 2. Ooes the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no reduction in effectiveness)?
181YES0 NO
- 3. Does the proposed change constitute an emergency action level scheme change? 0YES18J NO If questions 1 or 2 are answered NO, or question 3 answered YES, reject the proposed change, modify the proposed change and perform a new evaluation or obtain prior NRC approval under provisions of 10CFR 50.90. If questions 1 and 2 are answered YES, and question 3 answered NO, implement applicable change process(es). Refer to step 5.8[8].
Part VII. Signatures Preparer Name (Print) Preparer Signature Date:
Casey Karsten Emergency Planner, Sr. ... GJ ::;.a
~
1/15/19 (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:
Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature Date:
Timothy Garvey Nuclear EP Project Manager \~)~ 1/1s /1~
Approver Name (Print)
Frank Mitchell Manager, Emergency Preparedness or designee Aaii~
J;J;,