Text

IPEC Emergency Plan Procedures
	ML16166A059
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	06/06/2016
From:	; Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	EP-16-0011
	Download: ML16166A059 (210)
	v • d • e

IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN DISTRIBUTION LIST Page 1 of 2 LOCATION COPY HOLDER ADDRESS NUMBER OF COPIES DELIVERED BY IP3 CONTROL ROOM IP3 53FT. CCR 1 COPY OF ALL EP'S DOCUMENTS DELIVERED BY IP3 SHIFT MANAGER IP3 53FT. ELEVATION 1 COPY OF ALL EP'S DOCUMENTS DELIVERED BY IP2 CONTROL ROOM IP2 53FT. CCR 1 COPY OF ALL EP'S DOCUMENTS DELIVERED BY IPEC TSC IP2 53FT. ELEVATION 1 COPY OF ALL EP'S DOCUMENTS DELIVERED BY IP2 SIMULATOR IP2 SIMULATOR BLDG. 1 COPY OF ALL EP'S DOCUMENTS DELIVERED BY IP2 SIMULATOR - CLASSROOM 4 IP2 SIMULATOR BLDG. 1 COPY OF ALL EP'S DOCUMENTS DELIVERED BY 3 COPIES OF ALL EP'S IP2 SIMULATOR - CLASSROOM 5 IP2 SIMULATOR BLDG .

NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS NRC IP2 88FT. ELEVATION 1 COPY EXCEPT E-PLAN OF ALL EP'S 1 COPY OF ALL EP'S AND DOC CONTROL DESK

- - NRC - ROCKVILLE , MD ADDRESS

---. OFFSITE

--- GENERAL RECORDS EXCEPT IP-EP-115 1 COPY On ALL EP'S AND NRC STEVE BARR OFFSITE GENERAL RECORDS EXCEPT IP-EP-115 1 COPY OF ALL EP'S AND NRC DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFFSITE GENERAL RECORDS EXCEPT IP-EP-115 1 COPY OF THE FOLLOWING:

E-PLAN , IP-EP-115, 120, NEW YORK STATE OEM TED FISCH OFFSITE 210, 250,310, 340,360, 410, 420, 430, 620 & IP-1055 1 COPY OF E-PLAN, WESTCHESTER COUNTY OEM DENNIS DELBORGO OFFSITE IP-EP-310 & 340 ROCKLAND COUNTY FIRE AND 1 COPY OF E-PLAN, NICHOLAS LONGO OFFSITE EMERGENCY SERVICES IP-EP-3 10 & 340 ORANGE COUNTY EMERGENCY 1 COPY OF E-PLAN ,

SHANNON FISHER OFFSITE SERVICES CENTER IP-EP-310 & 340 PUTNAM COUNTY BUREAU OF ANTHONY SUTION EFFEC Tl1 -6 0PY cI F E-PLAN ,

< FFSITE EMERGENCY SERVICES IP-EP-3 10 & 340

"'"'

I.

~

J H Ii L I ftX45 DATE N~f:-

~

-::-: ;:- Entergy Indian Point Energy Center CONTROLLED DOCUMENT Document Control TRANSMITTAL 450 Broadway Buchanan, NY 10511 TO: DISTRIBUTION DATE: June 6, 2016 FROM: IPEC DOCUMENT CONTROL - 3Ro FLOOR ADMIN BLDG PHONE#: 914-254-6835 TRANSMITIAL#: EP-16-0011 The Document(s) identified below are forwarded for use. Please review to verify receipt, incorporate the document(s) into your controlled document file, properly disposition superseded, voided, or inactive document(s).

Sign and return the receipt acknowledgement below within ten (10) working days.

AFFECTED DOCUMENT: IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURES DOC# REV# TITLE INSTRUCTIONS THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE(S), DRAWING (S) HA VE BEEN REVISIED, PLEASE REMOVE YOUR CURRENT COPY AND REPLACE WITH ATTACHED UPDATED PROCEDURE:

I 1>:-1ro-:T1-~~~~

EFFECT\VE IP-EP-120 REV.11 JU \ 4 20\6 IP-EP-21-0 --REV.21 DATE IP-EP-220 REV.19 IP-EP-230 REV.15 IP-EP-410 REV.12

- - - - PLEASE NOTE EFFECTIVE DATE***********

RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE LISTED DOCUMENT(S) IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED. I CERTIFY THAT ALL SUPERSEDED, VOID, OR INACTIVE COPIES OF THE ABOVE LISTED DOCUMENT(S) IN MY POSSESSION HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM USE AND ALL UPDATES HAVE BEEN PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EFFECTIVE DAT (IF APPLICABLE) AS SHOWN ON THE DOCUMENT(S). ~~

NAME (PRINT) SIGNATURE DATE COPY LOCATION

ATTACHMEfllT 9.1 10CfR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET1 OF4 Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP~210 Revision: 21 Equipment/facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Central Control Room

Part I. Descriptlon of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

Refer to Revision Matrix for Revision 21.

Part ii. Activity Previously Reviewed? YES NO Is this activity fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 50.54(q)(3) Continue to Evaluation ls next part Alert and Notification System Design Report? NOT required.

Enter Jf YES, identify bounding source document number/approval reference and jusllflcatlon ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the below and complete Pl:ll'I proposed change is documented below: VI.

Justification:

D Bounding document attached (optJonal}

Part Ill. Applicablllty of Other Regulatory Change Control Processes Check if any other regulatory change processes control the proposed activity.(Refer .to EN-Ll-100)

NOTE: For example, whEm a design change is the proposed activity, consequential actions may include changes to

.other docu111ents which ha)le a different change control process and are NOT to be included in this 50.54(q)(3) s .

A BIUTY CONCLUSION il!J If there are no controlling change processes, continue the 50,54(q)(3) Screening.

D On'e-or more i:ontrolling.change processes are selected, however, some portion of the adivity involves the emerge~cy plan or affects the implementation of the emergency plan; continue the 50.54(q)(3) Screening for that portion of the activity. Identify the applicable contromng change processes below.

0 One or more controlling change processes are selected and fully bounds all aspects of the activity. 50.54(q)(3)

Evaluation Is NOT re uired. Ide chan e recesses below and com tete Part VI.

CONTROLLING CHANGE PRO

.. ,** ,_. 10.. ¢.F-R 50.54q only:

P~rtav.:EditOrlal Change YES NO 50.54(q){3) Continue to next

ls lliis activity an editorial or typographical change such as formatting, paragraph Evaluation is part numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? NOT required.

Justlflcatlon: Enter justification and Change #1 ls an editorial change. No further evaluation is required for this complete Pan change. VL "No" Is selected because remaining changes are non-editorial and require \

further screening.

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR5G.54(q) SCREENING SHEET20F4 Procedure/Document Number: IP*EP-210 I Revision: 21 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Central Control Room Part V. Emergency Planning Element/Function Screen (Associated 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standard function identified in bracketsl Does this activity affect anv of the folloWina. including proaram elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II?

1. Responsibility for emergency re~ponse is assigned. [1] D

2. The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (2417 D staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. [1]

3. The process ensures that on shift emergency response regponsibilities are staffed and assigned. [2] D

4. The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. [2] D

5. Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. [3) 0

6. State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. [3] D

7. A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. [4] D

8. Procedures for notification of State .and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the 0 declared emergency within 15 1T1inu1es after declaration of an emergency and providing f~llow*up notifications. {5]

9. Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to 0 the public within the plume exposure pathway. [5]

10. The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Gulde for Evaluation of Alert and LI Notification System!i:for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report !i!nd supporting FEMA~approval letter. [5]

11. Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response organizations. [6] LI

12. Systems are ~stablished for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. [6)' -* LI

13. Emergency preparedness information is made available to the publfc on a periodic basis within the plume u

.. exposure pathway ~mergency planning zone (EPZ). [7J *

14. Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. [7J LJ

15. A~equate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. [8] LI

16. Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. [BJ LI

17. Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. [9] u

18. Arange of publicPA'Rs is available for implementation during emergencies. [10] LJ

19. Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available to LI support the fonnulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. [1 O]

20. A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including those LJ for hostile action events.[1 OJ EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATIACHMENT9.1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET30F4 Procedure/Document Number: IP*EP-210 I Revision: 21 Equipment/facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Central Control Room

21. The resources for; controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. (11] LI

22. Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. [12] LI

23. Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. [13] LI

24. A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) is LI established. [14]

25. Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, and u demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. [14]

26. Identified weaknesses are corrected. [14] LI

27. Training is provided to emergency responders. [15] u

28. Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. (16] u

29. Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. [16J LI APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION 181 If no Part V criteria are checked, a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation is NOT required; document the basis for conclusion below and complete Part VI.

D If any Part V criteria are checked, complete Part VI and perform a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation.

BASIS FOR CONCLUSION:

Clumges 2, 3, 4: 9, 11, .12;*'t°3i 14and1~ - Revi~d to reflect new fleet standardized form numbers and include.the new fleet standardized form numbers corresponding to the equivalent IPEC form numbers. These changes do not change the meaning or-intent of a description, do not change facilities or equipment, and do not change a process related to a planning stand_;;ird el~ment: These cha.nges do not require a change to thi: IPEC Emergency Plan .. No further evaluation is required for. ~~e_se changes.. ..

~

Changes 5, 5 and 8 - Corrected procedure errors regarding position title: OSC p.osition is Operations Support position versus Operations *coordinator. These changes do not change the meaning or intent of a description, do not change facilities or equipment, and do not change a process related to a planning standard element. These chan'"ges do* not require a _change to the W~C Emergency Plan. No further evaluation Is required for these changes.

Change 7 -Addition of cla.rifyiog guidance to Shift Manager/ED regarding requesting NPO te~msJrq111 O.SC. Jhis change does* riot change thrifmeaning or intent of a description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related*tO' a plann,ing standard element. This change does not require a change to the IPEC Emergency Plan. No further evaluation is required for this change. .

Change 10 - Addition of clarifying guidance to On-Shift RP Technician regarding conducting applicable briefings and form completion for issuance of KL This guidance ensures alignment with Shift Manager/ED guidance. This change does not change the meaning or intent of a description, does not change facilities or equipment. and does not change a process related to a planning standard element. This change does not require a change to the JPEC Emergency Plan. No further evaluation is required for this change.

Proposed changes to IP-EP-210, Central Control Room, Revision 21, have been reviewed to establish affect to planning standards or program elements in Part V of this form. it has been conch.u.ied that there ls no affect and no further evaluation is required and the changes do not require a change to the JPEC Emergency Plan.

EN.:.EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT9,1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET40F4 Revision: 21 Equipmentlfacllity/Other. Indian Point Energy Center Tltie: Central Control Room Part VI. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print)

Anthony .E. Ambrose Sr. Emergency Planner (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print)

Reviewer Name (P,rint)

John P. Standridge Nuclear EP Project Manager Approver Name (Print)

Lori A. Glander EP Manager or designee

\

r I EN-EP-305 REV 3

IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE -AD-i 02 Rev: i 0 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 34of40 ATTACHMENT 10.2 iPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Page i of 1)

Procedure

Title:

Central Control Room Procedure No: *iP-EP*210 Existing Rev: 20 NewAev: 21 0 Converted To IPEC, Replaces:

CJ NEW PROCEDURE Unit i Procedure No: D EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change (enter Step Number In Revision Summary}

D GENERAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No: 0 ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change OPARTIAL REVISION D CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change

!ID EDITORIAL REVISION Terminating Condition:--------

D VOID PROCEDURE Unit 3 Procedure No:

D SUPERSEDED 0 RAPID REVISION Document in Microsoft Word:

!!! Yes D No 0 VOID DRN/fPC No(s): ---~--

Revision Summary 0 Refer to revision matrix.

Implementation Requirements Implementation Plan? D Yes 0. Ni? Formal Tr~ining? 0 Yes 01\!o APO Dept: Emergency Planning Writer (Print Name/ Ext/ Sign}: Anthon E. Ambrose I Review and Approval (Per Attactiment 10.1, IP Review And Approval R ii'ements)

1. lil Technical Reviewer: Rebecca Martin I

2. 0 Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept: * * * ~~vjewer: _ _..........._ __.,.,,,..,.....,..,.,..-_,,,.,,.,..._..,.......,.,,,...,....,..__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

. . -* (Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Dept:------ Reviewer:-----.,....,,,,...,....,...,.,-__,..,..,......,........,.,,,....,-,------'-------

. (Print Name/ Signature/ Data)

3. APO Responsibilities: ::Lo,,.,r"'"i=G""!a""'n""de..,,r..,,/_ _ _ _ _ _-=,..,....,..,,.,..___,..,,,.,......,........,~,...,...----------

<Prlnt Name/ Signature/ Date)

D PAD required and is complete (PAD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified) 0 Previous exclusion from further ll-100 Review is still valid D PAD not required due to type of change

4. 0 Non-Intent Determination Complete: -----=-~:-:----:-:=-:--.....,....._,.,,,.....,....,...-----------

(Pr!nt Name/ Signature/ Date)

NO change of purpose or scope ~change to less reslrlctive acceptance cliterla NO reduction In the level of nuclear safely ~change to steps previously Identified as commitment steps

~voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless requirements ~ dev!a!!on from the Quality Assurance Program Manual are !ncorpomled Into another procedum or the need for the ~change !hat may result in devialions from Technical Speciflcalions, procedure was ellmlnated via an altemate process FSAR, plant design requirements, or previously made commitments

5. CJ On-Shift Shift Manager/CRS:. ________-==-:-:---,.,,,.,.-~-=:-:--:--------

{Prlnt Name/ Signature/ Date)

6. 0 UserValidation: User:____________ Validator:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

7. D Special Handling Requirements Understood:_ _.,,,...,...,..,,.,...__,.,,,.,...._..,.......,,.,,,...,,-,--------

(Pr!nt Name/ Signature/ Data)

Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections must be completed, N/A or place a check on the line where applicable) .

Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type: (circle one) Administrative/ Implementing I EPLAN Doc/Procedure No: IP-EP-210 C/A: Yes =X_._No ~_CIA No. IP3-2016*233 CA-4 Due

' Date:_S/15/16_

Doc/Procedure

Title:

Central Control Room Rev No: Rev Distribution Date: ..._...6/14/16_ __

Reason for EPDCC: ~--- Revision _..._X,,___ Cancel __ Date of EPDCC: _4/4/16_.

Section2 Change Description

1. Originator: ,..A""'nt....,h""'on~v.....,A'""m"""""bro=se....________________________

2. Class of Change: Technical Correction_ New Commitment__ Other _X _ _

3. Page numbers affected and reason for change: Refer to revision matrix.

4. Emergency Planning Documents Affected: ""'N"""on""'e,.__________.....__ _ __

5. Emergency Planning Procedures f,\ffected..:..;:N ......o.,,..n""e'---------------

6.

References:

Othe'. Proce\:hJre(s} #~ Regulatory Document .. _ _ _ __

Other: _ _ _ _.....,;.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

7. Reviewed training requirements with depiartment training coordinator NIA_*_date _ __

8. The following are complete, *. .

or are not app1ica.1e .

and are so marked.

Tech Review* NIA 50.54q-2L, ENN-Ll-100 NIA PL-155 _.oLa_

SMM*AD-102 _lL Manager approv~I ~SAC n/a

9. Both table of contents and transmittals are complete_ _ _ _ _ date - - - - - - -

10. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Document Control for distribution date._ __

11. Position Binders updated if applicable date _ _ _ __

i 2. Copy of EPDCC and document/procedure placed in EP file_ _ _ _ _ _ _........____

Sheet 1of1

Revision Matrix for IP-EP...21 O "Central Control Room" Revision 21 Number Existing Condition Proposed Editorial Change? Affect on 50.47 Planning Std.?

Ccmdition

1 Rev20 Rev 21 YES NO - This is an editorial change to the revision number and effective date.

2 Page 13 of 44 Page 13 of 44 NO NO Attachment 9. i Attachment 9.1 Form revision to Fleet Standard Form. Thif? change does not Step 2.2, C., 3.: Step 2.2, C., 3.: change the meaning or intent of a (Form EP-B) (Form EP-4-AU/EP-6) description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a plannina standard element.

3 Page 13 of 44 NO NO Attachment 9.1 ' ..' Form revision to fleet Standard Step.2.2, c., 5.,1~: Form. This change does not Added (1. Utilize Form EP change the meaning or intent of a All!EP-65 to document date, description, does not change time and name of personnel facilities or equipment, and does m.gesting Kl.)

.: ~ ... . *-<?,

not change a process related to a plannirm standard element

4 Page 15 of 44 *Page 15 of 44' * " NO NO Attachment 9.1 Attachment 9. i Form revision to Fleet Standard Step2.5, A (Form EP-9)

. Step 2.5, A. ':'

(Form EP-2-ALLJEP*9)

Form. This change does not change the meaning or intent of a description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a olannirm standard element.

5 Page 17 of 44 Page 17 of 44 NO NO - corrected procedure error Attachment 9.1 Attachment 9. 'l regarding position title. This Step 3.6 Step3.6 change does not change the Coordinate in-Plant team activities Coordinate In-Plant team meaning or intent of a with Operations Coordinator/OSC activi~ies with Operations Support description, does not change Manager positioi1/0SC Manager facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a p!armina standard element.

Page 1of4

Revision Matrix .,

for IP..EP-21 O Central Control Room" Revision 21 .

6 Page 18 of 44 Page 18 of 44 NO NO - corrected procedure error Attachment 9.1 Attachment 9.1 regarding position title. This Step 3.6.A/B/C Step 3.6.AIB/C change does not change the

......Operations Coordinator...* **..*..Operations Support meaning or intent of a position ..*. description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a olannin!'.l standard element.

7 Page 18 of 44 NO NO Attachment 9. i Added clarifying guidance for Added:* sub-step 1. to 3.6, A.: Shift Manager/ED when (1. CCR should request two requesting NPO teams from NPO teams, one for osc. This change does not nuclear side tasking and change the meaning or intent of a one for conventional side description,* does not change tasking. Ensure that facilities or equipment, and does

, OSC OPS Support not change a process related to a position is updated as to planning standard element.

their tasking and status.}

8 Page 32 of 44 Page 32 of 44 NO NO - corrected procedure error Attachment 9.4 Attachment 9.4 regarding.position title. This Slep 2.1, B/C.: Step 2.1, B/C.: change does not change the

......Operations Coordinator***. ., .....Operati~ris Support meaning or intent of a

~osition ....

.. description, does not change I

facilities or equipment, and does

, .. not change a process related to a

.. planning standard element.

~:*.'.

.,, I IJ,'

9 Page32 of 44 Page 32 of 44 NO NO Attachment 9.4 Attachment 9.4 Form revision to Fleet Standard Step 2.1, D.: Step 2.1, 0.: Form. This change does not (Form EP-10) '(Form EP-3-ALLJEP-10) change the meaning or intent of a description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a olannino standard element.

Page2of4

Revision Matrix for IP-EP...21 O "Central Control Room" Revision 21

10 Page35 of 44 NO NO Attachment 9.5. Added clarifying guidance for On-Added: Step 2. i, D.: Shift RP Technician to align with

!f radiological conditions warrant Shift Manager/ED guidance in AND requested by Shift Attachment 9.1. This change Manager/ED. issue Kl to control does not change the meaning or room personnel. intent of a description, does not

.1. Conduct applicable change facilities or equipment.

radiological and/or Kl and does not change a process briefings to CCR . related to a planning standard personnel.. element..

2. Utilize Form EP-8*

ALUEP-65 to document date, time and name of personnel_ ingesting Kl.

Page35 of 44 Page 35 of. 44 NO NO Attachment 9.5 Attachment 9.5 Fann revision to Fleet Standard Step 2.2 Step 2.2 Form. This change does not (Form EP-10) (Form EP-3-ALIJEP-iO} change the meaning or intent of a description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a planning standard element.

12 Page37 of 44 Page 37 of 44 NO NO Attachment 9.6 :Attachment 9.6 Form revision to Fleet Standard Step 2.1 * *step 2.1 .. .. . * ~ .~ Form. This change does not (Form EP-10) .(Form .

EP-3~ALUEP~:IO):

... . . change the meaning or intent of a

.... description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a planninri standard element.

13 Page 40 of 44 , , :: *Page 40 ol 44 ** NO NO Attachment 9. 7 Attachment 9.1 Form revision to Fleet Standard Step 1.3, A.: . Step 1.3, A.:* :. Form. This change does not

{Form EP-47) {Form EP-7-ALUEP-47) change th~ meaning or intent of a description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a planning standard element.

Page 3of4

Revision Matrix for IP EP-21 O "Central Control Room" Revision 21 00

14 Page40 of 44 Page 40 of 44 . NO NO Attachment 9. 7 . Attachment 9.7 Form revision to Fleet Standard Step 1.3, B.: Step 1.3, B.: Form. This change does not (Form EP-47) (Fonn EP-7-ALL/EP-47) change the meaning or intent at a description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a olanninCJ standard element.

15 Page40 of 44 Page 40 of 44 NO NO Attachment 9.7 Attachment 9.7 Fonn revision to Fleet Standard Step 2.1, A.: *Step 2.1, A.: Form. This change does not (Form EP-47) (Fann EP-7-ALLIEP-47) " change the meaning or intent of a description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change a process related to a olannino standard element.

~ .. . .. .

*.~* ' .-~- .

Page4of4

ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET 1 OF 3 Procechare/Oocument Number: IP-EP-230 I Revision: 15 EquipmentJFacillty/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Operations Support Center Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan):

1. Page 15.*Att. 9.5 section 1.2 D changed sheet number 9 to sheet number 6 Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? DYES 12$1 NO Is this activity fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 50.54(q){3) Continue to Evaluation is next part Alert and Notification System Design Report? NOT required.

Enter If YES, identify bounding source document number/approval reference and justllicallon ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the below and complete Part proposed change is documented below: VI.

Justification:

O Bounding dowmentattached (optional)

Part Ill. Applicability of Other Regulatory Change Control Processes Check If any other regulatory change processes control the proposed activity.(Refer to EN-U-100)

NOTE: For example, when a design change !s the proposed actMty, consequential actions may include changes to.

other documents which have a different change control process and are NOT to be induded in this 50.54{q)(3)

Screeninci.

APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION 12?.l lf there are no controlling change processes, continue the 50.54(q)(3) Screening.

D One or more controlling change processes are selected, however, some portion of the activity involves the emergency plan or affects the implementation of the emergency plan; continue the 50.54(q)(3) Screening for that portion of the activity. Identify the applicable controlling change processes below.

D One or-more controlling change processes are selected and fully bounds all aspects of the activity. 50.54(q)(3)

Evaluation Is NOT ed. ldentifv controllinq chancie processes below and complete Part VI.

CONTROLUN ANGE PROCESSES 10 CFR 50.54q only.

Part IV. editorial Change IZJYES UNO SO.S4{q){J) Continue to nc~t :

Is this activity an editorial or typographical change such as formatting, paragraph Evnluntion is pan*

numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? NOT r~-quircd, Justification: Enter jtt~tiliClltion and Change 1 Is editorial. The Sheet number discussed In this section was incorrect complete Part number and typographical change was made. This change updated the correct VL sheet number that was discussed In this step.

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATIACHMENT 9.1 10CfR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET20F3 Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-230 I Revision: 15 Equipmentlfacmty/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

9perations Support. Center Part V. Emergency Planning Element/Function Screen (Associated 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standard function identified in brackets) Does this activity affect anv of the followino. indudino orooram elements from NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1 Section 117

1. Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. [1] D

2. The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (2417 0 staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. [1]

3. The process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned. (2) 0

4. The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. (2] 0

5. Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. [3] 0

6. State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. [3] 0

7. A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. [4] D

8. Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the 0 declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. [5]

9. Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway. (5)

.o

10. The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and .. LJ Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. (5]

11. Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response organizations. [6] u

12. Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. [6] u

13. Emergency preparedness infonnation is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the plume D exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). [1J

14. Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. [7] u

15. Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. [8] u

16. Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. [8] .,LJ

17. Methods, systems. and equipment for assessment of radioactive releases are in use. [9] *u

18. A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. [1 OJ :u*

19. Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available to u support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. [1 OJ

20. A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including those u for hostile action events.(1 OJ EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR50.54(q} SCREENING SHEET30F3 Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-230 I Revision: 15 EqulpmentJFaclllty/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Operations Support Center

21. The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. [11] u

22. Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured Individuals. [12] u

23. Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. (13] u

24. A drill and exercise program {including radiological. medical, health physics and other program areas) is u established. (141

25. Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, and u demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process In order to identify weaknesses. {141

26. Identified weaknesses are corrected. (14] u

27. Trainirig Is provided to emergency responders. [15] u

28. Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. {16] u

29. Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. (16) u APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION 0 If no Part V criteria are checked, a 50.54(q)(3} Evaluation is NOT required; document the basis for conclusion below and complete Part VI.

D If any Part V criteria are checked, complete Part VI and perfofTTl a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation.

NIA - Editorial revisions. .. ..

Part VI. Signatures:

~:;~

Preparer Name (Print) Data: :

Rebecca A. Martin .....

Sr. eP Project Manager .. 0(61//fo ..

(Optional) Reviewer Name (Print) Revi~er Signature Date:

Reviewer Name {Print) Reviewer Signature /1 Date:

John P. Standridge Nuclear EP Project Manager ... &~J~ ~'

s'/31/1~

Approver Name (Print) ~Appro*e. Slgnarure , . / '-' Date:

Lori A. Glander EP Manager ;f) 7,.?(-(b v

EN-EP-305 REV 3

IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM-AD-102 Rev: 10 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 34of40 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL Procedure

Title:

Operations Support Center Procedure No: IP-EP*230 Existing Rev: 14 New Rev: 15 Procedme Activity

{MARK Applicable} D Converted To IPEC, Replaces:

D NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No: D EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change (Enter Step Number in Revision Summary)

D GENERAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No: D ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change D PARTIAL REVISION D CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change li!l EDITORIAL REVISION Terminating Condition: /

D VOID PROCEDURE Unit 3 Procedure No:

D SUPERSEDED D RAPID REVISION Document in Microsoft Word:

D Yes D No D VOID DRNfTPC No(s): - - - - - -

Revision Summary D NIA- See Revision Summary page.

Editorial revision updated sheet number in attachment 9.5 step 1.20.

lmplememtatit::m Requirements Implementation Plan? D Yes IE No Formal Training? 0 Yes IENo Special Handling? D Yes rn:JNo RPO Dept: Emergency Planning Writer (Print Name/ Ext/ Sign): Rebecca A. Martin I I Jl~ ~~ Q,1/l~

Review and Approval (Per Attachment 10. i, IPEC Review And Approval Requirements)

1. D Technical Reviewer-----------=~..,.,....__,..,,,.,...__,_.,.,,....,...,._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

(Print Name/ Slgnaturel Date)

2. 0 Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept: Reviewer: ------..,.,=-=-'""""".....,...~-,,,_..,.,,,,...,...,,......----------

!Pr~nt Name/ Signature/ Date)

Dept:------ R e v i e w e r : - - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - - -

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date) aRPORe~on~bW~E~L=o~M-G~~~n_d_e_rl_ _~~~-~~~~~-~~~'~3_,_,_r~~-----~ {Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

D PAD required and is complete {P Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified)

IEPrevious exclusion from further U-100 Review is still valid D PAD not required due to type of change

4. D Non-Intent Determination Complete: ----..,,.....,,.......,.-_,...,,..,..--_..,,,..._.,._..----------

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

NO change of purpose or scope fiQ change to less restrictive acceptance criteria NO reduction in the level of nuclear safety NO change lo steps previously identified as commitment steps NO voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless requirements NO deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual are incorporated into another procedure or the need for the NQ* change that may result in deviations from Technical Specifications.

procedure was eliminated via an alternate process FSAR, plant design requirements, or previousiy made commilments

5. D On-Shift Shiff Manager/CRS: _ _ _ _ _ _-=.,....,....,........,..,,,,_...........-~_,.....,.----------

{Prlnt Name/ Signature/ Date)

6. D UserValidation: User: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Validator. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

7. CJ Special Handling Requirements Understood:_--=,_,__,...__,,..,,..,..-__,_,,__,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form

{All sections must be completed, NIA or place a check on the-line where applicable)

Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type: (circle one) Administrative I Implementing I EPLAN-Doc/Procedure No: IP EP 230 CIA: Yes _x_ No CIA No. 3L0-16-26 CA 12 Due Date: 05/27116 Doc/Procedure

Title:

Operations Sur.u2ort Center Rev No: 15 Rev Distribution Date: 06/14/16 Reason for EPDCC: New X Revision Cance! Date of EPDCC: 05125/16 Section 2 Change Description

1. Originator: :...;R"""eb""'e""c""'ca""""'"A.....M art n_....__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

....i....

2. Class of Change: Technical Correction *New Commitment_*_Other _,..;;..X,____

3. Page m;1mbers affected and.reason for change: Editorial Change; Update attachment 9.5 step

1.2.D to reference sheet 6. Sheet number was incorrect.

4. Emergency Planning Documents Affected:....N .....o.....n....e.....__ _~---------

5. Emergency Planning Procedures Affected:_!;.:.,P...:-E"""P__-"""23"""0....__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.,.,...__

8.

References:

Other Procedure(s) #NIA Regulatory Document# NIA Other: ___________________________________

7. Reviewed training requirements witl:H:lepartment training coordinator *_date: _____

.8. The following are complete, or <?fe not applicable and ;;m:r so marked.

Tech Review 50.54q_X__ !:NN-Ll-100: NIA PL-155 NIA SMM-AD-102.JL Manager approval .....lL SRC NIA

9. Both table of contents and transmittals are complete______ d a t e - - - - - - -

10. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Document Control for distribution . date_ __

11. Position Binders updated if applicable: . date i2. Copy of EPDCC and document/procedure placed in EP file date_ __

Sheet 1 of 1 Form EP-AD2-1 Rev, 0

ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET1 OF3 Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-220 I Revision: 19 Equlpmentlf'acillty/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Technical Support Center Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation oflhe emergency plan);

1. Page 19, Alt 9.9 section 2 1 A changed sheet number 9 to sheet number 3 2, Page 20, Alt 9.,9 section 2.4 A.1 changed sheet number 11 to sheet number 5 Part It Activity Previously Reviewed? LJYES f2:g NO is this activity fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 50.54(q)(3) Continue to Evaluation is next part Alert and Notification System Design Report? NOT required.

Enter If YES, identify bounding source document number/approval reference and justification ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the below and proposed change is documented below: complete Part VI.

Justification:

D Bounding document attached (optional)

Part Ill. Applicability of Other Regulatory Change Control Processes Check if any other regulatory change processes control the proposed activily,(Refer to EN-Ll-100)

NOTE; For example, when a design change is the proposed activity, consequential actions may include changes to other documents which have a different change.control process and are NOT to be included in this 50.54(q)(3)

Screenina, APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION I 1.81 If there are no controlling change processes, continue the 50.54(q)(J) Screening. * .

D One or more controlling change processes are selected, hoW?ver, some portion of the activity involves the emergency plan or affects the implementation of the emergency plan; continue the 50.54(q){3) Screening for that portion of the activity. Identify the applicable controlling change processes below.

D One or more controlling change processes are selected and fully bounds.all aspects of the activity. 50.54(q)(3)

Evaluation Is NOT reCJuired. ideniifv controllina chanae processes below and comolete Part VI.

CONTROLLING CHANGE PROCESSES 10 CFR 50.54q only.

.. 1.81YES ONO Part IV. editorial Change 50.54(q)(3) Continue to next Is this activity an editorial or typographical change such as formatting, 'Paragraph Evaluation is part numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? NOT required.

Justlflcatlcm: Emcr justification and 13oth change 1 and 2 are editorial. The Sheet numbers discussed in these two ~'Ompkh: Part sections were Incorrect and typographical change was made. These changes VJ.

updated the correct sheet number that was discussed In each step.

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET2 OF3 Procedure/Document Number: iP-EP-220 I Revision: 19 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center

Title:

Technical Support Center Part V. Emergency Planning Element/Function Screen (Associated 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standard function identified in brackets) Does this activity affect anv of the rollowinQ, includinci oroaram elements from NUREG-0854/FEMA REP-1 Section II?

1. Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. [1) D

2. The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (2417 D staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. [1]

3. The process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned. (2] D

4. The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. [2] D

5. Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. [3] D

6. State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF In accordance with the emergency plan. [3) D

7. A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. [4] D

8. Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of the D declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. (5)

9. Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt instructions to D the public within the plume exposure pathway. [5] . ** *

10. The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-:10, quids for Evaluation .of Alert and u*

Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA~approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. {5]

11. Systems are established for prompt communication among princip~ emergency response organizations. [6J u

12. Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel..fPJ u

13. Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the plume u exposure pathway emergency planning zone {EPZ). [7]

14. Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. (7] u

15. Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. [8] u

16. Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency* response. [8] u

17. Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactive rel~ases are in use. [9] u

18. A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies: (1 OJ ** - - u

19. Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are available to u support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. {10J r

20. A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including those u for hostile action events.[1 O]

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET30F3 Procedure/Document Number: IP*EP-220 I Revision: 19 Equipment/Faclllty/Other: Indian Point Energy Center ittia: Technical Support Center

.21. Th.e . resource.s for contromng radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. [11 l ... ,,

u

22. Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. [12] u

23. Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. [131 u

24. A drill and exercise program (inctuding radiological, medical, health physics and other program areas) is u established. [14]

25. Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, and u demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. (14)

26. Identified weaknesses are corrected. [14) /

u

27. Training is provided to emergency responders. [15] u

26. Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. (16] LI

29. Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. (16] LI APPUCASILJTY CONCLUSION D If no Part V criteria are checked, a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation is NOT required; document the basis for conclusion below and complete Part VI.

D If any Part V criteria are checked, complete Part VI and perform a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation.

N/A .. Editorial revisions. -. , ........

~*- ~.

Part VI. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print)

Rebecca A. Martin Sr. EP Project Manager (Optional) Reviewer Name (Prinl)

.~=:~M ~~-.*

Reviewer Signature Date:.

Date:

--~L,-((4' Reviewer Name (Print) Reviewer Signature/

John P. Standridge Nuclear EP Project Manager

~/1/_

P-~,

J..*

. - 5fa1f0

~*

'I

/Iv-}~~'"'""""

Approver Name (Print) Data; Lori A. Glander EP Manager 7'3t>f(o

(/

EN-EP-305 REV 3

IPEC HMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM-AD-102 Rev: 10 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 34of40 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PRoceomu: REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Page 1of1)

Procedure

Title:

Technical Support Center Procedure No* IP-EP-220 Existing Rev* 18 New Rev* 19 ORN/EC No* DRN-16-00789 Procedure Activi~ Tem~orary Procedure Change

{MARK Applicable) D Converted To lPEC, Replaces: (MARK Applicable) 0 NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No: D EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change (Enter Step Number in Revision Summary) 0 GENERAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No: 0 ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change 0 PARTIAL REVISION 0 CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change

!ID EDITORIAL REVISION Terminating Condition:

Unit 3 Procedure No:

0 VOID PROCEDURE 0 SUPERSEDED lfD RAPID REVISION Document in Microsoft Word:

0 Yes 0 No

D VOID DRN!TPC No(s):

Revision Summarv O N/A - See Revision Summary page.

Editorial revision. updated Sheet number in attachment 9.9 step 2.1and2.4A1 ..

Umplementijfti@n Requirements implementation Plan? D Yes .IE No Formal Training? 0 Yes !El No Special Handling? D* Yes t:ElNo .

RPO Dept: Emergency Planning w_riter (Print Name/ Ext! Sign):_R=.=eb=.:e~c~c::::,a.;:.A.::.*.1.iM~a:o:;rt!!!in.!.._:...I_.....!.l..;:;:;.Jl::..J.....-..1...lU~~

Review and Apprwal (Per Attachment 10.1, IPEC Review And Approval Requirements). j.

1. O Technical Reviewer

~-~-~---(=P~rin-t~N~am-e~/~S~ig-na-t-ur-~~D~a-~~)~~-~--__,...,......~~---

2. D Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept Reviewer:-----......,.,,......,..-,..,..-.,.,..,.--------~-------

(Print Name/ Signature# Date)

Dept ______ Reviewer:------..,,,,...,....,..,.,..-~-.,..-~....,....,-~**"i-*-_,..--~-----

(Prlnt Name/ Signature/ Date)

3.RPORes~n~biliUe~~L~o~ri~G~~~n~d=er~/-~~~--~~~~~-~~~/~-~/~~~~~~~~~~ (Print Name/ Signature/ Data)

D PAD required and is complete (PAD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified) fEIPrevious exclusion from further U-100 Review is still valid 0 PAD not required due to type of change

4. 0 Non-Intent Determination Complete: -----=..,......,...,,.,_--=-=--__,,.,,,....,....,..-----------

IPrlnt Name/ Signature/ Date)

NO change of purpose or scope NO cllange lo less restrictive acceptance criteria NO reduction in the level of nuclear safety NO change to steps previously identified as commitment steps NO voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless requirements NO deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual are incorporated into another procedure or !he need for the NO change that may result in deviations from Technical Specifications.

procedure was eliminated via an alternate process FSAR, plant design requirements, or previously made commitments

5. 0 On*Shift Shift Manager/CRS: _ _ _ _ _ _--:::--:-'.=-__,.,,,.,,...._,__...,."""'"'"...,-----------

(Print Name( Signature/ Date)

6. 0 User Validation: User:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Validator: _______________

7. O Special Handling Requirements Understood:_ __,,,,...,.......,....__,...........,._..,,,_,...,..----------

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections must be completed, NIA or place a check on the line where applicable)

Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type: (circle one) Administrative/ lmptementing I EPlAN Doc/Procedure No: IP EP 220 CIA: Yes _x_ No C/A No. 3l0-16-26 CA 11 Due Date: 05/27116 Doc/Procedure

Title:

Technical SupgortCenter Rev No: 19 Rev Distribution Date: 06/14/16 Reason for EPDCC: New X Revision Cancel Date of EPDCC: 05/25/16 Section 2 Change Description

1. Originator: _,R...

eb....e..,.c....

c..,.a....

A.....M==art

.....i....

n_.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

2. Class of Change: Technical Correction New Commitment_ _ Other _ ... x..____

3. Page numbers affected and reason for change: Editorial Change. Update attachment 9.9 step 2.1 to reference sheet 3 and step 2.4.A.1 to reference sheet 5. Sheet numbers were incorrect.

4. Emergency Planning Documents Affected:..N..,,o...,n...e_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

5. Emergency Planning Procedures Affected:_l.....P.....-E=P-*... 22...0..___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

6.

References:

Other Procedure(s) #NIA Regulatory Document#. NIA Other: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

7. Reviewed trqining requirements with department training coordinator _ .._date:_-__

8. The following are complete, or are not applicable and are so marked. ., *.

TechRevlew_n/a_50.54q_X_ ENN.:LJ.100:N/A PL-155 .N/A SMM*AD-102.JL Manager approval _L SRC NIA -.

9. Both table of contents and transmittals are complete_________ date--------------

10. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Document Control for distribution date_ __

11. Position Binders updated if applicable: . date

12. Copy of EPDCC and document/procedure placed in EP file date_ __

Sheet 1of1 Form EP-AD2-1 Rev. 0

Sheet 1of3 ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING Procedure/Document Number: IP*EP 120 0 I Revision: 11 EquipmentlFacility/Other: Indian Poim Energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Emergency Classification Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed Updated both Hot Conditions and Cold Conditions Note Section with the correct directions to contact the National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC).

Part II. Activity Previously Reviewed? DYES ~NO Is this activity fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 50.54(q)(3) Continue to Alert and Notification System Design Report? Evaluation Is - next part NOT required.

Enter If YES, identify bounding source document number/approval reference and justification ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the below and complete Part proposed change is documented below: VI.

Justification:

O Bounding document attached (optional)

Part Ill. Applicability of Other Regulatory Change Control Processes Check if any other regulatory tjlange processes control the proposed actlvity.(Refer to EN*Ll-100)

NOTE: for example, when a design change is the proposed activity, consequential actions may include changes to other documents which have ~ l:fifferent chai:ige c9ntrol process and are NOT to be induded in this 50.54(q)(S)

Screening. -

APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION 181 If there are no controlling change processes, continue the 50.54(q)(3) Screening.

D One or more controlling change processes are selected, however. some portion of the activity Involves the emergency plan or affects lhe.implen:ientatlon of the.emergency plan: continue the 50.54(q)(3) Screening for thal portion of the activity. Identify the applicable controlling change processes below.

O One or more controlling change processe~are selected and fully bounds all aspects of the activity. 50.54(q}{3}

E11a!uat!on ls NOT required. Identify controlling cfia~ge*processes below ancl complete Part VI.

CONTROLLING CHANGE PROCESSES 10 CFR 50.54(q)

Part IV. Editorial Change LJYES 1a1 NO 50.54(q)(3) Continue to next Is this activity an editorial or typographical change such as formatting, paragraph F.va!uation is ir.irt numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? NOT m1uired.

Enter Justification: justi fi1.<1tion uml complete Purt VI.

"NO" !s checked as there are non-editorial changes.

EN-EP-305 REV 3

Sheet 2 of 3 ATTACHMENT9.1 1 OCFR50.54(q) SCREENING Procedure/Document Number: IP--EP-120 I Revision: 11 Equipment/facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Emergency Classification Part V. Emergency Planning Element/Function Screen (Associated 10 CFR 50.47{b) planning standard function identified in brackets) Does this activity affect any of the following, induding program elements from NUREG-0854/FEMAREP-1 Section fl?

1. Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. (1] D

2. The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (2417 . D staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. [1]

3. The process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned. [2) D

4. The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. [2} D

5. Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. [3] D

6. State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. [3J D

7. A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. [4] D

8. Procedures for notification of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of D the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. [5]

9. Administrative and phys!cal means have been established for alerting and providing prompt D instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway. [5]

10. The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-10, Guide for Evaluation of Alert and u Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA,approval letter. (5l

11. Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response u organizations. [6)

12. Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. {61 LJ

13. Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within the u plume exposure pathway enie~ge.ncyJ>lanning zone.(EPZ)_. (7]

14. Coordinated dissemination of pi.tbliq information during emergencies is established. [7] u

15. Adequate facilities are maintained to *support emergency response. [8) u

16. Adequate equipment is maintained to support emergency response. [8] u

17. Methods, systems, and equipment for assessment of radioactilie releases are in use. [9] u

18. A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. [10] u

19. Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are u available to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and local governmental authorities. [10}

20. A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including u those for hostile action events.[1 OJ

21. The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. [1 i] LJ

22. Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. [12) u

23. Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. [13] '

u

24. A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program u areas) is established. [14}

EN-EP-305 REV 3

Sheet 3 of 3 AiTACHMENT9.1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING Procedure/Document Number: IP$EP*120 I Revision: 11 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center {IPEC) -

Title:

Emergency Classiflcation

25. Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, maintain, and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process In order to Identify weaknesses. [14]

26. Identified weaknesses are corrected. [14}

27. Training is provided to emergency responders. [15]

28. Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. [16]

29. Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. [161 APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION 1£1 If no Part V criteria are checked, a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation is !iQ.I required; document the basis for condusion below and complete Part VI. .

Q If any Part V criteria are checked, complete Part VI and perform a 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation.

BASIS FOR CONCLUSION Updated Note 4 for both Hot and Cold conditions to provide correct directions for contactlpg the NEIC. This update does* not change the mea~lf'!g or Intent of a description, does not change facilities or equipment, and does not change ai' process. This changlif does not require a change to the IPEC Emergency Plan. No further evaluation Is required for this change*

Part VI. Signatl.mes:

Preparer Name (Print)

Rebecca A. Martin Sr. EP Project Manager (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print)

Anthony E. Ambrose Reviewer Name (Print)

John P. Standridge Nuclear EP Project Manager Approver Name (Print)

Lori A. Glander EP Manager or designee EN-EP-305 REV 3

IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM-AD-102 Rev: 1 PREPARAT~ON, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 34of40 ATTACHMENT PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL Procedure

Title:

Emergency Classification Procedure No* IP-EP-120 Existing Rev* 1O New Rev* 11 DRN/EC No* DRN-16-00779 Procedure Activi!'l Temeora!jl Procedure Change (MARK Applicable) D Converted To IPEC, Replaces: !MARK Applicable) 0 NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No: D EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change (Enter Step Number In Revision Summary}

0 GENERAL REVISION D ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change IE PARTIAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No:

D CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change 0 EDITORIAL REVISION Terminating Condition:

Unit 3 Procedure No:

0 VOID PROCEDURE 0 SUPERSEDED 0 RAPID REVISION Document in Microsoft Word:

0 Yes 0 No D VOID DRN/TPC No(s):

Revisiorn Summaav D NIA - See Revision SUmfTlant page.

Updated both hot and cold condition note #4 to include update contact information for NElC.

,-, . - * * -.: ** *v '* '

lmplemer11tatior11 Reguirements Implementation Plan? D Yes tEJ No Formal Training? D Yes lfilNo Special Handling? D Yes lfilNo RPO Dept Emergency Planning Writer {Print Name/ Ext/ Sign):....;R:...:.:::.eb:.::e::.::c::.::c;:::a..:.A.::... ..:.:M:.:.:a:::.rt~in""'-/_._,~..,.._+-""3..lll.~;.:o__.;;;;..::,_.,;:,;:.

Review and Approval (PerAttachment 10.1, !PEC Re

w And A *val Requ

1. IE Technical Reviewer Anthon Ambrose/

2. D Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept Reviewer:------.....,...,.-~-.,..;,-,..;.._.,..-...,.,.,...,...,,.,....-'----------

{Prlnt Namersig~ature/ Date) *

Dept: ------Reviewer:-------:::..-.-~-***..,.'~.,..,,**,,,,.'. ., ,* ,. . *'.,......-:-::::.....,....,,.,-----------

(Prlnt Namersignaturet Date)'-*- . *

3. RPO Responsibilities: J,L.EO[!ri.:,G2.1!£:!!an[!!d!!;e!!:!r/;__..4."""""..Dl.-1t.'!::=::::::,..,..,...,,.,...___,..,,,.,,..._...:.:..,..,,.__,..,.O::::...-"-:::.!.....J..~-----

(Prlnt Name! Signature! Date)*

0 PAD required and is complete AD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified) lfilPrevious exclusion from further Ll-100 Review is still valid 0 PAD not required due to type of change

4. D Non-Intent Determination Complete: _ _ _ _..,,,_,,......,..,......-.,,.,---.....,-:,,....,-..,..-----------

(Print Name/ Signature/ Datel NO change of purpose or scope !iQ change to less restrictive aecep!ance criteria NO reduction in the level or nuclear safety NO change to steps previously identified as commitment steps NO voiding or canceling of a prqcedure, unless requirements NO deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual are incorporated into another procedure or the need for the tlQ change that may result In deviations from Technical Specifications, procedure was eliminated via an alternate process FSAR, plant design requirements, or previously made commitments

5. D On-Shift: Shift Manager/CRS: _ _ _ _ _ ___,.,,,..,.-,...,.,...,.._.,~-..,.___,-::-:-,------------

(Prlnt Name/ Signature/ Date)

6. D User Validation: User: ___________ Validator:.~--------------

7. 0 Special Handling Requirements Understood:_ _..,.,...,.....,...,.,...__,..,,..,___,.___...,,,...,....,..._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections must be completed, NIA or place a check on the line where applicable)

Section 'I Doc/Procedure Type: (circle one) Administrative/ Implementing I EPLAN Doc/Procedure No: IP EP 120 CIA: Yes _X_ No C/A No. 2-16-1125 CA 4 Due Date: 06101/16 Doc/Procedure

Title:

Emergencv Classification Rev No: 11 Rev Distribution Date: 06/14/16 Reason for EPDCC: New X Revision Cancel Date of EPDCC: 05131/16 Section 2 Change Description

1. Originator: :...:R:.:::eb::..:e:.::c<=c=-a..:..A::.....""M""a"""rti"""n_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _....,..._ _ _ _ __

2. Class of Change: Technical Correction New Commitment__ Other ____ x___

3. Page numbers affected and reason for change: Updated both Hot and Cold condition Note section #4 with the correct directions to contact directions to contact NEIC.

4. Emergency Planning Documents Affected: EAL Reference Manual AD13

5. Emergency Planning Procedures Affected: __l""P"'"'-E:=.;P_-,...12=0..__ _ _ _ _ __,...._ _ __

6.

References:

Other Procedure(s) # NIA -Regulatory Document# NIA Other: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

7. Reviewed training requirements with department training coordinator --*_date: _ _ __

a. The following are complete, or are not applicable and are so marked.

Tech Review _nla_ 50.54q _X_ ENN-Ll-100: NIA PL.~155 NIA *SMM-AD-102 .JL Manager approval _lL SRC N/A

9. Both table of contents and transmittals are complete._ _ _ _ _ da"tt~*---------

10. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Document Control for distribution date_ __

11. Position Binders updated if applicable:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. date _ _

12. Copy of EPDCC and document/procedure placed in EP file_ _ _ _ _ _ _date_ __

Sheet 1of1 Form EP*AD2-1 Rev. 0

ATTACHMENT 9.1 1OCF R50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET1 OF4 Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-410 I Revision: 12 EquipmentlFacmty/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that may result in a change to the emergency plan or affect the implementation of the emergency plan): The activity being reviewed is a procedure revision to IP-EP-410, "Protective Action Recommendations" to incorporate:

Refer to attached Revision Matrix fart II. Activity Previously Reviewed? DYES 181 NO Is this activity fully bounded by an NRC approved 10 CFR 50.90 submittal or 50.54(q)(3) Continue lo Evaluation Is next part Alert and Notification System Design Report? NOT required.

Enter If YES, identify bounding source document number/approval reference and justification ensure the basis for concluding the source document fully bounds the below and complete Part proposed change is documented below: VI.

Justification:

0 Bounding document attached (optional)

Part m. Applicability of Other Regulatory Change Control Processes

.Check if any other regulatory change processes control the proposed activity.(Refer to EN-Ll-100)

NOTE: For example, when a design change is the proposed activity, consequential actions may include changes to other documents which have a different change control process and are NOT to be included in this 50.54(q)(3)

Screenina.

APPUCABILITY CONCLUSION l8l If there are no controlling change processes, continue the 50.54(q)(3) Screening.

0 One or more controlling change processes are selected, however, some portion of the activity involves the emergency plan or affects the implementation of the emergency plan: continue the 50.54(q)(3} Screening for that portion of the activity. Identify lhe applicable controlling change processes below.

D One or more controlling change processes are selected and fully bounds all aspects of the activity. 50.54(q)(3)

Evaluation is NOT reC1uired. Identify controllinQ chani:1e processes below and t:omolete Part VI.

CONTROLLING CHANGE PROCESSES 10.CFR 50.54(q) ONlY Part IV. Editorial Change DYES !8lNO

m.54(q)(3) Continue le> next Is this activity an editorial or typographical change such as formatting, paragraph Evnluntion is pan numbering, spelling, or punctuation that does not change intent? NOT required.

Enter justification nnd complete Pnrl VI.

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR50.54(q) SCREENING SHEET20F4 Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-410 I Revision: 12 Equipment/facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations PartV. Emergency Planning Element/Function Screen (Associated 10 CFR 50.47(b) planning standard function identified in brackets} Does this activity affect any of the following, including program erements from NUREG*

0654/FEMA REP-1 Section II?

1. Responsibility for emergency response is assigned. [1] D

2. The response organization has the staff to respond and to augment staff on a continuing basis (24/7 D staffing) in accordance with the emergency plan. [1]

3. The process ensures that on shift emergency response responsibilities are staffed and assigned. [2] D

4. The process for timely augmentation of onshift staff is established and maintained. [2] D

5. Arrangements for requesting and using off site assistance have been made. [3] 0

6. State and local staff can be accommodated at the EOF in accordance with the emergency plan. [3] D

7. A standard scheme of emergency classification and action levels is in use. [4] D

a. Procedures for notlflcatlon of State and local governmental agencies are capable of alerting them of D the declared emergency within 15 minutes after declaration of an emergency and providing follow-up notifications. [5]

9. Administrative and physical means have been established for alerting and providing prompt D lnstructls.ms to the public within the plum~ exposure pathway. (5) ..

1o. *The public ANS meets the design requirements of FEMA-REP-1 o, Guide for Evaluation of Alert arid D Notification-Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, or complies with the licensee's FEMA-approved ANS design report and supporting FEMA approval letter. [5]

11. Systems are established for prompt communication among principal emergency response .u organizations. [6]

12. Systems are established for prompt communication to emergency response personnel. [6] D

13. Emergency preparedness information is made available to the public on a periodic basis within..the u plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ). (71

14. Coordinated dissemination of public information during emergencies is established. [7] D

15. Adequate facilities are maintained to support emergency response. [8] D

16. Adequate equipment Is maintained to support emergency response. [8] u

17. Methods, systems, and equipmentfor as;sessment of radioactive releases are in use. (9] u

18. A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies. [10] IZI

19. Evacuation time estimates for the population located in the plume exposure pathway EPZ are D available to support the formulation of PARs and have been provided to State and !ocal governmental authorities. [10]

20. A range of protective actions is available for plant emergency workers during emergencies, including u those for hostile action events.(1 O]

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT9.1 10CfR50.54{q) SCREENING SHEET30F4 Procedure/Document Number: IP-El'-410 I Revision: 12 Equipment/facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations

21. The resources for controlling radiological exposures for emergency workers are established. [11] u

22. Arrangements are made for medical services for contaminated, injured individuals. [12] LJ

23. Plans for recovery and reentry are developed. (13] D

24. A drill and exercise program (including radiological, medical, health physics and other program D areas) is established. [14]

25. Drills, exercises, and training evolutions that provide performance opportunities to develop, D maintain. and demonstrate key skills are assessed via a formal critique process in order to identify weaknesses. [14]

26. Identified weaknesses are corrected. [14] D

27. Training is provided to emergency responders. [15] D

28. Responsibility for emergency plan development and review is established. [16] 0

29. Planners responsible for emergency plan development and maintenance are properly trained. [16] LJ

.APPLICABILITY CONCLUSION 0 If no Part V criteria are checked, a 50.54(g)(3) _Evaluation is NOT required; document the basis for conclusion below and complete Pali VI. : -

> . *:.. ~. * * .* " .

If .any lZI . Part V cri!eria-are checked, complete Part VI and perfonnil 50.54(q)(3) Evaluation; BASIS FOR CONCUJSION

~ ..

Changes 1 and 2 - Changing the procedure revision and adding Attachment 9.5 to the TOC are considered editorial without a change of intent. No further evaluation is required for these changes.

Emergency Plarming Element 1a, in Part V of this form, is affected by change 3 identified on the revision matr.ix. A 10 CFR 50.M(q) evaluat!o~ will be performed to determine if the effectiveness of the IPEC.Ememency Plan is reduced and prior NRC aooroval is required.

ATTACHMENT 9.1 10CFR50,54(q) SCREENING SHEET4QF4 Procedura/Dccument Number. 11?-EP-410 Revision: 12 Equ!pment/Faclllty/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations Part VI. Signatures:

Preparer Name (Print) Preparer Signature Date:

~

Alain Grosjean (Optional) Reviewer Name (Print)

Reviewer Signature Reviewer Name (Print)

John P. Standridge Nuclear EP Project Manager Approver Name (Print)

Lori A. Glander EP Manager or designee

_...' ~~.* .

, - ~

. : *-~

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT 9.2 10CFR50.54(q) EVALUATION SHEET1 OF3 ProcedureJDocument Number: IP-EP-410 I Revision: 12 equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations Part I. Description of Proposed Change: The activity being reviewed is a procedure revision to IP-EP-410, "Protective Action Recommendations" to incorporate:

- Refer to attached Revision Matrix Part ii. Description and Review of licensing Basis Affected by the Proposed Change:

Implementing Procedure IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations, was previously screened out and excluded from future Process Applicability Determination (PAD) reviews in accordance with the criteria described in NEI 96-07 and EN-Ll-100. This procedure revision does not (1) change the facility or procedures as described in the UFSAR or (2) create a test or equipment not described in the UFSAR and is governed under the Emergency Plan 10 CFR 50.54(q) review process in accordance with EN-EP-305. IP-EP-410 is an Implementing procedure that provides guidance for determining recommended protective actions for offsite authorities. This procedure does not involve structures, systems or components controlled by 10 CFR 50.59 or 72.48 and does not have the potential to impact any of the LBDs on the PAD form, except for the Emergency Plan. All responses to the questions contained in sections Ill and IV of the PAD fonn were determined to be "no impact". Since this procedure does not contain any requirements that could affect any LBDs other tha.n the Emer.ssincy Plan and it is governed under 10 CFR 50.54(q). this procedure may be excluded fron:i tfl~ PAD process. All Se.ctions of the Indian Point Emergency Plan, including specifically Section J, Protective Response, and Section E, Notification Methods and Procedures, were thorouQhlv reviewed and-found that these J:;hanges do not affect the Emeraencv Plan.

Part Ill. Describe How the Proposed Ctuinge CompBies with Relevant Emergency Preparedness Regulatlon(s) and Prevl~us Commrtment(s) Made to the NRC:

Previous Commitments to the NRC - The licensing Commitment Management System and NRC commitment section of IP-EP-410 were reviewed for potential NRC*commitment changes as a result of this procedure revision. There were no Identified conflicts with this procedure revision and the current listing of NRC commitments associated with this lmplen:u=!nting Procedure or the IPEC Emergency Plan. All current NRC commitments that relate to emergency response notifications and Protective Action Recommendations continue to be maintained and fulfilled under this procedure revision.

~ '

10 CFR 50.47 (b) (10)...: Emergency Protective Actions:

o A range of public PARs is available for implementation during emergencies.

Site Compliance: A range of protective actions has been developed.

Part IV. Description of Emergency Plan Planning Standards, Functions and Program Elements Affected by the Proposed Change:

Emergency Plan Planning Standard: 10 CFR 50.47 {b)(10), Emergency Protective Actions Function: A range of public PARs are available for implementation during emergencies.

Program Elements -Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50 does not contain any supporting requirements.

Informing criteria appears in NUREG-0654 in Section 11.J. 7, and the IPEC Emergency Plan.

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATTACHMENT 9.2 10CFR50.54(q) EVALUATION SHEET20F3 Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-410 I Revision: 12 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations Part V. Description of Impact of the Proposed Change on the Effectiveness of Emergency Plan Functions:

Change 3 - Added Attachment 5.2, Wind Field Orientation - MIDAS vs. Plume Overlays The wind field orientation differs between MIDAS (Att. 9.2) and the Manual Method (Alt. 9.4) at certain wind speeds.

Based on the recommendations of consulting meteorologists, the origin of the up and down valley flow for low wind speeds ~4 mis) was changed to the center of the Hudson River (the plume overlays isopleth's origin was the super heater stack.) This is more representative of the true met expectations.

The origin change results in the down-valley plume range going from 340° -101° to 349° -101° for MIDAS.

As a result. the cross valley plume goes from 210° - 339° !Q 210° - 348° for MIDAS.

Change 3 -Analysis of Changes This text was deleted from the previou$ *reVisim.1-ro:* It has .been reintroduced: info this revision to,explain why there is a difference. in compass cfegrees in tlie dov\tri valley and cross valley plumes between MIDAS and the Plume Overlay Selection Cliar.t. This explanation is needed to preserve the historical. reason for this wind field orientation difference. The cidditlon of this attachment is administrative in nature.

The proposed changes to IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations, Revision 11, continue to meet the planning standards outlined in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(10), NUREG-0654 Section 11.J.7 and the IPEC Emergency Plan because the revision continues tQ facilitate the rapid and accurate determination of protective action recommendations for affected downwind areas, and does not diminish the ability and available resources for determining protective action recommendations. This revision does not require a change to the IPEC Emergency Plan or represent a reductiol') in ~ffectlveness to the IPEC Emergency Plan and can be incorporated without prior NRC approval. *

EN-EP-305 REV 3

ATIACHMENT 9.2 10CFR50.54(q) EVALUATION SHeeT30F3 Procedure/Document Number: IP*EP-410 Revision: 12 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)

Title:

Protective Action Recommendations Part VI. Evaluation Conclusion Answer the foflowlng questions about the proposed change.

1. Does the proposed change comply with 10 CFR 50.47(b) and 10 CFR 50 Appendix E? [21YES0 NO

2. Does the proposed change maintain the effectiveness of the emergency plan (i.e., no !21YES 0 NO reduction in effectiveness)?

3. Does the proposed change constitute an emergency action level scheme change? DYES 181 NO

!f questions 1 or 2 are answered NO, or question 3 answered YES, reject the proposed change, modify the proposed change and perform a new evaluation or obtain prior NRC approval under provisions of 10 CFR 50.90. If questions 1 and 2 are answered YES, and question 3 answered NO, implement applicable change process(es). Refer to step 5.6[8].

Part Vil. Signatures Preparer Name (Print) . . . Prep/ilf~r-~ignature -Date:

~

Alain Grosjean Senior Project Manager :_.;-.~ *:.'~ .. ,

(Optional) Reviewer Name (Print) Review13r Signature Reviewer Name (Print) Date:

John P. Standridge Senior Project Manager tf/!o/1&

Approver Name (Print) Date:

Lori A. Glander EP Manager or designee t/ ~z1--/

~ Revision Matrix IP-EP. .410, "Protective Action Recommendations", Rev. 12 I

r location Existing Condition Proposed Condition Editorial Chanae?

Impact on 50.41 pBanning standard?

1. Cover Paoe Rev. 11 Rev. 12 Yes No

2. TOC None NEW Attachment 9.5 - Wind Field Yes No Orientation - MIDAS vs. Plume Overlavs

3. NEW Page 10 None NEW Attachment 9.5 No Yes Wind Field Orientation - MIDAS vs. Plume Overlays The wind field orientation differs between MIDAS {Att. 9.2) and the Plume Overlays (Alt 9.4} at certain wind speeds.

Based on the recommendations of consulting meteorologists, the .

origin of the up and down VC!lley flow for low wind speeds (.::4 mis) was changed to the center !)f ,the Hudson River (the plume overlays*

. isopleth's origin was the super . ;, .

heater $tack.) This is more ' . '.

rep.resentative Qf the true met expectations. * * **

}. .. :. '. l, in The:ongin chang~ results the *., '.

dowri-~alley plurne range going

from 340° -101° to 349" -101" for MIDAS. -:-. .

As a result, the cross valley plume goes from 210° - 339" to 210° -

348° for MIDAS.

1

iPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE IP-SMM*AD* 102 Rev: 10 PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 34 of 40 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL Pro~!,!1.1re ActMt~ Temgora!:J! Procedure Change (MARK Applicable) 0 Converted To IPEC, Replaces: (MARK Appllcable) 0 NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No: 0 EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change (Enter Step Number In Revision Summary) 0 GENERAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No: 0 ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change c:;viS'ARTIAL REVISION 0 CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change 0 EDITORIAL REVISION Ter"'!inating Condition:

Unit 3 Procedure No:

0 VOID PROCEDURE D SUPERSEDED - "

0 RAPID REVISION Document in Microsoft Word:

D Yes D No 0 VOID DAN/TPC No(s):

Revision Summary D NIA* See Revision Summary page.__

~'-- \\i\~\{\~ t\M\,.\i,. . *'

Implementation Regui~ments Implementation Plan? D Yes ~

APO Dept \:..- ~ \...~ Writer (Print Name/ Ext/ Sl9n):......11:..:.'!...:_.:i.;i=..;:.;:~~::+..!!i.:i~:&.

Review and Approval (Per Attachment 10.1, IPEC Review And ApP, oval Requirement < *

1. [i/"rechnical Reviewer: * * * . ?-::J /-/If gnature/ Date)

2. D Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:

Dept: Reviewer: _ _ _ _ __,,,,...,...,.=-...,_,..,,,,...__,.__,-=-....,...----'--...:__----

(Print Nam~ ~.k111ature/ Date) :

el lgnature/ Oste}

D PAO required and is complete (PAO Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified)

~evious exclusion lrom further Ll-100 Review is still valid O PAD not required due to type of change

4. D Non-intent Determination Complete: -----==-~,.,.........,,.,,.,.-..,....,_..,..,,,_..,.____________

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date) f::!Q change of purpose or scope NQ change to less restrlct!ve acceptance criteria f::!Q reduction In Iha level of nuclear safety NO change to steps previously Identified as commitment steps f::!Q voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless requirements tlQ deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual are Incorporated Into another procedure or !he need for the NO change !hat may result in devlnttons from Technical Specifications.

procedure was eliminated via an allemate process FSAR, plant design requirements, or previously made commitmenls

5. 0 On-Shift Shift Manager/CRS:_ _ _ _ _ _...,.,,...,_,...,..,_""="__,.__,,..,,,....,....,,.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date}

6. O User Validation: User._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Validator:. _ _...,.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

7. 0 Special Handling Requirements Understood:._......_.,,,,,_,_...,...,.,_ _ _ _...,...._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-AD2 Revision 1 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE

-=-Entergy ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 23 Attachment 9.1 Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist (Form EP-AD2-1)

Sheet 1of1 Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections must be completed, NIA or place a check on the line where applicable)

Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type: (circle one) Administrative l~I EPLAN DoclProcedureNo:\]-4d-\:\\\ CJA:Yes_No~No. ~"'" DueDa~e:~

Doc/Procedure Tille: l ~\ Rev No:~Rev Distribution Date:~

Reason for EPDCC: _ _ New ~sion _ _ Cancel Date of EPDCC:. _ _ _ _ _ __

Section 2 -

Change Description

1. Originator: i\

b\\.~ \ ~

2. Class of Change: Technical Correction ~w Commitment__ Other _ _.......,

3. Page numbers affected and reason for change: _ _\..........:~wi.-----'----'--

\\.\_ ~l,~ ~\ i..

4. Emergency Planning Documents Affected:.__ \_,.\_,,_-_~=---~...n...;\'""t)...______

5. Emergency Planning Procedures Affected: \\ - \I --~\ ~~

6.

References:

Other Procedure(s) I#_~:..;...:\~"~-

i i \

Regulatory Document# \ ~ ~

Other:. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

7. Reviewed training requirements with department training coordinatct date

a. The following are complete, or are not applicable and are so marked.

Tech Revle~~ 50.54q ~N*Ll*10tf4\"' PL-15~\6\ SMM*AD-102 ~

Manager approval ~RC~

9. Both table of contents and transmitlals are complete t,L date------

10. Approved dodprocedure delivered to Document Control for distribution _ _date_ __

11. Position Binders updated if a p p l i c a b l e - - - - - - - - - d a t e - - - - -

12. Copy of EPDCC and tlocumenVprocedure placed in EP file._ _ _ _ _ _ _date_ __

Sheet 1of1 Form EP-AD2-1 Rev. 0

\

"-=-Entergy. IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE IP-EP-210 Page 1 Revision 21 of 44 Central Control Room Prepared by: 5~ft?

Approval: _ _L_or_,,iA=*....,,G=la,,,,_nd..;._e'-'-r_

Pnnt Name r-,.i.<-;<--=,.-i:;=*=---- *.,.J. 5-? /-( k Dale 1 Effective Date: June 14, 2016 This procedure e:u::!m:Jr::ci from further U-1 !JO reviews.

IP-EP*210 (CCR) R21.doc

\.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 44 Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................... 3

2.0 REFERENCES

............................................................................................................. 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................... 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ................................. , ................................................................... 3 5.0 DETAILS ....................................................................................................................... 5 6.0 INTERFACES ............................................................................................................... 5 7.0 RECORDS .......................................................................'............ : ................ :-**************** 6 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT ................. : ..................................................... 6 I

I 9.0 ATTACHMENTS ..... : .......................................... .-...............'................................ .-.......... 6 I

9.1 SHIFT MANAGER/PCM (EMERGENCY Dl~ECTOR)_C~E_CKLIST ...................................... 7 9.2 SHIFT MANAGER'S RESPONSE TO AN EMERGENCY AT THE OTHER. UNIT CHECKLIST ...... 20 9.3 CONTROL ROOM COMMUNICATOR CHECKLIST ............ ;; ..........................................':*'.. 25 9.4 FACILITY COMMUNICATOR CHECKLIST ........................... , .......................................... 31 9.5 ON-SHIFT RADIATION PROTECTION TECHNICIAN CH!=GKLiST .....*................................. 33 9.6 ON-SHIFT CHEMISTRY TECHNICIAN CHECKLIST ........... , .............................................. 37 9.7 SUPPORT STAFF CHECKLIST ................................................................................... 39 9.8 CCR DOSE ASSESSOR ................................................ : .............. : ........................... 43

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-210 Revision 21

)

Enlergy0 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES 44 REFERENCE USE Page ~ of Central Control Room 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To describe emergency response activities and operations of the Central Control Room (CCR) 1.2 To provide guidance for the response to emergencies declared at Unit 2 and Unit 3

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 Indian Point Energy Center Emergency Plan 2.2 IP-EP-430, Site Assembly, Accountability and Relocation of Personnel Offsite 2.3 IP-EP-610; Emergency Termination and Recovery 2.4 IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS) 3.0 DEFINITIONS None 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 . The Emergency Director has the sole author1ty and. re~ponsibility for the classification and declaration of any emergency,. approving offsite notifications and the making of protective action* recomme'ndati0ns for the general public.

These responsibilities may not be delegated. The Shift Manager in the role of Emergency Director makes the initial emerge'ricy classification; however the SM shall verify an independent review of th~ EAL selected.*

4.2 Following initial declaration of an emergency, the Shift Manager (SM) shall designate a Control Room Communicator. An on-shift Nuclea.r Plant Opera.tor (NPO) normally performs this function for both Units. Any other Operations staff member may be assigned to perform this function as a backup.

4.3 The Shift Manager SHALL, upon assuming the role of Emergency Director, continue to perform the duties of Emergency Director until properly relieved by either the on-call Emergency Director in the (A)EOF or by another qualified.

Emergency Director such as the Plant Operations Manager (POM).

4.4 The Shift Managers SHALL confer with each other for any event or condition which may affect both Units such as security, or natural events. IF it is agreed that both Units are affected, THEN the Unit 2 Shift Manager SHALL classify and declare the emergency and assume the role of site Emergency Director in accordance with this procedure, IP-EP-210, Central Control Room.

4.5 The Shift Manager SHALL ensure that notifications of offsite authorities are initiated within 15 minutes of declaration of any emergency classification, classification upgrade or protective action recommendation being formulated.

4.6 The Shift Manager SHALL ensure independent verification of the information on the Part I and Part II forms prior to being issued to the Offsite Agencies.

J

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-210 Revision 21

~ F.:ntergy EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page ~ of 44

4. 7 The Shift Manager SHALL request the opposite unit to activate mobilization of the IPEC Emergency Response Organization (ERO) and activation of the emergency response facilities (TSC, OSC, EOF and JIC) upon declaration of an Alert or higher classification.

4.8 For events classified as Unusual Events, the Shift Manager, acting as Emergency Director has the ability to activate, or request the opposite unit to active, ERO callout for support as needed.

4.9 The Shift Manager is responsible for the performance of Dose Assessment calculations until such time as the (A) EOF is activated.

4.1 O The Shift Manager/Plant Operations Manager (POM) SHALL establish and maintain accountability of all Operating Shift staff under the Shift Manager's control upon declaration of a Site ~rea Emergency or higher classification.

4.11 Until such time as the (A) EOF is activated, the Shift Manager/Plant Operations Manager SHALL assess the offsite consequences of any radiological release and, if appropriate, formulate offsite protective action recommendations. In all cases should a General Emergency be declared, protective action recommendations SHALL be formulated, approved and communicated to offsite authorities in accordance with implementing procedures.

4.12 For events classified as Unusual Events, the Shift Manager, acting as Emergency Director SHALL terminate the emergency_and ~m~er into recov~ry .in accordance with implementing procedures. For all emergencies. classified at*

the Alert level or higher, emergency termination and entry into tne recovery phase SHALL be at the discretion of the On-Call* Emergency Director in the (A)EOF. . . . *- ....

4.13 The On-shift Radiation Protection Technic.ian is re~porisibfe for mqnitoring Control Room habitability and establishment of Control Room contamination controls., * **... * " .:

4.14 The Control Room Communicator SHALL perform* duties in the. Control Room (or alternate CCR if uninhabitable) under the Shift Manager's direction.- These duties SHALL entail notifying the off-site authorities of an event at IPEC by utilizing the notification checklists (Forms EP-3N; 3A, 3S or 3G). Duties will also include use of RECS, radio, telephones and other communication equipment to provide directions and recommendations as appropriate from the Shift Manager. The CCR Communicator shall also remain ready to supply updates to the off-site authorities and support the Shift Manager (Emergency Director) with any other notifications or communications, as needed.

4.15 The Control Room Communicator is responsible for providing clear and concise communications between the CCR and other emergency response facilities.

4.16 The Control Room Support Staff person is responsible for assisting in the performance of CCR setup, second shift scheduling and faxing/record keeping.

4.17 The Facility Communicator is responsible to maintain communication with other facilities for the transfer of accurate and timely data and information.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page § of 44 5.0 DETAILS 5.1 The Shift Manager (SM)/Plant Operations Manager (POM) SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.1, Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist.

5.2 For an emergency at the other Unit, the Shift Manager (SM) SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.2, Shift Manager's Response to an Emergency at the Other Unit Checklist.

5.3 The Control Room Communicator SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.3, Control Room Communicator Checklist.

5.4 The Facility Communicator SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.4, Facility Communicator Checklist.

5.5 The On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.5, On-Shift Radiation Pro~ection Technician Checklist.

5.6 The On-Shift Chemistry Technician SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.6, On-Shift Chemistry Technician Checklist. * * * * . * . . .. ..

5.7 The Support Staff person SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.7, Support Staff Checklist.

6.0 INTERFACES 6.1 IP-EP-115, Emergency Plan "'.**Forms 6.2" IP-EP-120*; Em*ergency Classification 6.3 IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment 6.4 IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations .. .

..... ¥ *.

6.5 IP-EP-430, Site Assembly, Accountability and Relocation ofPersonnel *offsite 6.6. IP-EP-610, Emergency T ermin13tion and Recovery 6.7 IP-EP-340, Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS) 6.8 O-FSG-100, BDBEE/ELAP Emergency Response

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Entergy@ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page §. of 44 7.0 RECORDS All Logs, Completed Forms and other records generated during an actual emergency SHALL be considered Quality Records and maintained for the life of the plant.

8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE None 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 Shift Manager/POM (Emergency Director) Checklist 9.2 Shift Manager's Response to an Emergency at the Other Unit Checklist 9.3 Control Room Communicator Checklist 9.4 Facility Communicator Checklist 9.5 On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician Checklist 9.6 On-Shi.ft Chemistry Technician Checklist ,*

9.7 Support Staff Checklist 9.8 CCR Dose Assessor

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page I of Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 1 of 13 NOTE:

This Attachment should not be entered by the Shift Manager if a natural or man-made catastrophic event has occurred and there is a loss of one of the Central Control Rooms. Procedure, O-AOP-SEC-4 should be entered to support decision making by the SM.

NOTE:

The expectation for all ERO positions is to use WebEOC for log-keeping purposes. Reference to traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which WebEOC is unavailable such as a ower or com uter failure.

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES A IF at any time during the.implement?tion of this procedure the SM is relieved by the POM or the ED in the (A)EOF, turnover SHALL be completed in accordance with section 2.5.

NOTE:

Authority to classify and declare an emergency is reserved solely for the Emergency Director and may not be delegated; however, the SM shall . : .

and verify an independent review of the EAL selected. The SM in the role of Emergency Director makes the initial emergency classification.

NOTE:

The Unit 2 & Unit 3 Shift Managers SHALL confer with each other for any event or condition which may affect both Units such as security or natural events. IF it is agreed that both units are affected, THEN the Unit 2 Shift Manager SHALL classify and declare the emergency and assume the role of Site Emergency Director in accordance with this procedure IP-EP-210, Central Control Room.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 hntergy@ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page §. of Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet2of13 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 1.1 Classification of the Emergency NOTE:

The assessment, classification, and declaration of an emergency condition is expected to be completed within 15 min after the availability of indications (i.e. plant instrumentation, plant alarms, computer displays, or incoming verbal reports) to plant operators that an EAL has been exceeded.

The 15 min criterion .is not to be construed *as .a grace period to restore plant conditions to avoid declaring the event. '/

The emergency declaration SHOULD be made promptly without .

waiting for the 15 min period to elapse once the EAL is recognized as being exceeded. - *

For EALs that specify duration of the off normal condition, such as fire lasting 15 min, loss of power for 15 min etc.:

The ED SHALL make the declaration at the first available opportunity when the time has elapsed (NOT after an additional 15 minutes).

- The ED SHOULD not wait until the applicable time has elapsed, but should declare the event as soon as it is determined that the condition will likely exceed the applicable time.

-NOTE:

VERIFY events that affect both units are classified as dual unit events

("BOTH UNITS" selected on NYS Part I form in MIDAS). The category that is automatically a dual unit event is Security. For events such as weather or loss of power, both units are affected as long as they are at the same level of clas.sification (i.e. NUE). If one unit enters a higher classification at the initiating event (i.e. LOOP with one unit's EDGs all running and the other unit without EDGs running) or has to escalate then it becomes the only unit affected.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page ~ of Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 3of13 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES A. Classify the emergency condition in accordance with IP-EP-120-"Emergency Classification" AND ensure independent verification of the EAL selected. .

B. Declare the emergency, announce classification of the _

event to the Control Room AND document time of emergency declaration. Attachment 9.1 NOTE:

THE 15 - MINUTE CLOCK FOR INITIATION OF NOTIFICATION TO STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES STARTS AT THIS POINT.

THE MINUTE'NOTIFICATION IS MET UPON FIRST ROLL CALL RESPONSE ON RECS CALL.

C. IF a Beyond Desig11 Basis External Everit (BDBEE) occurs that ,

results in an* Extended Loss of AC Power (ELAP) t6 either unit, THEN entry into O-FSG-100, BDBEE/ELAP Emergency Response, is required.

NOTE:

Security and Operations will take steps as directed by Safeguard Instructions to protect the safety of site employees and the integrity of plant equipment.

Site access and egress will be controlled per Security procedures. r . ' . .

D. Obtain AND complete steps in the applicable Emergency Notification Checkli$ts:

1. IF Notice of Unusual Event is declared, use NUE checklist, Form EP-3N.

2. IF ALERT is declared, use ALERT checklist, Form EP:..3A.

3. IF Site Area Emergency is declared, use SAE checklist, Form EP-3S. *

4. IF Gene.ral Emergency is declared, use GE checklist, Form EP-3G.

Attachment 9.1

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Enterg~., EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE. REFERENCE USE Page 10 of Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 4of13 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES E. IF a General Emergency is declared, THEN protective action recommendations must be made in accordance with IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations.

NOTE:

IP-EP-430 Site Assembly, Accountability and Relocation of Personnel Offsite provides guidance for the suspension of personnel assembly and accountability under certain conditions.

NOTE:.

1. Notification of State and local authorities SHALL be initiated within 15 minutes of emergency declaration. The 15- minute notification is met upon FIRST ROLL CALL RESPONSE on RECS call.

j 2. Notification of initial and upgrade SHALL be made to the NRG within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months of e emer enc declara ion.

1.2 Assess Any Radiological Release A. IF any indications exist of abnormal radiological release as a result of the emergency, THEN assess offsite consequences in accordance with IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment.

B. IF dose assessment results indicate offsite consequences in excess of the EPA Protective Action Guidelines THEN evaluate the need to modify the General Emergency PARs per IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations.

1.3 Emergency Response Data System (EROS)

A. VERIFY that EROS is activated. EROS must be activated within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months of ALERT declaration OR higher.

B. Click Start - Programs - Nuclear Corporate Applications (ESM) -

EROS Activation - Site Activation Display C. A "Warning" display screen will appear. Click on Continue.

D. A Pass Code entry screen will appear. Click on "Enter View Only Mode".

E. A "Select Reactor" message box will appear. Select the affected unit to verify and click "OK".

F. VERIFY EROS Status is "Transmitting Data".

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED

IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 11 of Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 5of13 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES G. IF EROS Status is "disconnected", THEN exit EROS Activation Display. ACTIVATE OR request unaffected unit to activate EROS within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months .

H. IF TSC has been activated, TSC IT Specialist OR TSC Manager may be requested to activate EROS as a backup to the CCR.

I. Click Start - Programs - Nuclear Corporate Applications (ESM) - EROS Activation - Site Activation Display J. A "WARNING" display screen will appear. Click on Continue K. A Pass Code entry screen will appear.* Obtain Pass Code from EROS envelope in SM/POM position binder.

( ) Enter the appropriate pass code and press the "Submit" button. Pass Code is NOT case sensitive.

L. A "Select Reactor" message box will appeaL Select the affected unit to activate.

M. IF emergency affects. BOTH uh its, icon can be selected again to activate EROS for other unit.

N. "Site EROS Activation Display" will appear. Click "Connect" t6 activate EROS.

0. IF EROS is not functional, obtain additional resources from the unaffected Unit to complete Forms 31 A,8,C or 42 A,B,C.

NOTE:

These forms are EP-57, 58, 59 and EP-53, 54 and 55 respectively. Once completed, this information is to be given to the TSC to be faxed to the NRC within 60 minutes.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 12 of 44 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency.Director) Checklist Sheet 6of13

2.0 Interim Responsibility/Activity NOTES NOTE:

,IF while performing the Interim Responsibility/Activity steps as Emergency Director, you are relieved of Emergency Director Duties by the On-Call ED; THEN exit this section and enter the Continuous Responsibility/Activity (Shift Manager/POM) section at step 3.0.

2.1 Re-Classify the Emergency if Necessary A IF plant conditions change OR other events occur which may-warrant upgrade of the emergency classification, THEN re-classify the emergency condition in accordance with IP-EP-120 "Emergency Classification". *

/

f i B. Declare the emergency and announce the upgrade classification to Control Room personnel.

C. IF ALERT is declared, use ALERT checklist, Form EP-3A.

D. IF Site Area Emergency is declared, use SAE checklist, Form EP-3S.

E. IF General Emergency is declared, use GE checklist, Form EP-3G.

F. IF a General Emergency is declared, THEN protective action recommendations must be made in accordance with IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations.

~Entergy IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-210 Revision 21 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 13 of 44 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 7of13 Interim Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.2 Establish Radiological Controls and Maintain Onsite Personnel Safety A. Keep Security informed of emergency classification, plant

status and any radioactive release which may affect Security Personnel.

B. Once established, maintain personnel accountability.

C. IF the potential for abnormal radiological conditions in-plant or onsite exists, THEN:

1. Direct the On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician to establish radiological controls for the Control Room and initiate habitability monitoring for the Control Room; *

2. *Evaluate the need to relocate personnel offsite per IP-"

EP-430, Site Assembly, Accountability and Relocation of Personnel Offsite.

3. Authorize emergency exposure, if necessary, using Emergency Exposures Authorization Form (Form EP ALL/EP-6).

.. *... 4. IF Emergency Response Facilities are not operational, authorize issuance of Potassium Iodide (Kl) to onsite

personnel for any projected or actual Thyroid Exposure

> 5 Rem COE OR following declaration of a General Emergency IAW IP-EP-420, Use of Potassium Iodide by Indian Point Personnel During an Emergency.

5. IF authorization of issuance of Potassium Iodide (Kl) is required AND On-Shift Radiological Protection

Technician is not available (such as during a Hostile Action Based Event), THEN Shift Manager/PCM SHALL conduct applicable radiological and/or Kl briefings AND request the opposite unit Shift Manager/POM to conduct applicable radiological and/or Kl briefings.

1. Utilize Form EP-8-All/EP-65 to document date, time and name of personnel ingesting Kl.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 14 of . 44 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 8 of 13 Interim Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.3

Perform Periodic Update Notifications A. Periodic update notifications to offsite authorities should be made approximately every 30 minutes or more frequently when plant conditions change. Time interval may be lengthened with concurrence of offsite agencies. For each update notification, complete (or have completed) and sign a "NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form, Part I" (Form EP-1 ).

B. FAX, then Email completed Part I Form to Offsite Authorities.

C. IF there has been a radiological release to the environment, THEN complete (or have completed) and sign a "NYS Radiological Data Form Part II (Form EP-2). Ensure independent verification of information prior to sending to Offsite Agencies D. -For periodic update notifications during Unusual Event,

dfrect the CCR Communicator to confirm receipt of update notifications using "Control Room NUE Notification

. Checklist" (Form EP-3N).

E.

For periodic update *notifications during an Alert or higher classification, direct the CCR Communicator to confirm receipt of update notifications using "Control Room Alert/SAE/GE Notification Checklist (Form EP-3A, 3S or 3G as applicable).

2.4 Terminate the Emergency (Unu~ual Event Only)

A. When conditions warrant termination of the Unusual Event, enter IP-EP-610 Emergency Termination &

Recovery and terminate the emergency per section 5.1 "Transition and Recovery Following an Unusual Event."

B. Exit this section after termination of the emergency and enter the Closeout Responsibility/Activity section at step. 4.0.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE I

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 15 of 44 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet *9 of 13 Interim Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.5 Turnover Emergency Director Responsibilities NOTE:

For Unusual Events, the Shift Manager will normally maintain the Emergency Director responsibilities until the classification is termiriated per IP-EP-610, Emergency Termination & Recovery.

For Alert and higher classifications, the Plant Operations Manager (POM) will relieve ,the Shift Manager of Emergency Director Duties in the Control Room. The On-Call Emergency Director in the (A)EOF at his discretion may assume Emergency Director Duties directly from the Shift Manager via telephone turnover.

A. Provide a status .briefing to the POM upon his arrival in the Control Rooni. The POM will request status on all**

~ "*of the information specified on an Essential Information Checklist. (Form EP-2-ALL/EP-9).

B. Provide copies of all' completed NYS Radiological Emergency Data forms to the POM.

C., Resume duties as Shift Manager and proceed. to step 3:0.i_ri the. Continuous Responsibility/Activity (Shift Mariager/~OM) section.

2.6

Turnover Emergency. Director Responsibility's cont.

A IF the POM is relieving the SM of ED responsibilities, THEN the POM SHALL continue those responsibilities

. where the SM left off, AND the SM shall resume Shift Manager Responsibilities.

B. IF the ED in (A)EOF is relieving the POM of ED responsibilities, THEN after turnover, the POM SHALL proceed to or continue in Section 3.0 of this procedure.

C. IF the ED in (A)EOF is relieving the SM of ED responsibilities, THEN after turnover, the SM SHALL proceed to or continue in Section 3.0 of this procedure.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 16 of 44 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 10of13 Interim Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES D. After turnover to the EOF, the SM SHALL resume Shift Manager Responsibilities and the POM SHALL proceed to or continue in Section 3.0 of this procedure.

E. Due to unforeseen circumstances (illness, etc.) it may become necessary to transfer ED responsibilities back to the POM or SM.

3.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 3.1 Emergency Classification Upgrade or Radiological Release A. IF at any time an Upgrade from the previously announced

'*I Emergency Classification is declared or if a Radiological

) release has occurred, THEN:

1. Announce the information to the* Control Room.

NOTE:

No plant pages are to be made during a security' condition when s~curity procedures are in effect until determined safe"*

tO do so. **

2.* Direct Cc;~frol Room personnel to sound the site assembly alarm and make appropriate Plant Pages per Form EP-3A, 3S or 3G if required, for the new Emergency Classification OR if a radiological release has occurred, without an Emergency Classification upgrade, then make appropriate Plant Pages without sounding the site assembly alarm.

3. Contact or direct Control Room personnel to contact, the unaffected Unit's Control Room to inform them of the upgrade in Emergency Classification or Radiological Release and the need to refer to IP-EP-210, Attachment

9.2, "Shift Manager Response to an Emergency at the Other Unit Checklist".

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 17 of 44 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 11 of 13 3.2 Provide Backup Plant Data to the TSC A. IF the MRP-DAS is out-of-service THEN request the TSC to send an individual to the CCR to record plant data on Forms EP-57, 58 and 59 for Unit 3 and Forms EP-53, 54, and 55 for Unit 2 as needed, and to 'f<;ix the forms to the TSC on a periodic basis or as plant status and conditions ~hange.

3.3 Direct Entry Into Severe Accident Management A. IF plant conditions warrant the transition to Severe Accident Management.Guidelines (SAMG), THEN inform Emergency

.. Plant Manager to have the SAMG-Evaluator ready to take over Severe Accident Management.

3.4 Evaluate Emergency Action Levels A. Continue to evaluate current plant condition and events relative to the emergency action levels as specified in IP-EP-120, Emergency Classification.

B. Make recommendation's to the Emergency Director for upgrading of the em~rgency dassificatiqn as appropriate.

3.5 Maintain Co~munica~ions with the Emergency Director.

A. Keep the Emergency bi rector informed of current plant status and planned* operations.

B. Discuss tasks and procedures the Control Room is currently pe~orming and review priorities on a regular basis.

C. IMMEDIATELY inform the Emergency Director of any plant

. condition or event that has the potential to change the emergency_ classification or affect radiological release status.

3.6 Coordinate In-Plant team activities with Operations Support

Position/OSC Manager

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 18 of 44 Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 12of13 Interim Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES NOTE:

Once the OSC is activated, the dispatch of personnel with the exception of NPOs into the field for emergency operations is controlled from the OSC. At an NUE OR an Alert, NPOs will report to and be dispatched from the Control Room. At an SAE OR GE, NPOs shall be dispatched out of the OSC. Communications and directions can be provided to the teams from the Control Room; however, the OSC must retain team control for personnel safety and continuous accountability.

Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

'of..*

A. Once the OSC is activated, coordinate the dispatch and control of NPOs assigned to perform in plant operations with the Operations Support PosWoh located in the OSC. The* -

telephone number is located in*Emergem~y Telephone Directory {ETD). Utilize the;Facility Communicator to coordinate this activity (Use Form EP-56) .

1. CCR should reqwest two,NPO teams, one for nuclear side tasking and one for con\,/entional side tasking.

Ensure that OSC OPS Support is updated as to their tasking and status. -

B. For operations t~ams already dispat~hed and in the field prior to the osc being activated, coordinate the transfer of team control to the OSC with the Operations Support Position.

C. Direct requests for in-plant operational support IMMEDIATELY to the Operations Support Position in the OSC to facilitate prompt response to Control Room needs.

D. Re-enforce Control Room priorities and needs with the OSC Manager if in-plant team support is not being provided in a timely and effective manner.

3.7 Request Technical Support as Needed to Mitigate the Emergency.

A. Request the TSC Manager to provide 'forward-looking technical support as needed to assist the Control Room staff in responding to the emergency.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 19 of Attachment 9.1 Shift Manager/PCM (Emergency Director) Checklist Sheet 13of13 Closeout Responsibility/Activity NOTES B. Provide the TSC Manager with periodic briefs on current mitigation strategies and emergency procedures currently being implemented.

C. IF EOF is operational AND turnover with the Emergency Director at the EOF is completed, release unaffected unit's on shift Chemistry Technician/CCR Dose Assessor to return to the unaffected unit CCR.

3.8 Exit to Recovery Phase Upon notification from the Emergency Direetor that the emergency has been terminated, exit this section and enter the Closeout Responsibility/Activity section at step 4.0 Attachment 9.1 ~ . ~ ....

4.0 Direct the Control Room staff to return ~II equipm-ent utilized in the responseto*proper storage locations.

4.1 Review all documentation the <;:ontrol Room staff generated during the emergency:

A. Ensure all logs, forms and other documentation is complete.

B. Ensure all temporary procedures used and/or developed are properly documented for use by the RecOVE?rY Organization so that necessary actions can be taken fpr tong-term restoration.

C. Collect all computer printouts and strip charts.

4.2 Provide all logs and records to the Recovery Manager upon termination of the emergency and entry into the Recovery Phase.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 20 of 44 Attachment 9.2 Shift Manager Response to an Emergency at Other Unit Checklist Sheet 1 of 5 NOTES

NOTE:

This Attachment should not be entered by the Shift Manager if a natural or man-made catastrophic event has occurred. and there is a loss of one of the Central Control Rooms. Procedure, O-AOP-SEC-4 should be entered to support decision making by the SM.

NOTE:

The expectation for all ER*o positions is to use WebEOC for log

keeping purposes. Reference to*traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which W~oEOC i~ qnavailable, such as a power or computer failure.

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity*

1.1 Notification of the Emergency NOTE: *.. . .

Shift Managers SHALL confer with each ot1:1er for any ,event or condition which may affecfboth Units such as security ~r nc;ituraJ:events. IF it is L agreed that both units are affected, THEN the Unit 2 Shift Manager SHALL classify and declare the emergency and assume the role of site Emergency Director in accordance with this procedure, IP-EP-210, Central Control Room.

A. Upon notification from other Unit's Control Room that an event has been declared, ann*ounce the information fo Control Room personnel.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 21 of 44 Attachment 9.2 Shift Manager Response to an Emergency at Other Unit Checklist Sheet 2 of 5 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES NOT.E:

No plant pages are to be made during a security condition when security procedures are in effect until determined safe to do so.

1.2 A. UNUSUAL EVENT

1. Upon request from the affected unit, Notify OR Mobilize ERO using ERO Notification Envelope.

2~ Make a PA announcement providing information -'* .*

( regarding the event and any additional informatidri as required restricting access to areas af:fec;:t~ by the.*

emergency...

B. ALERT

1. IF not already completed, upon request from the aff~cted unit,. Mobilize ERO using ERO Notific~tion Enveiope.

. ' .. *~: ... :*; .: '* . .: . .

~ . ..

2. Sound the Site Assembly Alarm for (10) seconds-..: ..

(coordinate sounding of the assembly alarm with affected Unit CCR) and make the following announcement, (3) times, over the public address $ystem.

"Attention all personnel, Attention all personnel, an ALERT has been declared at All Emergency Response Organization personnel report to your assigned Emergency Response Facility. All other non-essential personnel are released from the site."

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 22 of Attachment 9.2 Shift Manager Response to an Emergency at Other Unit Checklist Sheet 3 of 5 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

3. Upon request from the Emergency Director, provide an On-Shift RP Technician OR On-Shift Chemistry Technician to support response.

4. IF requested by other Unit's SM/ED, verify ERDS is transmitting OR activate ERDS per Section 1.4 of Attachment 9.1 within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months of declaration.

C.. SITE AREA EMERGENCY I GENERAL EMERGENCY

1. IF not already completed, upon request from the:affected unit, Mobilize ERO using ERO Notification Envelope.

2. Sound the Site Assembly Alarm for (10) seconds (coordinate sounding of the assembly alarm with other Unit CCR} and make the following announcement (3) *.

times over the public address system: * * '* *

"Attention all personnel, Attention all personnel, a (Site Area Emergency I General Emergency) has p~~ri:: declare_d_ at~

___ . All Emergency Response Organization. personn~l report to your assigned Emergency Response Facility.- ..Al/: other non-essential personnel report to either the Energy Education Center or the Generation Support Building."

3. IF a Radiological Release has occurred then direct the On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician to take proper Radiological Controls and perform Habitability surveys as required or if necessary.

IPEC NON-QUALllY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Enlergy 0 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 23 of 44 Attachment 9.2 Shift Manager Response to an Emergency at Other Unit Checklist Sheet 4 of 5 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

4. IF the affected plant Control Room has been evacuated AND dose assessment results indicate offsite consequences in excess of the EPA Protective Action Guidelines THEN evaluate the need to modify the General

Emergency PARs per IP-EP-410, "Protective Action Recommendations".

5. Upon request from th.e Emergency Director, provide a Shift RP Technician OR On-Shift Chemistry Technician to support response. *

6. IF requested by other Unit's SM/ED, verify EROS is transmitting OR activate EROS per Section 1.8 of Attachment 9.1 within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months of declaration.

D. Radiological Release _ I

1. Announce the information to the Control Room.

I

2. Direct Control Room personnel to make appropriate Plant Pages.

I

3. IF opposite Unit has a Radiological Release, THEN place CCR ventilation in Recirculation Mode. 1 *

4. Contact the On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician-to .*, .. *...: -*..~*..*.._.. .

take proper Radiological Controls and perform ** ** ' * .. . -~; *. ~ '* .. '

Habitability surveys as required or if necessary

5. Direct On-Shift Chemistry Technician to provide dose assessment support, as required.

1 2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2.1 Provide Support to Opposing Unit as Requested A. Upon request from the Emergency Director, provide personnel,

. equipment and resources available to you.

2.2 Provide updates to personnel with information provided by the Emergency Director

/ A. When information is provided to you, use the public address system to disseminate that information to the personnel on Site.

~ Revision 21 IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP*EP-210

¥Entergy,,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 24 of 44 Attachment 9.2 Shift Manager Response to an Emergency at Other Unit Checklist Sheet 5 of 5 2.3 Evaluate Emergency Action Levels NOTES A. Continue to evaluate current plant condition and events*

relative to the Emergency Action Levels as specified in IP-EP-120, Emergency Classification and make recommendations for upgrade, if appropriate, to the Emergency Director.

3.0 Closeout Responsibility/Activity 3.1 Direct the Control Room staff to return all equipment utilized in the response to proper storage locations.

"I 3.2 I

Review all documentation the Control Room staff generated .

during the emergency: I A. Ensure all logs, forms and other documentation is complete.

B. Ensure all temporary procedures used and/or developed are properly documented for use by the Recove_ry Organization so that necessary actions can be taken for long-term restoration. -*~- .

C. Collect all computer printouts and strip charts. I 3.3 Provide all logs and records to the Recovery Manager upon termination of the emergency and entry into the Recovery Phase.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 25 of Attachment 9.3 Control Room Communicator Checklist Sheet 1 of 6 NOTE:

The expectation for all ERO positions is to use WebEOC for log-keeping purposes. Reference to traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which. WebEOC is unavailable, such as a power or computer failure.

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 A$sume the Duties of Control Room Communicator NOTE:

1. Notification of State and local authorities SHALL be initiated withiil 15 'minutes of emergency declaration. The 15 - minute notification is met upon the first -

ROLL CALL RESPONSE on RECS- calL

2. Notification to NRC SHALL be initiated within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months of the emergency declaration.

A. Upon being notifi~d to fulfill the Control Room Communicator role, IMMEDIATELY report to the affected Unit's Control Room.

'B. Inform the Shift Manager (Emergency Director} and the Control Room staff that you have assumed _the duties of Control Room Communicator.

C. IF making the initial notification for a Notification of Unusual Event classification, THEN, proceed to step 1.2.

D. IF making the initial notification for an Alert or higher

- classification, THEN, proceed to step 1.4.

E. IF making a periodic update of the NUE, THEN proceed to step 2.1 F. IF making a periodic update of the Alert/SAE/GE, THEN proceed to step 2.2 G. IF making an upgrade classification, THEN proceed to step 2.3 ;

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 26 of Attachment 9.3 Control Room Communicator Checklist Sheet 2 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 1.2 Perform Confirmation of Receipt of Initial UNUSUAL EVENT Notifications {Use Form EP-3N)

A. Obtain the completed and signed NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form Part I (Form EP-1) from the Shift Manager. Review form to ensure all required information is completed, including Shift Manager (Emergency Director) signature.

B. Verify SM has sent electronic Fax and email of the NYS Radiological Data Form Part I to State/Counties/EOF.

C. Using, "Control Room NUE Notification Checklist" (Form EP-3N) start the initial roll call to State and counties within 1.5 minutes of the declaration of the Unusual Event. The 15 -

minute notification is met upon the first ROLL CALL RESPONSE on RECS call. Confirm notification to each ..

location.

D. IF time challenged to meet the 15 minute requirement, immediately initiate the RECS call. Following roll call, inform

~

State and counties that FAX and email of Part 1 Form will follow.

E. IF plant condition/emergency classification changes prior to initiating notification:

a. Disregard previous classification and continue notification with highest current classification.

b. Follow-up notification SHALL include details of all conditions/emergency classifications.

F. IF plant condition/emergency classification changes while performing notification, THEN continue notification and state at the end the following "Changes in plant conditions indicate a potential for escalating the Emergency Classification. State and local authorities SHALL be notified within 15 minutes."

1.3 Support Shift Manager {Emergency Director) with other notifications.

A. Complete the remaining notifications as specified on the Control Room NUE Notification Checklist (Form EP-3N).

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCE;DURE REFERENCE USE Page 27 of Attachment 9.3 Control Room Communicator Checklist Sheet 3 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 1.4 Perform confirmation of reqeipt of Initial ALERT/SAE/GE NotificatiQns (Use Form EP-3A, 3S or 3G as applicable)

)

A. Obtain the completed and signed NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form Part I (Form EP-1) from the Shift Manager. Review form to ensure all required information is completed, including Shift Manager (Emergency Director)

. signature.

B. Verify that SM has sent Fax and E-mail of the NYS Radiological D~ta Form Part I to State/Counties/EOF.*

C. IF time challenged to meet the 15 minute requirement, im,mediately initiate theRECS call.. Following roll call, inform State and counties that FAX and email of Part 1 Form will follow.

D. Using "Control Room Notification Checklist Alert/SAE/GE (Form EP-3A, EP-3S or EP-3G as applicable), start the initial roll call to State and Counties within, 15 minutes of the declaration of the Alert, SAE or GE. The 15 - minute notification is met upon the first ROLL CALL RESPONSE on RECS call.. Confirm notification to each location.

E. Complete the remaining notifications as specified on the (Forms EP-3A, EP-3S or EP-3G as applicable).

F. IF plant condition/emergency classification changes prior to initiating notification:

a. Dis~egard previous Classification and continue notification with highest current classification.

c. Follow-up notification SHALL include details of all conditions/emergency classifications .

.G. IF -plant condition/emergency classification changes while performing notification, THEN continue notification and state at t.he end the following "Changes in *plant conditions

indicate a potential for escalating the Emergency Classification~ A completed Part I will be transmitted within 15 minutes.

sa IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21

~hnterP~ 0 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE. Page 28 of 44 Attachment 9.3 Control Room Communicator Checklist Sheet 4 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 1.5 Support Shift Manager (Emergency Director) with other notifications A Determine if personnel assembly is being suspended from the Emergency Director.

B. Request direction from Shift Manager (Emergency Director)

AND initiate notification of personnel located in the Protected Area if requested.

C. Complete the remaining notifications as specified on the (Form EP-3A, EP-3S or EP-3G Checklist as applicable).

2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2.1

Perform Periodic Update Notifications - UNUSUAL EVENT (Use Form *EP-3)

NOTE:

Periodic Update Notifications to offsite authorities shall be made approximately every 30 minutes or whenever conditions change. Time interval may be lengthened with concurrence of offsite agencies.

A Obtain the Gompleted NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form Part I (Form EP-1) from the Shift Manager. Review the form to ensure all required information is completed, including Emergency Director's signature.

B. Verify Fax and email of the NYS Radiological Data Form Part I to State/Counties/EDF.

C. Using Control Room NUE.Notification Checklist (Form EP-3N) perform notifications as needed, to make the periodic update notifications. Confirm notification to each location.

D. Fax, or have Support Staff Fax, copies of the NYS Radiological Data Form Part 1 to State/Counties/EOF.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Entergyw, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 29 of 44 Attachment 9.3 Control Room Communicator Checklist Sheet 5 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.2 Perform Periodic Update Notifications - Alert/SAE/GE (Use Form EP-3A, 3S or 3G as applicable)

NOTE:

Perigdic Update Notifications to offsite authorities SHALL be made approximately every 30 minutes or whenever conditions change. Time interval may be lengthened with concurrence of offsite agencies.

A. Obtain the completed NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form Part I (Form EP-1) (Part II if a radiological release has occurred or is in progress) from the Emergency Director.

Review form to ensure all required information is completed, including Emergency Director's signature.

B. Verify that SM has sent Fax and email of the NYS Radiological Data Form Part I to State/Counties/EDF.

C. Using an 'Alert/SAE/GE Checklist (Form EP-3A, 3S or 3G as :

applicable) start the roll call to State and Counties. Confirm notification to each location.

D. Complete the remaining notifications as specified on the (form EP-3A, 3S or 3G as applicable) Checklist.

2.3 IF the Emergency Classification is Upgraded, THEN Perform Upgrade Notifications (Use Form EP-3A, 3S or 3G as applicable)

A. Obtain the completed NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form Part I (Form EP-1) from the Emergency Di,rector.

Review form to ensure all required information is completed, including Emergency Director's signature.

B. Verify that SM has sent Fax and email of the NYS Radiological Data Form Part I to State/Counties/EDF.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 30 of Attachment 9.3 Control Room Communicator Checklist Sheet 6 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES C. Using an Alert/SAE/GE Checklist (Form EP-3A, 3S or 3G as applicable) start the roll call to State and Counties within 15 minutes of upgrade of the emergency classification.

D. Fax, or have Support Staff fax, copies of the NYS *

Radiological Data Form Part 1 to the State/Counties/EOF, IF required. Confirm notification to each location.

E. Support Shift Manager, as needed, with the remaining notifications as specified on the Checklist.

3.0 Closeout Responsibility/Activity 3.1 When directed by the Shift Manager, returlJ all equipment utiiized in the response to proper storage locations 3.2 Review all documentation the Control Room Communicators generated during the emergen!=y:

A. Ensure all logs, forms and other documentation .is. complete.

B. Collect all forms, logs and other documentation.

3.3 Provide all logs and records to the Shift Manager upon termination of the em~rgency and entry into the Recovery Phase.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 31 of 44 Attachment 9.4 Facility CommuniCator Checklist Sheet 1 of 2 NOTE:

The expectation for all ERO positions .is to use WebEOC for log keeping purposes. Reference to traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which WebEOC is unavailable, such as a power or computer failure.

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Assume the Duties of Facility Communicator

- A. Upon being notified to fulfill the Facility Communicator role, IMMEDIATELY report to the Control Room. *

(

\ B. Inform the Shift Manager and the Control Room staff that you are assuming the-duties of Facility Communicator.

C. IF not already established THEN establish an open line of communications over the Direct Line:

1. TSC

2. EOF

3. AEOF (if activated)

D. Inform the Shift Manager that you have established communications with the TSC/OSC and (A)EOF.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-21.0 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 32 of Attachment 9.4 Facility Communicator Checklist Sheet 2 of 2 2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity NOTES 2.1 Maintain Communications with the TSC, OSC and (A)EOF NOTE:

The primary responsibility of the Facility Communicator is to provide an open line of communication between the CCR and 1SC; however, the Technical Advisor to the Emergency Director in the EOF will periodically monitor the communications line or will request information from the CCR and TSC.

A. Transmit information as requested by the TSC, OSC and .

EOF. .

B -- Notify the .os9 Operations Supporj,Positign _qf te~ms. ,

. '~N PO's~ Chemists. etc*: yufaY havef been"li i~1S'atcileITTrorti: the CCR and log this information into WebEOC. *

C. Support Shift Manager (ED) or POM if in place, with coordination of dispatching and controlling of NPOs assigned to perform in--plant operations with the Operations Support position located in th~ OSC.

D. Use an ERO Log Sheet (Form EP-3-ALL/EP-10) to maintain

* - . a log.

1. Log the time when you assumed the duties of Facility

Communicator.

' ,;' ~ .

2. Log significant communications pertaining to plant operations and emergency events.

3.0 .Closeout Responsibility/Activity 3.1 When directed by the Shift Manager, return all equipment utilized in the response to proper storage locations 3.2 Review all documentation that was generated during the emergency:

A. Ensure all logs, forms and other documentation is complete.

B. Collect all forms, logs and ~ther documentation.

3.3 Provide all logs and records to the Shift Manager upon termination of the emergency and entry into the Recovery Phase.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page . 33 of Attachment 9.5 On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 1 of 4 NOTE:

The expectation for all ERO positions is to use WebEOC for log keeping purposes. Reference to traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which WebEOC is unavailable, such as a power or computer failure:

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES.

1.1

Assume the Duties of CR Ra~iation Protection Technician

~*---

.- . '"-t-~~.':j*"i-~; - - -- . ~ ..

A. IF the deClarea emergency is an Alert or higher, THEN first contaet the Control Point and obtain a list of personnel still in

( RCA B. IMMEDIATELY provide list of individuals still in the RCA to*

the Shift Manager.

C. Inform .the Shift Manager and the Control Room staff that

.. you :are assuming the duties of the On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician.

1.2

Establish Initial CCR Radiological Protection A. Evaluate the need and make a recommendation to establish radiological access control for the Control Room.

1. Ask the Shift Manager if there is potential for abnormal radiological conditions outside of the RCA.

2. Evaluate PRM-ARM instrumentation.

B. Place a DLR and dosimeter on the computer terminal by the RO's desk.

C. Issue DLR and dosimeters to persons who are dispatched from the CCR, if necessary.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 34 of Attachment 9.5 On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 2 of 4 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES D. IF conditions .warrant, or the Shift Manager directs that Control Room radiological controls be established, THEN:

1. Set up step off pad (SOP) requiring shoe check and frisker at the CR entrance.

2. Post rear door with "NO ENTRY/EXIT" signs.

3. Place SOPs in a position that does not preclude opening the door while.standing on the SOP.

4. *Set u*p' Frisker and perform periodic contamination surv~y~ on.,t}oth sides of the SOP.

5. Perform periodic (hourly or as directed) airborne contamina1fun checks with HD-288 or equivalent.

6 .. Record results on applicable forms and survey maps.

2.0 Continuous* Responsibility/Activity 2~ 1 Provide Radio~~gfoal Protection. I NOTE:

The.actions and responsibilities listed in this procedure are intended to assist the CCR Radiation Protection Technician in the performance of his/her duties. While some items are performed once, others are repeated over the duration of the event.

A. Provide radiological support, such as issuance of dosimetry, determination of respiratory and protective clothing requirements, and performance of radiological surveys for

. the following activities, as directed by the Shift Manager:

1. Search and rescue

2. Repair and corrective actions

la IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21

~Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 35 of 44 Attachment 9.5 On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 3 of4 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

3. Response to fires by Fire Brigade (includes survey

/decontamination of Fire Department personnel and equipment)

4. Personnel and equipment decontamination

5. As requested by the Shift Manager

~

B. Conduct outside surveys as requested by the Shift Manager C. Provide Radiological Support for Personnel Medical Emergencies

... ~ ... -;*

1. Upon notification that a personnel medical emergency ha~ occurred ansite, report to the scene with survey instrument(s). * -~ **

2. Support ~edical response* as necessary.

D. IF radiological conditions warrant AND requested by the Shift Manager/ED, issue kl to control room personnel.

1. Conduct applicable radiological and/or Kl briefings to CCR personnel.

2. Utilize Form EP-8-ALL/EP-65 to document date, time and name of per~onnel ingesting Kl.

2.2 Use ERO Log Sheet(s) (Form EP-3-ALL/EP-10) to maintain a log.

A. Log the time when you assumed the duties of CCR Radiation Protection Technician.

B. Log significant communications pertaining to personnel radiological conditions and actions.

C. Log any other significant information pertaining to actions taken as duty of Radiation Protection Technician. (i.e.,

surveys completed dosimetry issuance, A/S results, etc.)

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Bi1lergy,,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 36 of 44 Attachment 9.5 On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 4 of 4 3.0 Closeout Responsibility/Activity NOTES 3.1 When directed by the Shift Manager, return all equipment utilized in the response to proper storage locations.

3.2 Review all documentation that was generated during the emergency: I A Ensure all logs, forms and other documentation is complete.

B. Collect all forms, logs and other documentation.

3.3

Provide all logs and records fo the Shift Manager upon termination of the emergency ~nd entry into the Recovery Phase.

*\

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Jlntergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 37 of 44 Attachment 9.6 On-Shift Chemistry Technician Checklist Sheet 1 of 2 NOTE:

The expectation for all ERO positions is to use WebEOC for log-keeping purposes. Reference to traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which WebEOC is unavailable, such as a power or computer failure.

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Assume the Duties of On-Shift Chemistry .

Technician.

i A Upon being notified to.fulfill the Ori-Shift-Che.mistry Technician role, IMMEDIATELY report to the Control Room.

(, B. Inform the Shift Manager and the Control Room staff that.

you are assuming the duties of OR-$11jft Chemistry Technician.

1.2 Assist the Shift Manager/Plant Operations Manager with Emergency Planning duties as requested*;

2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity I

2.1 Use ERO Log Sheet(s) (Form EP-3-ALL/EP-10) to maintain a log. I A Log the time when you assumed the duties of On-Shift Chemistry Technician.

B. Log significant communications pertaining to radiological releases and emergency events.

!~\

I I

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 38 of Attachment 9.6 On-Shift Chemistry Technician Checklist Sheet 2 of 2 3.0 Closeout Responsibility/Activity 3.1 When directed by the Shift Manager, return all equipment utilized in the response to proper storage locations.

3.2 Review all documentation generated during the emergency:

A Ensure all logs, forms and other documentation is complete B. Collect all forms, logs and other documentation.

3.3 Provide all logs and records to the Shift Manager 'upon .*

termination of the emergency a*nd entry into 'the Recover.y;, :;

Phase. * * * -*

._]

<f*"'

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP*EP-210 Revision 21 Entergy@ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE

' /

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 39 of 44 Attachment 9.7 Support Staff Checklist Sheet 1 of 4 NOTE:

The expectation for all ERO positions is to use WebEOC for log-keeping purposes. Reference to traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which WebEOC is unavailable, such as a power or computer failure.

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Assume the Duties of Support Staff.

A. UponJ;u~iog.r:mtifiedJp.fulfill, the ..$1,ipp,Qr;t.Staff:: role;~c.. .*.,.:_-~. -*:

IMMEDIATELY report to the Contrc:il Ro~m. *.* .. . .

/ \

B. Inform the Shift Manager and the Control Room staff *that

you are assuming the duties of Support Staff.

1.2 Assist the Plant Operations Manager (POM) with CCR *set-

.I.

up.

A. Distribute Position Specific Binders to the_*following: I

1. SM/POM

2. CCR Communicator

3. Facility Communicator

4. On-Shift Radiation Protection Technician

5. On-Shift Chemistry Technician

6. Support Staff B. Plug in phones and headsets, if needed.

C. Verify the IPEC 10-mile Wind Sector Map in-place.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 40 of 44 Attachment 9.7 Support Staff Checklist Sheet 2 of 4 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES D. Verify appropriate emergency classification signs in place (NUE, Alert, SAE, and GE).

E. Set up and test fax machines.

I*

F. Notify SM/POM (ED) that CCR setup .is complete. I 1.3 Assist with accountability I A. Using (Form EP-7-ALL/EP-47), Accountability Roster, generate a list of individuals that are in your faCility; record badge numbers._ .- -*

B. Using (Form EP-7-ALL/EP-4 7), -Accoun'tability" Roster, record .

the names, badge numbers and locations of any watch . .

personnel located in the field aAd forward. roster*to th.e lead** .

Accountability Officer (LAO).* * ** * - **

2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity I

2.1 Assist with maintaining accountability **l A. Using (Form EP-7-ALL/EP-47), Accountability Roster, generate a list and record the names, badge numbers and

locations of any individuals as they enter/exit the control room.

2.2

Assist POM in scheduling second shift I A. Rosters of trained personnel are located in the Emergency Telephone Directory.

B. Call office extensions, beepers and home numbers as necessary to identify and schedule second shift relief.

Complete CCR staffing using Form EP-43 AND forward to Adrhin & Logistics Coordinator in EOF.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP*EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 41 of Attachment 9. 7 Support Staff Checklist Sheet 3 of 4 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.3 Fax forms, when completed, to off-site agencies and emergency facilities NOTE:

1. When NYS and County EOCs are activated, discontinue faxing Part I forms to Warning Points

2. When the EOF assumes responsibility for*offsite notifications, discontinue faxing Part I and Part II forms to offsite agencies.

A. "NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form" Part I "General Information Instructions" (Form EP-1) ** **

I* .. ....

1. NYS/County Warning Points I

2. NYS/County EOCs I

3. EOF/AEOF I

4. JIC I B. "NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form" Part II I -

"Radiological Assessment Data" (Form EP-2)

1. NYS/County EOCs

2. EOF/AEOF '\._

3. JIC C. When the (A)EOF assumes responsibility for offsite notifications, discontinue faxing Part I and Part II forms to offsite agencies. IF MRP-DAS is not operational THEN fax the following completed forms to the TSC and (A)EOF:

1. For Unit 2 - Form EP-53, Form EP-54, and Form EP-55.

2. For Unit 3 - Form EP-57, Form EP-58, and Form EP-59.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Entergy,_,, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 42 of Attachment 9.7 Support Staff Checklist Sheet 4 of 4 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.4 Receive faxes from the EOF/AEOF, when activated A. Form EP-1 "NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form" Part I "General Information Instructions" (Form EP-1)

B. Form EP-2 "NYS Radiological Emergency Data Form" Part II "Radiological Assessment Data" (Form EP-2) 3.0 Closeout Responsibility/Activity 3.1 When directed by the Shift Manager, return all equipment utilized in the response to proper storage locations.

3.2 Review all documentation generated during the emergency:

A. Ensure all logs, forms and other documentation is complete.

B. Collect all_ forms, logs and other documentation.

3.3 Provide all logs and records to the Shift Manager upon termination of the emergency and entry into the Recovery Phase.

e- JJillergy.,,

/'

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 43 of 44 Attachment 9.8 CCR Dose Assessor Checklist Sheet 1 of 2 NOTE:

The expectation for all ERO positions is to use WebEOC for log-keeping purposes. Reference to traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which WebEOC is unavailable, such as a power or computer failure.

I NOTE:

I This position is normally staffed by the unaffected unit's on-shift Chemistry Technician I 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity 1.1 Assume the Duties of a CCR Dose Assessor A. Upon being notified of a Declared Emergency ..

IMMEDIATELY report to the normally assigned Control Room.

",* ~*: ,

B.

Inform the Shift Manager that you are available to perform the duties of.the CCR Dose Assessor.

2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2.1 Assist the Shift Manager/Plant Operations Manager with Emergency Planning duties as requested.

NOTE:

IP-EP-340 Attachment 9.4 may be used for CCR Plant Vent or SIG Tube Rupture Quick Dose Calculations, and Multiple Accident*

Calculations.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-210 Revision 21 Elllergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE Page 44 of

44 Attachment 9.8 CCR Dose Assessor Checklist Sheet 2 of 2 Continuous Responsibility/Activity NOTE:

A NYS Part 2 Form SHALL be completed as soon as possible after it has been determined that a release above Federal Limits exists, a

.significant change in the radiation release, and updated approximately 30 minutes.

A. Perform Dose Assessment using IP-EP-340

8. Produce a NYS Part 2 Form C. *Get NYS Part 2 Form approved by the Shift Manager D. Transmit NYS Part 2 Form 2.2 Determine need for a subsequent dose assessment and Part 2.

Perform if necessary.

2.3 When directed by the Shift Manager, turn over Dose Assessment responsibilities to the Dose Assessor in the EOF.

3.0 Closeout Responsibility/Activity 3.1 When.directed by the Shift Manager, return all equipment utilized in the response to proper storage locations.

3.2 Review all documentation generated during the emergency:

A. En~ure all logs, forms and other documentation is complete

8. Collect all forms, logs and other documentation.

3.3 Provide all logs and records to the Shift Manager upon termination of the emergency and entry into the Recovery Phase.

,.. I IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN I NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE BP-EP-230 Revision 15 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES I REFERENCE USE Page 1 . of 41 (f*~ 1*20 r.\ ryl(J~ A* P. IT P fli?ZV.

( fI lJ 1!i) h i /I IH N

~ ~i li \J -u 'U ~J/ fb lb t-:m th:1 k *:;.:::J i Operations Support Center C'~~~-

.. . .......-~*-

Prepared by:

Rebecca A. Martin fu Print Name

Approval: Lori A. Glander ~ rJ(-/ {t; ..

Print Name

{!' / *~""" Date

- _.Effe*ctive Date: June 14, 2016 rli'"f*Ntue:i. excluded from further LM()() reviews.

IP-EP-230 (OSC) Rev 15.doc

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

-- Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page *2 of 41 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 PURPOSE ........................................*.................................................................... 3

2.0 REFERENCES

................................................................. :.......... :.......................... 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS ....................................................................................................... 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................ 3 5.0 DETAILS .............................................................*................................................:.4

. ~ .

6.0 INTERFACES ................................ ,...................................................................... 4 7.0 RECORDS ....................................: ................................................. :... :................ 5 8.0 REQUIREMl;NTS AND.COMMITfV1ENTS ........................................ :.................... 5 9.0. ATTACHMENTS

\

' .9.1 OSC Manager C_hecklist ............... ~ ............. ,.......... ;....................... :.......... .'6 9.2 .. l&C/Electrical Coordinator Checklist. .................. :...................... :, ............... 12 9.3 Mechanical Coordinator Checklist .......................... ~ ..* :...............................13 9.4 Operations.Support Checklist.. ............ :........................... ,......................... 14 9.5 OSC Rad/Chem-Coordinator Cl=lecklist ...................................................... 15 9.6 Work Control Coordinator:Ch~cklist ....................*..................................... 21 9.7 OSC Log Keeper.Checkli~(.::: ............~ ...................................................... 23 9.8 OSC Radiation Protection Technician Checklist ........................... :........... 24 9.9 Assembly Area Coordinator Instructions.'.......................*.......................... 38 9.10 TSC/OSC Layout. ....................... :..... ,......................................................... 39 9.11 OSC Guidelines ............................................................................................ 40 9.12 IPEC OSC ERO Staffing ........ .'., ........ ,, ..........................'............................ 41

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

""~Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 3 of 41

Operations Support Center 1.0 PURPOSE To describe the site specific actions for the activation and operation of the Operations Support Center (OSC). This procedure will be used in conjunction with the fleet procedures EN~EP-611, Operations Support Center (OSC) Operations".

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 Indian Point Energy Center Emergency Plan 2.2 New York State Implementation of the use of Potassium Iodide (Kl) as a Protective Action for the Public 2.3 IP-EP-350, Emergency Conta~ination Con.t~ol 3.0 DEFINITIONS r 3.1 Activated ""."" an order has been made to* actiyate. an emergency response facility, and the facility is in the process of being staffed: .

3.2 Operational - Status of an emergency facility declared by the appropriate manager

upon determining that the facility is *adequately staffed and equipment is setup and

available to*perform the emergency functions assigned to that facility.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES* . *......... .

4.1 See EN-EP-611 section 4.0 *for RespOrisi.bilities~*

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230' Revision 15 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 4 of 41 5.0 DETAILS 5.1 The OSC Manager SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.1, OSC Manager Checklist. -

5.2 The l&C/Electrical Coordinator SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.2, l&C/Electrical Coordinator Checklist.

5.3 The Mechanical Coordinator SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.3, Mechanical Coordinator Checklist.

5.4 The Operations Support person SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.4, Operations Support Checklist.

5.5 The Rad/Chem Coordinator SHALL follow the instructions outlined in A~tachment 9.5, Rad/Chem Coordinator Checklist.- :<

5.6 The Work Control Coordinator SHAb.L follow the instructions outlined-in Attachment 9.6, Work Control Coordinator Checklist. *- * -

5.7 T_he OSC Log-Keeper SHALL follow the instru9tions outlined in Attachment 9.7, OSC Log-Keeper Checklist.

5.8 The Radiation Protection Technician SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.8 Radiation Protection Technician Checklist.

5.9 The Assembly Area Coordinator SHALL follow the instructions outlined in Attachment 9.9, Assembly Area Coordinator Instructions.

6.0 INTERFACES 6.1 IP-EP-115, Emergency Plan Forms 6.2 IP-EP-210, Central Control Room 6.3 IP-EP-220, Technical Support Center 6.4 IP-EP-240, Security 6.5 IP-EP-430, Site Assembly, Accountability and Relocation of Personnel Offsite 6.6 IP-EP-420, Use of Potassium Iodide by Indian Point Personnel During an Emergency 6.7 O-FSG-100, BDBEE/ELAP Emergency Response

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

-~Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 5 of 41 7.0 RECORDS 7 .1 All logs, completed forms and other records generated during an actual emergency SHALL be considered Quality Records and maintained for the life of the plant.

8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENTS None 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 OSC Manager Checklist 9.2 l&C/Electrical Coordinator Checklist 9.3 Mechanical Coordinator Checklist 9.4 Operations Support Checklist 9.5 OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator Checklist 9.6 Work Control Coordinator Checklist **

9.7 OSC Log-Keeper Checklist 9.8 OSC Radiation Protection Technician Checklist

~ *.

9.9 Assembly Area Coordinator Instructions '

9.1 O OSC/TSC Layout 9.11 OSC Guidelines 9.12 IPEC ERO OSC Staffing

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

-~-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 6 of 41

\_

Attachment 9.1 OSC Manager Checklist Sheet 1 of 6 This is a core staffing position.

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES NOTE:

Procedure refers to an event at Unit 2, Unit 3 or both (i.e., Security, Natural event). If determined to be a Site event, then Unit 2 will be the lead plant for all communications.

1.1 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-611 Attachment 9.1 and the following 1.2 IF a Beyond Design Basis External Event (BDBEE) occurs that res Its in an Extended Loss of AC Power (ELAP) to either unit, THEN ent into O-FSG-100, BDBEE/ELAP Emergency Response, is ,required.

1.3 Initial Accountability CAUTION:

IF an emergency classification is entered due to a security condition, THEN evacuation and accountability may put personnel at risk:

Therefore, in these situations, evacuation and accountability will be ,

suspended until directed by Security and cleared through the Incident .

-commander.

A. IF the event has been classified as a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency AND initial accountability has-not been --

performed THEN direct accountability to be performed in accordance with Section 2.3 of this checklist.

B. Verify that the following core staffing is available before deelarin OSC staffed:

(a) OSC Manager (b) Work Control Coordinator (c) 3 Radiation Protection Technicians (d) 1 Mechanical Maintenance (e) 1 Electrical Maintenance (f) 1 l&C Technician

1. Staff the OSC using Form EP-10-ALL, "Filling an ERO Vacancy During Facility Activation/Operation"

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

~Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 7 of 41 Attachment 9.1 OSC Manager Checklist Sheet 2 of 6 lniti~I Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES C. IF additional personnel are required THEN: .

1. IF it is during normal working hours THEN call or assign someone to call the Assembly Area for needed personnel.

2. IF needed individuals are not available onsite THEN assign someone to call individuals at home using the Emergency Telephone Directory (ETD).

NOTE:

The relationship between the minimum personnel. required to STAFF the OSC, and the entire OSC ERO is explained in Attachment 9.12 of this procedure.

D.. Designate two individuals to act as Assembly Area Coordinators (AAC). Assign one to report to the Energy*

Education Center (EEC) the other one to the Generation Support Building (GSB) and have them follow guidance * .

provided on the Assembly Area Coordinator Instructions,,* ....

(Attachment 9.9), if necessary..

E. IF event occurs during an outage, THEN assess the need.to ,

staff the back-up assembly area at the Indian Point Traiilhg Center (IPTC). Designate an individual to report to the IPTC and have theni follow guidance provided on Assembly Area Coordinator Instructions (Attachment 9.9).

1. Inform other AACs that the IPTC is being utilized and to direct overflow of non-essentials to the IPTC.

2. IF additional personnel are required to meet staffing needs (Normal staffing per Form EP-43, or special requirements as needed) THEN call or assign someone to call the Assembly Areas or individuals at home (using the Emergency Telephone Directory) for additional personnel.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP*EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

~-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 8 of 41 Attachment 9.1 OSC Manager Checklist Sheet 3 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES F. Determine when the OSC staff is prepared to assume primary functions of OSC (dispatching and accounting of Operations, RP, Maintenance Teams to the plant).

G. When ready, -formally relieve the Control Room of the responsibilities to track in-plant teams as follows:

1. Call the POM (Shift Manager if POM not available) and request a complete listing of personnel currently performing tasks outside the OSC, and the CR. As a

.,=***

minimum, NPO's will be controlled at an SAE or higher classification. . *: *- .*.~. '

2. Notify the EPM and make*an announcement to the OSC, TSC, and _inform the EOF that the OSC is operational.

NOTE:

OSC Guidelines (Attachment 9.11) information should be provided to each OSC technician, mechanic and operator.

H. Conduct, or have the OSC Coordinators conduct a briefing for the OSC technicians, mechanics and operators:

1 . Provide a brief explanation of the event that caused the emergency.

2. Inform OSC personnel not to leave the OSC/TSC Complex without checking out with the OSC Work Control Coordinator.

3. Inform personnel that they will be briefed by one of the OSC Coordinators prior to being sent intq the field to perform a task.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230. Revision 15 PROCEDURE

~-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 9 of 41 Attachment 9.1 OSC Manager Checklist Sheet 4 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

4. When briefed and dispatched by a Coordinator they*

MUST check out with OSC Work Control Coordinator before they leave the OSCfrSC.

Complex.

5. When returning from an assignment they MUST check in witti the OSC Work Control Coordinator, report if they were successful and report any radiation exposure received while dispatched.

I. IF relieving another OSC Manager AND there has been a shift change of OSC Technicians and/or Mechanics THEN brief on plant:conditions*usingOSC Gdidelines (Attachment 9.11) 2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2.1 Ensure adequate materials and supplies are available to conduct emergency operations.

A. IF any necessary materials or supplies are not available on site, THEN request assistance in obtaining items * . *!.

from the Administrative & Logistics Coordinator at the EOF ..

2.2 Direct OSC Operation~

A Keep OSC Coordinators updated on pending a$signments.

B. IF multiple pre-assignment briefs are to occur simultaneously, THEN instruct the Coordinators to use other areas of the oscrrsc to conduct briefings.

C. Ensure OSC staff members are following.appropriate procedures.

2.3 IF the emergency classification is changed to a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency OR if directed by the Emergency Plant Manager, THEN establish or re-establish initial accountability as follows:

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

-- Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 10 of 41 Attachment 9.1 OSC Manager Checklist Sheet 5 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES NOTE:

Initial Accouritability SHALL be accomplished within 30 minutes from the declaration of a Site Area Emergency or General Emergency. Accountability may,be directed at the

Alert classification (or any other time deemed necessary) at the direction of the Shift Manager or Emergency Plant Manager.

Accountability is accomplished by assembly of all non-essential personnel outsjde the Protected Area and physically accounting for all individuals who remain within the IPEC Protected Area (Unit 2 and Unit 3) ~ *.

A. The Lead Accountability Officer (LAO) wil .generate the list of missing persons._.Jhis.list will be provided to the TSC Security Coordinator, Emergency Plant Manager and POM.

NOTE:

During plant shutdowns, when there may be large numbers of workers onsite and within the radiological control areas, a Radiation Protection computer printout may be used to assist in locating missing personnel within the radiological control area .*.*

after accountability is ~ompleted.

B. IF there are individuals who are missing, THEN verify that the following is performed:

1. Direct the OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator to obtain a Computer Printout of individuals within the Radiological Control Area.

2. Review Computer Printout for any missing individuals within the Radiological Control Area.

3. Inform the EPM, POM and TSC Security Coordinator immediately of any personnel discovered missing during accountability process.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

-~* Entergy

- a IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 11 of 41 Attachment 9.1 OSC Manager Checklist Sheet 6 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

4. Coordinate the search and rescue activities in accordance with procedure IP-EP-430, Site Assembly, Accountability and Relocation of Personnel Offsite.

NOTE:

Ongoing Accountability is required at the Site Area Emergency or General Emergency level. Accountability is at the direction of the EPM at an Alert and required at a SAE level.

C. Direct osc Staff to maintain acco~ntability of all osc personnel through the use of status boards, team assignments;- Individual Exposure Tracking Log (Form EP-29) and ERO Tracking Log (Form EP-42)

1. Instruct search and rescue teams not to move an incapacitated victim _without a Medical Representative or qualified First Responder UNLESS the potential harm from radiation or other hazards outweighs the potential harm 9f moving the victim.

- (

-0. Coordinate release of personnel at the EEC, GSB and IPTC with the EPM, LAO and Assembly Area Coordinator(s).

2.4 Inform the EPM of changing situations in the plant based on information received from teams out in the field.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

~-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 12 of 41 Attachment 9.2 l&C/Electrical Coordinator Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-611 Attachment 9.4

/ '

\

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

-- Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 13 , of 41 Attachment 9.3 Mechanical Coordinator Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-611 Attachment 9.4 I

' /

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCYPLAN PROCEDURE IP-EP-230 Revision 15 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 14 of 41 Attachment 9.4

Operations Support Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-611 Attachment 9.2

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

--- Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE *Page 15 of 41 Attachment 9.5 OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator Checklist Sheet 1 of 6 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-611 Attachment 9.5 and the following:

1.2 Assume the position of OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator.

A. Determine if any personnel are currently in the field as follows:

Entergy-IPEC web site

Applications drop down menu

_Sentinel

Fleet Prod.uction Reports

~ Indian Point

RCA Currently Logged In _

If not in Crystal Report printable PDF format, then convert to such and PRINT B. Obtain a copy of current employee exposure for use in ALARA considerations when assigni~g OSG team members as follows:** *

Use Item 2 instructions above for Sentinel access

- Select Daily Margin List by Department

Select the key departments needed (e.g.,

Operations, RP, Rad-waste, Chem., FIN, MNTS, Mech-1, Security)

Drop Down Menu

Select Last Name, OK

If not in Crystal Report printable PDF format, convert to such and PRINT C. Request the Control Room to align the OSC/TSC ventilation system for incident operation per procedure, if required.

D. IF necessary THEN direct a Rad Protection Technician to perform a habitability survey of the OSC/TSC and Control Rooms and verify that radiological controls are set up as shown on Sheet 6 of this Checklist for the TSC/OSC.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

~Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 16 of 41 Attachment 9.5 OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator Checklist Sheet 2 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES E. Establish the capability for monitoring of Iodine, should it become necessary. Have a Rad Protection Tech set up the AMS-4.

F. Establish Habitability and Contamination controls for the CR if necessary. At a minimum verify habitability in the Control Rooms and TSC/OSC and re-verify approximately every 60 minutes or when conditions have likely worsened.

NOTE:

Ensure Habitability and Contamination Controls are implemented when a Radiological Release occurs

. *-. G. IF dosimetry is necessary and individuals have not been previously issued dosimetry THEN assign a person(s) to go to

( HP-1 or HP-3 as appropriate to obtain dosimetry *

'\ (PRD's/DLR's) to be issued to them, H. Assign Personnel to the following positions:

1. OSC/TSC Rad Protection Monitor

2. Protected Area Monitoring Team, IF requested by the EOF,

3. EOF RP Monitor, as soon as RP tech minimum staffing has been satisfied.

4. Rad Waste Personnel to report to the EOF to support any decontamination efforts, IF requested by the EOF.

5. RP Monitor to Assembly Areas to verify habitability if a radiological release has occurred. Monitor will need to bring frisker and survey meter.

6. Chemistry Technicians to take samples and report results

as requested.

I. Obtain keys from Unit 2 control point for the lock box on the

.side of the OSC radiological equipment supply lockers. Check all instruments for operability and inventory any locker which has a broken seal.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 17 of 41 Attachment 9.5 OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator Checklisf Sheet 3 of 6 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES J. Obtain requested Chemistry sample, and report the results to the OSC Manager.

2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2.1 Direct Radiation Protection and Chemistry Technicians in the following activities:

A. Assign qualified RP/Chemistry Technicians to conduct emergency response support activities.

B. Use Emergency Team Briefing Form (EP-38) to prepare and.

*document team *assignments. Ensure each team dispatched :

*has ;i copy of the Emergency Team Briefi.ng Form. *

C. Assign personnel to conducfin:-plant radiological surveys and take chemistry samples as. required supporting ERO activities. -

D. Assign RP Technicians to accompany Teams requiring radiologi~al support.

I;. Prepare or have prepared the ERWP (EP-40). Review and approve the prepared

. form and then use or have it used.

F. Participate in T earn briefings to ensure team members ,

p'l'bperly'imderstand the assigned task. Briefings SHOULD

_ be Clear, concise, accurate, and prompt based upon the hazard(s) to be encountered.

G. Use the ERWP (Form EP-40) to discuss dose limits, surveys to be performed, expected and maximum dose rates and stay times. Advise team members to immediately contact or return to the OSC when dose rates or stay times approach the established limits.

H. Discuss dosimetry requirements. Coordinate with Radiological Coordinator any radiation exposure limit extensions necessary.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED

). EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

~Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 18 of 41 Attachment 9.5 OSC.Rad/Chem Coordinator Checklist Sheet 4 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES I. Discuss protective clothing and respiratory protection requirements.

J. Discuss travel route requirements and if there are any releases in progress.

K. Advise team members on monitoring and decontamination procedures following mission completion.

L. Advise team how they will be notified of changing conditions or classifications. Direct radiological control personnel to read dosimetryfor personnel whose exposure limits are

. approachei.~

M. Participate in OSCteam post job debriefings, if needed.

N. Maintain communication capability (i.e. phone, radio) and

work with the Work Control Coordinator while the team is in

.. the field to answer any questions that may arise concerning the task. *'

0. Assist the OSC Manager in planning and preparing for any

. Radiological or Chem is.try work activities needed to return the plant to a safe condition.

P: Verify the Work C9ritrol Coordinator is tracking individual

. '. exposure:data in WebEOC or Individual Exposure Tracking Log (Form ER-29).

Q. RP Tech escorts are required for any team being sent into an area where any of the following conditions exist:

1. Radiological conditions are unknown. Surveys or ARMs may be used to predict radiological conditions.

2. Radiation field in excess of 1 R/hr are expected.

3. In the event of any release of radioactivity to the environment.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

- - ~-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 19 of 41 Attachment 9.5 OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator Checklist Sheet 5 of 6

Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES R. Coordinate with the OSC Manager for tasks involving injured personnel or search and rescue activities.

1.' IF potentially contaminated br highly exposed personnel require offsite medical facility attention, THEN support transport with Operations and Security.

S. Frequently brief the OSC Manager on assigned task status and the results reported by RP and Chemistry Technicians T. Maintain an adequate reserve of personnel in the OSC RP/Chem pool by requesting additional resources from the Radiological Coordinator as necessary.

U.. Requ~::;.ttheHa_dibto*gical Coordinator to coordinate with the EOF Administration._and.Logistics Coordinator to obtain equipment and mated~ls not avail9b_le onsite or through previously arranged ;3greemerits.

V. Direct decontaminatiorf' of personnel, equipment and ,

areas inside the Protected Area.

W. If respirators are needed they.can be obtained at'the normal issue p9int location.

. . ; ~ .

2.5 !ft.here are contamir-ate~ ifijured personnel THEN perform the following: . .

A. Provideradiologi~~l.support for the assessment, treatment, and transportation of contaminated injured personnel.

B. Monitor patients on-site for contamination and decontaminate as appropriate. (IP-EP-350, Emergency Contamination Control)

\

I

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-230 Revision 15 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 20 of 41 Attachment 9.5 OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator Checklist Sheet 6 of 6

- "l A.

A D

/

B c

i E

~ .ir-;

osc R

- ** *.To.. :.::_-.:.,.::.

~ ~

E

rsc p.

M A

TSC/OSC Access Points to be posted:

If Hallway Contamination < 1000 dpm/ 100 sq. cm If Hallway Contamination > 1000 dpm/ 100 sq. cm A. Entry/Exit A. No Entry. Exit Only B. No Entry/No Exit B. Entry to TSC/OSC. No Exit. White Step Off Pad and Frisk Shoes before stepping here C. No Entry/No Exit C. No Entry/No Exit D. Equipment cabinets. Place sign at top of stairway D. Equipment cabinets. Place sign at top of stairway.

No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD Coordinator. No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD E. Air Monitoring Equipment Coordinator E. Air Monitoring Equipment

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE'

,/

~-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 21 of 41" Attachment 9.6 Work Control Coordinator Checklist Sheet 1 of 2 NOTE:

The expectation for all ERO positions is to use WebEOC for log-keeping purposes. Reference to traditional paper forms remains in this checklist for the situation in which WebEOC is unavailable,

. such as a power or computer failure.

This is a core staffing position 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in i;N'.'J:P-611

Attachment 9.3, EN-EP-610 Attachmer¢.9~11 and the

. following: .. * *

1.2 Issue radios (and lapel or. throat microphones as.

needed) ~o OSC Coordinafors *and teams being*

dispatched ..

1.3 Use of Throat Mies. And Ear Bud on portable radio:

NOTE:

Throat Mies. with Ear Bud or Lapel Mies-. woLitd be used when workers are dressed in Protective Clothing and/or respirators. *** .. * * * * . .

A. Attach microphone to portable radio using the adapter unit.

The adapter unit has a three

position switch

OFF

PTT (Push to Talk) \

- VOX (Voice

. ,_ Activated)

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-230 Revision 15 l EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE

-~Entergy j

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 22 of 41 Attachment 9.6 Work Control Coordinator'Checklist Sheet 2 of 2 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES B. Ensure radio is turned on C. Attach radio and adapter to

. workers clothing D. Place Throat Mic. On worker and ear bud in ear E. To transmit, touch the center front of the adapter unit (PTT) and speak. Release center of adapter unit when finished speaking.

F. Ensure proper radio col"T1muni~ationi?..Protocol is utilized at all-times. Refer tb EN.;.HLJ-to2*; * * *

Attachment 9.2 "Effective Communications 1' for

additional guidance.

G. Remind personnel using radios to check operability of their radio before entering any area (for example pump cells) for which * * .. , _ ..

communications might be suspect. .-

1.4 Maintain the Repair/Corrective Action Admin status board promptly. Update as tasks are assigned, old.

tasks are completed, and as priorities are changed. IF needed ask the OSC Log Keeper to assist in maintaining the status board.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 23 of 41 Attachment 9.7 OSC Log Keeper Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-611 Attachment 9.6.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

-=-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 24 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 1 of 14 This is a core staffing position 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 .Assume the position of OSC Rad Protection Technician A. Enter the OSC using one of the proximity Accountability Card Readers.

B. Sign in at the facility organization chart.

C. Report to and receive direction from the OSC

.Rad/Chem Coordinator or if not available the TSC Radiological Coordinator.

_D. Verify.Equipment is in calibration.

E. As directed by the OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator or the TSC Radiological Coordinator:

1.. Perform a habitability survey of the TSC/OSC and CCR's and set up radiological controls for the TSC/OSC as shown on sheet 14 of this Checklist.

NOTE:

AMS SHALL _be started during TSC/OSC activation

1. Initial AMS-4 Start Up:

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-230 Revision 15 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 25 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 2of14 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

OPEN filter-housing cover, remove any existing filter media AND install a new charcoal filter paper (#508 Carbon lmpreg). The "lined" side should face down.

CLOSE and latch the filter housing cover.

PLUG the AMS-4 in and turn on SW1 (power) and SW2 (pump) switches located in the back of the monitor.

NOTE:

IF beeping continues; THEN readjust.filter paper and restart.

AFTER the AMS-4 has gone through the initial self-test cycle (approximately 5 minutes), THEN VERIFY the "READY" light is on AND activity 'is displayed.

PRESS "2" on the keypad AND VERIFY that indicated flow rate is near the posted reference flow rate for charcoal filter. A low flow rate may indicate a flow blockage OR loaded filter paper.

PRESS "1" on keypad to display airborne concentration. Negative numbers indicate the current activity is less than the historical data.

2. Normal AMS-4 Operation:

NOTE:

This instrument is calibrated to monitor gas and p,articles.

CHECK periodically the AMS-4 flow rate by

pressing "2" on the keypad. IF desired, return to activity monitoring by pressing "1" on the keypad.

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

/

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 26 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC' Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 3of14 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

IF the flow rate approaches 28320 cm3/min OR the "MIN FLOW FAIL" alarm activities, THEN CHANGE the filter paper as per Section 3.

IF the AMS-4 "DAC HOUR ALARM DETECTED" alarm activates, THEN NOTIFY the Radiation Protection Coordinator. The alarm set point is 60 DAC hrs. Which is equivalent to 150 mRem.

IF the "FILTER DOOR, OPEN OUT OF

'SERVICE" alarm activates, THEN VERIFY that the filter housing is closed and latched., - * * *

IF the gamma background in the area ~.hanges substantially, THEN GO to Section 4to set the Gamma Factor.

WHEN finished monitoring with the AMS-4, THEN turn off SW1 (power), SW2 (pump).

3. Changing AMS-4 Filter Paper

TURN SW2 (pump) OFF

WHEN the audible alarm activates, THEN PRESS "ALARM ACK".

OPEN the filter housing cover AND WHEN the audible alarm activate, PRESS "ALARM ACK".

REMOVE any existing filter media AND install a new charcoal filter paper (#508 Carbon lmpreg).

The "lihed" side should face down.

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

.~Entergy. IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE lJSE Page 27 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 4of14 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

CLOSE and latch the filter housing cover.

TURN on SW2 (pump) switch.

WHEN the audible alarm activates, THEN PRESS "ALARM ACK"

PRESS "2" on the keypad AND verify that indicated flow rate is near the posted reference flow rate for charcoal filter. The low flow rate *-.*-,*

alarm set point is 28320 cm/3min. A low flow rate ..

may indicate a fl~w blocka~e OR loaded filter paper.

RETURN to Section 2 for normal operations.

4. Gamma Factor Set

VERIFY "READY" light is on. The AMS-4 front panel will NOT respond as expected if an alarm condition exists.

PRESS "MENU"

AT the prompt "password" TYPE in "0000" THEN press "ENTER".

PRESS "_" button until "Calibrate" appears in display.

PRESS "ENTER".

WHEN "Calibration Mode Halts Normal Operation" displays, THEN press "ENTER".

WAIT until both Beta AND BKG counts are greate than 400 counts THEN observe "Factor=

XX.XXX" (where XX.XXX is .a number) on display AND PRESS "ENTER".

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-230 Revision 15 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 28 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 5of14 Initial Responsibility/Activity_(cont.) NOTES

PRESS "ENTER" to accept and update Gamma Factor value.

PRESS "MENU" key twice.

"NOTE:

WHEN "READY" light appears AND airborne concentrations appears on top line of display THEN go to Section F.2 for normal operation. (IF the.flow rate appears, THEN press "1" to display activity).

G. Periodically check readings of AMS-:4 and ensure proper instrument operation.

1. IF there is a release, THEN monifor the AMS-4 to identify any increase in the radiological levels in t_he TSC/OSC.

2. Follow directions in Section F of this checklist to maintain AMS-4 operations.

H. Sample Count Using the MS-2/SPA-3:

NOTE: 11

'Perform Source Check prior to use

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

. 1

1. Enclose the cartridge (e.g. in plastic wrap).

2. Place the enclosed sample in the detector shield on the shelf closest to the detector.

3. Set the controls on the MS-2 as follows:

POWER switch "Or>J"

CPM RANGE switch - appropriate multiplier setting to register expected sample count rate.

COUNTING TIME IN MINUTES control - set to desired counting time (normally one minute)

Window IN/OUT switch- "IN"

TEST switch - "OFF"** * *

TIMED/STOP/MAN switch - "TIMED"

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 29 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 6of14 Initial Respon~ibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

WINDOW THRESHOLD AND HV ADJUST dials

- set to values posted on the instrument.

4. Momentarily depress the RESET-START button.

5. WHEN the sample has finished counting, THEN record the digital display value on appropriate RP survey form.

6. Calculate the sample activity using the appropriate correction factor using the following formula:

I

EFF - Efficiency (as given on the instrument or as directed by Radiological Assessment **

Coordinator or Radiation Protection Supervisor)

CFF - Charcoal Correction Factor (.95 or as directed by Radiological Assessment Coordinator or Radiation Protection Supervisor)

,1 (SampleCPM -BkgdCPM)x(JE-9).

U Cl1CC = ------------

2.2xEFFx Volume(L)xCCF Volume (L) = 28.32 .L...Volume (ft3) ft3

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 30 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 7 of 14 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

7. Remove the cartridge from the detector chamber and store or dispose of it properly, as appropriate.

8. Do a one minute background verification count to verify it has not changed and the counter is not contaminated. IF contaminated THEN take appropriate measures to decontaminate.

9. Insert new filter.

I. Sample Count Using the E-140N OR RM-14/HP-210:

1. Connect.the HP-210 detector, using the coaxial

//

cable. to the terminal on the instrument mark.~d "detector" or "probe".

2. IF using the RM-14 on AC, THEN do the following:

Connect it to a 120 VAC supply using the power cord which connects at the back of the instrument chassis_,

Place the rotary switch in the X10 position.

Operate the toggle "Test On" switch at the chassis rear AND check that the indication on the meter is APPROXIMATELY 3600 CPM (:t 10%). .

Turn the toggle switch off

Record data on appropriate HP survey form.

3. IF using the instrument on battery THEN check battery condition by placing the rotary switch in "Batt" position AND record data on appropriate HP survey form.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15

PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING

PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 31 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 8 of 14 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) .NOTES

Energize the instrument by turning the five position rotary ~witch from "OFF" to one of the

three counting ranges X1, X10, or X100.

Check the operability of the counter.

Place the detector in contact with the Ba-133 check source (located in the kit next to the meter). *

*Read source CPM above background AND record results on appropriate HP survey form.

\

Compare to count rate labeled on the source.

)

4. Place the detector on the sample holder (SH-4, -4a or equivalent) and check the background. *

Record the background CPM on DETERMINATION OF RADIOACTIVE

',* .. AIRBORNE CONCENTRATION (Form EP-16).

Use lead bricks as shielding to r~duce the background CPM to read on the X1 scale (if possible).

5. Place particulate filters to be counted, one at a time, face up in the counting chamber.

6. Read sample CPM and record results on DETERMINATION OF RADIOACTIVE AIRBORNE CONCENTRATION (Form EP-16)

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 32 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 9of14 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

7. Calculate the filter activity as follows:

,1 (SampleCPM -BkgdCPM)x(JE - 9) uC1 1cc=------------

2.2xEFFx Volume(L)

EFF-Efficiency =0.1

t G

NOTE:

Should sample holders be unavailable, the filters may be counted by placing the detectors within half inch of the filter.

8. To count the iodine filter cartridges .in the sample

. holders, modify the holders as follows:

. (a) IF using the SH-4, THEN do the following:

. Remove the sample holder slide.

Place the charcoal cartridge (lip up) or the silver zeolite cartridge (face up) in the cavity cr~ated by removing the sample holder slide.

Place the detector on the cartridge.

Determine the count rate.

(b) IF using the SH-4a, THEN pull out the slide:

Remove the insert.

Push the slide back in.

Place the charcoal cartridge (lip up) or the silver zeolite cartridge (face up) !n the cavity created by removing the sample holder slide.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES . REFERENCE USE Page 33 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 10of14 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

Place the detector on the cartridge.

Determine the count rate.

9. Calculate the cartridge activity as follows:

,1 (SampleCPM -BkgdCPM)x(JE -9)

U CltCC = ------------

2.2:xEFFx Volume(L)xCCF EFF- Efficiency = 0.0015 CCF- Charcoal Correction Factor= 0.95

\ '

J. Perform background and source checks approximately every hour OR as specified by the Rad/Chem Coordinator or TSC Radiological Coordinator

~ .. .. (frequency may be adjusted, either more or less often, in consideration of current radiological conditions).

.* \.* .. ., K. Using the readings from the AMS-4 Monitor and the noble gas-to-iodine ratio from Chemistry, determine the iodine activity.

1. IF iodine activity is determined to be greater than 1x10-7 micro curies/cubic centimeter by any of the above methods, THEN notify the OSC Rad/Chem or the TSC Radiological Coordinator.

L. Establish contamination controls for the TSC/OSC if necessary.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE PLAN

/

--* Entergy . IMPLEMENTING REFERENCE USE Page 34 of 41 PROCEDURES Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 11 of 14 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2.1 Establish and Maintain radiological controlls A As directed by the OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator or the TSC Radiological Coordinator, perform periodic radiological monitoring particularly when a release of radioactive material into plant environments is in progress or suspected.

B. Periodically verify habitability in the TSC or OSC and

Control Rooms. This should be done approximately onc-e every 60 minutes or when conditions have likely worsened or when directed to by the OSC Rad/Chem

. *Coordinator or the TSC Radiological Coordina.tor.

2.2 Inform the OSC Rad/Chem Coordinator or another coordinator when temporarily leaving the work area.

A IF you are leaving the TSC/OSC Complex .(the

'* * ** restroom is within complex) T.HEN:

1. Inform the Work Control Coordinator and/or OSC,

~

Log-Keeper (for accountability purposes)

.2. Inform the Work Control Coordinator and/or OSC Log-Keeper when you return.

B. Upon return, obtain a briefing from the OSC Rad/Chem or the TSC Radiological Coordinator on any events, which have occurred while away.

2.3 Escort as* directed, any team being sent into an area where any of the following conditions exist:

A Radiological conditions are unknown. Surveys ot ARMs may be used to predict radiological conditions.

B. Radiation fields in excess of 1 R/hr are expected.

C. In the event of any release of radioactivity to the environment.

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 35 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 12of14 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.4 Assist with the decontamination efforts of personnel, I

equipment, and onsite areas as appropriate.

3.0 Closeout Responsibility/Activity

'3.1 IF radiological conditions allow, THEN as directed by the Radiological Coordinator:

A. Return emergency equipment to proper storage areas

arid 'restock supplies as needed.

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE *page 36 of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 13 of 14 Information on use of Potassium Iodide IOSA T' Tablets Potassium Iodide Tablets

TAKE POTASSIUM IODIDE ONLY WHEN WARNING PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS TELL YOU. POTASSIUM IODIDE SHOULD NOT BE USED BY IN A RADIATION EMERGENCY PEOPLE ALLERGIC TO IODIDE. Keep out of the RADIOACTIVE IODINE COULD BE reach of children. In case of overdose or allergic RELEASED INTO THE AIR. POTASSIUM reaction, contact a physician or public health IODIDE (A FORM OF IODINE) CAN HELP authority.

PROTECT YOU.

IF YOU ARE TOLD TO TAKE THIS HOW POTASSIUM IODIDE WORKS MEDICINE, TAKE IT ONE TIME EVERY 24 Certain forms of iodine help your thyroid gland work HOURS. DO NOT TAKE IT MORE OFTEN. right. Most people get the iodine they need from MORE WILL NOT HELP YOU AND MAY foods like iodized salt or fish. The thyroid can "store" INCREASE THE RISK OF SIDE EFFECTS. or hold only a certain amount of iodine.

NOT TAKE THIS DRUG IF YOU KNOW In a radiation emergency radioactive iodine may be YOU ARE ALLERGIC TO IODIDE (SEE released in the air. If this air is breathed or 1---,--'-,-S_JD_E-'-_E_F_F_E_.c_T_&_B_E_L_O_W_)- - - - - - - - i swallowed it may enter the thyroid and damage it.

DIR.ECTIONS FOR USE The damage may not show itself for years. Children use only when directed by Emergency Management, are the most likely to have thyroid damage.

State, Local or Public Health Officials If you take potassium iodide, it will fill up you thyroid 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i gland. This reduced the chances that radioactive DOSE iodine will enter your thyroid.

ADULTS AND CHILDREN ONE YEAR OF AGE OR OLDER: WHO SHOULD NOT TAKE POTASSIUM IODIDE One ( 1) tablet once a day. Crush for small The only people who should not take tablets when children. directed to do so are people who know they are BABIES UNDE~ ONE YEAR OF AGE: allergic to iodine. Pregnant women, nursing women, children and babies may take this drug.

6ne-tialf (1(2) tablet'once a day. Crush first.

HOW AND WHEN

DOSAGE .. Potassium Iodide should be taken as soon as Take for 10 days unle.ss.directed otherwise. possible after authorities tell you to take it.

Store your supply at room temperature between 59° You should take one dose every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

F and 86° F. Keep package dry and foil packets MORE WILL NOT HELP YOU, AND WILL intact. * -

INCREASE THE CHANCES OF SIDE EFFECTS.

KEEP YOUR SUPPLY OUT OF REACH OF Continue to take the drug for 10 days.

CHILDREN.

WHAT TO DO IF SIDE EFFECT OCCUR SIDE EFFECTS STOP taking the drugs and contact a doctor or public Usually, side effects of potassium iodide happen health officials for instructions.

when people take higher doses for a long time. You should be careful not to take more than the recommended dose or take it for longer than you are told. Side effects are unlikely because of the low DESCRIPTION AND USE dose and the short time you will be taking the drug.

Each IOSATTM Tablet contains 130 mg. of Possible side effects include skin rashes, swelling of potassium iodide.

the salivary glands, and "iodism" (metallic taste, Thyroid blocking in radiation emergency only.

burning mouth and throat, sore teeth and gums, symptoms of a head cold, and sometimes stomach upset and diarrhea).

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE PLAN

--Entergy. IMPLEMENTING Page 37 PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE of 41 Attachment 9.8 OSC Rad Protection Technician Checklist Sheet 14 of 14 A c

~

_,.,... B D

A E

N osc R.

c TSC A / Computer Room A

TSC/OSC Access Points to be posted:

If Hallway Contamination < 1000 dpm/ 100 sq. cm If Hallway Contamination > 1000 dpm/ 100 sq. cm A. Entry/Exit A. No Entry. Exit Only B. No Entry/No Exit B. Entry to TSC/OSC. No Exit. White Step Off Pad and Frisk Shoes before stepping here C. No Entry/No Exit C. No Entry/No Exit D. Equipment cabinets. Place sigri at "top .of stairway D. Equipment cabinets. Place sign at top of stairway.

No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD Coordinator. No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD E. Air Monitoring Equipment Coordinator E. Air Monitoring Equipment

\

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED ~

IP-EP-230 Revision 15 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE

~Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 38 of 41 Attachment 9.9 Assembly Area Coordinator (AAC) Instructions Sheet 1 of 1

1. Review any special instructions with OSC Manager and ensure you have a full understanding of priorities

2. Take a key for the AAC Room. The key for AAC Room is the same as for the TSC/OSC/EOF.

Record OSC Manager Contact Number:

3. Assume the duties of the Energy Education Center (EEC) or Generation Support Building (GSB) Assembly .

Area Coordinator. (or Indian Point Training Center (IPTC) Assembly Area Coordinator if needed).

A. Report to the GSB or EEC (or IPTC if needed)

B. Establish telephone communications with the OSC Manager,

i. Call the OSC Manager to inform them you are in place, provide them with phone number at your location.

c. Draft an individual to remain ~t phone and communicate messages to you as necessary.

D. In the GSB/EEC, .~et up, or c!irect al)sistance to set up, the ~A System, stored in the AAC Room.

In the IPTC, ensure that the i.ns~~ll!3d PA System is working .

4. Draft at least3 Management per~onnel to assist in controlling personnel located at the Assembly Area.

Have them direct-assembled personnel to form groups by disciplines e.g. Mechanical, Electrical, l&C, Engineering and stand by for further infmmation and instructions.

5. Do not allow personnel to leave the Assembly Area until you have verified with the OSC Manager that there has been no release of Radioactive Materials and additional personnel are not needed for event response.

6. Periodically (-every 30 min) contact the OSC . Manager for brief overvtew of events and plant

~ -

conditions.

7. 'Periodically (-every 30 min') brief pe.rsorinel in th~ Assembly Area on events and plant conditions.

8. Locate and dispatch additional personnel fo respond inside the Protected Area or to the EOF as needed.

9. When directed by the OSC Manager either:

A. *Dismiss Individuals from the Site B. Release individuals back to work

c. Direct individuals to a designated location (on or offsite)

10. IF directed by Radiological Assessment Coordinator, distribute Kl to personnel in the assembly areas.

Brief personnel on Kl usage sheet 13 of Attachment 9.8 of IP-EP-230.

11. When all personnel have departed from the Assembly Area A. Return Portable PA System to its storage location.

B. Document any problems with equipment, personnel or procedures observed during event.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDl"RE

.-====-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 39 of 41 Attachment 9.10 TSC/OSC Floor Plan Sheet 1of1 TYPICAL SEATING LAYOUT (May be rearranged without a procedure revision.}

OSC RP/Chem Work Control TSC Security Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator R

c A

osc

Operations . i&C/Elec. Mechanical s

T Log Keeper Support : Coordinator Coordinator A

~~

N G

A R

E A Cabinet Communicator Engineer Engineer Elec/l&C Mechanical B

Engineer Manager 0 0

D SAMG Rx Engineer EPM OPS Coordinator k

s Engineer's tables IT PIGS PIGS U3 PIGS Spec Print U2 U2 RAD Coordinator

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE

)

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 40 of 41 Attachment 9.11 IPEC OSC Guidelines Sheet 1 of 1 General Guidelines BE CAREFUL

1. Always ensure you use one of the proximity Accountability Card. Reader or sign in on an Accountability Roster when you arrive at the Operations Support Center.

2. Maintain a quiet professional manner throughout the event.

3. Pay attention to the facility briefings and maintain awareness of conditions and events.

4. DO NOT leave the TSC/OSC Complex without checking out with the Work Control Coordinator or Security Coordinator.

NOTE: The restrooms at the top of the stairs are still within the TSC/OSC Complex, but you should inform a Co-Worker when going there.

Team Dispatch WORK SAFE

1. When selected to perform a task in the field, receive job briefing from .an. OSC Coordiflator (Operations Support, Maintenance, l&C/Electric or Rad/Chem) for your assigned t!:!sk. IF the.job involves possible radiological*

exposures THEN the Rad/Chem Coordinatqr or an RP,Superviso*r Will 'Provide you with a radiological briefing.

These briefs should be conducted in one .of the briefing rooms.

The Lead Coordinator will give you the Team Briefing Form when ypu ~re being dispatched after: completion of briefing.

2. ALWAYS check out with the Work Control Coordinator p'riGr to leaving TSC/OSC Complex to *perform a task -

Always take a radio and test it before going out into the fi-eld unles~*dir.ected otherwise by the Work Control Coordin~tor.

Gi~e the Work Control Coordinator a copy of the Teani Br!efing Form w~~.~- yo~- are checking out.

3. Maintain communications with the Work Control Coordinator while i'r:i the field. Report any unexpected conditions or events immediately. . . *

4. ALWAYS check in with the Work Control Coordinator aild report any exposure you received IMMEDIATELY upon a

your return to the TSC/OSC Complex after performing task. .

REPORT any safety concerns which may be important for future work or to teams currently in the field The Work Control Coordinator will return the Team Briefing Form to you after you have checked in with him/her.

5. Report to the Lead Briefer (Operations Support, Mechanical, l&C/Electrical or Rad/Chem Coordinators) for a de-briefing after you have completed checking in with the Work Control Coordinator. Report:

Status of the assigned task Any deviations taken from normal work practices or quality control processes Any follow-up task(s) you feel are needed to ensure assignment goal is completed

6. After the team de-briefing return to the pool area and await further assignment. Brief other Technicians in the pool on tasks you performed and conditions in the field.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY IP-EP-230 Revision 15 PROCEDURE PLAN

) IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 41 of 41 Attachment 9.12 IPEC OSC ERO STAFFING Sheet 1 of 1 At IPEC, the expectation is that ALL individuals assign~d to the Operations Support Center (OSC) report to the facility within 60 minutes of the declaration of an Event.

The OSG is able to be considered STAFFED when the following Core Individuals are present: OSC Manager, Work Control Coordinator, three Radiation Protection Technicians, a mechanical maintenance, *~n electrical maintenance, and an l&C technician. Regardless of whoever elseJs available, these positions MUST b~ filled pef9re the;O.SG;can be considered to be STAFFED. .. .

The IPEC Emergency Plan in Section B_ (Table _B-1) req~ires the following to respond within 60 minutes: 8 Rad Protedion techniciarts; :2* Mechanical Maintenance, 2.Electrical Maintenance, an'1&c technidan, *and a Che~istry technician.

The OSC may be declared OPERATIONAL whenever C~re Individuals are achieved and the OSC Manager determines *that' the faellity_ is_ adequately staffed for the event and equipment is set up and available to perform the emergency functions assigned to the OSC. * *

....Entergy.,

W".!;:_'C IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN NON*QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-220 Revision 19 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Page 29 REFERENCE Use 1 of Technical Support Center Prepared by; *- .

'~ : .

Re~ecca A IVla.rtin PrintName * *S!griature Approval:

. , *....

__Lo_riP~-.~t~-::-~d_er_µ~J~ f 2H k Effective Date: June 14; 2016 IP-EP-220 (Technical Support Center) R19.dac

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19

) Er1lergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ Of 29 Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE ..................................................................* :......................................'"********* 3

2.0 REFERENCES

............................................................................................................. 3 3 . 0 DEFINITIONS ........................'" ....... :.............................................................................. 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITl_ES ................................................................... "'., ......................*...... 3 4.1 Emergency Plant Manager................: .....................................*........... 3.

4.2 TSC Manager ..................................... *****.* ...................................... 3 5.0 DETAILS .................................. : .*.....................................'.....*................................. 4 6.0. INTERFACES********:********************************: .. :......................~:~~-:::*:: .:******,.. **:***::**.:*.*.'.********* 5

. *.** * . -* ..... _ **- ....... J*,: ~-

7 .0 .RE CO ROS*: .. :: ...................... :...... *............. :::'.*:-: ........... ***.***** ........... ::::.*::-..*... :.~-., ..'.'....... : .....s-** .

8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT ................................................................. ,... 5 9.0. ATTACHMENTS .*. *.. :.,.~ .... :................. :*. ,.; .............................:.... *.::........ *...~: .. :............ ,.... 5

9.1 EmergencyPlant Manager ChecklisL. ... '. ................................ ~ ......................... 5

- 9.2 *TSC Manager Checklist ................................................................................... 11

. . *:~* .: *.. . *. . .

... :* *: : .**9.3 operations Coordinator Checklist ........................ :..........._............ ~ ................. : 13

- '. 9~4 .*Re~~to.r f:ngineer Checklist ....................... :.. ;... ~ ..............*.... ,.......... ~ .. :............ 14 9.5 Engineering Coordinator Checklist ............................. :...... ,..... :...................... 15 .

9.6 Mechanical an*d El.ectrical/l&C Engineer Checklist ............................ ,............ 16 9.7 IT Specialist Checklist.. ............................... :**************************:******************** ... 17 9.8 TSC Communicator Checklist ............................................................. 18 9.9 Radiological Coordinator Checklist .................. ,.................... : ............... 19 9.1.0 TSC Security Coordinator Checklist ........................................... : ........ 24 9.11 TSC/OSC Layout .. . ... ... .. . .. ... .. . .. . ... ... .. . .......................................... 27 9.12 TSC/OSC Public Address System Description and Operation ................. 28 9.13 IPEC TSC ERO Staffing ....................................................................29

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP*EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ Of 29 TECHNICAL SUPPORT CENTER (TSC) 1.0 PURPOSE To describe site specific actions for the activation and operation of the Technical Support Center (TSC). This procedure will be used in conjunction with the fleet procedure, EN-EP-610, Technical Support Center (TSC) Operations.

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 Indian Point Energy Center Emergency Plan 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 See EN-EP-610 Section 3.0 for definitions.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 See EN-EP-61 O for.Re~p<;:msibilities.

5.0 DETAILS 5.10 . See EN-EP-610 for Details.

6.0 INTERFACES 6.1 IP-EP-:-115 *. E.m~rgency_Plan Forms 6.2 IP-EP-210, Central_ Control Room 6.3 IP--!=F>-230,_op~rations Support Center 6.4 IP~EP-430,

' . ~

Site A~*sembly, Acco*untat5ility and Relocation . of Personnel Offsite 6.5

IP-EP-51 O,,Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System 6.6 IP-EP-610, Emergency Termination and Recovery 6.7 IP-EP..:420, Use of Potassium Iodide by Indian Point Personnel during an Emergency

.6.8 O-FSG-100, BDBEE/ELAP Emergency Response

) 6.9 EN-EP.,.610, Technical Support Center (TSC) Operations 7.0 RECORDS.

All forms and logs completed by the Emergency Response Organization during a declared emergency are Quality Records and shall be maintained for the life of the plant plus twenty (20) years.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Enlergyrri EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ Of 29 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE None 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 Emergency Plant Manager Checklist.

9.2 TSC Manager Checklist 9.3 Operations Coordinator Checklist 9.4 Reactor ;ngineer Checklist 9.5 Engineering Coordinator Checklist 9.6 Mechanical and Electrical I l&C Engineer Checklist 9.7 IT Specialist Checklist 9.8 TSC Communicator Checklist 9.9 Radiological Coordinator Checklist 9.10 TSC Security Coordinator Checklist 9.11 TSC/OSC Lay~ut . , . .*: . ;

9.12 TSC/OSC Pu~lic Address ,!:;ystem Description and Operation 9.13 IPEC TSC ERO' Staffing.. * . . . .

. ~-'

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page .§ of 29 Attachment 9.1 Emergency Plant Manager Checklist Sheet 1 of 6 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES NOTE:

Procedure refers to an event at Unit 2, Unit 3 or both (i.e.,

Security, Natural event). If determined to be a Site event, then Unit 2 will be the lead plant for all communications, This is a Core Staffing position.

1.1 Follow responsibilities/activities in_ EN-EP-61 O Attachment 9.1 and the follovving:

1.2 IF a Beyond Des.ign Bas-is External Event (BDBEE) occurs that results in an Extended Loss of AC Power (ELAP) to either unit, THEN entry into, O-FSG-100, BDBEE/ELAP Emergency Response, is required.

1.3 Assume the position'"of Emergen<;y Plant Manager (EPM).

A. Announce yourself as the EPM and provide initial briefing to the TSC/OSC staff: Ensure briefing covers the following item$:. * * * **

1. Introduction of Self and FaciHty"Managers.

2. Establish clear expectations.for-.

a. Use of Three-Part Communications by ERO members.

b. Use of phones during facility briefs,

c. Limit excess chatter during emergency,

d. Review and follow your procedures,

3. Remind personnel to validate information,

4. When ready, announce to tlie TSC/OSC that the TSC/OSC is operational.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19

-!3nlergy 0 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING

.PROCEDURES

., REFERENCE USE Page § Of 29 Attachment 9.1 Emergency Plant Manager Checklist Sheet 2 of 6 2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity NOTES CAUTION IF an emergency classification is entered due to a security condition, THEN evacuation and accountability may put personnel at risk. Therefore, in these situations, evacuation and accountability will be suspended until directed by Security and cleared through the Incident Commander.

NOTE:

After initial accountability has been completed, facility managers are responsible for accountability of individuals assigned to_ their respective organizations. -- -

2.1 At a Site Area Emergency or highe.r cl~ssificati~n, or if .

the decision has been made to do so, INITIATE accountability. _ * -*,

A. Direct the TSC Security Coordinator/Lead

Accountability Officer (LAO) to perform accountability ..

Initial accountability shall be cqmpleted. within approximately 30 minutes from the declaration ofthe event. . .. . . * * --_~-....

B. IF anyone is unaccount~d for THEN q!rect the TSG .,

Security Coordinator a_nd the OSC Mar)ager to commence search and rescue operations.

C. Direct TSC Manager, OSC Manager, POM and TSC Security Coordinator to maintain onsite accountability throughout the event.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page z Of 29 Attachment 9.1 Emergency Plant Manager Checklist Sheet 3 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.2 When applicable, direct implementation of Severe Accident Management Guidelines.

A When the Control Room transitions from the EOPs to SACRG-1, or only declares an EAL for SFP conditions, ENSURE the TSC Reactor Engineer is ready to take over Severe Accident Management control, as SAMG evaluator.

B. Once the SAMG Evaluat6r(s) is ready to take over Severe Accident Management control ANNOUNCE yourself as the Severe Accident Management Decision Maker:* . *.

C. CONFER with the SAMG* Evaluato"rs *which SAM '

guidance should be implemented.* ...

D. NOTIFY the Emergency-Director (ED) which guidanpe will be implemented. IF the_ guidance involves . '

a;-.

-1' release t6the environment, ENSURE the ED disc1.:.isses..

this with the Radiologicaf.Asse$smerit Coordinafor*and

the State/Counties prior to implemeotation .. * -:, .

2.3 Authorize Emergency Exposures I ki: issuanc~ *

A -Inform the TSC/OSC Manager*ari.d Radiologiqal *:. .

Coordinator that you authorize erriergerrcfex~os1;.rres up to 1 Rem TEDE for all TSC/OSC and Operations personnel dispatched into the plant. Doc1.1ment this authorization in WebEOC, OR on your ERO Log Sheet (Form EP-10) if WebEOC is unavailable.

B. IF emergency measures require additional exposure THEN raise the emergency exposure limit 1 Rem at a time up to 5 Rem.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Enlergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page .§ of 29 Attachment 9.1 Emergency Plant Manager Checklist Sheet 4 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES C. Review and authorize, when requested by OSC Staff, emergency exposures beyond 5 Rem on an individual

1 basis using Emergency Exposure Authorization (Form EP-6) guidelines.

D. When requested by Radiological Coordinator, authorize issuance of Potassium Iodine (Kl). (Kl is normally issued at 5 Rem COE projected child thyroid dose or declaration of a General Emergency.)

2.4 Circumstances inciuding,..but;notli.mif~d/to.a p9wer. ->

outage, toxic *935- coridltion, or'in-creas'e'd 'radiation.. .. ..

levels may necessitate the need to evacuate the TSC/OSC ~<;>mplex. IF it becomes necessary to.

evacuate the. tsc1osc complex for any reason, the following guidance shall be fqllowed. . . _ . ... __ ,,_ .

A Work with the Radiological Coordinator, TSC/OSC . .. >

Managers and TSC Security Coordinator to determine a suitable alternate location(s) for TSC an.d OSC*st~ffs':

In selecting an alternate location, keep 'theJollowjngjn *.

mind: -.* * -- * --:*7.~o'ic ...

1. In the event of increased radiation levels or a: foxic * **

gas condition, consider relocating individuals to thEL CR or Outage Control Center. Another possible alternative location for consideration is the EOF.

Although desirable to keep the entire staff together; it may be necessary to utilize more than one facility.

2. In the event of a power outage, there may be additional locations that could be used for

relocation. Such possible locations include an IPEC Conference Hoom within the Protected Area, the Outage Control Center, the Indian Point Training Center or even the Generation Support Building.

3. In selecting the facility to which you are relocating to, ensure that you consider the ability for the TSC/OSC staffs to function in the new facility.

. IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergyf!; EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ Of 29 Attachment 9.1 Emergency Plant Manager Checklist Sheet 5 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES Some items for consideration include:

Is the required Plant information able to be readily obtained?

Are the necessary computer resources available?

- Will adequate communications be obtainable with all of the necessary parties?

B. PRIOR to evacuating the TSC/OSC complex, address

(

the following:

1. Ensure. that evacuating personnel take their position

~* *~ ... --

books* with-them* to the' new location. *. - * *~ '.:;

2. Ensure that all needed data is.gathered and transported during the relocation of personnel.

Examples include information on the electronic '

displ~ys, other ~harted information, cpmpleted;iogs

.*and the like. *

. ~

3. Inform the ED and the POM of your reloca.tion* *'

plans. Advise them that you will notify them of . .,;

when you have relocated and are a fuilctioniAg

.*:_ . ~.:.~.;-_: *-

facility. If relocation will be at two or more sites,-*, -...:..*.~.

direct an individual at each of those sites to advise**

you when their relocation is complete.

4. Determine the speed at which the relocation of personnel should occur giving consideration to the following items:

a. Consider the impact of immediate relocation vs.

mitigation activities in progress.

b. Current radiological or hazardous conditions within the TSC/OSC.

c. Radiological or hazardous conditions at the proposed TSC/OSC.

d. Radiological or hazardous conditio_ns en route.

e. The adequacy of response from the alternate location.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy@ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 10 Of 29 Attachment 9.1 Emergency Plant Manager Checklist Sheet 6 of 6 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

f. Determine proper path to take to new locations.

g. Direct personnel to relocate.

h. Notify Security to instruct incoming personnel to report to the designated alternate TSC/OSC location( s ).

5. After arriving at the new TSC/OSC location(s), re-establish this new location as the TSC/OSC.

6. Set up the appropriate equipment such as*electronic displays, plant-datadisplays*and telephones. . , ***

I

7. Notify the Eb and POM when established and ready .

to commence functioning as the TSC/OSC.

I.

8. Obtain arl"updated briefing on the.current status of the .emergency,. plant conditions and any actions

that are in progress or that may have been completed. ** -

9. Continue functioning as the EPM.

C. Direct personnel to relocate TSC/OSC personnel.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy 0 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 11 of 29 Attachment 9.2 TSC Manager Checklist Sheet 1 of 2 This is a core staffing position 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Follow responsibilities/activities in EN-EP-610 Attachment 9.2

and the following:

1.2 Activation of the TSC and assume the position of TSC Manager.

A. Synchronize your time with the TSC/OSC clock. Verify with the.

EOF and/or CR that the time displayed in the TSC/OSC is the same as it is there.

B. Verify you have the following core staffing prior to declaring the TSC staffed:**

a. EPM

b. TSC Manager

.C. TSC Communicator

\

\ j d. Mechanical Engineer

' e. Electrical/l&C Engineer

f. Reactor Engineer

g. Rad Coordinator C. Staff the TSC using Form EP-10-ALL, "Filling an ERO Vacancy During Facility Activation/Operation" D. IF additional personnel are required *THEN:

a. IF it is during normal working hours THEN call or assign * ***"'

someone to call the Assembly Areas for needed personnel. .

b. IF needed individuals are not available onsite THEN assign someone to call individuals at home using the Emergency Telephone Directory (ETD).

E. Emergency Response Data System (EROS)

a. If requested to verify EROS is active. Refer to procedure EN-EP-311, Emergency Response Data System (EROS)

Activation via the Virtual Private Network (VPN).

b. IF EROS is not functional, designate a person with Operations experience to go to the Control Room to complete Forms 31 A, B, C OR 42 A, B, C. (Forms EP-53, 54, 55 and EP-57, 58, 59).

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Enlergy0 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 12 Of 29 Attachment 9.2 TSC Manager Checklist Sheet 2 of 2 Initial Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES

c. Once the A, B, C Forms are completed, they are to be faxed to the NRC within 60 minutes.

d. PIGS should be started to display plant data for the affected unit IF both Units are affected utilize multiple computers to display both plants' data.

2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity 2, 1 Manage the activities of the TSC Staff:

A. Provide a central organization and facility for the accumulation and transmittal of plant information to the EOF and NRG.

8. When applicable, direct the appropriate individuals to implement and perform monitoring and evaluations as directed in the Indian_

Point Severe Accident Management (SAMG) Guidelines.

C. IF requested by the NRG to provide an open communications line for plant data, THEN direct an individual having sufficient technical knowledg13 to staff the ENS phone. This person may locate in any facility with E~S phone access. If necessary, request the Security Coordinator to obtain additional personal to support this* activity.

D. Verify th.at the .Engineering Action Tracking (,A.dmin) Display is :* ..

updated promptly as new tasks are assigned and old tasks completed and as priorities are changed.

E. Anticipate TSC support requirements from ERO.

F. Direct TSC staff to obtain drawings and information as needed to solve plant problems.

2.2 Monitor containment integrity status throughout the event:

A. Initiate a review to determine if any non-automatic containment isolation valves should be closed. (Reference 2-ES-1.4; 3-ES-1.3; 3-SOP-C8-011)

8. Repeat the above review approximately every 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months for first 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months of event and thereafter at the discretion of the EPM.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Eizlergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 13 of 29 Attachment 9.3 Operations Coordinator Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-610, Attachment 9.3

~* .. *- '* .. . .

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy@ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 14 Of 29 Attachment 9.4 Reactor Engineer Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 This is a core staffing position.

1.0 Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Follow responsibilities/activities in EN-EP-610 Attachment 9.4 and the following:

1.2 Monitor plant conditions for any indications of core damage.

A. Perform and update core damage assessment based on current information using guidance provided in procedure IP-EP-360, Core Damage Assessment.

B. Notify TSC* Manager and/or Engineering Coordinator immediately of any changes in core status.

C. Keep the Radiological Coordinator informed on core status to

. assist in maintaining radiological controls for plant personnel.

D. Through the TSC Manager and/or the Radiological Coordinator, ensure that the EOF Radiological Assessment Coordinator is kept informed of the latest estimate of the amount of core damage.

E. Maintain the Fission Product Barrier Status Board as needed.

1.3 Assist the EPM in implementation of Severe Accident Management Guidelines.

A. When the Control Room transitions from the EOPs to SACRG-1, or only declares an EAL for SFP conditions inform the EPM when you are ready to take over Severe Accident Management (SAM) control.

B. INFORM EPM which SAM guidance should be implemented.

~- IF guidance involves a release to the environment ENSURE the EPM and Emergency Director discuss it with the Radiological Assessment Coordinator who discusses it with the State/Counties prior to implementation.

1.4 Receive status updates from the TSC Manager and/or EPM and if directed post updates on the appropria.te electronic displays.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 E'nlergy0 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 15 Of 29 Attachment 9.5 Engineering Coordinator Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-610, Attachment 9.5.

2.0 If requested to provide information to the NRC Operations Center follow responsibilities in EN-EP-610, Attachment 9.12.

IPEC NON-QUALllY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN

PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 16 Of 29 Attachment 9.6 Mechanical and Electrical / l&C Engineer Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-61 O Attachment 9.6.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 E'nlergy0 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 17 of 29 I

Attachment 9. 7 IT *specialist Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 FQllow responsibilities/activities in EN-.EP-610 Attachment 9.7 and the following:

1.2 Assume the position of IT Specialist NOTE EROS is not functional in the Simulator for a Drill 1 . A.* Emergency Response Data System (EROS)

1. If requested to verify EROS is activated, refer to procedure EN-EP-311, Emergency Response Data System (EROS) Activation via the Virtual Private Network (VPN). * *

2. IF EROS is not functional, notify the TSC Manager

.to designate an operations experienced person to

go to the Control Room to complete Forms 31 A, 8, C OR 42 A, 'B, C. (Forms EP-53, 54, 55 and EP-57,

.. _t 58, 59). Once the A, 8, C Forms are completed, they are to be faxed to the NRC within 60 minutes.

.... *. . 3. Inform TSC Communicator of the time EROS was verified of activation OR activated and to log in WebEOC.

8. Ensure computer displays in the TSC and OSC continue to operate properly.

1. IF the PICS displays are NOT functioning THEN perform the following:

(a) IF Unit 2 obtain 42A, 428 and 42C data from the CCR (IP-EP-115 EP Forms 53, 54, and 55)

(b) IF Unit 3 obtain 31A, 318 and 31C data from the CCR (IP-EP-115 EP Forms 57, 58 and 59).

)

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 EnletgY<¥; EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 18 Of 29 Attachment 9.8 TSC Communicator Checklist Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 Follow Responsibilities/Activities in EN-EP-610, Attachment 9.8.

2.0 Verify that at least one of the Public Ad.dress Systems (Red or Green) in the TSC/OSC is turned on and ready for use. Refer to Attachment 9.12 of this procedure for a description and operation.

"c,

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 E'nlergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE I

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 19 of 29 Attachment 9.9 Radiological Coordinator Checklist Sheet 1 of 5 This is a Core Staffing Position.

1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Follow responsibilities/activities in EN-EP-610 Attachment 9.9 and the following:

1.2 Assume the position of Radiological Coordinator.

A.

Request the Control Room to align the OSC/TSC ventilation system for incident operation per procedure, if required.

B. Establish th.e capability for monitoring of Iodine, should it become necessary. Have a Rad Protection Tech set up the AMS-4 as per Attachment 9.13 of procedure IP-EP-230.

2.(> .:.continuous Responsibility/Activity J.

2.1 Establish Radiological Control oversight.

A. Verify that the radiological controls for the TSC/OSC have been set up per sheet 3 of this checklist. I

2.2 IF ~here are contaminated injured personnel THEN perform

- - the following:

. ;.*. - : A. Prpvide radiological support for the assessment, treatment,

. * .* *and transportation of contaminated injured personnel. Act as

..:. -* the point of contact with the hospital where treatment is executed.

B. M.ake arrangements to pick up Rad Protection personnel at the hospital.

C. Follow proper procedures to retrieve radioactive waste from offsite treatment locations.

D. Obtain concurrence from the EPM prior to releasing the hospital's Radiological Emergency Room or the ambulance for uncontrolled use.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 E'nlergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 20 Of 29 Attachment 9.9 Radiological Coordinator Checklist Sheet 2 of 5 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES 2.3 Provide oversight to ensure emergency teams -

receive proper briefs on radiological conditions and requirements.

2.4 IF individuals receive or are expected to receive radioiodine uptakes > 5 REM COE child thyroid dose or a General Emergency has been declared THEN:

A. lss_ue Kl to onsite emergency workers applying the

following controls:

.....-.. 1. Brief personnel in the protected area on the

. use of Kl and its potential side effects using sheet 5 of this Attachment 9.9.

2. Assure that persons in the TSC/OSC, both CC R's and Security personnel within the protected area are briefed ..

3_. For R&CA team personnel record Kl issuance information on Individual Exposure Tracking

Log (Form EP-29).

4. Have all TSC/OSC personnel and security

~* .,;;.:._ ' * ** personnel within the protected area report to the TSC/OSC for distribution of Kl.

2.5 Verify that the decontamination efforts of personnel, equipment, and onsite areas are appropriate.

2.6 Participate in Facility Briefings to announce radiological conditions at the TSC/OSC and also affected locations with an emphasis on status of a radiological release.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 hllleriJy@ EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 21 Of 29 Attachment 9.9 Radiological Coordinator Checklist Sheet 3 of 5 A

~---- ,,

E N 1*

osc R 1-c j I

.... *.... ~~* .. ----***-1 E I TSC

. p. I*' I.

Mi

~*-

A* Com'puter Room L,...* ..,....;....;.__~-----------*-----------------------

A TSC/OSC Access Points to be posted:

If Hallway Contamination < 1000 dpm/ 100 sq. cm If Hallway Contamination > 1000 dpm/ 100 sq. cm A. Entry/Exit A. No Entry. Exit Only B. No Entry/No Exit B. Entry to TSC/OSC. No Exit. White Step Off Pad C. No Entry/No Exit and Frisk Shoes before stepping here C. No Entry/No Exit D. Equipment cabinets. Place sign at top of stairway D. Equipment cabinets. Place sign at top of stairway.

No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD Coordinator. No Entry/No Exit without permission from RAD E. Air Monitoring Equipment Coordinator E. Air Monitoring Equipment

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE ..

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 22 Of 29 Attachment 9.9 Radiological Coordinator Checklist Sheet 4 of 5 Information on use of Potassium Iodide IOSA T' Tablets Potassium Iodide Tablets

TAKE POTASSIUM IODIDE ONLY WHEN WARNING PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIALS TELL YOU. POTASSIUM IODIDE SHOULD NOT BE USED BY IN A RADIATION EMERGENCY PEOPLE ALLERGIC TO IODIDE. Keep out of the RADIOACTIVE IODINE COULD BE reach of children. In case of overdose or allergic RELEASED INTO THE AIR. POTASSIUM reaction, contact a physician or public health IODIDE (A FORM OF IODINE) CAN HELP authority.

PROTECT YOU.

IF YOU ARE TOLD TO TAKE THIS HOW POTASSIUM IODIDE WORKS MEDICINE, TAKE IT ONE TIME EVERY 24 Certain forms of iodine help your thyroid gland work HOURS. DO NOT TAKE IT MORE OFTEN. right. Most people get the iodine they need from MORE WILL NOT HELP YOU AND MAY foods like iodized salt or fish. The thyroid can "store" INCREASE THE RISK OF SIDE EFFECTS. or hold only a certain amount of iodine.

NOT TAKE THIS DRUG IF YOU KNOW YOU ARE A. LLERGIC TO.JO. DIDE .(SEE In a radiation emergency radioactive iodine may be released in the air. If this air is breathed or l---'--'--s_1D_E_E_F_F_6C~T_S_B_E_L_O_W~)_"_*_*- - - - - - - - 1 swallowed it may enter the thyroid and damage it.

DIRECTIONS Fa°R USE The damage may not show itself for years. Children Use only when directed by Emergency Management, are the most likely to have thyroid damage.

State, Local or Public f-jealth Officials . If you take potassium iodide, it will fill up you thyroid l - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 gland. This reduced the chances that radioactive DOSE iodine will enter your thyroid.

ADULTS AND CHILDREN ONE YEAR OF AGE OR

.OLDER: WHO SHOULD NOT TAKE POTASSIUM IODIDE One (1) tablet once a day. Crush for small The only people who should not take tablets when children. directed to do so are people who know they are BABIES UNDER . ONE

. YEAR OF . AGE:

. allergic to iodine. Pregnant women, nursing women, children and babies may take this drug .

.One-half (1/2) tablet once a day. Grush first.

HOW AND WHEN

,** DOSA~E . - <_ -:* Potassium Iodide should be taken as soon as Take for 1O days unless directed otherwise. possible after authorities tell you to take it.

Store your supply at room temperature be~een 59° You should take one dose every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

F and 86° F. Keep package dry and foil packets MORE WILL NOT HELP YOU, AND WILL intact. INCREASE THE CHANCES OF SIDE EFFECTS.

KEEP YOUR SUPPLY OUT OF REACH OF Continue to take the drug for 1Odays.

CHILDREN.

WHAT TO DO IF SIDE EFFECT OCCUR SIDE EFFECTS STOP taking the drugs and contact a doctor or public Usually, side effects of potassium iodide happen health officials for instructions.

when people take higher doses for a long time. You should be careful not to take more than the recommended dose or take it for longer than you are told. Side effects are unlikely because of the low DESCRIPTION AND USE dose and the short !ime you will be taking the drug.

Each IOSATTM Tablet contains 130 mg. of Possible side effects include skin rashes, swelling of potassium iodide.

the salivary glands, and "iodism" (metallic taste, Thyroid blocking in radiation emergency only.

burning mouth and throat, sore teeth and gums, symptoms of a head cold, and sometimes stomach upset and diarrhea).

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 E'nlergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 23 of 29 Attachment 9.9 Radiological Coordinator Checklist Sheet 5 of 5 BRIEFING INFORMATION ON USE OF POTASSIUM IODIDE (Kl)

Why is Potassium Iodide being issued? In accordance with the New York State Policy on Potassium Iodide, potassium iodide is recommended on a projected thyroid dose of 5 Rem. Potassium Iodide is issued at a declared General Emergency or during an emergency related radioactive airborne release. Taking Potassium Iodide is voluntary.

What is Potassium Iodide? Potassium iodide is a thyroid blocking protective action for exposure to,_radioactive iodine. If you take potassium iodide it will saturate your thyroid.gland which*-will* reduce the chances th9t radioactive iodine_ will enter your thyroid. Additional information. is available on the informatiori handout with each . - ... .

~

tablet. . .

What dosage to take? A 130 rnilligrarn tablet. You should take as soon as possible after being told . One* (1) tablet every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . Take for 10

days. Unless otherwise direc~~d:~ * *

Side Effects? Skin rash, sweliing *of salivary glands, a metallic taste, burning mouth and throat, sore teeth and gums, symptoms of a head cold and sometimes upset stomach or diarrhea. This would usually happen when higher doses are taken over long period of time.

WARNING!

Potassium Iodide should not be taken by people allergic to iodine or shell fish.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE

~Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 24 of 29 Attachment 9.10 TSC Security Coordinator Checklist Sheet 1of3 1.0 Initial Responsibility/Activity NOTES 1.1 Follow responsibilities/activities in EN-EP-610 Attachment 9.10 and the following:

1.2 Assume the duties of the Security Coordinator.

A. Refer to EN-EP-610 Attachment 9.10.

B. Secure Site Access at the SITE AREA or GENERAL EMERGENCY level as ~~I~~~~; _., _-:- *;* .* .,_

(a) . Notify CAS and SAS to seouri;dhe site, except for ERO

/'

Members, perprocedure IP..-EP-240, S.ecurity..

I (b). Notify the EPM when this has been done:

1.3 Assign OSC Log Keeper to the position of Accountability Coordinator.

A. Report readiness to corrdud Accpl,intabiiity. to the EPM.

Utilize the OSC Log Keepe~ to-. assist in AC'couhtability. * .

B. Direct the OSC Log KeeRer to support the monitoring of the Accountability Card Readers while ERO members are carding into the TSC/OSC, direct them to verify badges are properly read by the Accountability Card Reaaer and to log the name and badge number on an Accountability Roster (Form EP-47) of anyone having difficulty using the. proximity card readers.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 25 of 29 Attachment 9.1 O TSC Security Coordinator Checklist Sheet 2 of 3 2.0 Continuous Responsibility/Activity NOTES 2.1 IF relocation of personnel offsite is called for THEN:

A. Follow guidance .in IP-EP-430, Site Assembly, Accountability and Relocation of Personnel Offsite.

B. Coordinate with TSC Radiological Coordinator to monitor evacuation routes.

2.2 IF relocating to the Security Administration Offices THEN inform the following individuals.

A. Emergency Plant Manag~r B. TSC Radiological Coordinator .. . -~. *

C. Emergency Director * ~* ,., ..

{ D. Lead Accountability Officer (LAO)

\ ' .

2.3 The Lead Accountability Officer (LAO) will generate the list of missing persons. This.list will be provided to th~*Emergency Plant Manager, POM, and/qr TSC Security Coordinat.or."

. NOTE During plant shutdowns, when there may* be la~ge :numbers of workers onsite and within the radioiogical contrqi}1reaS';' Radiation a*

Protection computer printout may be:u~ed to assist in locating missing personnel within the radibloglcaf.control area after .

accountability is completed.

1. IF there are individuals who are missing THEN:

(a) Review Accountability Rosters (Form EP-47) used to identify ERO members experiencing difficulty using the proximity card readers and remove them from the Missing Persons List.

(b) Obtain the Radiation Protection Computer Printout of individuals within the Radiological Control Area.

(c)

Check off names of possible missing individuals who have left the Protected Area to narrow the list of actual missing

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-220 Revision 19 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE

-=-Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 26 of 29 Attachment 9.10 TSC Security Coordinator Checklist Sheet 3 of 3 Continuous Responsibility/Activity (cont.) NOTES persons and review RP computer printout for any missing individuals within the Radiological Control Area.

(d). Inform the EPM immediately of any personnel discovered missing during accountability process.

4. Assist OSC Staff in maintaining accountability of all OSC personnel through the use of status boards, team assignments, Individual Exposure Tracking Log (Form EP-29) and ERO Tracking Log (Form EP-42).

2.4 Use the OSC Log Keeper to maintain Continuing Ac.countability A. Use Onsite ERO Shift Rosters (Form ~P-43) to list i~dividuals

currently on the first sbift .in the TSC.anc;I OSC.

B. Request EOF Support Staff to identify the current EOF personnel. .

C. Work with TSC and OSC Managers to identify personnel to fill second shift and ensure all needed po~jtions are identified and establish time second shift is to be cailed in.

D. Use ETD to identify and contact individuals to fill po.sitions on" *

second shift. OSC Log-Keeper and EOP Staff' may.be used to assist in notifications. - *** * - ~'.

. . ~ ... . ~ .

E. Inform the TSC and OSC Managers when notifications.are completed and if there are any problems filling required* positions.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP*EP-220 Revision 19

- hr1lergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE '

IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 27 of 29 Attachment 9.11 TSC I OSC Layout and NRC Room Sheet 1 of 1 TYPICAL Arrangement (Personnel locations may be changed as needed to fadlitate communication and movement without a procedure revision)

~ ~

Work Control Coordinator *

~

TSC Security Coordinator.

OSC Rad/Chem ConrrHn~*~r I I

~

- psc - Operations

- l&C/Elec Mechanical c:J Log Keeper Support Coordinator Coordinator e

~ I I Copier 1.

osc Ma.,ager Cabinet I ".

' ICommun;ca<m I II I I "" I I

D l&C/Elec. Engineers IT Specialist SAMG

Mech. Eng_i~ec;*ff Rx Engineer Engineering TSC Coordinator Man*ager,

~ ,___

EPM Rad Coor.

B 0

0 k

Ops Coordinator Engineer'slTables PIGS PIGS I *1 Print II I I I I -

IPEC NON-QUALITY IP*EP-220 Revision 19 Ent~ 0 '1!' EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 28 Of 29 Attachment 9.12 TSC/OSC Public Address System Description and Operation Sheet 1 of 1 1.0 General There are three Public Address Systems (PAs) in the TSC/OSC and they have been color.

coded for easy identification of microphones and speakers.

2.0 Systems/Operatiqn 2.1 Blue System comprises the plant page system. This page system is only from U2. The Speakers are located in the Halls, the OSC Bull Pen , the R&CA Briefing room, the NRC Conference Room, and the old U2 Records room. Volume controls are typically walls near speakers. Activation is via.the normal plant page access. . ."* .r 2.2 Red System is the permanently installed TSC/OSC page system. Tli*e speakers are located

in the ceilings similar to the Plant Page system. Speakers are in the Halls *. the OSC Bull

Pen, the R&CA Briefing room, the TSC/OSC Command room, the NRC Conference room and the old U2 Records room. The speakers are marked with red tape. Eacfi speaker has its own on/off switch and-volume control knob. The amplifier andJwo'microphones qre on/in the counter separating the TSC and OSC each marked with RED .tape: The

microphones are wireless and battery powered and simply require th_at they be turned on to activate the system. Volume control is via the local speaker or the }1mplifier on the ,counter separating the TSC and OSC. * * * .,

2.3 Green System consists of Wireless portable speakers distributed ar9und the facilify. Each speaker must be turned on by a switch on the back and the volume (3djusted locally by a switch on the front. The volume should be turned up to full volume and adjusted down as needed. Speakers are located in the OSC Bull Pen, the TSC/OSC Command room, the NRC Conference room, the Whole Body Count room and the old U2 Records room. There are two microphones on/in the TSC/OSC Counter each marked with GREEN tape. The microphones are wireless and battery powered and simply require that they be turned on to activate the system. Additional batteries are available in the supply boxes. Note that this system does not cover the Hallways.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-220 Revision 19 PROCEDURE

_,__ Entergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 29 of 29 Attachment 9.13 IPEC TSC STAFFING Sheet 1 of 1 At IPEC, the expectation is that ALL individuals assigned to the Technical Support Center (TSC) report to the facility within 60 minutes of the declaration of an Event.

The TSC is able to be considered STAFFED when the following Core Individuals are present: Emergency Plant Manager (EPM), TSC Manager, TSC Communicator, Rad Coordinator, Mechanical Engineer, E;lectrical/l&C Engineer.and Reactor Engineer. Regardless of whoever else is available these positions MUST .be filled before the' TSC can be considered to be STAFFED.

~- ..

~ '-** - -**-*

The IPEC Ernergency Plan in S.ection B (Table 8-1) requires the following to respond within 60 minutes: TSC Communicator. a Reactor Engineer;: a.n Electrical Engineer and a Mechanical Engineer..

The TSC may be declared OPERATIONAL whenever Core lhdividuals"are achieved and the TSC Manager determines that the facility is adequately

staffed for the event and equipment is set up and available to perform the .;

emerg-ency functions assigned to the TSC. **

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-IEP-120 Revision 11 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 1 of 49 Emergency Classification Prepared by: *Rebecca A. Martin

;- i:rint Name

~" Q McNMSignature

'5\g,J\lt.

ate Approval: " . f..ori

. . A. Glander Print Name 5~3t-Jk Date

.~** .... *,

Effective Date: June 14,.2016 IP-EP-120 (Class) R11.doo

ENNIPEC

NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-120 Revision 11 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page * ~ of 49 Table of Contents Section 1.0 PURPOSE ......................................................................................................... 3

2.0 REFERENCES

.................................................................................................. 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................... 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ..........................................*................................................ 3 5.0 DETAILS***'******************************************************************************************************** 5 5.1 Recognizing an Emergency **************~***************************************************** 5 5.2 Initial Emergency Declaration from the Control Room ................... ~ ......... 6 5.3 While In a Classified Emergency ............................................................. 6 6.0 5.4 5.5 .

Transitory Events,* Spikes and Spurious Indications ............................... 6 Compensatory Measur~s of Out-of..Service_ . EAL Instruments .

................. 7 1*NTERFACES ..................': ............................... :............... : ................................. 7 7.0 RECORDS ......................... :.............*............*...... ;............................................... 7

\; 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENTS .............................. ;........................... 7 9.0 ATTACHMENTS._ ............ .,......._. .... *......................................................................... 7 9.1 :Emergen~y Action Levels.'.:{::, ........ :............................................................. 8

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-120 Revision 11 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of* 49 Emergency Classification 1.0 PURPOSE To describe the method for classification of emergencies at IPEC as a Notification of Unusual Event (NUE), Alert, Site Area Emergency (SAE) or General Emergency (GE). It also described actions to take regarding Out-of-Service instruments that are used to evaluate EAL's.

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 Indian Point Energy Center Emergency Plan 2.2 NEI 99-01 Rev 5, Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels

2.3 IP-EP-AD13 IPEC Emergency Action Level Technical Bases 2.4 IP-EP-AD40 Equipmen.t lmportan~ fo*Ernergency Response 2.5 Hot Conditions. EAL Chart I

I 2.6 Cold Conditions EAL Chq.rt 3.0 DEFINITIONS ' *.'. *-* ..

Refer to Reference 2.3*,

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 The Shift Manager (Control Room Supervisor if the Shift Manager is unavailable or incapacitated) of the affected unit shall implement this procedure for the initial emergency Classification. For classifiable events that potentially impact both units (security, natural or man-made events), the Shift Managers for each unit shall confer about the need to classify the event. If it is determined that emergency classification is warranted, the Unit 2 Shift Manager shall declare the event in accordance with this procedure. Once an initial emergency classification has been made, the unit Shift Manager making the initial declaration shall be responsible for any subsequent emergency classifications, regardless of which unit is affected, until such time as relieved by the on-call Emergency Director.

4.2 The Shift Manager, upon initial emergency classification, shall assume the role of Emergency Director and shall act as the Emergency Director until relieved by the On-Call Emergency Director or other qualified Emergency Director (Plant Operations Manager).

4.3 The Emergency Director is responsible for overall command and control of the emergency response, including classifications; notifications, PARs and ensuring all resources are available to mitigate emergency conditions. The Emergency Director is the final authority for determining the emergency classification level (initial classification, upgrading, or terminating to recovery). This authority may not be delegated.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-120 Revision 11 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 49 4.4 Initial and subsequent emergency classification shall be made within 15 minutes following the identification of a classifiable event to ensure that prompt notification, mobilization, protective and corrective actions are taken.

4.5 Upon becoming aware of any condition or event that they believe may warrant an upgrade in emergency classification, Emergency Response Organization memb.ers shall promptly inform the Emergency Director via their chain of command.

4.6 A broc;id spectrum of discretion in classifying events is provided under "Hazards" Sub-category 6.0 "Judgement". In using the Sub-Category "Judgement" and in classifying emergencies under circumstances which are not a straight-forward use of the EALs, ERO members should be mindful than an approach is needed which is conservative with respect to public, plant, and personnel safety and with respect to ensuring the adequacy of personnel and technical support. Conservative decisions must be made if the Emergency Director has any doubt regarding the health and safety of the public.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-120 Revision 11 PROCEDURE

~Entergy. IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page § of 49 5.0 DETAILS 5.1 Recognizing an Emergency NOTE All classifications are to be based upon VALID indications, reports or conditions.

Indications; reports or conditions are considered VALID when they are verified by (1) an instrument channel check, or (2) indications on related or redundant indicators, or (3) by direct observation by plant personnel, such that doubt related to the indicator's operability, the condition's existence, or the report's accuracy is. removed. Implicit in this definition is the need for timely assessment.

5, 1.1 When indications of abnormal conditions or events are received, personnel will verify the symptoms/indications and then compare with the Emergency Action Levels (Attachment 9.. 1). * **

\

5.1.2 Identify the highest applicable emerg*ency classification level (if multiple EALs are I

exceeded) for which an EAL has been met or e)(ceeded considering the following:

(a)

The plant condition existing at the time the .at>normal condition exists:

All Operating Mod~i:; 1, .2. 3, 4, 5,6, DEF

Hot Condition Modes ~, 2, 3; 4. . *

\

Cold Condition Modes 5, 6, DEF: *

(b) IF conditions warrant the issuance of offsite Protective Action Recommendations (PARs), THEN the classification of General Emergency is required.

(c) IF plant conditions indicate a possible radiological release or a release is in progress or suspected, THEN evaluate the applicability of offsite dose-based EALs (IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment).

(d) IF a classification level was met or exceeded but the classifiable condition no longer exists (a lesser classification level may or may not still be appropriate),

THEN refer to Section 5.4, Transitory Events, Spikes and Spurious Indications.

ENN IPEC

NON-QUALITY RELATED EMERGENCY PLAN IP-EP-120 Revision 11 PROCEDURE

~Entergy. IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page § of 49 5.2 . Initial Emergency Declaration from the Control Room NOTE IF the condition or event requiring initial classification potentially affects both units (security, natural or man-made events), THEN th*e Unit Shift Managers shall contact each other and confer on the need to declare. Upon concqrrence, the Unit 2 Shift Manager shall make the appropriate emergency classification and assume the role of Emergency Director.

5.2.1

The Shift Manager (Control Room Supervisor if the Shift Manager is unavailable or incapacitated) shall announce to the Control Room operating staff:

(a) That an emergency has been declared.

(b) The emergency classification level.

(c) That the (Unit 2 or Unit 3) Shift Manager (Control Room Supervisor if the Shift Manager is unavailable or incapacitated) h:;:is assumed the role of Emergency Director. * * **

5.2.2 Implement procedure IP..:EP-210 "Central Control Room"

5.3 While in a Classified Emergency 5.3.1 Emergency response personnel shall continuously review the Emergency Action Levels (Attachment 1).

5.3.2 If an Emergency Action Level threshold is exceeded for an ~mergency classification higher than currently declared, the Emergency Director shall re-classify the event to the appropriate level and initiate all required notifications.

5.4 Transitory Events, Spikes and Spurious Indications 5.4.1 Transitory events that result in exceeding the Emergency Action Level criteria for event declaration, but which are terminated before they are declared, should still be identified,. documented and reported (10CFR50.72), but not declared to implement the Emergency Plan.

5.4.2 In the case of a "spike" in a plant indication or event which rapidly exceeds and then decreases below an Emergency Action Level threshold, entry into the Emergency Plan or escalation to a higher classification "in retrospect" is not appropriate unless the "spike" is indicative of continuing degrading conditions which will lead to an escalated emergency classification level. Examples include momentary steam generator level shrink following reactor trip or brief wind gusts in excess of classifiable levels.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page I of 49 5.4.3 Spurious alarms or parameters, which are known to be invalid indicators of actual plant conditions or of the emergency classification, should not be used to declare emergency classifications.

5.5 Compensatory Measures for Out-of-Service EAL Instruments.

5.5.1 IP-EP-AD40 provides guidance when planning to take an instrument OOS (Out of Service) that is used to determine an EAL condition or following an unplanned loss of the instrument.

6.0 INTERFACES 6.1 IP-EP-210, Central Control Room 6.2 IP-EP-220, Technical Support Center 6.3 IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment 6.4 IP-EP-410, Protective Action Recommendations 6.5 IP-EP-510, Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System 6.6 IP-EP-340, Meteorological -Information & Data Acquisition System{MIDAS) 6.7 IP-EP-AD40, Equipment Important to Emergency Response 7.0 RECORDS Any logs or forms completed by members of the ERO during *an actual declared emergency are permanent quality records. * * ...

8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENTS NONE 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 Emergency Action Levels

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING

~Entergy. PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 49 AU 1.1 Offsite Rad Conditions 2 3 4 5 6 DEF I1 I 2 I3 4 5 6 I DEF I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I I 1 I 2 I I 3 4 I I I 5 6 DEF I Any valid gaseous monitor reading > Any valid gaseous monitor reading > Table Table A-1 column "Alert" for> 15 min. A-1 column "UE" for~ 60 min. (Note 2)

Any valid radiation monitor reading Any valid radiation monitor reading >

(Note 2) - AU 1.2

>Table A-1 column "GE" for> 15 Table A-1 column "SAE" for~ 15 min. (Note 1) - min. (Note 1) AA1.2 I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I AG 1.2 AS 1.2 4 5 6 DEF Any valid liquid monitor reading> Table A-1 column "UE" for ~ 60 min. (Note2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 DEF I1 I 2 I 3 I _4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I Any valid liquid monitor reading > Table A-

. 1 column "Alert" for ~ 15 min. (Note 2) AU 1.3 Dose assessment using actual Dose assessment using actual AA1.3 I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I meteorology indicates doses

> 1000 mRem TEDE or> 5000 meteorology indicates doses :> 100 mRem TEDE or> 500 mRer'n thyroid I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I Confirmed sample analyses for gaseous or liquid releases indicate concentrations or mRem thyroid CDE at or beyond Confirmed sample analyses for gaseous release rates > 2 x Technical Specifications COE at or beyond the site boundary the site boundary. or liquid releases indicate concentrations (OOCM) limits for~ 60 min. (Note 2)

AS 1.3 or release rates > 200 x Technical AG1.3 Specification (OOCM) limits for~ 15 min.

1 2 3 4 5 6 DEF I1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I (NOTE"2)

Field survey indicates closed window Field survey results indicate dose rate > 100 mRem/hr. that is closed window dose rates > 1000 expected to continue for~ 1 hr at or mRem/hr. expected to continue for beyond the site boundary

~ 1 hr at or beyond the site OR boundary Field survey sample analysis OR indicates thyroid COE of > 500 Anakyses offield survey samples mRem for 1 hr* of inhalation at or indicate thyroid CDE of > 5000 beyond.the siteboundaiy .

mRem for 1 hr of inhalation at or beyond the site boundary

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of

2. AA2.1 AU 2.1 Onsite Rad Conditions I1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I 3 4 5 6 I DEF

& Irradiated Fuel Events Damage to irradiated fuel or loss of water Unplanned low water level or alarm level (uncovering irradiated fuel outside indicating uncontrolled water level decrease the Reactor Vessel) that causes a valid in the refueling cavity, SFP or fuel transfer high alarm on any of the following canal radiation monitors:

AND

- R-2/R7 Vapor Containment Area Monitors Valid area radiation monitor reading rise on

- R-5 Fuel Storage Bldg. Area any of the following:

Monitors

-R-42 [R-12] VC Gas Activity - R2/R7 Vapor Containment Area

-R-25/R-26 Vapor Containment High Monitors Radiation Area Monitors

- R-5 Fuel Storage Bldg. Area AA2.2 Monitors I1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I - R25/R-26 Vapor Containment High Radiation Area Monitors AU2.2 A water level drop in the reactor cavity, SFP or fuel transfer canal that will result in I 1 I 2 I 3 4 5 I 6 DEF irradiated fuel becoming uncovered '--*--'-*--'-*---'-----'--~~-~---'

Unplanned valid area radiation monitor reading or survey results increase by a factor of 1,000 over normal levels*

Normal levels can be considered as the

, . highest reading in the past 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months excluding the current peak value

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "A" Abnormal Rad Release I Rad Effluent 3 AA3.1 CR/CAS Radiation I 1 I 2 6 I DEF I Dose rates > 15 mRem/hr in areas requiring continuous occupancy to maintain plant safety functions:

Control Room [R-1]

OR CAS

I */

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 11 of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels TABLE A-1 EFFLUENT MONITOR CLASSIFICATION THRESHOLDS ll"--'-~~~""'"'4--"-"""'----......:...:.===

~;: ~!>"';::~~~~[i:~i ii~~tt~~!~! .

Gaseous R-27 7 .5 E+07 µCi/sec 7 .5 E+06 µCi/sec

1.4 E+06 µCi/sec 2.6 E+05 µCi/sec (2.3 E+OO µCi/cc) (2.3 E-01 µCi/cc) (4.2 E-02 µCi/cc) (8.0 E-03 µCi/cc)

R-44 [14] N/A N/A 4.2 E-02 µCi/cc 8.0 E-03 µCi/cc Liquid R-54 [18] N/A N/A 4.0E-02 µCi/cc 2.5E-03 µCi/cc R-49 [19] N/A N/A 5.8E-02 µCi/cc 5.8E-04 µCi/cc

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "H" HAZARDS 1 HA 1.1 , HU 1.1 Natural & ._I_1-"-I_2~_3_'~I_4--'-_s___.__6___._l_D_EF___.I I 1 I 2 I 3 4 s 6 I DEF I Destructive Two or more annunciators are lit on the Seismic event indentified by any two of the Phenomena Peak Shock Annunciator panel, one of following:

which is red

- Earthquake felt in plant by consensus of AND Control Room Operators Strong Motion Event Indicator is lit

- Unit 3 "Seismic Event Occurred" alarm AND (Panel SDF) or any amber Peak Shock Earthquake confirmed by any of the Annunciator light is lit following:

- Earthquake felt in plant by a consensus of - National Earthquake Information Center Control Room Operators (Note 4)

- National Earthquake Information Center (Note 4)

- Control Room indication of degraded performance of systems required for the safe shutdown of the plant HA12 HU12

._I_1~I_2~-3~_4_1._s___.__6--'-I_DE_F__.I I 1 I 2 I 3 4 s 6 I DEF Tornado striking or sustained high winds Tornado striking within Protected Area

> 90 mph (40 m/sec) resulting in EITHER: boundary Visible damage to any Table H-1 plant OR structures containing safety systems or components Sustained high winds> 90 mph (40 m/sec)

OR

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING

~Entergy. PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels Natural & Control Room indication of degraded Destructive performance of safety systems Phenomena (continued) HA 1.3.

HU 1.3 4 5 6 I DEF Vehicle crash resulting in Either:

I 1 I2 I3 4 5 6 I DEF Visible damage to any Table H-1 plant structures containing safety systems or Turbine failure resulting in EITHER:

components Casing penetration OR OR Control Room indication of degraded Damage to turbine or generator seals performance of safety systems HA1.4 HU 1.4 I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF Turbine failure-generated projectiles I 1 I2 I3 4 5 6 I DEF resulting in Either: Flooding in any Table H-1 area that has the potential to affect safety-Visible damage to or penetration of any related equipment needed for the Table H-1 area containing safety systems current operating mode or components OR Control Room indication of degraded performance of safety systems

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE . Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels Natural &

Destructive I 1 I 2 I 3 I4 I 5 I 6 I DEF Phenomena Flooding in any Table H-1 area resulting in Either:

An electrical shock hazard that precludes necessary access to operate .or monitor safety equipment OR Control room indication of degraded performance of safety systems HA1.6 HU 1.5 I 1 I 2 I I I 3 4 5 I 6 I DEF I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF River Water Level > 14 ft. 6 in.

River Water Level > 15 ft. (0MSL) (0MSL)

OR OR Low Service Water Bay (Intake Service Water Bay (Intake Structure) level resulting in a loss of Structure) water level< -4 ft. 5 in.

service water flow (0MSL)

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY,RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels Table H-1 Safe Shutdown Areas

- Control Building and associated Electrical Tunnels and Battery Rooms

- Service Water Pump Structure and Valve Pits

- Fuel Storage Building

- Primary Auxiliary Building I Fan House

- Vapor Containment Building

- EOG Buildings

- Auxiliary Feed Pump Building

- Condensate Storage Tank

- Refueling Water Storage Tank

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROC.EDURE

. . . IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN ,"'., ,,

IMPLEMENTING

""-'-.Entergy . PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Page of 2 HA2.1 Fire or* 11 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I Explosion Fire or' explosion resulting in EITHER: Fire in any Table H-1 area Visible damage to any Table H-1 area not extinguished within 15 containing safety systems or minutes (Note 3) of Control components Room notification or OR . verification of a control room Control Room Indication of degraded fire alarm performance of safety systems HU2.2 I I I I I I I 1 2 3 4 5 6 DEF I Explosion within Protected Area boundar 3 HA3.1

HU 3.1 Hazardous I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I I I I I I I 1 2 3 4 5 6 DEF I Gas Access to any Table H-2 area is Toxic, corrosive, asphyxiant prohibited due to toxic, corrosive, or flammable gases in asphyxiant or flammable gases which amounts that have or could jeopardize operation of systems required adversely affect normal plant to maintain safe operations or safety operations shut down the reactor HU 3.2 I I I I I I I 1 2 3 4 5 6 DEF I Recommendation by local, county or state officials to evacuate or shelter site personnel based on offsite event

ENNIPEC . ...

Noril-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11

~ . EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING ".

-=-Entergy . PROCEDURES . REFERENCE,USE Page I

17 I

of 49

I I ,,.

*9.1 - *Emergency Action Levels

Table H-2 Safe Shutdown Access Areas

- Control Building and associated Electrical Tunnels and Battery Rooms

- Service Water Pump Structure and Valve Pits

- Vapor Containment Building *

- Primary Auxiliary Building I Fan House

- Auxiliary Feed Pump Building

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING

-- Entergy . PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE

..... *. Page of Security I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I, I 1 I 2 I 3

14 I 5 I 6 I DEF I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF 3 4 5 6 DEF A hostile action has occurred A hostile action is occurring or has A hostile action is occurring or has A security condition that does not such that plant personnel are occurred within the Protected Area as occurred within the Owner Controlled involve a hostile action as unable to operate equipment reported by the Security Shift Area as reported by the Security Shift reported by the Security Shift required to maintain safety Supervisor

Supervisor Supervisor functions OR OR OR A credible site-specific security A validated notification from NRC of an threat notification A hostile action has caused airliner attach threat within 30 minutes of OR failure of Spent Fuel Cooling the site Systems and imminent damage A validated notification from NRC is likely providing information of an aircraft threat 5 HS 5.1 HA5.1 Control Room Evacuation I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF Control Room evacuation has been Control Room evacuation initiated initiated AND Control of the plant cannot be established within 15 minutes

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING R~FERENCE USE Page of PROCEDURES 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels 6 HG6.1 HS 6.1 Judgment I 1 I 2 I 3 \ 4 I .s I 6 I DEF I 1 I 2 I 3' ). 4. I 5. I 6 I DEF *1 \4 I 5 I I 6 DEF 3 4 5 6 DEF Other conditions exist that in the Other condjtions exist that in the Other i;onditions exist that in the Other conditions exist that in the judgment of the Emergency judgment.of. the Emergency Director judgment of the Emergency Director judgment of the Emergency Director Director indicate that events are indicate .that events are in progress or indicate that events are in progress or indicate that events are in progress in progress or have occurred have occurred which involve EITHER: have occurred which involve EITHER: or have occurred which indicate a which involve EITHER: An actual or likely major failures of An actual or potential substantial potential degradation of the level of Actual or imminent substantial plant functions needed for protection of degradation of the level of safety of the safety of the plant or indicate a core degradation or melting with the public plant security threat to facility protection potential for loss of containment has been initiated. No releases of OR OR integri!Y radioactive material requiring offsite Hostile action that results in intentional A security event that involves probable response or monitoring are expected OR damage or malicious acts; 1) toward life threatening risk to site personnel or unless further degradation of safety Hostile action that results in an site personnel or equipment that could damage to site equipment because of systems occurs actual loss of physical control of lead to the likely failure of or; 2) that hostile action the facility prevent effective access to equipment Any releases are expected to be limited Releases can be reasonably needed for the protection of the public to small fractions of the EPA Protective expected to exceed EPA ANY releases are not expected to Action Guideline exposure levels Protective Action Guideline result in exposure levels which exceed beyond the site boundary exposure levels (1 Rem TEDE EPA Protective Action Guidelines and 5 Rem thyroid COE) beyond exposure levels (1 Rem TEDE and 5 the site boundary Rem thyroid COE) beyond the site boundary

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING

-- Entergy. PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of

,~-~~~~~~~rP: :~~~~:

1 ISFSI I 4 I 5 I 6 I DEF Damage to loaded cask confinement boundary

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "S" SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 1 SG 1.1 551.1 ... ..

SA 1.1 SU 1.1 Loss of AC I1 I2 I3 I4 l,>:::.t.~:: JJ:;,;~I 1t 12 13 14*.b.i:"Jr:f;.<~'.1 I 1 l. 2* I 3 14 l**::.,J*;;~::*c.k';.~~"*I I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I\~~:. I**:4< *I Power Loss of all offsite and all onsite Loss of all offsite and all onsite. AC AC power capability to 480 V Loss of all offsite AC power AC power (Table S-1) to 480 V power (Table S-1 ) tp 480-V !: * .. safeguards buses (5A, 2A/3A, 6A) (Table S-1) to 480 V safeguards buses (5A, safeguards bu~s (BA, f.A/SA, 6A) 'red:uced to a single power source safeguards buses (5A, 2A/3A,6A) for~ 15 minute~ *(Note :3) ' t;~. (Table S~1) for~ 15 minutes (Note 3) 2A/3A, 6A) for~ 15 minutes AND EITHER: such that any additional single failure (Note 3)

Restoration of at least one would result in loss of all AC power to safeguards bus within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months safeguard buses is not likely OR Actual or imminent conditions requiring entry into ORANGE or RED path on F-0.2, "CORE COOLING"

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "S" SYSTEM MALFUNCTION

~: ::~: ;.;~~~~~'.~<.;~}: '.~ .

,,.,t/g~~eg9ry.,.;,

,,,.' ,/'>,,, .<'<{'/~~~"' :, <> ~~;,,~

2 SG 2.1 SS 2.1 ~A2.1 SU 2.1 ATWS Criticality Failure of automatic and all Failure of an automatic trip signal to fqilure of an automatic trip signal to Unplanned sustained positive manual trip signals to reduce power range < 5%

reduce AND

~6wer ~ange <: 5o;<?..

. ' 'I reduce. power range < 5%

AND startup rate observed on nuclear instrumentation AND '-

Manual trip actions taken

. . at the

~ : .., Manual trip actions taken at the Actual or imminent conditions reactor *control .console.are *~ot ... ** r~actor control console are successful requiring entry into EITHER: '*

successful

RED path in F-0.2, CORE COOLING OR RED path in F-0.3, HEAT SINK 3 SU 3.1 Inability to I1 I 2

I 3

I 4

I> :* I Plant is not brought to

<-+* .1 Reach Shutdown required operating mode within Conditions Technical Specifications LCO action statement time

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING

--- Entergy. PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "S" SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 4 SS 4.1 SA4.1 SU 4.1 Inst. I Comm.

I I I3 I4 I* >1 .*:**.1:,,/*.1 1 2 Loss of > approximately 75% *of Unplanned loss of> approximately Unplanned loss of>

Control Room Overhead 75% of Control Room Overhead approximately 75% of Control annunciators or. Control Room annunciators or Control Room Room annunciators or Control indicators Table S-3 associated with indicators Table S-3 associated with Room indicators Table S-3 safety sy~tems

.* *. s~{bty. systems for.::_ 15 minutes (Note associated with safety systems

. *l \:

AND 3) **. for.::_ 15 minutes (Note 3)

Any significant transient is in AND EITHER SU 4.2 progress, (Table-S.-2) *: : Any significant transient is in progress, Ir* I~ I~ I~ I qft3)Jv**.1 AND . . -~

(Table S-2) Loss of all Table S-4 onsite Compensatory indications are OR (internal) communications unavailable

Compensatory indications are capability affecting the ability unavailable to perform routine operations OR Loss of Table S-4 offsite (external) communications capability affecting the ability.

to perform offsite communications

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120

Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "S" SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 5 SU 5.1 Fuel Clad Degradation

[Unit 3]: 1(2) RM063A/B Gross Failed Fuel Detector High alarm (>50 µCi/ml)

SU 5.2 Coolant Sample Activity:

. I

' ~ . > 60 µCi/gm 1-131 dose equivalent 6 SU 6.1 RCS Unidentified or pressure boundary Leakage ... leakage > 10 gpm OR Identified leakage > 25 gpm

ENNIPEC EMERGENCY PLAN .

NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "S" SYSTEM MALFUNCTION 7 SS 7.1 Loss of DC Power < 105 voe bus voltage indications on all safety-related DC buses for .:::_ 15 minutes (Note 3)

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page Of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS Table S - 1 Safeguards Bus AC Power Sources

-480 V EOG 21 - Unit Auxiliary transformer*

-480 V EOG 22 - Station Auxiliary transformer*

2 -480 V EOG 23 -13.8 KV gas turbine auto transformer*

- Appendix "R" Diesel

-480 V EOG 31 - Unit Auxiliary transformer

-480 V EOG 32 - Station Auxiliary transformer 3 - 480 V EOG 33 - 13W92 feeder

-Appendix "R" Diesel - 13W93 feeder

With86P or 86BU tripped all offsite power supplie& must be considered as one power supply.

J' ENNIPEC NON~QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING

-- Entergy . PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS Table S - 2 Significant Transients

- Automatic turbine runback > 25% thermal reactor power

- Electrical load rejection > 25% full electrical load

- Reactor Trip

- Safety injection activation

-Thermal power oscillations of> 10%

/

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11

~ ~

EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING

~Entergy. 28 49 PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page I I of 9.1 .. Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS Table S .... 3 Safety System Indicators Reactivity Control RCS Inventory Reactor Trip Decay Heat Removal

Fission Product Barriers

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING

~Entergy. PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS Table S - 4 Communications Systems Plant Telephone System x x Plant Radio System x Page I Party System x Emergency Notification System x

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS CATEGORY "F" FISSION PRODUCT BARRIERS

* ** :f~~l!~!J~"~~fi~:,;:t~f;,

1 FG 1.1 FS 1.1 FA 1.1 FU 1.1 Fission Product Barrier Loss of any two barriers Loss or potential loss of any two Any loss or any potential loss Any loss or any potential AND barriers (Table F-1) of either Fuel Clad or RCS loss of Containment Loss or potential loss of third (Table F-1) (Table F-1) barrier (Table F-1)

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS TABLE "F-1" FISSION PRODUCT BARRIER MATRIX DLOSS D POTENTIAL LOSS DLOSS D POTENTIAL LOSS DLOSS DPOTENTIAL LOSS A.CSFST D D D D D D

1. Core -Cooling 1. Core Cooling 1. Integrity - RED entry 1. Containment RED entry ORANGE entry' conditions met - RED entry conditions met conditions met OR conditions met OR Heat Sink - RED entry Heat Sink - RED entry conditions met and conditions met and heat sink is required heat sink is required

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS ,

TABLE "F-1" FISSION PRODUCT BARRIER MATRIX

'~*' it*,

. * **. Fu~I CladcU~g,B,~rrJ~r {F:<:;) .;;T :* 0 ' ,: ; Rea~tof;;C,oq!a!lt:'~Y~t~m'.(RCS) ' .**

.:'£.: . .* ,h:*s*.l;:q~n~~"n'J}~~fs~t~J~i-~~~~~):'

'i 1

'.>:; '* *: '. X::< *:: : '.\'<'.* o::*: *' :;'., ' ,7 ',: ::*;,;.: .. ** '>: ,, :::!., . * *,. r.*+.:f:'J * ".*::,. :*:* *** . * ***

, .. ,,'; '. (**

DLOSS D POTENTIAL LOSS DLOSS D POTENTIAL LOSS DLOSS D POTENTIAL LOSS B. Core 0 0 0 0 0 02. Core exit TCs Exit TCs

2. Core exit 2. Core exit TCs >1,2oo*F TCs> [Unit 2] > 700° F AND 1,200* F [Unit 3] > 715° F Core exit TCs not lowering within 15 minutes after restoration procedure entry

03. Core exit TCs [Unit 2]

> 700° F [Unit 3] > 715° F AND RVLIS [Unit 2] < 41% [Unit 3] < 33% wino RCPs AND Core exit TCs not lowering or RVLIS not rising within 15 min. after restoration procedure entry.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS' TABLE "F-1" FISSION PRODUCT BARRIER MATRIX

fa~! 91~~t~~;1;j~t~ .

' , v ,,, '. ' ,. *~,.

DLOSS D POTENTIAL LOSS DLOSS D POTENTIAL LOSS DLOSS DPOTENTIAL LOSS c.

D D D Radiation

3. Containment 1. [Unit 2] 4. Containment radiation monitor R-41 > 1.2E-5 radiation monitor R-25 or R-26 > µCi/cc or R-25 or R-26 17 R/hr R-42 > 1.02 E-2 >68 Rhr

µCi/cc

[Unit 3]

R-11 > 1.2E-5

µCi/cc or R-12 > 5.0E-2

µCi/cc

ENNIPEC

Noril~QUALl\Y ~ELA.TED P._ROCEDURE. IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING .- I*

REF~RENCE USE Page of PROCEDURES 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS TABLE "F-1" FISSION PRODUCT BARRIER MATRIX OLOSS OPOTENTIAL OLOSS OPOTENTIAL LOSS OLOSS OPOTENTIAL LOSS LOSS D. D 0 0 0 0 1. A Containment 05. Containment Inventory

3. RVLIS 2. RCS leak rate 2. RCS leak rate pressure rise followed pressure> 47

[Unit 2] < 41% resulting in a loss indicated greater than by a rapid unexplained psig and rising

[Unit 3] < 33% of RCS sub- 87 gpm drop in Containment 06.

With no RCPs cooling (

Phase B (continued) leak rate > 10 isolation signal set-point gpm following LOCA AND AND Un-isolable Less than Table F-3 steam release depressurization from affected equipment operating as SG to the designed environment ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES .REF/:RENC;E'.*UsE* :, Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS 0 TABLE "'F-1" FISSION"PRODUCT BARRIER MATRIX

- R~~~t~~::c9ti1a11t system .Contaillinent Barrier

.*,};".;'*¥r;*.(~£~f} :*~ *. . DLOSS DPOTENTIAL DLOSS DPOTENTIAL DLOSS DPOTENTIAL LOSS LOSS LOSS E. Other D 4. Primary D 5. Inability to isolate coolant activity all valves in any one line > 300 µCi/gm 1- AND 131 dose Direct downstream equivalent pathway to the environment exists after Containment isolation signal F. 0 5. ANY D 4. ANY condition D 4.ANY D 3.ANY D 6. ANY condition in D 8.ANY Judgment condition in the in the opinion of the condition in condition in the the opinion of the condition in the opinion of the Emergency Director the opinion opinion of the Emergency Director that opinion of the Emergency that indicates of the Emergency indicates loss of the Emergency Director that potential loss of the Emergency Director that Containment barrier Director that indicates loss Fuel Clad barrier Director that

indicates potential indicates of the Fuel indicates loss of the RCS potential loss of Clad barrier loss of the barrier the Containment RCS barrier barrier

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE . Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action .Levels

' .HOT CONDITIONS Table

,,* x "F-2". RCS Sub-cooling A * /CV ~ ' << , ,.)-* -::: " < * " A A 0

Adverse Containment.***/*

~7. '!<- o"'" {:. v , ~. / *~:~,,>~~-:}L~,."~*, ,*_,~~ ,,~* ,-,*, -.~ ~;\*:~,:~",,': 0-400 52 '83 401 -800 36 49 2 801 -1200 23 30 1201 - 2500 19 26 < 1000 40 112 1000 -1900 40 78 3 > 1900 40 63 ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels HOT CONDITIONS Table "F-3" Minimum ~ontainment Cooling Systems FCUs Spray Pumps '**t <3 2 3 1 5 0 ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING REFERENCE USE Page 39 of 49 PROCEDURES 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels NOTES HOT CONDITIONS: NOTE 1: The Emergency Director should not wait until the applicable time has elapsed, but should declare the event as soon as it is determined that the condition will likely exceed the applicable time. IF dose assessment results are available, THEN declaration should be based on dose assessment instead of radiation monitor values. (See EAL AS1 .2/AG1 .2) Do not delay declaration awaiting dose assessment results. NOTE 2: The Emergency Director should not wait until the applicable time has elapsed, butshould declare the event as soon as it is determined the release duration has .ex<::eeded, or wjll likely exceed, the applicable time. In the absence of data to the contrary, assume that the release duration* has exceeded t~e applicable time if an ongoing release is detected and the release start time is unknown . NOTE 3: The Emergency Director should not wait until the applicable time has elapsed, butshould decJare the event as soon as it is determined that the condition wiU likely exceed the applicable time. NOTE 4: The.National Earthquake.lhformation Center (NEIC) can be contacted by calling (30;3) 273- 8500 toc9nfirm recent seismic activity in the vicinity of 0 IPEC. Provide the analyst with the following IPEC coordinates: 41° 15' 0 55" north latitude, 73° 57' 08" west longitude. Alternatively go to the USGS NEIC website: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/ NOTE 5: Not applicable to this chart. ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING REFERENCE USE Page of 49 PROCEDURES 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "C" COLD SHUT DOWN/REFUEL SYSTEM MALFUNCTION \?;~~~~~~,{~~)"~:~**~ 1 CA 1.1 cu 1.1 Loss of AC h: *:,*:::l:r;:;;tril~:'st:I :::~:ti'I s I 6 J,~\,}:J Power l'*.~:<*~':lz:;;r::*::h .. ::.'*I ;,:I:~r,,1 s I s I oEF AC power capability to 480V Loss of all offsite and all onsite AC power safeguards buses (5A, 2A/3A, (Table C:::-4) to 480V safeguards buses 6A) reduced to a single power

- (.9,.f., 2M3A, 6A) for~ 15 minutes. (Note 3) source (Table C-4) for~ 15 minutes such that any

additional single failure would result in loss of all AC power to safeguard buses (Note 3)

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING ~Entergy. PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of J~'~j~~!~~\ 2 CG2.1 CS2.1 CA2.1 cu 2.1 RPV Level With Containment Closure Reactor vessel level < bottom of Inability to restore or maintain Reactor vessel level < top of (Note 5) not established, reactor the RCS hot leg (60' 4.8" elev. pressurizer level > 18% or active fuel (57' 9.6" ele.v.- 56% vessel level < 6" below the bottom RCS target level band due to on RVLIS) for.:::_ 30 minutes - RVLIS 62%) of the RCS hot leg (59' 10. 8" elev.

RCS leakage for.:::_ 15 minutes (Note 3) OR

- RVLIS 60.8%) (Note 3) AND Reactor vessel level cannot be Any Containment Challenge CS2.2

monitored for.:::. 15 minutes cu 2.2 indication, (Table C-5) .:. (Note 3) with unexplained rise in F {J<t:fJ:;*;.::l* '*l>;*.*16 ICJJ CG2.2 any Table C-1 sump/tank level Unplanned reactor vessel level drop below vessel flange (69'

With Containment Closure elev.- RVLIS 83%) (or RCS (Note 5) established, reactor ..._ target level band if the RCS Reactor vessel level cannot be vessel level <top G>f active fueJ* level was procedurally being monitored for.:::_ 30 minutes (5T 9:6 elev. 56. % on R:VL1$) controlled below the vessel with core uncovery indicated *. flange) for .:::_ 15 minutes by ANY of the following CS2.3 (Note 3)

(Note 3) cu 2.3 - Containment High Range l~J ':Ft<! * <!-:/I .5 I 6 kt}'I l'i:/J;o. l~.~(;l:r::t;;f!~\*:1 6 k:::.'.~,1 Radiation Monitor reading Reactor vessel level cannot be upscale Reactor vessel level cannot be monitored for .:::,,30 minutes monitored with unexplained - Unexplained rise in any (Note 3) with a loss of inventory as rise in any Table C-1 Table C-1 sump/tank level indicated by any of the following: sump/tank level - Containment High Range - Erratic Source Range Radiation Monitor reading upscale Monitor indication - Unexplained rise in any Table AND C1 sump/tank level - Erratic Source Range Monitor Any Containment Challenge indication indication, Table C-5 ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "C" COLD SHUT DOWN/ REFUEL SYSEMT MALFUNCTION E~i~~~\~it~~~;~~::~~ 3 CA 3.1 CU 3.1 RCS Temperature ANY unplanned event resulting Any unplanned event resulting in RCS temperature > 200° F for in RCS temperature> 200° F >Table C-3 duration due to loss of decay heat OR removal capability RCS pressure increase > 10 cu 3.2 psig due to a loss of RCS cooling (not applicable to solid l*::.:'.l'.?;%;,;~l~.*~;jJ~.,:J s I s h'.L':,j plant operations) Loss of all RCS temperature and .. f reactor vessel level indication for ~ 15 minutes (Note 3) 4 cu 4.1 Communications ['.".vl :::;Jj~E:h?til 5 I 6 I DEF I Loss of all Table C-2 onsite (internal) communications capability affecting the ability to perform routine operations OR Loss of all Table C-2 offsite (external) communications capability affecting the ability to perform offsite notifications ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING -- Entergy. PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels CATEGORY "C" COLD SHUT DOWN/REFUEL SYSTEM MALFUNCTION

~sti~~~~J~~~~~: *

5 cu 5.1 Inadvertent I;. '.J,,.:t:l;i/i';l.;;:;L',l s I 6 I *:d Criticality Unplanned sustained positive startup rate observed on nuclear instrumentation 6 cu 6.1 Loss of DC Power < 105 voe bus voltage indications on all Technical Specification required 125 voe buses for.'.': 15 minutes (Note 3) l .* ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels COLD CONDITIONS

Containment sumps

CCW surge tank .

PRT

RCDT

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 ~ EMERGENCY PLAN ~Entergy. IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page I 45 I of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels COLD CONDITIONS System On site Offsite (Internal) (External) Plant Telephone System x Plant Radio System x Page/Party System x Emergency Notification System x ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action_Levels COLD CONDITIONS RCS Containment Closure Duration Intact and not Reduced Inventory N/A 60 Minutes* Not intact OR Reduced Inventory Established 20 Minutes* Not Established 0 Minutes

If an RCS heat removal system is in operation within this time frame and RCS temperature is being reduced, the EAL is not applicable

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 49 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels COLD CONDITIONS UNIT Onsite

Offsite 2

480 V EOG 21

Unit Auxiliary Transformer*

480 V EOG 22

Station Auxiliary Transformer*

480 V EOG 23

13.8 KV Gas Turbine Auto Transformer*

Appendix "R" Diesel 3

480 V EOG 31

Unit Auxiliary Transformer

480 V EOG 32

Station Auxiliary Transformer

480 V EOG 33

13W92 Feeder

Appendix "R" Diesel

13W93 Feeder

With 86P or 86BU tripped, all offsite power supplies must be considered as one power supply.

ENNIPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING ~Entergy. PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels COLD CONDITIONS

Containment Closure (Note 4) not established

Containment hydrogen concentration ?, 4%

Unplanned rise in containment pressure

ENN IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-120 Revision 11 EMERGENCY ........,.....E J. . PLAN -- niergy, . IMPLEMENTING REFERENCE USE Page 49 of 49 PROCEDURES 9.1 - Emergency Action Levels NOTES COLD CONDITIONS: Note 1: The Emergency Director should not wait until the applicable time has elapsed, but should declare the event as soon as it is determined that the condition will likely exceed the applicable time. IF dose assessment results are available, THEN declaration shoµld be based on dose assessment instead of radiation monitor values. (See EAL AS1 .2/AG1 .2) Do not delay declaration awaiting dose assessment results. Note 2: The Emergency Director should not wait until the applicable time has elapsed, but should declare the event as soon as it is determined that the release duration has exceeded*, or will likely exceed, the applicable time, in the absence of data to the contrary,* assume that the release duration has exceeded the applicable time if an ongoing release is detected and the release start time is unkn.own. Note 3: . The Emergency Director should not wait until the applicable time has elapsed, but should declare the event as soon as it is determined that the condition will likely exceed the applicable time. Note 4: The National Earthquake Information Center"(NEIC) can be contacted by* calling (303) 273-8500 to confirm recent seismic activity in the vicinity of IPEC. Provide the analyst with the following IPEC coordinates: 41° 15' 55" north latitude, 73° 57' 08'.' west longitude. Alternatively go to the USGS NEIC website: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/ Note 5: The site specific procedurally defined actions taken to secure containment a and its associated structures, systems, and components as functional barrier to fis~ion product release under existing plant conditions. As applied to IPEC, Containment Closure exists when the requirements of Section 3.9.3 of Technical Specifications are met (all un-isolated flow paths are promptly closes and at least one door in each air lock is closed following an evacuation of containment). ~ IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 12 -=- Enlergy. EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE Use Of 10 Page 1 CONTROllED

. PnJ~ective Action Recommendations

-..:.* *-* . .......... ~ Prepared by: Alain Grosjean

Pnnt Name Approval: ,*. ,. ..__ * ::- Lori A Glander PnnlName Effective Date: June 14, 2016 This procedure excluded from further U-100 review IP-EP-410 (PAR) R12.doc

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 12 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE / IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page* 6 of 10 Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................* 3

2.0 REFERENCES

................................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................. 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................................................,............................... 3 5.0 DETAILS ............................................................. :............................................................................ 3 5.1 NUE, ALERT, SITE AREA EMERGENCY .................................................... :................................. 3 5.2 GENERAL EMERGENCY ..................................................................................................,.......... 3 6.0 INTERFACES .............................................................................................................................*.... 4 7.0 RECORDS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 8.0 REQUIREMENTS.AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE .................................................... 4 9.0 ATTACHMENTS ...............................................................................:............................................... 4 9~1 FLOWCHA~f*F_QR GENEAAL.EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS ................... 5

~* .~~*.: .* . .

9.2 MIDAS STABILITY CArEGORY - DOWNWIND KEYHOLE SECTOR CORRELATION TABLE ................. 7

~ .

9.3

EPA. PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES ................................................: .................................... 8 9.4 OVERLAY SELECTION FLOW CHART (FOR MANUAL PLUME VISUALIZATION) ................................. 9 9.5 WIND FIELp ORl.ENTATION- MIDAS vs. PLUME OVERLAYS ................................... 10

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP*EP-410 Revision 12 Enlergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES of 10 REFERENCE USE Page ~

PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 PURPOSE To prescribe the responsibilities and methods for determining recommended protective actions for New York State and County authorities.

2.0 REFERENCES

EPA Protective Action Guidelines 3.0 DEFINITIONS Protective Action Recommendations (PARs)- Specific recommendations made by the Emergency Director to offsite authorities in accordance with Emergency Plan procedures based on Protection Action Guidelines.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 T,he Shift Manager is responsible for evaluating accident conditions, classifying the accident, and recommending protective actions to offsite authorities during the initial phases of the accident. Th~ Emergency Director assumes these responsibiliti~s.J1Yhe11-he ta~s control of the* emergency response from the Shift Manager. The *~~dlological*hssessment Coordinator will assist the Em~rQency Director with prot"Eidive**ac~ion recommendations.

4.2 The decision to initiate any protective actions is solely the responsibility of offsite authorities ..

5,0 DETAILS ...

5.1 NUE, Alert, Site Area Emergency .

5.2 General Emergency . : * * . ,

5.2.1 The initfal pro.tedive action recommendation should be made within 15 minutes ()f the. GENERAL

. . EMERGENCY declaration.

5.2.2 Protective Action Recommendations (PA.Rs) shall be made in accordance with Attachment .9.1. Downwind Sectors are identified on Attachment 9.2.

The MIDAS dose assessment program uses the logic from Attachment 9.1 and 9.2 to determine PARs and affected downwind sectors. Impacted sectors include both land and water areas out to the distances included in the PAR 5.2.3 The Acetate Isopleth Overlays may be used with the map table to visualize the plume. If the Isopleth Overlays are used, then use Attachment 9.4 to suppo'rt isopleth selection and placement on the map table.

5.2.4 The initial PAR shall be made in the first GENERAL EMERGENCY notification to the State/Counties. All subsequent, Part I notifications shall include the latest PAR.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 12 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES of REFERENCE USE Page ~ 10 5.2.5 Re-evaluate the PARs based on the following:

Changes in Wind Direction or Speed

Dose Calculations

Field Team Data

EPA PAGs -Attachment 9.3

Plant Conditions

5.2.6 IF conditions are present that require a revision to the current PAR, THEN the revised PAR must be determined within 15 minutes of those conditions being apparent.

5.2.7 IF a decision to revise the PAR has been made, THEN offsite notification shall be made within 15 minutes of the revised PAR determination.

5.2.8 As protective action recommendations change, ensure appropriate steps are taken to protect the onsite population.

5.2.9 IF an EPA PAGta.:.exceedectur expected to be exceeded beyond 10 miles THEN consider-.the n~~d forPARs: beyond 1o miles and discuss possible __ _

actions with Stat~f.C0unties:-*Send Field Teams to confirm projections. ~.

6.0 INTERFACES 6.1 Evacuation Time Estimates 6.2 IP-EP-310, Dose Asse~sment 6.3 *State of New York Kl Policy Paper 6.4 IP-EP-420, Use of Potassi~m Iodide by Indian Point Personnel during an Emergency **

7 .0 RECORDS ** * *- _

NONE 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE NONE 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 Flowchart for General Emergency Protective Action Recommendations 9.2 MIDAS Stability Category- Downwind Keyhole Sector Correlation Table 9.3 EPA Protec;:tive Action Guidelines 9.4 Overlay Selection Flow Chart (For Manual Plume Visualization) 9.5 Wind Field Orientation - MIDAS vs. Plume Overlays

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 12 Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page .§ of 10 Attachment 9.1 FLOWCHART FOR GENERAL EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS (Sheet 1 of 2)

General Emergency De.dared

Recommend.SHELTER-IN-PLACE and implement Kl Plan for*2 Mile Radius and 2-5 mile doll.(nwind sec\ors.

See Attachment 9.2

Advise remainder of. EPZ to monitor EAS.

YES

-~ .--*

Recommend EVACUATION and implement Kl Plan ior 2 Mile Radius an_d 2.-5. mile

downwind s_ectors.

Recommend SHELTER-IN"PLACE and

Re.commend EVACUATIQN a.nd Implement implement Kl Plan for 5,10 mile downwind Kl Plan for. 2 Mile Radius and i-5. mile sectors downwind Sectors.

See Attachment 9.2 See Attachment 9.2.

Advise remainder of EPZ to monitor EAS.

Advise remainder of EPZ to.moOitor EAS-..

Continue assessme.ht of event, as pe(

Notes2*. 3 and.4 * ;*

NO Con~ir:tU~*ass,~ssmer:i.t o~ event, as per Notes 2,. 3 and 4

No Change to PAR

Recommend EVACUATION and implement Kl Plan for 2 Mile Radius and 2-10 mile downY-'.ind S:ectors.

See Attachment 9.2

Advise remainder of EPZ to monitor EAS.

SeeNotes*

IPEC NON*QUALITY RELATED IP*EP-410 Revision 12 Elliergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page § of 10 Attachment 9.1 FLOWCHART FOR GENERAL EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS Sheet 2 of 2 NOTE 1: Rapidly Progressing NOTE 3: PAR Expansion NOTE 4:1F Recommended Severe Accident IF: Criteria: Sectors Change, THEN:

First PAR after GE declared

IF meteorological conditions

Add new sectors to new AND, change and result in other PAR.

Containment Loss sector( s )/area( s) being

DO NOT subtract any sector Conditions (Table F-1) AND impacted after initial PAR, in which actions have been EITHER: expand the initial PAR to previously recommended ..

include new sector(s)/area(s)

Containment Rad Monitors ONLY IF:

R.-25 or R-26 > 68 R/hr OR.

Plant conditions are unknown or continue to be unstable-- NOTE 5..:JF PAGs Exceeded

Likelihood of a significant radiological release (greater (mitigating acti9ns not staif&d ., -- . -~>. 10

.... Miles:

than PAGs at site boundary) or not successful) or * * * '*

in ab-out an hour. degrading OR,

IF an EPA PAG is exceeded

.or expected to be exceeded .

EPA PAGs are projected or beyond 10 miles THEN

If these conditions cannot be measured to be exceeded in' .consider the n:eed for PARs determined, the Emergency

b~yond 10 miles and*discuss Director should assume they the new sector(s)/area(s} *' .

,possible actions with are not taking place.

State/Counties.

11==~~~~~~~~~~~~1 For Wind Shifts:

NOTE 2: Event Assessment Criteria:

Only expand the PAR.t9 ,.: . * , .

include the sector(s)/area{s)**_ * ...

impacted by the in-transit * *

Wind Direction/Speed wind shift if dose assessment

Dose Calculations projects the EPA PAGs will

Field Team Data be exceeded in the in-transit

EPA PAGs (Attachment 9.3) sector( s )/area( s ).

Plant Conditions

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 12 E11tergy 0 EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Page of 10 REFERENCE USE I Attachment 9.2 MIDAS STABILITY CATEGORY DOWNWIND KEYHOLE SECTOR CORRELATION TABLE Sheet 1 of 1 TABLE I- MIDAS Up-Valley Plumes Up-Valley Plumes (wind speed _::: 4 m/sec and wind direction from 102°-209°)

Pasquill Stability Categories Sectors affected A,B 16, 1,2,3,4 C,D,E,F,G 16, 1,2,3 TABU~ II - MIDAS Down-Valley Plumes Down-Valley Plumes (wind speed< 4 m/secand wind direction from 349°-101°)

Pasquill Stability Categories Sectors affected A,B 7,8,9, 10, 11 C,D,E,F,G 7,8,9, 10 ***.... ...*... -: .. *.~

- .. ~

TABLE Ill...: MIDAS Cross-Valley Plumes Cross-Valley (wind*speed > 4 m/sec OR wind direction from 210°-348°)

Wind Direction Center Pasquill Stability Categories A & B Pasquill Stability Categories C-G From (deg) Sector No. Sectors affected Sectors affected 169 - 190 1N 15, 16, 1,2,3 .. 16, 1,2 '

191-213 2NNE 16, 1,2,3,~ 1, 2, 3 214- 235 3NE 1,2,3,4,5 '2, 3,4 .' . ~

236- 258 4ENE 2,3,4,5,6 ,.". *. ~ .*.3, 4. 5_ ......

259- 280 5E 3,4,5,6, 7 4,5,6 281 - 303 6ESE 4,5,6, 7,8 5, 6,. 7 304- 325 ?SE 5,6, 7,8,9 6, 7,8 '

326- 348 8SSE *6, 7,8,9, 10 7,8,9 349- 010 9S 7,8,9, 10, 11 8,9, 10 011 - 033 10SSW 8,9, 10,11, 12 9, 10, 11 034- 055 11 SW 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 10, 11, 12 056- 078 12WSW 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 11, 12, 13 079 - 100 13W 11, 12,13, 14, 15 12, 13, 14

101 - 123 14WNW 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 13, 14, 15 124- 145 15NW 13, 14, 15, 16, 1 14, 15, 16 146 - 168 16NNW 14, 15, 16, 1,2 15, 16, 1

IPEC NON*QUALITY RELATED IP*EP-410 Revision 12

- E'ntergycy, EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page .§ of 10 Attachment 9.3 EPA PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES Sheet:1 of 1 Recommended protective actions to reduce whole body and thyroid dose from exposure to a gaseous plume.

PROJECTED DOSE (REM)

TO THE POPULATION RECOMMENDED ACTIONS (a) COMMENTS Whole Body (TEDE) <1 No planned actions. (b) Previously recommended State may issue an advisory to protective actions may be Thyroid (CDE) <5 seek shelter and await further reconsidered or terminated.

instructions.

Monitor environmental radiation levels Whole Body (TEDE) Evacuate unless constraints make it If constraints exist, special impractical; then shelter. Monitor consideration should be given environmental radiation levels. for evacuation of children and Thyroid (CDE) ~5 Control access. p~~gr:w.nt wom~n. ,~-

GUIDANCE ON DOSE LIMITS FOR WORKERS PERFORMING EMERGENCY SERVICES (REM)

Whole Body (TEDE):

10 Protecting valuable property Lower dose not pra'?!icable .

~*

25 Lifesaving or protection of large populations Lower dose not p'ra*cticable.

> 25 Lifesaving or protection of large population Only on a volu.ntary.basis to .

persons fully-aware of the risks involv.ed~

TEDE* Total Effective Dose Equivalent: Sum of external effective dose equivalent anc:L'committed effective dose equivalent to non-pregnant adults from exposure and intake during an emergency situation. Wor)<ers performing services during emergencies should limit dose to the lens of the eye to three times the listed value and doses to any organ (including skin and body extremities) to ten times the listed value.

CDE- Committed dose equivalent (to the Thyroid). .

(a) These actions are recommended for planning purposes. Protective action decisions at the time of the incident must take existing conditions into consideration.

(b) At the time of the incident, officials may implement low-impact protective actions in keeping with the principle of maintaining radiation exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 12

\

I Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Page of 10 REFERENCE USE ~

Attachment 9.4 OVERLAY SELECTION FLOW CHART (FOR MANUAL PLUME VISUALIZATION)

Sheet 1 of 1 I OBTAIN METEOROLOGICAL DATA l

I I RECORD WIND DIRECTION I I 0 I RECO.RD WIND SPEED l I

I RECORD PASQUILL STABILITY CLASS l I 1..*:-~---:. .-~*-* . *- *;*~*

J:.'._-

- ~.*

WIND SPEED _:::. 4 mis WIND SPEED > 4 mis I I WIND DIRECTION WIND DIRECTION WIND DIRECTION 340° - 101 ° 102 ° - 209° 210° - 3~9° .....

I . *I,_:-*<*_:-*.*

-"*:-** ~-::_~,

USE DOWN VALLEY OVERLAY GROUND OR ELEV.

USE UP VALLEY OVERLAY GROUND OR ELEV.

(Yellow)

USE CROSS VALLEY OVERLAY GROUND OR ELEV.

(Blue) (Red)

I I

.PLACE OVERLAY OVER ALIGN OVERLAY ALONG 1

PLANT ORIENTATION POINT ( l WIND DIRECTION

1. Plant Orientation Point:

a. Using down valley overlay {Blue) align horizontal axis on go 0

- 270° line with plume extending south.

b. Using up valley overlay (Yellow) align horizontal a.xis on go 0

- 270° line with plume extending north.

IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP.-410

Revision 12

/

Entergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 10 of 10 Attachment 9.5 WIND FIELD ORIENTATION MIDAS vs. PLUME OVERLAYS Sheet 1 of 1 NOTE:

The wind field orientation differs between MIDAS (Att. 9.2) and the Plume Overlays (Att. 9.4) at certain. wind speeds.

Based on the recommendations of consulting meteorologists, the origin of the up and down valley flOVIJ f~:>r low wind speeds(~ 4 m/s) was changed to the center of the Hudson River (the plume overlays isopleth's origin was the super heater stack.) This is more representative of the true met expectations.

The origin change results in the down-valley plume range going from 340° -101° to 349°*- '--:

101° for MIDAS. . -~-- -~-

As a result, the cross valley plume goes from 210° - 339° to 210° - 348° for MIDAS.

ML16166A059

Text

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

References:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

References:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

References:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

References:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

Title:

References:

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

2.0 REFERENCES

Navigation menu

Search