ML20157A128
| ML20157A128 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/14/2020 |
| From: | Martin R Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| IP-EP-510, Revision 8 | |
| Download: ML20157A128 (15) | |
Text
---Entergy Indian Point Energy Center Document Control 450 Broadway Buchanan, NY 10511 TO:
DISTRIBUTION CONTROLLED DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FROM: IPEC DOCUMENT CONTROL -
3RD FLOOR ADMIN BLDG TRANSMITTAL#: EP-20-0020 DATE: 6/1/2020 PHONE#:
The Document(s) identified below are forwarded for use. Please review to verify receipt, incorporate the document(s) into your controlled document file, properly disposition superseded, voided, or inactive document{s).
AFFECTED DOCUMENT IPEC EMERGENCY PLANNING PROCEDURES DOC #
I REV# I TITLE I
INSTRUCTIONS THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE($) HAS BEEN REVISED, PLEASE REMOVE YOUR CURRENT COPY AND REPLACE WITH ATTACHED UPDATED REVISION:
IP-EP-510 REVISION 8 4 c;,e,J J?RA-l
'RECO(l.!>.S EFFECTIVE DATE: 6/1/2020 RECEIPT OF THE ABOVE LISTED DOCUMENT(S) IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED. I CERTIFY THAT ALL SUPERSEDED, VOID, OR INACTIVE COPIES OF THE ABOVE LISTED DOCUMENT(S) IN MY POSSESSION HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM USE AND ALL UPDATES HAVE BEEN PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EFFECTIVE DATE(S)
(IF APPLICABLE) AS SHOWN ON THE DOCUMENT{S).
NAME (PRINT)
SIGNATURE Ir-----------------~\\
! U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
ATTN: DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK 11555 ROCKVILLE PIKE.
ROCKVILLE, MD 20852 DATE COPY LOCATION I D Page 1 of 2 1 0CFR50.54(Q 1(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-510 Revision:
8 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center
Title:
Meteorological, Radiological, & Plant Data Acquisition System Part I. Description of Activity Being Reviewed (event or action, or series of actions that have the potential to affect the emergency plan or have the potential to affect the implementation of the emergency plan):
Procedure was revised, to reflect the requirement in the Post Unit 2 Shutdown Eplan (PSEP), as submitted to the NRC per LAR, license #NL-19-001. See attached matrix for changes made. Procedure will be effective on June 1, 2020, Part II. Emergency Plan Sections Reviewed (List all emergency plan sections that were reviewed for this activity by number and title. IF THE ACTIVITY IN ITS ENTIRETY IS AN EMERGENCY PLAN CHANGE, EAL CHANGE OR EAL BASIS CHANGE, ENTER THE SCREENING PROCESS. NO 10CFR50.54(q)(2) DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED.
Part 1
Introduction:
Section A: Purpose Part 2 Planning Standards and Criteria:
Section A: Assignment of Responsibility Section 8: Station Emergency Response Organization Section H: Emergency Facilities and Equipment Part Ill. Ability to Maintain the Emergency Plan (Answer the following questions related to impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan):
- 1.
Do any elements of the activity change information contained in the emergency plan (Section 3.0 Step 6)?
YES D NO [8J IF YES, enter screening process for that element
- 2.
Do any elements of the activity change an emergency classification Initiating Condition, Emergency Action Level (EAL), associated EAL note or associated EAL basis information or their underlying calculations or assumptions?
YES D NO [8J IF YES, enter screening process for that element
- 3.
Do any elements of the activity change the process or capability for alerting and notifying the public as described in the FEMA-approved Alert and Notification System design report?
YES D NO [8J IF YES, enter screening process for that element
- 4.
Do any elements of the activity change the Evacuation Time Estimate results or documentation?
YES D NO [8J IF YES, enter screening process for that element
- 5.
Do any elements of the activity change the Onshift Staffing Analysis results or documentation?
YES D NO [8J IF YES, enter screening process for that element EN-EP-305 ROOS Page 2 of 2 10CFR50.54(Q 1(2) Review Procedure/Document Number: IP-EP-510 Revision:
8 Equipment/Facility/Other: Indian Point Energy Center
Title:
Meteorological, Radiological, & Plant Data Acquisition System Part IV. Maintaining the Emergency Plan Conclusion The questions in Part Ill do not represent the sum total of all conditions that may cause a change to or impact the abrnty to maintain the emergency plan. Originator and reviewer signatures in Part V document that a review of all elements of the proposed change have been considered for their impact on the ability to maintain the emergency plan and their potential to change the emergency plan.
- 1.
Provide a brief conclusion that describes how the conditions as described in the emergency plan are maintained with this activity.
- 2.
Check the box below when the 10CFR50.54(q)(2) review completes all actions for all elements of the activity-no 10CFR50.54(q)(3) screening or evaluation is required for any element. Otherwise, leave the*checkbox blank.
1'8] I have completed a review of this activity in accordance with 1 0CFR50.54(q)(2) and determined that the effectiveness of the emergency plan is maintained. This activity does not make any changes to the emergency plan. No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10CFR50.54(q)(3).
Per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan (PSEP), Unit 3 CCR will be the active/running plant and Unit 2 will be at shut down. The changes made to this procedure (see attached matrix) reflects this requirement of the Post Unit 2 Shutdown Eplan, as submitted to the NRC (license# NL-19-001).
The NRC has approved the PSEP per RA-20-040.
A review of this activity in accordance with 1 O CFR 50.54(q)(2) has been completed and determined that the effectiveness of the PSEP is maintained. This revision aligns the procedure with the protocols of the post Unit 2 shutdown. None of the changes affect the ability to perform classifications, notifications, or PARs, it does not affect activation or staffing of the ERO, and all planning standard requirements are maintained. The changes made do not require a change to the Emergency Action Level scheme, On-shift Staffing study or the PSEP.
No further actions are required to screen or evaluate this activity under 10 CFR 50.54(q)(3).
Part V. Signatures:
Preparer Name (Print)
Rebecca A. Martin
{Optional) Reviewer Name (Print)
Reviewer Name (Print)
Timothy Garvey Nuclear EP Project Manager Approver Name (Print)
Frank Mitchell Emergency Planning Manager or designee Preparer Signature
~"Cty\\ll~
Reviewer Signature Reviewer Signature
(),{tc,cq~ (\\ {Vl~ -611, to<<, u-i!l-\\
Approved Per Telecom Approver Signature Date:
5/14/2020 Date:
Date:
5/14/2020 Date:
EN-EP-305 R008
Change Page/Section No.
- 1.
Page 5 Section 5.1.2
- 2.
Page 5 Section 5.1.2 IP-EP-510 Revision 8 REVISION MATRIX Previous Version New Version 5.1.2.1 EOF/AEOF: Call Unit 2 or 5.1.2.1 EOF/AEOF: Call Unit 3 CR, 3 CR, identify yourself and ask for identify yourself and ask for the 1 Om met tower elevation wind speed, wind the 1 Om met tower elevation wind direction and Pasquill Category. Unit 2 speed, wind direction and CR may also be called; however, they Pasquill Category.
may not be readily available.
5.1.2.2 CR: Obtain data from CR: Obtain data from MRPDAS using a MRPDAS using a personal personal computer (see 5.1.1.2) or call the other unit's Control Room for MET computer (see 5.1.1.2) or call the data. Unit 2 may not be readily available.
other unit's Control Room for MET data.
Page 1 of 1 Editorial Effect on 10 CFR 50.47(b)
Change Planning Standards or NU REG-0654 program elements? Justify if NO.
N N
this section discusses a back-up method to the primary system to obtain 1 Om MET data.
No changes are made other than if they try to contact Unit 2 for data, they may not be available with limit resources as per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan, which was approved by the NRC per RA-20-040.
N N - this section discusses a back-up method to the primary system to obtain 1 Om MET data.
No changes are made other than if they try to contact Unit 2 for data, they may not be available with limit resources as per Post Shutdown Emergency Plan, which was approved by the NRG per RA-20-040.
J
-- Entergy IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE REFERENCE USE.1 IP-EP-AD2 Page 1
Emergency Planning Document Change Checklist Form (All sections must be completed, NIA or place a check on the line where applicable)
Section 1 Doc/Procedure Type:
Administrativen Implementing [XJ EPLAN n Doc/Procedure No:
IP-EP-510 Doc/Procedure
Title:
Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition New revision number:
8 Revision 12 of 1
NIA Corrective Action:
Yes t8l No N/A CR#: OL-OLl-2018-00090 CA 18 Effective date:.
June 1, 2020 Section 2 Change Description
- 1.
Ensure the following*are completed, or are not applicable and are so marked:
- a.
50.54q
- b.
EN-FAP-OM-023
- c.
IP-SMM-AD-102
- d.
- e.
NRC Transmittal (within 30 days)
N/A~
- 2.
List any other documents affected by this chang/ NIA
- 3.
Transmittals are completed: D N/A lgj Date: S l<j /ac>'JiD
- 4.
Ensure the proper revision is active in eB Ref. Lib.:~ N/A D
- 5. Approved doc/procedure delivered to Doc. Control for distribution: D NIA~ Date:5./ao/~o;;~p
- 6.
Position Binders updated: D NIA 00 Date:.!!dJ_..,,p"J..o
- 7.
Copy of EPDCC placed in EP file: 0 NIA' Date: __
- 8.
Supporting documentation is submitted as a general record in eB Ref. Lib.: D NIA I&] Date: s/41>/d,.D:J.6
- 9.
Word files are move/ zm working drafts folder to current revision folder in the EP drive:
0 NIA 'fi9_ Date: 0 I b'J,D Sheet 1 of 1
I P-SMM-AD-102 Rev:17 IPEC IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURE PREPARATION, REVIEW, AND APPROVAL Page 35 of 43 ATTACHMENT 10.2 IPEC PROCEDURE REVIEW AND APPROVAL (Page 1 of 1) procedure
Title:
Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System Procedure No*
JP-EP-510 Existing Rev*
7 New Rev*
8 ORN/EC No* DRN-20-00310 Procedure Activitv Tem(;!ora!)l Procedure Change (MARK Applicable)
D Converted To IPEC, Replaces:
(MARK Applicable)
D NEW PROCEDURE Unit 1 Procedure No:
D EDITORIAL Temporary Procedure Change D GENERAL REVISION
@ PARTIAL REVISION Unit 2 Procedure No:
D ADVANCE Temporary Procedure Change D EDITORIAL REVISION D CONDITIONAL Temporary Procedure Change D VOID PROCEDURE Terminating Condition:
D SUPERSEDED Unit 3 Procedure No:
RAPID REVISION Document in Microsoft Word:
D VOID DRNffPC No(s):
D Yes D No Revision Summa!)£ D
NIA - See Revision Summary Matrix Implementation Requirements Implementation Plan? D Yes l!l No Formal Training?[&] Yes No Special Handling? Yes l!l No RPO Dept Emergency Planning Writer (Print
. x n: Re rtin/x7106/ Re~(lyY}cv&-i Review and Approval (Per Attachment 10.1, !PEG Re
- 1. ~
Technical Reviewer:
Kevin Robinson
/
- -r/
- ldUJ
- 2. Cross-Disciplinary Reviewers:
Dept: ______ Reviewer: ________
(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)
- 3. I!]
Dept: ______ Reviewer:--------,,=-=---=-,----,,..,,..,.----,---=---,----------
(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)
RPO-Responsibilities/Checklist: F. Mitchell_---,,U-,,_--='"-:-,-"="~::-'--'-'~~~'--,-=--a-=-*-~-Mi___.z;
.... ~~...,,',ilt;)'-='-----
'(Print Name/ Signature/ Date) l!l PAD required and is complete (PAD Approver and Reviewer qualifications have been verified)
D Previous exclusion from further Ll-100 Review is still valid D PAD not required due to type of change as defined in 4.6
- 4.
Non-Intent Determination Complete: -------=-~-=-=---,-,,.,---...,..,,,----,-----,--------
(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)
NO change of purpose or scope NO reduction in the level of nuclear safety NO voiding or canceling of a procedure, unless requirements are incorporated into another procedure or the need for the procedure was eliminated via an alternate process.
- 5.
On-Shift Shift Manager/CRS:
- 6.
User Validation: User:
- 7.
Special Handling Requirements Understood:
NO change to less restrictive acceptance criteria NO change to steps previously identified as commitment steps NO deviation from the Quality Assurance Program Manual NO change that may result in deviations from Technical Specifications, FSAR, plant design requirements or previously made commitments.
(Print Name/ Signature/ Date)
AE~
= llil¥gy@
Prepared by:
Approval:
IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page Meteorological, Radiological
& Plant Data Acquisition System Rebecca A. Martin Rttecc{A0i\\Mu~
Print Name Signature Frank J. Mitchell
//N~
Print Name Signature Effective Date: June 1, 2020 IP-EP-51 O(MRPDAS)RB. doc Revision 8 1
of 9
LLE
- r-/;o-1~
Date
~___,w1~:J-6 Date
~
IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 8
- go Er1lergy EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 2
of 9
Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 RERFERENCES..................................................................................................... 3 3.0 DEFINITIONS......................................................................................................... 3 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES............................................................................................... 3 5.0 DETAILS................................................................................................................. 4 5.1 Obtaining Meteorological Data..................................................................... 4 5.2 Obtaining Reuter Stokes and Selected Plant Parameter Data..................... 5 6.0 INTERFACES......................................................................................................... 6 7.0 RECORDS.............................................................................................................. 6 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE............................ 6 9.0 ATTACHMENTS
9.1 Example
MRPDAS Meteorological Data Report.......................................... 7 9.2 Pasquill Category vs. Temperature Change Between 60m and 10m........... 8 9.3 Estimation of Pasquill Category.................................................................... 9
IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 8
~
g Entergy*
EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 3
of 9
Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure describes the methods available to obtain meteorological, Reuter Stokes and selected plant parameter data in the Control Rooms (CRs),
the Emergency Operating Facility (EOF) and/or the Alternate Emergency Operating Facility (AEOF).
2.0 REFERENCES
NONE 3.0 DEFINITIONS Meteorological, Radiological & Plant Data Acquisition System (MRPDAS) - system that provides meteorological, radiological and certain plant parameter data i.e.: R-27, R-25/26, VC Pressure and VC Temperature.
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES The Unit 2 and Unit 3 Control Room, and the EOF Radiological Assessors are responsible for the implementation of this procedure.
,.a IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 8
~E'.
EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE
=... 11Lergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 4
of 9
5.0 DETAILS 5.1 Obtaining Meteorological Data:
5.1.1 Primary Methods:
5.1.1.1 Control Room (CR):
- a. Use the 1 Om elevation meteorological tower display panel to obtain wind speed, wind direction and Pasquill Category.
5.1.1.2 Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)/Alternate EOF (AEOF):
- a.
Use MRPDAS to access the information from the 10m met tower elevation -wind speed, wind direction and Pasquill Category.
- b.
From the IPEC Sharepoint Website, pull down the Applications menu.
C.
Double-click the MRPDAS icon to access the MRPDAS program (Plant screen appears).
- d.
Select one of the following from left column under "Entergy IPEC": "Drill Data" or "Live Data"
- e.
Select - "Common" - "Meteorological Data" Select- "Primary MET Display"
- f.
Read the reports from the display; or click the printer icon displayed in the top left corner of the Primary MET Display screen. Click "Print" button in the "Print" window.
- g.
Obtain the latest measured MET data every 15 min.
and obtain weather forecast from MRPDAS and/or Weather Bureau.
- 1.
Update the MET Data Status Board to display the correct data.
- 2.
Notify the Radiological Assessment Coordinator of any significant changes to the MET data.
- h.
To exit MRPDAS, click on the red X at the top right of the screen.
IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 8
-g§'Ei1lergy'!>
EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 5
of 9
5.1.2 Back-up methods:
5.1.2.1 EOF/AEOF: Call Unit 3 CR, identify yourself and ask for the 1 Om met tower elevation wind speed, wind direction and Pasquill Category. Unit 2 CR may also be called; however, they may not be readily available.
5.1.2.2 CR: Obtain data from MRPDAS using a personal computer (see 5.1.1.2) or call the other unit's Control Room for MET data. Unit 2 may not be readily available.
5.1.2.3 Obtain data from Offsite Weather Services 5.1.2.4 5.1.2.5
- a. Use the Emergency Telephone Directory to locate the offsite weather services phone numbers.
- b. AccuWeather - use personal computer to log on to offsite weather services web. Select AccuWeather:
www.accuweather.com and enter "Buchanan, NY" or "10511" in Search Bar and click "ENTER".
- c. National Weather Service (NWS) - select National Weather Service:
www.weather.gov and enter "Buchanan, NY" or "10511" for "Local Forecast, City, St". Click "GO".
Use Attachment 9.2 to estimate Pasquill Category by using the temperature change between 60 m and 10 m.
Use Attachment 9.3 to estimate Pasquill categories based on weather conditions in case the met tower data is unavailable.
5.2 Obtaining Reuter Stokes and Selected Plant Parameter Data 5.2.1 From the IPEC Sharepoint Website, pull down the Applications menu.
5.2.2 Double-click the MRPDAS icon to access the MRPDAS program (Plant screen appears).
5.2.3 Select one of the following from left column under "Entergy IPEC": "Drill Data" or "Live Data".
5.2.4 Select "Common".
5.2.5 Select "Reuter Stokes Data" and "5 Mile Radius Map".
~
IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 8
=E~
EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE
-=-
nlergy IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 6
of 9
5.2.6 Select "Data Summary Report" (see Attachment 9.1 for example report) under "Common" or other Plant Parameter reports under "Unit 2" or "Unit 3".
6.0 INTERFACES IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment 7.0 RECORDS NONE 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE NONE 9.0 ATTACHMENTS
9.1 EXAMPLE
MRPDAS METEOROLOGICAL DATA REPORT 9.2 PASQUILL CATEGORY VS TEMPERATURE CHANGE BETWEEN 60m AND10m 9.3 ESTIMATION OF PASQUILL CATEGORY
,A.
IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 8 g, hnlc.>rgy EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 7.1 EXAMPLE: MRPDAS METEOROLOGICAL DATA REPORT Sheet 1 of 1 NOTE:
All "9s" in a data field indicates the data was not collected.
- DAILY
SUMMARY
REPORT ***
- DATE: 05/29/2002 07:10 ***
TIME
- MET TOWER DATA (M/S,DEG FROM,F) ***
HRMN (EST) SPD10M SPD60M DIR10M DIR60M DT60 DT122 PC 0700 2.2 3.3 2
15
-1.2
-2.1 D
- UNIT #2 PLANT PARAMETER DATA***
VG VG VG VG VG P948A P948B T1203 R-25 R-26 (PSIG)
(PSIG)
(F)
(R/HR)
(R/HR)
VENT R-27 (UCI/SEC)
-.2
.0 1.02E+02 <=1.00E+00 <=1.00E+00 2.53E+02
- UNIT #3 PLANT PARAMETER DATA***
CONT CONT DOME RAD VENT (PSIG)
(F)
(R/HR)
(UGI/SEC)
-.1 94
<=1.0E+00 1.0E+01
- ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION***
SITE BOUNDARY DIST=.6 MILES 2 MILES 5 MILES 10 MILES XU/Q (1/M2)
XU/Q XU/Q XU/Q (1/M2)
(1/M2)
- (1/M2) of 1.0E-04 1.9E-05 5.1E-06 2.1E-06 MON NO SECTOR 1
N
- OFFSITE MONITOR DATA***
2 3
4 5
NNE NE ENE E
6 ESE 7
SE 8
SSE RAD (MR/HR) 3.4E-03 6.9E-03 6.8E-03 7.0E-03 6.3E-03 7.3E-03 7.9E-03 7.4E-03 MON NO 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SECTOR s
WNW NW NNW RAD (MRHR) 8.5E-03 6.0E-03 5.9E-03 8.5E-03 1.1 E-02 6.5E-03 7.0E-03 8.4E-03
- METEOROLOGICAL FORECAST***
HOUR SPEED (MPH)
DIRECTION (FROM)
RAIN STABILITY 17 0 5.8 130 YES D
18 0 4.9 50 YES D
19 0 4.5 30 YES D
20 0 4.0 0
YES D
21 0 3.6 350 NO D
22 0 3.6 340 NO D
9
A
-= Entergy IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 EMERGENCY PLAN RELATED PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page.2 PASQUILL CATEGORY vs TEMPERATURE CHANGE BETWEEN 60m AND 1 Om Sheet 1 of 1 PASQUILL TEMPERATURE CATEGORY CHANGE (OF)
A
<-1.74 B
-1.74 to <-1.56 C
-1.56 to< -1.37 D
-1.37 to <-0.46 E
-0.46 to <+1.37 F
+1.37 to.::_+3.66 G
>+3.66 Revision 8 8
of 9
IPEC NON-QUALITY IP-EP-510 Revision 8
~E,lle,gyF, EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING RELATED PROCEDURE PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page.3 ESTIMATION OF PASQUILL CATEGORY Sheet 1 of 1 9
of 9
Use this attachment to determine the Pasquill Category in the absence of both measured vertical temperature differences AND the standard deviation (sigma theta) for horizontal wind direction.
DEFINITION OF PASQUILL STABILITY CATEGORY PASQUILL CATEGORY STABILITY CONDITIONS A
Extremely unstable B
Moderately unstable C
Slightly unstable D
Neutral E
Slightly stable F
Moderately stable G
Extremely stable Pasquill category can be estimated by observir,g or estimating the time of day, solar radiation, cloudiness, and wind speed.
KEY TO STABILITY CATEGORIES Surface Wind DAYTIME NIGHT Speed (mis)
Incoming Solar Radiation Cloudiness (lnsolation)
Clear Partly Overcast Thinly Clear to Overcast or Sky Cloudy
>4/8 Low Partly Cloudy Cloud
<2 A
A-8 B
E-F G
2-3 A-8 B
C E
F 4-5 B
8-C C
D E
5-6 C
C-D D
D D
>6 C
D D
D D
General Definitions
- 1.
- 2.
Daytime is considered as one hour after sunrise to one hour before sunset.
(a) Clear sky
- less than 20 percent cloud cover.
(b) Partly cloudy
- 20 to 80 percent cloud cover.
( c) Overcast
- 80 to 100 percent cloud cover.