ML20235A049

Forwards Draft Hazards Analysis Dtd 630805.Requests Preparation of Separate Summary Statement Re Merits of Case as Described in ASLB Procedures.W/O Encls

ML20235A049
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date:	08/15/1963
From:	Case E US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Watson F US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20234A767	List: IA-85-665, Discusses Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants,Including Const of Nuclear Plants in Seismically Active Zones ML20234A761 ML20234A769 ML20234A792 ML20234A798 ML20234A803 ML20234A812 ML20234A816 ML20234A827 ML20234A830 ML20234A838 ML20234A841 ML20234A844 ML20234A847 ML20234A851 ML20234A855 ML20234A858 ML20234A861 ML20234A864 ML20234A868 ML20234A871 ML20234A874 ML20234A893 ML20234A896 ML20234A900 ML20234A911 ML20234A922 ML20234A929 ML20234A932 ML20234A937 ML20234A944 ML20234A956 ML20234A965 ML20234A968 ML20234A976 ML20234A984 ML20234A993 ML20234A996 ML20234A999 ML20234B005 ML20234B008 ML20234B023 ML20234B032 ML20234B035 ML20234B040 ML20234B062 ML20234B066 ML20234B076 ML20234B084 ML20234B098 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709230193
Download: ML20235A049 (1)

Text

ow*M??'2l*2*

c3 ...

'3"?QJ??M*W5 ..w ..m.

4GtCI?'M?'"MW@@?U'.MWTN*NWO2*MMYYh.'s  !*C 1 . . . .

y . ; .1,..9."'J*,

& . m . , . . v:t a.,s ~ si

%Y, . . , : r"* '.  ;

1:

...y . ,;'

1 gwr@ ' y - "*

• V < .4. . > ; p:ri ., y. g s ,

!a;, UNITED STATES GOVEILMENT ' ' -

l

)  ?..

m$

demorandum To  : F. Norman Watson DATE: Aug. 15, 1963

,%. I Research , Power Reactor Safety Branch

%J n .J

%J, FROM

• Edson i.se, Ass t Director inh for Faci Jie Licensing, DL&R

&G oA! PREPARATION FOR BODEGA HEAD HEARING W% ~ .4 . '

SUBJECT:

m .. , : , , . . , , , .,

.jg

.,.v..

. g.

$.fM ~ The Director of Regulation has been furnished with a copy ~~

of the Draft Hazards Analysis on the Bodega Head case 4] dated August 5,1963. Without pMjudice to any changes 1

that may need to be made in that draft, he has requested f' '

that a separate su= mary statement be prepared which deals with the merits of this case in the manner described in p the licensing board procedures (see pages 20-22 of ]

attached) . j m What the Commission vants from the boards is very clear f) en this point, but there is no hope that the licensing q(Y d./

- " boards can, as a practical manner, carry out the Com-mission's wishes unless the staff work puts them in an I'fk C.1 .. . U9 ~.7s easy, positica to do so. , ., ,

Preparation of a suem y of this case along the lines

. . . l! '

desc-ibed abow should be begun immediately so that it will be ready in ample time for the hearing. For our

, guidance, Dr. Beck has prepared a rough outline of the basic elements to be considered in this case (which I have slightly modified) which contains at least some, or most, of the judgement positions which we must support.

What we eventually decide to say on earthquakes can very logically follow the treatment of the items contained herein.

1

n. ..

[.jA 'l

~ '

Enclosures:

' ~"

M' - - "

.As stated above

.~.c.a

a. @.,

e$ $l ,

2 91 ns.y l

..w . . . ._ .

Apps  : .,y,. ,. .

- r .. . ~

g - .. .

4/VM u. ~: -

, 1.-. ;/[ a  ;

wrx , .,

' ' ~

i~ s

. ::.;s . .

g .i t

8, .

. p. ,

8709230193 851217 l PDR FOIA -

a

, Q F1RESTDB5-bbS PDR  % ,:,:'.: %;~ h M : w : -.

-: ~ "

%_f,_f.M._ isc:nWL,&f.%<. Q%_hM

'Q_.'~25Y.yS_WQG.fvsy~kWr.i:.:.W4a ._ , ., ._ _ &_%,.r.y.w,&. .. ~ . .

_ _ - _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ -