ML20214P648
| ML20214P648 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 09/16/1986 |
| From: | Lazarus W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Husar I Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8609230345 | |
| Download: ML20214P648 (33) | |
Text
.
t
, SEP 161986 Mr. Ihor W. Husar, Chairman Regional Assistance Committee U. S. Federal Emergency Management Agency i Region II 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10278
Dear Mr. Husar:
Congratulations on your appointment as Chairman of the Regional Assistance Committee. I and my staff are looking forward to working with you and the Comittee you chair.
The staff of the Emergency Preparedness Section has reviewed the New Jersey State Government's response to the RAC review comments for the Oyster Creek off-site plan. This has been done in response to your request and in confor-mance with 44 CFR 351.21(1). The work sheets are attached.
Twenty-nine responses were evaluated with respect to response and revision.
Twenty-seven responses were deemed adequate; eighteen revisions were similarly classified. Only two elements were assigned " inadequate" for both response and revision; they are criteria H.10 and H.11 found on page 15 of the work sheets. The inadequacies are non-substantive. The Plan is complete and detailed in almost all respects and could well serve as a model for similar plans; it is one of the better Plans reviewed.
Three criteria G.3.a. , J.9 and K.4, warrant note here. The first criterion was rated adequate by the RAC and a State response is not normally in order, yet a hand written one appears in the State Response Column. This response notes establishment of an alternate news center. The location of the existing news center is acceptable. There is no requirement to provide an alternate news center.
The State's responses to criteria J.9 and K.4 contain references to the ALARA concept. The NRC imposes legally binding dose control regulations on licensees for planned activities, that is normal operation. ALARA (see Appendix I to 10 CFR 50) is one of these. ALARA does not apply to emergencies. If New Jersey wishes to establish this policy, it may do so.
But, the Plan should then specify how the present worth of the future cost of averted health effects will be determined and balanced against the cost of protective action and dose savings. EPA in its' " Manual of Protective Actions and Protective Action Guides" states in Section 1.6.1 "... the goal is maximum protection of the public with the least cost and disruption. Costs and risks must be balanced." And, in Section 2.6, EPA further notes "... population dose be kept as low as possible...".
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 8609230345 860916 PDR ADOCK 05000219 I F PDR
Mr. Ihor W. Husar 2 Effective September 1, 1986, Emergency Preparedness Staff assignments were rotated. Charles G. Amato is the lead inspector for all New Jersey reactors and is also assigned the RAC responsibility.
If you have an 488-1208 or Charles Amato at (FTS)y questions or coments, contact me at (FTS) 488-1394.
Sincerely, OriBi=al s' = g. g.,.
William J. Lazarus, Chief Emergency Preparedness Section Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ encl:
J. O'Sullivan, FEMA RII cc w/o enc 1:
C. Amato J. Hawxhurst i
1 RI:DRSS RI:DRSS RI:DRSS a Lazarus Amato<f*E Hawxhurst<p"//,4 h 9//g/86 9//0 /86 9/r/86 /
0FFICIAL RECORD COPY 4
v-.--%,rm--- ww, ,r----wew--en->==--r-- -- - w--- - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - ,
ANNEX 8: RADIOWCICAI. EMERCENCY RESPONSE PtAll POR OYSTER CREEK E8IO .b 8f db= "
- Ac p7 QgmW o3%ry/r4 sEvlstou 1 nAr toss e ' \ '
g 35 2 na. !
y ,s R4 newease
?a
.r: ;i }i RAC Evaluatl#m meesse. N .,,,,,,,,, j i
g.g RAC Comissents/Recessamendation jj State Response (Acties) Ij et State Resposee i e e. M .g )
i D
T.
"" k1 l g
A. Assignment of Regpnnathtitty (Organtratton Content)
A l.a The response organizations are identified A in Sections B-1-l%-A, 8-II-E, and Figure B-!!I-l. Previous comments have been adequately addressed.
i A. I . b In Sections B-t-III and B-1-IV-A the A concept of operations and the relationship I of each agency tn the total effort are
! spectfied.
i l A.I.c The interrelattnn= hips of the organiza-tions having an operational role are 1
1 i illustrated in Table B-1-2; however, this y j table is not consistent with the plan.
A
- A
~
Table B-l-2 attli needs clartitention. Table B-1-2 has been revied to reflect
$ The four functional groupn of Ocean County the Agency Matriz a and the responsi-bilities designated in the plan.
&y /f/ //
Orm do not correnpond to Agency Matria.
Croups 3 and 4 on mat in is Orm and f / ,
Support Division (on the ame line) and or , i the legend Groups 3 and 4 are n.E.W.S.
Croup and Public Works Group. Also, tb lead responsiblitty and support roles is
, the entria do not coincide with tb l Plan. Page B-t-18 designates the Sheriff's Dept. as the lead county agenc:'
1 l
l I
i 3
e I
A l
a n a a. 44 Mt.W Jt.ssht Pt.AN REVIP.W AsmEx a:
MAC A J- RAD 10tDCICAs. EMERCENCY RESPON5E PIAll FOR OYSTER CREEK
( k n eSfr 0 7/p r/sr anvision I, nAs Isas I8I#- #I }L -
I f
3 *O
? 352 3 a ne
_oa 3 55 8*'"
RAC Commente/Recomaneadation
- i gj 3 i' RAC Evaluaties
- $y *"
State Response (Action) jj of State Response m as Assesses N .es.t.
lasasesses dis e m 41 1
A.I.c for Access Cont rol with Support froe IUSP.
Cont'd ht the entris shown KJSP as lead respon-sibility. On page B-t-19 ,
the County ODI ,'
Is designated as the lead county agency for Personnel. Monitoring & Record [
Keeping, but the entris shows BRP. Page B-t-18 dasignates the County ODI as the lead Count / agency to coordinate the County Pe.,d Water and Milk Coat rol opera-1 tions. As required to support State j
operet tons and Table B-t-1 also designates j Canty ODI as lead agency but Table B-I-2 1 , designaten BRP as lead responsibility.
fage 8-1-19 states the County ODI will ***
espport the ARC which is the lead agency *;
f
, i for Mass Care, tmt Table 5-1-2 shows DDt/ Support Divisions as lead respon-siblitty.
A.I.d Spectile individuals in charge of the A l tuergency response are identified by title in Tahle B-I-3 and Section B-t-IV-A. pages t
B-t-16 to B-l-23.
A.I.e 24-hour per day emergency response. A l including 24-hnur per day manning of communtcations links is indicated in Section B-t-IV-A.I.1, page B-1-17 and Section B-1-Ill-R.I. page R-I-15.
4
, 1 i
a g ' SL AIL OF MP.V JER5EY PIAN REVl>M
- Anu n:
- A//f (, / .Z-C5 jj nAoro!ACICAL EMERCENCY RESPOWSE PIAll Folt OYSTER CREEK Page .l_ of 2.L.
nS/gp/r/ REVISION 1 MAY 1985
( d 't w j
- e ,
E ,o # n
~
2 . .
. /, O # s A4 ***""
n.
g D
RAC Commente/Recomienendation
!j i
State Response (Actles) 3i jj RAC Evaluation of State Respesos u.c.e. N t.t.
m 3r. - aned====e=0ll .mn , a t:3 41 A 2.0 runctione and responsibilitten, both 1 Primary and support, for major elements 5*able B-2-2 has been revised to & JTA./, V/'C SA /
and key individualg are identified in justify it and the agencies in Plan y g, f,[g A J )) Z sectio, 8-I-IV and Section B-2-IV-A.I.
in Table R-t-2; sithough, there are discrepancies between Y
- Section B-l-IV-A.I and Table B-t-2. For gM Psample, the ARC and RADEF, which have '
N - g agetenments, are not included in the f g p g, g#t 4 ~/ " d ,
g A.2.b the leral bagts for the authorttles outilned an the plan are contained in A w sap # m Section B-1-1-A, page 13-1-1.
L3 ppf ,,,c.
/nd N The Annex B plan, Appendtx I (Section 4,7 g 1
111.A.5) refers to e n t s t ing memoranda and The State and County CEM's have cgreements for Federat, State, County, obtained 59 of the 95 local #0tt's R ,% f f pp() s S / . . L A g
hunicipal and privete agenctes, Attach ~ designated sine the original &
' 1 ment 3 of Annes R lists nome of thene submission of 19 MOU's. The State g gYg' s memoranda, but appears to be incomplete
- and County will continue their & & , ' 'A*' -
The memoranda provided do not address all efforts to obtain a11 required Mott's. pg gp *)
ergantrations having a support role in an 1.J M M 0 /AlS CO/ MS'j tmergency response within the plume j amposure EPZ for Oyster Creek. /, yps4 M*4 h g,g gh The following agreements with local emer-grney response organizations have been Aff U s &u s , h y
included in materialg submitted by the 4 g jgg Stat e. However, as nnted below, ninee some p cf these agreements are not dated, it #
cannot he determined when thc9e agreements went into effect.
fM Y$'
,W.d'N
.,X/d
.g t i hw Cw-Yf
{! .. . -
j STATE OF Ntv JERSEY FIAN REVIEW Awwxx s: RADTOIKICAI. EMERCENCY RESPONSE PtAN FOR OYSTER CREEK Page _4 of _3g J
// A C A 7- d%w@ '
OS/cr/5g aEv 5 ION 1, MAY 1985
- WP f 8 .
8a #"a 2
3 m Me f, y # &4 Rue ==
g .= 3 3-1 RAC Evalsatiea us e. N w.s.
p" RAC Censsents/Recessamendatlem g,: State Response (Actles) .* j of State Respense smea gene.W_
g, "3 3 W. 23 A.3 4unicipal Cont'd a Long Beach and Rarnegat Light - 1/1/80 ,
e Agreement between Harvey Cedars Long Beach. Ocean, Ship Rottom. Stafford, and Surf City - 10/9/79 l
}
e l South Toms River and NJDSP - 1/1/78 '
\
Schools /Shelt e rs '
e Ocean County Roard of C M +
Freeholders Resolution datet 4/7/82 e Brick Twp. School System and Ocean County - 4/7/R2 e Jachaon Twp. School System and =
a Ocean County - 4/1/82 '.
s *,
e Lakewood Twp. School System and Ocean County - 4/7/82 e Little Egg Harbor Twp. Ele- ._s
/
mentary School and o cean County f. ,
- 7/27/R2
~
I 1 -
. 1
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - - . - " - - - - - - - - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ '
e
.e
~
, b s 5
g STATE OF MN JERSt:Y PtAN REVIDM ANNFJ St I
r/# C /1 (AmJ M $4/c pg RADIOt4CICAL ENERCENCY RESPONSE PIAN FOR OYSTER CREEK ege $ N 3g
[
aEvlslow 1, nAr 19e5 w <
[
=
E ,u ^E s .
65 #
[s &4
- n.
a,,s.s RAC Comments /Recommeads:len } i RAC EveIsaties p g
- ~
j 8 tate Resposee (Aeties) 3j ei state Resposee 44====*e N a==*====*=Nm To : ::e g 2 A,3 o Manchester liigh School and Ocean County Cont'd - 6/I8/82 e New Egypt Schont, Plumsted Twp. and Ocean County - 4/7/82 i
e Pinelands Regional School System and Ocean County - 6/30/R2 e Point Pleasant Morough Public School System and Ocenn County - 4/7/82 e Tuckerton Elementary School and Ocean County - 4/7/R2 e Georgian Cnurt College and Ocean County
- 12/21/82 e Ocean County College and NJOEM - 6/1/84 e Stockton Stgte College and NJ0DI -
2/19/85 Fire Companies and First Afd Squads The letters of agreement with local fire companies and first aid squads are incom-plete. Letters with 12 fire companies and 7 first afd aquade have been received fr J
_ j J
s
- STATE OF wtv JERSEY PtAN REVIW ANwt1 a:
F#6 /I d%g eg,ffsc RADIOIDCICAL EMERCENCY RESPONSE Pt.AN FOR OTSTER CREEK Page _6Sf 31 REvtstow 1, MAY 1985 9 l I. '2
- 3 3 . +
65 jj 2 AG 8****
n.
y a
RAC Commente/Recomessendaties
- g ~j State Resposee (Actles)
} i RAC Evaluation ef State Response asse==ee lal a s.sa.
I j t==esseme=Nm : ::1 ly
- A.3 materials submitted by the State to cover i cont'd Oyster Creek. A total of 95 agreements is currently being soight by the County.
I
- e Laitchurst Fire Department and NJ0DI -
1, UNDATED o Staf ford Twp Fire Company and NJOEM -
UNDATED i
o East Dover First Afd Rencre Squad and NJOFM - liNDATFD 1
e Ocean Cate First Atd and NJOEM -
UNDATED l The necessary Jetterg of agreements should -
be obtained from AII of the local emer-gency response organizations and listed in i
Attachment 3 to the Annex B plan. -
A. 4 Section B-t-tv gractflem each principal A organization will he capable of 24-hour operations.
.I 4
i i
l l
. . u . u u . .o. nr.v i w AwwEx n: RAntothCICAI. EMERCENCY RESPONSE PLAN FOR OYSTER CREEK Page _y Of 31 N/( /% N, qdge gg aEv 5 ION 1, MAY 1985 a
he SE3 3 e
?$
oU 3 &f masseeen .
ne \
e i 3i RAC Evaluation 44e e. N .,,,,,,,,g, RAC Comments /Recemamendation j State Response (Actles) jj of State Response s==e====e=M se sig o,
2 41 C. Emergency Response Lippo r t and Resources C.I.c Attachment 17 of the State Plan and A Attachment 12 nf Annew B Identify fegourceg that will be available to support a Federal regponse. -
C.2.a Section B-I-III-R.2 indientes the county A may dispatch a renretentative to the EOF.
C.4 See A.3 above. I see A.3 carnent.
D. Emergency Clagstftration System M,m $fN [
M M MN W D.3 Section B-II-D cutabitnhes an emerstency classification system consistent with that A 4&M g gy;y estabtighed by the uti1Ity. gj ,
D.4 Emergency act ions to be taken are consts-A tent with the emergency actions recom- h. ##U 4 mended by the nucI*ar factitty Itcennee. g4h m/ M In Section B-t-III-F.3, indicateg that the page B-I-10, it OCNGS Emergency g g Director will estahltah llatson with the / d N [gj State 001, which will coordinate the off- MJ M 's ette emergency rc< ponce in accordance with M / g c,-
the OCNGS Site Energency Plan and the NJ . .
, g State RERP. It also states that the County mC, based on orders ceceived from d3 4M'W
m i
i seAit ut ht.W Jt.R34l,I $'t.AN REV lP.W 8I8 g 8 M
ANNEX 8: RADIO!DCICAL DfERCENCY RESPOIISE Pl.All POIl OYSTER CREEK -
A/r c /I C3%,,4 Lfg fra aEvlslow I, mar 19s5 f
E ,o ~S a 2 na
- sj Ag a.esa
! d, 5 RAC Evaluaties as e. N ,,,,,,,,,u,,
]i l y 3
RAC Cessments/Recessenendation jj
- ~
State Response (Actles) Ij et State Response s a.o e. M n, f t, E 51 D.4 the Governor through the NJ State OEM,
! Cont'd will direct County Emergency Operations.
E. Mottiteetton Methods and Proceduren
! E.1 Mutually agreeable hages for r.otification A i of response organization consistent with j the emergency classifteation and action
- level scheme is previded for in Section R-
] l-Ill-F.I, page R-t-8.
4 E.2 Procedures for alerting, notifying and /]- /#/6 hs mobiltring response pe rsonnel for all I The plan has been revised to include the Ocean County Office /f / / W f organtrations are contained in Section B- of Emergency Management CCOEM as y A g I-IV-A.I and the Implementing Procedures; one of the organizations who may however, Sectton A.I (Nottftcation 6 be notifying the County Sheriff's '
ra--.nicat ion) of the implementing Communications Division.
Procedures for Sheriff's Dept. Indicates i that the Sheriff's Dept. will be nottfled g by a telephone call from the County EOC i during working hours. I Section B-t-IV-i A.I.I of the Plan indicates that the i theriff's communice* ton Division will be nottfled by telephor.c or teletype from the State 000 and by dedicated telephone from OCNCS. The implementing procedure should be consistent wit h the Plan.
i 4
i l
STATE OF NW JERSEY PlJul REVlW /
/" Page 9 of y
- ANNEI R: RADIOIKICAI. EMERCENCY RESPONSE Ft.AN F0E OYSTER CREEK '
N#6 4% CJ;r e fw6 ada 4r mEvislow 1, nAr less
= -E s. n.
3U 3: Ai 8**""
fj jg 3i RAC Evoluetles asse==*e N wt.a. ew
" .3 RAC Cosaments/Recennsneadation .: State Response (Acties) .Im J et State Resposee hasse==** M : a 4:>
D M 3 "2 $1 T.
E. 2 Sectinn n-I-Iv-A.I.I (pg. s-I-16) g. /. / 8 " M M #*C # 8 Cont'd designates the OCSCD as the agency to make , w
- 311 nottftention calls. g 3 fp The paging system tg discunged in Section B-t-V-A.I I (see page B-1-I7).
j E.s The Emergency Broadcast System hag been A estabitshed as the means of disseminating information to the public, in Section R-III-D.2.
l In the event of a radtological emergency i
at the Oygter Creek Nuclear Cenerating j Station. ERS may be activated by telephone
- nottftcation to WADR-FM. The State OFN in b responstbte for developing and disseminat- I ing information in the initial and followup meggages to the public.
E.6 Sectiona R-Itt-D.I and R-I-III-D state A j that a nygtem of gireng will be used to notify the pohlte of an emergency within 15 minutes. Thig gygtem will be activated by the County FNC. The location of a Itst i of tone alert radtog tg algo stated.
l l
l
i
.l
' . . . . . .... .,,.m . r un n.. . s r.= .%
AM 4 45 (9rty~44 ANNEI 8: RADIGIACICAI. EMERCENCY RESFOIISE Fl.AN FOR OYSTER CREEK 8I' ~10 * "31 \.s ..'
<g e 5 / aEvlSION 1, MAY 1985
=
I ,'J -E d 2 . eaa -
l 6l} *2g 35
- a s.a.m 3i RAC Evelestina 88=e==*o N ww jEmi Ms RAC Comments /Receammendelles 4 State Response (Actles) .E j et Stat ~e Response seasemee=M : a. eses m ;
i D 3 "2 2 1 Z 8. I j E.7 Attachment I4 of Annen B contains sample A
! written message for the pubite giving instructions for protective actions based upon the Itcensee's classification scheme.
F. Emergency Communtrations
- F.I.e The Annen 8 plan containe prowlstong for A l 24-hour coverage of co muunication links as 1 well as primary and backup communications i between emergency factitttes. Refer to B-l III-F.I B-t-lll.F. B-t-IV-A.I. Table B ,I, and Figures R-t-l.
i F. I .b Frovisions for communications with the A i State and contignous local governments rigure B-1-4 has been replaced by d
within the Emergency Flanning Zone are Table B-2-21 in the cross reference ,
j described in TabIce B-t-1 and B-1-Il .'
j contained in Annex R. Figure B-t-4 should ,
be replaced by Table R-t-il in the creen reference.
- i F.1.c Refer to Annet R element F.I.b for A communications with etate. Section ill.C.2 of the State plan definem communication with Federal response organizations as a State res pons ibilit y.
j F.I.d Communt rat ton linka hetween the Emergency
) Operattnns Vartitty, State Enc and inca' 1
Communications with the County 1 Field Monitoring Team in SOP 204.
EOCm are documented in Tahles R-1-1 ant
[ B-t-Il of Annex R. However, these tables i
1 do not addreas commmicat ion with tlw County Field Monitoring Teams.
}
1
4 STATE OF MEW JERSEY Ft.Aal REVIEW ~%
ANNEX 5: RADIOt4CICAL DIERCENCY RESPONSE Pt.Aal FOR OTGTER CREEK Page A of 1 ,y,'
//46 AJ- (Affu/> # -4 / g- p g REVISION 1, MAY 1985 ' ~ '
. l
=
-S a 3a n.
E a 3 Ag 65 gg RAC Ceanuseets/Recessamendation j[
gj State Response (Action)
]i Ij RAC Evaluation of State Resposee asse====
A4 heesqueesN iw- as es N .M m O
E
- a it 1
4 F.I.e Refer to Annen B Element E.2. / ~
1 I See E.7 8 F.2 The NUREG crogg reference refers to the 1 The New Jersey Emergency Medical i JEMS cosununicat ion plan and the State Emergency Mass Casuntty Care Plan. The System (JEMS) Plan is referenced { $~W~ / Y k k in the Plan on page B-III-18. fgM$
JEMS plan provides an excellent discussion
. of a coordinated communication system.
However, referencen to these documents j could not be located in the Annex 5 plan. '
[j /-2#M F. 3 Frovisions for periodic testing of the 1
[hT .,
emergency communicattons system are The frequency of siren, Ess and tone alert radio tests is provided ' f, p, .7, j 5*ldS [ {
l described in Sectton B-I-V-B.2.1 of the in the plan on page B-1-25. '
! ~Annen R plan. However, the frequency of stren EBS and tone alert radio tests could , , .
not be deterutned. f'
,,. s j C. Public Education and Information *
[., , ,
l C. I . e , Sections B-III.E and B-1-ilt.E discuss tr general I
The Plan has been revised to /
terms a pubite in f ormat t or program; however, specifte reference ti include references to educational ff /2T -/2 M information on radiation, addition-M the following required information t' al sources of information, protec-g # [. 'iT 'c A
l absent:
tive measures and radio protective drugs, starting on Page B-III-9.
fW :
' {.
- a. educational information on radiation;
- b. contact for additional Information; i
I 4
ANNEX Bt
. sam ut Nr.W Jt.Rst.f PIJUI RtWlW .
f Net # % GWm4 5 rpptRADIOt4CICAL ENERCENCY RESPONSE PtAff FOR OTSTER CREEK arv Stow t, naf 19ss h IO ~12 g&
t * !
3 r
- 2 3E2 2 . s ou 3 A g n.
y RAC Counmente/Reconsamendelles
- i
} i RAC Evolustien a
i D E
~
State Response (Actles) jj et state Reepense mee=e.N sd Mm,,,,,,,,,e all I
A t C.I.e-d c. Protective measures, e.g.,
Cont'd evacuation s routes and I
f retarstion'~ centers.
sheltering, renptratory .t Protectton, radioprotective droge; and N .4
- d. special needs of the handicapped. .'g C.2 Section B-III-E specifies that updated A written material will *e distributed at ,
least annually to rentdents of the EPZ.
In addition, Information for the transtent population te also discugged.
C.3.a Secttons B-III-E. R-IV-B.2.I and B-1-III-E &
designate the reapective points of contact A [ ., .'. I I" * " W '
and locatton of the Emergency News Center g, 4 [,,, ,, p.. 'A for the media during an emergency. The ggf. *su A*
,,< l'
- C' '
ENC to 200 yards within the 10-stle EPZ e, '
g,j,gg and a back-up factitty has not been designated. I ~ 1g .
q M- # #
, , ,)
~
s A backup factItty should he wr c. MM deatgnated unicas the primary facility is g, , ,,, (,, . ,___t considered acceptable by the NRC. ~ gy y /* 4 ,p- ,
.. s ,, l. e * #,- ,- .- 8'*=4 @, g, ,,, ,
Plan Section B-IV-B.2.1 (p. B-17.3) should * .,
" /p g. p 4 ? d. Y } { 4 )[ Q & SJ M.
clartfy release the partles involved in the r 4 - _7ty, _ f e W f. 5. 4M of public Information announcements. g
, /
i
~[
u M/ s cer*< .-reen,
! wW
)
I
! I j i
(
i STATE OF NEW JERSEY FtAN REV1MW p8IO =g3== e{ 3g -
ANNEI 53 RADIOWCICAI. EMERCENCY RESPONSE FtAN FOR OYSTER CREEE NA C A 2 pyyJ ys,fgeggy mEv1Slom 1, naY 19e5 3 fl
? 352 s.
n.,
ou s e,,1a
- i .
3E RAC Evaluaties .
Aeeeses(4 ,m RAC Cessamente/Recommunesdatles State Response (Actles) jj .E j et 8 tate Response essespeesM ,= w - m
$y "- It C.4.s In Section B-It!-E and B-l-III-E the A County Public Information Officer under the direction of the Board of Chosen Freeholders in designated as the County spokesperson. The Governor's spokes-person, the Prems Secretary, will be the ,
State Public Information Officer. ,
C.4.b Section B-III-E estahlinhes arrangements A for timely exchange of information among destRnated spokesmen.
t C.A.c Section B-III-E indtentes the State will A
. .n .. l-coordinate rumor control operations ' ';f through a toll-free membe r. This is consigtent with Section III-E of the State , , p; (,
plan.
i C.5 In Section R-!!!-E the plan calls for A annual meetings to acquaint the newn media
, with the emergency plang and other pertinent informatton.
H. Emergency Facilittee and Equipment H.1 The Emergency Operatlong Center for each d
organization is described in Section 1 The Cocnty has allocated space at the Northern County Resource Center gg d 111.8.1 of the Appendices to Annen B. in Lakewood for Operat2ons. The M gj g- 7 Figure B-IV-5 shows that the following County Communications bus will M
provide all communications links needed. The Resource Center has l adequate space to allow for munici-pal EOC's that may need to relocate.
See page B-1-5.
'l l
- _ .~. .-. -
i STATE OF NtM JERSKY Pt.AN REVtW 31 AsafEI B: RADIOIACICAL DIERCBICY BESPONSE Pt.AII FOR OYSTER CREEIC 8 I8 14 O ""
//6
/ C7 MA, .f, sir [' #MM [df REVISIOIf 1,944Y 19e5 I w a -5 2a n.
3E 3: Ai
- f, 5 assessesini w,.a.
es,t 3g 3i RAC Evaluaties m p RAC Comments /Recessaneadation g4 8 tate Response (Actles) Ij of State Response sese===***M se m i 3" E
d3 di I
j H.3 ROCS are wiehin the IO-elle EPZ: Ocean
- Cont'd County. Barnegat Light, Barnegat, Beach-vood, Berkeley, Harvey Cedars, Island Melghts, l.acey, Ocean Twp., Ocean Cate.
Fine Beach, South Tous River, and Stafford. Provisions for alternate EOCs -
should be descrthed in the plan.
a Evacuatton procedures for workers in EOCs
! are also needed.
I In addition, Section B-t-111-8.1 states a
1 that a Ims will he used as the alternate County EOC. It appears doubtful that a zingle bus can accomendate the operations ,
af a County FfC. -
j j, s l H.4 Section B-t-Ill-F.I provides for the A
, timely activation and staffing of emergency factlitteg. ,2' H.7 Specif te reference to SOP-402 has not been I included in the /.nnes, A ' plan. The total Equipment for the county monitoring g "T P /SW N ,
team js identified in Attachement count for each type of equipment should be 18 of the State Plan page 6. 4ML provided so that it can be determined whether the available equipment is sufft- -py ~g '
cient to cover the number of teams. This g 7g /f- /-f A-/
equipment is critical, since the State plan specifiew (page IV-29) that the #d [M -
{ County field teams will provide data prior p r gd - #~
l to the arrival of the I1EP teams. nv w
1 4
STATE OF MEW JERSEY PtAN REVIEW ANNEE 8: RADIOIDCICAI. ENERCENCY RESrcWSE PtAN FOR OYSTER CREEK Page _15 of _31 -
- NW A 7 ( St % ,/c 74 M Sg aEVision 1, war 1,es i
.e. -s i EE d s. n.
3 A3 j f5 M
jg }i RAC Dalmaties 8'*""
adsesses M wem as
.t.lso RAC Cessmente/Reconsaneadation T, State Response (Action) .E j et State Resposee I
" u.
D 3 "2
- sesemessesM t.s ss. m K E1 !
H.10 Section B-I-V-C indicates the frequency of inspection, inventory and operattonal I Th'e Plan has been revised to identify y, C.'-/-2 7 h 3 % checks of escrgency equipment and instru- the State RADEF Officer as being # sents. This section also addresses the responsible for inventory and in-spection of equipment. See 3-1-27 gg ; supply of reserves to replace those re- j g gg # /4, sowed for catthration and repatr. Ilow-i ever, it should he clart fled specifically A3 l uho to responsible for the inspection and inventory. !H.lt Attachment 14 of the State Plan (not 18 as I The Plan has been revised to refer- // 8 i thown in the 0654 cross reference) Itsts ence SOP 402 under the County AM W [ commtmication networks which are avatl- Padiological Defense Service.
, xble. F.qutpment avatlable to DEP, otheT Accident Accessment on page B-1-21. q f-r-/3 4 State. and county permannel in shown in 3 p(4 SOP 402; however, the SOP has not been referenced.
Equipment is identified in Attachment 18 of the State Plan on page 6. 4f& pf M ~
$ /
Section B-t-IV-A.3.7 consists of a list of - p equipment. No indication is given as to 4 how this equipment is deployed, e.g., , ! sonttoring kita; decon hits, etc., or M I where the equipment Is stored. - iH.12 Sectton B-t-IV-A.l.2 (page R-t-21) states A ) that the County Radiological Defense ! Coordinator will forward all radiologica! dsta to the State RRP at fleadqua rt e rs or j, the Forward Command Post. i i e I
J i 4 . SI ATE OF Nt'W JERSEY PIAN REVIEW ANNEI 5: RADIOtDCICAI. DeERCENCY RESPONSE PIAN FOR OYSTER CREEK E8I8 =j6====== 'Y 3 7., f yet n FWwdd4pg6 Revision i, seat t,es * , .N"#; - t
;g . -E s oy js Ai a .
a**==
,,,1,1,e r
6a ;i }i RAC Evelasties assesses N
,w m s i
a gg RAC Ceansments/Recessaneadaties j State Respe: se (Actles) Ij ly of State Response immeseemenM x
- 1. Accident Anneagment
/f. 3..Z. $$ )$~l**El 5 * , 1.7 The equipment shown in Attachment 2 to SOP 1 The SOP 402 has been reference in f/,
j 402 indicates that the county monitoring the plan in section a-1-IV-A.J.7, yg ppy a team has the capabi11ty to monitor ambient on paae B-1-21. *' radiation levela and to determine the air-i borne lodine concentration in the presence
.g ] ; of noble gag. Parc B-l-21 indientes the ,[
j County will deploy a field monitoring ' i team. However, SOP A02 to not referenced. 30/-20Y .I 3Y I.8 Section B.-I-IV-A.1.2 does not address the tenues of activation, notification meane, I Activation, deployment and
, , , gjM gf l- **
composition of the County Field , field team composition, monitoring eqatp- Monitoring Team is identified in f _ a-) , uent, and estimat ed deployment times for sop 20d, % county teams.
. _ ' n. -
s J. Protecttwe Response n. ws s J.2 Informatton on evacuation routes and A
?ip 4 provisions for transportation for on-site ,
_ p, ,
. , .i -
~
individuals are contained in Attachment
- 15 Element A, Appendix I to the Annen B * ^ jf- '
- plan. ..
N v'g -
- J.9 Section B-1I-5 references the FDA PACS with appropriate tahic duplicated. There I The Table B-II-2 has been revised to reflect the correct value.
[) St ~ 9/ & bi [M .' j is, however, one error in Table B-11-2, g _g .y ! 2esponse tevel for Preventive PAC. On ' j/ g , 4 j/ p} \ S h M (0) A / W & } 8 s f /f/ h A-l
,wwWS fD<ns"
/ -
i t i 4
i STATE OF NEW JERSEY PtAlf REVtW
/1 ANNzx 8: RADIOwCICAI. EMERCENCY RESPONSE Pt.AN FOR OYSTER CREEK Page gy of _yg',;y-' .;
1 CA (- CWw </r-
<r d # / y g g arvlSION 1, MAY 1985 -'
g ~5 s. . o2 $* Ai 8"'"" rt.e - 60 : : 3i RAC Evaluation AssessesN ,a t.a.s a, RAC Ceanments/Recommaseadatien 8 tate Response (Actles) o jj Ij et State Response assessenes td se til W.
<- it 1 .s J.9 Table 8-11-2 the value for the tattlag Cont'd M N deposition for Sr-90 shguld be 0.5 oct/m rather than 0.05 uCt/m . The PACS for
- d - 44/48 ^'
emergency workers should be revised to MM-/# y ,ggc h &A #22 36/e) gg y 4 ^ include two additional itees? (l) pregnant g 7 emergency workers are subject to the PACS j for the general public only, and not those I A /# ' F # #* j for emergency workers; (2) any excessive rrposure he done on a voluntary basis with g gg, ,f) g full knowledge of the potential riska In- 6 ~ - C- M j volved. These changes should be included g gf e . 4/~ - In the test and tables which discuse g se 1 Emergency Worker PACS. Tables B-II-8,2 & /g _ a y-3 should he added to the cross reference. MN* ' D ,, 3 J.13.a y "8 //,i? CswW 4 d ' Maps showing evacuation routes, evacuation I M fIgu is.l[ s been replaced. ~ r areas, and ratocation centers are included in Attachment 15. flowever, Figure 15.12 h-[r -
~ 4 j to illegible. - s It is recommended that a ', [
i larger scale map he referenced with the _ g <g g fj g M '" nest plan revision. l Also, please provide M 8 #b final evacuation tms routes corresponding #-rg w M .[ to Figure 15.I3 under separate cover. '*,' J [ IT I Maps indtrating radiological sampling and monitoring pofnts are included in mf Y \ Attachment 5. 4 I
i < ~ STATE Otr mim Jensar rt.nm mEviear AnwEx as RADIOIACICAI. EMERCENCY RESPONSE Ptm FOR OYSTER CREEK , Page.3,._ of.[iTi@ w. g pec /E F J % e-SS arv Srom 1, seaY toes -'
'DD y 352 se ;nGe?
* 'd 3 3i se , sees ,, ,,,,,
oa i 3.i RAC (velmaties wN .m a gg RAC Cessamente/Recessamendatien jj State Response (Actles) .E j et State Reepense sesessenenM wm y,
<~ fy .- .
J.10.b 1aps showing pnpulation distributton A
; around the nuclear factitty are included [*i in Figure B-IV-3, Figure B-IV-4 and s
Figures 15.3 and 15.4 of Attachment 15. j J.10.c Sections B-II-D and B-t-III-D discuss the i various means of notifying the public. I Route Alerting Plans are maintained as supporting decuments by the Jocal MIMM [1 This is consistent with the State Plan. EMC's. Copies are provided. The M Q/ ~, However, neither plan presents specifics route alert plans and source of tone regarding route alerting and the distrt- /J M .jf A5 alert radios are referenced on page gg . /. button of tone alert radios. Refer to the 8-III-7. evaluation of element J.10.d for the State Plan. [M pyf M b dIf . J. t 0. d
)' The adequacy transportation of of resources onbtitty for the impatred I The number of non-institutiona21 red non-ambulatory persons is provided
/ M /S: 8 6 CectYW h -o'-
A j persons identifled in the Annex 5 plan in the Special Care racilities Plan 3,& . !j:;. ~ i could not be evaluated becmane the number on Table 15.8.6. This Jist is [MU _y y '7 h-of institutionaltzed and nontnatitutional-i
, ;. 4 derived from the annual public ined individuals who anny require trans- jnformation mailing.
f ,g"fp) C- q$ ,,,4 4 77 /S" ,QT *? portation could not he " ? il .' y located. addition, the plan does not disclose where In hJ Sj j hility impaired individuals are gg " f e, r f C.-S Ae b = 4 A
STATE OF NW JERSEY PIAN REVlW Amutx a: RADIOtDCICAI. ENERCENCY RESPONSE PIAN FOR OYSTER CREEK E8I8 *19===== Ot 31
#M /% (JM/mW 74ee Et aEvtsrom 1, AT 19ss e .
E ,o ~5 d s. ms
! s 3; angnese
/, 5 jj }i RAC Evelsaties Aaseases N w,,,,,,,a,3 gg D
RAC Cessments/Recessineadation gj
*~
State Response (Actles) j ,j et State Reapesse hadnesses M tw :: 2; &1 J.10.e 4 plan for the distributton of K1 to 4 i roergency unrkern utgned by the Commis-I section B-II-J has been added to the cross reference. The Potassium Y# g h M l < toner of Health and dated 8/29/85 has Iodide Distribution Plan has been / been received. it covers quantitles, added to B-II-J on page B-II-7 g 7 ylede ,/f / $ A storage, locattnns and distributton to [A ,7 g gg emergency workers. PAG for thyroid is 25 rem. g& #M' MM* g 44 M . [ In additton, Section 11.8.3 of Annex B references the use of KI. A projected dose AAL K3 Ak & of 25 rem to the thyroid will be the trigger point fnr K1 une by emergency ~W l-i workers. This in consistent with the ! 'Potagstum Indide Distrthutton Plen. N.J.
! Dept. of Health. Cji
[ Rowever, Section R.II.1 should he added to the cross reference and reference to the Potaantus Iodide Distribattoe Plan should be added to thin section. J.10.f Figure A-Ill-8 shows the dectaton mecha- 1 The Potassium Iodide Distribution ntsm regarding the administration of KI. Plan has been added to Section j t!=o, the Pntagstum Indide Distributton B-II-J of the plan on page Plan, indica 2ed in the cross-reference D-II-7. listing, pro-ides the dectaton mechanism i for the administrattan nf KI to emergency workers and instftuttnnalized populations. However, reference to the KI plan should be included in Section 11.B.3 of Annex 8. i
STATE OF ssEW JERSEY PtAn REVIEW Awwtx s: RAnnotoCICAI. ENERCENCY RESPONSE PIAN FUE OYSTER CREEK p8I8 =20 of 31
/// C / 1 Pym,J 74e4 Sg REvlstou 1 naf 1985 E ,o a-s s. n.
m Ag ea - 65 j3 }i RAC Evaluatiea Assesses N .,,,,.,,,m,
** 2 RAC Censsente/Recessaneadation :4 State Response (Actles) .I j nu D ~s
*= .
of State ReePesse heeseseen M se m
- 7. $1 J.10.g Local resourceg for evacuation and A i relocatton are identifted in Appendix C to Element A of Attachment 15 to the Annes B
; plan. Estimates of the institutionalized ) and general transit dependent populations are contained in Element A and B of Attachment 15.
The Marine Evacuation Plan page 15(d)-! to i, 15(d)-20 covers Barnegat Bay Clearance and Marine Evacuatten. It describes in detail I the role of the New Jersey Marine Law Enforcement Bureau (MLER) the U.S. Coast Cuard, and the New Jersey State Police. , Page 20 of the Ocean County Schout The four buses frorn Southern ~ Evacuation Plan does not include the Regional have been added to the , Southern Region A buses for Southern Plan. t Regional High School and Stafford Townships. This should be added. J.IO.h Appendtz D of Element A to Attachment 15 A to the Annes R plan Itats 32 Congregate I Care Sheltera, with a total capactty of I 26,510. Figure Ib l0 of Attachment 15 i shows that all of the shelters are at least 5 mile 9 beyond the EPZ and that 13 of the shelters are 10 miles beyond the EPZ. I
STATE or mew JEasar rws arvsm 4// 6 A 1. AnwEr a: stADIO!DCICAI. ENEaCENCY RESPONSE PIAN FOR OYSTER CREEK Page 21 of _31 t P h m gf fg ff Sg REVISION 1, MAY 1985
- =
d 5
~
- E ,o 2 .
n.
- f, 5 jj Ag . s.,== ,,,,,,,,
g D RAC Cessments/Reconsaneadation gj State Response (Actles) 3-1
.E j RAC Evaluation et State Response Ae=== nee (a) w .g3 heesomeo M <!3
*A t K h4 J.lO.1 Projected traffic capacities are presented A in Table 15-C-7 pages 15-C-37 to 15-C-42, of the Evacuation Plan. Attachment 15.
J.lO.j organtrational responsiblittles for access I control are presented in Section A.4.1. it and Appendix 5 to Attachment 15. Access control points are shown on Figure 15.9 of Attachment 15. Marine Access control is discussed in Element D of Attachment 55. Rouestr o The t/ SCC has been added to the Plan a responsible agency for Marine
//Il U O O b t Section A.4.l.it of Element A should be Access Control. &mG / S s
revised to include the USCC as a ' responsible agency for martaa access M Y j 7 jf ' control. fy[4) / 4#
- J.10.k Section A.3.V1 of Appendix A to Element A g The number of public works vehicles of Attachment 15 ( p. 15-(A)-A-2) state, is identified in the plan table. gyj g j/ y-tow t rm h a and smhlic works vehicles will be digpatched to disabled vehicles and
/
[ /D)'A ~2 MN 2 [ alternate evacuation routes will be estab- M g.6 g /r(g)-// -3 N2 linhed if necengary. However, information g ' on resources available to remove impedt- A
- e ments to evacuation and their location won [M # ' " - /
not found in Attachment 15. A Ym-a W + & Caus/ MowuA h
1 1 1 i STATE OF Ispf JERSEY Pl.AN REV!W .' AnwEr a: BADIOtDCICAI. D8ERCENCY RESPONSE PLAN FOR OTSTER CREEE Page _22of _31 4/46 A.7 C W M /p g g F r aaVISloss 1 MAY 1985 i
=
-3 s. n.s i
E$ ! 6{} jg 2 3i RAC Evaluaties adeessesN toets&ss j y a RAC Cesnamente/Receanmendellen gj
*~
State Resposee (Acties) jj et state Response hassessesN isses sm. nl 42 J.10.1 Evacuation time estimates are provided in 1 N Appendix C of 8.lement A of Attachment '
- 15. However. the following selecols, i listed in Element C - Ocean Comety Office /
, of Fdocation Emergency Response Flan -
- i were not included in Table 15-C-lO-A (p.
! 15-C-54): I.svallette, Tous River ) Alternate School, Seaside Park School and
- Seaside Heightm.
4 ) J.12 Section B-t-ilt-F.5 of Appendix 1 states A that suffletent personnel and equipment to monitor all evacueeg within 12 hours will be provided by local government with the , . support of the State ODt. Specific re-I sources excluding numbers of instruments and personnel are foamd in SOP 402. At t. 402-2. , K. Radiological Exposure Control l K.3.a Procedures for determining dose exposure A to emergency workers is spectfled in
- Section B-t-Ill-F.5 and in State SOPS 401 and 405.
i There are provisions, in SOP 405, to
- evaluate the permanent record dostmetern
] when the accumniated doge of 1.25 rem in indicated by self-reading donleeters. 1 i l I; l
l 1 l 1 l l l l l
~: O-
. Q'd(N'I STATE OF NEW JERSEY PIAlf REV!fth Page _23of _M ANNEX 8: RADIOIDCICAL ENERCDICY BESPOIISE PIAll FOR OYSTER CREEK
~ p' '
A> ,4 ( .( % fg gag 3 / REVISIOII 1. IEAY 1985 w a -5 3 ,a a 2a nE 3 A; assomose 6i jj 3i RAC Evaluation assemees N w,,,,,,g w gaas RAC Ceansments/Recessamendaties :4 State Response (Acties) Ij et State Resposee heesomeenN em 3 33 + A; y ] 7. K.3.a The inventory of dostmetry in Attachment I Cont'd of SOP 402-t provideg for a pair of self- reading (0-200 mR and 0-20 R) dostmeters and a TLD for approntmately 1725 county workers. This Atterhment alto lista permanent ' record dostmeters as equipment issued to sit DEP response personnel. '
].
K. 3. b Sors 401, 405, and 408 provide that the A The time interval for reading pocket dostmetern shall be read and the dosimeters has been established , readings recorded at Intervals no greater in the pJan at 30 minutes on page
'than 30 minutes. BRP to assigned the 3_J-22. The SDP 405 has been <**
Et responstbtlity '< l for maintaining done revised to refer to SOP 402 when records of all emergency workers and for **
.~ k the dosimeter reaches the .',,.
evaluating the need for further dose authorized Jimit. j commitment evaluation by whole body ' ,, b;. l counting. , KR?. SOP 405 should refer to SOP 402 when a ,.; - dostmeter reaches the authortred limit. Sectton 5-I-III-F.5 of Annex 5 should be consIateat wt th the SOPS and on page 5-I-12 indicate that danteeter will be read at intervals no greater than 30 etnotes and not "dostmeter will be read frequently."
i. l \
, vy.p(pf J
STATE OF NOf JERSEY FIAN REVIMW Page _24 of' _31' ; _, r i%0 ANNEI 8: RADIOLDCICAL D8ERCENCY RESPONSE PIAN FOR OYSTER CREEK
/) A C A7 CWJ /0,h c $4 REvlStou 1. MAY 1985
- %'M e
~p .;c
- = -E s. n.~
., E.o 5 s A; ese ess
- 65 ji 3i RAC Evolestles asseuses N as j
gg o RAC Consmeste/Recomsmondelles jj
*~
State Response (Aeties) iJ jy of State Response essenessesM w st, 7. K.A Section III.F.5 of Annes B and the I The Plan has been revised to
- g. a. I, / 6-2-69 4 p pff I applicable SOPS should be revised to specify that the DOFT is responsible g yg M f+/r[/M/M l specify that fMNI is responsible for for approving emergency worker .e approcing emergency worker exposure is exposure. See page B-III-29.
i excess of general puhtte PACS. (Note - pp - J g The ALARA concept cited in the g~ ef } page 3-111-17 states "upon recosusendation plan. See pages B-II-5, B-II-6 J ,l'd? 17 I from BRP, the DOM will authorize the use < of Kl.") and B-II-8. M' ls T Figure B-Ill-R indicates that governor's l '
?
i designee may authorize higher limits. .i ] The AIARA concept in discussed in the .J g State plan (Sec. II-8.t. p. 11-5). The %~ . fa, AIARA concept should also be cited in the - l4%. Oyster Creek site-specific plan (see B .[?
. ; - _9 5, p. B-II-b and Table 8-11-1).
1 t/ "*lw
- 4 K.5.a The action levet in SOP 404 has been A . .,I ];'
reduced to 50 cpm for the instruments j .. i
- f, j;/;,, '* ',.
l specified. The trigger point for the need 1 { for decontamination of emergency workers j is specified in SOP 406 along with the D * ,. '
- i instrumentation for which this trigger point is appitcable. 3
.w a d
i
} . .
4
31n W-AMIEI 8t RADIOIACICAL DIERCENCY RESPONSE PtAN FOR OYSTER CREEK I8IO .=25 /=== 0 h NA c /r Gwg.,g g w p p s mEvlston 1, m T 1,es -@i
~ W '.-:
#g
- s. @
- 3. gE 2m AG * . swes.s ?
3i LAC Evatustles. adessam M %w 0 RAC Cessamente/Recessaneadation h State Response (Action)
$*.3 3G Ab $j I
1 of State ReePease bedogsses$d games,,ses t) K.5.b Sor 401 providen that a Radiological A NUREG Element K.5.6 has been added Monitoring Technician will do relevant to the cross reference. monitoring and gives radiological equipment at decon centers. Also, the inventory of radiologteal equipment is i adequate. .
. s.
l SOP 401 deserthen the monitoring and , decontamination facility operation, SOP , 404 gives procedures for monitoring and
- decontamination of the general public and -
j SOP 406 gives procedures for monitoring ,'
- .and decontamination of emergency workers
! and equipment. $,';
j M.J. j' Rowever, NUREC element K. S. b and c/2 app!! cable plan and 50P references is not
.lh included in the cross reference. .* ', 2,]. ,
,r* i I Medical and Puhile Health Support f*?c/ /;
L.I See comments in revtew of State Plan. Also, the cross reference lists Attachment I A primary Nospital, consnunity A77/ A3A/ v s M ,'-l -l9' . , 7 I which is no longer consistent with Memorial Hospital and b:ck-up Hospital Bridgeton Hospital f -/ Q 7 "2 y M M ~ Attachment 9 of the State Plan. A primary have been designated for Ocean and back-up hospital should be designated County. .A pf [ for Oyster Creek NGS. g W We A sszou &
& r r r,<- ue n rr 7
' h#6 <
STATE OF NEW JERSKY PtJul REVIEW ANWEI Bt RADIOtDCICA1. OfERCENCY RESP 0sSE P1AN FOR OYSTER CREgg Page .26 of .31 NEC A 'J P m4 e 4 fc g4 aEvrSion 1, nAr 1,e5 i , .
= -3 m. ~ na.
8 a 3 2 &4 neareaee w ,, 6i j[ ]i RAC Evaluation wee N %m y D RAC Comments /Recoenmendaties j State Responee (Actles) Ij of State Respense Wee k w- m i 2; It
- l4 The Emergency Mags Casualty Care Plan has A
. The JEMS Plan hJs been added to
- been referenced in Section B-t-III-F.5. the cross reference, j The JEMS Plan should be included la the cross reference.
' M. Recovery and Reentry Planning and
- 1 Post-Accident Operations ,
! M. I Sections 8-III-F.5 and 8-1-III-F.5 A deserthe the decinton procean and general l plan for recovery and reentry. Sections 8-1-III-F.3 and B-III-F.3 provide for the coordination of State and County response. P l N. Exercises and Drills
~
N lN.I.a Adequate provisions have been included in A Section B-t-V-B.3 of Appendix ! to assure l that exercises are conducted in accordance i with NUREC-0654 i j N. I . b Sections B-t-V-B.3 and B-l-V-8.3.1 provide A { that the exercise geenario will test the capability to muhtltre resources.
,i ma Ash UF Mtw Jr.55tLY PIM mEVIN 2 Anwer as mAntotocicAs. unencency assrouss Pl.as rom ovstra carer Page _27of _31 4 4//C /% /pMg pg
/
PhY ErVIsl0N 1. MAY 19e5 g 4 ,
-3 3 I
3U d 2 3 Ag seesem m. I 6 f; 3 }i RAC Evaluatien 44 e=ses N w,,,,e,,,a,, g p RAC Comments /Reconsaneadaties gj
*~
8 tate Response (Acties) 4j of State Response es amesse M se up W. 41 1 N.2.o Section B-t-V-B.2.8 provides for an annual A test of comun t ent ions between OCNCS, the State, Cnemt y and amicipal F.0Cs. Conurunic a t ion drit!= wit! miso test the Eccurate trangetaston of the message content.
% 2.c Section B-t-V-8.2.2 of Appendix ! A sdequately describes provintons for i Medical Emergency Drilla.
, N.2.d Section B-t-V-B.2.3 states that the BRP is A l } responsible for conducting radiological , monitoring drille. I j L 3.a section B-t-V-B.I states the scenario will A j include the baste objectives for each 3 i eneretse on drill and evaluation criteria. I W 3.b section n-1-V-n.1 neates the scenario for A i s'ach czercise or dritt will include the } date(s), time pertad, place (s) and , ! participating organtration. I iN.3.c Section B-I-V-B.I state 9 the scenario for A }' each excretse will include a time schedule cf real and stentated events. i l i !_ l *
) 1 1 m e.x a: RADIOWCICAI EMERCENCY RESPhsfE PI W FOR OYSTgg rearr Page JL Of 3L,. 0
}
//sc n h pgge gg mEvlsion I, nAY 19e5 i
- ~e m ,,
80 -3
# 3 . se.,
i f5 8 2 &i ***"'* a ,,sas. , g RAC Eveleetles g .2 RAC Ceanseeste/Reeeannesidellea Y .: 3i aa.e=ses N a* State Response (Aeties) Ij of State ReePease assasqueenMm wm ' I a IE 21 N. 3. d Section B-t-V-B.I =tates the acenario for A 1
.each emeretse will include a time schedule of rest and simulated events.
1 l D.3.e Section B-t-V-5.1 staten the scenario for A . i j each esercise will include a narrative summary describing the met twitles 'to be *
- j performed.
I
- N.3.f Section n-I-V-B.! mentes the scenario and A l narrative vitt be distributed to official observers prior to the exercise.
) W.A -Sect ion B-1-V-B.3.I provides for A l i . observation. evaluation and critiquing of the annual cueretses. C. 5 - Section B-1-V-B.3.1 and R-t-V-E provides A for restew and updating of plan reflecting changes suggested by the exercise l critique. This section also assures that the revision are received and posted. ! O. i Radiological Emergency Reeponge Training
- O.1
+ Section B-1-V-A providen for training for A appropriate individuals involved in emer-gency response planning and those who may be called upon to aggtet during an i emergency. t l i i _ I
sTAn or met asassy rue nuvixw Ammer s: mAarotaCICAl. gremesurY RESPOmsE Pum FOR O M ER CREEE ISIe OY L ;e , I
##c M Ch '
y M p ss e navision 1, mar 1,es , 3y 33
,2 8 g
&s nee **=a m n.
. 6o ;j ]i RAC Evelsalles meesee. isl ,, y 3 RAC Casassente/Recomsmeedelles rj State Response (Actles) fj et State Reepense NM ,m.es,se. en i i Te At 0.1.b Section B-l-V-A specif tes that where MOUs A estet between Incat agencies, the training . } wt!! be offered to other departments which l are members of the mutual aid districts.
- 0. 4.a- Training programs have been provided in A j d, f-j Attachment 18 and Section B-t-V-A provides Attachment 18 has been added to the I
for the periodic retraining of emergency cross reference. I response personnel. Attachment 18 should j be added to the cross reference. t . j 0.5 Section B-I-V-A provides for the periodic A .. I retraining (at least once annually) of g 3 1 emergency response personnel. )g:1 {. , P. Responsiblitty for the Planning Efforts . ',9 #1 4 Development. Periodic Review and ' ' g",D Distributton of Emergency Plans J)f[ 4 P.I Section B-1-V-A states that the State 001 A , is responsible for training of county and 31 municipal emergency response planners. *. (' P.2 s. . Plan maintenance responalbtitty rests with A l the County EMC (see pages B-t-20 and B-t- -l 26). 1 l 1 I. i 4 9 9 i
- .. -- - ~~ ^
1 4 J e J STATE OF NEW JERSEY PtJN REVI N ~ ANNEX Bt RADI0taCICAI. ENencerY gg5r0W5E PIAN FOR OYSTgg ram page 30 o(31 * { i *_
///C. A.I hg /ph g / asVIs10s 1, naf 1985 * : ' '
" ,p' ~-<
J / ' 1 w 3U -3
# 3e
. t..
A; sei fj jg 2 3 -1 RAC Realsation sessesse aesesse. N . g., RAC Comuments/Recessaneedstles ll 4 State Response (Acties) Ij et State Response 5 "= 33 beesqueen N samenemmes (s) 21 1 3E ) P. 3 Regponsiblitty is assigned to the County j >- 2 A
- EMC (see Sees. B-1-III-A.I and B-t-V-E at d6 ') W "" " 7
)' pages B-I-4 and B-t-26, respectively). As pp y ;ZM 5
- j the Individust responsible for updating ,
emergency plans and coordinating these plans with muntelpal EMCs. , 2 P.4 Sectina B-l-V-E states that the annual I A i review and updating of emergency plans ) ' will reflect changes suggested by the exercine critique. These revisions will l be certified that they have been received
- , and posted.
s .. ; f f P.5 Approved changen to the plan will be i distributed by the State and County OEM. I The plan has been change to identify revised pages with dates and
/f / / d
- Nowever, there is no indication that the indicators.
y j revised pagen will he dated and marked to . j show where changes have been ande. The Title of Attachment 29 has been ') P. 6 Attachment 2 to a ligting of supporting A changed to Standard Operating MM N .*~. j plans and thier source. Procedures Cross Reference. M ' P. 7 The cross reference Itsting the procedures l I I by title and the aggactated plan reference has been received from OEM via letter { dated rugust 21, 19M. This Itat has been j referenced as Attachment 19 to Annes B. Bowever. for clarification. the title of 1 s ? / , o w i . .
~ ~ . 7
s
~
i t 4 1 1
- STATE OF NW JetsEr PtAN REVtW
~
Page L' W
- -- *? p*
' Amucx si naciotoC Cat. sucRCruCv masrouse Pian son orstsa r== . ~ c6. p navision 1, sear 19e5
- m% .
- pp(,py y g g g gf '
~;%, \
i .
,, - s, ress >:
s. 5 a, 3 sa
&i naaeeme
.my$ ;
65 jg State Response (Acties) 3i {j RAC Evaluaties of State Resposee aassumes N heesquete M wm m g .= RAC Comments /Recommendelles !j 32 p" 41r , , g~ .
- F. r' P.7 should be " Standard . ,; *
- I Attachment 19
'j Y. - j Cont'd Operating Proceduren Cross Reference
- and ;
sot " Implementing Procedures Cross n } Reference" as the procedure titles refer ' to the State SOPS and not the County ' N N') Implementing Procedures. . iA
* ?. ,.h.
;G l
< The revised OCEERP has been included as Ii4y. element C to Attachment 15. ,, f., {- { , ] ' P.8 Anneu 8 contains a table of contents and a 1 The revised cross reference is J I 1 cross reference. However, the cross attached. M' ..-
, reference has errors and shot 1d be g/,. App g p + '9,l'(% ;
rew'eved and revised. , P.10 There is no indication in Section 8-t-T-R 1 The plan has been revised to w W '3e[:7 f,N,4 ) indicate that telephone nunbers yy 'j "l that telephone numbers will be reviewed sad updated on at temet a quarterly bests. will be updated at least qu rterly. jf / / /j M M #. 7 I Q,' - A5M ' , ' f.I w A% m
. .aMy
"- :g .
w :9; l
,M{
r 1 7$y e...- 1 r 3 i
- g 4
4 o I
! ~
i '#m__. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ . . _}}