ML20198L384

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Stresses Awareness & Resolution of Listed Points Re Inconsistencies Between Mechanical/Piping & Qa/Qc Work Per Comanche Peak Technical Review Team Ssers.Qa/Qc Design Staff Needs Review by Terao,Landers & Chen
ML20198L384
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 03/08/1985
From: Scinto J
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To: Livermore H, Shao L
NRC
Shared Package
ML20197J316 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606040275
Download: ML20198L384 (1)


Text

.

~

/

f ~'

'f

/[*

\\

i r

Note to Herb Livermore o

  • V s'

t

/ 3/8/85 Larry Shao (g,

fi h

r 38 ht\\'U b )

1H sn, s

'r P' From Joe Sc!nto

?M h gh r \\Yp({k t \\,.. %\\,W$w.

>j f

t pc k

i Re: Comanche TRT SSERs

('

ht V J. (,e 1;z g c-

\\.11 V

rs-During our discussions of the Mech / Piping work and the QAYQC work, we pointed out a number of inconsistencies between the Mech / Piping work and the QA/QC work.

This note is to make sure that you are aware of these points and assure that they are resolved.

The principal points involve:

Mech 2(AQW 30) vs QA/QC AQ 7 relating to the Stanford NCR n-(Mech looks more comprehensive)

%T Mech 43 vs QA/QC 8 liner plates

=-

[D R lE6'T Mech 10 vs QA/QC A? 61 gouged pipe W f C.

In addition the QA/QC design QA staff needs review by Terao, Landers and Chen.

In addition, QA/QC AQ35 appears inconsistent with QA/QC AQ135 with respect to use of irs vs NCRs.

cc: VNoonan

=

STreby 8606040275 860527 s,

PDR FOIA QARDE85-59 PDR

.