|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217J3341999-10-19019 October 1999 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Sale of Portion of Land Part of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Site Including Portion of Exclusion Area ML20217E0181999-10-0606 October 1999 Provides Nj Dept of Environ Protection Comments on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station TS Change Request 267 Re Clarifications to Several TS Sections ML20216J7591999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs NRC That Remediation Efforts for Software Sys Etude & Rem/Aacs/Cico Have Been Completed According to Schedule & Now Y2K Ready 05000219/LER-1998-011, Forwards LER 98-011-02, Three Small Bore Pipe Lines Did Not Meet Design Bases for Siesmic & Thermal Allowables. Engineering Std Will Not Be Completed Until End of 4th Quarter of 1999 Due to Scheduling Conflicts1999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards LER 98-011-02, Three Small Bore Pipe Lines Did Not Meet Design Bases for Siesmic & Thermal Allowables. Engineering Std Will Not Be Completed Until End of 4th Quarter of 1999 Due to Scheduling Conflicts ML20212J6721999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs of Completion of mid-cycle PPR of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station on 990913.No Areas Identified in Which Licensee Performance Warranted Addl Insp Beyond Core Insp Program.Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl ML20216K1421999-09-29029 September 1999 Provides NRC with Name of Single Point of Contact for Purpose of Accessing Y2K Early Warning Sys,As Requested by NRC Info Notice 99-025 ML20217D1661999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards Proprietary Completed NRC Forms 396 & 398,in Support of License Renewal Applications for Listed Individuals,Per 10CFR55.57.Encl Withheld ML20217B2531999-09-24024 September 1999 Informs That on 980903,Region I Field Ofc of NRC Ofc of Investigations Initiated Investigation to Determine Whether Crane Operator Qualification/Training Records Had Been Falsified at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML20212E1971999-09-16016 September 1999 Forwards Rev 11 of Gpu Nuclear Operational QAP, Reflecting Organizational Change in Which Functions & Responsibilities of Nuclear Safety & Technical Support Div Were Assigned to Other Divisions ML20212A7921999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Second RAI Re GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, Issued on 950817 to Plant ML20212B5571999-09-10010 September 1999 Forwards Rev 11 to Oyster Creek Emergency Dose Calculation Manual, IAW 10CFR50,App E,Section V ML20211N2941999-09-0303 September 1999 Responds to NRC 990802 Telcon Request for Environ Impact Assessment of TS Change Request 251 Concerning Movement of Loads Up to 45 Tons with RB Crane During Power Operations ML20211J9831999-09-0202 September 1999 Discusses 990804 Telcon Re Sale of Portion of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Land.Requests Info Re Location of All Areas within Property to Be Released Where Licensed Radioactive Matl Present & Disposition of Radioactive Matl ML20211J6771999-08-30030 August 1999 Submits Response to NRC 990802 Telcon Request for Gpu to Provide Environ Impact Assessment for Tscr 251 ML20211K2391999-08-23023 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data Repts for TMI, Oyster Creek & Corporate Headquarters Located in Parsippany, Nj ML20211C0161999-08-19019 August 1999 Advises That Info Submitted by Ltr,Dtd 990618, Licensing Rept for Storage Capacity Expansion of Oyster Creek Spent Fuel Pool, Holtec Rept HI-981983,rev 4,will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20211B9011999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Rev 0 to EPIP 1820-IMP-1720.01, Emergency Public Info Implementing Procedure ML20210U4341999-08-17017 August 1999 Responds to to Chairman Dicus of NRC on Behalf of Fm Massari Concern About Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Not Yet Being Fully Y2K Compliant ML20210Q7331999-08-12012 August 1999 Responds to Re TS Change Request (TSCR)264 from Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.Questions Re Proposed Sale of Property within Site Boundary & Exclusion Area ML20210L6311999-08-0606 August 1999 Discusses Licensee Response to GL 92-01,Rev1,Suppl 1, Rv Structural Integrity, for Plant.Staff Has Revised Info in Rv Integrity Database & Releasing as Rvid Version 2 ML20210D2801999-07-22022 July 1999 Submits Response to Administrative Ltr 99-02 Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates. Estimate of Licensing Actions Projected for Fy 2000 Encl.No Projection Provided for Fy 2001 ML20209H5001999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Revised TS Pages 3.1-15 & 3.1-17 Which Include Ref to Note (Aa) & Approved Wording of Note H of Table 3.1.1, Respectively ML20210U4411999-07-12012 July 1999 Forwards Article from Asbury Park Press of 990708 Faxed to Legislative Officer by Mutual Constitute Fm Massari Indicating That Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating State Not Fully Y2K Compliant ML20209G1451999-07-0909 July 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to 2000-PLN-1300.01, Oyster Creek Generating Station Emergency Plan. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Summary of Changes,Which Became Effective on 990702 ML20209E0821999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards TS Change Request 269 for License DPR-16,changing Component Surveillance Frequencies to Indicate Frequency of Once Per Three Months ML20209B7501999-07-0101 July 1999 Responds to NRC Request for Info Re Y2K Readiness at Nuclear Power Plants.Generic Ltr 98-01 Requested Response on Status of Facility Y2K Readiness by 990701.Licensee Y2K Readiness Disclosure for Ocngs,Encl ML20196G1361999-06-23023 June 1999 Provides Status of Corrective Actions Proposed in in Response to Insp Rept 50-219/98-80 & Revised Schedule for Completion of Actions Which Are Not Yet Complete ML20196E6421999-06-22022 June 1999 Forwards Revised Pages of TS Change Request 261,dtd 990618. Replacement Requested Due to Several Dates Being Omitted on Certain Pages ML20195G6541999-06-0707 June 1999 Discusses 981204 Initiation to Investigate Whether Contract Valve Technician,Was Discriminated Against for Raising Concern Re Use of Untrained/Unqualified Workers Performing Valve Repairs.Technician Was Not Discriminated Against ML20195G6631999-06-0707 June 1999 Discusses 981204 Intiation to Investigate Whether Contract Valve Technician Was Discriminated Against for Raising Concern Re Use of Untrained/Unqualified Workers Performing Valve Repairs.Technician Was Not Discriminated Against ML20209B0561999-06-0404 June 1999 Informs That NRR Has Reorganized,Effective 990328.Forwards Organizational Chart ML20195D0551999-06-0303 June 1999 Forwards TS Change Request 226 to License DPR-16,permitting Operation with Three Recirculation Loops.Certificate of Svc & Tss,Encl ML20195C5511999-05-25025 May 1999 Forwards Book of Controlled Drawings Currently Ref But Not Contained in Plant Ufsar.Drawings Were Current at Time of Submittal ML20206N7711999-05-11011 May 1999 Forwards Rev 0 to Oyster Creek Emergency Plan, IAW 10CFR50.47(b) & 10CFR50.54(q).Changes Became Effective on 990413 ML20206H9441999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-16,requesting Approval to Handle Loads Up to & Including 45 Tons Using Reactor Bldg Crane During Power Operations,Per NRC Bulletin 96-002 ML20206B6991999-04-26026 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Rev 11 to UFSAR & Rev 10 to Oyster Creek Fire Hazards Analysis Rept. Without Fire Hazard Analysis ML20206D3801999-04-26026 April 1999 Forwards Rev 11 to UFSAR, & Rev 10 to Fire Hazards Analysis Rept, for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Per 10CFR50.712(e) ML20206A9931999-04-22022 April 1999 Forwards Number of Personnel & Person Rems by Work & Job Function Rept for Period Jan-Dec 1998. Included in Rept Is Listing of Number of Station,Util & Contractor Personnel as Well as Diskette Reporting 1998 Occupational Radiation ML20206C8261999-04-22022 April 1999 Submits Financial Info IAW Requirements of 10CFR50.71(b) & 10CFR140.21 ML20205P8411999-04-15015 April 1999 Forwards TS Change Request 267 to License DPR-16,modifying Items in Sections 2 & 3 of Ts,Expanding Two Definitions in Section 1 & Modifying Bases Statements in Sections 2,3 & 4. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205P5381999-04-14014 April 1999 Ack Receipt of Re Request for Exception to App J. Intended Correction Would Need to Be Submitted as Change to TS as Exceptions to RG 1.163 Must Be Listed in Ts,Per 10CFR50,App J ML20205P9401999-04-12012 April 1999 Informs NRC That Gpu Nuclear Is Modifying Oyster Creek FSAR to Reflect Temp Gradient of 60 F & to Correct Historical Record ML20205P0651999-04-0909 April 1999 Discusses 990225 PPR & Forwards Plant Issues Matrix & Insp Plan.Results of PPR Used by NRC Mgt to Facilitate Planning & Allocation of Insp Resources 05000219/LER-1998-015, Forwards LER 98-015-01,as Original Submittal on 981028 Inadvertently Indicated That Suppl Would Be Submitted.Suppl Should Not Have Been Required as Only Change Is on Cover Page1999-04-0505 April 1999 Forwards LER 98-015-01,as Original Submittal on 981028 Inadvertently Indicated That Suppl Would Be Submitted.Suppl Should Not Have Been Required as Only Change Is on Cover Page ML20205J3281999-04-0101 April 1999 Discusses Arrangements Made on 990323 for NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station During Week of 990524 ML20205H1081999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Current Funding Status for Decommissioning Funds Established for OCNPP,TMI-1,TMI-2 & SNEC ML20205F0611999-03-25025 March 1999 Submits Info on Sources & Levels of Property Insurance Coverage Maintained & Currently in Effect for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station,Iaw 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20205E1171999-03-24024 March 1999 Forwards Rev 39 to Oyster Creek Security Plan & Summary of Changes,Iaw 10CFR50.54(p).Rev Withheld ML20207F0331999-03-0404 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-219/98-12 During Periods 981214-18, 990106-07 & 20-22.Areas Examined During Insp Included Implementation of GL 89-10 & GL 96-05.No Violations Noted ML20207K2471999-02-25025 February 1999 Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data Repts for TMI, Oyster Creek & Corporate Headquarters Located in Parsippany, Ny 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217E0181999-10-0606 October 1999 Provides Nj Dept of Environ Protection Comments on Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station TS Change Request 267 Re Clarifications to Several TS Sections 05000219/LER-1998-011, Forwards LER 98-011-02, Three Small Bore Pipe Lines Did Not Meet Design Bases for Siesmic & Thermal Allowables. Engineering Std Will Not Be Completed Until End of 4th Quarter of 1999 Due to Scheduling Conflicts1999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards LER 98-011-02, Three Small Bore Pipe Lines Did Not Meet Design Bases for Siesmic & Thermal Allowables. Engineering Std Will Not Be Completed Until End of 4th Quarter of 1999 Due to Scheduling Conflicts ML20216J7591999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs NRC That Remediation Efforts for Software Sys Etude & Rem/Aacs/Cico Have Been Completed According to Schedule & Now Y2K Ready ML20216K1421999-09-29029 September 1999 Provides NRC with Name of Single Point of Contact for Purpose of Accessing Y2K Early Warning Sys,As Requested by NRC Info Notice 99-025 ML20217D1661999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards Proprietary Completed NRC Forms 396 & 398,in Support of License Renewal Applications for Listed Individuals,Per 10CFR55.57.Encl Withheld ML20212E1971999-09-16016 September 1999 Forwards Rev 11 of Gpu Nuclear Operational QAP, Reflecting Organizational Change in Which Functions & Responsibilities of Nuclear Safety & Technical Support Div Were Assigned to Other Divisions ML20212B5571999-09-10010 September 1999 Forwards Rev 11 to Oyster Creek Emergency Dose Calculation Manual, IAW 10CFR50,App E,Section V ML20211N2941999-09-0303 September 1999 Responds to NRC 990802 Telcon Request for Environ Impact Assessment of TS Change Request 251 Concerning Movement of Loads Up to 45 Tons with RB Crane During Power Operations ML20211J6771999-08-30030 August 1999 Submits Response to NRC 990802 Telcon Request for Gpu to Provide Environ Impact Assessment for Tscr 251 ML20211K2391999-08-23023 August 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data Repts for TMI, Oyster Creek & Corporate Headquarters Located in Parsippany, Nj ML20211B9011999-08-18018 August 1999 Forwards Rev 0 to EPIP 1820-IMP-1720.01, Emergency Public Info Implementing Procedure ML20210D2801999-07-22022 July 1999 Submits Response to Administrative Ltr 99-02 Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates. Estimate of Licensing Actions Projected for Fy 2000 Encl.No Projection Provided for Fy 2001 ML20209H5001999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Revised TS Pages 3.1-15 & 3.1-17 Which Include Ref to Note (Aa) & Approved Wording of Note H of Table 3.1.1, Respectively ML20210U4411999-07-12012 July 1999 Forwards Article from Asbury Park Press of 990708 Faxed to Legislative Officer by Mutual Constitute Fm Massari Indicating That Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating State Not Fully Y2K Compliant ML20209G1451999-07-0909 July 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to 2000-PLN-1300.01, Oyster Creek Generating Station Emergency Plan. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Summary of Changes,Which Became Effective on 990702 ML20209E0821999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards TS Change Request 269 for License DPR-16,changing Component Surveillance Frequencies to Indicate Frequency of Once Per Three Months ML20209B7501999-07-0101 July 1999 Responds to NRC Request for Info Re Y2K Readiness at Nuclear Power Plants.Generic Ltr 98-01 Requested Response on Status of Facility Y2K Readiness by 990701.Licensee Y2K Readiness Disclosure for Ocngs,Encl ML20196G1361999-06-23023 June 1999 Provides Status of Corrective Actions Proposed in in Response to Insp Rept 50-219/98-80 & Revised Schedule for Completion of Actions Which Are Not Yet Complete ML20196E6421999-06-22022 June 1999 Forwards Revised Pages of TS Change Request 261,dtd 990618. Replacement Requested Due to Several Dates Being Omitted on Certain Pages ML20195D0551999-06-0303 June 1999 Forwards TS Change Request 226 to License DPR-16,permitting Operation with Three Recirculation Loops.Certificate of Svc & Tss,Encl ML20195C5511999-05-25025 May 1999 Forwards Book of Controlled Drawings Currently Ref But Not Contained in Plant Ufsar.Drawings Were Current at Time of Submittal ML20206N7711999-05-11011 May 1999 Forwards Rev 0 to Oyster Creek Emergency Plan, IAW 10CFR50.47(b) & 10CFR50.54(q).Changes Became Effective on 990413 ML20206H9441999-04-28028 April 1999 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-16,requesting Approval to Handle Loads Up to & Including 45 Tons Using Reactor Bldg Crane During Power Operations,Per NRC Bulletin 96-002 ML20206B6991999-04-26026 April 1999 Forwards Copy of Rev 11 to UFSAR & Rev 10 to Oyster Creek Fire Hazards Analysis Rept. Without Fire Hazard Analysis ML20206D3801999-04-26026 April 1999 Forwards Rev 11 to UFSAR, & Rev 10 to Fire Hazards Analysis Rept, for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Per 10CFR50.712(e) ML20206C8261999-04-22022 April 1999 Submits Financial Info IAW Requirements of 10CFR50.71(b) & 10CFR140.21 ML20206A9931999-04-22022 April 1999 Forwards Number of Personnel & Person Rems by Work & Job Function Rept for Period Jan-Dec 1998. Included in Rept Is Listing of Number of Station,Util & Contractor Personnel as Well as Diskette Reporting 1998 Occupational Radiation ML20205P8411999-04-15015 April 1999 Forwards TS Change Request 267 to License DPR-16,modifying Items in Sections 2 & 3 of Ts,Expanding Two Definitions in Section 1 & Modifying Bases Statements in Sections 2,3 & 4. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205P9401999-04-12012 April 1999 Informs NRC That Gpu Nuclear Is Modifying Oyster Creek FSAR to Reflect Temp Gradient of 60 F & to Correct Historical Record 05000219/LER-1998-015, Forwards LER 98-015-01,as Original Submittal on 981028 Inadvertently Indicated That Suppl Would Be Submitted.Suppl Should Not Have Been Required as Only Change Is on Cover Page1999-04-0505 April 1999 Forwards LER 98-015-01,as Original Submittal on 981028 Inadvertently Indicated That Suppl Would Be Submitted.Suppl Should Not Have Been Required as Only Change Is on Cover Page ML20205H1081999-03-31031 March 1999 Forwards Current Funding Status for Decommissioning Funds Established for OCNPP,TMI-1,TMI-2 & SNEC ML20205F0611999-03-25025 March 1999 Submits Info on Sources & Levels of Property Insurance Coverage Maintained & Currently in Effect for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station,Iaw 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20205E1171999-03-24024 March 1999 Forwards Rev 39 to Oyster Creek Security Plan & Summary of Changes,Iaw 10CFR50.54(p).Rev Withheld ML20207K2471999-02-25025 February 1999 Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data Repts for TMI, Oyster Creek & Corporate Headquarters Located in Parsippany, Ny ML20206S2541999-01-20020 January 1999 Confirms Resolution of Thermo-Lag Fire Barriers in Fire Zones OB-FZ-6A & OB-FZ-6B (480 Switchgear Rooms) IAW Previous Commitments Contained in Gpuns Ltrs to NRC & 971001 ML20199J2631999-01-18018 January 1999 Requests That Listed Changes Be Made to Correspondence Distribution List for Oyster Creek Generating Station ML20199D0271999-01-11011 January 1999 Requests Listed Addl Info in Order to Effectively Review TS Change Request 264 Re Ownership of Property within Exclusion Area ML20199A6521999-01-0707 January 1999 Notifies That Reactor Operators G Scienski,License SOP-11319 & D Mcmillan,License SOP-3919-4 Have Terminated Licenses at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Effective 990101 ML20198T1061999-01-0606 January 1999 Forwards Rev 15 to Gpu Nuclear Corporate Emergency Plan for TMI & Oyster Creek Nuclear Station. with Summary of Changes Which Reflect Use of EALs Approved in NRC Ltr to Gpun on 980908 & Other Changes Not Related to Use of New EALs ML20198K0331998-12-23023 December 1998 Forwards Change Request 268 for Amend to License DPR-16. Amend Would Change TS to Specify Surveillance Frequency of Once Per Three Months ML20198H0181998-12-22022 December 1998 Forwards Attachment Addressing New Info & Modifying 980505 Submittal Re Request for Change to Licensing Bases for ECCS Overpressure,In Response to NRC Bulletin 96-03, Potential Plugging of ECCS by Debris in Bwrs ML20198H8521998-12-16016 December 1998 Dockets Completion of Physical Inventory Performed in July 1997,as Addl Info to Nuclear Matl Balance Rept Submitted on 980416 ML20196H4461998-12-0202 December 1998 Provides Final Response to NRC GL 96-01, Testing of Safety-Related Logic Circuits ML20196B4471998-11-23023 November 1998 Provides Required Response 2 to NRC Bulletin 96-003, Potential Plugging of ECC Suction Strainers in Bwrs. During Recently Completed 17R Refueling Outage,New Strainers Were Installed ML20195J8451998-11-12012 November 1998 Forwards Rev 11 to 1000-PLN-7200.01, Gpu Nuclear Operational QA Plan, as Change Previously Made Without Appropriate Notification to NRC ML20195C7201998-11-11011 November 1998 Forwards 120-day Required Response to GL 98-04, Potential for Degradation of ECCS & CSS After LOCA Because of Construction & Protective Coating Deficiencies & Foreign Matl in Containment, ML20195E1221998-11-10010 November 1998 Notifies NRC of First Time Usage of Code Case N-504 & Inclusion Into OCNGS ISI Program,As Accepted by RG 1.147, Inservice Insp Code Case Acceptability ML20155J6851998-11-0505 November 1998 Forwards TS Change Request 266,to Modify Safety Limits & Surveillances of LPRM & APRM Sys & Related Bases to Ensure APRM Channels Respond within Necessary Range & Accuracy & Verify Channel Operability ML20155H5641998-11-0202 November 1998 Informs That Bne Has No Comments on Proposed Change 259 to Ts,Correcting Required Water Level in Condensate Storage Tank So That Design Basis Is Correctly Implemented ML20155G3741998-10-29029 October 1998 Forwards Response to NRC 980619 RAI Re GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Conditions 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
. T.
i e '
g I
{ GPU Nuclear, Inc.
( U.S. Route #9 South 9
NUCLEAR . Post 0ffice Box 388 l
Forked River, NJ 087310388 Tel 609-9714000 February 28, 1997 l 6730-97-2065 l 1
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission !
Attention: Document Control Desk Washington D.C. 20555 l
Dear Sir:
Subject:
Request for AdditionalInformation related to Bulletin 96-02,
" Movement of Dry Storage Casks Over Spent Fuel, Fuel in the Reactor Core, or Safety-Related Equipment" In accordance with the referenced document, GPU Nuclear has considered the potential for dropping or tipping the fuel transfer cask during movement from the spent fuel pool to the area in which activities such as drying, inerting, and final securing of the cask lid are performed. The RAI specified that the analysis should assume the reactor is at power during fuel movement and i GPU Nuclear's analysis makes that assumption.
In evaluating the potential cask drop, GPU Nuclear considered the design of the Oyster Creek Reactor Building crane, the load path used in moving a fuel transfer cask from the Cask Drop Protection System (CDPS) to the area in which the dry shielded canister (DSC) is inerted and welded closed, and the loading and unloading processes. As a result of this review, GPU Nuclear concludes that a cask drop accident in that segment of the load path is not a credible event at :
Oyster Creek. Attachment 1 to this letter contains our detailed analysis. Attachment 2 is a sketch of the refuel floor which displays features cited in the text. If you have any questions on the analysis please contact Mr. Michael Laggart at (201) 316-7968.
Very truly yours, D f Michael B. Roche I
)
Vice President & Director I '
cc: Administrator, Region 1 NRC Project Manager '
NRC Resident Inspector 9703110102 970228 PDR ADOCK 05000219 ,
l G PDR o gg%%%%%,I! ;
l Attachment 1
. Loading Process
' The loading of the spent fuel assemblies into the dry shielded canister (DSC) takes place
! within the Cask Drop Protection System (CDPS). ARer the DSC is loaded with spent fuel in accordance with the applicable procedure and verified, the lifting yoke is attached to the crane. The DSC shield plug is attached to the yoke and carried along the east-west 1
centerline of the safe load path to the CDPS. The shield plug is placed on the loaded i DSC, the lifting yoke is attached to the cask and the cask is lifted above the CDPS. The i cask will be lifted no more than 6 inches above the top plate of the CDPS in accordance j- with Technical Specification 5.3.1 C.
1 i
The CDPS is permanen.1 alled in the northeast corner of the Oyster Creek spent fuel l pool. The CDPS is a pas.sive system which mitigates the effect of a cask drop on the spent fuel pool structure. (A complete description of the CDPS is contained in Section 9.1 of
. the Oyster Creek FSAR.) The CDPS includes the following features:
- ' a. A guide structure which properly guides and restrains a falling cask in the event it is dropped into the spent fuel pool.
i 4 b. A hydraulic dashpot in the lower section of the guide structure which j retards the falling cask such that impact loads are kept below acceptable i
values.
l In the event of a cask drop, the CDPS has been designed to slow the rate of fall by i hydraulic pressure. The system is designed to attenuate the forces generated by the l displacement of water and the impact of the cask against the guide tube walls. To achieve l the hydraulic attenuation effect, a base plate is attached to the bottom of the cask. The
) purpose of the base plate is to act as a piston within the dashpot.
A number of postulated cask drop scenarios have been analyzed and are included in the '
Oyster Creek Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. The following types of potential cask drops have been considered: drops onto the top plate of the guide structure, drops over or within the guide cylinder, and impacts with the floor of the dashpot.
Cask drops on the top plate of the guide structure including straight drops such as those caused by a break in the vertical cable of the crane, and eccentric drops such as when a lifting trunion or the lifting yoke fails on one side and then the other, were postulated. In addition, tipping of the cask caused by the cask base plate catching the edge of the top plate and tipping onto the north or east wall of the spent fuel pool was considered.
Furthermore, a potential scenario in which the base plate catches the edge of the top plate and allows the cask to fall into the guide structure was also postulated.
Seve'ral types of cask drops over or within the guide cylinder were evaluated. These include a straight fall within the cylinder, a straight fall with the cask tipped at the maximum angle ofinclination and eccentric drops resulting in the cask impacting the side of the guide cylinder during its descent.
The impact of a falling cask on the dashpot floor was considered both with the cask centerline vertical and at the maximum angle ofinclination permitted by the guide structure.
The NRC evaluation of the CDPS, in a March 1977 SER, concluded that it is adequate for the prevention of cask tip accidents and that the dashpot structure and the fuel pool stmeture are adequate for the loads imposed during postulated cask tip accidents. GPU - .
Nuclear believes that the occurrence of a scenario in which a fuel transfer cask is dropped or tipped while in or over the CDPS is a very low probability event. In the unlikely event of such an occurrence, however, the features of the CDPS are sufficient to mitigate the effects.
l Horizontal Movement i 1
A series of modifications were recently made to the reactor building crane to enhance its ;
safety and reliability. Among the enhancements was the installation of variable frequency '
drive (VFD) controllers which provide very smooth and precise speed control along with ,
torque limitation. In addition, a remote control system was added which permits !
l operation of the crane from the refuel floor. These enhancements, along with procedural controls limiting the speed ofload movement, will permit the operator to stop the load smoothly and quickly if a problem were to occur.
To preclude the accidental drop of a fuel transfer cask during horizontal movement on the refueling floor (reactor building elevation 119') engineered systems have been implemented including the installation and use of a redundant support system. This redundant support system is referred to as the Fixed-Link Support System (FLSS) and is designed for use with the NUHOMS@ fuel transfer cask. The FLSS consists of two vertical support arms that are attached to and hang down from the main reactor building crane trolley. During fuel transfer operations, the FLSS is attached to the yoke of the transfer cask. In the unlikely event of a crane system failure (such as a failure of the hoist rope), the FLSS system will completely support the cask. The FLSS is designed to provide this protection to the transfer cask and its contents, up to a maximum design load
. of 100 tons. The FLSS was load tested to 200% ofits design load in the shop and 125%
cfits design load after installation in the reactor building. Therefore, GPU Nuclear ,
believes that a cask drop during lateral movement while the transfer cask is attached to the FLSS is not a credible event.
1
' Dralitina. Inerting and Sealin.g The FLSS is not designed for, and therefore is not engaged during, vertical movement of
, the fuel transfer cask. At only two points during the cask move .1ent from the CDPS to the area in which the cask tid is secured, is the transfer cask disconnected from the FLSS.
In the first instance, the cask is over the CDPS and the analyses cited above are bounding.
In the second instance, the FLSS is disconnected in preparation for draining,'inerting and permanent sealing of the lid. During that activity, which takes place in the north east corner of the refuel floor, an energy absorbing crush pad is placed directly beneath the fuel transfer cask prior to disconnecting the FLSS.
i Although the fuel transfer cask will only be disconnected from the FLSS for a short duration, a crush pad fabricated from an aluminum honeycomb material was developed to 4 ensure protection against a cask drop event. If a cask drop event were to occur, the crush
- - pad is designed to absorb the energy of the cask by plastic deformation of the honeycomb.
The crush pad is also designed to maintain the stability of the cask during a drop event.
l The reaction loads on the floor will be controlled (based on design calculations and full-
- scale materials tests) and held below the load capacity of the floor. The crush pad is designed to provide protection against a cask drop for a 100 ton cask, dropped from a height of up to three (3) inches, with a safety factor of two The FLSS is designed such
- that the bottom of the base plate will clear the edge of the crush pad by 0.5 inches. To disconnect the FLSS requires that the cask be lifted approximately 1.0 inches. Therefore, 4
the maximum height of the cask will be approximately 1.5 inches above the crush pad, providing an additional safety factor of two.
Upon completion of preparing the cask for transport, the yoke is attached to the hook, the yoke is then attached to the cask. The cask is lifted approximately 1.5 inches and the FLSS is installed, the cask is then transported south along the safe load path.
?
l Conclusion i
- l. In summary, while the fuel transfer cask is in or directly above the CDPS, the features of
! that structure will mitigate the effects of a postulated cask drop. During lateral movement of the fuel transfer cask, the Fixed-Link Support System precludes the dropping of the cask and/or catching on the edge of the cmsh pad. Enhancements to the reactor building ,
crane, along with procedural controls on the speed ofload movement, will ensure precise l control over cask movement. Finally, the crush pad in the north east corner of the refuel l floor will protect the integrity of the floor and stabilize the cask in the unlikely event of a I cask drop in that location. For all these reasons, GPU Nuclear believes that an accident in which a loaded fuel transfer cask is dropped or tipped over prior to the point that the lid is permanently secured is not a credible event at Oyster Creek.
8
p C .
" - _ - o >tf E4x? _ -
i g
D"qg /
>44
- z F" ii r
N E" a s D / " i
^ ll e
s s
5 il s
K
^ S l A "sr Y O L C LAH "3 T
1 e A L
EP *- -
s sy 8'
7 R
- 1 O
U l U
N A
U FD1 9
1 it 1
e4 A1 S N
r TO O M TI NL K
- w. a V.
3 f E P E s PEE S h
f C
W
v e SfLAE -
S E
D
=
- R T
l c S F
I S *C t F O "3 y s.
e d n
2 _ _ _ - N u S I
e s
w A
a s *-
6 O
D 3
N ,
.E 1 r
D mr C l O D
E T
A n 3 6 R 5 E5 p'
R l E
/ T 9 6 YA , '^
l l
oN 9
=
E n E C 2 D2 A/7o 2 e
- a. 1 1 n<
_/ _ _ -
0 R 1
I sU k P E
T
/
2 1
/
2 1
/
2 1
Q 0
o L
Y s u s a E
O Z
N P E
L i
'2
/ 3
- O C C a
s m
m ilo a
et o
t 6_ -
V
,U
.A IL e 5
n.
t w M w ba(e sMg r
w " u e Awe E t 'N F R 3 o I
ill E
P S 3 , ,
J D A H f
J o
teJU J dmD_' %e-
- , C T
. 2 m
5 -
R l
~ l l l s
ro
_ 3
- N n -
s
._ 2
/ -
a a
. T, 1
r -
s l
/ w r
o i
s
._ _ - m u _ c. - s t
3 c
t o s o c
o P
tv t
- i y
c o
s
. r itu u
=
4 m J
E i
R R l l i
- . l n
0 o 1 .
C - -
A
.E w
- o c.
J
_ N- _ - rm x
r a
e 3
\ ( k il
~
3 R
T I l l l
- - _ \
1 l
M,- .
3
" n, . Acr
. o,
" m.<=.-
o
. a
_ " m=
' ,o= ..
r.
2 5"
sm
.,. b~
R i-l l l C' .
0s
" =s*n.
1 *
- .A
' eh f'"! s.c
, u i 4
hl's,
^ t" =nl'."i a =-
C B *
=.- 4 ".l, ,r R R R * . a o
.A E.T l!ca".s.n "ll."
T o "smc,0ii A
~
'u 4 ." .c 8 s. '^ .=a 1 8 R i l l i
1 1 /.
1 .
_ - - s