ML20132F548
| ML20132F548 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Waterford |
| Issue date: | 01/15/1984 |
| From: | LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082320156 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-206 PE-2-014, PE-2-14, NUDOCS 8510010350 | |
| Download: ML20132F548 (53) | |
Text
.
o WATERFORD 3 SE5 Wy PLANT OPERATING MANUAL w.w:
- p. -. -
g (HI C LOUISIANA h P O W E R l' L i G H T M'03;E SOUTw
'wLT.E5 SY=~~B.'
?OM VOLUME 16 PE-2-01; POM SEO ION P.ECSIO;i 1
UNCONTROLLED. NOT TO EE UScD FCR CUAL!!Y AFFIC11NG ACilvi!:Es AO::!;i!STRAT:7E PR00CDU7.E EQUIPME'C E:n'IRO:i:Ci!.'d. QUAL 17:CA!!O; PORC Meeting No.
95-5 /
Reviewed:,MM/NJ3/im-w
'~
POROsChairman QSLLS IIu-hy Approved:
d Plan: Manager-Nuclear approval Oa:e F.ffe::1ve Da:e 8510010350 050227
..e
.evisten e
.s A::acn e.-
tqvr
C.
4
'gr*.*..T..:..T -.
.t..T..R w...
'o
.g.=
. ; r..;......9. =
..A fs....,
gj.
..r..*.
s'-
.r a t. e, a y / ; ri.-
e = = n r = r.
l==
a s.
- yat.
g-
...a..-,...
.e.
...a
~
. ? r c e e cu r e b e. y=~ ~ 2 - C 4 Ti :l e i W w ; s t-r>4 4 & -s_ A irs.,- ' G sufic.;77cL,'
Effective Oa e (if differe..- f.c: app eval ca e)
C---1+
+
t.
e-C A.
Change Kc.
9 O S.
Revision He.
/
- C.
Deleticn sO t
- c o': =c: c=;yc=
e - N:
- c. : ~. r :-~ ~ s:
//p do Se 'b /~o lle: i re. sce/' e e
.?
A EU DreerdM t r e t' t r B c c ':A t*: r s O.-igina te:- b# OM ' s Date IMd3 Technical Review M I /I M *'N N Date
'74.' E/D
~
' t i
S A :.=. v.
."ha t h. "T.0N
.=
N' Dces this chznge, revisien, or deletion:
YES N0' 4.i
/
1.
Change the facility as described in the FSAR7 L
2'.
C'hange the precedures as cescribed in the FSA?.?
/
1 3.
Cendue; test _s/experi=ents net described in the FSAE7
[
t.
Create a conditier. er conduct an Operation which ex-
/
ceeds, er could result in exceeding, the limits in Technical Specificatiens?
.!f the annwer tc'any cf t*
abeve is ves, ec=;;ete and at-Iqs ta en a 10 CFF 50.5 9 Saf etyi s.va!1,1,z4 : checklist.
Safety Ivaluatien NMm u' Da:e 4 A $3 Group /Dep't. Head ?evieuY A $ ? N % S kt Da:e lol2 N l$ 5
}c l
s Te=pc.ary Approval
- Date (NOS 7e=perary Approva;*
Oate Q" Review CMMi--
Date H-M-V'
?OAC Review 8/'k
- Date l'3- }7 :2 Meeting Ec.
N '#/
Flant Manage.-Nuclear A;;r'eva; 64 Oate J/4
'~e:pera.y a;;reval nus; be f:1'.cwed b y.:l a..
Ma na g e. -Nue'. ear a;;r eval witni it cays.
t e.
- f. e V.a.,.a c.,. g a..z...e.
t. *- (*
t
. 4i r=wwe
.e
.w.
e---
-,-,..,,,+,-p----.e
.-,,,+,.-,.,,v---
p,...
,,.4-__#
p.,m y
.---.9
,,--_,y-__,9
_m7_.
g..,, - - - _ _.. _, _... - -.
.m.
...=
4 EcCiT.istrE',iVe fr00ecure s
'I i
Equipmer.
Envir nner.;11 "ualifica:10 r, Eevisict
}
L P
i i
- p.
=
S=
a n g,
=
. r.
L wr w v... L I...:
i.C
'?UE?DSE l
2.C REFERENCES 3.0 DEFINITIQUS 4.0 RES PONSISILITIES 5.0 PROCEDUEE l
5.1 Criteria for Identification of Safety-Relatec Syste=s 5.2 Requirements for Qualification l
53 Qualification File t
5.4 Qualificatien Methods 5.5 Milc Environments 5.6 Evaluation of Qualification 57 Procurement t
I 5.8 Spare Parts 59 Field-Fabricated Spare Parts 5.10 Warehousing t
5.11 Maintenance 5.12 Centrol of Plant Cnanges and Modifications i
5.13 Qualification Task 5.14 Qualification Task Package Cicsins 6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.1 Safety-Relatec Systems (3 pages) 6.2 P2.13, Review Recore of Enyironmental Qualification Documenta-tion, Waterford 3 (11 pages) 6.3
?2.14, Review Recore of Environmental Qualification Documenta-tion for Mild Environment, Waterford 3 (5 pages) 7.0 COMMITMENTS AND REFERENCES 1
L
[* w*.* i..e. l C.p a e. g m.,.
g T*
s****g-a.
W e= we ww..
w
==.
my e. e. g e. =e e..u=.
. en a. 4 6 4w m g wi e **
^****#
m...
...,e
- e *
.awG.
- =8G.
w G w.d
- 0.. g \\. n
...e g
ae
= =,
w.4 w ea U
- QM
- .W eEb e. we o h
.en.
.upc. J Q
- =w.
o weW
=M M.M MN A.Ogg.
g p g g gg
- d.*
ee
.,evisien.i 1M-6 7 5P A
ON d
e ed e w ee s
9 8
9 4
e 4
9 e
i
- s. s A:. nirtrat;ve Frecedure PE-2-::;
s Equipment Envircr ental Ouai; fica:icr.
Eev;:ic: 1 h
,. s-
.e n n. _e _-
- 1. i ' Tnis'p.90:edure gives the requirements fcr measures to.er.sure that all Class 1E and cther equipment relatec tc, or i=portant :c, nuc1=ar safety at Waterford 3 is qualified for the environment in wnich i: =ust operate, in accordance witn applicable federal regulations.
Inis precedure includes metho:s 00 ensure that such qualifica icn is esta:11shed fcr the original installation and that qualification is maintained fcr the life of the plant.
It includes y
measures to ensure :nat spare parts and replacements or new equipment acded are. qualified.
1.2.The environment to which safety-related equiptent is qualified cy l
methods cf this procedure includes normal operating conditions, the l
-Design Basis Accident, and the Design Sasis Seismic Event.
This l
procedure includes instructions for assentling and maintaining'an auditable file of documents to demonstrate qualification as required l
ty federal regulaticns.
2.0 c~= ton!cES 2.1 100FE50.49, Environmental Oualification of Electric Equipment for l
Nuclear Power Plants l
l 2.2 10CFE50,. Appendix A, General Dezign Criteria for Nuclear Pewer Plants, GD; 1, 2, 4 and 23 23 10CFE50, Appendix S, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants 2.4 NEO neg Guide 1.32, nev. 2, Use of 1EEE Std 305-1971, Criteria for Class 1E Electric Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, Dated 2-77 1
2.5 NE Beg Guice 1.00, Oualification Tests of Continuous-Duty Meters installed inside ne 00ntainment of Water-Occle: Nuclear Power Plants, Dated 3-16-73 4
1
~ ~ - - - -
Actir.istrative ?rocecure
?E-2-0*
Equipmen: Envirensen;al ;ualificatics Eevisier i I.6 NEC Reg Guide 1.73, Oualification Tests of Electric Valve Operaters Ir.stallec Inside One Containment of Guelear Power ?lants, Dated 1-7; 2.7 NEC Reg Guice 1.B9, Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants, Dated 1-74 2.3 NEC Res Guice 1.97, Rev. 2, Instrumentatien for Light-Water-0001ed Nuclear Power ?lar.:s to Assess Plan anc Envirens Conditions Durin5 anc TclicWin5 an Accident, Dated 12-80 29 NEC Reg Guide 1.100, nev.
1, Seismic Qualification of Electric Equipmen; for Nuclear. Power Plants, Dated 8-77 2.10 NEO Reg Guide 1.131, Oualificatien Testing of Electric Catles, Field Splices and Connections for Lign:-Water-Oooled Nuclear Power Plants, Dated'S-77 2.11 ANSI N45.2, Quality Assurance Pro 5 ram Requirements for Nuclear Facilities, 1977 2.12 IEEE S d 306-1971, Criteria for Class 1E Electric Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations 2.13 IEEE Std 323-1971, IEEE Standard for Qualifyin5 Class 1E Equipmen; fer Nuclear Power Generating Stations 2.1t IEEE 323-74, 'IEEE Standard for Qualifying Class 1E Equipment for
. Nuclear Power Generating Stations 2.15 IEEE 33t-73, IEEE Standare for Type Tests of Continuous-Duty Class 1E Motors for Nuclear Power Generating Stations 2.16 IEEE 344-75, IEEE Eecommended Practices for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power GeneratinS Stations 2.17
!EEE 382-80, IEEE Stancard for Qualification of Safety-Reisted Valve Actuatcrs 6
0
Actir.istrative Fr:cecure
?E-2-C'c Equipmen: Envircnmental Oualificatien Revisien
- 2.11 IEEE 353-74, IEEE Stancard for Type Testing cf Class 'E Electric Catles. Field S;1 ices, and Ocnnectiens for Nuclear Power Generating Stations 2.19 Waterford 3 FSAR Cnapter 3, Design of Structures, Compenents, Equipment and Syste=s 2.20 L?&L PROCEDURES 2.20.1 UNT-1-007, Nonconformances and Corrective Actions 2.20.2 UNT-4-006, Centrol of Plant Documents and Reccrds 2.20.3 UNT-5-002, Condition Identification and Work Authorization 2.20.4 UNT-S-001, Preparation of S:stion:?rocuremen: Docu=ents 2.20.5 U I'T-S - 0 0 2, ?rocessing of Station Procure =en: Documents 2.20.6 UNT-S-Oll, Stores Activities Procedure - Receiving, Contrcl and-Shipping 2.20.7 QF-2-001, Quality Con rcl Receipt Inspecticn 2.20.8 PE-2-006, ?lan Staff Station Modifica:icns Interfaces 2.20.9 PE-2-015, Review of Equipment Qualification File (Response to NUEEG 05SS) 2.20.10
?E-5-011, Mechanical Snubber Visual Inspection 2.20.11 PE-5-012, Hydraulic Snubber Visual Inspection 2.20.12 PE-5-013, Snubber / Piping Integrity Inspection 2.20.13
?E-5-014, Snubber Sampling and Functional Testing 2.20.10
?I-5-015, Monitoring cf Hydraulic Snubber Seals Service Life i,i 2.20.15 UNT-7-009, Evaluation Criteria for Deter =inatien of Safety-
)
Related Classification 2.20.~6 MD *-004, Freventive Maintenance Scheculing
=
a n.-~-
,----n---n---
,,--yw
-.r,r,
- ---,-;,m,
A:ministrative Procecure
?I-2-;~-
Equipmen: Envir:nmental Ouaiirica:icn Fevisier -
2.20.17 MD-1-006, Centrol cf Failec Equipment 2.20.16 MM-1-005, Mechanical Fabrica:;0n 2.20.19 PE-2-02*, Identification, Classification, Filing, and Recovery cf Equipmen Qualification Documents 2.20.20 PE-2-C22, Fermat cf Equipeent Qualifica icn 2.20.21
?E ~EM-003, Interic Station Modifica icn Procedure
' 2.20.22 FE-2-027, Plant Changes 2.20.23 UN~-1-003, Procedure Development, Review and Approval; Cnange and Eevision; and Deletion 2.21 RUEEG 0588, interim Staff Position en Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment j.U n _-- _ p r _ _i n_.n, _e 3.1 Safety-nelated (S-R) - A term applied to plant structures, systems, components. anc associated activities affecting safety, which provide reasonatie assurance that the facility can be operated f
witnout undue risk to the public, and which are required for the sc-complishment of the following safety functions:
3.1.1 Maintain the integrity of' ne reactor coclant pressure boundary 3.1.2 Ensure the capability to shut down the reactor 4
?'
3.1.3 Ensure tne capatility of removing heat from the reactor ccre 1
3.1.4 Ensure One capability of remcVing heat from ne reactor
>.. t
- i containment following an accident 3.1.5 Provide necessary coeling to another safety system 3.1.5
?reven: One release ef significant amounts of radioactive materials to tne atmos here 3.1.7 Contain, cent'rc; cr reduce rad:cactivity releasec in an accicent.
6 s
m F
f
,w,,-
,,e
,m
Acm r.istracive ?rocecure F E-E-M.
Eq ui;~ e r.: ELVircamental Oualificatier E e V i s i o T.
~
+
l.2 1E - A sucset cf safety-related equipment i n cl u ci r.g c r.13 electrical equipment required t>
cne cf the safety systems in the performance of its function.
3.3 Equipment Qualification Coordinator (EQC) - That persen designated cy the Technical Support Superintencent-Nuclear as having the responsicility for monitoring qualification activities ;c ensure cualification is maintainec.
34 Sase Line Data File - Documentation which establishes qualification of equipment originally installed in the plant.
It includes "L?&1 Response to NUREG 05Sc" and documen stion supplied with all etner safety-related equipment installed in the plant.
3.5 Equipment Qualification - The process of cemonstrating by test, analysis, or c:ner suitable means that a particular safety-related (S-R) cevice is capable of performing its safety function in the specified environment; the generation and assembling of documenta-tien establishing that such demonstration has been performed; the esta blishme nt, by documentation, that the S-R cevice has been maintained in such a way that it may logically be expectec to retain the required capability.
3.5" Qualification File - Tne, group of documents wnich are relied upon te estaolisn qualification of safety-related equipment, arranged and filed to permit recovery for reference or aucit.
3.7 Major Component (MC) - The leading pieces of equipment making up a system.
3.5 Subcomponent (50) - Items of equipment =aking up, or accessory te, and purchased separately from, a major component.
3.9 Parts and Materials.- ltems which are purchased separately from anc make up MC's, and SC's, or which are used to connect togetner MC's or SC's.
M e
Adnir.is ra:1ve F ece:ure
?E-2-C"-
Equipment Er.vironner. al Oualifiestier Revisien ~
3.10 Engineering and Tecnnical Services (ETS) - L P &~
staff providing c0 pany support Oc construc-icn, engineering and pr0curement activities, witn liaison oe: ween AE's, consultan s, contractors and the company.
3.11 Design Basis Accident (DEA) - An accident postulated and defined by the safety system cesigner wh:ch, sh0uld it occur, will subject the S-E item concerned Oc the =cs; severe environmen-it can reasonably be extaected to experience.
3.12- "ike-for-Like - Description of replacement of an itet with an exact duplicate.
The replacement must be by the same manufacturer and be the same model and design.
3 13-Condition Identification Work Authorization (CIWA)
The basic document for authorizing, planning and recording corrective maintenance.
3.14 Qualification Task (QT) - All efforts involved in the generation i
and asse=bly cf a Qualification Task Package.
3.15 Qualification Task Package - The checklist and set of all documents describing an activity which has been cetermined te have an effect on a safety-related system or ce=ponent.
This package is used as a control on all such activities which are n6t complete to ensure all required documentation is generated and filed so that qualification is net compromised.
3.16 Safety Systems - Those combinations of equipment which have been designed to perform one of tne safety functions.
4.0 RESPONsisILITIES t.1 The Equipment Qualification Coorcinator (EQC) shall be responsible for the fc11owing:
- 1.1 ueve oping anc maintaining EO procedures e
A.....:4...y.
s...+...
..w..
- e..<.
-wo.
..a.e
....a.. -..c.
~,. _: ~.s.c a... a
... \\. <, a n.
..s..
L.'.2 Reviewing qualifica icn documentation generatec cy various depar tents Oc verify :na; cocumentation relied upon ' 0 cain air.
qualification is sufficient to accomplish its purpose 4.1 3 Developing and maintainin's a Qualification File and index t.1.4 Aesisting Maintenance, Procurement, and etner Technical Suppert in the identifica:icn cf qualification require =ents 4.2 The Engineering and Technical Services Group (ETS) shall De responsible for -he fellowing qualification requirements:
4.2.1 Supporting and ensuring the completion of qualification activities connected with construction of the facility:
4.2.1.1 Ensuring that all equipment important tc safety installed during ccnstruction is qualified 4.2.1.2 Ensuring that all requirec vendor documentation is furnished 4.2.1 3 Securing further cocumentation from vendors if required for qualification t.2.1.4 Ensuring that all documents and data required for seismic qualification are supplied 2.2.2 Ensuring that the Sase Line Data File of docu=entation covering plant equipment qualification is asse= bled and delivered to the site 4.2.3 Providing the point of contact between Flant Engineering. ESASCO, and Combustion Engineering (CE) in the resciution of proble=s identified in the initial plant equipment qualification 0.3 The System Engineer shall De responsible for ensuring that all plant modifications are made in such a way that any new S-E equipment or equipment important to safety tnat is insta11ec is qualified and that qualification of existing S-E equipment is not ec=protisec.
c,
1 hs i
1 1
Acmir.istrative Prociture
?E-2-0.-
1 E;;ipmen: Ervirenmsntal ;ual fica::cr Eevisien ',
i 4.2 Tne Tecnnical Supper: Superintendent-Nuclear snail os respon:icle l
for general crersight Of the E; program anc for One c'esignation cf an E; Cocrdinator to De responsi;le for performing required activities of the program.
c.5 Ine Maintenance Superintencen -Nuclear shall have the ic11owing responsibilities regarding I;:
.5.1 Scheduling and performing maintenance of parts and materisi during s:crage according to LF&L-approved procedures 4.5.2 Seneduling and per' forming taintenance and replacement required for maintaining qualification 4.5.3 Ensuring that preventive maintenance and repairs are made with qualifiec parts anc materials according to the appropriate approvec procedure (s) 4.5.c Ensuring proper planning and preparation of work authorization packages 4.5.5 Ensuring that suitadle reccids are generatec and retained 4.5.'6 Ensuring that ceficiencies in werk methods or records are resc1vec
~
4.5.7 ident,1fying equipment and par;s replacement and refurbisnment required to maintain qualification 4.6 The Procurement Task Force Coorcinator shall have the following.EQ respossicilities:
4.6.1 Ensuring that applicadle procedures are fcilowed in preparation and processing of procJrement documents, and in-storage and issuing of parts from Stores c.6.2 _ Ensuring that the EQC reviews S/E purchase and receiving documents t.6.3 Ensuring that ceficiencies identified in steps 4.6.1 and C.6.2 soove are resc1ved 10 L.
i Actir.; : rat;ve Pr :e:ure
.E-1 ^ -
l Equ;pmen-Er.vir:nnental Oualifi:stier Revisi r l
i i
i l
c e_ n_ _ r__.~. _,. _r s
f l
,v,
- .1 v..-a
= s : D r.
D E h... -.,k i O t.,
O OA
-.s - :un. D 0.ca MS
- - r
-y,-
a:u Criteria for identification of safety-related syste=s anc forms fer cocumenting the evaluation of safety classification are included in UNT-7-009 5.2 REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFICATION 5.2.1 If an item is safety-related, it must have demonstrated the ability to survive the specified environment (ncrcal and DSA) and to acco:plish its safety functions during and/or after (as appropriate) the~DBA.
as the ite= is important to safety, it must have demonstrated that it will not fail curing a DBA in such a way as to prevent the operation of a safety syste: or to mislead the operator.
5.2.2 Sufficient cocu=entation must be on file to prove that this required capability has been.de=enstrated.
5.2.3 The responsibility for ensuring that tnis capability has been cemonstrated, that the demonstration has been documented, that the documentation has been secured and filed, and that it is available for audit is cescribed in this procedure.
5.3 QUALIFICATION FILE This section describes a group of cocument types wnich substantiate the qualification of safety-related structures, syste=s. and components'in the Waterford 3 plant.
Taken collectively, these documents are referred to herein as the Qualificatien File.
These documents shall be icentified and indexed for recovery by the methods of PE-2-021 and shall be stored by Central Records.
Su==ary documents and review records, Where requirec by this procedure, snall be prepared accorcing to the forma specified in ?E-2-022 and
= ace a part of tne Qualification File.
Enen the Qualification File
- s te De audi ed, documents snall be identifiec free the EI Incex, 11
Administrative Prececure
?E-2-014 Equipten: Inviren ental lualifica:icn Eevision
- as described in FI-2-021, section 5.6, anc recallet.
The Cualificatier File snail be asse=blec as fellows:
531
? nase 1 - Class iE equipment in a harsh environment:
The Response te NUEEG 05c6 Sub=ittal, with :ne associated test reports, analyses, and other supporting documentation, establishes qualificatien cf all class 1E equipment in a harsh environment.
This set of documents shall be identified and indexed in ac-cardance with FE-2-021 and-stored by Central Records.
Docu=ents
-in this file have been ecilected and assembled as part of the construction activity.
ETS has coordinated this activity.
Phase 1 documentation shall be reviewed by the EQC becorcing to PE-2-015 and the review documented.in accordance with the same procedure.
'r.'here the Pnase 1 cocuments are transferred to Plant Staff for storage and control,.tney shall be processed, identified anc filed in'accorcance with ?E-2-021.
5.3.2 Phase 2 - Class 1E equipment in a mild environment and S-E mechanical equipment:
All S-E equipment furnished as part of the construction progra: has been qualified in accordance with the
(
applicaele regulations.
Documentation establishing such-qualification snall be transferred to Plant Staff for storage and control.by the construction department under coordination by ETS.
i Phase 2 documentation, when transferrec, shall be identified and incexed for' future recovery in accordance with PE-2-021.
After indexing, these documents shall be filed by Central Records in ac-cordance with PE-2-022.
5 3.3 Phase 3 - Seis=ic Qualification:
Documents prepared and assembled for the l'EC SQET audit, with tne test reports, analyses and other supporting documentation, establish the seis=ic qualification of all S-E equipment _and other equipment requiring such qualification.
This documentation was asse=tlec as part cf the 4
construction activity under coordination of ETS.
1: shall be transferred tc Plan Staff for storage and con:rci.
Upen suct transfer, Phase 3 documentation shall be icentifiec, incexec and 4
Actinis:rs;1ve ?rececure
?I-2-01; Equipner.: Envirenzen;a' Oualifica:icn Eevisien "
t filed in acccrdance witn FE-2-021.
!ne set of c0cumentatien assentled in ? nase 1, ?hase 2 arfd ?hase 3 constitute One Base Line Data. rile and establish qualificati:n of ne varicus safety structures, systers and components as constructed.
5 3.4 Phase 4 - Maintenance of-the Qualificatien File and Index:
As descriced in tr.is procecure, cocumentation shall be genera:ec describing anc substantiating all mccification, maintenance, repair, testing and surveillance _ activities which affect any S-E structures, systets or co=ponents.
This documentation shall be sufficient to establish, in an auditable file, that all S-R equipment, or equipment important to safety, has been maintaned in a qualified conditien.
Phase 4 maintenance of the file and index is the responsibility of the EQC, and snall be in accordance with PE-2-022, sectier. 5.3.
5.3.5 When new S-R equipmen; is procured under the Station Modification
?rograc, documentation establishing qualification of the new item sr.all De ecliected and prepared in the for=at prescribed by PE-2-022, icentified for future recovery, and indexed in ac-cercance with ?E-2-021.
5.4 QUALIFICATION METHODS The following methods are acceptable for estaclishing cocumentary evidence that S-R equipment is qualified for its design function.
All S-E equipment, except that meeting the criteria of section 5.5 (mild environment), shall be qualified oy one cf these methods.
5.3.1 Data Sank Once an itec is qualifiec, this qualification is valid for any subsequent application of the ite= so long as:
5.t.1.1 The cesign of :ne ite= and tne controls on its production have not enanged
Admin;strative ?rocedu.e
?E-2.
Equipmen: Envircntental Oualificatien F.evicion ~
5.'.i.2 The environ = tnt, including seistic enviren=ent, Oc wnien i; is
- 0 be exposed is no mere severe : nan :ns: Oc whien it was qualified 5.4.1.3 Adequate documentary proof of the above ecnditions is furnished A.
Wnere an item has been qualified, and qualification data meeting the requirements of steps 5.4.1.1 and 5.4.1.2 is in a cata tank approved by L?&L OA, the ite: may be qualified by simple reference to the cata bank.
B.
The Cualification Documentation file of PE-2-022, section 5.1, is a data bank for Waterforc 3.
If an item to be qualified is already en file and meets the requirements of steps 5.4.1.1 and 5.4.1.2, it may oe qualified by simple reference to the same data package, ac-ccrding to UNT-6-001.
C.
The E00 chall be responsible for developing a syste: cf indexing the Qualification Documentation file to f acilitate the search for ite: match.
5.4.2 Type Testing 5.;.2.1 This is the most direct method of de=enstrating qualification.
A representative' sample or sa:ples of the item to be qualified are subjected to aging in the anticipatec service environment and DBA environments artificially created in a laboratory.
During and subsequent to the exposure to the DBA environment, One item is maintained in service to snow that it can perfort its safety function.
5.t.2.2 The test to be performed must be carefully specified to ensure that all pertinent characteristics are cemonstrated.
IEEE Standard 323(1074), along with ancillary and daughter standards, establishes tne general plan for Qualification Tests.
1EEE 323 is general, pertaining to any IE electrical
~
equipment.
IEEE 334, 3Si, 382, and 323 specify special tes; requirements for specific types cf equ;pment.
Inese stancards
Administra::ve ?rececure
? E-I- : ', -
Equipmen: Envir:n= ental lualificati:n F.e v i si e r,
nave been adopted by :ne KE0 nrough Reg Guides (.:.3 ' s ) whien, :.n scme instances (e.g.,
EU l.131 and EG 1.63), mocify the standarc.
These standards, as endorsed or modified by Eeg Guides, shall be the guide for designing and specifying Type Tests.
5.4.2.3 Although 1EEE 323 is directed specifica11y toward electrical equipment, tne general plans for qualificatien are apprcpriate for :ne qualificatien er mechanical equipment if tnese purely electrical requirements, such as insulation resistance tests, are neglected.
The methods of IEEE 323 (i.e.,
- testing, analysis, etc.) are valid methods for qualification of mechanical equipment as well.
The most common usec method for mechanical equipment is analysis, wnerein the equipment is shown Oc De designec. built and tested to an appropriate national standard whose design conditions envelop the expected environment.
5.4.2.4 Mechanical equipment may have special requirements from ANSI 18.2 and ASME section III imposed by the purenase specification for qualification.
Specifications written fer S-E mechanical equipment shall cite applicable portions of tn ese and other national standarcs.
5.4.2.5 If type testing is required, a specification shall be prepared.
5.4.3 Analysis 5.k.3.1 The item may be qualified by logical analysis if a =athematical or logical =odel which has oeen validated oy testing is availa-ble, or if sufficient testing is included to support the analysis.
Analyses are usually performed by the manufacturer, but may be done ey Plant Engineering or by a third party in similar f ashion to the test described in step 5.7.4.
5.4.3.2 if analysis is tc be done by One manufacturer, the preparer cf the purchase specification snail require that :ne Qualificatic:
k
\\
A::inistrative Pre:edure
.E-2-G*c E;;;;nen: Envirenten:21 ;;alificati:n Eevision '.
Eeport be Oc=plete and self-explana; ry, sn: wing full justification of method an: suffi:1ent data or citation of reference and sample calculations to permit a review by Flan:
Engineering (PE).
Description of method shall be adequate to ensure repeatability of results.
5.E.3.3 If an analysis precedure is of a preprietary nature, the vencor cust agree to retain all information require: for repeatability in nis own files, to make these files available for audi: by the proper regulatory authority, and to give.the company opportunity to accept a copy of the full procedure before it is cestroyed.
5.4.4 Qualification by analysis, experience and similarity may be justified under limited circu= stances, although qualification by these methods alone without testing is generally not acceptable.
UNT-8-001 gives instructions for specifying qualification by these methods.
Qualification by the above methods is generally done as part of the procure =ent process, but this does not preclude its being done at another time, either oefore or after procurement.
3.4 0 experience if it can be shown that a representative sample of the item has performed adequately in an environmer.
and to. operational requirements at least as severe as those postulated for the itet, this experience, properly documentec, =ay serve as qualification.
~
5.4.6 Similarity If it can be snown tnat a oevice that is not identical, but is equivalent in all essential respects, has performed adequately in an environment to operational requirements at leas; as severe as
- nose postulatec for the itec, this similarity, properly justified by analysis, may serve as qualification.
9 16
Ad:::: strati.ve Procedure
?E-2-;*a Equi;nen: Envircnnental Oualification Eevisien 5.a."
Ceccinstion Two or more cf the ateve methods Cay be ccccined, if tne combined plan is properly justified by analysis, to serve as qualification.
5.5 MILD ENVIEONMENTS Equipment which, due :: the nature cf the installation, cannot be sucjectec to an environ =ent more severe tnan roo= conditions" (classed as a "=ild' environ =ent") does n0: require environmental testing.
In general, these "=ild environment" areas are:
5.5.1 Areas where the environ =en: will not change significantly uncer any *d3 SES plant postulated accident conditions 5.5.2 Areas maintained by Class 1E environmental cupport systems 5.5.3 Areas cu: doors or -in areas of the plant where equipment is not subject to accident environment 5.5.a Areas that do not contain high energy lines or lines handling fluid which may become radioactive in an accident, and areas that are not subject to flood 5.5.4.1 Areas c:herwise qualifying as mild environment are so=etimes classifiec as narsh because fluic being handled in the area can become racioactive in an accicent, and can thus expose the area to nigh radiation.
For the NUEEG 0588 submittal, a lifetime I
integrated radiation cose >10 rads classes the area as "narsh."
For solid-state electronic equip =ent, the value is 3
>10 rads.
Documentation on safety-related equipment insta11ec in a mild environment snall be in accordance with PE-2-022.
For this equipment, the " normal" and "DBA" environments will be the same except for seismic requirements.
S-E equipment in a mild environmen
=ay be qualified by design specification which adequately descrices the functional and environmental requirements anc a maintenance / surveillance progra: designed to detec and forsta11 impending failures.
S-E eq uipment in a tilc 17
Accinist.a tive Procecurs
?I_2_;;;
s Equipment Environmental Oualification Revisien 1 environment may also be qualified by the metnoes cf sectica 5.c, in which-case maintenance / surveillance requirements are less severe.
It is sometimes mere cost-effective to qualify by the methods of section 5.4.
- f qualification is to be by cesign specification, a certification cf confermance te design spec.
shall be required.
In either case, Quality receip: inspecticn and traceability shall be requirec.
- 5.5.4.2 Seis=ic qualification requtrements (i.e., IEEE 344) are the same for " harsh" and "=ild" environments.
PE-2-022, section 5.1 3, describes the mild environment portion of the Base Line Data File. -Qualification of equipmen described therein shall be by the requirements of this section; qualification of items added, replaced, repaired, or modified by various activities during the life of the plant shall be qualified or maintained qualified by the methods of this section.
5.5.'5 Parts which meet the definition of commercial grade in 100FE21 may l
be used in safety applications with certain special l
consicerations:
l l
1) qualification requires that design specifications envelop service and environmental requirements of tne application 2) item is traceable tc its procurement documents 3) application is analyzed and found suitable by Plant Engineering i
l 4) documentation establishing 1, 2 and 3 above is generated and filed as EQ documents in accorcance with PE-2-021 l
When an assembly is qualified by one of the methods of section 5.4, all parts of the assembly serving a safety function are
{
qualified.
If the original equipment manufacturer (DEM) can certify that parts of the assembly were procured from sub-tier vendors at commercial grade, the like-for-like repair par; may aisc be commercial grace, subject Oc requirements 1, 2, 3 anc 4 above.
le
Act;nistrative Prececure
?I_2-;;_
Equipter.t Environmental Qualificatien Eevisier ;
..e
.e,. A...... m -,:
y...
w u r._..:
r,...r m..
va
.o When qualification is cone cy type testing, analysis, experience,
~
similarity cr a combination, ETS or PE (as appropriate) shall evaluate the qualification, using the checklist of Attachment 6.2 check the adequacy of documentation and using engineering judgement te critique the arguments presented.
If One reviewer cencurs with the resul s of the analysis. he shall sign and date One following statement and attach it to the Oualification Report:
"Sased upon review of the evidence presented in the attached report, it is my opinion the subject item is qualified for the service for which it is purenased and analyzed."
5.7 PROCUREMENT
.As detailec in UNT-S-001, UNT-6-002, and UNT-S-011, due considera-tion shall be given te the requirements for equipment qualification in all pnases of the procurement, receiving,' storage, and issuance process to ensure that materials, equipment, and spare parts tc De used on S-R equipment or applications are procurec under contrel's which ensure that qualification of existing 5-R' systems and equipment is not degraded.
5.7.1 Technical Support.cf Procurement The EQC snail be available te give assistance and support as required to the Spare Parts (SP) evaluators to a vise them on requirements.
3.7.2 -Review of Vendor Documents The EQC shall review the completec safety-relatec purchase oraer packages to verify that required qualification documents nave been furnisned by the vendor, that they are adequate, and tnat they address the required areas.
The organitation responsible for procuremen-shall De notified cf any ceficiency icentifiec anc u W l.
Actin;s:rstive F-ccecure FI-2
- Equ;;:en: Env;renzen:El ~usi;f;ca icr Ee,;sier shall have responri:ility for recenciling -he ceficien:ies ac-cording to UNT-5-011.
4-4.-
..t.3
. ---..e If vender documents are adequate, the EQC'shall ioentify tnem f0r storage by Central Recorcs according te PE-2-021.
l 5.~.c Qualifica:icn Testing In tne event a supplier willing to furnisn qualification documentation cannot be found, the EQC snall analyze qualification requirements and shall reco= mend to the Technical Support Superintendent-Nuclear a plan for having the iter qualified.
This plan shall include collection of environmental parameters for the 00EF (PE-2-022, Attach =ent c.1).
It shall include recom=endation of qualification method and a laboratory cr consultant Oc do the work if outside assistance is requirec.
5.8 SPARE PARTS Generally, a spare part for an S-E or important-to-safety component cust be qualified to at least tne same standard as the corresponding part in the original component unless justification can be shown for ceing otherwise.
In the case where the original was qualifiec to IEEE 323-71,.the spare part =ust be qualified to IEEE 323-74 unless sound reasons for doing c herwise are snown.
Spare parts shall be precured according to UNT-8-001.
5.5.1 Spare Parts suitable for More han one Co ponent A spare part may be procured for mere than ene S-E application if it is qualified to tne cost severe environment, including the seismic environment, of the cost severe cecponent application.
A spare part may be used in an S-E component cifferent from the one for wnich it was purchased proviced:
u
Acministrative Procedure
? E-2 -: *. a Equipmen: Envircntental Oualificatien Fevision ',
5.5.1.1 The part is qualifiec to an environment, inclucing seismic environment, wnich completely envelops the environment to whier.
it could e exposed.
5.3.1.2 The part is like-for-like replacement or is de=cnstrated equivalent ey an engineering evaluation in acccrdance with PE-2-C27, FE-2-006 cr PE-TEM-003, as applicable.
5.5.1 3 Proof is provided tnat use of the part will not alter tne seismic response of the component.
5.S.1.4 The requirements of criteria 5.8.1.1, 5.8.1.2, and 5.8.1 3 above shall ce documented in a for=at similar to that of UNT-8-001, Attachment c.18.
5.9 FIELD-FASE1CATED SPARE PAETS When, in the opinion of the Maintenance Superintendent-Nuclear or his designee, it is advantageous to fabricate a part for a safety -
related component locally rather than te purchase it, qualification may be maintainec by adequate documentation as described in MM-1-005.
Documentation shall be furnished to show the spare part was faoricated to the same material specifications and to the same snop drawings and procedures as tne criginal part.
As a minimum, documentation shall include:
Material specifications Materia 1' test records anc traceability Shop fabrication drawing identification
. Special process identification, if required NDE or other testing procedures and results if required by original design 5.9.1 If the information cescribed aoove (section 5.9) cannot be obtained from the manufacturer, tne part may still ce faericatec if it is supported by engineering design documentaticn accorcing 21
Acmin;strative Fr0cecure F E C ', -
Equipmen: Invircnmental Oualifica icn Eer;s en ".
Oc :ne 5:stion Modifica:ior ?r grar.
A " Flan; Change" will be generatec in accordance with ?E-2-C27.
Engineering decign must ce reviewed and approvec as adequate by proper review authority in accordance with the procedure cit'ed.
5.9.2 In either case, the documen:Etion cf Section 5.9 must be generated er procured.
Inis' documentation shall be transtitted tc tne EOC for review and icentificatien as EQ records pertaining to the ecmponent affected.
Any cocumentation discrepancies or deficiencies noted in this review shall be resolved by the EE or by Maintenance, as appropriate.
5.10 WAEEHOUSING The EQC shall assist the Materials and Stores Supervisor or the Procurement Task Fcree Coordinator, as appropriate, in determining storage requirements for safety-related equipment.
The EQC shall assist the Maistenance Superintendent-Nuclear in determining any maintenance curing storage requirements for safety-related equipment.
Tne ECC shall furnish Stores and Maintenance with any storage and maintenance requirements revealed by the review ef.the NUEEG 0588 submittal according to PE-2-015.
5.10.1 Stores and Maintenance personnel shall generate records showing proper storage and maintenance during storage.
These recorcs shall be reviewed by the EQC and identified for recovery as Qualification Eecords.
5.10.2 Issuance of spare parts for safety-rclated equipment shall be controlled according to UNT-6-011 snd UNT-5-002.
5.10.3 In the event the EQC identifies material as having been received without proper qualification, he shall notify the Quality Group by the preparation of a CIWA in accercance with UNT-1-007 Quality shall then attach a Quality Hold card to One ncncenforming material in accorcance witn Q?-2-001.
Material sc taggee snall'nct be released for use in S-E applications except 22 s m --
..m
e o
A: min;strs ive F ::e:ure
?E ;
E:u;; men: Envir:nmental ;us;;ficati:r Revis;;r,
- nat mater;al s:
agged may be eleased f:r in::alla:icn and-testing uncer ~a ";uality Conditional Release" ir accercance wit:.
UNT-1-007 anc Q?-2-001.
S-R equipmer.: witn a conditionally released part shall not be placed in operation until the release is made unconditional and the associated DN or NOR is rescived in ac:ordance with ne requirements of UNT 1-007.
e.11
.v.a !. l. !.. -
n Ine EQO shcIl be responsicle for advising Maintenance of any situations, as revealec ey the 50 review of the NUREG 0588 submit-tal in accordance with PE-2-015, wnere the qualification of an S-R item is conditionec upon the performance of maintenance or component replacement.
Tne Maintenance Superintendent-Nuclear
,.e -
shall designate one or more reviewers to review the purchase order files for S-R' equipment to identify any such situations regarding Y
g S-R items not covered by the NUREG 0588 submittal.
This informa-tien shall be used to prepare a preventive maintenance (PM) schedule which will ensure that qualification of such equipment is restored and maintained for tne life of the plant.
Such PM requirements shall be identified on the task cards by including the designation " Environmental Qualification Requirement" on the header of the task card.
Any tasx so identified shall be accorded priority to ensure it is performed on schedule.
If it should become necessary to delay performance of an " EOR" task, the EQC Shall be advised and the task shall be rescheduled as soon as possicle.
The EQC shall be advised when the task has been completed.
Maintenance that is required to maintain qualification includes:
5.11.1 General cleanliness and lubrication requirements as required by approved LF&L procedures; cleaning to kee; ventilating passages open 5.11.2 Replacement of parts naving shorter qualified life than the cesign life cf :ne plant as 1 entified :y EQ files 4
Actinistrative F ccedure FE-2-0*L E;uipnent Envircrr. ental 0;alificatien Revisic
=@
5.11 3 Where the qualified life of equipment is sncrter tnan tne p1Ent cesign life due to limitatiens Of the artificial aging technique, it is sometimes possible to extend the qualifiec life by retesting near tne end of qualified life.
5.11.3.1 The EQ shall identify such cencitiens and shall advise the Technical Support Superintendent-Nuclear of these requirements.
The Technical Support Superintendent-Nuclear shall designate the appropriate person to develop procedures according to UNT-1-003 to govern the conduct cf suen testing or analysis.
The EQC and Maintenance personnel shall assist as requirec in the development of these procedures, which shall include the requirement for the development of adequate records of testing to establish requalification.
These records shall be identified -by the EQC for subsequent retrieval as Qualification Records.
-5.11.3.2 Normally, the requirement for retesting or analysis to extend qualification will be set by the equipment manuf acturer anc will be specified in the qualification documentation.
This specification snould be identified during the review of One qualification documents.
This coes not preclude the icentification of the possibility of extending qualification from other sources and at other times.
5.11.4 The use of spare parts in the repair of safety-related equipment will be controlled by the methods of UNT-5-002 such that only spare parts qualified by the methods of UNT-8-001 are usec.
As required oy UNT-8-011, spare parts for safety-relatec equipment are released from Stores only on a properly-prepared ROS, which is part of the_C1WA work package required by UNT-5-002.
The C1WA shall acequately document the spare parts-used.
The C1WA work package'cocuments shall be reviewed for adequacy by the EQC and shall be identified as an EQ record for subsequent re trie v al.
a.
Actinistracive Prc:scure PI-;_:,;
Equ;pment Envir:nnental Oualificatien Revisic 5.11.4.1 In crcer to expecite the ecmpletion cf werk required by a CIW A, the EOC review cf tne C:WA work package will ner: ally te done after the werk is cc=plete.
This does not preclude tne review prior to the work if the Maintenance Superir.tendent-Nucletr or his designee requests an advisory review.
5.11.4.2 Tne EOC shall provide technica; cuppcrt te Maintenance persen-nel to assist in the icentification cf qualification requirements.
5.*1.5 The planning and preparation for caintenance activities shall be executed and centrolled by the methods of UNT-5-002 or MO-1-004 (as appropriate) to ensure that methocs and procedures used are proper to caintain qualification of equipment repaired or maintained.
UNT-5-002 and MD-1-004 require the generation of adequate records to demonstrate that quality and safety have been retainea undicinished by maintenance activities.
!nese records snall be reviewed and identified by the EQC as Qualification Records in accordance with ?E-2-021.
In addition to any other purpcse they may serve, these documents seccme EQ records for the affected cc=ponent.
Any deficiencies revealed by the review shall be brought to the attention of the appropriate Maintenance supervisor for resolution.
5.i".6 Maintenance of seis=ic Qualification 5.11.6.1 Special attention snall be given to any maintenance activity which could alter the seismic response characteristic of any safety-related component.
Any maintenance activity which changes the arrangement, =ounting, er structural configuration of any safety-related equipment or structure, or changes the weignt or position of any component in a safety-relatec panel or structure, shall se reviewet by Plant Engineering to cetermine wnetner tne seistic response will be affectec.
Tne Maintenance Superintendent-Nuclear snall be responsitle for l
ensuring that tr.e enange is ref erred to Plant Engineering for 25 i
t l
Actinistrative Frececure
?E-2-M a Eqci;nen: Enviren: ental Oual fica :cr
?.evtsien ~
review.
Tne Tecnnical Support Superin ender. -Guclear shall be respor.sicle-for ceciding, after censulting witn the technical reviewer, if a review by an eff-site consultant is necessary.
5.11.6.2 The above review and analysis shall be documented by suitable me=oranda, sketches, calculations, and other docu=entation acequate te substantiate he review and decision in an audita-tie canner.
Inis documentation shall become a part of plant recorcs after being received and identified cy the EOO for subsequent recovery.
5.11 7 Pipe Line snubbers The entire piping systet, including hangers and snubbers, shall be under surveillance as required by the following progra=s:
5.11.7.1 The ISI progra= inspection schedule will be so arranged as to result in a complete inspection a: 10-year intervals.
The frequency of this inspection will be increased if signs of damage are revealed.
5.11 7 2 Tech. Specs. require inspection and. functional test of snubbers at 18-month intervals.
Ten percent of snubbers are checked at eact inspt: tion.
If any are found to be defective, another 10%
is checked.
5.11 7.3 Inspections anc testing will be performed accorcing to the fo11cwing procedures:
PE-5-011
'PE-5-012 PE-5-013 PE-5-014 PE-5-015 These procedures include a methoc for trending failures tc predict seal life.
l 5.11.7.4 All of tne above inspections and tests shall be documentec ac-cording to One above procedures.
Any necessary maintenance 4
snall be documented according to applicable procedures.
All 26 4
l A m:nistrative Prece:ure FE-2-C,a Eq ui pme n: Envircnmental Oualift:stier:
Revisi r l
re: Orcs s: generate: shall ce reviewed by :ne E;;, sortec and identified a ording te FE-2-321, and forwarded to Central Records so tna; maintenance Of qualificaticn is established.
Any discrepancies noted shall be brcught tc the attention of the originator for resciutien.
5.12 CONTROL OF FLANT CHANGES AND MDE FICATIONS Any construction or =aintenance activity on a safety system which involves a change in some design feature (i.e.,
is more than restoration to the original condition by like-for-lixe replacement of components, adjust =ent, refinishing, etc.) shall be controlled cy ?E-2-006, PE-2-027 or PE-TEM-003, as applicable.
5.12.1 The System Engineer shall have full responsibility for completing the project in suen a way that any new safety-related equipment installed is qualified for the environment in which it must operate according to the requirements of IEEE 323-1974 and/cr other applicable standards, as required by federal regulations, and such that no existing safety-related equipment has had its qualificatien compromised.
5.12.2 If the plant modification includes the purchase of new equipment, an: if such new equipment is to os installed in a harsh 4
environment, it shall be qualifiec according to tne requirements of IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 3t4-1975 by one of the methods of sec-tion 5.4 of this procedure.
5.12.2.1 If the new equipment is to be installed in a mild environment, it shall be qualified according to the requirements cf see:1on 5.5.
5.12.2.2 In either environment, the equipment shall be seismically qualified by the method described in UNT-5-001, Attacnment 6.16.
3ccumentation of seismic qualification snall be reviewed oy the EQ', and the review shall be documented cy ?E-2-022, At-tachment 5.5.
l L
Actin c rative ?rocecure
?E-2-:::
Equipment Environmen;al Cualifica:icn Eevisien
- 5.12.3 Ine ECC shall be availatie to assis in tne pre;Erstien of plans, specifica:icas, tes procedures, and work procecures tc the ex-tent that these cocuments bear upon qualification.
He shall bring to the attention cf the SE any deficiencies noted in qualification requirements.
5.12.4 Upon ccepletien of the work, the EOC shall review the documents associated with qualification for adequacy according Oc the checklists and criteria of this procedure.
Tne fellowing documents shall be reviewed:
5.12.4.1 Procurement documents establishing qualification of new equipment according to UNT-6-001 5.12.4.2 Procedures and reports showing work was done in a proper manner by competen; workmen using suitable tools, instruments, and equipment 5.12. C. 3 Procedures and reports showing that all testing required by the equipment manufacturer and codes and standards mandated by federal regulations was co=pleted.
Reports of tests shall include pass / fail criteria and.results.
5.12.c.;
EOC review of qualification of S-E equipment in a harsh environment shall be according to the criteria of Attachment 6.2.
Documentation of the review shall be by Attachment 6.2.
Review cf qualifier' ion of new (to be procured and installed)
S-E equipment in a mild environment shall be according to the criteria of Attachment 6.3 Documentation cf the review shall be by Attachment 63 5.12.5 Any deficiencies noted pertaining to qualification shall be brought tc the attention of the SE for resciution.
When ceficiencies have been resolved, documentation shall be identified according to PE-2-021, and shall become a part cf plant records.
i 25
Actin;strative.rececure PE-2.
Eq ui pne r.: Envircr.nental Oualificati:r Eevisien ~
~,... -.
w e n -... A..
n,,. a, e.v. (e
,3 o
s.
Al; activities involving qualified equipment. and requiring :ne generation of qualification documentation shall have a Qualifica-tien Task (CT) generated.
A OT shall compr'ise the set of activities and tne securing er the. generating cf docu=ents necessary to =aintain a qualified status of the qualifiec equipment when the primary activity is co=plete.
Examples of such activities wnien require generating a O! are preventive / corrective maintenance or station modifications.
5.13.1 Qualification Task Package 5.13.1.1 A temporary file package shall be set up for each QT initiated to facilitate tracking of completed tasks.
Tne E00 shall review the task and documents submitted.
Eased upon the review, the EQC shall generate a checklist of documents considered to be required to establish maintenance of qualification.
This file shall be marked with the UNID number of tne affected component and the name of One task.
5.13.1.2 If the cocumentation received is considered to be incomplete or inacequate, it shall De copiec and copies retained as a QT package.
The original documents shall be marked witn a
' dentification nu=ber (PE-2-021, secticn 5.u) anc i
cocument forwarced to the next party in the review cycle, eventually being deposited in Central Records.
The copies retained shall be retained until the OT is consicerec complete, after whien
. time the interim copies may be destroyed.
5.13.1.3 If documentation received is considered to be adequate and complete, it is net necessary that temporary copies of the cocuments be retained in the QT package.
Ine checklist generated in step 5.13.1.1 shall be retainec.
5.13 1.4 The O! package file shall De purged annually.
All completec C T packages may De re=cved anc destroyec at this time.
2C 1
lk s
Acminis:ra:1ve F ecedure pI_g ;1 I;ai; men: Invircnmental lua'_ifica:icr Revisien
~
5.13.*.5 Until the OT package is come'ete, the item affected shall net be unconditionally released for use because its qualifica:icn is not established.
When.the CT package is complete, the item affected shall be released for use and the CT package closed.
5.1t OUALIFICATION TASK. PACKAGE CLOSING
'..'h e n th e d e fi c i e n c i e s, if any. have been resolved and any additional documents " received in the resolution process have been processed and forwarded (as addressed in step 5 13.1). the ECC shall add the title, record type number, and document number (from the red E0 stamp) of each new document to the index page for the affected component.
If a document affects more than one component, a line for that document snall be added to the index for each componeat se affected.
5.14.1 A copy of each index page revised by the addition of a line or lines shall have a revision number incremented by one and a copy made.
Mark the copy with the red EQ stamp as described in sec-tion 5.c of PE-2-021, and forward to Central Records for-processing and storage.
After the index has been revised and the revisions transmitted. the Qualification Task package may be disoarded or marked " COMPLETE" and retained if preferred.
5.14.2 A complete qualification history of any safety-related component may be generated by retrieving, from Central Records, a copy of each document on the index for tnat particular component.
6.0 LIILSBBEE:3 6.1 Safety-Related Systems 6.2 P2.13. Review Record of Enviror. mental Qualification Documentation, Waterford 3 6.3
?2.1c, Review Record of Environmental Qualification Documentation for Mild Environment. Waterford 3 30 k
I i
9 i
I
- ^w4
.e.'.e
.e
.; e.a s a..n. s e.c
~. -
e a j
-..=. a. s.
t w
w.
j e
7=e.
m p.g 7
e g w.J p 4....e.= -.en.
- J 9
w
....ee O-e+
- #J
.e. m.m..p, g om e =
gwG=-a m mo =4
- s.
- g,b.J
..a%.,.
g.
e
==
w.%,*-
e e.
e
= $ y p e = = (, = 9, m a
.a p\\ a
--. -- ti r= = q
.m f&
d
_..n --s 6
..-- - - - 'w l
G W
'e
-s....
b e." L.. - C.L a r.. ; J....., 2.b.L.,,..q CPron W-3 FSAE Ta:1e 3.2
- .)
Reac or ?rctec-ive Systee React:r.Cociant ? umps (?a sive)
Pressuri:er Vessel & SEV's CE Drive Mechanical H:using-(?assive)
Safety Injection Tanks LPSI Pu=ps HPSI Pu=ps Instruments on SI System Control & Interface-Status Displays Primary Elements Processing for Control, K.
R Shutdown Cooling Syste= Instrumentation Chemical and Volume Control Syste= Instrumentation Containment Spray Syste= & Instrumentation Gasecus Waste Management System Gas Surge Tank Cas Compressors Gas Decay Tank
. Soron Management Holdup Tanks t
by Equipment Drain Tank Pump Es Drain. Tank Pump
' Flash Tank & Pu=ps Component Cooling Syste:
Containment Cooling Syste= Instrumentation Essential Services Chilled. Water System Instrumentation Main Steat & Feedwater System Instrumentation Emergency Feedwater System
~-
Switchgear Operation Initiation & Panel Lights Containment Isclation System Instrumentation Panel Display Emergency Diesel Generator and Instrumentation Contr:1 Room Air Conditioner Instrumentation PE-2-014 nevision 1 32 Atta nment 6.1 (1 of 3)
s A -..
.. - r.
c.
-:.s..
(Frc= W-3 FSAR !a:1e 3.2-1}
RAI acle Vaul 5 Switer. gear Area HVAC Incirumenta:icn RAE HiV Equip =ent Rect HVAC Instrumentation FEE HVAC Instrumentation Containment A:=cspneric Release Syste Shield'Builcing Ven: System Con:rciled Ventilation. Area System
- Containment Vacuu: Relief Actuation Containmen; Pressure Indication Containment' Water Level Indication Miscellaneous HVAC Syste=s Instrumentation Combustible Gas Control System H2 Analyzer Instrumentation Safety Electrical Systems s
Safety Syste= Motors Containment Electrical Penetrations Vital de Switchgear and Control Soards Station Batteries & Chargers s
Safety Systems Power Control & Instrument Cables and Raceway.s Vital ac Inverters & Dist. Panels Cable Splices Connectors and Ter=inal Blocks Scric Acid Heat Tracing Safety System 125 Vdc & 120 Vac Dist. Panels PEM~in CCWs ARM (RE24-33)
Airborne Rad Monitors Accident Rad Monitor - Hi-Range Containment Main Control Panel Auxiliary Control Panel Remote. Shutdown ECCS Pu=p Roo= Flood Level Switches DG-Jacket Cooling System Containment Personnel Lock, Eq uipmen Hatch & Escape Lock Fuel. Transfer Tube Containment Piping Penetrations PE-2-01:
Revision
- 33 A::acnment 6.1
( 2 of 3)
..m. -
-...r.r. v..e. - - c.. s.e.ee r.e e.
rr-e.r... v..-
.r e. :
.=.-.. 2
-:,3
- c...
s
.~.~;,,e
....a....
F. e a 'c 0.-
Cavi ;. Co: ling Syste:
Snielc Buil:ing Ver.: latien Systec At:Ospheric Steam Ducp System Spent ru el. cool Syste= Instrumentation Cables and F.acewa.vs 4
FE-2-C14 nevision 1
,2 4 A.. a c..m a. a..
A.. *.
(o
.r
.t '
u
o
. =. =. '*
- r.
- 2. 7.*t..;,'W."
- 0. 0 * *. 0.."
.w.
.,....... i. t..~.. e.. p.. -..
w.r.
.I.wa..wn
.N.,,.g,
[... g..
7 4..
- 7
..t!. 6 s. r.
e w.
.n.
wo
.. L...:
3 v.
r.
_ _, _r.: _. '_
Inis Review Reccrd is cesignee.as an aid for reviewing Equipment
- ua'ificatien Reperts to assure that all requirements have been te
- .
Oes;1ete one Review Record for each ur.ique component or-component lot, based on canufacturer, model !;o., etc.
If subco=ponents were tested separately, write cut an individual checklist for each succomponent.
Tne Paragraph I.
(SUMMAEY) shall be finished last.
Equipment Qualification Data Evaluation Forms shall be filled cut for each individual piece of equip =ent and/or ce=ponent, reflectin5 its unique function, locati:n, etc.
The Review En5ineer.(as designated in this procedure) is to complete all parts of this Review Record and Equipment Qualification Evaluation Forms.
I.
SUMMAcY 1.
Component:
Model No.:
Plant Unique Tag Numbers (attach sheets as required):
Manufacturer:
Purchase Order No.:
S pe cifi c a ti o n.f;o. :
FI-2-Cit Revistor.
- 35 Attacnment 6.2 (1 cf **)
- = E ! "' ~ = '
- v _=_ " ~ ; '_ c '::
- i = ~ K ~ ~ :.o : v = "~ : ~ ~ r:
"~
t'
~===?=~
~
- _..,...__ _ m -, _e ;;
er
?rc:ec;
?roprLe.ary? (Yezit:c)
Fiis Reper;
~f Proprietary, identify
!; c.
9: c.
Sns ect reevete-er
-e e-t 2.
Equipment performance requirements are defined-in 3
Test ;1ans and objectives are contained in Qualification Report 4
Aging (analysis and/or conditiening) are contained in Qualification Report 5.
Qualification Test Procedures are contained in Qualification Report 6.
Test results are contained in Qualificaticn Report l
7.
Supportin;; data are contained in Qualification Report l
l l
S.
Analy:is data are contained in Qualification Report I
l t
i PE-2-01; Revision 1 36 Attacnmen-6.2
(: of 11)
I I
I I
t
9
- -_ _ r --_
_a t
.....r...-_... _ - _ _....,,.
~~
V;~EF: =:
..:........,,e......
1.
Oo.:penent is qualif.e: witn/withcut e x c e p-i ons.
Exceptions, if any, 1
are listed below:
Eycertfees Justifie-tiens 2..
Deficiencies in qualification, if any, are listed below:
Deriefencies co--eetive Aetiens t
3 Recommendation:
Acceptable Not Acceptable (Explain)
Review Engineer Date Independent Reviewer Date PE-2-C1C hevistor 1 37 Attaenment 6.2
( 3 of 11) 1
4
=.
9-
,~~;9:v? -;_
v_- : _ 7 - ; - - -
- v i e ; - -.-
- i;TE?? =- :
1;.
OU A' F:r;rISr ::?-:_t v 1
icen ify qualification =etned:
Type Test Analysis Operating Experience On-Geing Qualification Cc=bination of Methods (Check all nat apply.)
2.
The Test Report indicates that:
(If Yes, identify with section or part number of the report, as applicatie.)
A.
Appropriate codes and standards are utilized.
Yss No (Explain)
E.
Extrapciations are justified.
Yes No (Explain)
N/A C.
Deviations and modifications of procured equipment with respect to tested ite=s are evaluated.
Yes No (Explain)
N/A D.
Program for on-scing qualification is in'cluded and acceptatie.
Yes No (Explain)
N/A E.
Analyses are justified.
Yes No (Explair.)
N/A F.
Operating experiences are utili:ed and justified.
Yes No (Explain)
N/A l
t
+-
l l
?E-2-01L Revistor. 1 38 Attacnment 6.2 (e of 11' l
i l
?
l
- E"
- TV :E!*:0 1,...-_..,,,...
s..,.
..-_--_r-.-,. _ _ _.,,,... _,,.
t-
- rerm:- :
_-.. ::_-o.r.e.,.,.- )
m
(....
3.
?sss/ fail criteria are spe: fied.
Yes No (Explain)
N/A 3
Tests concuctec and sequence:
A.
- , - c e uene, 3,.
- :.c v=.
r..re.-,g?
v,.
g,ey.
- e. r e
- e....
- ndicate Yes No N/A Sequence 1.
Inspection Yes No 2.
Operation:
a.
Baseline b.
Extremes 3.
Aging:
i i
a.
Inermal b.
Radiation c.
Mechanical d.
Vibration 4.
Seismic Tes:
5.
DBA Tes:
Duration 6.
Operation t
7.
Inspection L
8.
Power supply extremes (voltage and frequency):
f l
PE-2-01;
.t.e v i s i o n 1 3C Atta nment 6.2 (5 cf 11) i
- E" I E;* :E 0: 2
?? E F"
- SC ME A *_
" t ' rrr r t.Trrf: TSC 'ME"
- TISN VATE.::SE
._..___:_-____t..
- n_ ::
Te::s c:ncucted knd se uence (Ocr.t'd):
5.
0:her effects considered (per NU.:.EG 0585) 1:2 12 f41 1.
Suomer5ence 2.
Dust 3.
Syner51stic effects If Yes, indicate C.
Was the same specimen used for all tests conducted?
Yes __No (Indicate tests performed on different specimens.)
SPEcTurN Ne. 1 seEcIMEN f:e. 2 SPECIMEN Ne. 2 4
Test temperatures were measured by:
__ Direct Mounted Thermocouple
__0ther Method (Explain)
CE-2-Cla Revision 1 40
- 1. tachment 6.2
( 6 cf 11)
= r" rr
- : a : ~.
?? F f"' r ? * "E!'TI'
- Ut'_ F*TA--ar rrrg! et Tir:M
~~
VITEF F
- e. "..:._ _: - _ : _ _- _.: : : s_ ~_.:.:.v
- t... n.,.-
5.
Iner=al aging was ccnducted ty:
Arrhenius Method
__Arrhenius Method Other
- Satisfactory
- Unsatisfactory (Explain) 6.
Temperature is less than temperature at which knowr. caterial pnase cnanges occur.
__Yes
__Ne
__N/k H5. A Radiation aging was by:
Cobalt 60 Other 6.B Were beta doses included above?
__Yes
__No I
If No. explain i
i 7.
Acceptance Criteria:
List ite=s such as instrument accuracy, drift, response time, transmitter output, valve closing time and torque, electrical insulation resistance, etc.
1 Items required to Actually monitored:
Explain
~
be mer!terede certfrueusir I-termittentiv Differences 1.
2.
3.
i l
.E-2-0*A Revision 1 41.2
(
of 11) m
(.
- r
- 7 _: _:..._- -
~ = E r " * = " v ~ !: ' '
:._~~~::~:D'
- ~':vic:~ T::'
FA Efr:E: :
....___r_-.g.___-
3:__:.e n.,..
E.
Test moni crtng instrumen a-icn was currently cslitraced an:
traceatle :s the National Sureau cf Standards.
__ Yes
__ N/A
__ No (Explain) 0 List any ancralies durir.5 test and causes of such anc=alies.
Descrite significance and subsequent equipment refurbishing er replace =ent.
10.
List any asumptions used by vendor to qualify equipment.
State whether assumptions are acceptable.
11.
Equipment is qualified for specific type of installation and countins method, vnich properly reflects actual field application.
__ Yes
__ N/A
__ No (Explain)
- 2.
Tes: pregrac icentified all interfaces, and qualification tes si=ulates specified installed conditions (including heat transfer fro: associated equipment to electrical component).
__ Yes
__ No (Indicate if differences are justified.)
13.
Specimen tested in qualification program is identical and traceable to permanent plant equipment.
__ Yes
__ Ne (Explain)
PE-2-014 Revision
- 42 Attaenment c.2 (E of 11) l 1
- - _--: :-~~~-
-.... = _,...,... ____--____-3_,.
s...
,-__,,,,_-__3_,..
-.._:___--.,..-__,..,:.r._
Vencer's qualified service conci:icr.s meet er exceec requiremer.ts ir Equipmen-Qualificatien Data Sheets.
~0=;are ar.
ev alua e.
__ Yes f;c (Indicate the cifferences and tneir impact en the equipment f un c ti o r..
Verify if qualificatien to 'ess than full service conditions is acceptatie.
Attach additional sneets as requirec.)
2.
Qualified service conditions include cargins as specified in IEEE Standard 323/1974 and in NUF.EG 0588, section 3.
Co= pare and evaluate.
__ Yes No (Describe the differences and indicate if they are justified and acceptable.)
i
.I-2-Ota Bevision 1 A3 Attaenment 6.2
( 9 of 11) i i
cr" D*
- r?"E
-.,......,,,,......-.-~.-:- n _
__._ =
__-n
__-_-...=:
PATEFF':: :
.. : _ _ r. _ _r.*
_r.e n _ _ _ae v._r _. -
(.....)
m.. __.. m_ _._... r._
The cetponer.t is deemed to be qualifiec for specified normal /atnertal and accider.: conditions and a qualifiec life
- of years witn tne replacement schedule listed in step u below.
__Yes
__Ne (~ndicate tr.e actual qualified life.)
years + 1 year accident conditions
- ^UALI ! S L*FP - The period of time, prior to the start of a desi5n basis event, for which the equipment was cemonstrated to meet the design require =ents for the specified service conditions.
At the end of tne qualified life, the equipment shall be capable of performing the cafety function (s) required for the postulated design basis anc post-cesign basis events.
4 Serimeement senedule Component and/or Part Re;1acement Schedule and Maintenance Procedure is identified.
__ Yes
__ No
__ N/A e rince
,e-Serecut.
P3-t re_
e-Bere-fetien t
I l
PI-2-O's Revisien 1 La Attaenmer.
(.2 l 10:f
- i.'
l t
l I
i
-.- - ~ _ - -
Iea I
SLVILM hLLDAD 8X_ L N V 18 test 8t N I AL. ON AL Ji JE AIJDE. PDfiHIEN14 f l ue Waikat988.3 iV, lo s 481181414 I init o
ebe.Iis&c.etanu Reports l ess:l enaf e itse t est i ou t eeg 1 set ase ssa t t om (Complete veely Elec quaalif Scatlee snelleod cleecked les 4 4 e en 18.8.)
IL;e llo n/4 Illi 50 EIA 1TrL 1L3I
_ _ DffBAIJNG.LAl'LBILNEL 4.gu s tment Spee t t ication
_._. ___ Engullement Specificatiose I e:,0 l'rogr ase:
_ __ _ Frototygne Tapeelficattom Service Coenditiones
_ Features Deen sastsated bliF. Cond i Li cess
_ __ ___ Cusspari some Variateles to be mea:.ureel
_ _ _ Sumsnary of Esperiesece flasalt oriesg Equa geemt
__ __ ___ Estrapolattoms or Modia ications 1
i*e r t ses sa nce Cisaract eri sti cs ___ __ ___ Justificattoes of Acceptaasce S ecla! Case:.e des ations -
_ __ __ Certif icat tense of Seport t
& got 3 ecset lla,unt i seg
. seed De tent 4L i use
~
interiaces A3&LI515 A cc el.t a nc e t's i t e s e.s
_ _.__ LgestseenL St.cetileation Ir:s t kesults:
_ Interf aces & Isopodary CamJitissess tatsj ec t i v e s
__ Specific features l.qen t leent toe sc r a s.t l ua.
___ __ __ talleere M Nes i.ectitty De scrl:41om
_ __ _ Falleare Effects I nst raunc set Cal t hr.et t oes Assiemptions l'e ucedures
_ ___ Matteematical Moelet s Isata & Acciaracy
_ ___ ispirical Values Nemes.ar) & C4enciessions
_ _., _ _, Me ttendol ogy or Computer Frogram l
_ _., _ __ Sememary of I'er feemassre Ceelallratters el Ne wal t s Clear.ac t er t :.t i c s est atel i steed Satismo t i eer. fea t.a 1
.__ __ __ Certificatiese =8 Repser t 8 a t r.es.u t.et t oses or M.=ti s t e.et lossa 4:ce t it tealt ues of Netwrt S
Id arps* a :. reece k. el. e apt aise-I t
g 8-l _ ' e8 8 9 Se v i:.s use 8 Att.ettsament le.2 ill eg g g) g i
--_-_r.
tr--:-
rr e " : r + - " ri : ;; _ - : A-
- rr.- er.
?"
___....-_e...
Lz
-?-
.. s..e _r rc.o~
GENERAL This Review Record is desi5ned as an aid for reviewing Equipmer.:
Cualification Reports to assure that all requirements have been met.
Complete one Review Record for each unique component or component ict, tasec On manufacturer, model Nc., etc.
If subcomponents were tested separately, write out an individual enecklist for each subcomponent.
The paragraph !.
(
SUMMARY
) shall be finished last.
Equipment Oualification Data Evaluation Forms shall be filled out for each incividual piece of equipment and/cr compenent, reflecting its unique function, location, etc.
The Review Engineer (as cesignatec in this procedure) is to complete all parts cf this Review Record and Equipment Qualification Evaluation Fcres.
I.
SUMMARY
1.
Component:
Model No.:
Plant Unique Tag Numbers (attach sheet: as required)
Manufacturer:
rurchase Orcer No.:
Specification No.:
PE-2-C1L Eev.sion 1 46 Attaenment 6.3 (1ef 5)
- r p:.-
.: r :;
e
....,.. u _.
.t.._..... _;,_.__-_.
--r.... :... u _e _. _
r._--_-
2.
Equipment performance require:en are cefinet in 3.
Coces and stantards are cited in 4
Certfricate of Conformance to purenase specifications is included in 5.
Component is qualified with/without exceptions.
Exceptions, if any, are listed below:
6.
Deficiencies in qualification, if any, are listed below:
Deficiencies Corrective Actions 7
Recommendation:
__ Acceptable
__ Net Acceptatle (Explain)
Review Engineer Date l
l
'e l
PI-2-014 Revision 1 4" 3
(: cf 5,'
t L
- -7 "," * ;,. : ? * *i,
. ; r t... -....,,, 7...,..- - - g.7.......
S...g,.,.....,,,
~
ga =.. _. _,... : m p p pj = _...
~
r p.r - :. -
--r_--..
e : n _ _: : u 1.
An-ic.patec enviror. ment is describec in purchase cocumen s.
__ Yes Uc (Explain) 2.
Appropriate coces ant standards are references.
__ Yes No (Explain) 3 Mar.ufacturer's desigr. conditions envelope conditions under step 1 aoove.
__ Yes No (Exceptions) 4 Manufacturer's proof-testing program meets requirements of national stancarcs:
(list or explain alternate.)
5.
Manufacturer certifies equipment meets purchase specification requirements.
__ Yes No (Explain)
?E-2-01L F.evtsion
- 4e Attaenment 63
( 3 Of 5)
,-J-4
_.n
-_.Ls_-._a_sA_4
,,_>+i,J.=
.~-._A.-
A.
as-..
__#.-J...
g
_.. _. _.,.._ _ _. _ _m _:.
9: e s " _ ; r: r.
s ~ t *_
9* ;t re ~:- T r:
~~.7 n 77 g-se ra: I' S E f"*IF O' U E !'?
- ~_ : : ~ : r.
-,, f, * :
~r - e.. t. e :,.. u g.,. -
1 ~.
Ernee ed 'fre The component is deemed to be suitable for specified conditions and an expectec life' cf years with the replacement schecule listed in step 2 below.
Yes No (Indicate the actual expectec life) years + 1 year accident conditions EMDECTED LIFE - The period of time, prior to the start of a design basis event, for which the equipment was designed to meet the requirements for the specified service conditions.
n At the end of the expected life, the equipment shall be capable of performing the safety function (s) required for the postulated design I
basis and' post-design basis events.
2.
Feelmeement schedete Co=ponent and/or Part Replacement Schedule and Maintenance Procedure is identified.
__ Yes No N/A Peri n e.ne - s e-e de',
Pm-t ti e. er Dere-detien i
l i
l i
P F. 014 Revision 1 49 3 (6 cf 5)
+
- -. _ _r., : r_ _ _, : -
g
_r _e s _ _: v u_ r__ e _ _: -
__.n____--_-_r.__-._c, n., w. r, _ : _ _- _,..
_m
..: E?? er :
_ -.,v.
_ _. r e gj p g. _,. ?_ _ _S _p
- e, a_
Venscr documentation incluces the ic110 wing information:
12.1 1::
EZA Cer iticate at Cortormance to purchase specs
- h...
4..3 ve 4c.4 4o, a...
Re:;uire=ents C:r surveillance and maintenance
/>
t l
PE-2-014 Revision 1 50 A tacnmen: 53
( 5 of 5) i l
l l~
.m