ML20127L491
Text
? ,., ". i. .
' %,}
~
UNITED STATES
,f g NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION a WASHINGTON, D. C. 20'P55 g
November 23, 1983
%g*****,/
MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans NMSS Ronald D. Becker, AEOD John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Lawrence A. Schlosser, Region III Dolores M. Meyer, Region IV Edward B. Frigi11ana, Region V FROM: Bernard L. Grenitr, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL AS,SISTANCE PROJECTS
-In accordance with estabTishe~d prodedures7the attached'NRREhnical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eastern United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites, (FIN A0448)
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10)workingdays. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this time frame will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
p h 1.: ., m n rd . renier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy E. Pentecost H. Lefevre I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
(Signed) (Date) 8505230007 841002 PDR FOIA SHOLLYB4-243 PDR (Office)
yy a..
.- r.
Statement of Work .
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eastern United States Nuclear Power Plant Sites FIN No: A0448
_B&R No: 20-19-10-12-2 Project Manager: Harold Lefevre, NRR, FTS 492-7732 Technical Monitors: Leon Reiter, NRR, FTS 492-8443 Jeff Kimball, NRR, FTS 492-8999 BACKG@UND On November 18, 1982, the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) forwarded a letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Comission clarifying their past position with respect to the 1886 Charleston earthquake. This clarification stated that both "deterninistic and probabilistic evaluations of the seismic hazard should be made for individual sites in the eastern seaboard to establish the seismic engineering parameters for critical facilities". Part of the Division of Engineering plan to address the USGS letter is a short term probabilistic assessment of all r.uclear power plants in the eastern United States.
OBJECTIVE -
The objective.of this project is to expand the development of efficient and improved ways to propagate both the systematic and random error through the seismic hazard calculations and to calculate the seismic hazard spectra and historic hazard spectra for all nuclear power plant sites east of the Rocky Mountains. Results will include an estimate of the probability of seismic ground motion exceeding the design level at each site using both the seismic hazard and historic hazard.
Calculations will also include sufficient sensitivity tests on input assumptions in such a manner as to allow the staff sufficient information to dete'rmine how the various input assumptions affect the probability results.
WORK REQUIREMENTS Task 1 Expand Development of Efficient and Improved Ways to Propacate Uncertainty Estimated Level of Effort: 0.20 professional staff years (psy)
Projected Completion Date: Three months from start of contract Restructure the computer program as developed in the Seismic Hazard Characterization of the Eastern United States Project to calculate the seismic hazard spectra for about 65 to 70 sites. A list of the specific sites that the seismic and historic hazard spectra will be calculated for is included. Examine simplified ways of propagating systematic error to reduce the number of computations that must be made to define the best estimate curve and its uncertainty. Completion of this task should be concurrent with the completion of internal computer code validation being undertaken as part of the Seismic Hazard Characterization Program.
., m..
Task 2 Calculate the Seismic Hazard Spectra for all Sites East of the Rocky flountains Estimated Level of Effort: 1.8 psy Project Completion Date: Four months after completion of Task 1
' Provide an estimate of the probability of seismic ground motion exceeding the_ design level at each site, taking into account site conditions applicable at each site. Completion of this task should not prece@ final computer code validation undertaken as part of the Seismic Hazard Characterization Program.
Subtasks 2.1 - Individual Panel Results at All Sites Perform the seismic hazard analysis of each site using each panel member's input from the Seismic Hazard Characterization of Eastern United States Project (simply referred to as panel members hereafter)
_ and2cmpare.this with-the-design-level for each site.
Subtasks 2.2 - Synthesis of Results of All Sites Synthesize the seismic hazard results of all panel members into one siesmichazardcurve(withitsassociateduncertainty)andcomparethis-with the design level for each site.
Subtasks 2.3 - Identification of Significant Parameters which Contribute
.to Seismic Hazard Assess the significant contributors to the seismic hazard at each site including site condition factors, when appropriate.
Task 3 Feedback and Sensitivity-Estimated Level of' Effort: 0.45 psy .
Projected Completion Date: Eight months after completion of Task 2 Assess the initial conclusions regarding seismic hazard calculations at individual sites in light of feedback from panel members on original input'provided as part of the Seismic Hazard Characterization of the Eastern United States project.
Subtasks 3.'1 Sensitivity Studies using Feedback Results
-Assess the significance of experts feedback results on the original seismic hazard calculated for each site.
Subtask _3.2 Sensitivity Studies using USGS Report 83-1033 Perform sensitiv'ty studies for all nuclear power plant sites utilizing the source zones and recurrence data contained in the U. S. Geological Survey document, Open File Report 82-1033 (Probabilistic Estimates of Maximum Acceleration and Velocity in Rock in the Contiguous United
+ States) using the ground motion mdoels developed as part of the Seismic Hazard Characterization of the EUS. This subtask is an expansion of the
use of Report 82-1033 from that done in'the Seismic Hazard Characterization of the EUS, to all sites.
Subtasks 3.3 Additional Sensitivity Studies Using Alternative Ways of Combining Expert Opinion Perform sensitivity studies utilizing as a minimum two additional alternatives of combining expert opinion using subjective weighting and provide hazard results showing the effect of these alternatives.
Examine the sensitivity on the choice of the expert panel, possibly lookirig at a subset of experts, on the synthesis of hazard results.
Task 4 Historic Hazard at Each Site Estimated Level of Effort: 0.40 psy Projected Completion Date: One month after completion of Task 2 ParforELa_fhistorieal" knard analysis for each site and compare with the probabilistic hazard analysis.
Task 5 Interaction with Electric Power Research Institute Regarding their Independent Hazard Assessment Estimated Level of Effort: 0.35 psy Projected Completion Date: Nineteen months from start of contract Interact with Electric Power Research Institute regarding the progress of the LLNL program and utility sponsored seismi~c hazard program to exchange information and results as appropriate.
Task 6 Alternative Forms of Seismic Input Estimated Level of Effort:' O.20 psy Projected Completio'n Date: Nineteen months from start of centract Develop alternative ways of representing the Uniform Hazard Spectra in terms of event-specific spectra and time histories and assess the sensitivity of the various assumptions made.
e
LEVEL OF EFFORT AND PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE The level of effort for this proposal is estimated at 3.4 professional staff years (psy) over a period of 19 months distributed in the following manner:
FY 1984 FY 1985 Task 1 0.20 psy 0.0 psy Task 2, Subtask 2.1 0.70'psy 0.0 psy Subtask 2.2 0.70 psy 0.0 psy Subtask 2.3 0.40 psy 0.0 psy Task 3 Subtask 3.1 0.03 psy 0.22 psy Subtask 3.2 0.02 psy 0.08 psy Subtask 3.3 0.02 psy 0.08 psy
. Task 4 0.40 psy 0.00 psy - - - - - - -
Task 5 0.08 psy 0.27 psy
' Task 6 0.0 psy 0.20 psy Total 2.55 psy 0.85 psy REPORTING PEQUIREMENTS
. Task 1 Expand Develooment of Efficient and Improved Ways to Propagate Uncertainty After completion of Task 1 prepare and. submit to the NRC Project Manager and Dr. Robert E. Jackson a letter report (5 copies) that contains what improvements were made to the computer code. In addition provide a copy of the computer code (1 copy) along with a users manual (5 copies).
Task 2 Calculate the Seismic Hazard Spectra for all Sites East of the Rocky Mountains After completion of Task 2 prepare and submit to the NRC Project Manager andDr.RobertE.Jacksonadraftreport(5 copies)providingthe results of Subtasks 2.1 and 2.2 and a brief written assessment of these results identified in Subtask 2.3. This draft report is due six weeks prior to Task 2 completion. Staff comments will be returned to the contractors within two weeks of receipt of the draft report. The contractor shall submit a final report (5 copies) within four weeks of receipt of the staff's coments.
Task 3 Feedback and Sensitivity After completion of Task 3 prepare and submit to the NRC Project Manager and Dr. Robert E. Jackson a draft report (5 copies) providing the resultsofsensitivitystudiesusingfeedbackresults(Subtask 3.1),
- u. . " . . '
r USGS Report 83-1033(Subtask 3.2),andalternativewaysofcombining !
- expertinput(Subtask 3.3).Thisdraftreportisdueeightweeksprior ;
4 to Task 3 completion. Staff comments will be returned to the contractor ,
within two to three weeks'of receipt of the draft report. Final report l (5 copies) .is to be submitted to.the NRC Project Manager and Dr. Robert i E.-Jackson within five to six weeks of receipt of the staff's comments. 1
) Task 4 Historic Hazard at Each Site l After completion of Task 4 prepare and submit to the NRC Project Manager 4
andDr'RobertE.Jacksonadraftreport(5 copies)providing.the results of this task along with on assessment of the differences between the historic hazard and seismic hazard results.where significant
- differences are.noted. This draft report is due six weeks prior to task '
i 4 completion. NRC staff comments will be returned to the contractor within-two weeks of receipt of the draft report.
, Final report (5 (
- copies) is to be submitted to the NRC Project Manager within four weeks
! of. receipt of the NRC staff's comments.
t
- Task 5 Interaction with Electric Power Research Institute Regarding Their Independent Hazard Assessment After each meeting with EPRI members or their consultants submit a - -
letter report to the NRC Project Manager and Dr. Robert E. Jackson (5 copies)outlinedthetopicsdiscussedatthatmeeting. This report is
- due within three weeks after each meeting.
Task 6 Alternative Forms of Seismic Input 3
- After completion of Task 6 prepare an'd submit to the Project flanager and Dr. Robert E. Jackson a draft report (5 copies) providing these results ;'
, along with a discussion of any sensitivity tests that were undertaken. !
This draft report is due eight weeks prior to Task 6 completien. Staff ,
comments will be re' turned within two to three weeks and a final report
- (5 copies)isduewithinthreetofiveweeksofthattime.
I
/
L t
t u
};
, tienthly Business Letter Report ,
A monthly business letter report will be submitted by the 15th of the month to the NRR Project Officer with copies provided to the Contracting Officer, the Director, Division of rnene Hnn , ATTN: E. Pentecost, Robert E. Jackson,
- DE and B. L. Grenier,~NRR. Tnese reports will identify the title of 'the project, the FIN, the contract number, the Principal Investigator, i the period of performance, and the reporting period and will contain 2 sections as follows: .
Project Status Section
- 1. A listing of the efforts completed during the period; milestones reiched, or if missed, an explanation pr,,ovided,. ,
- 2. Any problems or delays encountered or anticipated and recomendations for resolution. JJ -
- 3. A summary of progress to date (this may be expressed in terms of percentage completion for each task).
- 4. Plans for the next reporting period.
~~
' Financial Status Section ~
- 1. Provide the total cost (value) of the project as reflected by the .
contract, the total amount of funds obligated to date, and the balance of funds required to complete the work by, fiscal year as follows:
Total Funds Balance of Funds Projected Obligated By Fiscal Year
- Project Cost To Date FY- FY- FY-
- 2. Pr' ovide the total amount of funds expended (costed) during the period and cumulative to date in the following categories:
Period Cumulative
. , a. Direct labor .
- b. Indirect labor
- c. ADP. Support d .' Travel
- e. Subcontracts ,
- f. Equipment & Materials
- g. Overhead (G&A)
Total ( %) U 1/ If the recommended resolution involves a contract modification, e.g.,
change in work requirements, level of effort (costs), or period of performance, a separate letter should be prepared and submitted to. the Contracting Of ficer, DC, with cepies provided to the Director, Division of , ATTN: E. Pentecost , the NRC Project Officer, and B. L. Grenter, NF.R.
i
Meetings and Travel The contractor should plan and budget the following meetings in FY 1984 and FY 1985. These meetings will usually be of one or two days duration, but some may be longer if conditions warrant. The NRC Project Manager will provide a written request specifying the nature of the task
- and the anticipated level of effort prior to initiation of the contractors travel. .
FY 1984 -
Two people will attend one meeting with the ACRS Extreme External Events Subcommittee, place to be determined. ,
One person will attend three meetings with the Electric Power Research Institute and their consultants, place to be determined.
Two. people.will_ attend two. meetings with the.NRC-stafLin-8ethesdarMD. - --
The first meeting is to discuss the results of Tasks 2 and 4 and will be held within one month from the completion of Task 4. The second meeting will be held in September of 1984 and is to discuss overall project progress.
FY 1985 Two people will attend one meeting with the ACRS Extreme External Events Sub-Committee, place to be determined.
One person 'will attend one to two meetings with the Electric Power Research Institute and their consulta'nts, place to be determined.
Two people will attend two meetings with the NRC staff in'Bethesda, MD.
' The first meeting is to discuss the results of Task 3 and will be held within one month from the completion of Task-3. The second meeting will be held at the completion of the contract.
NRC Furnished Material The following is a list of all the facilities east of the Rocky Mountains for which the seismic and historic hazard should be calculated. The contractor should request any other information that is necessary to complete this project.
e 9
4 L.,
Facility Docket Number Arkansas 1 50-313 Arkansas 2 50-368 Beaver Valley 1 50-334 Beaver Valley 2 50-412 Bellefonte 1 50-438 Bellefonte 2 50-439 Big Rock Point 50-155 Browns Ferry 1 50-259 Browns ~ Ferry 2 50-260 Browns Ferry 3 50-296 Brunswick 1 50-325 Brunswick 2 50-324 Byron 1 50-454 Byron 2 50-455 Callaway 1 50-483 Calvert Cliffs 1 50-317 Calvert Cliffs 2 50-318 Catawba 1 50-413 Catawba 2 50-414 Cherokee 1 50-491 Cherokee 2 50-492 -
Cherokee 3 50-493 Clinch River 50-537 Clinton 1 50-461 Comanche Peak 1 50-445 Comanche Peak 2 50-446 Cook 1 50-315 '
Cook 2 50-316 -
Cooper 50-298 Crystal River 50-302 Davis Besse 1 50-346 Dresden 2 50-237 Dresden 3 50-249 Duane Arnold 50-331 Farley 1 50-348 Farley 2 50-364 Fermi-2 50-341 Fitzpatrick 50-333 Fort Calhoun 50-285 9
- .. s ..
Facility Docket Number Ginna 1 50-244 Grand Gulf 1 50-416 Grand Gulf 2 50-417 Haddam Neck 50-213 Hartsville A1 50-518 Hartsville A2 50-519 Hatch 1 50-321 Hatch 2 50-366 Hope Creek 1 50-354 Indian Point 2 50-247 Indian. Point 3 50-286 Kewaunee 50-305 -
LaSalle 1 50-373 LaSalle 2 50-374 Marble Hill 1 50-546 Marble Hill 2 50-547 -
-McGuire 1 50-369 McGuire 2 50-370 Midland 1 50-329 Midland 2- 50-330 Monticello 50-263 -
Nine Mile Pt. 1 50-220 Nine Mile Pt. 2 50-410 North Anna 1 50-338 North Anna 2 50-339 Oconee 1 50-269 Oconee 2 50-270 '
Oconee 3 50-287 Oyster Creek 1 50-219 Palisades 1 50-255 Peach Bottom 2 50-277 Peach Bottom 3 50-278 .
Perkins 1 50-488 Perkins 2 50-489 Perkins 3 50-490 Perry 1 50-440 ,
Pilgrim 1 50-293 Point Beach 1 50-266 Point Beach 2 50-301 Prairie Island 1 50-266 Prairie Island 2 50-306 Quad Cities 1 50-254 Quad Cities 2 50-265 Robinson 2 50-261 Salem 1 50-272 Salem 2 50-311 Seabrook 1 50-443 Seabrook 2 50-444 Sequoyah 1 50-327 Sequoyah 2 50-328 Shordam 1 50-322 South Texas 1 50-498 .
South Texas 2 , 50-499
Facility Docket Number St. Lucie 1 50-335 St. Lucie 2 50-389 Summer 1 50-395 Surry 1 50-280 Surry 2 50-281 Susquehanna 1 50-387 Susquehanna 2 50-388 Three Mile' 50-398 Islans Turkey Point 3 50-250 Turkey Point 4 50-251 -
Vermont Yankee 1 50-271 -
Waterford 3 50-382 .
Yankee Rowe 1 50-029 Zimmer 1 50-358
_ ~_lion 1-. 50 295 - - - - t Zion 2 50-304 e
6 e
e e
A '-
m W7 ,M,
- )
- # p o. ~ g '#o UNITED STATES
'. m ' J.W p./J u* N s., l 8 % ,.,( g NUCLEAR REEULATORY COMMISSICN u-Q y/g;' ? l
, , , % y WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- e '
November 23, 1983
..v 5
. . . . j/ .
.f
,.t}. ' ,:,, !; .* *ir *; i, ~ a /
' '" "#1 4' MEMORANDUM FOR: C ,
Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans, NMSS Er #'.y.5,
I Ronald D. Becker, AE00 '
John J. Mc0 scar, Region I y *'f A J, l
l Richard J. Maley, Region II '
Lawrence A. Schlosser, Region III
~~
Dolores M. Meyer, Region IV Edward B. Frigillana, Region V FRGM: Bernard L. Grenfer. Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence: l 1
1 Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eastern l
' [,
Title:
United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites, (FIN A0448) -
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten l (10) working days. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this time frame l l
will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually i receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; I you tray <aep the attached Statemento ' f Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
- 1
\
n rd- . renier l Technical Assistance Program Manager l Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR I Attachment-NRR Technical Assistance Project , , , l cc: Z. Rosztoczy l E. Pentecost l H. Lefevre i I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
}. + 2 .' 7:. - ..& . t / ~ I<* }
(Signed) (Date) t <1
.O' / C , ...: , , lh '
}0ffice) ) # y ..
/ thl t . ., o I l '0
,v s
'h #o UNITED STATES -
!% 3 ( F *j NUCLEAR REGULATCRY COMMISSION *
, r, , . ;; wAssinoTon, o. c. nosss og e....,/
.v November 23,1983 ,
MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Ha es RES John Evans, NMSS Ronald D. Becker, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Lawrence A. Schlosser, Region III Dolores M. Meyer, Region IV Edward B. Frigillana, Region V FR0!!: Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eastern United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites (FIN A0448) -
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10) working days. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this time frame will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
r .
n rt . renfor Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy E. Pentecost H. Lefevre I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is p ovided below.
, !!!Pi!d (Signed) (Date)
OT6 (OffTce)
' B
.'e,f "%[*
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION h
,h WASHING TO N, D. C. 20555
- g November 23,1983 fiEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan p. Muir I&E ona d D. Becker, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar, Region !
Richard J. Maley, Region !!
Lawrence A. Schlosser, Region !!! .
Dolores M. Meyer, Region IV Edward B. Frigillana, Region V FROM: Bernard L. Grenfer. Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eastern United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites, (FIN A0448) -
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10)workingdays. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this time frame will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually
, receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
. s
^ es < ^
@ n rd , renier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy E. Pentecost H. Lefevre I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below, b ~ & U/34kJ (Sig:d) (I) ate)
A8M44 (Office)
' / e vaag%,
UNITE D STATES
[G) .8 \
!\
^
o NUCLEAR REEULATCRY COMMISSION
~g {' 'g .
,h Y WASHING TON, 0. C. 20555
' s
Novembar 23, 1983 k .c . . . ,f' MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, !&E -
John J. Mc0 scar, Reg'on !
Richard J. Maley, Region !!
Lawrence A. Schlosser, Region !!! '
Dolores M. Meyer, Region IV Edward B. Frigillana, Region V FROM: Bernard L. Grenier Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is fomarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eastern United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites, (FIN A0448) -
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10)workingdays. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this tir.e frame will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; .
you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
s 2A%
n re . renier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
HRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy E. Pentecost H. Lefevre I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
/ hy. ...T.,
(51gnedL* (Date)
/ ?&h (Office)
/.[.{ .. . . ',gk
. UNITED STATES
, NUCLEAR REGULATERY COMMISSION 5 9 s W ASHING TON, D. C. 20555
~
- k....)
c November 23, 1983 ,
NEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans, NMSS Ronald D. Becker, AE00 -
John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Lawrence A. Schlosser Region III Dolores M. Meyer, Region IV Edward B. Frigi11ana, Region V FROM: Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS In~acc~ordande~with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eastern United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites, (FIN A0448) -
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10)workingdays. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this time frame will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attach'ed Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
s n rd . renier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy E. Pentecost H. Lefevre I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
Signed) (Date) b MA "
(Office)
T < . .
~
- 'o UNITED STATES EN I ,,o gc 'Y NUCLEAR REZULATCRY COMMISSIEN
'. WASHINGTON, D, C 20555 f' November 23, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir I&E John Evans, NMSS Ronald D. Becker, AE00 l.awrence A. Schlosser, Region III Dolores M. Meyer, Region IV Edward B. Frigillana, Region V FRQM: Bernard L. Grenier. Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRP
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eastern United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites, (FIN A0448) -
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10)workingdays. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this time frame will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
} %
s n rd , renier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project ec: Z. Rosztoczy E. Pentecost H. Lefevre I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provi ed b icw. .
. Am (51gned) N nA%I3
/
SDate)
(Office)
r a .
p.. g a.8ouq'o
- UNITED STATES -
E %( [,,g NUCLEAR REEULATCRY COMMISSION *
,{ gh % , p WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 , l*
g;c....* / November 23,1983
- MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E John Evans, NMSS Ronald D. Becker, AE00 John J. Mc0 scar, Region I on III Dolores M. lieyer, Region IV Edward 8. Frigillana, Region V FRGM: Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hirard for Eastern United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites, M If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10)workingdays. If a problen is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this time frame will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement of Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
g .
n rd . renier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project ec: Z. Rosztoczy E. Pentecost H. Lefevre I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
WA (Sign ~ed)
/, , _
/ 2/7>/f3 (Date) a) Offl6 A,75 Toff ac t) /
l NOV98 rn3
m
/9 ,. ga St>
k o UNITED STATES g -
y ( g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- fiECE!ygg WASHINGTON D.,C. 20555 jE , '!,*:.[
g*.v4,/
November 23, 1983 .
=NOV2B mci?
MEMORANDUM FOR: Martin Hayes, RES Alan P. Muir, I&E EC0!CN V L'd John Evans, NMSS Ronald D. Becker, AEOD John J. Mc0 scar, Region I Richard J. Maley, Region II Lawrence A. Schlosser, Region III Dolores M. Meyer Recion IV nV FRGM: Bernard L. Grenier, Technical Assistance Program Manager Technical Support Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
SUBJECT:
REVIEW AND COORDINATION OF NRR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS In accordance with established procedures, the attached NRR Technical Assistance Project is forwarded for your review and concurrence:
Title:
Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Hazard for Eat.' tern United Stated Nuclear Power Plant Sites, (FIN A0448) -
If you concur, please sign below and return this memorandum to me within ten (10) working days. If a problem is identified, please advise me within the 10-day period. Although the absence of any response within this time frame will be considered a positive concurrence, I would appreciate eventually receiving your written concurrence. You need only return this memorandum; you may keep the attached Statement o~ f Work for your record.
Your prompt attention to this review will be appreciated.
/ s -
4 nr . renier Technical Assistance Program Manager Planning and Program Analysis Staff, NRR
Attachment:
NRR Technical Assistance Project cc: Z. Rosztoczy E. Pentecost H. Lefevre I have reviewed the above titled Technical Assistance Project and find no objection in its issuance. Concurrence is provided below.
[b (Signed)
)
/ (Oste )
6 (Office) 1
v ...
-!! .; NRP.\ TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROG?AM PPAS ACTION SUFF.'.RY,' SHEET DATE RECEIVED BY PPAS: "7!X//f3 ,
- ~
FIO(<5): M4'd . .
W
- TYPE OF ACTION: i ~p 7 ib*q
%g .
1F9 ' .\ -
cfy P '
a orJ"9-fcfSI ,h y
PPAS P.EMARKS, COMMENTS, IDENTIFI'0ATION OF DEFICIENCIES:
& y s. k % & % = s w -3 s a c.
- p%,9pl(okg . ,
~ .N . , ,i ._ Q s L mi _4,0; c#p?
y, ~2.Q)fgg#
, rs i ay eux exo vu.w u>u q w wp. q c -
' '
- ce N Eif;.a u.culiiu. ts[ t bu. 'sd ed S 3 k)'appm -~9 cx%
@ }c g, i
- A" g \t f "y ..
y %m W upk & Lyev-~sens:a.
na_ m u c' ,as c-Jone ...
- g os a mes% f .s pequired iD <b ee % m hg sc<aosejg3 k Weh 6 te4pecl Df,he N, &[ SINU FROM FILE Ohodep eu$hi w sc_ ac,1 a prepa d . R a sc W\ LE{
DOCUMENT (S) MIS 7gc c5 3 8 3 -) l E c.c.TE ACriOx CongtETED BY PFAs:
dTbY9 ' 3