ML20102B314
| ML20102B314 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Mcguire, McGuire, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1984 |
| From: | Scinto J NRC |
| To: | Rawson R NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20102A920 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090174 | |
| Download: ML20102B314 (2) | |
Text
m.-
+f :
January 26, 1984 Note to Rich Rawson
SUBJECT:
MCGUIRE AMENDMENT ON SSF EMERGENCY LIGHTING Your note on the McGuire package would solve the problem but I don't think its going to turn out to be factually accurate.
I would be very surprised if the safe shutdown facility for Appendix R purposes is totally independent of and unrelated to the remote shutdown panels required by GDC-19.
I suspect that the safe shutdown facility serves that dual function.
Moreover, its not simply whether or not the SSF is required by any other Regu-lation.
It may also be used to accomplish some safety function that uses the SSF as an acceptable alternative (one way of doing it) even though a Regulation doesn't explicitly require a SSF. That may be true for some of the older plants
(
but I'm not sure its true for a plant like McGuire.
I would think the principle interaction for a safe shutdown facility is going to be between Appendix R and GDC-19.
If you wish, you can forward a copy of this note to Ralph to put him on notice that I'm going to be suspicious of any assertion that the SSF is unrelated to
.anything else.
I think he should simply 30-day notice this thing.
Q R
Joe Scinto e
v B502090174 840518 PDR FOIA ADAT004-166 PDR
_.y.
T
'7 ' 7fA b : 9.s:n/
(
- t.,.
or. sm 14 :
pC~;.< :-.
- c, s a : = >~~ y J y ^ ).
YA NA W A
,: =l^;e f
,= : = = f
- - r 4 A. -f
- ~ n " k V /~< *
- i d / rrd i,. ? A a m b -- L gmg
/= 4 4$ M.
-r.;4c
- y 2. A # =44
&==? A 4 A, v' A < p==n 14 x-H+
c 07,.y 6 m p J.:.,=--- J,== AM f A
,,4 p n = -,, s d' ;w :.e s~e-
.A ef 2:
c - f ::t, j,a'e 1 s, =w.
G7.GT.
l l
L f
i i
e
. f..
--