ML20102B185

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Station Blackout Test.Package Basis Weak.Suggests Adding Excerpt from Generic Ltr 83-24 as Basis for NSHC

ML20102B185
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Susquehanna
Issue date:	01/23/1984
From:	Scinto J NRC
To:	Perch B NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166, REF-GTECI-A-44, REF-GTECI-EL, TASK-A-44, TASK-OR GL-83-24, NUDOCS 8502090116
Download: ML20102B185 (1)

Text

.

s l

q.

t January 23, 1984 i

. Note to Bob Perch-

SUBJECT:

SUS 01.tEMANNA - STATION BLACK 0UT TEST (0 ELD #841643) 4 The no significant hazards consideration basis is very weak.

In fact, when I first looked at it, I didn't understand how you could be making the argument

'i'Eyou're making. However, when one looks at the explanation given in Generic j

. Letter 83-24 for this, in light of what you say, you have a good, strong argument that it doesn't involve a significant hazard consideration.

I would suggest that you add to the basis for the no significant hazards consideration an excerpt from Generic Letter 83-24.

I suggest you add the same excerpt from 83-24 that the Licensee includes in his letter of December 9, 1983.

I would

~ dd it at the beginning of our statement of the basis for no significant a

j, hazards determination.

b i _-

oe Scinto

-cc: Mary Wagner J.i

,;n e

X

i.

A 3

x 1C DOOfjl6e40528

, AD47084--2e MS m

j...

_ _._..,,.,.