ML20102B206

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Spray Pond. No Immediate Action to Modify Tech Spec,As Result of Test Results,Needed
ML20102B206
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Susquehanna
Issue date: 01/23/1984
From: Scinto J
NRC
To: Perch R
NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090126
Download: ML20102B206 (1)


Text

r_

.,g

[ sN

-x January 23, 1984 Note to R. L. Perch

SUBJECT:

SUSQUEHANNA SPRAY POND 4

Thank you for your note of January 3,1984.

I gather that altnough the Unit 1

~

tech specs may not be sufficient for two-unit operation, they are okay for a single Unit.

If so, I don't see a need for any imediate action to modify the technical ~ specifications as a result of the test results.

If the Licensee

' chooses the more restrictive tech spec limits (81*F), that appears to be exceptable for the tech specs.- However, with this much advanced warning of the nature of the problem, the Licensee will hardly be in a position to request an emergency tech spec change in the Summer when the temperatures get above 81*F. As long as the Licensee understands this, I don't see any problem with-it. That is his choice. He can choose a more limiting method of operating '

his facility but if he does, he does that with full exceptance of the conse-

quences of that; and that is, if the temperature gets above 81*F, he has power

,1 1 restrictions and he certainly can't, in the middle of the Sanmer ask for

..-T

'special: treatment.

If he wants to avoid these kinds of restrictions,.he'd E

'better get going now on figuring out ways to modify his plant design for operating conditions.to avoid these limitations.

j.

oe Scinto 1

cc:

..T. Novak-

. Mary Wagner

. j;-

1. -

..I-

-l:

.. y

.- 1 7

sfI o

1(

,1

-PDR FOIA8502090126'8405'18 t>

JADATOS4-166-PDR

~

.f p.

_ _.,, -- g

= _..

p

,