ML20102A931

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package.Discusses Problems W/Proposal Re Changing Deadline for Environ Qualification,As Expressed in Notice.Unable to Concur on Proposed Notice
ML20102A931
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Susquehanna
Issue date: 10/20/1983
From: Gray J
NRC
To: Perch R
NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090006
Download: ML20102A931 (1)


Text

__ _ _

j

.w-n i

i

+/s3 y

1 l

t I'

Note to:-

R. Perch e

~From:

J.R. Gray

SUBJECT:

AMENDMENT TO LICENSE CONDITION CHANGING DEADLINE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION FOR SUSQUEHANNA-1 OELD has been asked to concur in a proposed license amendment which

~

wou'd change the deadline for the environmental qualification of certain equipment at Susquehanna-1.

I have two problems with our proposal as exnressed in the Notice.

-First, the change would require environmental qualification of certain equipment in two years or by the end of the first refueling outage after the NRC comes up with a position on how to qualify the equipment, whichever is later.

In essence, the proposed deadline is open-ended.

That would not appear to be consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR

! 50.49(g) which specify that equipment is to be qualified by the second refueling outage.after March 31,1982 or March 31, 1985, whichever is earlier. -Under that regulation, the latest date to which the staff may extend-qualification is November 30, 1985.

i' Second, and apart from the deadline problem noted above, the proposed Notice does not provide the NRC's proposed NSHC finding. Rather, it i

a.

states what the licensee says about NSHC and indicates that the staff J

will review licensee's statement. Thus, in essence, the NRC has not made~a proposed NSHC finding. The purpose of these notices is, among n

other things, to set forth the NRC's tentative determination on NSHC.

You may adopt the-licensee's bases for finding NS58C but it must be an

-NRC finding. The proposed notice is deficient in this regard.

!l[

' Because of these problems, we are not prepared to concur in this proposed notice at this time.

9 lp L

J. Gray

.ts l }.

4

'8502090006 840518 PDR FCIA

' ADAT084--166 PDR s

7

~ _.

..*.._..;.,c..~,__...

M

  • * * * = * * *
  • wp *t*W wpgeme m, +4,me,' -

.%s.*

s.*

i

~

i w

e 1

November 3,1983 1

a

s NOTE TO:

J. R. Gray FROM:

R..L. Perch VIA:

M. Wagner

SUBJECT:

AMENDMENT TO LICENSE CONDITION CHANGING DEADLINE FOR QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT. SUBJECT TO SDV PIPE BREAK ENVIRONMENT In response to your note dated 10/20/83, the requested change is outside the requirements of 10 CFR 550.49(g) and therefore does not require qualification prior to November 30, 1985. The subject is addressed in Section 4.6 of SSER 1, SSER 2, SSER 3 and SSER 4 throughout its development.

The proposed deadline is no more open-ended than any other event or milestone oriented license condition (eg startup following first refueling).

'c The determination on NSHC has been modified based on discussions with

^

'M. Wagner and previous discussions with J. Scinto.

If you still have problems with the present content, please contact me to discuss viable alternatives.

f^ s C

1 kLhuh R. L. Perch x27235

.g r

g390 4s.,:

.3 8502090009 840518 PDR FOIA ADATOB4-166 PDR

~V

...; ;. _;_. w sc - - _ _, _._

,, _ :...r*,

_3

_