ML20102A929

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Protection of safety-related Equipment.Addl Tech Specs Need Separate Noticing Since New Tech Specs Cannot Be Included in Package
ML20102A929
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Turkey Point
Issue date: 10/24/1983
From: Scinto J
NRC
To: Mcdonald D
NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090005
Download: ML20102A929 (1)


Text

._.

i

~

...s 4

.a.

October 24, 1983 y

t i

Note to Dan Mcdonald SU3 JECT: TURKEY POINT 3 PROTECTION OF SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT (OELD # 838 402)

What's with the material on page three? A letter of October 28, 19837 That has to be an incorrect date. Second, it sounds to me like you're saying they added technical specifications by a letter we received after the original notice..If these new tech specs are included in this package, that's noggood. You can't do it that way. Those are additional technical specifications and they need separate noticing.

If you did not like the package as it came in from the licensee originally, deny it or condition it on additional conditions that we impose. That's a partial denial. In either event, the guy gets a right to a hearing. If in fact these are additional proposed technical specifications proposed by

(

the licensee then notice them under Sholly. You can't just stick tech specs into a package that you've previously noticed. You can't issue a license different from the one that you noticed.

l

,,, Joe Scinto.

cc:

M. Young F:

,3 f ~'

fj '

'3.

l s',

e.

y, 8502090005 840518 PDR FOIA ADAl084-166 PDR J