ML20102B120

Provides Results of Review of NSHC Package Re Valves. Suggests Checking W/Aeod Before Acting on Amend

ML20102B120
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, North Anna
Issue date:	01/19/1984
From:	Scinto J NRC
To:	Engle L NRC
Shared Package
ML20102A920	List: ML20102A922 ML20102A925 ML20102A929 ML20102A931 ML20102A933 ML20102A934 ML20102A937 ML20102A939 ML20102A942 ML20102A944 ML20102A946 ML20102A948 ML20102A959 ML20102A961 ML20102A969 ML20102A974 ML20102A981 ML20102A984 ML20102A999 ML20102B001 ML20102B008 ML20102B010 ML20102B032 ML20102B045 ML20102B058 ML20102B060 ML20102B063 ML20102B068 ML20102B080 ML20102B085 ML20102B106 ML20102B112 ML20102B114 ML20102B120 ML20102B122 ML20102B125 ML20102B127 ML20102B139 ML20102B142 ML20102B147 ML20102B156 ML20102B159 ML20102B167 ML20102B177 ML20102B185 ML20102B194 ML20102B196 ML20102B200 ML20102B206 ML20102B211 ... further results
References
FOIA-84-166 NUDOCS 8502090088
Download: ML20102B120 (1)

Text

..

gr

[::

.k January 19,1984 Note to Leon Engle

SUBJECT:

NORTH ANNA - VALVES (OELDf841669)

Leon, the notice of proposed determination is okay but make sure you check with AEOD before you act on this mendme Joe in o O

t P

.' i 4 I

.i

,l t

,i -

4 i

l l

t I-

' !GH";

4~

PDR wt:

O

't.

January 19, 1984 Note to Darrell Eisenhut

SUBJECT:

SUSQUEHANNA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (DELD # 841 639)

.Although this is okay to do, it strikes me that we should not be amending licenses to repeat in slightly different language, the requirements of the Regulations.. When 50.73 was passed, it automatically superseded all existing license requirements for reporting. We can, if we want, go back and put more of. the reporting requirements back in the tech specs but it strikes me that we are going.to have the same problems we had that gave rise to the need for the changes in 50.72 and 50.73, that is, inconsistent requirements from license to license.

I think we should delete the reporting requirements and simply say

" report in accordance with the requirements of 50.72 and 50.73". We don't even need to say that much; however, that's my recommendation for what we should do.

If you think you want to go back to the business of putting reporting con-

/...

ditions in all the licenses again, its okay with me, however, I think its a t,

mistake to do that.

The reason I'm making this suggestion to you rather than specifically to the PM's is that it appears that you, perhaps in a Memorandum to all the PM's, should tell them not to make these changes, that 50.72 and 50.73 now supersede all licenses and we thould not make any changes except to delete reporting 7

require.ments as an administrative change because they have in fact been super-3 seded by 50.72 and 50.73.

f.1 oe Scinto

.cc:

T. Novak in B. Perch

t t.

o -

T..

$.5

]

h$ (

40M"i(

g

., :::======

x-

==

=:== - :

r-

- - - ;.r.; =.,--

.