ML20094F396

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-244/84-12.Corrective Actions:Procedure Being Developed to Cover Overall Use of Air Samplers Should Be Completed by 840901
ML20094F396
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/27/1984
From: Kober R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To: Murley T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20094F355 List:
References
NUDOCS 8408100032
Download: ML20094F396 (2)


Text

.

e'*

  • f*3 g y a, , . n .

'~

. p ; ,...

Rt /"

c~ . ;_.

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION e 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y. 14649-0001 ~l

%1 7 i "an ROGEF4 W. MOE9ER VICE 79ESMMNT TELiPMONF nzctmc e strau smooucTioN aaaacoct no 546-2700 July 27, 1984 Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

Subject:

I& E Inspection Report 94-12 Notice of Violations Inadequate Airborne Monitoring Procedures R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-244

Dear Dr. Murley:

In accordance with the above subject which stated "As a result of the inspection conducted on May 7-11, 1984, and in accordance with the revised NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix,C), p,ublished in the Federal Register Notice (49 FR 8583) dated March 8, 1984, the following violation was identified:

Technical Specification 6.11 and 6.8.1, requires, in part, the licensee to develop written radiation monito-ring procedures consistent with 10 CFR 20. 10 CFR 20.103(a)3 requires suitable measurements of concentrations of radioactive materials in air.

Contrary to the above, the licensees procedures were inadequate in that procedures HP-4.3, HP-6.1 and HP-6.2, which require airborne monitering, did not specify the technique to be used to monitor area and breathing zone concentrations and to provide suitable measurements of such concentrations."

the following is submitted in response.

Corrective action to address this violation is as follows:

We agree with the finding as stated. Our current procedures do not describe specifically how various air samplers should be utilized to obtain area and/or brea' thing zone camples.

This could cause confuston for technicians and workers as to the proper placement od different types of samplers.

8408100032 840803 PDR ADOCK 05000244 G PDR

e ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORP. SHEET NO. 2 DATE July 27, 1984 . ,,

To Dr. Thomas E. Murley .,'

We are currently developing a procedure to cover the overall' .

use of air samplers at the station. This procedure should be completed by September 1, 1984.

Note: This procedure was being developed as a result of,ur '

investigation of an incident reported in a previous inspecti'on ,

  1. 50-244/80-02.

Vr truly yo es, R i ober Subscribed and sworn to me on this 27th day of July, 1984 62n ( )dxlg M' ROSE M ARIE PERRONE NOTARY PUBUC. State of N. Y., Monroe Cco t M/ Co'nmission Dpires March 30,19d. i f

A

=

p

=

e

. _ , ,, _ . _ _ . _ . . . . _ . . _