ML20083C288
| ML20083C288 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1991 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083C286 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9109260123 | |
| Download: ML20083C288 (98) | |
Text
_ - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AUGUST 1991 g 3 -
YIIIi y
Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division ,
System Engineering Test and Performance Group
'A-
'. - s4 e
,0 9109260123 DR 910920 ADOCK 0".000285 PDR
9 0%uil of wxn%a, w am, alhhuk...
il iawak wiuhrn, amd sound julpnud...
il w a, !ifdiars, cwtwA'ny. convmilanutl...
it w a, way, of !ij6,...il w dsimy, Unjob
'dyM Un,%l % ,wety, %. <9Lw irunev khd, ul Ox 'uwdl of utlevnid puuww, a w owv own, af wodrwk ws ain and Un pads wnd salulachon, Uwl cams litorn, k g, Uw dytl had of peuwn,, eljal im, daimy, Un 'ayM l%p.
Janar ). 6%noio
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT ;
l Prepared By:
Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group AUGUST 1991
ABSTRACT PURPOSE.
The
- Performance Indcators Program"is intended to provHe selected Fort Calhoun plant perior.
mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizir9 WI periormaace. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a si enns to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assesting and rnonitonng Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasle, on safety and reliability. Sol 1e periormance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be ust:d for comparis.on or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.
SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the monni being reported, unless otherwise stat 6d.
In orrier for the Performance in@cator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:
- 1) Select data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.
- 2) Irelude established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.
- 3) Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter, This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.
Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the Test and Portormance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respectivo depanments.
REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102,
- Performance Monitoring Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984,
- Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" l NUMARC 87 00,
- Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Stafion Blackout at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Aopendix D *EDG Reliability Prog am", dated April 6,1990-
Table of Contents INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS PAGE
.rcuttny umn term cLn
- m. gm nes tmtu utt Laynn FORCED OUTAGE RATE . .. .. . 0 05W. . 2 4% .. to rs. .119L .2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL , . 0... . 0- .. . 0 .. . 0 .. .3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION).. ..0 .0.. . 0- .0. -.4 GROSS HEAT RATE.. . . . - . . . . . . . . . . - . 9.935 .. .10.250.. 10.408. .10.444.. .6 EOUlVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR., . 82 5W. ~.-... 09% .. .952W. .92?%..,7 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR _..._ -- . .. . -_ . ..._ .. 0 04 . .14. _3 67. . .1.89.. 8 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) - -
166. . .. 75 .. .370_ . 34 .9 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE.. . . . - . . . 3,072.. . 4.500..- .6404. .$17t,. 10 DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FRFOUENCY RATE.. .0-.. . 0 31.. . 0 67... . 0 32. 11 l
OPERAllONS STATON NET GENERATON ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE. . .. ,, . . . . . . . ,, . .2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL.... ,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS -(INPO DEFINITION). .. . . .. . . . .4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS -(NRC DEFINITCN)..... .. . . . . . . . . . , .. . .... .5 GROSS HE AT RATE .... .. ....... ..... .. . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ..-....6 EQUIVALENT AVAILAB!LITY FACTOR... . ... ...... . . ..... .. . ........ ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....,7 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR , . . . , . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . .8 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT ... . .. ....... . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 ?
EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .13 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . 14 DOCUMENT REVIEW... . . . . . . ... ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . .. . .. . . 15 MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY , .. . . . ,, . ... 16.
DIESEL GENERATOR REllABILITY (25 DEMANDS) .. . . .. , . . . . .17 j DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY ... . . . . , .18 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE). . . . . 19 l
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE) . . . . 20 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OU1 AGE)., . . . 21 i
MAIN 1ENANCE (cont'd)
PAGE RATO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAIN 1ENANCE (NON. OUTAGE) . . . .. . . . , .. . . 22 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE . . . ... .. .. . .. . . . . 23 NUMBER OF OUTCF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS. . . . 24 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . 25 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) . . . . . .. . 20 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE).. . .27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVil ES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) . . 2B PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT).. . 29 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTEN ANCE) . . . . 30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE) . . ... 31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSmVMENTATON & CONTROL) . . 32 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS . . . . 33 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILURES.. . . 34 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS ... . . . . .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . , .. .. .. .. . 35 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE . .... . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . 36 CHEMISTRY AND RADOLOGICAL PROTECTION PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) . . . . . . . . , .. . . .9 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE . .. . . . .. . .10 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY . . . . ... ... . . , , . . . . . .. .. . . 37 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT . . . .
, . 38 AUXILI ARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATON LIMITS . . . .. .. . .39 IN LINE CHEMISmY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF SERVICE .. .. .. .. ... . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .40 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED . .. .. .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . . 41 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATON FXPOSURE. . ... . .. . . . .. . .. . . . 42 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATONS . ... . . . . . . . , .. . . , . ,, ... 4 3 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA. .. . , .. . . , -
,. . .. . . . . . 44 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM.. . . .. . . .. . . . . 45 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS . .. -..... .. . .. . .... . ... . - . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. 40 GASEOUS RADOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT. , . . .. . . . . . . . 4 7 LOUID RADCACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT... . . . , . . . . . 48 SECURfTY LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) . . . .49 SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN . . . . . . . 50 -
li l
l
SECURITY SYSTEM FAllURES . . .. . . . .. . . .. 51 1
MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES ffrE AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING P ARTS (NONOUTAGE) . . . 52 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE . . .. . 53 SPARE PARTS ISSUED . . . . . 53 INVENTORY ACCURACY... . . . 54 STOCKOUT RATE . . . . 54 EXPEDITED PURCHASES . . . . 55 INVOICE BREAKDOWN.. . . . . . 56 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING . . ... . .50 QES!GN ENGINEERING OUTSTANDING MODIFICATONS . . . 57 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) . . . . . 58 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EARS) . . . . . . . . . 59 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE ST ATUS . . . . .. .. . . 60 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN . ... . . . . . . 61 24DUSTRIAL S AFETY DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE. .. . . . .11 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE . . ,
, . 62 HUMAN RI SOURCES NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERs . . . . . .. . . 63 _
STAFFING LEVEL . . . . . . . 64 PERSONNEL TURNOVEP RATE . . . .. . . . 64 TRAINING AND QUAllFICATION LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATON TRAINING . . . . . . . , . 65 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS , . . .. .. ... . , . . 67 TOTAL INSTRUCTON HOURS . . ... . . . 08 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING . . . , . . . 69 REFUEllNG OUTAG.E MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE).. . 70 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATON PLANNING.. . . 71 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE) . . 72 iii
OUALITY ASSURANCE (cont'd) fMGf; VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . .. ..........73 COMPARISON OF VIOL ATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 74 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE. MONTH PUNNING TOTAL) .. .. . .. 75 OUTSTANDit.G. CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS .. . . . . . .. . . ... .. . . . 76 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPOR1S . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED . . . . . .. . . 78 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ................79 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX . .. .... . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . . 80 REPORT DISTRIBUTION Li5T. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . 88
SUMMARY
SECTION ADVERSE TREND REPORT .. . ... . .. .. ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..............89 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . 8 9 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES . . . . . . . . .. . _ . . . . . . . .,89 I
i
[] Net Generation (10,000 Mw hours) 50-40-34 61 b
31 27 31 18 g30- 27.26 28 03 pc 94 279
, ;i - :
y*
a: 2s 0s ~ .. ;
~~
8 2 g.:
y
%m 24 78 f
. 24 23 d-Of. ;
21.93 Y M# M-
'd R(
6 w
a Jg wn~ %) <<
4>
, 1 c ,,,
's
- 'y
- ug .
- ; a
>< w ,
d;
!((y, d'~
" h.I. $%.'
j-"- -{' g i'# [f?. l..? M9
?, 'D Ti 16.36 i @ .' '% Y Ry,)
n ~; e - b25 >
- , .e f:-
, n L.+
6x
[
y; **. - ,
_ 8
, 7 rw 9_ a s , .
t;g ,
3 _
s ,
f f+ ; '
jk[
- . n ;c'^.;
10- @x, .
,,d e
<m m
' d 4 4 p
0 <
+
d)-
9 ' <
' " r
.. g U .f ; , .Q' .: 1 " 1 L _ .y. ,..o
~:'<
m :' a ..
l'"1@.
,. + + , n
'r o: -
.Eg.,
y (>
?[' 7. :-4 'M ()? 't.
4 s#- , .T us Y
WH .I J -
% .K .. i% M *
' -i f. MF i f '.
Q ggy 1 4 lity 7%, 3T4. fa if ,, n. * , :, l < . '-
+
t- ',
0 6 i i l i i i i i i i i Sept 90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 STATION NET GENER ATION This indicator shows the not generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.
During the month of August 1991, a net total of 311,831 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station.
Data Source: Station Generation Report Adverse Trend: None I
i 1
- Forced Outage Rate
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4%)
15%-
-O- Incustry Uppar 10 Percentile (0.25%) ,
t 12%-
g, GOOD m
9%-
j V
,)
,?
?l 6%-
3%-
1.4 ! O IP2 i M M-r i i 0% '
'88 '89 '90 Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was repoded as 10.2 % for the last twelve months.
A forced outage occurred during the month of August to replace failed potential trans-formars (pts). These pts convert 345 KV to 120V for use in the breaker synchroniza-tion circuit.
Note: The Forced Ou'r Rate has decreased due to the August 1990 forced outage being deleted from' 2 month interval.
Data Source: GAD Forms Adverse Trend: Nono l
l 2
3-
--O- Fort Calhoun Goal
-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentilo 1
O FCS Reactor Scrams 2-1- C O O
, , , , ,0 - m , m , m , m , m , m , m , m , m , m , m , m ,
'87'88'89'90 Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in August 1991. The last unplanned automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.
The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at zero.
The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The For1 Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants in this area.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None i
1
r 3-E Safety System Actuations
-O-- Fort Calhoun Goal
-D- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2- GOOD V
1-l 0 0
, , , ,0 OW-C , D- r-O i D1
'88 '89 '90 Sept 90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(INPO DEFINITION)
There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the rnonth of August 1991. ;
The 1991 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.
1 The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system i
actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the l upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None l
i 4
I
l
~
- 12 Month Running Total SSA
- CriticalHours O Safety System A::tuations(SSA) -900 8- -800 1E $4 yt O-O hs b 6- c cre f -600 g a
t <13 / o f E5 -500 5 E
'd
$jfm 4-
-400 3 fh $ .-300
- ~ *
.l 2- -200
- . a 7 7 q
.: p ; g) :
L j }, , j -100
'$[fo ;- [,' j ? a 4
-0
,=, , ,0 >$
'88 '89 90 SONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJA 1989 1990 1991 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFINITION)
This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these cafety systems are challenged.
The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG 2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG 2 started a second time when a breaker trip occurred during DG 1 breaker synchronization. DG 2 was not required to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations.
The majority of SSAs displayec above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Pro-gram. The goal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None 5
E MonthlyGrou;:n:ha:e
-k- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate 13- .-e- Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goal I
h -O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile i n
E 12-8 GOOD S
11-10270 -10520 10304
' ~
-O .1 -O -O O O 10- !
, _ A - -
h --C 0 0 D
'88 ll...-
'89
'90 g _ l Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 i --
GROSS HEAT RATE The Gross Heat Rate Indicator goal has been changed. This goal was changed due to the rescheduling of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage which resulted in a reduction in operating power to save fuel.
This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previous -
1991 months, the year to date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 years.
The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,468 BTU /KWH during the month of August.
The year to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,393 BTU /KWH, The above year-end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH) is the theoretical best gross heat rate that can be achieved by the Fort Cahoun Station during 1991.
The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH, Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source) i Adverse Trends: None 6
l
O Monthly EAF Year to Date tiAF
--O.- Fort Calhoun Goal
--O- Irdustry Upper 10 Percontile 100 % - -
D- f} O D D D-U-C 0--C D 80% -
f - - - -
cs 0 -
0 -
O -
O -
0 -
0 -
0 C O--C O E -
56.6 60% -
GOOD j: ; 40%-
I i :
i -
20% -
, ~~ '
1
' ' ~ ~ f)
~~
i i i iO% , , i , , , , , , i i ,
'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOl1 This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year-to-date EAF for 1991, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.
The EAF was reported as 85.2% for the month of August. The EAF was not affected by the 70% power reduction during February, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).
The year-to-date EAF was reported as 90.11%.
The EAF Fort Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.
The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%.
Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trends: None 7
6-
- Fuel Fiellabikty Indicator E
4-GOOD N y 1.5 1.5
, lH~'-O
'88 '89 i
'90 J,an91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91
- FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 3.d7 nanocuries/ gram for the month of August. This value is higher than in previous months , cause of the rapid power changes on August 12 through August 20 and due to the inclusion rn a density correction factor to the letdown purification flow, as specified by an INPO directive issued 6/26/91. This density correc-tion factor is described in the PERFORMANCE INDICATORS DEFINITIONS under Fuel Roll-
- ability Indicator (page 80).The monthly INPO Fuel Reliability Indicators from January 1991 through July 1991 have been recalculated using this density correction factor.
This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate. The FRI value using the plant's actual letdown purification rate was reported as 4.18 nanocurles/ gram.
The August FRI was calculated using the data from August 1 through August 11 and from August 23 through August 31. During the remaining days plant operation was not at steady state power, per the INPO definition, which is required for the FRI calculation.
The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 10. The FRl values observed during Cycle 10 were in the 20 to 80 nanocurle/ gram range (without the density correction f actor which would make the FRl values larger). The CHIRON program from EPRI will be utilized to assess the potential of failed fuelin Cycle 13. Results from the evaluation will be reported in the September Performance Indicators ieport.
The 1991 fuel reliability goal, industry upper ten percentile and industy median values are not shown on this graph. They are no longer consistent with the FRI evaluation due to the ;
recalculations necessitated by INPO to incorporate a dencity correction factor in the letdown
- purification expression . INPO will provide this Information as soon as the revised figures are available. OPPD's goal for the FRI wl!I be revised at that time, Data Source: Holthaus/Gullant .
Adverse Trend: None 8
Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man Rem)
-e- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (75 Man Rem) 1
-D- Industry Upper 10 Percentile (166 Man Rom) 300-E 276
. GOOD ;
! 200- V 93.4 .
100-C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,=, 0
'88 '89 '90 Jan FebMar AprMayJun Jul AugSepOct NovDec ,
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
During August 1991,3.567 man rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while '
working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year to date exposure is 37.646 man rem. -
The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75 man rem..
The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man tem per unit per year. ,
Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP54 4
9
-. - _ - - . _ - . _ . . - -- _-=-, .= .
5 cumulative Radioactive Oil sent For Processing (in oaiions)
O Cumulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing (in cubic feet) 6000 -
4s -
?
ll
.ouO- -
Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried
-O-- Fort Calhoun Goal For Waste Buried (4s00) i
-Q- Industry Upper 10 Percentue Waste Buried (3072) 7s00-a stos' s000- O Radioactive Waste Buried This Month (in cubic feet)
N * As00- O C C C C C C C C C C C 3000- D O O O O O O O O O O O !
- 1s00 - i
$ l o l 89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 I Year end Total VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the_ monthly, the cumulative annual total, and the year end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.
The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the month of July 1991 has been revised. These revisions are due to th delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.
Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off site for processing (gallons) 4,330.0 .
Cumulative amount of solid radweste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 7,778.0 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month (cubic feet) 128.0 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) 646.4 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 0.0 ,
.-The Fort Calhnun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cmolc feet.
The industry upper ten porcentile value .s 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987, and 1988.
Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) SEP54 Adverse Trend: None 10
Q 1991 Disabling injury / Illness Frequercy Rate (
?
-H 1990 Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate
-A- 5 Year Average Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate {
14~ -O- Fort Calhoun Goal 1.2 -
--+- Irdustry Upper 10 Percentile GOOD
.1 - V l
0.8 -
0.6 0.50 g I 0.39 0 0.4 -
om !
C - :- - -
- - -C O O O 4!
0.2 - : .
l 0 $ i _ k , k ,i - n , 'n ',' 5 i
ny'- i Jan .Feb Mar Apr . May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury / illness rate in column form.
The 1990 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average of the corre-sponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate are also shown.
There was one lost time accident reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in August. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1991 is hvo. ,
The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31.
The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0.
y_gg Year End Rate
- -1988 1.6 1989 0.4 1990 0.5
- Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source) >
Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate, an adverse trend is indicated. <
SEP 25 & 26 11
.. - - . - - - .-_ . - - _ . - _ .. .- ~_-_ . - -.- ..-
I E Thermal Output
-O- Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goal
- Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit I
_ I 1500 c. age. - -
..-- ,f l
4 i
4
'a . A l 3 k'<. $ b.
1200 .U ,' 1 i .,
' ' ' 'b ' .*
('
,, . _ . i c ' ,'- '.
g _.
'.(
v ' '
i
' M
~
' ^h 900 .
i - ,
000 L . .
. ~ : .?;
s . . ;.. . .
300 ! - : ;
- I .
~ '
' %:'.0/
h
'/ ki . - J ..
jL k; -l
L5{; ].2&dh..t.. ... Al-..;,:i n
'J W % '- $WNO 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during August 1991, the 1500 thermal rr.egawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.
The first reduction in thermal output in August was due to the moderator temperature l coefficient test. The second reduction in thermal output during the month was due to the :
replacement of failed potential transformers.
Plant power level was reduced to 70% in February for fuel conservation in support of
. the extension of power operations for Cycle 13. This power reduction continued until l the latter half of June when 100% power was resumed. Reduced power operations will be resumed in the fall. '
! Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 12
. - - - ~ . .
2-l
- Equipment Forced Outage Rate j 1.8 - '
i 1.6 - !
1A-1.2 - GOOD ;
1-y .
0.8 -
o.53 0.0 -
OA-0.13 ;
. _ 0.2 -
i O
i h i l
0:
'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mer Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 ;
EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS One equipment forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991. The nutage was required to replace failed potential transformers (pts). These pts convert 345 KV ,
to 120 V for use in the breaker synchronization circuit.
One other equipment forced outage has occurred in 1991. It was in the month of Janu-ary and was due to the December CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January. -
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None 13
++eg--w- ,-v-y,-1,"-- p--- --wy--r-- y ,--e-, -- e-e--g--- g,u---mw>, y-2-syp-- Ly $w pw t----g e y
--- Operations 1991 Budget ($ Million) 1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 80- 1991 Revised Budget
~~'
60- -
2- ,
y- 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 25-Maintenance 1J91 Budget ($ Million) i 20-1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 15- @ 1991 Revised Budget 5- ; -w
" =
1 0 -
Jan- Feb- Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep _ Oct Nov Dec OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and MCatenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year-to date as ,
weil as the actual expc. ditu .6 for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.
T;1e December _ Bar Graph represents the revised year-end budget due to budget revi-E sions primarily reflecting the refueling postponement for Cycle 13. The revised year-end budget for Operations was 59.6 million dollars. The revised year-end budget for -
Maintenance was 12.7 million dollars.
The budget year to-date for_ Operations was 42.8 million dollars for August while the actual cumulative expenditures through August totaled 35.9 million dollars.
The budget year-to-date for Maintenance was 10.7 million dollars for Augt::t while the actual cumulative expenditures through August totaled 5.04 million dollars.
Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)
- Adverse Trends: None 14-
1500 -
-e- Occuments Scheduled for heview l Documents Reviewed 1200--
--V - Overdue Documents 900 -
600-300-g D. , -. > - - -
A
%^ _
0
' # =~ Y 4 i Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the n mber of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the sciteduled due date) biennia' ' views for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in house ar. ..icluda Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures,- Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.
During August there were 165 document reviews completed while 46 document re-views were scheduled. At the end of August, there was one (1) document review over-due.
During the month of August there were 105 new or renamed documents reviewed.
These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.
Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 15
_ _ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ _ _ - == -
-@ Number of Failuren/20 Demands -*- Trigger Values for 20 Demands O Number of Failures /So Demands ; Trigger Values for So Demands B Number of Failures /1oo Demands D Trigger Values for 100 Demands 8- - D D D D O O O O O O O O GOOD G- V k
1 l , i . <
4-4 4 4
4 I;
7 a b v
I u, ,
{ ,, 3
,3 ,, 3 m
3
- u, 3
o o .,
, r, l
3 f>
22 22 $ 22 $ 2 ? 2 2 2 2 P 22 22 Y 22 k 2- - - e -- w -
t
. . t 5, f f f h E
[ [ 11 I L h e -
- p ,5 r yr s a s g -
i o o l!
$ Y ; II o o o o o j -
(. d 4 x 0 l
i i e i i i i i i i i. i Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABCTY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,- 50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also snown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliabilit; ci greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-
- ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.
. The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start only demands '
and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manual initiation. . Load-run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of tne fol_ lowing criteria: a load run that is a result of a real load signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and ouration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini- .
mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and-other demand criteria in the Definition Section).
The demand failure which occurred during the month of August for DG-2 was due to a seal failure on the Jacket water pump.
Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 16
O DG 1 Failures /25 Demands I
5 DG 2 Failures /25 Demands 5- Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands 4-3-
2- b hg 1
1 1_ _ ;
0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 , O h 6 i i i i i i i i i i i Nov90 Dec JanS1 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)
This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load-run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.
It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more fai!ures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.
Diesel Generator DG 1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.
Diesel Generator DG-2 has experienced two failures during the last 25 demands on the unit. A roll pin failure occurred in July 1991 and a seal failed on a jacket water pump in August 1991.
Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 17
E Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailability Q Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailability G Unpianned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability O Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability k
3 120- _
j100- =
> 80-E 60 -
$ 40- i , 2 _ _
g O
2g- m 6 i i a I i i c
i e
I _ i i i I Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 E Curnulative Hours of Diesel Generator Nurnber 1 Unavailability l l
O cumulative Hours of Diesel Generaior Number 2 Unavailability
--O-- Fort Calhoun Goal (43.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of un.vailability per diesel generator) 70 64.5
,g 60 q 5 50-h40- 33.1 C O O O o 30-
's 20-g1 - 0 0 o i i i i i i I Jul01 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 DlESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diese' generator unavailability for 1991.
The top graph shows the diesel generator planned and "nplanned unavailable hours for DG 1 and DG 2. The lower graph shows the cumulative sours of unavailability for both diesel generators beginning in July 1991.
The Fort Calhoun goal of 43.8 unavailable hours per DG for the last four months of 1991 is based on the 1990 INPO industry rnedian value for diesel generator unavailable hours.
The 31.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of unplanned DG-2 unavailability in A' mst were the result of two sepa-l rate events. On August 7 during surveillance testing DG 2 failed to crank on the first attempt. On August 26 - 27 DG-2 was inoperable due to the failure of a jacket water pump seal.
Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None l 18
400-
@ June 1991 Outstanding MWOs O July 1991 Outstanding MWOs O August 1991 Outstanding MWOs 300-200-yp 100- -
5
+
< (fil) :
0
^
- I' " '
I i i i 1 0 3 Months 3-6 Months 6 9 Months 912 Months >12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MWO s) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None I
19
~
@ June 1991 Outstanding MWOs July 1991 Outstanding MWOs O August 1991 Outstanding MWOs 300-200 -
N fij 100- f ens le$k kn -
l 0 6 '-- '
, E'A I' I , N '
, i ,
0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months >12 Months MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 20
- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old
- ~
,_ C industry Upper Quartile j
- 70%- GOOD V
60%-
50%-
C C C C C C C C C C C D 40%-
30%-
20 % --
Sep90 Oct Nov- Dec Jan Feb- Mar Apr May Jun - Jul Aug91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work
' orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.
The percentage of open corrective non outage' maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of August was reported as 29.55 The industry upper quartile value'for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)-
Adverse Trend: None -
21
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenar.ce 0*/. -
C Industry Upper Quartile (57.7%)
A 80%-
a un Goal P.)
GOOD 70%-
60*/o - 4f 4 g 4 4 4 4 ; 4 50%-
40%-
30%-
20%
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the ratio of completed non outage preventive maintenance to total completed non outage maintenance, ,
The ratio o.' preventive to total maintenance was 53.89% in August.
' The Fort Calhoun goal _is to attain a ratio of preventive to totalmaintenance greater than 60%. The low values for the months of January through April 1991 are due to the low number of PM activities scheduled to be completed during these months.
The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57,7 %
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverste Trend: None 22
l 4%- Preventive Maintenance items Overdue
-O- Industry Upper Quartile
-O-- Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-
GOOD 2%-
V O O O O O O O O O O O O 1%-
0% \
Sep91 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of_ preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro-grams require.
During August 1991,1220 PM items were completed. The increase in the number of PM items from last month's total of 1060 is due to the security modification. All PM's were completed within the allowable grace period.
The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items over-due.- The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%.
The Fort Calhoun Staiton is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this indicator.
Data Source: Patterson/ Linden (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 23
M Number of C. R. Instruments Repairablo On Une 50- Total Control Room Instruments Out of-Service
--O- Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments 40- --O- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out of-Service instruments 30-7 20- , , : .
'/
D- O Q L - - - .-
10-O. -
o -
d- o - l ;-
fe o
( -
0 I i i i 4 i i i l i i l Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shov s the number of out of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on line), the industry upper _ quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.
There was a total of 25 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of August. A plant outage is required to repair 10 of these 25 control room instruments.
The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 15 out-of-service control room instruments.
The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of service control room instru-ments is 7.
Data Source: Patterson/ Adams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 24 1
- 80%-
- Maintenance Overtin e 70%- - +(-- 12 Month Average a n afr n u age Monk 60%-
V 50%-
40%-
30%-
C O O O O O -- O O O O O O 20% - ,, o m u u n n n ,,-
.10%- % ., m o a
^
b7'\[ _
0% -
Sep90 Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar . Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME
- The Maintenance Ovartime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the alloMed resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.
. The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 3.2%
during the month of August 1991. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 8.3%.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the percentage of maintenance overtime hours workad has been set at 25% for non-outage months and 50% for outage month .
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None.
25
~ . . - . - - - . . . - -. . _ . - . . . . - . .-
i l
- l 15-0 Open IR's Related to tne Use of Procedures (Maintenance)
@- Closed IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)
O Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance) 10-5-
3 3 3
) 2 2 h, 22 I,- 2 111 y ' 'sj '1 Y
- ),
- 1 i
! 000 O k O :- O h r '/ Ve.. 0 000 000 000 000 000
.id 0',
0
^
3 . , , , , , , , 4 ,
Sep90- Oct Nov Dec Jcn Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance Incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to the use of
. procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-
. pliance cause codes.
Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None. SEP 15 & 44-1 1
- j
- 26
l -
800 -
@ Open MWOs O Fort Calhoun Goal 600 -
0 0 0 0 C O O 400 - -
361 348
, } g 287 271
? Th /l' h,l !/ Vt',' /? 9ff }
= , ''^ , ' " ' , '"'
' " - ^ ' ' ' ^ ' -
O , , , , ,
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number nf corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.
Tha goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance war < orders remaining open.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 27 l l
L Completed Scheduled Activities (EM)
+ Fort Calhoan Goal i
100%-
80% - C O O O- O v O O ea C O 60% -
6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 -8/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the percent of_ the number of comnleted maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance' activities concerning Electrical Maintenance, Maintenance activities include iMWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations,
. and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
Reporting Month' Completed Scheduled Activities
- Week 1 85%
Week 2 79 %
Week 3 81 %
Week 4 91 %
Week 5 - 90%
Data Sourcc: Patterso#Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 28
i l
Completed Scheduled Activities (PE)
--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -
80% - - 0 0 0 - O O 60% --
40%
6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)
This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 82 %
Week 2 89 %
Week 3 80 %
Week 4 84 %
Week 5 91 %
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 29
Completed Scheduled Activities (GM)
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -
80%- C --C O O O O O O - O 60% -
l 40%
6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the perc9nt of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities, The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
Reporting Month Comp'eted Scheduled Activities Week 1 68%
Week 2 89%
Week 3 82 %
Week 4 _ 81 %
Week 5 95%
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) -
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 30
- _ _ _ . _ - - .--~ ._ _ , . _ , . _ _ .
Completed Scheduled Activities (MM)
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -
80% - -C O- C O--C
/ O 60% -
40%
6/7 G 14 6/21 6/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 a'2 B'9 8/16 8/23 8/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the pecent of the number of completed maintenanca activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance, Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 88%
Week 2 93 %
Week 3 83%
Week 4 83 %
Week 5 90 %
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 l
31 l
. ~ _ . .- . .. .- .- . . - - - - . -
Completed Scheduled Activities (10)
--O-- Fort Calhoun Goal '
100% - )
l 80% - C O ^
O O O O O O O O O h 1
60% -
l 40%
6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)
This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumenta-tion & Control. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 92 %
Week 2 87 %
Week 3 84 %
Week 4 89 %
Week 5 80%
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 32'
3 3-
@ Number of Missed STs Resulting in LERs 2-1-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 40 , , , , , , , , , , , i
'89 '90 Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows tha yearly totals for the indicated years.
Duiing the month of August 1991, there were no missed STs that resulted in LERs.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 33
20- -
E TotalNPRJS Component Failures O Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 10-77 4 4 33 3 3 22 g 00 0 00 00 00 00 00 i i i i i i 1 6 1 4 1 i Sep90 Cd. Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)
REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is: based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.
During August 1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS component failures.
Data Source:-Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None l 34 i
1 I
15- - --.-- Components With More Than One Failure
-X- Components With More Than Two Failures 10-GOOD V
5- : -
N : -
v v v v v v v v f\ f /\ f f\ f\
-0 % m
' Sep90 ' Oct ' Nov - - Dec 'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Sep91 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS p 1 The Malatenance Effectiveness indicator was developed following guidelines set forth l by the' Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data _(NRC/AEOD) The NRC/AEOD is currently developing arid verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System -
-(NPRDS) component failures,
~
'This indicator shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in a twelve month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance.
During the last 12 reporting months there were 4 NPRDS components with more.than 1 failure, 2 of the 4 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of these components are CH-1 A & CH 18.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Managsr/ Source)
Adverse Trend: None 35
20-Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Comp. Hours
-b - Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Comp, Hours 15-
-O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (2.00E 6) 10 10-GOOD V
5-A N A
. . g i i. 0
'89 '90 Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feo Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 Check Valve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is baseo upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous two years, are shown on the left.
The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.
For May 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.16 E-6 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2,88 E-6. At the end of August, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of zero
~ (0). The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00E-6.
Datt. Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)
- Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 HI 36 l
l l
[
--- Secondary System CPI l l Secondary System CPI Limit GOOD
-O-- Fort Calhoun Goal (,45) 1.5 -
-tr- Industry Upper Quartile Y 1- l l l l ; l l l l l l l o.se ou 0.5- N p __ q g gg i- ,0 _
- - S0 Aug90_ Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 200-175- - M- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines
-146.1 150 -
GOOD 100- y.
75-1125-
'90 50-25-0 ,,
- Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 -
SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), is calculated using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved
- oxygen. The bottom graph shows the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding the -
-Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPI is 0.45. The CPI was reported as 0.618 for the -
month of July. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August
- 1989 through Dec.1989. The CPIindustry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.
- The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 2.38 hours4.398148e-4 days <br />0.0106 hours <br />6.283069e-5 weeks <br />1.4459e-5 months <br /> for the month of July.
^
The_ above two chemistry indicators are one month behind'the reporting month due to--
the time needed for collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.
Data source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source):
_ Adverse T_ rend: None 37 l
10%- -
- M- Primary System Chemistry Out of Umit n amoun Goal 8%-
6%-
GOOD 4%-
31.8 2%- O O O O O O O
, . . , , 0% m h m m 89 90 Aug90 Sep- Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.
.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This indicator is
-one month behind the reporting month.
The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2%.
The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0% for the month of July..
. The high percentage of hours out of limit for the primary system during July 1990 was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluctuations which
- occurred during' June and July. A plant shutdown and startup in September and a plant outage in November / December resulted in a higher percentage of hours out of limit.
Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 38 ,
I
10-l 9- -M- Hours Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Umit 8- Industry Uppor Quartile 7-6-
5- Y 4-3-
A A- A A A A A A A 2-1-
- 0. ;, , ;, ,
O o ), .,
), . ); . ), ,), ,), .;,,,,1 ,n ,
' .gg ' .90 Aug90 Sep' Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting month
- due'to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.
The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as 0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> for the month of July, Tw/ industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station -
limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)
' Adverse Trend: None 39
~
z Numb $r of Instruments Out of Service <
--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 7-6 6 6 6- - .
. ,; -Q --C l --O--- ,
- O 5-
!' 'i ',
M
'i y-Q 5 5 '- 'I 5
- - ; g 4- .
- ) .} ,
5 3- -
d - '
?
O '---
3 i , ' '
i i i i
, i 4' '
i i
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out-of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved iri this indicatorinclude the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
At the end of August there was a total of 5 in line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Of these 5 instruments,3 were from the Secondary System and 2 were from PASS.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out-cf service has been set at 6. Six out of-service chemistry instruments make up 10%
of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator.
Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None i
40
)
l B Total Waste Produced (Kilograms)
Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg) 1000 - -
800-
'1 600-400-200- 144.s 0 ~, , , , i , , , , , ,
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jul Jul Aug91 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.
During the month of August,0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced,0.0 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.
Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 41
OPPD 4500 mRe nlyr. Limit -
4000- "
O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem)
@ Highest Exposure for the Omrier (mrem) 3000-G highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) 2000-
_=
1000- 961
(
T%%15sjT?% \
536 C4 y l ,
- s. , @Qyg ?? ,
August 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During August 1991, an individual accumulated 212 mrem which was the highest in lividual exposure for the month.
The maximum individual exposure to date for the third quarter of 1991 has been 536 mRom.
The maximum i.idividtial exposure reported to date for 1991 has been 961 mrem.
The OPPD T- it for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /
year.
Daic Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 42
237 250- _.
3 13onthly Pert.onnel Contaminations GOOD - Cumulative PersonnelContaminations 200-y -O-. Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (90)
I
-O- Industry Upper Quartile (129) l 157 .
150-
~
O O O O O O O O O O O O 100-
, O O O---C O O O O O O---C O 50.-
0- "
~
i i i , , , , , , , , , ,
'89 '90 Jan91 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 39 contaminations have occurred during 1991. ,
There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990, The 1991 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 90.
The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.-
Data Source: Pat ersonAVilliams(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: . 'one SEP 15 & 54 43
. .. :. . . ._.~.-..:---.-.~..-.::--..:.:--,------=------=-----
~
F 100 % - Docontaminated Auxiliary Building' Radiation Controlled Area
-O- Fon Calhoun Goal (non-outago months) 90%-
/
n---W c c'O O O O o- O O 80%-
Ak 70%-
GOOD 60%-
50%- -_
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 DECONTAMINATED RADIA*ilON CONTROLLED AREA This indicator (formerly titled " Decontaminated Auxiliary Building") was revised in June 1991 to include the now Radwaste building and the areas of the C/RP building that will be considered Radiologically Controlled. The graph shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a Fort Calhoun Ooal of 85% decontaminated auxiliary building (non outage months) and a goal of 75%
decontaminated auxiliary building (outage months).
At the end of the reporting month,19.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated.
~ "e Source: Patterson/Gu ndal (Manage r/ Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 44
l 10- l l
8- Q Number of Identified PRWPs 6- !
4 4- -
. 3 2
2- y 1 1 1 1 1
-0 4 1 I I I 4 _ i i t i i i Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices progam Ind!cator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month.-
The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a-means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.
4 During the month of August 1991, one PRWP was identified.
Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP52 1
i 45
.,.- . .;. ....:..,.. -:-.-:.- :. - .- a : . . - . = - . - - - - . - - - - - - - - - . =-
D Total Number of Hot Spots Number of Additional Hot Spots identified
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 65 55 53 53 53 54 54 54 g
-]
50- % " ':
E
'?: E. S p,
%, h:
e ;;
%> z
- s 9; g1
'g'; S-: %
e b xb a 2
- bg 2:
E pl}:
- S 4 1h x c c c o
'8l (! $ sl II .) :1 h-
- c. -i 1 & '1 s 25- ; y
- J,] ,
,, j ff xi : n .: m . 6
's
,,i
- :js,
('
g' ! $a 10 ) # 4 ! 3: 10 f:
W
.g 4 6 ve
, g p! 0 0- 'gj ,3 8s0 y 0 ,,.
- 1 f
i i e i e i i i i i e i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation.
A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.
ALARA personnel conducted an in depth survey of the entire auxiliary building during the month of August. This survey resulted in the identification of ten additional spots.
The Fort Calhoun goal for this Indicator is 40.
Date Source: Patterson. Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trends: None i
46 l
l
Q Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 800- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies)
--O- Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) 600~
GOOD 465 Y
400-C O O O O O O O O O O O ,
164- 200-r 0- , , , , , , , , , , , , ;
'89 10 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 1
G ASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 throi.igh June 30,1991. A total of 42.2 curies have been released to the environment during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 340 curies for this indicator.
The gaseous radioactive waste being dischargod to the environment is calculated every six months.
Date Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 47
, . _ ~ _ _ - , _ . _ _ . - . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ - . _ _ _ _ . _ _ - . _ _ _ _ . _ . -
@ Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged
-- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged
--O- Cumulative AnnualGoal 231 228 175 200-C O O O M O O O O O O 4 .[ GOOD
~
100 d V L e 28.2
_ g_g,3_jy "j { 4 i i i , O *: , , i i, , , , , , ,
'38 89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 g 40000-
.9 y30000-fC 20000-
@ 10000-o 2370 29104 800 3300 3750 3010 5 0 "NAAA i
i i i i i i i i i i i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the envircnment is shown for of Janu-ary 1,1991 through June 30,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 70.3 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 225 cudes.
The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive ivaste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 19.2 million gallons from January through June 1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.
Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 48 l .
30-25- _ Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not gggg 20- Include S tem Failures) 15- y 10-0
\ f - ~
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 Security System Failures
_ GOOD V
80-40-0 Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. .The first chart depicts the total numt'er of loggable/ reportable incidents con-cerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs); Security Badges; Security Key Control; ad Accesc Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning secu-rity system failures which occurred during the reporting month.
During the month of August 1991, there were 67 loggable/ reportable incidents identified.
System failures accounted for 66 (99%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 36 (54%) of these were environmental failures. CCTV environmental failures (29) ac-counted for the majority of the system failures for the month. New cameras, currently being installed, have contributed to the decrease in CCTV environmental failures from last month.
Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 49 1 1
i E Security Report / Log incidents May 1991 ,
16- O Security Report / Log Incidents June 1991 E Security Report / Log incidents July 1991 !
O Security Report / Log inc! dents August 1991 12- GOOD Month Totallnedents .
V Jan 91 0 Feb S1 o Mar 91 2 8- Apr 91 3 May 91 1 Jun 91 1 Jul91 2 Aug 91 1 o
1 1 1 o o o o o //, o o o ME o o o o o, i i i ,
LDVs Badges Key Control Access Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN .
-This indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs), Security Badges, Access ;
Control and Authorization, and Security Key Control.
Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 i
i i
I 1
So
'l
50-O EnvironmeritalFailures O Failures 40-GOOD 30- 29 Y
11 10 -
7 @$g fny 5 5 ka. m rw -
4 pp,; 3 g#,-
Mb ff@ 0 en 0 m 0 *^> 0 0 I i 4 4 4 Alerms CCTV Computer Search Equip. Doors Card Readers ,
SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures,
- Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Falldres, and Card Reader Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures are now divided into two categories: environmental failures and failures as defined in the performance indicator definitioris.
Number of incidents: July '91 August '91 System Failures Env. Fnitures Failures Env. Failutti- Failures Alarms 6 10 1 11 CCTV 36. 1 29 5
- Computer - n/a 4 0 4 Search Equipment n/a 5 0 1 .
Door Hardware n/a 1 0 -5 ,
' Card Render na 0 0 0 ,
Total 42 _
~ 21 36 26 L -Data Source: Sefick/Woerner(Manager / Source)
AdverseTrend: None SEP 58 51 i,
,l--,+ ,.,--,,n.--, ,,,a.,,,. --,n,,,,--,,4.m,n.-..v.,,,, .,,,-c.-, ,,,,--..,--,,,.,,nn-,-n.,w-n,rv.,n,vr,,- ,,-.,-v ,,-~,w w -~m.-,
Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Pans 10% -
9%- -O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 0%- GOOD 7%-
6%-
5%-
4%- /
^
C O O O O 3%-
2%- ,
l 1%-
0%
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE)
This procurement Indicator displays the percentage of open, non outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non outage rnalnte-nance items.
There was a total of 694 open, non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 10 of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.
The 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicatoris 3.5% of the total number of open, non-outage UWOs awaiting parts.
Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None l
l l
, 52
30-
- Spare Parts inventory Value ($ M!!! ion) 25-20 --
15 --
10-5-
0- , , , i i , , , i , , i Sep90 Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of August was reported as $13,595.319.
Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 500 - - Spare Parts issued ($ Thousands)
I 400-300 -
200-100-0 Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the cpare parts issued during August totaled $132,139.
Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)
Adverso Trend: None 53
Inventory Accuracy l -O- Fort Calhoun Goal (98%)
100 % -
ON O O O 95%-
90% - -
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 INVENTORY ACCURACY lhis indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.
During August,861 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 861 line items counted,7 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of August was reported as 100%. The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 98%.
Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trond: None PI' ~1 % of Pick Tickets Generated With 6%- Parts Not Available 5%-
'4%- -O- Fort Calhoun Goal 3*/. -
2%-
1%-
'0% O O O - 0 0 0 0--
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan~ Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator _shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no o parts available during the reporting month.
During August, a total of 1152 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1152 Pick Tickets generated,25 Pick Tickets (2.2%) were generated with no parts available.
The Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal for this indicator is 0%.
Data Source: Willrett/McCormick(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 54
. . . . . . ~
i 2%~
% of Total Purchases that are Expedited
--O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (0.5%)
l 1%-
C O--O O O O 0% , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 '
EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage oi .txpedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month, During August, there vms a total of 320 purchase orders generated. Of the 320 pur-chase orders generak d, two (0.6% of the 320) were expedited purchases.
The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator 0,5%,
Dete Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None i
E6
. . . . . . ._ _ . _.. . _ . - . . ~ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . - . . _ . ~ . . _ . . - - _
100-80-6o-40- 29 27 c
h ,
my/;c. n Service invoices COE invoices Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of August 1991.
Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) !
Adverse Trend: None i
Percentage of Material Requests for usues with
~ the Request Date the same as the Need Date l 10T/ '
80%-
A 60%-
40%- N 20%-
0%
AugDO Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 MATERIAL REQllEST PletNNING This indicator shows the percentage of material requests (MRc) for issues with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MRs for issues for the reporting month.
During the month of August, a total of 1152 MRs were received by the warehouse. Of the 1152 total MRs received by the warehouse,406 MRs were for issues with their request date the same as their need date.
Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None l
b6
__ , - - . _ . . __ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _. _ . . _ ~ - . _
l 000-
- Total Moddication Packages Open 500-426 425 7~
400-337 _
R 300- T -
i
. ~;
i E i Mi 1200
'88 '89 '90 Sop 90 Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb IAar Apr IAay Jun Jul Aug91 OllTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS r"is indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-ir g modifications which are proposed to be cancelled),
Cateoorv Recortlnald20th Form FC 1133 Backlog /In Progress 18 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 96 Design Engr Backlog /In Progress 97 Construction Backlog /in Progress 33 Deslan Enar Uodatgt[lar,;Llog/In Progrett 43 Total 287 As of the end of August,25 additional moditication requests have been issued tHs year and 19 modification requests have been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Com-mittee (NPRC) has completed 91 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 99 backlog modification request reviews this year.
Data Source: Jaworskiqurner (Manager / Source)
Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 57 l
3 Tcmporary Modifications >1 cycle old (RFO required for Romoval)
Q Tornporary Modifications >6 months old (Romovable on lino)
-o- Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modifications (0) 0-5 5 0'
- 9,99;( , 9;, , , ,
09/9:p' '/:y' Z 4- 'pV'67,
)??::??
jp;;pp,. 3 3- lfj
//hj)'[',;
', 97,' .:,
, , ,, ,3,
/99/// '/ / / / /.. //,'///
2 ////,$/ 2 '/////, 2 '
,/////
2- // '/ ' ' '///,, //,'/, '
// // &:'/,'/.. ' '/////
'/////,-
,l',' ' //
L /////
1 -- /hhhh th////. Shhhhhi
'/////.. 'hh' h///
hhh 0- 'hhhh? Chhhhh:: 'hhhh{
i ,
Juno July August TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)
This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of temporary modifications removable on line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications.
The goal for this indicator has been changed to be more indicative of Fort Calhoun's contiol and management of temporary modifications. There are currently 2 temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old. Beth of those modifications are 100% ready to be removed during the 1992 refueling outage, in addition, there are currently 3 temporary rnodifications installed that are greater than six months old that can be removed on line. Tnese are: handjack close of CCW/RW valves which is await-ing an engineering evaluation currently scheduled for 12/6/91; replacement of relay 94/
2883A which is awaiting parts that are scheduled to arrive in late August er early Sep-tomber; and Duratek tie ins to the Radwaste Buildin0 which has a modification being installed for removal.
At the end of August, thore was a total of 25 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station.
15 of the 25 instahed TMs require an outage for removal and 10 are removable on line, in 1991 a total of 27 temporary modifications have been installed and all but 13 have been removed.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) i Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 58 l
l l
- Total Number of Open EARS 200 -
~
150- _
100--
50-0 Oct90 Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 60- @ DEN 0 3 months @ SE 0 3 months 50- @ DEN 3 6 months O se 3 6 montns 40- O DEN >6 months O sE >6 montns 30- p4 20- W g q 10 - -
10-23 1 00 51 -
5 J- 6 4 gm [Jg g 10 g i 1 O3 r -1 I I
_. T~10 O n 0 i i i I Priory 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EARS)
The top graph shows the total number of open EARS at the end of the reporting month.
The bottom graph shows the EARS by Design Engineering Nuclear or System Engi-neering responsibility and their age in months at the end of the reporting month.
There was a total of 112 open EARS at the end of August. Of the 112 total open EARS, 87 were Design Engineering Nuclears responsibility,20 were System Engineering's responsibility,3 were Nuclear Projects' responsibility, and 2 were unassigned.
Data Source: JaworsklNan Osdel(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trand: None SEP 62 l
59 l , - . . _ .
-O- ECNs Backlogged in DEN
-+- ECNs Opened During the Month 200- -O- ECNs Completed During the Month
/
---cf 150-100-50-e .. c ./ '
Y 0-Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mai Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECNs opened during the reporting month -and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting morith.
At the end of August 1991, there was a total of 180 DEN backlogged open ECNs.
There were 45 ECNs opened, and 61 ECNs completod during the month.
Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is expected that in several months the number of open ECNs will begin to decrease.
Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 60
O DEN Ervinsering not complsts O System Engineering Engineering complete, MWO not written D Maintenance MWO scheduled, but not complete i
50 46 38 39 40-d* '
2 3 .,
I.' " ~ ' '
7 6 0- I i i 0 3 months 3 6 months > 0 months ECN FACILITY CHAfiQES_QEEN ,
l Q oEN Engineering not complete C System Engineering Engineering corrpleto, MWO not written l,'] Maintenanco MWO scheduled, bu' work not complete 90- 80 l- 60- as 30- 25 I'NA 9 10 0_
l ? .' 44 3 6 3 ,
0 3 months 3 6 months > 0 months ECN SUBSTILUTE REPLACEMENT PARTS OPEN Q DEN Ergineenng not cornplete System Engineering Walkdown or confirmation no, complete 38 40-30- 27 20- go 14 $;b . .
10-l a 2 li W id 4 g3M$m r hN; O , i
-c 0 - 3 months 3 6 rnonths > G months ECN DOCUMENT CHANGES OPEN ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows o areakdown of the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts Open, and ECN Document Changes Open.
Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 62
- 61
(
l
S- @ 1991 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rato 1990 Recordable injury / Illness frequency Rato I
--b- 5 Year Averago Recordable injury /fliness Frequency Rato !
4- -
3.5 - -j OD l
) i 3- 1 2.83 y ,
2.5 - !
- 'jj 1.93 1 2-s-
1.58 m -
,. M L W 1.5 - .
/
's ? ' 'j m_
y ; .. m .
l 0.5 -
n_
/
~ .
s 1; . ~.
/ .
~ - - .
! ]
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY HATE This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the Fort Calnoun Station 5
- year monthly average of the recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates. :
A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are !
Injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year to-date basis, i There were two recordable !njury/ illness cases reported during the month of August.
There has been a total of 10 recordable injury / illness cases so far in 1991.
! Year Recordable Cases Year End Rate 1988 11 - 2.6 1989 11 2.2 1990 1 2.1 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average recordable injury / illness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicated. SEP 15,25 & 26 62
- p. r c u e r, .,. .v-,,,,y,,,-y-,e--, --,.,ww+e. . , ,h ,[-h,m -,,,ve-w,, ,,w.., ,,,-:--w., w.,,--,- - , . , - , . . , + - , .,m.,%,,w.,w,y. ,
-g-wy- , - ., -..t,.r. --
50-40 D Licentee Event Reports T
(j Personnel Errors Reported in LERs
~
khi - Cumulative Licensee Event Reports s
f9 31
- Cumulative Personnel Errors 'eported in LERs M;
?
29 30-
- 26 N
,e
.j .i (
f 20 --
- i R
$= ;
3a
- : j g 10-
'j ,! s1 ,. i .
i 1: 4 i 10
, d, , 4 , n 1 [ n n i , i i i i , , , i
'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) with event dates during the reporting month, the I ERs attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year end totals int the three previous years are also shown.
In August 1991, there was one LER reported. This LER was not attributable to person-nel error.
There have been 16 LERs reported so far in 1991 and 7 of these LERs have been attributable to personnel error.
Data Source: Thorkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend; None SEP 15 63 l
600- $44- 558 O Actuai civision starring MO- Authorized Division Staffing 199 204 a ge ~
f ;,'
f) bpp 55 52 U '
i!. clear Operations Production Eng!neering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the threo Nuclear Divisions.
Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager /Sourco)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 24
-C}-- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate
-e-- Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate
~
+ Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate
- 4. ED
- Pr" A90 M90 J90 J90 A90 S90 090 N90 D90 J31 F91 M91 A91 M91 J91 J01 A91
= "
PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from
-OPPD.
Division Turnover Rate NOD ' 4.2%
PED 4.5%
NSD 3.6%
Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0*A.
This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.
Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None CA 1
1 O TotalTraining Hours 5 Simulator Training Hours 50- 0 Numberof JPMs E Number c! Exam Failures 40- p 36 -
30-3 20- 18 16 h16 W
14 14
- TQ i 10-
- 8 X] ee a p
- & : - , {.
$-h 4 f ': Tjj >I M 2 4
)
2 As 2 2 :
O OOO ,
g dy [g ;f 0g ( ;
i 1 I I I I I Cyda 911 Cycle 912 Cycle 913 Cycle 914 Cycle 915 Cycle 916 Cycle 917 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator, formerly titled "SRO and RO License Examination Pass Ratio", has been ruvised to more accurately reflect training department procedures.
This indicator providos infermation on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the totaltraining hours.
Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.
The pass ratio for NRC exams will be reported when those exams are given.
Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 65
@ SRO Exams Administered O SRO Exams easste B RO Exams Administered 0-
@ RC Exams Passed 45-40-3 5 --
30- I
l 25- f j a
20- E b : , ,
}
15- s 9 x '
10- ;
z i
l !! !
l I i i
! if 7 ! ! ; !i i i i i i I i
! I
!! i Sop 90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This Indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.
During the month of August 1991, sixteen SRO exams were administered and fifteen of these exams were passed. In addition, twelve RO exams were aaministered and eleven of these exams were passed.
Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 66
O HotlinesInitiated D HotlinesClosed 35- E Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks E Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 30-25-20-J 15- _
3 i
A 10- -
{ _
}
" ~ "
5- { [ {! - -
k y _{
0 i l l- i I I I i i i i l Sep90 0:t Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 HOTLINE TR AINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.
Auoust 1991 Initiated Hotlines 2 Closed Hotlines 6 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 2 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks 2 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trond: None 67 4
O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)
O General Employeo Training (1000 hrs.)
O Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)
D Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)
6-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)
E Operations (1000 Hrs.)
~
$ 4- ;
=
e z - 4 - -
n .=.; ( s p -- -
3 _ re 8g -
e l~~
~; n ~
_ y -
5 ~
ha &
=
b h _
9 1._
0- i i ; i i ; r T- T " r "9 May90 Jun Jul Aug Cep 0::t Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apt 91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-monts for the reporting nionth. Due to a programming problem,information for the months of May, June, and July was unavailable at the time of this report's publication.
This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time re quired for data collection and processing.
DEPARTMENT M AR '91 APR '91 Operations 187 61 Maintenance 1313 712 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1776 823 Technical Support 1004 523 General Employee Training 822 422 Other 39 43 Total 5141 2584 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None c8
O OtherTraining(1000 Hrs.)
@ General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)
O Technical Support (1000 Hrr.)
G Chemistry and Radiation Protection (100^ Hrs.)
30-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)
25- @ Operations (1000 Hrs )
e g 20-1 _
O
= -
15-N g
= . _ g g
,8 10- f ____
,74: 4,, re %2 Z A $ b i ? ?
5-
{
C mm M ?$
,~ -
0 , i i i i i i i i i i i May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TR AINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employeo Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. Due to a programming prob-lem,information for the months of May, June, and July was not available at the time of this report's publication.
This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.
DEPARTMENT M AR 91 APR '91 Operations 524 166 Maintenanco 4579 1400 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 5543 2129 Technical Support 4094 2124 General Ernployee Training 2005 1633 Other 112 182 Total 18357 7G34 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trond: None 69
t wr mw -
6 lp 401 -
47, .
- Total 0utageMW0s -
I
> ,s '
- MW0s ReadytoWork
.j.;
?>
( ;
, -O- OutageMWRbackbg
), ,.['
- l ,.e 3 s..? 3 ,
b.;y.
?_jf
';: a" * .+"
w .g c ,
400-
.;1M .
1 .
,[ k 200 -
g h f C S 0 -
1
~
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan01 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nw Dec91
- MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)
L b This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that have
, been written over the part reporting periods for completion uun.1g ine Cycle 14 >
i Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs that are ready for work (the parts for these )
MWOs are staged, the procedures are apprcved, and the paperwork is ready foi field :
use.) Also included is the number of ouxe Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) which have been identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWOs. Arey MWOs wmten afterthe start of the outage will be rallected in the indicator labeled Emergent MWOs. Approximately 3000 maintenance orders were comp eted during each of the pavious two refuwhig outages, ,
Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.
Data Sourca: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 i 70 P
- e. i
I
. l
- TotalOutage Modifications
-b- Mods Wnh Planning Document Approved 40- -O- Mods With Final Cochn Approved v- Mods With Construction Package Approved 30-20-10-l 1
0
~
0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 FP.JGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the number of modifications approved for planning (to determine feasibliny) or for completion during thL Cycle 14 Refueling Outage (RFO). Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.
TI:e cvrent schedule for completion of the modhcution phases of the Cycle 14
' Refueling Outage is as follows:
Outage Scope Freeze
- Oct.1,1990 Planning Documents Approved
- Feb 22,1991 Filial Designs Approved
- Apr 24,1991 Constmction Packages Approved
- Jun 15,1991 Schedule incorporated
- Jul 26,1991 Material On Site
- Jul 26,1991 Constructbn Started Feb 15,1992 Constn ction Complete Mar 30,1992 Accepted by SAC Apr 10,1992 l
- Indicates milestones which have not been changed as a recult of the new January l 1992 refueling outage start date. A forced outage after Noveiaber 1991 could result in
! an early start date for the Cycle 14 RFO.
l l Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager /Scurce)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 71 l
l
50-
- Total 0utageProjects .
1 Projects with Preliminary Schedules l 40-
- Submitted )
l
-O- Projects with Detailed Schedules Submitted l
I 30- '
8 20-10-
}
l 0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 l.
OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)
., This indicator shows the status of the projects which aff6ct tS scope of the Cycle 14 5-Refueling Outage.
- The projects that do not yet have preliminary schedules are Uquid Effluent Releases and Radiography.
Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes sva'i. ble.
i The schedule for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage proje ,u ls as follows:
All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct 1,1990 All Projects Scheduled in Detail Jun 28,1991 Procedures Ready. Oct 26,1991 Parts Staged . Nov 16,1991 Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 72 -
i
Violations per 1000 Inspection llours 12-
--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 9-C O O O GOOD 6-V 2.63- %_
"I I.3.7
- 1. 6
- 88 E'89190-10 ,
Aug90 Sep
.i. , , _
Oct - Nov Dec. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91-i 4
VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC _ violations cited in inspection repoits per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involvLd with collecting and processing the data.
The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 0,71 for the twelve months from August 31,1990 thru July 31,1991.
The Fort Calhoun Goal is 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours for 1991.
Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None ,
l 73 I
O Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours (12 month Period) I E Violations por 1000 Inspection Hours (1991 Only) e 4-a 2 3.53
.8 k3-
~E 2.46 NN 52
" kk 1.68 1.63 $$'
{ f57 # I'47 N'
' 38 1.3 JNQ s
9 N ' . s :$g :t$. D$
oy ;Qg ;g\ g:g gg 3)_ Q: 1.02 0'71 }N ^\ M \\
- W 56 N' {' :)^ $$ $$ D)
D') O.54 sf N>. ss. :$t $) I$'
ttl W ttt
^'
ett
5
) R"
- tt 11 M
0- -
j
- ; i Fort Cooper River Bend Commanche Wolf Creek Arkansas SouthTexas Waterford
- Calhoun Peak One COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1000 inspection hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The date is compiled for a twelve month period from August 31,1990 to July 31,1991 and for the calendar year 19g1 only.
The Fort Calhoun goal for 1991 is 1.6 violatians per 1000 inspection hours.
Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 74
. - . - . .~ . - ... - . . . - . . . . - - - . . - _
75j Nurnber of Violations During the Last 12 Months Number ofI tring the Last 12 Months 50-34 28 27
~
25-21
- 20 18 16 -
16 15 14 14 -
~
$ 7 3 12 12 11 11 S Ed i!% 3 7 w m 9 j 10 fp p 4 - 7 7 7
-6
- p p% 82) $ !% W@$ I6 ,,. 4 3 g
i.
hi i
Ml
-i is,
-i hi i
A i
$ $ i
$m3 i
im i
J-q i
1
- i. .i Aug90 Sep . Oct Nov. Dec Jan Feb Mar . Apr May Jun 'Jl91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)
The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months, Th:a ir~iice sone mont behind the reporting month due to the time involved with o itec:ing 21d processing the data for this indicator.
Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
- Adverse Trerd: None i
I 75 l-1
-l E Outstanding CARS That Are Modification Related 4 Outstanding CARS > Six Months Old Total Outstanding CARS 200 -
1 150-100-50- E O-----G 0
Sep90 Oct Nov - Den ~ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 OUTSTAND!NG CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS l This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),
the number of outstanding CARS that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstancing CARS that are modification related.
- - At the end of August 1991, there were 99 outstanding CARS,48 CAas that were greater than six months old, and 5 CARS that were modification related.
Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None L-i l
l 9
l 1
l l
76
-~ . ,i--, v,v--, --
r~,,e-,- -.cr
20-15- -O- NOD Overdue CARS 10- -b- NOD CAR; With Extensions Granted l
}5-0 1 C' O m m C m m M Sep90 Oct 'Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91
-O- PED Overdue CARS !
25 - l 20- -t- PED CARS With Extensions Granted 15- -
10-5- m 0 # '- # "
N #
O Sep90 Od Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 l- 6 5- -O- Other Overdue CARS 4~
--&- Other CARS With Extensions Granted 3-2-
N i Sep90 Oct Nov Dec 'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 l OVEROUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CARS and the number of CARS which receiveo extensions broken down by organization.
Qverdue CARS Overdue CARS June'91 July '91 August '91 NOD- 0 0 1 PED 1 0 1 Others 0 1 0 j Total 1 1 2 i Extended CARS l Extended CARS I- June'91 July '91 August 91 l
NOC 1 3 4
-PED 9- 12 4 Others 0 1 1 l Total 10 16 9 I
Data Source:- Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None 77 i_ .-.
1990 SALP Funct.
Area CARS Signif. CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations 62 0 2 10
- 0) Radiolog, 28 2 0 0 Controla C) Maint/Survell. 180 8 6 4 D) Emergency 7 0 3 0 Preparedness E) Secunty 26 0 5 3 F) Engr / Tech 172 5 3 12 Suppuri G) Safety Assess > 29 0 0 0 Qual. Verit.
H) Other 1 0 0 0 Total 505 15 19 29 1991 SALP Funct.
Area CARS Signif. CARS NRC Viola. LERs _
A) Plant Operations 19 1 1 1 B) Radiolog. 7 0 1 0 Controls C) Maint/Survell. 53(1) 0 0 6 (1)
D) Emargency 16(1) 0 0 0 Preparedness E) Security 4 0 1 1 F) Engr / Tech 65(6) 2 0 7 Support G) Safety Assess / 20(3) 1 (1) 0 1 Oual, Verif, H) Other 0 0 0 0 Total 184(11) 4 (1) 3 16(1)
Note:() indicate value for the reporting month.
CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1990 and 1991, included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Stciion each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.
Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)
Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
'dverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 78
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONC AGE OF OUTSTANDING ldAINTENANCE WORK OR- erator has been establi;hed based upon tne 1990 indus-DERS try median value provided by INPO.
This indicator tracks the tota' numbar of outstanding cor-rective norroutage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort DECONTAMINATED RAD:ATION CONTROLLED Calhoun Station versus their age in months. AREA The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAmHG PARTS includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non- areas of the C/RP building, which is decontaminated outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold await- based on the total square footage. This indicator tracks ing parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, mein- per'armance for SEP # 54. I tenance work orders, 1 DISABLING INJURY FREOUENCY RATE (LOST TIME I AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUT3IDE ACCIDENT RATE) j STATION LIMITS This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for The cumulative hours that the Component Coo'ing Water a'i utility personnel permanently assigned to tne station, system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours involving hs away from work per 200,000 man-hours are accumulated from the first sampk exceeding the limit worked (100 man-years). This does not inc!ude contrac-until additional sampling shows the parameter to be back tor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel perfor-within limits. mance for SEP #25 8 26.
CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIFICANT CARa vs NRC VIOLA. DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIEllNIAL)
TIONS vs LERs REPORTED The Document Review Indcator shows the nurrber of Provides a comparison of CARS issued, NRC violations, documents reviewed, the nustber of docum6nts sched-and LERs raported This indcator tracks performance for uled for review, and the number of documerd reviews SEP #15,20, & 21, that are overdue for the repomng month. A , . 'cument rev sw is considered overdue if the review is no' com-CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE plate within 6 months of the assigned due date. Tr.is indi-Compares the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate to cator tracks performance far SEP #46.
the industry check valv6 f ailure rate (f ailures per 1 millon component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT ret.ABIL-is three months behind the Pi Report reporting month. ITY This indicator tracks performance for SEP #43. This indicator shows the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die-COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMCNG REGION IV sei generator demands at she Fort Calhoun Station. Also PLANTS shown are trigger values which correlate to a high level Provides data on violations per 1000 inspection hours for of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have ob-Region IV nuc6ar puer plants. tained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the_ demand f ailures are loss than the tngger values.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER i)Numoer of Start Demands: All valid and inadvertent THAN 3 MONTHS OLD start demands, including all start-only demands and all The percentage of tota: outstanding corrective mainte- start demands that are followed by load run demands, nance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater whether by automatic or manualinitiation. A start-only than three months old at the end of the period reported. demand is a demand in which the emerge' icy generator is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator, CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON-CITED VIOLA. 2) Number of Start Failures: Any failure within the emer.
TIONS(12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) gency generator system that prevents the generator from The cumulative number of violations and Non-Cited Vio- achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as lations for the last 12 months. a valid start failure. This includes any condition identified in the course of maintenance inspections (with the emer-t>AILY THERMAL CWUt gency generator in standby mode) that definitely wouid This indicator shov3 tra. cally core thermal output as have resulted in a start failure if a demand had occurred.
measured from conipA point XC105 (in thermal mega- 3) Number of Lead-Run Demands: For a valid load-run watts). The 1500 MW Tech Spec limit, and the unmet demand to be counted the load-run as 'ot must meet portion of the 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting one or more of the following criteria:
month cre also shown. A)A load-run of any duration that results from a real auto-matic or manualinitiation.
DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAIL. ABILITY B)A load run test to satisfy the plant's load and duration This indicator proWdes monthly data on the number of as stated in each test's specifications, hours of diesel generator planned and unplanned un- C)Othat special tests in which the emergency generator availability. The Fort Ca:houn goa! for the second half of is expected *o be operated for at least one hour while 1991 for the number of sinavailable hours per diesel gen- loaded with .it least 50% of its design load.
79
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)
- 4) Number of Load-Run Failures: A lood-run feilure tations. Max: mum generaton is the energy that can be should be counted for any teaton in which the sm6a produced by a unt!in a given perod if operated continu-gency generator does not pick up load and run as pre- ously at maximum capacity.
dcted. Failures are counted during any valid load run l dernands. EXPEDITED PURCHASES l
5)Exceptons: Unsuccessful attempts to start or loao.run The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred should not be counted as valid demands or failures when dunng the reporting month compared to the total number they can be attnbuted to any of the following: of parcnase orders geneiated.
A) Spurious trips that would be bypassed in the event of an ernergency. FORCED OUTAGE RATE B) Malfunction of equipment that is not required du ing an This ir.dicator is defined as the percentage of time that emergency. the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared C)lntentionaltermination of a test because of abnormal to the time planned for electrical generaton. Forced conditions that would not have resulted in major diesel events are failures or other unplanned conditions that
- generator damaae c r repair. require removing the unit from service before the end of l
D) Malfunctions or operating errors which would have not the next weekend. Forced events include startup f ailures prevented ths emergency generator from being restarted and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdov.n and tetht to load within a few minutes. (i.e, the unit is available but not in service).
E)A failve w tart because a portion of the starting sys-tem was cMa > leo br test purpose,if followed by a suc- FUEL RELI ABILITY INDICATOR cessful start with the starting system in its normal akgn- This indicator is defined as the steady state primary cool-ment, ant 1131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contri.
Each emergency generator f ailure that results in the gen- buton and normahzed to a common purificaton erator being Jociared inoperable shoald be counted as rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on one demand and one failure. Exploratory tests dmng reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is corrective maintenance and the successful test that fol- present on the surface of fuel elements from the manu-lows repair to verify operabihty should not be counted as facturing processiteady state is defined as continuous demands or f ailures when the EDG has not been de- operations above 85 percent power for at least seven l clared operable again, days.This INPO indcator uses an industry ncimah7ad
- letdown purlication rate. The FRI has also been calcu-ENGINEER!NG CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK- lated using FCS's actualletdown purifcation rate. These DOWN calculations revealed that the use of the plant's actua!
This indicator breaks down the number of Engineenng rate would result in an approximete 45% increase in FRl Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design data.
Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engincering, and The density correction factor is the rate of the specific Maintenance. The graphs provide da's on ECN Facihty volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts (540 degrees F, Vf . 0.02146) divided by tho specibe open, and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 tracks performance for SEP #62. degrees F at outlet of tha letdown cooling heat ex-changer, Vf 0.016204), which results in a density cor-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATU3 recton factor for FCS equal to 1.32. This density correc-l The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were tien fa7or affects both the INPO and Plant Specific FRis.
completed, and open backlog ECNs awai1rsg completion by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks per- GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS.
formance for SEP #62. CHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRIT 1 gaseous radioactive nuclides released from FCS.
CAL HOURS l
Equipr9ent forced outages por 1000 entical hours is the GROSS HEAT RATE inverse of the mean time between forced outages Gross heat rate is definad as the ratio of total thermal caused by equipment f ailures. The mean time is equal to energy in Bntish Thermal Units (BTU) produced by the the number of hours the reactor is criticalin a period reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages the generato in kilowatt hours (KWH).
caused by equipment f ailures in that po iod.
HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED ECUIVtLENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The total amount (in Kilograms) of non-halogenated haz-This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross avai'able ardous waste, habgenated hazardous waste, and other generation to gross maximuru generaton, expressed as hazardous waste produced by FCS each month.
a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum mwer level permRted by equipment and regulatory hmi-80 l
1
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)
HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTM) that are MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS initiated, closed, and overdue less or greater than 4 The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System weeks for the indcated month. A HTM is a training docu- (NPRD3) components with more than 1 f ailure and the
" ment sent out for immediate review, The HTM should be number of NPRDS components with more than 2 f ailures reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the H1M. during the last 12 months.
HOURS CHEMIS iRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER B ACKLOG GUIDELINES The rumber of corrective non outage maintenanc9 work Total hours for 13 seccadary side chemistry parameters orders that remain open at the end of the reporting exceeding guidelines during power operation. Power month. Tnis indicator was added to the PI Report to operation is deiined as greater than 30% power. The 13 trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work or-parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation con- ders as stated in SEP #36.
ductivity, boron silca, chloride, sulf ate, sodium, f eed wa-ter pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, A d MAINTEN ANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN condensate pump discharge d ssolved oxygen, This indicator is a breakdown of correctNe non-outage maintenance work orders by several categones that re-IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTL OUT OF SER- main open at the end of the reporting month. This indica-VICE tor tracks maintenance performance for EEP #36.
Total number of in-hne chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in the Secondary System and the Post MAINTENANCE OVERTIME Accident Sampling System (PASS). The % of overtime bours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as INVENTORY ACCURACY contract personnel.
The percentage of line items that are counted each month by the warehouse which need count ac'justments. MATERIAL REQUEST pLANNINr; The percent of material requests (MRs) for issues wnh INVOICE BREAKDOWN their request date the same as their need date compared The number of invoices that are on hold due to shelf trf e, to the toMI number of MRs COE, and miscellaneous reasons.
MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS The total maximum amount of radiation received by an This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quiz- inorvidual person working et FCS en a monthly, quarterly, zes and exams that are administered and passed each and annual basis.
month, This indicator tracks training performance for SEP #68. IEWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)
LICENSED OPERATOR REQU AllFICATION TRAIN- The total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs)
ING that have been wntten for completion during the Cycle 14 The total number of hours of training given to each crew Refueling Outage. MWOs which are wntten after the start during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator train- ci the Refueling Outage will be labeled Emergent MWOs.
ing hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), Also shown is the number of MWRs which have been the number of Job Performance Measures and the num- identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have ber of exam f ailures. not yet been converted to MWOs. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #31.
LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator chsplays the volume c; liquid radioactive The number of radiological hot spots which have been waste released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks, identified and documented to exist at FCS at the end of to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio- the reporting month. A hot spot is a smalllocalized active nuclides are detected in the blowdown system. source of radiation. A hot spat occurs when the contact The curies from all releases from FCS to the Missouri dose rate of an item is at least S times the General Area River are also shown. dose rate and the item's Jose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.
LOGG ABLE/REPORTAB LE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The '.otal number of security incidents for the reporting NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu- SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED nty performance for SEP#58. The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS compo-nont f ailures (confirmed and possible) and the number of 81
PERFORM ANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) confirmed NPROS component failures The total number includes:
of NPRDS mmponent failures are based on the number A.)Modifcaton Requests that are not yet reviewed, of fa9ure reports that have been sont to the Institute of B.) Modification Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). Confirmed NPRDS Projects Review Committee (NPRC) component f ailcres are bas 3d upon f ailure reports that C.)Modifcaton Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear have been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS compo. Projects Committee (NPC) I nent f ailures are based upon f ailure reports that are still These Modifcation Requests may be reviewed severa! !
under review by INPO. NPRDS is a utihty industry users times before they are approved for accomphshment or j group program which has been outlined by INPO and cancelled, Some of these Modif cation Requests are re-implemented at FCS. turned to Engineering for more information, some ap. .
l proved for evaluaton. some approved for study, and NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM some approved for planning. Once planning is completed INSTRUMENTS and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Mode-A control roorn instrument that cannot perf orm its design fication Requests may be approved for accomplishment function is considered as out of service. A control room with a year assigned for constructon or they may be can-instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order celled, Al'of these different phases require review.
(MWO) wntten for it and has not been repaired by the 3) Design Engineering Backlog /in Progress. Nuclear end of the reporting period is considered out-of-service Planning has assigned a year in which construction will and will be counted. The duration of the out-of service be completed and dessn work may be in progress.
condition le not considered. Computer CRTs are not con. 4) Construction Backlogrin Progress. The Co utruction sidered as control room instruments. Package has been issued or com,truction ha begun but the modificat.on ha: not been accepted by the System NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN Acceptance Lommittee (SAC).
LERS 5) Design Engineenng Update Backlog!!n Progress. PED The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed has received the Modifcation Comoletion Report but the to personnel error on the original LER submittal. This drawings have not been updated.
indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15. The above mentioned outstanding modifications do not include modificatons which are proposed foNancella.
NUMBER OF MISSED SU'tVEILLANCE TE3TS RE. tion.
SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS The number of Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 Licensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting REFUELING OUTAGE) month, This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #60 & The number of projects which affect the scope of the
. 61. Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number of projects l for which detailed schedules have been submrtted. This i
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET indcator tracks performance for SEP #31.
The year to date budget compared to N actual expen-ditures for Operations and Maintenance departments. OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS The nember of overdue Corrective Acton Reports
- This indicator displays the total number of outstanding (CAP.s) and the number of CARS which received exten-Corrective Action Reports (CARS), the number of CARS sions broken down by organization for the last 6 months.
that are older than six months and the number of modifi-cation related CARS. PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAlWTE-NANCE ACTIVillES OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE. The % of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled mainte-OUESTS (EARS)
The total number of open EARS and the number of open nance activities each waek. This % is shown for each EARS broken down by their age in months. This indcator maintenance craft. Maintenance activities include tracks performance for SEP #62. MWRs, MWOs, STs PMOs, cahbrations, and other mis.
cellaneous activities, l hese indcators track Maintens.nce OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS performance for SEP #33.
The number of Modifcation Requests (MRs)in any state between the issuance of a Modificaton Number and the PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA.
completion of the drawing update. TiVE)
- 1) Form FC-1133 Backlog'la Progress. This number Collective radia!.on exposure is tne total external whole-reperesents modification regaasts that have not been plant approved during the reporting month.
- 2) Mod:fication Requests Being Reviewed. This cuegory 62 l
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)
,.- ' body dose received by all on-she personnel (including
' contractors and visitors) during a time period, as me6- RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREOUENCY RATE ,
sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Col- (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) .
I lective radiation exposure is rtported in units of man- The number of injuries requiring more than no, mal first rom. This indicator tracks radiological work performance aid per 200,000 man-hours worked. This indicator trends for SEP #54 personne! performance for SEP #15,25 & 26.
PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average emp'ov- INDEX ment. A turnover is a vacancy crer.ted by voluntary resig- The Cher listry Periormance Index (CPI) is a calculation nation from the company. Reti*ement, death, termination, based on the concentration of key impurhies in the sec-transfers within the company, and part time employees ondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the are not considered in tumover. most likely cause of deterioration of the steam genera-torw The chemistry parameters are reported only for the PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE period of time greater than 30 percent power.
This indicator is defined es the % of pr6ventive mainte-
= nance items in the month thas were not completed by the SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE scheduled date plus a ( ue period equal to 25 % of the INDEX (CONTINUED) scheduled interval. This indcator tracks preventive raain - The CPI is calculated using the following equation: CPI .
tenance activities for SEP #41. ((Kac.8) + (Na/20) + (0,/10)) / 3 where the following are monthly averages of: Ka average blowdown cation PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF HOURS OUT conductivity, Na = average blowdown sodium concen-OF LIMIT _
tration, O, . average condensate pump discharge dis-The % of hours out of limit are for six primary chemist y solved oxygen cuncentration.
parameters divided by the total number of hours possible
' for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, SECURITY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN Chloride Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and The number of Security loggable/ reportable incidents is Suspended Solids. EPRilimits are used. broken down into the folk) wing categories:
- 1) Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs) Incidents re-PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS lated to the use of LDVs, e.g., keys left in the vehicle.
(MAINTENANCE) loss of keys or failure to return keys.
The number of identified incidents cor , arning mainte- 2) Security Badges Incidents associated with improper nance procedural problems, the number of closed irs . use and handling of security badges. Incidents include related to the use of procedures (incic1es the number of securrty badges that are lost, taken out of the protected closed irs caused by procedural noncompliance), and area, out of controlisn stte, or inadvertently destroyed or the number of closed procedural noncompliance irs. broken.
This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP #15 3) Access Control and Authorization - Adtr.inistrative and
& 44. procedural errors associated with the use of tne card-access system such as tailgating, incorrect securrty PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAOE MODIFICATION badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also PLANNING includes incidents that were caused by incorrect access The number of modifications approved for planning (to authorization information entered into the security sys-determine feasibility) for completion during the Cycle 14 tem computer.-
Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for 4) Security Key Control . Incidents involving Suurity key -
SEP #31, control, e.g., lost Security keys, Security keys removed from site, or f ailure to retum Secunty keys, This type of RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRAC'I1CES PROGRAM event does not reflect incidents concerning LDV The number of identified poor radiological woik practices keys.This indicator tracks security performance for SEP
- (PRWP) for the rep rting month. This indicator tracks # 58.
radiological work performance for SEP #52.
SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES PATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE incidents involving alarm system f allures, CCTV f ailures, The ratio of preventive maintenance (including survell- security computer failures, search equipment f ailures, l lance testing and calibration proceduas) to the sum oi door hardware failures, and card reader failures. These l_
non-outago corrective maintenance and preventive main- system failures are further categorized as follows:
tenance compteud over the reporting period. The ratio, 1) Alarm System Failure Detection system events in-i expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man- volving false / nuisance alarms and mechanical failures.
hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance sc- 2) Alarm System Environmental Failures - Degradations
- tivities for SEP #41; to detection system performance as a result of environ-i l 83
M. n . ;;.e -- , 2..+4-ae---, --,;
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) mental conditions (i.e., rain, snow, frost). lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifi-3)CCTV Faiiures Mechanicalfailures to all CCTV hard- catons.
ware components, 3) Scaffolding is not considereo a temporary modificaton.
4)CCTV Environmental Failures Degradations to CCTV Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for which performance as a result of environmental conditons (i.e., EEARs have been submitted will be considered as tem-rain, snow, frost, fog, sunspots. shade), porary modifcations uroil final resolution of the EEAR
- 5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the multi- and the jumper or bioch is removed or is permar.antly plexer, cerf.ral processing unit, and other computer hard- recorded on the drawings.This indcator tracks temporary ware and software. This category does not include sof1- modif cations for SEP #62 & 71.
ware problems caused by operator error in usirg the software. TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS
- 6) Search Equipnient Failuras Failures of x ray, metal, The total number and depa tment breakdown of training or explosive detectors and other equipmen' u*ed to instructon hours administered by the Training Center.
search for contraband. This also incluNs inciderts where the search equipment is found defective or 6d not TOTAL HOU3S OF STUDENT TRAINING function properly during testing. The total number of rtudent hours of training for Opera-
- 7) Door Hardware Failures - Failure of the door alarn, tions, Maintenance, Chemistry / Radiation Protection, and door hardware such as latches, eteetric strikes, Technical Support, Goneral Employee Training, and door r. nobs, locks, etc. Other training conducted for FCS.
- 0) Card Reaoer Failures Incidents caused by mechani-cal breakdown of card readers, but not improper use of TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMil ATIONS the card readers. (See Access Control and Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above Authorization)This indcator tracks secunty performance background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm for SEP #58. squared. This indcator trends personnel performance for l SEP #15 & 54.
SPARE PARTS ISSilED The dollar value of the spare parts issued for FCS during UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS the reporting period. WHILE CRITICAL This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned au-STAFFING LEVEL tomatic scrams (reactor protecton system logic actua-The actual sta'fing level and the authorized staffing level tions) that occur while the reactor is critical. The indcator for the Nuclear Operations Division, the Production Engi- is further defined as follows:
nearing Division, and the Nuclear Services Division. This 1) Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a indcator tracks periormance for SEP #24. planned test or evolution.
- 2) Scram means tha automate shutdown of the reactor STATION NET GENERATION by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by The not generaton (sum) produced by the FCS dunng actuation of the roactor protecton system. The scram the reporting month, signal may have reselted f rom exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious.
STOCKOUT RATE 3) Automate means that the imtial signal that caused ac3 The total number of Pick Tckets that were generated tuation of the recctor protection system logic was pro. %
during the reporting month and the total number of Pck vided from one of the sensors monitoring plant param-Tickets that were generated during the reporting month eters and conditons, rather than the manual scram with no parts available expressed as a percentage switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room.
- 4) Critical means that during the steady state condition of TEMPORARf MODIFICATIONS the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication
'T he number of temporary mechanical and electrical con- f actor (k,) was equal to one.
figurations to the plant's systems.
. 1) Temporary configurations are defined as electrical UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or me- (INPO DEFINITION) c5anical blocks which are installed in the plant operating This indicator is defined as the sum of the foilowing systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the safety system actuations:
P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, cr flow diagrams. 1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling 2Wumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveil- System (ECCS) actuatons that result from reaching an lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Pro. ECCS actuation sotpoint or from a spurous/ inadvertent cedures, Special Procedures, or Oparating Procedures ECCS scorJ.
are not considered as temporary modifications unless the 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power sys-
- umper or biock remains in place after the test or prore- tem actuations that result from a loss of power to a safe-dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or guards bus. An unplanned safety system actuation oc-84
l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) cuts when an actuation setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a spurbus or inadvertent signal is generated (ECCS onty), and major equipment in the system is actuated. Unplanned means that tt e system actustion was not part of a planned test or evoluton. The ECCS actuatons to be counted are actuations of the high pressurs injection systent, the low pressure injection system, or the saf ety injection tanks.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS(NRC DEFINITION)
The number of safety system actuations which include (22) the Hgh Pressure Safety injection System, the low Pressure Safety injecton System, ine Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC clas-sification of safety system actuations includes actuations when major equipment is operated Ed when the logic sys-tems for the above safety systems are challenged.
VIOLAT:ONS PER 1000 INSPECT 10N HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for FCS por 1000 NRC inspection hours. The violations are reported in tha year that the inspecton was 1tctually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste actually shipped dor burial. This indicator also shows the volume of low level radoactive waste which is in temporary storage, the arrount of radioactive oil that has been shipped ofi-site for processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste which has been shipped off.
site for processing. Low-level scud radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sledges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry radioac6vs waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a hw level radioactive waste disposai site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level re-fers to '!! radioactive waste that is not spent f uel or a by product of spent f uel processing. This indicator tracks radio-logier.1 work performance for SEP #54.
e 85
_m_ . _ _ . _ . _ - . - _ . . - ._ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ . . . _ - . _ _ _
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGHAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators index is to list perfor-mance indicators related to SEP ltems with parameters that can be trended, SEP Reference Namber 15 h22 increase HPES and IR Accountability.Thugh Use of Periormance Indicators
( Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) ... .. . ... . ., ... . .. ..... . .. . . . . . . . . . .. ?6 :
Total Skin and Clothing Contaminctions .... ..... . . . ..... . ... . .. .. . ... . ...... .. . . . . . .. . ,. . 43 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . . .. .... . .. . .. .. ..... . . . .. . . . . . . . . ...........62 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs ..................... . ......... .............................63 :
CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs N AC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . . ... . 78 -
SEP Reference Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported ... . ...... 78 GEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional Inspections CARS issued vs Significant Cans issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . .. . .. 78 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 SEP Refergnce Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors Implemented Disabling injury Frequency Rate , .. . .. .. ......... ... . .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... 1 1 4
Recordable injury Casec Frequc ncy Rate . ... ., .... .. ... .. . ..... . . .. .. . ....... .. ... .... ........ ......... 62 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury FreqJency Rate . ... ....... . .. .... . ... .. . ... .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 1 1 Reconfable injury Cases Frequency Rate ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . 62 SEP Referecte Number 31
, Develog Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Overall Status (Cycle 13 Ref ueling Outage) . ... ..... ............. .... ....... ........... . ...... .. ... .,70 PropMt of Cycle 13 Outage Modification Planning ... ... ... . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
, OveraH PMjeA Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage) . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 72 SEP Defcynce Number 33 -
Demop On-Line Maintenanca and Modification Schedule Pettent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (ElecMcal M ainton ance) .... ..... .. .. ...., ... ... ... ... . .. . ......... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........28 (Preasure Equipment) . . . ............. . ... .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . 29 l ~( Ger.eral Maintenance).., .. ..... . . . .. .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . 3 0 l L ~ (M ecianical M alntena nce) .. ..... ..... ............ .. .. . .. .. .. ... .. .... ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 )
(Instrumentation & Control) ........... .... .. . ........ . ........ ....... . . .. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 3 2
[ SEP Reference Number 36 4' Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog e Maintenance Werk Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance) . .. . . . . 27
. Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance) .. . .-.. . .. . . 20
[ SEP Reference Number 41-
+ Davebp and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule L : Ratio of Preventive to Total. Maintenance .. . . . . .. .. ,. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. 22 .
3-86 1
h-
~. _ _ . . . - - . . . .. . , ., ..--,w
[
Preventive Maintenance items Cverdue .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . 23 Procedural Noncompliance incidents . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..26 S,EP Reference Numbar 43 Implemer".the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Faliure Rate.. .. . . . . . . . . . 36 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Provedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . ..26 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review . . . . . .16 SEP ReDrgnce Number 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices RadiologicalWo* Practices Program. .. . .45 SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) . . . ..9 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . .10 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . .43 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Assa. . . . .. . 44 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Piogram Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) . ... .. . . . . . . . . , . . .. .. .49 Security Incident Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. 4.50 3ecurity System Failures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ..51 SEP Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. ..33 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Corrcctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. ..33 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish Interim System Engineers Temporarv t'odificatiorw . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... ..58 Outstanding dngineering Assistance Requests (EARS) .. ..59 Engineering Change Notice Status . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown . . . .. . ... . .. . . 61 SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requalification Training . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 65 Licents Candidate Exams. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. ..66 SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Mcdifications Temporary Modifications. . . .. ..58 l, .
l 87
1 REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST J. C. Adams R 3. Henning B. A. Schmidt 1 R. L. Andrews K. R. Henry S. T. Schm}tz l G. L. Anglehart J. B. Herman F. C. Scofield W, R. Bateman G. J. Hill L. G. Sealock K. L. Belek K. C. Hotthaus H. J. Sefhk A. D. Bilau M. A. Howman D. K. Sentel B. H. Biome L. G. Huliska J. W. Shannon C. N. Bloyd C. J. Husk R. W. Short J.P.Bobba R. L. Jaworski C. F. Simmons C. E. Boughter R. A.Johansen E.L.Skaggs M. A. Breuer W. C. Jones J. L. Skilos C. J. Brunnert J.D.Kecy F. K. Smith M. W. Butt J. D. Keppler R. L. Sorenson C. A. Carlson D. D. Kloock K. E. Steele J. W. Chase J. C. Knight W. Steele G. R. Chatfield D. M. Kobunski H. F. Sterba A. G. Christensen G. J. Krause G. A. Teeple A. J. Clark L. J. Kripal M. A. Tesar O. J. Clayton J. G. Krist T. G Therkildsen R. P. Clemens J. B. Kuhr J. W, Tills
- J. L. Connolley L. T. Kusek D. R. Trausch G. d. Cook L.E. Labs P. R. Tumer M. R. Core M, P. Lazar J. M. Uhiand
- S. R. Grites R. C. Learch C. f . Vanecek D. W. Dale S.E. Lee J. M. Waszak R.C DeMeulmeester R. E. Lewis W. O. Weber R. D. DeYoung R. C. Liebentritt G. R. Williams D. C. Dietz C. J. Linden S. J. Wilfrett J. A. Drahota B. R. Livingston W. C. Woemer T. R. Dukarski J. H. MacKinnon P. D. Dunham G. D. Mamoran R. G. Eurich J. W. Marcil H. J. Fauthaber N. L. Marfice M. A. Ferdig D. J. Matthews V. H. Frahm J, M. Mattice F. F. Franco T. J. *civor M. T. Frans K. S. McCormick H. K, Fraser R. F. Mohaffey
, J. F. W. Friedrichsen K. J. Merris I- S. K. Garnbhlr D. C. Mueller l J. K. Gasper R. J. Mueller l- W. G. Gates W. L. Neal M. O. Gautier J. B. Newhouse S. W. Gebers M. W. Nichols l J. M. Glantz C. W. Norris l J. T. Gleason - J. T. O'Connor L. V. Goldberg W. W. Orr D. J. Golden L. L. Parent D. C. Gorence T. L. Patterson R. E. Gray R. L. Phelps M J.Guinn T. M. Reisdortf
!L R. Gundal A. W. Richard R. H. Guy D. G. Ried R. M. Hawkins G. K. Samide
. M. C. Hendrickson T.J.Sandene 88
ADVERSE TREND REPORT pockout Rate A Pe'iormance Indicator which has data representing (Page 54) three (3) consecutive months of declining performance The percentage of pick tickets generated with no parts constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report available has been above the Fort Calhoun goal of 0%
explains the conditions under which certain indicetors are since May 1991.
showing adverse trends. An explanation will be provided
, for indicators with data representing three months of de, Excedited Purchases clining performance that have been labeled as adverse (Page 55) trends The value of 0.6% for the reporting month is above the Fort Calhoun goal of 0.5%
Disablino iniurv/111 ness Frooy.gnev Rate (Page 11) Temocrary Modifications and (Page 58) 1he age of temporary modifications for the reporting Recordable Iniurv/1finess Cases Freauencylglg month sxceeds the Fc t Calhoun Goals.
(Page 62)
These indicators haw boon defined by the Manager of the End of Management Attention Report.
Safety Department as exhibiting adverse trends baseJ on the 5 year frequency raies.
End of Adverse Trend Report. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT niese, cenerator unava!!abintv IPage 181 This section ksts the indicators which show inadequacies This indicator has t een added to 'ho report.
as compared to the OPPD goa; and indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the industry uppor Temocrary Mod fientions quartile. The indicators will be compared to the industry . (Page 58) upper quartile as relsvant to that indcator. Thb indicator has been revised to show manager.1ent/. g control of temporary modifcations (TMs) and set perfor.
Gross Hesi nate mance measurements based on the TM age and plant IPage 6)- condition required for their remova!.
The gross heat rate has been above the Fort Calhoun year and goal since March 1991. SRO and RO License Examination Pass Ratio (Page 65)
Reio of Preventive to Tota! Maintenance (Non-Outaca) This indicator has been revind and renamed
- Licensed IPage 22} Oporator Requalification Training' to better reflect train-The value c , % for tae reporting month is below the ing department procedures, Fort Calhoun gs .I60 %
Number of Out of Service Contro! Room Instrurngati (Page 24)
- The total number of out of service control room instru- End of Indicator improvement / Changes Repc
- ments for the reporting month (25)is 9bove the Fort Calhoun goal cf 15.
Secondary Setem Chemistry (Page 37)
The Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index for the reporting month (0.618)is above the Fort Calhoun goalof 0.45.
Number of Het Scots IPage 46}
The number of Hot Spots for the reporting month (65) exceeds the Fort Calhoun goal of 40.
89
FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production IMWH1 Cumulative (MWH)
Cycle 1 - 09/26/73 - 02/01DS 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/01R5 05/0995
- Cycle 2 05/0995 - 10/01D6 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01D6 - 12/13D6 *
- Cycle 3 12/13/76 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30/77-12/0907 *
- Cycle 4 12/0997 10/1408 3,026,832 12,985,720 <
4th Refueling 10/1408 12/2408 *
- I l
' Cycle 5 12/24D8 01/13/B0 3,882,734 16,868,454 1 5th Refueling 01/18/80 06/11/80 '
- Cycle 6 OG/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 i 6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 *
- 1 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 i 7th Refucting 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 *
- l Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refuelino 03/03/84 07/12/84 *
- Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 *
- Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 *
- Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 *
- Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90 - 05/29/90 '
- Cycle 13# 05/29/90'- 02/01/92 # Planned Dates
- 13th Refueling # 02/01/92 05/01/92- *
- Cycle 14# 05/01/92- 09/18/93 *
- 14th Refuelino 09/10/93 11/13/93' '
- Cycle 15# 11/13/93 03/11/95 * *
- 15th Refueling # 03/11/95 - 05/06/95 *
- FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS
- First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)
Fi'st Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 I
Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) . September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468.800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,93fi,859 MWH)(Cycle 11) June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988 l
u
.__ __ _ , _ __ - _ _ _ _ _ . -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -