ML20079L522

Performance Indicators,Sept 1991

ML20079L522
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	09/30/1991
From:	Oconnor J OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20079L518	List: ML20079L515 ML20079L522
References
NUDOCS 9111060363
Download: ML20079L522 (98)

Text

- - - . - . . .

-3 . .

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS SEPTEMBER 1991 y --

9 gt...kh[] o" g . %

P Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Tost and Performance Group

l4" W e 7,u h n enn

0%sud of wwRuuz w arv abb,...

d tawok wisde,av wnd sowndjudganwnl...

d w a, bj%w, cwawv-lo,ng, corrnanilannal...

il w a, way, of !fn,...d w doiing, Unjol aghtCalust%,weu,,%.c9Lw taunev-diiudul, ul Un wu!L of wdeuna!,

piauws, il w owv own sy wedk wk we, aiw wnd uw piada, asal Q!adian, Gud coira jiuvin, kng, Uw ,ag11kiindof pevsoin,, uljud tin, dating, Uwag!d Cainy.

Jaara).6%wo l

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group SEPTEMBER 1991

ABSTRACT PURPOSE

' The

• Performance Indicators Program"is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant pertor-mance informaticn to OPPD's personnel responsiole for optimizing unit performance. The information

- is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress j toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and rnonitoring Fort 1 Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on saf ety and reliability. Some perf ormance indicators show company goals or industry information. This intermation can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation. l SCOPE 7

The conditions, goals, and projections reflected: Shin this report are current as of the end of the l month being reported, unless otherwise stated, in order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following gudelines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each performance parameter to ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the System Engineering Department's Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Statien's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES i

! INPO Good Practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Black-out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D. "EDG Reliabihty Program", dated l April 6,1990.

l

Table of Contents INDUSTRY KEY PARWEIEBS CAGE rour tin .ctn; m MPf'E R 'N 2 ItrE t.D?Litj LM1 f.4NJ1H FORCCD OUTAGE RATE . -. 0 25% . 24% 13 9% . 10 2% 2

)

Ui4 PLANNED AUTOMAT 10 F.EACTOR SCRAMS WHil E CRITICAL 0 .0 0. .0 3 UNPL ANNED SAFETY SYSlE8A ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION) .O. 0 0 0. 4 E

GROSS HEAT RATE. 9.9 % 10;60, 10.300 .10 468. 0 ECUIVALF.NT AVAILABILITY FACTOR 825% . t 'n. 3B% . es .% 7

~

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR _ 0 04 14 .3 91. 3 07. 8 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) .166 75 42 7.. 37 6. 9 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE.. 3.072 4 000 .772 6 . c46 4 10 DISABlifvG INJUkY/lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE . . 0 .. .. o 31. 0 49 . 0 57 11 CefilAIjQtiS i

STATION NET GENF. RATION . . .. .1

, FORCED OUTAi TE. . . . .. . . .2 UNPLANNED AU1 i,0 REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRillCAL.. .3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTE,,1 ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION). .4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTE64 ACTUATIONS -(NRC DEFINITION; . .5 CROSS HEAT RA1E . . . .6 OQUlVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR., . .7 FUEL RELIABillTY INDICATOR . .0 DAILY THERMAL FfTPI.lT . . . . . .12 EQUIPMENT FORCF.D OUTAGES PER 1000 CRiflCAL HOURS . .13 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET.. . . 14 DOCUMENT REVIEW. . . . . .15 MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY DIESEL GENEP ATOR UNIT RELIABILITY . .16 DIESEL GENERATOR REllABillTY (25 DEMANDS) . . . 17 DIESEL GtNERATOR UNAVAILABILITY , .. . .18 AGE OF CbTST ANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE). .19 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE) . 20 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKt OG GF.EA's JR THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (h0N OUTAGE).. 21 i

e MAINTENANCE (contd) f? AGE R ATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUT AGE) . . . 22 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE lTEMS OVERDUE . . .. . 23  :

NUMCER OF OUY OF. SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS .24 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME . . . . . 25 I

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDEN f S (MAINTENANCE) . . . . . 26 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE).. . 27 j PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVlilES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) . . 28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE COUIPMENT).. 29 PE6 CENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVlTIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE) .. , 30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVIT8ES (MECHANCAL MAINTENANCE) .. . 31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTT1UME. TATION & CONTROL) . . 32 I

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN tlCENSEE EVENT REPOHTS ... .. . . 33 NUMBER CF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRD% REPORTABLE FAILURES.. . 34 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . 35 3 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 36 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) . . . . . . . . . . . , . . .9 VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .10

! SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY. . ... . .. ... . .. ......... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .37 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT .. . . . .. . .. . . .. 38 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOUPS OUTSIDE STAT ON LIMITS. . . - . .. . . . . . . . 30 IN LINE CHEMISTHY INSTRUMENTS OUT.0F. SERVICE ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED .. .. . ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADLATION EXPOSURE., .. .. .. . . .. ..... . .. . . .. . . 42 i

TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATONS .... . ........ . .. .. , . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . 43 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA . . . - . . . . . . . , . . . .. . ... . . . . . 44 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM., . . . . ,, . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . 45 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS .. ...... .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...e . . . , , . , 46 GASEOUS RADOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT., , , . ... .. 47 LOUlO RADCACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT. , , , . . . 48 j

SECURITY l

l' LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) .. . . .. .. . . . .49 SECURITY INCIDEN T BREAKDOWN .-.. . . . . . . ,, . . . . 50 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES . . .. . . . . . . . . , . 51 l ii l

1 l

e MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES

[%QL AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON. OUTAGE) . .. . . . .. . 52 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE . . . . . . $3 SPARE PARTS ISSUED . , .

. 63 INVENTOHY ACCURACY... . . . .. , .. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . 64  !

STOCKOUT RATE .. . . .. . .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . 54 EXPEDITED PURCHASES ., .. . . . . . . . . , . . .. . . 05 INVOICE BREAKDOWN.... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 56 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING . .... .... . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . 56 DESIGN ENG!NEERING OUTSTANDING MODIFICAT' ; S . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . 57 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) . . . . . . .. . . .. ..  :. 58 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (E ARs) . . . . . . .... . . . . .. .. . 59 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS . .... . . . . . . . . . . ..._ . . . .. . . 60 ENGINLERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN . .. . . .. .. . . . 61 INDUSTRIAL S AFETY DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE . . .. , , ,, . . . . . . 02 HUMAN RESOURCES NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS FsEPORTED IN LERs .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . , . 63 S TAFFING LEVE L ... .. .. ... ... . .~.. .. .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. L 4 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE . .. ... . ... . . . .. .... .. . . . . ... ........ ,.. . . . . . . . . . . 64 TRAINING AND OUALIFIC ATION LICENSED OPERATOR REOUALIFICATION TRAIN'NG. . .. . .. . . . , , . . . .. . . . ., . 65 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . , . . . . . 00 HOTLIN E TRAINING ME MC S ......... .... . . ..... . .. .. ... .. .. .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 67 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS.... . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . .68 TOT A'. HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING . -. ...... . .. . .. . .... . . .. . .. ..~.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. 09 REFUELING OUTAGE -

MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE).-... .._, . .. . ,, . . 70 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNINC .. . . . 71 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE) . . . . . 72 iii

QUALITY ASSURANCE E6QL VOLATIONS PER 1000 lNSPECTioll HOURS . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . 73 COMPARISON OF VIOLATibtvS AMONG REGON IV PLANTS . . . . . . . 74 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NOVs (nVELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL). . . 75 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTON REPORTS . . . . . . . . 7ti OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS . . . . . . . 77 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF. CARS vs NRC VOLATIONS ISSUED vs. Lens REPORTED . . . . . . . 78 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . 79 a

SAFETY ENH ANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX . . . . . 60 REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST. . . , ,. . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . 88

SUMMARY

SECTION ADVE RS E TRE N D REPORT ... ...... . ..... ..... .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . . . - . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. 89 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTON REPORT .. . . ...... .. ... . . . . . . . ... 89 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES . .. . . . . . . . . .. . ... . .. .. 89 9

IV

Net Generation (10,000 Mw hours) 50-40-34 6i 31.27  ; 31 10 g

30- pg o3 , 77 ,

2c 94 L'5 68 24.76 pg g3 M.,

o .. ,. m e 11 93 <

o + v a.a ,

y~ ,

o. gn _  ;; tv o .. a, , x ~. .

I IOM *N ^4 7:(1h . ly y y a , w - .

3 K- "

ly 5 gg e. . (.

a+ gg;

• , n i 6(i 4 y77 r.  ;.t8 in' \@(

1J. ha 10- 6- '

v& '

Od .

gL ". .

i rfp ua r,*% rp , .

g' ,.

>J l"; ,f{'n. @ tl ,">

N,; . ,

+

i ,

3 +v m- ;a.

1< 9 --] +p J 3+ j; , ,

ca - -

i s.m .

g(

- g. .

t

? gi" w f.

p?

s%

,.y 4v 9 ,s, ~

c y ..

s

-s.

<c.

n a: n. -  :

r.. . y , .

0- i i i i i , i i i , i i Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.

During the month of September 1991, a net total of 132,851 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. This low not generation is due to a forced outage which oc-curred when the station batteries were declared inoperable. This outage began on 9/

12/91 at 2100 hours0.0243 days <br />0.583 hours <br />0.00347 weeks <br />7.9905e-4 months <br /> and continued for the remainder of the month.

Data Source: Station Generation Report Adverse Trond: None 1

Forced Outage Rate

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4%)

15%-

-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)

GOOD 12%-

9.7 v y h 9%-

3 y%

6 P4 6%-

1 I 3%-

3, J ; O O O O O O O O O O O O TFi i 0 jrg ,1 U I U M " U C U U

, , 0% 'h '

'88 '09 90 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced cutage rate was reported as 13.9% for the last twelve months.

A forced outage occurred during the month of September 1991 when the station batter-les were declared inoperable. The generator was taken off lino at 2100 hours0.0243 days <br />0.583 hours <br />0.00347 weeks <br />7.9905e-4 months <br /> on 9/12/

91 and femained off line for the rest of the month.

A forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991 to replace failed potential transformers (pts). These pts convert 345 KV to 1?0V for use in the breaker synchro-nization circuit.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & NERC GAD Forms Adverse Trend: None 2

- - . . -= .. . . -

+ Fort Calhoun Goal

-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentilo O FCS Reactor Scrams 1 2~

1- C C r, , , ,o u ,m ,m ,m i 9,m i m , m , m , m , m , m i

'87 '88'89 '90 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in September 1991. The Icst unplanned automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.

l The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at Zero.

l The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams por unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the uppet ten percentile of nuclear power plants in this area.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (1.ERs)

Advers1 Trend: None l

, . , . . - . _ - - _ _ . . _ .m., _,,

3-E Safety System Actuations

--C+- Fort Calhoun Goal

-B- Industry Upper 10 Percontito g

2- GOOD v

1 1 ..

i i i i 0 C i O,O,O,O i O ,-979 i 3,O,O,G3

'88'89'90 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar /spr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(IMPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of September 1991.

The 1991 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations por year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Ucensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None 4

- 12 Month Running Total SSA

- 1000

-O- CntcalHours O Safety System Actuations (SSA) -900 8- -

-800 t --

700 "g

g 6- , .

@ -600 g3 5

"~ y( j, y i i 5001  !

g a

{F14-

u. 2 400 3  !

d { -300

$ @ g  ;

i & ,

r B 2- - -

-200  :

V l ):

E & - -

100 i 0 '

j

, i i i 0- .L . -

0

'88 '89 '90 ONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJAS 1989 1990 1991 ,

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFINITION) ,

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Gerierators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged, The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG 2, The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG 2 started a second tirne when a breaker trip occurred during DG 1 breaker synenronization. DG 2 was not required to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations, The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities

- and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Pro-p gram. The goal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun. -

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) l Adversa Trend: None 5

y -n-, , , .~-g < ,.a <.-,-~an, ,, a-,,.n,,,,,.,.,,,r ,,,-,w ,ma,--.m ,,,e-- m .r- , - , . , , .+-,,.---,e.nuwn,,,--a,n.-- .-..,.,n - -.---.r-,..m

D Month!v Gross Heat Rate

--k- Year to Dato Gross Heat Rate 13- 4 , ort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goal

--D- Industry Upper 10 Percentile ,

5 12- -

GOOD 11-10270 ~10520

~

10304 g '

> s

$ .?  % TI k n

m n

m o 10- _ j -

k 6 d k -O O O g(i M $ s 3 f _

w '

'I 9-k k~ ,d N h

~

i i a i i a i i i i i T~ i i i i

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 GROSS HEAT RATE  ;

This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previous 1991 months, the year to date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 years.

The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,360 BTU /KWH during the month of September. l The year to date gross heat rate was repoited as 10,391 BTU /KWH.

• The above year end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH)is the thcoletical best gross heat rate that can be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station during 1991, The gross heat rato industry. upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

~ Adverse Trends: None 1 6

.. .. - , . -.,.,,,-.--...___.-....-_-.--.._..-_.-,-....~..-.;...,.._.,__-.

-. _ ~_. _ _ . . --

O Mo"*.hly E AF Year to Date EAF

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal

--G- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100% - -

w 00%- F /D -

D O -

D -

D-U -C O O 77 f cs O O -

O -

O -

O -

O -

O -

O --O O O O 60.6 00% -

A 40%- _

GOOD 20%-

1 i i iO%- , , , , , , , , , , , ,

'88 '89 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec01 EOulVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year to-date EAF for 1991, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF was reported as 38% for the month of September 1991. This figure is low due to the forced outage which occurred when the station batteries were declared inoper-able on 9/12/91, The EAF was not affected by the 70% power reduction during Febru-ary, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).

The year to-date EAF was reported as 84.3%.

The EAF For1 Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.

The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%.

Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 7

1 6-E - FuelReliabilityIndicator E

E 4-8 GOOD 2.4 2 g ,

\ V

"~

m 1.5 1.5 M l M 2

q 4;

J; E

y r i i , 0

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR T he Fuct Reliability indicator (FRI) was reported as 3.91 i,anocuries/ gram for the month of September 1991. This normalincrease is due to reactor power maneuvering.

This INPO indicetor uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate with a density correc-tion factor. The FRl value using the plant's actualletdown purification rate was reported as 4.61 nanocuries! gram.

The September FRl was calculated using the data from September 1 through 11. The remain-der of the month the plant was in either a cooldown or shutdown mode.

The last detected fuel f ailure was during Cycle 10. The FRI values observed during Cycle 10 were in the 20 to 80 nanocuries/ gram range (without the density correction f actor which would make the FRI values larger). There have been no observable lodine spikes which would be indicative of fuel failure dJring Cycle 13 operation. The CHIRON program from EPRI has been used to assess the potential of failed fuelin Cycle 13.

The CHIRON code was run with August and September coolant chemistry data. Failure predic-tions were made from the available lodine isotopes activities. The output f ailuto summary predicted, on average,1.19 failed rods with a one sigma statistical uncertainty of 0.89. The result is no confirmed failed fuel.

The 1991 fuel reliability goal,lndustry upper ten percentile and industry median values are not shown on this graph. They are no longer consistent with the FRI evaluation due to the recalculations necessitated by INPO to incorporate a density correction factor in the letdown purification expression. INPO will provide this information as soon as the revised figures are available. OPPD's goal for the FRl will be revised at that time.

Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani Adverse Trend: Based on the increasing value for the months of July, August and September 1991, the FRIis exhibiting an adverse trend.

8

-- - _. - - - - - . - - _- - =-_. . - _ .

Personnel Cumulativo Radiation Exposure (Man Rom) 400 -

-O- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (75 Man Rem)

-o- Industry Upper 10 Percontito (166 Man Rom) 300 -

272 276

= ww GOOD uz:- icew xen 'a n:

$$ 7M y E!! p 2*-

we; gg j o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o zem

's'gg; gyjg .

$"[. 93.4 f 100-

z : ,

fg (<l J :l C C C C C C C C C C- C C h$$ x i: Y 4:

i i I i

n i i I

'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

During September 1991,5.098 man rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to date exposure is 42.744 man, rem.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radia*.!on exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75 man rom.

The personnel rtdiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man rem per unit per year, Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 9

.- l

.t i

E Cumulattvo Radioactive Olt Gent For Procosting (in gations)

O Cumulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing (in cubic feet)

]

12000- _

8000- - - -

' ~

m, ,

fi ,

D , R , E ,E ,F , , , , ,

i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 ,

==== Cumutavve Radioactive Waste Duried

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal For Was:e Buried (4500) l

-Q~ Industry Upper 10 Percentile Waste Duried (3072) 7500-

'g M -6000- Q Radioactivo Waste Duried This Mr' nth (in cubic feet)  !

'310 4500- C I

O O O O O O O - . - O 3000- O D--O O D-- -C O O O---C) O C f .,~

15oor o

j 89 '90 Jan31 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul - Aug- Sep Oct Nov Dec01 Yeat end Total VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly, the cumulative annual .

total, and the year end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.  ;

-The rnonthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the months of August and September 1991 have been revised.- These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of t radioactive waste.

Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off site for processing (gallons) 4,330,0  :

Cumulative amount of solid iadwaste shipped off site 1or processing (cubic feet) 10,338.0 l

= Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month of August (cubic feet) 120.2 i Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month of September (cubic feet)' 187.8 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic fest) . 900.4 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary stoioge (aJbic feet) 0.0 The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried  :

ls 4,500 cubic feet.

The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit por year. The Fort Calhoun Station Was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987, and 1988. 4

- Data SourceiPatterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) SEP 54 l -Adverse Trend;fNone L 10 e .

,= yrgm,www-q*-.e -td r'd e tW1t9,2f 64T'*t-'*@*Mhsp. g,gg g y .gy--g-ymy sn ym yi a

l l

O 1991 Disabbng injury / Illness Frequency Hate '

-X- 1990 Disabbng injury / illness Frequency Rato L Year Average Disabkng injury /lliness Frequency Rato 14'

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal L2-

-+- Industry Upper 10 Percentile GOOD 1- V 08-0.0 - 0.5c 0.57

- -6, "T o.4g .

O4-y%'JI D o 39 M~ b kEM; pd E fM M i i 0X' o o  % g gg 3-

, , g')

-- ^

.r o o 12-3 % g r9 n, 0 0 0 o- h , d , A , '#7 4F 7 M 7 &J r ' ":7 L r---+- ,

, 3 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT R ATE)

This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury / illness rate in eclumn form.

The 1990 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average of the corre-sponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate are also shown.

There were no (zero) lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in Sep-tomber. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1991 is two.

The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0.

Year Year End Rate 1988 1.6 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 25 & 26 11

-n r-, e y - www

f C Therrnal Output

--O- Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goal

- Tech Spoc 1500 MW Umit 1500-g '

1230- ' ,'

.Y.

! 900-

, ,.[^ f 76 4 >

jp, '

gn - '

n;-

g{ 000- ., o .r

,-. o ,

," , ,i H

>. > }, . .

99 >

300- -- >,

, : ..n ,

kNr '

f; . ,

7 g.!, ID , .I l -

.. ,)...

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 27 20 '.'4 30 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during Sep-tember 1991, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.

Thermal output was reduced to zero in mid September due to a forced outage which occurred when the station batteries were declared inoperable.

Full power operation is anticipated thru January 31,1992 to obtain the burnup window for Cycle 14 design parameters.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 12 i

I

2-Equipment Forced Outage Rato 18-1.0 -

1 4 -.

1.2 _ GOOD 1 --

0.8 -

0.53 0e-T ffff 0.4-m OQ Y$ff 0.2 -

0 DW '?k?

i i 4 . 0

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS The equipment forced outage rate for the reporting month is 0.50. One equipmont forced outage occurred dunng the month of September 1991 when the station batteries were declared inoperable.

One ocpipment forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991. The outagc was required to replace failed potential transformers (pts). These pts coiivert 345 KV to 120 V for use in the breaker synchronization circuit.

One equipment forced outage occurred in the month of January 1991 due to the De-cember CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None 3

Operations 1991 Budget ($ Milkon)

--+- 1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 80-Q 1901 Revised BuJoel 60- , y e

40- _s

';A 20- ,,/

/ 3

g9 g,

in Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

~

Maintenance 1991 Budget ($ Million) 20- --+- 1991 Cumulative Total ($ Milkon) 15~

D 1991 Rev sed Budget r

10- jl:]:

gg 5- _

gf

^

~

w 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPEFtATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the For1 Calhoun Station.

The December Bar Graph represents the revised year end budget due to budget revi-sions primarily reflecting the refueling postponement for Cycle 13. The revised year-end budget for Operations was 59.2 million dollars. The revised year end budget for Maintenance was 12.7 million dollars.

The budget year to-date for Operations was 49.4 million dollars for September while the actual cumulative expenditures through September totaled 40.1 million dollars, t

The budget year to-date ior Maintenance was 13.6 million dollars for September while the actual cumulative expenditures through September totaled 5.5 million dollars. >

Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 14

_____o

. l 1500 -

--+-- Documents Schodulod for Roview l I

Docurnonts Reviewed 1200-

-V- Overdue Documents 000 -

Goo-300 -<

- Te .N_ m

• 'A ' ~L'A" o- =

~5 i h Oct90 Nov Doo Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop 91 DOCUME' .T REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month, These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During September there were 58 document reviews cornpleted whlle 60 document-reviews were scheduled. At the end of September, there was one (1) document review overdue.

During the month of September there were 51 new or renarned documents reviewed.

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.

i Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 15

O Number of Falluros'20 Domands -le- Trigger Valuos for 20 Domands O Number of FailuroW50 Domands -V- Triggor Valoos for So Demands O Number of Fallutoutoo Dornands - - Triogor VaLos for 100 Domands e- - -- -

GOOD o- V V V----Y  ? Y 27 - 4~~ -v v v V -y b 4- b b b

= -

-= '

2- at It s  ; I a a a as sa p at 3 u t i

! o o o o o o o b o: ,

, y- , , , , , , , , i Oct90 Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop 91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GEt4ERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly inGcators portaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of cont dence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including ali stan-cnly demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load run that is a result of a realload signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test cpecifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini-mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).

The demand f ailure which occurred during the monto of August for DG 2 was due to a seal failure on the jacket water pump.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 16

l O DG 1 Failures /25 Domands '

D DG 2 Failures /25 Demands 5- O Failuro Trigger Value for 25 Demands / Fort Calhoun Goal 4- C O O O O O O O O O C O 3-l l

2 2 2 2- - ,

s 1- 1 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 -

o 1 0

i i i I 4 i i i 4 , 1 I Nov90 Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun sul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 loud run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991, it must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will

, take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

Diesel Generator DG 1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on

! the unit.

i Diesel Generator DG 2 has experienced two failures during the last 25 demands on the unit. An air damper roll pin failure occurred in July 1991, and a seal failed on a jacket

- water pump in August 1991 Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None l

17

E Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailability Q Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No 1 Unavailabihty C Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavallab6hty O Planned Hours el Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability 120-N100- _

~~~ [

m:

9 00 (.o _- E 15 40-(~q h ,,,,

yg C _

tg 2 _

m i ~I I I I I 3 I i i i i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 5 Cumulative Hours of DG 1 unavailabihty from 7/1/9110 6'J1/91 C Cumulative Hours of DG 2 unavailatality from 7/1/9110 8/3U91 O Cumulative Hours of DG 1 unavailabikty ifom 9'1/01 to 9'30/91 C Cumulative Hours of DG 2 unavailabihty from 9/1/91 to 9'30/91

-O- For1 Ca!rcun Goal (43.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of uriavailabikty por d<osel generator) b~

t.e 6 g LO-g40 g O- --O - - - O- -O

'B 20-0 0 0 0 0 i , , , i i Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability for 1991.

The top graph shows the diesel generator planned and unplanned unavailable hours for DG 1 and DG 2 for each month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of un-availability for each diesel generator from July through August and during September 1991.

The Fort Calhoun goal of 43.8 unavaliable hours per DG for the last four months of 1991 is based on the 1990 INPO Industry median value for diesel generator unavailable hours.

There were no (0) hours of diesel generator unavailability during the month of Septem-ber. The 31,4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of unplanned DG 2 unavailability in August were the result of two separate events. On August 7, during surveillance testing, DG 2 failed to crank on the first attempt. On August 26 - 27 DG 2 was inoperable due to the failure of a jacket water pump seal.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 18 l

400-O July 1991 Outstanding MWOs O August 1991 Outstanding MWOs >

y September 1991 Outstanding MW0s 300-

=

E, je

/

2 100- gyg n

'h'h r1;i %m ~

x.<

..J . :. EMI , ,

esi 0 s i e i 1 0 3 Months 3 6 Months 6 9 Months 912 Months >12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON.

OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: None 19

400-350-E July 1991 O August 1991 O September 1991 300-

~

250 - ' , ' , ' ,, .

'll.

200-  ;'y n.

,6', 3

', '/ ,

150- ,// .',

s ', '.

' ,',/ n, J

100- f f? ;3

+ ..

50- ' ' #" N~

/..5 ',? .

, ,-:,, 9 .;' , ' , -

5 0- 1 i T 4 i Total Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Saf ety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > MWOs 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of correctivo nc. Sutage MWOs remaining open at the and of the report;ng month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 20 1

l i

Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 80%-

--G- industry Upper Quartile 70%-

GOOD 60%-

SW-

[.

O 3- O O O O O O O O O O 40%-

30%- _

20 %

Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE)

This indicater shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.

The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of Septernber was reported as 26.8%

The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear pc . 'r plants in this area.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 21

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 90Y. -

--C}- Industry Upper Quanilo (57.7%)

A 80%, -

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (60%)

GOOD 70%-

^

ar 8 8 8 8 8 8 50%-

40% -

30%-

20%

Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the ratio 01 completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non outage maintenance, The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 52,8% in September.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60% The low values for the months of January through April 1991 are due to the low ni:inber of PM activities scheduled to be completed during these months, The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7%.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manageribource)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 22 1

22

4%- - Preventive Maintenance items Overdue

-O- Industry Upper Quartile

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-

GOOD 2% - i V l c o-c = c c o a c -o o--a -

1%-

l 0% -

Oct90- Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE  ;

The purpose of this indicator is to mor.aor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance .

items overdue hdicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro- ~

- grams require. i During September 1991,1401 PM items were completed. All PMs were completed within the allowable grace period. ,

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items over ,

'due. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%

,_ The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this

- indicator.  :

Data Source: Patterson/ Linden (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 f

23

.-g-ey---ier..w,-r-e v.-t+a+ e * = - w w+m = ev'tw ee + ev e-er *wm ew=se~e--*e*w=e+--- v- -=-*--*tw +~=m s- em++r-%-" w e= c- w w***eww*me=-----*-* =+-'-**-r-+=> -===*--="-w-r

O Number of C. R. Instruments Repairable On Lino 50 - O Totai controi noom instruments Out of. Service

-D- Industry Upper Ouartile For Total Out-of Servico Instruments 40- -O- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out of Service instruments 30- _

5 20- ;w w W m.

w

=bW M9 w

p,m '

g,i ff <<g .Mt p -

Q .-

Q -

.K'Q Q

- - g _

Q Q g c

/ 2 F2 W E = F W ss 10- m  ?; a m R #2 E m -

D--- d -

o 6 -

Q -

0: -

O -

O! -

O! -

O -

6- O E M n W n d21 6 M DI o

N k M M $N!I , .Nf E*[ E k[I i i i i , i i i i i i Oct90 Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 NUMREP. OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the nui.iber of out of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 35 out-of service controlioom instruments at the end of Septem-bor. A plant outage is required to repair 9 of these 35 control room instruments.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 15 out of service control room instruments.

The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of service control room instru-ments is 7.

Data Source: Patterson/Adcms (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 24

i 80%- -

Maintenance Overtime 70%- X 12 Month Average GOOD

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal for Non-Outage Months V

) % -

40%-

30%-

C O O O O O -- 0 0-~ O O--C O 20%-

X X 3' -X-10% ~ , a

_4c ,, ,,

x _

0% -

Oct90 Nov De:: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 MAINTENANCE OVER flME The Ma!ntenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desirr.d mairite-nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect w normal hours was .eported as 5% during the month of September 1991. The 12 month averaga pe centage of overtimo hours with P ;pect to normal hours was reported as B%.

The Fort Laihoun goal for the percentage of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25% for non outage months and 50% for outage mo,$hs.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 25

)

15-O Open irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

[] Close. irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O Procedura: Noncomp;iance irs (Maintenance) 10-5-

3 3 3 3

. 2 2 '

22 , 2 111 1 f 1

0 0 0 0 '

'r 0 0 000 000 000 000 000 0 0- i i i i i i i i i i i i Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 PROCEDUR AL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicatt shows the number of open Maintenance incident Reports (irs) that are related to the cm of procedures, the num'oer of closed irs that are related to the use of procedures, and ine number of open and closed irs that received procacural noncom-pliance cause codes.

l Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 44 I

I I 26 l

800 -

O Opon MWOs + Fort Calhoun Goal 600-C O

- 0 0 O- 0 0 0 0 0 400- 361

= 348

- 329 122 j

I8d! E 293 302 289 287 W# k N

M9: 271 281 m _

v

, ,  : ,e %w 9%9: _

j ': $

l 5 .

[] . y' l.

j i '! .: $ k$

200 - (

'gg,,j

;f < *

.M 'g,f),l

'j  :$

F4

./',5/c

- se gg:

. 1:

i . .z.; .!/ , ' '

ix/,  :.

si A

.: 1p N

i.

i n#

? 2 5

'1

:: 2 0 I i i I i l i i I i i I Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CGRRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.

The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 27

a- ,

Completed Schoduled ActMties (EM)

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

80% - C O - 0 0 4v 0 0 0 O- 0 0 60%

7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26' 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/7- 9/14 9/21 9/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance. Main:enance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance acuvities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 77 %

Week 2 77 %

Week 3 69 %

Week 4 69 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 28

Completed Scheduled Activities (PE)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal k.

100% -

^

80% - 0 0 O m O O O 60%-

40%

7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMEN1)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of complei- 2 maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 88%

Week 2 70 %

Week 3 78 %

Week 4 78%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 29

- Completed Scheduled Activities (GM)

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80% - C O O O- O- -C w - O C O  ;

60% - ,

40%

7/5 7/12 7/19'7/26 8/2 -

8/98'168/23 E/30 9/7- 9/14 9/21 9/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

- (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

Thislndicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities E.s comparecio the number of schedulsd maintenance activities concernino *neral Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, eatibratinns, and

- miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort C'alhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

'Recortino Month Comcieted Scheduled Activities Week 1 97 %

- Week 2 64 %

-Week 3 89 %

Week 4 89 %

l

-Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None.: SEP 33 i l

i. 30

\.

I

__ m m. > - . . _ . . _ . - - .. . - - - . -_ _ _ . _ . . - . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ , _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ .

Completed Scheduled Activities (MM)

-O . Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

• 80%- O- -C O O O O O O---C O O 1

60%-

40 %

'6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 8/2 6/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 PERCENT CF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

. (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 -85%

Week 2 88%

-Week 3 93%

Week 4 93%

E Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 31

Completed Scheduled Activities (IC) l

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80% - C O O O O O C O d C--C O O 60% -

40%

7/5 -7/12 7/19 7/26 8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This indicator shows the percent of tha number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumenta-tion & Control. Maintenance activ: ties include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Reportina Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities Week 1 84 %

Week 2 85%

Week 3 85%

Week 4 85%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 i

32

3-Q Number et Missed STs Resulting in LERs hfh 2-

.g$

t a

M 1-c Y%

M i

h l 0

I 0

0 i

0 i

0 i

0 I

0 i

0 I

0 4

0 4

0 4

0 I

0 i

0 4

'89 '90 Oct90 No. Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years.

Dut;ng the month of September 1991,there were no missed STs that resulted in LERs.

Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 33

l 20-E TotalNPRDS Component Failures O Confirmed NPROS Componcut Failures i

l l

10-7 3

4 4 33 3 3 1

3' OO O OO OO O0 00 00 00 0 i i , , i. , , , , , , ,

Oc!90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows tile total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.

During September 1991, there were no (0) cor firmed NPRDS component failures.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 34

1 15- --+-- Components With More Than One Failure

-M-- Components With More Than Two Failures 10-GOOD V

5- -

X >' X A O s i Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintanance Effectiveness Indicator was d6veloped following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in an eighteen month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to the Sep-tember 1991 data. The data for October 1990 through August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval.)

During the last 18 reporting months there wr.sre 10 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. 4 of the 10 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of these compo-nents are CH-1 A, CH-1B, CH-1C and RC-4.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 35

20-Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Component Hours

--&- Industry Check Valve Feilure Rate per Million Component Hours 15-

-O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (2.00E 6) 10

- 10-GOOD V

5 --

g P d fM k 4 p 0

~

i i

'89 '90 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 Check Va!ve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failura rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous two years, are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

For June 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.14 E-7 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.08 E-6. At the end of September, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of

.614 E-6. This increase from the July and August rates is due to the failure of check valve SA 288.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a 'ailure rate of 2.00 E-6, Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 36 l

l

Secondary System CPI

+

l . Secondary System CPI Limit GOOD

-O- For1 Calhoun Goal (.45) 1.5 - y

-C)- - Industry Upper Quartilo 1- I l l l l l l l  :. l l S5 ,., m E $

& 2 ~,0 C ,,

D i , , ,. , , , , , , , , , ,

'89 W Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 200-175- .M- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines m146.1 - '60~ >

.~

125- l GOOD l

- 100- y J., , - 75-50- -~

g;% 25-f . "'~

0 - --- ' - -

, m

'90 5 ,i i Nov Dec 'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTFlY The top graph, Secondary. System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), is calculated -

using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen, The bottom graph shows the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPIis 0.45. The CPI was reported as 0.48 for the month of August. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1989 through Dec.1989. The CPIindustry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.

The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 2.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> for the -

. month of August.-

The above two chemistry indicators ara one month behind the reporting month due to

. the time needed for collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.

Data source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: -None 37

10%-

-M- Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit 8%-

6%-

GOOD V

4%-

d 1.8- 2%- O O O O O O O O

, , , 0% n' 'n n n

'89 90 Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May - Jun Jul Aug91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT

- The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters, 100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2%.

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0.55% for the month 01 August.

A plant shutdown and start up in September 1990 and a plant outage in November /

December resulted in a higher percerlage of hours out of limit.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

T' Adverse Trend: None 3B i.

i ., -. ._ ,

4 1

10 -. M Auxiliary System (CCW) Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits 9_ -O- Industry Upper Quartile 8-7-

GOOD 6-5-

4-3-

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

C O 2-1-

0 0 0 ,, , m , m , m , m i m i n , .s  ; m , ,

- )h , X -i Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 89 '90 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as 0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> for the month of August.

The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 39

2 Nunice of instruments Out of Service l

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 7 7

~T 5 G G G 6-

4f$

Q

-- :G , 'n --Q'i O O O O 'M--C

?22i p ---O-- p S$,'l: K

': sd  %#

5 g' 5

- 5 g

5- 8j '} 'g 7 g g'Me g

.MV ,1 'Sx  %% 1z<

/  ;%9 3%: @f'

: - 9 l- ,1  :

4- 'i -  :  : . W 'b% k'#:e 3%

? ':

s

?4; %g '(%: ze

': ,~

s

': %e f(u:  %%:

ge n 3 3 %V YbV Ikj 3- ':1

. h

,/

h; D

$' 'i E

I{'$,'l ca Mmg xw

}:X//

&  ;  :  %% <<  %% gb:  %%; x%;

2- $ 76^:

'p gf

'9 .

L:'

$7,y;

,gg

^

$  %,j

%9

$ {$-

ge $ <

$gg

',/;s:' ,'M'- %',: 9;(%

.'Mi:

I s. )  :%':  % .< '

%9 .. .: 'i;w 1~ O'* w

'k

' 'I '

'4% %'i (%

$(>% ^ 1%':'

"?'*'N j,

W,C,?:., $

','Q; W,#

40)

M ff W

'/-

g'? ' /

W W P h

$%: 'M?: >&%

Yai W I' f': 0fM' M

"'*

• 4# #

' '* '# # i'#'"

0 lI I i i i i i i i i i i i Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of-service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Acc! dent Sampling System (PASS).

At the end of September there was a total of 6 in line chemistry instruments that were out-of service. Of these 6 instruments,4 were from the Secondary System and 2 were from PASS.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service has been set at 6. Six out-of service chemistry instruments make up 10%

of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator, Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 40 1

l l

• O Total Waste Produced (Kilograms)

- Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg) 1000-800 -

600 -

400-

~

144.s 70.4

- 39.9 34.9 0 3 - --- , , , , i A ,- , i Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non-halogenated hazardous waste, haloganated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.

During the month of September,0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced,0.0 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 41 i

5000-OPPD 4500 mRemlyr. Limit 4000-O Highest Exposure for the Month (mRom)

O Highest Exposure for the Ouartor (mnem) 3000-D Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) 2000-1036 1000- .

,...g 564 k l

5 -/ --- 9 (

w w merr ..

0 September 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During September 1991, an individual accumulated 224 mrem which was the highest indbidual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the third quarter of 1991 has been 564 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1991 has been 1,036 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 42

237 250 -

~,, [] Monthly Personnel Contaminations YJM GOOD Cumulative " 'rsonnel Contaminations

?M 200-L -O- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (90) 432 P2+ -O- Industry Upper Quartile (129) 157 m

M 35+;:

hi g& I;h;+

1. i 150-M M C C O O D C O O O O -O O y,g::

y}

2 ,

j  ! g,,y 100-9 t C O O O O--O O O O O O O

>zM; x4x w :::

ggh x j u O,g x xv? :u6:<

/b'4 1s 4

i 0 b,[7 9

M 6

3 3 4

'"~ - ~

3 4 10 I I i 1 1 I i I l 1 i i i i

'89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 49 contaminations have occurred during 1991.

There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

The 1991 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 90.

The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.

Data Source: PattersonAVilliams (Manager / Source)

- Advert,e Trend; None SEP 15 & 54 43 l

100% - Decontaminated Auxiliary Building / Radiation Ccatrolled Area l

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (non-outage months) 1

=

90%- __

W O O O O O O O O O O <

80%-

A ,

70%-

-GOOD 60%-

50 %

Oct90 Nov Dec =Jan .Feb Mar - Apr -May Jun Jul Aug.'Sep91 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator (formerly titled " Decontaminated Auxiliary Building") was revised in June 1991 to. include the new Radwaste building and the arcas of the C/RP building that will -

be considered Radiologically Controlled. The graph shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a' Fort Calhoun goal

.of 85% decontaminated auxiliary building (non outage months) and a goal of 75% .

decontaminated auxiliary building (outage months);

At the end of the reporting month,89.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was; ,

, decontaminated.

Date Source: Patterson/Gundal (Manag er/ Source) -

. Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 b

- 44

_._______1_____________. . - - , _ . - - - .

10-l 8- @ Number of Identified PRWPs l

6-4 4-7 1%9 9 '- 3

$. f g l 2-2 1 gj ,

j

h,hi y9 1 1 1 1  ;

f 1 di )

r n m -~~

+.

{,3,9 m 0 l ,h 0- , , ,

_3 .. , ,

I .. q Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 i

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR AM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports.

The number o. PRWPs which are ider;lfied each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.

During the month of September 1991, three PRWPs were identified.

Data Source: Patterson/Williems (Manager / Source)

Adverre Trond: None SEP52 45

l

@ Total Number of Hot Spots l Number of Additional Hot Spots identified O Fort Calhoun Goal 65 65 1

6 @:

l W

gf i

53 53 53 54 54 54 55 g m x w 2 '?

)m )

.,a 50- 'j

fg

% i'

$ 7l

'y

@ {;j w

w IA: w ye w'

a .

e 5;  :; xx

, e&, .q , e , e ', c, e: ,  :; , w, m m h l'i ' ' '

i', :

g, p *'

' J' ', " '5" V "

?/  ;)  ?>

G d

T4 2 1 W u

$y 1 u ,;

Ey 25-  :' #n (

74 g  ;; g '

j j ^

,; 1 $

,,  :, l

\z -

..; a >

x:

j 10 L .)  : $  ; ly'5 $ l 10 $

e a g

6: -

.m

, :s :g & a o

i,$

,'h. O M

,.0 1

0

,0M ,I1 h -

h:s h 1

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation.

A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 tin.cs the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greator than 100 mrem / hour.

ALARA personnel conducted an in depth survey of the entire auxiliary building during the month of August. During September one hot spot in a vent duct in Room 6 was eliminated and one additional hot spot was identified in Room 13.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 40.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager /Gource)

Adverse Trends: None 46

@ Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 800- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies)

-O- Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) 600- GOOD I

465 Y a+

N,y. 400-f C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1. w 200-164 1 jK Q' a p g

v:

r" ~ i 0 7, ,

i ,-

i , , , i i ,

L 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 through June 30,1991. A total of 42.2 curies have been released to the environment during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 340 curies for this indicator.

7e he gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calcuiated every six months.

Date Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 47

@ Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Curnulative Radioactive Liquid Discharge 1

--O- Cumulative AnnualGoal 231 228 175 200-C O O O O O O O O C O O j GOOD 100- d Y 26.2 g 4.8"8.3~2.3 . A "8.4 . _

{~ i i i i i i l i i i i i i 6 I

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 g 40000-2 y 30000-

{C 20000-fn 10000-5 23; 4 800 3360 3750 am

C 9

&o 2910 m W'ad W t'"'A m i i i i i i 1 i i i i i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1991 through June 30,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 70.3 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 225 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volum,e of liquid .

radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 19.2 million gallons from January through June 1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 48

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - -_ - . _ - . -_ _ _ _ _ _ -._____-._______a

1 l

I Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Does not include 30- System Failures) GOOD 25- , y 20 - T 15-10-5- __

0- 4 i i i i i i i  ; i  ; j Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Ap- May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 Security System Friilures GOOD 120-9 80-

?0-1 I I I i i i i i l i 1 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 LOGG ABLE/REPOHTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first chart depicts the toial number of loggable/rerortable incidents con-cerning Licensee Des gnated Vehic'.es (LDVs); Security Badges; Security Key Control; and Access Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning secu-rity system failures which occurred during the reponing month.

During the month of September 1991, there were 57 loggable/ reportable incidents identified. System failures accounted for 53 (93%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 25 (47%) of these we:e environmental failures. The four loggable r,ecurity incidents involved two security barJges being removed from site, one lost / unattended security badge, and one incident involving the failure to return security keys.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 49

E Security Report / Log Incidents June 1991 16- O Security Report' Log incidents July 1991 O Security Report' Log Incidents August 1991 0 Security Report' Log incidents September 1991 12 - GOOD _

Month Total incidents Jan'91 6 V Feb '91 0 Mar '91 2 Apr 91 3 8-May S1 1 Jun 91 1 Jul 91 2 Aug '91 1 Sep '91 4 4-2 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 EO 6 0 k[ 0 0 0 0 0 1

LDVs Badges Key Control Access Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This !"dicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs), Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, and Security Key Control.

Data Source: SefickAVoerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 50

. . .- ~ .. - . - . ~ _ . . . - - . - . . . - - . _ . . - - - - . . .

Environmental Failures O Failures

'40-GOOD V

20- 18 11 10 - ~9 7'

gg ge '<

n,: 2 -

3 3 ~s 5% 7 M M @M 0 0 0 0 0 4 i i i i Alarms CCTV Computer _ Search Equip, Doors Card Readers SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES

'This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month:: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Failures Alarm

. systems and CCTVfailures are now divided into two categories: environmental failures and failures as defined in the performance indicator definitions.

Number of incidents:. August '91 . September '91 System Fai!ures Env. Failures FaHures Env. Failures Failuree;

- Alarms 7 11. 7- 9

-CCTV- 29 5- 18 2 (

Computer O_ 4 N/A 3 Search Equipment--

0 _1 N/A 3 _

Door Hardware 0 S N/A 11 Card Reader 0 0 N/A 0 Total - 36 25- 25 28-Data Sot'rce: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 51

__-:____- __-______-________2___________:-___---__-___-_-_

Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 9%- --O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8%- GOOD 7%- y 6%-

5%-

4%- /

/ O O O

^

O O O 3%-

2%-

1%-

0%

Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAlTING PARTS (NON OUTAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the percentage of open, non-outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total am Unt of open, non outage mainte-nance iterns.

There was a total oi ,'36 open, non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 19 of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting mon'h.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun Geal for this indicator is 3.5% of the total number of open, non-outage MWOs awaiting parts.

Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager /Sourca)

Adverse Trend: None 52

. _ _ _ _ . - . . _ _ _ . _ . ~ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ ._

30- - I 25- - Spare # vts Inveiery Value ($ Milhon) l 20-15-10- --

5-0-- , . , , , , , , . . . I Oc;90 Nc' Oc- an Feb Mar Ap. May Jun Jul Av0 Sep91 ,

i SPAf'E PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at :he Fort Calhoun Station at the end of September was reported as $13,744,295.

Data Source: Steele/Huliska (ManageriSource) 1 Advctse Trend: None 500- ,

- Spare Parts issued ($ Th0usands) 300-200- p

~

,;e i i i i i i i l i I I I 0ct90 NOV Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED i The vale of the spare parts issued during September totaled $176,859.

Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 53

- Inventory Accuracy

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (98%)

100 % -

1. cN o ,go o o -o 96% -

90%

Oct90 Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop 91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.

During September 1991,1127 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 1127 line items counted,97 items need3d count adjustments. The inventory accu-racy for the month of September was reported as 92%. The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 98%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: None 7%-  % of Pick Tickets Generated When 0%- Parts are not Available, etc.

~

6%-

4%- -O-- Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-

2%- O O O ----O O O - 0 1%-

0%

Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 STOCKOUT RATE This hdicator shows the Mrcentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated when the armunt of parts request ( d is equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available.

During September, a total of 1169 Pick Tickets were Generated. Of the 1169 Pick Tickets generated,43 Pick Tickets (3.7%) were generated when the amount of parts requested was equal to or less than the mimmum stocking level and parts are not avall-able.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 2%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trond: None 54

_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . . . . ~ _ - . -

4 2%-

% of Total Purchases that gro Expedited

--O-- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal {0.5%)

1%-

O C C C C -C O- ~~~O 0% , , , , , , , , , - , , ,

Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to tha total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During September, there was a total of 388 purchase orders generated. Of the 388 purchase orders generated, none (0) were expedited purchases.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 0.5%.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser(Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Nono

(

l l

l 55 1

100-8 0 .-

00 -

40-20 23 bl^'^'^f^

0- -- )'^^^ ' ,_' ..,-

Service invo6ces COE Invoices Miscellaneous INVOICE DREAKDOWN This indicatt,r shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of September 1991.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

~

Percentage of Material Rocuests for Issues with the Request Dato the same is the Need Date 100% -

80%-

60%- g 40%- N -

20%-

0%-

Sep00 Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percentage of material requests (MRs) for issue with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MRs for issue for the reporting month.

During the month of September, a total of 1169 MRs were received by the werehouse.

Of the 1169 total MRs received by the warehouse,465 MRs (39.8% of the 1169) were for issue with their roquest date the same as their need date.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend. None 56

600-

- Total Modification Packa0cs Open 500-425 425 a -

400-

![( ,*]

x j,p 300-m ~

h l ll r.s.a m-

,200

'68 '89 '90 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-ing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).

Category Recorting Month Form FC 1133 Backlog /In Progress 16 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 95 Design Engr. Backlog /in Progress 92 Construction Backlog /in Progress 39 Design Engr. Uodate BacHog!In Progress , 35 Total 277 At the end of September,33 addi'llonal modification requests had been issued this year and 20 modification requests had been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Roview Com-mittee (NPRC) had completeri 113 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) had completed 107 backlog modification request reviews this year, t

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 57

o Temporary Modihcations >1 cycle old (RFO required ior Removal)

O Temporary Modihcations >0 months old (Removable on line)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modifications (0) 6-5 5- .

,;9;,; ; .

4-  ;;;;,;,; ,

3-V.' w

.' 3 3 2 Sk C I' 2  ::5Y,I$$-$ 2 5'l ,,,;,7

'I .

2- w , ,i, . t.,,/ ,  ?, ,

$ 9,p;.;,:

s '

1-

,;,4;4p 79 7* ^ ' ' ' ' ' ' ^ Sp . , p'; . ,pp 0 v -

"v ' ' ' O w

'^

i i i July August September TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of temporary modifications movable on line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhc .. goal for temporary modifications.

The goal for this indicator has been changad to be more indicative of Fort Calhoun's control and management of temporary modifications. There are currently 2 temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old. Both of these rr.odifications are 100% ready to be removed during the 1992 refueling outage, in addition, there are currently 3 temporary modifications installed that are greater than six months old that can be removed on line. These are: handjack close of CCW/RW valves which is await-Ing an engineering evaluation currently scheduled for 12/6/91; replacement of AC 191/

192 spacer plates which is awaiting parts that are scheduled to arrive in early October; and IA 519 brace, which MWO 903015 wil1 close. This MWO is currently scheduled for l completion on 10/3/91.

l At the end of September, there was a total of 27 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun

Station.-15 of the 27 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 12 are removable on line. In 1991 a total of 35 temporary modifications have been installed and all but 16 have been removed.

l Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 l 58

- . . - _ . - -. - - - - - - - - -.. . .- - .. - ~ - - . ~

s

- TotalNurrberof Open EARS [

200-150- _f 100-50-0 +

Oct90 Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 60- @ DEN O-3 months @ S5 0 3 months 50-- @ DEN 3 6 months O SE 3 s montns 40- @ DEN >6 months B SE >0 months 30- ,

22 .

20-g 14 13 1 10 ,

001 10 10 nm 0 0 i i i i Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4  :

i OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EARS)

The top graph shows the total number of open EARS at the end of the reporting month.

' The bottom graph shows the EARS by Design Engineering Nuclear or System Engi-neering responsibility and their age in months at the end of the reporting month.

There was a total of 113 open EARS at the end of September. Of the 113 total open '

EARS,86 were Design Engineering Nuclear's responsibility,22 were Syst'em Engineering's responsibility,3 were Nuclear Projects' responsibility, and 2 were unas-

- signed.

i Data Source: JaworskiNan Osdel(Manager / Source)

- Adverse Trendi None SEP 62 L

i 59

=

ECN Bacepgcdin DEN

- - ECNs Opened During the Month

-V- ECNs Completed During the Month 200- ---

f 150-

/

100-k 50-y n.

- [

Y

'N 7 0-Oct90 Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECNr. opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of September 1991, there was a total of 170 DEN backlogged open ECNs.

There were 50 ECNs opened, and 72 ECNs completed during the month.

Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs, It is expected that the number of open ECNs will continue to decrease.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manag e r/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 60

l l

l Q DEN Engineering not completo O System Engincoring . Engineering completo, lAWO not wruton D fAaintenance PAWO schuduled, but not complotu 50- 38 39 43 40-30- 26 3Qb '

" 7 4

_ 2 j

[_

0-O . 3 mSnths 3 O months > 0 months ECN EAC11II.CHANGESSEEN O DEN . Enginooring not cumplete O System Engineering Engineering comploto. fAWO not westten D PAnintenance lAWO scheduled, but work not completu 90- 74 CO- 55 30- _

E3 7 b g g 34 $hjh ll;re.,-l 2 ,. , , ,qv/gi:

0_- , , ,

0 3 months 3 6 months > 0 months ECN SUQSTITUTE REE1ACEldENI_EA[U1QEEN D DEN Engineering not complete O System Engineering . Walkdown or confirmation not completo 50- 40

$ 7 2G 3

o '

1 0 + 3 months 3 6 months in G months ECRDOCMidEf1T_CBANGES OPEN ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, l and Maintenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility i

Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement Pans Open, and ECN Dccument Changes Open.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source) 1 Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 61

,. ~ - - _. . - _ ._ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - -

5- [] 1991 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 7

-+-- 1990 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 5 Year Average Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 3.5 - GOOD 3- 2.83 y  ;

2.5 - 2A 2.25 2.27 2.25 2- 3

,, 4_ 4,_

4 '6-~d d

1.5 - /

,1.58  %

.g g ^  %-

0.5 -

b \

/

/

0- -

i i i i i i i i i i i i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year monthly average of the recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates.

A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year to date basis.

There were no (zero) recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of Sep-tomber. There has been a total of 10 recordable injury / illness cases so far in 1991.

Year Recordable Cases Year End Rate 1988 11 2.6 1989 11 2.2 l 1990 1 2.1 Data Souice: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average recordable injury /il! ness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicated. SEP 15,25 & 26 62 l

_ l

50-46 w

@ Licensee Event Reports

!@ O Personnel Errors Reponed in LERs

! 40-Cumulative Licantee Event Report

@[$:

Id

$ -+- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LEPs Y ~~

29 30-

~~

4  :

$w26h

$w 5 q

h kk Iki 20-A f$ $

B g 2

$u s 12 T h

@y m 9 10~

y$ M yy $;

K

?  ? +

g E@%

w l

's i

i 4mn i 4 i i n

i n

I n

i l i I

'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMDER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Repons (LERs) with event dates during the reporting month, the LERs attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year-end totals for the three previous years are also shown.

In September 1991, there was one LER reported. This LER was not attributable to personnel error.

There have been 18 LERs reported so far in 1991 and 7 of these LERs have been attributable to personnel error.

Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 c3

600 - s38 550 0 Actuai oivision staiting 400- O Authorized Division stattino 201 204 51 52 o- I I I Nuclear Operations Production Engincoring Nuclear Sorvices S FAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Advemo Trond: None SEP 24

--G- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rato

- Production Engineering Division Turnover Rato 10*/. -

-O- Nuclear Sorvice .,: vision Turnover Rato 2*' -

8 C

_Q O

O- K O O-O---O-O--O--O MJO J90 J90 A90 S90 090 N90 D90 J91 F91 M91 A91 M91 J91 J91 A91 S91 PERSONNEL TURNOVER R ATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignaticns from OPPD.

DiyMon Turnover Rate NOD 3.7%

PED 5.0%

NSD 3.9%

Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0%

This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 64

O To lRequalificationTraining Hours O Simulator Training Hours 00-0 Non Requalification Training Hours 50-a1 40--

g 1

30- 'k: 28

~~

24 22 -

20- 18 18 2<

, 16 _

37

,. 14 , -

w 12 ', / ,- ,

10- u ':-  % '. 8  :( 6 X r kh W

4 4

3:1 6 2 l 'X 2 I'  :! -

2 I' :5:,- 2 3 4

.H X 0 i

0 '< 0

_r J :.m i ',-

m i

m i

m 3 i i Cycle 911 Cycle 912 Cycle 913 Cycle 914 Cycle 915 Cycle 916 Cycle 917 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator, formerly titled *SRO and RO License Examination Pass Ratio", was revised in August 1991 to more accurately reflect training department procedures.

This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the totaltraining hours. Non Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO comr.litments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Mar'ager lunches, Exam failures are defined as f ailures in the writton, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

The pass ratio for NRC exams will be reported when those exams are given.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP GB 65 I

4 O SRO Exams Administered 50- 0 SR0 exams eassed D RO Exams Administered 40- O RO Exams Passed T1'

~

00 --

j 9-20- T- @ - -- -

l - - _

gj i 7-4 4

5-j -

l ,

u .- 1 h

10- e l d :i -

: j 4 9- ..

4 j v s 4

j , %_

r

! 3  : . , i ,

0- I i i I i l i i 4 4 i i Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EX AMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of September 1991, eight SRO exams were administered and seven of these exams were passed in addition, six RO exams were administered and all of thece exams were passed.

Data Source: Casper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 66 I

O Hotlinesinitiated 35-D Hotlines Closed 39,. @ Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks E Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25-

~

20-.

15- _

10- -

' ~

1 1 . ,

"I

~ ' ~ ~

5- -

I fj f 8 0- E, Oct90 Nov k- ,

Jan S

E, , E, , , , ,

i Dec Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for c ose out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month, Seotembef_191 Initiated Hotlines 15 Closed Hotlines 8 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 1 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks 8 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 67

I C Other Training (1000 H .)

O General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

O Tcchnicai support (1000 Hrs.)

O Chemistry and Radiation ProteMion (1000 Hrs.)

6-O Maintenanco (1000 Hrs.)

E Operations (1000 Hrs.)

0 g 4- _ _

x -

E _ _ _ =:: -

g - -

s -

W - -

.;tc _.

-  :: i .,

f 2- -

_ 3 , yy.

g w g.

di 0- 6 1 i i i i"T T i E'TW i- 1 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-ments for the reporting month. Due to a programming problem,information for the months of May, June, July, and August was unavailable at the time of this repon's publication.

This indicator is normal'y one month behind the reporting month due to the time re-quired for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT Jd6[U91 APH '91 Operations 187 61 Maintenance 1313 712 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1776 823 Technical Support 1004 523 General Employee Training 822 422 Other 39 42 Total 5141 2584 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

i .

O Other Training (1000 Hr[)

@ General Employee itaining (1000 hrsj Q Technical Support (1000 Hr5.)

Q Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs )

30 1 O uaintenance(1000 ars.)

25.. @ Operations (1000 Hrs.)

e g20--

E .. .

O 8 15-. ,_

p)ij G

~

~

7?

A ~

e  ?%j ""~5 g '(f$

f10-  ! l] b 'm A

H l uA

. ,J1 TJ

.:._J w?]ii f".d"; M

~ s a

t c 4;>

ll s,z -

m T a a w S- - ~

99 5 BE 5 7_~: 5 5 T --"

E . . _

O t- , , , , , , , , , i i May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TR AINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemist y and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Trait :ng, and Other Training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. Due to a programming problem,information fur the months of May, June, July, and August was not available at the time of this report's publication.

Thit r.dicator i is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.

DEPARTfdENT M AR '91 APR '91 Operations 524 166 Maintenance 4579 1400 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 5543 2129 Technical Support 4094 2124 General Employee Training 2005 1633 Other 112 $82 Total 18357 7634 Data Source: GaspeuNewhouse (Managsr/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None 69 1 I

- Total 0atage 20s 10'J0-

--h- MWOS Ready to Work /

-O- Outa;e MWR Backlog

--~ --

600 -

4 400 -

~

4 1% . ~

'O---0,.N 0

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr Ma) Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov De:91 MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE '14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that have been written over the past reporting pariods for completion during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs that are ready for work (the parts for these MWOs are staged, the proceduras are approved, and the paperwork is ready ior field use.) Also included is the number of cetage Maintenance Work nequests (MWRs) which have been identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outag9, but have not yet been converted to MWOs. Any MWOs written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator labeled Emergent MWOs. Approximately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during oach of the previous two refueling outages.

At the end of the reporting month, there were 986 total outage MWOs with 546 of these MWOs mady to work and a backloO of 33 MWRs.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager /Snurce)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 70

4

- TotalOstage Mod >heations l Mods With Planning Document Approved l

40- -O- Mods Wah Final Design Approved i

~+- Mods With Construction Package Approved l

30-

-a  :

20-10 -

f+

0 2 2#' --

N m. M . -

+  ? .

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 PROGRESS OF CYCL.E 14 OUTAGE MODIF! CATION PLANNING This indicator shows the number of modifications approved for planning (to determine feasibility) or for completion during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage (RFO). Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes avallaole.

The current schedule for completion of the modification phases of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage is as follows:

Outage Scope Freeze

• Oct.1,1990 Planning Documents Approved

• Feb 22,1991 Final Designs Approved

• Apr 24,1991 Construction Packages Approved

• Jun 15,1991 Schedule incorporated'. Jul 26,1991 Material On Site' Jul 26,1991 Construction Staned Feb 15,1992 Construction Complete Mar 30,1992 Accepted by SAC Apr 10,1992

' Indicates milestones which have not been changed as a result of the now January 1992 refueling outage start date. A forced outage aftar November 1991 could result in l an early start date for the Cycle 14 RFO.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 71

50 -

- Total 0atage Projects

• Projects wth Prel;minary Schedules Submt.ted 40-

-t- Projects wth Detailed Schedu!es Submb1ted 30-

-~b & -

, h 20 - -4 l

10-

[h }[

0

• f Aug90 Sep Oct flov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct tJoy Dec91 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator chows the status of the projects which affect the scope of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The projects that do not yet have preliminary schedules are Uquid Effluent Releases and Radiography.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

The schedule for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage projects is as follows:

All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct 1,1990 All Projects Scheduled in Detall Jun 28,1991 Procedures Ready Oct 26,1991 Parts Staged Nov 16,1991 Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 72 1

1 l

Violations per 1000 inspection Hoe <=

9- -O-- Fort Calnoan Goal GOOD I

l E6- y 5

= c 3.7

$& W -

$$ fhf 2.6 3

$ i ~1

. .; D h- N  %

$ynx o -c o o-< o

!  : # 0 s g '

fi's)l,.

M h .

o I i i i l i i i i l I I 3 I l I

'BB '89 '90 Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports por 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting rnolith due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 0.79 for the twelvo months from September 1,1990 threugh August 31,1991.

The Fort Calhoun Goalls 1.6 violations per 1000 Inspection hours for 1ri91.

Data Source: Thorkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 73

[] Violatiens per 1000 Inspection Hours (12 month Period)

E Violations por 1000 lnspection Hours (1991 Only)

. 4-f 3 01 5

b 2.78 s

k2' 3 73

~ 1.61 143

{

, 1.30 1.33

' 1.4 9 TV-3,33 i 47 o.

s, i , . . . . . i Fort Cooper River Commanche Wolf Arkansas South Ws,terford Calhoun Bend Peak Creek One Texas COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1000 inspot. .. hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period from September 1,1990 to August 31,1991 and for the calendar year 1991 only.

The Fort Calhoun goal for 1991 is 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours.

Data Source: Thorkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend None 74

75 -

O Nuncer of vioiations Duringine Last 12 Monins O Nunber oi NCVs Dunng the Last 12 Montns 50-28 27

~

25 -

21 20 E ~

16 12 12 33 33

- _ g

~

-5 4 5 5

_3 - -

2 0

h '

I I i 4 i l i i i i l i Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months.

This indicator is one month behind the reporti.1g month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator.

Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 75

D Outstanding C ARs That Are Modifcation Related

-A- Outstanding C ARs > Six Months Old

"' " " "9 ^

200-150 -

100- -

A 50- A-A- Ar%A g I ' " ' '

0 Oct90 Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),

the number of outstanding CARS that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CARS that are modification related.

At the end of September 1991, there were 96 outstanding CARS,45 CARS that were greater than six months old, and 6 CARS that were modification related.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 76

l 20-15- -O- NOD Overdue CARS 10- .-/x- NOD CARS With Extensions Granted O

,, ,, . , u Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep01

~

--O- PED Overdue CARS 25 -

20- -tr- PED CARS With Extensions Granted 15-A---.- A \

r t---rt_-  % -. r' , '1._ ,, __ n _

Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 G-5- -O- Other overo. 'ARs

1. ~

--b- Other CARS With Extensions Granted 3 --

2-

,, , , N O a , , , w , G T-C i w i w iu i i w ih Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the nurnber of overdue C ARs and the number of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization.

Ov.cidue_ CARS Overdue CARS July E August '91 September '9L NOD 0 1 1 PED 0 ~I~ 0 Others 1 0 0 Total 1 2 1 Extended CARS Extended CARS July '91 August '91 September '91 NOD 3 4 2 PED 12 4 2 Others 1 1 0 Total 16 9 4 Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 77

1990 SA1.P Funct.

Area CARS Sigreif. C ARs NRC Viola, LERs A) Plant Operationo 62 0 2 10 B) Radiolog 28 2 0 0 Controls C) MainVSurveil 180 8 6 4  ;

D) Emergency 7 0 3 0 l Preparedncsc l E) Secunty LJ 0 5 3 F) Engr / Tect 172 5 3 12 Suppor1 G) Safety Assoss' 29 0 0 0 Qual. Venf, H) Other 1 0 0 0 Tota' 505 15 19 29 1991 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signif. C ARs NRC Viola LERs A) Plant Operations 23(4) 1 1 1 B) Radiolog. Controls 7 0 2 (1) O C) Maint/ Surveil. 55 (2) 0 0 0 D) Emergency 16 0 0 0 Prepareaness E) Secunty 5 (1) 0 1 2 (1)

F) Engr / Tech Supporl 72 (7) 2 0 8 (1)

G) Safety Assess' 24 (4) 1 1 (1) 1 Oual. Verif, H) Other 0 0 0 0 Total 202(18) 4 5 (2) 18(2)

Note: ( ) indicate value for the reporting month, C ARs ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. L"! '? )

REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the l

Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs.

I the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1990 and i 1991. Included in thic table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 78

l l

PERFORMAI4CE li1DICATOR DEFitJITIOt4S AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK OR. erator has been estabished based upon the 1Wo inda DERS try median value providod by INPO lh$ indcator tracks the total number of cutttanding cor-rectwo norcoutage Maintenance Work Orders at the I ort DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED Cathoun Stanon versut, their age in months AREA The percentage of the Hadiahon Control,ed Area, wh th AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS includes the autihary budding. the radwaste budding, and lhis indicator is dehnod as the fe'contage of open, non- areas of the C'RP bdding, that 4 decontaminated bawd outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold anart- on the total square footage lh$ indcator tra;ks pedor.

ing parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, main- mance for SEP W 54 tenance y ork orders DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME AUXlLIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE ACCIDENT RATE)

ST ATION LtMITS Tha indicator n dehnod as the number of acodentt. for The cumulatwo hours thut the Component Coohng Water an utiltty personnel pef manently as sgned to the staton.

system is outrade the stahon chomstry hmrt lhe hours involving days away from work por 200,000 man hours a'e at:umulated f rom the first sample suceechng the limit worked (100 tonn years) lhn does not relude contrac-unbl addttonal samphng shows the parameter to be back tot personnel lhis indcator tracu portonnel portor-within limit s mance for SEP #25 & 20 C ARs ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs. HRC VIO- DOCUMENT REVIEW (DIENNI AL)

LATIONS vs. LERs REPORTED The Document Hoview Indicator shows the numbs. of Provides a comparison of CARS issued, NRC violations, documents reviewed, the number of documents sched-and LERs reported. Th s indicator tracks performance for uled for reoow, and the number of document reviews SEP 815,20, & 21. that are overdue for the repor$i ng month A document teview is considsted overdue ff the review is not < om.

CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE plete wrthin 6 months of the assigned due date The end, Compares the Fort Calhoun check valve f ailure rate to cator tracks periormanco for SEP #46.

the industry check valve f ailure rate (f ailures per 1 milbon component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIAult.

is three months behind the Pl Report reporting month. ITY lha indicator tracks performance for SEP #43 This and cator shows the numtwr of f ailures that were reported dunng the last 20,50, and 100 emergency d,o-COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV set generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Staten. Also PLANTS shown are tr gger values which correlate to a h>gh level Provides data on violations per 1000 intpocion hours for of confsdence that a unft's diesel generators have ob-Reg on IV nuclear power plants. tained a rehability of g' enter than or equal to 95% when the demand f ailures are less than the ingger values CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER 1) Number of Start Domands; All vahd and inadvertent THAN 3 MONTHS OLD start demands, including all start-only demands and all .

The percentage of total outstanding corrective mainte- start demands that are followed by load-run demands, nance rtoms, not requiring an outage, that are greater whether by automat c or manualinitiaton. A start only than three months old at the end of the perod reportod. domand 65 a demand in which the emergency generator is started, but re attempt is made to load the generator CUMULATIVE V!OLATIONS & NON. CITED VIOLA. 2) Number of Start F ailures: Any f ailure within the emer-TIONS (12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) gency generator system that provents the generator f rom The cumulative number of volatons and Non Cited Vo- achievmg spoF'ied frequency and voltage is classited as latons for the last 12 months, a vahd start failure. This includes any conditon identihed in the course of maintenance inspections (with the emer.

DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT gency generator in stant.iby mode) that dehnitely would This indicator shows the daily core thermal output as have resulted in a start f ailuto if a demand had occurrod measured f rom computer point XC105 (in thormal mega- 3) Number of load Run Demands: For a vahd load run watts) The 1500 MW T)ch Spec limit, and the unmot demand to be counted the load run attempt must ruoet portion of the 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting one or more si the following critona:

month are also shown. A)A load run of any durabon that resurts from a real outo.

matic or manual initsaton.

OlESEL GENER ATOR UNAVAILABILITY B) A load-run test to satmfy the plant's load and duraton This indicator p 9vides monthiy data on the number of as stated in each lost's specifcations.

hours of diesel generator planned and unplanned un- C)Olher special tests in whch the emergency generator availabilty. The Fort Calhoun goal for the second half of is expected to be operated for at least one hour whdo 1991 for the number of unavailable hours por d,esel gen. loaded with at least 50% of its design load 79

PERFORMAt4CE IllDICATOR DEFilJITIOllS (Cont'd)

4) Number of Load Run f ailures: A load run f ailure tatons fAamimum generaton is the energy that can be should be counted for any reason in whTh the emer- produced by a unit in a given punod if operated continu-gency geno'atof does nN uck up loud and run as pro- ousiy at manimum capacity.

dicted f ailures are (tunted dunng any vahd kaad-tun demands. EXPEDi1T D PUFtCH ASES L)Laceptons: Unsuccessful attemptt, to stait or klad-run lhe percentage of opedred purchases which occurred should riot be counted as vahd demands or f ailures when during the teporting month wmpared to the total numbe' thoy can be s'inbuted to any of the tonowing- of purchase oracts genera *ed A)Spurous tops that would be bypassed in the e ent of an emeTency. FORCED OUTAGE RATE D)fAaltunction of equipment that is not iequ. red dunng an lh,$ indicator is dehned as the pntcentage of time that emetgency. the Unit was unavailable due to forced events compared C)fntSntional terminahon of a tatt because of ebnormal to the time planned for electhcal generaton f otted conchtons that would not have tesultod h major diesel events are f aitutes et other unplanned conditons that generatot damage or repair. tequire removing the unrt from serv ce before the end of D)fAattunctions or operating criots which would have not the nort weekend forewJ events include startup failures prevented the emergency genetutor from being testarted and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown and b*ought to load withir1 a few minutet (i e, the und is availtibb: but not in service)

L)A f adure ou start because a porton of the star 1ing sys-tem was disabled for test purpose, it fol6oe J tiy a suc. f UEL RELIADILITY INDICATOR c essf ul start wnh the starting system iri es normal abgn- This indicatot is dehned as the steady-sthte primary coob ment. ant l 131 activity, corrocted tot the tramp uranium contri-Et.:h emetgency penotator failute that results in the gen- buton and normahred to a common purthcaton erator being declarod inoperable should be counted as rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposned on one demand and one f ailure. Explors' ry tests durir.g teactor ccre internals f rom previous defective f uel or is corrective maintenance and the sumessf ultest that foL present on the surf ace of f uel elements f rom the manu-lows tepair to verif y opetabihty t.hould not os counted as f acturing process Steady state is dehned as continuous demards of f ailures when the EDG haa act been de- operations atove B$ percent power for at least seven cla,ed operable again. days. This INPO indicator uses an industry normahred letdown put heation rate. The f RI has also been calcu-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) DREAK- lated using FCS's actualletdown punhcation rate. These DOWN calcelatons revealed that the use of the plant's actual lhis indicator breaks down the number of Engineenng rate would result in an appresimate 45% increase in f RI Change Not;ces (ECNs) that are assigned to Design data Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and The consity correcton f actor is the ratio of the specihc IAsintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN f acihty volume of coolant at the RCS operahng temperature Changes open. ECN Substituto Replacement Parts (540 degrees f, VI . 0 02140) divided by the specific open, and ECN Document Changen open This indicator volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 trccks performance for SEP 662. degrees F at outlet of the totdown coohng heat en-changer, Vf . 0 010204), which results in a dentny cor.

ENGINCERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS tecton f actor for f CS equal to 1.32 This denstty correc-The numbe of ECNS that were opened, ECNS that were tion factor aff ects both the INPO and Plant Specibc FRis.

completed, and epen backlog ECNS awaning completon by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks per- GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS-formance for SEP #G2. CHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Cunes of all EQUIPMEN1 f ORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRIT 1- gaseous eadioactive nuchdes released f rom FCS.

CAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 cntical hours is the GROSS HEAT RATE inverse of the mean time between forced outages Gross heat rate is dehnod as the ratio of total thermal caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to energy in Btrtish Thermal Units (DTU) produced by the the numt" of hours the reactot is criticalin a perod reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of fotcod outages the generator in kilowatt-hours (KWH) caused by equipment f aitutes in that penod.

HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED EOUlVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The total amount (in Kilograms) of non halogenatad had This indicator is defined as Ine ratio of gross availab!e ardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other generaton to gross maximum generaton, expressed as hazardous waste produced by FCS each month.

a percentage. Avadable generaton is the energy that can be produced if the Un,t is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equ>pment and regulatory Omh 80

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)

HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS The number of Hotline Training Memas (HTM) that are MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS initiateo, closted, and overdus lass or greater than 4 The number of Nuclear Plant Reliabihty Data System weeks for the indcated month. A HTM is a training docu- (NPRDS) components w:th more !\an 1 failure and the ment sent out for immediate review. The HTM should be number of NPRDS components with more than 2 failures reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HIM. during the last 12 months.

HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GRCUP MAINTENANCE WOP % ORDER B ACKLOG GblDELINES The number of corrective non outage maintenance vern Total hours for 13 secondary side chemstry parameters orders that re nain open at the end of the reporting exceeding guidehnes dur;ng power opuation. Power month. This indicator war added to the Pl Report to operation is defined as greater than 30 Y. power. The 13 trend open corrective non outage maintenance work or-parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation con- ders as stated in SEP #36.

ductivity, boron sihca, chloride, sulf ate, rodium, f eed wa-ter pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazhe, iron, copper, and MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders by several categories that to-IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SER. main open at the end of the reporting month. This indica.

ViCE tor tracks maintenance performance for SEP #36.

Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out of service in the Secondary System and the Post MAINTENANCE OVERTIME Accitient Samphng System (PASS) The % of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as INVENTORY ACCURACY contract personnel.

The percentage < f line items that are counted each month by the warehou3e wh,ch need count adjustments. MATERIAL REOUEST PLANNING The percent of material requests (MRs) for :ssues with INVOICE BREAKDOWN their request date the same as their need date compared The number of ineces that a e on hold due to shelf Ide, to the total number of MRs.

COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE L CENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS The total maximum amount of radiation received by an This indicator shows the number of SRO rw T RO quiz- individual person working at FCS on a month!/, quarterly, zes and exams that are administered and passt ' ' tah and annual basis, month. This indicator tracks training perf.,.. .anu we SEP #68. MWO OVET A LL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAIN- h total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs)

ING that have been written fu completion during the Cycle 14 The total number of hours of training given to each crew Refueling Outage. MWOc which are wnt'en after the start ,

during each cycle. A!so provided are the simu'. tor train- of the Refueling Outage will be labeled Emergent MWOs.

ing hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), Also shown is the number of MWRs which have been the number of rmn4eq';alifcation training hours and the ident!!ied for the Cycle 14 Refuehng Outage, but have number of wNailures. rot yet been averted to MWOs. This indicator tracks perio mance for SEP #31.

LlOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENV!RONMENT NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator displays the volume of hquid radioactive The number of radiological hot spots which have been waste released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks, identified and documented to exist at FCS at the end of to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio- the reporting menth. A hot spot is a smalllocalizd active ,1uclides are detected in the blowdown system. source of radiation. A hot spot occurs when the utact The curies from all roleases from FCS to the Missouri dose rate of an item is at leest 5 times the General Area River ara also shown, dose rate and the item's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The total numbcr nf security ircidents for the reporting momh depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu-nty performance for SEPs58.

81

~ - .- . _ , - _

O PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cout'd)

NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIAt:llLITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURC REPORTS SUBMITTED OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS l The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS compo- The number of Modifcation Requests (MRs)in any state nont f ailures (confirmed and possible) and the number of j

between the issuance of a Modifcaten Number and the l confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number completion of the drawing update.

of NPRDS comoonent failures are based on the number 1) Form FC.1133 Backlog'In Progress. This number rep-of failure reports that have been sent to the Institute of resents modifcation requests that have not been plant Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). Confirmed NPRDS approved during the reporting month.

component failures are based upon failure reports that 2)Modifcation Requests Being Reviewed. This category have been accepted by INPO Possible NPRDS compo- ir cludes:

nont failums are based upon f ailure reports that are still A Ntcation Requests that are not yet reviewed.

under rewow by INPO NPRDS S a utihty industry users  %> caton Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear group program whch has been outhned by INPO and c,

, Review Cormrnee (NPRC).

implemented at FCS. ' * ..odificaten Requests being rev;ewed by the Nuclear Projects Commates (NPC)

NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM These Moddicaton Requests may be reviewed several INSTRUMENTS times before they are approved for accomplishment or A control room instrumen: that cannot perform its design cancelled. Some of these Modifcaton Requests are re-functon is considered as out of-service. A con: rot room turned to Engineering for more informaton, some ap-j instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order proved for eva!uaton, some approved fcr study, and (MWO) wntten for it and has not been repaired by the some approved for planning. Once planning is completed end of the reporting penod is considered out of service and the $ccpe of the work is clearly defined, these Mode and will be counted. The duration of the out of service fication Requests may be approved for amomplishment condition is not considered. Computer CRTs are not con- with a year assigned for cor.struction or they may be can-sidered as control room instruments- celled. Allof these ddlerent phases require review.

3) Design Engineering Backlog /In Progress. Nuclear NUMBER OF PERSONN2L ERRORS REPORTED IN Planning has assigned a year in whch constructon will LERS be completed and design work may be in progress.

The number of Licensee Event Reports (LER$) attributed 4) Construction Backlog /In Progress. The Ocastructen to persr.,nnel error on the original LER submittal. This Package has be 'ssued or mnstrucenn has begun but indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15+ the modification a not been accepw hy the System Accept 'e Committee (SAC).

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE- 5) Design dngineering UpJate Backlog'In Prcoress. PED SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT R iORTS has received iht Modifcation Completon Repcrt but the The number of Surveillanm Tests (STs) that result in drawings have not been updated.

Licensee Event Reports (LERs) dunng the repor*ing The above mentioned outstanding modifcatons do not J month. This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #60 & i.iclude modifcatons which are proposed for cancella-

61. ton.

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 The year, to date budget compared to the actual expen' REl-UELING OUTAGE) ditures for Operatons and Maintenance departments. The number of projects which affect the scope of tne Cycle 14 Refuehng Outage and the number of projects OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS for whch detailed schedules have been submitted. This

)

This indcator displays the total number of outstandin9 indcator tracks performance for SEP #31 I Corrective Action Reports (CARS), the number of CARS l l' that are older than six months W the number of modd'* OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION  !

! cation related CARS. REPORTE l

' The number of overdue Corrective Action Reports l' OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE- (CARS) and the number of CARS which received exten-OUESTS (EARS) sions broken down by organization for the last 6 months.

The total nuriber of open EARS and the number of open l EARS broken down by their age in months. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62.

82 l

l 1

PERFORMANCE It4DICATOR DEFINITIOtJS (Cont'd)

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE. RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM NANCE ACTIVITIES The number of identified poor radiological work practces The % of the number of completed maintenance activi- (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks i ties as compared to the number of scheduled mainte- radiological work performance for SEP #52. l nance activities each week. This % is shown for each maintenance craft. Maintenance activities include MWRs, RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE MWOs, STs, PMOs, cahbratons, and other miwelta- The rato of preventive maintenance (including surveil-neous activities. These indcators track Maintenance per. lance testing and cahbraton procedures) to the sum of formance for SEP #33. non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive main-tenance completed over the reporting pered. The ratio, PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA- expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-TlVE) hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance ac-Co'loctive radiation exposure is the total external whole. tivities for SEP #41.

body dose received by all on site personnel (including contractors and visitors) during a time period, as mea- RECORDABLE INJURY CAS!!U FREQUENCY RATE sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Col- (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man. The number of injunes requim;t 'nore than normal first rom. This indcator tracks radologeal work performance aid per 200,000 man hours worked. This indicator trends for SEP #54 personnel performance for SEP #15,25 & 26, PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE The rato of the number of turnovers to average employ- INDEX ment. A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary resig- The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI)is a calculation naton from the company, Retirement, death, termination, based on the concentratiori of key impurnies in the sec-transfers with the company, and part time employees ondary side of the plant, These key impunties are the are not considered in tumover, most likely cause of detercraton of the steam genera-tors. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 11 EMS OVERDUE period of time greater than 30 percent power, This indicator is defined as the % of preventive mainte- The CPIis calculated using the following equation: cpl .

nance items in the month that were not completed by the (Ka/0,6) + (Na'20) + (0/10)) / 3 where the following are scheduled dato plus a grace period equal to 25 % of the monthly averages of: Ka - average blowdown caton scheduled interval This indcator tracks preventive main- conductivity, Na - average blowdown sodium concen-tenance activities for SEP #41. tration, O, . average condensate pump discharge dis-colved oxygen concentraton.

PRIMARY SYSTEM CH5MISTRY % OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT SECF,lTY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN The % of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry The numoer of Secunty loggable/ reportable incidents is parameters divided by the total number of hours possible broken down into the following categories:

for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, 1) Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs)- incidents re-Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluonde, and lated to the use of LDVs, e.g., keys left in the vehicle, Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used. loss of keys, or failure to return keys,

2) Secunty Badges Incidents associated with improper

- PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLlANCE INCIDENTS use and handling of secunty badges. Incidents include (MAINTENANCE) securrty badges that are lost, taken out of the protected The number of identified incidents concerning mainte- area, out of control on site, or inadvertently destroyed or nance procedural problams, the number of closed irs broken, related to the use of procedures (includes the number of 3) Access Controland Authorizaton Administrative and closed irs caused by procedural noncompliance), and procedural errors associated with the use of the card-the number of closed procedural noncomphance irs. access system such as tailgating incorrect secunty This indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15 badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also

& 44. includes incidents that were caused by incorrect access authorizaton information entered into the security sys-PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION tem computer.

PLANNING 4) Secunty Key Control- Incidents involving Secur ty key The number of modifications approved for planning (to writrol, e g., lost Secunty keys, Securcy keys rernoved determine feasibihty) for completion during the Cycle 14 from site, or f ailure to reten Security keys. This type of Refueling Outage. This indcator tracks performance for event does not reflect incidents cor cerning LDV keys.

SEP #31. This indicator tracks security performance for SEP #58.

83

0 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS inccents involving alarm system f ailures, CCTV f ailures. The nurnber of temporary mechanical and electreal con-security computer f ailures, search equipment f ailures, figurations to the plant's systems.

door hardware failures, and card reader failures. These 1) Temporary configuratons are tefined as electncal system f ailures are further categonzed as follows: jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or me-

1) Alarm System Failure Detection system events in- chanical blocks whch are installed in the plant operating volving f alse/ nuisance alarms and mechanical f ailures. systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the

2) Alarm System Environmental Failures - Degtadatons PalD, schemate, connecton, wiring, or flow diagrams.

to cetection system periormance as a rosult of environ- 2Wumpers and blocks wh ch are installed for Surveil-mental conditons (i.e., rain, snow, trost). lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Pro.

cedures Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures  !

3)CCTV Failures - Mechanical f ailures to all CCTV hard-ware componente. are not considered as temporary modif cations unless the 4)CCTV Environmental Failures Degradations to CCTV jumper or block remains in place after the test or proco-performance as a result of environmental conditions (i.e., dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or rain, e now, f rost, fog, sunspots, shade). lab instruments are not considved as temporary modifi-

5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the multi- catons.

plexer, central processing unit, and other computer hard- 3)Scaf1olding is not considered a temporary modificaton.

ware and software. This category does not include soft- Jumpers and blocks which are instaued and for whch ware problems caused by operator error in u?ing the MRs have been submitted will be considered as tempo-software. rary modrf cations untillinal resoluton of the MR and the

6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x ray, metal, jumpe* or block is removed or is permanently recorded or explosive detectors and other equipment used to on the drawings. This indcator tracks temporary modifi-search for contraband. This also includes incidents catons for SEP #62 & 71.

where the search equipment is found defective or did not function properly dunng testing. TOTAL INSTRUCT 10N HOURS

7) Door Hardware Failures Failure of the door alarm The total number and department breakdown of training and door hardware such as latches, electre stokes, instructon hours administered by the Training Center.

foorknobs, locks, etc.

8) Card Reader Failures Incidents caused by mechani- TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING cal breakdown of card readers, but not improper use of The total number of student hours of training for Opera-tne card readers. (Seo Access Control and tions. Maintenance, Chemistry / Radiation Protection, Authorizaton). This in4cator tracks secunty periormance Technical Support, General Employee Training, and for SEP #58. Other Training conducted for FCS, SPARE PARTS ISSUED TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS The dollar value of the spare parts issued for FCS dunng Reportable skin ar# sthing contaminations above the reporting period, background levels greatar than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This indcator trends personnel perf ormance for STAFFING LEVEL SEP #15 & 54.

The actual staffing level and the authorized staffing level for the Nuclear Operatons Divisien, the Production Engi- UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOF ~ ORAMS neering Division, and the Nuclear Services Division. This WHILE CRIT;OAL indicator tracks performance for SEP #24. This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned au-tomate scrams (reactor protection system logic actua.

STATION NET GENERATION tions) that occur while the reactor is cr!!ical The indcator The not generation (sum) g.. 3duced by the FCS during is further d fined as follows:

the reporting month. 1) Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evo!uton.

STOCKOUT RATE 2) Scram means the automate shutdown of the reactor The total number of Pick Tickets that were generated by a rapid insertion of c!I control rods that is caused by during the reporting month and the total number of Pck actuaton of the reactor protecten system. The scram Tckets that were generated during the reporting month signal may have resulted f rom exceeding a setpoint or when the amount of parts requested is equalto or less may have been spurious.

than the minimum stocking level and parts are not avail- 3) Automatic means that the initial signal that caused ac-able. tuaton of the reactor protection system logic was pro-vided from one of the sensors monitonng plant param-eters and conditons, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main cor, trol room.

4) Critical means that during the steady-state condition of tne reactor prior to the scram,ihe effective mult;plcation f actor (k,) was 0gual to one.

84

e l

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)

This indicator is defineel a3 the sum of the following safety system actuations:

1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Coohng System (ECCS) actuatons that result nom .eaching an ECCS ac%ation setpoint or from a spurous/ inadvertent ECCS signal.

2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that resu!! f rom a loss of power to a r.afeguards bus. An unplanned safety system actuaton occurs when an actuaton setpoint for a safety system is reachod or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated (ECCS only), and major equipn.ent in the system is actuated.

Unplanned means that the system actuaton was not part of a planned test or evoluton. The ECCS actuatons to t,e

- counted are actuatons of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, c- m safety injecton tanks.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS(r 1C DEFINITION)

The numbe* of safety system actuatons which include (2 the Hgh Pressure Safety injecton Sy:, tem, the Low Pressure Gafety injection System, the Safety injection Tanns, and the Emergency Diesel Generators, The NRC clas-sification of safety system actuatons includes actuations when major equipment is operated g.d when the logic sys-tems for the above safety systems are challenged VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This ind.cator is defined as the number of volations sited in NRC inspecton reports for FCS per 1000 NRC inspecton hours. The violatons are reported in the year that the inspecton was actually performed and not based on when the inspecton report is received.The hours reported for each inspecton report are used as the inspection hours.

VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for ourial This mdcator also shows the volume of low level radoactive waste which is in temporary storage, the amour.t c1 radcactive oil that has been shipped off site for processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste which has been shipped off-site for processing. Low level sohd rado .ctive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated tags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers and any other mater i to be d:sposed of at a low-level radioactive waste d:sposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level re-fers to all radtoactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by product of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radio-logical work performance for SEP #54.

l l

85

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Erihancement Program (SEP) Performance indicators Index is to hst perfor.

mance indicators related to SEP ltems with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15 Eagg  !

Increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Performance wJacators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . .26 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . .43 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . . 62 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs . .63 CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued s s LERs Reported . .78 SEP Reference Number 20 Ouality Audits and SurveHlance Programs are Evaluated. Improved in Dep"1 and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations isnued vs LERs Reported . . 78 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Saf ety System Functional Inspections CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . .78 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff Studies Staffing '.evel . . . 64 SdP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate . . .11 Recordable Injury /lilness Cases Frequency Rate . . . 62 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requiremants Disabhng injury / Illness Frequency Rate . , , ., .11 Recordable Injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . . 62 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Overall Status (Cycle 14 Refuehng Outage) . . . 70 Progress of Cycle 14 Outage Modification Planning . .71 Overall Project Status (Cycle 14 Refueling Outage) .. . .. . . . . 72 SEP Ref erence Number 33_

Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Maintenance). . . 28 (Pressure Equipment) . . . . . . . 29 (General Maintencnce). . . . . . 30 (Mechanical Maintenance) .. . 31 (Instrumentation & Control) . . 32 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance). . 20 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance) . .27 l SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance .. .22 86

. ,- . ---. ,- .. .-.- -~ . - . -.- -

.e s: . .

- Preventive Maintenance itoms Overdue .... .. . . ., ... . . ... .. .... .. ........ .. .. ........ .. . . . . . . . ...23 A Procedural Nonccmpliance incidents .... .. . , ........ .... .... .. ............ .. .. .. ....... . . . . . ..26 l

l_ - .-

SEP Reference Number 43

. Implement the Check Valve Test Program .

_ Check Valve Failure Rate ........ ...... .... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..36 SEP Reference Number 4 4 Compliance With and lise of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . .. . . . .. ...26 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Controland Adm!nistrative Program Docu ment Re view .... .......... ., . , .. .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. . . . ... . . . . . . . .15 SEP Refgtence Number 52

' Establish Superv;sory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program.. ......... .. . . . . .. . . . , . .. , .. ..45 SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) .. ... .. .. ... . . . . . .. ,, .... . . . . , ., . ...9 Volume of Low-Level Solo Radioactive Waste . . . . ....... . .... . ..... .. ... . .. . ., .10 Total Skir and Clothing Contaminations ...... . ... ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ..43 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area ... ... .. .... . ... . ,, . . - . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . ..44

SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security. Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) . ......., ... . .. ,,. . . . . . .. . ... . . .. ....... 49 Security incident ereakdown.. ... ... . . . . ,, , ., . . . ... . . . . . .- . . . ...50

. Security System Failures , .. ..... . . . . .......... , ....... ... .. . . - . . . . .... .. . . . .. 51 -

SED Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. . . . . . . . . . . .... 33 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Survei!!ance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.. .. , .. . . . . . . . .. 33 SEP Reference Number 82 '

Establish Interim System Engineers

- Te mpo ra ry M odif icat io ns . .,.. . .. . ...... . . . .. .... . .... . .. .. .. ... ... . ... . .. . .. . . .. . . . , , . . . . . . .. . . . . . .-. ... 58

- Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EARS) .. . .. . .. .... .... ., . . .. . .. . . . .. . . i.59 ,

Enginee ring C hange Notice St atus ............... .... .......... . ... . . ..... . ........ . ...... . ,.. .. . .. ... ..60__

Engineering Change Notice Breakdown .......... ... . . ... ... ...... ... ... . .. .. . .. . .. .. . ..... 61

. SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator. Training Licensed Operator Requalification Training ..... '

. .. ... ...... . .. ............ .. .., .. .. . .. . . ...65.

License Candidate Exams... . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . 66

'SEP Reference Number 71

.  : Improve Cuntrols over Temporary Modifications

--Temporary Modifications . . . . .. . . . ... . . ... . . . .. 58

- 87 er-r-+-=4e m-=. == y- se (-r -ve c * * - - - m.-- s - --e*w - -ww+- e w - 4 ese >=**w- -- -- --*---a+=n-? e -+wm r?M+- s - bewir ~ -

i 4

REPOHT DISTRIBUTION LIST J. C. Adams R. M. Hawkins D. G. Ried R. L. Andrews M. C. Headrickson G. K. Samide G L. Anglehart R. R. Henning T.J.Sandene W. R. Bateman K. R. Henry B. A. Schmidt K. L Betek J. B. Herman S T. Schmitz A. D. Bilau G. J. Hill F. C. Scofield B. H. Biome K. C. Holthaus L. G. Sealock C. N. Bloyd M. A. Howman H. J. Sofick J.P.Bobba L. G. Huliska D. K. Sentel C. E. Boughtcr C. J. Husk J. W. Shannon M. A. Breuer R. L. Jaworski R. W. Short C. J. Brunnert R. A. Johansen C. F. Simmons M. W. Butt W. C. Jones E.L.Skaggs C. A. Carlson J.D.Kecy J. L. Skilet J. W. Chase J, D. Keppler F. K. Srnith G. R. Chatfield D. D. Kloock R. L. Sorenson A. G Christensen J. C. Knight K. E. Steele A. J. Clark D. M. Kobunski W. Steele O. J Clayton G. J. Krause H. F. Sterba R. P. Clemens L. J. Kripal G.A.Teeple J. L. Connolley J. G. Krist M. A. Tesar G. M. Cook J. B. Kuhr T. G. Therkildsen M R. Core L. T. Kusek J. W. Tills S. R. Crites L.E. Labs D. R. Trausch D. W. Dale M. P. Lazar P. R. Tun or R. C. DeMeulmeester R. C. Learch J. M. Uhland R. D. DeYoung S.E. Lee C.F.Vanecek D. C. Dietz R. E. Lewis J. M. Waszak J. A. Drahota R. C. Liebentritt W. O. Weber

- T. R. Dukarski C. J. Linden G. R. Williams P. D. Dunham B. R. Livingston S. J. Willrett R. G. Eurich J. H. MacKinnon W. C. Woerner H. J. Faulhaber G. D. Mamoran M. A. Ferdig J. W. Marcil V. H. Frahm N. L. Marfice F. F. Franco D. J. Matthews M. T. Frans J. M. Mattice H. K. Fraser T. J. Mcivor J. F. W. Friedrichsen K. S. McCormick S. K. Gambhir R. F. Mehaffey J. K. Gasper K. J. Morris W. G. Gates D. C, Mueller M. O. Gautier R. J. Mueller S. W. Gebers J. B. Newhouse J. M. G!antz M. W. Nichols J. T. Gleason C. W. Norris L. V. Goldberg J. T. O'Connor D. J. Golden W. W. Orr D. C. Gorence L. L. Parent l R. E. Gray T. L. Patterson  ;

M. J. Gu. inn R. L. Phelps E. R. Gundal T. M. Reisdorfi R. H. Guy A. W. Richard 88

t 4

ADVERSE TREND REPORT A Performance indcator which has data representing Egcondarv Systern Chemimv inree (3) consecutive months of declining performance (Page 37) const*utes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report The Secondary System Chemistry Pedormance tr' 9 x explains the conditions under which certain indicaiors are for the reporting month (0.48)is above the Fort Ca..wn showing adverse trends. An explanation will be provided goal of 0.45, for indicators with data representing three months of de-clining performance that have been labeled as adverse Number of Het Scots trends, (Page 46)

The following indicators are exhibitir g adverse trends for The number of Hot Spots for the reporting month (65) the reporting month; exceeds the Fort Calhoun goa! of 40.

Ecuivalent Avahbibtv Factor hventory Accuraev (Page 7) (Page 54)

This indicator has decreased sace May 1991 and the The inventory accuracy tot the reporting month (92%) is valus for the reporting month (38%) is below the Fort below the Fort Calhoun goal of 99%.

Calhoun goalof 69%.

Stoekout Rate cue' Re!iabi!ity Indicator (Page 54)

(Page B) The percentage of pick tickets generated when the Tr.e Fuel Reliabikty indicator value has increased since amount of parts requested is equal to ar less than the June 1991, minimum stocking level and parts are not available is above the Fort Calhoun gollof 2%

Disablino iniurvilhets Frecuenev Rate (Page 11) Temocrary Mod Acations This indicator has been defined by the Manager of the (Page 58)

Safety Department as exhibiting an adverse trend based The age of temporary modificatons for the reporting on the 5 year frequency rate. month exceeds the Fort Calhoun Goals.

Recordable hiurv$lness Cases Frecuency Rate End of Management Attention Report.

(Page 62)

This indicator has been defined by the Manager of the Safety Department as exhibiting an adverse trend based PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT on the 5 year frequency rate.

IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES End of Adverse Trond Report. Maintenance Effectiveness (Page 35)

Falure f:guros for the reporting month have been calcu-INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED lated on an eighteen month basis, rather than the twelve MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT month basis previously utilized.

This section lists the indicators which show inadequacies Eigekout Rate as compared to the OPPD goal and indcators which (Page 54) show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper The goal has been changed from 0% to 2%.

quartile. The indicators will be compared to the industry upper quartile as relevant to that indcator. Licensed Otarator Reauanfication Trainina (Page 65)

Gress Heat Rate The category " Number of Job Performance Measures" (Page 6) has been replaced with 'Non Requalificaton Training The gross heat rate has been above the Fort Calhoun Hours" for clarification, year end goal since March 1991.

Violations oer 1000 Insoectig.n Hours Ratio of Preventive tg_ Ictal Maintenance (Non Outace) (Page 73)

(Page 22) The 1990 goalis no longer shown because it was not The valua of 52.8% for the reporting month is below the based on the current method of calculating vio!ations per Fort Ca 40 goal of 60 %. 1000 inspecton hours.

Number of Out of Service Centro 1 Room Mstruments End of Indicator improvement / Changes Report.

(rage 24)

The total number of out of-service control roorriinstru-ments for the reportirq month (35)is above the Fort Ca!-

houn goal of 15. gg l

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERAT:NG CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH) Cumulative (MWH)

Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/01/75 05/09/75 *

• Cycle 2 05/09/75-10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01/76-12/13/76 *

• Cycle 3 12/13/76-09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30/77 12/09/77 *

• Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/14/78 12/24/78 *

• Cycle 5 12/24/78- 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/80- 06/11/80 *

• Cycle 6 06/11/80- 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 -12/21/81 *

• Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,8G6 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 *

• Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refuehng 03,03/84- 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85- 01/16/86 *

• Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87-06/08/87 *

• Cycle 11 06/08/8',' 09/27/83 4,936,639 41,771,505 lith Refueling 09/27/88- 01/31/89 *

• Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90 05/29/90 *

• Cycle 13# 05/29/90- 02/01/92 # Planned Dates

• 13th Refueling # 02/01/92 05/01/92

• Cycle 14# 05/01/92 09/18/93

• 14th Refueling 09/18/93 11/13/93 *

• Cycle 15# 11/13/93 - 03/11/95

• 15th RefueMo# 03/11/95 - 05/06/95

• FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5, 1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Elect icity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Comme cial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 19E7 Most Productive Fuel Cycle it JJ6,859 MWH)(Cycle 11) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988