|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20153E4221988-08-29029 August 1988 Forwards Order Revoking CPPR-172 & CPPR-173 & NRC Staff Evaluation of Site Stabilization Plan Per from Util ML20153E2331988-08-26026 August 1988 Forwards Status of Site Stabilization Activities,Per R Auluck Request.Tva Has Completed All Major Site Stabilization Activities at Plant W/Only Minor Maint Activities Remaining ML20215C5661986-10-0606 October 1986 Further Response to FOIA Request for All Records Concerning Allegations That Pullman Power Products Employees Intimidated QC Inspectors.Forwards App F Documents.App G & H Documents Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemptions 7 & 5) ML20133N7321985-10-24024 October 1985 Forwards Proposed Cancellation Plans for Plants Officially Canceled on 840829.Requests Withdrawal of CPPR-150,CPPR-152, CPPR-172 & CPPR-173.W/two Oversize Drawings ML20128Q2441985-05-17017 May 1985 Further Response to FOIA Request for Six Categories of Records Re Nuclear Waste Policy Act.App B Documents Available in Pdr.Forwards App C Documents ML18029A3981985-02-27027 February 1985 Responds to RM Diggs 850117 & 0211 Ltrs Re Determination of Fees for Const Extension Requests.Util Supports NRC Determination & Will Submit Fees ML20096F8731984-09-0505 September 1984 Forwards Motion to Terminate Appellate Jurisdiction.W/O Encl.Related Correspondence ML20077G6661983-07-27027 July 1983 Part 21 Rept Re Circuit Breakers Mfg Between Nov 1981 & Feb 1982.Breakers Should Be Inspected for Broken Puffer Linkage Studs.Stud Identified as Part Number 192247A.List of Circuit Breakers for Nuclear Plants Encl ML20023C3361983-05-12012 May 1983 Forwards Details of Deferral Plans for Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. ML20073S5851983-02-24024 February 1983 FOIA Request for All Documents Re Decision to Terminate Const of Facility ML20071B9741983-02-24024 February 1983 Reiterates 830121 Request for CP Extension Until 870901 to Permit Final Decision Re Future of Nuclear Units Based on Load Growth/Demand.Deferral Plan Details to Be Submitted by 830506 ML20069D8691982-09-20020 September 1982 Forwards Black Fox Station Soil Stabilization & Erosion Control Program, Per ASLB 820618 Memorandum & Order.Plan Addresses Concerns Raised in NRC 820602 Submittal ML20055C0611982-08-0606 August 1982 Forwards Info Re QA for Deferred Plants,In Response to NRC .Possible Cancellation of Some Units Will Be Discussed at Future Meeting of TVA Board of Directors ML20054K8881982-06-29029 June 1982 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept YCNP-SMR-7, Jan-June 1981 ML20054K1531982-06-23023 June 1982 Informs That Final Deficiency Repts for Listed Nonconformances Will Not Be Submitted Until Final Decision Is Made Re Const of Projects ML20052F0901982-05-0404 May 1982 Informs That Addl Action Will Be Required in Order to Fully Comply W/Asme Code Requirements for Radiography of safe-end Welds.Discrepancy Will Be Resolved by re-radiographing Affected Welds ML20069B9611982-03-0202 March 1982 Informs of Changes Re Slowdown in Const Activities.Busing of Employees No Longer Justifiable Due to Lower Employment Levels & Const Schedule Changes.Waterfowl Wetlands Wildlife Monitoring Results Show Const Has Not Affected Wildlife ML20040H4141982-02-10010 February 1982 Notifies That Facilities Ref CENPD-210,Revision 3 Per 820202 Request.Info Based on Review of PSARs ML20039B5581981-12-17017 December 1981 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Per Fes Section 4.5.2.5 ML20039A2811981-12-0404 December 1981 Notifies That Environ Const Noise Monitoring Procedures Will Be Revised at Hartsville & Yellow Creek & Terminated at Phipps Bend.Changes Caused by Slowdown & Cessation of Const. Summary of Const Noise Monitoring Program History Encl ML20009D9311981-07-0808 July 1981 Forwards Response to IE Bulletin 81-03, Flow Blockage of Cooling Water to Safety Sys Components by Corbicula Sp (Asiatic Clam) & Mytilus Sp (Mussel). ML20004B4021981-05-21021 May 1981 Responds to Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/81-02 & 50-567/81-02 Re Failure to Establish Adequate Measures to Control Welding & Nondestructive Exam.Rept Revises 810330 Rept to Reflect Bend Sample Fissure Evaluation Results ML19350D9121981-05-20020 May 1981 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Jan-June 1981 ML19350C7811981-03-30030 March 1981 Responds to NRC 810304 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/81-02 & 50-567/81-02.Corrective Actions: Certification of Welders Previously Certified Were Revoked & Are Tracking Potentially Unacceptable Welds ML19341D3021981-02-26026 February 1981 Forwards Revised Description of Onsite Meteorological Measurements Program.Revision Will Be Included in OL Application ML20003A0731981-01-26026 January 1981 Advises of Work W/Three Counties in Ms to Upgrade Emergency Response Capabilities.Requests That NRC Ltr Be Sent to Local Officials Explaining Use of Mitigation Funds for Emergency Response ML19341A0831980-12-23023 December 1980 Responds to NRC 801125 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-17 & 50-567/80-17.Corrective Actions:Part Ii,Section 5.1 of Div of Nuclear Power Operational QA Manual Rewritten ML19345D5871980-12-0505 December 1980 Forwards Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Semiannual Rept for Jul-Dec.Rept Prepared for Fes ML19338G6101980-10-24024 October 1980 Requests Expedited Review of Newport News Industrial Corp Draft Topical Rept Re Vol Reduction Sys.Util Plans to Utilize Sys at Units 1 & 2 ML19338G2151980-10-21021 October 1980 Forwards Response to NRC 800926 Lr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-14 & 50-567/80-14.Corrective Actions: Review of Concrete Test Dispositioned in Qcir 51057 Showed Design Strength Should Be Realized at Later than Design Age ML19338G4281980-10-0303 October 1980 Submits Second Revised Response to Infraction Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective Actions: Radiographs Made Before 800207 re-examined for Deficiencies. Film Processing & Shim Placement Guidelines Established ML19338E1241980-08-18018 August 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective Actions: Radiographs Before 800207 re-examined & Radiographers Instructed in Requirements of Shim Placement ML19331D1441980-08-18018 August 1980 Forwards Revised Final Response to IE Insp Repts 50-566/ 80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Response Reflects Util Decision to Radiograph Addl Seven Welds.Rept Will Be Submitted by 801027 Re Film Darkening Problem,Per NRC Request ML19320C0241980-07-11011 July 1980 Forwards Revised Final Deficiency Rept Re Placement of Earthfill in Essential Raw Cooling Water Spray Pond ML19320C5471980-07-10010 July 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit ML19320C5371980-07-10010 July 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Placement of Earthfill in ERCW Spray Pond ML19320C2251980-07-0909 July 1980 Forwards Second Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit. Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800820.W/o Encl ML19318A3751980-06-13013 June 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Defective Concrete Pour in Auxiliary Bldg ML19310A4311980-06-10010 June 1980 Responds to IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03 Re Failure to Establish Adequate Measures to Control Radiography.Radiography of Welds Scheduled for Completion by 800701 ML19320D6471980-06-0303 June 1980 Forwards Do Jourdan 800328 Ltr for Consideration ML19316B0711980-05-27027 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit YC-C-80-05.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800710 ML19312E4851980-05-27027 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Placement & Compaction of Concrete Pour A2-D1 ML19323F1361980-05-21021 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit ML19316A7591980-05-19019 May 1980 Requests NRC Cooperation in Expediting Approval of York Model 299 Type 3G Moisture Separator Discussed in Topical Rept York 80-67459,submitted 800331.Separators Required by Util by 800822 Due to Const Delays ML19323G6001980-05-19019 May 1980 Advises That Ah Gutterman Will No Longer Appear in Proceedings on Behalf of Util ML19323J0771980-05-19019 May 1980 Responds to NRC 800424 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-07 & 50-567/80-07.Corrective Actions:Purge Air Blower Filters & Solenoid Valve Cleaned ML19309H4951980-05-0505 May 1980 Forwards Second Interim Deficiency Rept Re Incorrect Use of Inertia Resulting in shear-related,cross-sectional Property Calculations for Control Bldg ML19309G4161980-04-28028 April 1980 Forwards Revised Response to Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03 Re Failure to Establish & Control Radiography.Film Interpreters & Radiographers Instructed in Shim Placement ML19312E3331980-04-28028 April 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective actions:800324 & 0421 Submittals revised.Re-evaluation of Radiographs Showed Only Seven Welds Will Require Reradiographing ML19344D6381980-04-21021 April 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Improper Documentation & Utilization of Computer Program Inertia. Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800801 1988-08-29
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20153E2331988-08-26026 August 1988 Forwards Status of Site Stabilization Activities,Per R Auluck Request.Tva Has Completed All Major Site Stabilization Activities at Plant W/Only Minor Maint Activities Remaining ML20133N7321985-10-24024 October 1985 Forwards Proposed Cancellation Plans for Plants Officially Canceled on 840829.Requests Withdrawal of CPPR-150,CPPR-152, CPPR-172 & CPPR-173.W/two Oversize Drawings ML18029A3981985-02-27027 February 1985 Responds to RM Diggs 850117 & 0211 Ltrs Re Determination of Fees for Const Extension Requests.Util Supports NRC Determination & Will Submit Fees ML20096F8731984-09-0505 September 1984 Forwards Motion to Terminate Appellate Jurisdiction.W/O Encl.Related Correspondence ML20023C3361983-05-12012 May 1983 Forwards Details of Deferral Plans for Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. ML20073S5851983-02-24024 February 1983 FOIA Request for All Documents Re Decision to Terminate Const of Facility ML20071B9741983-02-24024 February 1983 Reiterates 830121 Request for CP Extension Until 870901 to Permit Final Decision Re Future of Nuclear Units Based on Load Growth/Demand.Deferral Plan Details to Be Submitted by 830506 ML20069D8691982-09-20020 September 1982 Forwards Black Fox Station Soil Stabilization & Erosion Control Program, Per ASLB 820618 Memorandum & Order.Plan Addresses Concerns Raised in NRC 820602 Submittal ML20055C0611982-08-0606 August 1982 Forwards Info Re QA for Deferred Plants,In Response to NRC .Possible Cancellation of Some Units Will Be Discussed at Future Meeting of TVA Board of Directors ML20054K8881982-06-29029 June 1982 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept YCNP-SMR-7, Jan-June 1981 ML20054K1531982-06-23023 June 1982 Informs That Final Deficiency Repts for Listed Nonconformances Will Not Be Submitted Until Final Decision Is Made Re Const of Projects ML20052F0901982-05-0404 May 1982 Informs That Addl Action Will Be Required in Order to Fully Comply W/Asme Code Requirements for Radiography of safe-end Welds.Discrepancy Will Be Resolved by re-radiographing Affected Welds ML20069B9611982-03-0202 March 1982 Informs of Changes Re Slowdown in Const Activities.Busing of Employees No Longer Justifiable Due to Lower Employment Levels & Const Schedule Changes.Waterfowl Wetlands Wildlife Monitoring Results Show Const Has Not Affected Wildlife ML20040H4141982-02-10010 February 1982 Notifies That Facilities Ref CENPD-210,Revision 3 Per 820202 Request.Info Based on Review of PSARs ML20039B5581981-12-17017 December 1981 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Per Fes Section 4.5.2.5 ML20039A2811981-12-0404 December 1981 Notifies That Environ Const Noise Monitoring Procedures Will Be Revised at Hartsville & Yellow Creek & Terminated at Phipps Bend.Changes Caused by Slowdown & Cessation of Const. Summary of Const Noise Monitoring Program History Encl ML20009D9311981-07-0808 July 1981 Forwards Response to IE Bulletin 81-03, Flow Blockage of Cooling Water to Safety Sys Components by Corbicula Sp (Asiatic Clam) & Mytilus Sp (Mussel). ML20004B4021981-05-21021 May 1981 Responds to Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/81-02 & 50-567/81-02 Re Failure to Establish Adequate Measures to Control Welding & Nondestructive Exam.Rept Revises 810330 Rept to Reflect Bend Sample Fissure Evaluation Results ML19350D9121981-05-20020 May 1981 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Jan-June 1981 ML19350C7811981-03-30030 March 1981 Responds to NRC 810304 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/81-02 & 50-567/81-02.Corrective Actions: Certification of Welders Previously Certified Were Revoked & Are Tracking Potentially Unacceptable Welds ML19341D3021981-02-26026 February 1981 Forwards Revised Description of Onsite Meteorological Measurements Program.Revision Will Be Included in OL Application ML20003A0731981-01-26026 January 1981 Advises of Work W/Three Counties in Ms to Upgrade Emergency Response Capabilities.Requests That NRC Ltr Be Sent to Local Officials Explaining Use of Mitigation Funds for Emergency Response ML19341A0831980-12-23023 December 1980 Responds to NRC 801125 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-17 & 50-567/80-17.Corrective Actions:Part Ii,Section 5.1 of Div of Nuclear Power Operational QA Manual Rewritten ML19345D5871980-12-0505 December 1980 Forwards Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Semiannual Rept for Jul-Dec.Rept Prepared for Fes ML19338G6101980-10-24024 October 1980 Requests Expedited Review of Newport News Industrial Corp Draft Topical Rept Re Vol Reduction Sys.Util Plans to Utilize Sys at Units 1 & 2 ML19338G2151980-10-21021 October 1980 Forwards Response to NRC 800926 Lr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-14 & 50-567/80-14.Corrective Actions: Review of Concrete Test Dispositioned in Qcir 51057 Showed Design Strength Should Be Realized at Later than Design Age ML19338G4281980-10-0303 October 1980 Submits Second Revised Response to Infraction Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective Actions: Radiographs Made Before 800207 re-examined for Deficiencies. Film Processing & Shim Placement Guidelines Established ML19338E1241980-08-18018 August 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective Actions: Radiographs Before 800207 re-examined & Radiographers Instructed in Requirements of Shim Placement ML19331D1441980-08-18018 August 1980 Forwards Revised Final Response to IE Insp Repts 50-566/ 80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Response Reflects Util Decision to Radiograph Addl Seven Welds.Rept Will Be Submitted by 801027 Re Film Darkening Problem,Per NRC Request ML19320C0241980-07-11011 July 1980 Forwards Revised Final Deficiency Rept Re Placement of Earthfill in Essential Raw Cooling Water Spray Pond ML19320C5471980-07-10010 July 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit ML19320C5371980-07-10010 July 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Placement of Earthfill in ERCW Spray Pond ML19320C2251980-07-0909 July 1980 Forwards Second Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit. Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800820.W/o Encl ML19318A3751980-06-13013 June 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Defective Concrete Pour in Auxiliary Bldg ML19310A4311980-06-10010 June 1980 Responds to IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03 Re Failure to Establish Adequate Measures to Control Radiography.Radiography of Welds Scheduled for Completion by 800701 ML19320D6471980-06-0303 June 1980 Forwards Do Jourdan 800328 Ltr for Consideration ML19312E4851980-05-27027 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Placement & Compaction of Concrete Pour A2-D1 ML19316B0711980-05-27027 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit YC-C-80-05.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800710 ML19323F1361980-05-21021 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit ML19323G6001980-05-19019 May 1980 Advises That Ah Gutterman Will No Longer Appear in Proceedings on Behalf of Util ML19323J0771980-05-19019 May 1980 Responds to NRC 800424 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-07 & 50-567/80-07.Corrective Actions:Purge Air Blower Filters & Solenoid Valve Cleaned ML19316A7591980-05-19019 May 1980 Requests NRC Cooperation in Expediting Approval of York Model 299 Type 3G Moisture Separator Discussed in Topical Rept York 80-67459,submitted 800331.Separators Required by Util by 800822 Due to Const Delays ML19309H4951980-05-0505 May 1980 Forwards Second Interim Deficiency Rept Re Incorrect Use of Inertia Resulting in shear-related,cross-sectional Property Calculations for Control Bldg ML19312E3331980-04-28028 April 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective actions:800324 & 0421 Submittals revised.Re-evaluation of Radiographs Showed Only Seven Welds Will Require Reradiographing ML19309G4161980-04-28028 April 1980 Forwards Revised Response to Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03 Re Failure to Establish & Control Radiography.Film Interpreters & Radiographers Instructed in Shim Placement ML19312E3421980-04-21021 April 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Advises That Revised Response to 800409 Ltr Will Be Submitted by 800428 ML19344D6691980-04-21021 April 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Defective Concrete Pour in Auxiliary Bldg.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800613 ML19344D6381980-04-21021 April 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Improper Documentation & Utilization of Computer Program Inertia. Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800801 ML19354C3071980-04-21021 April 1980 Notifies That Revised Response to Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03 Re Failure to Establish Adequate Measures to Control Radiography,Will Be Submitted by 800428 ML19309F1201980-04-15015 April 1980 Forwards YCNP-SMR 3, Socioeconimic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, for Jan-June 1979 1988-08-26
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20153E2331988-08-26026 August 1988 Forwards Status of Site Stabilization Activities,Per R Auluck Request.Tva Has Completed All Major Site Stabilization Activities at Plant W/Only Minor Maint Activities Remaining ML20133N7321985-10-24024 October 1985 Forwards Proposed Cancellation Plans for Plants Officially Canceled on 840829.Requests Withdrawal of CPPR-150,CPPR-152, CPPR-172 & CPPR-173.W/two Oversize Drawings ML18029A3981985-02-27027 February 1985 Responds to RM Diggs 850117 & 0211 Ltrs Re Determination of Fees for Const Extension Requests.Util Supports NRC Determination & Will Submit Fees ML20096F8731984-09-0505 September 1984 Forwards Motion to Terminate Appellate Jurisdiction.W/O Encl.Related Correspondence ML20023C3361983-05-12012 May 1983 Forwards Details of Deferral Plans for Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. ML20071B9741983-02-24024 February 1983 Reiterates 830121 Request for CP Extension Until 870901 to Permit Final Decision Re Future of Nuclear Units Based on Load Growth/Demand.Deferral Plan Details to Be Submitted by 830506 ML20069D8691982-09-20020 September 1982 Forwards Black Fox Station Soil Stabilization & Erosion Control Program, Per ASLB 820618 Memorandum & Order.Plan Addresses Concerns Raised in NRC 820602 Submittal ML20055C0611982-08-0606 August 1982 Forwards Info Re QA for Deferred Plants,In Response to NRC .Possible Cancellation of Some Units Will Be Discussed at Future Meeting of TVA Board of Directors ML20054K8881982-06-29029 June 1982 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept YCNP-SMR-7, Jan-June 1981 ML20054K1531982-06-23023 June 1982 Informs That Final Deficiency Repts for Listed Nonconformances Will Not Be Submitted Until Final Decision Is Made Re Const of Projects ML20069B9611982-03-0202 March 1982 Informs of Changes Re Slowdown in Const Activities.Busing of Employees No Longer Justifiable Due to Lower Employment Levels & Const Schedule Changes.Waterfowl Wetlands Wildlife Monitoring Results Show Const Has Not Affected Wildlife ML20039B5581981-12-17017 December 1981 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Per Fes Section 4.5.2.5 ML20039A2811981-12-0404 December 1981 Notifies That Environ Const Noise Monitoring Procedures Will Be Revised at Hartsville & Yellow Creek & Terminated at Phipps Bend.Changes Caused by Slowdown & Cessation of Const. Summary of Const Noise Monitoring Program History Encl ML20009D9311981-07-0808 July 1981 Forwards Response to IE Bulletin 81-03, Flow Blockage of Cooling Water to Safety Sys Components by Corbicula Sp (Asiatic Clam) & Mytilus Sp (Mussel). ML20004B4021981-05-21021 May 1981 Responds to Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/81-02 & 50-567/81-02 Re Failure to Establish Adequate Measures to Control Welding & Nondestructive Exam.Rept Revises 810330 Rept to Reflect Bend Sample Fissure Evaluation Results ML19350D9121981-05-20020 May 1981 Forwards Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Jan-June 1981 ML19350C7811981-03-30030 March 1981 Responds to NRC 810304 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/81-02 & 50-567/81-02.Corrective Actions: Certification of Welders Previously Certified Were Revoked & Are Tracking Potentially Unacceptable Welds ML19341D3021981-02-26026 February 1981 Forwards Revised Description of Onsite Meteorological Measurements Program.Revision Will Be Included in OL Application ML19341A0831980-12-23023 December 1980 Responds to NRC 801125 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-17 & 50-567/80-17.Corrective Actions:Part Ii,Section 5.1 of Div of Nuclear Power Operational QA Manual Rewritten ML19345D5871980-12-0505 December 1980 Forwards Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Semiannual Rept for Jul-Dec.Rept Prepared for Fes ML19338G6101980-10-24024 October 1980 Requests Expedited Review of Newport News Industrial Corp Draft Topical Rept Re Vol Reduction Sys.Util Plans to Utilize Sys at Units 1 & 2 ML19338G2151980-10-21021 October 1980 Forwards Response to NRC 800926 Lr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-14 & 50-567/80-14.Corrective Actions: Review of Concrete Test Dispositioned in Qcir 51057 Showed Design Strength Should Be Realized at Later than Design Age ML19338G4281980-10-0303 October 1980 Submits Second Revised Response to Infraction Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective Actions: Radiographs Made Before 800207 re-examined for Deficiencies. Film Processing & Shim Placement Guidelines Established ML19338E1241980-08-18018 August 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective Actions: Radiographs Before 800207 re-examined & Radiographers Instructed in Requirements of Shim Placement ML19331D1441980-08-18018 August 1980 Forwards Revised Final Response to IE Insp Repts 50-566/ 80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Response Reflects Util Decision to Radiograph Addl Seven Welds.Rept Will Be Submitted by 801027 Re Film Darkening Problem,Per NRC Request ML19320C0241980-07-11011 July 1980 Forwards Revised Final Deficiency Rept Re Placement of Earthfill in Essential Raw Cooling Water Spray Pond ML19320C5471980-07-10010 July 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit ML19320C5371980-07-10010 July 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Placement of Earthfill in ERCW Spray Pond ML19320C2251980-07-0909 July 1980 Forwards Second Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit. Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800820.W/o Encl ML19318A3751980-06-13013 June 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Defective Concrete Pour in Auxiliary Bldg ML19310A4311980-06-10010 June 1980 Responds to IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03 Re Failure to Establish Adequate Measures to Control Radiography.Radiography of Welds Scheduled for Completion by 800701 ML19312E4851980-05-27027 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Placement & Compaction of Concrete Pour A2-D1 ML19316B0711980-05-27027 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit YC-C-80-05.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800710 ML19323F1361980-05-21021 May 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Const QA Audit ML19323G6001980-05-19019 May 1980 Advises That Ah Gutterman Will No Longer Appear in Proceedings on Behalf of Util ML19323J0771980-05-19019 May 1980 Responds to NRC 800424 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-07 & 50-567/80-07.Corrective Actions:Purge Air Blower Filters & Solenoid Valve Cleaned ML19309H4951980-05-0505 May 1980 Forwards Second Interim Deficiency Rept Re Incorrect Use of Inertia Resulting in shear-related,cross-sectional Property Calculations for Control Bldg ML19312E3331980-04-28028 April 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective actions:800324 & 0421 Submittals revised.Re-evaluation of Radiographs Showed Only Seven Welds Will Require Reradiographing ML19309G4161980-04-28028 April 1980 Forwards Revised Response to Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03 Re Failure to Establish & Control Radiography.Film Interpreters & Radiographers Instructed in Shim Placement ML19344D6691980-04-21021 April 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Defective Concrete Pour in Auxiliary Bldg.Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800613 ML19312E3421980-04-21021 April 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Advises That Revised Response to 800409 Ltr Will Be Submitted by 800428 ML19344D6381980-04-21021 April 1980 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Improper Documentation & Utilization of Computer Program Inertia. Next Rept Will Be Submitted by 800801 ML19354C3071980-04-21021 April 1980 Notifies That Revised Response to Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03 Re Failure to Establish Adequate Measures to Control Radiography,Will Be Submitted by 800428 ML19309F1201980-04-15015 April 1980 Forwards YCNP-SMR 3, Socioeconimic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, for Jan-June 1979 ML19309A4881980-03-24024 March 1980 Forwards Response to Infraction Noted in NRC 800228 Ltr Re IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Radiographs W/Unacceptable Shim Placement Will Be Reshot.Film Interpreters & Radiographers Instructed in Shim Placement ML19309F5871980-03-24024 March 1980 Responds to NRC 800228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/80-03 & 50-567/80-03.Corrective Actions:All Radiographs W/Unacceptable Shim Placement Will Be Reshot ML19296D1471980-02-22022 February 1980 Forwards Final Deficiency Rept Re Defective Electrical Conduit ML19305C8111980-01-23023 January 1980 Responds to NRC 791228 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/79-18 & 50-567/79-18.Corrective Actions: Chemical & Vol Control Sys Charging Pumps Relocated from Storage to Area W/Power Supply.Heaters Connected ML19260D8701979-12-21021 December 1979 Forwards Response to NRC 791130 Ltr Re Violation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-566/79-17 & 50-567/79-17.Corrective Actions:Testing Program Initiated to Provide Necessary Chemical Analysis Info for All Cb & I Welds on Containment ML19256F6431979-11-26026 November 1979 Forwards First Interim Deficiency Rept Re Defective Electrical Conduit 1988-08-26
[Table view] |
Text
-
i TENNESSEE VALLEY. AUTHORITY l CH ATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut Street Tower II
- February 26, 1981 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attentions Mr. F. M'mglia, Acting Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division ~of Licensing 4
U.S. Nuclear-Regulator:r Commission Nashington,.DC 2055C Dear Mr. Miraglia In the Natter of the Application of ) Docket Nos. STN 50-566 i Tennessee Valley Authority ) STN 50-567
< In Section 2 3 3 of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report for Yellow Creek
- Nuclear Plant, TVA provides a description of the prograen for-meteoro-logical measurements at the site. Enclosed for your information are seven j oopies of our revised description of the Onsite Meteorological Measurements Program. A similar revision has already been made for osch of the other TVA nuclear plant safety analysis reports. This revision has been designed-to standardize and minimize future revisions. This revision will be
) included in our application for an operating license for the Yellow Creek i Nuclear Plant.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY i d L. M. Mills, Hanager Nuclear Regulation and Safety
! Sworn er subsor before me thim M day of, , 1981
/L 44 h-
- .NotaryPublio 6 ,
My Commission Expires Y f!b $ ,..
f < y - .:
O nG Enclosure (7) F co: Mr. James P._O'Reilly, Director (Enclosure) [y)
"2; Office of Inspection and Enforcement ,
Ti hji
, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ~S
~
, Region II - Suite 3100 $
j- 101 Marietta Street ,,; ;
- Atlanta, Georgia 30303
]
903050 h b an cauai oppo,tumry anniave
e ENCLOSURE 2.3.3 Onsite iteteorological Measurement Program 2.3.3.1 Preoperational Program 2.3.3.1.1 Temporary !!cteorological Facility The temporary meteorological f acility for the proposed Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant consists of a 150-foot meteorological tower, sensors mounted on the tower, and a data collection system in an instrument trailer located near the tower. It is located in a large cicar area on the west side of the Yc.' low Creek embayment, at an elevation of approximately 154 meters (505 fcei) msl. The facility is about 2.2 km (7000 feet) west-southwest of t'.ie proposed location of the reactor c ntainment buildings (Figure 2.3-18 (T)) .
Data collection at the temporary facility began July 31, 1973, with measurements of wind speed, wind direction c d temperature at the 33- and 150-foot levels. A dewpoint sensor was installed at the 33-foot level on February 9, 1976. Because of instrumentation problems which were not resolved until late April 1976, collection of valid dewpoint data did not commence until April 23, 1976. Sensor specifications for the temporary acteorological f acility are given in the following subsection.
Detailed system accuracies are given in section 2.3.3.1.2 entitled, "Permar.ent Meteorological Facility."
i l
l
Instrument Description A description of the meteorological sensors follows. More. detailed scnner specifications are included in the station manual, which vill be updated as necessary (rather than the following linting) tu reficc t system sensor channes.
Replacement sensors, which may be of a dif f erent manuf ac turer or model, will meet or exceed the Regulatory Guide 1.23 specifications.
SENSOR DESCRIPTION llCIGitT(f ec t)
Wind Direction 33 and 150 Climet Instruments, Inc.,
Model 012-10;* threshold, 0.75 mph; accuracy, + 3 .
Wind Speed 33 and 150 Climet Instrument, Inc.,
Model 011-1;* threshold, 0.6 nph; accuracy, t 1%
or 0.15 mph, whicheect is
, gr'ater.
Temperaturc** 33 and 150 Weed Instrument Co..
Model 101;* accuracc,
+ 0.06 F; Climet instru-ments, Inc., Model n16-ta aspirated radiation shielo; crror, O F to 0.2 F.
Dewpoint 33 EC & G, Inc . , Model 440 accuracy, +f0.7 F.
/
- A eplacement set R.G. 1.23 specifica of a dif ferent manufac turer or model will meet or exceed ms.
- Temperature gradient (AT) measurements between 33- and 150 feet were made from July 25, 1974, through July 22, 1976, through use of a special bridge in a modified lionan Model 125 Trans ' tor. The aT and 33-foot temperatute data were used to calculate the 150-foot temperatutes.
A
4 Data Collection and Processing System A Pulse-0-Matic (P-0-M) data logging system was used for logging and processing of the temporary facility data prior to July 22, 1976. The P-0-M system included the tower-mounted meteorological sensors, cables, signal translators, analog voltage-to-pulse converters, magnetic tape recorders, and backup strip-chart recorders. Outputs from all sensors were continuously recorded on the strip-chart recorders and the P-0-M magnetic tape recorders.
Offsite computer processing of the magnetic tape involved converting the pulse rate signals into digital one-minute mean values. Hourly values of wind speed and temperature were computed as the arithmetic means of the 60 one-minute values. Hourly values of prevailing wind direction were computed as the arithmetic means of the values within the 23-degree sector (among 360 overlapping sectors) which had the highest number of one-minute values during each hour.
When P-0-M data logging outages occurred, the available data on the backup analog strip charts (all parameters) were analyzed, processed, and integrated with the normal P-C M data to provide data records as continuous as practical.
A minicomputer (NOVA 1200 by Data General Corporation) has been used for logging and processing of the temporary facility data since July 22, 1976.
The data acquisition system with the NOVA is identical to that described in the " Data Acquisition System" subsection for the permanent meteorological facility. Systems other than the NOVA system for data processing may be used. These systems will meet or excced total system specifications identified in Regulatory Guide 1.23.
s Instrument Servicing, Maintena ce, and Calibration Operational checks of the temporary meteorological facility are made at least twice weekly, or more frequently as necessary, to achieve the required 90-percent recovery of data. The calibration schedule currently followed is identical to that described in the subsection entitled " Instrument Servicing, Maintenance and Calibration" for the permanent meteorological f acility.
Prior to July 22, 1976, meteorological' systems were calibrated monthly.
lInc of Rmporary Facility Data Data acquired during the period July 2, 1974, through June 30, 1975, have been utilized in this report. Anrual joint frequency distributions of wind direction and wind speed, by stability class (in accordance with RG 1.23) are presented in .1hbles 2.3-29(T) and 2.3-30(T) . For comparison purposes, Tables 2.3-31(T) and 2.3-32(T) provide stability-classified joint frequency distributions for Memphis for both the onsite period of record and for the period 1950-1954 inclusive. Statistics on data recovery during this period are presented in Tabic 2.3-33(T). Tabulations of the onsite hourly data are provided in Appendix 2.3A. These data have also been provided (separately) on magnetic tape to the NRC meteorology review staff.
2.3.3.1.2 Permanent Meteorological Facility The permanent meteorological facility consists of a 110-meter meteorological tower, sensors mounted on the tower, and a data collection system in an instrument trailer (Environnental Data Station) near th'c tower. The facility Tower and sensor heights at the permanent f acility are given in metric units as a result of the policy change to the metric system since the dnta analyses from the temporary facility were completed. i l
l
is located at the ' center of a flat-topped hill on the cast side of the
! Yellow Crcck embayment, approximately 1 km (3,300 feet) northwest of the proposed' unit i reactor site. The base elevation of the permanent tower is 168 meters (550 feet) us1.
~
J Terrain at the permanent site is relatively flat in the immediate vicinity of the tower (within.about 100 maters) and slopes off in all directions 4
beyond'about 100 meters'(330 feet). Average terrain slope in the. direction of the Yellow Creek embayment, which lies about 300 meters (1000 feet) southwest of the meteorological tower, is about 14 percent. .The average slopes in other directions (within about 300 meters) range between 5 and 10 percent. .The effects of these slopes on air. flow at the permanent
[ facility have been reduced by retention of existing vegetation. Clearing
. operations .have reduced the width of a strip of trees which acts as a buffer between the meteorological tower clearing and a cleared-slope to the cast. The extent of this clearing is not expected to have a i . recognizable ef fect on the data from the meteorological facility. A 1
4- detailed sketch and/or aerial photograph showing the topography and v2getation cover around the site, will be included in the station manual.
5
^
Data collection at the permanent meteorological facility commenced on
" April 1, 1977. Meteorological sensors include tower-mounted sensors for i'; wind speed, wind direction and temperature at 10, 60, and 110 meters and for dewpoint temperature at 10 meters. Solar radiation and precipitation J
sensors are located approximately 25 meters from the tower at heights of 1
about 1 meter. An atmospheric pressure sensor is located in the
' Environmental Data Station (EDS), approximately 40 meters'from the tower.
i 1
l
-- - - . _ _ _ - , , - ._ - .,.w,. .,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,.__.y-,4-w.m,,.m,,,,per.,wm,.,99,yy,v
l Instrument Dencription
- A description of the meteorologi. cal sensors follows. More detailed sensor l
- specifications a rc included in the station manual, which yill be updated as I necessary (rather than the following listing) to reflec t system sensor changes.
Replacement sensors, which may be of a dif f erent ma nuf ac turer or model, will acet or exceed the Regulatory Guide 1.23 specifications.
SEUSOR !!CICllT (meters) DESCRIPTION Wind Direction 10, 60 and 110 ,Climet Instruments, Inc. ,
Model 012-10;* threshold.
0.75 mph; accuracy, i 3 Wind Speed 10, 60 and 110 Climet Instrument, Inc.,
Model 011-1;* threshold, 0.6 mph; accuracy i 1%
or 0.15 mph, whichever !s greater.
Temperature ** 10, 60 and 110 Weed Instrument Co.,
Model 101.* accuracy, 1 0.06 F; Climet Instru-ments, Inc . , Model 016 aspirated radiation shiaM; error, O F to 0.2 F.*
Dcwpoint 10 EC & G, Inc., Momel 440'
Solar Radiation 1 Epplcy Laboratories, I t. ,
Model 3-46;* accuracy,
+ 2% .
Rainf all 1 Belfort Instrunent Co.
Model 5915-12;* accurac,,
1 0.06 inch.
Atmospheric Pressure 1 11. E . So s tma n a nd Co . ,
Model 2014-23/32 raL;*
accuracy, + 0.06 inch lig.
- A replacement sensor of a dif f erent manuf ac turer or model vill meet or exct ed RG 1.23 specifications.
- Actual sensor heights are 10.0, 60.3 and 110.3 meters.
1
/
i
o System Accuracies
. The system is designed so that the data meet or exceed the accuracy requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.23. More detailed information on total system and system component accuracies are given in the station manual, which will be updated as necessary (rather than the following discussion) to reflect system component and accuracy estimate changes. Replacement components will be compatible with the total system and will be chosen so that th'c to tal system accuracy will meet or exceed RG 1.23 specifications. .
Wind Speed Error Units: mph mph mph Component Wind Speed: 10 30 100 Sensor, j; l'.' of true j; 0.15 j; 0.30 j; 1.00 value or f; 0.15 mph, whichever is greater Translator, linear- 1 0.21 + 0.21 + 0.21 ity plus drift, to-tal error DVM, total error, 1 0.03 1 0.03 1 0.03 full scale Software, total 0 0 0 crror, full scalc Total maximum error 1 0.39 1 0.54 + 1.24 Root sum square error 1 0.26 1 0.37 i 1.02 RG 1.23 specification 1 0.5 1 0.5 + 0.5 The instantaneous root sum square crror f or wind speed measurements (which assumes individual component errors are additive and independent) is within the RG 1.23 specifications for all wind speeds less than 45 mph.
The error of time averaged wind speeds will be less than the instantaneous roo.
sum square error (this statement is applicabic for all other /
parameters in this discussion). Therefore, for wind speeds considered to be most critical for dia-persion calculations, the estimated error is well within the RG 1.23 specifi-cations.
. Component Degrees
' Sensor -
1;3 DVM, total error, full scalc + 0.160 Software, total error, full scale - 0.674 Total maximum error - 3.834 Root sum square error + 3.08 BG 1.23 specification
+ 5.0 Dry-Bulb Tenocraturc Error .
Component 2 Sensor, RTD
+ 0.06 DVM, total error' + 0.08 Radiation error, maximum + 0.20 Software, total error
- 10*F - 0.35 50*F 0.00
- 110*F - 0.26 Total maximum error
- 10*F - 0.49 l 50*F - ,
+ 0.34 110*F - 0.40 Root sum squarc error
- 10*F + 0.42 50*F 8 +
_.0.22 110*F + 0.34
, l l
RG 1.23 specificatior ,
+ 0. 9 (+ 0. 5 *C) t
.. 1
. 1 l
Vertical Terperature Difference Error j l
Component 2 Sensor 1 j; 0.06 Sensor 2 j;0.06 DVM (Sensor 1 reading) j; 0.08 DVrt (Sensor 2 reading) + f.08 Radiation 0.0 Software 0.0 Total maximum error j; 0.28 -
Root sum squarc error j; 0.14 RG 1.23 specification j; 0.18 (+ 0. l*C)
The assumption is cade that the radistica and software errors arc identimal for both sensors and therefore cancel.
Deepoint Ter.perature Error Component 2 Sensor EG & G Model 440 j; 0.7 Mirror contamination + 0.3 Loss of water in sample lines - 0.2 Sample line contamination j; 0.1 Pressure change . correction j; 0.1 Frost point conversion (dewpoints j;0.05 below 32*F)
DVM, total error, full scalc + 0.04 h Software, total error 0.0 Total maximum error + 1.29 Root sum square error j;0.80 RG 1.23 specificatica j; 0.90 (+ 0.5*C)
11 i
Data Acquisition Systen i l
The data acquisition system is located at the EDS and consists of the !
sensors mounted on the tower, cables, signal translators, reed-relay scanner, DVM (analog voltage and ohms to digital converter) and minicomputer (NOVA 1200 by Data General Corporation). All meteorological sensor outputs are measured periodically during each hour by the data system for an hourly readout on the teletype. Horizontal wind direction is read each five seconds (720 per hour); wind . speed and solar radiation are read each 15 seconds (240 per hour); temperature and dewpoint are read cach minute (60 per hour); and rainf all and atmospheric pressure are read each hour (onc per hour) . Strip-chart recorders are also used to record wind speed and wind direction data.
Prevailing horizontal wind direction fnr each hour is corputed as the average direction in the 23-degree sector (among 360 overlapping sectors) that has the highest number of valid readings during the hour. Horizontal wind direction persistence percentage for a given hour is computed as the number of readings in the 23-degree sector divided by the total number of valid readings obtained in that one-hour period multiplied by 100.
Systems other than the MOVA system for data processing may be used. These systems will meet or exceed total system specifications identified in Regulatory Guide 1.23.
Data Recording and Display Data recording and display at the EDS consists of hourly teletypewriter printouts (ASR 33) and punched paper tapes. Strip chart backup recording is provided for wind direction and wind speed to assure, as nearly as
A*
possible, continuous data collection. The data collected on the paper tapes are transferred of fsite for processing onto magnetic tapes for storage and for use in analysis of onsite meteorological conditions.
. Selected meteorological data, along with other environmental data, will be remoted f rom the acteorological f acility for operational display in the reactor control room. The meteorological data will include 10 , 60 , and 110-meter wind speed and wind direction and 10- to 60-meter and.10- to 110-meter temperature dif ferences. Action is being taken to provide these data in digital form with at least 15-minute updating. Meteorological data from the EDS will also be telemetered to the TVA Meteorological Forecast Center in Muscle Shoals, Alabama, for use in support of the radiological emergency plan.
Instrument Servicing, Maintenance and Calibration The permanent meteorological f acility is serviced by engineering aides, instrument technicians, or engineers. Maintenance and calibrations are performed by instrument technicians, electrical engineering associates, or electrical engineers. Prior to plant operation, operational checks of the system performance are made twice weekly, or more f requently as necessary to achieve the required 90 percent recovery of data. The calibration status of each component of the meteorological facility (sensors, recorders, electronics, DVM, data logger, etc.), is checked and/or field calibrated and/or removed and replaced by a laboratory calibrated component, at least every six months. More, frequent calibration intervals for individual components may be specified in the station manual, on the basis of the operational history of that component' type, in order to ensure the maximum practicable recovery rate. Detailed, standardized l
t l
- s. .
, ;. : ea r e procedures are included in the station' manual and/or the laboratory
. calibration procedures document.
l 2.3.3.2 Operational Program.
t-Compariso,n of Temporary and Permanent Data ,
A study based on comparisons of meteorological data-from the temporary and' permanent meteorological facilitics was completed in response to hRC minireview request 372.08 and round one- question 372.32. The purpose'of
.t hL e stu dy was to identify any potentially_si,gnificant differences in the meteorological characteristics of the two sites _ and to assess the relative suitability of the meteorologicai data from the two sites for use in cvaluating site and regional dispersion characteristics. Conclusions of the comparison, which was based on four months of' concurrent data (April 1, 1977 through July 31, 1977) were: (1) that the meteorological data from the permanent f acility better represent airflow at potential ef fluent release points, and therefore, provide a more representative basis for evaluating site and regional dispersion characteristics and (2) that the X/Q's based on the temporary facility data are more conservative (higher) than those based on permanent facility data. Judgments, based on temporary.
tower X/Q's, and initially presented in the PSAR, are considered to be unchanged as a result of these comparisons. The full text of the TVA response tn question 372.32 has been included in amendment 12 to the PSAR.
' Operational Measurements The operational phase of the meteorological program includes those procedures
, i and responsibilitics related to activitics beginning with the initial fuel loading and continuing through the life of the plant. The meteorological l
t l
-- ~-
l' 9 e
data collection program will be continuous without major interruptions.
~
. Operational system checks on the meteorological facility will be ma'de
- daily Monday through Friday and as necessary on weekends and holidays
'(if there are storms, power system disturbances, etc.). The' meteorological program has been developed to conform to' the standards given in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.23 and the reporting procedures in Regulatory Guide 1.21. The basic objective is to maintain a continuous surveillance- (by digital or analog record) of the mctcorological parameters involved in the.
atmospheric dispersion of radioactive effluent releases, and to have the data available at any time for assessing the relative concentrations and doses resulting from accidental or routine releases. Meteorological
! data .will also be displayed in the reactor control room ar.d at the TVA Meteorological Forecast Center in Muscle Shoals, Alabama as discussed in the " Data Recording and Display" subsection.
4 .
The restoration of the data collection in the event of equipment failure 1
l or malfunction will be accomplished by prompt replacement or repair of i
f affected equipment. A stock of spare parts and equipment is maintained at the environmental data station to minimize and shorten ' the periods of ou t age:.. Equi pr.ien t malfunctions or outages are detected by field personnel during routine or special checks.
1 J
4 e
! i 1
I L
.