ML19277H292

LER 84-006-00:on 840601,discovered Weekly Power Operation Surveillance,Qis 60,not Executed within Tech Spec Limits. Caused by Personnel Error.Surveillance Test Immediately Performed.Weekly Summary Sheet displayed.W/840625 Ltr

ML19277H292
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	06/25/1984
From:	Kalivianakis N, Weinfurter E COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
LER-84-006-05, LER-84-6-5, NJK-84-203, NUDOCS 8407030195
Download: ML19277H292 (3)

Text

.

.. ' / p aea %,, UNITED STATES 8 a NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r, y WACHINGTON, D. C. 20555

% ..... / JUL 201984

' MEMORANDUM FOR: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear' Reactor Regulation *

SUBJECT:

PLANT-SPECIFIC BACKFITTING TRACKING SYSTEM Enclosed is the monthly status report on plant-specific backfits through l4ay including recent action on Palo Verde prepared by DL. The table below depicts the status of appeal items for both.0Rs and OL applicants; the enclosed tables i .

supplement this table. .TabTe02" shows. the time line of the appeal process; Table 3 gives a synopsis of each issue.

Table 1 d

ors OLs Open Appeal Items 0 0 Closed Appeal Items 1 5 Total 1 5 Pending 1st Level Appeal AD/DL) 0 0 Pending 2nd Level Appeal D/DL) 0 0 Pending 3rd Level Appeal D/NRR) 0 0 Resolved by Appeal / Level I/DD 4 No Longer in Appeal Process 2/AD 0 3 P) o ,

One significant change occurred since last month's report; the fire protection issue for Palo Verde was recently resolved. The staff evaluated the licensee's 'py,J position given (see Table 3) at the appeals meeting (AD level) on May 31, 1984, {$

and informed the licensee of its concurrence with that position on June 24, 1984. ip I 114 The licensee agreed to send a confirmatory PRA to the strff in the near future. p /W 8407300195 840nO

$&R C LIc CF

J1)L 2b b54 Harold R. Denton The three fire protection issues at LaSalle which were no longer considered to be a part of the active appeal process in last month's report will be shown closed in the plant-specific backfitting tracking system. The licensee has verbally informed the staff of its decision to comply with the staff's position.

The licensee is expected to send its concurrence in a letter the first week of originnisigea , f DarrellG-Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1. Table 2

2. Table 3 DISTRIBUTION Central Files ORAB r/f DEisenhut FMiraglia GHolahan JZwolinski PPTremblay

• PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE SEE DATE a ,

j ORAB:DL*

PTremblay:dm ORAB:DL*

JZwolinski

,C GHo15han DL 4D A:

Fi44ragW b.

DEisenhut 7/6/84 7/6/84 7/g'/84 7/f /84 .,

77)/f84 hH CWl'N',

s e .

IA8tt 2 STAltr5 DF PtANI-5Pitit!C BAttilillNG REQUIRE 9ENIS !# APPtAt P900155

• FOR 085 Ase CP/Dt5 a (1) (2)- (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) i1851 (16) (!!) (12) (13) (14) iBf LEVit SECONS (15) (16) (17) tiel PtAsl 10(4!!f! Call 0E LEVEL INI19 1550E 50uKt APPEAL AO sEtttaE AS LICluSEE APPEAL 00 LEett %AttIE tesaESPUseENLE REQUESTER SEEIING 00 tiCINSEE APPE AL IEETING lt!Nuff5 P051 tion atSP0n5E tt00E5 FED ME E Y!NG WIN 0f t $ POSITION Af 5Poe5E RE00E5tge 18 FACI OB tl Cit 5t f titlIMalg t-93-6 5-7/02 t 5/83 Y-5/31/84 ANAL YSl5 O(CISION tt SPONSE S!$P05tll0e Pale Verde 5/31/04 6/24/84 g 5-7/83 App. A t-!!/83 5-6/24/84 1-2/84 08-61-12 1-10/s2 5- 12/82 f arley 2 3/23/s3 4/29/s3 1ect Specs t-5/21/83 9/16/03 e/30/03 9/12/e3 10/6/83 4 I t-1/11/84 5-l/27/94 t-et-1 5-11/93 t-1/84 t-1/27/04 LaSalle 1/2 3/28/s4 4/24/94 3/28/94 g i App 8 6/94*

e L 2 5-15/93 1-1/94 ta$alla 1/2 t-1/27/94 3CS/84 4/24/89 3/29/94 -

E App. t t-3/28/94 t 3 5-!!/83 1-1/84 t-1/27/84 ta5atte 1/2 3/20. '4 4/24/84 3/28/94 8 App. B 2*

I .* s O/89*

f I ,,J t-84-4 5-11/a3 t-1/94 t-1/27/84 LaSalle 11/2

• 3/28/84 4/24/04 3/2s/84 N APP' 8 Ig *b 6/04*

U) (2) (3) (4) { ,

4' (5) (4) (7) (5) (3) ,

(lel l l) (12) (i3) (14) (It} (16) (17) (la) t EGire (U71 ant ease and issues (2) t=ticensee faltlally identitled Issue sad date g ggtNe 5=5taff lattially identifled issue and date (UT1ste of licensee response of appeals meeting (3)

(14) t=date of appeal by licensee If stafof fappeal (4) t=date initiates issue, by licensee correspondence beglas with staff positlen te licensee end ends with (4) Appeel V= proposed este of appeal meeting Y=date of proposed appeals meetin0 W=no appeal; lasse reseleed N=ne gpeal; issued reseleed (IS) Sate of Value/lepact Statement (5) Date of actual appeals meeting eith AD (6) (IE) Date of CD final decislan (1) DateDate of issuance of meeting stnutes (w/la 2 wts of senti;. (17) V/I Statesset of AD pesillee af ter meeting ew ."e (18) Cate of ettlaate disp 6sitten of issue (8) Date of licensee tes (9) !=date of appeal by se to outcese of appeals meetin0 Icensee Y=date of proposed appeals meetinS

• Licensee in vertally agreed with staf f's pesillee 6/84; lesue ne len0'F appeal process.

m:ne appeal; issue resolved (19) Date of appeals meeting with dielstom director (II) Date of issuance of meeting minutes 6/29/84 (t2) Date of DD positten af ter meeting

• P

TABLE 3 SUPPLEMENT TO STATilS OF PLANT-SPECIFIC BACKFITTING ISSUES IN APPEAL PROCESS Plant Issue Status L-83-6 Applicant should provide a source Applicant disagrees w/

Palo Verde range neutron flux monitor in the reqmnt., does not feel E. Licitra remote shutdown panel fer direct App. R applies to OLs.

ASB/DSI indication of reactivity to satisfy Applicant revised response App. R reqmnts. February 1984. Appeals meeting was held 5/31/84; -

staff concurred w/ licensee's Issue identified by ASB 7/82. LB 3 position 6/24/84, since informed licensee of NRC position licensee demonstrated its by 7/11/82 letter. capability to meet the intent of the regulations.

Issue resolved.

i L-84-1 Required to EpilyTGD(-1 to fire ~

LaSalle 1/2 Licensee initially did protection system's and equipment. not believe that G9C-1 is A. Bournia applicable to fire CHEB/DE Region III identified issue during protection systems and readiness review meeting 11/30/83 equipment. However, it prW to issuance of low power is reconsidel'ing its O ise. position. This is no -

longer in the active appeal process.

L-84-2 Required to comply with all aspects LaSalle 1/2 Licensee has committed to of NFPA codes. identify the specific NFPA A. Bournia codes by number that are CHEB/DE Region III identified issue during applicable to LaSalle.

readiness review meeting of 11/30/83 This is acceptable to the prior to issuance of low power. NRC staff. Issue resolved (3/23/84).

L-84-3 Required to perform periodic LaSalle 1/2 Licensee will submit surveillance tests on fire pumps revised damper surveillance A. Bournia and dampers. program. This item is CHEB/DE no longer in the active Region III identified issue during appeal process. Fire readiness review meeting 11/30/83 pump issue is resolved.

prior to issuance of low power license.

6/29/84

TABLE 3 SUPPLEMENT TO STATUS OF PLANT-SPECIFIC BACXFITTING ISSUES IN APPEAL PROCESS Plant Issue Status L-84-4 Required to comply with'NFPA 51b Licensee will submit LaSalle 1/2 training requirements for fire " hands on" training A. Bournia watches. program for staff

- consideration. This Region III identified issue during is no longer in the readiness review meeting 1/3/83 g tive appeal process.

prior to issuance of low power license. . . ,

- -i .f, u .g OR-83-12 Licensee had requ'ested deletion Farley 2 Licensee did not agree of all turbine surveillance with requirement. Appeal E. Reeves requirements in Tech Spec. NRC meeting at DD level was PSB/DSI agreed provided licensee prog,6m held on 8/16/83. Additional for ensuring turbine oversreed correspondeni:e and reliability is included in Section negotiations

• based on -

6 (Admin. Controls) of Tech Specs. results of appeal mtg produced mutually Issue identified 10/8/82 whtn acceptable position on licensee proposed deletion of Tech Spec modifications Tech Specs re: Turbine Overspeed 1/11/84. Issue resolved.

Protection System to staff.

6/29/84

- . . . . -_