ML18017A186

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards PA Power & Light Co Susquehanna Unit 1 Preservice Exam Final Rept & Relief Requests 1-10 W/Revision to Date, Per 820323 Telcon
ML18017A186
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/02/1982
From: Rhoades W
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Hum M
NRC
Shared Package
ML17139A609 List:
References
PLE-1708, NUDOCS 8204080510
Download: ML18017A186 (573)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION l;EM (BIDS) AGCES SION NBR 820 I08051 0 DOC ~ DATE 82/0 I/02 NOTAR IZED o NO DOCKET FACIL:50-387 Susquehanna Steam Electric Stations Uni,t 1? Pennsylva 05000387 50-388 Susquehanna BYNAME Steam Electric Stations Unit 2< Pennsylva 05000388 AUTH AUTHOR AFF, ILIATION RHOADES<H.J. Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Co.

    'RE1CIP. NAME           REC IP IENT AFFILIATION HUM?MD                  NRC  -   No  Detailed                 Affiliation Given

SUBJECT:

Forwards "PA Power 8 Light Co Susquehanna Uni,t 1 Prese[vice Exam Final Rept," S relief requests 1-10 w/revision to date? per 820323 telcon, DISTRIBUTION CODE: 8001S COPIES 'RECEIVED:LTR TITLE: PSAR/FSAR AMDTS and Related 'Correspondence

                                                                                ] ENCL   .
                                                                                             ]   SIEE:4?S NOTES:  ISE:3 copies      FSAR L     all   amends,                                                     05000387 ILE:3 copies      FSAR 8,    all                                                               05000388 DISP amends'~p7E'0 RECIPIENT              COPIES                          RECIPIENT                COPIES ID CODE/NAME            LTTR ENCL                      ID CODE/NAYiE            LTTR ENCL A/D L ICENSNG                                   0      LIC BR e2 BC                  1    0 LIC BR 02 LA'                                   0      PERCHgR  ~       01           1 INTERNAL: ELD                              1                        IE               06           1 IE/DEP/EPDB       35         "1                        IE/DEP/EPLB      36           3 MPA                           1                        NRR/DE/CEB       11           1 NRR/DE/EQB        13          3                        NRR/DE/GB        28          "2 NRR/DE/HGEB 30                2                        NRR/DE/MEB       18           1 NRR/DE/MTEB 17                1                        NRR/DE/QAB       21           1 NRR/DE/SAB        24          1                        NRR/DE/SEB       25           1 NRR/DHFS/HFEBQO               1                        NRR/DHFS/LQB 32               1 NRR/DHFS/OLB 3g               1                        NRR/DHFS/PTRB20               1 NRR/DSI/AEB 26                1                        NRR/DS I/ASB 27               1 NRR/DSI/CPS       10          1                        NRR/DSI/CSB 09                1 NRR/DS I/ETSB     12          1                        NRR/DSI/ICSB 16               1 NRR/DS  I/PSB     19          1                        NRR/DSI/RAB 22                1 N                 23          1                        NRR/DST/LGB 33                1 FILE        00          1                 1      RGN1                          2 2

-.EXTERNAL: ACRS 4] 10 BNL(AMDTS ONLY) 1 FEMA-REP DIV 39 1 LPDR 03 2  ? NRC PDR 02 1 NSIC 05 NTI,S 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 60 ENCL

r I e kk'k Il f kt

                >> lra I'1 W    ,

it liI t I '

                                                                            . t'       I kl't I y    'k     C1, IZ l                                          V li I

I

                                                                                          '\      iI 4I I

I lf II it II

                                                                                               )l II I                                                    !I
                   ,'1 I,

II kl lt II Vl t tt t,V r>~" v

0 Pennsylvania Power 8 Light Company Two North Ninth Street ~ Allentown, PA 18101 ~ 215 / 770-5151 gPR 02 t982 Mr. Martin Hum Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION PRESERVICE INSPECTION UNIT ¹1 ER 100450 FILE 899 PLE-

Dear Mr. Hum:

Per our telephone conference of Tuesday, March 23., 1982, please find attached the following documents for your, information:

               ~    Pennsylvania Power and Light Co., Susquehanna Unit ¹1, Preservice Examination Final Report of Reactor Pressure Vessel, National Board Number 3686. (Controlled Copy
                    ¹113) o    SSES  Unit ¹1 Relief Requests ¹1-10 with revisions to date.

Please note that the RPV Final Report is currently being reviewed by PPsL and is subject to minor revision subsequent. to review completion. Please advise should you have any questions on these documents. Very truly yours, pool

               . Rhoades
l;i W.

Nuclear Group Supervisor-Mechanical D's+ MTS/cah RESPONSE REQUIRED: No cc: H. R. Clarke N-5 Susq. SES Letter File N-3 M. T. Strenk N-5 Correspondence File N-3 C. T. Coddington N-4 Date File N-5 820402 l.'204080510 05000387 i PDR ADOCK

,9                    PDR

SUSQUEHANNA STEAN ELECTRI'C STATIOl'l UNITS j. AND 2 SQRT FORMS FOR BiOiPi EQUIPNENT P,O, NOS, M-12 thru M-365 PENNSYLVANIA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY

             ~~

I' I 4 4 4 h 4 4 4 A K 4 4 4 4 ' I 4 '.' 4 4 4 4 4 4 m.kkkk k~P':. ~

P.O vi-12 OUALiPiCP'iON SU!"'<RY 0 OUiPi~rNT 7

     ~ Plant
           ~
               ~

Name: Susauehanna SES Tvoe Utility: Light

                                                                               'VR Penns   lvania    Power     6
2. NSSS: G.E. 3. A/E: Bechte1 BUR 4 HK ZI ii. Component N~~e:- RHR Service Water Pum
l. Scope: [ ] NSSS [X] BOP
2. Yodel Number: 28 K X L 2-S tage VCT Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: Byron Jackson if the component is a cabinet
                                        'tV/A or pane',   name and model No.       of the devices included:
5. Phvsical Descr-'ption a. Aooeaiance Ve tical Turbine Puma
b. Dimensions 28'~ 2'-6" ll,000 lbs Motor 5,800 lbs.
Pumo (Dry)
c. aweigh" Build'ng: Emergency Service Water Pumt7house Bottom of Pump suction F 661 + 2 6"
7. Field F(onnzinS Condizione [7(] Bol- (No.

(So. ld, lB, Size ~le" Sole Pl to Fo.nnd Size liz")Heed to Sole Pl. [)

8. a. System in vhich located: RHR Service Water System RHR Service Water Pumps Cool
o. Punctional

Description:

the RHR Heat Exchancer

c. is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[@ Both [ ] Ne'her

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:

8856-N-12 Rev. 3 12/80

0 "ii. Es Equipment Available fo" inspection in the Plant: 'X] ves [ ] llo iV. Equip-..ent Qualification !'ethod: [ ] Test '[X] Analys's [ ] Co .bination of Test and Analys's qualification Report*: TCF-1035-SEj (UP 8856-212-13 (1) -3) Seismic Analysis for RHR

      'No;, Title and Date) Service Rater Pumos                             08 10 78 Company    that Prepared Report:          B  ron Jackson Company    that Reviewed R'eport:         Bechtel U. Vibration input:
       '. Loaas considered:       a. [ ] Seism-'c only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
c. [X] Corkination of (a) and (b)
2. ~~method of Combining RRS: [ ] Phsolute Sum [ ] SRSS [X] Absolute um S:

(other, specify) SRSS %<i. cLose(iy Recuired Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Spacek rtxa4eS

4. D- .ping Corresponding to PRS: OBE SSE
5. Required Acceleration in Each D'rection: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Resultant Response Spectrum in Qualif. Reoort (spec"')

OBE S/S F/B = V = O.l q SSE S/S- F/B ~ 0.2 a

6. there fatigue effects or other vibration loaas considered?

[ ] ves [X] No if yes, describe loaas considered and how they were treated in overall quali ication program: >> if nore than one report, complete te-..s IU r!iru Vii =or each "e ort. 12/SO

NOT APPLICABLE I vVI ~ If Qual='" '"- t ion bv Tes t then Co. ole te:": [ j random

1. [ ] S'ngle Freouency
                   ~                                    ]  .'!ul ti-Frequency:          ] sire beat

[ j

2. [ ] Single Avis f j I!ulti-Axis
3. No. of Qualificat on Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

s/s = F/B

6. Method of Dete~ning Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lao Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS useng Multi-F".equency Test [ ] Yes (At tach TRS & RM graph

[ ]No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S- F/B SSE S/S F/B =
9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ) Bolt (Ho., Size ) [ ) '4'eld (Length ) [ )
     .10. Functional operab'lity verified:            [ ] Yes        [ ] No    [  j Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modificat.:ons made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or frag'ity test, encluding results):
 >NOTE:    If qualification     by a combination of        test     and   analysis, also comolete Item VXI.

12/80

g" V:I. s T T a T if I=f 0oai'cation B Anal.sis then complete:. Method oz Analysis: (Vertical) [X] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analys's [X] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] T'me-History [ j Response Spectrum natural Frequenc 'es in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vert'al): f Model Type: [ ] 3D (Hors z) (vert) [] lD [ ] Finite Element [X] Beam (Lumped [ ] Closed Form Solute SAP ZV (Dynamic), FLTFLG mass) [X] Computer Codes: (for flange and bolt stress) HUBFLANGE Dxscnarge Nozz e F ange Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 186.2 Hz/10 Modes (horiz. z.rection,'Xj Hand Calculat'ons 208..3 Hz/3 Modes (vert. direction) because of several closely spaced supports

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [X] Absolute Sum p[ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: ) Damping: OBE SSE 1% Basis for (speci=y)

                                                                                     -Be d ,ning need:gnec.                 f&-:
                                                                                                          &             G-10 Support Considerations       'n the model: Ri      id Foundation w/2 Pinned supports
8. Crit-'cal Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seis,~c Total Stress A. Identification Locat on Combination Stress Stress Allowable See VP-8856-M-12-3.3 "Seismic Analysis" Section 4.0 (Tab. 111) 1faximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabil' See Tab. A-47 ill, to 57 Appendix A All with'n acceptable lim't. Pages Mode 1 to ll 12/SO

1

                                                                                ,   I 4

ro f-

                                                                                        )a  Eg O.                         = ~
                                                                                        ~ ',

e Ji J f., l 'R f' 1 W 4 Je

         .r t                                 -4
                                           <r                   1
                                                                  /

1 1 t T t

                                                                                                    ~

0 4 I' 1 I 0' f It

   ~-                                                               '4    k' fp I

k P CA

      ~    h r

P.O. M-22-1 rig UALIFICATION SEKA.CY OF E UIPIKNT I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA.- 1 Utility:

2. NSSS: GE 3 A/P. BECHTEL II. Component Name: ~a "-1H-21
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [Z] BOP
2. ?fodel Number: None Quantity: 1
3. Vendor: Harnischf e er P & H
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N. A.
5. Physica1 Descri ption a. Appearance Bridge Crane
b. Dimensions See DNG. 8856-M-22-47 q c. Weight 584, 000 LBS.
6. Location: Building: Reactor Building Elevation: 850'top of crane rail)
7. Field Mounting Conditi.ons [ ] Bolt (No. , Size )

[ ] Weld (Length ) 5] he ls on Crane Rail

8. a. System in which located: Load Handlincr for refuelin
b. Functional

Description:

Load Handl ina

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown-

[ ] Both [X] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 8856-M-22 8856 G 3 8856 G 10 8856 G 22 f 8856 M 397 g 8856 G 24 par z.a 12/80

Form: M-22-1 III. Is E ui ment Available for Iris ection in the Plant: fg] Yes [] No IV. E ui ment uglification Method: [ ] Test [g Analysis f ] Combination of Test and Analysis Analysis Report. of Reactor Building Cranes for gualification Report*: siesmic and hvdrod namic load SSES (No., Title and Date) V. P. N8856-M-397-2-2 2-82 Company that Prepared Report: URS/ John A. Blume & Associates. Company that Reviewed Report: Bechtel Power Cor oration. V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. f.] Hydrodynamic only

, 2. Method of Combining

c. P]

RRS: fg Combination of (a) and (b) Absolute Sum f ] SRSS [ ] (other, specify)

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Attachment, 1 4-. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE OBE + SRV 9 2%, OBE or SSE + SRV + IONIA 9 5%
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f. j ZPA ] Other See Attachment 1 (specify)

OBE s/s F/B ~ SSE S/S ~ F/B ms

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered2

[g] Yes [ ] No If yes, 'e describe loads considered and how they. were treated

                                                                                    'f  in overall qualification    program:      a          ef rect    d     to                  a sfic             o     'd  r'n    th  t-    1    cra  e     tura     f  ec   n        are ver    low    < 4             nd    2. SRV     loadin which is low intensity, to start with is even lower at frequencies less than 20 Hz.
   +NOTE:     If more than one report, complete items-IV thru VII for each report.

12/80

Form: N-22-1 If uglification b Test then Com lete*: NOT gppZ,IgpBLE f ] random

1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ j sine beat
2. f ] Single Axis f ] Multi-Leis

[]

3. No. of guali ication Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

s/s = F/B ~

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test f ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi;Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f]No
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S- F/B ~ V =

SSE S/S ~ F/B ~ 9, Laboratory Mounting:

10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes f ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made:

12 ~ Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results): +NOTE: If qualification by a combination of test and analysis, also complete Item VII. 12/SO

Form: M-22-1 VII. If uglification b Anal sis then cpm lete:

1. Method of Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis f33 Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History fK ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

for model 1 S/S = 2.26 Hz F/B ~ 1.76 Hz V ~ 2.208

3. Model Type: [g 3D E]2D Pg Finite Element E ] Seam [ ] Closed Form Soluti
4. [4 Computer Codes: JAB/SAP Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 0-55Hz, 110 modes

[ j Hand Calculations

5. Method of Ccabining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum g] SRSS

. 6. Except algebraic Damping: for closely OBE sum was used spaced modes where doub e SSE 5~ (specify) Basis But the damping used: see figs in tepoFE

7. Support Considerations in the model: Rigid S. Critical St~ctura2. Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total S tress A. Identification Location Coy>ination Stress Stress Allowable See Attachment 2'. Maximum Allowable Deflection Max Critica1 to Assure Functional Deflection Location 0 erabilit None Critical h a 12/So

P ~ Pr/, P N

                                                                   !   P h,i 0

P I P h.

                         /            P ~

I P F ~

                                          /
                                    ~

h II I.

   ~

P

                                               'I P
                                            .r I
                                                        ~ 'I P

P ' P I I pr P I

Sheet 1 Form: H-55 Rev. 1 Qualification Sunna 'of i nt r

                                                                  '}2e-

~ I. Plant Name:~

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: EKHTEL IZ. Camnnent 4

Name: Insulation and Pi inn Suo ort Steel

1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP H
2. Model Number: Quantity:
3. Vendor: Transco
4. Zf the ccaponent is a +jnet or panel, name and madel Nc. of the devices included:
5. physical Description a. Appearance R = 192", H 136"
b. Dimensions
c. Weight Containment
6. Location: Building-Elevation:

793'-ll"

7. Field Mounting Conditions [X[ Bolt (Ns. C", Size

[ [ Weld (length )

                                                 ]
8. a. System in which located: ~/4
b. Functicnal D.scription: Support of "Q" piping and RPV Insulatior
c. Zs the equipment required for [ I R)t Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X ] Both [ I Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-55; G24, Rev. 4
                                      %e
  • 10 bolts for each of 8 frames PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Pbam: Rev. 1 EEE. Xs uixment Available for Ens tion in the Plant: f X ] Yes f ] No IV. Equipnent Qualification Method: 4 f ] Test [xl Analysis [ ] Combination Of Test & Analysis

      *~alification ~+rt*            No. E-B-S-82007-1        "Analysis o f the RPV   Top-Head nsu    ation Frame,                     ec te D'CN       154399 -gzy, 0)

(No., Title and Date) (&8chtel SCQ 55' - ev. l port Cygna Energy Services, Inc. for verification wor zor Phase II & III Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Corporation V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. f ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X] Ccrnbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: Q(]Absolute Sum f ]SBSS [ ]

(Other, specify) Attach."1 used by TRANSCO

3. Rettuired Bespcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): Attach. 2 used by CYCNA
4. Damging CorresPonding to BRS: GBE+SRV~LOCA - 2% SSE +SRV+LOCA 5%

Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA f ] Other Peak bcciz. accel. 4.7Sg aud peak vezclcal accel~cg used by CBE S/S = F/B = V= TRANSCa SSE S/S = F/B = V= Required acce . in ttach. 2 usea y A Were fatigue effects or other vibxation loads considered? [ ] Yes [X] No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall ctualif ication pxogram: "%7ZE: If more than one report caaplete items lV thru Vll for each report.

    • The Phase II evaluation was performed by TRANSCO, Inc. in their report JM-4418.

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: FKV . T VI. If Qualification b Vest, then lete*: [ ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. Single Axis Multi-Axis

[) [ ] [ ]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
6. Methcd of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] lab 'Inst [ ) In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Vest [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[) No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

SSE S/S =

9. Laboratory Mcunting:
l. [ ] Bolt (Bo., Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ )
10. Functional cperability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOIR: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also carplete Item Vla. PF2/23-3

Sh~t M 4 Form: Rev. Vll .~ If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: 1

l. Methcd of Analysis:
                  ~

[ ] Static Analysis [g equivalent Static Analysis by TRANSCO coeff.=l. [ Xl Dynamic Analysis [ ] 'e-History [ ] Response Spectrum by CYGNA

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

5<<j~fg) dtr~4'w = )+ ~ = ))) ~ V~gig) dty~c4m= )7.$ g) S/S- F/B

3. Model type: [ 9 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [g] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [X] Ccmputer Codes: STRU Frequency Range and No. of rxdes considered: .2 0 8

[ ] Hand Calculations by CYGNA

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [g] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

                                       - 2%'SE+SRV+LOCA                                                  G-22 spe
6.

7. OBE+SRV+LOCA Damping: OBE Support Ccnsiderationns SSE in the n69el: Basis 5% for the damping used: Fixed against translation and Qt free to slide in radial direction

8. Crxtxcal Structural Elements:

TRANSCO report indicated all members are within allowable stress limits. Final results by Total Stress CYGNA are shown here with fixes de- Seismic r s c ib e d A ldentl 1catxon ation Combination Stress Stress Allowable k below**. Member 75A Corner Faulted *22. Fg (Bending) 28 .. ks Member 246 Horiz. Faulted *4. 98 ksi Fv (Shear) 15. 6 . Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ocerabilit Support displacements for the piping supported on the framework have been obtained from an independent dynamics analysis (of CYGNA). These displacements have been included in the piping analysis.

              *See Attachment      3   for calculations taken from Bechtel Civil Calc.No.

58-III-M55-:

            **Additional bracing members are required for piping                          hangers H17 and H34 as shown in Attachment 4.

PF2/23-. 4

P I ll t I, I ., ~

                                 'I
                                             'I W

I >>t t P E P

                                       * ~

l P

        !' ~

I l'I

                                                       ~

I'

                                                         'I AI                                                           y
                                                              ~,

P.O. M58 ualification Summar of Eouioment I.. Plant Name: Susquehanna SES

                                  - ennsylvania'ower
                                                                                         'Toe:

Utility: a Li<ht- PRR 24 NSSS G-E- 3 - A/E: Bechtel Se 4M'a

                                                 ~ ~

II. Comoonent Name ~ el Oil Transfer Pumps (Mo'tors> Scope: fj NSSS 1 f4 BOP

2. Node1 Number: GB-lq quantity: 4 units K'-
                                                                                                               /

Vendor. " mpump Division/Crane Comoanv

          . 4. If   the componen is       a  cdbinet or panel, N? A name and model No.         of the
                '.'devices included:
5.

Physical Description Dimensions

a. Appearance (HxÃxL) 15-15/16 "x10-4"x13-15/16" sumo pum~

1800 1bs/pulllp

6. Location: Building: Mounted inside buried fuel oil tang Elevation: 649 -0 I. Field uaun ing Cond;tines L'zj ..Salt (So. >s, Size h" )

C3 8 a. System in which located: Diesel Oil Storace a Trans er Svste Functional Qesci iption: Transfer dz.esl ~kk4 2 fu I

a. Is .th'e equipeent requireJ %r 7 3 Sot Standby L 3 Cold Shutdcun Both g Neither
                                                                                                       ~   ~
9. Per.inent ReVerence Qesign Specifications:
                    ~ ~

8856-M>>58 R v. 12/80

2

. III. Is  Equipment Available      for Inspection in the Plant:              [g       Yes        L3    Ho IY. Equipment qualifica ion Hethod:

f 3.Test - 'x3 Analysis f 3 Combination of Test and Analysis gualification RePort*: A-1771'3 (Hechtel'PF 8856-N58-78-l) Seismic Shock Analysis 10/13l75 Coo@any that. Prepared Report: che~~um~ Di~. Co>any that Reviewed Report: V'ibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. fQ Seismic only
                                     .b. f   3   Hydrodynamic only
c. f of (a) ..

e-, 2, method of. Corhining RRS: 3 f Combination 3 Absolute Sum fx3 and (b) SRSS . f 3

                                                                                                                ~

gozFier, speciTyg

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See attachments 1 a 2
4. Damping Corresponding to RRS:, OBE Q SSE 1%
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f 3 ZPA fX3 Other speci Ty QBE S/S = c F/8 = o 5'g V~ 0.33 SSE S/S ' 1 0 5 F/B
                                                           ="" 14       ~
                                                                                        "      V  =~67       g g

6- Mere fatigue eTTects or other vibration loads considered? f 3..Yes fx3 If yes, describe loads considered and hm they ~ere treated in overa11 qualification program: .

              ~~%%%A~~%%\ Ie%%%%~&rAeHOAAImaCHO%
   <<NOTE:    If more   than one report coaqlete items IV thru VII               for     each    report.:

NOT APPLICABLE YI. If Ooelificetion by Test, then'omplete*: 5'3 random

1. $ ] Single Frequency {: ).Multi-Frequency: t: ] sine beat
f. ]
2. g g Single Axis P g Multi-Axis
3. Ho. of gualification Tests: OBE SSS 'thec
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in E ch Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Yertical):
             'S/S    K                            F/8 ~

6 Method of, Determining Natural Frequencies t: 3 Lab Test ':.] In-Situ Test, t: ] Analysis 0

7. 'TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test t: ] Yes (Attach TRS h RRS graph
               ~   ~

t: ] No

8. Input g-level Test:, 08E S/S = F/8 SSE S/S ~ F/8 Y =

-.>> 9. t.abor'atory Mounting:,

l. {: 3 Bolt.{ho., Size ) {: 1 Me'Id {Length )

L'

10. Functional, operability verified: t.. ] Yes t,' No L ] Not Applicable El..Test Results 'including modifications {t de:
       .12. Other     test perforrad     (such as aging or           fragility t st;          including results)!
          ~Note:     If qualification       by a  co{rbination'f test             and  analysis also corplete I t'em   'Y I I.
                          ~ ~

12/M

YII. If /uglification by Analysis, then complete:

   .1.'ethod of Analysis:

I. 3 Static Analysis fx3 Equivalent .Static Analysis 5 3 Dynamic Analysis: L 3 Time-History [] Response Spectrum

                                      'P
2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical}:

Any Direction

                 % &&&&   w ~&
                       ~ 23.7Hz w   '%     %0 Mww
3. Model Type: f 3 3D fgj 20 I
                                                                                 .Vertical. R3           1D     Horizontal

[ ] Finite Element R3 Beam . I: 3 Closed Form Solutior

          $ 3   Computer Codes:       ~         +   Lknnggzhl o 4'. Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:                                   Not z>>~><yy~<

P) Hand Calculations. L 3 Absolute Sum I'x3 SRSS See Page I'. 3 Other: 7 of. rex

                                                                                              +speci Ty)                     e
6. Darrping: OBE ~% SSE >% Basis for the darrpirig used:. G-24 70 Suppo'rt Considerations in the oedel: seismic an~

Ao Critical Structura Identi O&W&MWA 0 Bearing Load .Puma Support Pipe

                                   ~         'r I Elements'.

fica.i on Locati orr Combina:ion

                                                   -"Governing Load

Response

lower by: Sei smi c S ro ss Total Stress 48,606 1,100 pipe support.

                                                                                                           ~

Stres's Al l owabl

                                                                                                             & wow& &MW&W 150,000 15,000 e

Pump Cover Pump .Shaft

                                ~    Pump...

Pump Pump

                                                        .'ower          by:

1260% 970% 161 1,755 12,600 18,800

                                                                           ~

Ma~iaum Allowable De=lection Max. Cri ical . to Assure F unct i ona 1 Oper-Deflection (ins) Location bility 0.400706 Pump Impeller .0.013200

        . 0.000228                       Pupp Rot'or                                         0..019600 12/80
                                                                                                        ~0
                                                ~   ~

I

                                                                                                 'J l

V I

                                                                                                "a
                                                                                                 ~

4 (

                                                                                                    ~,

7 t, r,. J', a S I C

                                                                                                               ~

I R P~w. r h 4 3 0, ~ i l ~ 4

                                              ~

4

                            'I 5

J W 4 E I h i I-A l 1 C

                                                                                        '~

J i'

                     \, ~

r

                                                                                                      ,  r sl'  ~
                ,1 t

'L "e ' I t, 4

  'h j 1
                                                                                                      >]

ma

0 Sheet 1 Form: M-60 Qualification Sunna of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHMM t

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL II. Canr]onent Name: Diesel Generator Fuel 0'.

Scme: ' ] NSSS [X ] BOP

2. Model Number: Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: Buffalo a
4. If the cadent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included:
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Cylindrical Steel Tank e F ](' Head
b. Dim nsions 60'on x 12'.

Height 44,900 lbs. (drv): 398,941 lbs. (~t)

6. Location: Building: NA Elevation: Bu ied at 16'rom arade to too of tank
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt Buried and anchored w3.th [ ] Weld (Length

(((o., Size 7-3" x 1/4" Hold Dam Straxfs ] with 3/4" P turnbuckle

8. a. System in which located: Brercencv Diesel Gen. (('ux.

Functional

Description:

Fuel Oil Storage

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown f Z] Both ( ] Neithet
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications:

Technical Specification 8856-M-60 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: P.O. M-60 III.~ Is Equi ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ ] Yes, [X ] No Tanks are buried IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Method: ~ [ ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* Diesel Fuel Oil Stora e Tanks Tag Nos. OT527 A thru D. Rev. ~ (No., Title and Date) Contract OX1910NC, dated 5/15/81 (Bechtel Vendor Prmt No. 8 -M -6) Ccmpany that Prepared Report Buffalo Tank Co. Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel PcM r Corporation V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [X] Seismic only + (External Earth Pressure) and Internal Fluid Pressure
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. f ] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)

NA

2. bRthod of ccmbining RRS: [ ]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS f ]

1 (Other,specify)

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs):

NA

4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA f ] Other (Specify)

OBE Pressure: 90 psf SSE Pressure: 180 psf

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered' Not affected by SRV, since the equipment is

[ ] Yes [X] No located outside the containm nt and Reactor/ Control Buildings. If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: NOZE: If more than one report complete items 1V thru Vll for each report. Oo PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: P.O. M-60 VI. If Qualif ication b Test, then Complete*: NOrp APPLIABLE [ ] random

1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat

[],

2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE 'S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = F/B =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ [ Balt (Na., Size ) [ [ (e.'ld (Length ) [ )
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
 "NOXE:  If qualification     by a ccmbination    of test  and   analysis also ccmplete Item   Vll; o

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: p.O. M-60 Vll. If Qualification b Analysis, then complete:

l. Methcd of Analysis:

[X] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [) 2D [) 1D f ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [Xj Closed Form Solution 4.
                                                                            ~~    Sec. III  Subsect. ND

[ ] Computer Codes: Frequency Range and No. of mx3es considered: [X] Hand Calculations NA

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ) Absolute Sum f ) SRSS

[ ) Other: (Specify) NK

6. Damping: CBE Basis for the damping used:

I

7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Shell (For external pressure 3269 psi 4063 psi

                                + seismic SSE)

Head (For external pressure 4797 psi 5375 psi

                                + seismic SSE)

Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabilit 3.55" 4.32" O PF2/23-4

I

                                                                                                   -~

II y

                                                           'r
                                                                                       <<r      I
                                                                                            ~, 'I, I
                                                                                        ~E 4
                                                                                                   'lii j;

I EE' II r 'I* E I E I I I E 5;I'>>'NP

                                            ~

p II I. Q'l

                                                                    ~ ~

4g~>>,', E T k&

    <<I
                  ~                     E       ~      I
               'r II II                                               I r'

I E I 'll I a I I

Sheet 1 Form: N87-1 Qualification Sum]a of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEZ II. Ccmmnent Name: Electric Hydrogen Recombiner
1. Scca: [ ] NSSS [X ] BOP
2. Model Number: Quantity: 4 per unit
3. endor: Westin house
4. If the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model hh. of the devices included: N/A S. Physical Description a. Appearance Stainless steel box Dimdansions H-8 'l" I W-51 I D 63"
c. Weight 6200 lbs
6. Location: Building: Containment Elevation: 690 ', 704 ' 719 Field Mounting Conditions [ x) Bolt x] Weld (No.

{length 8, 1 8" Size 1" A307 full ae el. pl-704' 690' [ ] 1/4" two inches ion 18 inches on center at el. in which located: 719'.

a. System 173 Functicnal ~scr jption. Post Loca H~ control
c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ ] Both [ x] Neither N/A

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 8856-N87-Rev. 4 8856-G22 Rev. 3 lZ440Af 1E440Bf lE440CI 1E440D PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: N 87-1 Rev., 2, III. Is i nt Available for tion in the Plant: [ x] Yes, [ ] No IV. ~ipnent. Qualification Method: [x] %hst [ ] Analysis f ] Combination of Test & Analysis RED-SP-2s Dynamic Qualification Test Report for W Qualification Export* Model A Electric dro e~ Recombi for Seismic and {3echtel V.P. No. 8856-M87- {No., Title and Date) 8 dred amis Lodss',~d'~8 56-2 ) Ccmpany that Prepared Report West ou "'on Car@any that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Cornoration Vibration Input-

1. Loads considered: a. fx] Seismic only
b. f ] Hy9xodynamic only
c. p] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: p]Absolute Sum bc]SRSS [ ]

{Other,specx fy)

3. Required R spcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): Attachment No. ~ -Phase II
4. Cupping Corresponding to RRS: CBE 0. 5g Attachment No.

SSE 4 -Phase III 1% 2C for combined loads {SSE or OBE + SRV + LOCA)

8. {sadnirad {emeleration in Each Direction: f f ZSA f f other see the reendred response spectra in attachment Bo 1-Phase"-LPi (Sn orfol CBE S/S = pdaclssent SSE S/S = F/B = V=
6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'

[9 Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: The SRV fatigue load vas considered. Tes With a total duration of 30 minutes v ~ enveloped SRV RRS. "NEE: If more than cne report ccnglete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M87-1 Rev. 1 VI. If Qualificat'on b Test, then lete*: jc ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [x] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ J Single Axis [xJ Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other x Six faulted (SSE + SRV + LOCA) tests for each four test positions. (Specify)

Thirty minutes SRV fatigue test vas also performed. 4 Frequency Range: / ~ oo A'. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical): See attachment No. 2 S/S = F/B =

6. Hethcd of Determining Natural Frequencies fx] Lab &st [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[1 No Attachment No. 3 For Phase ZZ & ZZZ+(

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = V =

See TRS in

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [x) Bolt (No. 8, Bize~Z ) [ ) (&'ld (Length ) [ [
10. Functional cperability verified: [x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: Test r sul s i ic recombiner is ualified for seismic and h drod smic loads.

l2. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results): The unit vas earlier qualification tested in 1975 to meet I~E323-1974. The unit vas a r ve i J 8 accordance vith IEEE323-1974, subject to conditions in staff evaluation. (John F. Stolz, USNRC to Thomas M. Anderson, Westinghouse, June 22, 1978). NOIE: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccaplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: -'87 1 Vll.,

   ~  1f Qualification   b   Anal  sis,  then'""complete:

1.~ Method of Analysis: - (HOT ApPLICABLE) [ J Static Analysis [ ) Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History f ) Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Bact, Vertical):

I S/S = F/B = V=

3. Model type: f J 3D f)2D [] lD

[ J Finite Element [ ) Beam f ) Closed Form Solution 4-: [ ] Ccmputer Codes: Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: f J Hand Calculations I

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: f ) Absolute Sum,[ ] SRSS

[ ) Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M 87-2 Bev.2 Qualification Sunma of Hauianent I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA TZee:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GZ 3~ A/E: BEQGXX nent Name: droaen Recanbina- Power Semi C-215 A B CaD
1. Scca: [ J NSSS [P( J BOP 2.. Model Number: A Quantity:
3. Vendor: Westin use
                                                                                                     \
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: Items 1,2 3 4 11 12 &13 on attached Bill of Material
5. physical Description a. appearance Instt~m nt Back
b. Dinensions 35-9 16" w x 61-1/16" h x 26"D
c. Weight 950 lbs.

6. 7. Location: Elevation: 719', Field Mounting Conditions [X 683'/8" Building: Reactor Buildincr [ Bolt (Nn. 8 gf Exp. Bolts i Bireme rer dso )sp 4.07 [ [ Weld (Length ) [ 1

8. a. System in which located: 173 Contaizutent At[rasa r
b. Functicnal Description- Provide
                                                                                             ~

Pow

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ J Cold Shutdcwn

[ ] Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:

8856~87 G 22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: M 87-2 Rev. 2 III. ~ Is Ekrui ent Available for tion in the Plant: [Z ] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Method:

           ~
    ~

IZ] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* WCAP-7709L Smnl. 7 "Electric Hydrogen Recombiner INR (No., Title and Date) Containaents S lerrental Test Nuaher 2", August, 1977. Ccmpany that Prepared Report Westinghouse Electri Co tion Ccmpany that Reviewed Report V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. Q] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. Q] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. bLthod of ccmbining RRS: Q]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

ttti&II II e 3. Required Respcase Spectra (attach the graphs): MO 2% W "9 for cabined loads Attachment No. 1- Phase (SSE or GBE + SRV + LOCA) e III

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other CBE S/S See RRS in Attachment No. 1 for Phase F/B =

II and Attac)ment.No. 3 for SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[] Yes Ix] N If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: NOTE: If more than one report ccmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M 87-2 Rev. 2 VI. If Qualification b Vest, then lete*: fK] randem

1. f ] Single Frequency k ] Multi-Frequency k] sine beat k]
2. [ ] Single Axis k ] Multi-Axis OBE-Biaxial Random Mtion SSE-'Biaxial Sine Beat
3. No. pf Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 0.1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Not reported. S/S = F/B = V=

     .6. Method    of Determining Natural Frequencies Not reported.

[ ] Lab &st [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'I98 enveloping BRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ] Yes -(Attach TRS s RRS graphs Attache No. 2 Phase - II; Attachr~t No.4-. Phase III
8. Input g-level Test: GBE S/S = F/B =

Se TRS above SSE S/S = F/B =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Bolt (No., field S~nulated Size anunting conditions
                                                      )   [ ]  Neld (Length
10. Functional cperability verified: -k] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Vest Results including modifications made:

hydrogen reccnbiner @ever supply is qualified for seismic and hydr~pmmic

12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOIR: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M87-2 Rev.2 Qualification b Anal is, then complete: Not AppU.cable. Method of Analysis: [ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ) Dynamic Analysis [ ) T~istory [ ) Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies .in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S M

3. Mcdel t~: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] 1D

[ ] Finite Element [ ) Bem [ ) Closed Form Solution

4. [ ) Ccaputer Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of nedes considered: [ ) Hand Calculations

5. ¹thcd of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ) Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Daaping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

t f, i j F t C tY t  % 5

                              /

t h h e I I F r f

                                                                                       ~y C
                                  'J g'p; l ~.

A pWpq

                    <r I

V I I

                                                                    $ e',,",'4" II                                                                 O C

c i ~

 .                     4  ~ ~              ~

e P H L ~ I A

                                     ,,E
   ~ w I     r

Sheet 1 Form: M-90 Qualification Suma of Equipment Jut 23'810144674 I. Plant Name; . SUSQUEHANNA 22e:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL E"R 'X II. Ccmconent Nam: Fuel Pool Sk~~ir S~~ae Tark
l. ~: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Hodel Number: Q T-208 Quantity:
3. Vendor: METEK
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model Yb. of the device-included: N A
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Vertical Cvl. Tank
b. Dimensions. 304" Hiah, 94" Dia
c. Neight 7730 ~M. e~"v, 71100 flood&
6. Location: Building: actor Elevation: Too: 816'5", Bot~: 791'1"
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ X ] Bolt (No. 8 , Size 1-4 Dia ) AS'LM A-490 (Upper Suppor~) [ ] Held'Length )
                                                 ] 4 Pins 1-778" dia. ASM A-490 w/nuts and (Bot~ Sue]ports)                      cotters at   each end.
8. a. System in which located: Fuel Pool Cooling 6 Cleans
b. Functional

Description:

Provides Surm Tar'~ Volte & P~~ Su't. Hea"

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Stare:~ [ ] Cold Shutdni.

[ ] Both [Y.] N ither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-90 G-10 ~22 The diagonal bracing mahers between El. 795'nd El. 804'-9" on section A of Dwg. C-980 which are in direct contact eath tank's PF2/23-1 seismic ring have to be cut to have clearance with g" min.

~ ~ Sheet 2 Form: iN-90 REV. 1 Is Equi ent Available for; Inspection in the, Plant: fX,.] Yes, [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualif ication Method: [ ] Test '[yJ Analysis [ l Carhination of Test & Analysi Bechtel Venom= Print Nos. 8856M-90-33-{1)-1 & Z. Qualification Report* M-90-33(2 -1 M-90-33 3 -1 (A",uS-1397, Rev. 2, 5/5/81) {No,;.Title and Date) 'smic and Nozzle Load Anal sis of th=- Bml Pcol Skirtm r Surge Tank Ccmpany that Prepared NJS Co ration for Pzetek Ccmpany that Reviewed Bechtel Pcr ar Co rat'on V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. f X] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [g Canbination of (a) and (b) specify)
2. M thod of canbining RRS: [']Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS f l

{Other,

3. Required R s~e Spectra {attach the graphs): AttaC1YRMt '-.,'1-Attachnmt 2 Phase IIX
4. I ming Corres po ndin g to RRS: OBE SSE 1$
                                                                                                =,".

(OBE or SSE+KW+~~- ) 28 Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA f ] Other saa Attac2ment fl, phasm 22, Attachment g2, ph.Ill (apac~tY) Ql CaE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Rhm fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'P

[g Yes [ l No If yes, describe loads considered and hex they were treated in overall qualification program: Faticu ch~. to SPV is irmlicitlv consider~. The conation f~ SRV axe arall ~iared to the ati~ louis frcm of ~ attachment 41. It is averred that fatigue due to SET is not a problem. NOZE: If,more than one report ccnplete items 1V thru Vll for each report.

Sheet 3 ZiL 23 '81 0 ) g g 6 "/ g VI. If Qualification b Test, then Complete*: N

                                                                                       ] randem
1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency ] sine beat
2. f ] Single Axis [ ) Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural ~encies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Baci;, Vertical):

V =

6. Method of D termining Natural Frequencies

[ ] mb Test [ ) In-Situ Test f ) Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency 'est f ) Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs f]No
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = V =

SSE S/S = g 9. Laboratory Mounting:

1. [ ] Bolt (No., Size ) [ ) ¹ld (length ) f ]
10. Functicnal operability verified: f ] Yes [ ) No f ] Not Appl'icable ll. Test Results including modif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NOIR: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also complete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M 90 Rev. yll. If Qualification b Anal sis, then co lete:  ?

l. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ l equivalent Static Analysis [K ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [X] 'Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

3-D Mx2el Freq. from 13 Hz - 118 Hz fa~ 50 rides

3. bkdel type: g] 3D [] 2D [] 1D g ] Finite Ele.t~ nt [ ] Bem [ ] Clo 'ed Form Solution
4. P ] Computer Codes: S~ ~e Frequency Range and No. of xx3es 'considered: 13 Hz-118 Hz for 50 nades

[ ] Hand Calculations Closely spaced rrrdes (pgs. 7-41) w>dely

5. Method of Canbinir g Dynamic Responses: [X] Absolute Sum g] SRSS spaced neQes

[ ] Other: (Specify) DAR Soct.

6. D~ing: OBE 4S SSE 3.%, Basis for. the damping used:7.1.4.1.2 (OBF, or SSE) +SRV + IDCA - 2S
7. Support Considerationns in the model: Riaid
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Knead or Response Seismic Total Stress

  • A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress StressPsi Allowable~

Shell s chute Tri elect &56,626 3S =60,000

p. 8.2 of 200 for Phase II
                                                                                    &57,196 the report                                                             for  Phase III Maximum   Allowable Deflection B. Max. Cri"ical                                          to Assure Functior.al Deflection                Location                         rabilit
              >hase  III Loca   does not change the governing            stresses...

See Bechtel calculation No. 58-IIX~0-1 and Attach. No.3 for justification. p PF2/23-4

 ,C.~~

C e

      ~ \"

r

        'r
         'I r     "   ~

r Jl

                                     ~ ~
 'L C

C r'<<7>> i g r,r ~"

Sheet 1 Font: N-151 Nev. 1 ification Sumna of Bxuianent I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA Tenne: lysis

1. Utility: PAL airers"
2. NSSS: GE 3~ A/E: BECHTEL II. Canrnnent Name: SUPPRESSICN POD).SUCrEW
l. Sccpe: [ J NSSS [X J BOP
2. Model Number: 50-P a 51-P Quantity: 32 (total) 3~ endor. Huston HanufacturlLlg
4. If the ccmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included: N/A
5. Ehysical Description a. Pppearance See Ninston Drawings ittansions VP M-151-14-3 & M-151-15-3 Sec. II
6. Location: Building: contairment Elevation: 650 to 667 feet.
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ J Bolt (No. , Size

[ J Weld (Length [x J Starward Plan e Bolts

8. a. System in which located: All svstans ta3cina 1 suc"'on
b. Functional

Description:

Suction Strainers for all cool suet'ons.

c. Is the ecuipnent reauired for [ J Hot Standby [ J Cold Shutcown

[gJ Both [ I Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Spec'ficat ons:

8856M-151 Rev. 1 Pn/23-1 I

                                ~ \ ~

l III. Is

      ~      Equipment Available for Inspection               in the Plant:
                                                               ~

{ ] 'es No IY. Equipment guali ication Method: {3 Test 1 Analysis 3 Combination of Test and Analysis gualification Report*: Bechtel VPP'896 gl53. 4 6 a (No., Title and Oate} Structural Design Report Suooression pool Suction za~ciTrtm~ Coapany that Prepared Iiaporo: Harry Z. Swedt & Associates, znc. COr'pany that ReVieWed Repart: Bechtel V; Yibration Input:

        . I. Loads considered:          a.  {   3 Seismic only
                                         .b.  {   ] Hydrodynamic only
c. 5 ) Coabination of (a) and (b)

Nethod of Combining RRS: {Xg Absolute Sum { j SRSS ..{ j

                                                                                           'otner,             spec1Tyj 3e   Required Response Spec ra (attach the graphs): See S>ee<                      2        N-l5l, .Rev.      1.

4 Oarping Correspondi ng to RRS: OSE SSE (SSE+SRV+LOCA).=2::

5. Required Acceleration in Each Oirection: { { j Other QBE S/S S/S=
                              ~

8. N/A 3~ "" F/B. ~ F/1=

                                                                 '/A     3 ZPA Y   =

swww (sperry Y=m.S g Aw~&wMw m/A. J SSE 65 '

        ~
6. Mere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'
               $  g:Yes       {g No If yes,      describe loads considered and         how they were     reated in overall aoaiification         program:    .
              ~%% O~A~A&%%%%%%%&~%~%%%%%

'NOTE: If more than one report coaplete iterrs IV thru VII for each report..'12/80:

N/A YI~ If gualification by Test, then Complete": f 3 random f ] Single Frequency f ].Multi-Frequency: 5 ] sine beat I:3 24 I:3 Single Axis f ] Multi-Axis

3. No. of qualification Tests: OBE SSS 'ther Frequency Range:

6.

         'S/S  =            '/g Natural Frequencies   in Each   Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
                                               ~

Method of. Determining Natural Frequencies Y ~ f3 Lab Test 'f 3 In-Situ Test ' 3 Analysis 7e TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f 1 Yes (Attach TRS ll RRS graph f jNo

8. Input g-level Test:. OBE S/S = F/B= Y ~

SSE S/S te Y =

9. Laboratory Mount ing:
     ~t
l. [ 3 gait.(Na., Size ~ .
                                                           }    [ 3  Meld (Length              }   [   3
10. Functional operability verified: f. 3
                                                        'I Yes    f 3 No       f  3   Hot Applicable
11. Test Results 'including mdif ications made:
   .12. Other test performed {such as aging or               fragility test;         including results)!
     <<Note:    If qualification   by a  co(rbination          aC  test   and    analysis also corylete rte YII.

12/80

e l ~ YI$ . lf gualific'ation by Analysis, then comolete:

~

1.Method of Analysis: px3 Stat i c Ana ly si s e [ 3 Equ>valent,Static Analysss

                                                    ~  ~

[

      ~

[

    ~

3 Dynamic Analysis: 3 Time-History [ 3 Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Yertical):

3. sfs-Model Type: . [ 3 30 0040~ W&&W [3 zo.

                                                                                ~   ~~         W Y  se Clio

[ 3 Finite Element El Beam f3 Closed Form Solution 4; f 3 Corputer Codes: Frequency Range and Ho. of modes considered: N/A [ 3 Hind Calculations N/A . Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: I. ] Absolute Sum [ 3 SRSS [ 3 Other: 0% OOA u~ Tspec>ry)

-               6. Darrping:       GSE Support Considerations SSE   2g in the mdel:

Basis for the fixed daeqirig used:.

                      ~   l
8. Critical Structural Elements'.
                                                             'overning     Load of Response       'eismic              Total        St res's Ae  Ldenti f i cation            Lacatiorf    Combina'ti an           Str    ss. S    ress    Al 1owabl e See       Item     4
                                                                                 ~

Magism Al lovable Deflect i on B. Max. Cri t i ca 1 . to Assure Func-.ional Opera-Defi ection Location bility N/A ~ N/A N/A

                         ~

' 12/80 IO

hJ

 , ~ J J ~ =~

a' rJ

                                   ~

Jh I (( Ih J I I

                     ~ h
                         , ~J p I

V

Form: N-156 Tag 5 l~!'2 T 6 A thee D Tag I 1&2 T401 A thru D Qualification Sumarv of Eauirxnent Tag ~ 1&2 T402 A thru F Tag I 1&2 T403 A thru H

                                                                                                         & J thru N, P, I. Plant  Name:          SUSQUEHANNA                                                 TZr?e-            R&  S
1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3~ A/E: BECPI'EL BWR X
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Model Number: N/A Quantity: 60
3. Vendor: ineeri Co., Vi inia
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and myel No. of the devices included: N/A
5. Physical Description a. Appearance lindrical Vertical (1) Tag 1,2 T401A-D & 1,2 T226A-D: 32"H x 8 O.D. Suppore, 10"H
b. Dimensions (2)'Ta 1,2 T402A-F 38"H x 18" O.D. Sexart 10"H
(3) Tag 1,2 T403A-H & J-N & PiR & S 21"H
c. Weight (1) 1,2 T401 &1,2 T226: 300 lbs. (2) 1,2 T402: 400 lbs.

(3) 1,2 T403: 213 lbs. l, 27 Z26 A-+, R x 12-3 4" O.D. Support: l0"H

6. Location: Building: Others: Prima Containment
                                         ,2 T226A-D El. 745 Others: 752'-2.-l/2"        -7'levation:
7. Field Rounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 6 , Size 1/2"

[ ] Weld (Length ) [ )

8. a. System in which located: Contairment Instrument Gas S stem
b. Functional

Description:

A s 1 source of N or air for FSRV's & HSD

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X] Both [ ] Neiehee

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: H-156, G-22 PF2/23-1

Rev. III, Is Ecruizment Available for Inspection in the Plant: fx] Yes [ ] No 1V. Ekmipnent Qualif ication Hethod: f ] Test fg Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test 6 Analysis Nalification &port* Containment. Instrument Gas Accumulators 8856-N-156-10-4 (No., Title and Date) 8856-N-156-37-3 Ccmpany that Prepared Report Richmcnd Enaineerina Co. Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechte1 Corooration V. Vibration Input:

1. toads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic any
c. [gj Ccmbination of (a) and (b) + Nozzle'oads
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: f /Absolute Sum [ ]SBSS [ ]
3. Required &spcnse Spectra (attach the graphs):See Attaint 01 for Phase 11 p, 4.

(OBE+SRV+LOCA) 2~ Ih&' P (S>E<><"+~~>2>~

                                   '%RI:                          See Attachnant r'2 foz Phase SSE    la                     III Bequired Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA               [ j Other As required per spectra indicated above                             (Specify)

CSE :S/S = F/B-SSE S/S = F/B =

6. bhre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'

[Axes . f ]No If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall aualification program: Fati e due to SRV is im Since the stress level is very low (the maximum stress due to licitl considered. SSE + SRV + LOCA is 12.3 ksi as against the allowable stress of 25 ksi) fatigue due to SRV is not a problem. "NOI'E: If more than cne report carplete items 1V thzu Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Bonn: M-15 6 If Qualification b Test, then Ccmolete*: NOT APPLICABLE f ] randem

1. f ) Single Frequency f ) Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat Multi-Axis

[)

2. f ] Single Axis f ]
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test f ]*In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f]No I 8.

9. 10. Input g-level Test: Laboratory Mounting:

l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size OBE SSE S/S =

S/S = Functicnal ocerability verified:

                                                     )   [ ]

[ ] Yes Weld (Length [ ] No [ ] V=

                                                                                     )    [ ]

Not Applicable

11. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
 "NOIR:  If qualification     by a canbination   of test  and  analysis also ccxnplete Item  Vll.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-1 56 Vll ~ If QIalification

                  ~

b Anal is, then carnlete: (SeeNote. 2),, Rev. 1 Method of Analysis: [X] Static Analysis ( ] Ekyivalent Static Analysis f ) Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrmn

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Fronk/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D f]2D [] lD f ) Finite Element (Z) Bem [ ] Closed Form Solution
4. ( ] Ceo@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of mxies considered: N A [X] Hand Calculations

5. bLthod of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ) Absolute Sum f ] SRSS fX] Other:

(Specify) (OBE+SRV+LOCA) 2S (SSE+SRV+LOCA) 2% Sect. 7.1.1.E Damping: OBE l/25 SSE 1% Basis for the damping used- of Spec. G-22 7~ Support Ccnsiderationns in the mcdel: . Ricrid Sun ort

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing or Response

                                                                ~         Seismic        Total          Stress A. Identification         Location      .Ccmbination            Stress         Stress         Allowable 1T402A-F            Anchor      bolts boltsj SSZ+SRV+      12,300 psi          14,170psi         (OBE) 2T402A-F            Anchor                  LOCA+         (incl.       SRV+         ~

25,000 psi Nozzle Load LOCA) Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ceerabilit N/A Notes: 1.Engineering has issued instruction to the the existing beams (see Bechtel drawing C-365, Rev. 15, DCN 1) f'ld to strengthen

2. The peak acceleration values for Phase III LOCA loads are less t'.m the valms used in Phase II analysis. Therefore, .tM Phase I solutions are still valid and the gas accumulators are quali ied for botn Pk~~e II as well as Phase III loads.

PF2/23-4

I I J I

                                   \

I T 1

                                 'I r0 t
                              'E 1

f f 0 r

  • I'

~ E. C ( g' F

                 )'

Sheet 1 Foon:, )4-160AC

                   'ualification     Sum+       og F   i     nt I. Plant  Name:        SUSQUEHANNA 1.
2. NSSS: GE'.

Utility: PAL (A) A/E: BECHTEL S)9V DL VACUUM BREAfKBS (B) KP, DL VACXKiM K~+KERS

l. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Model Number:

(A) DSM-62933 (B) DS-C-62934 Quantity: (A) (B) 32Anit 2/Unit ~~ A

3. Vendor: 'ROSBY VALVE & GAGE CO.
4. If the ccom)nent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included: NOT APPLICABZZ VACUUM RKZEF VALVE
5. Physical Description a. Appearance FLANGED TO PIPE TEE
b. Dimensions 14" x 20" (APPPQXiYATB)
c. Weight (A) 400 LBS (B) 42S LBS
6. Location: Building: (A) CCNTAMKNT (B) SUPPRESSION POOL Elevation: (A) VMMS FRCM APP. 708'o 716'B)

(No., 674'. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [x ] 6" 300g'STD. ANSI RF FLANGE

8. a. System in Wiich located: (A) NEAR BOILER (B) RHR RELIEVE VACiXiM IN BELT3w VALVE
b. Functional

Description:

DL TO LAIT WATER SLUG IN LINE

c. Is the ecpipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown (x 1 Both~A) (x ) ))either ~))
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 8856 y 160AC TAG NO. PSV-Ell-lF141A,B PSV-E11-2F14lA,B ())) Q)

PSV-B 1-12037 A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,J,K,L,M,N,P,R,S PF2g3-1 {A)+)

OII Sheet 2 fj e FOrm e ~~f IIX.,- Is uipnent Available for Ins tion in the Plant:

                                                   ~   ~

fx ] Yes [ ] No IV.~

            ~

Equipment Qualif ication Method: [x] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* BECHTEL NV.P. 8856M-160AC-33-1 (No., Title and Date) CROSBY 2/81 Ccmpany that Prepared Report CROSBY VALVE Ccmpany that Reviewed Report K~rzzz, m~ V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. f ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
c. [x] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. N>>thud of ccmbiniug SRS: [ [Atsolute Sum J7fSSSS [x[ Sll~ TSST Q[

(Other, specify)

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):

RIM TEST RIM ~

4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE
5. Required Acceleration in Bach Direction: [ ] ZPA [x] Other **

(Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = SSE S/S = ,F/B =

6. Vere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[] Yes [ ] Not EXPLICITLY If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall qualification program: TOIAL I F BOOZE: If more than one report complete items lV thru Vll for each report.

  • ~LESS THAN 12 g's FHM 10 K) 100 HZ. TO BE CONFIRMED BY FINAL AS BUXLT PIPING CAD'UIATEONS.

PF2/23-2

lg ~ Sheet 3 Form: M-l60AC VI. If Qualification b Test, then Ccmplete*: [ ] random

l. [x] Single Frequency** [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat

[ 2 45 sec sine dwell

2. [x] Single Axis -independent [ ] Multi-Axis test in 2 directions
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other 12 HORIZCNTAL AND VERPICAL H)R 33 AND 100 HZ AT 4.5, 6.0, AND (Specify) 12 G-'LQADS.

4 Frequency Range: SEARCH 10-100HZ. SINE D'rKU AT 33 AND 100 HZ

5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

SKK'TIDALWITH S/S = 100 HZ F/B= SS V= 100 HZ

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[5 Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[g No RIM TEST 4.5, 6.0

8. Input g-level Test: 33HZ S/S & 12.0 F/8 =SYmrRECAL V =4.5 6.0 & 12.0

, 9. Laboratory Mounting: 100 HZ S/S = 4.5, 6.0

                                                      &  12.0        F/B  =SYMMETRICAL e

V =4.5 RIGIDLY KXEKED TO TEST 6.0 & 12.0

l. { ] Bolt (({o.,Size )

STRE) BY 6" 300 LB STA;WARD HF [ ] Weld (Length )

10. Functional operability verified: [g Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including mx3ifications made: B THIS RUN SHOWED FLCN CYCLING BETWEEN 890 AND 1120 CEH DURING SHE REDUCED
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

FIQW BEEORE, DURING AND AFI'.ER SHAKE.

   "NOXE:   If qualification    by a ccmbination      of test   and analysis also ccmplete Item  Vll.
 *NATURAL PREQUMCY SEARCH SHOWED NONE FBCN 10-100 IHZ.               THEN TESTS RON      IN   EACH DIRECTION AT 33 AND 100 HZ AT 3 DIFFEBENI G-IQADS.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 r~ Form: H-l4ogC Vll. If Qualification b Anal sis, then complete:

                                                             @OS    API'~l<R~<<-
1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis f ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] adamic Analysis [ ] Time-History f ) Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ) f] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Carputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of ides considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ) Absolute Sum f ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the noel:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identif ication Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional D flection 1'oca tlon Ooerabilit

                                                                          'F2/23-4

k SN 4 P I r I

                                                                                                                               ~

g C I Ch

                                                                                                                                'I
                                                                        'S" t  a
                                                                                                                    <<I'We w
                                                                                   ~,

J

                                                 'h e

e I ~

         /

t E j ..::::.".-;.": '..-':.:-.".'-.--"'.-'='. ",'."-" ==.,-',";."'='=-'=':- -'--'-.'=-= -:-:: -.- C' 1 1 5=>> ~ 7 I~

                                                           \

ualifi cat i on Summa r of foui oment I ~ . Plant Name: Susquehanna sEs ~Tee: 1 0'ti ity: 1 Pennsylvania Power 6 Light Co. PMR 2 NSSS: 3 " A/E: >echtel BMR ~ MK ZX 1 P

                                                              ~ 0
                                                                  ~                              e TI ~    Component Name                  RD  'Piping /Supports and Vent Valve. platform Scope:         h3   NSSS                     P  ) BOP 2     Model Number.                  N/A                                      quantity:         /"

3o Vendor: Nuclear'Xnstallation Serv

              '. 4-       N the componen is a c8binet or panel,                          nam   and model No.         of the
                       '. devices included:,               >/A
 ~ ~

E 5

                       ', Physical Description Dimensions
a. Appearance Pi in and sun orts
c. weight go LOCat i On'ui 1 dl no 'eactor and Containment fleva"ion:
7. Fie',d Mounting Cond-tions Lx) . .Belt (Na.
                                                                    -6 )   Meld (Length
                                                                                          ,    Bcze
                                                                                                   ) .
                                                                                                                )
8. a. System. in which located: co Hydraulic S stem b- Functional Description. To perform rod, withdrawal, rod insertion and roa znsertx.on.
                ~

C. ?s .the equipment required for I: ) Hot Standby I. 3 Cold Shutdown Both ~ScRAM [ 3 Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:

8856-M-.164'

                           ~   ~

12/80

                                                                                                       ~%

C

                           ~ ~

III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection fn the Plant: f 3 Yes f] No gualification

                                                                                                                'V.

Equipment, Method: f ).Test ~ ' Q Analysis fg Coahination of Test and Analysis qua]if iCatiOn RepOrt>>: TR-284'2-1 (Bechtel'P88856-Ml64-432(l)-7 ~ Stress Analysis of Control. RodDrive (No-, Title and Date)

                                      ~~gg         ~gQ~~~                                  ts      Ql/29/79 Company    that Prepared Report:             Teledyne Engineering Servi'ces Company    that   Reviewed Report:              Bechtel I                  I V     Vibration Input:
   -1. Loads considered:         a. fj      Seismic only
                                    .b. f 3 Hydrodynamic only
c. f"] Combination of (a) and (b) 2, Method of Combining RRS: f9 Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS . f ) .

otner, spec%=y 3'. Required ReSpanSe SpeCtra (attaCh the graPhS): See Fi~ureA-12 tg~-g~~ ~pgr

4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OSE SSE
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:

See Figures A-l2 to A-22 of report. f]WA f 1 Other (specs ry i OSE S/S - - . FP-.. V = SSE S/S = F/~ = Y =

    ~
6. Mere faticue effects or other vibra ion loads considered' f ).Yes fx] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: .

<<NOTE: If more than one report coaqlete items IV thru VII for each report.

                                                                                                      '2/80

3 ~ VI:,. If gualification by Test, then'omplete: N/A

f. 3 random 5 3 Single Frequency fg Multi-Frequency: l: j sine beat I:3
2. [ 3 Single Axis L j Multi-Axis
3. Na. of gualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (5 peel Ty )
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each'Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Yertica1):

F/B ~

6. Method of. Oetermining Natural Frequencies 5 3 Lab Test 'P.3 In-Situ Test fg Analysis
7. 'TRS'enveloping RRS using Nuit.i-Frequency Test l: 3 Yes (Attach TRS h RRS graph.
                                                                               $ 3 No
8. Input g-level Test:. OBE S/S = F/B ~ Y a
                                     ~

SSE S/S ~ F/B

  • V =
9. Labor atory Mounting:
1. L' goIt.{No.. Size .
                                                               )    L'   Meld {Length                )    {: 3
10. Functional operability verified: I:. 3 Yes f 3 Ho I: ] Not Applicable 11..Test Results 'including modifications {rode:
    .12     Other test performed (such as aging or                 fragility tes.,'ncluding               resu1ts)'.
                                                                          ~ ~
        <<Nate:   If qualification      by  a  co{rbination        of. test    and  analysis a1so corp1ete It~ Yrr.
                                                                                                        ~

12/M

                                                    ~ t ~

'I YII. If gualific'ation: by

            $ 3 of Analysis:

Static Analysis Analysis, th'en f] complete".'1..'ethod Equivalent, Static Analysis f3 Dynamic Analysis: I. 3 Time-History I:xj Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, front/Back, Ver.ical):

3.

                     %W&%W~W~&~QWrO&40 13D                '
                                                         ~ ~ I\                   &W &WM  ~~      W Model Type:        I:                                                 g 20                 . I. AID 5 3   Finite    Elephant                        I.x3 Beam                   I. 3    Closed Form Solutior
4. [) Corputer Codes: ~&w TiKsAP o&~ &~'\&~~wW~WW&A~~w&~&w&'wwwwWMMM~W%a~CMj&MO Fre uency Range and Ho. of modes considered: ~ ~MWWWWWWWW~WWM&%W~

f3 Hand Ca 1cu1 ati ons

      '5. Method      of Combining Dynamic Responses:                                 L  g Absolute      Sum L     j SRSS I: g  Other:

Lspeciry'j per 4.2.2 of Spec 0"23 Fixed/Hinged See

6. Dawying: OSE l/2% SSE lX Sasis for the daaqing users:.

figures on Pgs. D.2-3 & -4, Also D.2-24

7. Support Considerations in the madel+25 and -26.
8. Critical Structural Elements:
                                                  'overning                       Load or Response                             Seismic       Total        S ress Id ntif'.cation Locatiort
            & OWWW&w'ww'\ww& w %

Combina:ion Stress S r ss Allowable Stress analysis (Section D.5 of the report) shov that the stresses are vithin allovabies. ' Ha~'rum Allowable Deflection B Max. Critical to 'Assure F unc: i on a 1 Oper a-Defi ecti on Locati on bi1 ity None stated None

               ~ ~

l2/80 OO

I 4 pl, Ig I I, V V V I

 ~ W                              t P

k R ~ I

                              \g  P 1'

I I ~ I h

                           ,I P'

J

Sheet 1 FOrm e g-192 Rev. 1 Qualification Smma of Equi nt E. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL
1. Sccpe: [ ]'SSS [P( ] BOP 48 xack modules
2. bkael Number: N/A Quantity:
3. Vendor: PaR Svstems. Co
4. lf the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model &. of the devices included: N/A Alum. Grates containing neutron absorber S. Physical Description a. Appearance canisters.
b. Dim nsions of aedule: 181" hi h x 69" wide x 82.26" lone
c. Weight 14,000 lbs. rack neaule
6. Location: Building: Reactor Building Elevation: 779'-4" Fuel Pool Bottom Elev.
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt {No. )

[ ] Weld {Length ) [Z ] Horizontall restrained through pins in clevis brackets welded to walls, vertically simply resting on floot-

8. a. System in which located: Fuel Pool Stora e Provide high density fuel storage capacity in
b. Functional

Description:

the ment Wel zxol through inclusion of eutron absorbers.

c. Zs the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X ] Both [ 1 Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications:

Technical Soecif ication 8856~41-192 Rev. 2 PaR Systems Design and Fabrication Criteria Vendor Print No. 8856-H-5-4 PF2/23-1

Rev. 1 llI. Is ui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [X ] 'Yes f ] No 1V. Equipnent Qualif ication Methcd: [ ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test s Analysis k Qualification ihgort* DR-3157-lA; Hitch Densi Snent Fuel (No., Title and Date) Racks Desi Ressort - Jul 19 1979 Bechtel V.P. N8856~1-192-93-9 Ccmpany that Prepared Report PaR S stems Coro. Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co ration V. Vibration Input:

l. leads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [ 4 Canbination of (a) and (b) 20 Method of ccmbining RRS: g ]Absolute Sum [gSRSS [ ]

Phase II Phase III (Other,specify) Sheet 1-7, Rev. 1 3~ Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See also Anoendix A-C o&Structural Analysis Report - Phase II., Attach. 51 Phase III Damping Corresponding to RRS: CBE 2% SSE 5

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Structural Analysis Report DR-3157-1 Phase I1 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V = See Attachm m, e - e I1I

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[] Yes [X] No If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall qualif ication program: "NCTE: If more than one report ccaplete itens 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

y I Sheet 3 Form: M-192 Rev. 1 VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: N/A [ ] random

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ) Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies
          ,[  )  Lab Test               [ ]  In-Situ Test                    [ ]   Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS 6 RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S = V=

9. laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ) Bolt [Bo., Size ) [ ) Wld {[ength ) [ )
10. Functional operability verif'ied: [ ) Yes [ ] No [ ) Not Applicable ll. Test Results including rredifications made:
12. Other test perfoaned (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOTE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccrr)piete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-192

l. If Qualification b Anal is, Vien 'ete'. Rev. 1
l. Method of Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis '[ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis fX] T~istory Q] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

See Table 4-1 of 8856-H-192-93-9 S/S = F/B = V=

3. Mcdel type: Ã] 3D [] 2D f]lD f ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution
4. [ g Cmguter Codes:

All frequencies fram 0-80 Frequency Range and No. of rides considered: Hz are Frequencies to 33 Hz are considered in ttw canguter

                           *'1"""'

See Attachment g2 II Other: f ]

                                                                         *'~

(Specify) DAR Section

6. Damping: OBE 2% SSE 5% Basis for the damping used: 7.1.4.1.2 See Structural Anal sis Re rt
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model: DR-3157-1 Rev.
8. Critical Structural Eletnents:

Governing Load or Res pcnse Seismic 'hiatal Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Module Beam Sect. 2, Pt. D+LK)BE Not Presented . 93 1.0 Stress 464/B in report D+L+SSE+SRV+LOCA .85 1.0 Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabilit Not Presented Not Critical '" II (A Cont'd) 4" Plate 7/8" Plate Sl-24/B D+IrfQBE D+L+SSE+SRV+TDCA D+IrK)BE

                                                                                        .99
                                                                                        .76 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 PF2/23-4

s" i', -' 0

t I I ( C C"

                      't I

~ t

               /

A e 4

  • P - *
                                                   ~ Iy
                                < w'l   ~

1 ~C t V' g I I C' r, .~ - -' '.~ '~' ~ '-w w,~ 4;, ' -. '.-' ~ ht f e+ J r v

Sheet 1 Form: M-302 M/R M-YFZ Tag " OT-109A & B Qualification Suma of i nt OT-113 A & B I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA 32e:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A//E: BECHTEF (OT-109A&B) (OT-113A&B) d 1, Scca: [ ] NSSS [g ] BOP 2 each
2. Model Number: Quantity: Total - 4
3. endor: Richmond En ineerin Co. Inc.
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N A
5. Physical Description a. Appearance See Vendor Dw s. (attached Horizontal tank Vertical tank
b. Dimensions See Vendor Dw s. 8856-M -302-16-6 & M 302-17-6
c. Height OT109A&B = 530 Lbs. OT113A&B = 572 Lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure
  • Elevation: El. 791' El. 806'
                                                                    /y for /lt> Se/ecr ego~ 07 //3Atg 7e  Field Mounting Conditions [X ] Bolt (No.           4

[ ] Weld (Length ) 74nkh 0+-/o9 W4 [ ]

8. a. System in which located:

To absorb chilled water expansion and

b. Functicnal

Description:

to remove air from water

c. Is the equipnent reauired for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown 5X] Both [ j Neither
9. pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: M-302 G-l G-3 G-9 G-10
  • Note: The tanks and air separators are supported at their tops. Therefore, for conservatism the'required PF2/23-1 response spectra is derived from response spectra from the next higher elevations (i.e, El. 806'-

and 818')..

Sheet 2 Form: ~>~ Rev. 1 I. XXX. Xs Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant:. [X] Yes .[ ] No XV. Equipnent Qualif ication Hethcd: [ ] Test [g Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Report* RECO En ineerin (No., Title and Date) 8856-H-302-31-2; 8856-H-302-30-2 3/23/81 Caqany that Prepared Report Richmond Engineering Co. Canpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Corporation See Calc. 58-M-.302-V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hy9rodynamic cnly
c. [X] Ccnbination of (a) and (b)
2. Hothod of ccmbining RRS: [WAbsolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other,specify)

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See attaint pz2 for Phase XX J See attachment 44 for Phase XXI
4. Eanping Corresponding to RRS: OBE l/2% SSE 1S OBE+SRV+LOCA 2% 'SE+SRV+LOCA 2 5
5. Required Ac"eleration in Ea& Direction: g] ZPA f ] Other (Specify)

CBE .~ = 0.302 0.393 V= -168 SSE = 0. 380 0. 495 See attachrent 01 for Phase XI . at t, $ 3 for P~~, XXX l

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration Joan's c8nszaereci> I

[X] Yes . []No Implicitly considered. The stress level is low even for combined seismic an y ro ynamzc oaas. Hence, xatxgue considerations is not. a problem. (Max. stress of any element or co one sexsm3cg y ro ynamz.c an operatang oaas xs 10.73 ksi).

  ~E:    Xf more than one report ccaplete items 1V thru           Vll for each     repoz .

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 FoITII: N-302 VI. If Qualification b Test, l then lete*: NOT AP PLZCABLE'

                                                                                    ] randcxn
l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. H thod of Zhtermining Natural Frequencies
           , [ ] Lab    'Inst              [ ] In-Situ    ~t                  [ ]  Analysis
7. TBS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test OBE S/S =

SSE S/S =

 ~ ~
9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ) Soit (Ne., Size ) [ ) Neld (Zength ) [ )
10. Functional ccerability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOI);: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccnplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form g-392 Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then (See Note belier)

                                                                                  ~i Rev. 2
1. Hethcd of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [X] ~ivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Specter

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = >33 HR V=

3. Hodel type: [ ] 3D [ 3 lD

[ ] Finite Elelt [ 3 Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ J Ccnputer Codes: N/A Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: Ricrid .

5 3 Hand Calculations

5. Hethcd of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [g Absolute Sum [ 3 SRSS

[ 3 Other: (Specify) ZPA valises used. Same values for all damping ratios

6. , Damping: OBE SSE Basis foi the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the fidel: Ri id
8. Critical Structural Elements: None Cbverning Load or Response Seismic Mtal Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable.

No Critical Elements maximum Allowable Deflection B. Nax. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Iocation rabilit Deflections not critical Note: It has be~ demonstrated in Bechtel calc. no. 58-III-&Q02-l that, the calculated stresses due.to Phase allowable limits. III loads are within F Also see Attachment No. 5 for 5ustifications.

0 I K v I 4J O

Sheet 1 Form: M-307-1 Rev. 1 Qualification Suma of ident .M-307-1, I. Plant Name: SOS QJ~~@ TV'

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BEQGKL XX. Ccmconent Name: Centrifugal Pan OV118A&B
1. Scene: f ) NSSS [P( ) BOP
2. Noel Number: 16-9-2 HP/SPC Quantity:

3, endor, Trane Co.

4. Xf the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel &. of the devices included: N/A S. Physical Description a. Appearance Typical Scroll Pan
b. Dinansions 33" High x 38" wide x 30" deep
c. Neight 525 lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 806'.

Field Mountie Conditions [ ) Bolt (No. , Size )

  • 3 sides of snubber welded [ x) Neld (Length to inbedded plate [ ) 4 x 15" ~60" total
8. a. System in which located: Standby Gas Treatment Equip. Area Vent.
b. Functicnal ascription: Cool the area in which the SGTS operates
c. Xs the equipment required for [ ) Hot Standby [ ) Cold Shutdcam
                                                             ) Both            [ xj Neither
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: M-307 G-22 307J Rev. 1
  • NOTE: The snubber clearance will be eliminated per Appendix C.4-2 Dwg. X10140488 of the analysis.

PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: y-307-1 Rev. 2 XII. Xs i nt Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ x) Yes [ ) No IV. ~ident Qualif ication Hethod: [ ] Test fx] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test k Analysis Qualification Export* TRA'.K SO Pxl M425 {Bechtel VP PM307-136-2g

                                                                             -l36-3) 3/27/81 for Phase XX Seismic 6 Hydrodynamic Analysis Susquehanna Huclear Pans
      'DAC Report No. 249-120.01, llJ2/81 (Bechtel VP rane Compan - P 4 M414-3-1)       kr  fh@m ZE EDAC-Phase IXX Bechtel Power Corporation V. Vibration Xnput:
l. Eoads considered: a. [ ) Seismic only
b. [ ] Hy9rodynamic cnly
c. g} Canbination of {a) and (b)
2. bhthod of canbining RRS: jc jAksolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ j for Phase XX & XXX fy 1*

R~ired ~spcnse Spectra (attach the graphs)- See Attach. 1 for Phase XX, Attach. 2 for Phase XXI

4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: CBE OBE+SRV+LOCA 2X SSE + SRV + LOCA 2l S. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [zl Other See RRS in Ital 3 above (Sp.erfy)

CBE S/S = F/8 ~ SSE S/S = F/B =

6. blare fatigue effects or othet vibration loads mnsidere8P

[g Yes [ l No If yes, describe loads considered and ~ they were treated in overall qualification program: Implici<vconsidered. The stress due to SSE+SRV+LOCA, is less than allowable. The contribution of SRV in the vertical d"rection is a o

           . horizontal direction is negligible.          From this it is concluded that fati ue due to SRV is not a roblem.

'%7ZE: If rmre than one report ccaalete items 1V thru Vll for each report.

Sheet 3 Form: M 307 a

~ VI.
    ~    If Qualification    b   Mst,   then Canplete*:         not appl'cable f ] random
1. f ] Single Frequency [ Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat
2. [ ] Sin'gle Axis J

[ ] Multi-Axis []

3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other

{ Specif y)

4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of D termining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[]No Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = V = SSE S/S =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
1. f ] Bolt (No., Size ~
                                                         )  [ ] Weld    (Length           )   [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes f ] No f ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including mx9ifications made:
12. Other test performed {such as aging or fragility test, including results):
  "%VIS:  If qualification     by a cmhination of test       and  analysis also ccmplete Item  Vll.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-307-1 If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: Rev. 1

1. Method of Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis f ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [x] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [x] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 5.7 hz rockin 9 F/B = 10.6 rockin 8 X V= 11.5 hz

3. Mcdel type: [x] 3D [] 1D

[x] Finite Element f ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [X] Car@uter Ccdes: AN S'ZS Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 80 hz hydrodynamic 33 hz seismic

[ ] Hand Calculations closely spaced modes widely spaced modes 5.. Bmthcd of Combining Ofnsmic Rssionsss: [x] Absolute Sum [xj SRSS [3g Other: H max + Vere (spatial) {Specify) for Phase II a III Data Sheet

6. Danping: OBE 1/2% SSE 1% Basis for the damping used: M-307J Rev.l OBE+SRU+LOCA 15 SSE + SRU+LOC* E/ (See Appendix A.4
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model: linear springs of Report)
8. Critical Structural Elements:

C'governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable 202 Belt Tightener 35326.2 475500 Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit The TRANE Company has determined that deflections will not impair the safety related function of the fan {See Section 3.0 of TRANK report) The defl~ions raaain unchanged for Phase II & III since D + OBE is the governing load case. NOTE: The analysis specifies that the 4 snubbers be installed with zero gaps, as discussed in Sections 3 and 5.3 of the TRANE report. PF2/23-4

Form: . Sheet M-307<<2 l M-307-2 Rev. 1 Qualification Sama of Equi nt I. Plant Nate: FJSQ3BiARR ZK

l. Utility PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECHTEL Centrifugal Fans OV116AGB 1 NSSS (X l BOP 18.)9-2-HF/SPC Quantity: 2
3. endor: TRANE CO.
4. If the ccxrponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel W. of the devices included: N/A
5. physical Description a. Appearance Typical Scroll Fan
b. Dhtensions 33" High x 40" Vide 33",Deep c~ We ight 587 lbs,
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 783'.

Field Haunting Conditions [ l Bolt (No. , Size ) 3 sides of (x I Weld (Length ) 15"/snubber

  • snubber welded to t 4x15" 60" total inbedded plate
8. a. Systen in which located: Cont. Bld . Batte Room Exhaust
b. ~cticnal

Description:

Exhaust Air from the Battery Rooms

c. Is the equiprent required for f ] Hot Staraby f ) Cold Shutocwn fx Both J j ~ither
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications-'-307 G-22 307J Rev. 1
              *NOTE:    The snubber clearance           will be  eliminated per Appendix C.4-2 Dwg. X10140488 of the           analysis.

PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Ebwit: H-30 7-2 Rev. 2 Xs Rrui nt Available for Xns tion in the Plant: [ x] Yes [ ] No XV. ~ipnent Qualification Method: [ ] Test f< ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis Qualification 8 port>> TRANK SO PX1-2425 (Bechtel VP 8H307-136-2&

                                                                                 -136-3) 3/27/81  for Phase XI (No.,   Title   and Date) Seismic     & Hydrodynamic Analysis Susquehanna Nuclear Fans EDAC Report No. 249-120.01,         ll/2/81 {Bechtel VP 4 M414-3-1) /or'ghgQ.3Z Ccmpany that, Prepared Report          TRANK Com anv- Ph"se 1I EDAC  Phase XXX Ccmpany    that Revived Report Bechtel         Power Corooration" Vibration Input:
1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [xl Ccmbination of {a) and {b)
2. Hethod of ccmbining RRS: [x]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

for Phase IX & XXX (Other, specify)

3. Required Respcrae Spectra (attach the graohs):

4. See Attach. 1 for Phase II, Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE Attach. 2 for Phase III SSE 1/2/ 14 OBK+SRV+1 OCA 2X

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: k ] ZPA [ ] Other See RRS in Item.3'above (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered?

[x] Yes []No If yes, describe loads considered and hew they ~re treated in overall qualification program: Im licit1 considered. The stress due to SSE+SRU+LOCA is less than allowable. The contribution of SRV in the vertical direction is about 30/ of total stress and the contribution of SRV in the horizontal direction is negligible. From this SRV is not a roblem. it is concluded that fatigue due to "NOPE: Xf more than one report ccnplete items 1V thru Vll for each report.

Sheet 2 Form: H-30 7-2 Rev. 1 Is Eauianent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ x] Yes [ l No. IV. Eauipnent Qualif ication Method: [ ] Test g ] Analysis [ l Gxnbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Begirt* TRANE SO PX1-3425 (Bechtel VP IJH307-136-26

                                                                                   -136-3)

(No., Title and Date) Seismic 6 Hydrodynamic Analysis Susquehanna Nuclear Fans 3/27/8 CCmpany that Prepared BepOrt TRANK Comoanv Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Corooration V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [x] Ccmbination of (a) and (b) 2.

method of ccmbining RBS: [x]Absolute Sum [ ]SBSS [ J 3, Required Bespcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): SSE OBE SRV LOCA at Kiev. 783'Attachment

4. Keeping Corresponding to RRS: GBE 1/2% SSE 1% No. 1 OBE+SRV+LOCA 2% 12 curves)
5. 'Beauired Acceleration in Each Dixection: ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment No. 1 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/8 = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Kere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[x] Yes []No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they-were treated in overall cualification program: Im licitlyconsidered. The stress due to SSE+SRV+LOCA is less than allowable. The contribution of SRV in the vertical direction is about 30% of total stress and the contribution of SRV in the horizontal direction is negligible. From this it is concluded that fatigue due to SRV is not a problem.

 "NVZE:  If more    than one report ca<piete items 1V thru        Vll fox   each   report.

) PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 FOGll: M 307-2

Xf Qualification b Test, then Ccxmolete*
not applicable

[ ) randem

1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. Single Axis Multi-Axis

[) [ ] [ ]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:

5, Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical): S/S =

6. Method of D termining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ 'Inst [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ) Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[) No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = F/B =

9. laboratory Mounting:
1. [ ] Solt {No., Size ) [ ] Weld {Length ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
 "NOIR:  If qualification       by a ccmbination    of test    and analysis also ccaplete Item   Vll.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-307-2 Ef Qualification b Anal

                  ~

is, then lete: Rev. 1 l.~ Methcd of Analysis:

                                 ~

[ ) Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ) Dynamic Analysis f ) T~istory f x) Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = F/B = 10 hz rocking 8 X V 12.4 hz axis

3. Model type: 5 ) 3D f) 2D f]lD fx] Finite Element f ) Beam f ] Closed Form Solution 4 f X) Canputer Codes: ANSYS Fr~ency Range and No. of ~es considered: 80 hz hydrodynamic z sea.smxc

[ ] Hand Calculations closely spaced modes widely spaced

5. Methcd of Canbining Dynamic Responses: f4 Absolute Sum g ) SRSS modes k ] Other: H max + Vert (s atial (Sp comfy) for Phase ZE a lEE Data Sheet
6. Dmping: CBE 1/2/ SSE 1/ Basis for the damPing used: M-307J Rev. 1 OBE+SRV+LOCA 2/ SSE+SRV+LOCA 2/ (See Appendix A.4
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the mx3el: linear s rin s of report
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable 230 Base D+OBE 29,429 Sosi 30,000 psi Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabi1 it TRANE Company has determined that deflections will not impair the safety related function of the fan. Section 3.0 of TRANE report. 'he NOTE: The de load case lections remain The analysis as discussed unchanged specifies that the in Sections 3. 6 4 for Phase snubbers be 5.3 of the XX & TRANE XII since D + OBE is the governing installed with zero gaps, report. PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form M-307-3 Rev. 1 , Qualif ication Seam of itrn nt N-307-3 I. Plant Nacne: RJSQ3ESA~

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3~ ~: BECK II. Cantonent Nate: Centrifugal Fans OVIOIA&B
1. Sccpe: [ ) NSSS f g ] BOP
2. Hcdel Number: 18-9-3-HF/SPC Quantity:
3. endor: TRANE CO.
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model W. of the devices included:
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Typical Scro11 Fan
b. Dinansions 43" High x 46" Vide x 34" Deep C. Weight 805 lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation; 806'.

Field Mounting Conditions ) Bolt (R). < Size ) 3 sides of j Weld (Length ~20-I/2"/snubber

            * ':snubber welded to                     )                                  4x20-I/2~ 82" total inbedded plate
8. a. System in which located: Cont. Bids. Emer . Outside Air Su 1 Supply Recirculated and Clean Air to the
b. Functicnal

Description:

Control Room in the event of a CL Leap

c. Is the equitant required for f ] Hot Standby ] Cold Shu~

[ ) Both [ xi Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: G-22 307J Rev. 1
  • NOTE: The snubber clearance will be eliminated per Appendix C.4-2 Dwg. X10140488 of the analysis.

PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Pbrm: H-307-3 Rev. 2 " 'iII. Is uirment Available for Inspection in the Plant: f x ] Yes [' 'No.- IV. EtIuipnent Qualification Nethod: [ ] Test fx] Analysis [ ] Qxnbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* TRANE SO PX1-J425 Bechtel VP CH307-136-2& Vp gM307 136 3) 3/27/81 for Phase XX (No., Title and Date) Seismic & Hydrodynamic Anal sis Sus uehanna Nuclear'ans EDAC Report No. 249-120.01, ll/2/81 (Bechtel VP IM414-3-1) fo) Canpany that Prepared Report TRANE Comoan - phase Zl EDAC Phase IXX fg~~ Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Cor oration Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic cmly
c. [x] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Rathod of canbining RRS: fx]Absolute for Phase Sum II f l~
                                                          & ZZX f ]
3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs):

See Attach. 1 for Phase IZ, Attach. 2 for P+se XII 4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: CBE SSE e ' Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA j Other See RRS: in Item 3 above (Specify) CBE S/S = F/9 = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V= 6, Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered' fx] Yes Zf yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: Xmplicitl ':considered. The stress due to SSE+SRV+LOCA is less than allowable. The contributi.on of SRV in the vertical direction is about 30/ of the total stress and the contribution of SRV in the hori-zontal direction is negligible. From this it can be concluded that fati ue due to SRU is not a problem.

"HOPE: If more   than one report ccnplete itans 1V thru       Vll for each report.

Sheet 3 Fossil: VI. If Qualification b Test, then Complete*: not applicable f ] random

1. f ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat Multi-Axis

[]

2. [ j Sixmile Axis [ ]
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural agencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f]No
8. Input g-level Test'. OBE S/S =

- SSE S/S =

9. laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ) Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ) Weld (Length ) [ )
10. Functional operability verified: f ] Yes f ] No f ] Not Applicable e
11. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
 "NOK:   If qualification       by a ccmbination    of test   and analysis also ccnplete Item   Vll.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 a)nn: -"->0> "> Rev. 1 If Qualification b

                      ~

Anal is,

                                         ~
                                           ~  then        lete:

Wthcd of Analysis: ~ f ) Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis f8 adamic Analysis f ) Time-Histozy fx) Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frectuencies in Each Dizection (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =5.7hz rocking 8 ZF/B = 7.8 hz rocking 8 X V= 9.2 hz

3. Mcdel type: f] 3D [) 2D [] lD k ] Finite Elarent f ) Beam [ ) Closed Fozm Solution
4. fg Ccaputer Codes: ANSYS Frequency Range and No. of andes considered: 33 hz seismic 80 hz h drod amic f ) Hand Calculations closely spaced modes widely spaced modes
5. bhthod of Canbining Dynamic Responses: 5c] Absolute Sum [x] SRSS k) Other: H max + Vert (s atial)

( Specify) for Phase II III 6 Data Sheet

        ~  Jumping:~    OBE     1/2%         SSE    1%          Basis   for   the damping used:M-307-J Rev; 1 OBE+SRV+LOCA 2%           SSE+SRV+LOCA        2%                                (See App. A.4 of
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model: linear ri Re ort
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Respcnse Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Element 26 Isolation Ease D+OBE 22 004 psi 30,000 psi Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit The TRANE Company has determined that deflections will not impair the safety related function of the fan. {See Section 3.0 of TRANE report) . The deflections remain unchanged for Phase II 6 III since D + OBE is the governing load case. NOTE: The analysis specifies that the 4 snubbers be installed with ze'ro gaps as discussed in Sections 3 6 5,3 of the TRANE report. PF2/23-4

Sheet 1

                                .....2 ~;Oj.~ ~511 Form:  f~g 8 1 Qualification   Suer'f          ianent I. Plant  Name:           SUSQUEHANNA
1. Utility: PP&L 22B'I.
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E- BEXZEL Ccmronent Name: i ation Fans: OV201AEB Scca: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Handel Number: Quantity:
3. Vendor:
4. If the ccagonent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices inc1uded:
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Vane Axial Fan
b. Dimensions 64" L a 60" D
c. Reight 2740 Lbs.
6. Lccation: Building: Reactor Bld Elevation: 799' Size 1/2" ) plus l.

(3/4" dia) for support clips*~

8. a. System in which -located: Reactor Bldg. H&V System
                ~,~g,> g,]1.,~ ~ L~<< To prov~ e ma.xxng o axr wxt xn reacto
b. Functional

Description:

refueling accident 2. (see below) *

c. Is the eauipment recpired for [ ] Hot Standby 'f ] Cold Shutdcwn

[X] Both 1 Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-308, G-22, Rev. 4 Data Sheet 8856-M-308-4, Rev. 0
            *2. To    prevent spread of radioactivity between various                        zones in Reactor Building.

PF2/23-1

           **      Bolts for support clips to be added later.

(Not currently existing in the field).

Sheet 2 Form: M-308-1 Rev. 1 IEE.~ Es ident Available for Ins ction in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV.~

             ~

Equipment Qualification Method: [ ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis McMahon Engineering ME 81-853, Buffalo Forge No. 81P-27908 Qualification Report* (Bechtel Vendor Print N8856~308-63-1 a -2) (No., Title and Date) Seismic and H rod 'mic Anal is Re rt Cattpany that Prepared Re~rt Buffalo Forqe Co., McMahon ineerinq Canaan

       ~

Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co ration V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [X] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly (SRV + LOCA)
c. [X] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Methcd of combining RRS: [X]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other, specify) Attachment Cl - Phase II - 3. 4. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Dampinq Corresponding to RRS: OBE 0.5% - Attachment SSE "2 1.0% Phase EI I 28 for combined loads (SSE or OBE+SRV+GX'A)

5. Required Acceleration
                      /
                                 "lt-     in any  Direction:
                                                    / =~1.
                                                                       /-

[ ] ZPA [X]

                                                                                      ~~'Other V = 0.53 x 1.5 = 0.8g A

SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Here fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[X] Yes [X] No Ef yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: The max. stress level for critical fan assembl member is 4588 psi against an allowable stress of 27,200 ps'or (SSE+SRV+ ZOCA) canbination (see . 078 of the McMahon Renort CME 81-853). This shows that for SRV loads, the stress 1.s very small canpared w.th the allowable stress. Hence, it is concluded fati ue due to SRV is not a oroblem.

 ~:      Ef more than one report ccnplete items lV thru             Vll for each report.

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M-308-1 VI. If Qualification b

                      ~

Test, then Ccmolete*: N/A [', randem l.~ [ ] Single Frequency [ ) Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat Multi-Axis [)

2. [ ] Single Axis f ]
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CUE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:

S. Natural Frequencies in any Direction: s/s =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies f ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test f l Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f)No
8. Input g-level Test: Max
9. Laboratory Mounting:
1. [ ] Bolt (No. g Size f ] Weld (Lenqth . ) f )
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

~: If qualification Item V11. by a combination of-test and analysis also complete PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-308-1 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then co lete: Rev. 2 Method of Analysis: [ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis [ ] history [X] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/hack, Vertical):

N/A because of 3D model. For frequency range see VII.4 of. this form. s/s = F/B = V=

3. Model type: fX] 3D f ] [] 1D

[X] Finite Element [X] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution 4~ fX] Computer Ccdes: ANSYS Fran 23.7 Hz for Mode 1 Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: to 100 Hz for Rx3e J3 f ] Hard Calculations Por rotor and stator

5. Methcd of Ccrnbining Dynamic Responses: f ] Absolute Sun [X] SRSS

[X] Other: SRSS exce t Abs. sum for (Specify) closely spaced rcdes, Data sheet 8856-M-308-4

6. Damping: OBE 1/2% SSE 1% Basis for the damping used:

(OBE or SSE)+SAT+LOCA 2S Conservatively 4 foundation bolts are

7. Support Considerationns in the fidel: considered in the nedel.
8. Critical Structural Elements: Foundation bolts and Weel clearance at blade tip.

Governing Load (canbination) or Response Seismic Total Stress Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Fran the Summary of Results, Section V of the McMahon Report (ME 81-853)I there are adequate marqins of safety for all load oonditions,- phase Zl Gc=CHTCL From calculation No. 58-III~%08-1, there are Safety for all load conditions - Phase III. ante margins of See Attachtnent 3 for justification. Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location(~le~eyt) rabilit For Phase II." 0.9466 x 10 Blade tip 0.175 x 0.75 = 0.13125 (page 085 of McMafmn Report ME-81-853) For Phase III: 1.75 x 0.9466 x 10 Blade tip 0.13125

         = 0.016567 (Sheet " 2    of Calc. No. 58-IIIM308-1)

PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 H-308-2 Rev. 1 Qualification Smma of i nt'" (SQM) I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHARV TKEe:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. +E: BECHTEL II. Canoonent'ame: VANE AXIAL FANS S p: [ lNSSS OV-512 A, B, C g p
2. Hodel Nunber: 66D5 Q a tity:
3. Vendor: BUFFALO FORGE
4. If the caqnnent is a cabinet or panel, nave and riedel No. of the devices included: N/A
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Ricrht linder
b. Dinensions 90" x 66" DIA.
c. Weight Approx. 1765 lbs.

W

      . 6. Tocation:    Building:    Dlhsaa. GENERA'IOR     Bld   .

Elevation: 710'

                                              ] mid (Length                          )

1 Note- 7/8" bolts are adequate Q5 g~ g ~~ )zan < Qk gg5f-gt;p) t

8. Natural Frequencies in Koch Direction (Sade/Side, Fron ck, Vertical:

9. S/S$ 33 hz a. Sl-F/B: >33 hz Functional

Description:

        'Ib su    1 V  )

outside 33 hz cooling air to the diesel gen. bid .

b. Is the equiprent required for [ ) Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[x ) Both

10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-308, G-10, G-5 and G-,

PF2/23-1

Lian i I 1'l-308-'2 Is i nt Available for Insrection in the Plant: [g ] Yes f ] No

      ~ident      Qualification Methcd:     'Xest:   No Analysis:     Yes Canbination     of Vest  and  Analysis:

Vest and/or Analys's by Mc~n En ineerina {nane of Cemgeny or Laboratory 6 Report No.) {see Bechtel V.P. 48856M-308-45-2 and 3) V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: l. [x] Seismic only 2. [ ] Hydrcdynamic only
3. f ] Explosive only 4. [ ] Other (Specify)
5. [ ] Ccrnbination of
6. Methcd of ccmbining BRS: [ ]Absolute Sum [ SBSS fx]

{Other, specs Required BesFense Spectra (attach the graphs)- Spec.88 Fig DE3-1, 2; DN3-1, 2; DV3-1, 2

3. Required Acceleration in Each Direction:

N-S, E-W & Vertical Directions of above spectra. s/s = F/a = V= If Qualification Vest, then Ccm lete: N/A f ] randem

1. [ ] Single Frequency f ] Multi-Frequency: f ] sine beat

[]

2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification V sts: OBE SSE Other (specify)
4. Frequency Range:

I

5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ] Yes (Plot TRS on RRS graphs)

[] No

6. Input g-level Vest at S/S =
7. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ) Bolt (No., Size ) [ ) W ld (length ) [ )
8. Functional C)perability verified: [ ] Yes f ] No [ ] Not Applicable
9. Vest Results including modifications made:
10. Other tests perforzed (such as fragility test, inclosing results):

PF2/23-2

Hot Applicable for M-308-2) -3 Ec -4 If Oualification b Test'hen.Complete+:

                                                                            ] random
l. [ ] Single/ Prequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat

[ ].

2. f ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other'specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction l,'Side/Side, Front/Back, Vert'cal):

s/s = P/B 6..Method of 'Determinng Natural Frequencies [ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TPS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graph
                                                                   ] No
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S P/B ~

) 9. Laboratory Mounting: SSE S/S = F/.B =

l. [ ) Bola (No., Size ) [ ) Beld (Leeg"h ) [
10. Functional operability verified: '[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Hot Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

VII.'2/80 MOTE: If qualification by a combination of test and analysis, also complete Item

VXX. Xf Qualification b Anal is or b the Gcaibination of Test and Anal'is, then Ccmolete: .Ah/) 5;S og j-~ gg+5.+ r

l. Description of Test including Results: N ~
2. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [x) Dynamic Analysis [ ] Tirade-History k ) Response Spec~ freq. in the rigid range So ZPA used.

3. Nxiel Type: [ ) 3D [Q 2D [ ] 1D

[ ] Finite Elerrent [ ) Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Computer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of mxhs considered: [x] Hand Calculations See 8856-M308-45-2 & -3 spatial

5. Hethod of Qcmbining/bynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [x) SRSS OBE 1/2S [ ] Other:s 1% ges 3-8 SSE (specify).

OBE + SRV + IDCA 2% Damping:SSE+SRV+Q3CA 2% Basis for the damping used: G-22 specs Support Considerations in the model: Flex~illy <<ba<<support ~eluded 0 D-

8. Critical Structural Elements:

All elanents are within all~lqs as mr Spec. Governing LoN or 6-3.0 Seismic

                                                                                 '2btal     Stress A. Identification location        Rs    nse Qxnbination    Stress       Stress     Allowable Effect Upon Functional B. Max. Deflection               I@cation                          Cperabilit Note:    The equipment has been      qualified for accelerations greater than specified in Sect. Va2  of this form. See Bechtel V.P. 4 8856-8308-45-2.

PF2/23-3

P .0. N".308-3 OUALIFICATION SPY'CRY OF EOUIP~KNT I. Plant Name: Susouehanna Tyne:

l. Utility: PWR
2. NSSS: 3. '/E: Bechtel II. Component Name: Yan Axial Fans Ref. OY521 A,B>C &: D)
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [X] BOP
2. Model Number: 2o Quantity:
3. Vendor: Bufi'alo Forge Co.
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: NA
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Right Cylinder

" b. c. Dimensions Weight

                                         -1 2" ion x 2 " diameter Approx.    $ 00  lbs.
6. Location: Building: ESSW Pumohouse Elevation: VO~
7. Field Mounting Conditions [Xj Bolt (No. 6 , Size 7/16")

[ ], Weld (Length . ) [ ]

8. a. System in which located: ESSW Pumohouse Buildin Ek stem to Provide outside air cooling to the
b. Functional Descript on: d
c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Snutdown

[X] Both ] Neither

           .9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:

G- 5 G-10 12/80

M-308-3 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: g ] Yes IV. E uinment ugly.ification Method: [ ] Test .[X] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report*: McMahon Engineering (No., Title and Date) . 8856-M308-45-2 8c 45-3 Company that Prepared Report: McMahon Engineering Company that Reviewed Report: c 0 wer o. V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [X] Seismic only be [ ] Hydrodynamic only
c. [ ] Combination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of Combining RRS: [X] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ]

(other, specify ) Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): CE3 1 ~~ C>3 1 ~~ CV3

4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1 SSE lg frequency in rigid range
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [X] ZPA [ ] Other (specify)

OBE S/S ~ P/B ~ V = SSE S/S ~ Z/B =

6. Vere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[ ] Yes [X] No If yes, describe loads c'onsidered and how they were treated in overall qualification program:

 ~NOTE:   If more   than one report, complete items IV thru        VII for   each  report.

12/80

Applicable for I'ot td-308-2) -3 Ec -4 3 VI. Ef Qualification b Test then Cor"olete+: [ ] random [ ] Single Prequency [ ] Multi-Prequency: [ ] sine beat

                                                      ] Multi-Axis

[].

2. [ ] Single Axis [
3. Ho. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other'specify)
4. Prequency Range:
5. Natural Prequencies 'n Each Direction {Side/Side, ."ront/Back, Vertical):

s/s = 6..Method of 'Determining Natural Prequencies f ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS us'ng tfulti-Prequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[]Ho

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S- P/B i) SSE S/S = P/.B =
9. Laborzto ~ountin g
10. Punctional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

KOTZ: If qual" fication by a combination of test and analysis, also complete Item VII,') 12/89

VII. If Qualification bv Analysis. then complete:

1. Method of Analysis:
               ] Static Analysis               [ ] Equiva1ent   Static Analysis

[ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direct'on (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S ~

3. Model Type: f ] 3D []2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam Closed Form Soluti

4. f ] Cortputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes cons'dered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum f ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (specify)

6. Damping: OB" SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerations in the model:
8. Critical Structuxal Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stxess Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable De "lection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabilit 12/80

P .0. M-.308-4 OUALIFICATION SU!i."ARY OF E UIPE(ENT Plant Name: Susquehanna Utility: Ppar, PUR

2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: Bechtel Bth)R II. component Name: vane Axial Fans (Ref. 1'P)06 A8CB 88+06 A8CB)
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS EX) BOP
2. Model Number: BF Quantity:

3 ~ Vendor. Buffalo Forge Co.

4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A

'. 5. 6. Physical Description

b. Dimensions Weight Location: Building:

Elevation:

a. Appearance ESSW 704 on x Approx, 468 pumohouse
                                                               " diameter lbs.

inder

7. Field Mounting Conditions [X) Bolt

[ ) Weld (No. (Length 6, gite ~916"

                                                                                  )
                                                                                            )
8. a. System in which located: SM umohouse Buildin H8V S stem
b. Functional

Description:

To rovide outside cooling air to the ESSW Pumohouse Building

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M- 08 G-5 8 G-10 12/gp

0 M-308-4 III. Is E uioment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes,, [ ] No IV. Equipment uglification Method: f ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report*: ,ahon Engineering (No Titl~ and Date) 8856-N% a 5-3

            ~

Company that Prepared Report: McMahon Engineering Company that Reviewed Report: Bechtel Power Co. V. Vibration Input: P

    , 1. Loads considered:       a. f( ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
c. f ] Combination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of Combining RRS: [::] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ]

(other, specify) 3'. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): 'CE-3-1-~~ CN3-1-~> CV3-lp-2>

4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1/~4 SSE frequency xn rigid range
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [X] ZPA [ ] Other (specify)

OBE S/S ~ F/B ~ SSE S/S ~ F/B w

6. Vere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[ ] Yes [X] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program:

 *NOTE:     If more    than one report, complete items IV thru        VII for  each  report.

12/80

Not Applicable for M-308-2, -3 0 -4 UI. If Qual'fication b Test then Comolete"-: [ ] random

1. ] Single Frequency [ ]  ?<ulti-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S ~ r/B V =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ j Analys's

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS 6 RRS .graphs)

[]No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S F/B tg SSE S/S ~

z

9. Laboratory Mounting:
1. [ ] Bolt (No. ', Size ) [ ] geld (Length ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: .

[ ] Yes [ ], No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:

12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
  +NOTE:   If qualification by    a combination         of test  and   analysis, also complete Item  VII.

12/80

H/A VII. If uali ication b Analysis then complete:

1. Hethod of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis f ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum 2, Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical): s/s = F/B ~

3. Hodel Type: [ ] 3D []ZD [] lD

[ j Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. f ] Computer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Hethod of Combining Dynamic Responses: ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (specify)

6. Damping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping 'used:
7. Support Considerations in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A., Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Kmimum Allowable De lection B. Hax. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabilit 12/80

I I I IS I

Sheet 1 Form: M-309-1 M-309 Tag NOV144A&B Qualif ication Surya of Eauiment I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTET II. Component Name: Air Handli Units
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Model Number: 39EH10 (CU144A&B) Quantity:
3. Vendor: Carrier
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: Prefilter, Heati Coil & Centrif al Fan (no oiling)
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Rect ular Box
b. Dimensions 114" L x 81" W x 31" H
c. Weiqht 1,325 Lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 806'-0" (Cast in-place anchor)
7. Field Mounting Conditions [XJ Bolt (No.~(7, Size 5/8" (See Deo. C-71

[ ] Weld (Length ) [ )

8. a. System in which located: Control Bl . SCTS Eaui~nt Rcom Heati
b. Functional

Description:

Provide heatinq in SGIS Eaui ent Roan ce

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X] Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-309, Rev. 5; M-398, Rev. 0 G-22, Rev. 3; G-24, Rev. 1; DS-309, Rev. 4; Data Sheet 8856-M-398-1, Rev. 0 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: M-309-1 Tag 50V144A&B Rev. 1 III.~ Is Eauiment Available for Inspection in the Plant:

                ~

[X] Yes f ] No ( ~ IV.

   ~    Equipnent Qualification Methcd:

[ ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* Quadrex Be rt No. QUAD-1-81-786 & QUAD-1-81-921 (No., Title and Date) Bechtel V.P. 08856~398-ll-l Phase II & VP5 8856-M-Company that Prepared Report Quadrex 398'-11-2 Phase III Canpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co ration Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. f ] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic only (SRV + LOCA)
c. [X] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: [X]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other,specify)

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Attachment $ 1-Phase II to l/2%

(attachment03- Phase l.'8 III Damping Corresponding RRS: OBE SSE

5. Required Acceleration in any Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other (specify)

See Attachment 51-phase II & Attach.N3-OBE S/S = F/B = t h ase~ SSE S/S = F/B = V =

6. Were fatique effects or other vibration loads considered?

fX] Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: The stress due to D+L+SRV for the nast stressed member (2E 10, 26 or 75) xs 9 ksx (see Attach. 02). This xs within the endurance limit stress (at 10 cles) of the material based on ASME Sect. III, App. I, criteria, Fiq. I-9-1. Hence, fatigue due to SRV is not a problem.

 ~: If     more than one     report canplete items   1V  thru Vll for    each    report.

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M-309-1 VI. D If Qualification b Test, then Complete~: N/A- [ ] randan

l. [ ] Single Frequency i [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat

[]

        ~
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify}
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in any Direction:
6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TBS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: Max
9. Laboratory Mounting:
1. [ ] aolt (No. , Size [ 1 Weld (Length ) f 1
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Apolicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

~: If qualification Item V11. by a canbination of test and analysis also complete PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: Yi-309-1 T~g OVj.44AGB Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then cormlete: Rev. 1

l. Method o Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis f ] Equivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [X] Response Spectrm

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Hcde)F~(/.'r) 3) 9.42 6) 77.42 1) 6.95 5) 50.24 1) 6.95 b/S = 4) 39.76 F/B = 2) 8.29 V= 2) 8.29

3. Rx3el type: fX] 3D f] 2D [] 1D

[X] Finite El+nant [X] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [X], Ccmputer Codes: Sta Frequency Range aM No. of rides considered: 1 to 80 Hz, 6 modes considered

[ ] Hand Calculations For rotor and stator

5. Methcd of Carhining Dynamic Responses: f ] Absolute Sm [ ] SRSS

[X] Other: See USNRC Re ulator (Specify)Guide l. 92 DAR Sect.

6. Damping: CBE 1/2% SBE le Basis fo the damping used: 7.1.7.4.1.

(OBE or SSE)+SRV+IlX'A 9 2%

7. Support Consid rationns in the nndel: Bottom fixed
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing I'ua3 (canbination) (ksi) (ksi) or Response Seianic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allu able Ph.2 Ph.3 Table 5-13a Housing BM 78 D+L+SSE+SRV+LOCA 5.480(5 E237) 28.8 Table 5-.13b Housing Q-Plate 57 IX.ErKSE 1.497(l 497) 24.0 Table 5-16 Blast Coil Support D+L+SSE+SHV+DXA 13. 624(13524)31.5 Heater Bracket (Refer to Qua3rex Report) Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Deflection Location Functiona'oerabilit None Critical PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M-309-2 M-309 Tag Nos. 1V222A&B Qualification S of i nt 2V222A&B I. Plant Name: SUSQU1RANNA

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL II. Caxonent Name: Air Handli Units Scope: [ } NSSS [ X } BOP (1V222A&B)
2. Rxlel Number: 39ED26 (2V222A&B) Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: Carrier If the e
4. cccaponent included: Prefilter, double ecol 'oils with is a cabinet or panel, name and rnxhl ii No.

and of the devices centrifugal fan.

5. Physical Description a. Appearance Rect ular Box
b. Dimensions 131" 1 x 99" W x 51.5" H
c. Weight 3 660 Lbs.
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildi Elevation: 739'-7" (Cast in-place anchors) (See Dwgs.
7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 8 , Size 5/8" C-166 & C-170

[ } Weld (Length ) [ ) Reactor Building Emergency Switchgear

8. a. System in which located: Load Center Cooli Provide cooling for emergency S'vGR and
b. Functional

Description:

load center rooms

c. Is the equipaent required for [ } Hot Standby [ } Cold Shutdown

[X} Both [ j Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-309, Rev. 5; M-398, Rev. 0 G-22, Rev. 3; 6-24, Rev. 1; DS~309, Rev. 4; Data Sheet 8856-M-398-1,
           .Rev. 0 PF2/23<<1

Sheet 2 M-309-2 Rev. 1 M-309 Tag Nos. 1V222A&B/2V222A&B III. Is uirment Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Method: [ ] Test [ Xl Analysis [ ] ~ination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* uadrex Report No. UAD-1-81-786 & QUAD-1-81-921 (No., Title and Date)Bechtel V. P. 08856-M-ll-l h. II&V.P . I 8856-M-398-11-. ph. IIX Canpany that Prepared Report uadrex Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel power Cor oration V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [X] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only (SRV +LOCA)
c. [X] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [X)Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other,specify) ai 3. 4 ~ Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs):See P AttachmentÃ1-Attachment43-ph.ZII h.II

5. ieaoired Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ZPA t j ~other aoecify)

II 1 See attachmentl1-phase & attachment13-phaseIII CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B V =

6. i@re fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'?

[X] Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: The stress due to D+L+SRV for the most stressed member (Size 10, 26,or 75)is 9 ksi (see attach.g2). This is within the endurance limit stress a 106 cycles of tne mater'l based on ASME Sect. III, App. I, Fig. I-9-1. Hence fati ue due to SRV is not a oroblem.

  "NAZE:  If more   than one report ccmplete items 1V thru        Vll for  each  report.

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M-309-2

   /  If Qualification b Test,      then Cormlete*:        N/A

[ ] random

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat

[1

2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other

{Specify)

4. Frequency Range: '. 60
                                                                                                     '.60 S. Natural Frequencies in any Direction:                                                     l.34
                                                                                                     .ion
6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'ERS enveloping BRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: Max
9. Laboratory Mounting: 7.4.1
1. [ ] Bo3.t {No. , Size [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable Test Results including modifications made:

(ksi) s able

12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, incluhing results):
  • NGTE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also complete Item V11.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Foan: M->09-2 Rev. 1 lg M-309 Tag Nos. 1V222A&B Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then co lete 2V222A&B

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [X] Response Spectrum 20 Natural Freguencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Baclc, Vertical): bkx3e 10) 54.94 14) 68.56

                                                 =
3) 20.76 16) 75.04
                                                                                    =
1) 4.53 ll) S7.60 Frey S/S =12) 63.S7 F/B 4) 32.00 '
2) 4.91 13) 67.60 (Hz)
3. type: [X] 3D, I'odel

[ ] 2D [ ] 1D 15) 70.92

16) 75.04

[X] Finite Element [X] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [X] Canputer Codes: Stardvne Frequency Range and No. of rredes considered: 1 to 80 Hz, 16 modes considers

[ ] Hand Calculations

5. Methcd of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sm [ ] SRSS

[X] Other: See USNRC Reaulatorv (Specify) Guide 1.92 DAR Sect. Damping: OBE 1/2~ SSE 1% Basis for the damping used: 7.1.7.4.1. (OBE or SSE)+SRV+ICCA 6 2%

7. Support Considerationns in the model: Bottcm fixed
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load (canbination) (ksi) (ksi) or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Aller able Table .~-13a Housing BM 163 D+LWBE 9.540

  • 24 Table. 5-13b Housing Q-Plate ll EH.LAMBE 7.37 24
  • Same for phase (Refer to Quadrex Report)

II and phase III Maximum Allowable Deflect 'on B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabili None Critical PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Poem: M-309-3 M-309 Tag No. OV103A&B Qualification Sunna of Equi nt 8~v. / I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA Tvoe ~

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL II. Camnnent Name: Air Handlin Units
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ X J BOP
2. Model Number: 39ED75 (OV1 03A&B) Quantity:
3. Vendor: Carrier
4. If the canponent is a cabinet or panel, name and nedel No. of the devices included: Prefilter, beati coil, cooli coil & centrifugal fan.

Piscina for coolina coil.

5. Physical Description a. Appearance Rectancrular Box
b. Dimensions 198" L x 159" W x 100" H
c. Weight 12,435 Lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 783'-0" (Cast in-place anchors) (See Attach.
7. Field Mounting Conditions [XJ Bolt (No. <4 , Size 5/8" 42)

[ ] Weld (Length ) [ ) See Attachment 03 for field rmdifications.

8. a. System in which located:- Control Buildi H/V Temp. & humidity control in various area
b. Functional Descripticn- of o ~ true
c. Is the equipnent required for [ Hot Standby 1 [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X] Both [ j Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-309, Rev. 5; M-398, Rev. 0 G-22, Rev. 3; 6-24, Rev. 1; ~-309, Rev. 4; Data Sheet 8856-M-398, Rev. 0 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: M-309-3 M-309-3 Tag No. OV103A&B Rev. 1 III. Is Equi nt Available for Ins ction in the Plant: fX) Yes f ] No IV. Equipnent Qual ification Method: [ J Test [X) Analysis [ ) Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* Quadrex Re rt No. QUAD-1-81-786 & QUAD-1-81-921 (No., Title and Date) Bechtel V.P. 48856~398-ll-l ah. ZZ VP":-.8856-M-398 that Prepared Report Quadrex 2-p .Iii Qmpany Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co ration V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ J Hydrodynamic only (SRV + LOCA)
c. [XJ Ccmbination of (a) ard (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: [XJAbsolute Sum [ )SRSS f J (Other, specify)
3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 01 phaseii r."ac mentis-p ase
4. Dampinq Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1/2% SSE 1.%

(OBE, or SSE)+SRV+LOCA) 6 2S Raonired Acceleration in any Direction: [ ) ZpA Other~(e ecify) 9 OBE S/S = See Attachment gl -ph. F/B = IiV=j attach.05-ph. [

                                                                                  &                  Zii SSE  S/S =                          F/B =                        V=
6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[X] Yes [JNo If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: The stress due to D+L+SRV for the most stressed member (Size 10, 26 or 75) is 9 ksi (see Attach. 44). 'ibis is within the endurance limit stress (at 106 cles) of the material based on ASME Sect. III, App. I criteria, Fig. I-9-1. Hence, fatigue due to SRV is not a problem. ~: If more than one report complete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M-309-3 VI.

 ~    If Qualification b Test,
                      ~

then Complete*: N/A [ ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency
        ~                                    [ ] Multi-Frequency              [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in any Direction:

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[]No

8. Input g-level Test: Max
9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size [ [ Weld [Length ) [ j
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aqing or fragility test, including results):
  • NVK: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also complete Item V11.

Calculations show that natural frequencies of the governor actuator when mounted 'on its drive housing are well above 33 Hz. Hence, the mounting can 'be considered rigid. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-309"3 Rev. 1

                                                                                  ,~                           N-309 Tag No.'V103A&B Vll. If Qualification b           Anal      is,   then covnlete:
1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ I Equivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis f ] T~History, fX] Response Spectrum 2e Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical): See Note (1) s/s = F/B = V=

3. Model type: fX] 3D

[X] Finite Element [XJ Bem f J Closed Form Solution 4~ [XJ Computer Codes: Stardvne Frequency Range arrl No. of mdes considered: 1 to 80 Hz, 31 modes considered f '] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynznic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sm [ ] SRSS Pg Other:

(Specify) EL~X Sect.

6. Demoing: QBE 1/2% SSE 1% Basis for the damoing used: 7.1.7.4.1:

(OBE or SSE)+SBV+Ilx2i 6 2%

7. Support Considerationns in the model: Bottcm fixed
8. Critical Structural Elements: (Including rmdification, for equipment
                                                                     @edification) see Attachment 43 Governing Load (canbination)                      (ksi)              {ksi) or   Response               Seismic           Total           Stress A. Identification            Location         Combination                 Stress            Stress          AllowdQe Table 5-13a Housing                 BM 12                   D+L+CBE                                  12.967*            24 Table 5-13b Housing                 Q-Plate 43              EH.L+OBE                                  4.389             24 Table 5-16 Blast Coil Heater Support                                                                 13. 624 Bracket EHL+SSE+SRV+LOCA
                                                                                       *sane   for phase       II  &  phase    III 31. 5   .

(Refer to Quadrex Report) Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit None Crit'.cal Note (1): INode I 2 -I 3 I 4 I 5 I 8 I ll I 12 I 13 I 14 I 15 I 16 I 19 I 23 I 24

/S IFrea (Hz) I14.75114.81I14-91I16-08I18.29I19-48I19.91I22.19I22.S6I26.45I28.59I42                                         49I52'71ISS 5' Mod            7    I   8 I 9           10       13        14      18          21      22       23        27       28       30      31
  ) I Freg (Hz) t18. 14 I 18. 29 I 18.96 I 18. 98 I 22. 19 I 22. 56 I 42. 39 I 49.04   I 51. 52 I 52. 71  I 63. 97 I 66. 87 I 73. 44174. 3 lexle            1        6    I 16       16 117            20 I 21         123              )31 I         I                1                 1 V IFreq (Hz) I 13.32 I 16.76 I 26-45 I 28-59 I 3S-05 I 46.58 I 49-04 I 52.71                -   74.34 PF2/23-4

0 0

Sheet 1 Form: M-309-4 M-309 Tag Nos. 07115A&B Qualification Sunma of Equi nt" OV117A&B

I. Plant Name
R)SQJEHANNA TvEe:

Utility: PP&L

2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECFH.'L II. Ccmenent Name: Air Handlin Units
1. Scooe: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP (OVllSA&B)
2. bhdel Number: N/A (OV117A&B) Quantity: 2
3. Vendor: Carrier
4. If the caaponent is a cabinet, or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: Prefilter, cooling coil with i in & centrifugal fan.
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Rec ular Box
b. Dimensions 168" L x 159" W x 100" H
c. Weight 9,954 0
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 783'W" (Cast in-place anchors) (See Attach.
7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No.

[ ] Weld (Length 10, Size

                                                                                 )

5/8" 02) [ ) See Attachment 03 for field modifications.

8. a. System in which located: Control Buildi , Control & Ccamuter Rm. Coolin
b. Functional

Description:

Provide coolin for control and ccmouter rcoms

c. Is the equipnent reauired for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-309, Rev. 5; M-398, Rev. 0 G-22, Rev. 3; G-24, Rev. 1; DS-N-309, Rev. 4; Data Sheet 8856-H-398-1, Rev. 0 PF2/23-1

sneer. Form: M-309-4 M-309-3 Tag Nos. OV115A&B OV117A&B Rev. 1 III. Is i@ment Available for In ction in the Plant: [X] Yes, [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualification Method: [ ] Test [X] Analysis **' ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* Quadrex Re rt No. QUAD-1-81-786 & QUAD-1-81-921 {No., Title and Date) Bechtel V.P. N8856~398-11-1ohase II -& V.P.48856 M-398-11-2 phaseIII Carrpany that Prepared Report Quadrex Canpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co ration Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only (SRV + LOCA)
c. [X] Ccmbination of {a) and {b)
2. Methcd of canbining RRS: [X]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS f ]

(Other, specify)

3. Required Response Spectra {attach the graphs): Attachment 41- phase II 4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1/2%

See Attachrent 55- phase SSE 1.% III (OBE or SSE)+SRV+LOCA) 0 2%

5. Required Acceleration in any Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See attac~t Il- uhase lI OBE S7S =
                                                &  attachnent N5- ohase F/B =

III V= (Specify) SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'P

[X] Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall if qual ication program: The stress due to D+L+SRV for the mast stressed merrrber (Size 10, 26 or 75) is 9 ksz (see Attach. 54). Thxs xs within the endurance limit stress (at 106 cles) of the material based on ASME Sect. III, App. I criteria, Fig. I-9-1. Hence, fatigue due to SRV is not a problem.

  • NOPE: If more
   ** This is than one report complete items 1V thru Vll for each              report.

based on analysis frcm M-309, Item 3, Tag 40V103A&B (See SQRT M-309-3) PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Fo'rm: M-309-4 - VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: N/A [ ) randem

l. ~

[ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat

2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ) Lab est [ ) In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'AS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS a HRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =
9. laboratory Mounting

SSE S/S =

l. [ ) Polt (No., Size ) [ [ Wld (Length ) [ )
10. Functional cgerability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including mdifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
 "KOI:   If qualification       by a ccmbination    of test   and  analysis also ccmplete Item    Vll.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-303-< M-309 Tag Nos. OV115A&B lI Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: OV117AGB Rev. 1 Method of Analysis: *Analysis based on M-309, Item 3F Tag 7FOV103AGB (See SQRT M-309-3) [ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [X) Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [X] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Freauencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

See Note (1) s/s = F/B = V=

3. Mcdel type: [X) 3D [] 2D [) 1D

[X] Finite Element [X) Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [X) Carputer Codes: Stard e Frequency Range and No. of modes considereo: 1 to 80 Hz, 31 nodes considered

[ ] Hand Calculations

5. Methcd of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sun [ ) SRSS
                                                                                  ~   Other: See USNRC Regulatory Guide1.9:

(Specify) BAR Sect.

6. Damping: OBE 1/2% SSE 1% Basis for the damping used: 7.1.7.4.1.

(OBE or SSE)+SRV+LOCA 9 2%

7. Support Considerationns in the model: Bottan fixed 8; Critical Structural Elements: (Including modification, for equipment modification) see Attachment 53 Governing Load {canbination) {ksi) (ksi) or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Table 5-13a Housing BM 12 D+LKBE 12.967~ 24 Table 5-13b Housing Q-Plate 43 MirK3BE 4.389 24
                                                                         *Saga for phase       II   G  phase   III (Refer to Quadrex Report)

Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabil itv None Critical Note (1): I Mode I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 8 I ll I 12 I 13 I 14 I 15 I 16 I 19 ( 23 I 24 S/S (Freer (Hz) (14.75( 14.81(14. 91(16.08 I 18.29 (19.48 (19.91(22.19 I 22.56 I 26. 45(28.59(42. 49 I 52.71(55. 5~ el ( (Mode

      <Mode I    7 i

I 8 6 I I 9 35 (10 16 (13 17 I 14(18 (21 20 IFrea (Hz) (13.32(16.76(26.45(28.59(35.05(46.58(49.04(52.71 21 23 I 22 I

                                                                                             )31 74.34 23    I  27    I  28   I  30.
      'Frey (Hz) I 18.14 I 18.29 (18.96 I 18.98 I 22.19 (22.56 I 42.39 l49.04 I 51.52 I 52.71 I 63.97 I 66.87 I 73.44 I 74.36 I 31 PF2/23-4

'1 C I I t'

Sheet 1 Form: M-321-1 Qual ification Surme of i nt, I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL II. Ccmconent Name: Standby Gas Treatnant System Unit Housing, Tag COF-173A&B, F-OE- 0 , OF- , OF-
1. Sccoe: [ ] NSSS [p( ] BOP
2. riel Nunrber: Custcrrr Desi Quantity: 2
3. endor: CUE Corporation & Karagozian and Case
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model Ro. of the devices included: N/A
5. Phys ical Description a. Appearance Filter Housing
b. Dinansions Approx: 4l'-9Q" x 9'-114" x 8'-44" 806'ou
c. Weight 33,195 Lbs.
6. I+cation: Building: Control Structure Elevation:

LIl

7. Field Mounting Conditions [X ] Bolt (No. 6*, Size 1" dia- ) anchors

[ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]

8. a. System in which located: Standby Gas Trea+rrent System To prec e rect x train oz contaxnnant to an
b. Functicnal

Description:

air frcrrr secondary contaizmant due aces ent or aono occurrence. co Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdcam [X ] Both [ ) Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: N-321, G-22
  • In addition to six existing 1" dianater grouted-in anchor bolts, additional 4-1" dia. cpauted-in anchors are required for 'seismic PF2/23-1 and hydrodynamic loacs. Additional stiffeners are also required.

These will be inplenanted in the field per Attachrant I2.

Sheet 2 Form: REV. 1 III. Is ui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: f ~] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualif ication Hethod: [ ] Test [55 Analysis(4e~ A <<'"]j [ [ Cosh[nation of Test a Analysis Qualification Report* 1311 "SOS Unit Sei (No., Title for and Date) Rev. 3 II. Ma 1981. t 08856M-321-54-4 Ccmpany Phase Beohtel V.P.88856~21-54-6 for Phase that Prepared Report Karaaozi III.) Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel P V. Vibration Input: 1 .. Zaads considered: a. [X) Seismic only

b. [ ) Hydrodynamic cnly
c. g] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)

Method of ccmbining RRS: [ ]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS fX] See Note below ** (Other, speci fy) Required Response Spectra {attach the graphs): Attachrent No. 1 f Phase II

4. to Attachment No. 3 for Phase III 5.

Damping Corresponding Required Acceleration in RRS: Each OBE 0.5% Di~ction: r [ ] ZPA SSE [ ) Other CBE See RRS S/S = in Attaint Il forF/BPhase

                                                            =

XI, Attachment I3 Eof Phase III V= (Specify) SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. blare fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[X] Yes [] No Xf yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall cualification program: Fatigue due to SRV is imp1icitiy considered. Since the calculated stresses cue to SRV are sma i to allowable, see Table 4.2 on P.35 of the report {approximately 20-30%, of the allowable stress , is not a problem. it can be inferred ~t fatigue due to SRV NOI'E: If more

        'I than one report complete items 1V thru           Vll for each report.
    • NOTE: The equipnent was analyzed for each individual RRS for SSE, SRV and QXA and then the results for each loading case were combined by Absolute Sum Method~for Phase II 6 XII and by SRSS Hathcd for Phase III.

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M-321-1 JUj, 23 '8f Q ] g 4 l) 7 g VE.. If Qualification b Test, then Camlete*: Not Applicable. [ ] randan

l. f ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis f ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequenci'es f ] Lab Test [. ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f]No 8, Input g-l.evel Test: OBE S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = F/B =

9. Laboratory Mounting:

[ ] Bolt (No., Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]

10. Functional cperability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. h
          'Inst Results including modifications           made:
12. Other test perfo~id (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOTE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccnplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 FOE%' Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: Rev. 1

l. Method of Analysis:
f. ] Static Analysis [ ] Kkyivalent Static Analysis

[X] Dynamic Analysis f ] Time-History [gal Response Spectrmn

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

1st Node 2nd Moch 3rd Mode 14.33 Hz 16.24

3. Mcdel type: [X] 3D f ]2D f l 1D

[g] Finite Element f l Beam f ] Closed Form Solution

4. [Z] Carputer Ccdes: SAP V Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: DC co:1sidexed signi ficant.

[ ] Hand Calculations For higher ides, ZPA's are included. (Phase XX a XXX

5. Method of Ccrnbining Dynamic Responses: [X] (Absolute Sum fy] SRSS for Phase XXZ

- , f l Other: (Specify) OAR Section

6. Damping:

2t for OBE 0. 5Q SSE la Basis for the damping used:~i~2 SSE or GBE + SRV + IQCA

7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Allowable (os'tress Demister franc Heater frame 58 7'~ 9,730 655+ 24,340 32,500 Shear in front panel 196 299 402 Canpression in rear channel 776 91.g 4,350 Maximum Alliable Deflection . B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit None Critical Thqse. X

                                                                                            'Apses   K

0 Sheet 1 Form: M-321-2 Qualification Summa of Equipaent E. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA 22e-

1. Utility: PP&L E/R
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTET BNR X
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP HV & SV - 07551Ali A2, A3 & A4 HV & SV 07551Bl, B2, B3 & B4
2. Model Number: Valve-WECO Model 12 Quantity: 8 "Actuator - NECO Model 333, solenoid Valve - ASCO Model
3. endor: CVE/FMC 8345-B5-NEMA 1
4. lf the component is a cabinet or panel, name and mdel No. of the devices included: NA j
5. physical ascription
a. Appearance Butterfl Valve
b. Dimensions Size 3"
c. Weight 30 lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation- 806'.

Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Veld (Length ) [ X] Line (Pi ) Mounted (Fla ed Joints)

8. a. 'System in which located: Standb Gas Treatnent S stem
b. Functional D scription: Maintain Pressure Bounda
c. Zs the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
                                                                   ] Both              f X]     Neither 9.'hrtinent       Reference Design Specifications:                  M-321, M-402
            *Field modification required to replace the existing double acting NECO 330 actuator to spring return WECO Model 333 actuator.

PF 2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: M-321-2 III. , IV. Is Equipment Available Eauipment for Ins ction in the Plant: Qualification Method: [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* Acton No. 16461 (Bechtel V.P. "8856-M-402-1-2) Report of test on sexsnu.c plus y rodynamc analysis (No., Title and Ehte) of the FMC 3" stan as treatment Butterfly valve, dated 4-29-81. Company that Prepared Report Acton Environm ntal Testing Co ration Company that Reviewed Report Bechtel ~er Corporation V. Vibration Input: From the SGIS Housing'nalysis (V.P. 58856-M-321-54-4)

1. Ioads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. f ] Hyd~amic only
c. [X] Combination of (a) and {b)
2. Method of combining RRS: [ ]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

{Other, speci fy)

3. Required Response ~ctra (attach the graphs):
4. Duping Corresponding to RRS:
      + %5      Required Acceleration      in  any  Direction:     [ ] ZPA      [X] Other Maximum
                                                                                                      'g'Specify)

NS = 0,63g; EN = 0.6g; Art. = 0.61g

6. Nere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'?

I [] Yes [X] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall cyalification program: NA "ICE: If more than one report complete items 1V thru Vll for each report.

    +m  A   review of the SGIS housing analysis has ensured that the actual (Item 5) are less than the maximum aualified 'g'oad (12g).                'g'oads PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: 4 VX. If Qualification b Test, then Complete*: KlZ APPLICABLE [ ] randem

1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. Single Axis Multi-Axis

[] [ ] [ ]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in any Direction:

S/S =

6. Method of. Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[ ] NA

8. Input g-level Test: OBE SSE
9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size ) [ ] Weld ((ength ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] & f ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including aedifications made:
12. Other test performed {such as aging or fragility test, including results):
  • NOTE: Xf qualification by a combination of test and analysis also complete Item Vll.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-321-2 Vll. If Qualification b Anal sis, then complete:

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ) Static Analysis [ ) Equivalent Static Analysis [X) Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in. Any Direction 41.5
3. Model type: [ ] 3D [) 2D [JlD

[XJ Finite El+rent [ J Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [XJ Computer Codes: STAR1KNE Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 1-100, 1st Mode 4

[ ] Hand Calculations S. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [X) Other: NA (Specify) . 6. 7. Damping: OBE NA Support Considerationns SSE in the NA model: Basis None for the damping used: NA

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Actuator Mounting Bolts 12g 16,800 psi 16,800 psi Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Eeflection Location rabili Not Tabulated Function not required. PF2/23-4

II t

       'X I

tQ EA C A

Sheet 1 FOES e Qualification Smma of irment I. Plant Name:

l. Utility: PPsL
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECFKI
l. Scca: f ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Yodel Number: N/A Quantity:
3. Vendor: Air Monitor Cor . Peab'od Wind
4. If the ccmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Circular
          . b. Dimensions         22"
c. Weight 55 Lbs.
6. Lccation: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 826 '3" 1

[ ] Weld (Length )

8. a. System in which located: SGTS Exhaust Vent
b. Functional

Description:

To measure air flow Ce Is the equipnent reauired for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdcwn [ X] Both j Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:

Pr2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: 0 M-323C-1'ev. 1 III. Is Bxui ent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ ZJ yes [ J No IV. Ekpipnent calification Method: [ ] Test [Xl Analysis [ J Canbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Rjort* Air Flow Monitorin Unit FE07 51 (No., Title and Date) 8856-M-323C-439-1 Ccmpany that Prepared Report Air Monitor Co Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Co V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seianic only
b. [ J Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [ZJ Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [ ]Absolute Sum [ JSRSS [ J (Other,spec@ fy)

See Att. "1 for Phase II

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs):

(D+OBE) See l/2S Att. N2 for Phase III (D+SSE) 1S P LOCA) 2%

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f f Other As required per response spectra indicated above. (sp'-ottYf
            , CaE    S/S =                        P/B =                        V=

SSZ S/S = F/B = V=

6. Vere fatigue effects or other vibration loads cunsidered?

g] Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall qualification program:.Faticrue due to SRV is im considered. 'ince licitl the stress level is very low (even the max. stress due to h drod namic load is .61 si s aa t e allowable stress) fatigue due to SRV is not a problem.

 "NOSE: lf more   than one report carplete itens lV thru         Vll for each report.

Sheet 3 Form: VZ. If Qualification b Test, then *'/A [ ] random

l. f ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis f]
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CSE SSE Other (Speozf) )
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = V=

6. ¹thod of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab 'I@st [ ] 1n-Situ ~t [ ] Analysis

7. TBS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

SSE S/S = F/B =

9. Eaboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Snit (No., Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]

l0. Functional cperability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:

12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
 "NOIR:  If qualification      by a ccmbination    of test   and  analysis also ccnplete Iten Vll.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Fosm: M-323C-1 Bsv. 2 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then lets: [Bae note below)~

1. Method of Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis g] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-Histozy k] Response Spectrum 2e Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical): (Casing) (Manifold) Hori~=. FJB = to 1800 Hz 4p. 35 oW ~of ) (pg. 56 of report)

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [Xl 2D(Manifold) [ ) 1D

[ ) Finite Elec.nt [X) Bean(Casing) [ ) Closed Fotm 8>lution 4~ [Z] Carguter Codes- Plow measurement Seismic Anal sis Pro ram (Vendor in-house program(for manifold) Frequency Range and No. of nades considered- 5 modes 66. 8 to 1800 Hz (pg. 56 of report) [X) Hand Calculations {for casing)

5. ¹thod of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [g] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ I Other: {Specify) OBE+SRV+LOCA 2%; SSE+SRV+LOCA 2S Sect. 7.1.1.6

6. Damping: CBE~12e BEE Basis for'he damping used: of Soec.

G-22

7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the mx3el: Sim 1 sur) orted
8. Critical Structural Elements:

R>verning Load or Response Seismic 'Ibtal Stress A. Identification Location Ccrrbination Stress Stress Allowable Manifold Center of SSE+SRU+ 0.61 ksi* 96 ksi Manifold LOCA tensile strength Allowable Deflection 'aximum B. Max. Critical to Assure Bmctional Deflection Location rabilit

             .006"*              Center of Manifold
           *See Pg. 31     of report Nate:

It has bem daronsmated calculated stresses due to in Bechtel Cele. Phase III loads No 58-XXZ.-M323C-1 are within allowable that the limits ~P, Also see Attachment No. 3 for justification. PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 porm M-323C-2 Qual ification Summa of i nt X. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. AjE: BECHTEL
                                                                  . Tag CAN/FE 07801 II. Ccmoonent  Name:     SGTS    Exh. Vent Flow Conditioning            &  Sampling Probe Sys.
l. Scene: [ I NSSS [X 1 BOP
2. Model Number: N/A Quantity:
3. Vendor: Air Monitor Corp.
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Circular
b. Dimensions 36"
c. Weight 3005
6. Location: Building: Ccntrol Structure Elevation: 858 '1" & 876 '0"
7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 30 Size 7/16" 0 )

[ l'

                                                ] Weld (Length                     )
8. a. System in which located: SGTS Exhaust Vent
b. Functional

Description:

To obtain air sampling

c. Is the 'equipnent required for f l Hot Standby f ) Cold Shutdown f 8 Both [ J Nsi>er
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: M-323C, G-22 PF2/23-1

s Sheet 2 Mrm: M-323C-2 Rev. 1 ( (,. > III ~ Is ui nt Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [X] Yes-' ] No IV. ~ident Qualification Method: [ ] Test [g Analysis [ ] Combination of Test a Analysis 1 Qualification &~rt* Air Flow Honitorin Unit AN/FE07801 (No., Title and Date) 8856-M-323C-438-1 Canpany that Prepared Report Air Monitor Cor Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Co V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [Xl Ccmbination of (a) ard (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: [Z]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

See att. att,2 1 for Phase II ltIII AI

3. Re2o1rsr) Response Spectra (attach the Sraphs): See for Phase
                                             e (D~OBE)     I/2t          (D+SSE)
4. p LOCA) 2% 2%
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other As required pe response spectra indicated above (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/S = V=

6. blare fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

tX] Yes []N If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall qualification program: Fati ue due to SRV is imnlicitl considered. Since the stress level is very low (even the max. stress due to h drod namic load is 4.53 ksi as against the allowable st ess of 27 ksi) fatigue due to SRV is not a problem. NOI'E: If more than one report ccaplete itens 1V thru Vll for each report.

Sheet 3 Form: M-.323C-2 VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: N/A [ ) randem

l. f ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat f ]
2. f ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CSE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ) Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ) Yes (Attach TRS 6 RRS graphs f]No
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = F/B = V =

9. Labora tory Mounting:
l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size ) [ ] )mid (Length ) [ ]
10. Functicnal operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including rmdif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

W(XK: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccaplete Item Vll. z PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 POrm: M-323C-2 Rev. 2 Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then lete: (See Note .below) ~

l. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [Xl Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~istoty [X] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Casing) 32. 9-860 Hz ISO Sample r Horiz. 126 Hz . P/B V = 27.5-730Hz Manifold g>>, gg,y ~~~~t) (pg. 29 a 100 of report) Total 6 Static manifold

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [K] 2D {Manifold)[ ] lD

[ l Finite Element tX] Beam(Casing) [ l Closed Form Solution "Flow measurement Seismic Analysis Program"

4. [X] Ccnputer Codes: (Vendor in-house ro ram Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 5 modes-fre uenc ranae see above

[X] Hand Calculations (for casing)

5. method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: k] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ l Other: {Specify) OBE+SRV+LOCA 2%; SSE+SRV+LOCA 2'8 Sect, 7 1 1 6

6. Danping: CBE~12% ~E l 8 Basis for the damping used-'of S G-22 ec.
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the rmdel: Sim 1 Su oorted
8. Critical Structural Elanents:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identif ication Location Ccmbination Stress Stress AU.ca'able Iso Sampler 1/4 pt. SSE+SRV+ *4.53 ksi 27 ksi Manifold LOCA *3.08 ksi 27 ksi Total 6 Static Center of Manifold Manifold Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Crit,ical to Assure Punctional Deflection Location rabilit Iso Sampler 1/4 pt. Manifold-.039"* Total & Static Center of 2 tl Manifold-.057"* Manifold

  • See pg. 34 6 p. 47 of report g Note: It has been demonstrated in Bechtel Calc. No. 58-III-M323C-1 that the calculated stresses due to Phase III loads are within allowable ~

limits. Also see Attachment No.' for ]ustification-PF2/23-4

Sheet l Bonn:" M-32K-3 A88 Qualification Suma of ident I. Plant Name: ~ SUSQUHiANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECFKL
l. Scca: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP 2 Heater Control Panels and see Attach
2. Hodel Number: NA Qentity. No. 1 for other items
3. Vendor: CVX Corporation
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model &. of the devices included: See Attachment No. 2
5. Ehysical Description a. AppearanceRectan ar and see Attachment No. 1
b. Dimensions 60 " H' 48" w x 10" D and see Attaint No.
c. %eight 150 lbs. and see attachment No. 1
6. Location: Building:

Elevation [ 806'or Control Structure

                                               ] Neld (Length                    )

Heater l. Panel

                                               ] See Attachment No. 1 70 A
8. a. System in which located:

Rom.tor and Control Standby

b. Functicnal

Description:

Gas Treatment S stan

c. Is the equipnent reauired for [ ] Hot Standby

[ ] Cold Shutdown [ Xl Both ) Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-321 G-22 E-407

Sheet 2 Form e Rev. 1 Is ui ent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Hethod: Q] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test s Analysis No. 16588-81N "Class lE Qualification Heater Control SCR Panel an/ Associated Qualification Report" ynamic Fatigue loaas Per IEEE 344-197/' July 30, 1981. (No., Title and Date) Bechtel V.P. Ccmpany that Prepared Report Acton Environmental Testin Corporation Ccnpany that Reviewed Report V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [ 5 Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydxodynamic cnly
c. [g Ccrnbination of {a) and (b)
2. ¹thod of canbining RRS: [2)Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

{Other, speci fy) Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Attachrtent Nos. 3 f, Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 0.M for Phase II III 6 SSE lg OBE + SRV + ZQCA - 2g, SSZ + SRV + LOCA 2g - Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [2'] ZPA [g Other See Attachment Nos. 3 and 4 for Phase II III V= {Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = SSE S/S = F/B = V = Nere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered' [X] Les []No If yes, describe loads considered and her they were treated in overall qualification program: The instruments and reels were sub~ two hours of extended duration testing to enerate TRS that env SRV RRS. See Attac~t No. 5. NOPE: If more than one report carplete items lV thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Meet 2 Form: ~-32)-9 & Rev, 1 III.

      ~  Is Equi      nt Available for Inspection in the Plant:
                              ~

fX ] Yes f ] No r IV. Ec{uipnent Qualif ication Method: fX] Test f ] Analysis l ] Gxbination of Test a Analysis Report 445155-1, "Fire Detect'cnfE~guishrent Control Qualification &port* stem" December 18 1980. (No., Title and Date) Bechtel V.P. 48856~320-123-1 Ccmparp that. Prepared Report le Zahoratories Huntsville, Facility Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co~ration Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [X] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. fZ] Canbination of {a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: [X]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS f ]

(Other, specs fy) 3 ~ Reauired Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): Attach. e II to Attach. 54 for Phase III Damping Corresponding RRS: OBE 0.5l SSE or OBE + SR7 + ICCA - 2%

5. Bequired Ac"eleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other Se Attach. gg for Phase II, Attach. N4 for Phase III{Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Vere fatigue effects or other vibration loads cansidered?

(5 OBE + 1 SSE) test, however was perfozned f ] ves IX] No on F/B vertical and S/S vertical configurations. In addition sin heat test were performed. If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall calification prcgram:

 "NOPE:  If more   than one report carplete items 1V thru           Vll for each report.

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Formz e Rev. 1 VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: [ 3 random

1. [ ) Single Frequency [ M Multi-frequency [ J sine beat

[ l

2. [ ] Single Axis [g Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE5 SSE 3 Other (5 upset, 3 Faulted) (Speci fy) 4, Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical ):

See Attachnent No. 6 S/S = F/B = V=

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[g Lab 'Inst f ] Xn-Situ Test [ ) Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [g Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs Se TRS in Attachment No. 5 and pp. 97 thru [ 1 309 of test report (Bechtel V.P. 8856-E 407-7-1)

Attachment No. 5 for

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B =

Phase II V& IIX See TRS in Item 7 abov@ = F/B

9. Laboratory Mounting:

See Attachment No. 7

l. [ ) golt [No. , Size ) [ ) Weld [Length > [ )
10. Functional operability verified: [g Yes [ ) No [ 3 Not Applicable ll. Vest Results including modifications made: The test results indicate that the subject itans are qualified for seismic and hydrodynamic loads with the dies entxrz, reso utxons noted m Attachment No. 8 for Phase IX&II:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None "NOZE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccaplete Item Vll.

Form: ~[~ Sheet 3 Rev. 1 g 7'r i,'[

    'z VI. If Qualification b Test,          then        lete*:

fg randem

l. f ] Single Frequency f yJ Multi-Frequency f)5 sine beat f )
2. f.] Single Axis fg] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE Other (Specify)
4. prequency Range: Data was analyzed fzcm 1 to 250 Hz S. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

No resonance search was pezfoznad. S/S = F/8 =

6. method of Determining Natural Frequencies N/A f.] Lab 'Inst f ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis
7. 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fx] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f ] No 4~+.

Attach.

                                                                                                      +to for Phase IX
                                                                                                      <11    for Phase  XXX
8. Input ( level Test: CBE S/S = V=

See TRS in Attach 110 for Phase XX WE S/S = Attach 9. Ill for Phase Laboratozy Mounting: XXX

l. [l[ Bolt (((o.~, Bize~gg ) [ [ chid (Length ) [ 1
10. Functicnal cperability verified: Q] Yes f ] No f ] Not Az[plicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:

the te((rgeratum detection uni

12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

Sine beat tests were perfozneQ. Th test levels weze 3 g horizontally and 2 vertica11 . The sine beat tes

                          'cal inputs in and out of phase. The and 1 SSE cozze equi'as          subjected to 5 O~

1 SSE levels. I "NVK: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also carplete Item V11. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 E'o'im: ~M321-3 V11'. lf Qualification b Anal

               ~  ~    ~

is; then lete:

l. Method of Analysis: N/A

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis f ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ) Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: [ ) 3D [] 2D [) lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ) Ccaputer Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of nxx9es considered: [ ) Hand Calculations

5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ) Other: {Specify)

6. Damping:. OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Suoport Considerationns in the rradel:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional D fI.ection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 4 Form:~~gJ Vll. Xf Qualification

                ~  ~    ~
                             ~     Anal    is,
                                           ~

then arete N/A l.~ Method of Analysis: ~ [ ] Static Analysis [ J ~ivalent Static Analysis [ .) Dynamic Analysis [ ] history [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = F/B =

3. Model type: [ ) 3D [J2D [] 1o

[ ] Finite Element f ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ) Cmputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of ides considered: [ ) Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ) Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Davping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural E1ements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Mtal Stress A. Identification L'ocation Ccmbination Stress 'tress Allowable Maximum All~able Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

     'I I

1 4 1

         )

t I 'I

  'P

0 Srieei I Form: N-325-l Qualification Sume of i nt"

2. Plant Name: SUSOSSlFLNNh TZEe:
l. Utility: PPsL 2 NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECRZEL OF-123AErB, OF-124A&B Scope: [ ) NSSS [ X ) BOP OF-125A&B, OF-126A&B G OE-143A'aB (ii) and housinq mounted thernnswitches
2. Mcdel Number: {i) Custom Design Quantity: 2
3. Vendor: FARR Co./Earthquake E ineeing stems 4., If the ~nent is a cabinet or panel, name and nadel No. of the devices included: (ii) Fenwal Thermoswitches Model 027121-0 and tkxiel 818000-0
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Filter Housing
b. Dimensions 21"-3" x 7'-ll-l/2" x 5'-5-3/8"
c. Weight '5,700 Lbs.
                                                                       ~
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 806'.

Expar.sion Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 21 , Size 3/4" g) [I [ ) Weld 1 (Lenqth )

8. a. System in which located: Control Structure H&V Svstem Filtration of outdoor,air c removal of any
b. Functional

Description:

gaseous icdine caninq to the control structure.

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Stardby [ ) Cold Shutdo;m

[Xl Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Speci ications: M-325, G-22, C-103, J-800
  • 2 additional bolts to be added later.

PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: Ie 325-1 Rev. 1-IXX. Xs Equi nt Available for Xn ion in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Bcruipnant Qualification 1&tbc-': for instrmnents [X] Test-vaunted cn [XJ Analysis-for housing [ ] Calcination of Test & Analysis housing Qualification Report* E-B-S-00111, Rev. 0 "Qualification of FARR C Hi h Efficiency Ventilation Filters" dated October, 1980. (h>. Title and Dat ) Bechtel U.P. 58856M-103-2-2 Qmpany that Prepared Report Earthauake - En-ineerincr tczs, Xnc. Ca~any that P, view% Report Bechtel Poorer Co . ration II V. [gee pechcel cele. tea. 58-td-325-2 for p ee Vibration Input: instruemtns, gcaIHacacron or locelng 'aoonred attachment 42) ~ Loads considered: a. [X] Sei anic only

b. [ ] Hy3rodmanic only
c. [X] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Nethod of canbining RPS: [XJAbsolute Sun [ ]SK~B [ ]

(0th r,specify)

3. Required Re~~ ~ctra (attach the graphs):

4~ Dairy Corre~nding to KG: GBE 0.58 SSE 1.0%

2. for canbined loads {OBE or SSE+SRV+LOCA)

Required Acceleration in any Direction: [X] SPA [ ] Other See the required response spectra attached in Item 3 (Sp cafy) OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Vere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'

[X] Yes [] ~ Xf yes, desnibe loaves considered and lm they vere treated in overall qualification progran: Faticue due to PV is imolicitlv considered. Since the stress leve1 is very lcm (the maxirmm stress due to SSE+SRV+ LOCA is 4.2 ksi in the maximum stressed element aaainst an allowable of 30.6 ksz), fatigue due to SRV is not a problem.

 ~:    Xf narc than one report catplete items 1V thru             Vll for each report.

g PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: W-325-1 Bev. 1 See Note-1 VI Xf Qualification b Test, then lete*: instranents munted on housing) below'for [ ) randan

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ J multi-Frequency [ ) sine beat sinusoidal

[XJ [ ] Single Axis f ] Multi-Axis

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE
                                                                           SSZ                        Other     X
4. Frequency Range: 2 to la~ Hz Natural Frequencies in anv Direction:

To l<o Hz S/S = F/B =

6. Method of D termining Natural Frequencies
                                                                                                                           /~N

[X) Lab Test 4 ~>AX [ J Xn-Situ Test fg Analysis' (<06K

7. TRS enveloping BBS using multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes {Attach TM 8 BBS graphs N/A [ J No
8. Xnput g-level Test:

1.59 fro all three directions, horizontal 6g 0 17 Hz, ver"ical 3g 9 12 Hz xn Peak Bespons Test. 1.5g to 10g 9 33 Hz

9. Laboratory Vaunting: in fragility test.

Xn-service conditions simulated

1. [ J Bolt (No- , Size [ } t'eld [Tang& ) [ [
10. Functional operability verified: . [X] Yes [ J M [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including mdifications made:

No xhvsical damage, electrical continuit durir and after test

12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, inclu3irg result ):

Fr ilitv test vas rformM. The inst'ts met the acceotance criteria with no vsical damwe and electrical continui after test. ~: Xf qualification by a canbination Item V11. of test and analysis also complete Note 1: Bef: {1) Farr Co. Report $ L-63229, Bechtel Verxhr Print 48856~-325-73-2 a 1 (2) Bechtel Civil Calculation 058M-325-2, Bev. 0 for Phase II. (3) Bechtel Civil Calculat'on 558-XXX~Q25-1, Rev.0 for Phase XXX (C) (= KS &<pa~~ E4c I= SS <<)(L Pe.u,o f< ('k~.< ~i {. B~.kte.( 0'e~dev rv[~f+QGSc,- etc~ -Z-z)

Sheet 4 Porn: F!-325-1 Reve 2 lf Qualification Anal is then coanlete: (for htareing) (See Note 1) [Qf

1. fkthod of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysi [ ] Ec(uivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynanic Analysis [ ] TirMistory fX] Re@ense -z-cpm

2. Natural Frequercies in Each Directim (Side/Side, Prcnt/b="ck, Vertical):

1st 2AQ 3rd llode ~ 21.89 Hz lMe ~ 28.13 Hz l-'.a9~ 50. 28 '!'. 3~ Nodel tyj . [X] 3D [] 2D [] 1D [Xl Pinite Elms [ ] Bean f ] Clo~ F~),, olution [X] Ccrputer Codes: ANSYS Frequency Range and W. of ~s considered: 20 tMes (21.89-115.0 Hz) [ ] Hczx3 Calculations

5. Yathod of Ccnhining Dynanic Re~n"es: f ] PJmolute Gm [X] SRSS f ] O&er:

(&~1 P) l%R Sect.

6. Daaoing: GEE 0.5a GEE 1.0t Khsis for th dwping use3: 7.1.7.4.1.2.

26 for 888 or Oat'+8NV+10CA

7. rt Comiderationns in the ~( el: Rizid
8. Crit,ical Structural Elan. nts:

Governing Lce9 (ksi) or Response mimic Total Stress A. Identification Lcx.ation Cczrbination Stress Stress Allo~le Cabinet l!~rane Elanents 1.4 0.05 P Sealer Hall 3.8 - 0.85 (l6) Truss Elerr nts 4 2 =30e6 ksi Expansion An&~* Y~hnm Allowable Deflection B. Yax. Critical to Assure Punctional. Deflection Eccation rabilit Hone Critical

  • The cqrner expansion anchors at the inlet end have a resultant load of 4.6. and 4.4 kips Mich exceed the allo(Wle design load of 2.4 kips.

Additional expansion anchors vill be provided at the inlet end corners.

   ~~ Note 1: It has bern demonstrated in Bechtel Calc. No. 58-IIIHQ25-1 that t~

Phase III RRS by SRSS method are 3amr than the Phase II RRS by ABS 23~ In thod. T}before, the housing is qualified for Phase II as F11 as Phase III loads. See Attachment No. 4 for Justification.

Sheet 1 Qualification Sunning of 't Fore: N-325-2 I. Plant Name: SUSQJEHANtaA ~r

l. Utility: PPGL 8'[B
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHIrL BHR X

( Control Structure Em rqency Outside Air II. Camonent Nam:(i) Hicth Efficiencv Filters - Control Panel: CC889AirB

1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Ya9el Numb=-r: Custcm Desiqn Quantity:
3. Vendor: PARR Co.
4. If the'ccmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and nedel Ko. of the devices included: See attached list (Attachmont Cl).
5. Physical Description a. Apg arance Rectangular Box See V.P. 8856-M.325-79-2 (Far Co. DFg. P57781).

b, Dim nsions 30" H x 24" W x 8" D

c. Weight 60 Lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 806'Floor Elevation)*
7. Field Yaunting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. 4 , Size 3/8" dia E 3 Weld (Length )

[x] Mounted on duct lenum by bolts.

                                                    *(See Ebq. C-1140, Rev. 2)
8. a. System in which located: Control Structure HGV S stem To fl.lter outside axr cceing to the
b. Functional

Description:

control structure.

c. Is the equipnent r~ired for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X[ Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-325, G-22, J-800 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: H-325-2 Rev. 1 Is Equiarent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X) Yes [ ] Ho

         ~iprent Qualification         Wthod:

for instrments [ ] Test f ] Pmalysis [X) Ccmbination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* S ismic Qualification of Elect".ical Gcemnents (No., Title and Date) K 63229 (Bechtel V.P. 58856~%-325-73-2. t4-325-76-1) Ccmpany that Prepared Re~rt Farr Co. (Los Angeles, CA) Ccnpany that Reviewed RepoW~ B chtel Pc~er Cor rat'on See Bechtel Calc. No. 8-89 (Attac~~ nt ~3) Vibration Input: Loads considered: a. fX] Seismic only

b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only
c. fX) Cmhination of (a) ard (b)
2. t~~thcd of ccmbining RBS: [X]Absolute Sun [ ]SRSS [ ]

{Other, specify) See atta.82 for Required R~+poi~ Sp ctra (attach the graQs)'eeee aatta i~<a5 for Phase II ~ 30 (see note x) 0 Phase III Daapi~ Correspording to RRS: OBH 1/2% SSE 1.8 (OBE+SRV+LCCA or SSE+SRV+UX'A) = 2% Required A~leration in any Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other As per spectra listed above for EW, N-S ar9 vertical direct. OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. N re fatigue effects or other vibration loads considereD

[ ] Yes [X] No If yes, describe loads considered and hear they were treated in overall qualification progrRA

  ~: If     narc than one report amplete items 1V thru           Vll for each report.

Note 1: The panel nnunted on the HVC plena by structural fork been evaluated to have fundamental frepzencies greater than 8p Hi (see which has (. attachnent C4) PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: H-325-2 Rev. 1 e If'Qualification b Test, then Cnrolete*: Se Note 2 below randem

l. [X] Single Frequency -

[ ] Mu3.ti-Frequency [ ] sine beat [X] sinusoidal

2. [X] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis acceleration
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE
4. Frequency Rage: 2 to )co Hz Natural Frermencies in any Direction:

Pleo Hz S/S =- F/a =

6. Yathcd of Determining Natural Frequencies

[X] Tab Test~aSKA< [ ] In-Situ Test [pc] Analysis Ta Qloogp +i. See Note 2 b lcru &

                                                                           "          f<<Pha<< II 7~  TRS See enveloping   RRS using Nulti-Frequency Test attachnent 56 for Phase III.

Dlmll tests were performed for one minute 9

                                                                                 ~3 (B  chtel Calc. J-89) frequency 2,7,10,17,25 a 33 Hz
                                                                                                         ~p,
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B = V SSE S/S =
9. MoratoryreVaunting: Sisnulated in-service mounting
l. [ ] Bolt (No. g S1ze
10. Functional operability verified: [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not 2@plicable
11. Test Results inclu3ing mx3ifications made: Peak Re nse Acceleration 9 17 Hz (horizontal), 3q 9 12 Hz (vertical
12. Other test perforrra9 (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

Fractilit test 1. to 10m 6 33 Hz

  • KKE: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vl l.

Note 2: Ocicinal seismic cualification was analytically (J-89 calcs.) extended to load ccmhinations which include SRV and DXA. Because of high level ot input reached during the test (up to 10g) it became possible to.proie that all reccaaendations contained in the seiaaic evaluation report is valid for the additional hydrodynznic loads. Fragility test of 8g 9 33 Hz would prcduce TRS which envelopes RRS. Lh'%@4- u.-i'l-8~ PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: It-32S-2 9 ~ Xf Qualification b Anal

                ~

is,

                                ~

then cormlete: Wt Applicable . l.~ N thod of Analysis: [ ) Static Analysis [ l Equivalent Static Analy is [ ] Dynamic Analysis

                                  ..     [ ] T~History              [ ) Response     Spectnxn
2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Pack, Vertical):

[] 2D [] lD [ ] Finite Element [ ] B-am [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccmputer Codes:

Freauency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Conside ationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load (canbination) (ksi) or Response Seismic Total Stress A. identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Alliable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit

C I ll

       ~

4 4 E

Sheet 1 Form: FI-310A, B M 310 Item 1 Qualification Suma of i nt Tag I OK112 A G B I. Plant Name: SUS I

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL 1, Scope: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Model Number: 19FA 461-114-14 Quantity: 2
3. Vendor: Carrier Corporation
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included:
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance See V.P. "8856-M310-63 a 64
b. Dimensions 13'-8" L x 8'-9"W x
c. Weight OK112A = 29900 lb. OK112B = 28190 lb.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 806'-0"
7. Field Mounting Conditions [Z ] Bolt (No. 4 V.P. M310-121-5 ~

[ ) Weld (Length Detail No. 1 Dwg. C718 [

8. a. System in which located: Contxol Buildina Chilled Water Provide chilled water for contxol structure
b. Functional D scription: ESF EDGE stems
c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X ] Both f I Neither

9. pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M310 Rev. 4 ~

G-3 Rev. G-22, Rev. 3; G-24 Gxm nt: 4 additional bolts will be required for each chiller. PF2/23-1

l f i@l

She t2 Form: H-310A Bev. 1 III.~ Is Foui ent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ g] Yes [ ] No IV. Ecuipnent Qualif ication Hethcd-~ Chiller unit - excluding con~~1 panel [ ] Test M] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test 6 Analysis 2echtel Vendor Report Nos. 8856-8310-242(1) -2, Qualification Beport* N310-242 (2 -2 M310-242-Seismic arB Hydrcdynazu.c Category I Analysis of a i~~tic (No J Title and Date ) Centzoffucal Licuid Chi 1 ler for S c8 's 1 6 2, Pav. 2 May 14, 1981 Ccmpany that Prepared Beport NUS Corporation for Carrie Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Eec.'l~~l P~r Corcoraticn V. Vibraticn Input:

l. lands considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X] Ccmbination of (a) ard (b)
2. ¹thod of canbining BBS: k]Absolute Sum [ ]SPSS [ ]

(Otner,speca fy) Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs ): Attac... Attachment 03 - Phase IlI (OEZ or SSE + SBV + DXA) 2%

5. Becyired Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachtent 01 (Specify)

CSE S/S = F/8 ~ V = SSE S/S = Fla V =

6. Y7ere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'?

[X] res [ ] No If yes, describe loads: considered and hm they were treated in ove all qualification prcgram raticue due to ~~ is izrolicitlv conside~ The stress of 0.5 ksi frcm SBV is mall camared w'th ot:"ar loads. l can be inferred tMt t"m fatigue due to SHV is not. a problem. ~: If more than one report ccnglete iteas 1V thru Vll for each repor".. PF2/23-2

Sheet 2 i4t-310B Rev. 1 III. Is Eauianent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ Z] ves [ ] No Q zv. Equipment Qualification Method: (por Control Panel) [ ] Test [ ] Analysis fg] Carhination of Test a Analysis Bechtel Vender Qgali fication Aport*' Reoort No. 885 . (Wi., Title and Date) Seiatu.c and Hydrodynamic Qua1i~ication Parol for the SOS ' of th 19'ontrol U Jure 26, 1981 Ccmpany tMt Prepared Report NUS Corporation Carpany that Reviewed Report V. Vibration Input:

l. Eaads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly.
c. [Z] Canbination of (a) ard (b)
2. Yethod of combining RRS: [MAhsolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other, specx fy) Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Att c. Phase II Attachment 53 Phase III {OM or SSZ + SRV + LCCA) 2%

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attac!mant $1 (Scecify)

CBE S/S ~ F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B ~ V =

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads consicered?

[ ] Yes [Xl No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program:

 ~E: If m>re      than cne report carglete      item  1V  thru   V11  for  each  report.

PP2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M-310A (For Chiller) If Quali fication b Test, then lete*: [ ] random

l. f j Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ) Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Hethcd of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. ~ enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ] Yes

[] No (Attach TRS a RRS r graphs

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes f ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Vest Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"HOIK: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also canplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3,

Sheet 3 Fora: M-310B Rev. 1 (For Ccntml Panel) VX.'. If Qualification b Test, then Cannlete*: [ ] randem [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-l"requency M sine beat lX] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis []

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CSE SSE Other

{Specify)

4. Frequency Range: 2 Hz to 44 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Bac((:, Vertical):

10, 17, 24, 30 1.5 4.75, 8, 13, S/S =39'4 Hz F/B =23z 39, 41 Hz V= 28 & 40 Hz

6. Method of Deternining Natural Frequencies fX] Cab &st [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
            ~ enveloping        RRS  using Multi-Frequency Test [X] Yes {Attach

[ ] No TRS a RRS (Attac.'rant graphs

                                                                                              ".2) -Phase  II (Attachment 44) -Phase      III
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B ~ V ~

of e S/S = F/B = (Se TRS SSE V =

9. Laboratory Mcunting: gn-sexvice condition was s~~atM)
l. ( ] BOlt (NO., Size ) [ ] NeiB ((eostt ) [ ]
10. Functional cperability verified: [4 Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including mxiifications n]ade: None
12. Other test perfoaned (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

e "NC]K: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also carplet Itan Vll. PF2/23-3

She t Forn: M-310A & B Rev. 1 %1. lf Qualification bv Ana3. is, then ccrc>lete:; (tHILLER-VulT) 1, Method of Analysis: [ ] Static Analysis [X] ~ivalent Static Analysis g] Dynamic Analysis [ ] (For ~nent T~istory Condenser Tube) [X] Response Spectate

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direc" ion (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

3W Mcdel Fraguwcy

        ~S fran 21 Pw to 102 Hz for 13        i~s
3. Model ape: [Z] 3D [] lD fZ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution
4. p] Car@uter Codes: S Ot Frequency Range and No. of rides considered:

fK ] Pand Calculations (For Carpcnent Ccndenser Tube) (Closely Soaced Mades) (Widely Spa~

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [g] Absolute Sum ['Cl SRSS ~es)

[ ] Other: (Speci y) DAR Section

6. Damping: CBE 1/2% Basi s for the damping used:7.1.7.4.1.2 7.

(OBE or ~ + SRV + Support Ccnsiderationns SSE ISA). 2% 1% in the noel: R'kaid

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Zdentif ication Location Carbination Stress Stress Alliable Ccoler Water 1.5S =20,550 Bax urer psl psl (Other cmtical s~sses have higher allcwahle margin) . Naximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Mlection Location Ooerabilitv Mene of th. deflect.cn is critical for the uncticnal cperabili y. VF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: Qualification Suma of Equi nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA TQR e

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL Unit Coolers, II. Ccmoonent Name:
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Model Number: Quantity:
3. Vendor: Buffalo For
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: Cabinet fan nestor & coollnc coil 2
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Box be Dlm nslons Ii 44
c. Weight 'SS
6. Location: Building: Reactor Building Unit 1 &

A/D Units, 670'or 2'levation:645'or B/C Units

      *7. Field Mounting Conditions         fX ] Bolt (No. 8                              Size 5/8" g         )

[ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]

8. a. System in which located: RHR Puma Roan
b. Functional D scription: Soace ooolina
c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ i(( Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
           "Units   A and D are platform aeunted Units  B and C are vaunted on grating           floor.

PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Foram: M315-1 Rev. 1 III. Is'Equipment Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ ] Yes [ ] No'V. Eouipment Qualification Methcx5: [] est [ ] Ar~lysis [ ] Carhination of Test a Analysis Qualification Report*Seismic anal sis-250 PC coolina unit with 43B5 vaneaxial fan (No., Title and Date)ME-81-854 Ma 1981 Bechtel vendor print 0 8856M-315-56-2 or Phase Il'; 8856-<21 Ccmpany that Prepared Report~an W ine ring f alo Forge Co. 3 or Phase III f Ccmpany that Reviewed Report V. Vibraticn Input:

l. loads c nsidered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. ~ Canbination of (a) and (b) 2., Method of carhining RRS: PCJAbsolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other,specify)

3. Reauired Response Spectra (attach the graphs ):

See

                                                                               ~~     ~i attachnent      4 -

Phase Phase II IIX 2% for load canbimtion of OBE or SSE with LOCA

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other (Speci f y)

CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V =

6. Here fatigue effects or other vibration loads consiceredP Pc] Yes [] No If yes, desc."ibe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall aualif ication program: cs V'CL 1 t c"nsidered. As hiches which is auite lcw a 'au "NOZZ: If more than one report carplete itans lV thru Vll for each report.

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M315-1 NOZ APPLICSQKZ VI. If Qualification b Test, then Gcmplete*: [ ] random

1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Vest [ ] In-Situ Test [ J Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[1 No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
1. [ [ Bolt [No., size ) [ l [e.'id [Length ) [ [
10. Functicnal operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including tnodifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

WOIK: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Iten Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 sutm; I~A Rev. 1 Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then ~lete:

l. Method of ~lysis:

[ j Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis fg Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ g Response Spectzun

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Cabinet/platform for 1-25 axxhs, freq. range 6-83Hz S/S M F/B = V= Cabinet/floor for 1-14 na8es freq. rance 14-119 Hz

3. Mcdel tyne: [gl 3D [] 2D [ j lD

[g Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Computer Codes:~~S Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: Cabinet/nlatfonn 25 mdes 83 Hz Cabinet/flcor 14 nenes U.9 Hz

[ j P~d Calculaticns

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: f yJ Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify) Daaping: 24 GEE~a for load BBE~ combination of OM or SSZ v.<> Basis t'os the damping used: L~ & SRV 7~ Sunport Ccnsiderationns in the nadel: p~ Tv' coupled madel.

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Respcrwe Seismic Total St ess A. Identif ication  ?@cation Canbination Stress Stress Allowable See Attac~at No. 1 - Phase ZI No. 3 - Hase XZT Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Gnerabilit 0.019" Blade Tip 0.082" PF2/23-4

FCt LC)WtQW t:-LFMEHT 4AVK F ~~M ~~U<lO ~D 'G~ VE~>~~a<<> ANfo R~UtfzF Q fx . tDENTt F IGKTION LOCATtC 8 Vh,x . awk'~55 8 L'~~WAUL~ (Q,K t=C>~K 6TR'P=-S t=f ) 19 P&X Ps<

                              ~otdii.)Rcpt< Q     SQEbZ: 34,gal& SAFAR': t3,700              gA wc~    Mt   ~:   cg,pgd <C'p'MAL:

2'5,4't:-c PG '%92 PLAT f=C tzW MOTOR 41OUWT t-"AH 455~13t 'f SHcAZ: l 2,26,1 St-t~~Z: t&,Mo 5EG ZA R.~a~ (A- sag) hL)ZEAL:A4,97$ 4olZ~J L: 2 r,Ceo P~..'3<<) VC zzLF catt ua.h~Z'ec MA

                                                                                           ~Cl ~~

Vt SEAT!CM t GdLATOZ U~PxFA EAUtP, BAwK I t=L~K tZQ~~ LiihM7 ALL. LCA> WalZ KL. &45-Ci" mAQ= 8 g pg"j) dt4CttnC: (t=otz J," y J)t-) ~ag~lz,c/c = f,5" EQSTfg& tean EYt ANslGt4 dhL~WcoES wtLL GE SUPPLEMENTED Mton.tON>L, >/4 P mCuCZ. POLTa.

0 M-31 5-1 Attachment C1A Job 58856 The following "fixes" have been scheduled for M-315-1 to remedy the overstress conditions for the following noted elements. Foundation bolts connecting the cabinet to the platform: The foundation bolts have been replaced by bolts of material. (A 354 BD) high'trength

2. Motor mount plate at the fan assembly:

Fix An additional stiffening plate is being added to the mounting plate to resolve the overstress problem.

3. Nozzle/Coil header:

Fix The piping reactions at the nozzle are to be reduced by installing a stainless steel flexible hose connection. This is to reduce the overstress condition at the nozzle to header connection.

4. Vibration isolators, underneath the base:

Fix The vibration isolators are to be replaced with isolators of a modified design to reduce the stresses. Expansion Anchors in the floor: Fix The existing 16 expansion anchors are to be supplemental by additional 3/4 inch diameter anchor bolts.

Sheet 1 Form'. Qualif ication Summa of ident Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA TYEe

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E:. BECFKL Unit Coolers
1. Sccge: [ ] NSSS fx ] BOP
2. Model Number: Quantity:
3. Vendor: F rae
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model Ho. of the devices included: Fetor & Ccolin Coil inet
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Box and linder
b. Dhrensions 99" W X 58" H X 40" L + 30" g X 57" L
c. >Might 2500 lbs
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin Unit 1 & 2 Elevation: See *
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ X ] Bolt {No. 8 , Size 5/8"9 )

[ ] Weld {Length ) [ ]

8. a. System in which located: Core rav Pm+ Room
b. Functional

Description:

Solace Coolin

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ) Cold Shutdown

[X] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M315 G-22
           *1V223A; 2V211A Platform Gl at el. 655'-6" PF2/23-1 1V211C; 2V211D       Platform Fl at el. 655'-6" 1V211D; 2V211C       18" above floor; el. 646'-6"

Sheet 2 Form: - 315-2 Rev. 1 III'. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant; (X ] Yes ( ] No IV. Equipnent Qual. ification iWthod: [] Mst [X] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis Qualification %port*Seismic analysis-120 PC ~linc cabinet with 29A9 fan on isolators {No., Title and Date)&K-81-857 Anril 1981 Bechtel vendor print '8856-M315-77-3. for Phase II & V.P. No. Ccmpany that Prepa ed Report Buffalo Force Co..~~on En g. 8856-.'4Q15-77-3 For Phase III Canpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co V. Vibration Irs>ut:

l. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. ( ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [)Q Ccmbination of {a) ard {b)
2. Method of ccmbinirg RRS: fX]Absolute S~ [ ]SRSS ( ]

(Other,specs, fy) Required Respcnse Scectra (attach the graphs):See Attachnent No. 2 - Phase I Attachment No. 4 - Phase II 4~ Dztping Corresponding to RM: OBE 0.5 SSE 1.0% 28 for load ccmbirwticns of OBZ or SSE m.th SCCA & SRV

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: ( ] ZPA ( ] Other See Attac~t 2 - Phase II & Attach. " Phase IIIV = (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = SSE S/S = F/B = V =

6. Viere fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsideeed?

{)(,'] Yes t]No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall cualification program: Fatigue eff~w due to SRV loads are inalicitlv considered. As hichest st ess due to SRV lcadinc is cnlv 1.8 ksi.

           ~1iich      is    'te  lcw, aticue should        rot  nose anv ozcblem.

WOI'E: If more than one report ccmplete itens lV thru Vll for each remrt. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form+ NC1'PPLICABLZ VI. If Qualification b Test, then Cannlete*: [ ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'IBS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = F/B =

9. Laboratory Mcunting:
i. [ [ Bolt [No., Size ) [ [ Weld ((ength ) [ [
10. Functicnal operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

%OK: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccaplete Item Vll. e PF2/23-3

VQ. If Qualification Anal is, then ccnalete: Forms ~~ Sheet Rev. 1 4

1. Hethcd of Ana1ysis:

[ } Static Analysis f f Bplivalent Static Aralysis fXl. Dynamic Analysis f I Tme-History 5 J Response Spectnm

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Cabaret/platfozm 'Fl! for 1-?p nn3es, f~u ncaa range 8~0 Hz S/S ~. F/B ~ P m Cabiret/platform '<ql! for 1-39 nadas, frequency range 8-80 Hz

3. Madel type- [1 2D f I lD fg Finite Elment f l Be~ [ ) Clcsed Form. Solution
4. f J Ccmguter Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of gades cons>dered: Cabmet/plat orm Fll 2' Cabi.".et/platform "51" 39 naaes

                                                                                                  ~s     ~<

802 f J Hand Calculations

5. Hethcd of Ccmbining Eynamic Responses: g] Ab olute Sum [ ) SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Darping: CEE~Q. a SSE 1.0% Basis for the damping used ~R 2% for load exhination of OBE or SSZ eth GXA & Pl Sec =KZVTL2
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the nadel: e~ & '~~t aM analvsed as
8. Critical Structural Elements:
                                                        ~led ~al Governing laad or   Response         Seismic       Total          Stress A. Identification        Location      Ccnhination           Stress        Stress         ~~capable See attachrant 1       (Phase   II)

See attachment 3 {Phase III) Maximum Alirwable De flecticn B. Max. Critical to Assure Bmc ional Deflection Location rabilit Dt 0. 024". Blade Tip 0. 062" PF2~

i~-~ Ti~l~AVlC V l-C>CA r MAX. aT@a+S (QR FCO RE. six) rz=-r-. av ~

                                                                                 + IN P~sF. cM, In'mme P~T                          lZEPG+

I-"CYdhJPA,T)C hf TlQG: QE4IZ: gg, g l~ 5MAC: l3,700 5~+. Iyg Bc>ma AB IHK7 WITH NDQ'Mi)I.: gg,QPg <~L:2C,! ao PS.kao PLATr cDRQ 1~Rblg P4H A~~H ere. tube, 4 CIIMWaL IBASE, PS. 690 g~~EHSL't TE~M=-LT(OW PWCA , <vA Pt . &a> l-OIL uah.~K, =C. NP. P~. Cool E'XPhhlalC H AMCltOiC~ F'C P . 1V2l{ 0 4 2Y2llC IV 2(l/4 )y Z) ) C 2v2n4 j J

g: ~slatiuC =- XP ~focal hNGWOrc WILL SE

M-315-2 Attachment I1A Job $ 8856 The following "fixes" have been scheduled for M-315-2 to remedy the overstress conditions for the following noted elements.

1. Foundation bolts connecting the cabinet to the platform:

Fix The foundation bolts have been replaced by bolts of high strength material.

2. Drain pan assembly and channel base assembly at cabinet base=

Fix The drain pan assembly and channel base are to be reinforced with additional bars and angles. Angles and bars to be welded together and to drain pan to resolve overstress at mounting .

3. Transition piece:

Fix A channel section is to be welded to the support at the transition piece to reinforce it and resolve the overstress in the member.

4. Nozzle / Coil header:

Fix The piping reactions at the nozzle are to be reduced by installing a stainless steel flexible hose at connection. the nozzle This is to reduce the overstress condition to header connection.

5. Expansion anchors in the floor:

Fix The existing 16 expansion anchors are to be supplemented by additional 3/4 inch diameter anchor bolts.

0 Sheet 1 Form: M315-3 Qualification Sun'f Equi nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEQJKA TQR 0

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL Unit. Coolers II. Ccmoonent Name:
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Model Number: Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: Buffalo Forae
4. If the ccmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: Cabinet fan motar (60 PC cabinet
5. physical Description a. Appearance
b. Dimensions 46" H x 69" W x 40" +
c. Weight 1700 1bs
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin Uni &

Elevation: 645' 654'-6"

      *7,  Field Mounting Conditions       [Z ]  Bolt   (No     8
                                               ] Weld   (Length
                                               ]
8. a. System in which located: RZZ
b. Functional

Description:

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X] Both [. ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M315 G-22 "Unit A platform mounted 8-5/8" p (See attachment 1)

Unit B floor vaunted with 8-3/4" g expansion anchors (wedge type) PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form Rev. 1 III. Is ui,ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ gJ Yes [ ] No IV. ~ident Qualification Method: [ ] Test k] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test a Analys's Qualification Reports smic analysis-60 PC coolin cabinet with 22A9 fan on isolator (No., Title and Date -855 vendor print 48856-8315-73 2 - Phase II Ccmpany that Prepared Report Buffalo Fo vendor print 48856-.2315-73-4 Phase Co./R~m ~g. III Ccmpany.that Reviewed Report Bechtel Pmer Coro. V. Vibration Input:

1. ~~ds considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ J Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [X]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other,specify)

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs ). See Attac~t 2 Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE l.og 2% for load canbinations of OBE or m. & SRV
5. Reauired Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other see Attachltect z for phase zz & Attach 4f.or phase zzz (speczfYi Dl CBE S/S>>- F/B = V =

SSE S/S = F/B = V =

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[X] Yes [ l No If yes, aescribe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall if qual ication program: f'a~ 3.75 ksi NOI'E: If more than one report canplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: VI. If Qualification b Test, then Ccmolete*: [ ] randem

l. [ ]'ingle Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ) Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Spec ify)
4. Frequency Range:

S. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical): S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ) Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ) Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ) Weld (Length ) f ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including rredif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NOIR: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also complete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: ~g-3 Rev. 1 Vll. If Qualification bv Anal is, then complete:

l. Hethcd of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [g Dynanic Analysis [ ] Time-History f g Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Cabinet/platform 1-20 moPes betwe~ 14 a 85 Hz. S/S = F/B = V=

3. Hcdel type: fg] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[~] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. f ] Carputer Codes: AN:~VS Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:

[ ] Hand Calculation"

5. Yathod of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: jc ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS f ] Other:

(Specify)

6. .6'/ '

tl'. dm' 7. 2%, for 1oad ccmbination of QBE or SSE with ZCCA support Conszderatxonns xn tne nadel: coupled

                                                                          &  SRF mxiel.
                                                                                   '~     Sec. 7.1.7.4.1.2 are analvsed as
8. Critical Structural Elements:

governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable

          *Se      Attachment 1  for Un't A -'Pjggg Q Attachment 3   for Phase III Attachment 5   for Phase III Haxi mum Allowable      Deflection B. Hax. Critical                                        to Assure Functional Deflection                  Location                     Ooerabilit
              -0. 01"                Blade Tip                                           for  Phase   II 6 Phase    III
          &nit B is directly rxmnted          on   floor with      anc?mr  bolts.

No changes required. PF2/23-4

IC EATS~]chalone MAR,. ~%as h,l'LDLvAQ,LE ~F. sH~ (QS FORK STRAD ~~ + lM Qip, c&, F lX) tZF loco~ PAT. halo CONLt C C'7 lhl Q LEAL-'S,o&O CbS u4KT bn~ KRAAL 29,Boo F'L;ATFOZH Fo UND 4 N Go LQ $ ( ~Q~ pg~lMQ- ~gp QgQ)N p ~ p~ 7'gg, P<AVPOP,M H A VZ .SKl"=N R("= pt AC) Q Q)ig g QQg,g5 ~ Q p. ~TREe4C (t Nhvagiac ( 0 -35< BD) I

  ~ ~

I I

~ ~

I

                                                   ~ ~
                                        ~

1

Sheet 1 Fore: 3~4 Qual ification Surrrna of i@ment I. Plant Name: SUSQUEF~

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL Unit coolers II. Ccmeonent Name- V2 A B
l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Hodel Number: Quantity:
3. Vendor: Buffalo Forae
4. If the caiponent is a aabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included:

75 PC cabinet

5. Physical Description a. Appearance Box and 1~der g b. Dimensions 50" H x 81" W x 40" 1 + 30" x 57" l
c. Weight 1800 lbs
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin Unit 1 & 2 Elevation: 654'-6"
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ X] Bolt (No. 8 , Size5/8"g

[ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]

8. a. System in which located:
b. Functional

Description:

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ 1 Cold Shutdown

[ X] Both [ ) Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M315 G-22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Eorm: 8315-4 Rev. 1 III. Is ui ent Available for Insertion in the Plant: [X ] Yes" [ ] 'Ao IV Equipment Qualif icaticn Method: [ ] Test [Xl Analysis. f ] Carhination of Test a Analysis Qualification Export* v fan on isolators 1'ith 25A9 (No., Title and Date) a

                                                                     '+~

0 tint Bechtel vendor print 58856 iM-315>>76-1 for Phase II 6 V. P. Cannany Prepared Report n r re Co ~ No. 8856~Q15-76<<3 for Cotttpany that Reviewed Report a Phase III Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X] Ccmbination of {a) and {b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: [X]Absolute Sum f ]SESS f ]

{Otner, specify) Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attest 2 -Phase II to RM: Attachment 4 -Phase III 4 ~ Damping Corresponding OBE 0.5% SSE 1.04 2% for load ccmbinaticn of OEZ or SSZ with LOCA & SRV

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other See AtMclment 2-Phase CBt: S/S =

II & AttacHimnt t'/8 =

                                                                    $4  -Phase       III SSE    S/S =                         F/B =                               V  -<<
6. Vere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'

[X] Yes f ] iW If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall cualification program: Paticu ~ t.l 'NCTZ: If more than cne resort ccnplete items 1V thru Vll for each repor". PP2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: F915-4 NCT APPLICABLE If Qualification b Test, then Ccmolete*: [ ] rancom

1. f ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis f ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Vest [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ] Yes (Attach TRS & RbS graphs No
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = F/B =

9. Zaboratory Mounting:
i. [ ] Bolt [No., Size ] [ ] 'i&id ((ength ] [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Vest Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOZE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also caaplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Fotlll: M~31 -4 Vll. If Qualif ication Anal is, then ccrrnlete: Rev. 1

1. Nethod of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [XI Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [Z] Response, Soectrmn

2. Natural Frecuencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Cabinet/platform for 1-20 nodes, frey. range 9-79 Hz S/S w F/B = V=

3. Model type: [X]>> [ I 2D [] lD

[g] Finj.te Qement [ [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ceo@uter Ccdes- SYS Frequency Range and No. of modes considered:Cabinet platform 20 modes 70 Hz

[ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [g Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Scecify) 6. 7. Darping: OBE 0. Sa 2% SSE for load ccnExna~on of OBE or 1.0S Support Considerationns in the nadel: p

                                                    ~       Basis for the damping used: DAR with ZQCA 6 SRV              Sec. 7,1.7,4,1.2 v

as coupled nodal.

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Respcnse Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Lccation Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable See attachment 41 - Phase II See attachment N3 - Phase III Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabili 0.024 Blade Tip 0.062 y PF2/23-4

4A p ~ ~ MSiw- C

                                                                               . g,gTg~g~+QT 4                        I
                                                                             .   <oa      +8Sgg VWLVCWto~     aL.+W~Ta           WARY~   ~~ ~cued                  vc   r~       evemTzm>~ah M~ IZ~Ol~&        h. AK lC~EWTlr(CAY'ICH         l-C CAVlae            MAC.         ~m+S          P. 1 LDhlAQ,LP               fZ~F. GH~

(sault elX) r STRE g + fbi cD,F, cc>;- PS'X EEPC ~

                                                 'I FQ UWDATlOQ             COklhlKC'TlhlC        @EM,: l4,590 ~E4g: lh,7CO                                 s~c sew CA~ IW+7 Wt~          uoE.mL: '25,5'fo uozgd,L 23,40                             P&, d.[P
      'IL COL CS                                                                                     ~
                                    ~ZFC)Z'M Z    SJPFCE'T          wMH+n'IQu              Pg =                      p~             QSoco          sEc. XA PIECE                                                                          I C.AI5 4,7'g
                                                              ~ Q2 9po               Fg              5Q, ooo Al~'

QEjh COMK ~c. zCA p-. giC

             &XPAhl&lOQ             FL~lr P eL.&L5-         ~ ~'ic g                 ALL. LCD'OE'gp hf4c l-';DR bucdoR'S                                                                ~ gj~"c/c = f.6 I

enazw& < Wze>W~icg huCOOtra u,il L a~ WuPF~~~VaD,S'1 40tolÃtC)gb,L. ~ r CLNcVC7E. ~L-Ts,.'. pjg I I

       . ~~K'-    ~KaK,      PlXWW..ee      WOT     ~mU)Ra'. bey tZKOAAZyaim 1

1 I

M-315-4 Attachment IlA Job f8856 The following "fixes" have been scheduled for M-315-4 to remedy the overstress conditions for the following noted elements.

1. Foundation bolts connecting the cabinet to the platform:

Fix The foundation bolts have been replaced by bolts of high strength material. (A-354 BD)

2. Bar support at transition piece:

Fix A channel section is to be welded to the support at the transition piece to reinforce it. This will resolve the overstress in this member.

3. Nozzle / Coil header:

Fix The piping reactions at the nozzle are to be reduced by installing a stainless steel flexible hose connection. This is to reduce the overstress condition at the nozzle to header connection.

4. Expansion anchors in the floor:

Fix The existing 16 expansion anchors are to be supplemented by additional 3/4 inch diameter anchor bolts.

~ ~ I, 'gj+'~+~+i~gj.' g)pjjgl@g~g i r~lpg 'leak'gg%f g p~%, ~ "Qpj~Ct,@ y y (i 'Q ~'QAkj+ a.a

~

~

  ~

Jl,'L 23 '81 O yg467 4 Sheet 1 of 1! Form: M-317 Qualification Surrrna of Equi nt Z. plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA 22e:

l. Utility: Pp&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECHTEL
                                        't Cco ers:                1V414 A&B lV415 A&B     & 1V416 A&B
1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [P( ] BOP
2. Model Number,: Quantity:
3. endor: Anarican Air Filter
4. 1f the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model R>. of the devices .

included:

5. Physical Description a. Appearance Air Handlin Unit consistin of a cooling coil and vane axial fan be Dirrensions 10 7" Lon x 6 1 Qn Wide x 4 =6n Hi h
c. Weight Lbs.

704'olts 33QQ

6. Location: Building: pr'ontainment Elevation:

may

  • 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X ] Bolt (No.

(Length 10, Size 3/4" ) be replac with equivalent [ ] Weld ) [ ] welds (field cption) .

8. a. System in which located: pr'*

Contaix~t Atrrasohere Circulation

b. FuncticnaI.

Description:

See below

c. Xs the equipment required for [ j Hot Standby [ j Cold Shutdown

[X] Both [ i Neither

9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Speci fications: M-317 G-22 M-395
           ** Sb. 1)  Maintain tenp. in various spaces during norrral cperation within specified limits.
2) Provide for primai~ contaimant air purge.

PF2/23-1 3) Y~ drywell atrrasphere to prevent hydrogen ccncentration build up e during post IDC'A. This is the only safety related function.

  • Requires mxKfication to neet seismic and hydrodynamic loads.

Sheet 2 of 19 Finn: N-317 Rsv. 1 III. Is ui ent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ X] Yes. f ] No IV. Eauipnent Qualif ication Method: f j Test fX] Analysis f ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* Drvwell Unit Cooler (1V414A) 8856-N-395-2-6 for Pahse II (No., Title and Date) 8856-H-395-2-5 for Phase II Ccmpany that Prepared Report Eartbcruake Engineering Systems Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Corporation V. Vibration Input: Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only b, [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly c, [X] Ccmbination of (a) and (b) Abmlute sum and

2. Method of canbining'RS: [X]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS 'K ] SRSS (Phase III)

(Phase II) (Other, specs fy) See Attachment 44, Phase III~)

3. Required Response Spectra {attach the graphs): See Attachrant 42, Phase II4 2% SSE+SRV+IQCA 2%
                                                                                                             'BE+SRV+DX'A 4~                               "                                      SSE     15
5. Bemired Ac'eleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other As r~red =

per response spectra indicated above (Specify) CBE S/S F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V =

6. Nere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

k] les []No If yes, describe loads considered and they were treated in overall hew

                                                                         'icitlv cyialification   program-    Fati The amcinnm ccnhined stress du to on the ASME Section       III, due I

to the~ SRV is considered.

                                                                      + Gravity + SRV loacs is 12 ksi. This is within the endurance limit stress of the mate ial Appendix criteria. Twas i~cates that fati due to SRV loadin is not a orcblem.
                                                                                                    ~

NOTE: If more than one report ccnglete items 1V thru Vll for each report. 9 PF2/23-2

Ji~. 2~ Yi 0144674 Sheet'3of 19 Form: M-317

                                          >APPLICABLE Nct VI. If Qualification b Test,       then       lete*:

[ ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency "

[ ] sine beat

2. [ ] Single Axis f ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE . Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Bac3c, Vertical):

S/S = F/B =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: QBE S/S =

SSE S/S =

9. laboratory Mounting:
l. [' Bolt (No. ', Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
10. Functicnal operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, includin'g results):
 "NOZE:  If qualification    by a ccmbination     of test  and analysis also ccmplete Item  Vll.

) PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 of 19 Form: H-317, Rev. 1 Vll. If Qualification bv Anal is, then complete:

l. Methcd of Analysis:

[ ) Static Analysis [ J ~ivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis ( ] Time-History [X) Response Spectrun

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical)':

Horia. 14. 7 Hz V= 12.2 Hz

3. Model type: [X] 3D []2D f J lD

[XJ Finite Element [ ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution

4. [XJ Ccnputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of nodes considered: 12.2 - 137 Hz 20 nodes cons3.dered [ ] Hand Calculations for closely for wide spaced nodes spaced nodes

5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: fX) Absolute Sum [X) SRSS f ) Other:

{Specify) OBE+SRV+LOCA - 2% SSE+SRV+LOCA - ERR Section g 6. Damping: OBE 8S SSE 1% Basis for the 2% damping used:7.3..7.4.1.2

7. Support Considerationns in the model: Cantilever Suocor m
8. Critical Structural Elements:
                                                                                                                 'o Load or    Response         Seismic          Total         Stress A. Zdentif ication       Location      Ccmbination           Stress           Stress        Allowable See  Attachnant 41 Maximum   Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical                                        to Assure Functional D flection                Location                     Ooerabilit
  • 001" fan rotor . 05"
              .000006"               Mtor rotor                           03N
            *See Attachment 53     for Phase ZI {also valid for Phase ZII since Phase ZIZ SRSS accelerations         <  Phase ZZ    accelerations)     .

gw PF2/23-4

Sheet 5 of 19 Pore: M. -317 'Bev. 1 III. Is Bruipnent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ g] Yes [ ] No IV. Bquipnent Qualif ication Yathod: [ ] Test fZ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* Drvwell Unit er lV4l ** (No., Title and Date) 8856-~395-2-5 Ccmpany that Prepared Report Zar~bmake Encineerina stuns Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Corporation V. Vibration Input:

l. Iioads considered: a. [ ) Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly j
c. Q ] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: k]Absolute Sum [ )SRSS [ )

(Other, specify)

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs ): Se Attactment ".

2 OBE+SRV+DX'A - 2% SSE+SRV+LOCh, - 2%

4. Damping Corresponding to* RRS: OBE SSE ja
5. Recuired Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ) Other As required per 'response spectra indicated above (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V =

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

II(; ) Yes [) N If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: Fati due to SRV is imulicitl conside ed The ccabined senses due to sustained operation load and the SRV load are in the rance of 6 to 12 ksi which are wi~ lizm.t stress of the naterial based on the ABK Section ITI, Appencix the endurance I criteria. This indicates that faticue due to SRV lead is not a problem. "NOZE: If more than one report canplete itens 1V thru Vll for each report.

   "* Unit lV414B        is qualified for Phase V.P. 8856-N-395-'2-6.

Ill loads hy similarity. 'ee Benhtel PF2/23-2

If Qualification b Test, then lete*: Not Applicable

                                                                                   ] random
1. f ] Single Frequency f ] Multi-Frequency ] sine beat
2. f ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE . Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test f ] In-Situ 'Inst [ j Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f]No
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S = V = a 9. Laboratory Mounting:

l. [ ] Bolt (No ., Size ) [ ] Weld (length ) [ ]
10. Functional cperability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
 "NOZE:   If qualification     by a ccmbination    of test  and  analysis also ccmplete Item  Vll.

PF2/23-3

Vll. If Qualification

                       ~

Anal

                                  <<    ~0 is,
                                             .Cabal  J w A then complete:.

I Jl". 23 'gl O ~ <

                                                                                        ~

Form: I~ Sheet 4 67 4 7 of 19

l. Methcd of Analysis:

[ ) Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [X] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Horiz.= 4.783 Hz V = 7.66 Hz

3. Mcdel type: [X] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[X] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [X] Car@uter Codes: ANSYS Rev. 3 Frequency Range and No. of mx3es considered: 4.783 - 86.24 Hz 20 modes considered

[ ] Hand Calculations for closely for widely spaced mades spaced rtedes

5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [X] Absolute Sum [X] SRSS

[ ) Other: (Specify) OBE+SRV+LCCA 2% SSE+SRV+DX'A 2'8 DAR, Sect.,

6. Dattping: CEE~% EEE 7; Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable See Attachm nt 01 Maximum .Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional D flection Location rabilit

           * .001"                   fan rotor                                   05 II
               .OOG006"             motor rotor                                  03 II
           *See Attachment N3 PF2/23-4

Sheet 8 of 19

                                                                                 ~zm;      H-317, Rev. 1 III.~   Is Equi ent Available for Ins               tion in the Plant:       [X ] Yes        [   ] No IV.
   ~    Equipment     Qualif ication Method:

f ] Test [X) Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test s Analysis Qualification Beport*'rywell Unit Cooler (lV415A) ** (No., Title and Date) 8856-W395-2-5 Ccmpany that Prepared Report Earthquake Engine~ S stems Canpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Corporation Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [ ) Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X) Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. ¹thod of canbining RRS: [X)Absolute Sum [ ]SBSS [ )
3. Required Bespcnse Spectra (attach the graphs):.See Attachnant 42 OBE+SRV+EDCR - 2% SSE+SRV+LCCA 2%

SSE

5. Required Ac"eleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ) Other As reouired per reszonse spectra indicated above. (Specify)

CBE erne = S/S F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Nem fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[X) Yes [)No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: Fati e due to SRV is inalicitlv considered. The combined stresses aue to sus~ed operation loads and the SRV load are in the range of 6 to 12 ksi which are within the endurance

z. s~sses oz maten.al based an the ASNE Section III, Appendix I criteria. This indicates that fati e due to SRV loadina is not a pro

'NOI'E: If more than one report complete items 1V thru Vll for each report.

       **Unit 1V415A is qualified for           Phase   III loads   by  similarity.

See Bechtel V.P. 8856-H-395-2-6. PF2/23-2

Sheet 9 of 19 Foviil: M-317 NCT APPLICABLE VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*-'ot Applicable [ ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of D termining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab 'Inst [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS s RRS graph

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

SSE S/S = V =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Solt (No., Size ) [ ] Ie ld ((ength ) [ ]
10. Functional cperability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NOIR: If qualification ky a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. Oe PF2/23-3

Sheet 10 of 19 Form: Vll. Xf Qualification b Anal is, then camQete:

1. Methcd of Analysis: JLL2~ >>Oy~~a><

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [K] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [X] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back; Vertical):

Horiz= **7.338 Hz F/B = V= 10.661 Hz

3. Model type: [X] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[X] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. {X ] Ccaauter Ccdes: ANSYS Rev. 3 Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 7.338 - 69 12 Hz 20 modes considered

[ ] Hand Calculations for closely for widely spaced modes spaced modes

5. ¹thod of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [X] Absolute Sum Q SRSS

[ I Other: (Specify) OBE+SRV+LOCA - 2S SSE+SRV+LCCA - 2'S DAR, Sect.

6. DeePing: OBE )fe SSE le Basis for the damping used:7.1.7.4.1.2
7. Support Cons iderationns in the model: Cantilever Suoaorts
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable See Attachnant Nl Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit

          *   . 001H                   fan rotor                                .05"
              .000006"                 abator   rotor                             0311
          *See Attachrrent 43
         **Frequency will be higher due            to strengthening the colum tubes.

PF2/23-4

She t 11 of 19 Form i III. Is ui ent Available -for Inspection in the Plant: [ X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualif ication Method: [ ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* Drywell Unit Qmler (1V415B) (No., Title and Date) or 8856~395-2-5 for Phase e II fz Canpany that Prepared Report Eart2mmke Engineering Systems Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Corporation Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X] Canbination of (a) and (b)

(for Phase III) 24 Method of ccmbining RRS: fX]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [X]Absolute sum SRSS (for Phase II) (Other,specx fy) See Attachnent+ for Phase 'II. 3~ Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 2 for Phase II OBE+SRV+IcjCA 2% SSE+SRV+

4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE 1%
5. Required Ac"eleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other As re(uired per response spectra irxiicated above (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered?

fX] Yes f ] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall aualification program: Fatigue due to SRV is implicitly considered. The amcinum ccnhined stress aue to + gravity + oacs xs 12 ksi. This is within the endurance limit stress of the material on ~4 Section III, Appenchx I crt,ten.a. T?u.s zn cates that fatigue due to SRV loading is not a problem. "NOTE: If more than one report carglete items 1V thru Vll for each report. 2 )

     ~  See Att:achment No. 5     for revised    Table  2  of V.P. 8856-M-395-2-6 and explanation.        Wgc~>g           Q~, $  9y   Jo~~~gg ~p Q f p~$ g Jy)~)$                2  7 PF2/23-2

Sheet 12 of 19 NOR APPLICABLE

                                                                   ~UL2S   Sio~

VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: Not Applicable

                                                                                    ] randem
l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency ] sine beat
                                                                                    ]
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = V= 6..Method of Determining Natural Frequencies [ ] Lab &st f ] In-Situ Test f l Analysis

7. 'IRS enveloping HRS using Multi-Frequency Test f ] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graph.

f]No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S = V =

9. ?aboratory Mounting:
l. [ j Bolt (No., Size ) f ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
10. Functional cperability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including mx3ifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
  %VK:    If qualification      by a ccmbination  of test  and  analysis also ccnplete Item   Vll.

Oz PF2/23-3

Form: ~~v Sheet 13 of 19 1 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then complete:

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Ekyivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis f ] Time-History g Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

9.4 Hz V= 10.8 Hz

3. Mcdel type: [X] 3D [] 2D [11D

[X] Finite Element [ ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution

4. [X] Carputer Ccdes: MSYS Rev. 3 Frequency Range and No. of mades considered: 9.4 87.1 Hz IHGQes cons 3.~~

f ] Hand Calculations for closely for widely spaced mades spaced mxies

5. bhthcd of Combining Dynamic Responses: [X) Absolute Sum [ g SRSS f ] Other:

(Specify) OBE+SRV+ZQCA - 2% SSE+SRV+DX'A - 2% DAR Section

6. Damping: OBE Qa SSE Basis for the damping used:7.1.7.4.1.2,,
7. Support Considerationns in the model: Cantilever S rts
8. Cri tical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable See Attach@ant -.1 Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional D flection Location Ooerabilitv

               .001"                fan rotor                                 05 tt
               -000006"             mtor rotor                                03'I
           ~See  Attachment g3     for Phase   IX and. Phase lXZ e

PF2/23-4

~ & - = A M 6 * ' << -

  • Sheet 14 of'19 Form: H-317, Rev. 1 III. Is Bxui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ gj Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent calif ication Method:

[ j Test 5] Analysis [ j Ccmbination of Test s Analysis qualification Report<<Dxywell Unit Cooler (1V416A) ** Qi (No., Title and Date) 8856-M-395-2-5 Ccmpany that Prepared Report ~~hauake Enaineerin Systems Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Cornoration V. Vibration Input:

l. Loa& considered: a. f ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hy9rodynamic only
c. fX] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)

Id

2. Method of ccmbining RRS: fZ]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ j
3. Required.Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment ~2 GBE+SRV+EOCA - 2'5 " SSE+SRV+DX'A - 2%
                      'w Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ j ZPA                          f j Other As zecg'ired ver response spectra idicated above                     (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V =

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[ 3 Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall calif ication program: Fatiaue due to SRV is inalicitl considered. The canhined, stresses due to sustained operation loads and the SRV load are in the rancre of 6 to 12 ksi which are wi limit stress of the material based an the 8&K Section III, Appendix I criteria. This indicates that fatiaue due to SRV loadina i t a problem "NOZE: If more than one report carglete itara 1V thru Vll for each report.

      <<<<Unit 1V416A is qualified for Phase                 III loads  by  similar'ty.

See Bechtel V.P. 8856-H-395-2-6. PF2/23-2

A M dtl 4'14/~ 4 ~ Sheet 15 of 19 Form: M-317 JLL 23 'sl 0 ]. 4 4 6 7 g VI. If Qualification b Test, then Ccmnlete*: Not Agglicable [ j randem [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat f )

2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:

7,

5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical ):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab 1hst [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graph

[) No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = V =

SSE S/S =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size
                                           'I
                                                                )   [ ) Neld (Length            )    [ )
10. Functicnal operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including rredifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NOK: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 16 of 19 Form: M-317 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is,,then camlete:

l. Methcd of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis g] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [X] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Horiz. = **S.SS7 Hz V= 8.899 Hz

3. Mcdel type: fK] 3D f]2D f] lD fK] Finite Element f ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution
4. [M Carputer Ccdes: ANSYS Rev. 3 Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 5.557 123.4 Hz 20 nenes ccnder f ] Hand Calculations for closely for widely spaced nades spaced ries
5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [Z] Absolute Sum [Z] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify) OBE+SRV+ZDCA 2% SS"+SRV+LOCA 2S DAR, Sect.

6. Dmping: OBE 4% SSE lS Basis for the damping used: 7.1.7.4.1.
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model: Cantilever Suooorts
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Se AttaMtent 41 Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabi lit

             .001"                  fan rotor                               05@
             .000006"               Motor   rotor                           03 Ic
          *See Attachment     N3
         **fluency will be        high  r due   to strengthening the colm+ tubes.

X F2/23-4

Sheet 17 of 19 Ebrm: M-317 Rev. 1 III. Is ui ent Availab1e for Ins tion in the Plant: [ X] Yes ) No IV. ~ipnent Qualif ication Methcd: [ ] Test [ 9 Analysis [ ) Combination of Test a Analysis Kalification Export* ll Unit Ccoler 1V416B 8856M-395-3-6 for Phase ZZI (No., Tits.e and Date) 8856M>>395-2-5 for Phase ZZ Ccmpany that Prepared Report Ccmpany that Review wd Report Bechtel Co ration Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ) Seismic only
b. [ ) Hydrodynamic cnly
c. fK) Combination of (a) and (b) for Phase IIZ
2. Method of canbining RRS- [ AAbsolute Sum [ )SRSS [<) Absolu e Sum SRSS (0 er,specify)

See attachnent N4 for Phase I.

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Att;Mme 42 or'Pha<<Z-OHE+~+QX'A - 2% SSE+SRV+QXA - 2S
4. "w 'w
5. Required Ac"eleration in Each Direction: [ ) ZPA [ ) Other As requi~ per response spectra indicated above (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Mre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered' g] Yes [) No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: Fati due to SKT is imlicitl ccnsidered.

The nexiziaxa ccahined stress due to thexnel + gravity + SRV lo'~ is 10 ksi. This is within the endurance limit stress of the material based on the A&K Sectary III, Aaoen3ix I criteria. This locates that fati due to SET loac3in is not a rcblem. NVK: If more than one report ccnplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

I Sheet 18 of 19 Form: M-317 NO1'PPLICABLE 23'8I 0 $ JIJL 4467 g VI. If Qualification b Test, then Ccmolete*: Not Applicable [ ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[] [ ]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE . Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graohs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S = V=

9. Laboratory Mounting:

l [ l Bolt (No., Size ) [ [ N ld (Length ) [ [

10. Functional ccerability verified: f ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NO%: If qualification by a canbination of test. and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF.2/23-3

Sheet 19 of 19 Form: M-317 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then complete: Rev. 1 1, Methcd of Analysis: f ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis [ ]. T~istory . [X] Response Spectrum

2. Natural F~encies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Horiz.- V= 11.7 Hz

3. Mcdel type: [X] 3D [] 2D f]lD

[X] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [X] Ccaputer Codes: Rev. 3 Freauency Range and No. of modes considered: 9.8 - 128.9 Hz f ] Hand Calculations S. Method of Ccrnbining Dynamic Responses: f ] Absolute Sum g ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify) OBE+SRV+QX'A 2% ~+SRV+IDC'A 2%

6. DBllpltlg: ZBE~ SSE j% Basis for the DAR, Sect .

damping used:7.1.7.4.1.2

7. Support Considerationns in the model: Cantilever Sumo~
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Cbverning Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location 'cmbination Stress Stress Allowable Se Attachment 41 Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit

              . 001"                 fan rotor                          .05"
              .000006"               motor rotor                    ~

03 tt

           *See Attachnant 43       for Phase   II  &  Phase  III PF2/23-4

It I I,

  • 1 'I I

I I 1 I' I ~ t= 1 I 11 1 I I '1 tl I

                                    ,t 1',', ,    11
     ,  r I

Sheet 1 Form: M-320-1 Mj'R'M-320 Item Nl Qualification S~ of ianent Tag: XISH-07802 A&B I. Plant, Name: " SUSQUEHANNA TYEe:

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTE?

nent Name: CHLORINE DETECTOR

1. Sccpe: f ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Model Number: 50-125D Quantity: 2
3. endor: Wallace & Tiernan (Thru JCl)

El

4. Zf the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel R>. of the devices included:
5. Physical DescriPtion a. APPearance CY I ND R AN F:< " FLAT PLATE nsions 24" x 24" x 104"
c. Weight 65 lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Area 21 Elevation: On wall above Flr. El. 806 9,. )thru Field Mounting Conditions [ x] Bolt (No. Size Unistrut

[ ] Weld (Length ) to wall

8. a. Systen in which located: 30L Detect chlorine in outside air intake
b. Functicnal D scription: to control room ventilation s stem
c. Is the equipnent recyired for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ x] Both [ ) Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: 8856-M-320 G-22 PF2/23-1

0 0 ~ '

Sheet 2 Eorm: N-320-1 Rev. 1 IZI. Is Hcruianent Available for Insertion in the Plant: Q ] Yes [ ] No IV. Ecpipnent Qual ification Hethcd: [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test a Analysis Qualification &port" El. 1414 lif'cation Testing of HVAC Instrument (No., Title and Date) Cattxeents & Controls for Seismic & Hydrodynamic Loads Y te Ven r Print p -124-2) V. Ccmpany Ccmpany that Prepared Report that Reviewed Report Vibration Input:

                                          ~4~        ~

Nesting>~ Electric Coxporaticn Coxp/Johnson Contxols

1. laads considered: a. [X] Seismic only
b. [ ) Hy3zodynamic cnly
c. [x) Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. method of ccmbining RRS: [x]Absolute Sum f ]SRSS [ ]

(Other, specs fy)

3. Bepired Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): Se attachment=l <

>se ZZ

                                                                                                 ~  r Phase ZZ 4~    Damping Corresponding     to  RBS:    OBE          48             SSE     1%
5. ~ired Acceleration See in Each attachment Direction: [ ) ZPA fo" Phase IZ

[ ) Other Mi' 1 (Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = I 3 for Phase IIIV= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Kexe fatigue ef ects or other vibration Icos considered'?

[x] Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall gmlification program: Tbe device was subj~M to tm hours of ~~ded duxaticn loading to gemxate TBS tMt envelope the SRV BRS. See Attach-nent f2. NOI'E: If narc than one report ccnplete items lV thxu Ill for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Fotze x-320-1 Fav. 1 If Qualification 1 Test, then Ccnelete*: [ ] randem

l. f ] Single Frequency [x] Multi-[Frequency [ 1 sine beat f ]
2. f ] Single Axis [x]= Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE 5 SSE Other (5 ~set & 1 faulted) (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Bactc, Vertical):

S/S = 27 Hz F/B 23 Hz V= 43 Hz (Frcm Table 1 of the report)

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab Vast, f ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis

7. '2S enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs See attach. No. 2, PP 33 thru 135 of f]No E~ report. Bechtel VP M320-124-2 for II, =See attest for e,

Phase g4 Phase g-level Test: CBE S/S ~ F/B V = II'nput 8SE S/S ~ F/B = V=

                            <<e
9. Laboratory Mcunting: Device is connected to 3 unistruts (P1000) by 9+"g-13x14 hex. head cap screws, unistruts axe rigidly cont~ted to test fram
l. [ ] Holt [Ho., Size
                                                       )   [  ] Weld {Lerz)th            )

i [ ]

10. Functional cperability verified: [x] Yes f ] No f ] Not Applicable Test Results including nadifications made: The test results indicate that th chlcrim detec~ is qualified for seianic & hydrcdyt]amic loads
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

~: If qualification Item Vll. by a canbination of test and analysis also ccnplete PF2/23-3

Form: ~)~ Sheet 4 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then complete: t applicable

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Ekyivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis f ] history f ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D f]lD f ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution
4. [ ] Ccmputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of nodes considered: f ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Dampi ng: CBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Fnnz: M 320-2-(A N/R =Nd20 Item w2-1A Qualification Sunma of ianent Tag: See Attach. 1 I ~ Plant Name:

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3~ ~: BEQKZL II. Ccnxonent Name: Plow Switches
l. Sccpe: [ J NSSS [P( ] BOP
2. Sxfel Number: 12-64-4D Quantity: 20
3. endor: Fluid Ccneor.ents Inc. t~ JCX
4. If the caqxeent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel &. of the devices included: N
5. Physical Description a. Appearance See VP-"'22 -62 and 2-
b. Dimnsions 8 5 8" x 6" x 7 15/16"
c. Weight Ar(orox. 9 lbs.
6. Lccation: Building; Cont~1 Structure & Pea. Bldcs. area 12, 2~ a 29 Elevaticn: 719'n to 806'ee attaclzent 1 7~ Field Mnunting Cnnditinne (

( zl Felt (ttz.

                                               ] Weld (Length 6, -   Size     3/8
                                                                                  )
                                                                                           )

[ x) See VP "M320-61 62 -63

8. a. System in which located: See attachrent 1 Detect flow in various KSr HERC Air
b. Functicnal !ascription: ban~~'r s chilled water svstems.
c. Is the equipnent required for [ I Rot Standby [ J Cold Shutdcwn

[ l Both ( Neither

9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications: 8856-8320, -22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Ebnn: N 320-2-1A , III. IV. Is Eauianent Available for In Equipnent Qualif ication Method: tion in the Plant: f, x] Yes f 7 No fx] Mst f ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* Wvle report -"..45767-1, Becht 1 VP888 6-q 396-5-1 (No., T'tie and Date) "Seianic & drcdvramic cual'ficaticn (pp~ II) on five various HVAC damper assemblies andean Air Plow Switch", 9-5-81. Ccmpany that Prepared Report Rvle Laboratories Huntsvi>>e Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Corooraticn Francisco, CA V. Vibration Xrxut:

1. Loads considered: a. f Q Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [9 Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [QAksolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

{Other,spec@ y)

3. Required Respcnse Spectra {attach the graphs):

Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1/2 % OBE + SRV + LOCA - 2%, SSE + SRlt' LOCA- 2%

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA f]Othe See Attachrtent ,"2 f (Soeci y)

CBE S/S ~ P/B = V = SSE S/S ~ F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads consioered?

f] Yes fx] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall nmlification program: KVK: If more than one report carplete iteos 1V thru Vll for each report. PP2/23-2

Sheet 3 Foehn: N 320-2-1A . VI. If Kalification b 1. 2. [ [

                )
                )  Single. Axis Test, then Single Freouency                [

lete": 3 Multi-Frequency Multi-Axis

                                                                       'x)              [ )

[) randem sine beat

3. No. of Qualificaticn Tests: CBE SSE Other 5 ~set conditions followed by 1 faulted (Sgecify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 H
5. Ltatural. Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical.):

No resonance search was performed S/S = F/B =

6. Hethcd of Determining Natural Frequencies N.A.

[ ) Lab Test [ ) In-Situ Test [ ) Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test k) Yes (Attach TRS & RRS grachs See Attachment "..'3 [ ) No
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

0 9, See Attachment 03 laboratory Mounting:

                                      'SSE S/S =

Actual field condition simulated F/B =

l. [ ) Bolt (No., Size ) [ ) Weld (Length ) [ )
10. Functicnal curability verified: [x) Yes [ ) No [ ) Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The ecruiment is cualified fr around the flow swiM see at"~c!mt -"'4.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

WOI: If qualification by a carhination of test and analysis also ccnplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

                                                                                          << <<  4<<  '    4>>  ',44<<PI Sheet     4 Form: yZ20-2-La Vll. If Qualification       Analysis, then complete:             N.A.
1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis J ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis f J T~istory [ ] Response Spectzun

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S M

3. Hcdel type: [ ] 3D [1 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. f J Car@uter Ccdes:

Frequency Range and Wi . of pedes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Bathed of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ) Absolute Sum [ ] SWISS f J Other:

(Specify)

6. Damping: CBE Basis for the darping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Eleven':

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identificat'on Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Alliable maximum Allcwable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Bnctional Deflection Location Ooerabilit r F2/23-4

hh A

                                                        ,,h    'll
                                                                'hh
                            .'k h

I h h e h e I j 1

            ~

h

                               -h I

I h N h A h

                                             ~,

h h I~ 't II i', 'l

Sheet 1 Form: M~2~2A M/R IM320 Item 52-2A Qualification Sumna of Eauianent Tag: FSL-08621 A 6 B I. Plant one: SUSQUEHANNA,

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BEG%EL
1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [X $ BOP
2. Model Heber: Quantity:
3. endor:
4. Zf the ccagcnent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel R>. of the devices included:
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance "M M
b. Dimensions ll I~
c. Weight
6. Location: Building:

Elevation:

7. Field Mounting Conditions [

[

                                             ] Bolt     {No.,
                                             ] Weld {Length Size
                                                                                    )
                                                                                               )

f~) pipe)

8. a. System in which located: ~ - o ~F04 sTJpllc~opw CCATS C. i4lA7 Detect chilled wa~ flow in control strict~
b. Functicnal

Description:

                 ~  + o~
c. Is the equipnent required for f ] Hot Standby ( l Cold Shutda~

[ ~J Both [ j Neither

9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications: 8856W220 22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Ebnn: N 320-2-2a III. Is Kcrui ent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ x] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualif ication Nethod: [x] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test a Analysis Qualification Report* Kyle report 545767-1, Bechtel VP 8856~~96-5-1 (No., Title

         'arious and Date)"Seismic HVAC  damper assemo that Prepared Report es an pn   ~~~'fication hydrodynamic ow (Phase smtch" 9/5/81 Wyle Laboratories, Huntsville III) on f'm Qzpany that Reviewed Report             Bechtel Power Cor" oraMcn,       San   Franc'co V. Vibration Input:
1. Loach considered: a. g ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. g] Ccmbination of (a) ard (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: g]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other,specify) 3 ~ Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See attac!mant $1 5. Damping Corresponding to OBE + SRV + XQCA: 2'8, Required Acceleration in

                                             ~

RRS-'BE

                                                   + SRV + ESCA: 28 Each Direction: [ ] ZPA SSE

[ ] Other See Attachtant 51 (Specify) CBE S/S = F/B ~ V SSE S/S = F/B ~ V=

6. Mere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'?

[] yes [4 No If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall qualification program: NVK: If more than one report ccnglete item lV thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Bonn: N320"2-2A VI. If Qualification bv Test, then Ccmolete>>: [x] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [x] Multi-Freauency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis Q] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CHE 5 SSE 1 Other (Specify)
4. Prequencv Range: 1 to 100 Hz Natural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

No resonance search was per ormed S/S ~

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies N.A.

[] Lab~t [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS 6" RRS graphs See at~cd $2 [] No
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

See Atmchneat <~2 SSE S/S =

9. laboratory Mounting:
                ** ~ted     on duct by
l. [x[ Balt (No. 6, Size~38" ) [ ) (e.'ld (Zefigth ) [ ]
10. Functicnal operability verified: [x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including mcdifications mace:

Seismic ](' 'c loads.

12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

>>NOIE: If qualification by a ccmbinaticn of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll.

         <<* Note:    Ttw laboratory mounting condition subje~ the lcd switch under a~

to a highter g-valm than the g-valm experienced by tM cev'ce field anting ~dition. PP2/23-3

Sheet 4 M320-2-2A Vll. If Qualification b Analysis, then lete:

l. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Ar~lysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~istory [ ] Response Scectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S M

3. Mcdel type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lo

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Car@uter Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Methcd of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: CBE Basis for the dazruing used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationra in the mcdel:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Se~i'c 'Ibtal Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allcwable Maximum All~able Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PP2/23-4

Mhr yh I

                                        ~   M I

M M h C i M I 4 P MM Oo I I, t

                        'I
                             ~ .

I' M p

  " ~
~

Sheet 1 Form: M-320-3 M/R 5M320 Qualification Sunna of i nt Item 53 Tag: LG-08634AEB I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHPIZK

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL
l. Sccpe: f ) NSSS f P( ) BOP
2. Model Number: 16-R-20 Quantity: 2
3. Vendor: Jerguson (thru JCl)
4. If the ccmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices N/A 'ncluded:
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance LONG R -,A~,G ~ ." "~'-y 'r<: ; VA~ V=~
b. Dimensions 18" x 9" x 94"
c. geight 20 1hs. (approx.)
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Area 21 Elevation: Above Flr. El. 806'Pipe Mounted) 70 Field Mounting Conditions [ ) Bolt (No. , Size )
                                                 ) Weld (Length                        )

f x) See ISO SP- - - an -HBD-3006-2 a p3.pe conEMons

8. a. System in which located: 309
b. Functicnal

Description:

Indicate chilled water level in ection

c. Is the equipment required for f ) Hot Standby f ) Cold Shutccwn f x) Both [ j Neith'er
9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications: M320,G-22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Rant: M-320-3 Bev. 1 IIl. Is Equi ent Available for Insr)ection in the Plant: [ ~] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: [g Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbinaticn of Test & Analysis alification Report" El. 1414 lificati (No., Title and Date) Caraonents Ccmpany

                                                 &  Controls for July 1981. Bechtel V.P. IM320-124-2 that Prepared Report Nestin&xaxse Electric Co dzocvnamic      ~

Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Pc~r Co . Johns Controls V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ Q Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [9 Ccmbination of (a) and (b) Se attac~t No. 3 2". Method of ccmbining BRS: [QAbsolute Sum [ ]SBSS f ]

I 3. 5. e'SZ Required %spcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): Required Accelecaticn See at~hnant in No. 1 Each for or OEE+SRV+ElXA Direction: [ ) Phase II & Phase

                                                                         -2S ZPA III SSE
                                                                                    )   )

1% Other for (Specify) Phase Phase IZ IIX CBE S/S ~ P/B = SSE S/S = F/B ~ V=

6. Nhm fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[x] Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and hew they were treated in overall qualification duration 1 'o program: The device was sub ected to 2 hours of exuded rate TBS that envelcce SRU RRS. see attachnent No. 2) "Q7ZE: If more than one report cxnplete items lV thru Vll for each report. PP2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: ~M- 2 -3 Rev. l. VZ. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: f ] randem

1. f ] Sinale Frequency fz] Multi-Frequency [ ] sire beat f ]
2. [ ] Single Axis fz] Multi-Axis C Other (5 Upset and 1 Faulted) {-pecify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = F/B = (Fran Table 2 of Report) Method of Determining Natural Frequencies k] Lab ~t [ ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis 7~ TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fx] Yes {Attach TRS a RRS graphs See att:achnant No. 2 8 VP 136 thou 203 f ] of Report VP 8856~20-124-2 for Phase ZZ s Phase ZZZ Input g-level Test: CBE S/S ~ F/B = V>>- SSE S/S = F/B ~ V=

.        9. Laboratory Mounting: Connected through 3/4" NPT couplings to tm 3/4" c.s. pipes rigidly attached to test freya SCH. 80
l. [ 1 Bolt [No., Size > [ ] ]e ld ((ength ] [ ]
10. Functicnal cperability verified: [ 4 Yes f ] No f ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: Test results irz3icate &~t tM J level is fied for seis'nic & hydro['ynamic loads
12. Other test performed {such as aging or fraaility test, including results):
Zf qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Ztan Vll.

I PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M320-3 V11 . If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: Not applicable

1. Methcd of Ar~lysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] history [ J Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = F/B = V =

3. Mcdel type: [ J 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Cmguter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Methcx3 of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] 'Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS f ] Other:

(Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional

          &flection                Location                      rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Foot: N'226-4 M/R IM320 Qualif ication Suma of i nt Item tt4 Tag: See attache e I. Plant Name:

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEZ II. Ccmconent Name: Pressure Differential Switches
l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [g ] BOP
       .2. Model Number:       SB 32   Bkr      1A16                    Quantity:                         4
3. Vendor: Automatic Switch Canaan (ASCO) (tt~ JCI)
4. If the cmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the A

devices'ncluded: N

5. physical Description a. APPearance CY  ! <Rl",4 HOL!S! >.'G Ah! SE.h! S F~
b. Dimensions 6-7/8" x 6-7/8" x 8-1/32"
c. Height' 1hs. (approx.)
6. Location: Building: Control Str. Area 21; REA. Bld . Area 29 Control Structure Above Floor El.

Reactor Bld . above floor El. 806'levation: 799'. Mounted on Field Mounting Conditions [ x] Bolt (No. 2, Size >4"

                                                                                                                    )a bracket

[ ] Neld (Length ) on a floor [ ] stand

8. a. System in which located: 70A & 34B Monitor Supply/Return Plenum aP
b. Functional

Description:

Start/Stoa Ventilation Ecuianent

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ N] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 8856~20 [" 22 PF2/23-1

Meet 2 i4L-320-4 Bev. 1 III. Is Equi ent Available for Inscection in the Plant: f <] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualificat'on Method: [ ] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Begort* El.'414,> Qualificaticn Testing of EDC Instrument (No., Title and Date) Caazzents 6 Controls for Seismic 6 Hydrodynamic Zaads July 1981. Bechtel V.P. 5N-320-124-2 Ccmgany that Prepared Report Westinchouse Electric Corporation Cangany that Reviewed Begort ~tel P~r Cora. /Johnson Controls Vibration Input:

1. loads considered: a. fQ Seismic only
b. [ ] Hyd~amic cnly
c. fQ Ccmbination of (a) and (b) 2; Method of ccmbining RRS: [x]Absolute Sum [ ]SBSS [ ]

Required Resgcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): Se A~chtant ~1 for Phase I2 ee ar,wccmnc > ror Phase II Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE QS SSE 15 SSE or OHr. + SBV + XQCA, 2S aanp. Bequired Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA [ ] Other See attac~t No. 1 for Phase II, Atm.54 fox Phase III(Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'?

fg Yes []No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: The device was subjected to two hours of extended duration loa3in to te TBS that envelope SBV BBS. (See attachment Mi. 2) "NCtE: If more than one report camlete items 1V thru Vll for each regort. PP2/23-2

Sheet 3 Batlll: M-320-4 eev. l VE. Ef Qualification b Test, then lete*: fg randem

l. [ J Single Frequency f x3 Multi-Frequency [ } sire beat f )
2. [ ] Single Axis [g Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE 1 Other (5 Upset, 1 Faulted) (Spe ify)
4. Frequency Range: H
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S- F/B ~ 23 Hz V~ 23 Hz (Prem Table 1 of Report)

6. Wthcd of D termining Natural Frequencies fg Cab 'est f ) En-Situ Test f } Ana1ysis 7~ TRS enveicping RRS usincr Multi- (ency Test [Q Yes (Attach TPS & RRS graphs See TRS in attach. No. 2 & PP. 33 '135 f i N of Report Bechtel V.P. 8856-M-320-124-2 for Phase EE & Atta. ~5 for Phase EII
8. Enput g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B ~ V ~

Se TRS in for Phas~ II at~.

                            & See No. 2 & pp. 33 thru 135 of report. V.P. 8856~4-320-124-2 SSE S/S =                      F/B ~                   V~

9. Attachment $ 5 for Phase III laboratory Mounting- Mounted on a Unistrut with 2-)/q"p -20xl4" ?m head

l. cap screws. Unis~t is rigidly (Wa., atta~ to test frana.

[ ) Balt Size ) [ ) Weld (Length ) [ )

10. Functicnal operability verified: [9 Yes [ ] No [ j Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made: Test results irdicate tMt t?w ressure diffe~tial switc?ws are loads.
                                                              'fied for seianic      &  h          ~c
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, includirg results):

'NO%: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also carplete Etea V11. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-320-4 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: Not applicable.

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ j Dynamic Analysis History [ I Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = F/B = V=

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [) lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccnputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of nedes considered: [ ) Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:-
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet l F01lll: ~QQ-511 M/R IM-320 Qualification Sunna of i nt Item 55A Tag: See Attach. No.3 I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA Rate:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECEKL
l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Model Number: Quantity:
3. Vendor:
4. Xf the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices, included:
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Np A HP  ! YG ANP "NSOR il II II
b. Dimensions 3 23/32 x 4-1/16 x 11-9/16
c. Weight 5 lbs. (Approx.)
6. Location: Building: Diesel Gen. & ESSW Elevation: Mmve Flr. El. 677' 685'ee attach. No. 3
7. Field Mounting Conditions [x

[

                                               ] Bolt
                                               ] Weld

{No. {Length 2,'ize thru Unistrut

                                               ]

to wall

8. a. System in which located: See attach. No. 3
b. Functional

Description:

Rocm theranstat start/stop ventilation equi>

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Stardby [ ] Cold Shutdown fX ] Both [ 1 Neither
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 8856-%-320, G-22 PF2/23-1

t III. lu. Is ui ent Available for Inspection in the Plant: fttuipaent Qualification Methcd: g] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] [ Form: X] Yes Combination Sheet 2 M-320-5A [ ] No of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* 8856M-320-116-1, Pressure/Temperature (No., Title and Date) Switch Seismic Ca o I Qualification Report Ccmpany that Prepared Report Autanatic Switch Company Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Corporation V. Vibration Input:

l. leads considered: a. [K ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [ ] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [ ]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ] N/A (Other,specify)
3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attach. 01
4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 0.5% SSE 1%
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [X] Other See Attachment ~l (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Kexe fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[ ] Yes {I ] No Not affected by Hydrodynamic loads. If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualif ication program:

 "NOPE:  If more   than one report carplete items 1V thru         Vll for each report.

PF2/23-2

0 0

Sheet 3 Form: ~)~A VI'. If Qualification b Test, then- lete*: [ ] randem

1. [X] Single Frequency Multi-Frequency sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis

[ ] [X] Multi-Axis [ ] [X] sine ~ll

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other 30 second dwell at each of 16 frequencies 1/3 octave apart. (Specify)
4. Frequency'ange:
5. Natural Fzecyencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = ) Hz F/B = V= )40 Hz (See Attachment I4)

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies Q] Lab 'Inst, [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [X] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs Se= Attach. 02
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B = 5 G max. V = 5 Gmax.

SSES/S = 5Gmax. F/B= 5Gmax. V= 5Gmax.

9. Laboratory Mounting: Simula~g field vaunting condition
1. [ ] Bolt (No.

rmunted on 2,Unistrut Size 3;"A307) [ ] Weld (length ) [ ]

10. Functional operability verified: [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: No malfunction was detected durin or after tests. Instxunent is ified for seismic loads.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NOZE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also caaplete Item Vll. e PF2/23-3

A ) X & I '- 5 ~ *4' ~ WJ Sheet 4 Form: M-320-5A Vll. ~ If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: N/A 1.~ Method of Analysis: f ] Static Analysis f ) Ekyivalent Static Analysis [ ) Dynamic Analysis f l T~istory f ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Madel type: [ ) 3D f) 2D f ] lD f ) Finite Element f ) Beam [ ) Closed Form Solution
4. f ] Ccnputer Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ) Hand Calculations

5. Methcd of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identif ication Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabilit 0 PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form- M-320-6-1A M/R gM-320 Item 16-1A Qualif ication Suma of i nt Tag: TSH-17631A & B I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL Temoerature Switches
l. Sccpe: f ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Model Number: SB1 11A4 Quantity:
3. Vendor: Automatic Switch an ASCD thru JCI
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included: N A
5. Ehysical DescriPtion a. PPPearance C I R ICAL H" I M AN S"-NS 23~i 1 ~ 1
b. Dimensions 3 32 x 4 16 x 7 8" with 12'caoill and bulb
c. Weight 5 Lbs. { rox.)
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bld . Area 29 Elevation: Above Floor El.

Field Mounting Conditions fX ] Bolt (No. [ ] Weld (Length 719'. 2, Size

                                                                                         )

Munted on

                                                                                                  )  floor stand

[

8. a. System in which located: 3 Boan Thezrmstat start/stop ESF
b. Functional

Description:

ventilation eaui nt Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdcwn [ X] Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 8856-M-320 G-22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Ebatl: M 320-6-1A Pav. 1 III., Xs irment Available for Inspection in the Plant: fg j Yes f ] No XV. Equipment Qualification Method: [g Test * [ j Analysis [ j Ccmbxnatxon of Test & Analysis Qualification &port* InstrUImnt & Contxo3 Catacnents In'ontrols for seismic & hyd~amic loads, (No., Title and Date) 4 Ccmpany that Prepared Report ation Carpany that Revi~ Report Ccntmls Vibration 1'nput:

l. toads considered: a. [Xj Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X] Ccmbinaticn of (a) and {b)
2. L&thod"'of ccmbining RRS: [+Absolute Sm f ]SRSS [ ]

(Other, specify) 3 4~

       ~

I 'SE Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Required See or 03E + SET + ICCA 28 Ao=eleration in Each Direction: f j ZPA Attach. ~3 for for f j Other Attach. Il for Phase II,See Atta.-.'3 for Phase IIX (Specify' Phase II Phase XXI CBE S/S = F/B = V =. SSE S/S = P/B = V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[xj Yes [] No h~ they vere treated in overall qualification Program: ~ Xf yes, describe loads considered ard devi e~~ duration loadie to (See Attach. 42 . ~E: If more than one report ccaplete itans 1V thru Vll for each report. This equipaent is qualified on basis of similarity with M-320%-3A (axial SalZSre/QollA4) PFZ/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M-320-6-1A VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: [X] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [X] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [X] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE 5 SSE 1 Other (5 upset, 1 faulted) { Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 71 Hz F/B = 29 Hz V = 45 Hz (Fran Table 1 of report)

6. Methcd of D termining Natural Frequencies fX] Zab 'Test f ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis e
7. 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fX] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs See Attach. 52 & pgs. 33 thru 135 of Report Bechtel V.P. H-320-124-2

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B = V =

See Attach, 42 pgs. 33 thru 135 of Report V.P. SSE S/S = F/B = V = M-320-1242

9. Laboratory Mounting: Mounted on Unistrut (P1000) by 24' 20 x 14" HEX Head cap screws. P1000 is rigidly connected to test fram .
l. [ ) Selt (No., Size ) [ ) Weld (Length ) [ )
10. Functicnal operability verified: [X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modif ications made: The test results indicate that the ature switch s are 'fied for seismic 6 hydrodynamic loads.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NQK: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-320-6-lA Vll. If Qualification"b Anal is, then cormlete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis f ) Equivalent Static Analysis f, ] Dynamic Analysis f ) T~istory f ) Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = F/B = V=

3. Model type: f ] 3D f) 2D f) lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution

4. f ] Ceo@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of mx3es considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Wthcd of Canbining Dynamic Responses: f ) Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS f ] Other:

(Specify)

6. Damping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identif ication Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Foot: ~2p-6-Bh M/R IM-320 Item I6-2A Qualif ication Su[ma of i nt: Tag: See Attach. 93 I. Plant Name: SUSQ3H3ANNA T}2e:

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL II. Component Name:
1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [g ] BOP
2. Model Number: Quantity:
3. Vendor:
4. If the cmgonent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices'ncluded:
5. Physical Description
b. Dinensions 23" a.

1<<3" Appearance C AL HO Si<iG ANO SENSOR

c. Weight
6. Location: Building:

Elevation: 4 I II Mounted thru

7. Field Mounting Conditions [ I(( Bolt
                                               ] Weld (No.~,

(Length Size

                                                                                     ) on a
                                                                                              ) Unistrut floor stand
8. a. System in which located:

[ ] 34E, AND 34F'latform at El. 64S or El. 654'-6" at Roan therm+stat start/stop ESF ventilation

b. Bnctional

Description:

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ g] Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications:

PF2/23-1

Meet 2 Raus: M -320 2R Rev. 1 III. Is Eauirment Available for Insaection in the Hant: [ g] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualif ication Method: g] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Mport* E1. 1414 " 'fication t sting f PVC Ccmanents & Ccntrols for Seimic & instrulmnt Hydrcd'ynanlic Loads". (No., TitLe and Date) Bechtel V.P. N-320-124-2 Canpany that Prepared Report Nestinctmuse Elect Corrorat'on Ccmpany that Revimed Report Bechtel Pm'oro. Johnson Controls V. Vibration Input:

l. loads considered: a. g, ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hy9rodynamic cnly
c. g] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Nethcd of ccmbining RRS: [MAhsoLute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]
3. Required Respcuse Spectra (attach the graphs): A for Phase IZ Attach. 54 for Phase ZZZ 4~

SSE or OBE + SRV + DXA - 2% Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other Qi f See Attach, gl for Phase.IZ & See Atta.",4 for Phase IZI(Specify) CBE S/S ~ F/B = V = SSE S/S = P/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration Loads mnsidered?

[XJ Yes []No If yes, describe loads considered and hew they vere treated in overall cualification program: The device was sub'ected to tm hou~ of extended duration loadin to cenerate TRS tMt envelop SRV RRS (See Attach, f2) 'NOTE: If more than cne report ccnplete itans 1V thru Vll for each report. PE'2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: Rev. 1, VI. Xf Qualification b Test, then Lete*: fQ randan

l. f J Single Frequency .

fXJ Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat f ]

2. f J Single Axis- fX] MuLti-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other

{Specify}

4. Freq]vncy Range: 1 to 100 8?
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Bac}(:, Vertical):

S/S 71 Hs F/B 29 Hz 45 Hz

                              . (Fran  Table 1    of remrt)
6. Method of Ehterminxng Natural Frequehczes fZ] Tab 'est f J In-Situ Test [ J Analysis
7. '1RS envelcping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test,[X] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs -';

See Attach. $ 2 and pgs. 33 thru 135 [] No XI, See Attach.~5 for Phase ZII of Report Bechtel V.P. M-320-124-2 for. Phase

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B =

See Attach. 42 and pgs. 33 thru 135 of Report V.P. M-320-SSE S/S F/B = 124-2 for Phase ZI, See Attach. 55 for Phase XXZ

9. Laboratory Mounting: ~ted on a. Unistrut P1000 vi.th 2-~v 9 - 20 x 14" F~-

Pl000 is zigid1y ccntsc~ tc test Sz'~%

l. [ ] Pelt (Wc., Seed cep sczews.

Size ) [ ] Weid (Length ) ( )

10. ~cticnal cper&ility verified: [g Yes f J No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modif icaticns made: Test results 3z~zcate that ~>

a~ swi has are fied for seismic 8 h

12. Other test performed {such as aging or fragility test, includ~e results}:

I~~ ( (} W(XK: Xf qualification by'a canbinaticn of test and analysis also ccaalete yp Z Ijk Xtem Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: ~~~2A Vll . If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: Not Applicable

l. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis f ] ~ivalent Static Aralysis f j Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History f ] Response Spectrum.

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type- f ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ) Closed Form Solution

4. f ] Ccmputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: f ) Hand Calculations

5. M thcd of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum f ] SRSS

[ ) Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: CBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response ":Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

s . ~

                                                                                              '~                 ,S a.

Sheet l Form: M/R CM-320 Itom 56-3A Qualification Summa of Bmi nt Tag: TSL-07802 A & B , I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL ch
l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS f g ) BOP
2. Rxfel Number: SB12 11A4 Quantity:
3. Vendor: Automatic Switch Catalan ASCO thru JCI
4. If the cmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices, included: N A
5. Physical DescriPtion a. APPearance CY I N R A <'.".~G AN SFNS R 23" 1 u
b. Dimensions 3 2 x 4 16 x 7 with 12' illarv and bulb
c. Weight
6. Location: Building: ure Area 21 Elevation: On wall above F1cor El.

Unistrut

                                                                        ., Size 806'.

On Field Mounting Conditions [g) Bolt (No. 2 ) which is f ) Weld (Length ) vaunted on wall f ] by 2- /g bolts.

8. a. System in which located: 30 L Bocm them+stat start/stop ESF
b. Functional D scription: ventilation eauizment
c. Is the equipment required for f ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ X] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: M-320 G-22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: M-320-6-3A III; Is ui ent Available for Inspection in the Plant:

               ~

[g ] Yes [ ] No IV.~ Equipnent Qualif ication Methcd: [g Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test a Analysis Qualification (No., Title Report.", and Date) C~xnents for Seismic & Hychxdynamic ~"Instrument July, 1981 Ccmpany that - Prepared Report tion Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bech 1 power Co . Johnson Controls V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [Zj Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [Z] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [yJAbsolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

{Other,specify)

3. Reguired Response Scectra (attach the graphs): A tach. "1 4,

SSE or OBE + SRV + LOC>> 2%

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attach. gl (Specify)

OBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads consideredP fg] Yes []No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall aualification program: The device was sub'ected to ~ hours of extended duration 1~ to enerate TRS that. enve1.one SRV RRS See Attach. 02 "NOI'E: If more than one report ccmplete items lV thru Vll for each recort.

PF2/23-2

        ~ ~  e, dk~<<ln&~ea<<~~<<e.~~~~ew~&'): <<<<<<<<l              m  << '~ ', wa w Aaa<<n  <<<<)<<<< ~, ~~  << 'aa        ~ <<<< ~ .

Sheet 3 Form: H-320-6-3A Nev.~ If alification b Test, then Ccmnlete*:

l. [ ] Single Frequency 'Xj Multi-Frequency k]

[ ] [] randem sine beat $P't8g~Qfg;:~hhf$ 4

2. [ ] Single Axis [Xl Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other jP~~4+> .o W 1 +~Qj. ((jP++f (5 upset, 1 faulted) (Specify) +~@MB Q
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz S. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 71 Hz F/B = 29 Hz 45 Hz

                              .(Fxcm  Table   3. af Recort)

Methcd of Determining NaturaL Lequencxes fg] Lab 'Inst [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'IBS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test k] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs See Attach. 82 5 pgs. 33 thru 135 [] No III L

8. 9. of Report Bechtel V.P. M-320-124-2 for Phase II, See Attach.04 for Phase Input g-level Test: CSE S/S = See Attach. 12 & pgs. 33 thru 135 of Report V.P. M-320~E S/S = 124-2 for Phase II, See Attach.54 for Pl~ F/B = F/B= III Laboratory Mounting: Mounted on a Unistrut (P lppp) by 2.<qp 20 x ~q>>

                                                                                      '~                     ~.
l. [ ) Bolt ()jo., Head can screws.

Size ) [ [ Unistrut rigidly connected to test

                                                                 )jelj) (Length               )   [ )      Btena
10. Functional operability verified: f g Yes [ ] No [' Not Applicable
11. Test Results including nadifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
'IK:  If qualif'cation      by a ccmbination      of test. and    analysis also ccmplete Item   Vll.

2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-320-6-3A Vll. lf Qualification b Anal is, then lete:

1. Methcd of Analysis:

[ ) Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis f ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD f ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution
4. f ] Computer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of mx3es considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identif ication Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Alla@able Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit FF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M-320-7 M/R NM-320 Item g7 Qualification Sunma of Foui nt;. Tag: See Attach. 53 I. Plant, Name: SUSQUEHANNA TYEe:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEK
l. Sccpe: f ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Model Number: SC11AR/QD10A4 Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: Autanatic Switch Canoan (ASCO) (thru JCI)
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the N/A devices'ncluded:
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance CYI INDRI 'L HOu ING AND SENSOR 23" 1" 9"
b. Dimensions 3 32 x 4 16 x ll 16
c. Weight 5 Lbs. ( prox.)
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Area 21 Elevation: on wall above Floor El.

Field Mounting Conditions [ X] Bolt (No. [ ] Weld (Length 2, 806'. Size

                                                                                        )

Mounted on

                                                                                                 )

which Unistrut is [ ] bolted to wall.

8. a. System in which lccated: 30A and 30B. See Attach. %3 Roan thernastat start/stop ESF
b. Functional

Description:

          ~mutilation eauiment
c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdcwn

[X ] Both [ ] LLeither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-320 G-22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 POrm 9>>320 7 Bev. 1 III. Xs i ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: ( g] Yes t ] No XV- Ecpipnent Qualification Method: I'K] Test

  • f ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test a Analysi Kalification Report*

(No., Title and Date) ydrodynanic Loads". Julyt 1981 (Bechtel V ~. M-320-124-2) Ccmpany that Prepared Report Mcn Ccmpany that Reviewed Report V. Vibraticn Input:

1. Loads considered: a. tx] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. g] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: t /Absolute Sum t ]SRSS t ]

Required Bespcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): e XX y' See Attach. S4 for Phase IZZ, SSE or OHE + SPil + LCCK - 2'8 Required Acceleration in Each Directicn: [ ] ZPA ( ] Other See Attach. $1 for Phase ZI,= See Atta.j4 for PhaseXZS SPeci fy) CBE S/S = F/8 V ~ SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered.

[g Yes f ] No 1'f yes, describe loads considered and hew they ~are treated in overall qualification program: extended duratin 1 o 1 See Attach. 2 . ~E: If rare than one report ccxglete itans 1V thru Vll for each report. As per test report, item tested was Hodel SC12B/QHQA4. M-320-7 is qua.'Lified on basis of similarity with ~~/<01QA4. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form'9-320-7 Rev. 1 VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: QJ random

l. f J Single Frequency f g Multi-Frequency [ J sine beat f J
2. f J Single Axis [9 Multi-Axis 0 Other (5 upset, 1 faulted) { Specify)
4. Fr~ency Range- 1 to 100 .
5. Witural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S 71 Hz F/B ~ {See Table 1 of report) Methcd of Determining Natural Frequencies [XJ rab ~t [ J In-Situ Test f J Analysis z TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [Q Yes (Attach TRS a RBS gra++ Se Attach, 52 8 pgs. 33 thru 135 f JNo of report. Bechtel V.P. M-320-124-2 for Phase II, See Attach.~5 for Phase IZ"

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S ~ F/B = V =

See Attach. 42 a pgs. 33 thru 135 of Bechtel V.P. SSE S/S ~ *F/B = V= M-320-124-2 for Phase II, See Attach.$ 5 for Phase IIX 9- laboratory Mcunting: Rented on Unistrut (P1000) by 2-r~gf 20 x 14" Rx. P1000 is r'gidly ccnn~ to test franc.

l. [ J Bolt {No., Size Head cap screws.
                                                         )   [  J Yield {Looqth               )   [ J
10. Bncticnal curability verified: [gJ Yes f J No f J Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOIX:. If qualificaticn hy a canbination of test and analysis also canplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: N-320-7 V11. lf Qualification b Anal is, then lete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History f ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
3. Model type: f ] 3D [] 2D f]1D

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: f ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M-320-S M/R <~M-320 IteHl Er8 Qualification Suma of Ekeirment Tag: See'Attach. 53 I. Plant Nane: SUSQUEHANNA 22e-

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL
1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [X ] BOP
2. Model Number: P-SC (s) Quantity: 18
3. Vendor: Tavis (thru JCI)
4. If the component is a cabinet or'anel, name and model No. of the N/A devices'ncluded:
5. Ehysical Description '. Appearance CYLIND
b. Dhensions 24" Dia. x 64
c. Weight %g Lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure a REA, Blda. Area 12, 21, 25, 27 See Attach. No. 3 Elevation: Above Floor Elevations 779'06',

1, 818'. Field Mounting Conditions [X ] Bolt (No. Size N/A ) [ ] Weld (Length )

8. a. System in which located: See Attach. "3 s erenow rocm pressures
b. Functional

Description:

relative to inside/outside afxasphe~

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X ] Both E 1 Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M-320, G-22 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 FOXIll~ Bev. 1 III. Is Equi ent Available for In tion in the Plant: [g ) Yes [ ) No IV. Ecpiprant Qualification Method:

                                     )  Aralysis               [ ) Ccmbination          of Test   &  Analysis Qualification &port>>                                                     EVE Instnment (No.,  Title and   Date)                                         1            dxcdynamic Loads" (Bechtel V-P. 4H-320-124-2)                          July,   1981 Ccmpany   that Prepared Report                                              tion Ccmpany   that  Reviewed Report                                       J hnscn Controls V. Vibration Input:
1. Loads considered: a. [g) Seismic only
b. [ ) Hy3rodynamic cnly
c. fg) Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. ¹thod of ccmbining RRS: Q)Absolute Sum [ )SBSS [ )
3. Required peepcoea Spectra (attach the graphs): e for p zr Attach 44 for Phase III 4~ i SSE or OM + SRV + LOCK - 2%
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ) ZPA [ ) Other CBE S/S ~

See At~- $ 1 for F/B Phase II See Atta ~4 h ~ v for V= {Specify)

          .SSE    S/S ~                        F/B =                        V=
6. Mere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they.~ere treated in overall cualif ication program:

             ~ded       duraticn loadie

~E: If more than cne report ccaplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PP2/23-2

1 ~J e 4 A, W~ M~. eE iM~A ~~M,~L ..N,~A Sheet 3 Form: M-320-8 VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: [Z] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency Q] Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat
2. [ ) Single Axis Q] Multi-Axis

[] SSE Other (Specify)

4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 45 Hz F/B = 45 Hz V = 23 Hz

6. Methcd of Determining Natural Frequencies

[K] lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ) Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fX) Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs See Attach. N2 8 pgs. 33 to 135 of report f ] No Bechtel V.P. IM-320-124-2
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B = V =

See Attach. I2 & pgs. 33 thru 135 of report Bechtel V,P. SSE S/S = F/B = U =

           &320-124-2
9. Laboratory Mounting:

By 2Q"

l. [ ) Solt (No.,

strap and P-204KUnistrut Size ) [ ) (e'ld (Length ) ( )

10. Functional cperability verified: fg] Yes [ ] No f ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modif ications made: ts indicate that fo seismic and hvdrcavnamic loads.
12. er Rest performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOIR: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also carplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: Vll. If Qualification

   ~                     b   Anal   is,  then complete:

1.~ Methcd of Analysis: f ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ J Dynamic Analysis [ ]'ime-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = F/B = V =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D . []1D

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Cmguter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of mx3es considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum f ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify).

6. Daaping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load

  • or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional D flection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Foall: M-320-9 N/R $ 320 Item 59/47+ Qual ification Summa of i nt Tag: CC-8SS A & B I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA TQR 0

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL II. Ccmoonent Name: ~ratuxe Detection Unit
1. Sccpe: [ ) NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Model Number: A971-1-1-SSS Quantity: 2
3. Vendor: Alison Controls Inc.
4. If the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included: 6 Rela s: SCHRACZ RM 302 2 ~

24V dc; 1 valve supervision module: Alison Contxol A971 series. See V.P. OM-320-37

5. Physical Description a. Appearance RECTANGU AR
b. Dimensions 30" x 24" ll "
c. Weight rox. 130 Lbs.
6. Lccation: Building: Contxol Structure Area 12 Elevation: 806'.

Field Mounting Conditions [ X ] Bolt (No. 4 , Size [ ] Weld (Length [ ]

8. a. System in which located: 70A
b. Bmctional

Description:

Honitor temoera of SGZS Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown f ] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications:

4 ITFM NO.9 IS TO BE REPLACED BY ITEM NO. 47. THE REFERENCED TEST REPORT APPLIES TO ITEM NO.47. PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 {e-320-9 Rev. 1 IXI. Xs i ent Available for I tion in the Plant: [~ ] Yes [ I No IV. Equipnent Qualification Nethod: [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test a Analysis Peport 445155-1, "Fire Detection/Extingui~~~t Control Qualification Beport* tern" Decare 18 1980. (No., Title and Date) Bechtel V.P. 48856-K-320-123-1 Ccmpany that Prepared Report le Laboratories Huntsville, Facility Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power raticn V. Vibration Input:

l. Eaads considered: a. [X] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hy9ndynamic cnly
c. fZ] Ccmbination of (a) and {b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: k]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

{Other,speci fy)

3. Res{sires Res9ense spectra {attach the 9rashs): Attach. ~ + ~ ZI 4 ~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 0.5%

Attach. <3 for Phase III SSE or ORE + SRV + ICCA - 2% Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attach. Nl for Phase II, See Atta.43 for PhaseIII {Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Nere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considemd?

(5 OBE + 1 SSE) test, however was performed [ ] Yes {X] No on F/B verd.cal and S/S vertica1 configurations. In addition sire beat test were performed. If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overae3.1 qualif ication program: "NOPE: If mare than one report ccmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

0 e l ' ~ - . *~ w4 ~ t>>>>z .,>>>>>> Sheet 3 Form'ev. 1 VI. If Qualification b Test, then 1ete*: [ Q randcGl

l. [ ] Single Frequency [g Multi-Frequency [g sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [g Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: Data was analyzed fran 1 to 250 Pw S. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

No zescnanc search was perforated. S/S ~ F/B ~ V=

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies N/A

[ ] Kab Vest [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TBS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f~] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs Gee Attach. 02 for Phase II []No See Attach. 04 for Phase III
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B ~ V =

See TRS in Attach. y2 for Phase SSE S/S F/B ~ V~ II, See Attac~t $ 4 for Phase III

9. Laboratory Mcunting:
l. [g Bolt (Bo.~, Bize~gg>> ) [ ) ))'ld ([eegth ) [ )
10. Functicnal cperability verified: Q] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Resul ts including nadif icaticns made:

the tore detecti 12. 2 beat tests were performed. Tl~ test levels verticall . The sine beat s

                                                                          ~

Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results): 3 g hozizcntally arB vertical inputs in and cut of phase. The equixaant was subjec~ to 5 QBE

                                                                                                              'ine and 1 SSE co                                                                     1
   ~:      Zf qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll.

r PF2/23-3

Vll . Xf Qualification b Anal is, then lete: N/A FOUI': ~Sheet 4

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History, [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Computer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. ¹thcd of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Xdentification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M-320-10 M/R I320 Item 410 Qualif ication Suma of i nt, Tag: LSH-08634AaB LSL-08634A&B I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA T}2e:

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL Level Switches
1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Model Number: 230 WZ-AV7704 Quantity: 4
3. Vendor: bkmooid
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, N/A name and mcdel No. of the devices'ncluded:
5. Physical Description a. Appearance CY lf N ~R 5
b. Dimensions 10" Dia. x 27 16
c. Weight 48 Lbs. (Approx.)
6. Location: Building: Control Struchue Area 12 and 21 Elevation: Akx~ Floor El. 806'pipe geunted)
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No., Size )

1

8. a. System in which located: 30 0 Menu.tor water eve m expansion s or
b. Functional D scription: control structure chilled water system
c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X ] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: M-320, G-22 PF2/23-1

I 0

Sheet 2 M-320-10 Rev. 1 III. Is i ent Available for tion in the Plant: [ XI Yes [ ] No IV. Fquipment Qualification Method: [X] Test [ ] Aralysis [ ] Combination of Test & Analysis El. 1414, "Qualification Testing of HVAC Instzunent Qualification %port* Seianic & daxiynamic Loads". July, 1981. (No., Title and Date) <<1 4 V. Canpany Ccmpany that Prepared Report that Vibration Input: Reviewed Report htel ~

                                              'house Electric Comoration Co   . Johnscn  Controls
l. Brads considered: a. QQ Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [g Ccmbination of (a) and (b) See Attac!ment No. 4
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [Z1Abaolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

<l ' ~ Required &spcnse Spectra (attach the graphs)- (Otner,specs fy) Attach. SSE 41 for Phase 15 Phase II III SSE or OBE + SRV + K@K 2%

5. Required Ac"eleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other CBE S/S =

See - Attach. j)lfor Phase P/B = II & Phase III V = (Specify) SSE S/S = l"/B ~ V=

6. Mere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
               ] Ye               []No If yes,   describe loads considered and hex they were treated in overall qualification    pxcgram: T'evice was sub'ected to tm hours of din to      +rate  TRS  "hat envelooe    SRV RRS.

"NOZE: If more than cne report ccaglete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PP2/23-2

Sheet 3 Botel: M-320-10 Bev. VI. If Qualification Test, then lete*: [g random

l. [ ) Single Frequency k ] Multi-Frequency [ ) sine beat

[)

2. [ ] Single Axis k ) Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: Other (5 upset, 1 faulted) (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Freauencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
                                                                                           \

S/S =. F/B = V= {Frcm Table 2 of report)

6. method of Determining Natural Freauencxes e

[g Lab Test [ ) In-Situ Test [ ) Analysis

7. TRS envelcoing RRS using Multi-Freauency Test [ ) Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graph See Attach. 42 & pgs. 136 thru 203 [) No or report. Bechtel V.P. M-320-124-2 for Phase II & Phase III
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V ~

See Attach. g2 & pgs. 136 thru 203 of report. Bechtel V.P. SSE'S/S = F/B = V= 9. H-320-124-2 for Phase Zabora tory Mounting: II & Phase III.

1. [ ] Bolt {No.,Attach.

See Size f3

                                                    ]  [ ]  {>>   11 {Length              ]   [ ]
10. Functicnal curability verified: fQ Yes [ ) No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Vest Results including nedif ications" made: that=

the narcoid level itches axe qu'Qified for seismic.& hydrodynanuc loads.

a@a'noWrequm8,~ see~'Attach.43- for.ear3.anation.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results)::

~: If quali ication Item Vll. by a ccmbination of test and analysis also cc((]piete

Sheet 4 Form; ~~1 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectnzn

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = V =

3. Mcdel type: [ ] 3D [] 1D

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccmputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of nedes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations S. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:

S. Critical Structural Elements: Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Carhination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location ,Ooerabili t PF2/23-4

   ' y~y'Q j (a~ y .'~.w~x'"-" p+.t. g- II',p; -'4~&' "-N>mA' ~m ~

a S . - d.4'A ~ AA'~ 'M~)Q ter~~~. -

                                                                           ~$ ~QQ 1J,c~ -++M-,4 ~" ~
                                                                                                     ...-,44 Q~g ~, Q,g

~ ~ ~ Wc

Form': Sheet l M-327-1A&B Qualification Sumna of i nt I. Plant Name:

l. Utility: PP&Z
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECEKL 1, Scca: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Hodel Number: Quantity:
3. Vendor:
4. If the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included:
5. physical Description a. Appearance
b. Dimensions ff
c. Weight
6. Location: Building:

Elevation: [ ] Weld (Length ) f l

8. a. System in which located:
b. Fmctional

Description:

c. Is the equipment required for f ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown

[ ~] Both f ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:

PF2/23-l

Fourmo Sheet 2 (Pump) III. Is ui ent Available for Ins

                               ~

tion in the Hant: [ g] Yes f ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: [ ] Test fK] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis (See Note-1 below) Qualification Beport* Stress anal sis of Chilled Water Pum OP-162A&B (Bechtel V.P. 48856M-327-41-2) (No., Title and Date) ME-317-dated April 1 1976 Ccmpany that Prepared ReportMcDonald En ineerin Anal sis Co. for for Goulds Punps, Inc. Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. g ] Seismic only-I
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. g.'Ccmbination of {a) and (b) See note 1 below
2. Method of ccmbining" RRS: [gAbsolute Sum f ]SBSS f 1
3. Required Besponse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attac?ment <<1 4 ~ SSE e'BE+SRV+LOCA: 2S; ssE+SRV+LOCA: 2S Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See attachment 1 & 2 (Speci fy)

OBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. ¹re fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?
                ~    Yes               f ] No If yes,     describe loads considered and hew they were treated in overall qualification      program: The loads which have the most fati e effects are    SRV. SRV   are   1~              'th the total      ccmbined loads as shown on attach>ant 42.          The  fatigue effects are not       a     zoblem.

"NOZE: If more than one report ccmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. Notel: This analysis is satisfactory forseismic and hydrodynamic loads. See Attachrrent N2. PF2/23-2

Sheet 2 Ebrm: M-327-1B. (Hotor) III. Is ui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ ] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Methcd: [ ] Test fK ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test & Analysis (See Note-1 below) Qualification Report"Stress anal sis Pumps OP-162A&B

      .(No.,   Title   and Date) Bechtel V.p                                     6, 1981 Ccmparyj  that Prepared Report austin Goulds Puris,   Inc.

Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel p V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. k ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. $ ] Canbinat='on of (a) and (b) See note 1 below
2. Method of canbining RRS: [XJAbsolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]
3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See attachment Nl
4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1/2% SSE 1%

OBE+SRV+LOCA: 2%; SSE+SRV+LOCA: 2%

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA f ] Other See attachnant Nl (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered?

[X] Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qua1if ication program: loads as shown on Attachnant $ 2. The fatigue effects are not a roblem. NOZE: If more than cne report ccmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. Note The analysis has been perfoxned for the worst of the following conditions by equivalent. static m thod.

1) OBE - 1/2% damping
2) SSE - 1% damping
3) OBE+SRV+~~ 28 damping
4) SSE+SRV+LCCA 2g damping PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 FozIllo VI. If Qualification b Test, then Gomnlete*: [ ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RHS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
1. [ ] Bolt (No., Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including mxiifications made:
12. Other test perforned (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

WOXE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccaplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 3 Form: M-327-1B (M0T0R) VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: N/A [ ] randem l., [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] f ] sine beat

2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies f ] Lab Vest f ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs

[ ] 'No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = F/B

9. Zaboratory Mounting:
l. [ ) Bolt (No., Size ) [ ) Weld ((ength ) [ )
10. Functional operability verified: f ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"WK: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccaplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3 ~r. zHCSVP

Sheet 4 Form ~ M 327 lA Vll. If Qualification b Anal sis, then lete: (P

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [X] Zkpivalent Static Analysis [ 3 Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum (Frequency analysis)

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

First mxie: 37.55 CPS; second mode: 59.21 CPS S/S = F/B = V=

3. Model type: fX] 3D [] 2D t]lD

[g Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [g Ccaputer Codes: I Frequency Range and No. of rrades considered:

[ g Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS Q] Other:

(Specify) DAR Section 7.1.7.4.1.2 Basis for the damping used: OBE+SEGT+LOC'A: 2%i SSE+SET+QX'A: 2%

7. Support Considerationns in the axx3el:
8. Critical Structural Elements: 1) Suction Flange
2) Xmpeller Clearance-Deflection Governing Ibad or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Stress - Suction 18,854 psi; 20,040 psi Flange Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit 0.006 in. Impeller 0.033 in.

Clearance

                                     -Deflection Note-2:      The equipment has been       qualified for      1G OBE   and 2G SSE which are higher than the "G"s for ccmbined seismic and hydrodynamic loads. See atta.t:haent N2.

PF2/23-4

Sheet -4 Form: M-327-lB Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then complete: (Motor)

1. 'ethcd of Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis [K] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis f ] Time-History f ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Not. applicable S/S = F/B = V=

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element fX] Beam [X] Closed Form Solution

4. f ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: I'X] Hand Calculations S. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS [X] Other:See Note 2 below (Specify) DAR Section 7.1.7.4.1.2 6~ DBzpltlg'BE~]pg SSE ].g Basis for the damping used: OBE+SRV+IDCA: 2%; ssz+SRV+LOCA: 2S

7. Support Considerationns in the mdel:
8. Critical Structural Elements: 1) Foot flaunting bolts (stress)
2) Shaft deflection at rear brkt.

Governing Load or Response . Seismic Total Stress A. Identification . Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Stress Foot naunting OBE 1869lpsz; 41000 ps'. bolts at, floor El 783'-0" Maximum Allowable Deflectiori B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit "0.0009 in. Shaft at 0.0059 in. rear brkt Note 2: The equiprrent has been analyzed using an bpzivalent:static coefficient of 1.5 on the peak of the re~e spectra. PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M-327-2A&B Qualification Suma of i nt I. Plant Nunc: SUSQJEDNNA

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL W
l. Scope: [ ) NSSS [P( ) BOP
2. Model Number: 3196 Mt 4 x 6 g 13 Quantity:

3, Vendor: GoQMgPumpSInc.

4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel Ho. of the devices included: None
5. Ehysical Description a. Pypearance Pumo
b. Dimensions 15' x 23 1/2" H X 52" L
c. Weight 975 1bs
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 783'.

Field Mounting Conditions [X ) Bolt (No. 4 , Size 5/8" [ ) .Weld (Length ) f )

8. a. System in which located: Control Structure Chilled Water
b. Functional D scription: Circulate Cooling Water c.'s the equipnent required for [ ) Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[X) Both [ 1 Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:M-327, G22, G-10 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 M327-ZL ['puw~) III. Is ui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [Y] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualif ication Method: [ ] Test [ g Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test s Analysis (See note-1 below) Qualification Report"Stress anal sis of Coolin Water Pumps OP-171A&B (Bechtel V.P. 48856W227-40-2) (No., Title and Date)ME-314 dated March 19 1976 Ccmpany that Prepared Report Mcdonald En ineexin Analysis Co. for Goulds Pimps, Inc. Ccmpany that Reviewed-Report Bechtel Power Co V. Vibration Input:

l. Ioads considered: a. [X] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X] Canbination of (a) and (b) See Note-1 below
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [X]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]
3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 51 4.. Damping Corresponding to. RRS: OBE,1/2% SSE 1%

OBE+SRV+IDCA: 2%; SSE+SRV+IQCA: 2%

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment 1 6 2 {Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'X]

Yes [ ] No If yes, describe loads considered and hex they were treated in overall qualification program: The loads which have the a@st fatigue effects are SRV. SRV 'are low in with the total canbined loads as shown on attachment'2. The fatigue effects axe not a.problem. NOZE: If more than one report cmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. Note-1: This analysis is satisfactory for seismic and hydrodynamic loads. See attachment 52. PF2/23-2

Sheet 2 Form: M-327-2B (Viator) Is ui ent Available for Ins tron in the Plant: [ g] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Method: f ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis: (See Note 1 below) Qualification R.'port"Stress anal is for nntor for Coolin Water Punps OP-172AaB (No., Title and Date) (Bechtel V.P. 0M-327-53-1 dated June 16, 1981 Canpany that Prepared Report N'estin ouse Electric Co . for Goulds Pump, Inc. Company that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Coro. V. Vibration Input:

l. laads considered: a. fX] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [K] Canbination of (a) and (b)See Note below
2. tLthod of canbining RRS: [K]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other, specify)

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachnent "1 SSE OBE+SRV+LOCA: 2S; SSE+Kgl+LOCA:

S. Required Acceleration xn Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attadment 51 (Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/8 "- V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

fg Yes f ] No If yes, describe loads considered and how .they were treated in overall qualification program: The loads which are SRV. SRV are low catoarin shown on Attachaent 2. The fati e effects "NOTE: If more than one report 'canplete items lV thru Vll for each report. Note 1: This analysis is satisfactory for seismic and hydrcdynamic loads. See Attachnant 42. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form (Pu~) ) VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: C ] ranckxn

1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No; of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural agencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

6. Methcd of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Khst [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS 6 RRS graphs

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

SSE S/S =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ) Bolt (No., Size ) [ ) 'ieeld (length ) [ )
10. Functional operability verified:. [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOEE: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also canplete Item Vla. PF2/23-3

Sheet 3 Form: M 327-2B-VI. If Qualification b %hat, then letee: Sgn (tu)O7OR) [ ] randan

l. [ ] Single Frequency f ) 'Multi-frequency f ) sine beat f )
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis I
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Speczfy)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, &rtical):

S/S =

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies f ) Lab Test f ) In-Situ Test f ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S =

I SSE S/S = . I

                                                                                                             ~
9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size ) [ ] hhld (length ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: f ] Yes f ) No f ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modif ications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOIR: If'ualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccnplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-327-2A Vll. If Qualification b Anal sis, then lete:

l. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis Q] Kkyivalent Static Analysis {Frequency analysis) [ Q Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Pirst= made: 35.39 CPS: 2nd mode: 87.87 CPS S/S F/B = V=

3. Model type: [ Q 3D [] 2D [] lD

[K] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. h ] Ccaguter Codes: I $ STRUDL Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 2 mcdes considered

[ Q Pand Calculations U S. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

                                     'I lxl Other-  See Note 2   below (Specify)

DAR Section 7.1.7.4.1 OBE+SRV+IOCA:

                         ~2l-28; SSE+SK7+DX'A: 2%

Basis for the damping used:

7. Support Considerationns in the fidel:
8. Critical Structural Elements: 1) Suction Flange
2) - Impeller Clearance-Deflection Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Alliable Stress Suction 18854 psi, 20040 psi Flange Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit 0.013 in Impeller 0.033 in.

Clearance

                                   -Deflection Note 2:    The  equitant        has been     qualified for   1G OBE   and 26 SSE which are higher than the "G"s for combined seismic and hydrodynamic loads. See attachment O2..

PF2/23-4

Sheet 4 Form: M-327-2B Vll., If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: Analysis for motor

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ) Static Analysis [X] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Not applicable S/S = F/B = V=

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] LD
                            )  Finite   Element       [X] Beam               [X) Closed Form   Solution
4. [ ] Cmputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of mx3es considered: [lc] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS tX] Other~ Note 2 below (Specify)

DAR.Section 7.1.7.4.1.2

6. Damping: OBE 1/2% SSE 1% Bas is for the damping used:

OBE+SRV+ZCCA~S; SSE+SRV+ZlX'A: 28

7. Support Considerationns in the model: Ri id
8. Critical Structural Elements: 1) Foot nnunting bolts (stress)
2) Shaft deflection at rear hrkt.

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Alliable Stress Foot neunting OBE 18,632 psi, 41,000 psi bolts at floor el. 783'-0" Maximum ALLowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional D flection Location rabilit IUI5! Shaft at 0.0059 in. rear brkt Note 2: The equignent has been analyied using an equivalent static coefficient of 1.5 on the peak of the response spectra. PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 M-334-1 M334-Item 1 Qualification Sunma of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3~ ~: BECHTEL II. Ccmmnent Name: CcMRC[L PANELS - CC 876 A&B
l. ~: [ } NSSS fg] BOP
2. Mcx3el Number: Quantity:
3. endor: COi&IP CUPIOHL1NE CORPORATION
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel> name and mcdel No. of the devices LISTS (Attach. I5) included: SEE ATTACHED
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance SEE ~ ~34 38
b. Dim nsions 8 PP. WIDE X 3 FT. DEEP X 6 PZ. 2 IN, HIGH
c. Weight APPR)X. 2200 lb EA PA".KE,
6. Location: Building: CO"HAIK)L STRUCii3RE Elevation: 806' 0ht Field Mounting conditions x] Bolt {No. 14, Bize M((" B

[ ] Weld [length )

8. a. System in which located:
b. Functional

Description:

c. Is the equigaent required for f ] Hot Standby f l Cold Shutdcwn

[ z[ Both [ I Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: ~34. J-8004 G-22 8856-E-4074 8856M-08 PF2/23-1

[

C Sheet 2 Pbrm: Rev. 1 Is ui nt Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ XJ Yes t J

        ~ipnent Qualification           Methcd:                                          B) QsR    No'Bghnenls f ]Ms'                          ] Analysis                     f4 Ccmbination      of Test             6 Analysis Qualification &port* l)Anal sis of Control and KRC Panels for Seismic a Hydro-
                                       ~l ami 1 s f htel.V.P. 8856>g-2 Pru>J(-7 )

ed ~ Xq-Situ dynamics - Testing {V.P, $ 8856&-8-8-2) vir. search Xnc. 3)Bechtel Re-5 Engmeerxng-Gxpany that Revi~d Report Sechtel Power Corp, V. Vibration Input:

1. Zoads considered: a. g ] Seismic only
b. t ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. g J Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. method of ccrnbining RRS: g ]Absolute Sum f ]SRSS ( ]

fyl. *

3. Required Fespcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Note-1 below Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE 1%

(OBE or SSE) + SRV + IlX'A9 2%,

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: t J ZPA '(
                                                                                        ] Other See Note 1 belch                                                 (S pecif y)

CSE S/S = F/B ~ SSE S/S ~ F/S a V~

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'P jc J Yes I]No If yes, describe loads considered 'and hm they vere treated in overall qualification program: Panel: For th ccmbined load~ even for (SSE + SR7 + DX'A) the max. stress m any element m only 37%, o allowable stress. Hence, fati e due to SW is not a oblem.

Cmpcnents: The specxrrens were subjected to 30 min multifrequency random nation frcm 1 to 100 H2:. A TBS lot of 50 sec. near the start, middle and near the end o test was o tamed such as to envelope SiV spectra xn each direction (See Sht. 566 of attach. 43) "NOI'E: If more than one report complete items 1V thru Vll for each report. Note gl a. for-Panels see Attach. Nl Phase XX see Attach. 47 Phase XXX.

b. for Ccaponents - see Attach. 42 Phase II see Attach. NS Phase III PF2/23>>2

Form: )4-334-1 Rev. 1 VI; If Qualification b Test, then lete*: fg randem] .

1. t ] Single Frequency f4 Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat E]
2. t-] Single Axis [e Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE* ** 1 fata.gue test
           +OBE   + SET +   LCCAF  **SSE + SET + DX'A, ++* 30             min. in    each             (Speci fy) directicpil
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S p 100 Hz F/B p 100 Hz V $ 100 Hz

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies tyJ Lab Test f } In-Situ Test f ] Analysis
7. ~ enveloping RRS using 'Multi-Frequency Test [ 9 Yes

( ] No (Attach See TRS a RRS Attach. graphs-43 -Phase II See Attach. 49 -Phase XII

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B =
             ~~4fes      '7 B)4'SB       SjS                                                 V =
9. laboratory Mounting: S~ated in field conditicns
l. [x] Bolt (No. Varies Size Varies) ( ] Skid ((ength ) [ ]

Duplicating Field condition

10. Functicnal curability verified: .f Q Yes ( ] No t ] Not Applicable Vest Results includi,na nadifiqations page: All panel~unted devices endured shake-table tests m.trout losing their testing a'withctut.damages to the devices themselves or their mamting ab'fter F
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

HOIK: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccnplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Form: H-334-1 If ~alification Anal is, then lete: 'Rev. 1 method of Analysis: See Note 1 belch f ] Static Analysis f ] Equivalent Static Analysis . r generating of resp. fx] Dynamic Analysis F'o fg Time-History ~ sp, for compcnmts qualification g Response For panel analysis Spectnzn

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

15 Hz to 123 Hz 19 rxdes 3; Ncdel type: f>l 3D f] lD fX,] Finite Element f ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution

4. fxl Carputer Codes: SK> 5A, TP~~ ~W Wx= PCI!~~PKC Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 15 Hz to 123 Hz 19 mxies fx] Hand Calculations For flexibilityof the supports.

q Closely spaced ides g widely spaced ides

5. khthcd of Carhining Eynxnic Responses ~f xI Absolute Sum f 5 SRSS lxl other:~sacral: @ax oz H> or H + v (Specify)

YT'4 6. 7. Darping: CBE (OBE GR SSE) + SRP+ b4 Support Ccnszderatxonns

                                             ~    SSE 0 2a 1%

xn the riedel: Basis for the

                                                                                ~   ~   ~

damping used: 7 1 2

8. Critical Structural Elements:

Cbverning taad or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identif ication Location Carhinat ion Stress Stress Alla'able Anchor Bolts 445 lbs. 1200 lbs. (per bolt,) Raximum A?le+able Deflection B. Nax. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Doerabi lit N/A Note 1. The qualification of tMs panel has been based upon analysis of five selected pane3.s GC8833p 2C661A2, 2C2013, 2C694g 2C222. For the information fron 1 to 8 the zesult of the analysis of pane1 0('R83B has been used. (Bechtel V.P. 88856-DOS-3-2)-Phase Bechtel V.P. 48856-J08-9. Phase II III Note 2. The report identified that panels require certain modifications which conceptually shown in attach.-.84. - Phase II attach. $ 10 Phase III g A<K~a~g - (.'~(=>Ri<i- > - Qgg<=i5 gg 4 Ht<Q RG<IYs %6 gp,gp g>a, pg S-. (r- FEE.R.S - Hount7<k q MOO>glhD Ca Abp STtf-Fgg U P4R Coggp P7u+( s p p q~ g <'i AY t o nLs - ( ( C bi@ z. - i 9 - 5z). PF2/23-4

I Sheet 1 Form: M-334-2 M334 Item 2 Qualification Suma of i nt I. P)ant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PAL
2. 'NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECHTEI BNR X ZZ Component Name. CONTROL PANELS QC 877 A&
1. Scape: f ] NSSS [X] BOP N/A
2. Howl Number: Quantity:
3. endor: COMSIP COSTOMLINE CORPORATION
4. If the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model Ro. of the devices See Attached Lists (Attachment f15) included:
5. Physical Description a. Appearance See ~ M334 - 33 6 FT WIDE x 3 FT DEEP x 6' 2" HIGH
c. Weight APPROX. 2000 lb EA PANEL
6. Location: Building: CONTROL STRUCTURE Elevation: 783'.

Field Mounting Conditions [x ] Bolt (W. 12 , Size 1/2' ) [ ] Weld (Iong,th ) [ ]

8. a. Svstem in which located: 30L Monitor and Control HVAC Systems or the
b. Functicnal

Description:

Control Structure c Is Qe equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown [x] Both i Neither 9.. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M334 G-22 J-800 8856-E-407, 8856- J-08 PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: Rev. 1 Is ui nt Available for Ins tion in the Plant: f ] Yes [ ] No Kkpipnent Qualification Hethcd: Panels by analysis f ] Test f ] Analysis Components. by, test tc] Carhination of Test, k Analysis Qualification Report~ 1) Analysis of Control and HVAC Panels for Seismic & Hydro-ynamxc oa s e te -J8-2 thru JS-7 ) (No., Title and Date) 2) Test of Electrical Devices {V.P. 88856-E-407-3-1) n- tu ynamics test ng . . 88856-J-8-8-P) Canpany that Prepareo Report 1) Computech,Inc. 2)Acton Envir.,1nc. 3)Bechtel Re-search & Engineering Ccmpany that Revi~:. Report Bechtel Power Corp ~ V.. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considere: a. js ] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. fx] Ccrnbination of {a) and (b)
2. method of combining RRS: fg]Absolute Sum f ]SRSS f ]

(Other, specify )

3. Regcired &.prese spectra (attach the graphs): see Rcte > te>ce Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1/2% SSE 1%

{OBE or SSE) + S LP Required Acceleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA f ] Other See Note 1 belaw {Specify) CBE S/ F/B = SSE S/:: = F/B = V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsideredP f5 Yes [] No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they vere treated in overall Panel: For the combined loading even for alification proqram:

SSE + SRU + LOCA) the max. stress n any e ament s on y o allowable stress. Hence, fatigue due to SRV is not a problem. mponents: e specimens vere su ected to min mu ti requency random motion from-1 to 100 Hz. A TRS plot of 50 sec. near the start, middle and near t e eno o test. va s o ta ne s u c as to enve o P e s p ectra n each direction. %7ZE: If rare than one report ccaplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. Note 1 a; for panels see Attach. 41 - Phase see Attach. N7 - Phase XZ XII b, for ccmgonents - see Attach g2 - Phase XI see Attach NS Phase XZX PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 gotrs: N-334"Z Bev. 1 VI; Zf Qualification b Test, then lete~: [g randan f ] Single Frequency [xl Multi-Frequency f ) sine beat.

2. f g Single Axis fx} Multi-Axis

[) 2 hr*** fatigue

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE
  • SSE**, 1 {)ther test
           &BE +    SRV + LOCA, **SSE + SRV + LOCA,       *** 30 min. in each                  {Specify) direction.
4. Frequency Range: 1 Hz to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, 4Iertical):

S/S ~ 100 Hz F/B ~ ) 100 Hz V g 100 HR

6. &thcd of Determining Natural Frequencies fxJ Lab est [ ) In-Situ Test [ ) Analysis
7. 1RS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fx} Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f ] No See Attach. ((i3-Phase See II Attach. I9 -Phase IIX
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S ~ F/B -" V ~

5~ 8'k& 7 /ho Yg. SSE S/S ~

9. Laboratory Mounting: Simulated in field conditions
l. [x] Bolt {No. varies Size varies) [ ){4-'i'd [length Duplicating field condition
10. Functicnal cperability verified: [x] Yes f j No [ l Not App>>cable ll. Vest Results including nadifications made: All panel-mounted devices endured shaketable tests vithout losing their ability to function normally during &

after testing & without damage to the devices themselves or their mountin ardware,excepting as noted on separate shts in Attach. No. 6.

12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

BOIH: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccn)piete Itaa Vll. Fr 2/23-3

Sheet Q"'" Fmrm: M-334-2 Rev. 1 733,. If %aerification Anal is, then ccmalete: 1

l. &thcd of Analysis: See Note 1 belov ll f } Static Analysis f ) ~ivalent Static Analysis fx) Dynamic Analysis k j Time-Hism~
2. Natural Frequencies in'Each Sir ction (Side/Side, Front/Back
                                                                                       ~]

For generating of resp. sp. 'for components qualig~a-

                                                                                       ~For Response Spectrum Panel Analysis Uertical):

15 Hz to 123 Hz 19 modes

                     ~po
3. Ya9el type: k ) 3D f) 2D f] lD k] Finite Elena' ) Bean f ] Closed Form Solution
4. [x] Carputer Ccdes: SAP 5A, THSPECT, GWIN, JANE, POSTPROC Frequency Range arx3 No. of modes cons jdered:15 Hz to 123 Hz 19 modes fx] Hand Calculations for flexibility of the supports g closely spaced modes gvide3.y spaced modes
5. Hethod of Ccnlbining Dynamic Respons~e~. tx] Absolute Sum tx] SRSS 0

[x] Other: Spatial:(Max of Hl or H2) + V {Specify) DAR Sect.

6. Darping: CBE 1/2/ SSE 1X Basis for the da~ing used: > 1 7 4.1. 2
                                                                                                                 ~

(OBE or SSE) + SR%' LOCA 8 2/

7. Support Ccnsiderationm in the nedel: The flexibility of the supports has been considered.

8; Critical Structural Elenents: Cbverning Load or Respaae Seismic-" Gbtal Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress A3.1~able Anchoi Bolts 445.1bs; 1200 lbs. (per bolt) ~ me ~ Naximum Alliable De lection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabi3.it N/A Note 1: The qualification of this panel has been based upon analysis of five selected panels OC8833, 2C661A2, 2C201B, 2C694, 2C222.. For the information from 1 to 8 the result of the analysis of Panel OCSS3B has been used (Bechtel V.P. 88856-J-8 Note 2: The report identified that panels require certain modifications vhich are con-ceptuallyshovn in attach. f4. - Phas<'I attach. 410 Phase XII 4 4LtCDOMQ QggFgg,i~<= y T AM):"t.5 5+ 4/tkLC4 Rl=t.AYg Algg Qov47L=Q Hgvp. AQQ EQ ST f f- F QL=R.$ - gdun47(aL Q MOO>l=Li=b Co AbD 9T'tr-'Pg t= S~ P6R Cog<y- p~+~ DRSlAM SPIC F<icAL'c N,Se- ( g bi~ z.-ig-gg) PF2/23-4 .

Sheet 1 Form: M-334-3 M-334-Item 3 Qualification Sum[a of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECHTEL
l. Scope: f ] NSSS f g ) BOP
2. Model Number: NA Quantity:
3. Vendor: COM SIP CUSTOMLINE CORPORATION
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model &. of the devices included: See Attached List (Attachment 85)
5. Physical Description a. Appearance See ~ M334-18
b. Dirtensions 6 ft - 2 in high x 3 ft wide x 3 ft deep
c. Weight 1600 1b EA PANEL
6. Location: Building: CONTROL STRUCTURE Elevation: 806'.

Field Mounting Conditions [x ] Bolt {No. , Size 1/2" ~ f ] Weld {Length ) f ]

8. a. System in which located: 70A nz.tor an n zo ana y as
b. Functiceal

Description:

System

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown

[ "[ Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: M-334. G-22e J-800.

8856-E-4 OV, 8856-J-08

Sheet 2 a>xm: ~ 3>4 ~ Rav. 1 ( (+ lZZ ~ tion in the Plant: fx ] Xes f J No

           ~ipnent Qualification          Method:                      Panels by analysis Components by      test f ) Test                     f } Analysis                     fx) Combination of Test       & Analysis Qu 1 f     t Re Qualxficatxon    Reportt+   1)Analysis of Control and HUAC Panels for Seismic & Hydro-ynam c oa s        e te        . .        2-2 & J8-3-2)

(No., T'tl Title and Date Date) 2)Test of Electr cal Devices (U.P. 88856-E-407-3-1) In-Situ ynamzcs - test pg . . 856-J-8-8-2) that Prepared Report 1)Computech,Xnc. Envir., n . 3)hechtel 2yacton Envir.,?nc. ) Re-earch & Engineering B echt el Power CorP . Ccmpany that Reviewed Report V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [x] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [xl Ccrnbination of (a) and (b)
2. method of ccmbining RRS: f)(IAtsolute Sum [ ]SRSS f ']

Required &spcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Note 1 below 1X 4 ~

                                      %:r 4'ESP+.9                                   SSE
5. Required Acce eration in Each Direction: f ) ZPA [ J Other See Note 1 belmr (Specify)

CBE S/S ~ FO- V~ SSE S/S ~ F/B ~ Vc

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[x} Xes [] No If yes, qualif describe loads considered and ication prociram Panel: For the

                                                                  ~     they were treated in overall combined    loading even for (SSE + SRU + IOCA) the max. stress             n any e emen        s o y allowable stress. Hence, fatigue due to SRU is not a problem.

Components: e spec mens were su gecte to man mu zequency ran om motion from 1 to 100 Hz. A TRS plot of 50 sec. near the start, middle and near t e en o test was o ta ne su as o enve ope spec each direction. KtE: If care than one report ccnplete items 1V thru Vil for each report.

a. for panels
                                    =

see see attach. attach. Il 47 Phase Phase XI XXI

b. for components -

see attach I2 Phase XX see attach IS Phase XXX Pr2/23-2

Sheet 3 ptattc: M-334-3 Rev. 1 lete*: fx] random f l Single Frequency'. fx ] Multi Frequency f 1 sine beat f ] f "l Sirgle Axis fx l Multi-Axis 2 hr *** fatigu~ 3e No. of Qualification Tests: CBE

  • 5 SSE *~ l Other test (Specify) direction.

Frequency Range- 1 Hz to loo Hz

5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 100 Hz F/8 = 100 Hz V= 100 Hz

6. Method of Determining Natural .Frequencies fx] Lab Test [ I In-Situ ~t f } Analysis 7~ 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fx) Yes (Attach TRS 6 RRS graphs See Attach. 83-Phase see attach. N9-Phase II II/
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = V ~

SAR et<{a 7 Qolfk. BBB 3/g V=

9. Laboratory Mounting: Simulated in field conditions 1~ [a) Bolt {No parieai Biteparfea ) [ ) )4.'1d {length ) [ )

Duplicating iield condition

10. Functicnal cperability verified: f g Yes f ) No f ] Not Applicable Test Results including nadifications made: All panel-mounted devices endured shake-table tests without losing their ability to unct on norma y urban w t out dama e to the devices themselves or their mounting hardware, excenting as noted on separate shts in Attac . o.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NOK: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccn)piete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Fozm: M-334-3 lf CUalification Anal is, then cmnlete: Rev. 1 See Note 1 below f ] Static Analysis l ] Ettuivalent Static Analysis

                                                    ~For generating of gesp. Sp. for Components             Qualificat')

t>> } Eynamic Analysis Tisn History ~<) Response Spectrtm

                                                                                      ~For     Panel Analysis
2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Ver ical):

15 Hz to 123 Hz 19 modes C~M SQC~ ega

3. Model type: tx] 3D t) 2D i]1D tx) Finite Elemnt ( 1 Beam f ] Closed Form elution
4. [x) Ceo@uter Codes: SAP 5A, THSPECT, GBfLN, JANE POSTPROC Frequency Range and No. of modes considered-'5 Hz to 123 Hz 19 modes Q) Hand Calculations For flexibility of the supports r Closely spaced modes~Videly spaced noc.
5. &thcd of Ccadoining ~mic Responses otx) Absolute Sm tx) SRSS fx) Other.-'Spatial:(Fax. of H or H +

(Specify) DAR Sect.

6. Basis for the damping used:7.1.7.4.1,2 (OBE or SSE} + SRU + LOCA 9 2%
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model The flexibilitv of the sun orts J has been considered
8. Critical Structural Elanents:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Alla able Anchor Bolts 44S lbs. 1200 lbs (per bolt) > Jw

  ' p                                                                      Maximum   Alliable De flection B. Hex. Critical                                     to Assure Functional Deflection                Location                      rabilit N/A Note 1. The   report identified that panels require certain modifications which are conceptually shown in Attach. 84. Phase II attach 410 . Phase ZZX
              +ALkn<mH           -  fogpagi~i=c - +AMI=Ls 5g              tvHLt'Ll RFt.Ave AR6 HOON.TL"=9 HAVE AoGBD S'Y t t=F,RB.R.$ -                        MOvnL7tnl cj l.004 t= t t'9 7a A.OD ST'tr-F)J 8 S5 f'kR Coo<r- Pyu pg Dash(H         spacqvicavioN.s- ( RblA                       t-lg-p.gg.

PF2/23-4

Sheet Fnon: N-334-4. l M-334 - Item 4 Qualification Sunna of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA TKEe:

l. Utility: PP&L FWR
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECHTEL BNR X
             "'               HVAC CONTROL PANELS               OC577ABCD
l. Sccpe: f ] NSSS fX] BOP
2. Bx3el Number: N A Quantity:

COMSIP CUSTOMLINE CORP ~

3. Vendor:
4. If the included:

ccnponent See is a attached cabinet or panel, lists (Attachment n~v5> and model No. of the devices

5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance See VP M334-28
b. Dhensions 6 ft. 2 in. hi
c. Weight 1600 1b EA PANEL
6. Location: Building:

Elevation: 6, 710'. Field Noonting Conditions [ x( Bolt (No. Size 1/2" 6 ) [ ( Weld ((ength )

                                                      ]
8. a. System in which located:

be Funct jonal D scription: MONITOR & CONTROL DIESEL GEN. BLDG. HVAC SYS.

c. Is the equipnent required for I ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdcwn f x] Both ( 1 Neither
9. pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: SpEC 8856-M334 Vp 8856-M334-61-1, 8856-M334-31-4, 8856-E<<407 F

FF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Pbrm: H-334-4 Is Equi ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [x ] Yes [ ] No IV. Bylipnent Qualif ication Hethod: Panels by analysis Components by test [ ] Test f l Analysis [x] Ganbination of Test & Analysis Qualification &port* 1)Seismic analysis of HVAC Control Panels (V.P. 88856-M334 (1) ) I (No., Title and Date) Test of Electrica1 Devices (V.P. 88856-E-407-3-1) Ctmpany that Prepared Report 1) Computech, Inc. 2) Action Envir., Inc. Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Pover Corp. V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [x] Seismic only
b. [ ) Hydrodynamic only
c. [' Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. ¹thod of canbining RRS: f.,)Absolute Sum f ]SRSS [ )

aA. (Other,specify)

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the. graphs): See Attach. 81 for Panels Attach. 82 for components SSE Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attach. //1 & 2 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered?

[ I ~es fx] No If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: MEE: If more than one report ccmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2'

Sheet 3 Forms )f Q4-4 Rev. 1 VX. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: [x] randan

l. [ ] Single Frequency fx ] Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat 2.
                    ] Single Axis                     fx] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify) 4, Range. 1 Hz to 100 Hz
5. Nato al Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 100 Hz F/B ~ p 100 Hz V~ p 100Hz

6. Wt M of Determining Natural Frequencies fx] mb 'Ihst . f ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach a RRS graph.

see Attach ~ t33

g. input S level Test: CSS S/S
                   ~~~4~      7 gloVg, SSE S/S ~                                           V=
9. Eaboratory Mounting: Simulated in field conditions
l. fx] Bolt (No. Variep Size Varies) f ] ~ld (Length ) f ]

Duplicating field conZicicn

10. Functicna3. cgerability verified: fx] Yes f ] No f ] Not Applicable

{See Note 1) Test Results 1Tlcludinc ~if ications made c shake-table tests wit&out losing their ab All panel mounted devices endur after testing 6 without damage to the devices themselves or their mounting ar ware, excepting as no

12. Other test, performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NOIR: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccnplete Item Vll. + ~ Note l: Attaches.nt gg is "evised to delete mxlifications. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: >D>4-4 II Vll. Ef Qualification b Analysis, then lete: '. Method of Analysis: See note 1 below [ ) Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis 1 [x) Dynamic Analysis - [ ) Time-History k] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

19.4 Hz to 39.8 Hz 6 Modes Sy@m t

3. Ncdel type: [x) 3D [] 2D [) lD

[x] Finite Element [ ] Bean [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [x] Ccnputer Codes: ANS~S F eVency Rage a& No. Of maes insider~: 19 ' Hz to 39.8 Hz 6 modes f ) Hand Calculations
5. Method of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [x] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify) DAR Sect.

6. Draping: OBE ~ ~ SSE f th 8
7. Support Considerationns in the model: Rigid
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Load 'overning or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Alliable Anchor Bolts 5666 lbs. 1200 lbs. (see pg. 13 of the report) Naximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit Note 1. Computech Report (Bechtel V.P. 8856-M334-6L(l)-1) indicates that for panel OC577 max. axial force per anchor bolt is 5666 lbs., which is much higher than 1200 lbs. allow. force for expansion type Anchor Bolts. Hence the additional Anchor Bolts are required.

                          - QgN,P~~~g.a QoOlw ionlgL,               ANct40b. Sot:t4 Q                  aps
    .g QJA<KyomQ PaaDFsi,aa RagviaagsNvs (                         g,~           p-ie-Si)

D PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 M<<334-5 M-334-ItGIR 5 Qualif ication Sunna of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA TEee:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3~ ~: BECHTEI
l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [g ] BOP
2. Model Number: NA Quantity:
3. endor: COMSIP CUSTOMLINE CORP.
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model Ho. of the devices included: See attached lists (Attachment 85)
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance See VP M334-18
b. Dirtansions 6 ft 2 in hi h x 3 ft 6 in wide x 3 ft dec (each)
c. Weight 1200 1b each.
6. Location: Building: ESSW PUMPHOUSE Elevation:

Field Mounting Conditions 704'. [ x] Snit [

                                                      ]

Weld (Nn. 6 (length

                                                                        ',     Size 1/2"
                                                                                         )

6 )

8. a. System in which located: 028A
b. Functional

Description:

Monitor & Control ESSW PUMPHOUSE VENT SYS.

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ x] Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 'SPEC. 8856-M334 VP f/8856-M334-28-3,'8856>>M334-61(l)-1, J-800 8856-E-407.

Sheet 2 Form: (,Q III. Is ui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [x [ Yes [ [ No Panels by analysis IV. ~ipnent Qualification Method: Components by test [ ] Test [ ] Analysis k] Canbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Report* 1) Seismic analysis of HVAC Control Panels (V.P. 88856-M334 (1)) (No,, Title and Date) 2) Test of Electrical Devices (V.P. 88856-E-407-3-1) Computech, Inc. 2)Action Envir., Inc. Canpany that Prepared Report 1) that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Corp. Canpany V. Vibration Input:

l. Wads considered: a. 4] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. f ) Ccmbination of (a) and. (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [,]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

hl.A. ~P

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attach. 81 for Panels, ac or components
4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE li Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA ] Other See Attach. gl & 2 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[] Yes P] No If yes, describe loads considered and how they vere treated in overall qualification program:

   "NOZE:  If more   than one report ccaplete items 1V thru            Vll for    each    report.

PF2/23-2

J

                                                                               <<      ~  <<-  vw       " <<<<<<<<~
  • j<<<<
                                                                                     -cheet     3 BOrm:    N->>4->,

Rev. 1 VZ. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: Q] randan

l. [ ] Single Frequency ~ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] syne beat

[ J

2. [ ] Single Axis 4 j Multi-Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other (Specify) 4, frequency Range: 1 Hz to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical.):

P 100 Hz y 100 Hz V~ p 100 Hz

6. method of Determining Natural Frequencies gl Lab 'I@st [ ) In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis 7~ ~ envelcping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x) Yes (Attach TRS 6

[ ],No See Attach. RRS P3 graphs Input g-level ~t: CBE S/S ~ F/B i V = 5A. j4gw 7 QI "-ya F/8 = V -"

9. Laboratory Mounting: 'imulated in field conditions
l. [r] Bolt {No. Varies Size Varies[ [ [ Amid {<<~nstA [ [ [

Duplicating Vials Condition

10. Functional cperability verified: [x] Yes f ] No [ ] Not Applicable (See Note l) All panel-mounted devices Test Results including modifications made; endured shake-table tests without losing their ability to function normally a

re t~n as qoted on separate shts in Attach. No. 6 V'ti ardw x e l2. KPier 75sk peAoake5 (sly ks aging or fragility test, including results): "KHZ: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccn[plete Iten Vll. Note 1: Attsciment <<4 is revised to delete sodificstions. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Fom: >>34-5 Vll. lf Qialification b Anal is, then complete:

l. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis f ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [x] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History f'x ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

aymgh'555t 16.3 Hz to 32.9 Hz 3 modes

3. Model type: k] 3D f]2D f]lD k] Finite Element f ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution
4. f x] Ceo@uter Ccdes: ANSYS Frequency Range and No. of modes'onsidered: 16.3 Hz to 32.9 Hz 3 modes f ] Hand Calculations a
5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum Q] SRSS f ] Other:

(Specify) DAR Sect.

6. Damping: GEE~12% SEE 1% Basis for the damping used:7.1.7.4.1.2
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model: Ri id
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Coverning Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable A. Bolts Axial 374 lbs. 4000 lbs. Shear 92 lbs. (See pg. 20 of the report) Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabilit N/A PF2/23-4

(3>'~~,"".C+ ',Q.k~k'4<<> ~ ',,i~+>> 9 ~f "Y'

~

                                     ~
                                                                   >0>                  Sheet 1 Fnoz: M~6A-1 (Z396-1)

Qualificatio~ Sumia of i nt Wyle Test Set up No. 1 I. Plant Name: SUSQUBQNNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3~ A/E: BECHTEL
1. Scca: [ ] NSSS [ P(.] BOP
2. Model Number: SBID Quantity: See list IIfl
3. endor: American Warmin & Ventilatin Co. (W le Lab.
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel> name and model No. of the devices included: Dam er and Actuator
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dinensions 36"x36" and attached list f/1 C. Weight Lbs. and attached list /fl
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin Unitl2 and attachment 1 Elevation: Various II
7. Field MoontinB Conditions [<[ Bolt (No.~vt, Size zt'
                                              ] Weld (Length                       )

[ ]

8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functional

Description:

Isolation Damper

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdcm

[ z[ Both f 1 Neither

9. Pertinmt Reference Design Specif ications: M396, G-22
                *Damper  is  supported    off   ducts which are supported by duct supports, No.       of bolts at 4" max. centers for damper PF2/23-1          mounting only.

Sheet 2 Form: M336A~1 (M396-1) III. Is ui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [ x] Yes f ] No IV. Ecyipnent Qualif ication Method: [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Beport* V le re ort No. 45510-1 Bechtel VP 08856~8396-3-1 (No., Title and Date) uglification on ei ht various HVAC 4/23/81 damper assemblies Ccmpany that Prepared Beport V le Laboratories Huntsville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Co oration SF. V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ) Hy9rodynamic cnly
c. [x] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. ¹thod of canbining RRS- [x)Absolute Sum f QSBSS f )

Direction

3. Required Besponse Spectra'(attach the graphs): S<< a ta m a
4. Damnina Correspondina to RRS: OBE SSE OBE+SRV+LOCA - 2% damping OB S - 2%

Q@P@ RQeieÃtion in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other See attachment P2 (Specify) CBE S/S = F/8 = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Nere fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined load [ ] Yes [x] No test were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV 6 L'OCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and her they were treated in overall qualification program: "NZE: If more than one report ccaplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

                                                                    'l t

Sheet 3 Form: M336W-1 "q; (H396<<1) UI. If Qualification b Test, then Camlete*: [x] ran@em

1. f ] Single Frequency fx] Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[] f Ih 1'f'ive Other upset conditions followed by one faulted (Specify)

4. Frequency Range: z or resonance search 1 to 100 Hz for proof testing
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 7.S U. F/B = 7 12,48,60 V ~ 23,30

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Vest f ] Analysis

7. 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fx] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs (Also see explanation as per attachment f ] No 83
8. Input g-level Vest: OBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S = F/B = attachment 82 9 Labo t M t See Simulate field mountings, assembly supported on l ~ [ l Eolt (No., Szze f ) ] (e.ld (Length ] [ ]

10. Functional cperability verified: fx] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. ~t Results including modifications assemblies are qualified without made: The dam ers and their supporting any compromise on structural and unct ona re uirement. Modifications as er attachment P4 are required in the field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None

 '%7K:    If qualification             by a canbination      of test   and analysis also ccmplete Item    Vll.

PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 M-336A-1 V11.'f"Qualification' 'nal is, then lete: not applicable

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Zkpivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~istory [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S ~

3. Model type: f ] 3D [1 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccaputer Codes-Frequency Range and No. of mdes considered:

[ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: .[ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Speci y)

6. Darping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the" model:
8. Critical Structura1 Elements:

Governing I@ad or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Futm: M336A-2 (M396-2] Wyle Test'et up No. 1 Qualification Surrrna of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA I. Utility: PP&L

2. NSSS: GE 3~ ~: BECHTEL II. Camnnent Name: HD27630B and attached List ffl (Horizontal mounting)
1. Scca: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Mcdel Nun]ber: 7402 Quantity See List 81
3. 'Vhndor: American Warmin 6 Ventilatin Co. (Hyle Lab)
4. If the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included: Dam er and Actuator
5. physical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dhansions 36" x 22" and Attached List 81
c. Neight Lbs and Attached List /Il
6. Zccation: Building: Reactor Buildin Unf.tt 2 and Attachment 1 Elevation: Various
7. Bield Mounting Conditions [x] Bolt (Nn ~ Various Size 3/6" 6 ]*

[ ] Meld (length. ) [ ]

8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functional

Description:

Control Air Flow

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[x] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications: 8396 G-22 H 336
  • Damper is supported off'ucts which are supported by duct PF2/23-1 supports,, No. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for damper mounting only.

Sheet 2 H 336A-2 (8396-2) III. Is ui ent Available for tion in the Plant: [x ] Yes f ] No IV. Equignent Qualif ication Method: [] Test f ] Analysis f ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Begort* Wyle report Ho. 45510-1, Bechtel VP fj8856-N396-3-1 (No,, Title and Date) Qualification on eight various HVAC, 4/23/81 amper assem z.es Company that Prepared Beport Pyle Laboratories, Huntsville Qzpany that Reviewed Beport Bechtel Power Corporation, SF V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. fx] Canbination of (a) and (b) of ccmbining
2. Method RRS: fx]Absolute Sum
                                                                     <<~d

[x]SRSS [ ]

3. Required Bespcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 82
4. Dampinq Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1/2% SSE OBE+SRV+LOCA - 2% damping 1%

0 S ~ ~ -2% SSE+SRV+LOCA 2%.

5. ared Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See attachment 82 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V >>- SSE S/S = F/B = V =

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined load tests f ] Yes, were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA loads If yes, describe loads considered and hew they were treated in overall qualification program: NOPE: If more than one report ca>piete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form..

                                                                                      ~~)

M336A-.2 VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: [x] random

l. [ ] Single Frequency [x] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat

[]

2. [ ] Single Axis [x] Multi-Axis
                       >>'f                                                                   Other C

upset conditions followed by one faulted

                           'ive                                                                      (Spec ify) 4~   F-equency Range:         1  to  60 Hz for resonance search 1  to  100 Hs for proof testing
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

V= 23 28 35 43

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. KRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [g Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[]No (Also see explanation as per attachment f33)

8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S ~ F/B = ~ V= See Attachment 82 Laboratory Mounting-. Simulate field mountings Assembly supported on D3 6 D3." supports

l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size ) [ ] )) ld (Length ) [ ]
10. Functional cperability verified: k] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their su ortin assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional 4 are re uired in the field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None "NOIE: If qualification by a cat]bination of test and analysis also cat]piete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form+ Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then lete: Not applgcagle

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~istory [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: f ] 3D f]2D f] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. f ] Ccaguter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of ides considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: f ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS f ] Other:

{Specify)

6. Damping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Nerm: N336AW (N396-3) Wyle. Test Set up No. 2 Qualification Surrae of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA TEEe

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL II, Ccmoonent Name: HD27630B and Attached List 8'1 ertxca ountxng
1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [X l BOP
2. Model Number: 7402 Quantity: See List 81
3. Vendor: American Warming 6 Ventilating Co. (Wyle Lab)
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: Damper and Actuator
5. physical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dinensions 36" x 22" and Attached List 81
c. Weight Lbs and Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Building Unitl2 and Attachment gl Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ xJ Bolt (No ~~ioi~s< Size 3/8" g ~*

[ } Weld (Length ) [ }

8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functional

Description:

Control Air Flow

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ) Co]d Shutd~

[ xl Both 1 Nei ther

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: M396, G-22, ~ 33s
  • Damper is supported off ducts which are supported by duct PF2/23-1 supports. No. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for damper mounting only.

Sheet 2 Form: M336A& (M396-3) III. Is ui nt Available for tion in the Plant: f x] Yes [ ) No IV. Equipnent Qualification Method: fx] vest [ ) Analysis [ ) Ccahination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* W le Re ort No. 45510-1 Bechtel VP,//8856~&96-3-1 (No., Title and Date) Qualification ei ht various HVAC 4/23/81 damper assemblies Canpany that Prepared ReportWyle Laboratories, Huntsville Caapany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Cor oration SF. V. Vibration Input:

1. Loach considered: a. f ) Seismic only
b. [ ] Hy3rcdynamic cnly
c. fx] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: fx]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

for Horiz. Direction, for Vertical (Other<specify) Direction

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See attachment t'I2
4. Damoina Corresponding to RRS: GBE 112'! SSE 1%

OBE+SRV+LOCA 2% damping BSE+SRU+LOCA 2%. ae

5. ~ared Ae:eleration in Each Direction: ] Other See Attachment 82 (Speci fy)

CeE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered'?

Extended'duration tests beyond combined load test f ] Yes [x) No were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: HVZE: If more than one report ccmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Foxm: M~336~3 (M396-3) VI. If Qvalification b Test, then lete*: [x] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [x] Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat
2. f ] Single Axis [x] Multi-Axis

[] Q 1 Other Five upset conditions followed by one faulted (Specify)

4. Frequency Range:

1 to 100 Hz for proof testing

5. Natural Frequencies in Each Directzon (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 19,24,34,42 F/B = 11,18,21,22,28 V = 20,22,30,42

6. Method of Detexmining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab est [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fx] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f]No (Also see explanation as per Attachment !/3)
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S = F/B = V= See attachment 82

9. Laboratory Mounting- Simulates field mountings, Assembly supported on D6 & D6 supports
l. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] hBid (Length ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [x] Yes f ] No f ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional re uirements. The modifications as er attach 84 are re uired in field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None 'tXHE: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 FOUQ. Vll. If'ualificat'ion b Anal is< then lete Not Applicable

1. Method of Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis f ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~istory [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D f]2D f]1D f ] Finite Element f ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution
4. [ ] Ccmputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum f ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Danping: QBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic 1btal Stress A. Identification Location Carhination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional D flection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M336A 4 (MF99=~ Wyle Lab Test Set Up 82 Qualif ication Suma of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQ3EHANNA

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECHTEL II. Ccrreonent Name: BDID 27653A and Attached List P1 (Vertical Mounting)
1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS f P( ] BOP
2. Hodel Number: 8700 Quantity: See List 81
3. Vendor: American Warmin & Ventilatin Co. W le Lab
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel< name and model No. of the devices, included: Damoer and Solenoid
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dimensions 30" x 24" and Attached List 81
c. Neight Lbs. and Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bld . Unitl 2 & Attachment 01 Elevation: Various 1
                                                  ] N ad <Zehgth                        )
                                                 ]
8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functicaal

Description:

Provide steam leak isolation in um room

c. Is the equipnent required for f ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown t x] Both [ 1 Neither
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M396 G22
                                      *Damper    is supported off ducts which are supported PP2/23-1                                by  duct    supports.. Ho. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for samper mounting only.

Sheet 2 Form +33 6A-4 (K396&) III. Is ui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [x ] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: [xl Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* W le re ort Ho. 45510-1, Bechtel VP 88856~>696-3-1 (No., Title and Date) uglification on eight various HVAC, 4/23/81 damper assemblies Ccmpany that Prepared Report W le Laboratories, Huntsville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Corporation, SF V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [x] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: [x]Absolute Sum [x]SRSS [ ]

Direction

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment I/2 9'

4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1 2% SSE 1%

                                                                           -2%     S                 2-2%

Mt)SOBS = Acceleration in Direction:

5. 'red Each [ ] %PA [ ] Other See Attachment 8'2 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Nere fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined load [ ] Yes [ g No test were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRU 6 LOCA loads If yes< describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: NOZE: If more than one report ccmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Meet 3 Form: M336A-.4 (M396-4) VI. If Qualification b Test, then Gamlete*: [g random

1. [ ] Single Frequency [ x] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [x] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other Five'pset conditions followed by one faulted (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:

1 to 100 Hz for proof testina

5. Natural Frecpencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Lateral) S/S = . 24 4 V= 912 12- 2 -1/2, 17-1/2, 22,25

6. Methcd of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab 'Inst, [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis 7., TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs (Also see explanation as per attachment 83) [] No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = V= See attachment i/2

9. Laboratory Mounting: Assembly supported on D9 &

field

l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size )

mountings [ ] 'Weld D9 (length supports

                                                                                          )    [ ]
                                                                                                               'imulate
10. Functicnal cperability verified: fx] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their su ortin assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional ation as er attach. 84 are re uired in field.

12'ther test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results): '%BE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form'36A Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then lete: Not applicable.

1. Methcd of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ 1 Equivalent Static Analysis [ 1 Dynamic Analysis [ 1 T~istory [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: [ ] 3D [1 2D C 1 lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ 1 Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Carputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of nudes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining DynaItu.c Responses: [ ] Absolute S~ [ 1 SRSS C 1 Other:

{Specify)

6. Danping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Mtal Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allawable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Bznctional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet l Fhzo: M336A 5 (M396-5) Wyle Test Set Up f33 Qualification Sum]a of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEfQHNA ~O

l. Utility: PP&L PMR
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECFI'EL BNR X
l. ~: [ ] NSSS 8700

[g] BOP Horizonta ountmg Quantity: See List Pl

2. Ncdel Number:
3. endor: American Warming & Ventilating Co. (Wyle Lab)
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel &. of the devices included: Dam er and Solenoid
5. Physical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dimnsions 30" x 24" & attached list fI1
c. Weight Lbs. & Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bldg. Unit1 2 & Attached List 81 Elevation: Various

[5A'] Bolt (Mo. Vazlouq Bize 3/8" *

7. Field Mounting Conditions () )

f ] Meld (length )

                                                 ]
8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functional

Description:

Provide steam leak isolation in pump room

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdawn

[z] Both [ ] Meithez

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M396,. G-22 u -33e
                           + Damper   is   supported     off ducts    which are supported by duct PF2/23-1                       supports. No. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for damper mountingionly.

Sheet 2 Eorm: H336A-5 (8396-5) ~ III. ~ Is. ui ent Available for tion in the Plant: [x ] Yes,, f ] No IV.~

            ~

Equipment Qualification ¹thcd:

                             ~

P k] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification RePort* V le Re ort No. 45510-1 Bechtel VP f8856-H396-3-1 (No-, Title arid Date) uglification'on ei ht various HVAC, 4/23/81 damper assemblies Cangeny that Prepared Beport W le Laboratories Huntsville Caapany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Cor oration, SF V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [x] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. ¹thod of canbining RRS- [x]Akaolute Sum [x)SRSS [ ]

Direction

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See attachment 82
4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 1/2% SSE
                                   -g     dampinS Igg8@eleration in Each Direction:    OBF +SRV  +LO 1%
5. Required [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment 82 (Specify)

CBE S/S = V = SSE S/S = V= Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'? Extended duration tests beyond combined loads [ ] Yes fx] No test were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall cpmli fication program: KXK: If more than cne report ccnplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PP2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: B336A 6 (){396 5) VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: [x] randem

1. [ ] Single Frequency [x ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [x] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other Five upset conditions followed by one faulted (Specify) 4~ Frequency Range- o Hz for resonance search 1 to 100 Hz for proof testing
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Laterial) (Longitudinal) S/S = 1 20 24 28 32 F/B = 15 18 26 40 V = 9 13 20 22 26 30 33, 38,42 & 45 52 & 56

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies Ix] Zab 'est [ ] In<<Situ Test ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs (Also see explanation as per

[] attachment 83) No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V=

SSE S/S = F/B = V= See Attachment 82 9~ Laboratory Mounting- Simulate field mountings, Assembly supported on D6B &

l. ( ) Bolt (No., Size ) ( ) Weld {(ength D45
                                                                                          )

supports ( )

10. Functicnal cperability verified: [x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their suDDortin assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional er attac ment 04 are reouired in the field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None "HVK: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccn)piete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Pozm: M-336A-5 (M396-5) Vl'l. If Qualification" b 'Anal is, then lete: Not applicable

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ], Static Analysis f ] Kkpivalent Static Analysis f ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D f J lD f ] Finite Element [ ] Beam ['] Closed Form Solution
4. [ ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ J Hand Calculations

5. Methcd of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allawable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Font: M336A-.6 (M396-6) Syle Test Set Up f/2 Qualification Su[m[]a of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA, TQR 0

l. Utility: PP&L EWB
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHI'EL BNR X
1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [P( ] BOP
2. Model Number: 2230 Quantity: See List II1
3. Vendor: American Warmin & Ventilatin Co. W le Lab
4. If the cmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model W. of the devices '-

included: Dam er and Counter Wei ht

5. Physical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dimensions 24" x 24" & Attached List //1 C. Weight Lbs & Attached List ill
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bld . Unitl 2 & Attached List /31 Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ z] Bolt (No. varioeedize 3/8" 6 ) *

[ ] Weld (Length ') [ ]

8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functional

Description:

Control Air Plow

c. Is the equipn nt required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdawn

[ x] Both [ ] Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: M396 G-22 ht Zz &
  • Damper is supported off ducts which are supported by PF2/23-1 duct supports. No. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max, centers for damper mounting only.

Sheet 2 Fbrm: (M396-6) III.~ Is i ent Available for tion in the Plant: [ x] Yes [ ] No u+ IV. Equipnent Qualification Method:~ Q] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Beport* g <8856-tQ96-3-1 (No., Title and Date) 4/23/81 damper assemblies CQlpany that Prepared Report V le La ora or e Hunt ville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power orati S V, Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. k] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. bL'thod of canbining RRS: [QAbsolute Sum k]SRSS [ ]

III *  ???

3. Required Phspcnse Spectra (attach the graphs)- See attachment P2 4~ Corresponding OB +SRV+LOCA to RRS:

27 damping OBE SSE >> osz slav 2?'na LOCa

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other See attachment 82 (Specify)

OBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined load [ ] Yes k] No test were not done. However RRS for combined loads included SRV 6 LOCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualif ication program:

   '%7ZE:  If more   than one report ccaplete items 1V thru          Vll for       each   report.

o, PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M336A-6 (M396-6) VI. If Qualification b Test, then Gamvlete*: Cx] random

l. [ ] Single Frequency f x] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis fx] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other Five upset conditions followed by one faulted (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 60 Hz for resonance search
                                 ~

1 to 100 Hz for proof testing S. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back Vertical): (Lateral) (Longitudinal) S/S = 8 9 13 20 32 40 F/B = 5 15 31 35 40 44 V'12 14 21 28 33 40,43

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis Z l

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Atta'ch TRS & RRS graphs (Also see explanation as per attachment I)3)

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S = F/B = V= See attachment 82 Laboratory Mcunting: Simulates field mountings. Assem'oly supported on D35 &

l. [ ] Balt (Na., Size ) [ ] (e ld (Length )

D35 [ ] supports

10. Functional operability verified: [x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their su portin assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional re uirements. The modifications as er attach. 84 are reouired in field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None WEE: If. qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Iten Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Forms Vll. If"Qualification b Anal is", then comilete: NO/ +pal

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Kkyivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
3. Model type: [ ] 3D t] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccnputer Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of mx3es considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load . or Response Seismic Xbtal Stress A. Identification Zecation Ccmbination Stress . Stress Alliable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

t.u.'w xe 'x <e ~ ~ A Sheet 1 Fnnn: M336A-7 (M396-7) g yg. p 7 ZS T Q 7 uP h]o. 6 Qualification Sumna of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUHQNNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BEXPZEL
l. Scope: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP
2. Rx3el Number: SBID Quantity: See List 81
3. Vendor: American Warmin & Ventilatin Co. (W le Lab)
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: Dam er and Actuator
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dimensions 8" x 6" & Attached List 81
c. Weight Lbs & Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bld . Unit 2 & Attached List 81 Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions x) Bolt (Mo. Vexioue Size 3/8" 6 )*

( ) Weld (length )

                                               ]
8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functional

Description:

Iso1ation Damper

c. Is the equipnent required for f ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown f x] Both ( ) Meithez
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: w F36 Damper is supported off'ucts which are supported PF2/23-1 by duct supports. No. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for damper mounting only..

Sheet 2 Pbzm: ~6A~ (M396-7) Rev, III. Xs ui 't'Available for in the Plant: [ l'ion IV. ~ipnent Qualification Hethod: fx] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis alification Report* VP [I[8856%396 3-1 (No., Title and Date) ou C 4/23/81 damper assemblies Ccmpany that Prepared Report e untsville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report ra ion SF V. Vibration Input: l.. Loads considered: a.. [ ] Seismic only

b. f ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [g Canbination of (a) and (b) 20 Method of ccmbining RRS: [x]Absolute Sum [QSRSS [ ]

I Direction Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): mn 2 r Phase I~ attachment for II ) a. Damping Correspording to RRS- CBE OBr+SRV+LOCA 2/ damping OBE SRV LOCA gqux&%Paleratian 'in Each direction: [ ] zpA See SSE 2X SSE +SRV [ [ ~er N5 LOCA2 Phase

                                                                                                         - 2'Z See attachment 42 for Phase II/See attachment 15 for Phase CBE S/S ~ .                         F/B ~                      V~

III SSE S/S ~ F/B ~ V~ Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered? Extended duration tests beyond combined load test [ ] Yes fxl No vere not done. Hovever RRS for combined loads include SRV & LOCA loads If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program:

 ~E: If more     than  @ac report ccnplete items lV thru Vll for         each   report.

cheet 3 FOZme (M396 7) Rev. 1 VI. If Qualification Vest> then lete*: k J random

1. [ ] Single Frequency [ xJ Multi-Frequency [ J sine beat

[ J

2. [g Single Axis [g Multi~is
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE Other Five upset conditions followed by one faulted (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: o Hz for resonance search 1 to 100 Hz for proof testing
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Lateral) (Longitudinal) 4 2 26 V~ 6'3 21 26 32 35 50,64 34,40,50,60,70

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[g Lab Test [ J In-Situ Vest [ J Analysis

           'IRS  envelcping   RRS using Multi-Frequency Vest                [ g Yes    (Attach     TRS a RRS      graphs

[1 No M.so see exolanation as per attach. Knout g-levVL Test: Q3E S/S = 43 for Phase II, attach g6 V'~ for Phase III)

8. F/B ~

SSE S/S i F/8 ~ V~ c)ee attachment 5g for Phase II, Attachment 06 for Phase III

9. ~ratory M~t>ng: Simulates field mounting. Assembly supported on Dt$ 5 6 supports
l. [ ) Solt. (Wo., Size ) [ l Weld (length )

D6B [ )

10. Functional cperability verified: [ g Yes [ J No [ J Not Applicable Vest Results including nedifications made: The damoers and their suooortin assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and unctiona re uirements. The modifications as er attach. 84 are re uired in field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

Hone NOIR: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also cm)piete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Forme Vll; If Qualification' Anal is, then ccamlete: Not applicable.

1. Methcd of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis f ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~'istory [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Model t~: f ] 3D f]2D [] 1D [ J Finite Element, [ J Beam [ J Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ceo@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of nndes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: CBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Forms g~~ (8396-8) 0 I. Plant Name: Qualif ication Suma SUS of i nt Wyle Test Set Up No. 5

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL
l. ~: [ ] NSSS fg] BOP
2. Model Runber: 8700 Quantity: See List 81
3. Vendor: American Warmin 6 Ventilatin Co. (W le Lab)
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panelF name and model No. of the devices included: Dam er and Solenoid
5. Kysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dinensions 37" x 22" and Attached List 81
c. Weight Lbs. and Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bld . Unitl 6 Attached List 81 Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions [)C] Solt (N> Vario.us, Size 3/8" S )

[ i Weld (Length ) [ ]

8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functional

Description:

provide steam leak isolation in pump room Ce Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown [ x] Both [ i Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: H396, G-22
  • Damper is supported off ducts which are supported PF2/23-1 by duct supports. No. of bolts are various by kA4 damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for damper mounting only,

Sheet 2 B)rmo (M396&) III. Xs ui ent Available for tion in the Plant: [g) Yes [ ] No IV. ~ipnent Qualification Method: Ix) Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification %port* V le Re ort No. 45510~1 Bechtel VP 88856M396-3-1) (No.i Title and Date) uglification on ei ht various HVAC 4/23/81 damper assemblies Ccmpany that Prepared &port M le Laboratories Huntsville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Cor oration SF V. Vibration Input: I. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only

b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. fx] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: fx]Absolute Sum [x]SRSS [ )

Vertical Direction

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See attachment f/2 5.

SP+Sv+INN fF' Reauired Acceleration "in Each 0~<<>> Direction:

                                                                 +L0~

ZPA SSE [ ) 1% Other See attachment 82 (Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = SSE S/S ~ F/B =

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'?

Extended duration tests beyond combined load [ ] Yes [x] No test were not done. However RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and hm they mre treated in overall qualification program: "5VZE: If more than one report ccaplete items lV thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: M336AA (M396-3) VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: [g randan

l. [ ] Single Frequency P ] Multi-Frequency f ] sine beat

[]

2. f ] Single Axis f ] Multi-Axis th>>'ive Other upset conditions followed by 1 faulted ( Spec zf) )
4. Frequency Range: ~%

ea h 1 to 100 Hz for proof testing

5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical.):

(Lateral) (Longitudinal) S/S = F/B = 4 V = 13 27 45

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[g Lab &st [ ] In-Situ Vest [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Vest f g Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[] No (Also see explanation as per attachment 83)

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S = F/B = V= See attachment 82 ounting'imulates field mountings, Assembly supported on D25 &

l. [ ) Selt (No., Size ) [ ] Weld (Length D25
                                                                                           )

supports. [P]

10. Functicnal cperability verified: f g Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Vest Results including modif ications made: 0 assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional d
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NOIE: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also carplete Itm Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Fozm: H336AM V11". Xf" Qualification' Anal is-, then" lete Hot applicable

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Bylivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~lstozy [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natuzal Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):
3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Cmguter Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Speci y)

6. Daaping: GBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load oz Response Seismic Tbtal Stress A. Edentif ication Location Canbination Stress Stress AU.owable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assuze Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M336A-9 [N~396-9 Qualification Su[ma of i nt ~yap 7 +zan'+> ~z /Qp5 I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECHTEL II. Camonent Name: BDID 27671A & Attached List'll
l. Scope: [ ] NSSS [p(' BOP
2. Model Number: 87 Quantity: See List Pl
3. endor: a in Co. Wvle Lab
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel< name and model W. of the devices "

included: t

5. physical D scription a. Appearance Box
b. Dimensions 18" x 18" & Attached List Pl c.. Weight Lbs. & Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bld . Unitl 2 & Attached List /!1 Elevation: various
7. Field Mounting Conditions [OC] Bolt (No.variousi Size 3/8" 6 ) *

[ ] Weld (Length ) [

8. a. System in which located: same as 6
b. Functicnal

Description:

Provide steam leak isolation in umn room

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdcwn

[x [ Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M396 G-22 Pf 334
                                *Damper    is supported off ducts which are supported by duct supports. No. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers, for damper mounting only.

Sheet 2 Form: M336A-9 (H396-9) III. Is i ent Available for tion in the Plant: [ x] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Method: g] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test a Analysis Qualification &port* 8856-M396-3-1 (No., Title and Date) 4/23/81 damper assemblies Canpany that Prepared Report Ccmpany that Reviewed Report'ibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic only
c. [] Combination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of combining RRS: [QAbsolute Sum pgSRSS f ]

Vertical direction

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs):

4~ ing Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE

                    +     +   CA     %                  amp  n8        OBE +SRV +LOCA       2%     SSE +SRV +LOCA    - 2%

IVquzMRAlektion in Each Direction: [ ].ZPA [ ] Other See attachment 82 (Specify) CBE S/S = F/B ~: V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Mere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[] Yes [ g No Extended duration tests beyond combined load test were not done. However, RRS for combined broad incl ded .SRV & LOCA lo d If yes, describe loads consxaere8 iana how tney were treated'n overall qualification program:

  "NOPE:  If more   than one report ccnplete items lV thru                         Vll for each report.

Oo PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: (M396-9) VI.

2. [ ]

f'ete*: If Qualification b Test,

l. f ] Single Frequency.

Single Axis then f g Multi-Frequency [J Multi-Axis f] f ] [] randem sine beat C l Other (Specify) 4~ Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz for proof testing

5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Long) (Lat) (in Hz) S/S = 6.5,9.5, 12.5, F/B = 21,26,31 36 V = 13,22,30,34 16.5

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[ 4 Lab Khst f ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test fx] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs (Also see explanation as per attachment 83)

[] No

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S = F/B = V= Laboratory Mounting: Simulates field mountings. Assemblies supported on D17

l. [ ) Selt (Na., Size ) [ ) Weld ((ength
                                                                                        & D17 supports
                                                                                        )   [ )
10. Functional cperability verified: [x] Yes [ ] No f ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional re uirements. The modifications as er Attach. 84 are reouired in field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None "NOIR: If'qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Forint: M336A-9 Vll. If Qualification b Anal isr then lete: Not app1icable.

1. Method of Analysis:

[ J Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ J Finite Element [ J Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Phthcd of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. De@ping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elenents:

Governing Load or. Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable De flection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit

Sheet 1 Form: ~~0 (M396-10) Wyle Test Set Up No. 4 Qualification Sum@ of Equi nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA Utility: PP&L

2. NSSS: GE 3~ A/E: BECHTEL II. Ccmtonent Name:
1. Sccpe: f ] NSSS [ g ] sop
2. Rdel Number: SBID Quantity: See List 81
3. Vendor: American Warming & Ventilating Co. (Wyle Lab)
4. If the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel>

Actuator name and mcdel No. of the devices included: Damper and

5. Kysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dimnsjons 78" x 58" & Attached List 81
c. Weight Lbs & Attached List 81 Location, building. Reactor Bldg. Unit/2 & Attached List /fl Elevation: Various 3/3
  • Field Wzontlng Ccndltlonz [X [ golt (Wz. Varzouq gjze g )

[ [ Weld (length )

                                                  ]
8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Flectional

Description:

Isolation Damper

c. Is, the ~ident tecpIired for [ ] Hot. Standby [ ] Cold Shutd

[ Wither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: H396, G-22, ~ 336
  • Damper is supported. off ducts which are supported PF2/23-1 by duct supports. No of bolts are various by 5

damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for damper mounting only.

Sheet 2 FoZIlle (M396-10) III. Is ui ent Available for tion in the Plant: fx ] Yes f ] No IV. Ekpipnent Qualif icatioa Method: [x] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report Wvle Re o 88856-3396-3-1 (No., Title and Date) ualifi a O/23/81 damper assemblies Qmpany that Prepared Report W le Labo Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel P V. Vibration Input:

l. Ioads considered: a. f ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. k] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: I'x]Absolute Sum [ gSRSS [ ]

Direction

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs):
4. SSE OBE +SRV +L - >X SSE2+SRV +LOCA - 2X
5. Required Acceleration in Each Dxrectzon: Pg ZPA'ee

[ ] Other attachment 82 (Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = . V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'P Extended duration tests beyond combined loads f ] Yes k] No were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA loads.

If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall qualification program: NOSE: If more than one report caaplete items lV thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Foehn: M336A 10 (M396-10) VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: [x] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [x] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [x] Multi-Axis

[] 3~ No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other Five upset conditions followed by 1 faulted (Specify) 4~ Frequency Range: 1 to 60 Hz for resonance search 1 to 100 Hz for proof testing

5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Long) (Lat) (in Hz) S/S = 7.5 13.5, 26 37 F/B = 9 23 27 37 V = 6.5,12 14.5 17.5, 30,38

6. Methcd of Determining Natural Frequencies fx] Lab 'I@st [ ] I'-Situ Test [ ] Analysis 7~ TRS enveloping RRS using Multi>>Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs (Also see e~lanation as per attachment

[] No

                                                                      //3)
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S = V= e, laboratory Mounting: Simulates 7t field mountings. Assembly supported by D25B

l. [ [ Bolt (No., Size [ [ [ Weld (LeoSth
                                                                                         & D25B supports
                                                                                           >    [ [

l0. Functional operability'erified: fx] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their sup ortin assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional requirements. The modifications as er attach. /f4 are re uired in field l2. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results): None NOIR: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also canplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M-336A-10 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: Hot applicable.

l. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~istozy [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model tyne: [ ] 3D f]2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. bLthod of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:

8.. Critical Structural Elements: Governing Load or Response Seismic 'Ibtal Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabxlit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 3t>rm: M336A-11 (M396-11) Wyle Test'et Up No. 7 Qualification Sumna of i nt I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3e A/E: BECHTEL II. Camnnent Name HD 27502B & Attached List 8 1
l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [ X ] BOP
2. Model Number: SBID Quantitye See List 81
3. Vendor: American Warming & Ventilating Co. (Wyle Lab)
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel< name and mcx3el &. of the devices included: Dam er and Actuator 5.. physical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dimensions 96" x 60" & attached List 81
c. Height Lbs & Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bldg. Unit/ 2 & Attached List 81 Elevation: Various
7. Field Nounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. Various Size 3/8" 8 )*

[ ] Meld (Length ) [

8. a. System in which located: Same as 6 Reference
b. Functional &scription: Isolation Damper
c. Is the ~ipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ x] Both [ .) Neither

9. Pertinent Design Specif ications: M396, G-22
  • Damper is supported off ducts which are PF2/23-1 supported by duct supports. No. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max.

+ centers, for damper mounting only.

g ~ Sheet 2

        ** gee   Note Below                                                        Fbzm:    H336A-11 (M396-11)

Rev. 1 III. Is ui ent Available for Insaection in the Plant: f x] mes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualification Method:

         ~

[g Test [ ] Analysis f ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification &port* o 4 510-1 Bechtel VP 88856%396-3 1 (No., Title and Date) f ation on ei ht various HVAC 4/23/81 damper assemblies Company that Prepared RepOrt W le Laboratories Huntsvi1le Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Po~er Cor oration SP V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only I~
b. [ ] Hydzodynamic cnly SRV & LOCA
c. [g Canbination of (a) and (b) 2e 3~

Method of canbining Requiz'ed Response Spectra RRS: k]Absolute Sum

                                                                         <<~!

f'x]SRSS f ] Direction (attach the graphs): See

                                                                                              ~
  • y)

Attachment 82 4. 5. I in~ Corresponding to RRS: OBE

                      +e)k+$ [)AA-p) dampdeg 2Z OBR +BRV +LOOA  2/

Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA SSE SSE +SRV +LOCA [ ] Other (Speci fy) 2X See attachment 82 CBE S/S = F/B = V~ SSE S/S ~ F/B ~ V=

6. Wze fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Extended duration tests beyond the combined [ ] Yes fx] No load test were not done. However, the RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall cualification program:

 '%7I'E:   If narc   than one report ccaglete items lV thru              Vll for each report.
   ** This Moper      assembly   is qualified far        Phase IIX on     the basis of similarity with    HD27586A   in  SQRV Fozm   M336A-30 (M396-30) .

PF2/23-2

 "* See note     below                                                                     Sheet 3 Forms (M396-11)

Rev. l. VI. If Qualification Vest, then lete*: [x] randan 1>> [ ] Single Frequency fx] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat

2. [ 1 Single Axis [xl Multi~is

[] 3e No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other pive upset conditions followed by 1 faulted 'Specafy) Frequency Range: 1 to 60 Hz for resonance search 1 to 100 Hz foz proof testing

5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Long) (Lat) (in Hz) S/S ~ 8.25 9 12 17.5 F/B = 8.5 12 21 26 V BB 8,20,25,31

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Zab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis 7~ ~ enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach [ ] No TRS a RRS graphs

                                                     ='/B (Also see explanation as per attachment 83)
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S ~ F/B SSE S/S ~ . V=

See attachment 82 Laboratory Mounting: Simulates field mountings. Assembly supported on D54A

l. [ ] Bolt (No., Size [ [ 1 6 D54A (d.ld (Length suppozts

[ [ 1

10. Functional cperability verified: fx] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable Test ResuICs including modificaticns made: The dam er and their su ozting assemblies are qualified vithout any compromise on structural and functional dif cations as er attach. 84 are reauired in field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None

 ~:       Xf qualification by a. ccmbination of, Item V11..

test and analysis also ccaplete

 ** This     damper assembly is qualified for Phase              XII on the basis of similarity with HD27586A      in SQRT Form M336A-30 (M396-30) .

f PP2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: ~~1 (M396-11) Vll. If Qualzfzcatzon

                  ~    ~

Anal xsr then lete: Q 1.~ Method of Analysis: ~ [ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ I Dynamic Analysis [] R ponse Sp ct~

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D []1D

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. f ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of rrades considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Caabining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Danping: CBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing ?aad or Response Seismic Mtal Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit I PF2~

Sheet l Form: M336A-12 (M396-12) Hyle Test Set Up No, 8 Qualification Surya of i nt I ~ Plant Name: TKEe:

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BEXPIrZ II. Ccmrenent Name: HD 27564A & Attached List II1 l ~ Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [X) BOP
2. Hodel Number: SBID Quantity: See List /fl
3. Vendor: American Warmin & Ventilatin Co. (Wyle Lab)
4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel &. of the devices included: D er and Actuator
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dinansions 60" x 96" & Attached List 81
c. Weight Lbs. & Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bldg. Unit/2 & Attached List 81 Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions [)C] Bolt (No,Various, Size 3/8" 5 )*

[ l Weld (Length )

                                                )
8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functicnal

Description:

Isolation Damper

c. Is the equiptent required for [ ) Hot Standby [ 1 Cold Shutdcwn

[x] Both [ 1 Neither .

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M396, G-22 > Pf 334
  • Damper is supported off ducts which ar@ supported by duct supports. No. of bolts are various by PF2/23-l damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for damper mounting only.

Sheet 2 Pena: N336A-12 (E396-12) III. Is i t Available for Ins tion in the Plant,, [x ] Yes., ] No

)'V.     ~ipnent Qualification        Hethod:

[ [ ] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Beport* -1 Bechtel VP 8 8856-M396-3-1 (No P Title and Date) Oua 1 ification on ei ht various HVAC 4/23/8 1 damper assemblies Caaparp that Prepared Report W le Laboratores Huntsville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Power Corporation SF V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly SRV & LOCA
c. [x] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. hLthod of canbining RRS: [absolute [x]SRSS [ ]

Sum Direction III

3. Required Bespcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See attachment 82
4. Dampinq Corresponding to RRS: QBE 1/2% 1%

SSE SRV +LOCA - 2%

5. Q@Nh SReIekticn in See attachment 82 Each Directicn: [ ) 2PA [] Other (specify)

CBE S/S ~ F/B = SSE S/S = F/B ~

6. Mere fatigue effects or other vibration loads cxesidered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined load [ ] Yes [x] No test were not done. However, the RRS for combined. loads included SRV & LOCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and hau they were treated in overall qualification program: NOTE: If mare than one report ccaplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. 46 PF2/23 2

Sheet 3 Form: (M396-12) VI. If Qualification b 'Inst, then lete*: randem

1. f ] Single Frequency fx] Multi-Frequency'] [ ] sine beat

[]

2. [ ] Single Axis [] Multi~is
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE -

5 SSE Other (Specify)

4. Frequency Range: 1 to 60 Hz for resonance search to z or proor testing
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Long) (Lat) 5/S 9 ~ 5 16 21 5e 25

                               ~             F/B     12e17e21 5e 27~               V  z  12 5e   19'4t      28
6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab 'Inst f ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

[]No (Also see explanation as per attachment 83)

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S ~ F/B ~ V=

SSE S/S ~ F/B ~ V= See attachment 82 laboratory Mcunting- Simulates field mountings. Assembly supported on D48

l. [ ) Bolt (No., Size ) [ ] (e.ld (Length
                                                                                                 & D73A supports
                                                                                                   )    [ ]
10. Functional cperability verified: [x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made: dam ers and their su oortin assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional 4 uired in field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NVK: If qualification by'a canbination of test and analysis also canplete Item Vll. PP2/23-3

Sheet 4 Fozm: M336A-12 V11. If Qualification Anal is< then lete- Not applicable

1. Method of Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis f ] T~istozy [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: f ] 3D f] 2D f]1D f ] Finite Element [ ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution
4. [ ] Ccaguter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: f ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS f ] Other:

(Spec@ y)

6. Danping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the rredel:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load. or Response Seismic Xbtal Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2~

Sheet 1 Form: ~6A-13 (5396&3) Qualification Sama of i nt eyL,E yzsr sz7UP Afo J. I.. Plant Name: SUSQUEKKNA T}¹

1. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3 A/E: B1XBTEL nent Name: HD 27651 & Attache List 1
1. Sccpe- [ ) NSSS fX J BOP
2. Model Number: 7402
3. Vendor: American Warmin & Ventila in Co. W 1 La
4. If the ccx~nent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel &. of the devices included: Damner and Actuator
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance be Dinansions 40" z 28" & Attached List 81 yi
c. Weight Lbs. & Attached List 81
6. Location: Building: Reactor Bldg. Unitl2 & Attached List Pl Elevation: Various
                  '1d        'w         '

IXI 1 f ) Weld (Length f

8. a. System in Mich located: Same as 6
b. Functicnal.

Description:

Control Air Flow

c. Is the equipnent required for f I Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdcwn

[x 1 Neth ) Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications: G-22 W 334
  • Damper is supported off. ducts whi& are supported by duct supports. No. of bolts are PF2/23-1 various by damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers

'.o, for damper mounting only.

0 Sheet 2 Form: M336A-13 (M39 6-1 3K III. Is i t Available for tion in the Plant: f x] Yes [ ] No IV. figment Qualification Method: [] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test & Analysis Qualification I@port* echtel VP 8856-8396-3-1 (No., Title and Date) various HVAC 4/23/81 damper assemblies

        ~ny that Prepared           Report                       ries Huntsville Canpany    that  Reviewed Report                                oration      SF V. Vibration Input:
1. Loads considered: a. f ] Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic only SRV & LOCA
c. fx] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: fx]Absolute Sum fx]SRSS [ ]

Direction

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See attachment 82
4. Damaging Correspgpdinq to RRS:
                              -- I/                   CBE          2%             SSE      1%

OBE+SRV+LOCA aamping OBE SRV +LOCA 2% SSE R + A 2% SSE+SRV+Z.OCA 2%

5. Mquxred Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other See attachment 82 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V = SSE S/S ~ F/B = V=

              .Mere  fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'P Extended duration tests beyond combined load

[] Yes fx] No test were not done. However, RRS for combined goads included SRV & LOCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: HOSE: If more than one report ccmplete itars 1V.thru Vll for each report. e, PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 FOtlll: M336A-13 (M396-13) VI. If Qualification Test, then lete*: [x] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ g Multi-Frequenc(]) [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [x] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other Five upset conditions followed by one faulted (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 60 Hz for resonance search 1 to 100 Hz for proof testing
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = No Data F/B ~ No Data V = 12 20 24 28 33

6. method of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab 'Inst f ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 1RS envelcping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs

[]No (Also see explanation as pwer Attachment /f3)

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S = F/B ~ V= See attachment 82

9. Laboratory Mounting- Simulate field mountings, Assembly supported on D6B (No., Size
                                                                                                           ]('6B supports
l. [ ] Bolt ) [ ] )hid (Zength ) [ ]
10. Functicnal operability verified: ['x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their u oorti assemblies are qualified without any compromise on structural and functional re uirements. The modifications as er atta 4 e u d
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

None ~: If qualification Item Vll. by a canbination of test ard analysis also ccaylete PP2/23-3

Sheet 4 Finn: H336A-13 Vll.

  ~    If Qualification Anal
                 ~   ~

is,

                                     ~

then lete: Not applicable

l. Method of Analysis:
        ~

f ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis f ] Dynamic Analysis f ] Time-History f ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back Vertical):
3. Mcdel type: [ l 3D f]2D f l lD f ] Finite Elarent f ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution
4. f ] Cmputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. hLthod of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specs y)

6. Damping: CBE Basis for the damping used:
     ~ 7. Support Ccnsiderationns     in the   model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Eaad or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccnbination Stress Stress Alliable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Locaticn rabili PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 porm: M336A-14 E~ 0 Qual ification Sama of i nt ~ygP 7gSY (i~~ SZ7 uP NO3 I. Plant Name: SUSQOHQNNA T}2e:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3~ A/E: BECHTEL II. Canaonent Name: HD 27657A & Attached List 81
l. Scope: f I NSSS f g l BOP
2. fidel Runber: SBID Qpantity, See List 81
3. endor". American Warming & Ventilating Co. (Wyle Lab)
4. If the caqmnent is a cabinet or panel, name and model &. of the devices included: Dam er and Actuator
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box ee
b. Dimensions 50" x 50" & Attached List 81 C. Weight Lbs. & Attached List 81
6. Lccation: Building: Reactor Bldg. Unit 2 & Attached List JJJ1 Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditices fW) Bolt (No. Various, Size 3/8" 5 ~

J Ne1d t Jeegth ) [

8. a. System in which located: Same as 6
b. Functional D.scription: Isolation Damper
c. Is the equiPnent required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ) Cold Shutdo fx ] Both J J Neither
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: M396, G-22, u vs&
  • Damper is supported off ducts which are-supported by duct supports. No. of bolts are various by damper size, bolts at 4" max. centers for damper mounting only.

Sheet 2 Form: M336A-14 iM39~6-14 III.~ Is i

             ~

nt Available for tion in the Plant: f x] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualification Method: [x] Vast [ ] Analysis f ] Ccmbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Report* g le Re ort, No. 45510~1, Bechtel VP, 8856W396-3-1 (No.E Title and Date) uglification on eight various HVAC, 4/23/81 damper assemblies Canpany that Prepared Report g le Laboratories, Huntsville Qzgpany that Reviewed Report Hechtel Power Corporation, SF V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. f ] Seismic only b f ] Hydrodynamic cnly SRV & LOCA
c. [x] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: [x]Absolute Sum Ret(uired Response Spectra (attach the graphs):

[s]SRSS Direction [ ] See III attachment 82 3.

4. Damping Cormsponding to RRS: OBE 1/2% SSE 1%

OBE+BRV+LO)A danedna ~ ~

5. Iqur& g OBER+BRV LOOA Rkeleretion in Each Direction: [ j ZPA [ ] Other See attachment 82 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B ~ V= SSE S/S = F/B ~ V= Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered? Extended duration tests beyond combined load f ] Yes [x] No tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV 6 LOCA loads. If yes, describe loads considered and hm they were treated in overall qualification program: NOSE: If more than one report ocaplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

0 Sheet 3 Form: M336A&4 (M~~ VI;. If Qualification Test, then lete*: fx] randem

1. [ I Single Frequency fx] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat f ]
2. f ] Single Axis fx] Multi-Axis 3<< No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other Five upset conditions followed by one faultec (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 60 Hz for resonance search 1 to 100 Hz or proor testing
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

(Long) (Lat) (i Hz) S/S = 9.25,15.5,22,34 F/B ~ 12.5, 22, 33,38 V ~ 12,19,35,48,55

6. Methcd of Determining Natural Frequencies

[x] Lab 'Xbst [ ] In-Situ Test f ] Analysis 7~ TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [x] Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs f]No (Also see explanation as per attachment 83)

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S = F/B = V =

SSE S/S = F/B ~ V= K

9. Laboratory Mounting: Simulate field mountings, Assembly supported on D4 6 D4 supports
i. [ ] Bait (No., Size ) [ ] Wld (length ) [ ]
10. Functional cperability verified: [x] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable Test Results including modifications made: The dampers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any comprom se on structura ana unc zona re uirements. The modifications as per Attach. 84 are required in field.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

Nona'OIR: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also caaplete Item Vll., PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M336A-14 V13.. If Qualification Anal is i then lete: Not applicable. ".Q>> l. Method of Analysis:

f. ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis

[ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~istory [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/hack, Vertical):

S/S = F/B ~

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] 1D

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ I Hand Calculations

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses:. [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specs y)

6. Daaping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the mx3el:"
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic 'btal Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. C itical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit

Sheet 1 Form: M336A- 2 I (M396-zs) Qualification Suma of i t Wyle Test Setup No. 5-I. Plant Name: SUSQG~NNA

1. Utility: PAL 2e NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BEG%EL PWR X QP&PGrP l HD 27 and Attachnent gl.

1~ ~: f ) NSSS [P() BOP

2. Sxhl Number: SB] Quantity: See Attach. 01
3. Vendor: American Wazmin & Ventilatin Co. ( le Lab)
4. If the ccagonent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included D and cy uu &3
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Bax
b. Dinansions 3C>> xz>> and Attachment 41
c. Weight See Attachment I-
6. Lccation: Building: Reactor Buildin, See Attachment 01 Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions f X) Bolt (No. Vari~ Size 3/8" g * )

[ ] Weld [lehgtt )

                                            )
8. a. System in which located: Sarge as 6 above
b. Functional

Description:

I s'o3-~~so~ on~

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ) Hot Standby [ ) Cold Shutdown f X) Both f ] Neither
9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications:

M-396, 6-22, M-336A

  • Damper is supported off ducts which are supPorted by duct supports.

Bolts at 4" imcin[um centers for damper mounting. '

Sheet 2 M336 A~A (M396-'2.I ) III. Is ui ent Available for Insrection in the Plant: [X ] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualif ication Method: [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* l8856 M396 5 1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No., Title and Date) p C damper assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Ccmpany that Prepared Report ville Qzpany that Reviewed Report 'on V. Vibration Input:

l. Eoads considered: a. f g Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [g Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: k]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

III

3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 02 4 Damping Corresponding to RRS: GBE SSE 1%
        ~

OBE + SRV + LOCA - 2%, SSE + SRV + LOCA - 2%

5. Hemi~ Acceleration in Each Direction: . [ ] ZPA [ J Other
                         . See  Attachment N2                                     (Speerf y)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S ~ F/B = V=

6. Nere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined [] Yes [X] No loads tests were not, done. However, RRS for combined loads If yes, describe loads considered and how they were included SRV & LOCA treated in overal1 load. ~ cualification program: NOPE: If more than one report cmglete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3

                                                                                     ~~~
 ~r VI. If Qualification Test,         then Qxmlete*:

Form: (M396--'I) I [P'] randan

l. [ ] Single Frequency g] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis g] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CHE SSE' Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. (~zfy)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

F/B =7'~4,4 5-e Hz. V= Gbi9oHZ

6. Methcd of D termining Natural Frequencies k] Zab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Vest, [ ] Analysis
7. ~ enveloping See RRS Attachment I3 using Multi-Frequency Test f3

[] Yes No (Attach TRS & RRS graphs

8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

See Attachment 03 SSE S/S = Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported

                                                             &95         supports.
1. [ ] Selt (No.,onSizeDBciA, )

[ ] (e.lt] (Length ) [ ]

10. Functicnal cperability verified: [ g Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Apolicable ll. Vest Results including modifications made: The damoers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise ctural and functional re uirements. The reauired field modifications areas indicated in Attachment 54.
12. Other test performed (such aging or fragility test, including results):

NONE

    ~: If      qualification Itan Vll.

by a canbination of test and analysis also caaplete PF2/23>>3

Sheet 4 Form: M336A-Zi (M396- ~ f ) Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then cannlete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis f ] Response Sp cd

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction-(Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: f ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of rxx9es considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum f ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: CBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support: Considerat,ionns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Zaad or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum AUawable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabili PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form: M336A- 2 z (M396-z~) Qualification Suma of i nt Wyle Test Setup Mo. X E. Plant Name: TQR 0

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BEQiTEL Dg&P<A';

IE. Ccmxonent Name: Hb R>8 Wo and Attachnent 411. 1, Scape: [ ] NSSS [ g ] BOP

2. Mcdel Number: 0 Quantity: See Attach. 01
3. Vendor: American Waxmin & Ventilatin Co. le Lab)
4. If .the ccaponent,is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel lh. of the devices included: Damper and Ac&el'~
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dimensions 34'sa and Attachment 01
c. Weight See Attach[nent 0- 3
        .6. Location:    Building:    Reactor     Buildin,   See Attachment 01 Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions X] Bolt (No. Vari~ Size 3/8" 9 * )

[ [ Weld (Length )

8. a.

b.. System in which located: Functicnal

Description:

[ ] Same as 6 C o~~zo~

                                                                ~

o~~s~eR c.. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdcwn [ X] Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications:

t PF2/23-1 M 396 e G 22e M 336A

  • Damper is supported off ducts which are supported by duct supp'~.

Bolts at, 4" n[aximum centers for dzavper mrunting.

Sheet 2 M336 A-Zn (M396-C4 I1I. Is i ent Available for Insaection in the Plant: [X] Yes- [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Nethcd: [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Eh~rt>> g le N8856-M396-5-1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No., Title and Date) p C damper assemblies. and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Ccmpany that Prepared Report ville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report 'on V. Vibration Input:

l. loads considered: a. [ g Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly c'. [g Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: k]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

(Other,specify)

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 42 4 Damping Corresponding. to RRS: .OBE SSE la
         ~

OBE + SRV + LOCA - 2%, SSE + SRV + LOCA - 2% Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment 42 (Specify) CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S ~ F/B = V=

6. %re fatigue effects or other vibration loads mnsidered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined [ ] Yes [XJ No loads tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were included SRV & LOCA treated in overall qualif ication program:. "NVZE: If more than cne report cmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2:

Sheet 3 Form'M396-ZZ) Ql VI. If Qualification b Test, then Cannlete*: fX] random

l. [ ] Single Frequency f'Z J Mult.i-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis g] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE 5 SSE 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 5 u i~ ~~ F/B = 7. fg ~f

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies fK] Lab 'Inst [ ] In-Situ Test [ J Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ 3 Yes (Attach TRS 5. RRS graphs See Attachment 03 [] No
8. Input g-level Test: C[BE S/S = F/B ~

See Attachment 43 SSE S/S = F/B = field Assembly supported Simulated on > 95 ~ mountings.

                                                                       > supports.
l. f ) Bolt (No., Size )

6 [ ) hhld (Length ) [ )

10. Functicnal cperability verified: [ 9 Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made: The damoers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise st ctural and functional recuirements. The re uired field modifications are indicated in Attachment 04.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NONE NOIR: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ca[)piete Item Vll. 0-PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M336A (M3 96-2w) Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then lete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis. [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] T~istory [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: [ ] 3D f]2D []lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Car@uter Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: f ] Hand Calculations

5. Methcd of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specs y)

6. Daaping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Yotal Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allcarable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Bnctional D flection Location Ooerabili PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 N336A- R9 (M396-M) Qualification Sunna of Bmi nt Wyle Test Setup No. 2. I ~ P1ant Name:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECfFZEL and Attachment 51.
l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [X ] BOP
2. Model Number: 7 o Quantity: See Attach. 41
3. endor: American Wannin & Ventilatin Co. (orle Lab)
4. If the cmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model &. of the devices included: Damner and O
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dim nsions 3' a2" and Attachment Ol
c. Weight See Attachment 4-
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin, See Attachment Ol Elevation: Various
7. Field Naanting Candit(ane xl Balt (Na. verianz Bite 3/8" (3 * )

[ ) Weld ([engtn )

                                          ]
8. a. System in which Iccated: Same as 6 above
b. Functional

Description:

     . Cavd. oc.
c. Is the equipnent required for f ] Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown f X] Both [ [ Neither
9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications:

M-396, 6-22, M-336A

  • Denper is supported off ducts which are supported by duct support.

Bolts at, 4" maxiznum centers for damper mounting. PP2/23-1

Sheet 2

                                                                        ~IIII:   M~33 6    89 (M3 9 6-2-%)

III. Is i ent Available for tion in the Plant:. [Z ] Yes, [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Method: [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Begort* W le 58856-M396-5-1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No., Title and Date) P a C damper assemblies and an air flow swit'ch", 9-5-81 Ccmpany that Prepared Beport v ville Ccmpany that Reviewed 'on Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. f g Seismic only
b. f ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [g Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. bhthod of canbining RBS: k ]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS f ]

III A

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 42 4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 48 SSE 1%

OBE + SRV +---LOCA - 2%, SSE + SRV + LOCA 2%

5. Required Rx:eleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment N2 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined [l Yes [g No loads tests were not. done. However, RRS for combined loads If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were included SRV & LOCA treated in overall qualification program: "NOK: If more than one report ccaplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2,

Sheet 3 Form ~~~n (M39 6-.25 ) VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: Qt] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency fg] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis g] Multi~is

[].

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other 5 upset oonaitions followed by 1 faulted. 'Speozfy) 4- Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz 5.

6. Natural Frequencies in Method

                                //

Each

                                        //   ~P'll Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

of Determining Natural Frequencies

                                                                             =/-&//

Lab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Vest [ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ 3 Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs See Attachment 43 [] No
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

See Attachment 53 SSE S/S = Laboratory Mounting: Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported on Db 6 D6 supports.

1. [ ) Bolt (So ~, Size ) [ ) {e.'ld (length ) [ )
10. Functicnal cgerability verified: [ 9 Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Vest Results including modifications made: The damaers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise uct ra and functional re uirements. The reauired field modifications are indicated in Attachment. 04.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NONE "%7K: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also cat)piete Iten Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M336A-'2.S (M3 9 6-2.b) (gf Vll.

      ~ Zf Qualification
                ~

Anal is, then lets: N/A

1. Methcd of *Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ) Zkpivalent Static Analysis f ) Dynamic Analysis f ) Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum 2'. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical): S/S =

3. Model type: f ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element . [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccaputer Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of mdes considered: [ ) Hand Calculations

5. bhthod of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: f ] Absolute Sum [ ) SRSS

[ ) Other: (Specify)

6. Danping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the mcdel:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

A. Identification Location

                                              'r Governing Load

Response

Ccmbination Seismic Stress Total Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allmab3.e Deflection B. Max. Critical to P~ure Pmctional Deflection Location rabili PF2~

Sheet 1 FozR: M336A- g+ {M396-24) Qualif ication Sunma of i nt Wyle Test Setup No. 2 I. Plant Name:

l. Utility: PPGZ
2. NSSS: GE 3~ ~: EXZGRL pamze~;

8Db 7 x 2. and Attachment $ 1. 1, ~: [ ] NSSS [X] BOP

2. Model Number: 2 a 3o Qgantity: See Attach. 41
3. endor: American Warmin & Ventilatina Co. {Wvle Lab)
4. Zf the ccaponent, is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: Damper and Cave
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box.
b. Dinansions W" X Xq" and Attachrent 41
c. Weight See Attachnent I-
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin, See Attachment Ol Elevation: Various
7. Field Nannting Canditinna [ X] Bolt (Nn. Variena Size 3

[ [ Weld (Length

                                          .[    ]
8. a. System in which located: Same as 6 above
b. Puncticnal

Description:

8pcpo gg7 o ~~a

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ], Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdcwn

[ X] Both [ [ Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications:

M-396, G-22, M-336A

  • Danper is supported off ducts which are supported by duct suppcL[~.

13olts at 4" maximum centers for daaager- naunting. PP2/23-1

0 Sheet 2 M336 A-.2+ {M396-~) III. Is i ent Available for Lm tion in the Hant: [X ] Yes [ ] No IV. Equignent Qualification Method: [X] Test f ] Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis-Qualification Report* W le 88856-M396-5-.1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No+i Title and Date) p C damper assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Ccmpany that Prepared Report ville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report 'on V. Vibration Input:

l. Loads considered: a. f g Seismic only
b. f ] Hy9rodynamic cnly
c. [X] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: k]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]
3. Required Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment "2
4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 4S . SSE 1%

OBE + SRV + LOCA - 2t, SSE '+ SRV + LOCA 28 -

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] SPA [ ] Other See Attachment N2 (Specify)

OBE S/S = F/B ~ V~ SSE S/S ~ F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined [] Yes [3g No loads tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: "NOI'E: If more than one report ccaplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Forms (M3 9 6-.~y) VI. If Qualification b &0t, then lete*: fp'] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency fK] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. f ] Single Axis g] Multi~is

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = I'C l)[ < f 0 F/B =S.6'r [tk ~~ Sglf $ 0V / g SS~y 9(iv50HJ

6. Method of Determining. Natural Frequencies g] Lab Vast [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [g Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs See Attachment 03 [] No
8. Input g-level Tlast: CBE S/S ~

See Attachment f3 SSE S/S ~ Laboratory Mounting- Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported

l. Bolt (No., on Size g 9g s > 3>Weld supports.

(Length [ ) ) [ ) ) [ )

10. Functional cperability verified: [ 9 Yes f ] No f ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The damaers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise o s ctural and functional re uirements. The re uired field modifications are indicated in Attachment 04.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

N7K: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also catplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M336A (M396-~f) V11. If Qualification Anal is, then lete: N/A

l. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ) ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ) Dynamic Analysis [ } Time-History f ) Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Model type.- f ] 3D [) 1D

[ ] Finite Element f ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccnguter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of ides considered: f ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynanic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Speci y)

6. Daaping: GBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Ccmbination Stress Stress Alliable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form+ M336A- 2$ (M396-2$ ) Qualification Sumna of 2bui nt Wyle Test Setup No. 2 I. Plant Name: SUSQUEHANNA ~O

l. Utility: PP&l ERR
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BEG%EL
                     ~~P~HO     .-

ZV sx and Attachment Nl.

l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [P( ] BOP
2. Model Number: 402. Quantity: See Attach. 41
3. endor: Anerican Wazmin & Ventilatin Co. le Lab)
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: and /lcd crt 7 o
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Bax
b. Dimensions 0 A 28 and Attachment Ol 4-6.
c. Weight Xccation:

See Attachment Building: Reactor Buil ', / See Attachment Ol Elevation: Various

                                                                            '* ~/"

( ( Weld (Length [ ]

8. a. System in which located: Sane as 6 above
b. Functional

Description:

(."ow a~ cue+~

c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdc(a

[ X] Both ( 1 Neither

9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications:

M-396, G-22, M-336A

  • Damper is su~x6 off ducts which axe supped by duct supports.

Bolts at, 4" mximzn centers for damper taunting. PP2/23-1

Sheet 2 EbtHI: M~33 6 A-(M3 9 6-'~ III. i 9)'ion

   ~  Is      ~

ent Available for in the Plant: [X ) Yes f ) No IV. Equipnent Qualification Method: [X] Test [ ) Analysis f ] Ccmbination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* w le $ 8856-M396-5-1

                               '"Seismic and hydrodynamic            qualification (No.,  Title and  Date)     P  as                                      C   damper assemblies       and an   air flow switch",             9-5-81 Ccmpany   that Prepared Report              7                            ville Ccmpany   that Reviewed Report                                       'on V.,   Vibration Input:
l. ?aads considered: a. [ g Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [x] Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. bhthod of ccmbining RRS: k)Absolute f ]SRSS [.]
                                                  -~

Sum

                                                                                         *'C         I
3. Required %spcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment . 2 4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE 1%
                               ~         ~                      ~~      + LOCA        -  28
5. Required Ao=eleration in Each Direction: f ] ZPA f ] Other See Attachment 52 { Specify)

CBE S/S ~ F/8 ~ SSE S/S = F/B =

6. Wxe fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined f) Yes fg No loads tests were not done; However, RRS for combined loads If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were included SRV & LOCA treated in overall load qualification= program: NOZE: If narc than one report ccmplete items lV thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

4 A8>> h4 4e4, ~ h'4M~ k~l l>>hho 4444 ', ~ h h 4 A 4 I Sheet 3 Form: ~~Zg {M396-Ze ) VI. If Qualification b Test, then lete*: Dc] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [K] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis g] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. {Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =if u Ze ~ g~ F/B =i~,Sn Z~.~erg V =/9,/R Z(,9o,.>by/+

6. ¹thcd of Determining Natural Frequencies k] Tab Vest [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. 'LES enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ 8 Yes {Attach TBS & RRS graphs See Attachment 43 Ih
8. Input g-level. Test: GBE S/S =

See Attachment 43 SSE S/S ~ Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported supports.

l. [ ] Bolt (No., on Size g)Q
                                                             )
                                                               &   .9 g

[ ] Weld (Length ) [ ]

10. Functicnal cperability verified: [ 9 Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
11. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise n s ructura and junctional re uirements. The reauired field modifications are indicated in Attachment k4.
12. Other test performed {such as aging or fragility test, including results):

"NOIR: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also canplete Iten %M. PF2/23-3 Zh

Sheet 4 Form: M336A-<p (M3 9 6-2<) Vll. If Qualification bv Anal is, then lete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

k [ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis f ] Dynmic Analysis f ] T~istoxy [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD f ] Finite Element [ ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution
4. [ ] Car@uter Codes:

Frequency Rang'e and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: f ] Absolute Sum f ] SMS f ] Other:

(Speci y)

6. Darping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allawable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Mnctional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet l Form: M336A-Z('M396-2S) Qualif ication Suma of i nt Hyle Test Setup No. 2. I. Plant Name: RJSQUEHANNA T}2e-

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ArrE: BEQFCEL and Attachnmt 51.
l. Scope: [ ] NSSS
2. Model Number: Quantity: See Attach. 01
3. endor: American Nazmin a Uentilatin Co. le Lab)
4. If the ccnponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel W. of the d'evices Included: Damoer and Socertrora
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dinansions 2o" X'2o" and Attachnent 01
c. Neight . See Attachment 4-
            '. Location:    Building:     Reactor     Buildin,    See Attachment 41 Elevation: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions [ X) Bolt (No. VariouS Size 3/8" g * )

( ] Weld (lengtt ) [ l

8. a. System in which located: Same as 6 above
b. Fmcticnal

Description:

8Acuogn v'sa~nwr~ lo w c

c. Is the equipnent required for [ J Hot Standby f ] Cold Shutdown

[ XJ Both ( J Neither

9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications:

M-396, G-22, M-336A

  • Damper is supported off ducts which are Bolts at 4" ataxizam centers for damper mountinge
                                                                       ~rted     by duct supports.

PF2/23<<1 e EW

Sheet 2 M~336 -3& (~396-~g III.~ Is ui ent Available for Ins

               ~

tion in the Plant: [X ] Yes[ ] No IV. ~ Equipment Qualif ication Method:

                               ~

[X] Test f ] Analysis f ] Ccmbination of Test & Analysis Qualification RePort* W le 58856-M396-5-1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No., Title and Date) P a C damper, assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Canpany that Prepared Report ville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report 'on V. Vibration Input:

1. ?oads considered: a. [g Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. fg Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: g]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]
3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 02 4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE 1%,

OBE + SRV + LOCA -- 28, SSE- + SRV + LOCA - 2%.

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA f ] Other See Attachment. 42 (Specify)

CBE S/S F/B = V~ SSE S/S ~ F/B = V=

6. Mere fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered2 Extended duration tests beyond combined

[] Yes fg No loads tests vere not done. Hovever, RRS for combined loads If yes, describe loads considered and hcv they were included SRV & LOCA treated in overall qualif ication program: "NCEE: If more than one report carplete items 1V thru V11 for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: ~~zg (M396-Z&) VI. If Qualification Vest, then lete*: fp'] randem

l. f ] Single Frequency .f'Z] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis k] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: Q3E SSE 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 5

l faulted. (Specify)

4. Frequency Range: l to l00 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =/0 5/<5 ~ (pg// F/B ~ &g/91 ZZ 4 V ~ /Si(/91 ~~

6. Methcd of l3etermining Natural Frequencies g] Lab &st f ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [3 Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs See Attachment 43 [] No 0 8. Input g-level Test:

See Attachment CBE g3 S/S ~ SSE S/S ~ Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported

l. [ ] Bolt (No., on Size
                                               & f       )
                                                          &        9 supports.

[ ] %hid (Length ) [ ]

10. Functional cgerability verified: [ 9 Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The damgers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise s ructu al and functional re uirements. The re uired field modifications are indicated in Attachment 44.
12. Other test perfor[ned (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NONE

 ~: If      qualification Item  Vll.

by a canbination of test and analysis also ccmplete PF2/23-3

                       ~  4               >               k Sheet 4 Form: M336A- ~C, (M396-2b)

Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then complete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

                          ]  Finite  Element        [ I                   [ ] Closed Form    Solution
4. [ ] Ccaputer Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Daaping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing tuad or Response Seismic 'Total Stress A. Identification I+cation Ccmbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allcwable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional D flection Location Ceerabilit PF2~

Sheet 1 M336A- 2 7

                                                                                        ~

(M396-27) Qua1if ication Sunna of i nt'yle Test Setup No. 3 I. Plant Name: SUSQ3HiANNA TEee

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3~ ~: BECHTEL g)pl&Pe.R II. Camonent Name: 8a o and Attachment Nl.
1. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [P( ] BOP
2. Model Number: Quantity: See Attach. 41
3. endor: American Narmin & Ventilatin Co. ( le Lab)
4. If the ccxrponent is a cabinet or panel, name'and model No. of the devices included: Danmer and 5o~~oi
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Bax
b. Dimensions 2o "p'2o" and Attachnent 41
c. Might See Attachnent 0-
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin, See Attachnent gl Elevaticn: Various
7. Field Moonting Conditions Xl Bolt (Wo. Verione Size 3/8" g * )

[ ) Weld (length

                                               ]
8. a. System in which lccated: Sane as 6 above
b. Functicnal

Description:

8aab r JsacrtriFAJ +AAgF

c. Is the equipment reauired for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown

[ X] Both [ [ neither

9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications:

M-396, G-22, N-336A

  • Damper is supported off ducts which are supported by duct supports.

Bolts at 4" maxix[am centers for damper rmunting. ' PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Erma: M~336 ->7 (M396-2/) III. Is ui ent Available for Ins tion in the Plant: [Z) Yes [ )No IV. ~ipnent Qual ification Method: [X) Test . [ ) Analysis [ ] Ccmbination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification &Port* Wvle N8856-8396-5<<1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No., Title and Date) P C damper assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Ccmpany that Prepared Report ville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report 'on V. Vibration Input: Loads considered: a. [ g Seismic only

b. [ ) Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [g Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: k]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

III

3. Recuired Respcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 42 4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE 1%
5. Eequicnf Accelezacicn in Each niaecaicn: [ 1 zpA ( ] ofhce See Attachment. N2 (speczfy)

CeE S/S = F/B ~ V= SSE S/S = F/B>>- V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered'?

Extended duration tests beyond combined [] Yes [g No loads tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall quali fication program: "KOZE: If more than one report ccnplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form:: ~~Z7 {M396-'y) VI. If Qualification b &st, then lete*:

                                                                                  >]   randan
l. [ ] Single Frequency fZ ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. f ] Single Axis g] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSF 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. (Specify}
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz S. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =0 w~ t 2 gF/B ~ t I 0'~ Z Zb V =//~ /.0 y 2 SiZ~r 5I

6. MeNcd of Determining tNatural Frequencies fK] Lab 'I@st f ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [3 Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs See Attachment <<3 f]No
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

See Attachment $3 SSE S/S ~

9. Laboratory Mounting: Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported
1. [ ) Solt (So ., on P>g Size )

6 D2g supports. [ ) Weld (Length ) [ )

10. Functional operability verified: f g Yes [ ] No . [ ] Not Applicable ll. ~t Results including modifications made:

supporting assemblies are qualified without any The da ers and their compromise on uctura and functional re uirements. The reauired field modifications are indicated in Attachment <<4.

12. Other test performed {such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NONE HO%: If qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M336A-~7 (M396-Q ) Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then lete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis f ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S ~

3. Hcdel type: [ ] 3D [] 2D []1D f ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution
4. [ ] Ccnguter Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Spec@ y)

6. Danping: CBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Iaad or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabili g PF2/23<<4

Sheet 1 Form M336A- 2 8 (M396-Z8) Qualification Sunma of i nt Wyle Test Setm. No.d Z. Plant Name:

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BEGGKL gpaI y g7$ 75" jf and Attachment Nl.
1. ~: f ] NSSS [P( ] BOP
2. Model Number: 8 TOO Quantity: See Attach. 01
3. Vendor: American Wazmin a Ventilatin Co. ( le Lab)
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel No. of the devices included: Damper and
5. Kysical Descriptian a. Appearance Box
b. Dutensions "X/2" and Attachment fl
c. Weight See Attachment 4-
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin, See Attachnent Ol Elevatian: Various
7. Field Mounting Conditions f X] Bolt (No. Various Size 3/8" 9 * )

[ [ Weld [length ) [ ] 8- a. System in which lacated: Same as 6 above

b. Functional Descriptian: B~bzA~. zso~rrou Dnwp
c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ .] Cold Shutdcwn f X] Both [ 1 Neither
9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications:

M-396, G-22, M-336A

  • Damper is supIartaK off ducts which are supported by duct sugmrts.

Bolts at 4" naxisnum centers for dan[per neuntinge PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 M336 A-8g (M396-Zg) III. Is i t Available for tion in the Plant: [Z ] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualification Method: [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ J Ccmbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Thwart* W le o f8856-M396-5-1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic quali ication {No., Title and Date) p a C damper assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Canpany that Prepax'ed Report o ville

      'Caapany  that  Reviewed Report                                      'on Vibration Input:
1. Loach considered: a. [ g Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydxodynamic cnly
c. fg Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: k]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

III

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the gxaphs): See Attachment 42 4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: CBE SSE 1%

OBE + SRV + LOCA - 2%, SSE + SRV + LOCA 2%

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment N2 (Specify)

CBE S/S ~ F/B ~ V= SSE S/S = F/B = V~

6. Nexe fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined [] Yes [ZJ No loads tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads If yes, describe loads considered and her they were included SRV & LOCA teated in overall load qualification pxogram: "NOZE: If more than one report ccnplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: (M396-28) VI. If Qualification b Vest, then Ccmolete*:

                                                                                        >]   randem
1. [ ] Single Frequency [K] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis k] Multi~is

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. (Bgeorfy)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/8 = 8'Illy 2+ 9G gz / F/8 ~ /Z /f 2 p p 25 +g P+ V /ls 5'(') Hp

                                                                                                     <r'.

Methcd of Determining Natural Frequencies fK] Lab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis

7. 'QS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test f 3 Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs See Attachment 53 []No
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

See Attachment 43 . SSE S/S = 9~ Laboratory Mounting- Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported L) I'7 D > 7 supports.

l. [ ) Bolt (No., Bite on
                                                         )

[ ) (e.'ld (Length ) [ )

10. Functicnal operability verified: [ 9 Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Vest Results including modifications made: The damoers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise tr ctural and functional re uirements. 'Zhe reauired field modifications are indicated in Attachment 04.

12.,Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results): NONE ~: If qualification Item Vll. by a canbination of test and analysis also ccmplete PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M336A- 2c'M3 9 6-z5~) vll. If Qualification Anal is, then caaolete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis f ] Zkyivalent Static Analysis [ l Dynamic Analysis [ l T~istory [ l Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: [ ] 3D f]2D t] lD

[ l Finite Element [ l Beam [ l Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Cmputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: f ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: f ] Absolute Sum f ] SRSS f l Other:

(Specify)

6. Danping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the mcdel:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabilit PF2/23-4

Sheet 1 Form e M336A- 2 9 0 Qualification Sutmna of i nt (M396-29) Wyle Test Setup No. 4 I. Plant Name: SUSQJEfQHNA

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: EXPEL A and Attachment fl.
1. Sccpe: [ ) NSSS [P( ) BOP
2. Model Number: 5 D Quantity: See Attach. 41
3. odor: American Wazmin & Ventilatin Co. ( le Lab)
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model W. of the devices includede DaInoer and Qc7v 3>> 1
5. Physical Description
b. Dimnsions g a.

0 'nd Appearance pox Attachnent Ol

c. Weight See Attachment 4-
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin, See Attachment 41 Elevation: Various
                                                                            '*  ~/"

f ] Ne1d (Length )

                                                    )
8. a. System in which lccated: Sana as 6 above.
b. Functimal Descriptign: /Sot.a Wow Qw we
c. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ) Cold Shutdcwn

[ X) Both [ 1 Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:

M-396, G-22, M-336A

  • Damper is supported off ducts which are supported by duct supports.

Bolts at 4" ma~ centers for damper aaun~g. PF2/23-1

EORMS: Sheet 2 M~33 6 - '-/ (M3 9 6-"7) III Is i ent Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Methcd: [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Export* W le N8856-8396-5-3.

                                 ,"Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No.,   Title  and Date)    Pha                                       C damper assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Ccmpany   that Prepared Report                                         ville Ccmpany   that  Reviewed Report                                     'on V.
l. ~

Vibration Input: considered: a. b. [g Seismic only [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly

c. [g Canbination of {a) and {b)
2. Method of ccmbining RRS: g]Absorb.ute Sum [ ]SBSS [ ]
  • ty)
3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 42
4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE 48 SSE 1%,

OBE + SRV + LOCA - Sg SSE

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment g2 (Specify)

CBE S/S = F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B = V=

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered' Extended duration tests beyond combined

[ ] Yes [ZJ No loads tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were included SRV 6 LOCA treated in overall qualification program: '%RE: If more than one report mrplete itens 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form e (M396-Zci ) VI. If Qualification Test, then lete*:

                                                                                    >]   randem
l. [ ] Single Frequency fZ] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis g] Multi~is

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CHE 5 SSE 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = .y I( a< 2 F/B I',iS,IZ, ZZ, z. V =i;g ~ I,Z,'.7//~

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies IK] Lab ~t [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis z
7. 'IRS envelcping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ 3 Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs See Attachment I3. []No
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S ~ F/B =

See Attachment 53 SSE S/S = Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported on 2 49' 979> supports.

l. [ ) Bolt (No., Size ) [ ) B ld (length ) [ [
10. Bncticnal cperability verified: [ Q Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The dame>ers and their supporting .assemblies are qualified without any compromise tr ct ral and functional requirements. The re uired field modifications are indicated in Attachment N4.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NONE "NOIR: If qualificaticn by a canbination of test and analysis also carplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Porm: N336A-2$ (M396-;.g) Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: N/A

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] history [ ] ~ponse Sp ctr

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S ~

3. Ncdel type:,[ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam f ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccaputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Ccxnbining Dynanu.c Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS'
                                                         ] Other:

(Specify)

6. Damping: CBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccasiderationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location ..Canbination Stress Stress Alliable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Bmctional Deflection Location Qcerabilit PZ2/23-4

                                                                                                    ~ e ~ ~ ke Sheet 1 Form     M336A- 90 (M396-3o)

Qualification Sunea of i nt Wyle Test Setup No. + Z. Plant Name: TQR 0

l. Utility: PP&L
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BEQFZEL H X 8 and Attachment, 01.

1~ Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [g ] BOP

2. Model Number: SBI L) Quantity: See Attach. Ol
3. Vendor: American Waxmin a Ventilatin Co. ( le Lab)
4. If the cadent is a cabinet or panel, name and model hb. of the devices included e Dc3Hloez and Ac7 cl o S. Ehysical Descriptian a. appearance Box
b. Dinensions 7
                                     " X< "                and Attachment 01
c. Weight See Attachment 0-
6. Location: Building: 'eactor Buildin, See Attachment 01 Elevation: Various
                                                                           '*  ~l"

[ ] Weld (Length )

                                                 ]
8. a. System in which located: Same as 6 above
b. Functicnal

Description:

         /S oc.nv.jo~      bamee
c. Zs the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby ] Cold Shutdown

[ X] Both 1 1 Neither

9. Pertinent Ref erence Design Specif ications:

M-396'-22'-336A

              *'amper is supported off ducts which are supported               hy duct supparts.

Bolts at 4" maximum centers far damper naunting. PP2/23-1. V

Sheet 2 EbEtll'~336 QQ (M39 6-9o ) III. Is i ent Available for tion in the Plant: [Z ] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: [X] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Cctnbination of Test & Analysis Qualification Report* N 'e $ 8856-8396-5-1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No., Title and Date) P a C damper assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Ccmpany that Prepared Report ville Ccmpany that Reviewed Report 'on V. Vibration Input:

1. Goads considered: a. [ g Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. [X] Canbination of (a) and (b) of ccmbining k]Absolute 24 Method RRS: Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]

ttt 3.. Required Bespcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 02 4~ Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE la OBE + SRV + LOCA - 28, SSE + SRV + LOCA - 2%

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment g2 (Specify)

CBE S/S =. F/B ~ V= SSE S/S ~ F/B = V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined [ ] Yes [}g No loads tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA If yes, describe loads considered and hcw they were treated in overall qual ification prcgram: '%7ZE: If more than one report ccnplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Poxm: ~[~0 (M39 6-3o ) 1 VI. lf Qualification bv Test, then lete*: fP'] randem

l. [ ] Single Frecuency fX] Multi-Frecuency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [K] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. ~{Sgeci )
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Bade, Vertical):

S/S =, ga F/B ~/9 ~C i/~o g~ V ~j g '.l, 5o,:3 .,3ggg,

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies fK] Lab 'Inst f ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. 'IRS envelcping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ 3 Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs See Attachment t3 f]No
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

See Attachment 43 SSE S/S ~ V= Laboratory Mounting:. Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported on > ~5& supports.

l. [ ] Pelt (Na., Size )
                                                        &  .?)499

[ ] )etld (Length ) [ ]

10. Bmcticnal operability verified: [ g Yes f ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The da ers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise n t uctural and functional recuirements. The reauired field modifications are indicated in Attachment O4.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
 "NOIR:  If qualification      by a ccmbination   of test     and  analysis also canplete Item  Vll.

PF2/23>>3 t

Sheet 4 Foll: M336A-3> (M3 96-~ ) Vll. If Qualification Anal is, then lete: N/A

1. Methcd of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis f ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] history [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S ~

3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccaputer Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of nades considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: (Specify)

6. Damping: OBE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Ccnsiderationns in the mcdel:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Caverning Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identificaticn Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional Deflection Location rabilit PF2~

Sheet 1 90DII: M336A- Si (M396-3/) Qualification Sunma of i nt Wyle Test Setup No. 5 X. Plant Name: SUSQ3EHMHA TQR e

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. ~: BECHTEL ZI. Camunent Name: DA g 7474 B and Attachment. 51.
1. Scope: [ l NSSS . [ g ] BOP
2. Mcdel Number: '700 Quantity: See Attach. 41
3. odor: American W Ventilatin Co. ( le Lab)
4. If the cmponent is a cabinet or panel, name and mcdel Ro. of the devices included: and SOlenoe'el
5. Ehysical Description a. Appearance Bax
b. Dimensions po go and Attachnent $ 1
c. %eight Se Att~hrent 4-
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin, See Attachment Ol Elevation: Various
                                                                             ~/"

( ] Weld (Lehgtt ) [ ]

8. a. System in which located: Sana as 6 above
b. Functlcnal

Description:

8@a ay r /soc,om~

c. Is the equipment required for [ l Wt Standby [ J Cold Shutdown

[Xj Both ( j Neither

9. Pertinent Reference Design Specif ications:

M-396, G-22, M-336A

            +'Damper   is  supported   off ducts      which are supported by duct       sup~s.

Bolts at 4" !~num centers for damper vaunting. PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Eb till: +~33 6 j (M396-91) III. Is i nt Available for tion in the Plant: [Z ] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Methcd: [XJ Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Test & Analysis Qualification &port* w le 18856-M396-5-1 (No., Canpany Canpany Title and Date) that Prepared Report that P Reviewed Report

                                                     ~

P o,

                                                                  'ille "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 C damper
                                                                               'on V. Vibration Input:
l. Loads considered: a. [ Xl Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. f X] Canbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: g]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]
3. Required &spcnse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment 42 4~ Dzaping Corresponding to RRS: OBE SSE 1%

OBE + SRV + LOCA - 0, SSE

5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] ZPA [ ] Other See Attachment 42 (Specify)

CBE S/S ~ F/B = V= SSE S/S = F/B ~ V=

6. %re fatigue effects or other vibration loads consideredP Extended duration tests beyond combined

[ ] Yes [X] No loads tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: NOZE: If more than cne report ccnplete iteaa 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form e (N396-~) ) VI. If Qualification Test, then lete*: g] randan

1. f ] Single Frequency fX] Multi>>Frequency f ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis 5r,] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =/o,/9 4,M F/B /~5 / al <~ . ~ V =go,M (['(lg

6. ¹thcd of Determining Natural Frequencies k] Lab 'I@st [ ] In-Situ Test [ ] Analysis
7. TBS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ g Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs See Attachment 53 f]No
8. Input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

See Attachment 43 SSE S/S ~

9. Laboratory Mounting: .Simulated field mountings. Assembly supported
l. [ ) Bolt (No., on .7)y~

Size s .P g~(eid supports. ((etz3th

                                                   )     [ )                            )   [ )
10. Functional. cgerability verified: [ g Yes f ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: The damaers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise s r ct ra and functional re uirements. The re uired field modifications are indicated in Attachment 44.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NONE "hOXE: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Sheet 4 Form: M336A<<9J (M396-5/) Vll. 0 If Qualification Anal is, then cermlete: N/A

1. Methcd of Analysis:

f ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ) ~nse Sp ~n

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: [ ) 3D [) 2D [) 1D

[ ] Finite Element [ ) Beam [ ) Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccnguter Codes:

Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other:

                                                                      .(Specify)
6. Damping: OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Alliable Deflection B. Max. Critical. to Assure Functional Deflection Location Ooerabili PF2/23 Sheet 1 Formal M336A- 3 Z (M396-3Z ) Qualification Sunma of i nt Wyle Test Setup No. 5 I e Plant Name: ~O

l. Utility: PP&Z lWR
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BEQFZEL BWR X z Z7/S yB and Attachment gl.

~ ~ <<

                               ] NSSS            fg]      BOP
2. Model Number: Bi Quantity: See Attach. 01
3. endor: American Waxmin & Ventilatin Co. le Lab)
4. If the cargonent is a cabinet or pane1i name and mcdel Ho. of the devices included: and c7 u 5., Zhysical Description a. Appearance Box
b. Dinansions ' 0'nd Attachment Ol c- Weight . See Attachment I-
6. Location: Building: Reactor Buildin, See Attachment 41 Elevatice: Various I <<<<' t

[' t 1 t Weld (length

                                                                                   ~/"
                                                                                          )
                                                      ]
8. a. System in which located: - . Sana as 6 above
b. Functicnal

Description:

- J Sos.saran ~ p e

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ] Hot Standby ] Cold Shutdown f X] Both [ [ Wele[tee
9. Pertinent Beference Design Specifications:

N-396, G-22, M-336A

  • Damper is supported off ducts which are supported by duct supports.

Bolts at 4" maximal centers for dan[per rraunting. PF2/23-1

Sheet 2

8) txll'~33 6 '3~

(M396-92.) III.~ Is i ent Available for

                           ~

I tion in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: [X] Vest [ ] Analysis [ ] Canbination of Vest & Analysis Qualification Report* w le 48856-M396-5-1 "Seismic and hydrodynamic qualification (No., Title and Date) P C damper assemblies and an air flow switch", 9-5-81 Caaparp that Prepared Report ville Company that Reviewed Report 'on V. Vibration Input:

1. Qm3s considered: a. [ g Seismic only
b. [ ] Hydzodynamic cnly
c. [g Ccmbination of (a) and (b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: k]Absolute Sum [ ]SRSS [ ]
3. Required RespcfLse Spectra (attach the graphs): See Attachment, 2
4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: OBE bS SSE 15 OBE + SRV + LOCA 2'8, SSE + SRV + LOCA - 2t
5. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: [ ] SPA [ ] Other See Attachment, N2 (speclfy)

CBE S/S ~ F/B = V~ SSE S/S ~ F/B ~ V=

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads cansidered?

Extended duration tests beyond combined [ ] Yes [ZJ No loads tests were not done. However, RRS for combined loads included SRV & LOCA If yes, describe loads considezed and how they were treated in overall cualification pzcgram: 'HOPE: If narc than one report canplete items 1V thru Vll for, each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form+ (M3 9 6-o<Q VI. If Qualification Test, then lete~: [p'] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency k] Multi-Frequency [ ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis t'K] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE 1 . Other 5 upset conditions followed by 1 faulted. (Speorfy)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 100 Hz
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S = 5i g 5< 9 F/B =7,JZ.Ra zl P V =No '0 SZ 70/7

6. Method of Determining Natural Frequencies g'] Lab Test [ ] In-Situ Test [ ].Analysis
7. 'IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [3 Yes (Attach TBS & RRS graphs See Attachment O3 []No
8. Input g-level Test: CHE S/S = F/B =

See Attachment 03 SSE S/S = F/B ~ 10. Laboratory Mounting:

l. [ ] Bolt (Wo ~, Simulated on Sire
           ~cticnal cperability verified:

D+

                                                  ~ ~

field

                                                       )
                                                        &     D+

mountings. [ ] Weld [ g Yes supports. (Letr(th f ] No Assembly supported

                                                                                              )

[ ] Not Applicable [ ]

11. Test Results including modifications made: The dam ers and their supporting assemblies are qualified without any compromise o s uctural and functional re uirements. The reauired field modifications are indicated in Attachment 04.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NONE NOXE: If .qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccaplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

Qualification Anal is, then cannlete: N/A'heet Form: M336A-3s-4 (M39 6-3 > ) Methcd of Analysis: [ ] Static Analysis [ ] ~ivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis . [ ] T~istory [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [ I lD

[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccaguter Ccdes:

Frequency Range and No..of males mnsidered: [ ] Band Calculations

5. Method of Canbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other:

6. Dsnping: Q3E 'SE in the model:

Basis (Speczfy) for the damping used:

7. Support Considerationns
8. Critical Structural Elements:
                                                   'overning     Load or  Response         Seismic      Total        Stress A. Identification 'ocation                    Carbination          Stress       Stress       Allowable Maximum   Allowable Deflection B. Max.-  Critical                                             to Assure Functional
                         '@flection Location                       rabilit PF2/23-4

t, ,J' k i I l I

                                                *  ,1
   ~                         V
                                        \

I " " 0 ,"Y ~

                                     'C f.

4 I it g 1 I I

              'y
     'l
   ~
   ~
   ~
   ~

Sheet 1 F011ll: Rev. 1 Qualification Sunxna of i nt I. Plant Name: TEEe:

1. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3. A/E: BECHTEL
                                                              /ov- to 9 A,B)

[ ) NSSS [X) BO-

2. Model Number: B L Quantity:
3. Vendor: f Buf alp Force
4. If the ccaponent is a cabinet or panel, name and model hb. of the devices included: Fan with vari e i 5 I
b. Dimensions Approx. 5' 7' 6'
c. %Might 1600 lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevation: 806
7. 1 << t?<<' Neld (Length

[ I

8. a. System in Mich located: Standb treatnent stem
b. Functicnal

Description:

To reneve air throuah SCiS

c. Is the equigaent required for [ ) Hot Standby [ ) Cold Shutdown

[X ) Both [ ] Naither

9. Zhrtinent Reference Design Specif ications- 8-362 M-307 G"5, G-9, G-10, G-22 PF2/23>>1

Sheet 2 Form: M-362 Beve ~ IlI. Is ui ent Available for Inspection in the Plant: t Xl Yes; f ] No IV. Equipnent Qualif ication Method: g] Test t ] Analysis f ] Canbination of Test a Analysis Qualification Report* ST&-135479-1 "Seismic 'ication Test Report on Fan azxi anting Assenbly", March 13, 3979. (No., Title and Date) P-Ccmparp that Prepared R portAm rican Envirorments Cavan Ccnpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Pcwer Co ration V. Vibration Input:

1. Loads considered: a. fK] Seismic only b, [ ] Hydrodynamic cnly
c. IZ] Canbination of {a) and {b)
2. Method of canbining RRS: [ ]Absolute Sum t ]SRSS { ]

(Other,specify) Attachnent No.1-Phase IX

3. Required R.sponse Spectra (attach the grag~): -P XIX P g 2't. for ccxnhined loads (SSE or OBE + SRV + GXA)
5. [eqnired Acceleration in Each Direction: [ [ ZPA [ [ Other See ERS in Attachsant No.

CBE.. S/S = lF/B = for Phase XX ani Attachsnnt Ho. 2 for Phase V= XXi SSE S/S = F/B = V= I

6. Wre fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

t] Yes k] No If yes, describe loads considered and her they vere treated in overall qualif ication program: "NAZE: If more than one report ccmplete items 1V thru Vll for each report. PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: 1&362 Rev. 1-Vl. lf Qualification b Test, then lete*: g] randem

1. f ] Single Fr~ency fx] Multi-Frequency f ) sine beat f )
2. [ ] Single Axis f'Z] '. Hulti-.Axis
3. No. of Qualification Tests: CBE 5 SSE Other
           'ive upset       conditions folla'ed by one faulted condition                                  (Specify)
4. Frequency Range: 1 to 80 Hz
5. Natural Frecpencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

Longitudinal Vransverse= 7 10 21 38 40 Hz ' 5 10 15 50 Hz V=15 Hz

6. Method of D termining Natural Frequencies f ] Lab est f ] ln-Situ Test [' Analysis
7. IRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [X) Yes (Attach TRS a RRS graphs

[ l No Attachnent No. 3

8. input g-level Test: CBE S/S =

See Attadm~~t No. 3 SSE S/S = h

9. Laboia tory Mounting:
l. [)(] Bolt (Bo. 8, 5/8"-11 BizeGrede 5)

UNC [ I hhld (Length ) [ ]

10. Functional cparability verified: [X) Yes f .) No f ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made: Test results indicate that the SOS centrifu fans are 'ied for seismic and hydrodynamic loads.
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):
                                                                                               'I None

'%PIC: H qualification by a ccmbination of test and analysis also ccmplete Etem Vll. PF2/23-3

0 Sheet 4 Form: W362 Vll. If Qualification b Anal is, then lete: ~ Rev.l

1. Method of Analysis: Not Applicable

[ ] Static Analysis [ J ~ivalent Static Analysis [ J Dynamic Analysis [] T~Histo~ t ] R ponse Sp ct~

2. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction {Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

S/S =

3. Mcdel type: [ ] 3D []2D []1D

[ ] Finite Element [ J Beam [ ] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ] Ccaputer Codes:

agency Range and No. of mx3es considered: [ ] Hand Calculations

5. bhthcd of Ccmbining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[ ] Other: {Specify) Q~Qyb

6. Danping: .OBE SSE Basis for the damping used:
7. Support Considerationns in the model:
8. Critical Structural Elements:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Canbination Stress Stress Allowable Maximum Allowable Deflection B. Max. Critical to Assure unctional Deflection Location rabilit PF2/23-4

                                                         '\

I' lt I I* 1J t J lt t J I I I I I I "IJ I t tt I l~ f 1 tJ I . t, J

               '                                                                                                                                                    ~ I                      t
                                                                                                                                                                                )

I t r I.tg

              'I f

5JJ i I,'9 A)

                                        ',            It
                                                                                                                                               't t           1f              t" I                             ~t ltgp           \ ttt            jgPgW dt          pit ~(                               *t" J       I
   )                      I J   JX
                                            )

0 J tt y E I t~p Q I g P 'I t J I i ' J, 5'"'I.lj'f, J, ",~.a., <<'PIJ I" " .,~ 4 Ja Igf-',j q+

                                                                                                                                        *il        '.   +Iyt'> OJI'I,","" P

Sheet 1 Bn1TI: H-365 Qualification Surya of i nt I. Plant Hone: z SUSQUiMHNA TK

l. Utility: PAL
2. NSSS: GE 3~ ~: BECHTEL
l. Sccpe: [ ] NSSS [X l BOP
2. Rx3el Number: LCZ-20 Quantity:
3. 'endor: J. E. Lon an Ccxraan
4. If the carponent is a cabinet or panel, nme and model ii] of
                                                                                  ~    the devices included:         N
5. Physical Description a. Sppearance Relief Valve l-l 2" e
b. Dinansions 1" x
c. Weight 23 lbs.
6. Location: Building: Control Structure Elevatian:

(No., 806', Field yonnt(ng Cere]itione ] Bolt Size ) [ ] N ld (length ) X] Line i Yu t Weld')

8. a. System in which located- Control Structure Chil W
b. Functicnal

Description:

Chilled Water Exoansic 1 oz 1Qf

c. Is the equipnent required for [ ) Hot Stardby [ ] Cold Shutdc[n

[;.1 Both [ 3] Neither

9. Pertinmt Reference Design Specifications:

PF2/23-1

Sheet 2 Form: M-365 4 III. Is Equipment Available for I ction in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ) No Available at site, to be IV. Equipment Qualification Method: installed. [ ] Test [X] Analysis [ ] ~ination of Test 6 Analysis Qualification Report* 8856-M-365-14-1, dated 5-7-81 (No., Title and Zhte) "Seismic Calculations - Safet & Belief Valves" Company that Prepared Report J. E. Loner an Canpany that Reviewed Report Bechtel Ewer Co ration V. Vibration Input: Kb The Piping Stress Analysis

l. Icads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only
b. [ ) Hydrodynamic only
c. [X] Cotthination of (a) ard (b)
2. Method of combining RRS: [X)Absolute Sum [X]SRSS [ ]

(0 er,speci y)

3. Required Response Spectra 885&6-24, CBE + SRV+ LOCA SSE + SRV+ DNA 4, Ehmping Corresponding to RRS: 2% 2%

Bequired Acceleration in any Direction: [ ] ZPA [X] Other Maximum

                                                                                              'g'Specify)
6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration loads considered?

[ ) Yes [X) No If yes, describe loads considered and how they were treated in overall qualification program: NA

  • %7': If nore than one report complete items 1V thru Vll for each report, Review of the piping stress output will ensure that the actual 'g'oad is less than the maximum qualified 'g'oad.

PF2/23-2

Sheet 3 Form: If Qualification b Vest, then Canplete*: Not Applicable. [ ] randem

l. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-F equency f ] sine beat
2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis

[]

3. No. 'of Qualification Tests: CBE SSE Other (Specify)
4. Frequency Range:
5. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side/Side, Front/Back, Vertical):

V=

6. Method of D termining Natural Frequencies

[ ] Lab Test f ] In-Situ Test '[ ] Analysis

7. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs f]No
8. Input g-level Test: OBE S/S = F/B =

SSE S/S = F/B =

9. Laboratory Mounting:
l. [ ] Bolt {No., Size ) [ ] told {Length ) [ ]
10. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable ll. Test Results including modifications made:
12. Other test performed (such as aging or fragility test, including results):

NVK: If qualification by a canbination of test and analysis also ccrplete Item Vll. PF2/23-3

 ~ ~                                                                                          Sheet 4 F()nn: M-365 VL1. If Qualification b Anal sis,        then complete:
l. Method of Analysis:

[X] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum

2. Natuxal frequencies in Any Direction 570
3. Model type: [ ] 3D [] 2D [] lD

[ ] Finite Elephant [X] Beam [ ] Closed Foxm Solution

4. [ ] Computer Codes: NA Frequency Range and No. of nades considered: 1-100, 1st Mode

[X] Hand Calculations

5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS

[X] Other: NA

                                                ~                    'Specify)
6. ~ing: OBE NA SSE NA Basis for the darrging used:

70 Support Considerationns in the nedel: None

8. Critical Structural Eleaents:

Governing Load or Response Seismic Total Stress A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable Inlet Neck 32,400 psi 32,400 psi Haximum Alliable Ehflection B. Max. Critical to Assure Functional I@flection Location rabilit N'ot Tabulated Valve Function Not Required. EP2/23-4 P

P}}