ML12207A543

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

WCAP-17540-NP, Rev. 0, Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Program Acoustic Load Definition Methodology
ML12207A543
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/2012
From: Longoni G
Westinghouse
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-MT-12-056, TAC MD9990 WCAP-17540-NP, Rev 0
Download: ML12207A543 (56)


Text

L-MT-12-056 ENCLOSURE 10 WESTINGHOUSE REPORT WCAP-17540-NP, REVISION 0 MONTICELLO REPLACEMENT STEAM DRYER PROGRAM ACOUSTIC LOAD DEFINITION METHODOLOGY 55 pages follow Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 WCAP-17540-NP May 201: Revision 0 Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Program Acoustic Load Definition Methodology Westinghouse 2

WESTINGHOUSE NON-PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 WCAP-17540-NP Revision 0 Monticello Replacement Steam Dryer Program Acoustic Load Definition Methodology Author Gianluca Longoni*Reviewed by David A. Suddaby*May 2012 Approved:

David R. Forsyth*, Manager Acoustics and Structural Analysis*Electronically approved records are authenticated in the electronic document management system.Westinghouse Electric Company LLC 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066, USA© 2012 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved WCAP-I 7540-NP. doc-051812 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS L IST O F TA B L E S .......................................................................................................................................

iii L IST O F FIG U R E S .....................................................................................................................................

iv A C R O N Y M S ..............................................................................................................................................

v i 1 EX EC U TIV E SU M M A RY ..........................................................................................................

1-1 2 ACOUSTIC CIRCUIT MODEL METHODOLOGY

..................................................................

2-1 2.1 NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE 3D [ ],C EQUATION .....................

2-1 2.2 ACOUSTIC CIRCUIT ANALYSIS OF MEASURED MSL PRESSURE FL U C T U A T IO N S ...........................................................................................................

2-4 3 END-TO-END BENCHMARK OF ACE REV. 1.0 USING MEASURED PLANT DATA ........ 3-1 3.1 MONTICELLO RSD [ ]aG DEVELOPMENT

................

3-1 3.2 ANALYSIS OF PRESSURE TRANSUCER DATA MEASURED ON THE STEAM D R Y E R ............................................................................................................................

3 -7 3.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ACOUSTIC CIRCUIT ENHANCED REV. 1.0 MODELING PA R A M E T E R S .............................................................................................................

3-14 3.4 END-TO-END COMPARISON OF PREDICTIVE MODELS WITH MEASURED PL A N T D A TA ...............................................................................................................

3-20 4 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ACOUSTIC LOAD DEFINITION FOR THE MONTICELLO RSD U SIN G A C E R E V .1.0 ..................................................................................................................

4-1 5 C O N C L U SIO N S ..........................................................................................................................

5-1 6 RE FE RE N C E S .............................................................................................................................

6-1 WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 iii Table 3-1 Table 3-2 Table 3-3 Table 3-4 Table 3-5 Table 3-6 Table 3-7 Table 3-8 Table 3-9 Table 3-10 Table 4-1 Monticello[

[I[I[I[I[I[I[I[[I[I LIST OF TABLES]2'C M ain Dimensions

......................................................

3-1]b ................................................................

3-3...................................................................

3 -1 5]b ...................................................................................................

3 -16] ...............................................................

3 -16...................................................................

3-17]b. .....................

3-17]b .......................................................................

3 -18 P .....................................................................

3 -2 1]b .......................................................................................

3 -2 3]b ...........................................

4-1 WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1 Schematic of Pressure Measurement Locations on an MSL ..................................................

2-5 Figure 3-1 Steam D ryer Top V iew ...........................................................................................................

.3-2 Figure 3-2 Section A-A from Figure 3-1 .................................................................................................

.3-2 F igure 3-3 [ Ic. .................................................

3-4 Figure 3-4 Two-Dimensional Cross-Section View at Z=70.9" ...............................................................

3-5 Figure 3-5 Two-Dimensional Cross-Section View at Z=1 31.1 ".........................................................

.3-5 Figure 3-6 Acoustic Model Structure Three-Dimensional Views ............................................................

3-6 Figure 3-7 Monticello RSD Instrumentation Locations

-Top View .......................................................

3-7 Figure 3-8 [ ]b ..............................

3-8 Figure 3-9 [ b ..............................

3-9 Figure 3-10 [ .b ............................

3-10 Figure 3-11 [ ]b ............................

3-11 Figure 3-12 [.b .............

3-12 Figure 3-13 Figure 3-14 [Figure 3-15 [Figure 3-16 Figure 3-17 [Figure 3-18 Figure 3-19 Figure 3-20 1 Figure 3-21 [Figure 3-22 Figure 3-23 Figure 3-24 [Figure 3-25 [Figure 3-26]b ...................................................

..... 3 -1.........................

3-13]b ..................................................................

3 -19.b .......................................................

3-2 0.b ............................................

3-22]a,c .......c...................

3-24.b ..............................

3-25.b ..............................

3-26 b ..............................

3-27 b ..............................

3-28.b ..............................

3-29 ib..............................

_m"3 3 ..............................

3-31...... -32 WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 V Figure 3-27 [Figure 3-28 Figure 3-29 [Figure 4-1 [Figure 4-2 Figure 4-3 [Figure 4-4]b ..............................

3-33 ib ..............., 3 .b .............................

3-35.b .................................

4-2.b ...............................

4-2 ib .............................

4-3]b ...........................

4-3 WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 vi ACRONYMS Acronym ACE ACM BWR CFD CLTP DAS EPU FEM IR MNGP MSL NRC OEM OR PSD RMS RPV RSD SCF SRV Definition acoustic circuit enhanced acoustic circuit model boiling water reactor computational fluid dynamics current licensed thermal power data acquisition system extended power uprate finite element model inner radius Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant main steam line Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S.)original equipment manufacturer outer radius power spectral density root mean square reactor pressure vessel replacement steam dryer strain correction factor safety relief valve WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 1-1 1 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (MNGP) underwent a replacement steam dryer (RSD) program during the spring 2011 refueling outage. MNGP replaced the original equipment manufacturer (OEM)steam dryer with a Westinghouse design.IC I IC In summary, the modeling features included in ACE Rev. 1.0 are the following:

c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 1-2 C[]a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 2-1 2 ACOUSTIC CIRCUIT MODEL METHODOLOGY This section describes the theoretical development of the acoustic circuit model methodology.

The two steps involved in obtaining the acoustic load definition for the MNGP RSD consist in the following:

2 a,c 2.1 NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE 3D [Ia,c EQUATION ac WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 2-2 a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 2-3 a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 2-4 L 2.2 ACOUSTIC CIRCUIT ANALYSIS OF MEASURED MSL PRESSURE FLUCTUATIONS In the acoustic circuit analysis, MSLs are modeled by following parameters:

Application of the methodology generates solutions in each MSL for: Where: Where: I a,c L r ac a,c-I a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 2-5 a,c Figure 2-1 Schematic of Pressure Measurement Locations on an MSL ac WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 2-6 a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-1 3 END-TO-END BENCHMARK OF ACE REV. 1.0 USING MEASURED PLANT DATA a,c 3.1 MONTICELLO RSD []ac DEVELOPMENT The geometric model of the steam dryer and surrounding fluid is developed using plant drawings and steam dryer design drawings as outlined in Reference

1. This is an improved model based on: K J a,c Table 3-1 lists the main dimensions used to develop the [Table 3-1 Monticello

[ ] Main Dimensions Ii WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 WCAP- 17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-2 II I a~c ac-I.Figure 3-1 Steam Dryer Top View ac-/Figure 3-2 Section A-A from Figure 3-1 WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-3 Table 3-2]b*1-I.4-i+r a,c WCAP- 17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-4/I-a,c Figure 3-3 1 I ,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-5 ac Figure 3-4 Two-Dimensional Cross-Section View at Z=70.9" a,c Figure 3-5 TWo-Dimensional Cross-Section View at Z=131.1" WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-6 ac Figure 3-6 Acoustic Model Structure Three-Dimensional Views ac__I WCAP- 17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-7 3.2 ANALYSIS OF PRESSURE TRANSUCER DATA MEASURED ON THE STEAM DRYER a,c-I/I-a,c Figure 3-7 Monticello RSD Instrumentation Locations

-Top View I-a,c WCAP- 17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-8 b Figure 3-8[ ]b WCAP- 17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-9 b Figure 3-9 [b WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-10/f Figure 3-10 [1b WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-11 b Figure 3-11 1 Ib a,c J WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-12 b Figure 3-12 f Ib b Figure 3-13 [WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-13 ac Figure 3-14 [b a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-14 ac-/3.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ACOUSTIC CIRCUIT ENHANCED REV. 1.0 MODELING PARAMETERS a,c WCAP- 17540-NP-l/May 2012 Revision 0 3-15 a,c Table 3-3 [b]b a,c-I WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-16 Where:/f" a,c Table 3-4]b II I a~c Table 3-5[I]ac I 2ýc WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-17 Table 3-6 1 ]b Table 3-7 ]]b a.c K WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-18 Table 3-8 [ ]b I _ __The application of the total uncertainties listed in Table 3-8 to the predicted pressure loads is compared with the measured data as shown in Figures 3-15 and 3-16.WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-19 Figure 3-15!b WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-20 b Figure 3-16 f lb]a,c 3.4 END-TO-END COMPARISON OF PREDICTIVE MODELS WITH MEASURED[]a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-21 Table 3-9 [b[b I]a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-22 I-b Figure 3-17 1 Ib II]a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-23 Table 3-10 1 ______________________________

ri WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-24 b-l Figure 3-18 [Iaxc WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-25/-b I'll, J Figure 3-19 1 Ib WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-26 Figure 3-20 1 Ib WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-27 b Figure 3-21 [ jb WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-28 Figure 3-22 [b WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-29 Figure 3-23 f jb WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-30 b Figure 3-24 [ ]b WCA P-i 7540-NP May 2012 WCAP- 17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-31 b Figure 3-25 1 WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-32 b Figure 3-26 1 WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-33 Figure 3-27 [b WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-34 b Figure 3-28 1 Ib WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 3-35 Figure 3-29 [WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 4-1 4 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ACOUSTIC LOAD DEFINITION FOR THE MONTICELLO RSD USING ACE REV. 1.0 I I ac Table 4-1 [b]b WCAP- 17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 4-2 K Figure 4-1 Figure 4-2 1 Ib b Ib WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 4-3 b Figure 4-3 Figure 4-4 [ib b ib WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 5-1 5 CONCLUSIONS

[]a~c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0 6-1 6 REFERENCES

1. [2.a~c 3. []a,c WCAP-17540-NP May 2012 Revision 0