IR 05000445/1984005

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Memo Re Completion of Allegation Feedback Effort for Witness A-38.Concerns Re Hanger Welding Problems in Nov 1983 Examined by Region IV & Documented in Insp Rept 50-445/84-05.Record of Telcon w/A-43 Encl
ML20206U712
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 11/20/1984
From: Wessman R
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML19284C882 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8607110071
Download: ML20206U712 (8)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:% J U.'JITED CTM E f ,. - - NUC: EAR REGULATORY CCr<1?,11SClOrj /e/ . ' / g '/ -,' 'I ' S H I NG T C 'J. O C. ;C '.,5 /p / #, ./ j .'s ., t ,,.i u.n - r - a + + r / ,

  • .

, -e .- .- NOV 2 0 .-qi .... tr e MEMORA"DUM FOR: Vincent S. floonan Project Director Comanche Peak FROM: Richard H. Wessman Technical Review Team Ccmanche Peak SUBJECT: COMPLETI0tl 0F ALLEGATI0tl FEEDBACK EFFORT FOR WITt1ESS A-38 A11eger A-32 rairad several ccncerns regarding hanger weiding prebiams in I!cvl7.i3r 1933.

(4llipticCs AE-13 - AE-22).

Thlte COnOSrns '.!Gre 6::a;7i"ad Q Region IV cnd wars documan:3d in inspectica re;c.: SC 425/24-C5, c::ac Jun$21,1954.' Ace;yofthisreportwasprovidadtoA-33.

..... >u ... . ' The TRT reviewed these issues and interviewed A-33 on 'T F 1,. 4, E "4 a.

The . et A. ? .

l interview was transcribed.

. _ .. by Mr. 'l2::msn cn k@- 4NW,M.um. i to accert:i.' a " ' A-33 wc: cent:c:2: E a.m - desired feedback re;;rcing the TRT effor:. A-35 declined, stating :na: inspecticr rercr: 32-C3, previcuciy provisied, s :isfied

cncarr:.

, r ( y. w./ p. tuc% c I Richard H. Wessman Technical Re"'ew Team f C JanC!'J PJ1 s l CC: i'.C.

IJnq , J. Ztaan

0A-85-59

- 8607110071 860624 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR _. . NEMORANDlN TO: Vincent 5. Noonan,' Director Comanche Peak Project $/fDS1/)3A/V FRON: . DATE: I /9

7- _.

SUBJECT: ALLEGER FEEDBACK h3 Alleger # A11egation is kU-G A// // A/n AA/9 A/ 20 A/-2/ '/ / / J j Af 22 AbuJ'3.5, A W 'f/ i A.

O Feedback Conducted: Type of Feedback: Feedback Date: Staff Involved: . A11eger Coments: Followup Action Required: (list allegations and any NRC committments) New Allegations: I B.

Feedback Not Conducted Justification: $1 A11eger declined feedback on //_7-PV c 2.

Alleger Address / Phone # Unknown D 3.

Feedback Correspondence Undeliverable / Returned fg Jk,lpf t l ' ' ' ' ' f f Si nature f200 _

Wh .

e

  • q C.C.C.

-- l'. - - Yl l.' $ ' A set v"o1 l}(@.t a t% Y 0 ~.,) ' t ea y RS8 ,/Hl.-// kllv,', .t a-,i. n -" . ' " nn8 ) {~Y~l0 lh.nii,Sq$if:f(.'.b-.'6h ~ S.

bbb

Q % - . , . s / ,.. . $'/eh cu7 o 7.%&7. her,id >(:Eo=, ?) '.' h ' g //P /~') , , , _ -. _,. c.l.i.u Mh I'9, s,....e o,, n.auc.. ; x, ', . x . a~d.l.~d %dAJ ej QQ ' > L<m< ., i;... ::s.

I . f bf 2( !N,,. o , s 7 ;. //'v ' ?. -.

    • c

=. P, (9, jJ . . I. c.,.-iy p , ' * 4

    • v

" . w o 6 4.

.

. . ... w.d. - ' ' 7L4Y'.'tf,44' O\\ Y

- - s ,a..s ,.~ - Y*d f"

  • /#

= 's!. e" -/ , ' i..1( ' d .o -. u.

.v. v,.-t .u.c.+, n ..i....< - . . $.. ,

. - g-VIM-00-Oh 62ol --

MEMORANDUM TO: Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FRON: {. fDsLUS#y / ! /J,,/ # DATE: < .. SUBJECT: ALLEGER FEEDBACK Alleger i h 39

( Allegation is A(J J--/D A.

O Feedback Conducted: Type of feedback: Feedback Date: Staff Involved: Alleger Cossents: , Followup Action Required: (list allegations and any NRC connittments) l New Allegatfons: l t , B.

Feedback Not Conducted Justification:

D 1.

Alleger declined feedback on g 2.

Alleger Address / Phone i Unknown D 3.

Feedback Corr spondence Undeliverable / Returned nw 8f9/ ki f,_ ? ^ a - ..' a, ,r / / / e <V bee.

,.. > .. Signatyre - . -- - -

_ - _ _ MEMORANDUM TO: Vincent S. Noonan, Dissctor Comanche Peak Project FROM: C, [oS Auf #y / DATE: 7" 3-IT .. SUBJECT: ALLEGER FEEDBACK Alleger # 4Y2 Allegation is NrO h / A.

O Feedback Conducted: Type of Feedback: Feedback Date: Staff Involved: Alleger Connents: Followup Action Required: (list allegations and any MRC connittments) New Allegations: _ B.

QFeedbackNotConducted Justification: C 1.

Alleger declined feedback on a 2.

Alleger Address / Phone f Unknown " C 3.

FeedbackCorrespondenceUndeliverab)/ . " y we naar, . M Y- $~ ? Y 'W r , a Signature . 2 Eo3 - - - - - - _ -

MEMORANDUM TO: Vincent S. Noonan. Director Comanche Peak Project FROM: 0 h0Slu]Ny DATI: 4 //PI

7 ... SUBJECT: ALLEGER FEEDBACK Alleger # M MO Allegation is A-I - /u /10 f./o / A.

O Feedback Conducted: Type of Feedback: Feedback Date: Staff Involved: . Alleger Connents: _ Followup Action Required: (list allegations and any NRC connittments) New Allegations: Q Feedback Not Conducted B.

Justification: O 1.

Alleger declined feedback on g 2.

Alleger Address / Phone # Unknown D 3.

Feedba Correspondence Undeliverable /Re / / / Signature I ZDb

. , d , ' i

: v a.. : :_ r ~.., ". :. - _:.:. I C ", ~ e_ n.. :. D n_

. . ___.. - . l ., earty Ca. led: n -,: - i I had called in August 1982 ar.d left a messt.ce with his mother.

fieverber 2. 19?J (Evening): '

I called and explained my purposes for contacting him, the missicr cf TFT, the .. status of TP.T efforts, etc. He told met'that he had toalked to the lGC in 1982 but had not heard frcm anycne since.

He said that that is wPy he rever returned ry August 19E' call because I identified mysel# as being witn t"e t He also said th:: Pe had res-termina:ed by TUGC0 tecause TU^C^-[[nQ.

b ;' k b f M $h$k M A.D.li7 de ther saic that he v.as rure.i g I ter:3rature cf 103 F.

I said I..cuic call him back en l'crccy, l:cve :er 5, 1932 flc"e-be.- E. 1922 D crning): I called and socke [5Sfsfifd4Md;3'..culd not tell me where he had gone and when he :Culd return.

I cffered to cail back cr Friday, fiovember 9,1934 -' ..........O.,. . r, 0,* /. i. *...a q . . . t.

called and s;cke with A l?,

I again explained tPe reascns for.'~ cicse-cL: s. m,.# J.

c.

. L.a :__, ,.i-s u.

u-,.,. m.- ~. _ .......... .. _, 4 _....... - - .. ..; . -(~ -. ... o- % ............., . -.. .. cass, I saic, we particular'y r.ee; to mee; witn hi" to ensure tna: <..: na.: !* I cc: rectly underotccd his ccccerns since we have not been ab;e tc ccc sc: 'c: ar iri'ial interview.

1 l l

01A-RR59

. i Mos

. . b e .,-

. He agreed tr a tele;here intervisa bu; wc: reluctant to hve it rect -de: - e.clained that we are ergineers ar.c not lawyers, ar.d that the pur;;3es .# recording a cerversa:icn is to keep a cc:rpiete arc accurate record, .w.u... ;3 I M M P.- - -. W n) He then agreed.

I said I uc;1d call hi-t :k i a::er coordinating with.he ,. reviewers.

. c i r. i

fiever.ber 9. 19Fa (12:00 necr) I called A-43 to confire that a telephone interview wculd take place t:caj a: 4:20 p.n. E3T with V. Ferrarini ard a ccurt reporter, f:cterber 9. 1984 (4: 20 cm - 5:20 cm) Cerfer:-rcs c511 u s held.

2 a?'s c rcem apparen:iy is ainly He s::d -"E wren he woriedl ~- yh...

in c::i cn/ ha rrc:.nren t.

< . ', . _ sta:sc that he was generating en the averare cf 3 f:CRs a week.

With u: ar s:scifics of the !!CRs, it is hard to fird cut whether any of the ore: :/2: ce issued (attempted to issue) were voidec cr destrcyed.

r ,IY C,...,. ., s' r.. C. iarg, ini-- - l ! l cc: 7. Necnan, TE ,

l l

l -. - -.... l --.. -... - - -... _ _.. -. ........ _.. _ ...... -. _,_ _...... .. - - - - - - - }}