IR 05000361/1981025
| ML20032B649 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 10/16/1981 |
| From: | Johnston G, Zwetzig G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032B646 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-361-81-25, NUDOCS 8111050759 | |
| Download: ML20032B649 (4) | |
Text
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
.
.
REGION V
Report ho.
50-361/81-25 Docket No.
50-361 License No.
CPPR-97 Safeguards Group
.
Licensee:
Southern California Edison Company P.
O.
Box 800 224 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead. California 91770 facility Name-San Onofre Unit 2 Inspection at:
San Onofre, San Diego County, California Inspection conducted:
September 15 to 25, 1981 Inspectors:
d j
hjihL /[l/k G.0W.O ohndthn[ Resident. Inspector - Trojan Date Sigrfed J
Date Signed
Date Signed h
M M. /d, /ff'/
Approved By:
j Gj B OZwet0ig, Chief, Reactor Operations Date Signed l
Projects Section 1, Reactor Operations Projects Branch Inspection on September 15 to 25, 1981 (Report No. 50-361/
81-25)
Areas Inspected: Routine, resident inspection of applicant's preoperational test program, applicant's action on inspector identified items and an item of noncompliance, TMI Task Action Plan items, and independent inspection effort.
The inspection i
!
involved 37.nspector-hours on-site by one NRC inspector.
Results: Of the four areas inspected, no items of no
'iance or deviations were identified.
'
,
8111050759 811020 gDRADOCK 05000361 PDR
!'
i RV Form 219 (2)
,
_
_
.
.. _... _
,
.
_ _ _.
_,
, _ _ -.. _
,,.. a.
',
,
y n
,
,'
.
-
--t,w
-
p y,-
..
a.
'
' v.[ w.
/ ".j p,
,
f'
"
,.x
.
..
, *, ;.
fi DETAILS e,
' l e,s _
A
+#
,
,
,
p
.f, ",
r: b
-
,
<
,
(
+t
,
..
- l~. '
Persons Contacted
'
~
.
,, y
,
<
.,
',
s
,
'
[
a.
Southern California Edison l
'
g g_
Chavez,StartuplSupebvisor.X,
- G.
A.
- P.
A. Croy, Proj ect-Quality Assurande,(QA).. Supervisor
- C.
R.
Horton,:Startup-QA Supervisor
- T.
O.
Gray.' Project QA 3:
J.
J.
Pantaleo, Startup QA P.. King, Startup QA
- W..Lazear, Startup QA i
'
~
b.
Bechtel Power Corporation
D.
Bye, Startup Engineer
i In' addition, operating personnel, craftsmen,.and engineers were also contacted during the course of the inspection.
- Denotes those attending the exit meeting on September 25, 1981.
2.
Plant Status
"
.
The licensee reports that the plant is 99 percent' complete as-
of July-29,-1981.
.3.
Preoperational Test Observations
,,
j The inspector observed selected portions of Test 2PE-225-01,-
High Pressure Safety Injection.
During the' conduct of the test,-
the inspector observed that the personnel conducting the test
,
were using the latest revision of the t e's t procedure'and were following the procedure.
The inspector also verified by observation that the test prerequisites were met; that proper
'
lineup of plant systems required for the test were complete; and that test equipment was calibrated and in service prior to commencement of the test.
,
...
No items of noncompliance-or deviations were identified.
4.
TMI-Task Action Plan Items
~
The following items requiring action by the applicant in response to NUREG-0737 and NUREG-0712 (Safety Evaluation Report for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3),' Supplements 1 and 2 were examined by the inspector to verify implementation.
,
'.
d f. -.,
.,. - -
- _,, _ _ _ _. - -
, - -,..
'
'
.
-2-
.
i i
!
'
I.A.1.2.
Shift Supervisor Administrative Duties The applicant has implemented Station Orders S023-0-4 and SO23-0-1 which establish administrative controls for the activities of operating personnel and delineate the responsibilities, duties, and authority of the Watch Engineer.
I.A.1.3 Shift Manning
'
Operating Instruction S023-0-14 describes the minimum required manning and the actual manning as proposed by the applicant.
The minimum manning conforms to the guidelines.in NUREG-0737 and to the requirements in the Standard Technical Specifications.
I.C.2 Shift and Relief Turnover Procedures Operating Instruction S023-0-10, Operations Shift Turn-over Procedures, provides instructions and checklists to assure that critical plant parameters are within allowable limits, all systems essential to the prevention and mitigation of operational transicats and accidents are.available and properly aligned, and that.jstems j
and components that are in a degraded mode of operation permitted by the Technical Specifications are identified.
I.C.3.
Shift Supervisor Responsibilities This item is covered under I.A.1.2.
I.C.4.
Control Room Access Station Order 9023-0-4, Station Operations, assigns the authority and iesponsibility for limiting control room access to the Watch Engineer.
The procedure also de-lineates the line of succession, and limits the succession to those persons possessing a current senior reactor operator license.
II.E.1.2.
Auxiliary Feedwater Initiation and Indication
'
The inspector examihed installed equipment to verify that flow indication in each train of the Auxiliary Feed-water System (AFWS).was available in the control room.
The inspector alsofexam~ined the drawings and associated equipment of the AFWS to> determine that the automatic initiation system, logic,:and circuitry met the require-ments of NUREG,0578, Section 2.1.7.a, and NbdEC-0737.
l a
,-
-
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
- - - -
>c
.-
3.
.
,
{
y m-h4 s
f L. i
- %
7p3
~
-
v
4
.,
..
Q.
C; e
i
,
y
_
t y
a _ -
..
,
,
,
'
'
i
,
_
-
.
'
,
f
_3_
4-
,
,
p
_
%
,
-,. +
,
s.
5.
LLicensee Action-on Previdbs Inspection Findin
-
s-The[ inspector examined the action taken by the applicantoon previously identified concerns:
(50-b61/81-03-01): Th'e inspector (Closed) Followup Item examined the SCELEngineering evaluation of the failure of the Low Pressure Safety Injection Valve and found no further conerns.
(Closed) Followup Item (50-361/81-03-02):
The-inspector verified that the applicant conducted a walkdown of low temperature systems subject to thermal expansion.
.
(Closed) Followup Item (50-361/81-05-02):
The applicant has completed the evaluation of the Main Steam Line support failure.
The inspector' examined portions of the report to confirm the analysis evaluated stresses affecting the piping.
6.
Followup on Item of Noncompliance The inspector examined corrective action taken by the applicant
.in response to an item.of noncompliance in the area of review and. updating of preoperational test procedures prior to per-formance.
The item of noncompliance concerned a procedure (2HA-102-01) for thermal expansion measurements.
The procedure was corrected by review against the latest design documents and the issuance of Test Change Notices.
The applicant also included a stress engineer from the design group for each team that took thermal expansion data.
Thirty
-
measurements added by the procedure revision, and not taken during the original ambient temperature condicion, were obtained when the system was returned to ambient.
Training sessions for Startup Engineers were conducted to emphasize the requirement in Startup Test Instruction TI-2, Paragraph 5.2.2.,
that requires a detailed review of test procedures.
This item of nocompliance is closed. (50-361/
81-03-04)
7.
Exit Meeting On September 25, 1981, the inspector met with applicant representatives (identified in Paragraph 1) to discuss the scope and findings of the inspection.
.
.
o p
N a e
/
,
-
It.
-
---
. + * '
- _ - _ _ - _.