IR 05000275/1982024
| ML20062K019 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 08/02/1982 |
| From: | Morrill P, Thomas Young NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062K015 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-275-82-24, NUDOCS 8208160525 | |
| Download: ML20062K019 (3) | |
Text
-
-
-
(-
~
.-
,
,
'
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report No.
50-275/82-24 Docket No.
50-275 License No.
DPR-76 Safeguards Group Licensee:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
P. O. Box 7442
,
San Francisco, California 94106 Facility Name:
Diablo Canyon Unit 1 Inspection at:
Diablo Canyon Site, San Luis Obispo County, California I
Inspection conducted:
July 12-15, 1982
[
kb/f L Inspector:
@
P. J. McFrill, Reactor Inspector
" Da'te Signed j
h IMd IL
~Date Signed 2./fL
'
Approved by:
I. Yo)ng,' Jr., Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2 i
Reactor Operations Projects Branch Summary:
Inspection of July 12 through July 15,1982 (Report No. 50-275/82-24)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of plant operations, Onsite Review Committee, and independent inspection.
The inspection involved 24 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
l 8208160525 820802 PDR ADOCK 0500027S RV Form 219(2)
l G
_...
-
_..
.. _ - _
.
.
_ -,. - -.
_
--
.. -
.. _.
. --_
.
/
DETAILS
>
1.
Persons Contacted
- R. Thornberry, Plant Manager
- J. M. Gisclon, Power Plant Engineer D. A. Backens, Supervisor of Maintenance
- J. A. Sexton, Supervisor of Operations
- W. B. Kaefer, Technical Assistant to the Plant Manager J. S. Diamonon, QC Supervisor The inspector also talked with and interviewed a number of other licensee employees including plant technicians and engineers, quality assurance personnel, and members of general construction.
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Plant Tour The inspector toured the facility and.made the following observations:
a.
Unit 1 system and components were in a status consistent with the current plant mode.
,
b.
Units 1 and 2 safety-related batteries were in the process of being replaced. A nonsafety-related battery room was being constructed in the Unit 1 Turbine Building.
c.
Housekeeping and cleanliness in Units 1 and 2 appeared consistent with current construction activities, as well as applicable fire and safety requirements.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Onite Review Committee The inspector examined the meeting minutes and associated records for the Plant Safety Review Committee (PSRC) for the months of May, June, and July 1982, and discussed these records with appropriate licensee personnel to determine if the onsite review functions are being conducted in accordance with the technical specifications and regulatory requirements.
The inspector also examined selected licensee 10 CFR 50.59 reviews, procedural changes, design changes, and nuclear plant problem reports (NPPRs).
The inspector observed that some of the licensee's NPPRs were not in the central files for these documents (specifically, DC0-82-ST-P0001, DC0-82-PS-P000S/P0024, and P0032), but were in the appropriate originating group's log.
In response to the inspector's question at the exit meeting, licensee representatives stated that the quality control group was responsible to track and close out NPPR...
-.
.-
.
.
'
,
,
l'
f'
-2-
[
i The inspector also observed that NPPR DCO-82-ST-P0013 raised the j
question as to whom would keep track of and document postponed PSRC agenda items. When questioned, licansee representatives stated that the quality control group would keep track of and document t
,
these itens.
!
i No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
[
!
4.
Exit Interview l
The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)
t on July 15, 1982.
During this meeting, the scope and findings of
'
the inspection were summarized by the inspector.
.!
t i'
'
,
i t
l
s I
.
,
f
!
I i
'
.>