IR 05000261/1988013
| ML14191A947 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 06/22/1988 |
| From: | Conlon T, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14191A946 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-261-88-13, NUDOCS 8807220098 | |
| Download: ML14191A947 (5) | |
Text
~pilREGuL UNITED STATES o
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 Report No.:
50-261/88-13 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:
50-261 License No.:
DPR-23 Facility Name:
H. B. Robinson Inspection Conducted:
June 7-10, 1988 In spector:____________
___
J. R. Harris ate Signed Approved by:
12-' 21-1?k T. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed Plant Systems Section Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection was in the areas of Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
controls and work activities for the dry spent fuel storage facility, seismic monitoring program and followup on previously identified inspection item Results:
In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identifie PDR ADOCK 05000261 e%
REPORT DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. M. Curley, Acting General Manager, CP&L
- J. Epperly, Project Engineer Construction
- S. A. Griggs, Aide, Regulatory Compliance D. Northcutt, Maintenance Coordinator
- H. J. Young, Director, Quality Assurance/Quality Control
- S. M. Pruitt, H.B.R. ISI Coordinator
- S. McCutcheon, ISI
- S. B. Clark, Project Engineer, Configuration Control
- A. M. McCauley, Principle Engineer, ONS
- B. Harward, Principle Engineer
- R. Dayton, Project Engineer Technical Support Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included craftsmen, engineers, technicians, and administrative personne NRC Resident Inspectors L. Garner
- R. Latta, Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview Independent Inspection Effort (92706)
The inspector discussed the seismic monitoring program with responsible engineers, examined seismic monitoring equipment and reviewed procedures for surveillance of seismic monitoring equipment. The equipment consists of two SMA-2 Triaxial Time History Accelerographs. Recorder A is located inside the containment purge inlet structure and Recorder B is. located south of the waste retention basin. The recorders are set to trip at
.05 The operating base earthquake is based on the fact that the site area could experience a shock in the order of the 1959 McBee earthquake once during the life of the plant. A magnitude of 4.5 earthquake was selected with an epicentral distance of less than ten miles was selected as the Operating Base Earthquak This is based on a ground acceleration of 0.1g, even though the probable ground acceleration is expected to be in the.07g to.09g rang The safe shutdown earthquake is based on a hypothetical earthquake with a ground acceleration of 0.2 Procedures reviewed by the inspector for surveillance of seismic equipment are as follows:
MST-904 Seismic Recorder Operation, Monthly Interval MST-905 Seismic Recorder Calibration, Semi-Annually Review of these procedures and the most recent surveillances showed that FSAR and Technical Specifications for seismic monitoring were being me.
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (T10110/4)
The inspector examined QA/QC controls and work activities for placement of the concrete pad for the Horizontal Storage Module (HSM).
The HSM is a reinforced concrete structure for dry storage of spent nuclear fue The nuclear fuel assemblies will be placed in stainless steel dry shielded canisters (DRC)
which will be stored in the HS These facilities are being constructed to provide additional interim storage capacity for the spent nuclear fuel. The HSM is committed to the requirements specified in
CFR 72, Licensing Requirements For Storage Of Spent Fuel in an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation. Subpart G, Quality Assurance of 10 CFR 72, requires a quality assurance program based on the criteria in Appendix B of 10 CFR 5 Areas examined during this inspection to verify that these requirements were being met were as follows: Review of Quality Implementing Controls examined by the inspector included the following specification, procedures and drawings:
(1) Specification L2-C-021, Fabrication Specification for the Horizontal Storage Modul (2) Plant Modification M-929, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Expansio (3) Drawing N C-1201, Horizontal Storage Module, General Layout and Details Horizontal Storag (4) Drawing N C-1202, Horizontal Storage Module, Foundation Plan, Sections and Detail (5) Drawing N C-1203, Horizontal Storage Module Roof Plan and Wall Sectio (6) Drawing N C-1204, Horizontal Modules Embedment Section and Detail (7) Drawing N C-1205, Horizontal Storage Modules Concrete Reinforcing Sections and Detail (8) Drawing N C-1206, Horizontal Storage Module Air Inlet precast Shielding Slab, Plan and Section (9) Drawing N C-1207, Horizontal Storage Module Air Outlet Shielding Block Plan and Sections
(10) Drawing No. 87081-C-1208, Horizontal Storage Module Front Access Cover and Frame Elevation Section and Detail (11)
Drawing N C-1209, Horizontal Storage Module Heat Shield Assembly, Section and Detail (12) Drawing N C-1210, DSC Support Assembly Plan, Sections Detail (13) Drawing N C-1211, DSC Support Assembly Alignment Drawin (14) Drawing No. 87081-C-1212, DSC Seismic Retainer Assembly Sections and Detail (15) Drawing N C-1213, MSM Lighting Protection Section and Detail (16) Drawing No. 87081-C-1200, Horizontal Storage Module Site Pla (17) Drawing No. RNT 162-M-2200, ISFSI Ram Spider Assembl (18) Drawing No. RNT 162-M-2201, ISFSI Ram Spider Assembl (19) Drawing N RNT 162-M-2222, ISFSI Ram Assembly Ram Mountains Assembl (20) Drawing No. RNT 162-M-2221, Ram Assembly Bracket Hose Ree b. Observation of Concrete Placement Operations The inspector observed preplacement preparation and placement operations for the concrete slab. Preplacement observations included verifying that forms were tight, level, and had the proper dimensions; that the size, number and spacing of reinforcement steel and steel supports complied with drawing requirements; and that the placement had been properly cleane Observation of placement activities showed that the placement was continuously monitored by construction engineers and QC inspectors and that activities pertaining to delivery time, freefall flow distance, layer thickness, and consolidation conformed to specification requirement Samples of plastic concrete were obtained from designated sampling points and were tested in accordance with procedure requirement Test results indicated that the plastic concrete being placed met the specifi cation requirements for slump, air content, unit weight and temperature observations of the making of test cylinders used to verify the strength of the concrete being batched showed they were being made and field cured in accordance with specification requirement. Action on Previous Inspection Findings (92701)
(Closed)
IFI 50-261/87-13-01, Applicable Requirements for Coatings and Supporting documentation for Coatings in Containmen During this inspection the inspector reviewed updated procedures for coatings in the containment and documentation to verify that coatings were being applied in accordance with applicable Regulatory Guides and FSAR requirements. This item is close. Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on June 10, 1988, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection result Dissenting comments were not received from the license The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio Licensee management was informed that the IFI discussed in paragraph 4 would be closed.