IR 05000322/1985025

Physical Security Insp Rept 50-322/85-25 on 850611-14.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Onsite Review of Rev 10 Proposed Changes to Physical Security Plan & Personnel Training & Qualification

ML20138A057
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	10/02/1985
From:	Keimig R, Martin W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138A053	List: IR 05000322/1985025 ML20138A048
References
50-322-85-25, NUDOCS 8510080453
Download: ML20138A057 (3)

Text

.- .~

'

'

.

,

l l

l U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /85-25 Docket N License N NPF-19 Licensee: Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801 Facility Name: Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Inspection At: Wading River, New York Inspection Conducted: June 11 - 14, 1985 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: March 4 - 8, 1985 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspectnr: =U; h /o ..;a . gf WTG.~Mapin,py cal Security Inspector date Approved by: .

~

_1 -_i__- / o. 2 - f(

R/.Keimg,C f, Safeguard Section, DRSS date Inspection Summary: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on June 11 - 14,1985 (Inspection Report No. 50-322/85-25)

Areas Inspected: Routine inspection for Site Orientation; Physical Barriers -

Protected Area; Personnel Training and Qualification; and, a onsite review of changes proposed for Revision 10 to the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Physical Security Plan. The inspection involved 32 hours3.703704e-4 days <br />0.00889 hours <br />5.291005e-5 weeks <br />1.2176e-5 months <br /> onsite by one region-based inspecto Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas inspecte g3 ADOCK O PDR PDR G

. . . . - . . . - __ _ . _ - . _ - . .. .

.- - .,

T

,.

..

DETAILS Key Persons Contacted

• J. Morin, Manager, Nuclear Services Division

• R. Reen, Site Security Supervisor

• J. Devlin, Se'urity c Administrative Supervisor K. King, Security Engineer E. Burger, Training Officer, YOH Security In V. Taggert, Training Officer, YOH Security In . MC 30703 - Exit Interview At the conclusion of the inspection on June 14, 1985, the inspector met with the licensee representatives indicated by an asterisk (*) in Para-graph 1. At that time, the purpose, scope and results of the inspection were reviewe At no time during the inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspecto . MC 81014 Site Orientation A site orientation tour was made by the inspector of the facility . pro-tected and vital areas, controlled access points, general site conditions, and a proposed revision (Revision 10) to the site Security Pla . MC 81078 - Physical Barriers - Protected Area The inspector observed that the licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the protected area in accordance with the physical security plan. The barriers were adequate and appropriate for their intended func-tion. A change is to be made in the protected area perimeter fence to include the three new Colt Pielstick diesel generators which are needed during full power operation. This change will be reviewed during subse-quent inspections. (Inspection Follow-up Item (IFI) 322/85-25-01) ML 81501 Personnel Trainir.g and Qualification Inspection No. 50-322/85-16 was conducted to ascertain the ability of the security force to carry out their assigned duties and responsibilities in accordance with the security program. A statistically unacceptable number of failures occurred during testing Central Alarm Station (CAS) and Sec-ondary Alarm Station (SAS) operator The licensee retested all CAS/SAS operators and evaluated the results in order to determine whether:

.-

l

(1) the training properly prepares an individual for the required tasks; (2) the qualification examination is a valid measure of the knowledge an individual requires to carry out the tasks; and, (3) the indiv auals selected to be operators are properly suited for that assignmen As a result of the evaluation of the qualification test, the licensee determined that the test contained questions which were not within the scope of the CAS/SAS operators day to day duties. The CAS/SAS operating procedures were revised and a new examination was developed for qualifying Alarm Station Operators. This qualification was to be accomplished and the new test results forwarded to NRC, Region I by July 15, 198 . Proposed Revision 10, Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Physical Security Plan On May 2.1, 1985, the licensee submitted to the NRC a proposed Revision 10 to the Physical Security Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. The changes were required to provide physical protection for the low power emergency generators which would take the place of the TOI diesel genera-tors. A complete review of Revision 10 changes and site preparations for implementation were made by the inspector during this inspection. The revision became unnecessary on June 14, 1985 when the NRC approved use of the TOI diesel generators as an emergency power source for low power operation. The licensee stopped all site preparation that were related to Revision 10.