IR 05000322/1989008
| ML20248G942 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/21/1989 |
| From: | Dexter T, Keimig R, Olsen W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20248G936 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-322-89-08, 50-322-89-8, NUDOCS 8910110102 | |
| Download: ML20248G942 (7) | |
Text
n
-. - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - _
Encarr: h,5...
.
YY (m2) ' CE' 1XL
-.
. Ny '
-
, Smn.2)
- ,,,,,,,,_,
.EdCi-ble15 9-Z/-ff l
(cm.t.:nnn z;)
( m s)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
-Report No.
50-322/89-08 Docket No. 50-322 License No. NPF-19
.
Licensee:
Long Island Lighting Company P. O. Box 618 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Wading River, New York 11792 Facility Name:
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station
' Inspection At: Wading River, New York Inspection conducted: August 21-24, 1989 Type of Inspection: Soutine, Unannounced Physical Security
/ I~N Inspectors:
I A
W. T. Olsen, Reactor Engineer-Physical Security date
$/}&
J
'l/
Al
~
T. W. Dexter, Physical Se'turAty Inspector
/
date Approved by:
p 9-2/- [F
-
.
R. R. Keimif;-6hief feguards Section
~
date Division of Radiat Safety and Safeguards Inspection Summary:
Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection (Inspection Report No. 50-322/89-08)
Areas Inspected:
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items; Management Support, Security Program Plans and Audits; Protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers, Detection and Assessment Aids; Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications; Power Supply; Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures; Training and Qualifications, and the Safeguards Information Progrim.
Results: The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas inspected.
8910110102 890925 PDR ALOCK 05000322 Q
FDC
_ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _
__
_ _ _ - _
- _ _ -
__ _ - _ _ _
___ - -
- - -
_
_
_ _ - - _
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _
_ - - _ _
-__
.
-
.
,
,
.
DETAILS 1.
Key Personnel Contacted Licensee and Contractor Personnel
- L. Lewin, Maintenance Manager
- K. King, Acting Security Division Manager
- J. Spampinato, Protection Technology Incorporated (PTI) Program Manager
- A. Downs, Security Administration Supervisor
- J. Welsh, Security Operations Supervisor
- L. Britt, Manager, Nuclear Licensing
- R. Rutkowski, Compliance Engineer
- D. Smith, Compliance Engineer
- R. Glazier, Acting Manager, Quality Systems
- M. Bowden, NQA D. Eagle, Office Manager, PTI J. Little, Screening and Badging, Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission F Crescenzo, Resident Inspector j
- indicates those present at the exit interview
!
2.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items (Closed) Violation 88-07-02: The resident inspector found a licensee
!
contractor, who was not authorized for unescorted PA access, in the protected area without an escort, contrary to the licensee's Security Procedure, SP 92.005.02," Personnel Escort". The licensee revised SP 92.005.02 to prevent recurrence of the violation. This procedure revision was reviewed during this inspection and found to be adequate.
3.
Management Support, Security Program Plans, and Audits a.
Mjanagement Support - Management support for the licensee's physical security program was determined to be generally adequate by the i
inspectors. This determination was based upon the inspector's review of various aspects of the licensee's program during this inspection,
,
as documented in this report.
I b.
Security Program Plans - The inspectors verified that changes to the licensee's Security, Contingency, and Guard Training and Qualification Plans, as implemented, did not decrease the effectiveness of the respective plans, and had been submitted in accordance with NRC requirements.
l l
___
_ _ _
_.
_. _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ __
_ _.. _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
s..
-
.
.
.
c.
Audits - The inspectors reviewed the 1987 and 1988 annual security program audit repcrts and verified that the audits had been concocted in accordance with the NRC-approved. Physical Security Plan (the Plan). The audits were comprehensive in scope and the results were reported to the appropriate levels of management.
The inspectors'
review included the licensee's response to and corrective actions for.
the audit findings.
The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the findings.
4.
Protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers, Detection and-Assessment Aids, Isolation Zones and Lighting a.
Protected Area Barriers - The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of the Protected Area (PA) barriers on August 21 and 22, 1989.
The inspectors determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and maintained as described in.the Plan, b.
Protected Area Detection Aids - The inspectors observed the PA perimeter detection aids on August 22 and 23,1989 and determined that they were generally installed, maintained and operated as committed to in the Plan.
Tills PARAERAFH C6HADIS SAFIGUARDS
,
L ITUEifG! AH IS MT f0R PIRic l
D!!0!03EE,li G INGITISHilY l
LUi ELAK l
c.
Isolation Zones - The inspectors verified that isolation zones were adequately maintained to permit observation of activities on both sides of the PA barrier.
d.
Protected Area and Isolation Zone Lighting - The inspectors conducted a lighting survey of the PA and isoittien Zones on August 23, 1989.
The inspectors determined, by observation, that lighting in the PA and isolation zones was as committed to in the Pl a r,.
e.
Assessment Aids - The inspectors observed t~ne PA perimeter assessment aids and determined that they were generally installed, maintained, and operated as committed to in the Plan.
I
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
-
...
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ __
!
..
'
-
.
L L
l THl$ PARAGRAP!! COMAINS SAFEGUARDS IRFORMATISH AND IS NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE, IT IS INTENTIONALLY LEFTBLANK.
f.
Vital Area Barriers - The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of selected Vita) Area (VA) barriers en August 22 and 23, 1989. The inspectors determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and taaintained as described in the Plan.
g.
Vital Area Detection Aids - The inspectors observed the VA detection aids and determined that they were installed, maintained and operated as committed to in the Plan.
5.
Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel, Packages and Vehicles a.
The inspectors determined that the licensee was exercising positive control over personnel access to the PA and VAs. This determination was based on the following:
1)
The inspectors verified that personnel are properly identified and authorization is checked prior to issuance of badges and key-cards.
I
___ -__---__-_- - ___
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
L
,
<
..
.
2)- -The inspectors verified that the licensee has a program to confirm the trustworthiness and reliability of employees and contractor personnel.
This program includes checks on prior l
employment and criminal history, and a psychological
'
examination.
p 3)
The inspectors verified that the licensee has a fitness-for-duty
'
program in place.
A drug testing program has been implemented
.
l
'and individuals are tested annually, or for cause.
4) - The inspectors verified that the licensee has a search program for firearms, explosives, incendiary devices and other unauthorized materials, as committed to in the Plan. The inspectors observed personnel access processing during shift changes, visitor access processing, and interviewed members of the security force, and the licensee's security staff, about personnel access procedures.
Iliis PARAGRAPil CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS li:FOR!!.ATIM AND IS NOT FOR PSUG DISCLOSURE, IT is INT!20HilU LEFTBLANK.
The inspectors also discussed the planned closing of the Secondary Access Facility (SAF) with the licensee to determine what physical security protection it would be afforded after it was closed. The licensee stated that the final plans had not been completed and agreed to make a presentation to the Region I staff when they were completed.
5)
The inspectors determined, by observation, that individuals in the PA and VAs display their access badges as required.
6)
The inspectors verified that the licensee has escort procedures for visitors to the PA and VAs.
7)
The inspectors verified that the licensee has provisions for expediting prompt access to vital equipment during emergencies and that the provisions are adequate.
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ - - _ _
.
.
-
..
1 8)
The inspectors verified that unescorted access to VAs is limited to authorized individuals. The VA access list is revalidated at least once every 31 days as committed to in the Plan.
b.
The inspectors determined that the licensee was exercising positive control over packages and material that are brought into the PA.
i The inspectors reviewed the package and material control procedures and found that they were consistent with commitments in the Plan.
The inspectors also observed package and material processing and interviewed members of the security force and the licensee's security staff about package and material control procedures. No deficiencies were identified.
c.
The inspectors determined that the licensee properly controls vehicle access to and within the PA. The inspectors verified that vehicles are properly processed prior to entering the PA. The process was consistent with commitments in the Plan.
The inspectors also reviewed the vehicle search procedures and determined that they were consistent with commitments in the Plan. This determination was made by observing vehicle processing and search, inspection of vehicle logs, and by interviewing members of the security force and licensee's security staff about vehicle processing and search procedures. No deficiencies were identified.
6.
Alarm Stations and Communications a.
The inspectors observed the operation of the Central Alarm Station (CAS) and the Secondary Alarm Station (SAS) and determined that they were maintained and operated as committed to in the Plan. CAS and SAS operators were interviewed by the inspectors and found to be knowledgeable of their duties and responsibilities.
The inspectors verified that the CAS and SAS do not contain any operational activities that would interfere with the assessment and response functions.
b.
The inspectors observed tests and communications capabilities in both the CAS and the SAS and reviewed the testing records for the communications channels.
No deficiencies were identified.
7.
Emergency Power Supply a.
The inspectors verified that there are several systems (batteries, UPS inverters, and plant on-site AC power) that provide backup power to the security systems and reviewed the test and maintenance procedures for these systems. The systems and procedures were consistent with the Plan. At least one system is located in a VA.
b.
The inspectors verified that the door access control system for VAs will permit emergency egress when normal power is lost.
I
1
_ - _ _ _ - _ _ _
_ _
_ _
_
- - _ _ _ _ _
_ - _-_=___ --_-_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
L
-
.
-
,...
8.
Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures a.
The inspectors reviewed testing and maintenance records and confirmed that the records committed to in the Plan were on file and readily available for NRC review. The Station provides I&C technicians to repair / replace and test security equipment. A review of repair records by the inspectors indicated that repairs / replace-ments and testing has been accomplished in a timely manner.
THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS SAFIGUARDS INFORMATION AND IS NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE, II IS INTEKil0NALLY LEFTBLANK.
b.
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's use of compensatory measures and determined them to be as committed to in the Plan.
9.
Security Training and Qualification a.
The inspectors randomly selected and reviewed the training and qualifications records for ten 50s. The physical qualifications and firearms qualifications records were inspected. These records were for armed guaras, security watchman and supervisory personnel. The inspectors determined that the required training had been conducted in accordance with the security program plans and that it was properly documented.
b.
Several S0s were interviewed to determine if they possessed the requisite knowledge and ability to carry out their assigned duties.
The interview results indicated that the 50s were very professional and knowledgeable of their job requirements.
c.
The licensee's contract security force consists of 105 50s and supervisory personnel. The inspectors verified that the armed response force meets the commitments in the Plan and that there is always one full-time member of the security organization on-site who has the authority to direct security activities.
10.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with the licensee representatives indicated in paragraph I at the conclusion of the inspection on August 24, 1989. At the time, the purpose and scope the inspection were reviewed, the findings were presented, and the commitments inade by the licensee, as documented in this report, were confirmed.
At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspectors.
-
. _ - _ _ - _ -. ___ ________ _ _ _