IR 05000322/1987008
| ML20237J135 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1987 |
| From: | Kemig R, Martin W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20237J133 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-322-87-08, 50-322-87-8, NUDOCS 8708180002 | |
| Download: ML20237J135 (5) | |
Text
I
..
(;
i
'
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
REGION I
r l
Report No.
50-322/87-08
!
Docket No.
50-322
-
License No.
i Licer.see:
Long Island Lighting Company
175 East Old Country Road Hicksville, New York 11801 Facility Name:
Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Inspection At: Wading River, New York
.
Inspection Conducted: April 20-24, 1987 Type of Inspection:
Routine, Unannounced Physical Security i
Inspector:
(?
Walter G. Martin, Physical Security Inspector
/
date l
!
Approved by:
.h/
72# 87
-
,
M ichard R. Keimig, Ch
, Safeguards Section, date
)
Nuclear Materials Sa y and Safeguards Branch i
.
'
I Inspection Summary:. Routine Unannounced Physical Security Inspection i
on April 20-24, 1987, (Report No. 50-322/87-08)
l Areas Inspected: Security Plan and Implementing Procedures; Security Program l
Audit; Records and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers l
(Protected and Vital); Security System Power Supply; Assessment Aids; Access
l Control (Personnel and Packages); Detection Aids - Protected Area; Alarm
'
Stations; Safeguards Contingency Plan and Implementing Procedures - General-Requirements; and the status of Inspector Follow-up Items.
Results. The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements.in the ereas examined, except as follows:
a protected area intrusion detection system zone was found in the access mode without proper compensatory measures.
-
8708180002 870004 PDR ADOCK 0500
G
________ _ o
.
.
,
v.
DETAILS I
l 1.
Key Persons Contacted Long Island Lighting Company i
R. Gutman, Manager, Nuclear Operations Support Department S. Skorupski, Assistant Vice President Nuclear Operations J. Devlin, Division Manager, Site Security l
A. Downs, Security Administrative Supervisor J. Walsh, Security Operations Supervisor R. Grunseick, Operations Compliance Engineer J. Carey, Licensing Engineer J. Graziano, Licensing Engineer Protection Technology Incorporated M. Annast, Senior Vice President i
A. Crouse, Program Manager The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the contract guard force.
l 2.
Status of Inspector Follow-up Items
'
>
(Cicsed) Inspector Follow-up Item 86-21-01:
The inspector noted that the
licensee addressed all current NRC security related Information Notices
<
'
that were forwarded for review and information.
The inspector confirmed that they 'were considered by the licensee.
3.
Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The inspector reviewed the security plan and selected implementing procedures.
Two 10 CFR 50.54(p) changes (Revisions 12 and 13) were submitted to the NRC on January 12, 1987 and accepted. The implementing procedures were found to be adequate and appropriate to carry out the licensee's commitments as contained in the NRC-approved security plan.
Other changes to the plan are contemplated as the licensee continues to enhance the security systems.
4.
Records and Reports I
The inspector noted that security records and reports required by the Plan and procedures are clear, concise, current and well maintained.
Regional reports were submitted to the NRC in accordance with Plan commitments and NRC regulatory requirements..
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
._
f
.!
.
.
.
l i
\\
o
,
l
l l
!
1 l
5.
Testing and Maintenance
)
The Itcensee's program for testing and maintenance of security equipment
!
i was reviewed by the inspector and determined to be in conformance with
{
the NRC-approved security plan and implementing procedures.
The licensee is
!
'
performing major testing, maintenance, and/or replacement of various segments of the perimeter intrusion detection system to enhance its
!
operation.
!
l 6.
Physical Barriers-Protected Area l
l B
The inspector observed that the licensee maintained the physical barriers
{
surrounding the protected area in accordance with the NRC-approved j
i security plan.
)
'
i
,
i I.FOR ?y 0NTAINS SAFEGUAgg5 a
DISCLD5yRE,liIS ;g ND FOR PUBllc l
LEFT BLANK.
nil 0RhlLY
\\
l
7.
Physical Barriers - Vital Areas The inspector verified that the licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the vital areas in accordance with the NRC-approved security plan, The licensee, at the request of the inspector, conducted several tests of the alarms associated with the vital area barriers and access points.
The results of the tests were satisfactory.
8.
Security System Power Supply The inspector determined by review that the licensee's emergency back-up power for the site security systems conforms to the NRC-approved security plan.
However, the licensee is planning to install a dedicated back up power supply to support the security systems and security lighting.
10.
Assessment Aids The inspector observed that the assessment aids conformed to the NRC-approved security plan and were adequate for their intended function.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_.
y
..
l
.
o
.
11. Access Control-Personnel
The inspector observed that the licensee controlled access to the i
protected and vital areas in accordance with the NRC-approved security l
plan and implementing procedures.
Search equipment was adequate and
!
appropriate for its intended use.
12. Access Control-packages '
I The inspector observed the processing of packages and material into the protected area and found the procedure to be in conformance with the NRC-approved security plan and implementing procedures.
13.
Dstection Aids-protected Area The inspector noted that the licensee had initiated changes to the l
perimeter intrusion detection system to enhance detection capabilities
!
and reduce false alarms. The inspector observed and participated in
!
penetration testing of the detection systems during the physical security
'
inspection that was conducted in December,1986. As a result of the testing, minor adjustments to some newly replaced detection zones were needed and were made.
The licensee continues to enhance the system with j
improvements to the equipment.
The inspector observed that the l
l equipment and the systems in place were in conformance with the NRC-J
.
approved security plan.
j 14. Alarm Stations l
The inspector confirmed by direct observations at the central alarm
'
station (CAS) and secondary. alarm station (SAS) that they were in conformance with the NRC approved security plan. The inspector noted that CAS and SAS operators demonstrated adequate skill and knowledge in the performance of their duties.
Plans to relocate the SAS, due to the potential for overcrowding at its current location, are continuing. The licensee also plans to enlarge the central alarm station to improve efficiency.
15.
Safeguards Contingency Plan Implementation Review - General Requiremen,ts The inspector ascertained that the licensee's program for responding to security threats and other contingencies, as outiined in the NRC-approved security plan, was adequate.
The licensee conducts twelve security con-tingency drills and six site emergency exercises each year.
Two of the site emergency exercises conducted since January 1, 1987 were security related and, therefore, required the active participation of both the security and the operations organizations for their execution and success-ful completion.
- _ _ _ _ _
_-
'
a..
..
o o
..
!
The inspector reviewed the critique of one of the.exercisesLand noted that the organizational interfaces were effective in completing the.exeret'se..
The implementation of a program to exercise organizational interfaces was initiated by a Standing' Order, dated December 3, 1986, Subject:, Opera-
'
tional Response.to Events Concerning Deliberate Acts Directed Against Plant Equipment.
16.
Exit Interview l
I
'The inspector met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on April 24 1987..At that time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings
.
presented.
At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the
-
licensee by the inspector.
>
i
'l l
I l
)
l
s
!
!
__-----__L