IR 05000322/1985006
| ML20129F868 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/29/1985 |
| From: | Cohen I, Harpster T, Rich Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20129F862 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-322-85-06, 50-322-85-6, NUDOCS 8506070063 | |
| Download: ML20129F868 (7) | |
Text
.
.
~
>
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Report No.
50-322/85-06 Docket No.
50-322 License No. CPPR-95 Priority Category B
--
Licensee:
Long Island Lighting Company 175 East Old York Road Hicksville, New York 11801 Facility Name: Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Inspection At:
Shoreham, New York Inspection Conducted: January 22-25, 1985
'
7
Inspectors:
e
~
/
,
. Smith " ' '
Emergency Preparedness Specialist E. Woltner, Emergency Preparedness Specialist AM rlohc I. Cohen
' date ~
Emergency Preparedness Specialist Approved by:
_
_ler-
f~
T.L/Harpstf, Chief
' date Emergency Preparedness Section Inspection Summary:
Inspection on January 22-25, 1985 (Report No. 50-322/85-06)
Areas Inspected:
Routine announced inspection to review open items identified on previous inspections and to review the status of programs for changes to the emergency preparedness program, knowledge and performance of duties, and licensee audits.
The inspection involved 108 inspector hours by three NRC regional-based inspectors.
Results: No violations were identified.
,
$
'
y
.
.
e-
,
.-
_
DETAILS 1.
Individuals Contacted 1.1 LILCO
- C. Daverio, Manager.. Emergency Preparedness
.
M. Howley, Watch Engineer
- J. Leonard, Vice President, Nuclear Operations
- W. Steiger, Plant Manager
.
1.2 Contractors
.
- J. Brand, Stone & Webster (S&W), Licensing
- W. Burnett Impe11, Compliance Engineer B. Mandell, S&W, Equipment & Facilities Specialist
- G. Rhoads, Impe11, Compliance Engineer
- R. Rossin, S&W, Emergency Preparedness
- F. Strickhart, S&W, Emergency Preparedness 1.3 NRC P. Eselgroth, Senior Resident Inspector
- Denotes those individuals attending the exit meeting on January 25, 1985.
The inspectors also contacted other personnel.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings 2.1 (Closed) 50-322/82-18-14: Complete the installation and assure the operability of facilities and equipment incorporating the guidance of NUREG-0737 for sampling and analysis of post-accident primary coolant.
,
Based on NRC Inspection Report No. 50-322/83-37, only a valve had to be replaced in the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS) to complete correction of this item. The inspectors examined the licensee's maintenance records, discussed the corrective action with licensee l
representatives and determined that the valve had been replaced,
'
and tested.
2.2 (Open) 50-322/82-18-30: Complete the installation and operational l
testing of communications and notification systems described in the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.
l
,
,
T
.
r
>
!
The status of the communications and notification systems are as follows:
2.2.1 (0 pen) The New York State Radiological Emergency Communications System (RECS) hotline had been installed. However, the system has not been formally implemented since a letter of agreement between the licensee and the State organization has yet to be obtained.
The licensee notified New York State and Suffolk County by letters dated December 21, 1984, of their intent to use commercial telephone numbers to make required notification to both parties for declaration of an emergency if the RECS is not operative.
2.2.2 (Closed) Communication links for the National Alert Warning System (NAWAS) had not been installed or tested in the TSC or EOF, Installation had been completed and was operational in the Control Room.
The inspector determined that the Itcensee had communicated with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding completion of sne NAWAS installation and that only the Control Room would be equip-ped with a NAWAS link.
The licensee will revise the Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures to reflect this change.
2.2.3 (Closed) The Health Physics Network (HPN) hardware had been installed but the telephone was not operational in the EOF.
Installation had been completed and was operational in the TSC and Health Physics access control point.
The licensee provided the circuit number for the EOF installation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in a letter dated April 23, 1984 The Itcensee had not been informed of the installation date by the NRC at the time of the inspection.
2.2.4 (Closed) The plant public address and party line system (Gai-Tronics)
had been installed and was operational. However, additional adjust-ments will have to be made in high noise areas when the plant is given an operating license (NRC I&E bulletin 79-18 regarding volume level in high noise areas).
The inspector determined that modifications to the system for noise level had been made in the Olesel Generator Rooms, the fire Pump House, and some Reactor Building locations.
The Itcensee has a tracking system for completion of this item and reports results to the NRC Resident Inspector.
2.3 (0 pen) 50-322/82-18-34:
Prepare and distribute public information mate-rial regarding the actions to be taken by individuals within the Emergency Planning Zone.
-
_
,
-.
-
I
.
The licensee representative stated that the public information material was complete and ready for printing. The distribution of the material to the public is required before operating above five percent of rated power.
3.
Changes to the Emergency Preparedness Program 3.1 References 10 CFR 50, Appendix E.V 10 CFR 50, 47(b)(16)
Shoreham Emergency Plan, Section 8.0 Shoreham Emergency Preparedness Implementing Procedures (EPIPs),
5-1, Rev. I and 5-2, Rev. 1 3.2 Scope _of Review The inspectors reviewed Section 8.0 of the Shoreham Emergency Plan and EPIPs 5-1 and 5-2 and discussed changes to the emergency program, organt-zation, and distribution of the emergency plan and procedures with licen-see representatives.
The inspector also reviewed 16 EPIPs in the 1 and 5 series dated July 15, 1984.
EPIP 5-2 describes a detailed program for making changes to either the emergency plan or procedures. The Emergency Preparedness organization also has a program for implementing any required training as a result of program changes.
3.3 Findings The inspectors determined that all changes to the plan and procedures to date had received the proper management review and that distribution was adequate.
The Itcensee is evaluating the distribution of the plan and procedures to reduce the distribution where feasible.
No violations were identified.
4.
Knowledge and Perfo*mance _of Duties (Traininal 4.1 References Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Emergency Preparedness Plan, Section 8.0 EPIP 5-4 Emergency Preparedness Program Training EP!P 5-5 Emergency Preparedenss Drills and Exercises Emergency Plan Training Manual, Lesson Plans, Volume !!!
Training Administrative Manual dated December, 1981.
4.2 Scope _of Review A description of the Itconsee's emergency preparedness training program appears within Section 8.0 of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Emergency Preparedness Plan (Rev. 5).
The plan provides for initial training and retraining of offsite and onsite Itcensee personnel and local support services personnel (i.e., fire, ambulance and police) by means of in-class m _ _.
._ - -__ _-_.
..
,:
i
'
instruction, walk-throughs and participation during drills and exercises.
Training is provided by members of the emergency preparedness staff and by
,
contractor personnel.
,
References 1-4 serve as a means for implementation of the training program.
The inspectors reviewed the referenced documents, held discussions with
. emergency preparedness training instructors and attended four training sessions as follows:
EP-1 Overview of Emergency Plarning EP-3 Emergency Organization and Responsibilities
'
EP-20 TSC Activation and Support L
EP-21 OSC Activation, Support, and Staff Functions.
!
In addition, the inspectors completed the examinations given for each of r
the training sessions and noted that the examinations were thorough and i
well proctored.
4.3 Findings The inspectors reviewed copies of drill / exercise coordination reports and i
noted that all individuals identified as watch engineers (initial Emer-gency Directors) and Response Managers had participated in a drill /
exercise during calendar year 1984.
,,
The inspectors conducted walk-throughs with two watch engineers which consisted of presenting initiating conditions relating to emergency action levels and noting responses. The watch engineers were able to classify the emergency and take appropriate actions.
However, the watch engineers
!
could not readily identify all responsibilities that could not be dele-gated by Emergency Directors, although the watch engineers were aware of these responsibilities when they were identified by the inspectors.
i
's
_
The inspectors noted that although procedure EPIP 5-4, Paragraph 5.5 -
i i
Training Records, indicated that the training. records for each individual on the On Site Emergency Response Organization shall be maintained on com-
!
puter, that this record system had not been implemented.
This item is
!
open(50-322/85-06-01) and Will be reviewed during a subsequent NRC:RI i
inspection.
A review was conducted of the training modules covering eleven emergency
!
positions and included the training records, attendance and pass / fail i
grades of fifty-three individuals assigned specific positions.
It was l
!
determined that the emergency plan training program had been administered
-
as outlined in the Emergency Plan and Procedures.
It was noted, however,
,
that not all emergency response personnel had completed retraining by the
-
end of calendar year 1984 including two Radiation Monitoring Technicians
'
f and two of the six Watch supervisors.
This item is open (50-322/
i 85-06-02) and will be reviewed during a subsequent NRC:RI inspection.
'
l
'
_
. _ _,
-
_ _ _ _
__
_____
_ _ _ _ _.
.
- .
~
'
p
'
i
,
,
-
,
The training department did take initial corrective action in that
.
formal notification was issued Itsting personnel who are presently
'
,
l unqualified for their emergency response organization position.
The inspectors also noted that Watch Supervisors did not receive the same Emergency Director training as the Watch Engineers, although they may be required to perform the function.
During the inspection, the licensee stated that the training matrix would be revised and that Watch Super-
'
visors would also receive Emergency Director training.
This item is open (50-332/85-06-03) and will be reviewed during a subsequent NRC:RI inspec-tion.
No violations were identified.
I 5.
Licensee Auoits i
5.1 References 10CFR50.54(t)
10 CFR 50, Appendix E IV, F.
Shoreham Emergency Plan, Section 8
5.2 Scope of Review The inspectors reviewed the results of Quality Assurance (QA) Audit 83-01 conducted June 6-10, 1983, and discussed the audit with the QA Audit Team Leader. The following elements of emergency preparedness were included in the audit:
Organization, Administration Qualifications, Training, Drills Instructions, Procedures, Drawings, Document Controls Emergency Center / Facility Readiness,
Communications Notification Pubite Education /Information
'
5.3 Findings
,
,
The audit report included details of 38 items which required corrective action.
The inspectors noted that a tracking system was implemented, and that the system provides for verification of corrective actions.
The inspectors verified corrective action completion on nine of the items, and all had been corrected according to documentation.
The Itcensee representative stated that an audit of the annual emergency
-
exercise had been planned for 1984; however, the exercise was not con-ducted. A general audit of the emergency preparedness program is planned for 1985.
No violations were identified.
-
- - -
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
.
.
Q
\\f r
.
..
,
,.
,
,
,
,
'
+
. ',
..
I s 6.
Status of the EOF. TSC. and OSC Emergency Responst Facilities (ERF)
The inspectors obtained the followfig status information from the licenseeandalsoir.spectedtheTpCandOSC.
"
6.1 Physical Facilities The structures are cornplete and operational.
Ventilation systems are installed and operational. All furniture and hardware are available in the facilities for activation as an'ERF.,. All instrumentation and communi-cations equipment as described in the Emergency Prepar<sdness Plan is installed ano^ operational with the exceptiun of the NAWAS in the EOF and TSC, the HPN in the EOF, and the RECS system for New York State and Suffolk County. The present SPDS is an interim system as described in the FSAR and is installed only in the TSC.
The permanent SPDS is to be installed and orafational following the first refueling outage and will include the EOF. All radiation and meteorolotical morttoring equipment s
and other equipment is installed and operationaDinc;he,TSC and EOF.
'
6.2 Data Acquisition Systems
.
.
l All hardware, firmware, and software is designed, insta11ed snd opera-I tional. All detectors and indicators are installed,t.onnec.ted,to inter-rogation systems and operational. All informattor, df st. lays ar(calcula-tional models are designed, installed, and operatinhal.' T_he verification of all data :yttem displays and models are complet.a and do'cumented. The SPOS status is described in 6.1 above.
'
'
I
,
s 6.3 All procedures have been i:ompleted in final fo.n for activation and opera-tion of all facilities, instrumentation, equipnent, and functions with the exception of the permanent SPDS.
6.4 About85percentoftheEmergencyRespoteOrgaSizationhasbeentrained l
to carry out'ERF fut.ctions and operattui of all data systems, communica-tions, instrumentation,andequipment.(
.
.x
-
..
>
6.5 All plant records, drawings and other information essential for determin-ing plant accident status is available to:the ERFs.
I l
7.
Exit Meeting On January 25, 1985, the inspectors met with the individus1s listed in Paragraph 1 and the Teim Leader sumarized the icope and findings of the inspection.
l Licensee management acknowledged On findings and stated that the retrain-ing would be completed and that the. Watch Supervisors would be scheduled for Ernrgoney Director Trair.ing.
At no time during this inso.tction was written mater 91 provided to the l
licensee by the inspectors.
I l
..
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
8