ML12355A784

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 234 of 561 - Page 283 of 561
ML12355A784
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Miktus P
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2266 SNCF164-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML12355A784 (50)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of7 56 Status: YE9'NO U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIN23POO1B Equip, Class, 5 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El, 100 Room,, Area - /92--

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on-the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmenis and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklistfor documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y['N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such.verification)?

2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[2"N-- U0 N/AC-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface SNC] UD N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[3 NC] LT] N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YQ'NC UC N/AC]

(Note: Thiis question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6., Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YV6 N[3 UC]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 234 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofrgy Status: YfIý Nr-E UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIN23POO1B Equip. Class, Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER PUMP IB Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yrl NO U0 N/AC
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[Y NEI UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[12NM UC N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI1IPC UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YER/NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional. pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: .V"-101W YL'AJ Date: 91-t ff ?

PA Ut A4 M Page 235 of 561

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .0 Page 236 of 561

9ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1*0

-r Page 237 of 561

9 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .010 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 238 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 F:F I Sheet i ofx -, ~

s Jl Status:. Y[ýJNM UE1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist.(SWC)

EquipmentIb No. QIPIILT05.6 -Equip.ý Ciss]

Equpmet Dscrptin CNDENISATESgTORAGE TANvKLEVEL TRANSMWT.TERq Location: Bldg. ,YARD Floor.El. 155 ,Room, Area . C.- . .

Manufacturer- Model, Etc. (optional bUt recommended)

Instructions for C.mpieting.Checklist This checklist.may be used to doc~ument the results of fhfeeismic iWakdown of an itemr ofequipment onvthe SWEL. The space belowii ach .ofthe folloqWifixg qiiestidns maiy be, used to record.the rdsu its ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided afthe, end ,of ihischecklist for docume'ing.iother, comment s.

,Anchorage Js.

,isthe anchorage configurationiveri.ficationrequ ired:(i.e-, is theitem one Y NI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such veiification)?

2. Is the.anchorage~fiee of bent, broken, mi1ssIing orloosehardware? 'YKNE U0E N/AE
3. Is the anchorage freie nofcoo

.sin that is'more t.h1amid. surface UE IiU0 oxidation.?

4. Is the anchorage freqedofisib e crack*s in te concrete heart.e anchors? Yh NE3 UE N/AET
5. Is the anchorage con figuration consistent. vith plant, docuimentation? YE NEI U[E N/A2-(Note: This question only appliesiif the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuraion verification is required )

.6 Ba"sed on the above' anchorage evaluations, is-the anichorage free of potentially adverse seismic :conditions?

  • J"KEE UE3 Enter the equipment class:.name from Appendix B: Classes ofEquipmcnt.

Page 239 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 s heett of, I'u A 11FL Status: ElU[]

Sei1smltcWalkdown Chackllist (SWC)

Equipmhent!ID No. QIPI'ILT0516 Equip. Classl 18 Equipmeiit Description, CONDENSATE STORAGE'TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER .

7nteratison Effects

7. Are soft tarxgets free firori] impact :by nearby equipiment or~structtures?

YC U[

1E N/A[LI

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles'and, tig ting, Y Nl VE:J N/AU and masonrybbck walls not likely to collapsebonto the equii"'e-t?

S9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid-damageo .p-:-

V-1 N/AU 100. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yp4EE Uml of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects.?

Other Adverse Conditions 1 . Have you looked fbr and, found no other seismic conditions that could IFjo

,adversely affect the safety functions of the equipmient?

Comments (Additionalpagesbnay be added as necessary)

Evaluated-by: Date:

Co Q AI~irb& ~)

Page 240 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONP Page 241 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 242 of 561

m z

-4 m

C/)

9 m

r-Cl, CD 0I (A

0 z

Cl) 0)

C?

m z

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 I Sheet of.

Status: I~~4 To I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmn4D No QIPW0TOO Equip. Class' 21 Ecpiipment Description. CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK

.Lo0ation: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) instruetions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of.an item of equipimýent on the SWELThe space below eacl of the followinguictions may be used to record the resu 74:ofPtdgments ad findings. Additional space is provided at the end f this checklist for documefitihg other cofrmments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y,*NDI of the'50% of SWEL items requiring'such verification)?

2. Isthe anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YErN'6 UO N/,ý[]

3., Is the a nchorage f-ee of corrosion that is more thanmild surface Yt N] Ui1 N/AC]

oxidation?

CR tAg free i *.

4. is the anchorage ~free of visible eracks in the concrete nea the an chors? YEI"NC ViC] NC
5. Is the:anchorage configuration consistent with plant: documentation?. fN C] N/ACE (Note&This qutestion only applies if the item is one of the 50%/ for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0410C IJO potentially adverse seismic conditibris?

2E'riler thc,equipmen't cla sin nic ftumApj~efdix B.CWeses of Equipment, Page 244 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of lft)

Status: Yif Nol Uin Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentiD No. QiPI1T01 Equip. Class, Equipment Description . CONDENSATE STORAGE :TAN K Interaction Effects 7, Are soft targets. free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ý UE N/AO U

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yf I UDTN)/AD and masonry block walls nxotlikejy to. collapse.onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? VrfN[O UQ N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yj uNEJU of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11, Ha.vc youi looked for and foundno other seismic conditions that could UY[L]1 adversely'affect the safety functions of the equipmen)t?

Comments(Additional pages may be added~as necessary)

Evaluated by:.-t kl/4'K- 2) -4AJZ )Date::

(,V-Page 245 of 561

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .40 Page 246 of 561

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONP Page 247 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

ýp-1,

-(o,4-Shieet 1of 3 Status: Y[ý(NDI U0]

Seismicf Walkdown.Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP15HV31tA& Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description AMP VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 77 Room, Area .. fz Manufacturer,'Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic. Walkdotvn.of an itern of equipment on the SWEL. The space*below each of the followirig questions'may be Used to'trecord ther*rilts ofjudgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the ed of this checklist for documenting other commiien!ts Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification requited (iLe, is the item one YEo Ne of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchoragefiree ofbent, broken, missing orloose hardware? Yl NE0 UD NYA[3
3. Isthe:anchorage free of corrsion that is more than.mild surface N'E1 UE N/AD oxidation?
4. Istihe:anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete, near thedanchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? 'E NE UDI NIAt-"-

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is requir.ed:)

6. Based.on.the above anchorage evaluations,is the:anchorage free of 'I/N NEUE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

"Enter the quipment class name from Appe dix B: Classes of Eqoipmenmt.

Page 248 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Steu ofs3 Status: Y NO UD Seismic WalkdownChecklist (SWC)

Equipipenm ID No. Q1P15HV31OI /.I Equip..Classi 7 Eq'uiiment Description RHR HX A SAMPLE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are. soft targets free from impaei by nearby equipment or structui'es? YNE uED N/AC
8. Are overhead equippment,distributicm sýsitem; cediing tiles and lightin<g, *NE UC3 N/A[C and masonry block walls not likely to0collapse onto the equipmeit?
9. .Do attached lines have adequateflexeibility to avoid damage? 2 Yqz/ 0.UC N/AC1
10. Based on the above seismic: interactionlevaluations, is equipitn ttfN freen uC0 of potentiatly adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have yulooked for and found no otheri seismlic conditions thatcoIid Y'(4jNC UC' adverdely.affedt the safety funtions of the equipmewt?

Comments (Additio6nl pages may be added as necessary) puADv3, . 53 Evaluated by: .. Date:;

. .... / Za,2 qhv z

-T-jfoN Page 249 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: S SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 250 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 5'k; Sheet i of/4 Status: YEI NUI J[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1PI6FSOCA Equip. ClassI 0 Equipment Description SW STRA4NER IA Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 167 Room, Area :12Pe Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudginents and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anehorave

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e,, is the item one Y$ No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? N. TM "/I;,/ac*v
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YPN' UD N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface x~N$'V.UO N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YK140 UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y<ND UED N*AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

e{- 6d5 l-hac-o~o ve-r. 7-0

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO Ný U1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 251 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 44 FFIs~ Status: YO] NO Ul]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID)No. QIPIBF501A -Equip. Class, 0 Equipment Description SIN STRAINER 1A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? NO UO N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NEI U[D N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý,NEOUO NIAE]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free VX'ND U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could l1 UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A VV3 w V--b, W k 'rn-( Iat*- rI- IIc "lbf' 190t" col-rmslo0 i Evaluated b3 Date: 9/10llZ2-9I oi For2 iWfs/ 12

~Y)a&ctq -~r~ AAQcfay s/~nz Page 252 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 253 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 6'

Page 254 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

IF.:jI-. C,.O S heet i otjf I Status; Y NO UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP16FV3009A. Equip. Glaýss 7 ___-_..... .___.

Equipmeit Descition.'

. .......... .. CCW

.. ..HEAT`EX

. .. . . cHANGERP.SERVICE

. . . . . ... WA TER. DISCHARGE, Location:iBBdg. AUXILIARY.FloorfEl. 100 Room, Area Manufacturer,Mo[el -Etc.(*.piooal buirecommended)y Instructions for Compoleting Cbeheiist JThis dhecklist myav be used to dtc týenýtlte results of the Seismic WalkdoWn ofan item of equipment 6ti the SWEL., The spac below, each of the foll6 woing questions may b e1used to recordlthe results ofjudgjent.'and

,findings. Additional space'is provided at thte end ofh its checklist for documenting other comments.

Anehorage:
1. Is th*e anchoiaglconflgurafion Verificlation requfed (i.e , is thejitem.one YE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2, Is the-anchoiragefree dfbeint, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE N/A "

I t'jý- 1-1.OL

3. I' tthe achorage free of:60.orsion that is mofe than. iild surface YEI NE, .UE /A oxidation?
4. Is thedchorage free of visible cracksin the conhrete near, thfe achors? 'EI NE11UE NA 5'. Is the anchdrage cbiofigtiratioh consistent with plant documentatibfi? YEI NE UEM /

(Note: [1is question only appliesif thle item is,one of the 50% for whichiah aiichorage donfiguration: vefication is required.)'

.6.. Based on ttib above anchorogeý, e'aluaiti6nis, ils the,anchorage free Of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

iEnter ihe equipmentl'class:name~fromn Appendix B: Classes of.Equipipnent.

Page 255 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

.Sh~eet 2of a Staltutt YL UI tLj Seismic Walkdbwn.CChecklist (SWC)

,Equipnefit ID :No.. QIP16FV3009A Equip. Class 7. _ ..........

EquipmentC Desciption CCW.HEAT-EXCHiANGER SERVICE, WATER DISCHARGE::..

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact:by nearby equipment or structures?

7, "8. Are overhead eqtiipmet, distribution systenS::ceiling fies ani gting, andlmasonry bl56dk w'alifhiot likely: tocollapse onito the equipriient?

Yf~<NC UCrn/A 9..Do 'attachdedlines:hage: adequate1 flexibility to avi/id damage?

10. Based onmtheabovesismoic interaction evaluationis,is &quipmIc, free, of potentiall y adverse seismic inýteraction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1.ave you looked for apd found no.other seismic conditions.that could H INCU adversely. affect the safety functions of the eqiipment?

,Comments (,ddionilpages maybe addedaSnecessary)

U)-

Evlae

... by: " **  :/i ....

Date:-% 21. 2-D/Z Page 256 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 l<

Page 257 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

-- I 1 5--1~0 k to.14 Page 258 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

.- I*

Sheet 1 of3:

,Status: Y :NEI U01 SeismicWalkdown CheCkliSt (SWC)

Equipment-D No. Q1P16G517B Equip:.Class! .20 quipment(Description TURB.BLDG SW/SQ vALVCREAYBOX -. ...

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor EL. 155 Roo6mArea **(* . ........

.Manufacturer,:ModclEtfc. (otionalbut recommi.ended) . .. . .--...---. ...... ,.

Insiructions for Completing!C-heckiskt T"his checklist may be used taodocwment the resulthsof the:Seismnic. Wi lkdoWn:i of an item of equipmnent on the SWFLý The space below each. of.the'following questions may be. wIsedlto record the results,.ofJudgments and fi.idings. Additional Spaee'is provided at the end of this checklist foir documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configurationverification requiied (i.e., is:the item one Yif.*ND-Ofithe 5-0%of SWEL items requiring such verification),
2. Is the an*horagefree of bent, brokern missing or loose hardware?.

N17l, .VF N/AD

3. is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild sUrface oxidation?

Yth NEI Uli N/A-

4. .Is the anchorage free of visible cracks. in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Isthe!eanc!orage configuration consistent with plant' documreniation? YmkND UE7l N/AD (NOte: ThiSqutiestion onplynappiess if the item is onef the 5,010.0%.for wlhich an, anchorage configurationT verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the ancthorage free of 141ND LJD pý,otentially adverse seismic cdnditions?

Diter the equipme~it c1a~u narnefroni Appendix B::Classes dfEquiprnent.

Page 259 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

_Sheetf 2 Of3 us:Yl~ ~NLF!

Sat Seismic Walkdown Checklist{(SW§)

Equipmen[t IDNo. QIPn6G*TBLD 7B 1qu.,ip. Class' 20 Equipmenlt DeLscriptiom-TURB. BLDG, SW /SO 'AL VE RELAYBOXý ntiwraction Effects

7. Aresot targetS free fi diiniphiftby nearby equipmeen't oi-istructtu-rbs?

8:Ar

. o 'erhead equipme~t; distributioni sysems~ ceililg tiles and lightiing, Yri NEI Un N/AC and masonr i;blocklw*walls, not ikely to coplapse onto thlqic pment?

9. Do attached lines lave adequate flexibiity id admage?

ctavoi Yi NO VU N/AC

'*NC UC N/AC 10l.:Based onti.B tabove eismic intcraction evaluanions, is-equipment free of-potentiaya-ydverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse' Conditions lLHave you looked for and found fio othe~rseismic conditions that ýould lý UQ NC Coin ments (Adduidoralpodes may býaddjAe:ssuey~.

Evalby...

ate i: * ... .. h. < .

t..c......... . .

~T U&:

Page 260 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

-L--I - I- )

Page 261 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

~ Statu~s. SYým(Nt iof4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No6. QIP16MOV3149 Equip. ClIass' .8 Equipment Descriptori BLOWDOWN HX-ISOLATIONMOV . ........... .....

Location: Bldg.,AUXiLIARY" FloorE1, 121 Room, Area .

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) instructions*for Completingý Checklist Thischecklist may be used-to document ,the results of the Seinsmic Walkdown of an item.of equipment mon he SWEL. The-s-pace below each'of the fUltowing questions-mnay be used't6 record the result' ofjudgu'nenits and findings. Additionalspace is provided at the-end of this checklist for-documenting other comments.

Anchorage, Is the anchor'age co3figuration verification required ,,(i.,is the item one YE ,/*

.of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2 . Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the:atnchorage free Of corrosion that is more thanmilld surface YE IND, U10 NWA oxidation,?

4., 1 the{anchorage free ofvisiblecracks in the-coincrete near the anchors? YE NE UF1 N/Ag

5. is the anchiorageconfiguration:consistent witt plant documentatin?: YE3 NIE :U0 N/AY (Note:-This question only applies if the item is oneof the 50% for which anr a.nctlhorage confi guration verification is required.)
6. Basd..onthle above ancbhorage evaaluaions, iis:thelanchorage freel of Y 6"NmU m potentially advedtse. seismic con.ditions?

I Efntht*hhc cglrS naiefrdih 1ti1ii "1n 1 Appendix B: Clasies-of Eq*iipment,*

Page 262 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 shee t 2 Status:' YE~] NEI tI'D Seisrnic~alkdowgn Checkfist (SiWC),

Bqutipnent ID-Vo.. QIP16MOV3149; Equip, Cla~ss' 8

ýEquiprentDescriptibn. BLBOWDOWN HX ISOLATION MOV.

Iiteraction Effects

7. Aresoft targets freefrom inpact by r tb61' .stYictures? yj1 N-o 'UM WADl
8. -Ve overhead equipnmenlý distributilon syvstems, Cejfri 6tnaid i.ihtidn, YvFA N0:010 N'/ALC and masonry block walls no0(tlikely to ctlapse Onto thle equipmlýrn

ý9. Do att*ched liineshhaveadicquato flexibility to avoid damagec? YIA, 140 TUl N/ADl

10. Base6d on the abovseilsn terction evlaluation, :is equipment fr*e YeNDUE of ponijally advre scisie interaction effects?

Other Addverse Co iditions iI IN-Hve you looked, for and foun d nio other sei kmic conditions .thiardould ..Y.2' Nf U171 adversely atTet;t týh safety functios o)f the equipmnti?

Comments(Adtditional pages.ybe: a dded asinecessary).

.. ,A. \Y  :...... . .

Evaluated .'.J, Date: I Page 263 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .0 K

Page 264 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Fr-*

Page 265 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3 Statuis: Y NE-] uoZ Seismic Walkd.own Checkliist(SWC)

EquipmentIYN16o.. Q*P16PCOIC. Equip. Class 6 qupetespion SERVICLE WTRUM. R C.......... ..

Lo ation-: .Bjdg. SWIS Floor El. 188 .Room, Areai - .* .... _._ .

'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but. recomnmended) -  ::  :: ~ . -. - . -- -------

Instructions'for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document: the results of the Seismic Walkdowno6f an item of equipmedrit:on the SWE."The sp.c- below each ofhe following questions may be used to record thc: resultsofjudgmints and findings.. Additional space is-provided at the endoftfthis checklist for documenting: 6ther comm-nts.

Anchoranee 1, iS th anchorage configuration:verification'required (ie.Jeis tIhe: item one Y N]

of the 50%0/ofSWELitems requiringbsUch verification)?

2. I* the anchorage free of bent, broken, missingor loose hardwvare? Y NED UDlls/AD1
3. Is the anchorage free of porrosion that is moretihanmild surface.

oxidation?

  • NEI UDI N/AD-4.ý Is the anchOrage freeIF .oIisibl e *sacIksthe concrete near the anchors?
5. Is: the nchorage confgura6ion contsistenIt with plantOd*cuentation?

(Note.: This qiesfion only.applids if the item is oneo.thie 50% fto which.an anchorage configuration verification is required)

.l(D NEAD

6. Based on ihe above anchora'ge evaluations, is the anchor-age free of potefitiAlly ddverse seismic conditions?

.Ent~f thp-qqui'p-ent class name from- A'peiiucB: Cla sge of Equip,!feht.

Page 266 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y NFD U-1 Seismic .Walkdown Checklist, (SWC)

Equipment'flDNo. QIP16POOI:c Equiip. ClassI 6.

Equipmen*,IDescription SERVICE WATER PQ.MP4C Intýraction Effects

7. Are soft trfgets§I free.Trom*impact by. nearby equipment or structures? I IUIEJ N/A[]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceilingjtiles and lighting, Y[ý.*Nj- U[3 NIAQ and masonry blodk walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? /

t 1 ..

9'. Do attached !ines have adequate flexibility to ,avoiddmage? ;7,N-E UE: N/AE

10. Býased:on~the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmentfree IY1NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adver.e Conditions

11. Have youlooked for and found n0io theriseismic conditions that-couIldd YE NE , UED adversely affect the safety fnctLions of theeequipment?

Cominents (Additional pages :iay be added as netessary)

Evaluated by: 1 -'$L/4@.*a L MLxJ Date: /0 /12

  • .J * * ' := . zl:""...*i VAV*

'C ))!  :

0 , , .

Page 267 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 268 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetie ofI/4 Status:;' Y[* N[] U{J Seismic Walkdown Checklist,(SWC)

EquitiimehtIDNd.o QIP16V.514. Equip.,ClassI 8 . .. , . . .. .. = . .,.. ÷

.Equipment Description SERVICE WATERTO, TURBINE BLDG-I:SOLATION VALVE. .

Location: Bldg. YARDý FloorEl. 155, Roomr, Area

  • ____ ....

Mantifacturer,.Model, Etc. (opti onal but rqcornmended)

Instructions .fr Completing Checklist This` checdlst may beus~ed to document the: results of the Seismric:Walkdown of an itermof equipment on the SWEL. The space~below each of the f6llowing questionsmay be used to, record the results ofjulgments and.

findings: Additiona Ispade is provided at theend of'ithis checkliýt for~documenting other comments.

1.-Is; the ýAnchorage cofguration verification reuie (ie, ste tmon E of he:.50% of SWVFL item-srequiring such vlerificapiion)?

2. Is the anchorage free ofbentl, brokenmissing or loose hardare?: YE] NE] UE] N/ASl 411hz co"'I cn en-ý-

3.: Is the anchorage freebof corrosion that is more than mild sufface YE] NE] VE] N/AW oxidation?

4. Is thý anchorage freeof visible cracks in the concrete nearthe anchors.$ Y] NEI UE] N/A
5. :s:the.anchorage configuration consistent' with pl*nt documentation? YE] NE] E] N/1AE (N bte::This question only appliesi the itetn is one of th 506% for

,lhiih, an.anchorage configuatioif verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YýNE]- UE],

potentially adverse 'seismic conditions?,

Enter the equipmentclass name from.Appendix B: Classes of Equiprcent Page 269 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 O Seismic NWalkdownChecklist (SWC)

Equipmeniit 11DNýo. *QEP16V514 Equip.TClass. 8_E.

Equipm-ent Descti.ptihn, SEýRVCE WATER:70 TURBINE BLDG ISOLATIONI/ýAL-VEI inter*actiof Effects

7. Are soft targets freefoin impact bynearby equipment or sfrudture§? Y~J NE UE NIAE 8.Are, overhead equip~ment, distriibutioni systmrs, ,cilig tiles :kid lighiting, Xyv NO U0, N/AC and mansonry block wvalls, riatlikely to colljapse ooth eqipmen~t?:
9. 0D attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yi -NEI UE3 N/,ADI
10. Based on the aboe vseismi intýraction evAlu*ations, is ,equiprent fre of potentially iider* seismii inrtioii~effets?

Other AdverseConditions 1 1. Have You looked.for andfound no other seismic cond i ons a .-.... NE

,adypersey affect the-safety fuinctions ofithe equipment?

Comments (Additional ages, ma be added ~sncsa Evaluated by:. kAU? C Da~i~: _________________

fc AA4' ~ .JL 12-.

Page 270 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .01.

J Page 271 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 54v 70 f1-70 Page 272 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 tSheeta1 of17 Statuis: YEVNIZ _j Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

'Equipincnt tD No. Q1P16V579 Eup Cas 7 E-quipmqnit Dey.iiption B TRAIN SERV/CE WATER Mý!JNFLOW MLca~tion:Bldg. SW/ El. (ot63_ Floor 18, oo j rea.Aa Ma~f~t rrModlEtc. (optional blut r Ico IIenedl 61*

instructions for Completing Checklist Thirs checi s maybe sed to docuh* enýnthe t re u s ofthe sVa SoisM ic. dbwafie ofre, itoe ml of eui'men ons he SXELTh pae eoweahof die floigusonmyeused to Jýco'd t"creui ofjudgrnevs -nd findingms. Additional space is provided tihe end ofthlls Checklist for doecumentiiig oldthr ýonmments.

.Anchorage,::

1. steacoaecn"uainv-fcto eurd(~; is the item one; YENA of theý 50%"ofiNVWEL itemns requr uhvfcto)

I2istie anchorage free ofbeil brol*ki iifiisir bIhardwae? lose

ýYE NE U0>/A Isthe (3 anchoragfree d6fcorrsionii*atfis more than mild:surface.

4. Isbea tkhe pancrg free of visible cracks in the'concrete near the anchors? YE] NE__UE NIAm F5the anchorage configuratioi consist fitwith plant documenetation?

Is YE 'NE UE) N/IAfi (14ot,ý: This que n'ton only applie. if the iiem jis oneof the 50y% for whi~ anancorae cnfigraton eriidiibiis required.)

V~ Based o'n thec above anchorage~laini the anchoragqze free of fK3NO UE

'Ehtr te e~ipmnAýIass name from.Apedý T  : Casscsdf qipet Page 273 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 H-~ I Sheect 2s6

ýSeismlic Walkdown..Checklist}SW-),

.IqupmntD o.Q14Pl6V579- qipClas _______ _

EqpinDesciiption 8 .T .RAIN -SERVICEWA TER tINIFL OW.....

interactionj Effects' 7.Arsottretfrefo rpatb erb uimit:stutr? N .~QQEN/L Are overhead "and equipmentcdiwribUtisto miasoni)y btock '.alis niot liel s§yfems, Golap'c ceilingtiilc h and lihtin-ýi g,

.... y.. .NOl.. U7

n N/AD 9.Do attached lines-have adequate flexibility to avoid damfage? NO NY N/AU
10. Based ,on the acbov~e seismi'c in~teractio~ncvIaluations,,is qquipment. freet of Potdiitially ad'verse sei.smic iteralctioh effects,? {i:4l NiOU l Other AdVerse Coniditions:

.11 I Bave~yo.6.u looked for and f-ound' no other seismic coniditilbns that could Y'NEI 'O advecrselyý1affect thIesafety unctions. of the equipment-?

Co...i...t.(.Add.iional pag.e.s..ay.be'add...s n.eccssi )

v~i~-i-Ap~ ~ Qo&e

',I t VLot IA'alated y: I 'A q Kloc D)ate:

Page 274 of 561

9 I TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 iAGIW Page 275 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 rI Page 276 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

,: *¸*

Sheet 1 of,3 Status: YIZNE] CL]

Seismicd WalkdowntChecklist (SWC)

EqUiipment ID No, Q1.HO 1... . Equip. ClassY:21 _____*____ a ___-

Equipment Descriition 'CCWHEATEXCHANGERTRAtNA.

Loeation: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El% 100 Rool Manuffacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but reconmended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be used: to docun entthe resitits: f the Seeijnie Walkdowt ofian item of equipment on the SW.EL. The: space below each ofihe following questions may be usedto record the results ofjudgments ad findings. Additional space's provided at the end ofthis checklist for documnenting other comments.

1. Is the anchb)rge configuration verificatibn required (i.e., is theitem one Y m NE ofthe 500% of SWEL items'requiing such verification)?

2=',Isthe anchorage free of'bent, broken, missing or-loose. hardware?: YoNEE E1 NWAD 3.: Is:the anchorage free of ýorrosion that is more than.mild surface, TýUON/AF1 oxidation?

4. Is theanchorage free of visiblel cracks in the concrete near the anchors? NE ;UC N/AE
5. Is the anchorage configurationconsistent withqplant documeniation? 1VNEU N/AEJ (Note: This question onlypplies if theitemis one of the 50%. for Which an anchorage configuration verification is required,)

6ý. Based on the above0anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NEI C1 potentially adverseseismic conditions?

J Enter the equipment class name~from Appendix B: Classes of Equ pment Page 277 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 She f3; S.itats XM;N4] UI]

Se ismric, WalkdodWn Checklist (SWC)'

EquipmeqntlD.:No. .Q!P17H001C, Equip. Clas' 21 T(EqupipmenijDescription-CCW0 HEAT EXCHANGER.TRAINMA Interaction Effects 7 Arý'e 'ofjtrgpfs f6e. frdihii~iihb~ttby -nearbyequ~jii'ient~oi structur6i? YNEI iE1 N/AE1 S- Are ove-rhead cciumi-pmet, ditibtonsstcnnm, C'eiling4' e' and tighting, and masoniyl block %vý1lls nout likely to col~ nothe:jequiument?

/I Y NO LtL NEA

10. BasedboA'the above.sismiIc mn*teractiton wealuations,:is eqiipment free:

ozf poteniially ad Verse, Seismpic inilteraclio0,1i pffdds?

Other.Adve'se Conditiobns

11. Haý,' you looked 'ir ind iipfoud no othlier seismic6condifions.that could! Y~<~EUE g yersely affect t~he safety functions of jthte quipaieni?,

C .mments(Additional pag..s m y b add. d -iinc *ssaiy.

Ii ahi~ted by: ALj~,

{Uz ~ ~ ,K& 4,1f

___________ A

.~<.

Page 278 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONR

-2 Page 279 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i:o Status: N]UI Seismic Walkdown, Checkl.ist (SWC)

EquipmeintD No.: Q1P17HV3045 . Equip. Classi ...

Equipment)Description CCW.RETURN FROMRCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION.

Location: Bidg.,AUXILtARY Floor El. 121 Rd6fh, AifOa: __,___,____

ýMainufacturer-, g- Mdel,

+- =÷ :+Etc.

. .* ..(optional.

2 ..............but recommended),

Insrutios orComnpletingx -Cbheklist This cliecklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of'an item of equipment on the, TSVEL.sThe spaebelow eah'of the following questions may bte used-o record the reSults~of judogpets and' findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this: chedklist for documenting other comftments.

Anchorage 1; is the anchorage cotifigurationmerificatfbn required (i.e., is the item one, YE o~fthe 50%,.of SWEL itemsý,reqpiiring su~ch~vification')?

2. Is the anchorage free of bentpbroken, missing or looseohardware? YE NEI UE N/A'
3. Is the anqhoragefree of corrosion thatri more thanwmild'surface YE- NEI UE- N/Ag
6xidanion?

4;. Is the, anchorage free of visible;,cracks in theý co~ncretfenear the anchors I? YET NEI' UE. N/AEY'

5. Is the anchorage configuratibn consistent withlip lant documentation?' YEI NE UE

,(Note: This qucthtion ~only 6ýpties if the item is one ofthe,50% for which ann anchorage, configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above.anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage: free-of Y1NE1d , U El potenitially adverse sýeismiic conditions?

.Enter theequi iet, asI - nide6 por . R4ndx.B ts~ofqire Page 280 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 20bf 1 3 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmn*ent INo. Q1P17HV3045 Equip.

pClassi. 7 . ... . ..

Equipaent.Description CCW RETURNFROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER, /SO TtON.. . .

Int*raction Effects

7. Are soft targets* fr'ee frf6mimpact*:by nearby diquipment*or strudtUres? V01 NIE JEJ N/AET
8. ýAre :overhead .equipment, distrfibitio6n systems, ceiling 'tiles and lighting; Y9:~NE- U[]; N/,AEl rand mason.bl ock walls not ikelv to coliapse ont.tthaequipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid-*damage? Y(j NEI ýE] N/AE f10. Based on-the above seismicinteracfion evaluations,. is.equiprment free ofpotentiailly advperse seismic initetactioh effects?

Otheir Adverse Conditions 1H1.MHaveyou looked forand found no other sei miic conditions that could ly&NET U0

ýadversely affect the safety functions of tihe:equi*ment?

Commentg (Additiinaipages rladded ap: g c:ieaby)

Page 281 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .00 Page 282 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

ý~ i

",*> ~ I\ 4 ,

FI- 73 Page 283 of 561

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12355A784&oldid=2638152"