ML20136E752

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:53, 13 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Co Woody to Hl Thompson Discussing Contention 8 in Spent Fuel Pool Expansion Proceeding Concerning Postulated LOCA in Spent Fuel Pool.Related Correspondence
ML20136E752
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/03/1986
From: Frantz S
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO., NEWMAN & HOLTZINGER
To: Cole R, Lazo R, Luebke E
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#186-666 OLA-2, NUDOCS 8601070116
Download: ML20136E752 (4)


Text

.-

lhY

r. .m WWED COnhEdruauwA NEWMAN & HoLTZINGER, P.C.

1615 L ST REET. N.W.

JACK R. NEWMAN WA S Mt N GTON. D.C. @ @OQ 6 ;

  • WILUAM E BAER, JR JOHN C. MOLTZINGER.JR. c .?- DOUGLAS L. BERL$ FORD MAROLO F. REls BARBARA A DUNCOMBE MAuRICE ARELRAO 202*955 66OO JANETE.8 ECnER J. A. BounNIGHT.JR MERLE W FALLON PAUL H. nECM - $TEVEN P. FRANTZ GEORGE "aa^a " ' " " ' ' '

RATHLEEN H SMCA '86 JAIN -5 A10 *'C9 BRIAN R. GISH DAVtO G. POWELL dsLL E. GRANT DOUGLAS G. GREEN AUSON LaMASTER MAROL LYN NEWMAN HOLLY N. LINDEMAN JonN T. stouGw. JR. 6FIK! Ur_ E it /. '- nEviu J. upsoN JA eCs a vAsiLE GGC,QJit;G & $Mg, DAVID B RA$nfN MICHAEL A. BAUSER ALVIN M. GIJTTERMAN gg q JANET.RYAN DONALD J. $sLVERMAN MEVIN P. GALLEN JACOLYN A SIMMONS THOMAS A SCHMUTZ . JOSEPH E. STUBBS MaCMAEL F. MEALY SCOTT A. AN ROBERT LOWENSTEIN NORMAN A. FLANINGAM OF CouhSEL January 3, 1986 Dr. Robert M. Lazo, Chairman Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Dr. Richard F. Cole Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Pan, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Florida Power & Light Co. (Turkey Point Plant, Units 3 and 4), Docket Nos.

50-250-OLA-2 and 50-251-OLA-2 (Spent Fuel Pool Expansion)

Dear Licensing Board Members:

Enclosed is a copy of a letter dated December 26, 1985, from C.O. Woody of Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) to Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which discusses a matter which relates to Contention 8 in the Turkey Point spent fuel pool expansion proceeding regarding postu-lated loss-of-cooling accidents in the spent fuel pool. As re-flected in Section 2.7 of the NRC's Safety Evaluation for the Turkey Point spent fuel pool expansion (November 21, 1984), FPL committed to upgrade the Turkey Point spent fuel pool cooling system to assure that it would remain functional after a safe shutdown earthquake. The attached letter from FPL states that 8601070116 860103 PDR ADOCK 05000250 G PDR 3503

NEWMAN & Hotrzzwoma,P. C.

Dr. Robert M. Lazo, Chairman Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Dr. Richard F. Cole January 3, 1986 Page Two the cooling system upgrade and installation oi* flow measurement devices will be completed by the end of the Unit 3 Cycle 11 and Unit 4 Cycle 12 refueling outages.

Respectfully submitted, 6 h Steven P. Frantz Co-Counsel for Florida Power & Light Company Enclosure .

cc (w/ enc.): Mitzi A. Young Joette Lorion Norman A. Coll Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel Office of Secretary - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

. 4 PO89A

FloRioA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY DEC 2 61985 L-85-465 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Director Division of PWR Licensing - A U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission F y @}PP,".'17 T' ~

Washingion, D.C. 20555  !

Dear Mr. Thompson:

Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 ^ DbW5 Newman & Holtzinger, PY Oocket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Revisions to inservice Test Program for Pumps and Valves Florido Power & Light Company submitted a revision to the inservice Test (IST)

Program for Pumps and Volves for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 in letter L-84-238 dated October 24,1984 to add components to the Pump and Valve Test Program.

The estimated date for impler entation of the spent fuel pit (SFP) cooling pumps into the test program was January 1,1986. However, subsequent to the above submittal, FPL committed to upgrade the Unit 3 and 4 SFP cooling systems. The seismic analysis of the SFP cooling system for that upgrade will not be completed until the second quarter of 1986. The design, procurement, and installation of the spent fuel pit cooling pump flow measurement devices will be done concurrent with the spent fuel pit cooling system upgrade, which will be completed by the end of the Unit 3 Cycle il and Unit 4 Cycle 12 refueling outages. We will inform Mr. D. G. Mcdonald when this action is complete.

Attachment I provides a revised relief basis for the change to the IST program.

This basis supersedes that submit,ted with our October 24,1984 letter.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.

Very truly yours,

[

. O. Woody roup Vice President Nuclear Energy COW /RG/gp Attachment 'TM------------------- '* ' * * " " * " 2 - - E * ?

5 m ?c. 012. N!N .  !
T. .

On .iriW  :.00:U: !y?"

it.*C;". " U n'*n* 7",;mb. i L7!'"'

l;it:7"U. u ;50 ' "" "" nt"!

TCG3/020/l PEOPLE . . SERVING PEOPLE

l l

ATTACHMENT I l

)

RELIEF REQUEST BASIS PUMPS Spent Fuel Pit Cooling (* P212A)

Spent Fuel Pit Cooling (* P2128)

Test Requirement: IWP-4600 Flow Measurement Basis for Relief: The original spent fuel pit cooling system design does not provide for flow measurement. There are no flow nozzles, flow orifices, or pressure tcps for flow measurement.

Therefore, flow measurement is impractical.

The original spent fuel pit cooling system was based on removal and replacement of the spent fuel pit cooling pump  ;

when the spent fuel cooling function could not be fulfilled.

The time period associated with the removal and replacement of the pump was within the time the spent fuel cooling system could be out of service.

A 100-percent-copocity spore pump has been installed in the spent fuel cooling system. This pump is capable of operating in place of the originally installed pump, but not in parallel with the originally installed pump. Also, alternate connections are provided for connecting a temporary pump to tne spent fuel cooling loop.

Alternate Testing: Continue operation of the spent fuel pit cooling of system based on the original system design with the addition of the installed spore pump and alternate connections to provide for connecting a temporary pump to the spent fuel cooling loop.

Design, fabricate and install a flow measurement device using either a bypass loop or the normal system flow path by the end of the Unit 3 Cycle iI and Unit 4 Cycle 12 refueling outoges.

TCC3/020/2 m