ML20129D135

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:12, 6 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Preliminary Results of Staff Review of 960823 & 29 Ltrs Re Technical Problems Requiring Resolution
ML20129D135
Person / Time
Site: Maine Yankee
Issue date: 10/17/1996
From: Cooper R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Frizzle C
Maine Yankee
References
NUDOCS 9610240205
Download: ML20129D135 (3)


Text

3 4

4 b

i i

October 17,1996 l

P r

i Mr. Charles D. Frizzle President Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company !t 329 Bath Road  :

Brunswick, Maine 04011  !

I

SUBJECT:

TECHNICAL PROBLEMS REQUIRING RESOLUTION l

Dear Mr. Frizzle:

I The purpose of this letter to provide the preliminary results of the staff's review of your letters of August 23 and 29,1996, in reference to the subject issue. These technical '

problems were initially identified by our Integrated Safety Assessment Team (ISAT), and i further developed by your organization or the ISAT, and evaluated by your organization for resolution sufficient to support safe restart of the unit. Specifically, four problems needed i resolution to assure safe operations: adequacy of logic system safety function testing; i adequacy of net positive suction head (NPSH) for the containment spray system (CSS), -i specifically during recirculation actuation; operability of the temperature control valves for j the Primary Component Cooling (PCC) and the Secondary Component Cooling (SCC) heat  ;

exchangers; and, operability of the thermostats (in need of calibration in additional to j functional test) for the emergency diesel generator (EDG) room exhaust fans. As described  ;

below, these problems were sufficiently resolved to support safe restart of the unit; but t longer term actions remained to be completed. Reactive inspections on these problems will l be documented in NRC Inspection Report No. 50-309/96-09. Additional followup  ;

inspections are planned.  !

With respect to the issue of safety system logic testing, our inspection found the scope of l your review and testing to be appropriate; the review was performed by knowledgeable l engineers; the reviews were thorough and deficiencies were documented and appropriately resolved prior to plant restart. ,

With respect to the NPSH for CSS, analysis at a power level of 2700 Mwt identified a worst case condition where the NPSH margin, excluding the hot fluid temperature j correction, would be -0.7 ft. The period of reduced pump performance with this negative NPSH margin potentially lasts for about five minutes during post accident long term  ;

recirculation realignment from the refueling water storage tank to the containment sump. .

Additional analysis for operation at a reduced power level of 2440 Mwt was performed and (D ,

information from the pump vendor indicated the CS pumps can operate at reduced NPSH l (about 4 ft below the required value or -4.0 NPSH margin) for several hours without damage or loss of capability. With the additional analysis and vendor information, the  !

commitment was made to perform a thorough operability evaluation for 2 of the 3 pumps i i

9610240205 961017 4*Ol )

DR ADOCK 05000309 PDR lV

  • Mr. Charles D. Frizzle 2 before restart. The determination for the third " swing" pump was to be completed shortly after restart during which time the third swing pump would not be used for CS function.

Based on extensive discussion and independent NRC analysis, the NRC staff concluded that the CS pumps are likely to perform their safety function. However, the NRC staff has identified several concerns with the analyses in which we concluded that the CS pumps are in a degraded, non-conforming condition. The operability determination performed by the Maine Yankee staff supported operation at 2440 Mwt. Staff concerns related to operations above 2440 Mwt are required to be resolved as a part of the staff action to review the integrated containment pressure response analysis being performed to address the staff's Order and Demand for Information, dated January 3,1996.

With respect to the latter two testing problems (PCC and SCC Control and EDG room thermostats), adequate testing was completed for restart and the results were reviewed by our resident inspectors. We have no immediate concerns on these specific tests. In light of these two testing problems and that noted for the logic system function testing, our preliminary review of ISAT findings indicated at least a program weakness in the area of testing for which we plan further inspection.

Thank you for informing us of your actions documented in your letters. We consider these actions acceptable for operation at 2440 Mwt pending our further review of your licensed program.

Sincerely, Original Signed By:

Richard W. Cooper, ll, Director Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-309 cc w/ encl:

G. Leitch, Vice President, Operations J. M. Elock, Attorney at Law P. L. Anderson, Project Manager (Yankee Atomic Electric Company)

C. Shaw, Plant Manager L. Diehl, Manager of Public and Governmental Affairs J. A. Ritsher, Attorney (Ropes and Gray)

P. Dostie, State Nuclear Safety inspector P. Brann, Assistant Attorney General U. Vanags, State Nuclear Safety Advisor C. Brinkman, Combustion Engineering, Inc.

First Selectmen of Wiscasset Maine State Planning Officer - Nuclear Safety Advisor State of Maine, SLO Designee State Planning Officer - Executive Department Friends of the Coast

t Mr. Charles D. Frizzle 3 Distribution w/ encl:

Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

PUBLIC NRC Resident inspector D. Screnci, PAO R. Conte, DRP H. Eichenholz, DRP J. Zwolinski, NRR D. Dorman, NRR C. O'Daniell, DRP Distribution w/enci (VIA E-MAIL):

W. Dean, OEDO S. Varga, NRR J. Zwolinski, NRR D. Dorman, PM, NRR R. Correia, NRR R. Frahm, Jr., NRR Inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

DOCUMENT NAME: S:\PPRMY\RSTRESP.LTR Ta recoh,e a copy of thie document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment / enclosure "E* = Copy with ettachment/ enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE NRR/ADR/l Rl/DRS ,

Rl/DRP NAME JZwolinskiW(} (_ JWiggins Qt> RCooper DATE pl !991 " '#~ 09/l'l/96 09/ /96 09/ /96 09/ /96

& f Cvf $4si Y t.Y9})f ing 1%

+ Pu 3 D6H O A>ML cd .

J,% 9 2 uJiidCA+

y h A Ler-un-Id

~~ ,a -