ML20134B749

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850520-0711

ML20134B749
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood, Hartsville
Issue date:	08/12/1985
From:	Harrison J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20134B744	List: IR 05000456/1985026 IR 05000520/2007011 ML20134B740
References
50-456-85-26, NUDOCS 8508160058
Download: ML20134B749 (2)

See also: IR 05000520/2007011

Text

.

.

Appendix

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-456

. .

As a result of the inspection conducted on May 20 through July 11, 1985, and

in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement

Actions, (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violations were identified:

A. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XI, " Test Control," as implemented

by the Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance Manual, Quality

Requirement 11.0 and the Braidwood Startup Manual requires that testing

to demonstrate that systems perform satisfactorily in service be

performed in accordance with written test procedures which incorporate

,

the requirements and acceptance limits contained in design documents.

10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Criterion V, " Instructions, Procedures, and

Drawings", as implemented by Commonwealth Edison Company Quality

Assurance Manual, Quality Requirement 5.0, requires that appropriate

acceptance criteria be included in documents affecting quality to show

that the activity nas been completed satisfactorily.

Contrary to the aboVE, sufficient testing and acceptance Criteria

were not incorporated in tne Auxiliary Feedwater ( AFW) system test

procedure to ensure that the design basis of the Braidwood FSAR is

verified. The design basis in question is verified by performing an

'

AFW pump endurance run to ensure satisfactory bearing / bearing oil

temperature and vibration and that pump room temperature and humidity

remain within environmental cualification limits for safety related

!

equipment. The preoperational test procedure does perform the pump

endurance run for both AFW pumps, but does not require sufficient data

j to be taken or recorded and the acceptance criteria does not encompass

all that is necessary to verify this design basis (456/85026-01(DRS)).

I This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

E. 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action," as implemented

by the Commonwealth Edison Quality Assurance Manual, Quality Reouirement

16.0 and the Braidwood Startup Manual states, in part, " Measures shall

be established to assure conditions adverse to quality such as...

deficiencies...are promptly identified and corrected."

Contrary tc tne aDnVE.'

1. A test deficiency was not written for the BWPT FC-10 preoperational

test by the System Test Engineer to identify a deficient condition

until directed by the Test Review Board (456/85026-02a(DRS)).

l

!

~

! 8508160058 850812

l PDR ADOCK 05000456

l

G PM

l

.

.

I

Appendix 2

2. The description of the deficient condition was inadequate to

properly define the problem that test deficiency FC-10-K was

initiated to correct in that the deficient-condition involved

both writing and verifying procedures while the description only

addressed writing procedures (456/85026-02b(DRS)).- _

' 3. Corrective actions taken to resolve deficient conditions were

not adequate to close test deficiencies: for FC-10-K, the

deficiency itself was closed even though the deficient condition

'had not been corrected; for 00-12-80, no documentation of the

verification of procedures existed;'and for RH-10-123, the

!

'

deficiency was closed with temporary equipment installed

(456/85026-02c(DRS)).

This is'a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to

this office within. thirty cays of the date of this Notice a written statement

or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) corrective action

-taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid

further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

! .

-

AU212 $35

Datec- J. J. Harrison, Chief

Engineering Branch

..

1

i

. - - . .