ML20137T117
| ML20137T117 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 04/08/1997 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137T070 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-456-97-04, 50-456-97-4, 50-457-97-04, 50-457-97-4, NUDOCS 9704150315 | |
| Download: ML20137T117 (2) | |
Text
-
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket Nos. 50-456; 50-457 Braidwood Station Units 1 & 2 Licenses No. NPF-72; NPF-77 As a result of an inspection conducted March 3-7,1997, one violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with tne " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:
10 CFR 50.54(t) requires that the 12 month review of the emergency pmparedness program shall include an evaluation for adequacy of interfaces with State and local I
1 governments and of licensee drills, exercises, capabilities, and procedures. The i
results of the review, along with recommendations for improvements, shall be documented, reported to the licensee's corporate and plant management, and retained for a period of five years.
d i
Contrary to the above, Site Quality Verification Audit Report OAA-#20-96-05,
" Emergency Plan and implementing Procedures," dated March 22,1996, the 12 month review of the emergency preparedness program did not include an evaluation of the adequacy of interface with the State of Illinois. (50-456/97004-01 and 50-l 457/97004-01)
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement Vill).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Commonwealth Edison is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, i
ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region 111, 801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois 60532, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the Braidwood Statinn within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for j
each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the i
corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a demand for information may 4
i be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, j-consideration will be given to extending the response time.
1 4
i h
i 9704150315 970400 PDR ADOCK 05000456 1
0 PDR
4 I
Notice of Violation Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. However, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information 7
that you desire not to be placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.
l l
h 3
Dated at Lisle, Illinois this 8th day of April 1997 b
V
{
9 i
(
f h
I
- -