ML20147G539

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:24, 24 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds,Iaw 970218 Telcon to Closed Discussion Items 1i(3), 2a,12a & 12b.Responses to Remaining Discussion Items Provides as They Become Available
ML20147G539
Person / Time
Site: 05200003
Issue date: 02/28/1997
From: Kemper R
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP.
To: Fineman C, Huffman B, Lois L
IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY, NRC
Shared Package
ML20147G451 List:
References
NUDOCS 9703280189
Download: ML20147G539 (10)


Text

%

COVER mewm e,AX MTR 41997 Os e Brian A. Mc intyre SHEET To: Bill Huffman/L. Lois(NRC), Cliff Fineman(INEL), L. Hochreiter(PSU)

Subject:

Text to close WCOBRA/ TRAC CAD Discussion items li(3),2a,12a,12b Date: February 28,1997 Pages: 3 including this cover sheet.

COMMENTS:

Attached are responses, in accordance with our telecon of 2/18/97, to close discussion items i

li(3), 2a,12a,12b. A completely new response is provided for the former two items, while additions to the previously provided responses to items 12a and 12b are highlighted in the text. Comments about the attachment may be directed to the undersigned. In the near future, responses will be provided to close items 2e and 2g. Further, responses to the remaining discussion items will be provided as they become available.

cc: B. Rarig, B. McIntyre (for informal NRC correspondence file); E. Novendstern

, 'm

.r

. i 1 ,

~

From the desk of...

Robert Kemper Advanced and WER Plant Safety Analysis Westinghouse PO Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA 15235 9703280189 970321 3 (412) 374 -4579 PDR ADOCK 0520 Fax: (412) 3744011 E

Response to Question ii-3 1

This phenomena is ranked lower in the Westinghouse PIRT as compared to the LANL i

' PlRT. There were two elements to the LANL rational for the ranking of this item from page 64 of the LANL report, " Multidimensional effects in the core enhance the heat transfer by supplying more water to the high powered bundles below the quench front" .

We agree with this part of the statement and is one reason that the low powered

! regions are modeled as a separate channelin the WCOBRA/ TRAC PWR model. The l quench front is uniform across the core such that the lower powered bundles quench at about the same time as the high powered bundles, and there is cross flow into the hot assembly from the adjacent, lower powered assemblies BELOW the quench front.

i LANL also says in the same sentence on page 64, "and more entrained water in the l

liquid deficient region" We do not agree that there is more water entrained into the hot 1 assembly from the adjacent assemblies ABOVE the quench front which is what the i LANL statement implies.

Therefore, we ranked this item as a "5" , but did consider it important enough that we modeled multiple channels in the reactor to capture this three-dimensional behavior.

Response to Question 2a The calculated PCTs are significantly below the threshold for significant zire/ water reaction which can influence the resulting PCT However, the methodology which is used to calculated the AP600 PCT is the same as that used for the three and four loop plants. Therefore, the uncertainty of the zirc/ water reaction and its effects will be calculated in the " hot spot" calculations; however, since the PCTs are expected to be so low, the impact of the uncertainties and the zirc/ water reaction are expected to be negligible.

i 1

I f

l f

s

}

i i

I l

! 12. The following questions relate to Section 4.4.

}

a. Table 4.41: Has the Westinghouse grid deformation analysis been approved '

by the NRC7 If not, will Westinghouse commit to addressing grid deformation if the NRC review results in this becoming a concem for the AP600? For mixed cores, how will Westinghouse address mixed cores if they are used in AP600 in the future?

Since seismic loads are a altem speclSc parameter, M le dlMicult to assens l their impact at this time, The structural and mechanicalintearitv of the fuel as l evaluated Ibr each fuel cycle. In the event luel grkt dehormation becomes a concern W e proposed AP600 site, Wendnghouse wlR address No impact on the large break LOCA analysia, W Westinghouse hool of a dHFerent design or another vendor's luelis pieced into AP000 in the hoture, an evaluation wHI be perkmed of the mhred core; the evaluation wHI consider any dHFarences in the dimensions, hydrauNc renietencee and burnup eMincin between the fuel types to be loaded.

b. Westinghouse identifled power shapes (PSs) 2, 3, 4 and 11 as the PSs it would evaluate from the RMR to determine the limiting PS for AP600. Jusdfy the basis for selecting these PSs as the ones to study the AP600. Could the 4 excellent blowdown cooling for the AP600 cause the limiting axial power shape (s) to change for AP600 relative to the 3-/4 loop plants? Also, Westinghouse has an approach to ider*fy limiting axial power shapes to meet ,

Appendix K, item I.A. Does this approach have any applicability for AP6007 Justify your answer.

The W4 loop power shapen were established to be bounding for aW Westinghouse core designs, and they are bounding har A9000 as well To

.. horther demonstrate the Nmiting nature of power shapen 2, 3, 4 and 11 line AP600, a bottom ekewed power shape case wee also earecuted and shown to be nor>llmMing. Power shape 3 le the bounding shape and le appHed in aH A9000 matrbt sensMivHy cason. The power shape reeutte wlH be reported and lustiMed in the SSAR large break LOCA section. l

/em/444Metwpf Page $

-,k FAX to DINO SCALETTI March 5,1997 CC: Sharon or Dino, please make copies for: Ted Quay Bill liuffman Diane Jackson Tom Kenyon Joe Sebrosky Cindy IIaag Don Lindgren Robin Nydes Brian McIntyre Ed Cummins Bob Vijuk This is a reminder list of the Open Items where we have recently provided background documentation showing the difference between "W Status" and "NRC Status" In all cases, we believe the next action is with NRC and await your definitization of a Westinghouse action or your direction to change the "NRC Status" to something other than " Action W". Note that we have received no information from NRC on items on this list for over a week. Note that submittal dates oser a year old and request dates over a month old are in bold type.

Open item Number Westinghouse Submittal Request for Status Change 142 (M3. Il-9) 2/29/% 2/3/97 3/4/97 157 (MS.2.5-13) 1/9/97 2/12/97 164 (M5.2.5-20) 1/10/97 2/12/97 172 (MS.2.5-29) 1/14/97 2/14/97 173 (M5.2.DO) 1/14/97 2/17/97 182 (MS.4.11-5) 1/10/97 2/20/97 184 (M5.4.I1-7) 1/13/97 2/20/97 405 7/8/% 2/11/97 681 (DSER 3.8.2.4-3) 2/11/97 2/17/97 706 (DSER 3.8.2.4-28) 2/11/97 2/17/97 710 (DSER 3.8.3.1-1) 1/16/97 2/18/97 716 (DSER 3.8.3.2-5) 1/16/97 2/18!97 717 (DSER 3.8.3.3-1) 1/16/97 2/13/97 >

718 (DSER 3.8.3.3-2) 1/16/97 2/18/97 1 of 4

2 i

Open Item Number Westinghouse Submittal Request for Statu.5 Change  !

722 (DSER 3.8.3.4-3) 1/16/97 2/18/97 i 724 (DSER 3.8.3.4-5) 1/16/97 2/18/97 729 (DSER 3.8.3.4-10) I/16/97 2/18/97 731 (DSER 3.8.3.4-12) 1/16/97 2/18/97 l 740 (DSER 3.8.4.1-3)- 1/16/97 2/20/97 754 (DSER 3.8.4.4-6) 1/16/97 2/20/97 757 (DSER 3.8.4.5-1) 1/16/97 2/20/97 758 (DSER 3.8.4.5-2)  !/16/97 2/20/97 782 (DSER 3.9.2.3-1) 6/30/95 2/28/97 l 783 (DSER 3.9.2.3 2) 2/19/97 2/28/97 786 (DSER 3.9.3.1-1) 2/29/96 2/28/97 793 (DSER 3.9.3.3 2) 2/19/97 2/28/97 801 (DSER 3.9.6.2-4) 2/19/97 2/28/97 802 (DSER 3.9.6.2-5) 2/19/97 2/28/97 l 805 (DSER 3.9.6.2-8) 2/19/97 2/28/97 807 (DSER 3.9.6.3-1) 2/19/97 2/28/97 809 (DSER 3.9.6.4-2) 2/19/97 2/28/97 854 (DSER 4.2.8-1) 4/12/% 3/4/97 1172 (DSER 11.2-6) 2/21/97 3/4/97 1210 (DSER 12.4.2-2) 4/30/% 2/6/97 1227 7/8/% 2/11/97 1228 7/8/% 2/11/97

\

1231 7/8/% 2/11/97 j 1232 7/8/% 2/11/97 j 1716 12/17/ % 2/28/97 1727 12/17/ % 2/28/97 4 i

1730 2/19/97 2/28/97 l 1

1731 2/19/97 2/28/97 l

I 1736 2/19/97 2/28/97 2 of 4 i

i J

s Open item Number Westinghouse Submittal Request for Status Change 1740' 10/11/ % 2/28/97 1742- 12/17/ % 2/28/97 1745 12/17/ % 2/28/97 1747 12/17/ % 2/28/97 1753 12/17/ % 2/28/97 1760 12/17/ % 2/28/97 1792 (DSER-CN 3.9.2.1-4) 10/23/ % 2/28/97 1793 (DSER-CN 3.9.2.31) 10/23/ % 2/28/97 1797 (DSER-CN 3.9.2.4-4) 10/14/ % 2/28/97 1802 (DSER-CN 3.9.3.3-3) 9/5/% 2/28/97 1803 (DSER-CN 3.9.3.3-4) 9/5/% 2/28/97 1807 (DSER-CN 3.9.7-1) 6/19/% 2/28/97 1888 (DSER-COL 3.8.2.4-1) 2/11/97 2/17/97 2034 (DSER-OISO 13.) 7/8/% 2/11/97 2066 12/17/ % 2/28/97 2347 1/16/97 2/18/97 2348 1/16/97 2/18/97 2349 1/16/97 2/18/97 3057 5/30/% 2/18/97 3247 (RAI 230.98) 4/30/96 2/18/97 3372 (RAI 210.213) 1/8/97 2/28/97 4617 2/14/97 2/14/97 4998 2/19/97 2/28/97 l

4999 2/19/97 2/28/97 5001 2/19/97 2/28/97 5002 2/19/97 2/28/97 Note that the status was changed for a large number of items so they have been removed from the

- table.

3 of 4

J F

b I Thanks for your help.

l lia%

Jim Winters 1

1 l

l l

1 l

1 I

l l

l I

l i

l 4 of 4 l

l

i.  ;

I

.y

, FAX to DINO SCALETTI March 5,1997 CC: Sharon or Dino, please make copies for- Ted Quay Bill Iluffman Diane Jackson Tom Kenyon i Joe Sebrosky Robin Nydes Cindy Haag Don Lindgren Bob Tupper Bruce Rarig l Brian McIntyre Ed Cummins l

Bob Vijuk NRC is requested to please acknowledge receipt of information related to each of the following Open Items. These are a subset of the items with " Action W" in "NRC Status" for which I have personally i checked, since the first of the year, that we have submitted what we believe is the resolving l

, information. Unlike those on the other list I will send you today, I have not prepared a background )

package for each of these. However, the reviewer in each case should have a submittal from

{ Westinghouse as identified in OITS for the item. Recognizing that reviewing for completeness of the response in each cace constitutes an NRC action, we recommend that receipt acknowledgement be accompanied by d ution to change their "NRC Status" to " Action N" If these are truly " Action W", please provide a description of the action Westinghouse is expected to take. We know of no action required. This is the seventh weekly request of this type. Many of these are very (over 6 months) old. We are not asking for resolution or even NRC review at this time, just acknowledgement that you have received the information as outlined in the OITS Status Detail if j your investigation shows I goofed and didn't remove item numbers that I should have, please let me know.

! 3, 142, 157, 164, 172, 173, 182, 184, 262, 300, 305, 308, 333, 405, 425, 457, 458, 628, 681, 698, l 706, 710, 716, 717, 718, 722,'i24, 729, 731, 740, 754, 757, 758, 782, 783, 786, 793, 801, 802, 805, 807, 809, 854, 972, 973, 1009, 1101, 1102, 1172, 1210, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1228, 1231, 1232, 1317, 1458, 1697, 1698, 1699, 1700, 1701, 1702, 1703, 1704, 1707, 1716, 1727, 1730, 1731, 1736, 1740, 1742, 1745, 1747, 1753, 1760, 1792, 1793, 1797, 1802, 1803, 1807, 1885, 1888, 1996, 1999, 2018, 2019, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2034, 2040, 2045, 2066, 2051, 2199, 2200, 2201, 2202, 2272, 2273, l i 2347, 2348, 2349, 2442, 2457, 2515, 2676, 2683, 2684, 2686, 2691, 2698, 2939, 2942, 2945, 2958, 2959, 2960, 2 % 1, 2 % 2, 2 % 3, 2964, 2 % 5, 2966, 2 % 7, 2 % 8, 2 % 9, 2970, 2971, 2972, 2973, 2974, i 2975, 2976, 2977, 2978, 2979, 2981, 2982, 2983, 2984, 2985, 2986, 3057, 3098, 3122, 3126. 3127, 3128, 3197, 3202, 3247, 3372, 3398, 3399, 3400, 3401, 3402, 3427, 3439, 3468, 3469, 3470, 3471, 3472, 3473, 3505, 3517, 3895, 3944, 3945, 3946, 3947, 3948, 3949, 3950, 3951, 3952, 3953, 3954, 3955, 3956, 3957, 3958, 4116, 4117, 4118, 4119, 4120, 4121, 4122, 4123, 4124, 4125, 4126, 4127, 4128, 4129, 4130, 4131, 4132, 4133, 4134, 4135, 4136, 4137, 4138, 4139, 4140, 4141, 4142, 4143,

,. 4144, 4151, 4202, 4203, 4204, 4205, 4206, 4209, 4214, 4224, 4225, 4226, 4227, 4998, 4999, 5001, 5002, and 5012.

4t-3

  • l .. cae seed 7eloi ==

i i ,

4

, . I 1 i 1

4 INSERT 1 i i

i Ptre Barriers As dameribed in =h 9.5.1.2.1.1, nom =ible fire 5arriers are provided in accordance with l' BTP CMEB 9.5-1 and NFPA 803 (Reference 2). The equivalent ftre barrier ratings are_shown in S. ;k. . e y , _^ - u- :- .i ,^%es form the h=ndaries of

~

Figures 9A 1 through 9A-5 dNE For most ch==d, fire equi,==* If cables of a cry related division Inust pass % = . =^.to a Ere area or fire zone of an unrelated

' vision, they are prot e barriers A ,

DISERT 2 Fire Areas F1 e areas are three dimensional spaces designed to contain a fire may exist within them. They i are sunauw by Sre bamers, rr-- : - "'- ^~ t L..-L., fire barrier penesrstion protection, and other den:ss, such as those wuhin the hearing and air conditioning ducts, that isolate a Are to wuhan the fire area.

DISERT 3 Outside contalrunent, zone of influence is not denned A fire outside containrnent is assumed to affect its entire fire area. Inside the coremmment fire area, the zone of influence is defined as the ennte fire zone containing the fire. )

A containmers, fire zones are usually Ma ey physical strucAires equivalent to a 3-hour Gre f i

/ barner. In sorne cases, other fire protection fontures apply, such as distance or lack of fuel. For example, fire zone 1100 AF 11300A has no physical barrier between it and fire mone 1100 AF l

113008. This is due to the fact that all combustibles are at the extreme ends of these Art zones and are separated by more than 40 feet. There will be no rammunication of a fire (km one fire zone to S the other. Other examples include fire monas 1100 AF 11301 and 1100 AF 11302 which are open at ,

their tops into fire zone 1100 AF 11500. Fire sons 1100 AF 11500 is the open upper contalarnem. I With no fuel sources over fire zonas 1100 AF 11301 and 1100 AF 11302, there will be no fire comn=mirm between these zones and fire sons 1100 AF 11500.

INSERT 4 Fire Zanes Fire scans are three dimensional spacas within fire arsas. Fire zones are identified uniquely to indicase thes they have Are pensection features or eartbutes different than other fire acons in a given

. m,- -_- m _ .. ,---- - .

__,,_____m_,

faarmiamens, fire mones are idereified to establish

  • zones of innuence". d
  • n n
  • WM DWN 01 AW33 NCIS30 BB9de Womd GC 21 46, IC NUT

I J

l I

8 l 5

, l'  !  ? ~,-

, . 8n-

. i zg l

t

- g.

s g

4 1

d2 l

_qi n j i .

' 1

..EER g

'4 j I? ~

gj i l  ? '.  :

i: ** 3:

i t'I .y  !

ts i

I i .

. i la;E I

I k

,a ,

l ll \

  • Na t

l l

,?

?x

.i, n a

-i ~j t.

~l f~. :

'o e

, i l .

'N, l l l

{

i i i , ,

s ] i55 = l l  ! tim  ?

+

'. -- !gn,

, I j n: . E i

D O

1 t, . .l ;5 }B O

i x

s

. 1- 5 2 I a f.' .

'l m

i , ,

! lQ * .' N

  • N I $2 i

l i

-j i i

!2 .

E '

l .g

{E i

i U; w o i s

e is

g j  ? , t i
lp! z- . . '.

x

-!  !& 2 i I lslw * ~' RI In  ;

) .

l

\. $. s #

, i n o. .

-a i

o i

t s

t -

--j. .e i

, .g 4 I l

i i j la k,,

R$

==

)

c k

i e I ,I a <

em

' ~

gl . 5 k!

-t i

t l .t U

}*

\ 8 k N - '

i o 2$ 1 5 e '

- V w o 8: i a * ,

w ~s 9

M w

ir 8 lc l E E e

g,t a

i , n 8x-

~h. bb

88 i

} -8  ;

8 7

1 g e e m N * @

I j swou wedo a mwaN i

4 i