IR 05000440/1985057

Insp Rept 50-440/85-57 on 850819-23.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Safety Committee Activity,Tests & Experiments & Preoperational Test Records

ML20135A446
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	09/05/1985
From:	Hawkins F, Westberg R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20135A428	List: IR 05000440/1985057 ML20135A425
References
50-440-85-57, NUDOCS 8509100162
Download: ML20135A446 (6)

Text

. .

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Report No. 50-440/85057(DRS)

Docket No. 50-440 License No. CPPR-148 .

!

Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company '

Post Office Box 5000 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plants, Unit 1 Inspection At: Perry Site, Perry, Ohio Inspection Conducted: August 19-23, 1985 DQt2 -

fW

Inspector: R. Westberg  :'

Da Approved B : F. C. Hawk Chi f

' QualityAs[anceProgramsSection Dater Inspection Summary Inspection on August 19-23, 1985 (Report No. 50-440/85057(DRS))

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection by one regional inspector of licensee action ~on previous inspection findings; safety committee activity; tests and experiments; preoperational test records; operating staff training; and surveillance testing and calibration control. The inspection involved 37 inspector-hours onsit Results: No violations or deviations were identifie ;

i

!

'

t

. .

I i

i

!

-

>

hDR 40 e PDR

-

. .

l DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI)

• P. A. Russ, Compliance Engineer

• Chasko, Surveillance Engineer

• J. L. Hansen, Surveillance Coordinator '

G. R. Anderson, Electrical and I&C Lead

• E. J. Plunkett, Component Lead, Records J. L. Marden, Unit Supervisor, Programs

• W. J. Wright, Nuclear Safety Review Committee (NSRC) Secretary ,

• R. G. Schuerger, Principle Nuclear Operations Engineer, NSRC Chairman

• R. G. Solt, Supervisor, Procurement Quality

• N. J. Lehman, Staff Analyst

• E. Riley, General Supervisor, Construction Quality

• R. H. Simmons, Unit Superviscr, Operational Quality

• J. J. Lausberg, Unit Supervisor, Operational Quality

• B. B. Liddell, Operations Engineer

• W. R. Kanda, General Supervising Engineer, Technical

• B. S. Ferrell, Licensing Engineer

• S. F. Kensicki, Technical Superintendent

• A. F. Silakoski, General Supervisor, Training R. L. Luse, Supervisor Support Services D. W. Goddard, Skills Training Coordinator J. B. Heishman, Lead I&C Instructor D. E. Heck, Supervisor, Nuclear Skills Training Unit S. R. Bennett, Training Clerk M. D. Lazar, Material Control Supervisor R. M. Selan, Unit Supervisor '

C. D. Banks, Senior Engineer USNRC J. A. Grobe, Senior Resident Inspector, Operations Other personnel were contacted as a matter of routine during the inspectio * Indicates those attending the exit meeting on August 23, 1985.

2. Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Open Item (440/85014-04): Procedure No. SMI-0006,

" Identification and Control of Dated Material," did not address

. acceptance criteria for shelf life of items'already in storag The licensee issued Revision 1 to this procedure which included provisions for shelf life review and shelf life extension request The inspector reviewed Revision 1 to this procedure and found it acceptable,

,

i

. .

! (0 pen) Violation (440/85014-03): Failure to follow procurement procedures. The inspector reviewed procedure No. NQADP 1002,

" Inspection of Procured Items", Revision 2 Draft; Procedure No. 81-0707, " Verification of Suppliers Certification Validity",

Revision 0; and " Spare Parts Documented Position No. 001",

Revision 0, and found them acceptable. The item remains open pending NRC review of the licensee's implementation of their corrective action comitment . Safety Comittee Activity The inspector verified that the off-site safety review committee had been established and was functioning in conformance with Technical Specification requirements. The following aspects of the Nuclear Safety Review Comittee (NSRC) charter were reviewed during this inspection:

assigned responsibilities; membership makeup and qualifications; designation of alternate members; requirements for comittee quorum; meeting frequency; distribution and maintenance of minutes and records; interfaces with onsite review groups; and followup action to resolve identified deficiencie The inspector also verified that the Independent Safety Engineering Group (ISEG) had been established and was functioning in conformance with Safety Evaluation Report (SER) comitment Documents Reviewed (1) " Nuclear Safety Review Comittee Charter", Revision 2 (2) NSRC Operating Guidelines (a) No. 001, " Administrative", Revision 0 (b) No. 002, " Operations and Maintenance Subcomittee".

Revision 0 (c) No. 003, " Radiological Environmental and Chemistry Subcomittee", Revision 0 (d) No. 004, " Audit Subcommittee," Revision 0 (e) No. 005, " Engineering Subcomittee", Revision 0 (3) " Independent Safety Engineering Group Charter", Revision 0 (4) POP 0203, " Independent Safety Engineering Group Operations",

Revision 0 (5) NSRC Meeting Minutes a No. 4, March 13, 1985 b No. 5, April 10, 1985 c No. 6, May 8, 1985 (d) No. 7, June 12, 1985 (e) No. 8. July 10, 1985 (6) ISEG Project Reports (a) No. 85001, " Fire Suppression System Causing Inoperability of Safety-Related Equipment" (b) No. 85004, " Technical Assessment of Fuel Receipt Activities"

. . Results of Inspection To determine that the NSRC was accomplishing its activities in accordance with its charter, the inspector reviewed the meeting minutes for the last five NSRC meetings. The NSRC was found to be meeting its charter and the inspector had no further concern To determine that the ISEG was accomplishing its activities in accordance with its charter, the inspector reviewed two ISEG project reports and concluded that the results were acceptabl No violations or deviations were identified in this are . Tests and Experiments The inspector reviewed the program for control of special reactor tests and experioients to verify conformance with the FSAR; draf t Technical Specifications; 10 CFR Part 50.59; 10 CFR 50, Appendix B; and ANSI N18.7-197 Documents Reviewed (1) OMIA: PAP-1107, "Special Test Control", Revision 0 (2) OMIA: PAP-0507, " Preparation Review, Approval, Revision, and Cancellation of Instructions", Revision 1 (3) OMIA: PAP-0518, " Preparation of Periodic Test Instructions",

Revision 1 4) OMIA: PAP-1604, " Reports Management", Revision 0 5) OMIA8: PAP-0305, " Safety Evaluations", Revision 2 6) 91-0332, " Safety Evaluations", Revision 1

, Results of Inspection The inspector's review of the test and experiment control procedures indicated that the written program was acceptable with one exception: procedure No. PAP-1107, did not reference procedure No. PAP-0507 for preparation of test instructions. This concern was discussed with the involved licensec personnel who agreed to revise the procedure to include this item. Pending further review,

.

this matter is considered open (440/85057-01).

!

No violations or deviations were identified in this are . Preoperational Test Records The inspector reviewed the program for control of preoperational test records to verify conformance with FSAR commitments and regulatory requirements. The following aspects of the program were considered during this review: administrative controls; record storage; and record retentio , 4

. ,

t Documents Reviewed (1) TPI 15, "NTS Records and Document Control", Revision 3 (2) PA 1701, ' Records Management Program", Revision 4 Results of Inspection The inspector's review indicated that the written records control program and records storage practices were acceptable for in-process records. Since the Nuclear Test Section (NTS) only processes records, the administrative controls for record storage and record retention for the pennanent records are the same as previously reviewed by the inspector in NRC Inspection Report no. 50-440/85020, Section 8. Record No violations or deviations were identified in this are . Operating Staff Training The inspector verified that the FSAR t*aining commitments for non-licensed personnel had been completed. This inspection consisted of a review of the training records for mechanics; General Supervising Engineer, Maintenance; Plant Health Physicist; Chemical Supervisors; I&C Supervisors; I&C technicians; and Health Physics technician To verify that on-the-job training objectives are being met, the Senior Resident Inspector will attend selected training sessions and review the involved lesson plans. This review will be documented on a separate repcr No violations or deviations were identified in this are . Surveillance Testing and Calibration Control To verify implementation of the surveillance testing program, the inspector selected 20 surveillance tests required by the Technical Specifications and verified that each of the selected tests or inspections had been included in a master schedule. The master schedule was also reviewed for conformance with the requirements of the Technical Specification Five safety-related plant instruments, not specifically required to be calibrated by the Technical Specifications, were selected and verified to be calibrated and included in a master calibration schedule. The innpector's review indicated, however, that the instruments had been calibrated and scheduled by NTS since they were in systems that had not been turned over to the plant. The inspector discussed the calibration of these instruments with the Electrical and I&C Lead who demonstrated that approved calibration procedures had been prepared and that when these systems were turned over, the scheduling and calibrations would be picked up by the repetitive task program. The inspector then reviewed

.-- . - ...- - . .

. . .

procedure No. PAP 0903, " Repetitive Task Program", and procedure No. TAP-0512, " Calibration Intervals for Plant Instruments", and found

'

them acceptabl No -violations or deviations were identified in this area.

'

- Open Items

.

Open items are matters which have been discussed with the licensee, which will be reviewed further by the. inspector, and which involve some action on the part of the NRC or licensee or both. An open item is discussed in Paragraph 4.b.

Exit Interview

. The inspector met'with licensee representatives on August 23, 1985, and

'

summarized the purpose, scope, and findings of the inspection._ The

, inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the i inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed by the i inspector during the inspection. The licensee identified all documents reviewed as proprietary; however, none of these documents are quoted in this report.

!

I i

I

.

F l

i

.

'

I A

.

. - . - . . -= .-- ..:.. . - - - . . . .