IR 05000440/1985062

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Insp Rept 50-440/85-62 on 850918-20.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Electric & Instrument Terminations,Instrumentation Cable Installation & Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings
ML20205E450
Person / Time
Site: Perry 
Issue date: 10/07/1985
From: Neisler J, Tani K, Williams C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20205E443 List:
References
50-440-85-62, NUDOCS 8510170309
Download: ML20205E450 (4)


Text

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Report No. 50-440/85062(DRS)

Docket No. 50-440 License No. CPPR-148 Licensee:

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Post Office Box 5000 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Facility Name:

Perry Nuclear Power Plants, Unit 1

,

Inspection At:

Perry Site, Perry, Ohio Inspection Conducted:

September 18-20, 1985 Inspectors:

J. H. Neisler M I4

/

~7" 7I K. Tani

/O - 7-2I Date

& l$0. h.-

Approved By:

. C. Williams, Chief lo'7 M Plant Systems Section Date Inspection Summary Inspection on September 18-20, 1985 (Report No. 50-440/85062(DRS))

Areas Inspected:

Routine, unannounced safety inspection of licensee action on previous inspection findings; electric and instrument terminations; and instrumentation cable installation.

The inspection involved a total of 44 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors.

Results: No violations or deviations were identified; however, an unresolved item in Paragraph 3 requires further evaluation.

85101703o9 851007

~

[R ADOCM 05000440 PDR

-

..

-

-

- -

. -

- -

-.

.

.

.

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Principal Licensee Employees

  • C. M. Shuster, Manager, Quality Assurance
  • E. Riley, General Supervisor, CQS
  • F. Stead, Manager, Nuclear Engineering
  • B. Walrath, General Supervising Engineer, 0QS
  • E. Willman, Senior Engineer, NED
  • R. Segen, Quality Engineer, PQV
  • V. Higaki, Unit Supervisor Electrical /I&C, 0QS
  • B. Ferrell, Licensing Engineer, NED
  • S. Tulk, Unit Supervisor, Electrical, CQS
  • R. Czyzewski, Lead Quality Engineer, CQS
  • G. Parker, Unit Supervisor, Pipe / Mech, CQS
  • M. Makar, Fire Protection Engineer, NED
  • K. Cimorelli, Lead Quality Engineer, CQS R. Varner, Quality Engineer, CQS R. Peterson, Quality Engineer, CQS 0. Lamson, Quality Engineer, 0QS R. Matthys, Lead Quality Engineer, CQS
  • Denotes those persons attending the exit interview.

2.

Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Violation (440/83037-03):

Electrical design drawings inadequately reviewed and checked. The inspector reviewed the licensee's audit of the project electrical engineering design organization and ECN 6220-33-1240 that corrected drawings to identify the relays listed in the violation.

The inspector determined that relay tags are identification tags for the basic relay and that the additional numbers in the ECN indicated the incorporation of more contact blocks in the basic relay.

(Closed) Open Item (440/85028-01):

Cable separation within the reactor protection system (RPS) panels. The licensee's quality inspectors have performed a reinspection of the RPS panels.

The inspector reviewed the results of these inspections as documented in licensee inspection reports R85-8793, R85-9092, and R85-9292.

Deficiencies identified during these inspections were documented on nonconformance reports and appropriate corrective actions initiated.

The inspector has no further questions regarding separation within these panels.

(Closed) Open Item (440/85028-02):

It was previously identified that the licensee had a significant number of reverse slope problems on the instru-ment sensing lines detected during construction and heat-up testing activities.

During this inspection, the inspector reviewed ten NCRs related to the slope problems and determined that the NCRs were adequately dispositioned.

Further, the licensee indicated that a total of 127 slope

-

-

-

.

problems were further identified during the B33 system fast speed test.

Of these 127 slope problems, 79 were dispositioned as "use-as-is" and 48 were dispositioned for rework.

Based on the above reviewed data which indicates that the licensee has adequate control of the slope problem,

'this item is considered closed.

3.

As-built Inspection of Panel Terminations The inspectors visually examined instrument and control cable terminations in selected panels and cabinets in the control and intermediate buildings.

The examination consisted of the inspector's comparing each terminal in a panel or cabinet with the as-built or latest termination drawing to ascertain whether each conductor from each cable was landed on the proper terminal.

In addition to the latest drawing,-the inspector reviewed engineering change notices and field design deviation reports to determine whether the latest approved changes had been posted to or incorporated in the as-built or latest revision of the termination drawings.

While inspecting the terminations, the inspectors also examined instrument mountings, adherence to separation criteria, and installed hardware and protective devices within the panels.

Panels in which terminations were inspected included:

IC61-P001, Remote Shutdown Panel, Cubicles A, B, C, D IM56-P001, Hydrogen Igniter Panel, Division 1 1R14-5015, ATWS Distribution Panel, Division 2 1H13-P730E, Control Room Termination Cabinet 1H13-P747A, Control Room Termination Cabinet 1H13-P7478, Control Room Termination Cabinet During the inspection of panel 1C61-P001 the inspector observed that the fuses installed in positions 34 and 35 were labeled as 10 ampere rated fuses. These fuses were shown on drawing 865 E 788 as 5 ampere rated fuses and on drawing 865 E 787 as 10 ampere rated fuses.

The licensee issued nonconformance report 0QC-3088 to resolve the discrepancies between drawings 787 and 788 and between the drawings and the installed fuse size.

This issue will remain unresolved pending NRC review of the disposition of nonconformance report 0QC-3088.

(440/85062-01)

4.

Instrumentation Cable The inspector reviewed documentation and observed work associated with the installation of instrumentation cables.

Documentation included in the review consisted of examples of pre pull checklists, cable pull checklists, cable pull tension calculations, pull slips, insulation resistance / continuity and procedure deviation reports.

In addition, the inspector reviewed ten nonconformance reports (NCR) issued to document deficiencies identified during quality control inspections.

The NCRs had been properly dispositioned and the appropriate corrective action had been accomplished.

.

. _.

..

.-

. ~.

.-

.

-~-

,

,

-

.

The inspector examined cable testing records, specifically, insulation resistance and continuity testing.

Tests were conducted according to either the contractors procedure (LKC 4.3.18) or the licensee's opera-tions procedure (GEN-E-004) depending upon when the cables were installed.

Cables are presently being tested by the Nuclear Test Section pursuant to licensee procedure GEN-E-004.

Cables reviewed during this inspection were:

)

1M43R-28A 1C11R-1798 IC51R30-6B 1R43A-11B

'

.1M43A-48-1M32R-17A I

No violations or deviations were identified.

5.

Unresolved Items t

An unresolved item is a matter about which more information is required

,

in order to ascertain whether it is an acceptable item, a deviation, or a

,

.

violation.

An unresolved item is identified in Paragraph 3 above.

6.

Exit Interview -

The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)

-

at the conclusion of the inspection.

The inspectors summarized the scope

-and findings of the inspection.

The licensee acknowledged this information.

j The inspectors also discussed the likely informational content of the

'

inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed during the inspection. The licensee representatives did not identify any such

.

documents / processes as proprietary.

,

l

!

,

b

,

.

I i

!

l L-

- -

.-