IR 05000440/1985067

Insp Rept 50-440/85-67 on 851002-04.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings,Const Deficiency Repts & Instrumentation Installation & Records

ML20133M585
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	10/22/1985
From:	Neisler J, Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133M569	List: IR 05000440/1985067 ML20133M567
References
50-440-85-67, NUDOCS 8510280142
Download: ML20133M585 (4)

Text

.-

.

!

I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION

REGION III

,

Report No. 50-440/85067(DRS)

Docket No. 50-440 License No. CPPR-148 Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Post Office Box 5000 Cleveland OH 44101 i

Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plants, Unit 1

!

Inspection At: Perry Site, Perry, Ohio I

Inspection Conducted: October 2-4, 1985 Inspector:

0 0 W N h "

J. H. Neisler /B-2-1 - $4-Date Y0f '"

Approved By: . C. Williams, Chief IO--2 2 ' M Test Programs Section Date

.

,

Inspection Summary j Inspection on October 2-4, 1985 (Report No. 50-440/85067(DRS))

Areas Inspected

Routine safety inspection of licensee action on previous i

inspection findings, construction deficiency reports, and instrumentation I installation and records. The inspection involved a total of 20 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector.

Results

No violations or deviations were identified.

i

i

!

!

i I

!

!  ;

i i

! warea Mho l 0

- - _ - _ . - - . . - - - . - - - - - , , . - . . . - - . - _ - . . . . . . - . - , . . - - - - - , _ . - . . . - . .

- - -. __. -. .-

.

f DETAILS Persons Contacted Principle Licensee Employees

• C.M. Shuster, Manager, Quality Assurance

!

E. Riley, General Supervisor, CQS/NQAD

• B. Walrath, General Supervisor, 0QS/NGAD

• Gerber, Supervison Administrator, NTS

• R. Segen, Quality Enjineer, PQAS

• V. Higaki, Unit Supervisor, 0QS

• R. Stratman, General Supervisory Engineer, ND&AS

• W. Kanda, GSE Technical, PPTD

• E. Willman, Senior Engineer, NED

• S. Tulk, Unit Supervisor, CQS K. Cimorelli, Lead Quality Engineer, CQS R. Matthys, Lead Quality Engineer, CQS

*B. Ferrell, Licensing Engineer, NED G. Parker, Unit Supervisor CQS D. Lamson, Quality Engineer, 0QS K. Kaplan, Senior Engineering Technician

• N. Lehman, Staff Analyst, PPTD

,

• Denotes those persons attending exit interview,

Action on Previous Inspection Findings I (Closed) Open Item (440/85028-03)

Qualification documentation for 25 reels of cable were not available. The inspector reviewed documentation attesting to the IEEE-323 qualification of cable supplied under purchase order P-6135-Z. Included in the documentation were the architect

.

engineer's review and acceptance of the qualification documents and the

! suppliers certification of product quality. The inspector has no further

concerns regarding the acceptability of this cable.

l (Closed) Open Item (440/85038-02): Field connections in panel 1H13-P693 were not landed in termination points as shown on drawings. The inspector reviewed General Electric field deviation disposition report (FDDR)

KL1-6107 that required the field connections to be moved from terminal points AA34-37 to 0D38-4 The wiring is now installed as required by FDDR KL1-610 (0 pen) Open Item (440/84028-02): Inadequate control and implementation of corrective action concerning fuse control. The inspector observed in panel H13-P618 that the fuse in TB-M position F7 had a 5 ampere rating. Drawing 866E325 requires a 10 ampere rated fuse. This item will remain open

'.

pending further review of licensee's corrective action and verification that proper fuses are installed to protect safety related system . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ - _ __ _ _ _ _ ______- _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _

- _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,

f

]- (Closed) Unresolved Item (440/85028-01): Separation between reactor protection system wiring and class 1E redundant wiring in DAS panel

> 1H22-P11 The inspector reviewed the results of the licensee's rein-spection of DAS panels 1H22-P112 and 1H22-P113. Deficiencies found in the panels were identified as nonconformances by report NR:0QC-2947 and P073-3200. The inspector verified that separation deficiencies in these panels have been properly identified and adequate corrective actions initiated.

(Closed) Open Item (440/85033-02): NRR requested Region III to verify that division 2 cabling is not physically touching Division 1 cabling and

) is in conduit that provides at least a one inch air space in panel

! H13-P691 and the reverse for panel H13-P692. The inspector verified that the divisional cables were not touching; that the cables are in flexible i metal conduit and the required separation existed. The inspector also reviewed reviewed fire test results for the conduit and an Agastat relay

'

common to both divisions. The test results proved the conduit and relay meet design requirement (Closed) Open Item (440/85033-05): NRR ICSB found that outboard main t

steam isolation valves (MSIV) B and D were incorrectly tagged. The inspector verified by visual inspection and P&ID review that tagging of outboard MSIV's B and D and MSIV leak off valves are identified (tagged)

according to P&ID D-302-342 Revision A. The inspector also reviewed nonconformance report NR-TAS-111 and General Electric response 2976 that was initiated by the licensee to correct the erroneous equipment I

identification on the valves.

i (Closed) Unresolved Item (440/85038-03): Discrepancies between field i terminations and drawing in panel 1H13-P693. The inspector reviewed General Electric field deviation deposition request KL1-6165 that shows i conductor C71A 1539C terminated at TB-1-2 and requires correction of

drawing 866E341 sheet 2 that showed the conductor terminated at TB-1-1.

The inspector also reviewed G.E. document 304A1640EB that states that a l

wire marker is not required on jumpers when the length is insufficient to apply labels on both ends of the wir I

' Action on 10 CFR 50.55(e) Reports

'

(Closed) Construction Deficiency Report (440/84046-EE)(DAR-211). The licensee was notified pursuant to 10 CFR 21 of a defect in the adjustment

) of the low soltage " shut-off and turn on" of Class IE inverters manufactured by Power Mark division of Topaz. The adjustment was set toc l high by the manufacturer. The inspector reviewed calibration documents j and inspection reports of calibration of the inverters in Unit 1 to an

'

operating range of 100-140 volts such that the inverters will shut off at j 100 volts and restart at 108 volts on low voltage conditions and shut off

at 140 volts and restart at 132 volts on high voltage conditions. These

,

settings correspond to General Electric component design conditions.

i i

b h

n 3 /

f

, _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ , . _ _ _ _ . , _ - _ _ . _ _ _ 1_ _ _ . . . _ - - _ - - - . - -- - - .-

,

i s

!

'

I

! (Closed) Construction Deficiency Report (440/83014-EE) (DAR-133): This

'

item was closed inadvertently in Inspection Report No. 440/85050 as item (440/85014-EE) (DAR-133). 10-CFR-50.55(e) report No. 440/85014-EE remains ope . Instrumentation, Installations, and Records .

t

The inspection consisted of a walkdown of instrument and control panels and the cables within those panels. Each cable termination was compared i with the appropriate termination drawing to determine whether the cable j was terminated upon the terminal point shown on the latest or as-built drawing, engineering change notice, or other engineering document approved

'

by the architect engineer or NSSS vender. The inspector determined that

'

within the scope of the inspection, terminations were landed on the

! terminal points shown on the drawings or were documented on approved change documents for incorporation in the termination drawing The inspector also reviewed inspection reports, nonconformance reports, deficiency reports and corrective action reports associated with instrument cables and components. The reports had been properly dispositioned and appropriate corrective action take !

The inspector observed that cables were properly identified, separation between redundant cables was maintained by either free air space or -

!

barriers. Redundant components were either in separate panels or isolated

by barriers or isolation devices such as relays or breakers.

!

, The inspector reviewed contractor records for installation and calibration i of instruments. Installation records indicate that instruments were installed according to approved drawings. The installation was verified by the inspector in those panels included in the walkdown inspectio No violations or deviations were identifie . Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1)

at the conclusion of the inspection and summarized the scope and findings l of the inspection. The licensee acknowledged the inspector's comments.

i The inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the

'

report with regard to documents or processes reviewed by the inspector j during the inspection. The licensee did not identify Sny such l

documents / processes as proprietar ,

/

l /

i

u-__ _. _ _ . _ _ _ _ _