ML20072K778

Public Version of Revised Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures,Including Procedures Erpip 4.1.25 Re Environ Svcs,Erpip 4.1.26 Re Environ Monitoring Team & Erpip 4.5.6 Re Offsite Protective Actions

ML20072K778
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	02/09/1983
From:	BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20072K769	List: ML20072K772 ML20072K778
References
PROC-830209-01, NUDOCS 8303300777
Download: ML20072K778 (29)

Text

'

• ERPIP 4.1.25 Rev.9 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL: Environmental Services Coordinator Conditions: Alert Site Emergency General Emergency Action L NOTIFY Radiological Assessment Director (RAD) of your presence at Alternate Emergency Control Center.

2. REVIEW emergency conditions and radiological release (s).

3. ASSIST / advise RAD. .

4. INTERFACE with Environmental Monitoring Team Leader (EMTL).

l

- CAUTION -

Environmental sampiing and TLD exchange during atmospheric

- radiological releases may result in tsidue exposure / contamination to personnel and equipment.

5. Eprojected or measured radioactivity levels in air, water, soil or vegetation indi.cate significant environmental contamination may be present CONSIDER initiating environmental sample collection within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

O .

h hbh 0" T

7 3

8303300777 830325 PDR ADOCK 05000317 l

F PDR

ERPIP 4.1.25 Rev: 9

. 5. Emenswed radioactivity levels indicate potential for exceeding:

Gross Activity Medium greater than Bay Water 10-3 uC1/mi Ground 0.01 mrem /hr/m2 or 3

0.14 uC1/m Milk 0.007 uCl/ liter .

Vegetation 0.7 uCl/Kg Greater than Airborne (offsite) 5 mrem /h(" Alert" levels or higher)

CONSIDER initiating environmental sample collection immediately or within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />,

7. Einitial environmental sample activities exceed:

l Radionuclides Mn Fe Co Co Zn ZrNb I Cs Cs BaLa H3 54 59 58 60 65 95* 131 134 137 140+

Medium Water (pC1/L) 2E4* IE3 4E2 IE3 3E2 3E2 4E2 2 30 50 2E2 Fish (pC1/kg, wet) 3E4 IE4 3E4 IE4 2E4 IE3 2E3 Airborne particu 3 0.9 10 20 late or gas (pC1/m )

3 60 70 3E2 Milk (pC1/L)

Vegetation (pC1/kg, wet) IE2 IE3 2E3

• For & inking water samples (40 CFR 141 value).

+ Parent and daughter total.

CONSIDER initiating additional sampling.

CONSIDER protective actions listed on Attachments I through 6.

2

- - - - - - - , , , . , , ,, _ _ , , . _ , . , - , , , _ , . _ _ _ , , , _ , , . - , , , _ , , , . , , . , , , , . _ , , _ _ , , , , , _ , , , ,,,y_,, - _ . , . - . - - - - , .

ERPIP 4.1.25 Rev.9 l

!' 8. E, projected or measured ambient radiation dose rate (s) indicate Attachment 7, Environmental Sample Station External Background Radiation levels, will be exceeded by 25% or more for the respective location CONSIDER initiating collection / replacement of environmental TLDs.. - - .

' ~ .. .

9. PORWARD records from collection and data reports generated by this emergency response to the Supervisor-Emergency Planning Unit.

mi l

1 l

3 of 3

ERPIP 4.1.25 r i^

Rev.9 .

]

4 i t

• ATTACHMENT 1 )

U i

PROTECTIVE ACTION GtRDELINES POR EXPO 5URES TO AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS VIA DIRECT EXPO 5URE OR INHALATION t

Population Projected Whole Body Projected Thyroid At Risk. Exposure-Gamma (rem) Dose-Inhalation (rem)

General Population 1 to 5 (a) 5 - 25 (a)

Emergency Workers 25 125 ,

Lifesaving 75 (b)

A) Lowest value is used if there are no major local constraints in providing protection at that level, especially to sensitive populations. Local constraints may make lower values impractical to use, but in no case will the higher value be exceeded in determining the need for protective action.

B) No specific upper limit Is given for thyroid exposure since In extreme case completc thyrold loss might be an acceptable penalty for life saved. If respirators and/or thyroid blocks (potassium lodide) are available for rescue personnel, a specific upper Ilmit is unnecessary.

EXPCSURES TO THE PUBUC VIA THE FOOD PATHWAY FROM DEPOSITED RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS i

Protective Projected Dose Commitment to Projected Dose Action Whole Body, Bone Marrow or any Commitment to the Other Organ (rem) Thyroid (rem)

Guide (PAG) 0.5 1.5 Preventative PAG Emergency PAG 5.0 15.0

i- '

!l fi ERPIP 4.1.25 Rev.9

$.['

ATTACHMENT 2 l

j! RESPON5E LEVEL EQtJIVALENT TO PREVENTATIVE PAG

. !; Infant a as critical segment of population t

i. Il31 Cag3gd Cag37 Sr90 Sf89

Initial deposition 0.13 2 3 0.5 8 (microcuries/ meter2)

, Peak activity:

Pastwo (microcuries/ kilogram)C 0.05 0.8 1.3 0.18 3 Milk (microcuries/11ter)b 0.015 0.15 0.24 0.009 0.14 Total intake (microcuries) 0.09 4 7 0.2 2.6

a. Newborn infant Qncluding fetus (Pregnant women) as critical segment of population for lodne-131. For other radonuc!! des " Infant" refers to children under 1 year old.

b. From fallout, lodine-131 is the only significant radiolodine with respect to milk l

l contamination beyond the first day. For reactor accident, cumulative lodine-133 Intake via 1

i milk is about 2 percent of lodine-131 assuming equivalent deposition.

c. Fresh weight.

d. Ceslum Intake via meat / person pathway for adults may exceed milk pathway, therefore, milklevels should cause surveillance and protective actions for meat also. Reduce response levels by a factor of 2 If Cesium-134 and Ceslum-137 are present equally.

D

- - - , - - - - i.-. -.m- _.-._._m...___.,,w-,_._ - _ . - . _ . - _ _ < - - - . _

J l

!' ERPIP 4.1.25 ,

Rev.9 ATTACHMENT 3 l

RESPONSE LEVEL EQUIVALENT TO EMERGENCY PAG i

Ig3g Cst 34 Cs137 Sr90 Srg9 Infant

• Adult . Infanth Adult' Infant b Adult

• Infant Adult Infant Adult

initial Deposition 2 1.3 20 40 30 50 20 80 1,600 (microcuries/ meter ) 18 5 Peak Activityf

Pastwe (miaocuries/ 0.5 17 8 17 13 19 1.8 8 30 700 j kilogram)d i

Milk (microcuries/ 0.15 2 1.5 3 2.4 4 0.09 0.4 1.4 30 liter)c Total intake 0.9 10 40 70 70 80 2 7 26 400

a. Newborn Infant Gncluding Fetus (pregnant wumen,) as critical segment of population for lodine-131.

b. Infant" refers to children 1 year old.

c. From fallout, lodine-1311s the only significant radiolodine with respect to milk contamination

. beyond the first day. For reactor accident, cumulative lodine-133 Intake via milk is about 2 percent of lodine-131 assuming equivalent deposition.

d. Fresh weight.

e. Response levels for the adult population for cesium refer to the meat pathways. Cesium Intake via meat / person pathway for adults may exceed milk pathway; therefore milk levels should cause surveillance and protective for meat also. If Cs-134 and Cs-137 are equally present, the response level should be reduced by a factor of 2.

f. Peak activity in meat, microcurie per kilogram.

NOTE: Response levels equivalent to Emergency PAG are presented in both infants and adults thus assuring a flexible approach for action in cases where exposure of the most critical population portion Gnf ants and pregnant women) can be prevented.

I

e n -

9

! H U* ERP!P 4.1.25 ,

Rev.9 ATTACHMENT 4 i i

. ItECOMMENDED PROTECTIVE ACTION 5 POR POPULATION AND WORKERS 1

Projected Dose from) Recxwnmended Actions (s)b) Comments i To the Population whole body 1.0 No planned protective action *). Previously recommended State may lasue advisory to protective actions may seek shelter and wait further be reconsidered or Thyroid 10 instructions. Monitor environ- terminated.

mental radiation levels.

J whole body 1.0 to 10 Seek shelter Consider If constraints exist, evacuation. Evacuate m- give special consideraton

. Thyroid 5.0 to 25 less constraints make it im- for children and pregnant practical Monitor enviromnental women evacuation.

radiationlevels. Control access.

Whole body 5 and above Conduct mandatory evacuation. Seeking shelter is an Monitor environmental radiation alternative if evacus-levels and adjust for mandatory tion is not immediat-evacuation based on these ely possible.

levels. Control nece==~

. To Emergency Team Workers Whole body 25 Controi emergency team members Although respirators and exposure to these levels ez- stable lodine should be cept for lifesaving missions. used where effective to (Appropriate controls for emerg- control dose to emerg-ency workers, include time ency team workers,

!!mitations, respirators, thyroid dose may not be l

and stable lodine), a limiting factor for 11fesaving missions.

l Whole body 75 Control exposure of emergency l team members performing life-l saving missions to this level.

Thyroid (c)

(Control of exp)osure time is most effective .

i (a) Actions are recommended for planning purposes. Protective action decisions at time of incident must take existing conditions into ponsideration.

(b) At time of incident, officials may implement low-impact protective actions in keeping with principle of maintaining radiation exposures as low as reasonably achievable.

(c) If one or more lives is likely to be saved, no upper limit for thyroid dose is estab!!shed.

ERPIP 4.1.25 Rev.9

~

ATTACHMENT 5 RECOMMENDED PROTECTIVE ACTIONS POR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT 5 Consider these rv;.c4ve actions when projected dose equals or exceeds PAG:

For Pasture - Remove lactating dairy cows from contaminated pasturage and substitute tacontaminated stored feed.

- Substitute secontaminated water or contaminated water.

- Withhold contaminated milk from market to allow short-lived For Milk i

radionuc!!de radioactive decay.

- NOTE -

May be achieved by storage of frozen fresh milk, frozen concentrated milk or frozen concentrated milk products.

- If ultra high temperature pasteurization techniques were employed in processing, store for prolonged times at reduced temperatures.

- Divert fluid milk for production of dry whole milk, nonfat dry milk, butter er evaporated milk.

For Fruits and Vezetables -Wash, brush, scrub or peel to remove surface contamination, or preserve by canning, freezing and dehydrating or storing to permit radioactive decay of short-lived radionuc!! des radioactive decay.

For Grains - Mill or polish.

For other Food Products - Process to remove surface contamination.

For Meat and Meat Products - Consider on a case-by-case basis.

For Animal Feeds (other than pasture)- Increase noncontaminated mineral calcium to a maximum and on a case-by-case basis.

l 1

l l

l l

l

'5

.]

ERP!P 48.1.25 Rev.9

' ATTACHMENT 6 RECOMMENDED PROTECTIVE ACTIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT 5 Isolate food containing radioactivity to prevent its introduction into commerce.

t

~{ Determine if condemnation or other disposition is appropriate. Consider:

- Availability of other possible protective actions discussed for preventative PAG.

- Relative proportion of total diet by weight presented by the item in question.

- Imp w.cs of particular food in nutrition.

- Availability of uncontaminated food or substitutes having same nutritional properties.

- Relative contritMtion of other foods and radionuclides to total dose. .

- Time and effort required to effect corrective action.

I I

e'

• l l

i -

e ERP!P 4.1.25 Rev.9 i

ATTACHMENT 7 Page 1 of 7 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING STATIONS EXTERNAL BACKGROUND RADIATION LEVEL 5 *

(Results in Units of mR/30 days)

Location #7 Jan. 3.1710.14** Jul. 2.7310.08 Feb. 3.213 16 Aug. 2.4510.31 Mar. 3.2310.11 Sep. 2.9510.27 Apr. 3.06 4 .22** Oct. 3.6510.15 May 3.1810.02 Nov. 2.9110.26 Jun. 3.1610.25 Dec. 2.9510.21 Location #17 Jan. 4.4210.10 JuL 4.3810.14 Feb. 4.8510.29 Aug. 4.5210.31 Mar. 4.8110.03 Sep. 4.3710.03 Apr. 4.783 02 Oct. 5.213 34 May 4.4610.07 Nov. 4.4210.10 Jun. 4.373 34 Dec. 4.9210.26 Location #18 Jan. 3.9110.27 Jul. 4.2510.45 Feb. 4.5010.05 Aug. 4.0810.16 Mar. 4.5610.17 Sep. 4.1510.09 Apr. 4.4610.11 Oct. 5.1010.12 May 4.2410.02 Nov. 4.2310.05 Jun. 4.0610.07 Dec. 3.7710.77 Location #19 Jan. 3.9710.21 JuL 3.8710.13 Feb. 4.3210.16 Aug. 3.6110.15 Mar. 3.9610.22 Sep. 3.7710.01 Apr. 3.883 11 Oct. 4.1710.04 May 3.7310.17 Nov. 3.8010.10

' ~ Jun. 3.5810.12 Dec. 3.8310.09 l

s

. m Il

'(

ERPIP 4.1.25 Rev.9 ATTACHMENT 7 Page 2 of 7 ENVDtONMENTAL SAMPLING STA110N5

a. EXTERNAL BACKGROUND RADIATION LEVEL $*

I (Results in Units of mR/30 days)

Location #20 Jan. 3.97313 Jul. 3.8110.46 Feb. 4.123 33 Aug. 3.6410.22 Mar. 4.1310.11 Sep. 3.713 38 Apr. 4.1510.24 Oct. 4.313 27 May 3.9410.2% Nov. 3.9210.28 l

l

. Jun. 3.633 19 Dec. 3.7610.07 Location #21 Jan. 3.723 11 JuL 3.93to.26 j ,

Feb. 4.693 62 Aug. 4.013 21 Mar. .4.123 11 Sep. 3.8810.17 Apr. 4.173 05 Oct. 4.45to.28 May 3.9010.20 Nov. 3.8410.17 Jun. 3.96g0.19 Dec. 4.393 78 I

Location #22 Jan. 3.81_4 23 JuL 3.6510.05 Feb. 4.35go.14 Aug. 3.833 06 Mar. 4.2410.21 Sep. 3.6110.60 Apr. 4.0810.19 Cct. 4.57 3 25 May 3.9010.04 Nov. 3.5410.48 Jun. 3.7110.16 Dec. 3.603 22 Location #23 Jan. 4.7910.05 JuL 5.2510.10 Feb. 5.1510.01 Aug. 5.1910.34 Mar. 5.5810.21 Sep. 5.5610.21 Apr. 5.2110.07 Oct. 6.503 40 May 5.2710.34 Nov. 5.7010.22 Jun. 5.3210.11 Dec. 4.31_4 16 l

l s.

t I

d -

1 -

I I ERPIP 4.1.25 Rev.9 f

I l

< ATTACHMENT 7 l'

Page 3 of 7 l

l ENVRONMENTAL SAMPUNG STATIONS EXTERNAL BACKGROUND RADIATION LEVELS *

(Results in Units of mR/30 days)

Location #24 Jan. 4.3910.09 JuL 4.8910.17 Feb. 5.2410.08 Aug. 4.7110.16 Mar. 3.1410.27 Sep. 5.1410.24 Apr. 5.3610.20 Oct. 5.6010.17 May 4.9110.18 Nov. 4.7110.29 1

. Jun. 4.603 22 Dec. 5.0310.13 Location #25 Jan. 4.3610.01 JuL 4.3510.23**

Feb. 4.843,0.28 Aug. 4.4310.02 t- Mar. 4.7110.22 Sep. 4.7710.15 Apr. 4.853 34 Oct. 4.863 13 May 4.3910.03 Nov. 4.4510.20 Jun. 4.359 02 Dec. 4.4610.18 Location #26 3an. 3.8410.02 JuL 3.6910.06 Feb. 4.3210.15 Aug. 4.0210.06 Mar. 4.3410.28 Sep. 3.7210.09 Apr. 4.0310.17 Oct. 4.4430.05 May 3.9010.04 Nov. 3.9710.39 Jun. 4.1110.33 Dec. 3.3910.29 i

Location #27 Jan. 3.6610.15 JuL 3.4410.17 Feb. 4.2010.15 Aug. 3.5810.23 Mar. 4.0010.03 Sep. 3.5710.09 Apr. 4.0110.15 Oct. 4.2010.36 May 3.7510.12 Nov. 3.9010.11

. Jun. 3.7410.23 Dec. 3.5910.12

w f

i f. I h,I 4 o' i: ERPIP 4.1.25

'~ Rev.9

'. ATTACHMENT 7 ,

hp 4 of 7 l ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING STATIONS ra a r.xNAL BACKGROUND RADIATION LEVELS

• I 1 l l

'4 .

j: QLesults in Units of mR/30 days) , i l

, I' I Location #28 Jan. Jul.

4.17_4 06 4.13_4 68 ,

)

l Feb. 4.5630.34 Aug. 3.99_4 27 Mar. 4.41_4 30 Sep. 4.39_4 02 i )

Apr. 4.143 18 Oct. 5.06:0.25 .

j May 4.5110.18 Nov. 4.2710.07 l

.. Jim. 4.223 17 Dec. 4.0510.12 l

• Data based on TLD measurements made during 1982 except where Identified with double asterisks.

• • Data based on TLD measurements made during 1981. The 1982 data not ava11aNe either because the TLDs were stolen er were unaNe to collect the TLD due to adverse weather conditions.

i 1

i

s 4

j. -

-l5 1: ERPl? 4.1.25 j~ ,

Rev.9

-I fI ATTACHMENT 7 Page 5 of 7 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION MONITORING i .

i SAMPLE POINT DESCRIPTIONS Distance

, Sector Sample from CCNPP Type of from CCNPP & Description (ft.) Sample N b water)

NNW 3 Kenwood Beach 35,000 oysters 4 Rocky Point 10,000 oysters 6 Long Beach 15,000 sediment

. PS Plant Site 4,600 crabs NW 17 Plant Site 1,200 TLD, air sampler 21 Long Beach 14,000 TLD, air sampler 24 Plant Site 1,800 TLD, air sampler 26 St. Leonard 27,000 TLD 29 Flag Pond 7,500 Rooted Aquatics WNW 11 Plant Site 1,300 soil W 14 Plant Site 1,200 soll, vegetation WSW 12 Plant Site 1,600 soll 15 Farm 24,000 vegetation 19 Giovanni's Lobster Pot 8,900 TLD, air sampler 25 White Sands Club Sign 7,300 TLD SW 16 Farm 22,000 vegetation SSW 20 Lusby 9,900 TLD, air sampler PS Plant Site 1,400 Precipitation S 27 Solomons 42,000 TLD 23 Bertha 17,000 TLD SSE 2 Country Club 20,000 Ground Water 13 Plant Site 2,400 Soil i

1:

il

.4* ERPIP 4.1.25 I Rev.9 3

1 ATTACHMENT 7 j i.

it Page 6 of 7 i:

i: li y ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION MONITORING l; i!

l :i SAMPLE POINT DESCRIPTIONS t

i  ;,

~

i Distance Sector . Sample .

from CCNPP Type of from CCNPP No. Description -

(ft.) Sample

• l l SE 1 Cove Point 38,000 Fish -

5 Camp Canoy 3,000 Oysters, Sediment

! 10 Plant Site Well 600 Ground Water 18 Plant Site 2,000 TLD, air sampler l 22 Cove Point 24,000 TLD, air sampler

[

ESE (on water)

! E 8 Plant Intake 5,000 Crabs, bay water j sediment ENE 22 Taylors Island 40,000 TLD, air sampler NE 7 Plant Discharge Area 2,500 TLD, bay water

, sediment NNE (on water)

\

l

I ERPIP 4.1.25 l t Rev.9 ATTACHMENT 7 1 Page 7 of 7 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION MONTTORING

l. SAMPLE POINTS IN THE VICINITY OF CCNPP

, *e

.."' ss

} .5Q

9. -

g. is .

4 , g' g;. . . g *

[. .e , .;

. ~ . .

9.,,,

m

're,i!?!, ~n*4

'k g*

? V ;r-g.

~

O $\ ; , /

-s

.. m

,..- 14 y{  ; ,o ...

.,w Q . 12

,, ,. t).. ,$ 13 *>

9 : -

1 .

, .N.,j 2*W. A . S. ,*

s ,, ,

_Q"' 'p' ' . ' '

Q.

~

1 jf # .

0 . . y' .

}.

,g me-

' 5g., 3 , _ ,

h '.>

2' .a., j,,A ,. ,,

i r . ..e. . *. .

u.;

, ***. . : e e'

~

. J .Wg' .M ;-

e, .

g. , ,

. ', gp -

~ ' . . , ' %';*, 2 s

,.i

~

' I*h?

i h.- iff.,'7, _

.- +

"~

1

v. , $ d

' y.

, ,M ,

9.

\

,' **M

. - %c r:. "i. R.

T .a

- , ,s UV. . -3N*

i s .Y '/.s k , g f

• l i gd k.3 ' ~ ' $,f7k aff ~ *

. p ' t.

s $ g ,, r e g .

w.,

e ,

\

[ # ' ** e -

- .' pf/iQ "

\ - \

O

.v. . .. . _ _

t .

- I i

i  !

i i ,

1 -

i . .

I

~

. . ERPIP'4.1.25 REVIEW /AP' PROVAL .

1, .

hEVISION CHANGE REVIEWET SIG/ SUPERVISOR POSRC Pl. ANT SUPERINTENDENT

~

. , ,DATE, r; - EPU SIG/DATE MTG /DATE 9 -

1. {%.t.n ffa<hcdb sz-w hR L s ah/n y

o , . , .

i .

ap8 e

9 O

t O

G I

e e

G O

O 9

9 ,

O O

e W

4 W

4 mum M

S enum O

4 S

O e e e

0 n .

T.e 4

i ERP!P 4.1.25 Rev.9 LBT OF EFFECTIVE PAGES i PAGE NUMBER REVISION 1 9 2 9 3 9 ATTACHMENT 1,Page1 9 A hge l 9 h hge l 9 4, Page 1 9 5, hge l 9 6 hge l 9 7, Pages 1-7 9 I

! I m

- - ,- ,e-

• 1

- ERPIP 4.1.26 Rev.0 ENVRONMENTAL MONITORING TEAM RESPONSBLE INDIVIDUAL: Environmental Monitoring Team Leader CONDITIONS: Alert Site Emergency General Emergency ACTIONS: /

Signature Date

- CAUTION -

Failure to consult Radiological Assessment Director (RAD)/ Environmental Services Coordinator (ESC) may resuit in undue personnel radiation exposure (s) to.

personnel and equipment.

1. DISPATCH mobile van to 10 mile EPZ, Calvert County.

l l

2. CONTACT Radiological Assessment Director (RAD)/ Environmental Services Coordinator (ESC) at Alternate Emergency Control Center. REPORT van availability.

3. RECORD assistance requested / initial instructions:

a Standby Other:

1

ERPIP 4.1.26 Rev.0 ,

4. PROVIDE assistance / execute instructions.

5. REPORT monitoring results.to RAD / ESC.

6. FORTARD this procedure and all records generated by this emergency response to Supervisor-Emergency Planning Unit.

4 mm 2 of 2

. ERPIP 4'1426

. REVIEW / APP'ROVAL REVISION CHANGE REVIEWER SIG/ SUPERVISOR POSRC Pl. ANT SUPERINTENDENT

. DA,

/ TE'g-j EPU SIG/DATE MTG /DATE O -

$ $ 2.1 D r0]JfEe N/5 93 M NLA 3/9]n o 7ti an* .

e 4

O M

6 0

e e I

ERPIP 4 l.26 Rev. 0 O

CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES ERPIP PR 1 0 2 0 l

S

. s

_., r _ ,,

-,-,,e.v,_,, .-. , , , - , - - , . . . _ . - . ,- __, .___ m

ERPIP 4.1.27 Rev.O METEOROLOGIST RESPONSBLE INDIVIDUAL: Meteorologist CONDITIONS: Alert Site Emergency General Emergency f

ACTIONS:

1. REPORT to Electric System Operations Building, Rutherford Business Center.

2. ESTABLISH commtmications with Radiological Assessment Director (RAD)/

Environmental Services Coordinator (ESC) at Alternate Emergency Control Center.

3. ADVISE RAD / ESC on meteorological conditions as they affect the emergency.

i l of 1

h h a

9

• a

• 6 e 4 ERPIP 4.1.27 REVIEW / APPROVAL REVISION CHANGE REVIEWER SIG/ SUPERVISOR POSRC PLANT SUPERINTENDENT D

- ATE, '(."

EPU SIG/DATE MTG /DATE o 7 sis <<

o M'

e G

O e

e 1

6

?

e O

S O

e e

, , - - - - - - - - - - . .r, , - ,--w-. , - ,.--.,---,....,-,--,w-, - - . . - , , , , - , , + , , , - . - , , , - - . . - - . - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ,

ERPIP 4.1.27 -

Rev.0 .

)

LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES PAGE NUMBER REVISION 1 0

-l s

e 0

1 1

i l

I

r

'ERPIP NO.: 4.5.6 / REY. 2 C 6TE: September 1,1981 i

~

TITLE: OFFSITE PROTECTIVE ACTIONS 1.0 RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL i

The Radiological Assessment Director is responsible to promptly determine projected and actual doses to the population-at-risk, and to advise the SEC on protective actions when these doses meet Preventative Protective Action Guidelines or Emergency Protective Action Guidelines. The Site Emergency Coordinator is additionally responsible to assure recommended protective actions are properly communicated.

2.0 CONDITIONS AND PREREQUISITES Actual or projected doses to the population-at-risk meet or exceed Preventative PAGs or Emergency PAGs.

3.0 ACTIONS AND LIMITATIONS 3.1 Radiolonical Assessment Director:

3.1.1 Assess actual effects of offsite releases per ERPIP 4.3.1,4.3.2 and 4.3.3 surveys and resultant data.

3.1.2 Assess projected effects of offsite releases per ERPIP 4.4 procedures.

3.1.3 Review EXHIBITS 4.5.6-A through 4.5.6-C, to determine if PAGs have been met or exceeded in the Plume exposure pathway and to determine appropriate protective actions as indicated on EXHIBITS 4.5.6-A and 4.5.6-E.

-CAUTION-EVEN IF THE LOWER PROJECTED OR ACTUAL DOSES IN AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PLUME DO NOT REQUIRE PROTECTIVE ACTIONS PER PROCEDURES, CONSIDER INFORMING THE MEDIA TO RECOMMEND SHELTER OR EVACUATION IF UNCERTANTITIES IN WIND DIRECTION, TOPOGRAPHY, ETC.,

INDICATE POTENTIAL DANGER TO THE PUBLIC.

3.1.4 Direct monitoring teams as required or requested by the SEC.

3.1.5 Record and communicate survey data.

3.1.6 Assist the SEC in determining protective actions to be recommended for the Population at Risk in EPZ sectors.

O 4.3.s.1

l.

l -

l ERPIP NO.: 4.5.6 / REY. 8 -

Chance I

• 1 C

4 l

I 3.g Site Emergency Coordinator 3.11 Determine recommended offsit'e protective actions, and assure they l CH are recorded on notification lists and communicated to appropriate 1 offsite agencies and emergency operations centers.

-NOTE- -

EXHIBITS 4.5.6-B and 4.5.6 C are to be recommended only upon request from the Accident Assessment Command Center of the Division of Radiation Control (Md.

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene). -

l l

l 3.2.2 Review Exhibit 4.5.6 F for General Emergency class evacuation i

l recommendations relative to PAGs and PWR accident sequences.

R

%b 4

l l

l l .

9 O

4.5.s-2

4  %

. ERPIP'4.5.6 REVIEW / APPROVAL REVISION CHANGE REVIEWE:t SIG/ SUPERVISOR POSRC PLANT SUPERINTENDENT DATEQ .EPU SIC /DATE MTG /DATE -

% l 'lN4E21.6 QMenkdh W O RM 2R/n 6

,7 nv -

1. 6

. o O

o.

O D

O e

a 9

9 9

,.- ---. ,..-- . ,. , - ,,---- . _ . __ _ .,_ ._-r

\

ERPIP 4.5*.6 Rav. 6 '

Change 1 CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES l

ERPIP PAGE REV j l

4.5.6-1 2 4.5.6-2 8 Change 1 4.5.6-3 2 4.5.6-4 2 4.5.6-5 2 4.5.6-6 2 4.5.6-7 2 4.5.6-8 2

4.5.6-9 2 4.5.6-10 2

- - - - . . ,_ _ _ _