ML20095G755

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Administrative Procedure NS-1-300, Industry Operating Experience Info Processing
ML20095G755
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/11/1993
From: Boone K, Pieringer P
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20095G750 List:
References
NS-1-300, NUDOCS 9512210265
Download: ML20095G755 (29)
v • d • e


Text

_ . _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED O

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Administrative Procedure Industry Operating Experience Information Processing NS 1300 Revision 0 Effective Date 9/1/93 gE eotn Tech Spec Related Management Related Writen Karen L Boone Sponson Paul A. Pieringer Approved'

!/ *

~b (Meneger . Nucleat Safety & Plannias) Dese O

O i

l es122;ggg3gi!% sit 7 PDR PDR P

L - - _ - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ - _

- . _ - . . . _- .- - . . ~ . . . . _ - - . . - - . - - . . - - -- .. . - - . . - . . . . . ~ .

12/5/1995 09:56:43 (JSER CONTROLLED NS-1-300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 O RECORI) OF RINISIONS AND C11ANGES Page 2 0f 29 REVISION CilANGE

SUMMARY

OF REVISION OR CllANGES l 0 0 InitialIssuc; incorporates lOER Unit Procedures IOER-01, IOER-02, IOER 03, sections of CCI-146 and CCI-122 to support the initial issue of NS-1-100.

Updated Bases References (B ll through [B 11) from INPO 85-001 to INPO 90-15.

Deleted IOER-01 Basis Number (B-14). Biennial Revice arc performed per PR 1-100; a separate Biennial Review Form does not need to be included in this procedure.

O O

12/5/1995 09:56:43 tlSEA CONTROLLED l

NS. I .300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page 3 of 29 C TAllLE OF CONTENTS 1

SECTION TITLE PAGE l 1.0 INTRODUCBON. . . . . . . . . .. . .. .6 1 1

1.1 Purpose .. .. .,

. . . .. . .. 6 l 1.2 Scope / Applicability . . .. , . . . . . . . . .. . .. 6 I

2.0 REFERENCES

.. . . . . . . . . .6  !

1 2.1 Developmental References - .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . 6 1 2.2 Performance References.... . - . . . . . . - . . . . . . .. 7 3.0 DEFINITIONS.... .. . . . . . .7 i

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES lB.1] .. .. . --

.10 4.1. Supervisor Opcrating Experience Review (S-OER).. .10 4.2 Work tradcr. Industry Operating Experience Review (WL 10ER).. .. 10 l

4.3 Industry Operating Experience Review (IOER) Staff.. . . . . .10

)

44 NUCLEAR NEWORK Coordinator lB.2l: .11 5.0 PROCESS . ... .11 1

5.1 Industry Operating Experience (IOE)Information Administration ....... ..11  !

1 5.2 Industry Operating Experience (IOE)Information Processing.. . . . 12  !

5.3 Industry Operating Experience Review (IOER) Screening . ... . .. . . 13 5.4 Industry Operating Experience Review (IOER) Evaluation.. . .. . 14 5.5 IOER Monthly Report . .. ... . . ...-- . 17 5.6 IOER Effectiveness Review-- - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 17 5.7 IOER Resolution of Plant Operating Experience Assessment Committec (POEAC) Outstanding items (Ols) and SOER Action items..... .... . . .19 5.8

  • Industry Briefs
  • Newsletter. . . . - . . . .19 l 6.0 B AS ES .... .... ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .. . .. 20 7.0 RECORDS. . .. . .. - . ..21

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USE:t CONTROLLED NS. I .300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 TAllLE OF CONTENTS SECrlON TITLE PAGE 8.0 ATTACllM ENTS. . . . ... .. . 22 ATTACHMENT 1, IOE INIORMATION ROUTING /AITS ENTRY. ... 23 ATTACllMENT 2,IOE INFORM ATION SCREENING / DATABASE ENTRY. . .. .. .. . 24 ATTACHMENT 3 APPLICABILITY REV1EW . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . 25 ATTAC11 MENT 4, UPDATE RECORD = . . . . ..

........... . 26 ATTACHMENT 5, CLOSEOUT FORM.. . ..... . . . . . . . . .. . . .. 27

{

ATTACllMENT 6. IOER DATABASE INPUT / UPDATE FORM. . . . . _ 28 ATTACHM ENT 7, IOER EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW CHECKLIST - --.. 29 l

O O

l I

I

12/5/1995 09:56:43 LtSER CONTROLLED NS.1300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page 5 of 29 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Page No. Change No. Page No. Change No. Page No. Change No. -

1 0 26 0 2 0 27 0 3 0 28 0 4 0 N O 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 I 9 0 10 0 11 0 12 0 13 0 O' 14 0 15 0 16 0 17 0 18 0 19 0 20 0 21 0 22 0

)

1 23 0 24 0 25 0 0 _.

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.I.300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0

, Page 6 of 29 1.0 INTRODUCI'lON I.1 Purpose The purpose of this instruction is to describe the process for managing nuclear industry operating experience (IOE) information to improve plant operational safety.

1.2 Scope /AppIlcability A. This instruction describes the IOE information to be evaluated, the evaluation methodology, and the means to ensure IOE information is incorporated as appropriate.

B. The Industry Operating Experience Review (IOER) shall:

1. Screen and evaluate nuclear lOE information.
2. Perform the necessary research, or recommend additional investigation, to evaluate the applicability of these events to Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP).

C. De results of the IOE information Applicability Review shall be forwarded to appropriate CCNPP personnel.

D. His instruction is applicable to allIOER personnel and other Operating Experience Review (OER) Section personnel who may be assigned Applicability Reviews ofIOE information.

2.0 REFERENCES

2.1 Developneental References A. INPO 90-015, Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near term Operating License Plants. August 1990 B. NRC Generic LetIcr 83 28 commitment C. CCNPP LER 90 22 D. OL-2-100, Issue Reporting and Assessment E. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Section XVI, Corrective Action F. INPO 89-015, Significant Event Evaluation and Information Network (SEE-IN)

Program Description, Ikecmber 1989 G. INPO 91-005, NUCLEAR NETWORK Users Manual, August 1991,'lhird Edition

i 12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.1-300

] Industry Operating Experience Information Proccasing Revision 0 3

Page 7 of 29 2.2 Performance References

{ A. Q1 3-102, Program Dc0ciency Reporting

B. CCI 122, Control of Technical Manuals and Other Vendor Technical Information
C. NS-1 100, Use of Operating Experience and the Nuclear llotline D. CCI-154, Calvert Cliffs Response to NRC Correspondence E. OL-2-100, issue Reporting and Assessment F. PR 3100, Records Manage
ncnt G. INPO 89-005, Guidelines for the Usc of Operating Experience, November 1990 3.0 DEFINITIONS A. Condition [ Adverse to Quality)

An event, failure, malfunction, deficiency, deviation, nonconformance, defective material and/or equipment, crror, trend, etc. (refer to QL.2 100, issue Reporting and Assessment and 10 CFR 50. Appendix B,Section XVI).

B. Significant item:

Any type Condition which,if repeated at the initial k> cation or elsewhere in  !

Q

%.y the plant in any operating or accident mode, could by itself or in combination 1 with any subsequent equipment failures or human errors cause a significant {

increase in the chances for serious damage to people or the phnt. '

Methods or procedures used to implernent a Technical Speci0 cation requirement do not adequately do so and there is an associated significant increase in the chances for serious damage to people or the plant.

3. Any type Condition which, on recurrence, may be indicative of a significant increase in the chances for serious injury to people or damage to the plant.

C. Safety Concern A Significant item which could compntmse plant safety and requires corrective action. Notification of senior management is required per 01 2-100, Issue Reporting and Assessment. An affirmative "yes' reply to any of the below questions identifics the issue as potentially significant.

Does this IOE item:

affect the ability of the operator to asse ss or control the Nuclear Safety Ststus of the plant? (1114] .

l change the Nuclear Safety Response of the plant to normal evolution, l anticipated operational occurrences or design basis accidents? (11-14] 1

1 12/S/1995 09:56:43 USE2 CONTROLLED l NS.1-300 industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0

,q Page 8 of 29 U 3.0 Definillons (Continued) affect ihe qualification or operational chatacteristics of installed components classified as Safety Related in the O List? IH 14]

increase the potential for the release of radioactive material to the emironment?

significantly increase the potential for a plant trip?

D. Significant Event Evaluation and Information Network (SEE IN)

A program managed by INPO to screen nuclear power plant events occurring I worldwide and to disseminate (usually via NUCLEAR NETWORK) important IOE information:

j

1. Topic IS '

Significant Operating Experience Report (SOER)

Significant Event Report (SER)

Significant Event Notification (SEN)

Significant by Others (SO) Repori

2. Topic OR: Operations and Maintenance Reminder b 3. Topic OE: Operating Plant Experience E. Nuclear Network An INPO electronic information system to disseminate information to memhcr utilitics. (Refer to INPO 91-005. NUCLEAR NETWORK Users Manual.)

F. IOER Screening A preliminary review of IOE information, to select those events having a potential impact on the safety or reliability of CCNPP or to close IOE information which is cither not applicable (NA) or of no concern (NC).

l. Significance
a. Nuclear Safety- Condition which directly affects the confinement and/or control of radioactive material within the established

~ boundaries (i.e., operating outside of the design hasis).

b. Personnel Safety--Condition which directly affects the safety of personnel (i.e., operating with faulty equipment could directly lead to personnel injury or fatality).
c. Significant- Condition could affect Nuclear Safety or deals directly with a threat to Personnel Safety. lH 14}

O l

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS-1300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Pagc 9 0f 29 0 3.0 perinitions (Continued)

d. Possible--Condition which may challenge or affect Nuclear Safety, or threaten Personnel Safety, or affect our ability to operate the plant as designed. [H 14]
c. Reliability--Condition which challenges or alTects plant Reliability.

[H-14]

f. Not Significaat--Condition does not affect Nucicar Safety, Personnel

~

Safety. Reliability, or the ability to operate. [H 14)

2. Applicability Category _
a. Applicable--Cor$dition as described is associated with specific equipment, systems or programs at CCNPP.
b. Possible--Condition as described may be associated with specific equipment, systems or programs, OR similar equipment, systems or programs at CCNPP.
c. Not Applicable--Condition as described is not associated with specific equipment, systems or programs, OR similar equipment, systerns or programs at CCNPP.

G. IOER Evaluation p

V ne review of an IOE condition to assess the impact on CCNPP activitics and to document results. All deficiencies arc documented per 01-2100, Issue Reporting and Assessment.

H. Effectiveness Revicw Program Primarily applies to SOERs, SERs and recurring industry events. All industry, NRC and vendor information is reviewed by IOER should be used to determine effectiveness. The program is results driven -- to prevent events, minimize repetitive errors and stop recurring events. De program does not address details of administration or procedural adherence.

1. Effectiveness Review Report A report issued to document program strengths or arcas where improvement is needed to maximize the lessons learned from industry events. Results are assessed by management and appropriatelyinvolved in impicmentation of corrective actions.
3.
  • Industry Briefs' Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Piant newsletter describing recent nuclear IOE information to keep plant staffinformed.

l O

__ _ _ _ _ = , _ __ _ . _ ._ _ _ _ _ _

12/5/1995 09:56:43 tlSER CONTROLLED NS. I .300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0

/D Page 10cf 29 V 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES (111]

4.1. Supervisor-Operating Experience Review (S.OER)

A. Oversecs the review of operating experience from nuclear power plants.

B.

Ensures IOER Effectiveness Review Reports and Applicability Reports are performed periodically.

4.2 Work Leader-Industry Operuting Esperience Review (WI,10ERJ A. Superviscs the review of operating experience from nuclear power plants.

B. Ensures IOER information is provided in a concise and uscable format to the line organizations and the Nuclear Training Unit.

C. Designates an IOER staff member to be the NUCLEAR NETWORK Coordinator.

D. Ensures CCNPP operating experience is uted in the evaluation of IOE.

E.

Ensures that auditable SEE.IN evaluation files are maintained.

F. Revice IOER applicability determinations.

G. Approves issue reports and IOER evaluations.

H.

Assesses the adequacy of CCNPP staff responses to IOE generated issue reports.

y,,/ 1.

Provides activity status reports to management showing status of IOER issues.

J.

Screens IOE infortnation to determine whether further evaluation is necessary.

K. Preparcs a monthly status report.

L. Assesses the effectiveness of plant responses to prevent securring events.

M. Releases the " Industry Briefs" newsicttc for distribution.

4.3 Industry Operating Experience Review (IOER) Staff A. Evaluates industry operating experience.

B. Determines applicability of conditions having the potential to affect CCNPP, concisely reports problems, evaluates solutions and verifies probicm corrective actions.1814]

C.

Review the effectiveness of corrective actions resulting from IOER issue reports.

O

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.1-300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page 11 of 29 d 4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES [H 1) (Continued) 4.4 NUCLEAR NL'lWORK Coordinator [H 2]

A. A member of the IOER staff responsible for distributing NUCLEAR NETWORK information to those individuals who need or can henefit from it.

[ H-10, -11)

B. Serves as a liaison between CCNPP and INPO's NUCLEAR NETWORK Manager.

C. Publishes the " Industry Briefs" newsletter at least monthly.

5.0 PROCESS 5.1 Industry Operating Experience (IOE)Information Administration A. Industry Operating Experience (IOE) Information Sources

1. He NUCLEAR NETWORK database information is retrieved at least twice per week and routed to appropriate CCNPP personnel. [H 10,1!)
2. He" Industry Operating Experience Review Work Group Database"shall ,

contain information pertaining to an Applicability Review, including the original document and any actions taken by IOER personnel.

3. Other Industry Information, such as Vendor or Part 21 Notifications, shall also be processed per CCI 122, Control of Technical Manuals and Other

,D\ Vendor Technicallnformation. [1115]

U B. Industry Operating Experience (IOE)Information shall be categorized as follows:

)

1. Category i INPO Information [H 7], [H 16]

Significant Operating Experience Reports (SOERs) ,

l Significant Event Reports (SERs)

Significant by Others (sos) ,

1 0

-~

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED 1 I

! i

' NS.I 300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page l2 cf 29 4

l i

l 5.1 ladustry Operating Experience (IDE) Information Adeministration (Continued) 1

2. Category 2 Information [B '1] I
a. INPO: lit-16)

SigniGcant Event Notifications (SENs)

Operations & Maintenance Reminders (ors)

b. NRC:

Information Notices (INFON)

Administrative Letters (AL)

c. Combustion Engineering (CE) Information Bulletins NOTE Nuclear Regulatory Matters is responsible for processing and coordinating written responses to all NRC Bulletins, Generic Letters and other NRC information.
3. Others as deemed appropriate, by WL-lOER, for exampic:

10 CFR 21 Reports -

O -

Vendor Information (e.g., CE Technical Notices, Fairbanks Morse, Westinghouse, Foxboro, Rosemount and General Electric technical information or newsletters)

Sclected Network Topics: liotlinc (HL) & Operating Experience (OE)information Miscellaneous information [NRC Office of Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD), Gencric letters (GL), Nuclear Management and Resources Council (NUMARC), Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Edison Electric Institute (EEI), other utilitics, License Event Reports, (LERs) etc.]

SJ ladu.try Operating Experience (IOE)leforenation Processing A. Category I Information

1. Category i IOE information is routed to appropriate supervisory personnel for their information using Attachment 1,IDE Information Routing /AIE Entry. [H 9]
2. Category i IOE information requires a written evaluation per Section 5.4, IOER Evaluation. A summary classiGcation of Potential Applicability and SigniGcance is recorded on Attachment 1. Screening for Applicability and SigniGcance per Attachment 2,IOE Information Screening / Database Entry is not required. [N.6], [H 16]

4 O

. -- . - ~ - ~ - -- .. - .-. - - .

12/5/1905 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.1-300 Industry Operating Experience Information Proccasing Revision 0 Page 13 of 29 s

S.2 Industry Operating Experience (lOE) Informselon Processing (Continued) l l

B. Category 2 Information

1. Category 2 IOE information is routed, as deemed appropriate by the IOER screening process, using Attachment 1, IOE information Routing /AITS Entry. [11-9]

1 2.

As a result of Section 5 3, IOER Screening, Category 2 IOE information may requirc a written evaluation. [H-6) 1 C. Information determined by the WL lOER as low probability, not applicable or of no l concern, shall Dg1 be screened. [H-16]

D. If at any point during the process a signincant safety issue is identified, an Issue Report shall be submitled and the Plant Operations and Safety Review Committec i (POSRC) Informed. Ill 16]

E. For SOERs, a Project Manager will be assigned by the Plant General Manager to complete the SOER recommendations iH-6]

53 Industry Opeesting Experience Review (IOER) Screening l

NOTE I INPO Emergency llotline (IIL) and Significant Event Notifications (SENs) are exempt from this requirement when incomplete information prohibits an accurate screening. [H 13]

L/ A. Category 2 IOE information should be screened within 3 workdays of receipt.

1 B. 'Ihc "lOER Databasc* should be um: to determine significance and/or applicability l of repetitive IOE information.

C. Attachment 2, IOE Information Screening / Database Entry, may be used to determine the significance and applicability of Category 2 IOE information. [H 13],

[R 16) l

1. The information should be routed immediately if the WL-IOER determines it l is of a time-sensitive nature,or has the potential for a significant safety or personnel hazard.
2. 'Ihc Shift Supervisor shall be promptly notified per QL 2100, Issue Reporting and Assessment if a condition requiring initiation of a Limiting i

Condition for Operation (LCO) or requiring a report to the NRC (e.g.,10 CFR 50 or 10 CFR 21) is identified or suspected.

j l

l O l

m .__-.-.___m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

i 12/5/1995 09:56:43 (JSER CONTROLLED NS 1300 j Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 j Page 14 of 29 5.3 Industry Operating Experience Review (IOER) Senening (Continued) l NOTE While determining applicability, presume the information is applicable, until proven otherwise.

For example,if the information concerns the RCS in a BWR, interpret this as concerning both 3 3

the RCS and the secondary steam /fecdwater systems. j l

D. M *NO" responses (in PART I of Attachment 2, IOE Information i

Screening / Database Entry) shall be classiGed as "Not Significant", and " CLOSED *,

without further screening. ,

E. M "YES" responses (in PART 11 of Attachment 2,IOE Information Screening / Database Entry) shall be classined u *Not Applicabic", and ' CLOSED",

F. Other responses (on Attachment 2, IOE Information Screening / Database Entry) l significs the IOE information as Conditionally Applicable or of Consequence and a  :

written evaluation will be considered. I G. nc Wl lOER signature on Attachment 1 identifics the IOER Evaluator to review Attachments 1 & 2 and to perform the Applicability Review (if necessary).

H. The IOER Evaluator's signature on Attachment I indicates acknowledgement of the assignment. [H-8) 5.4 Industry Operating Experience Review (IOER) Evaluation A. Ocncral NOTE Category 1 Evaluations shall be documented via Attachment 3, Applicability Review. Category 2 Evaluations may be evaluated via Attachment 3. Applicability Review or via Attachment 5.

Closcout Form.

1. Evaluation reports shall be assigned one of the folk > wing prioritics:
a. IMMEDI ATE :" Red" SOERs only Ec typewritten Applicability Review shall be completed within 30 days afect receipt of the IOE information.
b. PROMPT : All other Category 1 IOE information ne typewritten Applicability Review shall be completed within 60 days after acccipt of the IOE information.
c. ROUTINE: Category 2 and "Other*

%c cvaluation should be completed and issued within 90 days after ieccipt of the IOE informatkin.

O

. _ . _ . _ _ _ . ~_ _ - . _ . m________ .. ... __ _ _ _ ._

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTT.0LLED NS.I 300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 5.4 Industry Operating Experience Meilew (IOER) Evaluatloa (Continued)

2. The IOER Evaluator shall research and conduct interviews to perform a thorough, complete and accurate evaluation report.
3. The IOER evaluation process may require an in-depth study of site design, equipment, procedurcs, programs and information systems. The following guidelines for performing an evaluation describe the typical actions necessary for a completc evaluation.
a. Review previous IOER cvaluation reports of similar operating experiences (sce the document references), the INPO Keyword Index and the "lOER NOAII Databasc."
b. Review previous investigations of similar in house experience using the Issuc Report.
  • Nuggets" and Trends databases.
c. Review NPRDS, Alpha Numeric Listing, NUCLEIS, CCE13 Approved Vendor List, IOERVEND FOCUS report, and the Technical Library Listings for any hardware related information.
d. Review site design, equipment, procedures, programs and information (using the UFSAR Technical Specifications System Descriptions, eic.).
c. Discuss with cognizant units (which are the same or similar to those discussed in the IOE information) the design, equipment, systems and programs, as they relate to the event.
4. Faulty or inadequate vendor technical information shall be forwarded to the appropriate system enginecr. [H 12]
5. The IOER Evaluator shall specifically address cach recommendation made in the document being reviewed. For those recommendations being reviewed which the evaluator disagrecs with, the evaluation shall Licarly identify the difference between the recommendation and the IOER position.

6.

De IOER Evaluator shall forward the evaluation to the WL-lOER for review and approval.

B. Records 1.

hc IOE information file shall include the following forms, as applicable:

a. Attachment 1, IOE information Routing /AITS Entry
b. Attachment 3, Applicability Review
c. Attachment 4, Update Record
d. Attachment 5, Closcout Form O

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . - ~ _ ___ __

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.I.300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 f Page 16of 29 t

5.4 ladustry Operating Experience Neview (IOER) Evaluation (Continued)

2. %c cvaluation should be formatted per Attachment 3, Applicability Review or Attachment 5, Ck> scout Form.

C. Review and Approval [H.3]

1. The report shall be reviewed by the Wl lOER (or designee).
2. %c Wi lOER shall sign Attachment 3, Applicability Review, indicating his approval.
3. If the Applicability Review references an issuc Report and recommendations; the affected organization assigns a responsible individual via the normal IR/AITS processing through the cognizant GS. [Il-5)
4. De IOER Evaluator shall complete an Attachment 6. IOER Database Input / Update Form and forward to the IOER Clerk for data entry.
5. %c evaluation shall be distributed to the appropriate cognizant unit (s) for review.

l

6. %c 10ER Evaluator shall answer all technical review comments.
7. Mc IOER Evaluator shallincorporate the resolutions into the IOER evaluation as revisions to the IOE information file.

E. Cortcctive Action impicmentation

1. Once accepted, the cognizant section will status the IOE Information via the normal AITS entry and updating. [H.3)

F. Tracking Ill-3)

1. WielOER tracks and reports the status of Issue Reports generated from IOER applicability reviews after an A113 entry (IR)is generated.
2. De IOER Evaluator will monitor the progress of long term actions and document status changes using Attachment 4, Update Record.

l

3. When the deficiency is reported as having been corrected, the evaluator shall verify the adequacy of the approved corrective action, nominally within thirty days.
a. Suflicient investigations, inspections, and assessment should be performed to verify the corrective actions will prevent the probicm at CCNPP.
b. %c method of verification shall be documented using Attachment 5, Closcout Form, citing the actions taken and substantive evidence reviewed (or included / attached).

v

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.1400 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 p Page 17 of 29 5.4 ladustry Operating Experience Reslew (IOER) Evaluation (Continued)

c. Once verified, the issue shall bc
  • Closed" on Alls and the IOER Database updated by submitting an Attachment 6,IOER Database Input / Update 1 orm.

O. SOER Review 1

1. "Sclected* SOER recommendations. as listed in INPO Report 91-007, shall l be reviewed annually. j j
2. Each recommendation shall be reviewed on or before the anniversary of closcout verification and tracked on AITS.

H. Revision A revision to an approved lOER cvaluation shall be prepared, reviewed and approved in the same manner as the original.

5.5 IDER Monthly Report A. The report should inform management of significant issues, backlog on issues pending resolution and SOER status and progress. l l

B. %c report shall be provided to the:

Supervisor-Operating Experience Review O*

  • POSRC Chairman [l15]

5,6 IOEM Effectiveness Review I A. Review Requirements ,

l

1. An independent effectiveness review ofimplemented IOER applicability reviews shall be conducted once per year. [11-4]
2. The review shall assess whether the IOE program is attaining its objective of identifying and recommending improvements in plant activitics,
a. De review should not focus on the details of the IOE program administration, but on the end results of the program,
b. He review should be conducted using the guidelines of INPO 89-005, Ouidelines for the Use of Operating Experience.
c. The IOER Effectiveness Review Program primarily applies to SOERs, SERs, and recurring industry events. All industry, NRC and vendor information reviewed by the IOER should be used to determine effectiveness. The program is results driven - to prevent events, minimize repetitive errors and stop recurring events. The o address details of administration or procedural program docs p_ot adherence.

O v

- - . . - . .. . . ~ . . - - . ~ - . . . . . , _ . . . . . . - -. - - ... _ . - - - . ~ . . _ . . . _ . . _ . . _ ,

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS-1300

' Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page 18 of 29 5.6 IOEM Effectiveness Review (Continued)

3. De results of this review shall be forwarded to the Vice President, Nuclear Enctgy Division. [H.4)
4. his review should be conducted by personnel with suitable technical and plant knowledge, and are not directly involved in IOER. (Consideratk>n '

should be given to supplementing the review team with personnel from Quality Assurance, the Independent Safety Evaluation Unit (ISEU). or contractors / personnel from onher nuclear utilities.)

B. Effectiveness Review Report Requirements

1. %c IOER Effectiveness Review Program will report on the adequacy of the following key aspects of industry operating cxperience reviews:

Distribution of Operating Experience to appropriate personnel (a sampic size of at least 5% of all Nuclear Network events will be used for a given timc-frame).

Technical reviews of Significant Operating Experience (a sampic size of at least 10% of all SOERs, SENs, SERs and sos, determined to be applicable and assigned for acchnical reviews, shall be reviewed for thoroughness).

Impicmentation of action items resulting from reviewing operating experience (25% of the assignments are reviewed for completion by observation and/or interviews).

Discussion of the usefulness (based upon in. house events) ofIOER corrective actions to prevent events, imptove plant safety and enhance reliability.

2. Attachment 7, IOER Effectiveness Review Checklist, provides typical questions for interviews and observatkins.
3. %c Effectiveness Review Evaluator will maintain a detailed record of activitics, rescarch and observations. ~ Bis record will be used to improve future conective actions and reviews.

\.

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.1 -300 Industry Operating Experience information Processing Revision 0 g Page 19 0f 29 S.7 IOEM Mesolution of Plant Operating Experience Assessment Committee (POEAC)

Outstanding items (Ois) and SOER Action Items A. Following the dissolution of POEAC, IOER will resolve the remaining open POEAC-Action item Tracking Sptem (PC- AITS) action items and document Iheir resolution.

1. A log (Post POEAC Minutes) will be maintained to document the reccipt of closure / extension request items for the remaining open PC-AITE action items.
a. %c log shall identify (as a minimum) the POEAC action item designation, the author of the closurc/ extension request item and the related item (N RC concern, INPO concern, vendor concern, etc.).
b. %c resolution ( Action) by .!OER shall be describcd.
c. He closure response shall be made an attachment to the log entry and the attachment will be serialized.
d. %c PC-AITS action item shall be updated to tellect the resolution by IOER. The resolution will be forwarded to the PC-AITS action item responsible individual.
2. A monthly summary of the log will be forwarded to the WL-lOER.

B. %c status of the remaining open PC-AITE action items will be provided to the Managers in a monthly report.

5.8

  • Industry Briefs
  • Newslet ter A. Recent operating experience information from both the nuclear industry and CCNPP should be included in the newsictter in order to keep plant staffinformed B. Submittals for the newsletter should be provided at least monthly and approved by the WL lOER.

O v

. _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . - - - . _ _ _ _ .- ~ _ - - ._ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . - __

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTCOLL.ED NS 1-300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page 20of 29 B-1 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near-term Operating License Plants, section OElf Responsibilitics and authority of cach management, supervison,, e.d professional position involved in the program are clearly defined and understood.

B2 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near term Operating License Plants, section OEl.D.

Interfaces with in-house and industry supporting groups are clearly defined and understood.

B3 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near term Operating License Plant, section OEl.F.

Action items resulting from operating experience review rcccive appropriate approval and are tracked to completion.

B4 INPO E015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for

{ Operating and Near-term Operating License Plant, section OEl.O.

An effectiveness evaluation is performed periodically to apprisc management of how well the operating experience program is functioning and attaining desired results.

B5 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85 001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near-term Operating License Plant.section OEl.H.

Management is appropriately involved in operating experience review activitics to ensure adherence to station policies and procedures and to identify and correct probicms.

B-6 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near.tcrm Operating License Plant, section OE3.A.

A comprehensive evaluation is performed on applicabic, significant industry operstmg experience, and appropriate corrective action is completed in a timely manner.

B-7 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near term Operating License Plant,section OE3.B.

1 Sources of significant industry operating experience information reviewed for applicability.

B-8 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near term Operating License Plant, section OE3.C.

Appropriate checks are performed to verify that industry operating experience information is being properly classified for applicability.

. . - ,.. - . - ~ _ - . . - .. - - .- - . - .- - - - . - - - . - _ - .

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONT 7.0LLED NS-1300 4

Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page 21 of 29

s' i 6.0 BASES (continued) 4 B9 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85 001), Performance Objectives .nd Criteria for
Operating and Near-term Operating License Plant, sectior GE.3.D.

Applicable significant industry operating experience imormation is distributed to appropriate personnel and departments in a timely .oanner.

I

~

B 10 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for 3 Operating and Near tenn Oju rating ljcense Plant, section OE.3.E.

Distribution of connicting or extrancous industry operating experience information to operators and other personnelis minimized.

B-11 INPO 90-015 (formerly INPO 85-001), Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near-term Operating ljcense Pla it section OE.3.F.

Other applicable industry operating experience information from the sources such as the following is disseminated to operators, maintenance, or ather personnel for review and training purposes.

B 12 BG & E letter dated July 17,1987 providing additionalinformation for NRC Generic Letter 83 28, item 2.2.2 ' Vendor Interface".

B 13 LER 90-22 Operating experience review of documents will require a documented record of what action, even if none, is tsken by cognizant organizations.

B 14 December 1991 IPAT inspection, i.a.w. TS 6.5.1.7. (N RC Commitment CO9200029.)

B 15 CCI 122, Control of Technical Manuals and ather Vendor Technical Information (to be superseded by EN 1 100).

B-16 QA Surveillance (Recommendation 4.2) S 92-62 of November 24,1992.

7.4 RECORDS

'Ihc following records are generated by this procedure:

IOE Information Flouting /AITS Entry (Lifetime Records)

IOE Information Screening / Database Entry Form (Non permanent) -~

IOER Applicability Reviews (Lifetime Records)

Update Record (Lifetime Records)

IOER Evaluation Closcouts (Lifetime Records)

IOER Effectiveness Review Reports (rctsin mrut recent)

O

. . . - - - - - . . . . .. -.. . . - . . - . . . - . . . . - - . ~ . . -. ..- -. . - . ..- - ..

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS. I .300

, Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 e

Page 22 of 29 7.9 RECORDS (Continued)

IOER Monthly Reports (Non permanent, retained for 1 year)

%dustry Bdefs" Newsictier (Non-permanent, electronic media is sufficient)

Post POEAC Minutes (Lifetime Records)

Records are maintained according to PR 3-100, Records Management 8.0 A'ITAC11 MEN'13 Attachment 1,IOE Information Routing /Al'IS Entry Attachment 2, IOE Information Screening / Database Entry Attachment 3, Applicability Review  ;

Attachment 4. Update Record j

Attachment 5, Closcout Form

{

Attachment 6,IOER Database input / Update Form Attachment 7, IOER Effectiveness Review Checklist O

l O

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS 1300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 rx Page 23 of 29 A1TACllMENT I,IDE INFORMATION ROLTflNG/AITS ENTRY IQ: DATE: / /

TITLE:

1 SOURCE: INPO / NRC / CE / WEST / GE / Other DATED. / /

SOER # AL/GUNRCB/INFON # CElB/CETN SER/SEN # O&MR/SO # Network OE Applicability: A/CA/NA Eff ect S / C / NC Eotential: H / M / L / None

[ ] For information Only (over) l} Review Requestod (over) [ ] Type written Response KEYWORDS:

l i

l RELATED DOCUMENTS- l COMMENTS; EVALUATION PRIORITY CATEGORY: 1/2/OTHER REPORT DUE DATE

_leAMEouTE Report Completed and hoved WMNn 30 Days / /

_PaouPT nepwiiseued wnNn eo oeys tee.se m Bj:

_aouTws n.po,t weved weima 80 osys AITS#:

_ N/A No Evaluation Required

/ /

WL M R Dane Evaluesor Date

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.1300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 m

Page 24 of 29 ATTACIIMENT 2, IDE INFORMATION SCREENING /llATAllASE ENTRY YES POSS N_O SIGNIFICANCE (Summarize on Attachment 1) PART 1

[] ll l) Dir.cth e's. cts the coneinement and/or control of ad.oactiv. meter 6al within

m. .eiebie.h.d bounde,i (t. op.,.iena out.id. .: *. de. ton b i.).

II i1 I1 m>=w aa+= *. ***v

  • p*.*a i t' t ae**aac **a 'avar aquipm.at met .ad d,,.cti, i d to p.t.onn.i iniury o, esi >,ty).

II I1 II o =5ya's. m in.*b w ta pa a in+p**ni**de.ioned

[j [] [] important ' lessons learn.d* or f.ty benefits .ould result from evaluation of th t. port.d condste (d. scribe below)

[] l] [] The conds.on d cnemon te incompi.t /in.d.quet. (... b.iow).

_N_Q POSS YES APPLICABILITY (Summarize on Attachment 1) PART 2

[] [] [] The report.d condit.on ident4.. .n eveni pec.t a to BWa eyetem ony.

[] [] [] Th. compon.nl tenure i v ndor .p. cmc. is not u .d et ccNPP.

[] [] [] Th. .ymm d.. crib.4 in the repo<t is noe . .y.i.m uuiu.d at cCNpP.

[] [] [} The environm.nis condicon. de. crib.a are pient op.cuac.

Identify (wth a *X') the consequences of the event:

Non. Equipment demage inp UE/Al.rt Equipment swap increas d radiatson _ Longer outage

'Op.teting Limits

  • exceeded Bad pubbcaty NRc notdecetson Personnel Injuri.e R.duced output l

CitatorWeotebon PeleMot Part.cles Other r\

Q identity (wth a 'X') the causes/ factors of the event, and circle the root cause:

Proc.durel error Tagg ng Human tros Equipment feiture Wrong onwain calculebon Inemention to detam Safety conc m Miscommunicat.on

". g_' M.p, Work practic.s Labeling Documentation Envwonm.nt _ Meneg.ne!

Orgerdret>onal _ RlWA (Reght intent Wrong Acten) _ Training Poor turnover D.aign Othee

SUMMARY

Further evaluation is / ls not roovired.

CLOSEOUT:

REFERENCE:

/

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS 1300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 ATTACllMENT 3, APPLICAlllLITY lilWlEW AP PLIC ABILITY REVIEW DATE: Of industry . Opereeing Earerkare Rodow TO: Expert VIA: WLlOER FROM: IOER Evaluator TITLE:

SUMMARY

lOER has reviewed , determinod this affects your area of responsibliity and is / is not applicable to Calvert Cli*fs. Please review this report for accuracy.

Your input is requested by / / to ensure an accurato industry event database is i maintained.

DISCUSSION:

1 irs WRITTEN: RECOMMENDATIONS:

REFERENCES:

INTERVIEWS:

l ec: File S OER o umemmaxxn O

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USEA CONTE.0LLED NS.I.300 industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page 26 of 29 1

A17ACilM ENT 4, UPDATE RECORD Evaluation Report l AITS # l Date: _ _/ /

This recommendation is OPEN / CLOSED / REOPENED / Cil ANG ED / VERIFIED based upon information from a PilONE. CON / LETTER / DISCUSSION with of on / / and is ATTACllED / SUMM ARIZED as:

Necessary actions as a result are: 1 1

l l

l 1

l l

l l

l Responsibic Individual / Unit: Notified By: On: / /

cc: Responsible Individual / Supervisor Original to IOER Routing, then IOER Files.

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS.I.300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 Page 27 of 29 O NITACllMENT 5, CLOSEOUT FORM IOER EVALUATION : AITS #:

SUBJECT:

ISSUE:

DATE STATUS / COMMENTS QATE VERIFICATION AITS Verified:

IOER Evenuetor (S;gnature) Dele WI lOER Approval:

o.t.

IOER Databases Updated:

Clerk-lOER (Signature) Date O

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS-1300 Industry Operating Experience Information Proccuing Revision 0 Pagc 28of 29 (V~\ NITACllMENT 6, IOER DATAllASE INPUT / UPDATE FORM TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

DATABASE UPDATE / PLANT POSITION DOCUMENT ID:

APPUCABluTY REVIEW DOC. ID:

RELATED DOCUMENTS /

REFERENCES:

AIT #:

UPDATED INFORMATION:

O b

a i

12/5/1995 09:56:43 USER CONTROLLED NS 1-300 Industry Operating Experience Information Processing Revision 0 A'ITACllMENT 7,IOER ElTECI'lVENESS REV1EW ClIECKI.IST The following topic questions should be considered when completing the IOER Effectiveness Review Report:

Arc the program functions adequately siaffed by experienced technical personnel?

Is pertinent industry operating experience information being provided to afIccted personnel in a timely manner?

Are plant personnel being made aware of industry operating experiences through continuing classroom and simulator training?

Has the information been incorporated into initial training material to ensure new personnel are familiar with lesson learned from operating cxperience?

Has the information been presented in a manner that mskes *rcal" the experiences of others to the trainces, including careful descriptions of the events at specific plants, with plant names, dates, and circumstances?

Is the distribution of catrancous and conflicting information being adequately controlled?

Is the applicability ofindustry events to the plant being determined adequaicly?

Are adequate prioritics being established on which events are addressed first?

Is the status readily availabic for an event report in the review and implementation process?

Are thorough technical evaluations being performed on applicabic industry events?

Do recommendations resulting from the evaluations seem adequate to resolve the subject concerns?

Are corrective actions developed and implemented in a timely manner following receipt of an industry operat;ng experience report?

Have the corrective actions been effective in solvisig the problem for cases in which results can be measured?

Is management being updated on the status ofIhe operating review process?

Do corrective actions remain in effect until no longer applicable?

Are in house events used to monitor cfTectiveness of industry operating experience?

Arc in-house events compared to improvements planned for plant safety and reliability?

Arc in-house events compared to ineffective corrective actions from industry events?

O

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20095G755&oldid=3487679"