ML20195B286

Rev 0 to Rept 98-TR-FSW-005, Test Rept on Alloy 800 Mechanical Sleeve-Addl Qualification Testing Using Low Yield Strength Tubing

ML20195B286
Person / Time
Site:	Calvert Cliffs
Issue date:	06/05/1998
From:	Kurdziel E, Proctor D, Stepnick D ABB COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NUCLEAR FUEL (FORMERLY
To:
Shared Package
ML20195B258	List: ML20195B252 ML20195B275 ML20195B286
References
98-TR-FSW-005, 98-TR-FSW-005-R00, 98-TR-FSW-5, 98-TR-FSW-5-R, NUDOCS 9905280213
Download: ML20195B286 (27)

Text

F,,".

, TEST REPORT ON THE ALLOY 800 MECHAN.ICAL SLEEVE -

ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATION TESTING USING LOW YIELD STRENGTH TUBING i REPORT NO. 98-TR-FSW-005 Revision 00 i

Prepared by: /M M Date: 4-S-ff D. Proctor, Cognizant Engineer Reviewed by: b Date: ( 'O 7d' 8

D. G. Stepnick, Manager, Primary Side Repairs Approved by: Date: 4[f/9tf E. P. Kurdziel, T 7 Project Manager Approved by: h Ub Date: 6 /r/W B. K. Smith l Independent Reviewer.

l Issue Date:

9905280213 990525 PDR ADOCK 05000317 P PDR

l' ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power RECORD OF REVISIONS 1

No. Date Eases Involved Prenared by Anorovals 00 06/05/98 Initial Issue D. Proctor D. G. Stepnick E. P. Kurdziel i

I i

l i

i l

Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00 Page 2 of11 l l .

1

-- T

' ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power i

~i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

. .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.0 OBJECTIVE ... ...... . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . 4-3.0 . CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. 4

4.0 REFERENCES

. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.0 DISCUSSION OF TESTING . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. 5 6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 i

7.0 - RECORD RETENTION . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8.0 LABORATORY TESTING DATA . ... ... . . . . . . . . .. 8  !

. .I i

i TABLES

1. Alloy 800 Sample Average Leak Rates.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 l FIGURES

1. A800 Sleeve Assembly Leak Rate Test Layout . .... . . . . . . . ... 7 I

APPENDIX A) Alloy 800 Sample Assembly Dimensions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

~

B) Leak Rate Data Sheets.... . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00 Page 3 of11

i ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power

~

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This test report documents the leak rate testing performed on Alloy 800 sleeve

, specimens which were assembled using low yield strength steam generator tubing.

The purpose of the test was to compare the leak rates from these specimens with test results done on higher yield strength tubing performed in 1997. The results are to be used .to determine what, if any, effect low yield strength tubing has on 1 joint integrity.

Tubes for the test samples were specially heat treated to have a yield strength in the range of 35 to 39 ksi. The sleeve specimens tested are representative of top-of- l tubesheet sleeves. The sleeves were hydraulically expanded into the steam l generator tube at the upper end and rolled into a block at the lower end to simulate the tubesheet joint. Leak testing was performed before and after the cyclic loading was applied. For the cyclic loading test, the steam generator tube portion of the specimen was severed above the tubesheet (block) so that the axial load which was l applied to the ends of the tube would be transmitted completely to the tube / sleeve l joint through both the expanded and rolled joints.

2.0 OBJECTIVE The objective of this testing was to develop leak rate data for low yield strength tubing and compare the data with similar data for higher strength tubing. The comparison will be used to determine whether or not the lower yield strength of

)

the parent tube will adversely affect joint integrity.

i

3.0 CONCLUSION

S 3.1 All six of the Alloy 800 sleeve assemblies tested exhibited initial leak rates below the acceptance criteria of 0.0053 Gallhr., found in Reference 4.3. Additionally, the f

leak rates were similar to those found for higher yield strength tubing (Reference  !

4.4).  !

l 3.2 Three samples, selected randomly, were subjected to thermal and load cycle l

testing. Cyclic load testing results may be found in Reference 4.7. The samples,  ;

048-1, 048-3, and 048-4 were leak rate tested upon completion of the load and thermal cycling. The leak rates for each of the samples showed no increase from  !

those found initially, and were comparable to the data found previously for higher yield strength tube samples.

3.3 Since the leak rates found for all low yield strength tests, initial and post thermal cycling, are comparable to those found during high yield strength tests, the Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00 Page 4 of11

ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power

~

conclusion can be made that tubing yield strength has little or no effect on joint l

integrity.

4.0 REFERENCES

)

4.1 ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear. Operations, Quality Assurance Manual, QAM-100, Fourth Edition, Revision 05.

4.2 ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations, Quality Procedures Manual, QPM-101, Revision 02.

4.3 Test Procedure for Leak Rate Testing of1800 Sleeve Samples. Document No.

00000-NOME-TP-0043, Revision 00, 4.4 Test Report for Steam Generator Tube Leak Rate Testing of A800 Sleeve Samples. Document No. 00000-NOME-TR-0049.

l 4.5 Test Plan for the Low Tube Yield Strength Testing in Support of the Qualification of the Alloy 800 Mechanical Sleeve, Document No. STD-400-175, Rev. 01.

4.6. Assembly of Alloy 800 Sleeved Tube Specimens for Low Yield Strength Testing, Procedure No. 00000-OSW-025, Rev. 00.

4.7 Thermal and Load Cycling with Thermal Gradient on Alloy 800 Sleeved Severed Tubes, Test report No. MISC-PENG-TR-122, Rev. 00.

5.0 DISCUSSION OF TESTING 5.1 The leak rate of the A800 samples was found by performing a hydrostatic test

. using de-ionized water, Reference 4.3. The make-up water was provided by a.

positive displacement Intensifier Pump of known bore diameter and with sufficient stroke so as to provide constant pressure for the time required to test each sample without a return stroke being necessary. The pump piston travel was measured using a Linear Displacement Transducer which provided a signal to a Readout i Display Unit.

5.2 The pressure gauge used to monitor the hydraulic pressure exerted on the sleeve assembly read over the range of 0-1000 psig in 2 psig increments. The Linear Displacement Transducer (LDT) and the Readout Display Unit (RDU) were calibrated by using a Digital Readout Caliper.

Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00' Page 5 of11

.- . i

)

I ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power l l

5.3 The water tight connections to the A800 sleeve assemblies were accomplished with 3/4" Swagelok bulkhead union tube fittings which were connected to the sleeve assembly ends. The threaded rods were 'used only to capture the end plates in the event that the tube fittings should slip off the sleeve assembly but otherwise did not restrain the longitudinal movement of the sleeve assemblies as shown in Figure 1.

5.4 The de-ionized water and the A800 sleeve assemblies were allowed to reach ambient temperature before the testing began.

1 5.5 An A800 sleeve assembly was chosen and placed in the testing apparatus as shown in Figure 1 and purged of air using a small purge pump connected to the test  !

piping specifically for this purpose. Once all of the air was purged out of the assembly, the vent valve and the purge pump isolation valve were closed and the i intensifier was pressurized so that the initial test pressure of 510120 psig was reached. The intensifier pressure was controlled by adjusting the air pressure regulator. The air reservoir was utilized as a buffer between the regulated air l supply and the intensifier low pressure piston. Once the target pressure had been  ;

reached a time of thirty minutes minimum was allowed to elapse before any leak rate testing began. This allowed for the testing apparatus to stabilize and for verification of no leakage in the 3/4" Swagelok bulkhead unions and other fittings.

5.6 The data recording began by noting the initial value of the LDT as shown by the RDU and the initial pressure as displayed by the 0-1000 psig dial pressure gauge.

The period of each test trial was set at ten minutes, as prescribed in Reference 4.3, at which time the final value of the LDT as shown by the RDU was recorded along with the pressure gauge reading.

A total of three (3) trials were conducted at 510 psig and then three (3) more trials were conducted at 870 psig. When the test pressure was increased to 870 psig, the testing layout was allowed to stabilize for at least 30 to 45 minutes before the leak rate testing resumed.

5.7 Once the initial leak rate testing was completed three sleeve assemblies were subjected to the thermal and load cycle testing with a thermal gradient. The test i was done for one thermal cycle and 50 compressive load cycles. The total thennal period; heat up, stabilization, and cool down required 2 to 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. The leak rate testing resumed upon completion of thermal and load cycle testing for those l samples. A detailed description of the thermal and load cycle testing can be found in Reference 4.7.

l 5.8 The leakage rate for the A800 sleeve assemblies was found to be minimal j throughout the entire test procedure with respect to the volume of the intensifier l

l Test Repon 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00 Page 6 of11  !

ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power 5.3 The water tight connections to the A800 sleeve assemblies were accomplished with 3/4" Swagelok bulkhead union tube fittings which were connected to the sleeve assembly ends. The threaded rods were 6 sed only to capture the end plates in the event that the tube fittings should slip off the sleeve assembly and othenvise did not restrain the longitudinal movement of the sleeve assemblies as shown in Figure 1.

5.4 The de-ionized water and the A800 sleeve assemblies were allowed to reach ambient temperature before the testing began.

5.5 An A800 sleeve assembly was chosen and placed in the testing apparatus as shown in Figure 1 and purged of air using a small purge pump connected to the test piping specifically for this purpose. Once all of the air was purged out of the assembly, the vent valve and the purge pump isolation valve were closed and the intensifier was pressurized so that the initial test pressure of 510 20 psig was reached. The intensifier pressure was controlled by adjusting the air pressure regulator. The air reservoir was utilized as a buffer between the regulated air supply and the intensifier low pressure piston. Once the target pressure had been reached a time of thirty minutes minimum was allowed to elapse before any leak rate testing began. This allowed for the testing apparatus to stabilize and for verification of no leakage in the 3/4" Swagelok bulkhead unions and other fittings.

5.6 The data recording began by noting the initial value of the LDT as shown by the RDU and the initial pressure as displayed by the 0-1000 psig dial pressure gauge.

The period of each test trial was set at ten minutes, as prescribed in Reference 4.3, at which time the final value of the LDT as shown by the RDU was recorded along with the pressure gauge reading.

A total of three (3) trials were conducted at 510 psig and then three (3) more trials were conducted at 870 psig. When the test pressure was increased to 870 psig, the testing layout was allowed to stabilize for at least 30 to 45 minutes before the leak rate testing resumed.

)

5.7 Once the initial leak rate testing was completed three sleeve assemblies were subjected to the thermal and load cycle testing with a thermal gradient. The test was done for one thermal cycle and 50 compressive load cycles. The total thermal period; heat up, stabilization, and cool down required 2 to 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. The leak rate

testing resumed upon completion of thermal and load cycle testing for those l samples. A detailed description of the thermal and load cycle testing can be found in Reference 4.7.

5.8 The leakage rate for the A800 sleeve assemblies was found to be minimal throughout the entire test procedure with respect to the volume of the intensifier I

Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00 Page 6 of11 ]

i i i

} -

,6.-

i 1

h, I f

o 7

e g

a W,

R P E

C U

D N N A , O T

R S T I P

T. D Y 4 C D- T CL R E1 S 1P  !

U 1P H '

l$ CU G I S

R$

tR I

N C H C 0 E f

re V R P

T 1T C A ol CA P V

(

i V

U DV tN MJ O

L O P [!

Y CA GL i

~

A RO US -

L PI Y L

B T C N

S $

R E .

A C

- fl T ~

R

[ RS l

E l

f ON w I F[

T T

N CN A VI C

I LG N AN R P M

U

• I Vti S

K P *  ? U aA A

E 1

e C

G R

U

• Y ", vH 3[

R 0 0

r P E L u g

T A v e

Y i F v P L

R L t D B

8 N C

1 MC .. gp d: -

M 1 A g E C g# y L

S C V A S C V A D E

I L g t

p E

0 p R 0 s E 8 N g

V f

n V A O g

si o E E

-S I

N U

t a E C S D r

e L U I

A E

p S D^ H r

R t

o O

O 0 R t u R V C R

_ r 0 8 C D i D K

[ u sR a C O C st

.l e A C A

C L R C Rat c e G R PLU

.u i t

A V

I A eG N S iE AP g

• i n

r e

3 4

/

C V

L A 1

\ 5 0

0-e V 1 n W i

g 0\ I N S n E V 4_e . F-

', E C d4 D V R

'n T A

To EL SP i

o .

P L

c SP EU T-t D RS 8 s N P

-,u E Nf tl 9

b CA t r

m o o , p C e

-B R t

B s e

,A a T

. ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations 6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 6.1 Samples were assembled using the guidelines provided by Reference 4.6. Tube

. expansions for the assemblies ranged from 0.05% to 0.20%, corresponding to diametrical expansions between 0.0004 and 0.0016 inches.

6.2 Initial leak rate testing was performed .on all the sleeve assemblies, three samples were then thermal and load cycled tested. A second set ofleak rate tests was then done on these samples. The following table contains the average leak rate data, in gallons per hour, for the samples tested.

Tablel Test Initial Initial Post Load Post Load Sample Leak Rate Leak Rate k Leak Rate Leak Rate F

No. 510 psi 870 psi 510 psi 870 psi ises2EsiE li#223!!sSfst fin M E M N N esEd22612si n t n itt M N i 048-1 0.00014 0.00037 d 0.00014 0.00039 l 048-2 0.00085 0.0035 & n/a n/a

} 048-3 0.00011 0.00024 $ 0.00014 0.00036 l 048-4 0.00021 0.00031 $I 0.00022 0.00050

( 048-5 0.00025 -

0.00081 $ n/a n/a 048-6 0.00011 0.00036 $$ n/a n/a 6.5 Data sheets listing the hydraulic expansion dimensions and percent tube expansion can be found in Appendix A. Leak rate data sheets for each sample are available in Appendix B.

7.0 RECORD RETENTION This test report shall be retained as a lifetime record in accordance with the requirements in the Quality Procedures Manual, QPM-101, Revision 01, Reference 4.2.

J 8.0 LABORATORY TESTING DATA 8.1 . Conversions to Calculate Leakage Rate.  !

l i

. The following conversions were used to obtain a leakage rate in Gallons per Hour i e from the stroke length of the Positive Displacement Pump, Reference 4.7. l 1

- Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00 Page 8 of11

p,... ]

L'

ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations J

. 8.1. l ' Conversions found in Ref. 4.8.

l 1 gallon = 3,785 liter r

1 inch cubic = 16.38706 cm cubic

^ 8.1.2 . Workings to obtain gallons from inch cubic.

I gallon l 1 liter I 16.38706 cm cubic

'3.785 liter l ~ 1000 cm c~ubic l 1 inch cubic

= .004329 gal /.in cubic l

Volume ('V ) = Bore Cross Sectional Area ( A ) x Piston Disolacement ( D )

. Area ( A ) = 3.14159 x { d / 2 }2, where d = .5635 inches, Ref. 4.7

. A. = .2494 inch: ,

2

- V = .2494 inch x Piston Displacement ( D )

Leakage Rate ( gal /hr ) =

j

' V inch cubic I .004329 callon 1 60 minutes 10 minutes j 1 inch cubic l 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />

= V x '.02597 gal / hr wilere 10 minutes is the test period per Reference 4.3. l l

i l

Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 - Rev.00 Page 9 of11

6 e

a N'l ti$:P o iMi 3 '!M'

( $ W dis $$ ME Si 5J EA E*

siss sst hN '9 N g M

,' t k0 M t

.::: C iti O O D - g g 4

" 4$.< am $lgiW $ u p$$

& 4 9 s

9 o

, 9 S s  % o iEli pmu Ei!

.mm

.hRtM;

m. .u . s "uG Y s"D" N

~

EB g e O w. M M 03 M M M I;g!

!Eils .y 1  !!:Ili I

O N h bg g bg R$

sjimi sh $0l! -iihe  % g

. 9 O

. O.

st!

a ibii . 9  %  % g we

}!$s E!' N55 EE wuu si!E m

MMRi? "A'.'U.

$dii ed DO'

.O- U ??j uv ,.n b

.o

1. $IO

=q h k h

ci;i

N .e . R!r. n. m 4 m 4

<' o- av icliWE MMii yO iaiF:

=

m.

• !* B Nb M M

% y  %

O k I Y z A anii -:a 2 igm

!=n 4 iiEid se

' LD isaw ?Wim W igsi Meii!

ZM !EiE! $$55i Psw

-m . .m

^

- $3 nu O dim b g

.4 95}I b cj 'Eli

, 9 k Q D 8 UG 2 4 h c

2 3j- r@u 1

9 M et D N

' HW 9e< m thN aa =

hii tx k A  %

m m A

mJ  %

d $$5 Ein:

hM Eli D D D

D DU W:S D  %

CD Q siss M@isi iii

%2 T

1. jf:=EE wii' qu wr a..

.k,e:fN O 13i N wna.->

.,Fi@v.,.,.~.

U n %.-

...n ,.

' ...yc w ~:w.E,

" ^ WWNM.a ?"!:N.;,

mm&p 52 4 Ee' Mais n .R. A".

c..,i.l. dx.n8,!1. .

~ , - u =

"d g.

p re ., I P s.

E igl'ei r @M w m% i 2.gm ; E 4, &.a k

w. <, w. w - .w, .=wm==Mr ,

U q N -- '

TC__^ ~-':_~

~l_, 5 .

o E,  ; m 54lstr

.c - e sg '-  ; ~

we%,

gQ p 2, s

s 3.: . g-1 gg% gt H 2 ,H - '.$ . .. . .

x n u. e wg, ,p..e.m h **

5 O' ' _' g ; *- *

! g- g g j g! .

y p~~'"M

. 2 E $l

$71 MDT$$. MQ$?$$ ld@h [rGg"g'" f f Ik hhh @Nk h *b u_h(w[ij[

h N in D

, u_ww* G. w_am.m _*_u e_

pi i d.s.e'%ET0;W 3lgjW@"*'t'D - , "

m u.wt.r s 44,g~.M*.

c..

- n> * :

g; ,:

S$:ra.:!#wQ o .;d d#s,%c.'t q,. E? m-

'J

> C 63 Er? 74 8 E *..w-:.'  : h o C INi ai 6i kg *@N.M*X O

VN .

Gy,, . "T@'. at jr4 . . .;c tweW - A O *O iM es J 'Muii k $..'sG% 4ityn' 7%At

• Wf3D4 ~:..

O*

Q'yW:$:

j

.)

W C uP%. bg w 3

$?i%i fin!

q %eW?# %Q%8WJ 4W7MN

^bMik Em*f.<WM G 54*~' O $M. . .:'fMI:

@NiOM;I 4Mpp .1',5dif $g%4x yn8(k2

is W*3- C h

$nlei' ;g, D GF k L?b9t &?%' 'd*k. i :'q2Mt;;' . f;s 64 4@fri N

qp; eW:*p um'cd easn4 Mt 19y :i+b'iner[*e,t.. '

%};. p; w-

, ~

c' i # .a-a 5 t; ~

Ap@i,e wm -7 pjerej!m.:

3c' s m 1 - _..,,

m.a %w,22 n -mbb

s. O h m :,i== m e. swu

> c,,.:,W" Aw.m eSr.# A ~_~y: , #m p ag u vw +e%t paw

- ~~-

• D' u o.

k

~rE"n a t.~!),g pas;fon: $ps: 7% J'ng, #:*u.4 c.,.*~.x-

^ c yq waW54 O !E!@ R'in" g T-4;;M%# "g..es ;x:w:-W4?.n?'M@

....g

;;c. #s 2' g"WJA pf w s.,g%wA0M%db:c :r'ewgyjg

$o 7%.5'!.W OoO

4 4 4

9

- s o==:

uE#

aM 5

.= n, N

% s 4' e e e

. e e u: i r

o  % D. e u: l 2  :

%a; .  %.  %. e, .

1 1

_hh 9 N D D N id @N $ 15 8

! 5 a im

-R

.wf

..o x s.-n; N

m #.3d!

09 *N N *N

')s *M se .n t , -m m e w ws ips *, Y  :

1s  %.

e 9 -

fie'G  % ' -

$!!!!! }$!{ D D S

$!!!! Ihj isis? 6 .;

6 lid th N ENi a I

~5 e EsHE

= e- z x $

wt a h  % O Q  %

U 'm = #sWi 4 . iiii 4 m  % A N

• T 5 5$ E " D 9 C ~o ..

A m$$

!dE a $a  % M. M. M. . - -

Z A = $ IE g 9 9 D /

i 1 li

o m E:! - $i i

w n - ' .  ;

2d ssii %i ,

NNN } ij$N l hk - T!N d 'l$ -

- 3 Ed Ja  % o b  %  %

e

. "o

= e" n>,

2 a

6 ft w

kw N w w%

s w

9< m sti g- m; o w%

HW 5 EEi 14 a A N A N

.E -

$d a

W!N!E .T 4  %

D Q D f ,

cu D C 1

@ j!

b NUI! 3! @$$ M^ . MSjM $@fE

~

%M@1 n

e, _

i! ! 1R11 m  ;

r __

O l l 4

$,a 1a E I si. o y

i 1

m

%n .r:

u

&y.c; s , Q $Ly?g-C 8 $_a:#rax c

n 3! b; _

I _- '.d} )

= = = -

a gmp' gym Cf#g~ag^;

. 't ' O

?! n 8 gj F cl2 mj

.E r .ii

.n @  % %g jh!N Bijn 4 xx spg:

, . , n g-; a_ m -

.a qe >

gz w .rea. - we i

c5 j u e

gj a I

s; ed1E3M :n zi I 3 - 4

% p- .

3 u hh

_j 9 H3 E di 4iW w 5; a8 UO .: 1 s sa  : n,..- um~zd a ns.i -

I8

i

/

e 1

e iM!!C a ,

! \

aiP,M g.

2 s ss bs x ?e

.= m s e s, e e

me L4 o a e e e e o.

k b b b n - n <

%4 0 g di  :

- !m = r j M M M M M Mt l$ (6L 1: h D 9 $ 9 S Le e 4 e s e s 2

!:tr m i:s!! si iiN! 'hi Y

3 = =db3 5 E.

=!=sa#

= 1;;

1 $sc

a. p a s, ~

4 (

N s w

g IED pg! .

g!

j s e

<o a s 4 a

m.

'W Ili x e c;

- Z, g j:i!!  :!

-m .

v. c6 N y

. e 1 * ,  %  % s sm 55- i 4 A k< k, k.

MJ E iii!!

4, s

" 2

., . k. D Do D 9 9 mD O t

' ~

El Q ,

gf m"wsn' meg p?gn g.

w+3 g+ .. =

N k **

u ..

x o 1

• 5 yy $." s 55 -E  !

c

5 g ewmas . w. -

t u .n

~

> ' 'i~~. b

ES

' ~ ~ ^

. e .g k .;

me ;e y 4waa Ldi$eniPJru gc -

p ,

--.gg ,

e e3 7 amem-- A a

i

< l

F . .

4 e

, .uI.l?%

= m n%T q $ E@I bs 4s  %

-c.a '2 . n 4$-

o D

% . s

~. o s

o Q

0 g 9 7 9 3 58.])a 4- l ms ric q ,; o o .% s e [I, ti E

[2 i ' 'M'll kk ,  !

! M N, Ns oM 8s 'M jL$~.!!8h J l!!!  :

$Es 4

g e

s s  %

e 5 e.

i siihS # b Ms! D f f d O 9 nnb iiinni

$Eid gsia @su!!!

n Einili #55Ei!

$0".-,

b , EU!N*d5 u

iiG l C 55i03 $. #Ei \

9$p! .

3.

O E 4 . ]I!h E

N N  %

A N

• hA tt N

M 4

I$ y$$,E ,l og

$. $. M a

~ ._

aa '

d as se s $.

9 9 s-

/9 S

z p< ili ik g ii!! -  %

5 W & a

.im lib

'iii! ] j tm h ,

- !i Eh I! 4 4 8 1 2 >- E n 2 ( u i J .c -

! 9 9 et n o m ga ].

m M  %

m b m m

%  %  % 1 E

ou"<! $ ]gE N 6 6 6' 4 N

4 A

6 QD a ($!!

a 5iEr  ;

hhb .n

' Af .

$ ~'_ ".."

g f"b g i i-

- Si  !

s p ,u _~  %... g

_ .__.m_

_ _ __m .

,/ M t EW ? IN D .e 4 );]p!2 i i!M & .': g -

u - pp -

M #* !mpl i (F7EMERI$

e intz.  ! -

W8o a.

. 1

, 1 d

9n EP! '

o Es@ IMi

ea in5 nsenE- P'M

&S o ss rk asa Qo d b l 5$" ~

m*

ge n  ;

D o .c h

! u S

< LRi 4 S s t 4

ne  !

dIA iiGi 1W!i

$!$hi TBER!!

In "y IN$

h ininn

NY Y' *N t,

'k . 'M o "k

ab 5: ~

.!! iM!c im  % s. . <

gg! *t p %a; g 4 o o 0 9  %'

ww: m  ;

5HE Ei (sgl!  !

>, na . wg n I Wi 3;5-kel$@$ l $$ 4 m  % h (' Q  %

{

I c ioni 4.15 m h- k i s itin E i d! @ M  % 3 .$ M z

a 4si5 $$

-xx j4%

, jg 4 6 6 S

/4 6 I 22 6 m Es.-

m 2 sg .

m p 1d eu 3 a ElEIE $4I$5  !

EW -

!!iiE y4 I w w 4 o i t -

yo u. g ik q  %

g u

0g 2 e

E -

Q %g  %

,g g %rw rs tx rx %n-0 "i G. Et$

N mg d 4 6 6 6 6 1

l$ p$$ K g g ,

.s pq e ggq

~

b.l

.E E poa

.s H

ft) % '

ll:

f:.

5 x

^

==

o ma m *_*i

_ p-  ! $

e si$h -

e i

j 4

Y 7

>c e

s kN' [ $NIdj

, it e _

% 1 k.. NN

$'S m a Bit! r~e .N x M q tE -~G ji E!!

g$ *.

kvnt; e ff*ifist

} s&g . Je- 1

( .g5 ! 45- !n Ee ~

i$

e.

aO =. ,-s -

-mptu ps F 4 $lYJJ -

.4

$dME5 #h[d$b:.,~3N) b[ s p$i

!g8 '!

EdY

[

• i ,

oe pg% w;- N'

_C " Ei 5 $ $

c 5 he s o o \

~

8 D

u s 9 4 6 s 9

' d,@l r e

-kt de 74 EE rs "

w

!E M

t 1'I [e,. 9 $p bS 3

s M

t h

wN b

~

M

'"!$ h ! ! M.NS 1 O Q D 3

#@ jQ f f  % f  %  % l sk 50i?

is!!!S Pgj

!!Di he x' U$i$ ,

.Ei i 3 m !!5 sis I 5 5 $$ j @".::E "

u l o-E :;;

!n - E O 4 N b m u 1

c$$$l 4 I E . fili  % M M M u

)

c, 1 E !!!Ni y5y_

E

- pi 4 M 4 4

9 4

3 9 s

4 4 f2 z

2 m

E i

4 1c 9 m rui 2

$ c: $5!Ei liii W Eiisi . @

! k h 9 kw k

+ssa <

.=

m la n

p

.s ,a 8 B  %

A 0 m; a m m a m

"4 d$

oo 5 255 Ess ui

% 6 6 6 4 6 O"

C3 D 22 Qi

aad -

• Ni O "Si y;g @ 7,j l &g Sk3-' $$ll;32 ed 3

d

% ,[e E -

)

~

f! h- 4 d

ee c E N- '

333 .! t!* -

$ t. $ ""

• 4 3 ,

s 4r W

_s -

w -

.i lii$ades; yc g

seen L Mc

=- W c aus n q; 7

M h e ._ .

se ti, hk sif ,

f, gks5$!M N sm uan a ,a!hd li0 n

et 8 x .

z

I- .- .

l.

! ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations l

l l

. 1 i

1' Appendix A I 1

f l

ALLOY 800 TEST SAMPLE DIMENSIONS

/

i l

1 Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00 Page 10 of11

1 l

ABB Combustion Engineering Nuclear Operations

)

1 I

Appendix i l

B 1 1

1 LEAK RATE DATA SHEETS Test Report 98-TR-FSW-005 Rev.00 Page 11of11

m ,

E* Alloy 800 Test 01ta Form Rev. 01 J

ALLOY 800 TESTING DATA SHEET Excel File: DATAFRM1.XLS. B.W. Ring Name of Recording Person (s): O 7; W d / cac Date: f- //- SVr Test Sample No. OVF-/ / ne7~e.4 ( Gauge 4.D. _ di 2of J.

• LVDT I.D. M :ro / V # 7-A. Testing Pressure Range = 510120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

Ma's Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in') Initial Final 1 f.[4t.T " /. S/(, " .op9 0.563 4 /y- 5/8 2CJd2 /334 hrs /34t4 hrs 00h10 hrs 2 81:3r?J. Ern; 2 f. [/ 4 " /.tJ23 " ,63/ 0.563 s*/g S 10 sMtM /ay ;r. hrs /u 2 hrs 00h10 hrs Wm'"* MM 3 43*2.9 " /.310 " 0/9 0.563 . cost 93 s.1o S/ g*

N'Stt: /vo thrs /u/2 hrs 00h10 hrs Mm Wmc 4 /. 3o 9 " /. 22g. " .o:13 0.563 . coS92 S/g 5/to iWFM /4//3 hrs /4/23 hrs 00h10 hrs QWf  !?/MMJ 5 /. 2 8C. " /.20. " . 021,L 0.563 . on9 2- S'/2 5/6 En~77sd /92.t/ hrs /V3phrs 00h10 hrs is s arJMl5FJ:

Notes:

Alf. (E4Af SIf . ~

00SbIY O*'^'

0326'/6+tf/vt.

000/4!2. G sc

( B. Testing Pressure Range = B70120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

MJ:4A Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in3) Initial Final 1 s. / 44 44 /. o ;19 " .045- 0.563 . o/4 / r r.;zo 372 CM31' 14/37 hrs /4V9 hrs 00h10 hrs WBSIN 29!3MurA 2 /. o ;t 3 " /. 0/g " ,0 54- 0.563 . o/3 g 9 874 f-72 aNIESW /vro hrs /foo hrs 00h10 hrs MM 3 f. o/U. " 16 5 " ,o3/ 0.563 .o/2po- 7.;rs sp2 308322 /fo/ hrs /f/ / hrs 00h10 hrs M M 1 4 0.563 m hrs hrs 00h10 hrs N M S 0.563 mulil24!b hrs hrs 00h10 hrs M EIIIIElam Notes: '

A+7&" -L> ,ooa34Yf4 L

]

/

References:

a. Test Proceedure for Leak Rate Testing of 1800 Sleeve Samples, ABB.CENO Document No. 00000-NOME-TP-0043 Rev.0.

(e b. Intensirer Positive Displacement Pump. ABB-CENO Cwg. No. E sGNS.222-623. Rev.01.

ABB-CE Brian W. Ring x.3147 5/7/98

Alloy 800 Test Data Form Rev. 02

/

ALLOY 800 TESTING DATA SHEET Excel File: DATAFRM2.XLS B.W. Ring

' )

Name of Recording Person (s): Date: S~ f 8

{

Test Sample No. O TAP --/ TT Gaugeal.D. d l - 2092

• LVDT l.D. AGo /+l# 2 l A. Testing Pressure Range = 510120 psig, Test Period = 10 minutes.

AW95 Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig) 2 Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Area (in ) of Leakage (in') Initial Final 1 /, Ko.2. " /. 92.1 " 0.2 o 0.2494 . c o S~o St.2. d;~/o fCMG o733 hrs opv3 hrs 00h10 hrs iEnM%TI4;r2EE G M 4W Seis M rs GeEn 2 /. 7 & / /. 759 " . o.2 d 0.2494 . oo t. o 5/M 4*/.2 MEN o pe/</ hrs oys</ hrs 00h10 hrs C 9ttmia at eft sr#w.5iists utsilill s' 2:MEls 3 1. 75y " 1.-731 " .o23 0.2494 . o o S 9- 5 /.1 Es.2.

McE5u o75f hrs ogofhrs 00h10 hrs 90ikutgrePiw ICSO E W 8tFM_C med;ted j 4 0.2494 2m:rne hrs hrs 00h10 hrs Ni.KM1E"mM K4Jh%*%i;;ts 3'EEM  ; T 6?TJ 5 0.2494 MSRG hrs hrs 00h10 hrs  % %fdTir5f3 % Tdrw.W74c71,2 Ntt:Fa TNs I Notes: (g,qg Q,,,77g ~~., , o .33yub - t :7 . O o o JYl SM B. Testing Pressure Range = B70120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

2:s: ret ## intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Area (in') of Leakage (in3) Initial Final 1 t. r. 9 / " /. & .2 o " , o g. / 0.2494 .osS2 g7.2. 6 70 N eMt% o po.2 hrs of/.2. hrs 00h10 hrs "O

__ - ? &Er.4:si&^310igiist anssiimr. mc 2 s. fa.2 4 " /. 51, f. " 040 0.2494 . cid9 290 #4f afsiERE o9/3 hrs of,73 hrs 00h10 hrs mmM M 3 s.54 / " /.50.2 " . o C9 0.2494 . of st 7 M 2. ,.F 7 0 M o 9,x,/hs off# hrs 00h10 hrs NNMM 4 J0.2494 SEPM3tti hrs hrs 00h10 hrs MNN 15W438t 5 0.2494 WIBMWilB hrs hrs 00h10 hrs -6 M M Notes: l.fo4st' kA7f~ --L.3 o'O f 9 6 *

. OC0 3 68" 6/0 /]

M

/

References:

a. Test Proceedure for Leak Rate Testing of 1800 Sleeve Samples. ABB-CENO Document No. 00000-NOME-TP4043 Rev.0.

b. Intensifier Positive Displacement Pump, ABB-CENO Dwg. No E-SGNS-222-623. Rev.01.

ABB CE Brian W. Ring x-3147 S/13/98

Alloy Bc0 Tzst Dita Form Rev. 01

?

ALLOY 800 TESTING DATA SHEET Excel file: DATAFRM1.XLs B.W. Ring s Name of Recording Person (s): D. Mec75'4 Date . #-//-ff Test Sample No. 0 4/# ' 2-.- /A/ / T/.44- Gauge-1.D. C - 2 0 92-

' LVDT 1.D. M 90/ 4/# 7 A. Testing Pressure Range = 510120 psig, Test Period = 10 minutes.

RMiwa Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in') Initial Final 1 /.f4 / " t,V33" . /2 2 0.563 , g g/ 9 S20 Sm' CM2f.0% /f2 / hrs /.r3/ hrs 00h10 hrs AW *E 2 f./f2 " 1. oyt " 0.563 0 34 t,l

. 14(4 .s /kl 5o8 k' SEW /53.2. hrs /S//.2 hrs 00h10 hrs Faiin ELMETx 3 /.o.2-/ " .Foo " ,/.2 / 0.563 . opp _ .for soil CEiW2 /3//3 hrs /fG hrs 00h10 hrs N. Illsp%":t 4 0.563 schG: hrs hrs 00h10 hrs N.2d 2!KfG 5 0.563 i #En2 hrs hrs 00h10 hrs NE70% N Notes: (,,ggyz, sh yg 3<, ,, / 9f m 3  % , ggn yg,3 Ggt.,/g

/

B. Testing Pressure Range = 870120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes, i= M Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psia)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in3) initial Final 1 l. + /3 " /. IL/') " ss e,L 0.563 .11/obt. 870 84.L OfMYE /rgVhrs /4oe,lbrs 00h10 hrs WRM12t MJ 2 /.o9.2. " 54 4l " 52 7 0.563 . /3/4/ ft 2 M.2 -

massmann fgog hrs //,/r hrs 00h10 hrs M M 3 1,4-10 " 1.1.C T " 55S 0.563 ./394 24& Elo M //,/f hrs /z 2phrs 00h10 hrs MM 4 -0.563 WWCf hrs hrs 00h10 hrs 8EEEEEE M 5 "

0.563 M hrs hrs 00h10 hrs M M

"** (EAK b 7E y , f/(M 3 -'--D .DD35 W 64t,-ths-

References:

a. Test Proceedure for Leak Rate Testing of 1800 sleeve Samphs. ABB-CENO Document No. 00000-NOME-TP 0043 Rev.0.

b. Intensirter Posnive Displacement Pump. ABB-CENO Dwg. No. E-SGNs-222-623, Rev.01.

ABS-CE Brian W. Ring x 3147 S/7/98

Alloy 800 Test Data Form Rsv. 01 ALLOY 800 TESTING DATA SHEET Excel File: DATAFRM1.XLs B.W. Ring Name of Recording Person (s): 3 $ ese eo.e Date: 5-// 9#

Test sample No. 0 W 8 '~3 / ALIT /M Gaugs1.D. O L 3 0 %1.

LVOT LD. M3n/ndE?

A. Testing Pressure Range = 510120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

rSccar Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Ruri No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in') Initial Final 1 /. 9610 " /. P.2 9 " , o /_.3 0.563 .003.2,3 C/o S*/o '

$17a% 757 hrs /oo.3 hrs 00h10 hrs "m o'Cs' LMW 2 /. 927 " /. Po ? "

,0.20 0.563 . o c t,l97 S/ 2 S/2 v N2::S /o o4,thrs /o/Alhrs 00h10 hrs &%Q ts NM.'

3 /.704 " /. 4 84 " . o.2 o 0.563 . ood98 5/4 Cs'o /

MPM /o/shrs /025tirs 00h10 hrs api 7&; "%

4 /. 6 85 " /. foi ? " . o /fo 0.563 .o0398 5/7 S*/6 Mm.E! /o24 hrs /o36 hrs 00h10 hrs Ef.:ittsc **Ed 5 /. 4 4 '] " /. 6 50 " .o/9 0.563 . oost;r3 5/2 5/O FEM 2 /o27 hrs /ot,t p h rs 00h10 hrs Estcn IR3Rca Notes: 1. 8/& +*noy3g g jo,esid cbvan Y

An1 c 2 '/81 / r w

/.4 rc ,c/ j oo M .28 sm l

. ooo//h f*1 k B. Testing Pressure Range = 870120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

Moelum intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Dif'erence (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in3) Initial Final 1 /.61/ " /.4 54 " , 03 P- 0.563 .009.2/ 84 7 ,942 EiMT //o s hrs ///S-hrs 00h10 hrs stb M I EliEMutt -

2 /. 4 53 " /.4/4 " ,ot/P- 0.563 . o //Pc 890 84 8 <

isRkan: ///6 hrs //34 hrs 00h10 hrs m m 3 /. fa /4 " /.580 " . o dy- 0.563 .0084& 820 Mf; '

N //J7 hrs //3 7- hrs 00h10 hrs M M 4 /.SW9' " /.5/ /

.033 0.563 .004.2/ 8% 8P 'l '

BtfEE1E /25fhrs /so9 hrs 00h10 hrs M N 5 /.So8 " /. ti?f, " 03.2 0.563 ,00994 87L A'92 N /3/o hrs /32o hrs 00h10 hrs MM otes fyg , 90 9// M popfg/

u,vt s

,,y < 0 SAll C JM. h

,000;234 f44,-/&

References:

I a. Test Proceedure for Leak Rate Testing of 1800 Sleeve Samples, ABB-CENO Document No. 00000 NOME-TP-0043 Rev.0.

b. Intensifier Positive Displacement Pump. ABB-CENO Dwg. No. E sGNS-222-623, Rev.01.

ABB-CE Brian W. Ring x.3147 5/7/98 L.. .

Alloy 800 Test Data Form Rrv. 02 ALLOY 800 TESTIN", NATA SHEET Excel File: DATAFRM2JLS B.W. Ring Name of Recording Person (s): Date: 5/27/ff Test Sample No. o4/#-3 57' Gauge-l.D. Cl-2OF2 LVDT l.D. A 9 90 /4E9 A. Tes':v ' Pressure Range = 510120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

MCet; Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume o f ressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Area (in ) ,of Leakage (in') : tr.Ja! Final 1 /. f2 3 " /. #e t/ " .o/9 0.2494 . Oo4f 7 6 /2 S/o c"A m o?vrhrs 0753 hrs 00h10 hrs , P N A ngorap rpm 4534ds,Tv.s A"M .ecrn 2 /. ? 9-7 " /. y p st " ,p23 0.24g4 . coS y gio Soy W/A % OPS? hrs opo9 hrs 00h10 hrs . CM3iteguiCils eMNIM4sdu M5CMrK m:ri 3 /. ? ? / " i. ?Vf " . o 2 2. 0.2494 00S [ 5/o 506

1. 1. $3G of/o brs o#2o hrs 00h10 hrs MeiMMXCiv McEWWE WW.:4 Kmm 4 0.2494 r o ta9e hrs hrs 00h10 hrs WnERWEE %"tW's 3Nv eME MMWth 5 0.2494 l NSnitt hrs hrs 00h10 hrs :T N E AE sis? BWmwrMJ7t. c*,;ter WNPJC j Notes: [.E.4 Af [<976 ~~L:> . 0 3/8 M 4t,

.000/Yd4t.lptc B. Testing Pressure Range = B70120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

mw! sit Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig) 2 Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Area (in ) of Leakage (in3) Initial Final 1 f. M C " /.34/" . o sc 0.2494 . o / 37- eFPo 442 i"W2 o9/r hrs o 9,2p hrs 00h10 hrs N - MSEME Mr 2 /.B 34l " s.178 " . o.S 4, 0.2494 0/M f4 # R4L Blaatst OSay hrs oya9 hrs 00h10 hrs N- m M )

3 /.'.1 %2. " /.//9 " . oSF 0.2494 . o/3 7- XLA R 4 (.

N OS4/ ohrs o 9fotu 00h10 hrs M-MM 4 ;0.2494 EMem!N hrs hrs 00h10 hrs - BIA 4 EIRIMMEllE W W M M S 02494 Gensure hrs hrs 00h10 hrs MQM N M M Notes:. [g.g Q,4 yg m --

,06C26 in

,0003C Got-

References:

I a. Test Proceedure for Leak Rate Testing of 1800 Sleeve Samples. ABB-CENO Document No. 00000-NOME.TP-0043 Rev.0.

I

b. Intensifier Positivt. Displacement Pump. ABB-CENO Dwg. No. E.SGNS-222-623. Rev.01.

ABB-CE Brian W. Ring x-3147 5/13/98

r . ., 1

. I

} -

Alloy 800 Tsst D:ta Form Rev. 01

(

I l

l ALLOY 800 TESTING DATA SHEET Excel File: DATAFRM1.XLS B.W. Ring Name of Recording Person (s): E. / 04 0c'75 4 Date: #-/.2 - f#

Test Sample No._ 0%f-4/ /A//774/ Gaugel.D. C t. -20 ff.

' LVDT l.0. S=>h/UR7 A. Testing Pressure Range = 510120 psig. Test Period = iu minutes.

EW>ttre Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in') Initial Final 1 /./. W " /. ( </5 " .0.29 0.563 .oo 7,2.2. 5/2. S//

G?nas op.14/ hrs of.3Vhrs 00h10 hrs  ::m?ssa *yMH 2 /.h// " . 0% 0.563

/. f, //, "

. so411- f/8 S*/L 3%W oS35 hrs o9v5 hrs 00h10 hrs utM29 fdlllELW 3 /.t,/4 " /.5 9o " o s p/ 0.563 . o/o 95* f/(, .530

1. 1. /MN ofv4 hrs off4 hrs 00h10 hrs ESEsha Gre w 4 "

0.563 WE.W hrs hrs 00h10 hrs S'm2Ct ND

" " i 5 0.563 l iSCC hrs hrs 00h10 hrs 5E*i2Ks tuliRE1

' Notes: (pg & ~fg* -n > 0. 00f/3 tonfro mgjg X$* O 0 YS$ hs-(,&E&46-2) , y 23 / m =:'" 0. 00d2 //

• GAsk i d'r.4 4 ,

i I

B. Testing Pressure Range =. 870120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

satsinst Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in3) Initial Final 1 /. 406 " 1.390" ,o 54 0.563 . o /3% 976 87.2.

dt:2MN o f5yhrs /oo 9 hrs 00h10 hrs illaisalEE M 2 1. 3 f,. -7 " /. 3.2 2." .:ostr' O.563 .o //.2.0 69 8  ?%

Mti$ulit /o/o hrs /o.2o hrs 00h10 hrs M M 3 /.3/8 " /. ,2 76 " 0 4t.2. 0.563 , olo sts' S7.2. 840 M /o.:z/ hrs /o.5 / hrs 00h10 hrs MM 4 "

-0.563 gligigillE hrs hrs 00h10 hrs M M S 0.563 m hrs hrs 00h10 hrs

[ MM j.-

Notes: [pg p yg~ 9 , g y,, g g3 4 ,000 N GPL

/

References:

a. Test Proceedure 'or Leak Rate Testing of 1800 Sleeve Samples, 'S-CENO Document No. 00000-NOME-TP-0043 Rev.0.

(.

b. Intensifier Positive Dtspiacement Pump, ABB-CENO Dwg. No. E ~~NS.222-623. Rev.01.

ABB-CE Brian W. Ring x.3147 S/7/98

• 1 Alloy 800 Test 'D:ts Form Rzv. 02 l

ALLOY B00 TESTING DATA SHEET Excel File: DATAFRM2.XLS 8.W. Ring Name of Recording Person (s): D. b Date: 5 c24-f/f l Test Sample No. O Al# "'"M 45 7 Gauge 1.D. d 4 c24 F 2-LVDT l.D. ti7;to / 9f 7 A. Testing Pressure Range = 510120 psig, Test Period = 10 minutes.

OKWle Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig) 2 Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Area (in ) of Leakage (in') initial Final 1 /. 7 94 " /. 7 </3 " 0J/ 0.2494 ,0099 )

hM2r4 /t//t/ hrs s %)4. hrs 00h10 hrs $TM2&OCK  ?.a74;;M5eRir2E Tf2Y.,;;Z ;pilIT.Rt 2 f. 731 " /. 4 76 " . o '/3 0.2494 0/D 7 CF#2 /t./25' hrs /93fhrs 00h10 hrs m:2:%rm EcGessmegrr yE53% gette 3 /,4,S/ " /./ t 3 " .O27 0.2494 . og -70 EvM /VJ/ hrs it/4/, hrs 00h10 hrs Mir KfM c r. Sc mTGM m*2r E.4ing WM '

4 O.2494 DMW.* l hrs brs 00h10 hrs MaWE4M*aA i M 7J GT A S:S DM W54.9 1 5 " -" 0.2494 POSv hrs hrs 00h10 hrs s t ra n T n % r. ;.rMztwnm ;rFes::e %mt Notes: Lggx ,%75 2 , o,5 / p- j , o n p 2,1, g ,4 L I

B. Testing Pressure Range = 870 20 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

4SEs Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig) 2 Run NO. Initial ' Final Difference (in) Area (in ) of Leakage (in3) Initial Final 1 /. / 7 3 " /.09/" . o g 2.- 0.2494 .oJoM I m%c /13'f hrs /Je/7 hrs 00h10 hrs 85ir5N r .st m m M SEMur.s 2 /.o 82. " /.s o 2. " ,ogo 0.24g4 .0/99 anzamI M /3rd hrs /Voo hrs 00h10 hrs m- - - ensinisms 3 . 99t/ " .923 " , o 9./ 0.24g4 . c/ *9 7 M /4,/o/ hrs /</// hrs 00h10 hrs M- M M 4 0.2494 WEREilt hrs hrs 00h10 hrs MN M S O.2494 m hrs hrs 00h10 hrs Mm'MM Notes:

[g,z y4 w- ;,. , j (t, m3 M _ g nogg c'

1

References:

3. a. Test Proceedure for leak Rate Testing of 1800 Sleeve Sampks. ABB-CENO Document No. 000CONOME.TP.0043 Rev.0.

'. b. !ntenstfier Positive Displacement Pump. ABB-CENO Dwg. No. E.SGNS-222-623, Rev.01.

i ADB.CE Brian W. Ring x.3147 5/13/90 L i

4

• I Alloy 800 Test Data Form Rev. 01 ALLOY B00 TESTING DATA SHEET Excel File: DATAFRMI.XLS B.W. Ring Name of Recording Person (s): d._ Moc7o4 Date: 5 -/d-ff Test sample No. OYP-S~ /N/7/'A L Gauge l.D. CL~Jo93 A. Testing Pressure Range = 510120 psig, Test Period = 10 minutes.

me."c& Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in') Initial Final 1 /. 2 95' " /.3 t/2 " . 04t9- 0.563 .n//yo r/4 S/2 ETW /ouphrs /oSuhrs 00h10 hrs 2:;Mr AW%~f~t 2 /. 3 45~ " /. 208 " . o:3 9- 0.563 . o0 9.2 / J~/2 S/2

% " 21 6 /oSerhrs //o r brs 00a10 hrs Mcts It w a rJu:

3 /. po r* " /.17.2. " 03-3 0.563 . con / S/o fo g UMM //of hrs ///4. hrs 00h10 hrs 22*M 1MJ 4 "

0.563 mrts hrs hrs 00h10 hrs mas "?/t,#rd 5 0.563 inELM hrs brs 00h10 hrs MF2 SFeewt Notes: (,g4 g 2772 m , O Sf,~7) ou  %> . 000.3 Sol GN l

l l

B. Testing Pressure Range = B70120 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

{

l tes ssa5 Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leskage (in3) Initial Final 1 79S'" . 4t/7 " . /LJ & 0.563 . o 3 434L /.74 g?2 "Je' arc / /19 hrs // 2_9 hrs 00h10 hrs M Mi 2 6,34 " .577 " . //9 0.563 ,o n t.L 270 846 m //3o hrs //#o hrs 00h10 hrs M N 3 . So & " 39sL" . //.2.- 0.563 .o:3789- fr ?2. 8 90 M //q/ hrs //r/ hrs" 00h10 hrs M M 4 0.563 N hr , hrs 00h10 hrs 6 M 5 0.563 i M hrs hrs 00h10 hrs M M N ** /Eg [~fg* -

2,,, p ./874d N & , 0005/E* 6 0 /

I i

I i

/

References:

f a. Test Proceedure for Leak Rate Testing of 1800 Sleeve Samples, ABB-CENO Document No. 00000-NOME-TP-0043 Rev.0.

P b. Intensirer Positive Displacement Pump. ABB-CENO Dwg. No. E-SGNS-222-623. Rev.01

+

ABB.CE Brian W. Ring r.3147 5/7/98 L ,

4 l

Alloj Sc0 Tsst Data Form RIv. 01 .

ALLOY B00 TESTING DATA SHEET Exce! File: DATAFRMt.XLS 8.W. Ring Name of Recording Persor.(s): b. Sf'oc"7EE Date: 5-/2 -f#

Test Sample No. OW8-46 /A//774 C- Gauge-r.D. rd . - 2 072 -

LVDT 1.D. . ~? 7 90 / 4 E 7 A. Testing Pressure Range = 510 : 20 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

1. ca@m intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakago '

(in') Initial Final 1 /.4ff " 1.44/" . 0 / 9- 0.563 . oor)25/ .520 .520

@2229 /254 hrs /2od hrs 00h10 hrs stec!? WM 2 /.490 /. 6 54 " .oly 0.563 . coggtps sJ o s*/&

0.3CM /397 hrs i3/7 hrs 00h10 hrs erre; Mr2lsm 3 1.L.fr " /. 4 3t,l. " .02) 0.563 . oo52.2.V- 31o 50g Muff % /3/p hrs /32ghts 00h10 hrs faire mb? flu 4- "

0.563 isttaa hrs hrs 00h10 hrs cGon siMxr1.5 l 5 0.563 I 32t#c%t: hrs hrs 00h10 hrs ravw res.n b

Notes: if12 5472? % a O.258f ktlj,, R--> .

0 0 6 / l.2. & L,fg ,-

/

l i B. Testing Pressure Range = 870 + 20 psig. Test Period = 10 minutes.

J Siidsdrat Intensifier Piston Location & Time Cylinder Volume Pressures (psig)

Run No. Initial Final Difference (in) Diameter (in) of Leakage (in3) initial Final 1 /.5/8 ~ /.455 " .oc3 0.563 . o /S48 .9 9 4 872 M/M,5 /330 hrs /3//o hrs 00h10 hrs Mm8Misilt WWilR 2 f.UAI9 " /. 3 96 " . o S3 0.563 ,o/3/7 f96 R94 I faleggrd /34t/ hrs /35/ hrs 00h10 hrs M M 3 /. 39 / " /332 " .oSB 0.563 . o /3 /9 8M E' ? 2. ,_,_

M /353_ hrs /4to2 hrs 00h10 hrs MM l 4 20.563 6 hrs hrs 00h10 hrs M S 0.563

m. hrs hrs 00h10 hrs omm W A;' S ~7]  % , Of4//Z. nt. W , 00 0 3 6 $ $4Ll44.

References:

n. Test Proceedure for Leak Rate Testing of 1800 Sleeve Samples, ABB-CENO Document No. 00000. NOME-TP-0043 Rev.0.

\- b. Intensifier Positive Displacement Pump, ABB-CENO Dwg. No. E-SGNS.222 623, Rev.01 ABB-CE Brian W. Ring x.3147 5/7/98 k