ML20086E791

Performance Indicators,Oct 1991

ML20086E791
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	10/31/1991
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20086E788	List: ML20086E787 ML20086E791
References
NUDOCS 9112020320
Download: ML20086E791 (99)

Text

.

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OCTOBER 1991 f w _

' b" p1H IIII'

' mammas ;I '

amme l  : :l g,gRama ~

5..

, /

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group

,?

yll t i J,

-l _k ,

I

~

0%sud of wwka w wn,idhlwk...

il iawak wisdorn, wnd sowndjwhynenl...

il w a, b)&hans, cwawu %g, cormadanenl...

il w a, w<uj, of ofs...d w doug. Ljob q u L ,b l 6 , weaj, 6 . Jl a uvnev-dhudal, ul L wull of wdem?

pimwa, a w owv owrv ssf wea wh un, wa wnd & piads wnd salykhorv L.L corns $wrn, bany L dght kl of peuserv, uljud wo do&ng, & 4V hnp.

Jauns ).6%nev

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group l

l L OCTOBER 1991

ABSTRACT PURPOSE The " Performance Indicators Program"is intended to provide seleded Fort Calhoun plant perior-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends /Ind a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The informmion can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliaoility Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for cornparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goats, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.

In older for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitor.= Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were oev* pen w cach performance parameter to ensure consistency in futere reports and allow cornpariso.. with industry averap9s where appropnate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailoreo te address the areas wnich are most rneaningful to the people using the mport. Please refer comments to the System Engineering Department's Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respect'/e departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA-102. " Performance Monitoring Mant,gement Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87 00,"Guidehnes and 1echnical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Black-out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D, "EDG Reliabikty Program", dated April 6,1990.

l l

4 Table of Contents / Summary INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS P. AGE PDJSTRY M QffQ UDPFR ifai M TH'S LOSUH LAET LOkUH M FORCED OUTAGE RATE . . . , . .._........ .. 0.25% . .24%. . 14.7% .. 13 9 % . D. .2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL... , . ,. .. . o .. n .. .0.. .0. , l .. ..3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION).. . 0 .. . . o .. .. c ..o. . . l .. .4 GROSS HEAT RATE-. . 9.935. . 10.250.. . 1).245. . 10.360.. .. l . . .6 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR... ,.._..~ . 8 2 5% . . 69% .. . 69% .. .38%. . l .. .7 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR .. -. . ._N A . . 0 75 .. . 2 s .. . 3.91. .l. ,. 8 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)- 166.. . 75.. . 46 . . 4 2. 7 .. .. N A . .9 VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE... ... .. . . . _ . . . . 3,072.. . 4,500 .. . 992.5. ~ 960 4 .. .. N A .. .10 DISABLING INJURY /II LNESS

• FREQUENCY RATE.. ..._.. . . . ~ . .. o . . 0.31. . 0 44 . 0 49.. . . l .. . 11 OPERATIONS P, AGE PDJSTRY uppen e.

M (gpfQ m THis(*>iTstasiuynH M STATION NET GENERATION (10,000 Mwh) ... . . .. N A .. .. N A .. . 23 1. . 13 3 .. . . l .. .1

- FORCED OUTAGE RATE , .. . . . 0.25% . 2 4% .. .14 7%.. ,13 9% . .. D . .2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL , , . 0 .. . 0 .. . 0 .. .. o . . . l .. .. . 3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION).. . 0 .. .0.. . 0 .. ..o. . . l ., . .4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION).. . 0 .. .0.. .0.. .. o . . . l .. .5 GROSS HEAT RATE .. . 9.935.. .10.250. . 10.245. 10.360.. . l .. .6 EOUlVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR... .825%. . 69% .. . 69% .. .38%. ..I. .7 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR . .. N A .. . 0 75 .. 2 46. .3 91. .. l . .6 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT.. . .. NA .. .NA. .. NA . .. N A .. . . N A .. .12 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS . . . . N A .. . N A .. . 0.76 . . 0. 5 . .. A . .13 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET. . .. N A .. .. NA . . NA .. . . N A .. .. N A .. .14 DOCUMENT REVIEW . .. .. N A .. .. N A .. r4 A . . NA.. , N A ., .15

r MAINTENANCE P6GE NN.'9T RY ,QppA QDfg UDPr A e% QQ,Q TH'S LOSITH LAST A4NITH }ff,tQ EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ,. .. N A .. NA. ..N A . .. NA . .. NA .. 16 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS). . . . . .. . .. . .. . . ... N A . ..NA. .. N A . . NA .._ NA.. .17 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY . .. N A . . . N A .. .NA N A .. . NA . .18 AGE OF CMTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE) . . ..NA . . NA .. NA . NA. ~NA. 19 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE) . . .. N A .. . . N A .. .. N A . . . N A ., .. N A .. . 20 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE) .. . .. .. .~...... .. . ,, N A ,. ..N A . . 20 5% .. . 28 8% . .l. . 21 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE) . . .. N A .. .60%. 4 7.3% .. . 52 8% . .. A . . 22

~ PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE... .. . . ,, ... .. NA . .1.2% . . 0% .. . 0% .. .. l . . 23 NUMBER OF OUT-OF. SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS . . ,. NA .. .. < 15 . .25. . 35 . .. NMA . . 24 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME . . . . . . . . . . . . N A .. .25%. .15.2% . . 5% .. .. N A .. . 25 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) ... . .. . . . .. ,, N A .. .. N A .. .. N A .. .. NA .. .. N A . 26 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOO (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE),.. .. N A . .. <4 50 .. . 302 .. . 281 . _ N A .. . 27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) ... . . . . . . . .. N A .. .. N A .. NA , .. NA .. .fN A.. . 28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED

, MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

_ (PRESSURE EOUIPMENT).. . .. . .. N A .. .. N A . . , N A .. .. N A ,. .. N A .. . 29 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MA!NTENANCE ACTIVITIES i (GENERAL MAINTENANCE).. .m.. .. N A .. - . .. N A . .. NA . .. N A .. .NA...30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE) . .

.. N A . . . , . .. NA . NA. .. N A .. . N A .. . 31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) . . . .. .. N A . . N A .. ..N A . .. N A .. . . N A .. . 32 j

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE l TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS . . .. N A . ..NA. .NA. , NA . . N A.. . 33 i ii n_ i

-1 MAINTENANC.E l cont'd)) PAGE POU!TAY ,Q Df,Q, QffQ Uf'Df 4 *M. Q,OAL TH!$ LOMTH LAST AONTH ]pfQQ NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILURES . ,, .. N A . .. N A . .0. .0. NA. . 34 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS . . .. N A . , NA . .. N A . .. NA .. .. N A . . 35 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE . ..N A . 2 00E 6 0 6 14 E .7 . ..I .36 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PPOTECTION E,A,ff A

ep miav ,Qy;pq Qy;Q UDPE G 'M. Q TH'E LOMTH LAET LOMTH IffQQ PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPCSURE (CUMULATIVE) , , .166. . 75 . .46. . 4 2 7.. N A .. .9 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE . . . , , , . 3.072.. . 4.500, . 992.5.. .,960 4 , -

.. N A .. .10 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY.. .. N A . 0 45. 0506. 0 48 .NMA. . 37 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT . .. N A - 2% .. , . 0% . 0 55 % . ~ l .. . 38 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS . . . 2 6' .. NA . .0, .0. , l .. . 39 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT.OF SERVICE , . . . . - . . . . , .. NA . . 6 .. ,4. .6. .,1 . .40 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED . .. . . _ .. . . N A . NA. .0. 0. . l .. . 41 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE (mrem).. . .. N A . .. N A . .183. .224. . l .. . 42 TOTAL SKIN AND l CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS .. . .109' . 90_ . 51, ,. 4 9 . N A .. . 43 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA. . .. N A . . 85%. . 89 9% . .899%. .. l . . 44

! RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM . . .. NA . .. N A . . 45 l .2. .3. .. l ..

j NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS . . .. .. N A . 40 . . 63.. ,65. .. NMA . .. 46

,. GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies) . .. N A 340. . NA - . NA . N A .. . 47 i

LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.. .. NA . .225. NA. NA - .NA. . 48 l

lIl l

- . _ _ .- .- .. - ~ . _ . - - - . , .

SECURITY PAGE tNousinY QppfD QfrQ

(!PPE 4 % M M(3 LA.ST LONTH }f,QQ LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECUR'TY) .... . .... . . , , .. NA .. .. NA . . 55. 57. .. NA , ..49 SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN.... .. . . N A .. .. N A .. .NA. .. NA .. .. N A , , . 50 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES, . .. . . . N A .. .. NA .. . N A ..

. .. NA .. .. N A ., . 51 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES P_ASE INSOfTRY QDf,Q QffQ UpprA P". 2 TH'S AONTH LAST t*ONTH TREND AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON OUTAGE).. . .. N A . .35% .)in.. .26%. .I. . 52 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE ($ million)... .. N A .. .. NA . 13 8. .13 7. .. N A . .. 53 SPARE PARTS ISSUED ($ thousands).. .. NA .

~ N A .. . 242.7.. 176B, .NA. . 53 INVENTORY ACCURACY, , . . . , .. NA .. . 98% . .100% .. . 92% .. .. l . 4.54 STOCKOUT RATE.. . . , , . . . .. N A .. .2%. .23%. .,3 7% .. ..NMA .. . 54 EXPEDITED PURCHASES..,.. .. , ,, , . . ... N A . . 0.5% . . 0% .. .0%. .. l .. ..55 INVOICE DREAKDOWN . ... , , ..NA. . NA .. ... NA . .. NA .. .. NA . ..56 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING., , ,, ,...NA.. .. N A . . 36.8% .. . 39 8% .. ..l. .56 DESIGN ENGINEERING PJ.GE INDUSTRY Q,AfD QfDfD UDPFP % f C,$,L TH's AONTH t AST AONTH J,8QQ OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS.. . .. NA . .. N A . . 2 74 .. .277. .. N A ., ... 57 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING), . , , .. NA .. ,. N A . . 25 . 27. . NMA . . 58 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EARS), ,, . NA ,. .. NA . 113.. .113. . NA . . 59 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS .. ,, N A .. .. N A . .182 - . . .170. .. NA . ..60 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN , .. N A .. .. N A .. ., NA . .. NA . .. NA . ..61 iv i

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY P. AGE mousTny e Qr2Q UDDE P *% M TH'S t.O*lTH Le.ST.L*2MTtt IP110 DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE . . 0. . 0 31. . 0 44 . .,0 49 .. . l .. .11 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE . . ... .. . . ... .. NA . . NA .. .2 64 . . 2 45. ~A. . 62 HUM AN RESOURCES PA.LGE

,s v ,pv QfyQ QDDQ UDPEP *% M TH'S LO*ITH L A ST B.ONTH M NUMBER OF FERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS . . . .. NA . .NA. .1. .0 .. D . . 63 STAFFING LEVEL , . .. N A . NA .. N A . . . N A .. .NA. . 64 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE , . .. N A . .. N A . .. NA , . NA.. .NA. . 64 TRAINING AND OUAllFIC ATION PA.GE fNOUST9Y CfDfQ QfDQ L'D DF D *% M TH'? $.ONTH LA.ST k.40*ltH M LICENSED OPERATOA REQUAllFICATION TRAINING., ,. N A ,. .. N A .. .NA. .. N A .. .. N A .. . 65 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS... . .. N A .. . NA .. .. NA . _ NA.. .. N A . . 66 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS . ,.NA.. .. NA .. .. NA .. _. N A .. . N A .. . 67 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS .. .. . .. N A . . .. NA .. . 2.352.. . 2.108.. .. N A . . 68 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING.. .. N A .. . . N A .. . 10,048. . 8.239.. .. N A . . 69 REFUELING OUTAGE PAGE IN?J5TRY QD2Q QP!DQ QDDF R *% Q.2 A,' TH's AnNTH Lefi,TM TP.END

. MWO OVERA.LL STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE) . .. N A . .. N A . . 985 . 996 . .. N A . . . 70 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING.. .. NA . .. N A . . 34 . 33. NA. . 71 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE) , , .. NA . NA, . 25 . . 25 . .NA. . 72 v

f QUALITY ASSURANCE PAGE

!?Di.!STRY Qpf.D CffC UDPE R M M THf5 MSPH LAST MSMH M VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS . .. . N A . .1. 6 . . .1.01. . 0.79 . .A. . 73 COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS . . . .. N A NA .. .NA. N A .. . NA . .74 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) .. .. N A .. .. NA - . US . .. W2.. .NA. . 75 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS . . . . . .. NA .. .NA. 78. . 96 . . ,1 . . 76 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS.. .. N A .. . N A ,. . 0/9 . 1/4.. .. N A . . 77 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF. CARS vs.

NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs.

LERs REPORTED., . .. N A . ..NA. .. NA . . NA . .NA. . 78 PERFOP'AANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS . ,

. 79 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX . . . . 86 -

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST., . . . . . . . . 88

SUMMARY

SECTION ADVERSE TREND REPORT .. . . . 89 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT.. . 89 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES . . . . . 89 TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

TREND SYMBOLS A. ADVERSE TREND I - IMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE NMA - NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTION NA- NOT APPLICABLE

. INPO UPPER QUARTILE l

vi I

.- . . - . .. - - - _ . - .. .-----~ =- --.- . .

4

- O Net Generation (10,000 Mw hours) 50-40-34 61 i g.

31.27  ;" ( 31.18 g30- Qf I gh

nap 26.94 27.9 $

p Nk!I gy 24 76 .c~w~

~ '

4 m rM F 24.23 rm u we

}yag  :-

@3 If?L d!Ms ty%5 f 23.15 o *md %m). : th styr 21.93 45 4/yy ys $4g O R.$ WW MIA 1TB'*/7 qw pg?p T@49 ws fM+$  % ti p$u3rg:

}hsv..

f<

$s o y70,A 5

o o

20- g g44 gg pgg;

j. A m. su m; x)yg qp (gg %2

" 99 4pg o i 16.36 44% Gb PM FM 44% %2a W pg&

W hA!E

!*% EdM *$iih2 m  !

• 5 68 key WT dE h f@%[Adl jyld Nh @i% M@IB!!M g%gp ggi 13.28 D

Jggg

$l 7 $> j$$Jh. gep 'b4 h NN D N E p39 Nh gg qg N$' g sp?

'39g gg g?

e 10~ 7~ -  :

3 2 %g>1 vwd qx% Y 0 wn mt: w:

3# so e?h a +. i w$:6#$

g

!p (gf! Me kii $@% 8 && M $%s %s 4t-mi &pw se aw Wi wm m

& M un IM kg

% & kN 5% G R S M pio 45 EA%

w 0

i i i , i i i i i , i i.

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 STATION NET GENERATION This indicator.shows the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reponing--

month.

- During the month of October 1991, a net total of 231,537 MWH was generated by the

- Fort Calhoun Station. This low net generation is due to the following three forced out-ages: 1) the station batteries replacement outage from 9/12/91 at 2100 hours0.0243 days <br />0.583 hours <br />0.00347 weeks <br />7.9905e-4 months <br /> through 10/6/91 at 1114 hours0.0129 days <br />0.309 hours <br />0.00184 weeks <br />4.23877e-4 months <br />; 2) a steam leak on the drain line from a turbine control valve was repaired from 10/18/91 at 0307. hours to 10/19/91 at 1116 hours0.0129 days <br />0.31 hours <br />0.00185 weeks <br />4.24638e-4 months <br />; and 3) a steam leak repair on a test pipe on the high pressure turbine shell from 10/25/91 at 2204 to 10/26/

91 at 0810.

Data Source: Station Generation Report

- Adverse Trend:- None 1

- Forced Outage Rate

-O- Fort Calnoun Goal (2.4%)

20%-

--O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)

GOOD

- 15%-

V 9.7 ; 10%-

5 -

1,4 _ __

C O O O O O O >< 0 0 0 O'

, , , 0% C O O O O O O O O O O 1 88 '89 '90 Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr - May .Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 l'

FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 14.7% for the time period from 11/1/90 to 10/

31/91.

A forced outage. occurred during the months of September and October 1991 when the =

station batteries were. declared inoperable. The generator was taken off line on 9/12/91 l and remained off Une until 10/6 /91.

The generator was taken off line on October 18 & 19 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line. The generator was again taken off line on October -

25 & 26 due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbine.

A forc_ed outage occurred during the month of August 1991 to replace failed potential transformers (pts). These pts convert 345 KV to 120V for use in the breaker synchro-nization circuit.

- Data Sourcei Monthly Operations Report & NERC GAD Forms l

Adverse Trend: None 2-

- -. , . . . - , - . - . . ~ . . _ . - - . . . . . - - - _ . _. , . - . . . . - - -

3- . .

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal

-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile O FCS Reactur Scrams 2-1- C i i i i 4 0 m ,m , m ,m ,m ,m ,. m ,m ,m , m , m ,_ m ,

'87 '88'89'90 Nov90 Dec 'Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in October 1991. The last-unplanned automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at "zero.

The industry upper ten percenti_le value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fon Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants in this area.-

- Data Source: Monthly Operations Repon & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

IAdverse Trend: None -

i -.

l 3

3-E Safety System Actuations O Fort Calhoun Goa!

O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-GOOD V

1 j_

i 6 [0 O i O,O i O,C,O,C,O,C,C,C,O i

'88 '89 '90 Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of October 1991.

The 1991 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system L- actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None 1

4

- 12 Month Running Total SSA 10- -1000 O Critical Hours

-900

@ Safety System Actuations (SSA) 8- -800 g -700

.9 6- ,

-600 $

m 5  :

ax. , -500 28 y4- -400 j

. 3, h  :

F; -

g -300 2- ,

, -200 f lj g 2

j -100 3 7 0

0 -0

'88 '89 '90 ND-J-FMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASO 1989. 1990' 1991 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFINITION) -

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection

- Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for

- these safety systems are challenged.

l: The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory -

i- signal starts for DG-2. The first start occurred after a contrc' relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4, DG-2 started a second time when a i

breaker trip occurred during DG-1 breaker synchronization. DG-2 was not required to .

provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations.

I' L The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities

! and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Pro-gram. The goal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun.

Data Source:- Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None-l 5

i

(.

t- , _ _ _ . _ . _ _ __ - , _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . .

i

@ Monthly Gross Heat Rate

--k- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate 13- O Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goal 3

y- -O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile D

E 12-

@ Gooo 11-10270_ 10520 10304. m i

An  ? Y 1 m me m m " n O

10- j% A A L td' Mi #A M Wd @

Q G Q G O O O-Q-Q-C D

~

@i :~ #

Ja W #" ;Fis S  %

~

o^

h R1 & & 2

$  % g$g$

i G '30 O'i @3 Ed @ If7 ANs .!y i

i i _9 1 i i i i i i i i i 6 i i

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Ded1 GROSS HEAT RATE This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previous 1991 months, ti e year-to-date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 years.

The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,245 BTU /KWH during the month of October.

The year-to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,377 BTU /KWH. -

The above year-end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH) is the theoretical best gross heat rate that can be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station during 1991.

The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None l

l l- 6

\

O Monthly EAF Year-to Date EAF

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal

-D- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100% - -

F O O-CF M a

-n 80% -

fD-O -O - -

O es a CMO -O-O-O- O- - O -

O O-O-C O 56.6 60%-

~~"~

, A 9 40%~ <

s 1 GOGO '

'g 20%-

^

, y .

i i iO% , , , , , , , , , , , ,

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec01 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year-to-date EAF for 1991, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF was reported as 69% for the month of October 1991. This figure is low due to a forced outage that occurred from 9/12/91 to 10/6/91 when the station batteries were declared inoperable. Also during October: power was reduced from 100% to 10% from 10/18/91 to 10/19/91 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line; and power was nduced from 100% to 10% from 10/25/91 to 10/26/91 due to a steam leak from an ins.rument tap on the high pressure turbine. The EAF was not affected by the 70% power reduction during February, since the reduction was under management control and for rear s d economy (fuel savings).

The year to-date EAF was reported as 83%.

The EAF Fort Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.

The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%.

Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trends: None 1

7 l

, . . -- . .- .- . - - . . . .- . ~ . . - . . . - - - ~ . - - , .

l Fuel Reliability Indicator  ;

6- .!

-G- Industry Median Value l 0

o 4- V

-8 5 i R4 z 2- A, 1.5 1.5 n n C v. v m- vy v n

v n

v n

v v O

.. '.. u.

0 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr - May - Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91

.'88 '89. . '90 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRl) was reported as 2.46 nanocuries/ gram for the month of October 1991.

This iNPO indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate with a density correc-tion factor. The FRI value using the plant's actua! letdown purification rate was reported as 2.76 nanocuries/ gram, f

The October FRI was calculated using the data from October 12 through 17. These dates were chosen in accordance with INPO's requirements of steady state operation. Under these requirments, a plant must be in continuous operation for at least three days at a power level that does not vary more than + or - 5 percent. Plants should collect data for this indicator at a power level above 85 percent, when possible.

The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 10. The FRI values observed during Cycle 10

- were in the 20 to 80 nanocuries/ gram range (without the density correction factor which would -

make the FRI values larger). There have been no observable iodine spikes which would be

indicative of fuel failure during Cycle 13 operation.

The INPO industry median value of 1.6 nanocuries/ gram has been addsd to this graph.

A Fort Calhoun goal of 0.75 nanocuries/ gram will be utilized in 1992. Fort Calhoun recognizes .

the INPO 1995 U.S. industry goal of 0.5 nanocuries/ gram and will revise our FRI goal accord-ingly upon completion of the current FRl re-evaluation by INPO.

Data Source: Holinaus/Guliani Adverse Trend: None l

l 8

l

~ . - , . - . . . . . , _ ---

l Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man Rem) 400 -

O Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (75 Man Rem)

-o- Industry Upper 10 Percentile (166 Man Rem) 300 -

276 2J2 ,

,, GOOD 200- Y o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-c a a a

~

93.4  : 100 -

'pp .

c o o o o o o o o o o o l

fB ./

.. A .

0

~

'85 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

During October 1991,5.24 man-rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to-date exposure is 45.984 man rem.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75 man rem.

The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man rem per unit per year.

Data Source: PattersonAVilliams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 l

4

@ Cumulative Radioactive Oil Sent Fo/ Processing (in gallons)

O Cumulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing (in cubic feet) 12000- _ _ _

e000- - - -

' ~

, m i i F i F i F a F i F i F i F i F i i i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov oec91

- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried

-C) - Fort Calhoun Gon! For Waste Buried (4500)

-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile Waste Buried (3072)'

7500-6195 6000 - Q Radioactive Waste Buned This Month (in cubic feet)

1. 3'* 4500 - C C C C C C C C C C C O f' 3000 - 'O O O O O O- O O O O O O 1s00-

- 44 ., --

'89 '90 Jen91 Feb. Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec01 Year-end Total VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly, the cumulative annual total, and the year-end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the month of October 1991 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay in-volved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste; Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off-site for processing (gallons) 4,330.0-Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 10,338.0-Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month of October (cubic 1eet) 32.1 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) 992.5 Amount of solt' radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic f eet) 0.0 The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cubic feet.

The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987, and 1988.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) SEP54

-- Adverse Trend: None -

10-

@ 1991 Disabhng injury /lliness Frequency Rate X 1990 Disabkng injury / Illness Frequency Rate

--tr- 5 Year Average Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate 14-

-O-- Fort Calhoun Goal

-+- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1.2 -

GOOD 1- V 0.8 -

0.6 - 0.56 g '

O.39' * 'A O 0.4- -

y,,

-j'-h.m---C, C C ,

.-l - -

.; O 0.2 - ,

y

0 0

s

.o.

, e , x

.o.

~

r-fL '

i i

'~

l- C i j, -

" 'f(h

^

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT R ATE)

This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury / illness rate in column form.

The 1990 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average of tne corre-sponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate are also shown.

There were no (zero) lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in Octo-l ber. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1991 is two.

l l The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0.

l l Y_ tar Year-End Rate

, 1988 1.6 l

1989 0.4 1990 0.5 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse .end: None SEP 25 & 26 11 l

e Thermal Output

-O- Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goat

-= Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit 1500-

'-"**% $$%. Niy}$V g

y > wa ut g

+

-fganWN $gWM M4PM Mi

"#$i&*R$Ufidp2?TNf?

khkkh khh

• ?! @ @ p k #

=

m g&t  ;&. wpsgw%

y m g s@ if8 gg

) g$jigp9%

j@900-

?

.g%

L r F.? J @a4*M  ? Si g.m,awggglpd

$

• if :

[s.,

g. g

!5 ef t y , + 4 ,  ;

~tt) . h: <n.

. . 9_ $

60 -

<~*Jjg i l  ?" , ..

~ ' '

WR - 7% C ~

300-

' ~ *

' %- wEftY ~ ykpW ' 84%f ~

n sa dk A% *\ $$r "4' ~.~ yhdl$Epy . +

d

. /. ifMsgyb. Eh ei y- ,

N n

- m., :d nmnn n ik&M 3Mktke 1 3 5 7 9 11 = 13 - 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during October 1991, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.

Thermal output was zero in early October due to a forced outage which occurred when the station batteries were declared inoperable.100% power was attained on 10/17/91.

On 10/18/91 power was reduced to 10% due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line. On 10/22/91 100% power was attained. Again on 10/25/91 power was reduced to 10% due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbine.100% power was attained on 10/29/91.

Full power operation is anticipated thru January 31, t 992 to ootain the burqup window

-for Cycle 14 design parameters.

l Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source) y Adverse Trend: None 12

1

, ,I,

2-

-+-- Equipment Forced Outage Rate f

- 1.8 -

i 1.6 -

1.4 -

- 1.2 - GOOD y

0.8 -

0.53 ._ 0.6 -

0.4-i 0-a 0.13 h

'88 - '89 i

1'O.2-90 i 0 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS The equipment forced outage rate for 1. a reportir g month is 0.76.

An equipment forced outage due to the station batteries being declared inoperable was Carried into October, in addition, two forced outages occurred during the month of

- October: cn 10/18/91 the generator was taken off line due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line; on 10/25/91 the generator was taken off line due to -

- a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbine.

One equipment forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991. The outage was required to replace failed potential transformers (pts). These pts convert 345 KV -

to 120 V for use'in the breaker synchronization circuit.

One equipment forced outage occurred in the month of January .1991 due to the De-cember CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January.-

Data Source; Monthly' Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

L Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecutive months of declining performance.

13 P

~ - u ,. _,sm..- ., . .-- . . - . - - 4

. . . _ - . -- ~ - . - . ..-. - . . . - - - - .... - . - - - --. - -.

' [

Operations 1991 Budget ($ Million) 1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million)

'80-

@ 1991 Revised Budget 40- ;W '

20- )

0 Jan Feb- Mar Apr May .Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

~

Maintenance 1991 Budget ($ MHlion) 20-  :

.1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 15- @ 1991 Revised Budget 10-5- .f

=

-0 -

Jan Feb Mar Apr - May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year-to-date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.

~

The December Bar Graph represents the revised year-end budget due to budget revi--

sions primarily reflecting the refueling postponement for Cycle 13. The revised year-

end budget for Operations was 58.3 million dollars. - The revised year-end bJdget for Maintenance was 12.7 million dollars.

The budget year-to-date_for Operations was 57.0 million dollars for October while the actual cumulative expenditures through October totaled 44.9 million dollars.

The budget year-to-date for. Maintenance was 18A million dollars for October while the -

' actual cumulative expenditures through October - ,;aled 6.4 million dollars.

Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

AdverseTrends: None l

14

1000-

Documents Scheduled 'or R9 view

! Documents Reviewed 800-

--V-- Overdue Documents l

i Goo -

400 -

200 - 4 i  ? -

o -

Nh h =

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During October there were 18 document reviews completed while 40 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of October, there were two document reviews overdue.

During the month of October there were 12 new or renamed documents reviewed.

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 l

l 1

15

1

@- Number of Failures /20 Demands -M-- Trigger Values for 2o Demands O Number of Failures /So Demands T Trigger Values for So Demands D Number of Failures /1oo Demands --

Trigger Values for 100 Demands GOOD 6- V 5 5 7 Y Y Y Y "

V V V V V 7 4 4 4 4- - - -

3 3 3 3 3 _ _

! i > j 22 s 2 2 2 s

2 t 2 2 . 22 22 22 ,

22 22 "

2- 7- -  ; - - ; - x - 1 -- - ,-  : -- -

7- .

? i h  ? $ ,

g 11 -

j -

)

y -

r r .

~ .

$  ; g , o z 1 o- %%- '

o k. o f

o o

o o

o h $

);

I ,-h .

i Nov9o Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Gep Oct91 EMERGENCY DIESEL' GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at '

the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-

ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and in3dvertent starts, includir.g all start-only demands .

and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load-run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load run that is a result of a realload signal, a load-run test. expected to carry th? plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test m which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini-mum of one hour and to be loaded with.at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).

The demand failure which occurred during the month of August for DG-2 was due to a seal failure on the Jacket water pump.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 16

O DG 1 Failures /25 Demands l 5 DG 2 Failures /25 Demands 5- O Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands / Fort Calhoun Goal 4- C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3-2 2 2 2 2- .

kh hl h m 7:

4 l~

h a

f e

f

+

s M R 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 1 0 0 0 E 6 i i i i 4 i i i i i i Nov90 Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load-run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 l

failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.

It must be empilasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

l Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on i

the unit.

t Diesel Generator DG-2 has experienced two failures during the last 25 demands on the

unit. An air damper roll pin failure occurred in July 1991, and a seal failed on a jacket water pump in August 1991.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 17 l

E Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailability O Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailability G unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability O Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability b

f 120- _

~ '

[ 60-  ;

- 40- 3 C

g Jan91 i

Feb i

Mar i i May i i i i i i i i Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 91 E Cumulative Hours of DG 1 Unavailabihty from 7/1/91 to 8/31/91 O Cumuistav. Hours ce oG-2 unavsiiabihty from 7/ii91 to a 3i/9i O Cumulative Hours of OG.1 Unavailab hty from 9/1/91 to 10/31/91 O Cumulative Hours of DG 2 Unavailab.hty from 9/1/91 to 10/31/91

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (43.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of unavailabihty per diesel generator) k so-60-g4o. ni O O- C> -- O

% 20- '***

O  ; , , , ,

Jul91 Aug Sep Oc Nov Dec91 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator orovides a monthly illustration of diosel generator unavailability for 1991.

The top graph siiows tne diesel generator planned and unplanned unavailable hours for DG-1 and DG-2 for each month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of un-availability for each diesel generator from July through August and during September and October 1991.

The Fort Calhoun goal of 43.8 unavailable hours per DG for the last four months of 1991 is based on the 1990 INPO industry median va' ior diesel generator unavailable hours.

The 14.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of DG-1 unavailability and 18.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> of DG-2 unavailability for the month of October were attributable to planned maintenance activities.

The 31.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of unplanned DG-2 unavailability in August were the result of two sepa-rate events. On August 7, during surveillance testing, DG-2 failed to crank on the first attempt. On August 26 - 27, DG-2 was inoperable due to the failure of a jacket water pump seal.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 18 l

l

l 400-h August 1991 Outstandin; MWOs O Septembs.1991 Outstanding MWOs O October 1991 Outstanding MWOs 300-200-4 Y

100-ar /

0

'I ' ' ' ' ' '

i i i i i 0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6 9 Months 9-12 Months >12 Months

/

AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE) _

This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Sourn 3: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Ncne 19

400-350- M August 1991 @ October 1991

~

-' September 1991 250- .

[h: ,

200- '//' '

hk

• /r gi 9

150- [#:

/

]

gg 100- ,

'/f $% ..,

'/r : chi ,[/, -

' pk @f 50 - (( $Q ,9;. @

/4WS j& @ M .z Er 0-w @% - wm ; E:,y ; g .x a

; q Total Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > MWOs 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

Dath Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 20

=

Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 80%- -

-G- Industry Upper Quartile 60%-

GOOD C O O O O O O O O O O O

'40%-

. 20%-

1 0%

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percently of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than *hree months old at the end of the reporting month.

The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greaterthan three months old at the end of October was reported as 20.5%.

The industry upper quartile value'for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 l_

months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper'

! quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.

L ~ Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 21

Ratie of Preventive to Total Maintenance

-O- Industry Upper Quartile (57.7%)

A 80%-

d un Goal M GOOD 70%-

78 B . y C-8 y B B 60%-

40%-

,' 30% -

20%-

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the ratio of completed non outage preventive mairnenance to total completed non outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 47.3% in October. The values for this indicator have decreased during September and October 1991 due to a greater empha-sis being placed on comp!stion of MWO work (see p. el for the " Corrective Mainte-nance Backlog Grater Than 3 Months Old" indicator) during the battery outage.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.

The industry upper quartilo value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7 %

^

Data Source: Patterson/Schmaz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Based on three consecutive months of declining periormence, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 41 22 l

4%- PMvontivo Maint <coce items Overduo

-O-- Industry Upper Quartite

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 3% -

GOOD l 2%- I V

P O O O O O O O O O O O O 1%~

0%

Nov90 Dec Jar' Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventiv6 maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro-gramr require.

During October 1991,1599 PM ltems were completed. All PMs were completed within the allowable grace period.

The Fort Calhoun goalls to have le. than 1.2% preventive maintenance items over-due. The industry upper quartile for p ventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%

The Fort Calhoun Station is currently pt iorming in the industry upper quartile for this indicator, Data Source: Patterson/ Linden (Managcr/ Source, Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 23

O Number of C. R. Instruments Repairable On Une 50 Total Control Room Instrurnents Out.of Service

-O- Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of Service lastruments e_ -O- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out of Service Instruments I

_ _ _ 1 30- _  ;

V,M 20- Q T E &'N p' g -

h - -

M -

o -

h a-q

-o. -

c  :

M

' ,i q@s M M o$

10- / f f $ .; g g g d -

O - -

dj 'Q h d@fy 5 W # '"4 is d# d# EO --

di -

6 -

d - - -

0- , ,

w %re& n- > , te ik- m e a-- w-i Nov90 Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May .Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 NUMBER OF OUT.OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on-line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 25 out of service control room instruments at the end of October. A plant outage is required to repair 5 of these 25 control room instruments.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 15 out of service control room instruments.

The industry upper quartib value for the number of out of service control room instru-ments is 7.

Data Source: Patterson/ Adams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None l

24.

80% -

Maintenance Overtime 70%- --H- 12 Month Average GOOD i 609'r

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal for Non Outage Months j 1r 50% -

40%-

30%-

C O O O O O- O O O O O O 20% - m s, u

10%-

~ ,mx

, o

,m 0%

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May A .i Jul Aug Sep Oct91 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect io normal hours was reported as 15.2%

during the month (;f neber 1991. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 8.5%.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the percentage of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25% for non outage months and 50% for outage months.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 25

15-D Open irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O Closed irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O Procedural Noncomphance irs (Maintenance) 10-l l

l 5- ,

3 3 3 2 2 22 2 2 111 ,

1 1 1 7 0 0 - 0 000 000 000 000 000 05 00 i i i i i  ! 4 i i e 4 i Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance Incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to the use of precedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-pliance cause codes.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 26

800-O Open MWOs -O- Fort Cahoun Goal 600-C O O O O O Or O O O 400-348 302 293 289 287

,n a b 7 m om 281 rg g/>

2 g

200- .

.' . EM@ [

y' '

V:%, . ..

Ik 9%

~

,  ?

O

- ^ '

4 4 4 i i i i 4 i I i i Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91

-MAINTEN ANCE WORK ORDER B ACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE) l This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.

The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.

l l Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) f Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 27

Completed Scheduled Activities (EM)

-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80% - C\ Q- J O O O O O O O O /N O

'60%

8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL Malt 4TENANCE)

This indicator shov/s the percent of the number of completed maintcnance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities Week 1 77 %

Week 2 70%

Week 3 85%

Week 4 81 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager /S >urce)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33

+ ,

28

- Cornpleted Scheduled Activities (PE)

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100%-

80% - C O v O O O- O O O O-- O 60% -

40%

8/2 8/9 8/16 - 8/23 8/30 97 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 74 %

Week 2 78 %

\Veek 3 80*4 i Week 4 71 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 29

B

- Completed Schaduled Activitios (GM) ,

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80%- -C O w O O O O O '

60% -

40%

8/2 (1/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as ,

compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortino Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities ,

Week 1 54 %

' Week 2 62 %

Week 3 53% '

Week 4 65%

- Data Source: .. Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 30

,~, .

, _ . . _ _ - _ _ . _ _ ~ . _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . . . _ _ . _ _ . ._.____._-___.__i.

D , npleted Scheduled Activities (MM)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal l

100%-

80% - C O O O O O O O O 60% -

40%

8/2 8/9 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/14 9/21 D/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 PERCENT OF COMP' ETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICA!. MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as

compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical l Maintenance. Maintenance activities hclude MWRs, MWOs, STe, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

1

( Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 76 %

Week 2 81 %

Week 3 70 %

Week 4 81 %

l Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 31 i

Completed Scheduled Activities (IC)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100% - l 1

h l 80% - C O O O v O O - -O O O --C O O l

60% -

40%

8/2 6/0 8/16 8/23 8/30 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning instrumenta-tion & Control. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, '

and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

_ Recortino Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities Week 1 87%

Week 2 91 %

Week 3 88%

Week 4 83 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 32

3 3-

@ Number of Misted STs Resutting in LERs 2-

, 1 -.

2 /

' ~~

O O O O O O O O O O O O O i i iO , , , , , , , , , , , ,

'89 '90 Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yehrly totals for the indicated years.

During the month of October 1991, there were no missed STs that resulted in LERs.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

I Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 l

[

33

4 E Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures O Suspected NPRDS Component Failures

-A-- Total NPRDS Component Failures 10-8 7 7 g

,6 0 4 4 4 3

4 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures -

is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed

~

NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.

During October 1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS ccmponent failures.

The industry average for confirmed NPRDS component failures is 10 per month.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

(

34

_ _- _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ .._. - ._ _ __ _. _ . _ ___._

15- -*- Components With More Than One Failure

--X- Components With More Than Two Failures 10-GOOD V

5- - -

X X

- M X >!

N -

0 \ m Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 MAINTENANCE EFFE.CTIVENESS l The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-i tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in an eighteen month period should l

indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to the Sep-tember and October 1991 data. The data for September 1990 through August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval.)

i During the last 18 reporting months there were 11 NPRDS components with more than 1 tailure, 4 of the 11 had more than two f ailures. The tag numbers of these compo.

nents are CH 1 A, CH-1B, CH 10 and RC-4.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 35

20- l Calculated Check Va!ve Failure P3te per %Ilion Component Hours  ;

l Industry Check Valvt Failure Rate per fMlion Component Hours 15-

--O- Fort Ca!houn 1991 Goal (2.00 E 6) l l

10

- 10-O GOOD

, f-5-

5 A 0 0 k j g - iQ -

m v

m v

m v g

, 0 ' N

'89 '90 flov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 Check Valve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve fa: lures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous two years, are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporiing month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

For July 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.14 E 7 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.85 E 6. At the end of October, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of zero.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00 E 6.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 36

. . - _ _ _ - - . = . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ - -~ _ --_

Secondary System CPI

--i- Secondary System CPI Limit GOOD

--C>- Fort Calhoun Goal ( 45) 1.5 -

-O- Industry Upper Ouartile V 1- l l l l  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ; l- +

1 0.3s o.34 0.5 - M OM7 l i

gg e 1 0

o a

W Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 200-175- --+(-- Hours Chemistry is Outsida OG Guidotinos 146.1

'80~  !

125- GOOD l 100- p 75-50-25-0 ,; ,, h ,

'90 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul . Aug Sop 91 ,

I SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY

a ha graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance index (CPI),is calculated up ,1e following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, ,

wth n in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved taygen. The bottom graph shows the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPIis 0.45. The CPI was reported as 0.506 for the "

month of September. The industry upper quanile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1989 through Dec.1989. The CPIindustry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.

The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as zero hours for the

- month of September.

The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting month due to

. the time needed for co!!9ction and evaluation of the station chemistry data.

Data source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None -

37

.__ _ - . _ Jh . . . L. _i .. J_ l_,..E u_ _ __._ _ ,- ~ ,._ _ . _ _. _ _ . .-.-_ _ _,_..

4 10%-

-%- Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit aboun Goal 8%-

6%- _

GOOD ,

y 4%-

2% .

C C C C C C C C C

/4 . ,

d ,9A , 0% ,

h m-m n 89 ~ '90 Oc190 Nov- Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit Indicator tracks the primary system chemistry per'ormance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.

100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This indicator is  :

one month behind the reporting month. l i The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2%.

r .

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0% for the month of September.  !

A plant shutdown and start up in September 1990 and a plant outage in November /

December resulted in a' hlgher percentage of hours out of limit.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None L

.38 H..._.-..._.i......_-.-__.-._._.._-~,._____.,__._-__-..._._,..__....--_..._-

. .-.- _ . - . . . ~ ..-. - - .-. - --- - - -

- . _ _ _ _ - . - - - ~

10- -

M- Auxiliary System (CCW) Chemisiry Hours Outside Station Limits 9_

D- Industry Upper Quartile '

8-y 7-J 6-  ?

5- Y 4- -

3-C C C C C C C Dd-D-- O C C 2-i 1-0 0 );  ;(

o  ;; , ;; ,  ;, , ); , ;; ; ); , g; ) ,  ;; ,. .,

89 '90 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar /,pr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the

. monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemisty indicatoris one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was. reported as zero hours for the month of September.

The hdustry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

. Adverse Trend: None t

4 39 a- w---rn-, ,,-e4 .-w.w,,,---mes w- -, a.%,g-s--,wr-- -- ,,e,,,-,-,w-m -e,ww, -r y. w, w---,- m-y--- w w.e ----.e- ,,, - w-w rrg w y gy--i , mm y gw si-,, ir ri g, - - g -y--,,wsiiry x Number of Instruments Out of Service i.

--(>- Fort Cathoun Goal 7

7- -

6 6 6 6 6- . ,---. , ' --C C C C y; O M; O--  % O w '& 3?e y

5-  !

i  ; - i 3 w & 2 4~

' /'

'$ f9j J'

-'49  %

3-  :

I 1 d b '

h &

%l J'

', k ll i L 2- , .::

[j -

l { g,f , -

l l

g -

j . -

j  :

c:

1- -

'; :e -

.M .: -

i: :

5 '

. E 3 "

S # .;

O I i i i i 4 i i 4 i i i Nov00 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF SERVICE This indicatcr shows the total number of it' line chemistry system instruments that are out of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).

At the end of October there was a total of 4 in line chemistry instruments that were out-of service. Of these 4 instruments,2 were from the Secondary System and 2 were from PASS.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system mstruments that are out of service has been set at 6. Six out of service chemistry instruments make up 10%

of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator. ,

Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None l 40 l

l

@ Total Waste Produced (Kilograms;

- Federal & State Monthly Umit (Kg) 1000- l i

800 -

600 -

i~

400 -

00 -

144.5

/w/ 70.4 i

% 4 e 9.7 i i i 15 i

4,9 i

15 i

0 i

0 i

0 i

i Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May - Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non halogenated haz6rdous waste, t

halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous vaste produced.

During the month of October,0.0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste was ,

produced 0.0 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was producad, and 0.0-kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.  :

Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: Nonc 41

._. _ _l-_ _ _._.-__._. ._ _.__ _ _..._-___..-- -. _ ...._.__._. . _ .._ . .. ,,..__ ..,_. .

~

- - . - . . = - - - - - - . . . - . - _ - . . . - . - - - ~ . -

5000-OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Umit 4000-O Hir.."est Exposure for the Month (mRom)

@ Highest Exposure for the Quaner (mrem) 3000-E Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) 2000-1079 October 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE i

During October 1991, an individual accumulated 183 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month. ,

The maximum individual exposure to date for the fourth quarter of 1991 has been 183 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1991 has been 1,079 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year.

Date Source: Patterson/ William.e (Manager / Source)

_ Adverse Trend: None 42 .

,. - . ~ . .- - , - . . - - . - , . .- ..- -. _ ,.._ - - - - - .. . - , .

237 250 -

7e O Monthly Personnel Contaminations GOOD Cumulativa Personnel Contaminations 200-

)

y -O-- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (90)

-O- Industry Upper Ouartile (129) 157  ; ,j

,, 150-i q C C C C C C C C C C C C

, 1' 3

100-O O O O O O O O O O O O

, 50-l I '" " i , 0 , , , , , , , ,---, , ,

'89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 51 contaminations have occurred during 1991.

There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contam! nations in 1990.

The 1991 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 90.

The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 43

100% - Decontaminated Auxiliary Building' Radiation Controlled Area

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal (nonautago months) 90%-

/

C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80%-

A 70%- -

GOOD 00%-

50% --

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator (formerly titled " Decontaminated Auxiliary Building") was revised in June 1991 to include the new Radwaste building and the areas of the C/RP building that will be considerad Radiologically Controlled. The graph shows the percentage ot the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated auxiliary building (non outage months) and a goal of 75%

decontamlnated auxillary building (outage months).

At the end of the reporting month,89.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated.

l l Date Source: Patterson/Gundal (Manag er/ Source) l Adverse Trend: None SEP54 l

I l

44 1.

10-6- C Number of identified PRWPs 6-4 4- -

h:Gg 3 h$i FA

%e .m 2- P W 1 1 1 1 g  :

1 -

0 O

h--- ,

0 ,e, 0 .

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identif;ed through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports.

The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountabikty for their workers' radiological performance.

During the month of October 1991, two PRWPs were identified.

Data Source: PattersonAVilliams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP52 45

@ Total Number of Hot Spots D Number of Additiona! Hot Spots identified 75 -

65 65

- 63 g $ 5 53 53 53 54 54 54 55 g g g

,,. ,. :c x y w 50- d

h.  %: $ fj g y $

1  :$ lj g $ g $ 3 3 $3 'I 3 3 {3 'j, $3 O O l f lI f,4j] 0 3

.  ?'b S

b .x: $

.c w s $ w

z

z & x

$ $, :  :$ p$! y$ $ f' ": 3,! E 25- W ' -  : '

M 'f' $ h-

• k

~

) . $j $ if $ Tji

(' l L fj $ .$ $ $

10 'pj  :

.j * *

,i n #

f'.

{'s x

10 z

s u

& 'g z z O i , i , , ,

, , , i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation.

A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

ALARA personnel conducted an in-depth survey of the entire auxiliary building during the month of August. During October two hot spots were eliminated and no new hot spots were identified .

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 40.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 46

@ Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 800- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies)

- Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) 600~

GOOD 465 Y ll ;. 400-m

1{ C O O O O O- O O O O--C O a

id 164  ;";-

200-

p. ,g; jyp -

0- ,-

i i ,-

i i i , i , , , , , ,

'89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 through June 30,1991. A total of 42.2 curies have been released to the environment during this time.

The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 340 curies for this indica-tor.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Dat? Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 47 i

11

O Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged

^"""" "

300-231 228 175 200-C O O O O O O O O O O O

.E GOOD 100- b Y 26.2 g 4.8-8.3~2.3.sM 1 i i e i i i i e i i i i i i i i

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 p40000-8

, y 30000-

! 7:i g20000-C

@10000-o 2370 29104 B00 3360 3750 3010

5 ' I " I'l M 0- i i i i i i i 6 i i i 1 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1991 through June 30,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 70.3 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 225 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 19.2 million gallons from January through June 1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liouid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 48

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ - a

Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does nounclude l 30- System Failures) GOOD l 25- _

20- V 15-10-

~

f%

_ ~ -

0 i i i i i i i ,

i i i i Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul AJ Sep OcG1 Secunty System Failures GOOD 120-9 80-N 40-0 , , , , , , , , , , , i Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep OcG1 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Secunty) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first chart depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents con-cerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs); Security Badges; Secunty Key Control; and Access Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning secu-rity system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of October 1991, there were 55 loggable/ reportable incidents identi-fied. System failures accounted for 53 (96%) of the loggable/reporable incidents, and 35 (66%) of these were environmental failures. The two loggabte security incidents involved two lost / unattended security badges. The increase in environmental f ailures was primarily due to poor weather conditions during the last week of the reporting pe-riod.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 49

• M Secunty RerorVLog incidents July 1991 O Security ReporVLog incidents August 1991

[ Q SecurityI oorVLog incidents September 1991 0 Secunty Report' Log incidents October 1991 i kOOD ~

~

4 ,g Jan'91 6

" ( - -;. . jq -

F eb '91 0 P ~, I Mar '91 2

" V Apr '91 3

[ w May '91 1 vun'91 1 y ...} Jul '91 2 Aug'91 1 Sep '91 4 Oct '91 2 3

72 '

1 ;Ih 1 0 0 0 0 0 ,j. { _ .

0 0 0 0 0 p- ;l 0 i i i i LDVs Badges Key Control Access Control hi' SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator now shows the number of incidents enncerning the tollowing items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles s. 's), Security Bad;;3s, Access Control and Authorization, and Security Key Control.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

~

Adverse Trend: None SEP SB 50 l

.e -

sr . mm am n

i l

50- ,

Environmental Failures D Failures 40-GOOD 30-26 V

20-11 10- 9 5

n~ 2 W q 0 0 l_ j 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 i i i i Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equip. Doors Card Readers SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicatur shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Failures, Alarm systeras and CCTV failures are now divided into two c airgories: environmental failures and failures as defined in the perft,rmance indicator definitions.

Number of incidents: September '91 October '91 System Failures Env Failures Failures Env. FaHures FaHures Alarms 7 9 9 5 CCTV 18 .- 26 0 Ccmputer NrA 3 N/A 2 Search Equipraent N/A 3 N/A 0 Door Hardware N/A 11 N/A 11 Card Reader N/A O N/A O Totals 25 28 05 18 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Managor/ Source)

Adverse Treno: None SEP 58 51

Au L .

Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 9%- -O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8%- GOOD 7%- ,

6%- ( s 5%-

4%- -

/ 7

^

C O O O O O O 3%-

2%-

s 1%-

0*/

NovS3 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON OUTAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the percentage of open, non-outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non-outage mainte-nance items.

There was a total of 780 open, non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 8 of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 3.5% of the total number of open, non-outage MWOs awaiting parts.

Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 52 l

l

30-25-

- Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Million) 20-15-10-5-

0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the For: Calhoun Station at the end of October was reported as $13,805,326.

Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Mr. nager / Source) s Adverse Trend: None

- Spars Parts issued ($ Thousands) 500-400-300-200- /

100-0 , , , , , , , i i , , ,

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 SPARE PAdTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during October totaled $242,735.

Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 53

_ ._ _ . . ~_ ~-

Inventory Accuracy

--O- Fort Calhoun Goat (98%)

100% -

G C C 95% -

90%

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 INVENTORY ACCURACY '

This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.

During October 1991,1112 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 1112 line items counted,4 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of September was reported as 100% The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 98%

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

% of Pick Tickus Generated 7*/. - When Parts are not Available, G%. etc.

6

_4 -- O - Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-

2%- C C C O- --O C C w C 1%-

0%

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 i

STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated when the amount of parts requested is, equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available.

l During October, a total of 1452 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1452 Pick Tickets generated,34 Pick Tickets (2.3%) were generated when the amount of oarts requested was equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts were not available.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 2%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 54

e- -l'

2% -

- % of Total Purchases that are Expedited

-O . Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (0.5%)

.1%-

o o e o o o -c A. o o 0% , , , ., , , , , , , , ,

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May . Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES .

This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the toial number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During October, there was a total of 326 purchase oiders generated. Of the 326 pur-chase orders generated, none (0) were expedited purchases.

The Fort Calhoun 1991_ goal for this indicator is 0.5%.

Date_ Source: -- Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) -

Adverse Trend: None 1

55

. . . - .__ . _ _ , _ _ _ . _ _ = . _ . _ ._. _ _. _ . . . . _ . . - _ _ _ _ .

100-80 -

60-AO' 26 28 o - '- '-- -- -

'- -- -s i V&Diu /N> uni 3 Service invoices COE Invoices Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This Indicator.shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of October 1991 Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None Percentage of Material Requests for issue with the Request Date the sarne as the Need Date 100% -

80% -

A ~

60%-

40%- \ _

20%-

0%

Nov91 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING l

.This indicator shows the percentage.of material reouests (MRs) for issue with their request date the same as their need date compreu to the total number of MRs for issue for the reporting month.

During the month of October, a total of 1452 MRs ware eceived by the warehouse. Of the 1452 total MRs received by the warehouse,634 MRs (36.8% of the 1452) were for issue with their request date the same as their need date.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None .l l

56 l

600 -

- Total Modification Packages Open 500-l 425 425 400-337 i 300-

~

t 200 i

'88 '89 '90 Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar _ Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-ing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).

' Categorv Reoorting Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /in Progress 17 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 88 Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress -94

-Construction Backlog /In Progress 44 Design Encr. Uodate Backlog /in Progress 31 Total 274 At the end of October,40 additional modification requests had been issued this year.

and 25_ modification requests had been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Com-mittee_ (NPRC) had_' completed 155 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) had completed 141 backlog modification request reviews this year, Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

- Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Ncne 57 L

a

@ Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (RFO required for Removal)

@ Temporary Modifications >6 months old (Removable on line)

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modificatiens (0) 6-5-

4-3 3 3-p_

2 .h{f(f'{hjh{h{ 2 ;f,'f f$h;,f 2 2

'- {$$N [5b'I'!$!'!5 $bdI ;!sss::':': NYk? !!I!!!!!!!

s? W 9?ies,(ss,s,s,ps ,;

n 6 , , ,

mwy,(s,;::::::,s,: Edhw my :4,. ,,:,s:;-

v i v i v i August September October TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of ten porary modifications removable on-line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications.

The goal for this indicator was changed in August 1991 to be more indicative of Fort Calhoun's control and management of temporary modifications. There are currently 2 temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old. Both of these modifica-tions are 100% ready to be removed during the 1992 refueling outage. These are: Al-198 power supply failure alarm, and pre'sure indication for RW/CCW HXs. In addition, j at the end of October there were 2 tcinporary modifications installed that were greater l than six months old that can be removed on line. These were: handjack close of CCW/

l RW valves, which is awaiting an engineering evaluation currently scheduled for 12/6/91; and replacement of AC-191/192 valves wnich is awaiting valve receipt inspection (MWOs 91295 and 91296, scheduled for 1/6/92).

At the end cf October, there was a total of 25 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station.

14 of the 25 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 11 are removable on line.

In 1991 a total of 41 temporary modifications have been installed and all but 14 of those have been removed.

Data Source: Jaworskiffurner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 58

, m____. __._..-m_._ . _ _ . _ . _ _ . . . _ . . _ . . . _ _ . _ . - _ . _ . _ _ . _ . . -

- TotalNumb',rof Open EARS 200- ,

150- __

e 100- ,

50-0 Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 60 - @ DEN 0-3 months @ SE 0 3 months 50- @ DEN 3 6 months O SE 3-6 montns 40- O DEN >6 months E SE >6 months 30 -'

25 20- U g $) -jo 11 12 12 10- -7 -

5 $E

~}[M 4 5 5 01 300'1 -

4 g@ 00 i

ll h E 10 i

pm 0 p 1 1 i

Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4

-OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EARS)

The top graph shows the total number of open EARS at the end of the reporting month.

The bottom graph shows_the EARS by Design Engineering Nuclear or System Engi-neering responsibility and their age in months at the end of the reparting month.

There was a total of 113 open EARS at the end of October. Of the 113 total open EARS, 88 were Design Engineering Nuclear's responsibility,22 were System Engineering's responsibility, and 3 were Nuclear Projects' responsibility.

Data Source: Jaworr!6 Nan Osdel(Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Nont. SEP 62 59 us. -

. . - . _= -. - - - . , . . ~ . . - - - - . - . . - - . - .. -

- ECNs Backlogged in DEN

-+-- ECNs Opened During the Month

--V-- ECNs Completed During the Month 200 - --

'l 150 -

i 100 -

--Y

+

, 49

• O Nov90 'Joc Jan- Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS

.This~ indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting

--completion by DEN, the number of ECNs opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month.

. At the end of October 1991, there was a totcl of 182 DEN backlogged open ECNs.

There were 52 ECNs opened,.and 72 ECNs completed during the month.-

Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce -

, the backlog of_open ECNs. It is expected that the number of open ECNs will continue to -

decrease.-

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source)

- Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 i

60 a . _ . _ - -_ . - - _ _ _ _ -__ . .._ _ , . . _ _

O DEN - Engineering not complete System Engineering Engineering complete, MV*O not written Q Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but not complete 50- 46 46 44 4 0 --

30-

ggf w ,

30 .

20~ Nb -

5 10 7 11 (fydf '

10- ge g , 3 p 1 .; ;g,yyq ,

0 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 months ECN FACILITY CHANGES OPEN O DEN - Engineering not complete System Engineering Engineering oomplete, MWO not wntten Q Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but work not complete 90-60- 57

p. pl 6 2 II 9 5 10 O ,

0 - 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 months ECN SUBSTITUTE REPL A3EMENT PARTS OPEN Q DEN - Engineering not complete O Systern Engineering - Walkdown or confirmation not complete 50- 39 2 23 25 h[

0 IRjlgyyjg O '

7 3 A'N i 4 i 0 - 3 months 3 6 months > 6 months ECN DOCUMENT CHANGES OPEN ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of Engineering Change Notices

_(ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement Pans Open, and ECN Document

- Changes Open.

Data Source: Phelps/Puiverenti (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 61

p 4

5-1991 Recordable' Injury /lliness Frequency Rate 4.7

1990 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate

--6-- 5 Year Average Recordable injury /lliness Frequency Rate 4- 9 m

3.5 - Q 3.4 GOOD

$ 3.09-

'I 3- N 2.93 pg 2.73 2.64 V 2.5 - Mg 24 -

=,

- g ,

y; gm -

2- , ' ,

g ,- g_g w .

y ,

A 1.5 - gg. k: / @? -

Y [h / hkg h s g

' ~

! i ,

- 0.5 - / ??. ~

O d[ f ,

a ,.

w' Jan- Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1991 month'y,1990 monthly, and the Fon Calhoun Station 5 year monthly average of the recordable :.1 jury / illness cases frequency rates.

A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require currective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year to date basis.

. There were no'(zero) recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of Octo-ber. There has been a total of 12 recordable injury / illness cases in 1991.

~ Year Recordable Cases _ Year-End Rate 1988 11 2.6

-1989= 11 2.2 .

1990 .1 2.1 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year serage recordable injury / illness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicated.- SEP 15,25 & 26 62 -

50-6 @ Licensee Event Reports for October 1991 0 Personnel Errors Reported in LERs for October 1991 40-Cumulative Licensee Event F'eports

-+- Curnulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 29 30 -

21 s 2^

12 9

10-M i

7 7'

, f

$y R i

4 i 10 4,r' i , ,

% "1 4 i i i i R % ,

i i ,

'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb M,r Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Report:; (LERs) with event dates during the reporting month, the LERs attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both The year-end totals for the three previous years are a!so shown.

In October 1991, there were two LERs reported. One of these LERs was attributable to personnel error.

T here have been 21 LERs reported so far in 1991 and 8 of these LERs have been attributable to personnel error.

Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Nona SEP 1E 63

600- s37 558-aan._ O Actuai otvision Starting fn&&

400- FM~ I F ;::Syt . .,

O euinorizee Division starting i

. _ w yn A3; NMifisW

" 204 204 200- Mg l

' 0k? ^

,, so 52

%Re i j l Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL Th9 authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 24

-C}- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate

-- d - Prodtetion Engineering Division Tuinover Rate 10% -

, --O-- Nuclear Services Division Turnov9r Rate

a==s+*4~ ? R v

':::: y

~===-

J90 J90 A90 S90 090 N90 D90 J01 F91 M91 A91 M91 J91 J91 A91 S91 0 91 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD.

Division Turnover Rate NOD 3.2%

PED 5.4%

NSD 2.0%

Currently, the OPPD coiporate turnover rate is being reported cs approximately 4.0%.

This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four y ears.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 64

1 l

l 1

Total Requalification Training Hours

- E Simulator Training Hours 60-0 Non Requalification Training Hours 50- B Numberof Exam Failures 41

~40- -

7 30-  !: 28 I 24 9 22 ':

20- 18  ? 18  ;'.  :':

f:' ja- 7 .Ih 18 {:

.? 12 .,: ,9:

10- ((' .. );

8 ):h 8 '3:

4 4 4' v z '

4

/: Z 2 4 2

~

2 0

' ^

i. i i i i i i

. Cycle 911 Cycle 912 Cycle 912 Cycla 914 Cycle 915 Cycle 916 Cycle 917 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUAliFICATION TRAINING Tnis indicator, formerly titled "SRO and RO License Examination Pass Ratio", was revised in August 1991 to more accurately reflect training department procedures.

- This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and

. Division Manager lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance

Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

A'I.of the twelve car.d: dates passed the NRC Licensed Operator Requalification exami-na'.icns.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

- Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 65

4 O SRO Exams Administered 50- O SsO Exams Passed E RO Exams Administered 40- O RO Exaras Passed 30- T-

/

20-  : -- -

5  ;-

~

?

[ ,

gl ~

10- '

y -

)

i

/ A ... .  :. ,

f  !~ f I O i i i i i i 7 i >

i i i Nov90 - Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of October 1991, there were no internally administered SRO or RO exams taken.

Also during the month of October 1991, seven NRC administered SRO exams were taken and, unofficially, seven of these exams were passed in addition, seven NRC administered RO exams were taken and, unofficially, all of these exams were passed.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 66

O HotlinesInhiated 35-1 Q Hotlines Closed 30- @ Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks E hotlines Overdee > 4 Weeks 25-

~

20-15- ,

10- -

~ , - - ,

- t 4

~ ~ ~

5- , - - ;

l b,'

0 x

i Nov90 Dec i

Jan i

b Feb i

Mar i

J.

Ap; i

May

~

i

~L i.i Jun b

Jul Aug i

Sep i d Oct91 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.

_pptober 1991 Initiated Hotlines 7 Closed Hotlines 11 Hotlines O *rdue < 4 wks. 2 Hotlines Ov rdue > 4 wks. 5 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 67

=-..u.. + 44 a .A42 Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

@ General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

@ Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

6-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

e g Operations (1000 Hrs.)

I E 4- "

-y .. .

u

-c ,,,,

= . . ...

.]m y ,,..,

Q ?j  ;

~

2g:  :

giy -

?) w-kj E C,

] 2-w f

li?2

a 9

~

. e g ,:-

o - -

cu ,

s -

_ - =

p .

i i 4- i i i i i i i i i Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb _ Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS

~

This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-ments for the reporting . month. Due to a programming problem,information for the month of September 1991 was unavailable at the time of this report's publication.

This indicator is normally one' month behind the reponing month due m the time re-

quired for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT JULY '91 AUGUS).'9;

_ Operations 416 .371 Maintenance 519 509

'Jhcmistry and Radiation Protection 655 757

- Technical Suppor!- 141- 93 General Ernployee Training 357 520 Other 20 102 Total 2108 2352 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adv' erse Trend: None G8

O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

Il General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

@ Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

O Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

30-Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

, 25 - 5 Operations (1000 Hrs.)

Ei O

I y 20-E a

$15-o ..

IIE E'~ g .- ...-

j 3] 5 5~ 2 5 y- e & E n

L..

u

~

p = ..

T...

5- .

d e

1 9'*# -.

g -

0 , , , , , , , , , , , i Sep90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total numbec of student hours for Operations, t/.amtenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other Training conducted for tne Fort Calhoun Station. Due to a programming problem,information for the month of September 1991 was not available at the time of this report's pubiication.

Thic indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and eva:uate the data.

DEPARTMENT JULY '91 AUGUST '91 Operations 205C 1598 Maintenance 1351 1216 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1743 2135 Technical Suppon 367 202 General Employee Training 2322 4473 Other 100 424 Total 8239 10048 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 69 i

x 4

- TotalOJageMW0s 1000-

-*- MW0s ReadytoWork

~

' 0- Outage MWR Backlog

~

6N-l-

400 -

200 -

A.A 0

C U Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total r. umber of Maintenance 'Nork Orde'rs (MWOs) that have

~ been wntten over the past reporting periods for completion during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs that are ready for work (the parts for these

- MWOs are_ staged, the procedures are approved, and the paperwork is ready fer field use.) Also included is the number of outage Maintenance _ Work Requests (MWRs) which have been identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWOs Any MWOs written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator labeled Emergent MWOs. Approximately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during each of the previous two refueling outages. .l At the end of the reporting month, there were 985 total outage MWOs with 558 of these .

I MWOs ready to work and a backlog of 32 MWRs.

Additional data points wiil be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source) i Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 l

J 70

.- _. . . . - ~ -- . . - - _ - - . . - . . . - . . - . . . - . .~ ... - - .-

TotalOutage Modifications

--b- Mods With Planning Document Approved 40_ -O- Mods With Final Design Approved

-+- Mods With Construction Package Approved 30-20 -

10-0

/ "

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov .Dec Jan91 Feb - Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep = Oct Nov Dec91 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the number of med!!ications approved for planning (to determine feasibility) or for completion dur_ing the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage _(RFO). Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes availaute.

The current schedule for completion of the modification phases of the Cycle 14

-Refueling Outage is as follows:

LOutage Scope Freeze

• Oct.1,1990 Planning Documents Approved

• Feb 22,1991

Final Designs Approved

• Apr 24,1991 l Construction Packages Approved

• Jun 15,1991 Schedule incorporated

• Jul 26,1991 Material On Site

• Jul 26,1991 Construction Started Feb 15,1992 Construction Complete Mar 30,1992

-Acceoted by SAC - _

- Apr 10,1992

• Indicates milestones.which have n: t been changed as_ a result of the new January 1992 refueling outage ste.rt date. A forced outage after November 1991 could result in

- an early start date for the Cycle 14 RFO.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None- SEP 31 71

30- - Total 0utage Projects -

Projects with Preliminary Schedules Submitted -

40-

+ -

Projects with Detaild Schedules Submitted )

. 30-b 20- ^ ^ ^

4--f 10-0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun - Jul Aug Sep. Oct Nov Dec91 .

4

. OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the status of the projects which affect the scope of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The projects that do_not yet have preliminary schedules are Liquid Effluent Releases and Radiography, Additional data points will bc added to this indicator as information becomes available.

The schedule for tha Oycle 1_4 Refueling Outage projects is as follows:

All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct 1,~ 1990.:

All Projects Scheduled in Detail Jun 28,1991 -

Procedures Ready. Oct 26,1991 Parts Staged Nov 16,1991

- Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 72 i

.e.--+- .m.- .

.--m --.-___ , .. - . - - - . ,,_ y vv . , .-% ~

Violations per 1000 inspection Hours 9- --O-- Fort Calhoun Goal l GOOD 6- y 5 g s

3.7 b

2.6 3-lr

~

O 5 C C C C C C C

. j

, , ~, ,.0- , , , , , , , , , , , ,

'88 '89 '90 Oct90 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 1.01 for the twelve mc s from October 1,1990 through September 30,1991.

The Fort Calhoun Goalis 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours for 1991.

Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Based on three consecutive months of declining performance, an ad-verse trend is indicated.

73

O - Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours (12 month Period)

E Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours (1991 Only) g 4-8 3.61 I

.h 3.19 v

R 3-

.i 8

0 2.16 1.74 1.61

$ 1.44 1.51 1.52 3,47 g 1.28 1.3 g;-

p g 1,11 p, l  :-m y.; <

0.67 0 ,

-g i ,

RR ,

!W G ,

m cEl M i Fort Cooper River Commanche Wolf Arkansas South -Waterford

. Calhoun Bend Peak Creek One Texas COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1000 inspection hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period from

October 1,1990 to September 30,1991 and for the calendar year 1991 only.

The Fort Calhoun goal for 1991 is 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours, Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 74

ob

. A* 40

%~q>@&  ;,cs  % ,5 e%

\

N)/g//

v. '

V jy$9' IMAGE EVALUATION //g / [ ;[ ? ffj TEST TARGET (MT-3)

N ':['

~

p /),,f/p 5 '

,7

{?

%# 9

$  %<tq 1.0 it a B

$ $ HM l

,tl i.i [m 22 lH1 i!lp= 1.8 1.25

!t 1.4 1.6 11= li==

4 150mm >

4 6" - ->

6>%

e>yy,y'y b _ ,

+++% ag ;

s+ -

N r,

o- ms ,

v(t

. ~

& /

.e /

%:t& #A' o,,;-' //j['[ &(O c g '# V IMAGE EVALUATION a ';%

\)j// ';:. th? TEST TARGET (MT-3) [19 * %

, f y

+ s 1.0 20 "4'#

s.3 pm pn_n Il.1 L~ 1 % h~3S

- =

l- n ts l.25 1.4 l 1.6

==

4 150mm >

< 6" >

ep en%%, ++ sA+

4,;;g;l/,tj7>77,7 o%,7 m <3plg 4

/

va e

/ i A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

"v

'g A :-

,M ,b q

[O

'4 esv9 O h g ff) y, i'$$ +g IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3)

'/ / Nj5~/2%

///

j e v,{;f [ g!

9> gk r( f l \s'(p# %g'd

,.o ,=

r l:' I p3", @=22 1 =

biE?'!!s2.0 l,l { ' hms 'l I.8 I! ems l

1.25 1.4 '

l _1.6 4 150mm >

l 4 6" >

1 A

e> g~ y

. % ej # p;/4

+ sAo

,y/

7 0g;,/ - .

eqm@ gr

ft

-w,. 4 6 -Q . , e .,

aw

, O Nutrber of Violations During the Last 12 Months .

Q Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 50-27 26-21

, , . 20 18 14 12 12

~~""

3 -

15 33 33

@ to x .

9

, b bs M2 L, e -" 7 7 7 6

c. .: - _ _ . .di

~ ,

mi _

1 2

I i e a i i i e i i i

~ C#0 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND HCVs (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

- Tt s Cumulatve Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-

- lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator.

Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None -

75

1 l

• O Outstanding CARS That Are Modification Related

--A-- Outstanding CARS > Six Months Old a stan6ng Ns 200 - ,,

1 3

150 -

100 - '

50- A *

- -~1 ,

lwr a;; W - -

9 ,

Nov90 De0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),

g the number of outstanding CARS that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CARS that are modification related.

?

At the end of October 1991, there were 78 outstanding CARS,44 CARS that were greater than six months old, and 4 CARS that were modification related.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manner / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 76

. _ . _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . . . . . _ _ . . . ._____.m._. - _ - . _ _ - _ . _ __ ___

20 -

15 - -{"}- NOD Overdue CARS 10- 6- NOD CARS With Extensions Granted -

m A ,,

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb ' Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 25 -

-O- PED Overdue CARS 20 - --6-- PED CARS With Extensions Granted 15-10-rh - ri -

m_ _

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep itt91 6-5- -O-- Other Overdue C ARs

1. ~

- Other CARS With Extensions Granted 3-2-

w 5 4 C C i C C i u i h Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS Ttlis indicator shows the number of overdue CARS and the number of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization.

Overdue _ CARS Overaue CARS August '91 September '91 October '91 NOD 1 1 0 PED 1 0 0 Otners 0 0- 0 i lotal 2 1 0 Extended CARS Extencea CARS August '91 September '91 , October '91 NOD 4 2 3 PED 4 2 4 Others 1 0 2 Total 9 4 9 Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Tretid: None 77

1990 SALP Funct.

l Area CARS Signit. CARS NRC Viola LERs A) Plant Operations 62 0 2 10 B) Radiolog 28 2 0 0 Controls C) Maint/ Surveil. 180 8 6 4 D) Emergency 7 0 3 0 Preparedness E) Secuilty 26 0 5 3 F) Engr / Tech 172 5 3 12 Suppori G) Safety Assess) 29 0 0 0 Qual. Verit.

H) Ober 1 0 0 0 Total 505 15 19 29 1991 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signif. C ARs NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations 24(1) 1 1 3 (2)

B) Radiolog. Controls 7 0 2 0 C) Maint/ Surveil. 63 (8) 0 1 7 (1)

D) Emergency 16 0 0 0 Preparedness E) Security 5 0 4 1 F) Engr / Tech Suppor1 76 (4) 2 1 8-G) Safety Assess; 24 1 0 2 (1)

Qual. Verif.

H) Other 0 0 0 0 Tota' 215(13) 4 9 21 (4)

Note: ( ) indicate value for the reporting month.

CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs. g the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1990 and 1991, included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The numberof NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 78

t 9

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK OR- erator has been established batad upon the 1990 indus-DERS try med.an value provided by INPO.

This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding cor-rective non outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED Calhoun Staton versus their age in months. ARF'.

The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS includes the auxinary building, the radwaste building, and This indicator is dehned as the percentage of open, non. areas of the C/PP building. that is decontaminated based outage, maintenance work orders that are on hole awart. on the total square footage. This indicator tracks perfor-ing parts, to the total number of open, non outage, main- mance for SEP a 54.

tenance work crders.

DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEM!STRY HOURS OUTSIDE ACCIDENT RATE)

STATION LIMITS This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, system is outside the staton chemistry limit. The hours involving days away from work per 200,000 man hours are accumulated from the first sample exceeding the limit worked (100 man-years). This does not include contrac-until additona! samphng shows the parameter to be back tor personnel This indicator tracks personnel perf or-within limits. mance for SEP #25 a 26.

CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs. NRC VIO- DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)

LATIONS vs. LERs REPORTED The Document Review indcator shows the number of Provides a comparison of CARS issued, NRC violat cas, documents reviewed, the number of documents sched-and LERs reported. This indcator tracks performance for uied for review, and the number of document reviews SEP #15,20, & 21. that are overdue for the repo' ting month. A document review is considered overdue if the review :s not com-CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE plate within 6 months of the assigned due f ate. This indr Compares the Fort Calnoun check valve friture rate to cator tracks periornance for SEP #46.

the industry check vatve f ailure rate (tailures per 1 millon component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABIL-is three months behind the P1 Report reporting month. ITY This indicator tracks performance for SEP 843. This indicator shows the number of f ailures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die.

COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV sel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Staton. Also PLANTS shown are trigger values which correlate to a high level Provides data on volations per 1000 inspecton ,,,urs for of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have ob-Regon IV nucleai power plants, ta:ned a rehability of greater than or equal to 95% when the cemand f ailures are less than the trigger values.

CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER 1) Number of Start Demands All vahd and inadverteat THAN 3 MONTHS OLD start demands, including all start-only dem nds and all The percentage of tota 1 outstanding corrective mainte- start demands that are followed by load run demands, nance items, not requinng an outage, that are greater whether by automat:c or manua!initiaton. A start only than three months old at the end of the pered reported. demand is a demand in wh:ch the emergency generator is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator.

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA. 2) Number of Start Failures: Any f ailure within the emer.

TlONS (12 f tONTH RUNNING TOTAL) gency generator system that prevents the generator from The et,mulative number of volatons and Non-Cited Vo- achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as latons for the last 12 months. a vahd start f ailure. This includes any conditon identified in the course of maintenance inspectons (with the emer-DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT gency generator in standby mode) that definttely would This indicator shows the daily core thermal output as have resulted in a start failure if a demand had occurred.

measured from computer point XC105 (in thermat mega- 3) Number of Load-Ruri Demands: For a vahd load run watts). The 1500 MW Tech Spec limit. and the unmet cemand to be counted the load run attempt must meet portion of the 1495 MW FCS dai!y goal for the reporting one or more of the following enteria:

month are also shown. A)A bad run of any duraton that resutts from a real auto-mate or manua! ininaton.

DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY B) A load run test to satisf y the plant's load and duration This indcator provides monthly cata on the number of as stated in each test's specifications.

hours of diesei generator planned and unplannec un- C)Other special tests in whch the emergency generator availabihty. Tne Fort Calhoun goal for tne second ha'f of is expected to be operated for at least one hour while 1991 for the number of unavailable hours per diesel gen- loaded with at least 50% of its design load.

79

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

4) Number of Load.Run Faitures: A load-run failure tatens. Maximum generaton is the energy that can be should be counted for eny reason in which the emer. produced by a unft in a (iiven pered if operated continu.

gency generator does not pick up load and run as pre- ously at maximum capacay, dcted. Fahures are counted during any vahd load run  :

demands, EXPEDITED PURCHASES

5) Exceptions: Unsuccessful attempts to start or load ru, The percentage of expedned purchases whch occurred should not be counteo as vahd demands or tastures when dunng the reporting month compared to the htal number they can be attributed to any of the following: of purchase orders generated.

A) Spurious trips that would be bypassed in the event of an emergency. (

FORCED OUTAGE RATE B)Malfcncton of equipment that is not required dunng an This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that emerg ancy. the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared C) intr ntional termination of a test because of abnormal to the time planned for electrical generaton. Forced con 6 tons that would not have resulted in major diesel events are failures or other unplanned cond tons that gererator damage or repair, require removing the unft from serv ce before the end o' D) Malfunctions or operating errors which would have not the next weekend. Forced events include sta'1up failures p evented the emergency generator from being restaned and events imtiated while the un!t is in reserve shutdown and brought to load within a few minutes. (im . the unit is available but not in servicet E)A failure to start because a porton of the starting sys-tem was disabled for test purpose, if followed by a suc- FUEL RELI ABILITY INDICATOR cessful start with the starting system in as normal abgn. This indcator is dehned as the steady state primary cool.

m ent, ant 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contn-Each emergency generator failure that results in the gan- bution and normahzed to a common punfication crator being declared inoperable should be counted as rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been depastted on one demand and one f ailure. Exploratory tests dunng reactor core internals f rom previous defective fuel or is corrective maintenance and the successf ul test that 101 present on the surface of fuel elements from the manu-lows repair to venfy operabihty should not be counted as facturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous demands or failures when the EDG has not been de- uperations above 85 percent power for at least seven clared operable again. days. This INPO indsator uses an industry normahzed letdown punfcation rate. The FRI has also been calcu-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK- lated using FCS's actualletdown punfcation rate. These DOWN calculatons revealed that the use of the plant's actual

. This indicator breaks down the number of Engineenng rate would result in an approximate 45% increase in FRI Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design data.

Engineenng Nuclear (DEN) System Engineering, and The density correcten f actor is the ratio of the specific Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facihty volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature Changes open ECN Substnute Replacement Parts (540 degrees F, Vf - 0.02146) divided by the specific open, and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 tracks performance for SEP a62. degrees F at outlet of tne letdown cookng heat ex.

changer, Vf . 0.016204), whch results in a density cor-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS recten factor for FCS equa! to 1.32. This densny correc-The number of ECNs that were opened. ECNs tnat were tion factor a'fects both the INPO and Plant Specife FRis.

completed. and open backlog ECNs awarting completon by DEN for the reporting month This indcator tracks per- GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS-formance ior SEP #62. CHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Cunes of all EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITI. gaseous radcactive nuchdes released from FCS.

CAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 crnca! hours is the GROSS HEAT P ATE inverse of the mean time between forced outages Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal caused by equipment f ailures. The rnean time is equal to energy in Bntish Thermal Unrts (BTU) produced by the the number of hours the reactor is criticalin a pered reactof to the totat gross electrical energy produced by (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages the generator in kilowa 1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> (KWH) caused by equipment failures in that penod-HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The to*al amount (in Kilograms) of non-halogenated haz.

This indicator is defined as the rate of gross availab!e ardots waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other generation to gross ma;omum generation, expressed as hazardous waste produced by FCS each month.

a percentage. Available generaton is the energy that can be produced ff the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory hmi-80

1 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTM) that are MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS initiated, closed, and ovetue less or greater than 4 The number of Nuclear Plant Reliabikty Data System weeks for the indcated inore. A HTM is a training docu- (NPRDS) components with more than 1 failure and the j ment sent out for immediate review. The HTM should be number of NPRDS components with more than 2 f ailures j reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HTM dunng the last 12 months,  ;

I HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG GUIDELINES The number of corrective non outage mamtenance work Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters orders that remain open at the end of the reporting  ;

exceeding guidehnes during power operaton Power month. This indicator was added to the Pl Repon to eperation is det ned as greater than 30% power. The 13 trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work or-parameters tracked aie ste,i generator pH, cation con- dets as stated in SEP #36.

ductivity, boron si!ca, chloride, suif ste, sodiu a, f eed wa-ter pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and MAINTENANCE WIN ORDER BREAKDOWN condensate pump discharge dissolved oxynen. This indicator is a !- 4. own of corrective non outage maintenance work c . ' <. by severaicategones that re-IN LINE CHEMISTRYINSTRUMENTS OUT OF SER. main open at tne end of the reporting month This indca-VICE tor tracks maintenance pe formance for SEP #36.

Total number of in hne chemistry instruments that are out of-service in the Secondary System and the Post MAINTENANCE OVERTIME Accident Samphng System (PASS). The % of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This ine'udes OPPD personnel as well as INVENTORY ACCURACY contract oersonnet.

The persntuge of hne items that are crv;nted each month by the warehouse which need count adjustmentt MATER:AL REQUEST PLANRilG Tne percent of meenal requests (MRs) for issues with INVOICE BREAKDOWN ueir request cate the same as thee coed date compared The number of invoces that are on hold due to shrff ofe, to the total number of MRs.

COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS The totalmaximum amount of radiaton received by an This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quiz- individuat person working at FCS on a monthly, quarterly, zes and exams that are administered and passed eacn and annual basis-rnonth. This indcator tracks training performance for SEP #68. MWO OVEMLL STATUS (CVCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAIN- The totai number of Mamtenance Work Orders (MWCs)

ING tnat have been written for completon dunng the Cycle 14 The total number of hours of training given to each crew Refuehng Outage, MWOs whch are wntten aber the stan dunng each cycle. Also provided are the simulator train- of the Refuehng Outage will be labeled Emergent MWOs-ing hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), Also shown is the : cmber of MWRs which have been the number of non requaldcaton training hours and the identified for the Cyde 14 Ref uehng Outage, but have number of exam f a; lures. not yet been converted to MWOs. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #31.

LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator displays the volume of hauid radoactive The number of radiologcan hot spots which have been waste released from the radioactive waste mon: tor tanks, identied and documented to exist at FCS at the end of to inclues releases through the plant blowdown if radio- the repo* ting month. A hot soot is a sma!!locahzod active nuclides are cetected in the blowdown system- source of radiaton. A hot spot occurs when the contact The curies from all releases from FCS to the M.ssouri dose rate of an item is at least 5 times the General Area Rtver are also shown. case rate and the item's cose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem. tout.

LOGG AB LE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The total number of secunty incidents for the reportmg month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu-nty performance for SEPs58.

81

A PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS compo-The number of Modifcation Requests (MRs)in any state nent f ailures (confirmed and possible) and the number of between the issuance of a Modifcaton Number and the l confirmed NPRDS component f ailures, The total number completion of the drawing update, of NPRDS component failures are based on tne number 1) Form FC-1133 Backlog'In Progress. This number rep-of failure reports that have been sent to the institute of resents modifcation requests that have not been plant Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) Confirmed NPRDS approved during the reporting month.  !

component failures are based upon failure reports that 2)Modifcaton Requests Being Reviewed. This category j have been accooted by INPO, Possible NPRDS compo- includes: l nont tailures are based upon f ailure reports that are still A )Modifcaton Requests that are not yet reviewed.

under review by IWPO, NPRDS is a utihty industry users B }Modifcation Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear group program which has been outlined by INPO and Projects Review Commmee (NPRC).

impiemented at FCS.

C.)Modifcation Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Commmes (NPC) l HUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM These Madrheaton Requests may be reviewed several INSTRUMENTS j times before they are approved for accomphshment or '

A control room instrument that cannot periorm its desgn cancelled. Some of these Modif cation Requests are re4 iunction is considered as out of service. A control room turned to Engineenng for more informaton, some ap-instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Orde' proved for evaluaton, some approved for study, and (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the some approved for planning. Once planning is compteted end of the reporting pered is considered out-of service and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Mode-and will be counted. The duration of the out of-se*vice fication Requests may be approved for accomolishment conditon is not considered. Computer CRTs are not con-with a year asstgned for constructen or they may be can-sidered as control room instruments. celled. Allof these different phases require review. 2 3)Desgn Engineering Backlog'In Progress. Nuclear NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN Planning has assgned a year in which construction will LERS be completed and desgn work may be in progress.

The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attnbuted 4)Constructon Backlog'tn Progress. The Constructen to personnel error on tne orginal LER submittat This package has been issued or constructon has begun but indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15.

the modificaton has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Commmee (SAC).

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE* 5)Desgn Engineenng Update Backlog'In Progress. PED SULT1NG IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS has received the Modifcation Completon Report but the The number of Surveillance Tests (STs) that resutt in drawings have not been updated.

Lcensee Event Repo ts (LERs) during the reponin9 The above mentoned outstandtng modificatons do not -

month, This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #60 &

include moddeations which are proposed for cancella-61, tion, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 The year- to- date budget compars,d to the actual expen*

REFUELING OUTAGE) ditures for Operatens and Maintenance departments. The number of projects which aff ect the scope of the Cycle 14 Retuel.ng Outage and the number of proiects OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS for which detailed schedutos have been submmed. This

- This indicator displays the total number of outstandmg indicator tracks performance for SEP #31 Corrective Action Repo'ts (CARS),the number of CARS that are older than six months and the number of modifi- OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION cation related OARS. REPORTS The number of overdue Corrective Acton Reports OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE 0% (CARS) and the number of CARS whch received exten-QUESTS (EARS) sens broken (town by organicat:en for the last 6 months.

The total number of open EARS and the number of open EAPs broken down by their age in montns. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62.

82

l .

l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) i PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE. R ADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR AM NANCE ACT1YlTIES The number of identified poor radclogical work pract ces The % of the number of completed maintenance activi- (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks ties as compared to the number of scheduled mainte- rad clogical work performance for SEP #52.

nance activities each week. This % is shown for each maintenance craft. Maintenance activities include MWRs. R ATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTEN ANCE MWOs, STs, PMOs, cahbratons. and other miscella- The ratc of preventive maintenance (including surved-neous activities. These indcators track Maintenance per- lance testing and cahoraton procenures) to the sum of formance for SEP #33. non outage corrective maintenance enc preventive main-tenance completed over the repo ' ig pered The ratio, PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA- expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-TlVE) hou s. This ind;cator tracks preventve matntenance ac-Conective radiaton exposure is the total externa! whole- tivities for SEP #41.

body dose received by ail on sce personne!(inci,.idmg contractors and visttors) dunng a time penod, as mea. RECORDABLEINJURY CASES FREQUENCY RA16 sured by the thermolummescent dosimeter (TLD). Col- (RECORDABLE INJURY R ATE) _

lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man- The numoet of m;uries requinng more than normal first ,

rem. This indicator tracks radolog cal work pedormance aid per 200.000 man-hours worked. This indcator trends for SEP c54. personne: performance for SEP #15,25 & 26.

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE The raic of the number of turnovers to average employ- INDEX ment. A turnover is a vauncy created by voluntary resig- The Chemistry Pedormance Index (CPI)is a calculaton naton from the company. Retirement, death,termmaton, based on the concentratoa of key impurities in the sec-transfers within the company, and pa t time employees ondary side of the plant. These key impunties are the are not considered in turnover. most IAety cause et detercration of the steam genera-tors The chem:stry parameters are reported only for the PREVENTIVE MAINTEN ANCE ITEMS OVERDUE penod of time greater than 30 percent power.

This indicator is defined as the % of preventive mainte- The CPI is calculated us ng the following equaton CPI .

nance items in the month that were not completed by the (Ka'0 8) + (NdC) e (0,/10)) / 3 where the follow ng are scheduled date plus a grace penod equalto 25 % of the monthly averages of: Ka - average blowdown caton scheduled interval This indcator tracks preventive main- conductivi'v, Na - average blowdown sodium concen-tenance activities for SEP 841. traton, O, - average condensate pump discharge d:s-solved oxygen concentraton PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT SECURITY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN The % of hours e it of hmit are for six primary chemistry The number of Secunty loggable reponable incidents is ,,,

parameters divided by the total number of hours possible broken down into the totlowing categones:

for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, 1) Licensee Designated Vehcies (LDVs) - Incidents re-Chionde, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluonde, and lated to the use of LDVs. o g., keys lett in tne vehicle, Suspended Sohds. EPRI kmns are used loss of keys, or fadure to return keys

2) Secunty Badges incidents associated with improper PROCEDUR AL NONCOMPLI ANCE INCIDENTS use and handkng of securcy badges incidents melude (MAINTENANCE) securcy badges tnat are lost %en out of tne protected The number of identified incidents concern ng mamte- area, out of control on-site, or inadvenently destroyed ~

nance procedura! problems,'ne number of closed irs broken.

related to the use of procedures (includes the number of 3; Access Control and Authonzaten - Administrative and closed irs caused by procedural noncomphance), and procedural errors associated w!!h the use of the card-the number of closed procedural noncomphance irs. access system such as taugatmg. incorrect secunty This indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15 badge issued and improper esco t procedures. This also

& 44. mcludes incidents that were caused by ncorrect access authonzaten information entered into the security sys.

PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION tem computer.

PLANNING 4) Secunty Key Controt Incidents involving Secunty key The number of modifcanons aporoved for planmng (to control. e g , lost Secunty keys. Secunty keys removed determine f easibihty) for completon dunng the Cycle 14 trom site. or f a:!ure to retum Secunty keys Th's type of Ref uehng Outage. This indcator tracks pedormance for event does not retiect incidems concermng LDV keys SEP #31. Th s mdtcator tracts secunty pedarmance for SEP c58 83

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIOt4S (cont'd)

SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS Incidents involving alarm system 1 allures, CCTV f ailures, The number of temporary mechanical and electreal con-security computer f ailures, search equipment f ailures, figurations to the plant's systems.

door hardware failures. and card reader failures. These 1)Ternporary configuratons are defined as electr cat system failures are further categonced as follows jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or me-

1) Alarm System Failure Detecton system events in- chanical blocks which are installed in the plant opera'ing i volving f alse/nu:sance atarms and mechanica! f ailures. systems and are not shown on the latest revison of the 2)Atarm System Environmental Fadures Degradations P&lD, schemate, connecton, wiring, or flow diagrams.

to detecton syshm periormance as a resu!! of environ. 2)Jumpars and blocks which are installed for Surveil-mental condcons (te,, rain, snow, frost). lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures. Caleraten Pro-3)CCTV Failures Mechancal failures to all CCTV hard- cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures ware components.

are not considered as temporary modifcat ons unless the 4)CCTV Environmental Fadures Degradatens to CCTV jumper or block rema:ns in pl ace after the test or proce-pe formance as a resuft of environmenta! conditons (i e., dure is complete. Amoors and blocks installed in test or rain, snow, frost, log, sunsoots, shade). lab instruments ars not cansidered as temporstry mcdif r

5) Securrty Computer Failures Faelure of the muhr catons.

plexer, central processmg una, and other computer hard- 3)Scattolding is not considered a temporary modificaton ware and software. This category does n t include soft. Jumpers and blocks whch are installed and for whch ware problems caused by operator error in using the MRs have been submitted wdl be considered as tempo.

Schware. ra y modif catons until final resolulcn of the MR and the

6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x ray, metal, jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded or explosive detectors and other equtpment used to on the drawings. This indcator tracks temporary modifr search for contraband. This also includes incicents catens for SEP #C2 & 71.

where the search equipment is found defective of did not function property during testing. TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS

7) Door Hardware Failure Failure of the door alarm The total number and depa tment breakdown of training and door hardware such latches, electre strikes, instructon hours admimstered by the Training Center.

doorknobs, locks, etc.

8) Card Reader Failures -Incidents caused by mechani- TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING cal breakdown of card readers, but not improper use of The total number of s'udent hours of trainmg for vpera-the card readers. (See Access Control and tions. Maintenance, Chemist y/Radiat on Protecten, Authorization). This indicator tracks security periormance Technical Support, General Employee Traming, and for SEP #58. Other Training conducted for FCS.

SPARE PARTS ISSUED TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAM! NATIONS The dollar value of the epare parts issued for FCS during Reponable skin and clothmg contam nations above the reporting perod. background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This indcator trends personnel performance for STAFFING LEVEL SEP #15 & 54.

The actual staffing level and the authorized staffing level for the Nuclear Operatons Division, the Producten Engi- UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS neenng Division, and the Nuclear Servees Divisen. This WHILE CRITICAL indcator tracks performance for SEP #24. This ind cator is defined as the number of unplanned au-tomatic scrams (reactor protecton system logic actua-STATION NET GENERATION tions)Inat occur while the reactor is critcal. The indcator The net generaison (sum) produced by the FCS donng is f urther defined as follows:

the reportmg month. 1) Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a p!anned test or evoluton.

STOCKOUT RATE 21 Scram means the automate shutdown of the reactor The total number of Pek Tekets that were generated by a raate insert on of att control rods that is caused by during the reportog month and the total number of Pick actuaton of the reactor protechon system. The scram Tckets that were generated dunng ine reporting month signal may have resutted from exceeding a setpomt or when the amount of pa ts requested is equalto or less may have been sputous.

than the minimum stocking level and paits are not ava:1- 3) Automatic means that the inftia! signal that caused ac-able. tuaton of the reactor protecton system logic was pro-vided from one of the sensors monitoring plant param-eters and conditons, rather than tne manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) m the ma:n contro! room.

4)Cntcal rneans that durmg the steady-state condition of tne reacto pror to the scram, the effective muttiphcation f actor (y) was equa! to one 84

_____= _ _.

l .

t l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) l l

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(INPO DEFINITION)

This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations:

1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cochng System (ECCS) actuatons that resut: Irom reaching an ECCS actuaton setpoint or f rom a sputous' inadvertent ECCS signal.

2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuatons that result from a loss of power to a safeguaras bus. An unplanned safety system actuaton occurs when an actuaton setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a sputous or inadvertent signa' ts generated (ECCS onty), and major equipment in the system is actuated.

Unplanned means that the sys:em actuaton was not part o' a planned test or evolu'on. The ECCS actuatens to be counted are actuatons of the high pressure injecton system, the low pressure in;ection system, or the sa'ety injecton tanks.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS (NRC DEFINITION)

The number of safety system actuatons which include edy) the High Pressure Saf ety inseton System, the Low Pressure Saf ety injection System, the Saf ety injecton Tanks, and the Emergency Diese1 Generators. The NRC clas-

~~

si'ication of safety system actuatons includes actuations when major equipment is operated g when the loge sys-tems for the above safety systems are challenged.

VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violat ons sited in NRC mspecton repoqs for FCS per 1000 NRC inspection hours The violatons are reponed in the year that the inspection was actualiy pedormed and not based on when the inspecton report is received. The hours reported for each inspecton report are used as the inspecton hours.

VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTWE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level sohd rad oactive wasts actua!)y shipped for buna!. This indicator also shows the volume of low-level radcactive waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of radcactive oil that has been shipped off site for processmg, and the volume of sohd cry radcactive waste which has been shipped off, site for processing. Low level sohd radcactive waste conststs of d y active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning matenals, disoosaole protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other matenal to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal srte, except resm, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low level re-fers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by product of spent f uel processing. This mdicator tracks radio-logical work performance for SEP 854.

85

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) P trmance Indicators Index is to hst perfor, mance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15 Ea02 increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedura! Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance). . . . .

.26 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . .

. 43 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . , . . . 62 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs . .. . 63 CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reponed . . 78 SEP Reference Number 20 Quakty Audits and Surveillane Programs are Evaluated. improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . .78 SEP Ref erence Number 21 Develop and Conduct Satety System Functional Inspections CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations tssued vs LERs Reported . .78 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Statt Studies Statting Level .

. . 64 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate .11 Recordable injury /lliness Cases Frequency Rate , .62 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate . , .I1 Recordable injury /Itiness Cases Frequency Rate . . 62 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training -

MWO Overall Status (Cycle 14 Refuehng Outage) . . . . .70 Progress of Cycle 14 Outage Modification Planning . . 71 Overall Project Status (Cycle 14 Retueling Outage) . . 72 SEP Refer 3nce Number 33 Develop On Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical M sintenance) .. . .

. 28 (Pressure Equipment) . . 29 (General Maintenance). . 30 (Mechanical Maintenance) . . 31 (Instrumentation & Control) . . 32 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance). . .20 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance) . 27 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . 22 86

-O Preventive Maintenance !! ems Overdue .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Procedural Noncompliance incidents .. , .. . , . . .. .26 SEP Reference Number 43

. implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate.. . . . . .. . . .36 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . . .26 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review ... . .. . . .15 SEP Fueference N. utf2 -

Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program. . . .45 SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) . . . .9 Volume of Low Level Solid Radioactive Waste. , ,

. .10 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . .. . .A3 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area . . . . . . . 44 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Proced .re Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) . . .. . .49 Security incident Breakdown..... . . . . . ~ . .

. . 50 Security System Failures . . . . . . , .. . 51 SEP Reference Number 60

- Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. .. .. . 33 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Cornputer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. . . . 33 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications . .. . . 58 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EARS) , . . . 59 Engineering Change Notice Status . . . . . . . .. 60

. Engineering Changa Notice Breakdown . . . 61 SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Mon.1or Operator Training Licensed Operator Requalification Trainng . . . . 65 License Candidate Exams... . .. . .. .66 SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modihcations Temporary Modifications . . .

. 58 87

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST J. C. Adams R. M. Hawkins D. G. Ried R. L. Andrews M. C. Hendrickson G. K. Samide G. L. Anglehart R. R. Henning T.J.Sandene W. R. Bateman K. R. Henry B. A. Schmidt K. L. Belek J. B. Herman S. T. Schmitz A. D. Bilau G. J. Hill F. C. Scofield B. H. Biome K. C. Holthaus L. G. Sealock C. N. Bloyd M. A. Howman H. J. Sefick J.P.Bobba L G. Huliska D K. Sentel C. E. Boughter C. J. Husk J. W. Shannon M. A. Breuer R L Jaworski R. W. Short C. J. Brunnert R A. Johansen C. F. Simmons M. W. Butt W C. Jones E L Skaggs C. A. Carlson J D. Kecy J. L Skilos J. W. Chase J. D. Keppler F. K. Smah G. R. Chatfield D. D. Kloock R. L. Gorenson A. G. Christensen ,

• C. Knight K. E. Steele A. J. Clark D. M. Kobunski W. Steele O. J. Clayton G. J. Krause H. F. Sterba R. P. Clemens L. J. Kripal G A Teeple J. L. Connolley J. G. Krist M. A. Tesar G. M. Cook J. B. Kuhr T. G. Therkildsen M. R. Core L T. Kusek J. W. Tills S. R. Crites L.E. Labs D. R Trausch D. W. Dale M. P. Lazar P. R. Turner R. C. DeMeulmeester R. C. Learch J. M. Uhland R. D. DeYoung S.E. Lee C. F. Vanecek D. C. Dietz R. E. Lewis J. M. Waszak J. A. Drahota R. C. Liebentritt G. R. Williams T. R. Dukarski C. J. Linden S. J. Willrett P. D. Dunham B. R. Livingston W, C. Woemer R. G. Eurich J. H. MacKinnon H. J. Faulhaber G. D. Mamoran M. A. Ferdig J. W. Marcil -

V. H. Frahm N. L Marisce F. F. Franco D. J. Matthews M. T. Frans J. M. Mattice H. K. Fraser T. J. Mcivor J. F. W. Fnedrichsen K. S. McCormick S. K. Gambhir R, F. Mehattey J. K. Gasper K, J. Morris W. G. Gates D. C. Mueller M. O. Gautier R. J. Mueller S. W. Gebers J. B. Newhouse J. M. Giantz M. W. Nichols J. T. Gleason C. W. Norns L. V. Goldberg J. T. O'Connor D. J. Golden W. W. Orr D. C. Gorence L L. Parent R. E. Gray - T. L Patterson M. J. Guinn R. L. Phelps E. R, Gundal T. M. Reisdorff R.. H. Guy A.W Richard 88

9 ADVERSE TREND REPORT A Performance indicator which has data representing Number c' HM Scots three (3) consecutive months of occhning performance 1Page 46]

constitutes an adverse trend. The Aoverse Trend Rep 3rt The number of Hot Spots for the reporting month (F) explains the conditions under which certain indicators are exceeds the Fort Calhoun goal of 40.

showing adverse trends. An explanation will be provided for indicators with data representing three months of de- Steen ou' p re chning performance that have been labeled as adverse (Page 54) trends. The percentage of pick tiehets generated when the The tol lowing indicators are exh; biting adverse trends for amount of parts requested ts equal to or less than the the reponing month: mmimum stocking level and pans are not available is above the Fort Cathoun goal of 2%

Eauioment Forced Outres Der 1000 Cr*ica Hours (Page 13) Temoo'n v Mod Aca' ens Th:s indcator has shown an increase for three consecu- (Page 59) tive months. The age of tempe"ary mod;1: cations for the reporting month exceeds the Fort Calhoun Goals Rato e' Preve"rve to TotM Mantonsace (Non.OAaae) 1Page 22} End of Management Attention Report The ratio of preventive to total maintenance has oe-creased for three consecutive months.

Recordable in;urv@ ness Cases Frecuenev Ra'e (Page 62)

This indicator has been defined by the Manager of the PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT

' h " '

on tho s a tIeq$ cy a[" IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES Voistions r,er 1000 Insoecton H Tabie o' Contents (Page 73) The table of contents has been revised, at the request of This indicator has shown an increase for three consecu. S. K Gambhir, to include a comparison of the repor*ing live months, month's indic ator values to the previous months and to note improved or dechning periormance.

End of Adverse Trend Report Number of Nue! car Plant Rehabey Data Systems Re.

Do'tabie Fa' lures (Page 34)

The graph for this indicator has been revised to correct a graphing arror in past months reports _

INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED Ches Vaive Fauure Ra'e MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT (Page 36)

The graph for this inoicator has been revised to correct a This section hsts the indicators whch show inadequacies graphing error in past months reports as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper quartile, The indcators will be compared to the incustry End of Indcator imp ovement> Changes Repon upper quartile as relevant to that inoicator.

Number of Out of Servee cow Room lastrumeats (Page 24)

The total number of out-of-service control room instru-ments for the reporting month (25)is a%ve tne Fort Cal-houn goal of 15.

Se-enda v System Chemis'ry (Page 37)

The Secondary System Chemery Pe*iormance Index for the reporting month (0 506)is above the Fort Cathoun goal of 0.45.

I 89

-b FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH1 Cumulative (MWH)

Cycle 1 09/2693 + O2/01n5 3,299,639 -3,299,6'39 1st Refueling 02/01/75 05/09/75 *

• Cycle 2 05/09/75 10/010 6 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01R6 12/13/76 *

• Cycle 3 12/13/76 09/3097 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/3097-12/0907 '

• Cycle 4 12/0997 - 10/14n8 3,026,832' 12,985,720 l 4th Refueling 10/1498 12/2498 *

• i Cycle 5 12/2498 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Sth Refueling 01/18/80 06/11/80 *

• Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 -12/21/81 *

• Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330.034 7th Refuciing 12/06/82 04/07/83 *

• Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 * *-

Cycle 9 07/12/84 -09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/86 *

• Cycle 10. 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 .

10th Refueling ~ 03/07/87 06/08/87 *

• Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89- *

• Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90- 05/29/90 *

• Cycle 13# 05/29/90 02/01/92 # Planned Oates

• 13th Refueling # 02/01/92- 05/01/92 - *

• Cycle 14# _05/01/92 09/18/93 *

• 14th Refueling 09/18/93 11/13/93 *

• Cycle 15# 11/13/93'- 03/11/95' *

• 15th Refueling #

• 03/11/95- 05/06/95

• FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS "RFCORDS*

First Sustained Reaction ~ August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the Gystem August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973

' Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974' Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987-Sept. 27,'t 988 l Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 l Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH)(Cycle 11) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 L

l l

,,..--n., - , - . -

. - - . . . . . ~ , + - . - , . , , , - -

- , , , v , - . - , - - ..---w -,-n--.- ,